REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES – NÁRODOHOSPODÁŘSKÝ OBZOR
VOL. 18, ISSUE 2, 2018, pp. 155–176, DOI: 10.2478/ e ecp-2018-0009
© 2018 by he au ho s; licensee Re iew o Economic Pe spec i es / Ná odohospodářský obzo , Masa yk Uni e si y,
Facul y o Economics and Adminis a ion, B no, Czech Republic. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde
he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 3.0 license, A ibu ion – Non Comme cial – No De i a i es.
Mul i-c i e ia E alua ion o he S a e o P o essional
Thea es in he Czech Republic in Te ms o Mixed
Public Goods P o ided o he Ci izens
E a A dielli, Jiří Bečica
1
Abs ac : The p o ision o public goods is an impo an aspec o public sec o man-
agemen , and i is a subjec o speci ic condi ions. Public Goods should be p o ided
e icien ly and in acco dance o consume demand and should mee he p o ide 's poli -
ical and inancial p io i ies as well as o he obliga o y commi men s. An impo an ole
also play he ci izens ha a e inc easingly appealing on he p o ision o high-quali y,
accessible and cos -e ec i e public goods in line wi h he p inciple o “ alue o mon-
ey”. The e alua ion o he p o ided public goods is, he e o e, a opical issue. A pa icu-
la case would be he p o ision o mixed public goods. This a icle deals wi h he opic
o e alua ion o mixed public goods p o ided in he cul u al sec o , speci ically in he
ield o hea es. The basis o he economic alue o cul u al goods (p oduc s) and se -
ices is hei a i y and u ili y alue. Majo di icul ies a e associa ed wi h he e alua-
ion o eely a ailable cul u al goods o cul u al se ices p o ided o non-equi alen
admissions. Cul u al goods o en a e o a high spi i ual alue in he eyes o he public,
bu , a he same ime, hei inancial alue is low. The aim o he pape is o e alua e he
le el o mixed public goods p o ided by Czech p o essional hea es om he pe spec-
i e o echnical and inancial a ailabili y o ci izens. Fo he assessmen o he le el o
p o ided cul u al goods, he mul i-c i e ia e alua ion me hod WSA is used. In e ms o
echnical and inancial aspec s, he esul s o he esea ch demons a e a g ea a iabili y
ac oss o ganiza ions associa ed in he P o essional Thea es Associa ion. The o ganiza-
ions a e anked acco ding o he le el o p o ided mixed public goods om bes o
wo s .
Key wo ds: Assessmen , public goods, p o essional hea es, WSA me hod
JEL Classi ica ion: H41, Z11, Z18
Recei ed: 19 No embe 2018 / Accep ed: 13 Ap il 2018 / Sen o Publica ion: 4 June 2018
1
VSB – Technical Uni e si y o Os a a, Depa men o Public Economics, Sokolská 33, Os a-
a, Czech Republic, e a.a dielli@ sb.cz, [email p o ec ed].
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
156
In oduc ion
Cul u e does no only ep esen ou his o y; i also is he p esen and he u u e. Acco d-
ing o he S a e Cul u al Policy (Minis y o Cul u e o he Czech Republic), cul u e is
he Czech Republic’s "Ticke o he Fu u e" (MKČR, 2015). Cul u e is one o he col-
lec i e public goods whe e he de eloped s a e has a g ea in e es in he p oduc ion and
consump ion; howe e , his does no immedia ely decide he scale and s uc u e o hese
goods. The main goal o cul u e is o cul i a e and educa e. Some o he cos s o he
acquisi ion o cul u al goods come di ec ly om ci izens and consume s and he es is
paid om he budge o s a e o local sel -go e ning uni s.
The subjec o he a icle is he e alua ion o public goods wi h collec i e consump ion
a he le el o p o essional hea es ope a ing in he Associa ion o P o essional Thea es
in he Czech Republic, i.e. a he le el o he cul u al and c ea i e indus ies (CCIs).
Žáko á (2017) also includes in he CCIs a chi ec u e, design, digi al games, ilm, music,
books and p in , ashion, monumen s, ad e ising, so wa e, TV and adio, a s and
c a s.
The aim o he pape is o e alua e he le el o p o ided mixed public goods (wi h a link
o he inancing o hese goods) in he hea e ield in he Czech Republic. The eason o
esea ch he issue o public goods in he ield o scenic a lies in he inding (which is a
ypical common ea u e o mos o he collec i ely p o ided public goods) ha he ma -
ke is unable o e icien ly ensu e he p oduc ion o hese goods wi hou he in e en ion
o he s a e o e i o ial sel -go e nmen .
1. Concep o Public Goods
F om heo e ical poin o iew, public goods a e p oduc s ha a e di icul o keep om
consump ion by nonpaye s (non-excludabili y), and o which anyone can consume as
much as desi ed wi hou educing he amoun a ailable o o he s (non- i al consump-
ion). The sub-ca ego ies o public a e public se ice and public good (p oduc ). In
economic li e a u e, he issue o consump ion o public goods was i s men ioned in he
wo ks o Pa e o and Schwie (1927). The i s de ini ion o public goods is a ibu ed o
P. A. Samuelson (1954) and is based on he pos ula e o economic goods di ided in o
p i a e and public. Public goods a e hen ca ego ized as pu e o mixed, a guing wi h he
p inciple o consump ion o he condi ions o non- i al consump ion and non-
excludabili y om he consump ion o a gi en public good.
The concep o public goods by Samuelson is ollowed by o he au ho s, especially
Musg a e (1959), who ex ended he issue wi h he pe spec i e o inancing om public
budge s. Acco ding o his iew (wi h which he au ho s o his a icle iden i y), among
public goods (bo h pu e and mixed) can be anked hose public se ices and public
goods (p oduc s) which a e inanced en i ely o pa ially h ough he alloca ion unc ion
o public budge s (in he Czech Republic i is he budge o he s a e, egion o
municipali y), ega dless on hei p o ide , which may be bo h p i a e and public. Simi-
la ly, his issue is deal wi h by Och ana e al. (2007).
The issue o public goods (especially public se ices) is b oached by many au ho s, as
can be encoun e ed in wo ks such as A ow (1963), Polli (1993), Samuelson,
No dhaus (2010), S igli z and Rosenga d (2015). Fo example, acco ding o S igli z
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
157
(1997), he imbalances in ma ke p o ision a e he esul o p i a e companies ailing o
pu sue hei na ow in e es s, mos ly seeking o jus maximize p o i s o hei owne s
ha do no bene i he socie y as a whole.
