scieee Science in your language
[lt] (orig) [en] [de] [fr] [it] [es] [pt]

Nijolė Tuomienė. Kalba ir tapatybė Pietryčių Lietuvos ir Baltarusijos paribiuose (XX a. II pusė – XXI a. pradžia). 1 dalis

Read accessible full text
Machine-translated document

This is a machine-generated translation of the original document and may contain errors, omissions, or changes in meaning. Do not rely on this translation for quotations, citations, or authoritative references. Please consult and cite the original document.

Nijolė Tuomienė. Kalba ir tapatybė Pietryčių Lietuvos ir Baltarusijos paribiuose (XX a. II pusė – XXI a. pradžia). 1 dalis

Author: Janina Švambarytė-Valužienė
Year: 2025
DOI: 10.35321/e-
Source: https://journals.lki.lt/actalinguisticalithuanica/article/download/2500/2456
Li huanian Linguis ic Ac
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
Con en s linked o Tu in e e ence
ISSN 2669-218X (online o elec onically)
This Decision shall en e in o o ce on he day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he
Eu opean Union. Published by he Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language. This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed
unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License, which allows un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and
ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho and sou ce a e c edi ed. Published by he Li huanian
Language Ins i u e. This a icle is open access, dis ibu ed unde he e ms o a C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion-Sha eAlike License ha allows unlimi ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion o he con en on any medium, including au ho s and sou ce.
Recei ed by Gau a on 28 No embe 2024. Accep ed: Accep ed: 2025-01-21. This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal.
1
This Decision shall en e in o o ce on he day ollowing ha o i s publica ion.
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day
ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o
he Eu opean Union. 1 DALIS Vilnius: Ins i u e o Li huanian Language, 2023, 259 p.
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
I'm no su e ha 's a good idea.
The Commission shall be empowe ed o adop delega ed ac s in acco dance wi h A icle 26 o supplemen his Regula ion by laying down de ailed ules o he applica ion o his Regula ion.
The ORCID ID is: –
Resea ch a eas: dialec ology, lexicog aphy and lexicology o Li huanian dialec s, analysis o
dialec al exp essions in w i en sou ces, sociolinguis ics.
This Regula ion shall en e in o o ce on he wen ie h day ollowing ha o i s publica ion in he O icial Jou nal o he Eu opean Union.
The book on he iden i y o people who speak se e al languages, Vingius, a language and iden i y
s udy by Nijolė Tuomienė, is abou how he implan ed an i- e bal a i ude o language shapes a
ulne able pe sonali y. how ha inju ed pe son, li ing quie ly in his illage, is i ually "li ed"
om he s a e o he s a e, i.e. epea edly occupied in his own coun y, how gene a ions eel
ha he is expe iencing hose des uc i e ac ions; exis en ial ime, as ha ing one's own
eposi o y […] language, he cu ia des oys he sel -wo h o he speake ; how a language
e en ually becomes auma ized and ma ginalized, how i ine i ably akes he place o ano he
language, o e en a ew o he languages.
The au ho 's a en ion, as indica ed in he i le o he book, is ocused on he second hal o he 20 h
cen u y […] he beginning o he 21s cen u y. The main p oblems o he s udy o he wo k o Nioli a
Tuomienė a e mos closely ela ed o he wo k o Halina Tu sko a (1995 [1939] and Vale ija Čekmona
2
(2017) Concep , many o which can be seen in compa ison wi h he wo k o Pe o Gaucho, Václa Milyas,
Aloysius Vidugo yi, Tama os Sudnik, Kazimie z Ga šo , Laima G umadinė, I ena Adoma ičiū ė and o he
Sla ic and Whi e Pa isian esea che s. In o he wo ds, Nijolė Tuomienė is undoub edly assigned o he
di ec ion o he de elope s o he concep o Halinos Tu skos. The monog aph e eals he complex
cu en linguis ic si ua ion in he sou h-eas e n ou ski s o Li huania and no h-wes e n Bela us
(Va anasi). I is he his o y o he la e e i o y mo e han any o he ha e eals he abili y o
