A Review of the European Union’s Gender Approach in Its Support for the Colombian Peace Process

European Union Support for Colombia’s Peace Process Civil Society, Human Rights and Territorial Peace Edited by Karlos Pérez de Armiño RETHINKING PEACE AND CONFLICT STUDIES SERIES EDITORS: OLIVER P. RICHMOND · ANNIKA BJÖRKDAHL · GËZIM VISOKA Editor Karlos Pérez de Armiño Hegoa, Institute for International Cooperation and Development Studies University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Bilbao, Spain ISSN 1759-3735 ISSN 2752-857X (electronic) Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ISBN 978-3-031-24796-5 ISBN 978-3-031-24797-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24797-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2023. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherw ise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained her ein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover design by © MC Richmond This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Natur e Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland CHAPTER 8 A Review of the European Union’s Gender Appr oach in Its Support for the Colombian Peace Process Irantzu Mendia Azkue 1Introduction In Colombia, for decades the women’s and feminist movement experienced a marginalization of their analyses, indictments and proposals with regard to political and scholarly inquiry into the causes and consequences of the armed conflict. However, its strong dynamism and growing capacity for political impact have been crucial for the inclusion of gender as part of the “differential perspective” which has permeated the current peace process, to the extent that the gender appr oach and the positions of the women’s movement and, to a lesser degree, the LGBTI movement—now have a presence in the discussions about the armed conflict, the 2016 Peace Agreement and its implementation. As a result, the case of I. Mendia Azkue (B) Hegoa, Institute for Development and International Cooperation Studies, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2023 K. Pérez de Armiño (ed.), European Union Support for Colombia’s Peace Process, Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24797-2_8 209 210 I. MENDIA AZKUE Colombia is considered internationally as a peace process that is conceptually and politically innovative due to the importance given to the gender approach and to sex-gender diversity during the negotiations and in the Peace Agreement itself. Within this framework, for international actors who support the Colombian peace process, such as the European Union (EU), their involvement in the gender and peace agenda has become both an unavoidable matter and an opportunity to establish a reputation and leadership in this area. The EU has reiterated its support for observance of the Peace Agreement and the institutional ar chitecture created in relation to it (European Parliament, 2021). This has also meant supporting the set of gender measures in the Agreement, in a political-institutional and partly social context that puts barriers in the way of implementing them, and which has pr oven hostile to the gender provisions it contains. In fact, this matter was a vital one for the No supporters in the referendum organized by the Juan Manuel Santos government in order to endorse the Agreement. Among other arguments, they invoked the formula of “gender ideology” to spread fake news that attributed to the Peace Agreement, for example, the imposition of sex education, the removal of children from their parents’ custody, and support for abortion (Gil Hernández, 2020). The consequences have been negative from the point of view of human rights and peacebuilding in the country. In the revision of the agreement that took place after the referendum, these sectors managed to have the gender approach understood as a “women’s issue”, expurgating contents covering the rights of the LGBTI population, including traditional definitions regarding the family and working to “remove sexual and reproductive rights from the heart of the social pact” (Gil Hernández, 2020). Despite this backward movement, or perhaps precisely because of it, Colombia has offered the EU an opportunity to take on a role, both self-proclaimed and desir ed, of leadership in favour of gender equality. The goal of this chapter is to carry out an analysis of the gender approach in EU cooperation in Colombia and its transfor mational potential in term s of moving towards a peace that includes gender justice, understood as the end of inequalities and subordination between genders (Goetz, 2007). In order to do this, I will firstly offer some background to the inclusion of the gender approach in the peace process and the central role played in this by the Colombian women’s and feminist movement. Secondly, I will look at the gender and peace agenda in the EU’s 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 211 cooperation in Colombia, based both on the pertinent body of regulations and how the gender approach has been implemented in its initiatives supporting the peace process. At the methodological level, this study is essentially based on a bibliographical review and documentary analysis of, mainly, EU regulatory and