A iew o he ins i u ional na u e is ackled by Béna d (1990) in he con ex o he ques-
ions: "how he se ices a e p o ided o he socie y" and whe he " he e is a demand o
paymen o he ma ke p ice o i he goods a e p o ided ee o cha ge". The goods a e
di ided in o ma ke , semi-ma ke and non-ma ke . Musg a e and Musg a eo á (1994)
s a e: "I we say ha public goods a e secu ed publicly, we mean ha hey a e co e ed
by he budge and a e a ailable ee o cha ge o indi idual consume s. How hey a e
p oduced does no play a ole." Řežucho á (2010) adds ha he p o ision o public
se ices co e s a wide impo ance in he sense o gua an eeing, o ganizing, egula ing,
con olling and inancing o a speci ic public se ice. In e ms o public se ices,
benchma king is an example o one o he me hods o pe o mance e alua ion o o -
ganiza ions, which, acco ding o Nenadál e al. (2008), is de ined as a con inuous p o-
cess o measu ing o p oduc s, se ices, p ocedu es and me hods wi h he la ges com-
pe i o s on he ma ke espec i ely wi h hose businesses and ins i u ions ha ha e a
leading posi ion in he gi en a ea.
2. P oblem Desc ip ions
Acco ding o V abko á e al. (2017) o Va adzin and Bečica (2016), he p o ision o
public goods (p oduc s) and se ices wi h collec i e consump ion ends o be ine icien .
This ine iciency is usually he esul o he ma ke o e hang on he supply side and an
unbalanced (insu icien ) numbe o inqui ing on he demand side. In he cul u e sec o ,
howe e , his imbalance in he ma ke canno be simply sol ed by e.g. educ ion o he
capaci y o he hea e audi o iums, conce halls, exhibi ion space o exhibi ed objec s
and in-s o e objec s. I we wan o p ese e he his o ical iden i y and spa ial a ailabili y
o cul u al goods and se ices o p esen and u u e gene a ions, i is necessa y o sup-
po hem h ough he ounde , i.e. a public budge a s a e le el o local go e nmen
(Musg a e, 1959). Acco ding o Po ůček e al. (2005), he alloca ion o unds om
public budge s depends on he limi ed inancial esou ces and he ac ual poli ical ep e-
sen a ion, whe e he goal is he economic, e icien and e ec i e unc ioning o publicly
es ablished ins i u ions ha p o ide public goods and se ices, including cul u al goods
and se ices.
None heless, hea e is a p i a e good, i al and exclusi e, which is due o poli ical
decision-making subsidized on he basis o ad hoc decision-making by poli ical powe
holde s, usually ci y councillo s, as ci ies and municipali ies a e he mos equen
ounde s o hea es in he Czech Republic. Due o he long- e m compliance o elec ed
ep esen a i es o poli ical powe a local, egional and s a e le el in ensu ing o he
ope a ion o e alua ed hea es and hei p edominan inancing om public budge s
(due o hei lack o inancial sel -su iciency, see V abko á e al. (2017, p. 116), i is, in
ac , he p o ision o publicly p o ided goods.
Gi en he abo e, he p o essional hea es in he Czech Republic chosen o his a icle
a e anked among he p o ide s o mixed public goods (goods and se ices) because
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
158
hei unding is p ima ily ealized h ough he public budge . The ounde s o mos o
he e alua ed hea es a e he municipali ies o he egions (Těšínské di adlo in Český
Těšín, Ho ácké di adlo in Jihla a) o he s a e (Ná odní di adlo – he Na ional Thea e
in P ague). In his a icle, he p o essional hea es a e e alua ed using a mul i-c i e ia
analysis including indica o s o bo h he p o ided mixed public goods and indica o s
desc ibing he ma e ial and echnical cos s necessa y o he p o ision o mixed public
goods.
3. Speci ics o Czech Thea es
In legal e ms o hea es’ exis ence in he Czech Republic as economic uni s, mos
hea es ha e he s a us o he so-called con ibu o y o ganiza ions (o he s a e, egions,
municipali ies). Howe e , he e also a e p i a e hea es (ci ic associa ions, public se -
ice companies) and business hea es. Con ibu o y o ganiza ions ha e been ope a ing
in he Czech Republic o abou 60 yea s. Thei o igins da e back o he middle o he
20 h cen u y and a e associa ed wi h he p e-1989 socialis go e nmen o he Czecho-
slo ak Socialis Republic. The legisla ion o he con ibu o y o ganiza ions ollowed he
o m o o me ly adi ional public law ins i u es o public law (Telec, 1998).
Ac i i ies ca ied ou in he Czech Republic by con ibu o y o ganiza ions o s a e, e-
gions o municipali ies a e in o he Eu opean coun ies pe o med by simila ly con-
cei ed ins i u ions o non-p o i na u e, also wi h legal pe sonali y and public unding
links wi h he public ounde . Such o ganiza ions in F ance, Aus ia o Ge many mos
o en a e es ablished as public ins i u ions and ope a e pa icula ly in he ields o heal h,
educa ion o cul u e ( hea es, museums, galle ies, lib a ies); o mo e in o ma ion see
Lo ě ínský and Mylko á (2011). Con ibu o y o ganiza ions ha engage in cul u al
ac i i ies in he Czech Republic a e no p ima ily p o i -o ien ed (as hey should no be)
bu a e p edominan ly de e mined o he sa is ac ion o cul u al needs and he p ese a-
ion o cul u al iden i y. The budge o he con ibu o y o ganiza ion needs o be com-
piled as balanced and he di e ence be ween budge ed e enues and budge ed cos s is
co e ed by he unds o he ounde (i.e. s a e, egion o municipali y) in he o m o a
con ibu ion o he ope a ion ollowing he ounde 's de ined pe o mances o o he
c i e ia.
The pape e alua es p o essional hea es es ablished by local go e nmen in pa icula .
Municipali ies and egions se up con ibu o y o ganiza ions pu suan o Sec ion 35a o
Ac No. 128/2000 Coll., On Municipali ies and o Sec ion 14 o Ac No. 129/2000 Coll.,
On Regions, in o de o mee he needs o he popula ion, which is ela ed o he inde-
penden compe ence o he e i o ial sel -go e nmen . This includes, amongs o he
hings, he a ea o cul u al de elopmen (Mo á ek and P okůpko á, 2015). In 2015,
hea ical ac i i ies in he Czech Republic we e pe o med by 155 hea es, which man-
aged 180 pe manen hea e scenes. As o he o al numbe o o ganiza ions, hea es
es ablished by p i a e and legal pe sons p e ail in he Czech Republic (abou 2/3 o he
o al numbe ). The la ges concen a ion o p i a e hea es is in la ge ci ies, especially
in and a ound P ague (NIPOS, 2018). Unde e alua ed o ganiza ion (es ablished by he
s a e, egions o municipali ies) which a e membe s o he Associa ion o P o essional
Thea es in he Czech Republic, a e only 28 o ganiza ions, bu hey manage 56 pe ma-
nen scenes and hei sea capaci y is 45% (18,676 sea s) o he o al sea ing capaci y
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
159
ope a ed by pe manen hea e scenes in he Czech Republic. F om a geog aphic pe -
spec i e, he a icle lis s he 28 hea es acco ding o he coun y’s egion hey belong in:
P ague and he Sou h Mo a ian Region (each wi h 4 hea es), he Mo a ian-Silesian
Region (3 hea es each), he Regions o Zlín, Olomouc, H adec K álo é, Libe ec, and
Plzeň, he Cen al Bohemian Region and he Region o Vysočina (2 hea es each). The
o he egions ha e one hea e each lis ed.