Li huanians, who ha e been occupied se e al imes in hei li es and su ounded by o he popula ions,
o adap in o de o su i e. The imp in o ha expe ience has been passed down om gene a ion o
gene a ion un il now. The e o e, I hink ha Tuomienė's scien i ic wo k would be sui ed o he
monog aph "Likimų monog aph", which appea ed in he summe a e isi ing mos ly only he o me
Li huanian islands o Bela us and he adjacen sou he n Li huanian ansi poin s, eco ding and
ca e ully lis ening o mo e han 160 hou s o audio eco dings, a e amilia izing wi h he
socioling is ic ques ionnai es o he esponden s and e iewing a ious scien i ic li e a u e. The
1
esea ch ma e ial, compiled om 21 poin s o he Li huanian language a las (LKA), co e s a pe iod o 70
yea s ( he second hal o he 20 h cen u y o he second decade o he 21s cen u y), bu he main
a en ion is ocused on ou days o almos ou days. His o ically in he 20 h cen u y, Li huania was a
s a e wi h ou lined bo de s: pa o i s e i o y belonged o Bela us, i wen h ough se e al
occupa ions (1920-1939 yea s o he Poles, a e Wo ld Wa II o he So ie s). Wi h he long-es ablished
ideology o he " o me a he land o he Polish coun yside", which has become openly Polish in he
las hi y yea s, he inhabi an s o he sou h-eas e n coun yside o Li huania ha e been isola ed
om he Li huanian socie y (p. The Li huanian-speaking islands o Bela us had o swi ch om
Li huanian dialec s and Bela usian dialec s (p ope ly) o he s a e-speaking Russian language. As he
local Li huanian snacks, which we e g adually and g adually elimina ed om he sou he n and eas e n
ele a ions in he beginning o he 20 h cen u y, we e a ibu ed o he local Li huanian snacks in
eas e n Li huania ( he cu en municipali y o he Ša čininkų dis ic ) and no hwes e n Bela us ( he
cu en Va anė o dis ic ), he au ho p o ides de ails and insigh s in he monog aph. The me hod o
linguis ic geog aphy applied o he linguis ic plo s s udied un il he 21s cen u y o sol e he p oblems
aised by he au ho was only pa ial: he ac s we e eco ded, bu his me hod did no explain he
easons o he change in language. The e o e, by applying he old me hod, he ea lie Li huanian
linguis s we e o ced o ea he obse ed de ia ions as a coincidence, as de ia ions om he
cou se o he logical p ocess, so ha he e was no only a emp a ion, bu simply a necessi y o
elimina e hem om he s udy. The i s o desc ibe he changing language si ua ion ou side
Li huania's e i o y was Edua d
2
Edwa d Vol ai e and Ola B och. Resea che s o he nine een h cen u y ound ha nex
o each o he in he neighbo hoods o Pa ibio […] Va anã o and Ša čininkų […]
1
Desc ip ions a e gi en on pages 223-259 and he 256 h li e a u e posi ion is gi en on pages 151-169.
2
The me hod o linguis ic geog aphy was applied by he i s esea che s o his egion: Kazys Mo kūnas, Zigmas
Zinke ičius, Jad yga Ka dely ė, e c., and Aloyzas Vidugi is, Laima G umadienė, Kazimie as Ga š a, Vy au as
Ka delis, e c. w o e abou he obse ed changes in he g amma .
3
Li huanian slang is no longe used in e e yday li e. In he absence o a na u al con inui y, he LKA
3
c ossing poin s c ea e he condi ions o he acquisi ion o he common Li huanian language (bk) in
he absence o a na u al con inui y. The main obs acle o i s use only in he sou h-eas e n pa o
Li huania and on he bo de wi h Bela us is ha he Li huanian language, ha ing los i s main
unc ions, is g adually being pushed ou o ac i e use and eplaced by ano he language (o o he
languages) (12). The e o e, o he 17 LKA poin s in he e i o y o Li huania, only 7 a e li ely, 2 […]
li ely, mixed and 8 […] dying. The emaining 4 LKA poin s on he e i o y o Bela us a e sunny,
excep o he s ill exis ing Peles poin . The au ho based his esea ch on he sociolinguis ic and
linguis ic ma e ial o he wo men ioned linguis ic a eas: no only Li huanian, bu also local Bal ic
languages and local Polish languages, as well as he ma e ial o he a ian s o he Bal ic and
Russian li e a y languages used he e, collec ed om
F om 1964
4
o 2017.
The monog aph is aluable o he cle e applica ion o he quali a i e esea ch me hod o wo
di e en and a he same ime simila linguis ic plo s o he pe iphe y and he pe iphe y.