planning texts related to the gender agenda and peacebuilding, as well as documents regarding the application of the gender approach in the European cooperation instruments employed in Colombia. It is important to underline the fact that these instruments are very diverse and they have been implemented for many years, and so this analysis can in no way, in intention or in fact, be exhaustive. In this respect, I add three considerations: firstly, to order the analysis I follow the description of instruments proposed by the European Cooperation in Colombia’s Information System (known as SICEC)1 ; secondly, I describe the assessments of the EU’s most recent actions related to the gender and peace agenda in the country (projects underway or recently finalized); and lastly, in reviewing projects I have taken as a criterion the appearance of aspects related to “gender”, “gender equality”, “women’s empowerment” and/or “LGBTI population” in their titles, descriptions, goals and/or indicators. Additionally, I have interviewed two people with technical responsibilities in the EU Delegation in Colombia, and representatives of two networks of Colombian women’s organizations with experience in carrying out European cooperation projects. 2Background to the Inclusion of the Gender Approach in the Peace Process: The Leading Role of the Women’s Movement In Colombia, the women’s and feminist movement has played an outstanding role for decades in terms of organizing and mobilising towards a negotiated solution to the armed conflict, in bringing to light violence against women, and in demanding truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-repetition (Gallego Zapata, 2017; Gómez & Montealegre, 2021). It is a broad and diverse movement, which includes different feminist currents, and which often acts by joining temporary or permanent networks and associations of groups. 1 https://sicec.eu/basic/. 212 I. MENDIA AZKUE In the period 1982 to 2017, women’s organizations became involved in 363 collective pro-peace actions, as organizers in 33% and as participants in 67% of the cases, which shows that it is a social movement with a considerable capacity to build alliances with other sectors of civil society. The majority were actions that were against the armed conflict, and violations of human rights and International Humanitarian Law, and about seeking peaceful alternatives and in favour of dialogue processes and n egotiated outcomes. These actions have included a broad range of methods, for example: marches and rallies, meetings, forums and seminars, cultural events, actions oriented at memory, civil resistance actions, collective statements, walkouts and strikes (Parr ado Pardo, 2018:4–6). During the peace negotiations held in Havana between the Colombian government and FARC-EP, the women’s movement managed to promote the creation of a Gender Subcommittee, in September 2014, with the goal of including the gender perspective in the partial agreements already adopted, as well as in the eventual Agreement that resulted from the dialogues. As a r esult of the work of this subcommittee, the gender approach of the Peace Agreement included content in eight specific areas: (1) Access and formalization of rights to rural property under equality of conditions; (2) Guarantee of economic, social and cultural rights of women and people with diverse sexual identities fr om the rural population; (3) Promotion of the participation of women in r epresentation, decision-making and conflict resolution spaces; (4) Prevention and protection measures that attend to specific risks for women; (5) Access to the truth and j ustice, and to guarantees of non-repetition; (6) Public recognition, non-stigmatization and dissemination of the work done by women as political subjects; (7) Institutional management for the strengthening of women’s organizations and LGBTI movements for their social and political participation; and (8) Separate infor mation s ystems. Since 2016, the women’s movement in Colombia has contributed to the implementation of the Peace Agreement in the different territories. The conditions of violence and discrimination in which this task has been car ried out are alarming. The already high rates of femicide, the most important indicator of the levels of inequality between women and men, have increased since the Peace Agreement. In the period between 2017 and 2021, 2,722 femicides were registered in the country, with four provinces leading in ter m s of the prevalence of this crime: Antioquia (488), Valle del Cauca (397), Cauca (181) and Bogotá D.C. (161) (Observatorio Feminicidios Colombia, 2021). That is to say, the Peace 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 213 Agreement has not brought a reduction in the levels of violence against women in Colombia, as expressed in femicides. The same happens with violence against LGBTI people, given the average of 110 murders per year since 2011 and a considerable increase to 226 in 2020, an especially violent year for this group. The Report on the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans Persons in Colombia report, whose title eloquently states Nada que celebrar (“Nothing to Celebrate”), registers 1,060 victims, including victims of threats (443), murder (333) and police violence (284) in 2019 and 2020. Most victims are located, once again, in Antioquia, Valle del Cauca and Bogotá D.C. (Colombia Diversa, 2020). From a territorial point of view, the greatest number of feminist peace actions between 1982 and 2017 were concentrated in Antioquia (25%), Bogotá D.C (21%), Santander (14%) and Valle del Cauca (9%) (Parrado Pardo, 2018). That is to say, in three of the four provinces where the highest rates of femicides have occurred in the last five years (as well as murders of LGBTI people in 2020). This could indicate a certain relationship between the dynamic of pro-peace feminist activism and the terr itorial occurrence of femicide. In fact, this occurrence reflects a geography of violence that is much more complex than the one offered in the usual analyses of the conflict, which focus on the variability of the areas of territorial control by the armed actors. Furthermore, according to figures from the Somos Defensores Programme (2020), between 2013 and 2019 1,338 incidents of violence against women human rights defenders were registered, 31% of the total attacks on defenders. The figures for attacks on them have increased, particularly within the framework of the implementation of the Peace Agreement, with a greater percentage rise (165%) when compared to attacks on men defenders (a rise of 116%), and a significant increase since 2018. Many women defenders, whether in women’s organizations or peasant, indigenous, Afro-descendent, popular, victims’ and sexual diversity organizations, have stood out for their work in favour of peace, in such a way that, both before and after the Peace Agreement, women and their organizations are a target of violence. In this context of structural violence against women and LGBTI people throughout the country, both sectors emphasize the fact that peace demands a profound transformation of the set of discriminatory, unequal and violent relations in Colombian society. In this regard, they point to the ways in which sexist, homophobic, transphobic, racist, classist and colonial relations feed on each other and are behind the armed 214 I. MENDIA AZKUE conflict itself and the construction of violent masculinities that contribute to maintaining it. Upon these bases, the feminist movement, as a diverse political subject, has been crucial to include the differential approach in the Colombian peace process. This covers not only the gender approach and sexual diversity, but also approaches that consider ethnic affiliation, age or life cycle and disability, as well as dealing with psychosocial and cultural matters, as has been assumed by the Colombian Truth Commission. The articulation of approaches based on intersectionality is a feminist contribution that challenges both the Colombian State, given its patriarchal, heteronormative, racist and classist foundations (Curiel, 2013), and the international cooperation, still saturated with essentialist views regarding the gender and peace agenda (Mendia Azkue, 2014)and with legacies of colonial modernity (Gómez Correal, 2016; Gómez Corr eal & Montealegre Mogrovejo, 2021). 3The European Union’s Gender and Peace Agenda in Colombia 3.1 International and Regional Regulatory References The actions taken by the EU in Colombia with regard to gender equality are based on various international and European regional instruments. Among the international sources of reference, it is worth highlighting that the Fourth World Conference on Women (United Nations, 1995)urged to adopt the gender mainstr eaming strategy into all public policies and encouraged an interest in gender as a key dimension of the international peace and security agenda. For the first time in these kinds of conferences, a working group on Women and Armed Conflicts was created, one of whose results was the adoption of six goals in the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, which respond to strategic interests for the guarantee of women’s rights in situations of armed conflict.2 2 The goals agreed were: (1) Increase the participation of women in conflict resolution at decision-making levels and protect women living in situations of armed or other conflicts or under foreign occupation; (2) Reduce excessive military expenditure and control the availability of armaments; (3) Promote non-violent forms of conflict resolution and reduce the incidence of human rights abuse in conflict situations; (4) Promote women’s contribution to fostering a culture of peace; (5) Provide protection, assistance and training to refugee women, other d isplaced women in need of international protection and internally 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 215 Another r eference point in terms of EU actions in Colombia is Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security passed by the United Nations Security Council (2000). This recognizes differ ent experiences of conflicts according to gender, calls for the protection of women from all kinds of violence against them and urges guarantees in ter ms of their participation in the pr omotion of peace at all decision-making levels. Resolution 1325 (R1325) was considered to be a watershed in terms of regulatory progress in the sphere of gender, conflicts