Marine photosynthetic picoeukaryotes: community structure at different spatial scales
Abstract
Programa de doctorado en Oceanografía. En portada: Institut de Ciènces del Mar. Instituto Español de Oceanografía. La fecha de publicación es la fecha de lectura
Full text
UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA Facultad de Ciencias del Mar ANEXO I Dª MARÍA ISABEL PADILLA LEÓN, SECRETARIA DE LA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEL MAR, ÓRGANO RESPONSABLE DEL PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO EN OCEANOGRAFÍA, DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA. CERTIFICA Que el Consejo de Doctores del Programa de Doctorado en Oceanografía, en su sesión de fecha 16 de noviembre de 2015, tomó el acuerdo de dar el consentimiento para su tramitación, a la tesis doctoral titulada: “Marine photosynthetic picoeukaryotes: Community structure at different spatial scales” presentada por la doctoranda: Dª Ana Mª Cabello Pérez dirigida por los Doctores D. Mikel Latasa Arcalís D. Ramón Massana Molera Y para que así conste, a efectos de lo previsto en el Artº 6 del Reglamento para la elaboración, tribunal defensa y evaluación de tesis doctorales de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, firmo el presente en Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, a dieciséis de noviembre de dos mil quince. PÁGINA 1 / 1 ID. DOCUMENTO VkjLieJx6GmUKtkBiT.PgQ$$ FIRMADO POR FECHA FIRMA ID. FIRMA 43646105V ISABEL PADILLA LEÓN 13/11/2015 12:40:32 NTM4Njk= Documento firmado digitalmente. Para verificar la validez de la firma copie el ID del documento y acceda a / Digitally signed document. To verify the validity of the signature copy the document ID and access to https://sede.ulpgc.es:8443/VerificadorFirmas/ulpgc/VerificacionAction.action
Marine photosynthetic picoeukaryotes: community structure at different spatial scales (Picoeucariotas fotosintéticos marinos: estructura de la comunidad a diferentes escalas espaciales) Ana María Cabello Pérez Tesis Doctoral presentada por Dª Ana María Cabello Pérez para obtener el grado de Doctor por la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Programa de Doctorado en Oceanografía Directores: Dr. Mikel Latasa Arcalís y Dr. Ramon Massana i Molera Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria Institut de Cièncias del Mar (ICM-CSIC) Centro Oceanográfico de Xixón (IEO) En Barcelona, a de de 2015 La Doctoranda El Director El Codirector Ana María Cabello Pérez Mikel Latasa Arcalís Ramon Massana i Molera
A mis padres, a mi hermano, a mi compañero de viaje, y a la familia y amigos que siempre me han apoyado.
A un capitán de navío Sobre tu nave - un plinto verde de algas marinas, de moluscos, de conchas, de esmeralda estelar, capitán de los vientos y de las golondrinas, fuiste condecorado por un golpe de mar. Por ti los litorales de frentes serpentinas desenrollan, al paso de tu arado, un cantar: - Marinero, hombre libre, que las mares declinas, dinos los radiogramas de tu Estrella Polar. Buen marinero, hijo de los llantos del norte, limón del mediodía, bandera de la corte espumosa del agua, cazador de sirenas; todos los litorales amarrados del mundo, pedimos que nos lleves en el surco profundo de tu nave, a la mar, rotas nuestras cadenas. Rafael Alberti, Marinero en tierra (1924)
Cover photograph: Irene Forn.
Contents Summary 11 General Introduction 15 Aims and outline of the thesis 31 Chapter 1 Vertical distribution of major photosynthetic 37 picoeukaryotic groups in stratified marine waters Chapter 2 Distribution of phytoplankton groups within the deep 69 chlorophyll maximum Chapter 3 Global distribution and vertical patterns of a 101 prymnesiophyte-cyanobacteria obligate symbiosis Chapter 4 Global distribution and intraspecific variability 131 of marine pelagophytes Synthesis of results and general discussion 159 Conclusions 173 Spanish summary (Resumen de la tesis) 177 General references (Introduction, Discussion and Spanish summary) 227 Acknowledgements 239
16 General Introduction Planktonic microbes are operationally categorized into three logarithmic size classes: picoplankton (0.2 to 2 µm), nanoplankton (2 to 20 µm), and microplankton (20 to 200 µm) (Figure 2) (Sieburth et al:LWKDIHZH[FHSWLRQVVXFKDVWKH¿ODPHQWRXVTrichodesmium sp., marine cyanobacteria are smaller than 2 µm, so the prokaryotic phytoplankton belongs virtually only to the picoplankton. By contrast, eukaryotic phytoplankton presents single-celled organisms covering a wide range of cell sizes, from a few micrometers to hundreds, including also colonial forms, so it appears in the three size classes above mentioned (Figure 2). The actual cell size spectra of the phytoplankton, mostly due to the eukaryotic component, is related to the trophic status of the system and has direct impact on the fate of primary production. So, eutrophic systems with high nutrient loads DUHJHQHUDOO\GRPLQDWHGE\ODUJHSK\WRSODQNWHUVVXFKDVGLDWRPVZKLFKDUHHI¿FLHQWO\JUD]HG by copepods but also can fast sink down to the deep layers, whereas oligotrophic systems are dominated by small phytoplankters whose fate is to be mostly recycled in the microbial loop (Figure 1). The marine phytoplankton thus forms a functional group by itself, that of primary producers with a planktonic lifestyle. This wide group can in turn be subdivided in smaller functional types, which KDYHEHHQPRVWO\GH¿QHGLQEDVHRISDUWLFXODUELRJHRFKHPLFDOUROHVXVHIXOIRUPRGHOOLQJSXUSRVHV (Le Quéré et al7KHVHW\SHVFRPSULVHSK\WRSODQNWRQFDOFL¿HUVHJFRFFROLWKRSKRULGV DIIHFWLQJ RFHDQ DONDOLQLW\ DQG FDUERQDWH FKHPLVWU\ SK\WRSODQNWRQ VLOLFL¿HUV HJ GLDWRPV PDMRUFRQWULEXWRUVWRFDUERQH[SRUWGLPHWK\OVXO¿GHSURGXFHUVHJ Phaeocystis and small DXWRWURSKLFÀDJHOODWHVDIIHFWLQJWKHDWPRVSKHULFVXOIXUF\FOHSLFRDXWRWURSKVProchlorococcus, Synechococcus and picoeukaryotes), which form the component generally recycled; 5) N2¿[HUV (e.g. Trichodesmium and N2¿[LQJXQLFHOOXODUSURNDU\RWHVZKLFKFDQXVHGLQLWURJHQIURPWKH DWPRVSKHUHDQGPL[HGSK\WRSODQNWRQHJGLQRÀDJHOODWHVDQGRWKHUVPDOOÀDJHOODWHVZKLFK constitute the background phytoplankton biomass but do not have a direct biogeochemical role assigned. Each of these functional types presents particular ecophysiological requirements that Figure 2. A comparison of the size range (maximum linear dimension) of phytoplankton relative to macroscopic objects. From Finkel et al., 2010.
General Introduction 17 control their biomass and activity and therefore deserve a careful ecological inspection. Two of these types that are particularly relevant in the context of this thesis are developed next. Picoautotrophic cells, also named picophytoplankton, are important contributors to total phytoplankton carbon biomass and primary production and constitute the ocean’s veil above which larger protists and metazoans might bloom (Smetacek, 2002). These small algae are found HYHU\ZKHUHDQGGRPLQDWHWKHELRPDVVDQGSURGXFWLRQLQROLJRWURSKLFFKORURSK\OOD>&KO a] <0.3 mg m-3), nutrient poor (NO3 + NO20DQGZDUP!Û&ZDWHUVZKHUHDVWKH\ represent <10% of autotrophic biomass and production in rich (Chl a >5 mg m-3DQGFROGÛ& waters (Agawin et al., 2000) (Figure 3a). As mentioned before, nutrient rich waters are generally dominated by larger phytoplankters from other functional groups such as coccolitophores, diatoms DQGGLQRÀDJHOODWHV7KXVLQDJOREDOODWLWXGLQDOUDQJHIURPWKHFROGHVWWRWKHZDUPHVWZDWHUV picophytoplankton biomass dominates in the central gyres of the oceans comprising tropical and subtropical waters, with minor contribution in temperate and cold latitudes where the nano and microphytoplankton are major contributors (Figure 3b). On a global view, picophytoplankton dominate in huge areas of the oceans. A % contribution of picoplankton Total phytoplankton primary production (mg C m-3 d-1) B Surface Chla (mg m-3) Latitude A % contribution of picoplankton Total phytoplankton primary production (mg C m-3 d-1) B Surface Chla (mg m-3) Latitude 1LWURJHQ¿[LQJF\DQREDFWHULDDOVRFDOOHGGLD]RWURSKVSOD\DFHQWUDOUROHLQRSHQRFHDQPLFURELDO FRPPXQLWLHVE\SURYLGLQJ¿[HGQLWURJHQWRWKHELRWDIURPDWPRVSKHULFGLQLWURJHQ12) gas. As a consequence, they control the total ocean inventory of reactive nitrogen (Thompson and Zehr, 2013). Marine planktonic diazotrophs are composed by a few major lineages within three major Figure 3. (A) The relationship between the percent contribution of picophytoplankton fraction to total phytoplankton production (mg C m-3 d-1). Solid symbols represent the mean percentage within increasing bins and WKHLUVWDQGDUGHUURUDQGWKHVROLGOLQHLQGLFDWHVWKHHQYHORSHGHWHUPLQHGE\¿WWLQJDFXUYHWRWKHPD[LPDRIWKHELQ intervals. 0RGL¿HGIURP$JDZLQet al., 2000. (B) Zonal average of the contribution of different phytoplankton functional types to the total chla (in mg Chl m-3) for the micro-, nano-, and pico-size classes estimated using the combination of the statistical analysis of an HPLC pigment database and monthly composite SeaWiFS scenes of the year 2000.0RGL¿HGIURP/H4XpUpet al., 2005.
