Cu en Psychology
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s12144-024-07245-1
mos o he assessmen scales alida ed in Spanish ha e
ocused on body image as a s able ai , such as he Body
Shape Ques ionnai e (BSQ) (Coope e al., 1987), he shape
and weigh conce n subscales o he Ea ing Diso de Exam-
ina ion Ques ionnai e (EDE-Q) (Fai bu n & Beglin, 1994)
o he body dissa is ac ion subscale o he Ea ing Diso de
In en o y (EDI) (Ga ne e al., 1983). Some ques ionnai es
assess body image om a con ex ual app oach (e.g., Si ua-
ional In en o y o Body Image Dyspho ia, [SIBID]) (Cash,
2002), al hough he Body Image S a es Scale (BISS; Cash
e al., 2002), which is he i s b ie measu e o body image
as a s a e (Thompson & Schae e , 2019), was no published
un il 2002.
The BISS comp ises six i ems ha measu e aspec s o
body expe ience a he ime o assessmen and has dem-
ons a ed high in e nal consis ency and high co ela ions
wi h measu es assessing nega i e a i udes owa d physical
appea ance (conce ns abou body weigh , size, and shape),
ea ing symp oma ology (Alle a e al., 2014), and body
dissa is ac ion (Cash e al., 2002; Meba ak-Chams e al.,
2019). The scale has been used equen ly in p e ious s ud-
ies, demons a ing i s use ulness in analyzing a ia ions in
body image s a es in e e yday li e (Casale e al., 2024; E u
& G ay, 2010; Melnyk e al., 2004; Rudige e al., 2007).
In oduc ion
Body image is a complex and mul idimensional cons uc
composed o body- ela ed beha io s, he pe cep ion o
one’s own body cha ac e is ics, such as he es ima ion o
body size and body a (Mölbe e al., 2018), as well as
hough s, a i udes, and emo ions abou one’s body (Cash &
Smolak, 2012; Tuschen-Ca ie e al., 2015). Some au ho s
ha e conside ed ha body image is a s able ai indepen-
den o empo al a ia ions and si ua ional con ex s (Cash,
1990, 2002; Tiggemann, 2001). Meanwhile, o he au ho s
de end ha i a ies depending on he con ex and ime
(Laba ge e al., 1998; La in & Cash, 2001). In spi e o his,
C is ina Senín-Calde ón
[email p o ec ed]
1 Depa men o Psychology, Uni e si y o Cádiz, Cadiz, Spain
2 Depa men o pe sonali y, e alua ion and psychological
ea men s, Uni e si y o Valencia, Valencia, Spain
3 Depa men o pe sonali y, e alua ion and psychological
ea men s, Uni e si y o Se ille, Se ille, Spain
4 A da. República Á abe Saha aui S/N. Pue o Real, Cadiz,
Spain
Abs ac
The aim o he p esen s udy was o alida e he Spanish e sion o he Body Image S a e Scale (BISS) in a sample o
Spanish males and emales and o examine i s psychome ic p ope ies. We e alua ed he BISS as a measu e o body
image s a e using an expe imen al ask o assess con ex sensi i i y a e exposu e o a ac i e Ins ag am pho og aphs.
The sample consis ed o 533 pa icipan s (M = 22.40, SD = 3.52). The unidimensional s uc u e o he BISS as ound by
he au ho s o he o iginal scale was co obo a ed. The BISS showed sa is ac o y in e nal consis ency and ull scala
in a iance ac oss sex. Nega i e ela ionships we e ound wi h a measu e o dysmo phic conce ns (Dysmo phic Conce n
Ques ionnai e, [DCQ]) and body mass index (BMI). Mean di e ence analyses showed ha pa icipan s in he expe imen al
g oup e alua ed hei physical appea ance as being wo se a e exposu e o pho og aphs o young men conside ed a ac-
i e. The Spanish alida ion o he BISS seems adequa e o assessing s a e body image in he gene al popula ion, opening
a wide ield o clinical and esea ch applica ions.
Keywo ds Body image s a e · BISS · Body dissa is ac ion · Dysmo phic conce n · Ins ag am
Accep ed: 23 Decembe 2024
© The Au ho (s) 2025
Spanish alida ion o he Body Image S a es Scale (BISS): e alua ion o
sensi i i y o exposu e o pho og aphs on Ins ag am
I eneSie a1· Ma íaRonce o2· Juan F.Rod íguez-Tes al3· C is inaSenín-Calde ón1,4
1 3
Cu en Psychology
The BISS has been ansla ed in o Ge man (Vocks e al.,
2007), I alian (Ca a o e al., 2010), Du ch (Alle a e al.,
2014), and F ench (Ba di e al., 2021). The “Spanish Body
Image S a e Scale” (S-BISS), is a Spanish-language e sion
alida ed in Colombia by he eam o Meba ak-Chams e al.
(2019). Al hough he esul s acc ued subs an ial e idence o
cons uc alidi y in he Colombian popula ion (Meba ak-
Chams e al., 2019), i needs o be e ised and adap ed o
he cul u al and linguis ic cha ac e is ics o he popula ion
o Spain o add ess he possible e ec o cul u al di e ences
(Muñiz e al., 2013; Swami & Ba on, 2019), such as s an-
da ds o beau y and a i udes owa d he body and linguis ic
exp essions. Valida ion o he BISS in a Spanish popula ion
would be e y use ul bo h o e alua ing ea men p og ess
in clinical p ac ice and analyzing sho - e m changes in sel -
e alua ion o physical appea ance in esea ch. Such a scale
would expand knowledge o appea ance dissa is ac ion in
o he Spanish-speaking popula ions.
Dissa is ac ion wi h physical appea ance is a isk ac o
o he de elopmen o ea ing diso de s (S ice e al., 2011)
and body dysmo phic diso de (Con e ino e al., 2022),
making i a p io i y public heal h p oblem (Bo nioli e al.,
2019). A ecen me a-analysis conduc ed by López-Gil e
al. (2023) shows ha he o e all p opo ion o child en and
adolescen s wi h ea ing diso de s in Spain is 30.41%, and
i is es ima ed o be associa ed wi h a mo ali y a e highe
han ha o any o he men al diso de (Wo ld Heal h O ga-
niza ion, 2024). I is he e o e impo an o ha e ools o
e alua e hei onse and e olu ion.
F om he pe spec i e o he ipa i e in luence model o
body image and ea ing dis u bance (Thompson e al., 1999),
he key elemen s a e in e naliza ion o he beau y ideal,
social compa ison, and in e pe sonal and media p essu e.
People ecei e p essu e om social agen s, such as pee s,
amily, and media, o adop cul u ally accep ed body image
ideals. These p essu es lead o he in e naliza ion o hese
ideals, which a e di icul o achie e, gene a ing dissa is-
ac ion wi h one’s own body image (Rodge s e al., 2020).
Many s udies ha e shown a posi i e ela ionship be ween
ime spen on social ne wo ks and one’s dissa is ac ion
wi h and conce ns abou physical appea ance (Fa douly &
Va anian, 2015; G i i hs e al., 2018; Holland & Tigge-
mann, 2016), in bo h males and emales (V ies e al., 2016),
h ough phenomena such as compa ison o physical appea -
ance and sel -objec i ica ion (Fa douly & Va anian, 2015;
Tiggemann & Sla e , 2017).