and peacebuilding, largely because the UN Security Council approved it, an entity that had previously not been ready to consider violence against women as an inter national security and peace matter. In fact, the R1325 gave rise to approval by the Security Council of new resolutions on the same matter, contributing to the consolidation of what is known as the International Agenda on Women, Peace and Security (WPS).3 Taken as a whole, this agenda promotes the participation of women in conflict resolution and peacebuilding, the prevention of violence, protection against violence and the rehabilitation of victims. In terms of gender and peace, the R1325 has become the main reference, and occasionally the only one, for governments and multilateral, international and local organizations. This includes the EU, which refers to R1325 much more fr equently than to the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. In any case, this Resolution does not contain binding commitments for States (and so ther e are no international mechanisms for demanding compliance), but rather it leaves to the discretion of countries whether or not they pass a National Action Plan (NAP) for its application, both in terms of domestic and foreign policy.4 Lastly, at the international level, the UN’s Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have now become a dimension to be mainstreamed at all levels in EU actions, particularly in its cooperation instruments (Sanahuja & Ruiz Sandoval, 2019). Therefore, SDG number 5, “Achieve gender equality and empower displaced women; and (6) Provide assistance to women in colonies and non-self-governing territories (United Nations, 1995: paragraphs 131–149). 3 These are UNSC Resolutions 1820 (2008); 1888 (2009); 1889 (2009); 1960 (2010); Resolution 2106 (2013); Resolution 2122 (2013); Resolution 2242 (2015); Resolution 2067 (2019); Resolution 2493 (2019) and Resolution 2538 (2020). 4 Colombia is one of the countries that has not yet passed a National Action Plan for the implementation of R1325, despite demands in this regard from numerous women’s organizations in the country. 222 I. MENDIA AZKUE Other European cooperation mechanisms that have similarities with budgetary support programmes are: that known in Spanish as the “Presupuesto-Programa” and the Latin America Investment Facilities (LAIFs).9 In the first case, the eight interventions that were underway in 2018 in Colombia cover matters such as: mine clearance, penal system, transparency, peacebuilding, digital television and public finances, with no sight of actions focusing on gender equality or women’s and/or LGBTI rights. In the second case, the LAIF projects in Colombia are aimed at supporting: the management of water r esources; the sustainable development of cities and regions; and the implementation of a “climate intelligent” rural landscape (SICEC, 2018); similarly, in this case, there are no actions that explicitly, centrally or significantly support gender equality or the empowerment of women and LGBTI communities. b. European Fund for Peace The Eur opean Union Trust Fund for Colombia (EUTF), also known as the Eur opean Fund for Peace, is one of the main instruments by means of which the EU channels its support for the peace process in Colombia, particularly point 1 of the Peace Agreement: Integrated Rural Reform. The Fund is based on six pillars or strategic lines that give focus to the EU’s project-based interventions in the country. Therefore, a description of them offers a fi rst level of information regar ding the inclusion of the gender approach in this instrument (Table 1). A closer look at the projects supported by the European Fund for Peace makes it possible to broaden the analysis. Of the 10 projects classified by the SICEC as in the “gender equality” category as of December 2021, a majority are supported by this fund (66.26%), followed by the EU (32.21%) and Spain (1.53%), which reflects the importance of this instrument, compared to others, in the promotion of this goal in Colombia. Among them, the following stands out: Political and economic territorial empowerment with a focus on rural women. Women transforming Putumayo (2019–2024). This project, designated by the EU as “Women who Transform”, appears as an intervention oriented towards Point 1 of the 9 The LAIFs ar e a mixture of European Union donations with loans fr om financial organisations and other public or private subsidies, both regional and international. 