18 General Introduction JURXSVD¿ODPHQWRXVDQGIUHHOLYLQJQRQKHWHURF\VWIRUPLQJF\DQREDFWHULDLHTrichodesmium sp.)E¿ODPHQWRXVKHWHURF\VWIRUPLQJF\DQREDFWHULDHJRichelia sp., Calotrix sp.) in symbiosis with diatoms, and (c) unicellular cyanobacterial forms (e.g. UCYN-A, UCYN-B). Recently, 8&<1$KDVEHHQGLVFRYHUHGLQV\PELRVLVZLWKDVPDOOPSU\PQHVLRSK\WHDVLQJOHFHOOHG eukaryotic algae (Thompson et al., 2012), while UCYN-B (i.e. Crocosphaera sp.), once thought to be free-living, seems also be living in association, in this case with diatoms. Thus, diazotrophic cyanobacteria showcase a continuum of interactions with other microbes that range from freeOLYLQJORRVHDWWDFKPHQWWRREOLJDWHV\PELRVLV)LJXUH12¿[DWLRQLVDKLJKHQHUJ\GHPDQGLQJ process and diazotrophs have advantages in well-lit, warm, and nutrient poor waters, but are outcompeted elsewhere. Although Trichodesmium has been extensively studied and is though to EHWKHPDMRUQLWURJHQ¿[HULQWURSLFDODQGVXEWURSLFDOZDWHUV&DSRQHet al., 2005), recent studies have demonstrated the ubiquity and abundance of UCYN-A in a greater latitudinal range than Trichodesmium (Moisander et al., 2010; Thompson et alDQGKLJKOLJKWHGWKHLPSRUWDQFH of unicellular diazotrophs in the global N2¿[DWLRQ Figure 4. The spectrum of cellular interactions engaged in by marine N2¿[LQJF\DQREDFWHULD Dashed lines show features that are uncertain, such us the location of symbionts relative to host inner or outer membranes and the presence of calcareous plates on the Candidatus Atelocyanobacterium thalassa (UCYN-A) host. From left to right, other features include: free-living Crocosphaera cells (double cells are dividing); Trichodesmium with associated microbiota (gray); Calothrix with terminal heterocyst (brown) and vegetative cells (green); UCYN-A in relation to its host membranes; colonial aggregates of Crocosphaera-like cells in association with a diatom; and Richelia with terminal heterocyst (brown) and vegetative cells (green). From Thompson and Zehr, 2013.
General Introduction 19 THE PLACE OF THE EUKARYOTIC PICOPHYTOPLANKTON 7KHSLFRSODQNWRQZDVWHFKQLFDOO\GH¿QHGDVFHOOVWKDWSDVVHGWKURXJKD¿OWHURIµm in pore size and initially this size class was thought to contain only prokaryotes. Nevertheless, very small eukaryotic algae were soon observed in natural assemblages (Jonhnson and Sieburth, 1982) and are well represented in cultured species (Vaulot et al., 2008), so it became clear that the picoplankton also contained eukaryotic cells. Furthermore, inspections of natural assemblages revealed that for these cells the upper threshold of 3 µm (instead of 2 µm) was a more natural boundary (Massana et al., 2011). Photosynthetic picoeukaryotes (PPEs), considered as cells from 0.8 to 3 µm in size, show a clear seasonality and generally explain the majority of eukaryotic phytoplankton counts (>80%) in marine systems (Figure 5) (Not et al., 2008; Massana et al., 2011; Piwosz et al., 2015). This 3 µm threshold KDVEHHQZLGHO\DSSOLHGLQ¿HOGVWXGLHVWKDWWDUJHWWKHGLYHUVLW\RI33(WR separate this community from larger cells. Nevertheless, some studies have considered cells up to 5 microns (the so-called ultraphytoplankton; Murphy and Haugen, 1985) to evaluate the ecological relevance of the tiniest algae (Li et al0F'RQDOGet al., 2007). In fact, some abundant and widespread algal lineages, such as the prymnesiophytes, display a natural size continuity towards this 5 µm-boundary (Cuvelier et al., 2010). Figure 5. 3HUFHQWDJHRISLJPHQWHGHXNDU\RWHVH[SODLQHGE\33(DQGPFHOOVDWWKH%ODQHV%D\ 0LFURELDO2EVHUYDWRU\GXULQJQLQH\HDUVRIPRQWKO\VDPSOLQJ0RGL¿HGIURP0DVVDQDet al., 2011. Julian day Pigmented eukaryotes (%)
20 General Introduction 33(VDEXQGDQFHVWKDQNVWRWKHUHGDXWRÀXRUHVFHQFHRIWKHFKORURSK\OODDUHXVXDOO\HVWLPDWHG E\GLUHFWFRXQWVWKURXJKHSLÀXRUHVFHQFHPLFURVFRS\+REELHet al., 1977; Murphy and Haugen, RULQDIDVWHUDXWRPDWHGZD\WKURXJKÀRZF\WRPHWU\2OVRQ)LJXUH7\SLFDO abundances of PPEs in the global ocean are between 103 to 10 cells ml-1, being more abundant than heterotrophic eukaryotes of the same size fraction (Jürgens and Massana 2008; Not et al., 2008; Massana et al., 2011), and usually less abundant than prokaryotic picophytoplankton. A general trend was observed of PPEs plus Synechococcus dominating in high-nutrient situations (coastal systems) and Prochlorococcus being more abundant in low-nutrient oligotrophic environments (open sea). On a global latitudinal scale, cyanobacteria tend to disappear at higher latitudes, so PPEs remain as the unique picophytoplankters. Red fluorescence (FL3) 90º light scatter (SSC) A B Figure 6. (A)(SLÀXRUHVFHQFHPLFURVFRS\LPDJHRIDSU\PQHVLRSK\WHDOJDHWDNHQXQGHUEOXH OLJKWH[FLWDWLRQIRUFKORURSK\OODUHGDXWRÀXRUHVFHQFH.0RGL¿HGIURP0DVVDQDet al., 2011. (B) Example of a picophytoplankton sample observed with blue light excitation. The sample corresponds to the Bay of Xixón (Southern Bay of Biscay, Cantabrian Sea). The beads (B) used are invitrogen 1 µm beads. The populations that can be distinguished are as follows: P, Prochlorococcus; S, Synechococcus3NSLFRHXNDU\RWHV0RGL¿HGIURP*DVRODQG0RUiQ Numerous picophytoplankton studies have shown the importance of the picoeukaryotic component in terms of biomass and primary production. Data from the landmark study of Li and colleagues in LQWKH1RUWK$WODQWLFVKRZHGWKDW33(VDOWKRXJKOHVVDEXQGDQWWKDQWKHF\DQREDFWHULDa of total picophytoplankton counts), accounted for more than three-quarters of carbon biomass and more than half of the primary production (Li et al.,/L7KLVGRPLQDQFHZDVDOVR observed in coastal sites (Worden et al.,&DOYR'LD]et al., 2008) (Figure 7). Thus, despite a much lower abundance and due to their larger size, PPE can indeed rival marine cyanobacteria in terms of biomass and activity.
General Introduction 21 )RUGHFDGHV33(VKDYHEHHQWUHDWHGDVDEODFNER[RIGLI¿FXOWDFFHVVEHFDXVHXQGHUHSLÀXRUHVFHQFH PLFURVFRSLFREVHUYDWLRQVRUÀRZF\WRJUDPVWKH\IRUPVHHPLQJO\KRPRJHQHRXVSRSXODWLRQVRI cells. New insights into this assemblage came with direct molecular studies of natural samples that revealed PPEs as taxonomically very diverse, with members from all known algal groups that are placed in most major lineages of the eukaryotic tree of life (Figure 8). This wide diversity was unveiled at the beginning of the XXI century by sequencing the 18S rDNA gene from environmental samples from the picoplankton size fraction (Díez et al.,/ySH]*DUFtDet al., 2001; Moonvan der Staay et al., 2001). These seminal studies revealed the presence in this small size fraction of a wide array of algal classes such as Bacillariophyceae, Bolidophyceae, Chrysophyceae, &U\SWRSK\FHDH 'LFW\RFKRSK\FHDH 'LQRSK\FHDH (XVWLJPDWRSK\FHDH *ODXFRF\VWRSK\FHDH 3HODJRSK\FHDH3UDVLQRSK\FHDHDQG3U\PQHVLRSK\FHDH5RPDULDQG9DXORW3DUWRIWKLV diversity has been brought into culture (Vaulot et al., 2008) and some strains are preserved in reference collections for picoplankton cultures (Andersen et al.,/H*DOOet al., 2008). About hundred species of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes have been formally described (Vaulot et al., 2008), which represent a minor fraction compared to those species or entire new lineages found by molecular culture-independent tools. Relative abundance (%)Relative carbon biomass (%) Figure 7. (A) The relative contribution to picophytoplankton abundance (%) and (B) the relative contribution to picophytoplankton standing stock carbon ELRPDVVIRUHDFKJURXSIURP$XJXVWWKURXJK-DQXDU\LQD3DFL¿F coastal site. From Worden et al
22 General Introduction The use of ‘universal’ 18S rDNA gene primers targeting both phototrophs and heterotrophs has been extremely useful, but may also prevent to characterize adequately the diversity of the phototrophic component since for this purpose an extensive screening of clone libraries is required. Subsequent VWXGLHVWDUJHWLQJWKHFKORURSODVW6U'1$JHQHVXSSRVHGDVLJQL¿FDQWSURJUHVVLQWKHDVVHVVPHQW of PPE diversity (Fuller et al., 2006a; McDonald et al.,7KHVHVWXGLHV\LHOGHGDVLJQL¿FDQW dataset of 16S chloroplast sequences from the environment and from cultures, and allowed the design of marine algal-plastid PCR primers that excluded picocyanobacteria. With the same intention of avoiding underrepresentation of phototrophs, the diversity of the PPE community has EHHQDQDO\VHGE\WKHLU6DQG6U'1$JHQHVLQSRSXODWLRQVVRUWHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\6KLet al., 2009, 2011). Other plastid encoded genes have also been used in a minor extent, including the psbA (encoding the D1 protein of photosystem II) (Zeidner et al., 2003; Man-Aharonovich et al., 2010) or the rbcL (encoding the large subunit of the CO2¿[LQJHQ]\PH58%,6&23DXO et al., 2000; Bhadury and Ward, 2009). As the result of all these combined molecular studies, three algal lineages come up as major representatives of PPE assemblages: chlorophytes (mainly mamiellophytes and prasinophytes), stramenopiles (mainly pelagophytes and chrysophytes) and haptophytes or prymnesiophytes (Figure 9). )LJXUH6FKHPDWLFSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHUHSUHVHQWLQJWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRISK\WRSODQNWRQLFWD[DDFURVVHXNDU\RWH lineages (in color). Illustrations of (a) Chlorophyceae, (b) 3VHXGRVFRXU¿HOGLD sp., (c) Porphyridium cruentum, (d) Gymnochlora dimorphaH'LQRÀDJHOODWHVI Odontella sp., (g) %ROLGRPRQDVSDFL¿FD, (h) Dictyocha sp., (i) Aureococcus anophagefferens, (j) Heterosigma akashima, (k) Pinguiochrysis pyriformis, (l) Ochromonas sp., (m) Nannochloropsis salina, (n) Calcidiscus sp., (o) Cryptomonas sp., (p) Euglenids. From Not et al., 2012.