Va ious sociolinguis ic su ey me hods ha e been used o e eal bo h he beha iou o he
esponden and he linguis ic p ocesses aking place, de e mined by economic, social, poli ical and
o he ac o s. The a ge in o ma ion o moni o ing he e hnolinguis ic si ua ion is con eyed
h ough a g oup con e sa ion, an in-dep h and semi-s uc u ed in e iew. I is necessa y o
s udy he linguis ic, cul u al and men al a i udes o he esponden s, i.e. o apply he
e hnolinguis ic da a analysis me hod. Examples o he esponden s' mul i-language s a emen s
5
a e ansc ibed. The objec o s udy also inspi ed he o ma ion o a ocabula y o commonly
used e ms, acili a ing he unde s anding o he monog aph ex . The pe cep ion o he
ep esen a i es o Li huanian language dialec s as o wha is local and wha is no local di e s
om he analogous pa ibio-zab abio e ms. In he sou h-eas o Li huania, he local non-local has
a di e en meaning [ he e, u he in Li huania, his is ou […]localism[…] misunde s ood[…] (p.
109)]. He e, as a componen o e hnic iden i y, he language has changed mo e han h ee imes in
a cen u y: om 1920 i was o ced o equi e Polish (in addi ion o Li huanian and Bulga ian); since
1945 […] Russian (g e a lenkų, bal a usių i lie u ių), since 1988 he Li huanian language has been
es o ed (g e a usų, lenkų i bal a usių). As a esul , he linguis ic si ua ion is being in es iga ed bo h ca e ully and judiciously. 20 h cen u y languages
3
F om 1972 o he p esen day, he bilingualism and mul ilingualism o he Pa isian popula ion has been
emphasized in he publica ions o esea che s o Li huanian and Sla ic languages o dialec s.
4
The du a ion o he audio eco dings is […] 166 hou s, sociolinguis ic da a […] comple ed popula ion su eys
(ques ionnai es). 89 mul ilingual esponden s om he olde , middle and younge gene a ions we e in e iewed and
(o ) eco ded. The eco dings we e collec ed om all 17 LKA poin s in he Pie yčių Lie u os pa ibas ( o al o 70
hou s). The eco dings we e made in wo dis inc pe iods: 1964-1990 and 1994-1994 wi h he use o he soundscape o
he sou he n and eas e n highlands o Vilnius. 2011[…]2013 […] 36 hou s o sound eco dings om Šalčininkų . poin s (31
hou s in local Sla ic languages, only 5 hou s in Li huanian ansla ion and non-language e sion o Li huanian
language). In he con inua ion o he Sou h Highlands Add ess in Bela us, he da a o he li ing language we e
collec ed in se e al s ages (ou o a o al o 96 hou s o eco dings): om 1995 o 2007, 58 hou s o Li huanian
language ex s we e eco ded, and in 2017, 34 hou s o ex s (9 hou s in Li huanian and 25 hou s in local Bulga ian and Polish, only in Bulga ian and 4 hou s in s anda d Bulga ian).
5
Examples o eas e n and sou he n highland dialec s a e gi en in he Copenhagen phone ic ansc ip ion. The
simpli ied ansc ip ion used in he scien i ic publica ions o he Sla s and o he speake s o he Bal ic languages
and local Polish examples. The examples ci ed a e also ansc ibed as bk, wi h he meaning o he di e en wo ds indica ed in b acke s.
4
The ideas o Vale ijus Čekmon, he ounde o he di ec ion o con ac linguis ics, ha
sou heas e n Li huania needs "an analysis o he his o y o Li huanian Poles, i s knowledge and
p ope ea men " and ha he esul s o he p ocess o language con ac s depend on " he
simila i y o languages and hei social p es ige" (p. Un il he 21s cen u y, he e has been no
subs an ial change in sel -awa eness. K is ina Ru ko ska, who s udied Li huanian dialec s, ound
ha he e a e no monolingual egions in he egion, and a mixed-language en i onmen p e ails. In
he sou he n pa o Li huania, he e a e 9 (o 17) LKA poin s in he mani es a ions o Li huanian
language dialec s in he Amžių sandy. They ha e bo h be e and less p ese ed cha ac e is ics
o sou he n highlands (dzūkuojama; na owed ą, ę; heal hy p ese ed double an, am). The o he
eigh LKA poin s in he a ea ha e become Sla ic, he inhabi an s unde s and Li huanian, bu can
no longe speak i . Un il he end o he 20 h cen u y, he si ua ion was di e en : in he
sou h-eas e n pa o Li huania and Bela us, he in o ma ion o he olde and pa ly middle
gene a ions was spoken in ansla ion, only he you h had aken o e he Sla ic languages.