Sel -objec i ica ion, a e m p oposed by F ed ickson and
Robe s (1997) in hei objec i ica ion heo y, e e s o how
in e nalizing he ex e nal gaze o he body as an objec is
ela ed o inc eased body dissa is ac ion (Fel man & Szy-
manski, 2018). Social ne wo ks play a key ole, as pe -
cei ed e alua ions o physical appea ance ein o ce he idea
ha only physical appea ance ma e s (Cace es-Lembcke &
O oya, 2021). S udies indica e lowe le els o sel -objec i-
ica ion in males compa ed o emales (Mo adi & Huang,
2008), as social p essu es ela ed o hinness in luence his
p ocess di e en ially depending on sex (F ede ick e al.,
2022). Howe e , nume ous s udies show his sense o objec-
i ica ion in males, pa icula ly du ing adolescence, due o
exposu e on social ne wo ks and media (Holland & Tigge-
mann, 2016; Ka say e al., 2018), which ein o ces he need
o achie e a muscula and s ong physique (López-Cuau le
e al., 2016; O i , 2019). In emales, i is associa ed wi h
he desi e o be hin and a sexual conno a ion, when hey a e
seen o conside ed as sexual objec s (Ka say e al., 2018),
which is also in luenced by social ne wo ks, magazines,
media, TV se ies, and music ideos (Peek, 2019; Rodge s
e al., 2019).
In compa isons o a ious social media pla o ms, Ins-
ag am has been ound o a ec body image he mos nega-
i ely, as much o i s ac i i y is based on e alua ing one’s
own and o he s’ physical appea ance (Senín-Calde ón e al.,
2020). Mo e han hal o he wo ld’s popula ion (54%) cu -
en ly ha e an Ins ag am accoun , o whom a ound wo bil-
lion a e mon hly ac i e p o iles (Omnico e Agency, 2024)
and a e aged 18–24 (S a is a, 2023). Thei main use is o
pos and sha e pho os and ideos (Da aRepo al, 2024), and
Ins ag am’s success and impac is measu ed by he num-
be o “likes” and posi i e commen s ecei ed. This ype o
ac i i y has been shown o be speci ically ela ed o nega-
i e body image (Fa douly & Holland, 2018; Fa douly &
Va anian, 2016; Fel man & Szymanski, 2018; Sla e e al.,
2017; Wick & Keel, 2020). This is due no only o expo-
su e o pho og aphs o models o celeb i ies ha mee he
s anda ds o he beau y ideal (B own & Tiggemann, 2016),
bu also exposu e o idealized images o pee s (Fa douly &
Holland, 2018).
All o he abo e men ioned sugges s he need o clini-
cally use ul ools o unde s and and iden i y he impac
ha he socio-cul u al con ex has on he sel -e alua ion
o physical appea ance in he gene al Spanish popula ion.
The e o e, he p esen s udy aimed o alida e he Spanish
e sion o he BISS o he ollowing speci ic objec i es:
(1) analyze he ac o ial s uc u e in a Spanish sample, (2)
examine measu emen in a iance ac oss sex, (3) de e mine
e idence o eliabili y and alidi y in ela ion o ano he
scale, and (4) assess body image s a us h ough a ask o
exposu e o a ac i e Ins ag am pho og aphs, as well as o
de e mine di e ences ac oss sex.
1 3
Cu en Psychology
Me hod
Pa icipan s
The sample consis ed o 533 pa icipan s om wes -
e n Andalusia (Spain) aged 18 o 35 yea s (M = 22.40,
SD = 3.52). O he o al sample, 55.7% we e emale. The
mean social class index (SCI) (Hollingshead, 1975), which
is a social esea ch measu e used o classi y and analyze he
socioeconomic posi ion o indi iduals in a sample, includ-
ing income le el, educa ion le el, and ype o occupa ion,
was 40.09 (SD = 17.32) (middle class). Body Mass Index
(BMI) anged om 15.43 o 48.44 (M = 23.45, SD = 4.27).
P ocedu es
The s udy was app o ed by he Bioe hics Commi ee o he
Jun a de Andalucía (Andalusia Regional Go e nmen ). Pa -
icipan s we e ec ui ed by snowball sampling om a g oup
o unde g adua e psychology s uden s who we e compen-
sa ed wi h academic c edi in one o hei subjec s. They
we e p o ided wi h an in o ma ion shee desc ibing he
s udy and an in o med consen o m ha had o be illed
ou o pa icipa e. Pa icipan s who signed he consen o m
ecei ed an alphanume ic iden i ica ion code and we e
in i ed o mee as a g oup in a uni e si y class oom, whe e
hey we e p o ided wi h a web link o he assessmen es s
on compu e s a ailable in he class oom. One hund ed pa -
icipan s a ended. Those who did no (n = 432) we e sen
he link by e-mail along wi h an ins uc ion documen o
comple ing he es s. The e we e no di e ences in sociode-
mog aphic o clinical a iables be ween pa icipan s who
comple ed he es s a home and hose who comple ed hem
in he class oom (see Supplemen a y Ma e ial).
P io o he comple ion o he es s, he en i e sample was
di ided a andom in o wo g oups (con ol and expe imen-
al g oup). The andom di ision o he sample was ca ied
ou wi h he so wa e SPSS .29. All pa icipan s answe ed
ques ions on sociodemog aphic in o ma ion and he Dys-
mo phic Conce n Ques ionnai e (DCQ; Oos huizen e al.,
1998). The con ol g oup iewed 15 neu al pho og aphs
(landscapes, objec s, buildings, e c.) aken om Ins ag am
while he expe imen al g oup iewed 15 pho og aphs o
a ac i e people o he same sex. A e each pho o, hey
had o a e how a ac i e hey ound he pho o (0 = no a
all a ac i e o 5 = e y a ac i e). Then, he pa icipan s
comple ed he BISS (See Supplemen a y Ma e ial o pho-
og aphs and u he in o ma ion on he p ocedu e).
Measu es
Basic sociodemog aphic in o ma ion (designed by he
au ho s). I consis s o ques ions on pa icipan sex, age,
weigh , heigh , p o ession and educa ion.
The Body Image S a es Scale (BISS; Cash e al., 2002) com-
p ises six i ems, assessing he ollowing six dimensions o
body image expe ience: (1) dissa is ac ion-sa is ac ion wi h
o e all physical appea ance; (2) dissa is ac ion-sa is ac ion
wi h body size and shape; (3) dissa is ac ion-sa is ac ion
wi h weigh ; (4) eelings o a ac i eness-una ac i eness;
(5) cu en eelings abou one’s appea ance ela i e o
how one usually eels; and, inally, (6) e alua ion o one’s
appea ance ela i e o how he a e age pe son looks. I has
a 9-poin Like - ype esponse o ma wi h hal o he i ems
in he nega i e-posi i e di ec ion and he o he hal in he
posi i e-nega i e di ec ion. Highe sco es on he BISS indi-
ca e mo e a o able body image s a es. The au ho s o he
ques ionnai e iden i ied a single ac o . A o al sco e can
be ob ained by adding up he i ems. The au ho s ound an
in e nal consis ency o α = 0.77 o emales and α = 0.72 o
males, es - e es eliabili y (a 2–3 weeks) o = .69 o
emales and = .68 o males (p < .001), and high co ela-
ions wi h scales assessing nega i e a i udes owa d one’s
body shape and weigh , conce ns abou physical appea -
ance, as well as al e a ions in body size pe cep ion, such as
he BSQ (Coope e al., 1987) and he EDE-Q (Fai bu n &
Beglin, 1994).