General Introduction 23 TOOLS FOR EVALUATING COMMUNITY STRUCTURE It is important to characterize PPEs community structure over temporal and spatial scales and to LGHQWLI\WKHHQYLURQPHQWDOIDFWRUVGULYLQJFRPPXQLW\DVVHPEO\7KHTXDQWL¿FDWLRQRIWKHZKROH DVVHPEODJHDQGLWVYDULDWLRQLQVL]HVSHFWUDFDQEHGRQHGLUHFWO\E\HSLÀXRUHVFHQFHPLFURVFRS\DQG WRDOHVVH[WHQWE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\+RZHYHUIRUDFTXLULQJVLPLODUGDWDIRUSDUWLFXODUWD[RQRPLF groups other tools were required. One of the tools that was initially used to provide relative DEXQGDQFHVRIVSHFL¿FJURXSVZLWKLQ WKH33(V FRPPXQLW\ZDV WKHDQDO\VLV RISK\WRSODQNWRQ pigments by +3/&KLJKSHUIRUPDQFHOLTXLGFKURPDWRJUDSK\+3/&DQDO\VLVRIJURXSVSHFL¿F marker pigments has been widely applied in biological oceanography (Roy et al. 2011) to describe the structure and dynamics of the PPEs (Letelier et al., 1993; Andersen et al., 1996; Bidigare and Ondrusek, 1996; Latasa and Bidigare, 1998; Mojica et al., 2015). When coming to the molecular ¿HOGVHYHUDODSSURDFKHVZHUHGHYHORSHGWREHDEOHWRSURFHVVWKHQXPEHURIVDPSOHVW\SLFDOO\ associated with oceanographic cruises (cloning and libraries were very powerful for taxonomic % of clones Oligo Meso Eutro Figure 9. Overall composition of the photosynthetic picoeukaryotes community IURPD6RXWK3DFL¿FWUDQVHFW Composition is expressed as percent of clones. This V\QWKHWLF¿JXUHLVEDVHGRQDFRPSLODWLRQRIIRXUDSSURDFKHV6SODVWLGSULPHU VHWV 2;<)2;<5 DQG 3/$)2;<5 RQ VRUWHG PDWHULDO 6 SODVWLGSULPHUVHW3/$)2;<5RQ¿OWHUHGPDWHULDOWKURXJKPLFURQVDQG 18S nuclear primers on sorted material. Oligo, Meso and Eutro correspond to the WKUHHPDMRUUHJLRQVFRQVLGHUHGROLJRWURSKLFPHVRWURSKLFDQGHXWURSKLF0RGL¿HG from Shi et al., 2011.
24 General Introduction LGHQWL¿FDWLRQVEXWWRRWLPHFRQVXPLQJIRU¿HOGVWXGLHV'RWEORWK\EULGL]DWLRQDVVD\VFRQVLVWRQ quantifying the relative hybridization of membrane-bound DNA (typically PCR products of the WDUJHWJHQHXVLQJVSHFL¿FROLJRQXFOHRWLGHSUREHV7KXV33(FRPSRVLWLRQDQGYDULDELOLW\ZDV VWXGLHGZLWKGRWEORWVDQGSODVWLG6U'1$FODVVVSHFL¿FSUREHV)XOOHUet al., 2003, 2006b), allowing a fast analysis of many samples to assess distributional patterns of different PPEs classes over large spatial scales (Lepère et al., 2009; Kirkham et al., 2011a,b; Bouman et al., 2012; Kirkham et al.,0RUHUHFHQWO\KLJKWKURXJKSXWVHTXHQFLQJ+76WHFKQRORJLHVDQG Illumina) have provided a means of estimating species richness from deeply-sampled communities and for discovering novel species (Sogin et al., 2006; Amaral-Zettler et al., 2009; Logares et al., +76DOVRSURYLGHVSUR[LHVRIWKHUHODWLYHDEXQGDQFHRIVSHFL¿FWD[DLQDIDVWFKHDS and high-throughput scale and has been applied on broad studies of marine plankton from coastal (Massana et al., 2015) and open ocean (de Vargas et al., 2015) systems, including a particular analysis of the picoeukaryotic fraction. Although useful, HPLC pigment analysis, dot blot assays, and HTS surveys provide at best semiquantitative abundances, and to obtain cell abundances a true quantitative method such as FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) is required (Pernthaler et al., 2001; Amann and Fuchs, 2008). 7KLVWHFKQLTXHDOORZVVLQJOHFHOOLGHQWL¿FDWLRQE\XVLQJJURXSVSHFL¿FSUREHVPRVWO\6U'1$ SUREHV+HUHDODEHOOHGSUREHSHQHWUDWHVLQWRWKH¿[HGPLFURELDOFHOOWKDWKDGEHHQLPPRELOL]HG LQDPHPEUDQHDQGELQGVWRWKHU51$LQWKHULERVRPHVZKHQ¿QGLQJWKHVDPHVHTXHQFHIRU K\EULGL]DWLRQWR¿QDOO\SURGXFHDÀXRUHVFHQWVLJQDO7KHODEHOOHGFHOOVFRXOGWKHUHIRUHEHREVHUYHG DQG TXDQWL¿HG XQGHU HSLÀXRUHVFHQFH PLFURVFRS\ WR REWDLQ DEXQGDQFHV RI VSHFL¿F JURXSV DQG rough morphological properties, at least the cell size (Figure 10). FISH has been applied both in coastal and open ocean sites to assess the abundance and distribution of well-known groups, such as prymnesiophytes (haptophytes), pelagophytes and chrysophytes (stramenopiles) (Jardillier et al., 2010) and mamiellophytes (chlorophytes) (Not et al.,1HYHUWKHOHVVFRQWUDU\WRVHPL quantitative approaches, manual counts of targeted cells is time-consuming and only few studies have applied FISH over large spatial scales (Not et al., 2008; Jardillier et al., 2010; Kirkham et al., E*UREet al., 2011).
