Influence of stacking sequence on mechanical properties of basalt/ramie biodegradable hybrid polymer composites

Citation: Ramesh, V.; Karthik, K.; Cep, R.; Elangovan, M. Influence of Stacking Sequence on Mechanical Properties of Basalt/Ramie Biodegradable Hybrid Polymer Composites. Polymers 2023,15, 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polym15040985 Academic Editors: Hammad Raza Khalid, Il-Woo Nam and Taha AzizŁukasz Klapiszewski Received: 22 December 2022 Revised: 9 February 2023 Accepted: 14 February 2023 Published: 16 February 2023 Copyright: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). polymers Article Influence of Stacking Sequence on Mechanical Properties of Basalt/Ramie Biodegradable Hybrid Polymer Composites Velumayil Ramesh 1, Krishnasamy Karthik 1, Robert Cep 2and Muniyandy Elangovan 3,* 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi 600 062, India 2Department of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic 3Department of R&D, Bond Marine Consultancy, London EC1V 2NX, UK *Correspondence: muniyandy[email protected] Abstract: In this study, the mechanical properties of basalt/ramie/polyester hybrid composite laminates were investigated. A matrix of 45% polyester was used, as it has good bonding properties between fibers. The composite laminates were fabricated using a hand layup technique, with seven layers stacked in different sequences and impregnated in the polyester matrix to create a hybrid configuration. Tensile, flexural, impact, compression, and hardness tests were conducted according to ASTM standards for mechanical characterization. The results showed that the overall stacking sequence of sample number seven (BRBRBRB) had the highest tensile strength at 120 MPa, impact energy at 8 J, flexural strength at 115 MPa, compression strength at 70 MPa, and hardness of 77. Natural fiber-reinforced composites are being used in current automotive industry applications, such as in electric vehicles. Keywords: tensile; flexural; hybrid composite; impact and hardness; SEM; microstructure analysis 1. Introduction Many researchers are developing natural fiber-reinforced composite (NFRC) materials by extracting them from plants. These materials have several advantages, including being readily available, reproducible, biodegradable, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly. They are also recyclable and sustainable, making them popular in the automotive industry for use in electric vehicles. Natural composite materials can be found in plants and animals. For example, wood is made up of long cellulose fibers, a type of polymer, held together by the weaker component lignin. Cotton also contains cellulose, but it is in a more fragile state because it lacks the lignin that holds wood fibers together. The combination of lignin and cellulose creates a more robust material. Additionally, bones in the human body are a composite material, consisting of hydroxyapatite, mainly composed of calcium phosphate, and collagen, a protein that is both soft and flexible. An early example of a natural composite material is a mud brick. By allowing mud to dry into the shape of a brick, a building material with good compressive strength can be created. However, it has poor tensile strength and will shatter easily if bent. By combining straw and mud to create a mixture, bricks with improved resistance to squeezing and tearing can be made. These bricks are suitable for use as building blocks [1–3]. In recent years, fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials made from natural plant fibers have gained popularity due to their superior properties compared to artificial fibers. These natural fibers, which are abundant in India’s forests and villages, are used in a variety of day-to-day applications including the production of plates, cups, coir threads, ladders, and other products made from coconut, banana, and bamboo trees [ 4 ]. According to Ganesan et al. [ 5 ], it is expected that the trend will move away from using plastic and towards using hybrid composite materials in the future. A literature review was conducted Polymers 2023,15, 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040985 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers Polymers 2023,15, 985 2 of 17 to identify the resources used and areas where there are gaps in current knowledge. Several mechanical characterization methods, including tensile testing, impact testing, flexural testing, and dynamic mechanical analysis, were used to examine the performance of hybrid polymer matrix composites (HPMCs). Using a projection approach, the relationship between fiber density and properties such as Young’s modulus and flexural strength was determined in hemp Crete, a combination of hemp and lime. It was found that increasing the composite’s density improved its mechanical and thermal properties [6]. Karthik et al. [ 7 ] researched the use of glass fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites as a potential replacement material for use in automobiles and airplanes due to their low weight and