scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Juggling academic practice and care: collaborative autoethnography within a Basque University Research Group

Abstract

Many university scholars, including the authors of this article, acknowledge that they feel like they are riding an emotional roller coaster with academic success, as well as many project failures. Except for our PhD thesis, many of us complete our research tasks in relatively established research groups. However, little research has examined the potential these groups might have to mitigate feelings of academic isolation. To fill in this gap, we designed two methodological steps. First, we adopted the Woolfian metaphor of a room of our own, where we composed individual vignettes regarding our feelings of isolation. We read each other's texts and then, in a second step, moved to a “living room” to negotiate our emerging ideas, echoing a Collaborative Autoethnography. Two full professors and two early-career researchers reflected on and talked about their feelings of academic isolation, from their personal and professional standpoints. Despite the differences in job stability, the four participants acknowledged having felt isolated and abandoned. We argue that viewing research groups not as a community of practice, but a community of care is a more humane and desirable framework to model university research groups in these current times of exacerbating neoliberalism.

Read accessible full text

Juggling academic practice and care: collaborative autoethnography within a Basque University Research Group

Author: Martínez Arbelaiz, María Asunción,Gutiérrez-Cabello Barragán, Aingeru,Jiménez Aberasturi Apraiz, Estibaliz,Correa Gorospe, José Miguel
Publisher: TQR
Year: 2024
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627
Source: https://addi.ehu.eus/bitstream/10810/68045/1/Juggling%20Academic%20Practice%20and%20Care%20Collaborative%20Autoethnograph.pdf
The Quali a i e Repo The Quali a i e Repo
Volume 29 Numbe 4 A icle 6
4-1-2024
Juggling Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e Juggling Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e
Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
, asuncion.ma [email p o ec ed]
Ainge u Gu ie ez-Cabello
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
, [email p o ec ed]
Es ibaliz Abe as u i-Ap aiz
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
, [email p o ec ed]
Jose M. Co ea-Go ospe
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
, [email p o ec ed]
Follow his and addi ional wo ks a : h ps://nsuwo ks.no a.edu/ q
Pa o he Quan i a i e, Quali a i e, Compa a i e, and His o ical Me hodologies Commons, and he
Social S a is ics Commons
Recommended APA Ci a ion Recommended APA Ci a ion
Ma ínez-A belaiz, A., Gu ie ez-Cabello, A., Abe as u i-Ap aiz, E., & Co ea-Go ospe, J. (2024). Juggling
Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup.
The Quali a i e Repo
,
29
(4), 968-985. h ps://doi.o g/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627
This A icle is b ough o you o ee and open access by he The Quali a i e Repo a NSUWo ks. I has been
accep ed o inclusion in The Quali a i e Repo by an au ho ized adminis a o o NSUWo ks. Fo mo e
in o ma ion, please con ac [email p o ec ed].
Juggling Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Juggling Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a
Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup
Abs ac Abs ac
Many uni e si y schola s, including he au ho s o his a icle, acknowledge ha hey eel like hey a e
iding an emo ional olle coas e wi h academic success, as well as many p ojec ailu es. Excep o ou
PhD hesis, many o us comple e ou esea ch asks in ela i ely es ablished esea ch g oups. Howe e ,
li le esea ch has examined he po en ial hese g oups migh ha e o mi iga e eelings o academic
isola ion. To ill in his gap, we designed wo me hodological s eps. Fi s , we adop ed he Wool ian
me apho o a oom o ou own, whe e we composed indi idual igne es ega ding ou eelings o
isola ion. We ead each o he 's ex s and hen, in a second s ep, mo ed o a “li ing oom” o nego ia e ou
eme ging ideas, echoing a Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy. Two ull p o esso s and wo ea ly-ca ee
esea che s e lec ed on and alked abou hei eelings o academic isola ion, om hei pe sonal and
p o essional s andpoin s. Despi e he di e ences in job s abili y, he ou pa icipan s acknowledged
ha ing el isola ed and abandoned. We a gue ha iewing esea ch g oups no as a communi y o
p ac ice, bu a communi y o ca e is a mo e humane and desi able amewo k o model uni e si y
esea ch g oups in hese cu en imes o exace ba ing neolibe alism.
Keywo ds Keywo ds
academic p ac ice, communi ies o p ac ice, collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy, e hics o ca e
C ea i e Commons License C ea i e Commons License
This wo k is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion-Noncomme cial-Sha e Alike 4.0 In e na ional
License.
Acknowledgemen s Acknowledgemen s
We hank Wendy Baldwin o he edi ing help and pa icula ly o making su e ha he English ansla ion
kep he same egis e and one as he o iginal igne es.
This a icle is a ailable in The Quali a i e Repo : h ps://nsuwo ks.no a.edu/ q / ol29/iss4/6
The Quali a i e Repo 2024 Volume 29, Numbe 4, 968-985
h ps://doi.o g/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627
Juggling Academic P ac ice and Ca e: Collabo a i e
Au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Basque Uni e si y Resea ch G oup
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz, Ainge u Gu ié ez-Cabello Ba agán,
Es ibaliz Abe as u i-Ap aiz, and José Miguel Co ea Go ospe
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU
Many uni e si y schola s, including he au ho s o his a icle, acknowledge ha
hey eel like hey a e iding an emo ional olle coas e wi h academic success,
as well as many p ojec ailu es. Excep o ou PhD hesis, many o us comple e
ou esea ch asks in ela i ely es ablished esea ch g oups. Howe e , li le
esea ch has examined he po en ial hese g oups migh ha e o mi iga e eelings
o academic isola ion. To ill in his gap, we designed wo me hodological s eps.
Fi s , we adop ed he Wool ian me apho o a oom o ou own, whe e we
composed indi idual igne es ega ding ou eelings o isola ion. We ead each
o he 's ex s and hen, in a second s ep, mo ed o a “li ing oom” o nego ia e
ou eme ging ideas, echoing a Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy. Two ull
p o esso s and wo ea ly-ca ee esea che s e lec ed on and alked abou hei
eelings o academic isola ion, om hei pe sonal and p o essional s andpoin s.