4. Assessmen o Public Goods and Public Se ices
The e alua ion and measu emen o o ganiza ions p o iding compa able public goods
and public se ices o he popula ion is ela i ely common. Och ana a al. (2007) s a es
ha he p o ision o public se ices is o en associa ed wi h ex e nali ies and ine icien-
cy in he spending o public unds. This ine iciency hen leads o a lack o esou ces
and a educ ion o he se ices p o ided (Hampl, 2001). The o ganiza ions p o iding
public goods and public se ices in Finland we e e alua ed by, o example, Jä-
äskeläinen (2010). Wi hin he Czech Republic, simila assessmen s we e unde aken, o
example, in he anspo en e p ises o selec ed ci ies (Klieš ik, 2009) o in he e alua-
ion o hospi als, schools (V abko á e al., 2017), lib a ies (S ejskal e al., 2013; Rich e ,
2015) o he ZOO (Bečica, 2016). Mi wallyo á (2014) says ha he main ea u e o he
con ibu o y o ganiza ions ha mos o en p o ide public se ices in he Czech Repub-
lic is non-p o i abili y and he di e ence be ween own e enues and o al cos s is subsi-
dize by he ounde . In his espec , he di e ences in he legal o m o he es ablished
o ganiza ions a e conside ed and i sugges s ha he legal o m is no impo an and ha
mos o he unds needed o he p o ision o public goods and se ices a e p o ided
om public budge s (s a e, egions o municipali ies). The iabili y o o ganiza ions in
he cul u al sec o in he Czech Republic has been analysed by Dos ál and Kislinge o á
(2012). The o eign au ho s engaged in he ield o scenic a s, hea e, cul u e and adi-
ions a e e.g. Meineck (2010) in he USA o Julien (2017), who deals wi h he unc ion-
ing o hea es in Canada. Simila ly in Romania, Co boş and Popescu (2013) s udy he
ole o he hea es in imp o ing o Bucha es compe i i eness. In hei wo k, i can be
obse ed ha he hea e can become a unique cul u al cen e ha con ibu es o a s a-
egic de elopmen o he e i o y.
5. Usage o MCDM Me hods in Public Sec o Assessmen
Se e al me hods a e used o he e alua ion in public sec o . Fo he e alua ion o pub-
lic o ganiza ions in selec ed public sec o s, da a en elopmen analysis (DEA) (Wang, e
al., 2016) o Balanced Sco eca d (Badia and Bo in, 2012; Kaplan and No hon, 2001)
a e used. O he me hods such as economic-size and s uc u al analysis, clus e analysis
o cul u al sa elli e accoun s (UNESCO, 2009) a e also applied. Following he s udy o
Shaou and Yousi (2014), mos ly mul i-c i e ia decision-making me hods (MCDM) a e
used o he e alua ions o he selec ed sec o s o na ional economies. Fo example,
TOPSIS, WSA, VIKOR, AHP a e used o e alua e he pe o mance in heal h sys em
(Ka adayi and Ka sak, 2014) o public anspo a ion se ices (Key an-Ekba ani and
Ca s, 2015). TOPSIS and WSA a e used o assess elec onic se ices in public admin-
is a ion, as seen e.g. in A dielli (2015) o A dielli and Halásko á (2015). WSA is also

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
160
applied o he e alua ion o he le el o public goods p o ided by Czech p o essional
hea es in he p esen ed pape .
6. Ma e ial and Me hods
The a icle ocuses on he e alua ion o he le el o p o ided mixed public goods (wi h
a link o he inancial ensu ing o hese goods) in he hea e ield in he Czech Republic.
This objec i e is accomplished using a model o mul i-c i e ial analysis o a ian s,
whe e he ou pu is he achie emen o he comple e a angemen o he se o a ian s
(indi idual hea es) acco ding o he moni o ed c i e ia ( he le el o p o ided public
goods). The esul s desc ibe he a ailabili y o cul u al goods o moni o ed hea es o
he ci izens in sense o echnical and inancial aspec s and he success a e o indi idual
hea es p o iding cul u al goods and se ices wi h ega d o echnical equipmen and
he inancial aspec o he ope a ion. Due o he limi s o he applied s a is ical me hod,
he esul s o he pape a e no gene alized and no conc e e indi idual conclusions could
hence be d awn.
6.1 Ma e ial and Da a
The as majo i y o he da a used has been ob ained om he annual epo s o hese
hea es o he yea s 2010 and 2015 and om he specialized in o ma ion po al o he
Minis y o Finance o he Czech Republic – IISSP – Moni o (MFČR, 2017). Some
da a ha e also been ob ained h ough p ima y esea ch, especially om he su ey in-
qui y ealized a selec ed hea es. To ob ain compa able da a o hea es is no a simple
ask. The au ho s ha e aced a numbe o da a de iciencies.
Wi hin he e alua ed da a se o indi idual p o essional hea es, he e a e pa ial di e -
ences be ween he compa a i e yea s 2010 and 2015 which a e based on he di e en
da a ha we e o he pu poses o he a icle p ima ily ob ained om he ele an annual
epo s and he p o i and loss s a emen s. Occasionally, he in o ma ion p o ided on he
websi e o a gi en hea e (such as he numbe o sea s o e ed o sale) can sligh ly
di e wi h he in o ma ion p o ided in he o icial annual epo (e.g. CED B no).
The numbe o sea s o indi idual hea es was acqui ed om he a ailable da a (usual-
ly annual epo s) om 2015. Looking in o he annual epo s and in o ma ion on he
hea e’s websi e, he icke sales sys em and a ious p omo ional ma e ials, he da a on
he numbe o sea s o en do no co espond and i is di icul o judge which piece o
in o ma ion o ake as inal. In some cases, hese di e ences can be caused by he ac
ha o some pe o mances o gi en ins i u ion he numbe o sea s is sligh ly di e en
as he numbe gi en in he annual epo e.g. in case o selec ed i les he numbe o
sea s o a pe o mance is empo a ily educed. An example would be he play "The
Li le P ince" p esen ed on he New S age o he Na ional Thea e in P ague. In case o
his pe o mance he speci ied pa o he audi o ium (speci ied numbe o sea s) was
changed as a pa o he s age.