high strength. The hand-laying method used to prepare the specimens is described in the article, and the tensile, hardness and impact energy characteristics were characterized according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. The study used glass woven fabric as the reinforcing medium and polyester resin as the matrix material, both of which are readily available. Mohanavel et al. [ 8 ] investigated the effect of fiber composition, layering arrangement, and sequencing on the mechanical characteristics of polymer composites. Four specific matrix composites with five laminae and varied layering patterns of jute/Madar/glass fibers were prepared using a manual method. Yoganandam et al. [ 9 ] studied the effect of ageing on saltwater and hand-laid-up composites kept at room temperature for 90 days. The results showed that the hybrid composite’s flexural strength was highest (490 MPa) when it was dry. In comparison to carbon composite reinforced with plain glass fiber, the hybrid composite exhibited 44% lower diffusivity in saltwater. In recent years, global researchers have focused on enhancing the mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced composites using various techniques, such as pinning, stitching, and the addition of short and long fibers [ 10 ]. The stacking sequence of fibers and different weight percentages of reinforcement are varied to develop new composite laminates, as studied by Nagamadhu et al. [ 11 ]. Basalt fibers, derived from naturally occurring volcanic rocks with finely grained fibers with widths ranging from 10 to 20 µm, have been investigated by Abhilash et al. [12] for their favorable characteristics, including high heat conductivity, high elongation, and low density, although they also have relatively poor thermal conductivity and find various applications in textiles, insulation, and heat-resistant plates. Hybrid fiber-reinforced composites, which combine the benefits of multiple fibers, are a significant advancement over using individual fibers [ 13 ]. For example, pure ramie fibers have a tensile strength of 50–60 MPa but the tensile strength of basalt fibers is around 100 MPa. The mechanical characteristics of hybrid composite laminates can be improved by combining these two fibers and employing a different stacking sequence during fabrication, as reported by several studies [ 14 – 16 ]. In addition, the incorporation of Kevlar fibers into a composite made of natural fibers can improve its mechanical properties to a greater extent than using natural fibers alone. In this study, we use a saturated polyester matrix to construct four distinct laminates made of basalt and ramie mixed fibers stacked in an alternating six-layer sequence. These hybrid composite materials have potential applications in roofing and other structural uses [17,18]. There was a variation in the tensile mechanical characteristics of a polymer composite reinforced with basalt fiber with changing yield stress and temperature levels. The digital image correlation (DIC) approach generated whole field distortion distributions in basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) specimens, which accurately reflected the composite material’s characteristic non-uniform pattern. The DIC-determined strain responses were then averaged, and the experimental stressors were associated with them. The mechanical properties of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites (NPCs) have been studied extensively with regard to different strain rates, as demonstrated by the extensive literature on the topic. This review summarizes what has been learned about the approaches to characterizing strain rates, but also reveals that there are still obstacles to overcome when describing mechanical properties over a broad range of strain velocities [ 19 , 20 ]. Quagliarini et al. [ 21 ] investigated the durability of basalt fiber ropes and rods for structural engineering, as these Polymers 2023,15, 985 3 of 17 are some of the newest popular basalt products in civil engineering and construction. They subjected these products to durability tests and found that, while basalt is a sturdy material, the literature on the durability of basalt products is mixed at best. Prasad and Talupula [ 22 ] reviewed research on the use of basalt and aramid (Kevlar 129) fibers for reinforcement. They found that using a hybrid composite of basalt fiber reinforced with Kevlar could potentially save costs and improve water resistance through the use of compatibility and bonding promoters. While Kevlar has high quality, it also has several drawbacks including low compressive strength and moisture absorption. To address these issues, a hybrid composite of basalt fiber and epoxy resin was suggested. Natural fibers such as basalt are being chosen to produce low-cost and lightweight composites due to the increasing demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly products. This paper provides an overview of the chemistry of basalt and Kevlar. Das et al. [ 23 ] found that plain glass/polyester (S7) had the best mechanical