Al hough a Spanish e sion o he ques ionnai e al eady
exis ed (Meba ak-Chams e al., 2019), i was decided o
ca y ou a new ansla ion in o Spanish o ensu e he cul-
u al ele ance and accu acy o he ins umen in he spe-
ci ic con ex o he Spanish popula ion. Pe mission was
eques ed om he main au ho o he BISS o ansla e
and alida e he scale in he Spanish popula ion. A e he
au ho ’s app o al, he guidelines p oposed by Swami and
Ba on (2019) we e ollowed o es ansla ion and adap-
ion. Two bilingual expe ansla o s, one a na i e Span-
ish speake and he o he a na i e English speake , amilia
wi h bo h cul u es, independen ly ansla ed he scale in o
Spanish. They hen discussed he disc epancies and a i ed
a a consensus e sion. Two o he independen esea ch-
e s ansla ed his e sion om Spanish back in o English
and checked i s co espondence wi h he o iginal e sion.
The ansla ion o he scale was assessed by a commi ee
o expe ansla o s and he inal e sion was gene a ed
and adminis e ed o a pilo sample o 34 psychology s u-
den s who we e asked abou i em comp ehension, emo ional
impac , and accep abili y. A e analyzing he pa icipan s’
assessmen and commen s, he bilingual ansla o s made
some seman ic adjus men s, and his e sion was e iewed
1 3
Cu en Psychology
in sex, con ex , and in e ac ion e ec s we e analyzed by
one- ac o analysis o a iance wi h a 2 × 2 gene al linea
model (GLM ANOVA). S a is ical analyses we e pe o med
wi h FACTOR .12.01.02, SPSS .29 and Lis el . 8.7.
Resul s
Desc ip i e analysis o he BISS i ems
The esul s o he desc ip i e analyses o he BISS i ems a e
shown in Table 1. The da a did no ollow a uni a ia e no -
mal dis ibu ion (Kolmogo o -Smi no p < .05). Howe e ,
skewness and ku osis did no exceed he ecommended
limi s ± 2 (Geo ge & Malle y, 2006).
Explo a o y ac o analysis
The EFA was pe o med in G oup 1 (n = 273) wi h he
RDWLS es ima ion me hod, using he polycho ic co e-
la ions ma ix. The esul s we e adequa e o he Kaise -
Meye -Olkin, KMO = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.74, 0.86], and
Ba le ’s sphe ici y es , χ 2(15) = 709.8, p < .001. MSA
alues anged om 0.759 o 0.842. Bo h pa allel analysis
(PA) based on minimum ank ac o analysis and a iance
explained by eigen alues ecommended a unidimensional
s uc u e, explaining 56% o he a iance. Communali ies
anged om 0.32 o 0.80 and he ac o loadings anged
om 0.44 (I em 2) o 0.83 (I em 1) Table 2.
Con i ma o y ac o analysis
CFA wi h RDWLS was pe o med wi h G oup 2 (n = 260).
The EFA sugges ed a one- ac o model The esul s o he
goodness-o - i s a is ics we e adequa e. Howe e , he
RMSEA exceeded he ecommended limi and he SRMR
was sligh ly abo e he gene al pa ame e s. These esul s a e
by wo o he au ho s o he pape wi h English language
skills, who ga e hei inal app o al.
The Dysmo phic Conce n Ques ionnai e (DCQ; Oos hui-
zen e al., 1998) assesses dysmo phic conce n as a symp om
wi hou seeking o es ablish a diagnosis o body dysmo -
phic diso de . The Spanish e sion by Senín-Calde ón e al.
(2017) was used. The scale comp ises se en i ems wi h a
Like - ype esponse o ma anging om 0 (no a all) o
3 (much mo e han mos people). The DCQ is a unidimen-
sional measu e. The au ho s ound an in e nal consis ency
ange o α = 0.80 o α = 0.88, and a es - e es eliabili y
(one-mon h in e al) o = .87. In he Spanish popula ion,
he in e nal consis ency was α = 0.85 and he es - e es eli-
abili y a one-mon h in e al was = .87 (Senín-Calde ón e
al., 2017). Wi h he sample in his s udy, C onbach’s α was
= 0.85.
S a is ical analysis
Desc ip i e analyses o he BISS ques ionnai e i ems we e
pe o med. The o al sample was di ided a andom in o wo
g oups o c oss- alida ion. Be o e pe o ming he co e-
sponding analyses, he wo g oups we e checked o equi -
alence o sociodemog aphic a iables (i.e., sex, age, BMI,
and SCI) and global BISS measu emen s (see Table 2 in he
Supplemen a y Ma e ial). An explo a o y ac o analysis
(EFA) was pe o med o G oup 1 o e idence o cons uc
alidi y. Wi h he s uc u e ound, a con i ma o y ac o
analysis (CFA) was done wi h G oup 2, using he Robus
Diagonally Weigh ed Leas Squa es (RDWLS) es ima ion
me hod wi h he asymp o ic co a iance ma ix.
The goodness-o - i es s calcula ed we e: he Sa o a-
Ben le Chi-squa e (2), compa a i e i index (CFI), and
non-no malized i index (NNFI), which mus ha e sco es
abo e 0.90. Addi ionally, he oo mean squa e e o o
app oxima ion (RMSEA) wi h a 90% con idence in e al;
and he s anda dized oo mean squa e esidual (SRMR),
which mus ha e a esul unde 0.08 o be conside ed accep -
able (Hu & Ben le , 1999). In e nal consis ency was e alu-
a ed using C onbach’s α, McDonald’s Ω and he in aclass
co ela ion index was calcula ed. E idence based on ela-
ions wi h o he a iables was assessed using Spea man’s
co ela ions o he DCQ o al sco e and BMI.
Finally, measu emen in a iance ac oss sex was analyzed
in a mul ig oup CFA. Model i was assessed by ΔCFI and
ΔRMSEA. In a iance was conside ed o be p esen i ΔCFI
we e ≤ 0.01 and ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015 (Chen, 2007). Di e ences
Table 1 Desc ip i e s a is ics o Body Image S a es Scale (BISS) i ems
I ems M (SD) Asymme y Ku osis
1 5.4 (2.0) −0.24 −1.00
2 5.2 (2.1) −0.07 −1.10
3 5.1 (2.3) −0.02 −1.21
4 5.2 (2.0) −0.31 −0.78
5 5.1 (1.6) −0.02 0.58
6 4.9 (1.7) −0.18 −0.14
To al BISS 5.1 (1.4) −0.19 −0.08
No e. BISS Body Image S a es Scale, M mean, SD s anda d de ia ion
Table 2 BISS Goodness-o - i indices
SB
χ
2 d CFI RMSEA [90% CI] NNFI SRMR
G oup 2 (n = 260) 40.35 9 0.97 0.12 [0.08, 0.15] 0.95 0.14
No e. SB
χ
2: Sa o a-Ben le Chi Squa e, CFI Compa a i e Fix Index, RMSEA Roo Mean Squa e E o o App oxima ion, NNFI Non-No med
Fix Index, SRMR S anda dized Roo Mean Squa e Residual
1 3
Cu en Psychology
h esholds, he model emained s able, indica ing ha he
sco es o he wo g oups we e compa able. These esul s
suppo BISS measu emen in a iance ac oss sex.