General Introduction 25 PHOTOSYNTHETIC PICOEUKARYOTES IN THE OCEANS: SPATIAL SCALES OF VARIABILITY The mentioned tools for evaluating PPEs community structure have been applied in surveys that have tracked the water column at different depths in oceanic regions with different trophic, temperature and salinity gradients. Combining the data obtained, the general consensus is that prymnesiophytes, chrysophytes and pelagophytes dominate in oligotrophic open ocean systems with minor contribution of chlorophytes, mostly mamiellophytes and new prasinophyte clades (Figure 9). On the other hand, coastal and nutrient rich systems contain the same PPE groups but in that areas mamiellophytes can dominate numerically, particularly in certain periods of the seasonal cycle that establishes in temperate regions (Not et al1HYHUWKHOHVV environmental parameters (Chl a, nitrate, phosphate, salinity, water column depth, latitude and temperature, among others) shaping PPEs community composition at global scale are still poorly characterized (Kirkham et al., 2013). A B Figure 10. (A) The principle of CARD-FISH FDWDO\VHG UHSRUWHG GHSRVLWLRQÀXRUHVFHQFH in situ hybridization). CARD-FISH combines CARD RI ÀXRUHVFHQWO\ ODEHOOHG W\UDPLGHV ZLWK VLQJOHFHOO LGHQWL¿FDWLRQ E\ ),6+ 7KH K\EULGL]DWLRQ LQYROYHV D single oligonucleotide that is covalently crosslinked to D KRUVHUDGLVK SHUR[LGDVH +53 ODEHO $PSOL¿FDWLRQ of the signal relative to that achieved with probes that DUH ODEHOOHG ZLWK D VLQJOH ÀXRURFKURPH LV EDVHG RQ the radicalization of multiple tyramide molecules by a single horseradish peroxidase. From Amann and Fuchs, 2008. (B) (SLÀXRUHVFHQFH PLFURVFRS\ LPDJH RI WKH CARD-FISH assay (green-labelled cells under blue ligth excitation) in Pelagomonas calceolata FFPS E\ XVLQJWKHSHODJRSK\WHFODVVVSHFL¿FSUREH3(/$ A B
32 Aims and outline of the thesis The mentioned thesis outline can be summarized under the umbrella of three major objectives and VHYHUDOVSHFL¿FRQHVDVIROORZV Objective 1: 7R FKDUDFWHUL]H WKH ¿QH YHUWLFDO GLVWULEXWLRQ RI PDMRU SK\WRSODQNWRQ JURXSV ZLWKLQWKH'&0GHYHORSLQJLQWHPSHUDWHDUHDVGXULQJVXPPHUVWUDWL¿FDWLRQ We hypothesize a vertical segregation of the investigated groups along the water column, particularly within the DCM, according to their different ecophysiological requirements in the light, nutrient and temperature gradients. In Chapter 1 ZH IRFXVHG RQ WKH PDMRU SKRWRV\QWKHWLF SLFRHXNDU\RWLF JURXSV 7KH VSHFL¿F objectives were: - To obtain reliable counts of targeted groups. - To evaluate their vertical distribution in abundance and size spectra. - To explore whether chlorophytes, prymnesiophytes, pelagophytes and chrysophytes are distributed differentially across the DCM. In Chapter 2, we expanded our study to other phytoplankton groups and more sampling stations to achieve the following purposes: - To obtain a comprehensive view of the phytoplankton composition within the DCM. - To explore the vertical segregation of PPEs as compared with Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus, GLDWRPVDQGGLQRÀDJHOODWHV Objective 2: To obtain global abundances of the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis A particular symbiosis has been recently described between prymnesiophyte species and the XQLFHOOXODU 1¿[LQJ F\DQREDFWHULXP 8&<1$ $W OHDVW WZR GLIIHUHQW 8&<1$ FODGHV H[LVW UCYN-A1 in symbiosis with an uncultured small prymnesiophyte and UCYN-A2 in symbiosis with the larger coccolitophore Braarudosphaera bigelowii. While previous molecular surveys show a widespread and overlapped distribution of the two clades, few microscopic observations of this symbiosis have been performed in the ocean.
Aims and outline of the thesis 33 In chapter 3ZHTXDQWL¿HGWKLVSDUWLFXODUV\PELRVLVXQGHUWKHQH[WVSHFL¿FREMHFWLYHV 7RWDUJHWVSHFL¿FDOO\ERWKWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WHKRVWDQGWKHF\DQREDFWHULDOV\PELRQWE\DGRXEOH CARD-FISH approach. 7RFRQ¿UPWKHEURDGGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVV\PELRVLV - To evaluate its ecological niche and distribution patterns. - To provide further evidence about the obligatory dependence of both symbiont and host. Objective 3: 7RVWXG\SHODJRSK\WHGLYHUVLW\DQGELRJHRJUDSK\DWVSHFLHVDQGLQWUDVSHFLHV OHYHOV XVLQJDJURXSVSHFL¿FDSSURDFK Pelagophytes are important components of marine photosynthetic picoeukaryotic assemblages and are widely distributed across the oceans. However, their diversity has been only evaluated in molecular surveys targeting all picoeukaryotes, suggesting that pelagophyte assemblages are formed by a single species, Pelagomonas calceolata. Here we wanted to expand the knowledge of WKHLUGLYHUVLW\XVLQJDJURXSVSHFL¿FDSSURDFKDQGKLJKWKURXJKSXWVHTXHQFLQJ The study of pelagophytes in chapter 4IROORZHGWKHQH[WVSHFL¿FREMHFWLYHV 7RGHVLJQJURXSVSHFL¿FSULPHUVFRYHULQJSDUWLDO6U'1$JHQHDQGWKHLQWHUQDOWUDQVFULEHG spacer 1 (ITS1). - To validate the prevalence and distribution of other pelagophyte genera aside from Pelagomonas. 7RHYDOXDWHWKHLQWUDVSHFL¿FYDULDELOLW\LQWZRPRVWLPSRUWDQWSHODJRSK\WHVSHFLHVPelagomonas calceolata and Aureococcus anophagefferens, using the ITS1 marker.
Chapter 1
Chapter 1 37 Chapter 1 Vertical distribution of major photosynthetic picoeukaryotic JURXSVLQVWUDWL¿HGPDULQHZDWHUV Ana M. Cabello, Mikel Latasa, Irene Forn, Xosé Anxelu G. Morán and Ramon Massana. Summary Photosynthetic picoeukaryotes (PPEs) are fundamental contributors to oceanic primary production and form diverse communities dominated by prymnesiophytes, chlorophytes, pelagophytes, and chrysophytes. Here we studied the vertical distribution of these major groups in two offshore UHJLRQVRIWKHQRUWKHUQ,EHULDQ3HQLQVXODGXULQJVXPPHUVWUDWL¿FDWLRQ:HSHUIRUPHGD¿QHVFDOH YHUWLFDOVDPSOLQJHYHU\aPDFURVVWKH'&0DQGXVHGÀXRUHVFHQFHin situ hybridization (FISH) to determine the PPE composition and to explore the possible segregation of target groups in the light, nutrient and temperature gradients. Chlorophytes, pelagophytes and prymnesiophytes, in WKLVRUGHURIDEXQGDQFHDFFRXQWHGIRUWKHWRWDO33(VUHFRUGHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\LQWKH$YLOpV canyon, and for more than half in the Galician Bank, while chrysophytes were undetected. Among these three groups, often the prymnesiophytes were dominant in biomass. In general, all groups were present throughout the water column with abundance peaks around the DCM, but their distributions differed: pelagophytes were located deeper than the other two groups, chlorophytes presented two peaks and prymnesiophytes exhibited surface abundances comparable to those at WKH'&07KLVVWXG\RIIHUV¿UVWLQGLFDWLRQVWKDWWKHYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQRIGLIIHUHQW33(JURXSV is heterogeneous within the DCM.
Chapter 1 39 Introduction 0DULQHSKRWRV\QWKHWLFSLFRHXNDU\RWHV33(VGH¿QHGRSHUDWLRQDOO\DVFHOOVȝPDUHUHFRJQL]HG as major contributors to phytoplankton biomass :RUGHQet al., 2004; Cuvelier et al., 2010) and primary productivity in marine systems (Li, 1994, 1995; Agawin et al., 2000; Morán, 2007; Jardillier et al., 2010). This assemblage displays a tremendous diversity with members from all known algal groups and also uncultured lineages, as revealed by molecular surveys based on the 18S rRNA gene (Díez et al.,/ySH]*DUFtDet al.,0RRQYDQGHU6WDD\et al., 2001; Romari and Vaulot, 2004; Shi et al., 2009; Massana et al., 2011a) and the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis (Rappé et al., 1998; Fuller et al., 2006a; McDonald et al., 2007; Lepère et al., 2009; Kirkham et al., 2011a; Shi et al., 2011). Molecular surveys have complemented previous reports based on culturing, pigment analysis, and ultrastructure, to reach an overall view of PPE diversity (Vaulot et al., 2008; Massana, 2011b). Due to the ecological relevance of PPEs, it is important to unveil its community structure over temporal and spatial scales and to identify the environmental factors driving community assembly. This effort requires the right tools to quantify the abundance of the different phytoplankton taxa in natural samples. Early studies were based in pigment analysis (Letelier et al.,$QGHUVHQet al., 1996; Bidigare and Ondrusek, 1996; Latasa and Bidigare, 1998; Suzuki et al., 2002), and these ZHUHODWHUFRPSOHPHQWHGZLWKGRWEORWK\EULGL]DWLRQDVVD\VEDVHGRQSODVWLG6U51$FODVV VSHFL¿FSUREHV(Fuller et al., 2006b; Lepère et al., 2009; Kirkham et al., 2011a,b; Bouman et al., 2012; Kirkham et al.,. However, this view based on pigments and rDNA gene frequencies FDQVWLOOEHGLIIHUHQWIURPWUXHFHOODEXQGDQFHVZKLFKFDQEHZHOOUHVROYHGE\&$5'),6+FRXQWV (Not et al., 2002, 2004, 2005, 2007; Biegala et al.,3LZRV]et al., 2015), a method that has been applied only in a few large spatial scale studies (Not et al., 2008; Jardillier et al., 2010; Kirkham et al., 2011b; Grob et al., 2011). Combining the data obtained from molecular surveys, pigment analysis, dot blot hybridization and FISH, the general consensus is that prymnesiophytes, chrysophytes and pelagophytes dominate in oligotrophic open ocean systems with minor FRQWULEXWLRQRIFKORURSK\WHVZKLFKEHFRPHGRPLQDQWLQFRDVWDODQGQXWULHQWULFKDUHDV One of the most pervasive gradients in the sea is the vertical structure of the water column, where phytoplankton is subjected to opposing resources: light that comes from above and nutrients often VXSSOLHGIURPEHORZ,QVWUDWL¿HGZDWHUVSK\WRSODQNWRQIUHTXHQWO\IRUPVDSHDNRISLJPHQWVDQG often of biomass) known as deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM), typically located towards the base of the pycnocline and strongly coupled to the nutricline (Cullen, 1982; Estrada et al., Sharples et al., 2001). Adaptation and competition for light and nutrients within this structure could explain the distinct vertical distributions of major phytoplankton groups such as cyanobacteria and eukaryotes (Latasa et al., 1992; Zubkov et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2006; Hickman et al., 2009, 2010):LWKUHJDUGWRSDUWLFXODUWD[DZLWKLQWKH33(VRQO\DIHZVWXGLHVKDYHWDUJHWHGWKHLU relationship with the DCM, and always with a rough (tens of meters) vertical resolution.