properties of all the tested materials, with tensile, bending and flexural strength 146.3, 167.6, and 188.7% stronger than that of neat jute/polyester (S0). The material characteristics of composite samples are largely influenced by the stacking sequence and the quantity and location of glass fiber layers in the laminated composites. The mechanical properties were highest in S6, a hybrid composite, compared to the others. Khalid et al. [ 24 ] emphasized the importance of finding entirely combustible or biodegradable materials to reduce the environmental impact of high-tech materials, a vital and challenging task. They argued that natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites (NFRPCs) are a better choice than synthetic fiber-reinforced composites due to their abundance, cost-effectiveness, and potential to improve physical and mechanical properties through chemical treatments, coatings, and hybridization processes. This paper also discusses the synthesis, categorization, characterization, and applications of responsive composite microgels made with silver nanoparticles. The mechanical properties of glass/Kevlar hybrid composite laminated sheets were studied with varying fiber in-plane alignments and stacking sequences. The mechanical characterization was performed using tension and three-point bend tests, along with numerical simulation, to investigate the mechanical characteristics and damage mechanism. Additionally, the flax-Kevlar hybrid epoxy composite and its mechanism of deterioration were analyzed. This article summarizes the results obtained using fiber-reinforced composites produced by additive manufacturing (AM), specifically the fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique. The FDM method has recently made significant progress in producing fiber composites, and all types of fiber-reinforced composites, including those made with short and long fibers, were analyzed in this review. While the impact of carbon fiber reinforcement on FDM-fabricated composites has received the most attention, future studies should investigate the impact of other natural and synthetic fiber reinforcements. Few researchers have looked at the impact of natural fibers on FDM, which has led to the development of biocomposites using this technique. Some researchers focused on extracting fibers from plants using various techniques, and after extracting long and short fibers they used them in a variety of applications, including those in the automotive industry and the domestic/homemade product sector, highlighting the importance of the existing literature. The mechanics of basalt-reinforced polymer composites and the role of hybrid glass/Kevlar fibers have also been studied. Natural fibers are increasingly being considered as reinforcements for polymer composites due to their environmental and cost-effective advantages, but their full potential as reinforcements remains untapped until certain limitations, such as lower strength and greater water absorption capacity than inorganic fibers, are addressed. Combining two or more fibers, such as natural and synthetic fibers, can easily improve these characteristics. Polymers 2023,15, 985 4 of 17 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials For this investigation, 400 GSM woven basalt and a ramie fabric mat with fiber random orientation direction were used to enhance the mechanical properties through the addition of fibers. These materials were purchased from GO Green Products Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India. Although polyester matrix has a low density and low cost, similar to an epoxy matrix, polyester and an acceleration catalyzer were used for curing purposes. The physical characterization of basalt and ramie fibers’ physical properties depends on the manufacturing process and additions [ 25 ]. Table 1provides the various properties of basalt and ramie fibers, as well as matrix polyester [ 26 , 27 ]. Figure 1shows the basalt and ramie fibers used as reinforcement for composite fabrication. Table 1. Physical characteristics of materials. Fibers Strength (MPa) Modulus Elasticity (GPa) Density (g/m3)Poisson’s Ratio Type Basalt (B) 310–420 110 2.8 0.24 Woven Ramie (R) 180–205 80 1.2 0.2 Woven Polyester 40 3 1.09 0.23 Resin Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 17 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Materials For this investigation, 400 GSM woven basalt and a ramie fabric mat with fiber random orientation direction were used to enhance the mechanical properties through the addition of fibers. These materials were purchased from GO Green Products Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, India. Although polyester matrix has a low density and low cost, similar to an epoxy matrix, polyester and an acceleration catalyzer were used for curing purposes. The physical characterization of basalt and ramie fibers’ physical properties depends on the manufacturing process and additions [25]. Table 1 provides the various properties of basalt and ramie fibers, as well as matrix polyester [26,27]. Figure 1 