Despi e he di e ences in job s abili y, he ou pa icipan s acknowledged
ha ing el isola ed and abandoned. We a gue ha iewing esea ch g oups no
as a communi y o p ac ice, bu a communi y o ca e is a mo e humane and
desi able amewo k o model uni e si y esea ch g oups in hese cu en imes
o exace ba ing neolibe alism.
Keywo ds: academic p ac ice, communi ies o p ac ice, collabo a i e
au oe hnog aphy, e hics o ca e
In oduc ion
Isola ion, loneliness, soli ude. Pop singe Rigobe a Bandini’s song, “In Spain we call
i Soledad,” eminds us ha his may be a uni e sal eeling wi h a local la o . To ou Spanish
ea , he noun soledad has a nega i e conno a ion. Fo an ou going and g ega ious socie y like
ou s, being alone is pe cei ed as a law mo e han as an ad an age. In English, howe e , he
h ee e ms ha e e y dis inc nuances. The li e a u e on educa ion and managemen uses he
e m isola ion, de ined as a s a e o eeling disconnec ed and apa om o he human beings
(Belkhi e al., 2019). We belie e he e is a ine line be ween a use ul, necessa y, and pleasan
eeling o being wi hou o he human beings o w i e, concen a e o jus ead and an
uncom o able and pa alyzing sense o being disconnec ed om he academic wo ld. The igh
balance be ween being a pa o a g oup and enjoying momen s o soli ude (bu no o soledad!)
is a e y pe sonal and p obably, a cul u ally media ed endea o .
In he p i acy o hei soli ude, uni e si y p o esso s hink, ini ia e p ojec s, compose
p elimina y d a s o hei e lec ions and de elop hem usually wi hou unwelcome
in e up ions (Jand ić, 2022). Ne e heless, acco ding o B aido i (2014, p. 177) “un enu ed,
pa - ime, sub-s anda d, unde paid wo k has become he no m in mos ad anced libe al
economies''. This means ha no e e yone enjoys he inancial and pe sonal condi ions o ha e
a p i a e esea ch space, wha e e physical o m his space may ake. Echoing ou p e ious
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 969
esea ch in oking Vi ginia Wool (Abe as u i-Ap aiz e al., 2020), we esea che s can p o i
om a oom o ou own. Howe e , e en hose o us p i ileged enough o go o a uni e si y
o ice e e y mo ning acknowledge he need o sha e he ideas ha ched in soli ude. I he silence
and peace o ou p i a e ooms a e a e ile g ound o ideas o eme ge, i is in sha ed mo ing
a enas whe e we can nego ia e ou p oposals. This ini ially concei ed indi idual knowledge
mus be discussed, modi ied, adap ed and e en ually adop ed by a gi en academic communi y.
Two yea s ago, du ing he pandemic, we published a pape whe e we un eiled he
di icul ies and eelings o ulne abili y ha we expe ienced as membe s o a esea ch g oup
when we s a ed o e ise and change ou me hodological choices (Abe as u i-Ap aiz e al.,
2020). A ha ime, we could no desc ibe ou esea ch me hodology in de ail because we could
no concep ualize i clea ly, i was wo k de ini ely in p og ess. Now, hanks o he passage o
ime and ou own discussions on me hodology, we can exp ess ou ideas ega ding ou esea ch
op ions in a mo e a icula e way. When e lec ing on wha i mean o us o change o a pos -
quali a i e app oach o esea ch (S . Pie e, 2021), we adop ed and de eloped he me apho o
ou p i a e oom. I is no he i s ime ha he Wool ian me apho is asc ibed new meanings
in quali a i e esea ch me hodology. Fo h ee Aus alian PhD s uden s and a p o esso , he
p oduc i e me apho o he oom is he a icula ing piece in a pe o ma i e a icle ha
add esses hei academic and pe sonal li es (Mackinlay e al., 2022). Taking he me apho a
s ep u he , hey w i e:
We ha e won ooms o ou own, a ained leade ship posi ions wi hin ou
p o essions. Bu his eedom is only a beginning— he ooms a e ou own,
bu hey a e s ill ba e. They ha e o be u nished; hey ha e o be deco a ed;
hey ha e o be sha ed. How a e you going o u nish you oom, how a e
you going o deco a e i ? Wi h whom a e you going o sha e i , and upon
wha e ms? These, I hink, a e ques ions o he u mos impo ance and
in e es . [emphasis in he o iginal] (Mackinlay e al., 2022, p. 340)
These ques ions added no only a challenge bu also an oppo uni y o e lec upon ou goals,
esea ch me hods, ajec o ies, impac and he u u e o ou esea ch g oup. Following
Mackinlay e al. (2022), we discussed how we may u nish and deco a e ou own p i a e ooms.
Howe e , he exe cise o deco a ing ou own ooms was no enough and i was when we le
he soli ude o ou ooms and mo ed o he li ing oom when ou collabo a ion lou ished. I
is in his me apho ical sha ed space whe e we could discuss ou pas , p esen and u u e as a
esea ch g oup. Au oe hnog aphy was ou ini ial me hodological choice, bu hen we added o
ou oolbox he c ucial and use ul me apho o he li ing oom, as a way o add ess he need
o dialogue and he nego ia ion o meaning. The pu pose o ou mee ings in he li ing oom
was o discuss ou indi idual ex s on academic isola ion and o e lec on he u u e choices
and de elopmen o ou esea ch g oup.
In sum, gi en ha he li e a u e so a has add essed he issue o soli ude om he poin
o iew o ea ly-ca ee esea che s o schola s exclusi ely, we belie e ha he e is a need o
see how bo h no ice and old- ime s in academia in e ac wi h each o he . Do bo h age-g oup
schola s eel isola ed? And i so, how do hey cope wi h he uneasiness o being aliena ed? In
o de o answe hese ques ions, we de eloped an inno a i e me hodology akin o
Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy ha sui ed he spi i o ou esea ch g oup and eme ged
o ganically om simple me apho s o ooms and li ing ooms.