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 223 Table 1 Gender approach in the description of the pillars of the European Fund for Peace Pillar Description Reconciliation and conflict de-escalation Does not explicitly establish goals or actions related to gender equality or the empowerment of women and LGBTI people and their organizations Social and economic reincorporation of former FARC-EP combatants Includes among its areas of action, the “empowerment of women in the process of reincorporation” Social inclusion: youth, women and ethnic groups Aims at the “integrated attention and effective protection of the rights of youth, women and ethnic groups, as well as the promotion of social and cultural initiatives, the generation of income and the strengthening of the social fabric in a way that responds to their interests and needs”. It establishes actions of support specifically for women: participation in economic activities as producers within family units and as entrepreneurs; strengthening of mechanisms for political incidence and participation; prevention of and attention to gender violence, particularly family and sexual violence; and support for women’s organizations in the implementation of their own social and cultural projects Sustainable and inclusive productivity Does not explicitly establish goals or actions related to gender equality or the empowerment of women and LGBTI people and their organizations Legitimacy of the state and local governance Does not explicitly establish goals or actions related to gender equality or the empowerment of women and LGBTI people and their organizations (continued) Peace Agreement, and it is considered by the EU Delegation in Colombia as the most emblematic example of this instrument aimed at women. The main local partner is the Alianza de las Mujeres Tejedoras de Vida del Putumayo, a large network of grassroots women’s organizations created in 2003. At first the funds were channelled through the German Caritas association (acting via the Pastoral Social de Colombia) and, 224 I. MENDIA AZKUE Table 1 (continued) Pillar Description European Union value added Does not explicitly establish goals or actions related to gender equality or the empowerment of women and LGBTI people and their organizations. It aims to capitalize the experience of the EU and visibilize the differential factors of its cooperation, in terms of innovation (in technology and technical knowledge), cooperativism, marketing, democratic values, institution building and public policy design. European skills and knowledge in the areas of “the consolidation of peace, human rights, humanitarian action and/ local development”, and aspires to the “strengthening of the commercial and investment ties and relations between the European and Colombian private sectors” stand out. Gender equality is not mentioned among the values added Source Own elaboration, based on European Fund for Peace (n.d.) after it left the project, through the international NGO, the Interchurch Organisation for Development Cooperation based in the Netherlands. These are two organizations that, in principle, are not characterized by their level of specialization in gender and women’s empowerment. The action, promoted originally by the German and French embassies, has a very high budget—6.34 million Euros—compared to the other actions supporting gender equality and women’s empowerment in Colombia. It was initially directed at women and their organizations, in order for them to develop productive and social projects and gain spaces for political participation and incidence in the territory. However, the project was opened up at an early stage to numerous mixed local organizations, which meant, for the Tejedoras de V i da alliance, an increase in the complexity of managing the project, due to the mandatory reorientation of the subject population, to the many actors involved (135 local organizations), and to the resistance of some mixed organizations to the inclusion of the gender approach and women’s rights in their activities. At the present time, the project—halted on a number of occasions—carries 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 225 out three lines of action: women’s rights (including psychosocial and legal attention in cases of gender violence, building women’s organizational and leadership skills, and peacebuilding); economic empowerment of women through production-based initiatives in various industries, particularly the agriculture and fishing sector; and the promotion of legal and sustainable local economies with a gender approach. Looking at the indicators of the results of the action, it can be seen that women are given as the s ubject population in half of them, while in the r est the subjects ar e “people” or “families”. The project has also involved local authorities,10 in that part of the Fund that promotes links between authorities and social organizations. The dynamics of interrelation in this case add complexity to the project, particularly when situations arise such as: a lack of political will to keep commitments that have been taken on, omission of institutional responsibility in guaranteeing women’s rights, strongly-rooted clientelism and even corruption. Given these kinds of difficulties, and despite the efforts of the Tejedoras de Vida alliance as the main local partner, the sustainability of the social and productive processes generated by the project can be seriously questioned. Another gender and peace action supported by the Fund for Peace, although with a substantially smaller contribution from the EU (522,000 Euros), is the project MIA: Mestiza, Indígena, Afrodescendiente (“Mixed race, indigenous, Afro-descendent women”), aimed to facilitate the transition to civilian life of women ex-combatants in parts of Caquetá and Chocó through personal, economic and political empowerment. This initiative is oriented at the fund’s second pillar, regarding the reincorporation of former FARC-EP members. Other Fund for Peace projects do not mainstream the gender approach throughout their activities, although they may contain occasional actions with women, for example: the Sustainable territories of Caquetá for peace: a commitment to building development, peace and legal observance in post-conflict Caquetá municipalities,orthe Ter ritorial development in the Department of Nariño in conditions of peace initiative. In the first case, the subject referred to in the results indicators is families, and only in 10 Alcaldías (municipal councils) of Mocoa, Orito, Puerto Asís, Puerto Caicedo, Puerto Guzmán, Puerto Leguízamo, San Miguel, Valle del Guamuez and Villagarzón, as well as the Gobernación (departmental government) of Putumayo. 