shows the basalt and ramie fibers used as reinforcement for composite fabrication. Table 1. Physical characteristics of materials. Fibers Strength (MPa) Modulus Elasticity (GPa) Density (g/𝐦𝟑) Poisson’s Ratio Type Basalt (B) 310–420 110 2.8 0.24 Woven Ramie (R) 180–205 80 1.2 0.2 Woven Polyester 40 3 1.09 0.23 Resin Figure 1. (a) Basalt (b) Ramie reinforcement for composite fabrication. The catalyzer used in this study is an aliphatic primary amine, while the polyester resin is bi-functional. Saturated Polyester Resin (Brand—Adarsh Fibre Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India) in liquid form was used. In most cases, the polyester is premixed and homogenized with the accelerator and catalyzer. Natural fibers and polyester matrices have good bonding between fibers and the matrix. General Purpose Polyester (Brand—Adarsh Fibre Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India) was used as a catalyst and accelerator, with a matrix ratio of 10:1 resin and a hardener that served as a binder and cured the hybrid composite. 2.2. Preparation of Composite Laminates Various laminates were fabricated, as shown in Table 2, and the polyester resin and accelerator catalyzer mix were prepared in a separate setup. The specimens were then covered with a plastic cover and sealed with sealant tape to prevent leakages. One end of the corner was attached to a vacuum pump, which was used to remove excess resin from the mold. A pressure of 2.04 kg/cm2 was maintained for 8–10 min, after which the composite laminate was opened and hot air was used to dry it under wet-to-dry conditions. The laminate was then post-cured for 24 h while maintaining a weight of 25 kg. Figure 2 shows the stacking sequence of composite laminates [28,29]. Figure 1. (a) Basalt (b) Ramie reinforcement for composite fabrication. The catalyzer used in this study is an aliphatic primary amine, while the polyester resin is bi-functional. Saturated Polyester Resin (Brand—Adarsh Fibre Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India) in liquid form was used. In most cases, the polyester is premixed and homogenized with the accelerator and catalyzer. Natural fibers and polyester matrices have good bonding between fibers and the matrix. General Purpose Polyester (Brand—Adarsh Fibre Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India) was used as a catalyst and accelerator, with a matrix ratio of 10:1 resin and a hardener that served as a binder and cured the hybrid composite. 2.2. Preparation of Composite Laminates Various laminates were fabricated, as shown in Table 2, and the polyester resin and accelerator catalyzer mix were prepared in a separate setup. The specimens were then covered with a plastic cover and sealed with sealant tape to prevent leakages. One end of the corner was attached to a vacuum pump, which was used to remove excess resin from the mold. A pressure of 2.04 kg/cm 2 was maintained for 8–10 min, after which the composite laminate was opened and hot air was used to dry it under wet-to-dry conditions. The laminate was then post-cured for 24 h while maintaining a weight of 25 kg. Figure 2 shows the stacking sequence of composite laminates [28,29]. Polymers 2023,15, 985 5 of 17 Table 2. Compositions of specimens neatly arranged. Code Stacking Structure Fiber Volume Fraction of Matrix % Fiber Volume Fraction % S1 BBBBBBBB 45% polyester 55% S2 RRRRRRR S3 BBRRRBB S4 RRBBBRR S5 BRRBRRB S6 RBBRBBR S7 BRBRBRB S8 RBRBRBR B-Basalt Fiber; R-Remie Fiber. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 Figure 2. Stacking sequence of composite laminates. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Table 2. Compositions of specimens neatly arranged. Code Stacking Structure Fiber Volume Fraction of Matrix % Fiber Volume Fraction % S1 BBBBBBBB 45% polyester 55% S2 RRRRRRR S3 BBRRRBB S4 RRBBBRR S5 BRRBRRB S6 RBBRBBR S7 BRBRBRB S8 RBRBRBR B-Basalt Fiber; R-Remie Fiber. As seen in Figure 3, the vacuum bag infusion technique is commonly used when working with composite materials. Hybrid composite laminates with different layers of unidirectional basalt and ramie reinforcement were created using a vacuum bag infusion approach that followed fiber stacking sequence techniques. First, clean polyester basalt and pure polyester ramie laminates were made as neat laminates, and the remaining six hybrid composites were prepared by varying the cross-ply of both fibers [26]. The bottom surface of the vacuum bag infusion setup was glass with a releasing agent added. Figure 2. Stacking sequence of composite laminates. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). As seen in Figure 3, the vacuum bag infusion technique is commonly used when working with composite materials. Hybrid composite laminates with different layers of unidirectional basalt and ramie reinforcement were created using a vacuum bag infusion approach that followed fiber stacking sequence techniques. First, clean polyester basalt and pure polyester ramie laminates were made as neat laminates, and the remaining six hybrid composites were prepared by varying the cross-ply of both fibers [ 26 ]. The bottom surface of the vacuum bag infusion setup was glass with a releasing agent added. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 17 Figure 2. Stacking sequence of composite laminates. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Table 2. Compositions of specimens neatly arranged. Code Stacking Structure Fiber Volume Fraction of Matrix % Fiber Volume Fraction % S1 BBBBBBBB 45% polyester 55% S2 RRRRRRR S3 BBRRRBB S4 RRBBBRR S5 BRRBRRB S6 RBBRBBR S7 BRBRBRB S8 RBRBRBR B-Basalt Fiber; R-Remie Fiber. As seen in Figure 3, the vacuum bag infusion technique is commonly used when working with composite materials. Hybrid composite laminates with different layers of unidirectional basalt and ramie reinforcement were created using a vacuum bag infusion approach that followed fiber stacking sequence techniques. First, clean polyester basalt and pure polyester ramie laminates were made as neat laminates, and the remaining six hybrid composites were prepared by varying the cross-ply of both fibers [26]. The bottom surface of the vacuum bag infusion setup was glass with a releasing agent added. Figure 3. Composite materials are fabricated by vacuum bagging techniques. Polymers 2023,15, 985 6 of 17 Design calculation of hybrid composites: The size of the fibers is 25 ×25 cm2. Hybrid sample specimen 1: This sequence consists of BRBRBRB (4B + 3R) mats. 4 Basalt fiber weight = 91.02 g. 3 Ramie fiber weight = 54.90 g. Total reinforcement weight = 91.02 + 54.90 = 145.92 g. Resin weight = 145.92 ×1.5 = 218.88 g (1:1.5 ratio of fiber weight). Hardliner weight = 21.88 g (10:1 ratio of resin weight). 2.3. Mechanical Characterization Test Hardness, tensile strength, flexural strength and impact energy are some of the mechanical parameters that were evaluated for the manufactured composite laminates, including the six hybrids. Coupon specimens were prepared following ASTM requirements for testing. The tests for hardness, tensile strength, flexural strength and impact were carried out with the help of ASTM D2240, D638, D790 and D256, respectively. Tensile (165 ×19 ×3 mm) , flexural (100 × 12.7 × 3 mm), compression test (12.7 ×12.7 ×25.4 mm) , hardness (30 ×30 mm) and impact (66.5 × 12.7 × 3 mm) samples were prepared according to ASTM standards. The specimens were cut to the specified dimensions for analysis. SEM was used to examine the broken surfaces of the tested specimens. The scratchedup skin of the mechanical specimens was subjected to scanning electron microscope examination. The test’s purpose was to determine not only the quality of the material but also how it failed when subjected to the applied load. Figure 4depicts the tensile test specimens used in this study to establish the mechanical characteristics of the material. The mixed laminate combination was designated as S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6, while the two remaining composite laminate configurations were designated as S1 and S2, respectively. The Izod impact test equipment was used to compare the mechanical characteristics of the various configurations. The surface of mechanically tested specimens that had been broken was the target of scanning electron microscope inspection. The test’s purpose was to determine not only the quality of the material but also how it failed when subjected to the applied load. Figures 5and 6depict the flexural test specimens and impact test specimens used in this study. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 17 Figure 3. Composite materials are fabricated by vacuum bagging techniques. Design calculation of hybrid composites: The size of the fibers is 25 × 25 cm2. Hybrid sample specimen 1: This sequence consists of BRBRBRB (4B + 3R) mats. 4 Basalt fiber weight = 91.02 g. 3 Ramie fiber weight = 54.90 g. Total reinforcement weight = 91.02 + 54.90 = 145.92 g. Resin weight = 145.92 × 1.5 = 218.88 g (1:1.5 ratio of fiber weight). Hardliner weight = 21.88 g (10:1 ratio of resin weight). 2.3. Mechanical Characterization Test Hardness, tensile strength, flexural strength and impact energy are some of the mechanical parameters that were evaluated for the manufactured composite laminates, including the six hybrids. Coupon specimens were prepared following ASTM requirements for testing. The tests for hardness, tensile strength, flexural strength and impact were carried out with the help of ASTM D2240, D638, D790 and D256, respectively. Tensile (165 × 19 × 3 mm), flexural (100 × 12.7 × 3 mm), compression test (12.7 × 12.7 × 25.4 mm), hardness (30 × 30 mm) and impact (66.5 × 12.7 × 3 mm) samples were prepared according to ASTM standards. The specimens were cut to the specified dimensions for analysis. SEM was used to examine the broken surfaces of the tested specimens. The scratchedup skin of the mechanical specimens was subjected to scanning electron microscope examination. The test’s purpose was to determine not only the quality of the material but also how it failed when subjected to the applied load. Figure 4 depicts the tensile test specimens used in this study to establish