This a icle is o ganized as ollows. Fi s , we e iew he ew a icles ha discuss
academic isola ion in he con ex o he g owing commodi ica ion o highe educa ion. Then
we desc ibe he con ex , he his o y, he people, and he main goals o ou esea ch g oup. Then,
we discuss he possibili y o unde s anding ou uni e si y-based esea ch g oup as a
970 The Quali a i e Repo 2024
Communi y o P ac ice (Wenge , 1998). Agains his heo e ical backd op, in sec ion 4 we
in oduce ou choice o me hodology, Collabo a i e Au oe hnog aphy. Fou membe s o he
g oup— wo ull- ime p o esso s and wo assis an p o esso s—engaged in au oe hnog aphic
wo k and w o e an indi idual igne e in he soli ude o hei p i a e ooms, as summa ized in
sec ion 5. Then, we all me in he li ing oom and enjoyed a couple o collabo a i e
au oe hnog aphic sessions o dis ill he main poin s ha came ou o conside ing no only he
o iginal p omp o academic isola ion bu he many ela ed opics ha eme ged ega ding ou
posi ioning in he esea ch g oup. Finally, in sec ion 6, we eimagine ou esea ch g oup as a
“Communi y o Ca e” by inco po a ing he ea u es and iews de eloped in ou li ing oom.
Res lessness and isola ion a neolibe al uni e si ies
The places whe e we concei e and pe o m esea ch a e no neu al and ha e
conside able impac on ou li es. No dbäck e al. (2022) adop ed collabo a i e
au oe hnog aphy o in es iga e he wo k and li e changes hey expe ienced when he Aal o
Uni e si y me ge ook place. This esea ch illumina es he challenges pushing con empo a y
academia owa d a mo e business-o ien ed uni e si y, ending up in he commodi ica ion
(Wilmo , 1995) o McDonaldiza ion o highe educa ion (Pa ke & Ja y, 1995). By
neolibe alism and i s di ec consequence, namely, commodi ica ion, we unde s and ha
academic knowledge is concei ed as a commodi y and he ield o highe educa ion as a ac o
o economic g ow h. In his sense, we echo he wa ning ha Chomsky (2017) issued abou he
assaul o neolibe alism on uni e si ies, modi ying he egula o y amewo ks and cul u e o
hei eaching s a , he p i a iza ion o public knowledge and he ad ance owa ds academic
capi alism. A business model whe e wha ma e s seems o become he baseline, whe e he ue
owne s a e he iducia ies who seek o keep cos s low and a pe manen ly e alua ed wo k o ce
edi ec ed owa ds he sea ch o p oduc i i y and which ends up becoming docile, obedien ,
and a omized, hanks in pa o ch onicling hei condi ion as wo ke s wi hou s abili y.
Gi en he me ge and campus eloca ion expe ienced by he h ee Finnish academics,
hey no e ha “[o]u iden i ies (including iden i ying wi h social g oups) a e ela ed o spaces
and places, as we wo k emo ely om home o commu e o he uni e si y, en e i s buildings,
wo k in a dedica ed (o no ) o ice space, each in lec u e halls, and encoun e people in open
spaces, ooms, and hallways” (No dbäck e al., p. 335). They con incingly show ha physical
places can enhance o hinde social in e ac ion, an obse a ion ha is di ec ly ela ed o he
ini ial opic o his a icle, namely, academic isola ion. Th ough collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy,
hey show how esea che s’ mu ual engagemen can help loca e and make sense o hei
es lessness amids he changes ha hei pa icula neolibe al uni e si y is expe iencing. The
Finnish uni e si y, like any o he uni e si y, has no been able o escape he e ec s o he
neolibe al logic and has expe ienced some building and loca ion me ging ha has changed he
li es o he h ee academics wi h campus eloca ion. No dbäck e al. (2022) ecommend ha
o he schola s y o engage in dialogue wi h each o he pa icula ly in sha ed spaces, such as
depa men s and uni e si ies, because “[i] has helped us o lea n abou ou sel es and o he s
and o suppo each o he in dealing wi h he a oci ies o neolibe alism” (pp. 345-346). In his
con ex o neo libe aliza ion, hese au ho s ecommend suppo ing each o he and engaging in
collabo a ion and dialogue o make uni e si ies meaning ul places a e di icul imes, such as
he ones desc ibed in Aal o Uni e si y.
Belkhi e al. (2019) also add ess he eeling o isola ion ha a ises among esea che s
in social sciences. By adop ing he same me hodology, namely, collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy
as hei me hodological s ance, hey ocus on how in e disciplina y esea ch eams can be he
app op ia e ame o helping ea ly-ca ee esea che s mi iga e eelings o isola ion as hey
a e se he pa h o becoming es ablished academics. Belkhi e al. (2019) de ine isola ion as

Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 971
“an in olun a y pe cei ed sepa a ion om he academic ield o which one aspi es o belong,
associa ed wi h a pe cei ed lack o agency in e ms o one’s engagemen wi h he ield” (p.
263). They posi ha isola ion mani es s along ou dimensions—geog aphical, cul u al,
ela ional, and echnical—and conclude ha “isola ion is o inc easing impo ance as
con empo a y academic ca ee s ha e globalized” (p. 283). Pa adoxically, he mo e global ou
academic ac i i ies become in e ms o collabo a ions wi h colleagues all o e he wo ld, he
mo e isola ed hese academics eel. In addi ion, hey poin o h ee a eas ha can comba
isola ion: men o ing, ne wo king, and communi ies o p ac ice.