The economic aspec o he ope a ion o hea es is also in luenced, o a ce ain ex en ,
by he s a e o publica ion o in o ma ion acco ding o legal o m. Fo ins ance, he e
could be a di e ence in epo ing in he p o i and loss s a emen s o con ibu o y o -
ganiza ions and business companies o public se ice companies. A p ac ical example
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
161
would be he change o legal o m a “Se e očeské di adlo ope y a bale u“ in Ús í nad
Labem, which was a con ibu o y o ganiza ion o he s a u o y ci y in 2010 and in 2015
was a business company. The ounde o he con ibu o y o ganiza ion was un il 2012
he S a u o y Ci y o Ús í nad Labem, and since 2013 he ounde o he hea e is S a u-
o y Ci y o Ús í nad Labem (50 %) and he Ús í nad Labem Region (50 %). The eason
o he change in he legal o m o he hea e was he ac ha he hea e had been in a
long- e m loss - he income o he hea e was incapable o e en co e he ope a ing
cos s and he ac o s’ ees. As a esul , he S a u o y Ci y pu s he p ope y ( hea e build-
ing) a he alue o CZK 80 million as a sha e capi al in he newly-buil business com-
pany, and he Region pu s in he cash amoun o CZK 20 000, c ea ing a basic capi al o
CZK 80 020 000. Due o he change in legal o m, he new epo ing o economic in-
o ma ion on he hea e's economy has also been included in he p o i and loss s a e-
men and annual epo s. “Se e očeské di adlo ope y a bale u, s. . o.” un o una ely is
no he only hea e ha has changed i s legal o m o e he cou se o ime, and which
makes he mul i-c i e ia compa ison o p o essional hea es mo e complica ed han
migh seem a i s glance.
In spi e o all hese de iciencies, he au ho s o he a icle ha e a emp ed o selec hose
indica o s ha allow mul i-c i e ia compa ison o e alua ed hea es (a ailable o all
e alua ed ins i u ions) and o use his o he e alua ion o he p o ision o mixed public
goods in he ield o scenic a o he o dina y popula ion as hei consume .
6.2 Model and Inpu Da a
Mul i-c i e ia decision models show decision-making issues whe e he consequences o
decisions a e assessed based on mul iple c i e ia. This “mul i-c i e iali y” cha ac e izes
almos e e y decision-making si ua ion. In hese models o mul i-c i e ial analysis o
a ian s, a inal se o a ian s m is gi en, de e mined by n c i e ia. The pu pose o he
models is o ei he ind he bes a ian , o exclude ine ec i e a ian s o o es ablish a
se o a ian s (Šub e al., 2015).
In he modelling p ocess speci ic condi ions o hea e ope a ion as he p o ide o
mixed public goods ha e been aken in o accoun , such as o ganiza ion ensu ing,
p o iding and inancing he cul u al ou pu s. The e alua ion o goods and se ices p o-
ision by p o essional hea es was de i ed om he u ili y unc ion. Wi h ega d o his,
ele an echnical and inancial indica o s ha e been chosen. The indica o s e alua e he
a ailabili y o mixed public goods o ci izens ( echnical indica o s such as he numbe
o places o gen es; inancial indica o s such as he a e age cos o a icke ) as well as
he pe o mance o he o ganiza ion (inpu indica o s such as o al e enues, o al cos s,
wage cos s o ene gy cos s; ou pu indica o s such as he numbe o i les o isi o s). A
speci ic case is ans e s (i is necessa y o conside ha hey go om he ci izens’ own
walle s), and hey a e he e o e p ocessed as minimiza ion c i e ion – he smalle he
subsidy he be e he a ing.
The elemen s o he model o mul i-c i e ia analysis o a ian s:
 a ian s o decisions ai, i=1,…,m (p o essional hea es in he Czech Republic)
 c i e ia j, j=1,…,n used o e alua e he a ian s (16 indica o s)
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
162
 e alua ion (p e e ence) o a ian s acco ding o indi idual c i e ia yij, i=1,…,m,
j=1,…,n
 p e e ence o c i e ia j, j=1,…,n, exp essing hei impo ance
The weigh o c i e ia is de e mined wi h he sco ing me hod. The me hods iden i ying
c i e ia weigh s om he ca dinal in o ma ion abou hei p e e ences assume ha he
e alua o is able o de e mine he o de o impo ance o he c i e ia and he a io o he
impo ance be ween all pai s o c i e ia. The mos commonly used me hod is he sco ing
me hod, which ans o ms he poin assessmen o he impo ance o he c i e ia in o he
o m o he weigh ing ec o . The c i e ia we e e alua ed by wo expe s. The selec ed
c i e ia and hei weigh s a e summa ized in Table 1, and he a ionale behind he inclu-
sion o indi idual c i e ia in he model is desc ibed below he able.
Table 1. Selec ed c i e ia and hei weigh s
No.
C i e ia
Weigh
Impo ance
I1
Numbe o sea s
0.0875
Weigh s o a o al a ea o 0.5.
I2
Numbe o scenes
0.0875
I3
The numbe o ensembles
0.0875
I4
D ama
0.0175
I5
Ope a
0.0175
I6
Ope e a, Musical
0.0175
I7
Balle
0.0175
I8
O he gen es
0.0175
I9
Numbe o i les
0.12
I10
Thea e a endance
0,03
I11
To al e enues
0.0833
Weigh s o a o al a ea o 0.5.
I12
To al cos s
0.0833
I13
A e age icke
0.0833
I14
Founde 's pe capi a con ibu ion
0.0833
I15
Wage cos s
0.0833
I16
Ene gy consump ion
0.0833
To al
1.0000
Sou ce: MFČR, 2017, Annual epo s om 2010-2015, au ho s’ own p ocessing
The au ho s o he pape a e awa e ha weigh ing e alua ion is always e y p oblema ic;
he e o e, a e all ci cums ances we e discussed and conside ed, he same weigh was
assigned o he c i e ia o i s g oup o indica o s (I1 - I10) – 0,5 and second g oup o
indica o s (I11 - I16) – 0,5. The i s se o indica o s has an impac on he size and di e -
si y o he public good p o ided:
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
163
 I1 – I3: Selec ed indica o s a e impo an in e ms o assessing he echnical en-
su ing o he cul u al goods and se ices (numbe s o sea s, scenes, a is ic en-
sembles) and es i y he a ailabili y o goods and se ices o ci izens.