the mechanical characteristics of the material. The mixed laminate combination was designated as S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6, while the two remaining composite laminate configurations were designated as S1 and S2, respectively. The Izod impact test equipment was used to compare the mechanical characteristics of the various configurations. The surface of mechanically tested specimens that had been broken was the target of scanning electron microscope inspection. The test’s purpose was to determine not only the quality of the material but also how it failed when subjected to the applied load. Figures 5 and 6 depict the flexural test specimens and impact test specimens used in this study. Figure 4. Tensile specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Figure 4. Tensile specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Polymers 2023,15, 985 7 of 17 Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 Figure 5. Flexural specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Figure 6. Impact specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). On the same equipment, tensile tests, compression tests, and flexural testing were carried out by changing the grips to a three-point bending arrangement, as shown in Figure 7. A UTM machine (FIE-Blue Star, Kolhapur, MH, India; Cap.0-100 kN, Model: Instron-UNITEK-94100) was used. The Izod impact testing machine and the Shore D hardness testing equipment were used to determine the impact energy and hardness of the produced composite laminates. Three specimens were selected for each mechanical characterization trial, and the average of the three is provided as the mechanical property value in this research. When comparing the mechanical characteristics of the different laminate configurations, the hybrid laminate combinations were designated as S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. In contrast, the two remaining composite laminate configurations were designated as S1 and S2, respectively [28–30]. Figure 5. Flexural specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 17 Figure 5. Flexural specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). Figure 6. Impact specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). On the same equipment, tensile tests, compression tests, and flexural testing were carried out by changing the grips to a three-point bending arrangement, as shown in Figure 7. A UTM machine (FIE-Blue Star, Kolhapur, MH, India; Cap.0-100 kN, Model: Instron-UNITEK-94100) was used. The Izod impact testing machine and the Shore D hardness testing equipment were used to determine the impact energy and hardness of the produced composite laminates. Three specimens were selected for each mechanical characterization trial, and the average of the three is provided as the mechanical property value in this research. When comparing the mechanical characteristics of the different laminate configurations, the hybrid laminate combinations were designated as S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. In contrast, the two remaining composite laminate configurations were designated as S1 and S2, respectively [28–30]. Figure 6. Impact specimen after the test. (S1-BBBBBBBB; S2-RRRRRRR; S3-BBRRRBB; S4-RRBBBRR; S5-BRRBRRB; S6-RBBRBBR; S7-BRBRBRB; S8-RBRBRBR). On the same equipment, tensile tests, compression tests, and flexural testing were carried out by changing the grips to a three-point bending arrangement, as shown in Figure 7. A UTM machine (FIE-Blue Star, Kolhapur, MH, India; Cap.0–100 kN, Model: Instron-UNITEK-94100) was used. The Izod impact testing machine and the Shore D hardness testing equipment were used to determine the impact energy and hardness of the produced composite laminates. Three specimens were selected for each mechanical characterization trial, and the average of the three is provided as the mechanical property value in this research. When comparing the mechanical characteristics of the different laminate configurations, the hybrid laminate combinations were designated as S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. In contrast, the two remaining composite laminate configurations were designated as S1 and S2, respectively [28–30]. Polymers 2023,15, 985 8 of 17 Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 Figure 7. A universal testing machine was used to conduct the experiments. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Tensile Properties of Hybrid Composites To assess the effect of vacuum bag molding on the strength of the composites, the tensile strength of mats made from composites including basalt and ramie fibers as reinforcing materials was examined. The mats were stacked in a variety of different sequences. Figure 8 illustrates how the tensile strength of produced composite laminates can vary depending on the sequencing patterns used. Compare the tensile strength of each sequencing combination with that of pure basalt and ramie fibers. Among the other possible combinations, the composite made with the BRBRBRB sequence arrangement was found to have the highest tensile strength of 120 MPa. Figure 8. Comparison of tensile strength. The tensile strength exhibited by the hybrid composites is related to the load transmission along the fibers. In this study, woven fiber mats were used as reinforcement materials. These allow the load to be distributed along the lateral and longitudinal directions Figure 7. A universal testing machine was used to conduct the experiments. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Tensile Properties of Hybrid Composites To assess the effect of vacuum bag molding on the strength of the composites, the tensile strength of mats made from composites including basalt and ramie fibers as reinforcing materials was examined. The mats were stacked in a variety of different sequences. Figure 8 illustrates how the tensile strength of produced composite laminates can vary depending on the sequencing patterns used. Compare the tensile strength of each sequencing combination with that of pure basalt and ramie fibers. Among the other possible combinations, the composite made with the BRBRBRB sequence arrangement was found to have the highest tensile strength of 120 MPa. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 17 Figure 7. A universal testing machine was used to conduct the experiments. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Tensile Properties of Hybrid Composites To assess the effect of vacuum bag molding on the strength of the composites, the tensile strength of mats made from composites including basalt and ramie fibers as reinforcing materials was examined. The mats were stacked in a variety of different sequences. Figure 8 illustrates how the tensile strength of produced composite laminates can vary depending on the sequencing patterns used. Compare the tensile strength of each sequencing combination with that of pure basalt and ramie fibers. Among the other possible combinations, the composite made with the BRBRBRB sequence arrangement was found to have the highest tensile strength of 120 MPa. Figure 8. Comparison of tensile strength. The tensile strength exhibited by the hybrid composites is related to the load transmission along the fibers. In this study, woven fiber mats were used as reinforcement materials. These allow the load to be distributed along the lateral and longitudinal directions Figure 8. Comparison of tensile strength. The tensile strength exhibited by the hybrid composites is related to the load transmission along the fibers. In this study, woven fiber mats were used as reinforcement materials. These allow the load to be distributed along the lateral and longitudinal directions of the Polymers 2023,15, 985 9 of 17 loading. Therefore, the produced hybrid composites show an anisotropic nature, which significantly contributes to their tensile strength. Figure 8compares the tensile strengths of the six hybrid composite laminates, as well as the two plain composite laminates, that were used in this study. Out of the six hybrid composites of different composites tested specimens, the single fiber showed the lowest tensile strength, which ranged from a minimum of 102 MPa to a maximum of 120 MPa. Out of the eight specimens, the hybrid composite laminate made from the S7 material achieved a tensile strength of 120 MPa, the highest value achieved by any of the laminates. The hybrid laminate S2 had the minimum tensile strength compared to all the specimens at 50 MPa. The remaining hybrid laminates, such as S3, S4, S5, S6, and S8, each have tensile strengths of 118 MPa, 106 MPa, 102 MPa, 119 MPa, and 105 MPa, respectively. Pure basalt and polyester (S1) and ramie and polyester (S2) achieved tensile strengths of 142 and 50 MPa , respectively, when tested. Compared to pure laminates, hybrid composite laminates have superior mechanical properties [31,32]. Figure 9shows the stress–strain curve of the various composite laminates tested. From the graphs, it can be seen that as stress increases, strain decreases. The neat or plain samples show the minimum and maximum values, while the remaining six samples show average values. The hybrid sample S7 produces a tensile strength of 120 MPa. However, it is thought that pure laminates have mechanical properties that fall somewhere in between the two. The same can be seen in this study, with the difference that the hybrid laminate S7 achieved the highest tensile strength out of all of the materials tested. This finding should be treated as an outlier, and further testing is needed to confirm this behavior. Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 17 of the loading. Therefore, the produced hybrid composites show an anisotropic nature, which significantly contributes to their tensile strength. Figure 8 compares the tensile strengths of the six hybrid composite laminates, as well as the two plain composite laminates, that were used in this study. Out of the six hybrid composites of different composites tested specimens, the single fiber showed the lowest tensile strength, which ranged from a minimum of 102 MPa to a maximum of 120 MPa. Out of the eight specimens, the hybrid composite laminate made from the S7 material achieved a tensile strength of 120 MPa, the highest value achieved by any of the laminates. The hybrid laminate S2 had the minimum tensile strength compared to all the specimens at 50 MPa. The remaining hybrid laminates, such as S3, S4, S5, S6, and S8, each have tensile strengths of 118 MPa, 106 MPa, 102 MPa, 119 MPa, and 105 MPa, respectively. Pure basalt and polyester (S1) and ramie and polyester (S2) achieved tensile strengths of 142 and 50 MPa, respectively, when tested. Compared to pure laminates, hybrid composite laminates have superior mechanical properties [31,32]. Figure 9 shows the stress–strain curve of the various composite laminates tested. From the graphs, it can be seen that as stress increases, strain decreases. The neat or plain samples show the minimum and maximum values, while the remaining six samples show average values. The hybrid sample S7 produces a tensile strength of 120 MPa. However, it is thought that pure laminates have mechanical properties that fall somewhere in between the two. The same can be seen in this study, with the difference that the hybrid laminate S7 achieved the highest tensile strength out of all of the materials tested. This finding should be treated as an outlier, and further testing is needed to confirm this behavior. Figure 9. Stress vs. strain of tensile strength. 3.2. Flexural Properties of Produced Composites According to the investigation’s findings, the hybrid composites that contained ramie fiber sandwiched between polyester had a maximum flexural strength of 115 MPa, with a minimum of 100 MPa. The least amount of flexural strength was achieved using pure ramie fiber for the polyester. The stacking sequence (BRBRBRB) was found to meet the surface strength and endurance requirements. The outer layer of ramie contributed to an increase in both bending stress and elastic modulus. Figure 10 shows the test specimens’ values after flexural testing, which reveals that the sequence in which the reinforcing fibers were inserted into the composite materials significantly influenced the composite’s Figure 9. Stress vs. strain of tensile strength. 3.2. Flexural Properties of Produced Composites According to the investigation’s findings, the hybrid composites that contained ramie fiber sandwiched between polyester had a maximum flexural strength of 115 MPa, with a minimum of 100 MPa. The least amount of flexural strength was achieved using pure ramie fiber for the polyester. The stacking sequence (BRBRBRB) was found to meet the surface strength and endurance requirements. The outer layer of ramie contributed to an increase in both bending stress and elastic modulus. Figure 10 shows the test specimens’ values after flexural testing, which reveals that the sequence in which the reinforcing fibers were inserted into the composite materials significantly influenced the composite’s characteristics. When the stacking order of the reinforcing material was changed, there was a noticeable improvement in the flexural strength of the hybrid composites, as demonstrated by the results obtained during the loading of the flexural specimens. Polymers 2023,15, 985 16 of 17 35. Shcherbakov, A.S.; Mostovoy, A.S.; Yakovlev, N.A.; Arzamastsev, S.V. Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization on the physicochemical and mechanical properties of modified fiber-reinforced composites based on an epoxy resin. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2021,94, 1080–1087. [CrossRef] 36. Shahid, M.; Farooqi, Z.H.; Begum, R.; Arif, M.; Irfan, A.; Azam, M. Extraction of cobalt ions from aqueous solution by microgels for in-situ fabrication of cobalt nanoparticles to degrade toxic dyes: A two fold-environmental application. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020 , 754, 137645. [CrossRef] 37. Arif, M.; Farooqi, Z.H.; Irfan, A.; Begum, R. Gold nanoparticles and polymer microgels: Last five years of their happy and successful marriage. J. Mol. Liq. 2021,336, 116270. [CrossRef] 38. Begum, R.; Naseem, K.; Farooqi, Z.H. A review of responsive hybrid microgels fabricated with silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, classification, characterization and applications. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2015,77, 497–515. [CrossRef] 39. Shahid, M.; Farooqi, Z.H.; Begum, R.; Arif, M.; Azam, M.; Irfan, A.; Farooq, U. Multi-functional organic–inorganic hydrogel microspheres as efficient catalytic system for reduction of toxic dyes in aqueous medium. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 2021 , 236, 87–105. [CrossRef] 40. Arif, M. Complete life of cobalt nanoparticles loaded into cross-linked organic polymers: A review. RSC Adv. 2022 ,12, 15447–15460. [CrossRef] 41. Shahid, M.; Farooqi, Z.H.; Begum, R.; Arif, M.; Wu, W.; Irfan, A. Hybrid microgels for catalytic and photocatalytic removal of nitroarenes and organic dyes from aqueous medium: A review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019,50, 513–537. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.