E alua ion o di e ences ac oss sex on he BISS and
i s sensi i i y o con ex
Fo sex compa isons by expe imen al s. con ol con ex ,
a 2 (sex) x 2 ( ype o con ex : con ol s. expe imen al)
one- ac o analysis o a iance (ANOVA) was pe o med.
Table 4 shows he means and s anda d de ia ions o he
BISS sco es o males and emales by con ex . The esul s
showed ha he pa icipan s in he expe imen al g oup e al-
ua ed hei physical appea ance wo se a e iewing pho-
og aphs o young people conside ed a ac i e. Males and
emales a ed hei physical appea ance in a simila manne .
A summa y o he analyses, including he in e ac ion, can be
ound in Table 4.
Discussion
The main objec i es o his s udy we e o alida e he BISS
in a Spanish popula ion and analyze he e idence o eli-
abili y and alidi y based on ela ions wi h o he a iables,
including he assessmen o i s sensi i i y o con ex a e
expe imen al exposu e o pho og aphs om Ins ag am.
The i s speci ic objec i e ocused on analyzing he ac-
o s uc u e o he BISS in a Spanish sample. CFA esul s
showed ha goodness-o - i indica o s o he BISS ’s unidi-
mensional s uc u e we e adequa e. This s uc u e is in line
wi h he one ound by he au ho s o he BISS (Cash e al.,
2002) and he Colombian alida ion (Meba ak-Chams e al.,
common o models wi h small deg ees o eedom (Kenny
e al., 2015). Fully s anda dized ac o loadings anged om
0.57 o 0.91, wi h he lowes ac o loading on I em 2 and
he highes on I em 1.
E idence o eliabili y and e idence based on
ela ions wi h o he a iables
E idence o eliabili y was ound o he BISS i ems, wi h
McDonald’s Ω = 0.82 and C onbach’s α = 0.81. The in a-
class co ela ion index was 0.81, 95% CI [0.78 o 0.83]. The
Spea man’s co ela ion coe icien was calcula ed o ana-
lyze e idence based on ela ions wi h o he a iables. To al
BISS co ela ions DCQand BMI we e nega i e ( = − .40
and = − .23, espec i ely), indica ing ha pa icipan s who
we e mo e sa is ied wi h hei physical appea ance had
lowe sco es on dysmo phic conce ns and lowe BMI.
Measu emen in a iance ac oss sex
Sex in a iance analyses we e ca ied ou on he unidimen-
sional model sugges ed by he EFA. The model was i s es i-
ma ed sepa a ely o each g oup (males and emales). Model
i was easonable, al hough he RMSEA was sligh ly highe
han ecommended. The con igu al in a iance model i he
da a well, sugges ing ha he unidimensional s uc u e was
equi alen in bo h g oups. As seen in Table 3, when equali y
es ic ions we e imposed on he ac o loadings o es o
me ic in a iance, he model showed no mis i (ΔCFI < 0.01
and ΔRMSEA < 0.15), sugges ing ha he magni ude o he
ac o loadings o he wo g oups we e s a is ically equi a-
len . A he nex le el o in a iance (scala ), when equali y
cons ain s we e imposed on he ac o loadings and i em
Table 3 BISS measu emen in a iance ac oss sex
Model SBχ2d CFI NNFI ΔCFI RMSEA [90% CI] ΔRMSEA
Males 32.30* 9 0.95 0.92 0.10 [0.67, 0.15]
Females 44.90* 9 0.97 0.96 0.11 [0.08, 0.15]
Con igu al in a iance 77.19* 18 0.97 0.95 0.11 [0.09, 0.14]
Me ic in a iance 83.22* 23 0.97 0.96 0.00 0.10 [0.07, 0.12] 0.01
Scala in a iance 85.26* 29 0.97 0.97 0.00 0.09 [0.07, 0.11] 0.01
No e. BISS Body Image S a es Scale, SBχ2, Sa o a-Ben le chi squa e, d deg ees o eedom, CFI Compa a i e Fix Index, NNFI Non-No med
Fix Index, RMSEA Roo Mean Squa e E o o App oxima ion, CI Con idence In e al
Table 4 Means, s anda d de ia ions, and mean di e ence in in luence o sex and con ex
Va iables Female M(SD) Male M(SD) F(1,531) pPa ial e a squa ed
Ω2
Expe imen al 4.9 (1.4) 5.1 (1.3) 4.71 0.003
Con ol 5.2 (1.4) 5.5 (1.3)
Sex 3.64 0.057 0.007 0.005
Con ex 10.45 0.001 0.019 0.017
Sex*con ex < 0.001 0.984 0.000 0.002
Sample size. Female expe imen al g oup (n = 153); Female con ol g oup (n = 144); Male expe imen al g oup (n = 118); Male con ol g oup
(n = 117)
1 3

Cu en Psychology
physical appea ance wo se a e iewing Ins ag am pho-
og aphs o young men a ed as a ac i e. Acco ding o
he ipa i e in luence model by Thompson e al. (1999),
his esul sugges s ha ecu en consump ion o social
ne wo k con en , whe e he impo ance o physical beau y
is salien , could be ela ed o g ea e body dissa is ac ion,
possibly due o he in ensi ica ion o social compa ison
p ocesses and enhanced in e naliza ion o he beau y ideal.
O he s udies ha e al eady poin ed ou he associa ion o
social ne wo king wi h body image dis o ion (Alsaidan e
al., 2020) and de elopmen o ea ing p oblems (G i i hs e
al., 2018), such as inc eased binge ea ing and bulimic symp-
oms mo e b oadly (Smi h e al., 2013). O he s udies spe-
ci ically analyzing he e ec o Ins ag am exposu e on body
image ha e no shown conclusi e da a. On he one hand,
Kleemans e al. (2018) ound ha exposu e o edi ed Ins a-
g am pho os impai ed pa icipan body image pe cep ion,
esul ing in g ea e dissa is ac ion wi h hei body size and
shape, weigh , eelings o una ac i eness, nega i e eel-
ings owa ds hei body, and compa isons o hei appea -
ance o ha o an a e age pe son. Howe e , Muñoz-Pa alo
and Gómez-Bujedo (2023) concluded ha such exposu e
did no ha e a nega i e e ec on body image pe cep ion.