S udies o Li huanian mul ilingualism in he sou h-eas o Li huania in ecen yea s show ha he
use o Li huanian, Russian, Polish o Bela usian is si ua ional. This mul ilingualism o he egion is
alued anew by speake s o di e en gene a ions his is an ad an age. And his iew, applied o
he geog aphical con ex o he Li huanian-speaking people o p esen -day sou heas e n
Li huania, appea s o ha e emained unchanged o a cen u y: […]al hough he Li huanian
language is he s a e language and i is compulso y in s a e ins i u ions, p e ailing in daily
communica ion, he egional language is s ill Polish[…] (p. 42). In he sou h-eas o Li huania, he e
is a endency o he common language o he Li huanians o be eplaced by he common language
o no only Li huanians, bu also o he Bal ic peoples (p. 43). So ie -e a Russi ica ion, which
educa ed he middle and younge gene a ions o he Russian language, as well as changing hei
a i ude o he Russian language, no longe main ains p es ige. This would pa e he way o he
6
s a e Li huanian language, bu i is s ill a his o ical mix: […][T]en was Li huania, and he e is Poland. The Poles li e he e. My g and a he old me ha om ancien imes e e yone he e spoke Polish, no one spoke Li huanian (p. 80).
His o ically, sou heas e n Li huania and he Li huanian islands in Bela us belong o bo h he
LDK, he People's Republic o Poland, he Russian Empi e, and he So ie Union. In he local sense,
all he lands a e he Li huanian indigenous people who li ed in hem, and in he poli ical sense, he
inhabi an s o he egion a eled om s a e o s a e (p. 66). Responden s a e old: […][T]he
a he says, we need o un, we won' li e, well, we need o go somewhe e. And so we s ayed and
we li ed, we g ew and now we li e, we p ay, we p ay, we p ay.
(in Bulga ian) we speak […] (p. 66).
Since he e we e no bo de s be ween coun ies ha o med he na ional basis a e Wo ld
Wa I, hen he joy did no wan o ecognize i s belonging o one o he o he na ion, o ming
he e m u eišis ( u eišiškumas) […] a man who speaks a ious languages, bu emphasizes only
he place o esidence, i.e. he connec ion wi h geog aphy: […]P ie lenkų likom be sa o kalbos, be
lie u iškų mišių. I emembe my a he didn' go o a Polish mass. The Polish school did, well, hen
he Russian school. We didn' ead o w i e in Li huanian. How I g ew up. Ve y ew people spoke.
Then he language was changed, and e e yone had lea ned (in Bela usian). The people a e he same. Fa he
6
I will come om Tu geli, Šalčininkų dis ic municipali y.
5
Li huanian language, and his son is al eady Polish […] (p. 70). Tu eism is seen as a ac ic o cul u al
esis ance and o he local popula ion i is associa ed wi h sel -su iciency, adap ing o
inc easingly new social and poli ical ci cums ances: […][S] e imi came and w o e down all he Polish
(pase)[…], […][V]isoki languages we e lea ned, bu he Polish and he Russian did no […] (p. 71[…]72).
The monog aph emphasizes ha he adi ional basis o he o ma ion o na ionalism (poli ical
e i o y, na i e language, ecognized eligion) was supp essed: […][T]he iden i y, cus oms, as well
as he igh o choose all his, h oughou he egion o en belonged o o he […] o eign
a i als[…] (p. 73). The local inhabi an s o he se lemen s we e cons an ly humilia ed and
punished, e.g. Li huanians who wo ked in he kolkhoz did no ea n money, hey we e all pe secu ed
[[…]Sako, we a e you pee s (pe auklėsim) […] (p. 77)]; "I wen o wo k e e y day, and he didn' w i e.
[…]...[…] He answe ed me ang ily: shou loudly, Li huanian, i wasn' gi en o you. […] (p. 78)".
Li huanians li ing on bo h sides o he bo de needed o ob ain "local esidence s a us", al hough,
as he esponden bo n in Bela us and li ing in Šačininka said, "I would be Polish i I did no speak
Polish". I 's a mixed language. And my child en a e al eady speaking Russian, my g andchild en […]
Li huanian[…] (p. 77). In he con essional sense, he inhabi an s o he islands o sou heas e n
Li huania and Bela us a e endogamous, bu hey p ay in Polish e en when he mass is o e ed in
Li huanian, i.e. he con essional c i e ion de ines he ules o language use. The au ho men ions
ha he local Li huanians in Ramashkonys (Bal a usija) a e each occupa ion sough o egain
he igh s o he Li huanian language p ima ily in he chu ch and school, bu i is claimed ha
Polish and Ca holic a e synonymous, and […]lenkiškumas […]owne ship[…] a ises om being a
7
Ca holic[…] (p. 88). The only eligious communi y du ing all he yea s o he occupa ion ha did no
espond o polonocen ism (in e up ion o Polish his o iog aphical in e p e a ion emains).