226 I. MENDIA AZKUE one indicator out of 20 is there a reference to women, when a reference is made to a number of them being effectively linked to citizen participation and development processes promoted by the local authorities. In the second case, women appear as the target group in actions for promoting the participation of civil society, together with other subjects such as producers, youth and victims of the conflict. In more detail, only two of the 19 project indicators mention women, referring to the number of them who access protection of and attention to victims of gender violence, as well as economic empowerment attention services set up by the project. c. IcSP projects The Instrument Contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP) is the instrument par excellence of the European External Action Service (EEAS) to guarantee the pr evention of conflicts and situations of crisis or threats in stable countries and to strengthen security and peacebuilding in countries in crisis. Of the 15 IcSP projects carried out in Colombia, with a total budget of 27.9 million Euros (SICEC, 2018), not a single one can be seen, based on its title, to indicate that it is directed at transforming gender relations or the empowerment of women and/or LGBTI people. Taking as a basis the conclusions and recommendations of the Evaluation of IcSP actions supporting the Colombian Peace Process report (Guardans et al., 2019: 46–53), in only one of the 13 projects assessed is there a reference to the gender question. This is the Barometer Initiative: technical support to official verification of the application of the peace agreement in Colombia, included among the EU cooperation actions supporting initial implementation of the Peace Agreement. Women’s organizations are cited among the sources for data for this initiative, which supervises the observance of 578 Peace Agreement commitments, including the gender measures provided for. It can be said, then, that the sum total of IcSP projects that prioritize gender equality in the activities supported is rather a low one. d. European Parliament Pilot Pr ojects and Preparatory Actions The European Parliament Pilot Projects and Preparatory Actions (PP-PAs) are “tools for the formulation of political priorities and the 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 227 introduction of new initiatives that can eventually become specific European Union activities and programmes with their own budgetary lines” (SICEC, 2018). They have an experimental nature and they act to test the viability and usefulness of an action. European cooperation supports three PP-PAs in Colombia, two of which promote economic-labour initiatives and access to productive, financial and commercial resources and land for women in southern Cauca. The projects are: Economic autonomy and empowerment of rural women in South Cauca,and Economic and social empowerment of rural women in the Alto Patía region in the south of Cauca department, as a commitment to peacebuilding and territorial development. Both have the same budget, 0.83 million Euros, the first with an EU contribution of 0.75 million Euros and the second of 0.68 million. These are actions aimed at the empowerment of rural women that are in line with the women’s autonomy focus and respond to strategic gender interests.11 The third pilot project, Harvests of peace: A sustainable investment for peace, with a total budget of 1.875 million Euros and an EU contribution of 1.5, seeks the “reactivation of the economy of small peasant producers in the department of Cauca”. It does not have a gender focus nor is it aimed at benefitting women, but rather “families”, and it presents as a positive result the participation of women in leading productive processes. No women’s or LGBTI organizations lead any of the three projects. e. Thematic lines of European cooperation The EU implements six thematic cooperation programmes in Colombia: four that are part of the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) (Support for non-state actors and local economic development, Environment, Investing in people and Managing migration and migratory irregularities); the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), and Food Security (IFS-FOOD) (SICEC, 2018). Of the six thematic programmes, with a total of 45 projects, we find actions explicitly related to gender equality or the empowerment of women or the LGBTI population in three of them, with a total of eight 11 The women’s autonomy focus works based on the notion that this autonomy has