This dispa i y o esul s could be due o he selec ion o
he s imuli in ou expe imen al design, as well as o he
sociodemog aphic di e ences o he sample. I should be
no ed ha ou sample was mo e di e se in e ms o age, sex,
and s udy a iables han ha o p e ious s udies, and hese
di e ences may c ea e complex e ec s ha a e no e iden
in mo e homogeneous samples. The esul s o his s udy
did no show di e ences be ween males and emales by
e alua ion con ex . These esul s di e om o he s udies
which did e lec g ea e suscep ibili y o emales o body
image dyspho ic s a es (Cash e al., 2002). In he Colombian
alida ion (Meba ak-Chams e al., 2019), pa icipan s we e
no exposed o any si ua ional con ex . They ound ha he
mean sco e o males was highe han he mean sco e o
emales on he BISS. In he esea ch by Cash e al. (2002),
emales we e mo e dissa is ied han males wi h hei physi-
cal appea ance. Howe e , Cash e al. (2002) did no expose
pa icipan s o pho og aphs, bu he la e we e asked o
imagine ha hey we e in a speci ic si ua ion (posi i e o
nega i e) and hen o answe he BISS ques ionnai e. The
wo nega i e si ua ions we e a day a he beach in a ba hing
sui and being alone in a oom eading a same-sex ashion
and i ness magazine. These di e ences be ween he esul s
ound in ou s udy wi h espec o ha o Cash e al. (2002)
and Meba ak-Chams e al. (2019), could he e o e be due
o di e ences in expe imen al design, cul u al di e ences,
and in e naliza ion o he cu en beau y ideal o bo h males
and emales. Cul u al no ms and pe cep ions o beau y
and body image a y be ween he wo cul u al con ex s
2019). In he alida ions in he emaining languages (Ge -
man, I alian, Du ch, and F ench), he ac o s uc u e was
no analyzed.
The second speci ic objec i e o his s udy was o analyze
whe he he sco es o he BISS ques ionnai e a e in a ian
ac oss sex. The in a iance analysis indica ed ha he BISS
is an ins umen ha can be used o males o emales indi -
e en ly wi hou in luencing esponse o he scale. These
esul s di e om hose o he Colombian alida ion (Meb-
a ak-Chams e al., 2019) whe e he in a iance assump ion
was no me .
The nex objec i e was o analyze he psychome ic p op-
e ies o he BISS. The in e nal consis ency o he Spanish
e sion o he BISS was adequa e. In ac , i was e en highe
han in he o iginal e sion o he BISS, which had a C on-
bach’s α o .62 o 0.77 in he neu al condi ion (Cash e al.,
2002). Howe e , he Colombian alida ion ob ained supe-
io e idence o eliabili y (α = 0.92; McDonald’s ω = 0.93).
A nega i e associa ion be ween he BISS and BMI was
obse ed, as also shown in o he s udies (Meba ak-Chams
e al., 2019; Weinbe ge e al., 2016). Pa icipan s wi h a
highe BMI indica ed g ea e dissa is ac ion wi h hei
physical appea ance a he ime o assessmen . Howe e ,
his co ela ion was lowe han in he o iginal publica ion
o he BISS (Cash e al., 2002) o in he Colombian e -
sion (Meba ak-Chams e al., 2019). This could be explained
by sociocul u al di e ences since body sa is ac ion is in lu-
enced by p essu e exe ed by he media, in e naliza ion o
he beau y ideal, as well as cul u al pa ame e s o wha is
a ac i e and he mos app op ia e body shape (Ga a io &
F isén, 2019). Fu he mo e, sel - epo ed BMI can be biased
by andom e o s due o social desi abili y bias (Go be e
al., 2007) and sel - epo bias (Dekke s e al., 2008). Conse-
quen ly, hese biases o en lead o accu acy e o s, such as
an unde es ima ion o BMI alues, especially when BMI is
highe (S ommel & Schoenbo n, 2009), o o he p o ision
o inaccu a e da a.
Mo eo e , e idence based on ela ions wi h o he a i-
ables was ound wi h an ins umen measu ing dysmo phic
conce ns. The da a showed ha body-s a e dissa is ac ion
as assessed by he BISS was associa ed wi h body- ai dis-
sa is ac ion as assessed by he DCQ scale. These esul s a e
simila o hose ound in he Colombian alida ion (Meb-
a ak-Chams e al., 2019), whe e a posi i e associa ion was
ound be ween body dissa is ac ion (BISS) and body image-
ela ed psychopa hology (BSQ).
The las objec i e was o assess whe he an expe imen al
con ex , in which ei he pho og aphs o a ac i e people o
a neu al con en we e iewed, could in luence sel -app aisal
o physical appea ance. We also wan ed o ind ou whe he
men and women we e equally a ec ed by he expe imen-
al con ex . The da a showed ha pa icipan s a ed hei
1 3
Cu en Psychology
obesi y and a g oup wi hou ea ing p oblems should also be
explo ed.
Clinical and esea ch implica ions
In Spain, he e a e se e al ins umen s a ailable o ai
body image assessmen ; howe e , he e is no sel - epo
measu e alida ed in a Spanish sample ha assesses con ex -
dependen body image. This is ele an , no only o p o ide
new ins umen s o he assessmen o body image, bu also
because o i s e sa ili y o esea ch on his opic, making
i a signi ican con ibu ion. This s udy had a la ge sam-
ple a o ing gene aliza ion o esul s. The BISS will help
Spanish-speaking heal h p o essionals and esea che s o
quickly assess sho - e m changes in he sel -e alua ion o
one’s physical appea ance, allowing o mo e pe sonalized
in e en ions and he explo a ion o con ex ual ac o s in lu-
encing body image. Mo eo e , i s alida ion enables c oss-
cul u al compa isons and longi udinal s udies, enhancing
bo h clinical p ac ice and scien i ic unde s anding o body
image dynamics in di e en con ex s.
Conclusion
The BISS is a b ie measu e wi h su icien empi ical sup-
po o assess con ex -dependen body image o bo h males
and emales. Using he BISS, an inc ease in dissa is ac ion
wi h one’s physical appea ance was de ec ed a e expo-
su e o pho og aphs o males and emales who mee cu en
beau y ideals. This esul highligh s he need o a Span-
ish language ins umen wi h psychome ic gua an ees o
assessing he impac o exposu e o si ua ions whe e he
body is he objec o a en ion.
Supplemen a y In o ma ion The online e sion con ains
supplemen a y ma e ial a ailable a h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 / s 1 2 1 4 4 - 0
2 4 - 0 7 2 4 5 - 1 .
Funding Funding o open access publishing: Uni e sidad de Cádiz/
CBUA.
Decla a ions
Con lic o in e es The au ho s decla e no compe ing in e es s.
Open Access This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License, which pe mi s use, sha ing,
adap a ion, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium o o ma ,
as long as you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he
sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons licence, and indica e
i changes we e made. The images o o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his
a icle a e included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence, unless
indica ed o he wise in a c edi line o he ma e ial. I ma e ial is no
included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence and you in ended
use is no pe mi ed by s a u o y egula ion o exceeds he pe mi ed
(Vázquez-Mi az, 2019). Fu he mo e, he ime gap be ween
Cash’s o iginal esea ch (2002) and ou s is o e 20 yea s,
meaning ha he beau y ideal may ha e changed be ween
he s udies (Dimi o & K oumpouzos, 2023).
Limi a ions and u u e esea ch
This s udy had some limi a ions ha mus be aken in o
accoun when d awing conclusions. Gi en he size o he
sample, only one g oup o pa icipan s could be e alua ed
in he p esence o he esea che s, and he es condi ions
o he g oup ha was no could no be con olled. How-
e e , a e pe o ming he ele an compa isons o means,
no signi ican di e ences we e ound in ei he assessmen
es s o sociodemog aphic cha ac e is ics, hus he esul s
a e compa able e en hough he assessmen con ex was no
con olled.