Con essional a ilia ion, as a c i e ion o communi y iden i ica ion, is s ill ele an oday (in
Li huania, masses a e held in Polish and Li huanian, and in Bela us in Polish and Bulga ian). The
younge gene a ion does no ye ha e a eligious-e hnic model. Un il now, he p o ision inhe i ed
om he pos -wa pe iod due o he weak na ional iden i y o he popula ion has c ea ed he
condi ions " o iden i y indi idually wi h any na ionali y and o be mo i a ed o ac on he side o
any coun y" (p. Does he au ho call his pe iod a limi ed o ma ion o non- o ma ion o na ional
iden i y? he p ocess.
Di e en ac o s ha de e mine he communica ion and code damage o he inhabi an s o
he pe iphe y ( he abili y o pa icipa e in a con e sa ion o o consciously seek sepa a ion
by using a supe io language) we e one o he condi ions o bilingualism and mul ilingualism o
occu . Di e en gene a ions o amilies in eas e n Li huania speak di e en ly: husband and
wi e […] in Russian, a he and child en […] in Russian and plain, mo he […] in Polish and plain,
child en in e ac ing […] in Li huanian. Simila ly, on he islands o Bela us, only child en and
iends speak plain and Russian. The olde gene a ion emembe s ha […][N]ea ly
con e sa ions we e in e up ed by ensions a ising om in ole ance o he Li huanian language o he Li huanian people[…] (p. 95).
7
This s e eo ype e lec s he p o isions o he ideology o he noble (LKD a is oc acy) based on an i-Ch is ian
paganism.

6
Localism is also cha ac e is ic o he e hnic pa o Bela us wi h which people a e s ill
connec ed? and language, and close kinship. The linguis ic si ua ion o he emaining Li huanian
islands, which a e classi ied as pe iphe al languages, is no en iable: "being isola ed, Sla ic
languages, which a e pa icula ly easily in luenced, ha e los no only he ocabula y o he
languages, bu also he p es ige o he Li huanian language" (p. 44). Resea che s o he Join
Sla ic and Li huanian Complex Expedi ions (which ook place in 1974, 1976, and 1986 yea s) ha e come
o he conclusion ha he Li huanian language, which was once he mos impo an language o
he inhabi an s o his egion, has g adually become he language o he household and he amily,
and in some places has no been used a all. Bal a 's language simply g adually expelled he
Li huanian language om he amily. (p. 45) The olde esiden s o Pa ibas, who call hemsel es
locals, Chionyks is, Tu eis, can' ell who hey a e. Only geog aphically iden i ied esponden s who
8
speak a mix u e o Polish, Russian, Bulga ian and Li huanian do no ha e a clea ly de ined na ional
iden i y. The Pelesos poin in Bela us, whe e he Li huanian language is spoken in he public
en i onmen and in he chu ch, and young people a e augh Li huanian in he school (closed in
2023), is loca ed in he posi ion o he nyks an poin . Local esiden s a e o ced o adap o he
language. Li ing in small u al communi ies (Nočià, Pelesà, Ramaškónys, Ródūnia) in Bela us,
Li huanians did no wi hs and he p essu e o a la ge and long-las ing Sla ic-speaking majo i y.
The p onuncia ion o he language is ela ed o he s a us o he language: in he e hnic
e i o ies o Li huania, he Li huanian language has ne e been an o icial o public language and
i has no been handled by any o icial w i ing. The monog aph desc ibes he ela ionship be ween
he a e o he language and he cul u al assimila ion o he communi y. As a esul , he
cha ac e is ics a e g adually los and eplaced by he mo e "p es ige", "highe le el", "cul u al"
adi ions. Consciously o unconsciously, people adap o new cus oms and new languages by
becoming bilingual. La e , when he second language, he lea ned language, en e s e e yday li e,
people mo e om bilingualism o monolingualism.