various dimensions: physical, decision-making and economic. These permanently interact, in such a way that they cannot be either understood or dealt with in an isolated way. 228 I. MENDIA AZKUE projects (17.7%). They have a budget of 1.32 million Euros, that is to say, only 2.3% of the total sum of the projects. Firstly, and by way of example, the DCI programmes include the Effective participation of women in monitoring the implementation of the PA and vigilance of security conditions for women’s organizations and platforms committed to a stable and lasting peace in Colombia project. This is the only one focussing on support for women’s organizations and the only one carried out directly by an organization in this sector, namely the Ruta Pacífica de las Mujeres. Secondly, in the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights, in whose description women and LGBTI people appear as “vulnerable groups”, of the 11 projects underway in 2018, four have an explicit link with the gender appr oach or the empowerment of women or the LGBTI population. Among them, the project Reinforcing the strategic work of the defence and enforceability of the human rights of the LGBT population in Colombia, as a guarantee for the development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law (2015–2017), specifically attends to the rights of the LGBTI population and is executed by an organization within this movement, namely Colombia Diversa. In June 2021 the number of projects in this line fell to six, with the gender approach appearing in two, in the description of their added value: the project Safeguarding peace. Actions aimed at community protection, defence of human rights and the construction of historical memory in indigenous communities of the departments of Chocó and Antioquia,which seeks “the participation of girls and women in community leadership spaces”; and the project Protection of leaderships for an inclusive democracy, carried out in Guajira, César and Córdoba, which recognizes that violating the human rights of political, social and community leaders “particularly affects women”. A women’s, feminist or LGBTI organization had carried none of these projects out. 4Conclusions The European Union is an influential actor in terms of the i nternational peace and security agenda. In its exterior action, its positions in favour of democracy, human rights, the participation of civil society and gender equality in the prevention of conflicts and peacebuilding have offered it a source of legitimacy with r espect to other international actors. 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 229 However, the abundant EU documents that point to gender equality and women’s empowerment as a priority in its exterior action are only partly reflected in European cooperation in Colombia. It is not possible to conclude from this review, based on documents and interviews, that gender mainstreaming has been achieved in the instruments implemented and in the projects supported in the country, although the EU Delegation is making efforts in this direction. It is likely that the pathway indicated in the new EU Gender Action Plan (GAP III) will enable new levels of progress and impact, given that by 2025 85% of its actions are supposed to contribute to gender equality and the empowerment of women. In general, EU projects in Colombia that explicitly include the matter of gender equality and women’s empowerment seek: (a) to increase women’s participation in community spaces that create multi-actor dialogue and in political and decision-making processes at the institutional level; (b) strengthen the skills of women as regards the prevention of violence and peacebuilding; and (c) sustain women’s economic and social empowerment processes. The instrument through which the EU is, to the greatest extent, promoting these goals is the European Fund for Peace, which funds the majority of the pr ojects included by the SICEC in the gender equality category. An outstanding example is the Putumayo-based “Women who Transform”, a major initiative and one that represents an example with a terr itorial focus by the Fund. Once it has been completed and assessed, this project could result in important learnings for future EU gender actions. Taking everything into account, it can be proposed that these kinds of experiences indicate the need to place special attention on matters such as: the level of completeness of the political, socio-economic and organizational analyses of the contexts in which they ar e occurring; the operational difficulties resulting from the Fund’s complex administrative procedures, which require high administrative capacities from the grassroots organizations involved; definition of the inter mediary role that international organizations have in the execution and, above all, their level of specialization in gender and women’s empowerment; the relationship and power dynamics between the local partner organizations and the authorities that the Fund involves in the projects; and, linked to this last point, planning for mechanisms that guarantee the sustainability of the productive and social processes created. Together with the Fund’s actions, important projects are the two EU Pilot Projects that promote