Since he es s we e only adminis e ed a a speci ic ime,
he es - e es eliabili y o he ins umen could no be
assessed. I would be necessa y o analyze he s abili y o
he measu e o e ime.
Fu he mo e, we did no assess di e ences be ween body
image s a e and ai , no did we compa e di e ences in
body image-s a e be ween expe imen al and e e yday li e
si ua ions. Fu u e esea ch should add ess whe he he body
image-s a e is in luenced by e e yday si ua ions in he same
way as has been demons a ed in expe imen al condi ions.
Ano he possible limi a ion is ha he pho og aphs
selec ed we e based on he e alua o s’ subjec i e pe cep ion
o wha hey conside ed he Wes e n Eu opean beau y ideal.
Such an ideal is e y gene al and need no coincide wi h
pe sonal as es. Fu u e esea ch could selec pho og aphs
acco ding o he p e e ences o he es ake using a i icial
in elligence. This would o e come he limi a ion ha he
selec ion o pho og aphs does no adjus o pe sonal, cul-
u al, and con ex ual as es.
Ou s udy p o ides in o ma ion on he psychome -
ic p ope ies o he BISS ins umen , bu u he s udies
a e ecommended o mo e accu a e, op imal body image
assessmen . We we e unable o co obo a e he con e gen
alidi y o he BISS, since we did no adminis e any al e -
na i e measu es o body image-s a e. A measu e assessing
posi i e body image should also be adminis e ed in addi ion.
This would allow he body image cons uc o be assessed
dimensionally.
In addi ion, since he in o ma ion was collec ed wi h sel -
epo measu es, he da a may ha e been biased, especially
weigh and heigh . Fo u u e s udies, we ecommend ha
he sel - epo assessmen be complemen ed wi h an implici
body image assessmen . Fu he mo e, di e ences and simi-
la i ies be ween a clinical g oup wi h ea ing diso de s and
1 3
Cu en Psychology
In e na ional Jou nal o Ea ing Diso de s, 55(12), 1765–1776. h
p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / e a . 2 3 8 2 9
Coope , P. J., Taylo , M. J., Coope , Z., & Fai bum, C. G. (1987). The
de elopmen and alida ion o he body shape ques ionnai e.
In e na ional Jou nal o Ea ing Diso de s, 6(4), 485–494. h p s
: / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / 1 0 9 8 - 3 1 1 0 8 X ( 1 9 8 7 0 7 ) 6 : 4 < 4 8 5 : : A I D - E A T 2 2 6
0 0 6 0 4 0 5 > 3 . 0 . C O ; 2 - O
Da aRepo al (2024). Digi al 2024: Spain. Re ie ed Janua y 10, 2025
om h ps:/ /da a e po al. com/ epo s/digi al-2024-spain
De V ies, D. A., Pe e , J., De G aa , H., & Nikken, P. (2016). Adoles-
cen s’ social ne wo k si e use, pee appea ance- ela ed eedback,
and body dissa is ac ion: Tes ing a media ion model. Jou nal o
You h and Adolescence, 45(1), 211–224. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 /
s 1 0 9 6 4 - 0 1 5 - 0 2 6 6 - 4
Dekke s, J. C., Van Wie , M. F., Hend iksen, I. J., Twisk, J. W., & Van
Mechelen, W. (2008). Accu acy o sel - epo ed body weigh ,
heigh and wais ci cum e ence in a Du ch o e weigh wo k-
ing popula ion. BMC Medical Resea ch Me hodology, 8(1), 69.
h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 86/14 71-2288-8-69
Dimi o , D., & K oumpouzos, G. (2023). Beau y pe cep ion: A his-
o ical and con empo a y e iew. Clinics in De ma ology, 41(1),
33–40. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/j. clinde ma ol.2023.02.006
E u, S. F., & G ay, J. J. (2010). A p elimina y in es iga ion o he ela-
ionship be ween induced umina ion and s a e body image dis-
sa is ac ion and anxie y. Body Image, 7(1), 82–85. h p s : / / d o i . o g
/ 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 0 9 . 0 9 . 0 0 4
Fai bu n, C. G., & Beglin, S. J. (1994). Assessmen o ea ing diso de s:
In e iew o sel - epo ques ionnai e? The In e na ional Jou nal
o Ea ing Diso de s, 16(4), 363–370.
Fa douly, J., & Holland, E. (2018). Social media is no eal li e: The
e ec o a aching disclaime - ype labels o idealized social media
images on women’s body image and mood. New Media & Socie y,
20(11), 4311–4328. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 77/14 61444818771083
Fa douly, J., & Va anian, L. R. (2015). Nega i e compa isons abou
one’s appea ance media e he ela ionship be ween Facebook
usage and body image conce ns. Body Image, 12, 82–88. h p s : / /
d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 4 . 1 0 . 0 0 4
Fa douly, J., & Va anian, L. R. (2016). Social media and body image
conce ns: Cu en esea ch and u u e di ec ions. Cu en Opin-
ion in Psychology, 9, 1–5. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . c o p s y c . 2 0 1 5
. 0 9 . 0 0 5
Fel man, C. E., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Ins ag am use and sel -
objec i ica ion: The oles o in e naliza ion, compa ison, appea -
ance commen a y, and eminism. Sex Roles, 78(5–6), 311–324.
h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 07/s1 1199-017-0796-1
F ede ick, D. A., Schae e , L. M., Hazza d, V. M., Rodge s, R. F.,
Tylka, T. L., Ong, L. Q., Pennesi, J. L., Con e ino, L., Pa en ,
M. C., B own, T. A., Comp e, E. J., Cook-Co one, C. P., C e and,
C. E., Malca ne, V. L., Naga a, J. M., Pe ez, M., Pila, E., Ke in
Thompson, J., & Mu ay, S. B. (2022). Racial iden i y di e ences
in pa hways om sociocul u al and objec i ica ion cons uc s o
body sa is ac ion: The U.S. Body P ojec I. Body Image, 41, 140–
155. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/j. bodyim.2022.01.019
F ed ickson, B. L., & Robe s, T. A. (1997). Objec i ica ion heo y:
Towa ds unde s anding women s li ed expe iences and men al
heal h isks. Psychology o Women Qua e ly, 21(2), 173–206.
h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 11/j. 1471-6402.1997. b00108.x
Ga ne , D. M., Olms ead, M. P., & Poli y, J. (1983). De elopmen
and alida ion o a mul idimensional ea ing diso de in en o y
o ano exia ne osa and bulimia. In e na ional Jou nal o Ea ing
Diso de s, 2(2), 15–34. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / 1 0 9 8 - 1 0 8 X ( 1 9 8 3
2 1 ) 2 : 2 < 1 5 : : A I D - E A T 2 2 6 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 > 3 . 0 . C O ; 2 - 6
Ga a io, K. H., & F isén, A. (2019). F om nega i e o posi i e body
image: Men’s and women’s jou neys om ea ly adolescence o
eme ging adul hood. Body Image, 28, 53–65. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1
0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 8 . 1 2 . 0 0 2
use, you will need o ob ain pe mission di ec ly om he copy igh
holde . To iew a copy o his licence, isi h p : / / c e a i e c o m m o n s . o
g / l i c e n s e s / b y / 4 . 0 / .