The au ho o he book analyzes how cul u al assimila ion was ca ied ou " om abo e", i.e.
h ough he p essu e o he local adminis a ion, educa ion and he chu ch, in he a eas unde
in es iga ion, especially in he Li huanian islands in Bela us. Fo example, du ing he So ie e a, he
Li huanians o he sou heas e n pa o Li huania and i s e hnic e i o ies could no allow hei
child en o go o Li huanian schools because he e we e no such schools (o hey we e oo a om
se lemen s). My pa en s, who wen o Polish and Russian schools, did no y o each Li huanian o
hei child en. Thus, his language has become an unhea d-o "li ing language" o he pas , which
does no mee he daily needs o young people (p. 60). In he dis ic s o Šačinkai and Va anas,
Li huanians became an e hnic mino i y and his s a us has no changed un il now [he is a Ca holic he
is also Polish (p. 61) gene ally denied he p esence o Li huanians in he dis ic s unde in es iga ion].
As he e hnic iden i y was " o med" by he uni s o he A my o K ajina, pe secu ing Li huanians,
he esponden om Ramashka ells: "He had signed a con ac . […] Polish, bu speaks Li huanian. They hough he was a ake Pole. Nex ime we'll come, he says, we'll help.
8
The claim ha he Polish e hnic and na ional iden i y is exp essed mo e s ongly and ac i ely in Vilnius and i s
su oundings han in he ci y and dis ic o Šalčinki is ques ionable, as o he s a is ical da a show. Acco ding o
he 2021 and 2022 Li huanian census, only 79.5 pe cen o he popula ion in Šalčininkų dis ic was w i en o w i en by Polish.
7
I wan you on his bench. And, you know, he me al ba says, "I we cu you, you'll know wha you' e
made o ". Conscious and consis en popula ion celeb a ion was ca ied ou on a s a e scale: i he
pa en s' na ionali y was no eco ded in he bi h ce i ica e, hose ci izens we e w i en as
Polish na ionali ies. Tuomienė conside s he code o be no only a linguis ic, bu also a social,
psychological, e en p ac ical phenomenon, obse ed a he le el o bo h phone ics, lexicon, and
ph ase o sen ence, discou se. Swi ching codes is ei he ela ed o he desi e o solida ize wi h a
social g oup, o o b eak away om i (emphasizing social s a us, eli ism), o […] ano he de ia ion
om he opic o con e sa ion. Theo e ical s a emen s o code changes a e con incingly
illus a ed by bilingual and mul ilingual examples. In he s udy o code change and language use in
gene al in a ious ields, he mos sui able o s udy a e he six code change unc ions iden i ied
by he esea che s Renee Appel and Pe e Muisken (Appel and Muisken, 2005: 118). In he s udied
mul ilingual communi ies o sou h-eas e n Li huania and no h-wes e n Bela us, he au ho
eco ds he ha m o ou languages […] ou codes […]. I has been s udied ha he code change in
he language o he h ee gene a ions o he inhabi an s he elde , he middle and he younge
se an s pe o ms i e unc ions: e e ence, con ol, iden i y, me apho and me allinguis ic. The
9
au ho es ablished a connec ion be ween he use o sepa a e codes and he na ional and ci ic
iden i y o he local popula ion. In he case o all-speake code changes, i was mos o en inse ed
by swi ching o a single language […] he common language o he Bal a s. Acco ding o he
esea che s, he equency o ansi ions o his language may ha e been in luenced by he
en i onmen (neighbo hood wi h Bela us), he age o he inhabi an s, and less o en by educa ion.
The au ho desc ibes in de ail each o he unc ions o he change o he codes being analyzed: he
e e ence is used in o de o e i y he exp ession o he hough s o he co espondence o he
wo d being con eyed. The unc ion o changing go e nmen codes is ecognized by he speake 's
adap a ion o he language spoken by he speake in o de o include him in communica ion ( his is
mo e common in con e sa ions be ween ep esen a i es o he middle and younge gene a ions
han he olde ones, because he la e a e no always inclined o change he code). The
con e sa ions ha ake place in wo al e na ing languages - Li huanian and Bulga ian - a e simply a
sign o he au ho ship o he book as a mani es a ion o he iden i y unc ion, i.e. o he iden i y.
The use o one o mo e wo ds om ano he language in he main language o a dialogue is in ended
o emphasize, highligh he essence o a s a emen o o gi e i an addi ional seman ic conno a ion
(me apho ical unc ion). The au ho no es examples o unc ional changes in me allinguis ic codes
in he con e sa ions o inhabi an s when hey discuss he speci ics o he languages o hei egion, he unc ions o he languages spoken in hei na i e a eas, names he meanings o indi idual wo ds, and is in e es ed in he simila i ies and di e ences o hose meanings.