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 40 In this work we studied in detail the vertical distribution of major PPEs groups during summer VWUDWL¿FDWLRQ LQ WKH WHPSHUDWH 1($WODQWLF EDVHG RQ &$5'),6+ JURXS VSHFL¿F SUREHV :H SHUIRUPHG D ¿QH VFDOH VDPSOLQJ ZLWKLQ WKH '&0 ! GHSWKV HYHU\ ¾2 m) to evaluate the variability of the PPE composition within this structure, and to explore whether chlorophytes, prymnesiophytes, pelagophytes and chrysophytes are distributed differentially. Because of their different ecophysiological features (pigment composition, nutrient requirements and temperature optima) (Roy et al., 2011; Kulk et al., 2012) we hypothesize a segregation of these groups along the water column, and especially at the DCM according to the strong gradients of light, nutrients and temperature. Our results indicate that PPE groups were not evenly distributed through the water column, in support of this hypothesis. Results Microscopic observations of target groups In this work we have applied a set of published FISH probes to obtain cell abundances of chlorophytes, prymnesiophytes, pelagophytes and chrysophytes at four stations in the temperate NE Atlantic in summer. The FISH signal obtained when targeting photosynthetic picoeukaryotes ZDVWULFN\7KHJUHHQÀXRUHVFHQWVLJQDORIWKH6U'1$SUREHZDVUHVWULFWHGWRDVPDOODUHD since the unlabeled chloroplast often occupied a substantial part of the cell volume. Nevertheless, detection of chlorophytes and prymnesiophytes was optimal, and probes CHLO02 and PRYM02 always labeled a clear population of cells. On the other hand, pelagophyte cells appeared weakly labeled with probe PELA01, specially in samples from surface or below the DCM, and positive FHOOVZHUHQRW HDVLO\GLVWLQJXLVKHGIURPRWKHU GLPÀXRUHVFHQWSDUWLFOHV7KHVHXQVSHFL¿FLWLHV were not due to natural peroxidases and were not removed by increasing the blocking reagent LQWKHK\EULGL]DWLRQEXIIHU7RKHOSGLVWLQJXLVKLQJSHODJRSK\WHFHOOVIURPQRQWDUJHWSDUWLFOHV DQGEDFNJURXQGÀXRUHVFHQFHZHGHYHORSHGDGRXEOHK\EULGL]DWLRQDVVD\DJDLQVWERWK6DQG 16S rRNA (Fig. 1). In a P. calceolata (pelagophyte) culture this resulted in cells with green labeled cytoplasm and red labeled plastid under blue and green light excitations, respectively. In environmental samples this procedure allowed a straightforward detection of target cells, even when both signals were faint. Surprisingly, the last targeted group, the chrysophytes, was never detected, so this group seemed absent from the four stations in this particular sampling period. 'LVWULEXWLRQSUR¿OHVRISKRWRV\QWKHWLFSLFRHXNDU\RWHV33( 7KHIRXUVHOHFWHGVWDWLRQV)LJDGLVSOD\HGDVWUDWL¿HGZDWHUFROXPQZLWKVXUIDFHWHPSHUDWXUHV EHWZHHQ&WKDWGHFUHDVHGXQWLOVWDELOL]DWLRQDW&EHORZP)LJE6DOLQLW\
Chapter 1 41 5 µm (A) (B) was higher in the Galicia Bank than in the Avilés canyon region. In the Avilés canyon region the thermocline started near the surface and had the strongest gradient between 40 and 60 m. In the Galicia region the thermocline was found between 40 and 70 m, with a clear surface mixed layer. )OXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHVUHYHDOHGYHU\FOHDU'&0SHDNVSODFHGWRZDUGWKHEDVH$YLOpVVWDWLRQVRU in the middle of the thermocline (Galicia stations), in close association with the nutricline (Fig. 61XWULHQWSUR¿OHVZHUHVLPLODULQERWKDUHDV7KHXSSHUZDWHUFROXPQZDVQXWULHQWGHSOHWHG down to the DCM depth. From here, nutrient concentrations increased with depth and maximum YDOXHVIRUQLWUDWHSKRVSKDWHDQGVLOLFDWHZHUHDQG0UHVSHFWLYHO\ (average of the deepest samples of the 4 stations). As shown in the graphs (Figs 2b), the selected sampling depths coveredLQGHWDLOWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHVRIWKH'&0V The distribution of total 33(VFHOOVREWDLQHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\IROORZHGWKHvertical pattern of the ÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHZLWKPD[LPDOFRXQWVFRLQFLGHQWZLWKWKH'&0SHDN)LJD$EXQGDQFH YDOXHVZHUHVLPLODUDWERWKUHJLRQVUDQJLQJEHWZHHQFHOOVPODWWKHVXUIDFHDQG 8000 cells mlDWWKH'&0GHSWK7KHYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQRIVSHFL¿F33(VJURXSVZDVREWDLQHG Figure 1.(SLÀXRUHVFHQFHPLFURVFRS\LPDJHVRIWKHGRXEOHK\EULGL]DWLRQDVVD\LQSHODJRSK\WHVIURPHQYLURQPHQWDO VDPSOHV/HIWSDQHOVFRUUHVSRQGWR'$3,VLJQDOEOXHODEHOHGQXFOHXVULJKWSDQHOVFRUUHVSRQGWRWKHFRPELQHG VLJQDORIWKH3(/$SUREHJUHHQODEHOHGF\WRSODVPXQGHUEOXHOLJKWH[FLWDWLRQDQGWKH3(/$SUREHUHG labeled plastid under green light excitation). (A)3HODJRSK\WHFHOOVRIW\SLFDOVL]HaP(B) A larger pelagophyte cell displaying the red plastid signal localized in two separated dots.
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 48 Discussion 7D[RQRPLFFRPSRVLWLRQRIWKH'&0FRPPXQLW\DWWKHWZRVWXG\VLWHV Sampling at the Avilés canyon and Galicia Bank regions showed the common DCM structure GHYHORSHGGXULQJWKHVXPPHUVWUDWL¿FDWLRQLQWHPSHUDWHDUHDVIROORZLQJWKH³7\SLFDO7URSLFDO 6WUXFWXUH´ GH¿QHG E\ +HUEODQG DQG9RLWXULH] 9HUWLFDO SUR¿OHV LQ ERWK RFHDQRJUDSKLF regions showed similar ranges of temperature and nutrient concentrations, whereas the salinity was higher in the Galicia Bank than in the Avilés region, as expected from the water masses composing these regions (Botas et al.,*RQ]iOH]4XLUyVet al., 2004). Differences in the picophytoplanktonic community were also detected, both at the cyanobacterial level (Synechococcus was present in both regions and Prochlorococcus only in Galicia, Latasa et al., Chapter 2), and at the PPEs composition. Moreover, in the Avilés stations, chlorophytes, SHODJRSK\WHV DQG SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV FRPSOHPHQWHG WKH 33( DVVHPEODJHV PHDVXUHG E\ ÀRZ cytometry, while these three groups accounted for about 50% of PPE cells in Galicia stations. In other studies, both based on FISH and dot blot hybridization, it is common not to cover the total PPE abundance with the assayed probes (Kirkham et al., 2011b; Grob et al., 2011; Piwosz et al.,, so the situation detected in Avilés is more the exception than the rule, and the question remaining is which other groups are completing the PPE assemblage in the Galicia stations. It is remarkable the fact that we did not detect chrysophytes, known to be important within PPEs LQWHPSHUDWHDQGWURSLFDO$WODQWLFDQG3DFL¿FZDWHUVEDVHGRQ),6+aRIFHOOV(Jardillier et al., 2010; Grob et al., 2011; Hartmann et al., and dot blot data (~40% of the signal) (Lepère et al., 2009; Kirkham et al., 2011b). Curiously enough, the abundance of chrysophytes in the Avilés region in a station closer to the coast (bottom depth of 110 m) and taken one month later was ~500 cells ml, being most cellsȝPLQVL]HGDWDQRWVKRZQ$OVRZHQRWLFHG that the probe &+5<62ZDVQRWODEHOLQJVRPHRIRXUFKU\VRSK\WHFXOWXUHVVRLWFDQQRW be discarded the possibility that we were missing some chrysophyte species in our survey. &U\SWRSK\WHVZHUHGHWHFWHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\LQRXUVDPSOHVEXWDOZD\VDWORZDEXQGDQFHV less than 1% of PPEs cells (data not shown). Other PPE cells in Galicia samples might include dictyochophytes, bolidophytes, pinguiophytes, eustigmatophytes, or chlorarachniophytes. These groups are considered minor components of the community based on dot blot surveys (Kirkham et al., although dictyochophytes and bolidophytes in particular are often found in clone libraries from the picoplankton size fraction (Kirkham et al., 2011a,b; Massana, 2011a; Shi et al., 2011). Our results agree with previous FISH data in the temperate North Atlantic, which show the PPE FRPPXQLW\ GRPLQDWHG E\ FKORURSK\WHV RI WKH FHOOV IROORZHG E\ SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV
Chapter 1 49 pelagophytes, and minor components like cryptophytes and bolidophytes (Not et al., 2002, 2007; Biegala et al., :LWKLQ FKORURSK\WHV 0DPLHOORSK\FHDH VSHFLHV SDUWLFXODUO\ ZLWKLQ WKH genus MicromonasFRPPRQO\GRPLQDWHWKH33(FRPPXQLW\LQQXWULHQWULFKRIIVKRUHDQGFRDVWDO waters (Not et al., 2004, 2005). In our samples chlorophytes were mainly composed by cells <2 +m that likely corresponded to Mamiellophyceae, whereas pelagophytes and prymnesiophytes were VOLJKWO\ODUJHU,QWHUHVWLQJO\WRWDO),6+FRXQWVRIFKORURSK\WHVZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\FRUUHODWHGWRWKH VPDOOHURIWKHWZR33(SRSXODWLRQVREVHUYHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\VHH([SHULPHQWDOSURFHGXUHV (Fig. 7). The slope of the regression close to the 1:1 line indicatedWKDWWKH VRFDOOHGµVPDOO¶ picoeukaryotes &DOYR'tD]et al., 2008) were made up to a large extent by chlorophytes. Since pelagophytes and prymnesiophytes presented similar abundances in both regions, the decrease of chlorophytes and the presence of other groups in Galicia stations were responsible for a shift in WKH33(FRPPXQLW\FRPSRVLWLRQ,QIDFWWKHSHUFHQWDJHRIµVPDOO¶SLFRHXNDU\RWHVH[SODLQHGE\ FKORURSK\WHVZDVPXFKORZHULQ*DOLFLDWKDQLQ$YLOpV)LJ,QDQRIIVKRUHHVWXDULQHWUDQVHFW in the English Channel, a similar community shift was observed regarding chlorophytes, which doubled the abundance from offshore to the coast, while pelagophytes maintained their abundances (Biegala et al.,7KHLQFUHDVHRIFKORURSK\WHVLQ$YLOpVVWDWLRQVZRXOGUHÀHFWWKHLQÀXHQFHRI coastal waters explained by the hydrodynamics of the Avilés canyon, known to produce upwelling DQGGHÀHFWLRQRIFRVWDOZDWHUVWRZDUGVRIIVKRUHDUHDV*RQ]iOH]4XLUyVet al., 2004). 'small' picoeukaryotes (cells ml-1) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 chlorophytes (cells ml-1) 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 st A st B st C st D y = 0.88x - 649.6 R2 = 0.63 Figure 7. 5HODWLRQVKLSRIFKORURSK\WH),6+FRXQWVDQGWKHSRSXODWLRQRIµVPDOO¶33(VW\SLFDOO\PFRXQWV GHULYHGIURPÀRZF\WRPHWU\'DWDIURPHDFKVWDWLRQDUHUHSUHVHQWHGZLWKDGLIIHUHQWV\PERO7KHUHJUHVVLRQOLQH (solid line; P < 0.05) and the 1:1 line (dashed line) are plotted.