 I4 - I9: The indica o desc ibes he eal a ailabili y o cul u al mixed public
goods o in e p e a i e a o selec ed o ganiza ions (p oduc ion o li e hea e
pe o mances, conce s, ope a o dance pe o mances, g oup ac i i ies, o ches-
as o bands, ac i i ies o indi idual a is s such as ac o s, dance s o musi-
cians). Indica o s I4 -I8 do no only ake in o accoun he o al numbe , bu also
he numbe o indi idual gen es – i is hence di ided in o mo e indica o s.
 I10: The indica o o o al hea e a endance illus a es he popula i y o he
hea e, espec i ely he p o ided mixed public goods.
The second g oup o indica o s hen shows he inancial complexi y o he mixed public
goods p o ided:
 I11 - I14: The indica o s desc ibe he inancial ensu ing o he a ailabili y o he
public goods and se ices o he in e p e a i e a o selec ed o ganiza ions.
To al e enues (including ope a ing subsidies) demons a e iabili y and man-
agemen o he o ganiza ion, o al cos s o secu ing he p oduc ion o public
goods and se ices pe capi a ( he o al cos s a e based on he o icial alues
s a ed in he in o ma ion sys em o he Minis y o Finance o he Czech Re-
public – IISSP – Moni o and hey a e he esul o he sum o i em A o he
P o i and Loss Accoun o he main ac i i y and economic ac i i y), a e age
cos o a icke (showing he app oach o managemen o a public ounde o
p ice se ing, which, in acco dance wi h he Cul u al Policy o he Czech Re-
public, should in he a ea o scenic a s be widely a ailable o public - he inal
consume ), ounde 's pe capi a con ibu ion (showing he willingness o he
ounde o con ibu e o he ensu ing o he ins i u ion's ope a ion, aking in o
accoun he ac ual numbe o isi o s).
 I15: The indica o o o al wage cos s is he sum o he i ems o he P o i and
Loss Accoun o he main ac i i y: labou cos s, s a u o y social insu ance
and s a u o y social cos s. Nei he he ac ual no he ecalcula ed numbe o
employees acco ding o ime job is published in he o icial s a is ics.
 I16: Ene gy cos s o indi idual hea es pe yea
All indica o s a e gi en in he same uni s o each hea e. Using he WSA me hod, he
inpu da a a e con e ed o pe cen age exp essions o dis u b he e ec s o di e en
uni s and scales. The indica o s I1 – I11 ha e been chosen wi h a maximizing cha ac e ,
while he indica o s I12 - I16 we e minimizing.
6.3 Me hods
The mul i-c i e ia decision model was ca ied ou using he WSA me hod. The WSA
me hod (Weigh ed Sum App oach) equi es ca dinal in o ma ion, ca dinal ma ix Y and
ec o o c i e ia weigh s . The ou pu o WSA is he o e all a ing o each a ian and
can be used o o ganize a ian s om bes o wo s . The WSA me hod is based on linea
u ili y unc ion, ollowing he p inciple o u ili y maximiza ion. I he a ian ai eaches
he ce ain alue yij acco ding o c i e ion j, i gi es he use he u ili y ha can be ex-
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
170
F om Table 6 and 7 i is e iden ha he same ou hea es a e included in he i s
ca ego y o bo h 2010 and 2015. I could be concluded ha he p o ision o cul u al
mixed public goods in e ms o he indica o s moni o ed in his a icle is ela i ely s a-
ble o hese ou hea es and hey a e mos success ul in cul u al goods p o ision in he
long e m.
Ca ego y 4 lis s hea es ha a e leas success ul in he p o ision o mixed public goods
in e ms o echnical and inancial aspec s. Bo h in 2010 and 2015 his ca ego y includes
he hea es ”Slo ácké di adlo Uhe ské H adiš ě”, “Di adlo Na záb adlí P aha”, “Di-
adlo ALFA Plzeň”, “Di adlo Šumpe k s. .o.”, “Dej ické di adlo o.p.s.” and
„Se e očeské di adlo ope y a bale u“. F om his esul , i can be concluded ha he
p o ision o cul u al mixed public goods by hese hea es is he wo s o he se o
e alua ed hea es in he Czech Republic in he long e m.
“Slezské di adlo Opa a” alls om ca ego y 3 in 2010 o ca ego y 4 in 2015. The ea-
son is he de e io a ion o he alues o all inancial indica o s and he educ ion o he
numbe o i les ( om 41 o 32). “Mo a ské di adlo Olomouc” also expe iences he
same change in ca ego ies due o he mino wo sening o alues o inancial indica o s
(p ima ily he a e age icke p ice, om CZK 225 in 2010 o CZK 264 in 2015, and he
o al cos s om CZK 120,795,000 in 2010 o CZK 133,580,000 in 2015).
As o “Východočeské di adlo Pa dubice”, an imp o emen in he alues o echnical
indica o s can be obse ed be ween 2010 and 2015 (mainly an inc ease in he numbe o
i les om 29 o 43). This esul mo es he hea e om ca ego y 4 in 2010 o ca ego y 3
in 2015. Imp o emen s in moni o ed indica o s be ween 2010 and 2015 can be also
ound wi h “Ho ácké di adlo Jihla a” ha expe iences he same upg ade wi hin he
yea s.
Mino changes and mo emen be ween ca ego ies 2 and 3 in long e m a e only e iden
o “Klicpe o o di adlo H adec K álo é” and “Měs ské di adlo Kladno”; he se o
hea es lis ed in he ca ego ies o he wise emains unchanged o bo h 2010 and 2015.
This esul shows ha he hea es a e anked simila ly e en in a longe pe iod and he
p o ision o mixed public goods is emaining ela i ely s able in long pe iod.
8. Discussion
The e ha e al eady been au ho s dealing wi h he issues o e alua ions in a and cul u e
non-p o i o ganiza ions ab oad (Tu bide and Lau in, 2009; Badia and Bo in, 2012;
Kaplan and No hon, 2001; Cai and Wang, 2012). Fo example, DCA (2014) has de el-
oped a new in eg a ed quali y assessmen me hod, which add esses di e en a ibu es
o he hea e as a space used o cul u al ac i i ies and helps o o e he public he ull
alue o a s and cul u al ac i i ies. Whe eas Bo g (2017) has assessed eigh hea es in
Valle a and he G and Ha bou Region. He has also examined he ci y o Vic o ia in
Mal a. The sample consis ed o i e public hea es, wo communi y hea es and one
belonging o he Uni e si y o Mal a. This quali y assessmen add essed echnical issues,
social and cul u al aspec s, managemen and inancial cons ain s, and o he aspec s
con ibu ing o he quali y.