The monog aph desc ibes he s udy o code change unc ions as a o wa d-looking and
con empo a y way o e ealing he ole o language o languages in oday's mul icul u al and
mul ilingual socie y, which could be applied mo e b oadly o linguis ic wo ks. Thus, i can be
a gued ha he esul s o his ype o s udy seek o eplace he p e iously dominan
nega i e assessmen o language change in linguis ics. I is clea ha communica ing in a
mul ilingual en i onmen equi es communica ion pa icipan s o use languages p ac ically and
skill ully and o use a ious language esou ces c ea i ely and eely. I hink ha u he esea ch in Tuomienė science is ela ed o
9
The unc ion o changing poe ic codes is no examined in he wo k due o he lack o examples.
8
The change in he codes o he younge gene a ion in he egions o Li huania and he linguis ic
beha iou in a mul ilingual en i onmen would be e y p omising.
The au ho s o he books emphasize he di e en linguis ic si ua ions ha ook place in he
con lic o he cen u ies, since he 20 h cen u y (6-8 decades) in non-public communica ion he
dominan Li huanian and Bulga ian languages, he 21s cen u y (1-2 decades) a e changed only o
Sla ic languages. Why did his happen, he esponden s explain: […]...> i was he Russian
go e nmen , la e he Li huanian go e nmen , hen he Polish go e nmen . The wa s a ed
and he So ie s came. Then he Li huanians again. So wha kind o coun y a e we li ing in? I a
hund ed yea s ago i was Li huania, Poland, he So ie Union and Bela us, now i is Li huania
again. In my a he 's li e ime, o example, powe changed six imes. And e e y ime a new
go e nmen asks people, "Who a e you?" Who he hell a e you? People ealized ha he bes
hing o do was o say ha I was a local. And ha s i . I'm a local, by he way. Acco ding o he
au ho , he language si ua ion on he islands o Bela us is di e en : […][L]ie u iškai he e he e
is li le alk. No, we ha e no one o alk o. Young people do no lea n, hey s udy (in Bela usian
language), only Bela usian, Russian. They don' need Li huanian. (p. 118) Since he eigh h decade o he wen ie h cen u y, he younge gene a ion no longe speaks Li huanian.
The desc ip ion o he dea h o he language is gi en h ough he sequen ial analysis o he code
change o he Ramaškoni mic o-a ea (Bal a usija). The au ho 's dis inc i e assimila ion s ages
( he p essu e on he communi y o speak he dominan language, he bilingualism o he
popula ion and he iden i ica ion o he younge gene a ion wi h he o he language) slowly
pushed he Li huanian language ou o i s in ancy. A he beginning o he 20 h cen u y,
Li huanian was s ill spoken by he olde gene a ion, bu i was no passed on o he middle and
younge gene a ions. The Li huanian language has been pushed ou o he p i a e home
en i onmen in wo ways: he pa en s spoke Li huanian o each o he , and he child en spoke
Li huanian o each o he . They say all so s o hings, and we kids don' unde s and wha hey' e saying anymo e. We kids don' unde s and any hing, we' e al eady been spoken o plainly.
The s a us o he languages changed: he Polish language g ew s onge un il he second decade o
he 20 h cen u y, and om 1920 o 1939, when Poland occupied he Vilnius egion and pa o
no hwes e n Bela us, he Polish language ook o e . And he unc ions o he Li huanian language
we e aken o e by he Polish language, which was ac i a ed by he chu ch, he opening o Polish
p ima y schools, he in oduc ion o compulso y p ima y educa ion and a go e nmen egula ion
( he language was a means o communica ing wi h he go e nmen ), e.g. […][D]ie es does no each
o he wise, only Polish[…]; [P]e wen y yea s, he Polish people hough ha he Li huanian language
was no cul u ed, i was an a heis ic language. God will no lis en o Li huanian p aye s (p. 137-138).