In Belkhi e al.’s (2019) a icle, howe e , we pe cei ed a lack o a en ion o
es ablished academics. By es ablished academics we mean enu ed p o esso s whose o ices
and wo kplaces c ucially will no change he nex u u e. In ac , Belkhi e al.’s 2019
publica ion is signed by ou assis an p o esso s, h ee lec u e s, a PhD candida e, a pos -
doc o al esea che and a single ecen ly enu ed p o esso , om en di e en Eu opean,
Aus alian, A ican and Ame ican uni e si ies. We unde s and ha ocusing on ea ly-ca ee
esea che s is p obably a na u al choice adop ed by many esea che s (Jand ić, 2022), bu i
lea es ou o sc u iny a la ge pa o academia. The o iginal cha ac e iza ion o a Communi y
o P ac ice in La e and Wenge (1991) and Wenge (1998) con ends ha he cons an
in e ac ion and engagemen among no ices and old- ime s is a necessa y ing edien o any
communi y o lou ish and hus, be sus ainable. In o he wo ds, he in e ac ion o indi iduals
om bo h si ua ions ( enu ed and s able and un enu ed and in hei ini ial s ages o hei ca ee s)
is equi ed o build a heal hy and endu ing communi y o p ac ice. Old- ime s, he es ablished,
seasoned uni e si y esea che s in ou case, can gene a e new knowledge, bu we also no e he
need o no ices o engage in ac i e nego ia ion wi h es ablished schola s. These in e ac ions,
bo h o mal and in o mal, gi e ise o new knowledge h ough mee ings, abs ac and esea ch
p ojec w i ing, pa icipa ion in con e ences and a icle and book chap e w i ing (Hyland,
2000). These ac i i ies may expand he sha ed epe oi e o he esea ch g oup and c ucially
can become cemen o i s membe s. Like Peele-Eady and Moje (2020), we a gue o “a iew
o a communi y ha cen e s di e se g oups o people wo king oge he o a common goal—
e en when pe cep ions o ha goal di e —and making he mos o di e ence in he p ocess”
(p. 230). In he nex sec ion we desc ibe he na u e o ou esea ch g oup agains he backd op
o he heo y o communi ies o p ac ice.
Wha is Elka ike uz? A esea ch g oup as a communi y o p ac ice?
We ha e gone om ques ioning disciplina y limi s and ou own p o essional
isola ion, p o esso s who wo k alone in uni e si ies wi hou any e e en ,
ho izon, o suppo , o o mally and in o mally ques ioning o he dimensions
ela ed o ace, language and gende , and ying o un eil many o he p ejudices
ha we e appa en ly e y dis an om wha happens in ou class ooms and
should be pa o ou cu iculum. (Co ea e al., 2010, p. 127; ansla ion by he
au ho s)
This quo e comes om an a icle we published mo e han en yea s ago, whe e we p o ided a
desc ip ion o he di e en phases he esea ch g oup wen h ough. In he conclusion o ou
a icle, we made i clea ha he eam was a mo o o mo ing o wa d and o e coming ou
own p o essional isola ion, as he abo e quo e illus a es. E en hough his a icle was w i en
in Spanish, i su passes he limi s o language and adop s a mul imodal pe spec i e by na a ing
he esea ch eam’s incep ion and his o y h ough a comic s ip. The ex unde lined he
esea ch g oup´s openness owa d new o ms o expe imen al and expe ien ial esea ch; ways
o wo king ha a e a he ma gins and limi s o knowledge legi imized by academia. Since i s
972 The Quali a i e Repo 2024
incep ion Elka ike uz has paid a en ion o ma ginal, mino i y, subal e n, non-no ma i e, and
decolonial issues, becoming a poli ical p ojec linked o c i ical, and dissiden pedagogies.
I is pe inen o cla i y ha ou esea ch g oup, Elka ike uz, based in he School o
Educa ion, Philosophy and An h opology a he Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y, UPV/EHU,
chose a name ha unde sco es he idea o “ oge he ness.” The name Elka ike uz comes om
he combina ion o he wo Basque wo ds, elka ekin “ oge he ” and ike uz “by doing
esea ch.” Despi e ou appa en g oup’s esemblance o a communi y, he e m Communi y o
P ac ice (Wenge , 1998) has no been p e iously applied o i . Analyzing he na u e o ou
g oup agains he backd op o he heo y o Communi ies o P ac ice can be a ui ul jou ney
o se ou esea ch goals and o ind he means o achie e hem. In his sense, we canno ap io i
p esuppose ha a g oup o p o esso s and g adua e s uden s ha sel -iden i y as esea che s
cons i u es a Communi y o P ac ice (CoP om now on). The e a e some undamen al ea u es
ha he li e a u e (Lea e & Wenge , 1991; Wenge , 1998) has iden i ied as conduci e o he
o ma ion o a CoP. As King (2014) con incingly a gues, “[o]ne canno sa ely p esume,
howe e , ha a andom g oup o people cons i u es a communi y o p ac ice (wi h i s own se
o highly localised p ac ices) me ely because hey a e pa icipa ing in an ac i i y oge he on a
egula basis o because hey sha e a social iden i y” (p. 62). In ou pa icula con ex , jus
because he membe s o ou esea ch g oup a end egula mee ings, p esen in p o essional
con e ences, au ho o co-au ho con e ence p esen a ions and publish pape s in collabo a ion,
we canno assume ha hese indi iduals cons i u e a CoP.
Wha a e, hus, he necessa y ing edien s o call an agg ega e o people a CoP?