The ocus has gene ally been mainly on he pe o mance e alua ion o he o ganiza ions.
Howe e , we ha e no ound any simila ly o ien ed publica ions in he Czech en i on-

Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
171
men . As s a ed by Chia a allo i (2014), pe o mance e alua ion (as means o a go -
e nmen con ol) in he publicly unded cul u e sec o has ecei ed much a en ion in
ecen yea s. This is de e mined by he ac ha he public unds a e limi ed and he
go e nmen s a e unde an inc eased p essu e om ci izens o “gi e alue o money”
(Mihaiu, 2014). Bu in p ac ice, he measu emen o pe o mance in cul u al sec o deals
wi h numbe o di icul ies, such as de ining pe o mance, iden i ica ion o sui able
indica o s o implemen a ion o pe o mance managemen sys em, as s a ed by Mihaiu
(2014). Also, a la ge ange o indica o s has been in oduced o he pu pose o a pe -
o mance measu emen (Key an-Ekba ani and Ca s, 2015). Pe o mance indica o s a e
ypically ocused on inancial measu es (Tu bide and Lau in, 2009), bu non- inancial
indica o s ha e also been conside ed, especially in an examina ion o non-p o i o gani-
za ions (Kaplan and No hon, 2001, Cai and Wang, 2012). The as majo i y o o gani-
za ions in cul u al sec o (non-p o i o ganiza ions pe o ming a is ic disciplines such
as ci cus, dance, music, hea e o a ie y) use mul iple indica o s o measu e hei pe -
o mance (Tu bide and Lau in, 2009).
The au ho s’ objec i e was o selec indica o s allowing mul i-c i e ia compa ison o
selec ed Czech p o essional hea es (a ailable o all e alua ed ins i u ions) and use i
o examine he p o ision o mixed public goods by hea es o ci izens as hei consum-
e s. In e ms o a ailabili y o goods o ci izens, hei echnical and inancial aspec s a e
essen ial and we e hence included in he pape . The hea es ha e been anked acco ding
o he le el o mixed public goods hey p o ide, om he bes alue o o al u ili y o he
wo s .
Howe e , he pu pose o his a icle is no o e alua e he pe o mance o he o ganiza-
ions; he inpu / ou pu a io was no , he e o e, measu ed. E en so he emphasis was
also pu on he ep esen a ion o bo h ypes o indica o s (inpu and ou pu ) and alloca-
ion e iciency. Fo example, he indica o o alue o public expendi u es ( ans e s o
he ounde ) is p ocessed as c i e ia wi h a minimizing cha ac e .
F om he esul s i is e iden ha be ween 2010 and 2015 he e a e no signi ican di e -
ences in he ankings o indi idual hea es. This means ha he e we e no any signi i-
can echnical o inancial changes o e ime ha would p oduce a signi ican inc ease
o dec ease in he le el o p o ided mixed public good. None heless, he esul s show
signi ican di e ences be ween indi idual p o essional hea es in he le el o cul u al
mixed public goods p o ided in e ms o echnical and inancial ensu ing. The le el o
public goods p o ided by he wo s -pe o ming hea e is in 2010 abou 50 % and in
2015 39 % lowe han by he bes - anking hea e.
In he long un, he highes le el o mixed public goods is p o ided by he ollowing
hea es: “Jihočeské di adlo České Budějo ice”, “CED B no”, “Di adlo J.K. Tyla Plzeň,
p.o.” and “Ná odní di adlo P aha”. These o ganiza ions ha e he same cha ac e is ics in
e ms o he moni o ed indica o s. They ha e p o en o ha e he bes alues o echnical
indica o s such as he numbe o sea s, scenes and i les p esen ed. Wi hin he ame-
wo k o inancial indica o s, hese hea es achie e he highes o al e enues and o e
lowes a e age icke p ices.
Some o he esul s a e somewha mo e su p ising. Fo example, al hough “Měs ské
di adlo B no” has one o he la ges sea capaci ies, he numbe o scenes and i les is
lowe han in he case o he bes a ed hea es; also, he a e age p ice o a icke (436
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
172
CZK) is abo e a e age ( he a e age alue in 2010 was 242 CZK). This esul mo es
his hea e o he 12 h posi ion. On he o he hand, “Jihočeské di adlo České Budějo ice”
has pe o med e y well in 2010 compa ed o “Ná odní di adlo P aha”, despi e i s sea
capaci y being only a hi d o he la e . This is he only hea e apa om “Ná odní
di adlo P aha” wi h ou scenes; i also has he hi d highes numbe o i les pu on.
Addi ionally, i s a e age icke p ice (CZK 325) is only abou a hal o he icke p ice
in “Ná odní di adlo P aha” (681 CZK).
Conclusion
The aim o he a icle is o e alua e he le el cul u al mixed public goods p o ided by
selec ed Czech p o essional hea es. The mul i-c i e ia me hod (WSA) chosen o he
e alua ion has allowed a compa ison o Czech p o essional hea es in e ms o he le el
o mixed public goods hey p o ide. This le el depends on he alues o he 16 echnical
and inancial indica o s selec ed. In he esul s, he hea es a e anked acco ding o hei
le el o mixed public goods p o ided om bes o wo s .
Based on he esea ch on he indi idual membe s o he P o essional Thea e Associa-
ion, i can be s a ed ha hese o ganiza ions a e no simila . Each o ganiza ion is di e -
en in e ms o i s capaci y, inancial possibili ies, managemen , numbe o managed
halls, o a ge ed p oduc ion. The hea es in he Associa ion mainly a e con ibu o y
o ganiza ions; only h ee o he hea es a e limi ed liabili y companies and only h ee
a e companies o gene al in e es . As o he ounde s, he legal o m o he hea e is
only a o mal ma e since hey all a e es ablished and suppo ed by he ci y, he egion
o he Minis y o Cul u e o he Czech Republic. Also, he le el o mixed public goods
p o ided is di e en .
The a icle demons a es he di e en le els o mixed public goods p o ided by Czech
p o essional hea es based on he selec ed in luencing echnical and inancial indica o s
and he mul i-c i e ia decision-making me hod WSA. The highes le el o mixed public
goods p o ided has been iden i ied in he case o “Jihočeské di adlo České Budějo ice”,
“CED B no”, “Di adlo J.K. Tyla Plzeň, p.o.”, and “Ná odní di adlo P aha”. The clus e
analysis has con i med a ela i e s abili y o he le el o mixed public goods o e ime
(2010 – 2015).