When schools open, we ga he , we s op, we make ou ally and speak Li huanian. This is indica ed by
o he inge s, hese a e Li huanians, hei dog blood. The common Bulga ian and Polish languages
we e consciously conside ed as wo a ian s o he same language. Since he middle o he 20 h
cen u y, he pe cep ion o Li huanian na ional iden i y has been s eng hened: i was desi able o
lea n he common Li huanian language, bu he e hnic sel -de e mina ion o he inhabi an s o he
Ramaškoni mic o-a ea has always been dependen on he au ho i ies, o ming he opinion ha
Li huanian language is a "no mal u al language"; "We don' speak Li huanian e y well". inju ed in
Li huanian language; "Ou language is ugly, as i i we e made o s aw". […]hideous language[…]; The
9
Commission conside s ha he aid is compa ible wi h he in e nal ma ke wi hin he meaning o
A icle 107 (3) (c) TFEU. I 's no app ecia ed, and i 's jus : […]lie. People don' wan o be spoken o in
a simple language in chu ch, o be add essed o a p ies as i he we e a cow. The loss o p es ige o
he Li huanian language was caused by ela ions no only wi h he common Bal ic language, bu also wi h he Polish language: bo h hese languages - bo h Li huanian and Bulga ian - we e di ec ed agains he "highe cul u e", he mo e p es igious (in he ecen pas ) Polish language (p.
The inhabi an s o he no hwes e n pa ish o Sou heas e n Li huania and Bela us emained
he same, bu hey became bilingual o mul ilingual (due o he cul u al assimila ion o he local
popula ion h ough adminis a ion, educa ion, chu ch). The iden i y o he Pa isian popula ion
a ies om an unde ined e hnic basis o iden i ica ion wi h se e al e hnic g oups a once.
Tu eiškumas (locali y) was a way o esis poli ical, social p essu e and o he linguis ic iden i y
sys ems. Al hough he you h o 21s -cen u y eas e n Li huania unde s ands he impo ance
o educa ion, is in e es ed in issues o na ionali y, e hnici y, would like o link hei u u e wi h
Li huania, abandon he model o locali y, bu hei s is no ye es ablished [[…]My na ionali y is
in e na ional[…] (p. 81)]. In Bela us, he Li huanian language is dead, he s a e language is he
Russian language. The Polish language has a con essional unc ion.
Summing up he i s pa o he monog aph Language and Iden i y o Pie y s in Li huanian and
Bela usian Pa ibas (second hal o he 20 h cen u y - beginning o he 21s cen u y), i can be said
ha he wo k ca ied ou by Nijolė Tuomienė is impo an and ele an because o wo main
hings. Fi s ly, he book summa izes and c i ically e iews he au ho 's esea ch wo ks and
esea ch a eas, e alua es hei me hodology. Secondly, a new sociolinguis ic model o he s udy
o he ange and in ensi y o language con ac s has been p oposed. The alue o his scien i ic
monog aph is also inc eased by he ac ha i is no jus a linguis ic o sociolinguis ic […] i is an
in e disciplina y wo k. The au ho 's esea ch is based no only on he wo k o linguis s o
sociolinguis s, bu also on he wo k o sociologis s, cul u al scien is s, his o ians, because i
examines no only linguis ic o sociolinguis ic ac s, bu also his o ical, cul u al, sociocul u al and
poli ical con ex s. I is impo an ha he wo a eas unde in es iga ion a e iewed " om bo h
sides", i.e. he a ea o he Li huanian language ha was once one, a i icially no di iding i in o
Li huania and Bela us. The no el y, ele ance and o iginali y o he monog aph is u he
enhanced by he ac ha he au ho elies on mul ilingual au hen ic audio eco dings, composed
in o he s udy om sociolinguis ic su eys o he local popula ion. I is wo h men ioning ha
he au ho o he book he sel comes om he Li huanian-speaking island o Bela us, so she unde s ands and can e alua e he in es iga i e si ua ion no only om he collec ed ma e ial, bu also based on au hen ic expe ience.
A e closing he book, i can be boldly said ha he aim o he monog aph is o e eal, on he
basis o empi ical da a, he ajec o y o he mig a ion o he Li huanian language om he
sou h-eas e n pa o Li huania o he e hnic Li huanian islands in Bela us, o iden i y he
causes o he sociolinguis ic and e hnolinguis ic language changes and o in es iga e he new
ypes and unc ions o he codes used by people li ing in he a eas o mig a ion. Today's
si ua ion o he Li huanian language in he sou h-eas e n pa o Li huania, un o una ely, does
no inspi e much op imism: in he es o ed S a e o Li huania, which has su i ed o mo e han
hi y yea s, "cus omism" exis s. Un il now, we obse e he "g ea es wa s" s ill aging in he
hea s o he people. I 's gonna be a long ime be o e i 's ealized ha e e yone's been h ough
wha a man's been h ough.