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 50 Here we determined also the size distribution of the three algal groups, and the breadth of the size spectra was consistent with their taxonomic diversity. Thus, mamiellophytes, likely the major contributors to chlorophytes, and pelagophytes, both having the majority of cells in a single size class, are known to be less diverse than prymnesiophytes based on rDNA (Liu et al., 2009; Pernice et al.,. 7KH¿UVWWZRJURXSVDUHUHVWULFWHGWRWKHSLFRHXNDU\RWLFVL]HIUDFWLRQVFHOOVP while prymnesiophytes are also well represented in the nanoplankton, including cells larger than 5 P/LXet al., 2009). As a result, prymnesiophytes do not need to be the most abundant group to become important contributors to phytoplankton biomass (Liu et al., 2009; Cuvelier et al., 2010). 9HUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQSDWWHUQV 2XULQWHQVLYHVDPSOLQJLQDERXWPLQWHUYDOVDFURVVWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHJUDGLHQWRIWKH'&0OD\HU allowed us to determine in detail the vertical distributions of the target groups and to observe that they presented decoupled abundance peaks. Pelagophytes were located deeper than the other two groups, chlorophytes presented two peaks (well marked in Galicia) and prymnesiophytes exhibited surface abundances comparable to those at the DCM. Although their distributions presented the differences just mentioned above, all groups occurred throughout the water column (not restricted to particular layers), usually with subsurface abundance maxima around the DCM peak. This overall regular pattern could be, in part,EHFDXVHZHXVHG'LYLVLRQUDQN&+/2DQG35<0 RU &ODVVUDQN 3(/$ SUREHV ZKLFK FDQ WDUJHW VSHFLHV ZLWK GLIIHUHQW HFRSK\VLRORJLFDO requirements. The high prymnesiophyte abundances in surface waters suggested that surface species might be different than the ones occupying the DCM. As an example of this case, we GHWHFWHGLQWKHVHSUR¿OHVDSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVSHFLHVKDUERULQJDF\DQREDFWHULDOV\PELRQWWKDWZDV UHVWULFWHGWRVXUIDFHZDWHUVZKHUHLWDFFRXQWHGIRURISU\PQHVLRSK\WHFHOOVDQGZDV absent from the DCM (Cabello et al., 2015). This provides evidence that our level of taxonomic resolution likely masked vertical gradients. Another important observation was the presence of two chlorophyte peaks, well marked in the Galicia region. Micromonas and Ostreococcus species DUHNQRZQWRFRPSULVHVHYHUDOSK\ORJHQHWLFFODGHVDQGVRPHDUHUHODWHGWRORZOLJKWRUKLJK light adapted ecotypes, with different optima for irradiance and also for nutrients, temperature and salinity (Rodríguez et al., 2005; Foulon et al., 2008). Although niche partitioning in depth of these ecotypes remains unclear'HPLU+LOWRQet al., 2011), the observed chlorophyte peaks in our SUR¿OHVFRXOGEHWKHUHVXOWRIVHOHFWHGHFRW\SHVDGDSWHGWRGLIIHUHQWQXWULHQWDQGOLJKWUHJLPHV,WLV noticeable that the shallowest peak was placed at the base of the mixed layer and the deepest peak within the nutricline, coinciding with settings that characterize the distribution of Ostreococcus HFRW\SHV'HPLU+LOWRQet al., 2011). 2QWKHRWKHUKDQGWKHFODVV3HODJRSK\FHDHKDVH[SHULHQFHGORZHYROXWLRQDU\GLYHUVL¿FDWLRQEDVHG on the 18S rDNA (Pernice et al.,DQGWKHYDVWPDMRULW\RIVHTXHQFHVIURPPROHFXODUVXUYH\V
Chapter 1 51 DI¿OLDWHWRPelagomonas calceolata (Shi et al., :RUGHQet al., 2012). Thus, the PELA01 probe is probably targeting mostly the P. calceolata population, and this is consistent with the observation that pelagophytes exhibited a more conserved distributional trend than chlorophytes and prymnesiophytes. Pelagophytes accumulated half of their population deeper than the other JURXSVDQGGLVSOD\HGJUHDWHUFRQWULEXWLRQVZLWKLQWKHGRZQVORSHRIWKH'&0JUDGLHQWLQGLFDWLQJ a preference to occupy deeper layers. The increased relevance of pelagophytes within the DCM UHODWLYHWRVXUIDFHZDWHUVZDVSUHYLRXVO\REVHUYHGLQSLJPHQWEDVHGVXUYH\VZKLFKSURSRVHG an adaptation of pelagophytes to low light conditions and perhaps high nutrient requirements (Claustre and Marty, 1995; Barlow et al., 1997; Marty et al., 2008). Pelagomonas calceolata is FRQVLGHUHGDORZOLJKWDGDSWHGVSHFLHV7LPPHUPDQVet al., 2005; Dimier et al., 2009) and a recent PROHFXODUVXUYH\VKRZHGKLJKH[SUHVVLRQOHYHOVRIQLWURJHQDVVLPLODWLRQJHQHVLQSHODJRSK\WHV indicating that this group was an important contributor to nitrate assimilation within the DCM (Dupont et al., 2015). &RQFOXGLQJUHPDUNV :HZHUHDEOHWRHYDOXDWHIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHWKHYDULDELOLW\RIWKH33(FRPPXQLW\VWUXFWXUHLQ WHUPVRIFRPSRVLWLRQFHOOVL]HDQGELRPDVVZLWKLQW\SLFDO'&0VRIWHPSHUDWHUHJLRQV2XU¿QH VDPSOLQJDSSURDFKSURYLGHGFRQ¿GHQFHWRHVWDEOLVKWKHYHUWLFDOVWUXFWXULQJRIWKHKDELWDWVRIWKH three groups, which not always revealed smooth distributions. Although groups generally peaked in the vicinity of the DCM depth, the abundance maxima of each was vertically separated within this layer. At the level of taxonomic resolution resolved by our probes, ZHFRQ¿UPHGWKHSUHIHUHQFH of pelagophytes to occupy the deepest layers, the intriguing presence of two chlorophyte peaks and the high abundance of prymnesiophytes within surface relative to DCM waters. This study has shown that the DCM should be considered a heterogeneous structure that requires more than a single sample to obtain a representative picture of its phytoplanktonic composition. Experimental procedures 6WXG\DUHDVDQGVDPSOLQJSURFHGXUHV 7KHRFHDQRJUDSKLFFUXLVH,1'(0$5(6WRRNSODFHGXULQJVXPPHU-XO\ August) on board the R/V Thalassa (IFREMER / IEO) in two regions near the Iberian Peninsula, the Avilés canyon (Cantabrian Sea) and the Galicia Bank (NE Atlantic). Two offshore stations ERWWRPGHSWK!PZHUHVHOHFWHGZLWKLQHDFKVDPSOLQJUHJLRQ)LJDStations A, B, &DQG'FRUUHVSRQGHGWRFDVWVDQGUHVSHFWLYHO\At each station, vertical casts ZHUHSHUIRUPHGDIWHUVXQVHWZLWKD&7'SUR¿OHUUHFRUGLQJWHPSHUDWXUHDQGVDOLQLW\¿WWHGZLWK