Since he esul s o he pape ( he a ing o he indi idual hea es) depend on he num-
be o gen es, he size o he audi o ium and he numbe o scenes he hea e ope a es
wi h, i is no easy o ecommend a gene al imp o emen p oposal o all hea es. Rec-
ommenda ions could only be made o indi idual hea es, which is no possible due o
he scope o he a icle. The “big hea es” mos ly anked on he i s places, which is a
consequence o he chosen me hodology as he aim o he a icle is o assess he a aila-
bili y o mixed public goods o ci izens (in he o m o echnical and inancial a ailabil-
i y o he hea e pe o mance). In case o hea es wi h la ge audi o iums, highe e-
quency o pe o mances is a ailable and also he numbe o ealized gen es. Howe e ,
he en y le el usually is also highe , which he me hodology akes in o accoun and
which has mo ed some o he “big hea es” o wo se posi ions (such as “Měs ské di-
adlo B no”). The c i e ia o he analysis show ha “small hea es” (usually only pu -
ing on plays and ha ing smalle audiences, such as “Dej ické di adlo”, “Di adlo AL-
FA Plzeň” o “Di adlo Na záb adlí P aha”) has anked he wo s . None heless,
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
173
“Dej ické di adlo” has a highe a e age p ice o icke s, so i is, om he pe spec i e o
ci izens, less a ailable in e ms o echnical and inancial aspec s. In addi ion,
“Se e očeské di adlo ope y a bale u”, which has he wo s anking, is a medium hea e
in he sense o numbe o sea s (486). We e he inpu da a chosen di e en ly, he esul s
would ha e changed, which could be demons a ed, o example, wi h he DEA me hod
ha uses economic indica o s. “Small hea es” would hen a e be e han “big hea-
es”.
Howe e , he p ac ical applicabili y o he conclusions is gi en by he signi ican p o-
po ion o public hea es se up by public bodies (minis y, egion o municipali y).
P ecisely o hese ounde s he in o ma ion o “whe he public hea es p o ide public
goods a su icien le el and e icien ly” is impo an . The p esen ed ou pu o he a icle
could se e as an app op ia e guide o ounde s o public hea es. Apa om he ac-
companying indings o he esea ch, hey should ind use ul he p oposed me hodology
o he assessmen o he quali y o public goods ha he hea es es ablished by heses
ounde s p o ide. This me hodology is well sui able because i is based no solely on he
assessmen o inancial indica o s; i s scope is wide . This ac is making i sui able
special o he e alua ion o cul u al ins i u ions.
Funding: The pape was c ea ed wi hin he inancial suppo o he s uden g an p o-
jec SGS No. SP2017/129 “Economic Fac o s A ec ing he Ensu ing o Public Se ices
wi h Collec i e Consump ion” on Facul y o Economics, Technical Uni e si y o Os a-
a.
Disclosu e s a emen : No po en ial con lic o in e es was epo ed by he au ho s.
Re e ences
ARDIELLI, E. (2015). E alua ion o he s a e o e-go e nmen in Eu opean Union
coun ies. In Ma hema ical Me hods in Economics - MME 2015. Cheb: Uni e si y o
Wes Bohemia, 2015. pp. 13-18.
ARDIELLI, E. and HALÁSKOVÁ, M. (2015). Assessmen o E-go e nmen in EU
coun ies. Scien i ic Pape s o he Uni e si y o Pa dubice. Vol. 22, No. 34, pp. 4-16.
ARROW, K. (1963). Social Choice and Indi idual Values. 2nd edi on. New Yo k: J.
Wiley and Sons.
BADIA, F. and BORIN, E. (2012). Oppo uni ies and C i ical Poin s o he In oduc-
ion o Pe o mance Measu emen Sys ems in Thea es - A Compa ison be ween Theo-
e ical Assump ions and Empi ical Reali ies. Jou nal o Cul u al Managemen and
Policy. Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 45-59.
BEČICA, J. (2016). Zoological ga dens in he Czech Republic and Slo akia om he
iew o echnical e iciency and p oduc i i y. In Teo e ical and P ac ical Aspec s o
Public Finance 2016. P ague: Oeconomica, 2016. pp. 132-139.
BNARD, J. (1990). Veejn ekonomika I. P aha: EÚ ČSAV.
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
174
BORG, R. P. (2017). A me hodology o he quali y assessmen o he hea e. In V. A.
C emona (ed.), Capi alising on cul u e? Mal a and he Eu opean capi al o cul u e. pp.
77-96. Msida: Mal a Uni e si y Publishing.
CAI, Z., WANG, Y. (2012). Resea ch F on ie s in Public Sec o Pe o mance Meas-
u emen . Physics P ocedia. 2012, ol. 25, pp. 793-799.
CHIARAVALOTTI, F. (2014). Pe o mance E alua ion in he A s and Cul u al Sec o :
A S o y o Accoun ing a I s Ma gins. The Jou nal o A s Managemen , Law, and Soci-
e y. Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 61-89. DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2014.905400
CORBOS, R. A. and POPESCU, R. I. (2013). S udy ega ding Thea es' ole in inc eas-
ing u ban compe i i eness. Adminis a ie si Managemen Public. Vol. 20, pp. 78 – 96.
DCA (2014). Public Value Measu emen F amewo k. Measu ing he Quali y o he
A s. [online]. [ci . 2018-02-02]. A ailable om
h p://www.dca.wa.go .au/Documen s/New%20Resea ch%20Hub/Resea ch%20Docum
en s/Public%20Value/PVMF_Measu ing_Quali y_A s_Resea ch_Hub_08_14.pd .
DOSTÁL, P. and KISLINGEROVÁ, E (2012). Ekonomika kul u y: e ek i ní me ody a
ns oje podnikní sek o u kul u y. P aha: Oeconomica.
HAMPL, M. (2001). T ojí přís up k eřejným s a kům. Finance a ú ě . Vol. 51, No.2,
pp. 111–125.
JAASKELAINEN, A. (2010): P oduc i i y Measu emen and Managemen in La ge
Public Se ice O ganiza ions. Tampe e: Tampe e Uni e si y o echnology.
JULIEN, M. (2017). Communi y, iabili y: Thea e pas and p esen . Canadian Thea e
Re iew. Vol. 169, pp. 78 – 83. DOI: 10.3138/c .169.013
KAPLAN, R.S., and NORTON, D.P. (2001). T ans o ming he Balanced Sco eca d
om Pe o mance Measu emen o S a egic Managemen : Pa I. Accoun ing Ho izons.
Vol. 15, No.1, pp.87−104. DOI: 10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
KARADAYI, M.A. and KARSAK, E.E. (2014). Fuzzy MCDM App oach o Heal h-
Ca e Pe o mance Assessmen in Is anbul. In P oceedings o The 18 h Wo ld Mul i-
Con e ence on Sys emics, Cybe ne ics and In o ma ics. O lando, pp. 228-233.