Acco ding o Wenge (1998, p. 184), h ee main elemen s mus co-occu o a communi y o
eme ge. The i s is ha he e mus be mu ual engagemen , ha is, he membe s mus ge
oge he o engage in hei sha ed p ac ices. C ucially, his engagemen mus be ime and place
bound. Mu ual engagemen in ou case can ake he o m o a mee ing, which in u n can be
ha monious o con en ious. I can also be he w i ing o a g an p oposal o an abs ac o a
con e ence, he a ending and p esen a ion a a con e ence, o he w i ing o a icles and book
chap e s. The second ing edien o a CoP is he join ly nego ia ed en e p ise. Wha seems clea
is ha he en e p ise mus be nego ia ed wi h by he membe s. I is in e es ing o no e ha
Wenge lea es some oom o agency, since he join en e p ise belongs o he membe s despi e
all he aspec s ha may be beyond hei con ol. This is because i is a esponse ha he
membe s nego ia e oge he , and i is based on hei own unde s anding o hei si ua ion, e en
in cases whe e p ac ice is p o oundly shaped by ex e nal o ces. Finally, he mos angible
ing edien o he CoP heo y is he de elopmen o a sha ed epe oi e, de ined as “ ou ines,
wo ds, ools, ways o doing hings, s o ies, ges u es, symbols, gen es, ac ions o concep s ha
he communi y has p oduced o adop ed in he cou se o i s exis ence, and which ha e become
pa o i s p ac ice” (Wenge , 1998, p. 83). The ques ion is whe he ou uni e si y esea ch
g oup i s he de ini ion o a CoP. Does i exhibi hese h ee c ucial elemen s? Le us analyze
hem one by one.
Ou esea ch g oup and mu ual engagemen
Some o he de ining ea u es o a CoP ela e o sus ained mu ual ela ionships. I is
impo an o poin ou ha hese ela ions a e some imes ha monious bu also con lic ual. As
we men ioned abo e, his has been he case in ou own expe ience. Rela ions become mo e
con lic ual and s ess ul pa icula ly when adop ing new o ms o doing esea ch and
abandoning old and amilia ones. This was he case in ou ansi ion om doing na a i e
inqui y o doing pos -quali a i e inqui y du ing ou lea ning ajec o y as a communi y. Ou
ulne abili ies and in e nal di icul ies we e amply epo ed in Abe as u i-Ap aiz e al. (2020),
In his sense, Peely-Eady and Moje (2020) emind us ha “communi ies a e no always
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 973
ag eeable; hey can be (and should be) con en ious spaces” (p. 234). These g oup-in e nal
di e ences in ou unde s anding o esea ch me hodological choices and goals mani es
hemsel es du ing ou esea ch g oup mee ings. Ne e heless, whe he we we e engaged in
planning and p epa ing con e ence p esen a ions o collec i ely w i ing, minimal ag eemen is
equi ed and e en ually eached, o ou own su i al as a g oup. The g oup’s asks and goals
ha e o be accomplished despi e i s membe s’ di e ences and misalignmen s.
Since we a e mo e o less connec ed h ough social media whe e in o ma ion can low
apidly, in ou g oup mee ings he e a e usually e y ew p eambles, and we go di ec ly o he
main poin , wi h ew o mali ies, which acili a es he needed engagemen .
Ou esea ch g oup and join ly nego ia ed en e p ise
Ou websi e, designed by some o he membe s o he esea ch g oup, s a es ha he
goal o he esea ch g oup is he analysis o inno a ion and he imp o emen o educa ion
quali y and lea ning con ex s, p omp ed by he ans o ma ions in socie y. This is a e y b oad
goal, and we ag ee wi h Peele-Eady and Moje (2020) when hey p opose ha “communi ies
a e bo h eal and imagined” (p. 233). In ac , he ou membe s ha con ibu ed o his pape ,
and p obably he emaining se en een esea che s in he g oup, ha e e y di e en ideas o
wha cons i u es he imp o emen o educa ion quali y in ou communi y. These di e ences
may simply be due o he he e ogenei y o ou academic backg ounds and ela ed iden i ies:
some membe s come om he ine a s, o he s om educa ion o om linguis ics. In addi ion,
i is clea ha each membe o he g oup in e p e s he g oup i sel and i s in ended goals in his
o he way. Fa om being a p oblem, he di e si y wi hin ou esea ch g oup is an asse and
we all know each o he ’s a eas o expe ise. The indi idual and collec i e goal is he
ad ancemen o he p o essional ca ee o he g oup and he indi idual membe s. I one
membe ge s enu e, hen he whole g oup bene i s om ha pe son’s job s abili y.
Ou esea ch g oup and sha ed epe oi e
The membe s in ine a s de eloped a dis inc logo (see Figu e 1) o ou esea ch g oup.
This logo was a clea index o ou iden i y as membe s o he esea ch g oup and si s a he
cen e o ou websi e (see Figu e 2), whe e all membe s' pic u es and CVs can be ound.
Figu e 1
Resea ch G oup`s Logo
The websi e and he pic u es ha e a casual and dynamic s yle ha e lec s ou
pe spec i e on educa ion. Du ing ou g oup mee ings and du ing ou uno icial lunches, we
ha e coined and used ja gon. This ja gon is no unde s andable o anyone who has no been
pa o he esea ch g oup o a while, and i is usually embedded in inside jokes. Fo example,
only g oup membe s know wha we mean by he Ca alans, he pos , he cuali, e c. In line wi h
King (2014) ´s esea ch amed in linguis ic e hnog aphy, we ha e de eloped a sha ed
linguis ic epe oi e which mixes English, Spanish and Basque in seamless ways.
974 The Quali a i e Repo 2024
Figu e 2
Resea ch G oup Web sc eensho s
The websi e and he pic u es ha e a casual and dynamic s yle ha e lec s ou pe spec i e on
educa ion. Du ing ou g oup mee ings and du ing ou uno icial lunches, we ha e coined and
used ja gon. This ja gon is no unde s andable o anyone who has no been pa o he esea ch
g oup o a while, and i is usually embedded in inside jokes. Fo example, only g oup membe s
know wha we mean by he Ca alans, he pos , he cuali, e c. In line wi h King’s (2014)
esea ch amed in linguis ic e hnog aphy, we ha e de eloped a sha ed linguis ic epe oi e
which mixes English, Spanish and Basque in seamless ways.
In sum, by acing he h ee ea u es o a CoP, namely, mu ual engagemen , join ly
nego ia ed en e p ise and sha ed epe oi e, we ha e shown ha ou esea ch g oup can be
concei ed as a CoP. Ne e heless, his model does no lea e any oom o he po en ial ole
ha his communi y may ha e in mi iga ing eelings o isola ion. To del e in o his aspec o
he CoP, ou membe s o he esea ch g oup engaged in collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy o
u he in es iga e his issue. The la ge ques ion we wan o ackle in his a icle is he ex en
o which a esea ch eam such as ou s, concep ualized as a CoP, can p o ide suppo in
mi iga ing he eelings o academic isola ion o i s membe s, bo h no ices and old- ime s. To
answe his ques ion, we desc ibe ou me hodological s ance in he ollowing sec ion.