Re e ences
Alle a, J. M., Ma ijn, C., Jansen, A., & Nede koo n, C. (2014). Body
language: A ec ing body sa is ac ion by desc ibing he body in
unc ionali y e ms. Psychology o Women Qua e ly, 38(2), 181–
196. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 77/03 61684313507897
Alsaidan, M. S., Al aya , N. S., Alshmma i, S. H., Alshamma i, M. M.,
Alqah ani, F. T., & Mohaje , K. A. (2020). The p e alence and
de e minan s o body dysmo phic diso de among young social
media use s: A c oss-sec ional s udy. De ma ology Repo s,
12(3). h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.40 81/d .2020.8774
Ba di, L., A naud, C., Bagès, C., Langlois, F., & Rousseau, A. (2021).
T ansla ion and alida ion o a s a e-measu e o body image sa is-
ac ion: The body image s a e scale. F on ie s in Psychology, 12,
724710. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.33 89/ p syg.2021.724710
Bo nioli, A., Lewis-Smi h, H., Smi h, A., Sla e , A., & B ay, I. (2019).
Adolescen body dissa is ac ion and diso de ed ea ing: P edic o s
o la e isky heal h beha iou s. Social Science & Medicine, 238,
112458. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/j. socscimed.2019.112458
B own, Z., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A ac i e celeb i y and pee
images on Ins ag am: E ec on women’s mood and body image.
Body Image, 19, 37–43. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 6 . 0
8 . 0 0 7
Cace es-Lembcke, E. B., & O oya, K. M. (2021). Cons ucción de la
iden idad en la adolescencia a a és del uso de edes sociales.
[Iden i y cons uc ion in adolescence h ough he use o social
ne wo ks] Re ie ed Ap il 12, 2024 om h p : / / h d l . h a n d l e . n e / 2
0 . 5 0 0 . 1 1 9 5 5 / 7 5 3
Ca a o, A., Na , A., & Sca pa, S. (2010). E ec s o a single session
o physical exe cise on body s a e image. Re is a B asilei a De
Ciências do Espo e, 32(1), 173–184. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 5 9 0 / S 0
1 0 1 - 3 2 8 9 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 2
Casale, S., Pe ini, C., Fio a an i, G., Pado ani, M., & Ghinassi, S.
(2024). The link be ween p oblema ic Ins ag am use and body-
image in es men dimensions: The media ing ole o social com-
pa ison on Ins ag am and he need o conceal body laws. Clinical
Neu opsychia y, 21(1), 79–87. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 3 6 1 3 1 / c n i o i i
e d i o e 2 0 2 4 0 1 0 5
Cash, T. F. (1990). The psychology o physical appea ance: Aes he ics,
a ibu es, and images. Body images: De elopmen , de iance, and
change (pp. 51–79). The Guil o d P ess.
Cash, T. F. (2002). The si ua ional in en o y o body-image dyspho ia:
Psychome ic e idence and de elopmen o a sho o m. In e -
na ional Jou nal o Ea ing Diso de s, 32(3), 362–366. h p s : / / d o
i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / e a . 1 0 1 0 0
Cash, T. F., & Smolak, L. (Eds.). (2012). Body image: A handbook o
science, p ac ice, and p e en ion (2nd ed.). Guil o d P ess.
Cash, T., Fleming, E., Alindogan, J., S eadman, L., & Whi ehead, A.
(2002). Beyond body image as a ai : The de elopmen and ali-
da ion o he body Image S a es Scale. Ea ing Diso de s, 10(2),
103–113. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 80/10 640260290081678
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensi i i y o goodness o i indexes o lack o
measu emen in a iance. S uc u al Equa ion Modeling: A Mul-
idisciplina y Jou nal, 14(3), 464–504. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 / 1
0 7 0 5 5 1 0 7 0 1 3 0 1 8 3 4
Con e ino, A. D., Elbe, C. I., Mendoza, R. R., Calzo, J. P., B own,
T. A., Siegel, J. A., Jun, H. J., Co liss, H. L., & Blashill, A. J.
(2022). In e naliza ion o muscula i y and hinness ideals: Asso-
cia ions wi h body dissa is ac ion, ea ing diso de symp oms, and
muscle dysmo phic symp oms in a isk sexual mino i y men. The
1 3
Cu en Psychology
size es ima ion a e dis o ed. Psychological Medicine, 48(4),
642–653. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 17/S0 033291717002008
Mo adi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objec i ica ion heo y and psy-
chology o women: A decade o ad ances and u u e di ec ions.
Psychology o Women Qua e ly, 32(4), 377–398. h p s : / / d o i . o g /
1 0 . 1 1 1 1 / j . 1 4 7 1 - 6 4 0 2 . 2 0 0 8 . 0 0 4 5 2 . x
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hamble on, R. K. (2013). Di ec ices Pa a
La aducción Y adap ación De Los es s: Segunda edición. Psi-
co hema, (25(2), 151–157. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 7 3 3 4 / p s i c o h e m a 2 0
1 3 . 2 4
Muñoz-Pa alo, M., & Gómez-Bujedo, J. (2023). E ec o De La
exposición a o os edi adas de ins ag am en la imagen co po al:
Una eplicación sis emá ica en jó enes uni e si a ias españolas.
Análisis Y Modi icación De Conduc a, 49(179). h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0
. 3 3 7 7 6 / a m c . 4 9 i 1 7 9 . 7 5 7 7
Omnico e Agency (2024). Ins ag am by he numbe s: S a s, demo-
g aphics & un ac s. Re ie ed Janua y 10, 2025, om h p s : / / w
w w . o m n i c o e a g e n c y . c o m / i n s a g a m - s a i s i c s /
Oos huizen, P., Lambe , T., & Cas le, D. J. (1998). Dysmo phic con-
ce n: P e alence and associa ions wi h clinical a iables. Aus-
alian & New Zealand Jou nal o Psychia y, 32(1), 129–132.
h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.31 09/00 048679809062719
O i , G. (2019). Muscle dysmo phia: P edic i e and p o ec i e ac-
o s in adolescen s. Cuade nos De Psicología Del Depo e, 19(3),
1–11. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.60 18/cp d.347981
Peek, H. S. (2019). Dis o ed eali y: Reali y ele ision and he e ec s on
emale body image. In E. V. Be esin, & C. K. Olson (Eds.), Child
and adolescen psychia y and he media (pp. 11–22). Else ie .
h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/B9 78-0-323-54854-0.00002-3
Rodge s, R. F., Campagna, J., & A awala, R. (2019). S e eo ypes o
physical a ac i eness and social in luences: The he i age and
ision o D . Thomas Cash. Body Image, 31, 273–279. h p s : / / d o i
. o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 9 . 0 1 . 0 1 0
Rodge s, R. F., Sla e , A., Go don, C. S., McLean, S. A., Ja man, H. K.,
& Pax on, S. J. (2020). A biopsychosocial model o social media
use and body image conce ns, diso de ed ea ing, and muscle-
building beha io s among adolescen gi ls and boys. Jou nal o
You h and Adolescence, 49(2), 399–409. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 7 /
s 1 0 9 6 4 - 0 1 9 - 0 1 1 9 0 - 0
Rudige , J. A., Cash, T. F., Roeh ig, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2007).