KEYVAN-EKBATANI, M. and CATS, O. (2015). Mul i-C i e ia App aisal o Mul i-
Modal U ban Public T anspo Sys ems. T anspo a ion Resea ch P ocedia, Vol. 10,
pp. 1-11.
KLIEŠTIK, T. (2009). K an i ikácia e ek i i y činnos í dop a ných podniko pomocou
da a en elopmen analysis. E+M. Ekonomie a managemen . Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 133–
145.
LOVĚTÍNSKÝ, V. and MYLKOVÁ, P. (2011). Fungo ní píspě ko ých o ganizací
České epublice a yb aných zemích E opy. [online]. [ci . 2017-07-18]. A ailable
om h p://www.a po.cz/wp-
con en /uploads/2014/01/p ispe ko e_o ganizace_ _CR_a_EU.pd
MEINECK, P. (2010). Page and s age: Thea e , adi ion, and cul u e in Ame ica. Clas-
sical Wo ld. Vol. 103, Iss. 2, pp. 221 – 226.
Volume 18, Issue 2, 2018
175
MFČR.(2017) Moni o . [online]. [ci . 2017-06-22]. A ailable om
h p://moni o .s a nipokladna.cz/2015/p ispe ko e-o ganizace/.
MIHAIU, D. (2014). Measu ing Pe o mance in The Public Sec o : Be ween Necessi y
And Di icul y. S udies in Business and Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 40-50.
MITWALLYOVÁ, H. (2014). Mají píspě ko é o ganizace dnešní době s é
opods a nění? In P  ník 9/2014. P aha: Ús a s á u a p á a AV ČR, . . i., pp. 772-
792.
MKČR. (2015). S  ní kul u ní poli ika na lé a 2015 – 2020. [online]. [ci . 2017-06-17].
A ailable om h ps://www.mkc .cz/s a ni-kul u ni-poli ika-69.h ml.
MORÁVEK, Z. and PROKŮPKOVÁ, D. (2015). Píspě ko é o ganizace 2015. P aha:
Wol e s Kluwe ČR.
MUSGRAVE, R. A. (1959). The Theo y o Public Finance. New Yo k: McG aw-Hill.
MUSGRAVE, R. A. and MUSGRAVEOVÁ, J. P. (1994). Veejné inance eo ii a
p axi. P aha: Managemen P ess.
NIPOS (2018). S a is ick da a publikacích – S a is ika kul u y. [online]. [ci . 2018-
04-15]. A ailable om h ps://s a is ikakul u y.cz/wp-
con en /uploads/2017/11/S a is ika-2016-di adla.pd
NENADÁL, J. e al. (2008). Mode ní managemen jakos i. P incipy, pos upy, me ody.
P aha: Managemen P ess.
OCHRANA, F. e al. (2007): E ek i nos zabezpečo ní yb aných eejných služeb na
ú o ni obcí. P aha: Oeconomica.
PARETO, V., SCHWIER, A. S. (1927). Manual o Poli ical Economy. Augus M Kel-
ley Pubs.
POLLITT, C. (1993). Manage ialism and he Public Se ices: Cul o Cul u al Change
in he 1990s? Ox o d: Blackwell.
POTŮČEK, M. e al. (2005). Veejn poli ika. P aha: Sociologické naklada els í
(SLON).
RICHTER, V. (2015). S o ná ání kniho en se ypla í. Č en. Vol. 67, No.5, pp. 163–
166.
ŘEŽUCHOVÁ, M. (2010). Pa ne s í eejného a souk omého sek o u: Analýza
možnos í e ek i ního zabezpečo ní eejných služeb. Dise ační p áce. B no: Masa-
yko á uni e zi a B no. A ailable om h p://is.muni.cz/ h/77468/es _d/
SAMUELSON, P. A. (1954). The Pu e Theo y o Public Expendi u e. The Re iew o
Economics and S a is ics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 387–389.
SAMUELSON, P. A., NORDHAUS, W. D. (2010). Economics. 19 h ed. New Yo k:
McG aw Hill.
SHAOUT, A. and YOUSIF, M.K. (2014). Pe o mance E alua ion – Me hods and
Techniques Su ey. In e na ional Jou nal o Compu e and In o ma ion Technology.
Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 966 – 979.

REVIEW OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
176
STIGLITZ, J. E. (1997). Ekonomie eejného sek o u. P aha: G ada Publishing.
STIGLITZ, J. E., ROSENGARD, J. K. (2015). Economics o he Public Sec o . 4 h ed.
New Yo k: W. W. No on Company.
STEJSKAL, J. e al. (2013). Měení hodno y služeb (na píkladu eejných kniho en).
P aha: Wol e s Kluwe ČR.
ŠUBRT, T. e al. (2015). Ekonomicko-ma ema ické me ody. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, s. .o.
TELEC, I. (1998). Adap ace a ans o mace nadací. P  ní p axe podnikní. 1998,
Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 1.
TURBIDE, J., LAURIN, C. (2009). Pe o mance Measu emen in he A s Sec o : The
Case o he Pe o ming A s. In e na ional Jou nal o A s Managemen . 2009, Vol. 11,
No. 2, pp. 56–70.
UNESCO. (2009). Measu ing he economic con ibu ion o cul u al indus ies. A e iew
and assessmen o cu en me hodological app oaches. [online]. 2009 [ci . 2017-03-02].
A ailable om h p://uis.unesco.o g/si es/de aul / iles/documen s/measu ing- he-
economic-con ibu ion-o -cul u al-indus ies-a- e iew-and-assessmen -o -cu en -
me hodological-app oaches-en_1.pd .
VARADZIN, F. and. BEČICA, J. (2016). Sídla a p odukční po enciál. ( ungo ání a
ekonomický po enciál obcí ČR s příklady z území Mo a skoslezského k aje). P aha:
P o essional Publishing.
VRABKOVÁ, I., e al. (2017). Píspě ko é o ganizace: pos a ení, úkoly a echnick
e ek i nos , SAEI, ol. 47. Os a a: VSB-TU Os a a.
WANG, S., e .al. (2016). Using DEA Models o Measu e he Pe o mance o Public
Cul u e Se ices in China. In Compu a ional Science and Compu a ional In elligence
(CSCI), Las Vegas, pp. 1-10.
ŽÁKOVÁ, E. e al. (2017). Mapo ní kul u ních a k ea i ních p ůmyslů ČR - Vyme-
zení, k an i a i ní mapo ní a s a egické dokumen y. [online]. [ci . 2017-06-18]. A ail-
able om h p://www.idu.cz/cs/mapo ani-kul u nich-a-k ea i nich-p umyslu- -c -i-.