CAE as a esea ch me hod: On ooms and li ing ooms
We u ned o collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy (Chang e al., 2016; He nandez e al.,
2017; Lapada , 2017) o del e in o ou po en ial eelings o isola ion and o discuss ou
awa eness o he shape o ou esea ch eam in imes o neolibe alism. Collabo a i e
Au oe hnog aphy (hence o h CAE) is a pos mode n o m o esea ch (La he & S . Pie e,
2013) ha blu s he bounda ies be ween esea che s and subjec s. Lapada (2017, pp. 597-598)
de ined CAE as an “au obiog aphical, au oe hnog aphic, polyphonic app oach o w i ing,
elling, in e oga ing, analyzing, and collabo a i ely pe o ming and w i ing up esea ch on
pe sonal li e challenges and on nego ia ing pe sonal and p o essional iden i ies''. We chose
CAE as ou me hodological s ance o he ollowing easons. Fi s , i allows us he eedom o
desc ibe ou job and ela ed endea o s wi h anspa ency; CAE is in line wi h ou men ioned
and published commi men o he pos -quali a i e o ms o doing esea ch (Abe as u i-Ap aiz
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 981
(Young e al., 2022), we ex end ou p e ious concep ualiza ion o a CoP and add some
undamen al ing edien s, so ha he cons uc o a CoP can be concep ualized as a Communi y
o Ca e. The addi ional ea u es and ac ions ha a e equi ed a e de ailed in Table 2, o ex end
he ocus o ca e o ou ins i u ional con ex . The ac ual ac ions ha cons i u e he Communi y
o Ca e ha e been dis illed om he ex bolded in he ac ual igne es in sec ion 5. The ini ial
o he esea che ha has poin ed o his pa icula ac ion has been added nex o i .
Table 2
Main ea u es and ac ions de ining a Communi y o Ca e (CoC) and how hey ex end om he
ones o a CoP
Fea u es
Communi y o P ac ice
ac ions
Communi y o Ca e ac ions
Mu ual engagemen
● Holding mee ings
● W i ing abs ac s
● W i ing con e ence
p esen a ions,
a icles and book
chap e s
● Simila in ol emen in all he
asks (E)
● Equal sha ing o wo kload (E)
● Awa eness and espec o amily
ca e (JM)
● Sha ing pape s and ideas (As)
● Sha ing and discussing ele an
esea ch (As)
● Ga he ing socially (Ain/E)
● Encou aging leisu e ime (E)
Join ly nego ia ed
en e p ise
● Paying a en ion o
educa ion a all
le els
● De eloping a ca ee
in academia
● Paying a en ion o all membe s’
physical and men al wellbeing,
including p ojec leade s when
unde deadline (JM/E)
● W i ing collabo a i ely (As)
● A oiding compe i ion (E)
● Se ing easonable deadlines
(Ain)
Sha ed epe oi e
● G oup websi e
● Academic and in-
g oup ja gon
● Inside (in-g oup)
jokes
● C ea ing a common body o
knowledge (p oposals, heo ies,
me hodologies, da a, e e ences,
ele an eadings) (As)
● Using CAE as a esea ch me hod
(The ou o us)
In sum, he ini ial ques ion o whe he ou esea ch g oup can mi iga e eelings o
isola ion, which p omp ed ou e lec ions in he p i acy o ou indi idual ooms, has made us
mo e beyond an emphasis on human ela ionships and pay a en ion o highe educa ion
poli ics and mo e- han-human ela ionships wi h ime and spaces. In ou CAE jou ney, we ha e
ske ched an imagined communi y in he o m o a communi y o ca e ha sui s ou esea ch,
p o essional, and pe sonal goals, namely, a communi y ha nu u es each one o i s membe s
h ough hei academic li es. E en i we acknowledge ha an in i a ion by es ablished
academics o join a esea ch g oup can be a poisoned chalice ha is di icul o esis (see José

982 The Quali a i e Repo 2024
Miguel´s igne e), once newcome s join he esea ch g oup, hei aking pa in he ou ines
ou lined in Table 2 can unc ion as he cemen ha cohe es he g oup. Resea ch membe s
should be cognizan o he impo ance o building and nu u ing pe sonal ela ions in he
p ocess o comple ing esea ch p ojec s. Ca ing o hese ela ions should be no only a goal
bu a de ining ea u e o ou esea ch eam. Much has been w i en on he e hics o esea ch in
au oe hnog aphy, a imes ocusing on he con ex whe e esea ch is being p oduced (Dahal &
Lui el, 2022). De eloping ca ing ela ionships in he esea ch g oup also should be pa o his
e hical beha io . In Spanish, we call hese ela ionships “cuidado,” which is e ymologically
ela ed o La in “cogi a us” o “ hough ” and di ec ly links o ac ion. We belie e ha hinking
abou he o he membe s o he esea ch g oup and hei pe sonal and emo ional needs is he
i s mo emen owa d building an endu ing and heal hy and long-las ing communi y o ca e.
Re e ences
Abe as u i-Ap aiz, E., Co ea, J. M., & Ma ínez-A belaiz, A. (2020). Resea che ulne abili y
in doing collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy: Mo ing o a pos -quali a i e s ance. Fo um
Quali a i e Sozial o schung / Fo um: Quali a i e Social Resea ch, 21(3).
h ps://doi.o g/10.17169/ qs-21.3.3397
Belkhi , M., B oua d, M., B unk, K. H., Dalmo o, M., Dinnin Hu , A., Fe ei a, M. C.,
Figuei edo, B., Sca abo o, D., Sibai, O., & Smi h, A. N. (2019). Isola ion in globalizing
academic ields: A collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy o ea ly ca ee esea che s. Academy
o Managemen Lea ning & Educa ion, 18(2), 261-285.
h ps://doi.o g/10.5465/amle.2017.0329
Benjamin, W. (2002). La dialéc ica en suspenso: F agmen os sob e la his o ia. A cis-Lom.