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 52 DÀXRURPHWHU:(7ODEV(&2$)/DQGDERWWOH1LVNLQURVHWWH:HFDUULHGRXWDQLQWHQVLYH VDPSOLQJZLWKLQWKH'&02QWKHEDVLVRIWKHUHDOWLPHÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHUHYHDOHGGXULQJWKH downcast, we chose the depth just below the DCM where to start the sampling, and during the XSFDVW1LVNLQERWWOHVZHUHFORVHGHYHU\VHFRQGV$YLOpVFDQ\RQRUVHFRQGV*DOLFLD Bank) at a constant ascent rate of 0.25 m s from the chosen initial depth to just above the DCM. 7KLVJDYHXVD¿QHYHUWLFDOVDPSOLQJUHVROXWLRQRIWRP7KHODVWERWWOHVZHUHFORVHGZLWKLQ the mixed layer and at surface. From the 22 bottles continuously sampled, we chose 11 or 12 to ¿QHO\UHSUHVHQWWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHJUDGLHQWRIWKH'&0. )ORZF\WRPHWULFFRXQWVRISKRWRV\QWKHWLFSLFRHXNDU\RWHV33( PPEs cells were counted from samples (1.8 ml) preserved on board with 1% paraformaldehyde SOXVJOXWDUDOGHK\GHÀDVKIUR]HQLQOLTXLGQLWURJHQDQGNHSWDWí&XQWLODQDO\VLVLQ WKHODERUDWRU\ZLWKD)$&6&DOLEXUÀRZF\WRPHWHU%HFWRQ'LFNLQVRQHTXLSSHGZLWKDODVHU HPLWWLQJDWQP7ZRGLIIHUHQWO\VL]HGJURXSVRI33(VUHIHUUHGWRDVµVPDOO¶DQGµODUJH¶ ZHUHGLVFULPLQDWHGIURPF\DQREDFWHULDEDVHGRQWKHLURUDQJH)/QPDQGUHG)/! QPÀXRUHVFHQFHDQGOLJKWVFDWWHUVLJQDOV&DOYR'tD]DQG0RUiQ)RUHVWLPDWLQJFHOO DEXQGDQFHVFDOLEUDWLRQRIWKHF\WRPHWHUÀRZUDWHZDVSHUIRUPHGGDLO\DQGDVROXWLRQRIȝP ÀXRUHVFHQWODWH[EHDGVUHI)0ROHFXODU3UREHVZDVDGGHGDVDQLQWHUQDOVWDQGDUG&DOYR 'tD]DQG0RUiQ&HOOVXSWRFDPLQVL]HZHUHURXWLQHO\GHWHFWHG&RXQWVRIµVPDOO¶DQG µODUJH¶HXNDU\RWLFFHOOVZHUHVXPPHGXSWRREWDLQWRWDO33(VFRXQWV &$5'),6+FRXQWV&$WDO\]HG5HSRUWHU'HSRVLWLRQ)OXRUHVFHQW,Q6LWX+\EULGL]DWLRQ )RUZKROHFHOO&$5'),6+POVDPSOHVZHUHSUH¿OWHUHGE\ȝP¿[HGZLWKIRUPDOGHK\GH ¿QDOFRQFHQWUDWLRQ¿OWHUHGRQPSRUHVL]H1XFOHRSRUH¿OWHUVPPGLDPHWHUDQG NHSWIUR]HQ*URXSVSHFL¿FROLJRQXFOHRWLGHSUREHVZHUHDSSOLHGWRWDUJHWFKORURSK\WHV&+/2 SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV 35<0 FKU\VRSK\WHV &+5<62 DQG SHODJRSK\WHV 3(/$ DQG 3(/$'HVLJQDQGWHVWLQJRIWKH6U'1$SUREHV&+/235<0DQG3(/$ZDV described before (Simon et al., 2000; Not et al., 3UREHV&+5<62DQG3(/$ targeting the plastid 16S rDNA, were described for dot blot hybridizations (Fuller et al., 2006b) DQGPRGL¿HGIRU&$5'),6+E\-DUGLOOLHUet al. (2010) and in this work, respectively. Probes were SXUFKDVHGZLWKD¶DPLQROLQN&IURP7KHUPR)LVKHU6FLHQWL¿FDQGODEHOHGZLWKKRUVHUDGLVK perodidase, HRP (Roche Diagnostic Boehringer) as described before (Urdea et al., 1988; Amann et al., 1992))LOWHUVIRU&$5'),6+ZHUHHPEHGGHGLQZYORZJHOOLQJSRLQWDJDURVH WRPLQLPL]HFHOOORVV7KHK\EULGL]DWLRQZDVFDUULHGRXWE\FRYHULQJ¿OWHUSLHFHVZLWKORI K\EULGL]DWLRQEXIIHUGHLRQL]HGIRUPDPLGH>H[FHSWIRU&+5<62DQG3(/$WKDW
Chapter 1 53 ZDV@01D&OP07ULV+&O>S+@VRGLXPGRGHF\OVXOIDWH>6'6@DQG mg ml%ORFNLQJUHDJHQW>5RFKH'LDJQRVWLF%RHKULQJHU@FRQWDLQLQJORI+53ODEHOHGSUREH VWRFNDWQJO–1DQGLQFXEDWLQJDW&RYHUQLJKW$IWHUWZRVWHSVRIPLQDW&LQD ZDVKLQJEXIIHUP01D&O>RUP0ZKHQK\EULGL]LQJZLWKIRUPDPLGH@P0('7$ 6'6P07ULV+&O>S+@WKH¿OWHUVZHUHHTXLOLEUDWHGLQ3%6IRUPLQDWURRP WHPSHUDWXUH577\UDPLGHVLJQDODPSOL¿FDWLRQZDVGRQHIRUPLQDW57LQWKHGDUNLQDVROXWLRQ containing 1x PBS, 2 M NaCl, 1 mg ml blocking reagent, 100 mg ml dextran sulfate, 0.0015% H2O2DQGJPO$OH[DRUJPO$OH[DODEHOHGW\UDPLGH)LOWHUVZHUHWUDQVIHUUHGWR 3%6EXIIHUIRUPLQULQVHGZLWKGLVWLOOHGZDWHUDQGDLUGULHG3UHSDUDWLRQVZHUHFRXQWHUVWDLQHG ZLWK¶GLDPLGLQRSKHQ\OLQGROH'$3,DWJPO–1, mounted in antifading reagent (77% JO\FHURO9(&7$6+,(/'DQG[3%6DQGNHSWIUR]HQXQWLOPLFURVFRS\1RSUREH controls were carried out at surface and DCM in all stations to verify the absence of endogenous peroxidases in these samples. Hybridization conditions for probe 3(/$ were optimized using different formamide concentrations in the buffer. At 20% formamide, bright FISH signals were obtained in pelagophyte cultures used as positive controls (Pelagomonas calceolata [CCMP1214], Aureoumbra lagunensis >&&03@DQGAureococcus anophagefferens [CCMP1706]) while no hybridization signal was seen in other marine algal cultures used as negative controls (Pinguiococcus pyrenoidosus [CCMP1144] from Pinguiophyceae, Rhizocromulina sp. [&&03@IURP 'LFW\RFKRSK\FHDH and Ochromonas sp. [CCMP584 and RCC21] from Chrysophyceae). 'RXEOH&$5'),6+IRUSHODJRSK\WHV 3UREH3(/$ZDV LQLWLDOO\ WHVWHGLQHQYLURQPHQWDO VDPSOHV IURPWKH1:0HGLWHUUDQHDQDW WKH'&0GHSWKDQGEHORZUHVXOWLQJLQXQVSHFL¿FVLJQDOVDQGIDLQWÀXRUHVFHQFHRIWDUJHWFHOOV 7R VROYHWKLVZH GLGDGRXEOH&$5'),6+IRU SHODJRSK\WHVE\FRPELQLQJSUREHV3(/$ DJDLQVW HXNDU\RWLF F\WRSODVP DQG 3(/$ DJDLQVW FKORURSODVWV 3UREH 3(/$ ZDV tested on pelagophytes cultures and cultures from other marine algal classes and bright and clear ÀXRUHVFHQFHVLJQDOORFDOL]HGLQWKHFKORURSODVWZDVREWDLQHGRQO\ZLWKWKHSHODJRSK\WHFXOWXUHV Pelagophytes in INDEMARES samples were detected by a double hybridization procedure, using SUREHV 3(/$ DPSOL¿HG ZLWK$OH[D W\UDPLGH DQG 3(/$ DPSOL¿HG ZLWK$OH[D W\UDPLGH7KHGRXEOHK\EULGL]DWLRQZDVSHUIRUPHGLQVHTXHQFHDVSURSRVHGLQ3HUQWKDOHUet al.IRU³0XOWLFRORU&$5'),6+´$IWHUWKH¿UVWK\EULGL]DWLRQWKH3(/$SHUR[LGDVHV were inactivated with 0.01M HCl for 10 minutes at RT in the dark. Filter sections were then rinsed WZLFHZLWK0LOOL4ZDWHUDQGDLUGULHGEHIRUHVWDUWLQJWKHVHFRQGK\EULGL]DWLRQ:HWULHGGLIIHUHQW FRPELQDWLRQVRISUREHFRORUDQGDSSOLFDWLRQRUGHULQPelagomonas calceolata and the proposed combination nicely provided separated colored signals at different parts of the cell.