the economic autonomy and empowerment 230 I. MENDIA AZKUE of rural women. It is interesting to note that these projects have been considered and included in the category of “experimental”, when (physical, political and economic) autonomy is an essential part of the strategic gender interests that have been promoted by the feminist movement for decades. In fact, this kind of project should form part of the habitual actions of the EU, and be granted with sufficient resources to produce notable progress in the autonomy of women and in the transformation of gender inequalities. With respect to the gender approach, it is possible to identify some trends in the gender actions supported by the EU that need be looked at critically: (a) “adding” women to activities that have not necessarily been designed based on critical analyses of the causes of gender inequality; (b) adopting a “ family focus” that presupposes equal impacts on all family members regardless of gender considerations; (c) reinforcing homogenizing and victimizing images of women when they are reduced to the category of “vulnerable groups”; (d) subsuming support for women into actions directed at a diverse group of civil society subjects, particularly youth and ethnic populations, without attending to their differentiated realities; (e) suffering from a lack of integrated gender and intersectionality focuses with the potential to reflect the matrix of inequalities rooted in the patriarchy, capitalism and colonialism that puts obstacles in the way of implementing peace; (f) lacking a dual strategy that, while promoting the integration of the gender perspective in existing cooperation instruments, also develops a specific line of action with its own funding. In terms of financial resources, it is evident that the EU’s narrative regarding the centrality of gender equality does not correspond to the sums it is allocating to this objective in Colombia. This is a recurring political incoherence that affects the forms of action of most international cooperation actors, not only in Colombia. At least until now, the EU has not allocated funds for gender equality in significant amounts and in proportions able to create substantial transformations in either social relations or in the living conditions of women and LGBTI people in this country. Lastly, in terms of the subjects prioritized, if the organized action of the women’s movement in Colombia has enabled the inclusion of the gender approach in the Peace Agreement, a strengthening of the movement’s organizational and mobilizing capacities would seem to be the most probably way of favouring the governmental implementation of the Agreement 8 A REVIEW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION’S GENDER … 231 and in order to achieve important results with regard to gender equality. It might be useful to remember that Colombia has, for decades, had one of the most advanced bodies of regulations and public policies in terms of gender equity, at least in the Latin American region, and that the problem continues to be the r epeated failure to comply with these at all levels of government. However, in its actions regarding women’s participation, the EU does not give sufficient centrality to the movement’s autonomous organization and mobilization when it comes to demanding compliance with existing policies, but rather focuses on the movement’s presence in “government-society dialogue spaces”. This way of acting is according to a “democratic governance” focus that may be ignoring the historical correlation of power that has not been favourable to the country’s social and popular sectors, particularly the women’s movement. This study shows that women’s, feminist and LGBTI organizations are recipients of a considerably lower proportion of European funding and, what is mor e, they do not have permanent mechanisms for dialogue with the EU. This is the result of comparisons with funds aimed at state building and for spaces of inter-institutional articulation created between the EU and the Colombian government, in which the true negotiation and decision-making dynamics regarding the orientation of European cooperation occur. In these unbalanced conditions, pushing for women’s participation to happen in government-society dialogue spaces can act to erode these organizations, stimulate their instrumentalization by the authorities and, in the worst of cases, their persecution through political and penal channels, particularly in those territories where power dynamics resulting from the conflict and high levels of violence against them still last. This last case is a strong argument for, firstly, paying more attention to strengthening the women’s and feminist movement and, secondly, to promoting such dialogue spaces in circumstances in which women’s organizations have a solid local and national position, capacity for r eal incidence and secure conditions. References Colombia Diversa. (2020). Nada que celebrar. Informe de derechos humanos de personas lesbianas, gays, bisexuales y trans en Colombia. Bogotá. Council of the European Union. (2008, December 1). Comprehensive approach to the EU implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 on Women, Peace and Security. 15671/1/08. Brussels.