Bozalek, V., Zembylas, M., & T on o, J. C. (Eds.). (2020). Pos human and poli ical ca e e hics
o econ igu ing highe educa ion pedagogies. Rou ledge.
B aido i, R. (2014). W i ing as a nomadic subjec . Compa a i e C i ical S udies, 11(2), 163-
184. h ps://doi.o g/10.3366/ccs.2014.0122
Chang, H., Ngunji i, F. W., & He nandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy
(Vol. 8). Rou ledge.
Co ea, J. M., Abe as u i-Ap aiz, E., & Gu ié ez-Cuenca, L. P. (2010). Elka ike uz: Indaga
e inno a en la docencia: La génesis y p oyección de un equipo de uni e sidad
expandida [Elka ike uz: Inqui ing and Inno a ing in Teaching: The Genesis and
P ojec ion o an Expanded Uni e si y Team]. Tendencias pedagógicas, 16, 107-130.
h p://hdl.handle.ne /10486/5268
Chomsky, N. (2017). El asal o neolibe al a las uni e sidades y cómo debe ía se la educación.
Ta eas, 155, 35-48. h p://www.apps.buap.mx/ojs3/index.php/be ol/a icle/ iew/1473
Dahal, N., & Lui el, B. C. (2022). Unde s anding and encoun e ing he e hics o sel and o he s
in au oe hnog aphy: Challenging he ex an and explo ing possibili ies. The Quali a i e
Repo , 27(12),2671-2685. h ps://doi.o g/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5572
Dionne, É. (2020). Slowing down wi h non-human ma e : The con ibu ion o eminis new
ma e ialism o slow schola ship. In V. Bozalek, M. Zembylas, & J. C. T on o (Eds.),
Pos human and poli ical ca e e hics o econ igu ing highe educa ion pedagogies
(pp. 91-106). Rou ledge.
Du án He as, M. Á, (2018). La iqueza in isible del cuidado. Uni e si a de Valencia.
Geli, C. (2018). Byung-Chui Han. El País. Feb ua y 7 h, 2018,
h ps://elpais.com/cul u a/2018/02/07/ac ualidad/1517989873_086219.h ml#?p m=co
py_link
Gell, A. (2021). The an h opology o ime: Cul u al cons uc ions o empo al maps and
images. Rou ledge.
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 983
Ha dy, A., Mu ay, R., Thow, M., & Smi h, M. (2020). “So maybe I´m no such an impos e ”:
Becoming an academic a e li e as a eache -p ac i ione . Highe Educa ion Resea ch
and De elopmen , 41(1), 163-176. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/07294360.2020.1835835
He nandez, K. A. C., Chang, H., & Ngunji i, F. W. (2017). Collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy as
mul i ocal, ela ional, and democ a ic esea ch: Oppo uni ies, challenges, and
aspi a ions. a/b: Au o/Biog aphy S udies, 32(2), 251-254.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288892
He nández-So o, R., Rod íguez-Medina, J., & Gu ié ez-O ega, M. (2020). Con ianza e
in e cambio de conocimien o en una comunidad de p ác ica ansdisciplina : un caso de
es udio de con e gencia pa alelo. RELATEC, 19(2), 47-63.
h ps://dialne .uni ioja.es/se le /a iculo?codigo=7735505
He e o, Y. (2012). P opues as eco eminis as pa a un sis ema ca gado de deudas. Re is a de
economía c í ica, 13, 30-54.
h ps://dialne .uni ioja.es/se le /a iculo?codigo=3926562
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplina y discou ses. Social in e ac ions in academic w i ing. Pea son
Educa ion Limi ed.
Jand ić, P. (2022). Alone- ime and loneliness in he Academia. Pos digi al Science and
Educa ion, 4(3), 633-642. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s42438-022-00294-4
King, B. W. (2014). T acing he eme gence o a communi y o p ac ice: Beyond p esupposi ion
in sociolinguis ic esea ch. Language in Socie y, 43, 61-81.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1017/S0047404513000870
Lapada , J. C. (2017). E hics in au oe hnog aphy and collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy.
Quali a i e Inqui y, 23(8), 589-603. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1077800417704462
La he , P. A., & S . Pie e, E. A. (2013). Pos quali a i e esea ch. In e na ional Jou nal o
Quali a i e S udies in Educa ion, 26(6), 629-633.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
La e, J., & Wenge , E. (1991). Si ua ed lea ning: Legi ima e pe iphe al pa icipa ion.
Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Mackinlay, E., Madden, K., Mickelbu gh, R., & G een, M. (2022). W i ing adically as women
wi h Vi ginia Wool : Why? Quali a i e Inqui y, 28(3-4), 333-343.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/10778004211066879
No dbäck, E., Hakonen, M., & Tiena i, J. (2022). Academic iden i ies and sense o place: A
collabo a i e au oe hnog aphy in he neolibe al uni e si y. Managemen Lea ning,
53(2), 331-349. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/13505076211006543
Owens, L. W. (2016). Re lec ions o a p academic: A jou ney om social wo k p ac i ione o
academic. Re lec ions: Na a i es o P o essional Helping, 22(1), 37-43.
h ps:// e lec ionsna a i eso p o essionalhelping.o g/index.php/Re lec ions/a icle/ ie
w/1410
Pa ke , M., & Jay, D. (2014). The McUni e si y: O ganiza ion, managemen and academic
subjec i i y. O ganiza ion, 2(2), 319-338. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/135050849522013
Peele-Eady, T. B., & Moje, E. B. (2020). Communi ies as con ex s o lea ning. In N. Nasi ,
C. Lee, R. Pea & M. de Roys on (Eds.), Handbook o he cul u al ounda ions o
lea ning (pp. 230-246). Rou ledge.