Day- o-day body-image s a es: P ospec i e p edic o s o in a-
indi idual le el and a iabili y. Body Image, 4(1), 1–9. h p s : / / d o
i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 0 6 . 1 1 . 0 0 4
Senín-Calde ón, C., Valdés-Díaz, M., Bení ez-He nández, M. M.,
Núñez-Gai án, M. C., Pe ona-Ga celán, S., Ma ínez-Ce an es,
R., & Rod íguez-Tes al, J. F. (2017). Valida ion o Spanish lan-
guage e alua ion ins umen s o body dysmo phic diso de and
he dysmo phic conce n cons uc . F on ie s in Psychology, 8,
1107. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.33 89/ p syg.2017.01107
Senín-Calde ón, C., Pe ona-Ga celán, S., & Rod íguez-Tes al, J. F.
(2020). The da k side o Ins ag am: P edic o model o dysmo -
phic conce ns. In e na ional Jou nal o Clinical and Heal h Psy-
chology, 20(3), 253–261. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . i j c h p . 2 0 2 0 . 0 6
. 0 0 5
Sla e , A., Va sani, N., & Died ichs, P. C. (2017). # i spo o #lo eyou -
sel ? The impac o i spi a ion and sel -compassion Ins ag am
images on women’s body image, sel -compassion, and mood.
Body Image, 22, 87–96. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 7 .
0 6 . 0 0 4
Smi h, A. R., Hames, J. L., & Joine , T. E. (2013). S a us upda e:
Maladap i e Facebook usage p edic s inc eases in body dissa -
is ac ion and bulimic symp oms. Jou nal o A ec i e Diso de s,
149(1–3), 235–240. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/j. jad.2013.01.032
S a is a. (2023). Ins ag am: Dis ibu ion o global audiences 2023, by
age g oup. Re ie ed Ap il 15 2024 om h p s : / / w w w . s a i s a . c o
m / s a i s i c s / 3 2 5 5 8 7 / i n s a g a m - g l o b a l - a g e - g o u p /
Geo ge, D., & Malle y, P. (2006). SPSS o Windows s ep by s ep: A
simple guide and e e ence; 13.0 upda e (6 h ed.). Pea son A and
B.
Go be , S. C., T emblay, M., Mohe , D., & Go be , B. (2007). A compa -
ison o di ec s. sel - epo measu es o assessing heigh , weigh
and body mass index: A sys ema ic e iew. Obesi y Re iews, 8(4),
307–326. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 11/j. 1467-789X.2007.00347.x
G i i hs, S., Mu ay, S. B., K ug, I., & McLean, S. A. (2018). The
con ibu ion o social media o body dissa is ac ion, ea ing dis-
o de symp oms, and anabolic s e oid use among sexual mino i y
men. Cybe psychology Beha io and Social Ne wo king, 21(3),
149–156. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 89/cy be .2017.0375
Holland, G., & Tiggemann, M. (2016). A sys ema ic e iew o he
impac o he use o social ne wo king si es on body image and
diso de ed ea ing ou comes. Body Image, 17, 100–110. h p s : / / d o
i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . b o d y i m . 2 0 1 6 . 0 2 . 0 0 8
Hollingshead, A. A. (1975). Fou - ac o index o social s a us. Yale
Uni e si y.
Hu, L., & Ben le , P. M. (1999). Cu o c i e ia o i indexes in co a i-
ance s uc u e analysis: Con en ional c i e ia e sus new al e na-
i es. S uc u al Equa ion Modeling: A Mul idisciplina y Jou nal,
6(1), 1–55. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 80/10 705519909540118
Ka say, K., Knoll, J., & Ma hes, J. (2018). Sexualizing media use and
sel - objec i ica ion: A me a-analysis. Psychology o Women Qua -
e ly, 42(1), 9–28. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.11 77/03 61684317743019
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The pe o -
mance o RMSEA in models wi h small deg ees o eedom.
Sociological Me hods & Resea ch, 44(3), 486–507. h p s : / / d o i . o
g / 1 0 . 1 1 7 7 / 0 0 4 9 1 2 4 1 1 4 5 4 3 2 3 6
Kleemans, M., Daalmans, S., Ca baa , I., & Anschü z, D. (2018). Pic-
u e pe ec : The di ec e ec o manipula ed Ins ag am pho os
on body image in adolescen gi ls. Media Psychology, 21(1),
93–110. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 80/15 213269.2016.1257392
Laba ge, A. S., Cash, T. F., & B own, T. A. (1998). Use o a modi-
ied S oop ask o examine appea ance-schema ic in o ma ion
p ocessing in college women. Cogni i e The apy and Resea ch,
22(2), 179–190. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 23/A: 1018732423464
La in, M. A., & Cash, T. F. (2001). E ec s o exposu e o in o ma ion
abou appea ance s e eo yping and disc imina ion on women’s
body images. In e na ional Jou nal o Ea ing Diso de s, 29(1),
51–58. h p s : / / d o i . o g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / 1 0 9 8 - 1 0 8 X ( 2 0 0 1 0 1 ) 2 9 : 1 < 5 1 : : A I
D - E A T 8 > 3 . 0 . C O ; 2 - Q
López-Cuau le, C., Vázquez-A é alo, R., & Mancilla-Díaz, J. M.
(2016). Diagnos ic e alua ion o muscle dysmo phia: A sys em-
a ic e iew. Annals o Psychology, 32(2), 405–416. h p s : / / d o i . o
g / 1 0 . 6 0 1 8 / a n a l e s p s . 3 2 . 2 . 2 0 3 8 7 1
López-Gil, J. F., Ga cía-He moso, A., Smi h, L., Fi h, J., T o , M.,
Mesas, A. E., Jiménez-López, E., Gu ié ez-Espinoza, H., Tá -
aga-López, P. J., & Vic o ia-Mon esinos, D. (2023). Global
p opo ion o diso de ed ea ing in child en and adolescen s: A
sys ema ic e iew and me a-analysis. JAMA Pedia ics, 177(4),
363–372. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 01/ja mapedia ics.2022.5848
Meba ak-Chams, M., Tinoco, L., Mejia-Rod iguez, D., Ma inez-
Ban i, M. L., P euss, H., Hamme le, F., Vélez, J. I., & Kola , D.
R. (2019). The Spanish body image s a e scale: Fac o s uc u e,
eliabili y and alidi y in a Colombian popula ion. F on ie s in
Psychology, 10, 2553. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.33 89/ p syg.2019.02553
Melnyk, S. E., Cash, T. F., & Janda, L. H. (2004). Body image ups
and downs: P edic ion o in a-indi idual le el and a iabili y o
women’s daily body image expe iences. Body Image, 1(3), 225–
235. h ps:/ /doi.o g/10.10 16/j. bodyim.2004.03.003
Mölbe , S. C., Thale , A., Mohle , B. J., S eube , S., Rome o, J., Black,
M. J., Zip el, S., Ka na h, H. O., & Giel, K. E. (2018). Assessing
body image in ano exia ne osa using biome ic sel -a a a s in
i ual eali y: A i udinal componen s a he han isual body
1 3