Phan, A. N. Q. (2022). The emo ional geog aphies o being s anded due o COVID-19: A
poe ic au oe hnog aphy o an in e na ional doc o al s uden . Cul u al S udies↔C i ical
Me hodologies, 22(1), 66-75. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/15327086211054049
Pillow, W. (2003). Con ession, ca ha sis, o cu e? Re hinking he uses o e lexi i y as
me hodological powe in quali a i e esea ch. In e na ional Jou nal o Quali a i e
S udies in Educa ion, 16(2), 175-196. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/0951839032000060635
Shaw, O. (2022). Misguided allegiances, misjudged weaknesses, and mixed messages in pee
984 The Quali a i e Repo 2024
e iew. In P. Habibie & S. Bu gess (Eds.), Schola ly publica ion ajec o ies o ea ly-
ca ee schola s (pp. 77-93). Palg a e Macmillan, Cham. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-
3-030-85784-4_5
Schilling, E., & König, A. (2020). Challenging imes—Me hods and me hodological
app oaches o quali a i e esea ch on ime. Fo um o Quali a i e Social Resea ch,
21(2), A icle 2. h ps://doi.o g/10.17169/ qs-21.2.3508
S . Pie e, E. A. (2021). Why pos quali a i e inqui y? Quali a i e Inqui y, 27(2), 163–166.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1077800420931142
Young, T., C inall, S., & Malone, K. (2022). Dis up ions o pos -quali a i e educa ion esea ch:
Tensions and openings. Quali a i e Inqui y, 28(3-4), 312-321.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/10778004211038255
Wenge , E. (1998). Communi ies o p ac ice. Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Willmo , H. (1995). Managing he academics: Commodi ica ion and con ol in he
de elopmen o uni e si y educa ion in he U.K. Human Rela ions, 38(8), 1135-1149.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/001872679504800902
Au ho No e
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3784-2266) is an assis an
p o esso a he Facul y o Educa ion Educa ion, Philosophy and An h opology o he
Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU (Spain) and a membe o he Elka ike uz
esea ch g oup (IT1586-22). She has been he language coo dina o o Uni e si y S udies
Ab oad Conso ium and a Spanish language eache o mo e han wen y yea s. A e COVID-
19 she jobs and s a ed eaching a he Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU ull ime.
He esea ch ocuses on language acquisi ion, pa icula ly in s udy ab oad con ex s, educa ional
echnology, li e acy, and language pedagogy in gene al. Please di ec co espondence o
asuncion.ma [email protected]
Ainge u Gu ié ez-Cabello Ba agán (ORCID ID: h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0001-6841-
1170) is an assis an p o esso a he Facul y o Educa ion, Philosophy and An h opology o
he Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y UPV/EHU (Spain) and a membe o he Elka ike uz
esea ch g oup (IT1586-22). His esea ch ac i i y ocuses on you h lea ning, a s-based
esea ch and new ma e ialisms. He has pa icipa ed in p ojec s ela ed o he cons uc ion o
he iden i y o Ea ly Childhood Educa ion eache s du ing ini ial aining and he i s yea s o
wo k (Minis y o Economy and Compe i i eness, EDU2010-20852-C02-02), as well as he
lea ning o p e-school and p ima y school eache s (Minis y o Economy, En e p ise and
Compe i i eness, EDU2015-70912-C2-2-R). His la es p ojec ocuses on he lea ning
ajec o ies o young uni e si y s uden s (TRAY-AP, PID2019-108696RB-I00). Please di ec
co espondence o ainge u.gu ie [email p o ec ed]
Es ibaliz Abe as u i-Ap aiz (ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7827-0850) has a BA in Fine A s
and a PhD in Educa ional Sciences. She is a ull p o esso and esea che a he Facul y o
Educa ion, Philosophy and An h opology o San Sebas ian, Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y
UPV/EHU (Spain). The esea ch and eaching ca ee is mainly associa ed wi h eache
educa ion, pedagogical inno a ion and esea ch and lea ning o he isual a s in educa ional
con ex s. She is he p incipal Resea che a Elka ike uz (IT1586-22), he consolida ed
esea ch g oup in he Basque uni e si y sys em esea ched in he p esen a icle. Please di ec
co espondence o [email p o ec ed]
Jose Miguel Co ea Go ospe (ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6570-9905) is ull p o esso a
he Facul y o Educa ion, Philosophy and An h opology o he Uni e si y o he Basque
Coun y (UPV/EHU) and one o he unding membe s o he Elka ike uz esea ch g oup
(IT1586-22). His eaching and esea ch ac i i y ocuses on ini ial and ongoing eache
Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz e al. 985
educa ion, inclusi i y, and digi aliza ion om a pos human and new ma e ialis pe spec i e.
Like Ainge u and Es i xu, he has been pa o he p ojec TRAY-AP, PID2019-108696RB-I00,
ocusing on he lea ning ajec o ies o young uni e si y lea ne s. He belongs o he REUNID
ne wo k o educa ional inno a ion and esea ch. Please di ec co espondence o
jm.co eago [email protected]
Acknowledgemen : We hank Wendy Baldwin o he edi ing help and pa icula ly o
making su e ha he English ansla ion kep he same egis e and one as he o iginal
igne es.
Copy igh 2024: Asunción Ma ínez-A belaiz, Ainge u Gu ié ez-Cabello Ba agán,
Es ibaliz Abe as u i-Ap aiz, José Miguel Co ea Go ospe, and No a Sou heas e n Uni e si y.
A icle Ci a ion
Ma ínez-A belaiz, A., Gu ié ez-Cabello Ba agán, A., Abe as u i-Ap aiz, E., & Co ea
Go ospe, J. M. (2024). Juggling academic p ac ice and ca e: Collabo a i e
au oe hnog aphy wi hin a Basque uni e si y esea ch g oup. The Quali a i e Repo ,
29(4), 968-985. h ps://doi.o g/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6627