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 54 &RXQWLQJQDWXUDOFHOOV Filters were observed E\ HSLÀXRUHVFHQFH PLFURVFRS\ 2O\PSXV %; DW [ DW GLIIHUHQW excitations: UV (DAPI signal), blue light (Alexa 488 signal, green emission) or green light (Alexa VLJQDOUHGHPLVVLRQ&RXQWVRIK\EULGL]HGFHOOVZHUHGRQHIURPUDQGRPO\FKRVHQ¿HOGV [PRUZKHQFHOOGHQVLWLHVZHUHORZHUWKDQaFHOOVSHU¿HOGIURPWZRWUDQVHFWVa PP[PDFURVVWKH¿OWHUVHFWLRQ'XHWRWKHODUJHQXPEHURIVDPSOHVDQGWKHWLPHQHHGHG IRUHDFKFRXQWZHGLGQRWFRXQWUHSOLFDWHVIRUHDFKVDPSOH,QVWHDGZHFDOFXODWHGWKHFRHI¿FLHQW of variation (CV) in two samples displaying high (~1700 cells mlDQGORZaFHOOVPO) DEXQGDQFHRISHODJRSK\WHV7KUHH¿OWHUVHFWLRQVZHUHK\EULGL]HGLQWZRUHSOLFDWH¿OWHUVDWRWDO of six hybridizations per sample), yielding CV ranging from 24% (low abundance) to 18% (high DEXQGDQFH+\EULGL]HGFHOOVZHUHFODVVL¿HGLQWR¿YHVL]HFODVVHVDQG!P E\YLVXDOPHDVXUHPHQWVXVLQJDQRFXODUPLFURPHWHUPLQFUHPHQWV7KHW\SLFDOELRYROXPH RIHDFKVL]HFODVVZDVWDNHQDVWKHDYHUDJHRIWKHELRYROXPHRIWKHWZRVL]HOLPLWVDVVXPLQJD sphere. Biovolumes were converted to carbon biomass following the formula: pgC cell = 0.261* YRO>LQP])0.860 0HQGHQ'HXHUDQG/HVVDUG. $FNQRZOHGJHPHQWV Financial support has been provided by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity WKURXJK SURMHFW )$0262 &70&0$5 WR 0/ 0(),672 &70 3WR50DQG0,&52%)32&($1(8WR&3$$0&DEHOORZDV UHFLSLHQWRID6SDQLVK)3,JUDQW%(6:HWKDQN)6iQFKH]IRULQYLWLQJXVWR participate in the INDEMARES 0710 cruises and the chief scientists, technicians, researchers and FUHZIRUWKHLUFROODERUDWLRQ:HWKDQN*6DOD]DUDQG)0&RUQHMR&DVWLOORIRUGDWDWUHDWPHQW advice.
Chapter 1 55 Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 80 temperature (ºC) 10 14 18 22 NO30246 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 10 14 18 22 fluorescence ru 0246810 Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 80 0246810 (µM) PO43- (µM) Si(OH)4(µM) fluorescence ru temperature (ºC) NO30246 0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 (µM) PO43- (µM) Si(OH)4(µM) St A St B St C St D Fig. S1. Vertical profiles of inorganic nutrients (silicate, phosphate and nitrate) at each station, together with temperature and fluorescence profiles. Supplementary material Figure S1. 9HUWLFDOSUR¿OHVRILQRUJDQLFQXWULHQWVVLOLFDWHSKRVSKDWHDQGQLWUDWHDWHDFKVWDWLRQ WRJHWKHUZLWKWHPSHUDWXUHDQGÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHV
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 56 Figure S2. &RQWULEXWLRQRIFHOOVL]HFODVVHVRIHDFKJURXSDORQJWKHYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHV prymnesiophytes depth (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Contibution of size classes (%) 020406080 100 depth (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 < 2 µm 2-3 µm 3-4 µm 4-5 µm > 5 µm 020406080 100 Contibution of size classes (%) St A St B St C St D Fig. S2. Contribution of cell size classes of each group along the vertical profiles.
Chapter 1 57 depth (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Contribution of size classes (%) 020406080 100 depth (m) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 020406080 100 Contribution of size classes (%) pelagophytes St A St B St C St D Fig. S2. cont. < 2 µm 2-3 µm 3-4 µm 4-5 µm > 5 µm Figure S2. cont.
Photo-picoeukaryotes community structure in the DCM 64 3LZRV].6SLFK.&DáNLHZLF]-:H\GPDQQ$.XELV]\Q$0DQG:LNWRU-0 'LVWULEXWLRQRIVPDOOSK\WRÀDJHOODWHVDORQJDQ$UFWLFIMRUGWUDQVHFWEnviron Microbiol 17: 2406. Rappé, M.S., Suzuki, M.T., Vergin, K.L., and Giovannoni, S.J. (1998) Phylogenetic diversity of XOWUDSODQNWRQSODVWLGVPDOOVXEXQLWU51$JHQHVUHFRYHUHGLQHQYLURQPHQWDOQXFOHLFDFLGVDPSOHV IURPWKH3DFL¿FDQG$WODQWLFFRDVWVRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVAppl Environ Microbiol 64± Rodríguez, F., Derelle, E., Guillou, L., Le Gall, F., Vaulot, D., and Moreau, H. (2005) Ecotype diversity in the marine picoeukaryote Ostreococcus (Chlorophyta, Prasinophyceae). Environ Microbiol 7± Romari, K. and Vaulot, D. (2004) Composition and temporal variability of picoeukaryote communities at a coastal site of the English Channel from 18S rDNA sequences. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 784–798. Roy, S., Llewellyn, C.A., Egeland, E.S., and Johnsen, G. (2011) Phytoplankton pigments: Characterization, chemotaxonomy and applications in oceanography. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. Sharples, J., Moore, C.M., Rippeth, T.P., Holligan, P.M., Hydes, D.J., Fisher, N.R., and Simpson, J.H. (2001) Phytoplankton distribution and survival in the thermocline. Limnol Oceanogr 46: 486–496. Shi, X.L., Marie, D., Jardillier, L., Scanlan, D.J., and Vaulot, D. (2009) Groups without cultured UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV GRPLQDWH HXNDU\RWLF SLFRSK\WRSODQNWRQ LQ WKH ROLJRWURSKLF 6RXWK (DVW 3DFL¿F Ocean. PLoS One 4: e7657. Shi, X.L., Lepère, C., Scanlan, D.J., and Vaulot, D. (2011) Plastid 16S rRNA gene diversity among HXNDU\RWLFSLFRSK\WRSODQNWRQVRUWHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\IURPWKH6RXWK3DFL¿F2FHDQPLoS One 6: e18979. Simon, N., Campbell, L., Ornolfsdottir, E., Groben, R., Guillou, L., Lange, M., and Medlin, /.2OLJRQXFOHRWLGHSUREHVIRUWKHLGHQWL¿FDWLRQRIWKUHHDOJDOJURXSVE\GRWEORWDQG ÀXRUHVFHQWZKROHFHOOK\EULGL]DWLRQJ Euk Microbiol 47: 76–84. Suzuki, K., Minami, C., Liu, H., and Saino, T. (2002) Temporal and spatial patterns of FKHPRWD[RQRPLF DOJDO SLJPHQWV LQ WKH VXEDUFWLF 3DFL¿F DQG WKH %HULQJ 6HD GXULQJ WKH HDUO\ summer of 1999. Deep Sea Res II 49: 5685 –5704. 7LPPHUPDQV.5YDQGHU:DJW%9HOGKXLV0-:0DDWPDQ$DQGGH%DDU+-: 3K\VLRORJLFDOUHVSRQVHVRIWKUHHVSHFLHVRIPDULQHSLFRSK\WRSODQNWRQWRDPPRQLXPSKRVSKDWH iron and light limitation. J Sea Res 53: 109–120.
Chapter 1 65 8UGHD 06 :DUQHU %' 5XQQLQJ -$ 6WHPSLHQ 0 &O\QH - DQG +RUQ 7 $ FRPSDULVRQRIQRQUDGLRLVRWRSLFK\EULGL]DWLRQDVVD\PHWKRGVXVLQJÀXRUHVFHQWFKHPLOXPLQHVFHQW and enzyme labeled synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res 16± 9DXORW'(LNUHP:9LSUH\0DQG0RUHDX+7KHGLYHUVLW\RIVPDOOHXNDU\RWLF SK\WRSODQNWRQPLQPDULQHHFRV\VWHPVFEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 795–820. :RUGHQ$=1RODQ-.DQG3DOHQLN%$VVHVVLQJWKHG\QDPLFVDQGHFRORJ\RIPDULQH picophytoplankton: the importance of the eukaryotic component. Limnol Oceanogr 49: 168–179. :RUGHQ$=-DQRXVNRYHF-0F5RVH'(QJPDQ$:HOVK500DOIDWWL6et al. (2012) Global distribution of a wild alga revealed by targeted metagenomics. Curr Biol 22: R675–677. Zubkov, M. V., Sleigh, M.A., Burkill, P.H., and Leakey, R.J.G. (2000) Picoplankton community structure on the Atlantic Meridional Transect: a comparison between seasons. Prog Oceanogr 45: ±
Chapter 2
Chapter 2 69 Chapter 2 Distribution of phytoplankton groups within the deep chlorophyll maximum Mikel Latasa, Ana M. Cabello, Xosé Anxelu G. Morán, Ramon Massana and Renate Scharek. Summary 7KH ¿QH YHUWLFDO GLVWULEXWLRQ RI SK\WRSODQNWRQ JURXSV ZLWKLQ WKH GHHS FKORURSK\OO PD[LPXP '&0ZDVVWXGLHGLQWKH1($WODQWLFGXULQJVXPPHUVWUDWL¿FDWLRQ$VLPSOHVDPSOLQJVWUDWHJ\ DOORZHGH[DPLQLQJWKHYHUWLFDOVWUXFWXUHLQWKHZDWHUFROXPQZLWKFDWZRPHWHUUHVROXWLRQ7KH GLVWULEXWLRQRIProchlorococcus, SynechococcusFKORURSK\WHVSHODJRSK\WHVSU\PQHVLRSK\WHV GLDWRPVDQGGLQRÀDJHOODWHVZDVLQYHVWLJDWHGZLWKDFRPELQDWLRQRIJURXSSLJPHQWPDUNHUVÀ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rochlorococcusGLQRÀDJHOODWHVDQGSynechococcus) SUHIHUUHGWKHVKDOORZ'&0OD\HUDQGFKORURSK\WHVDQGVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVZHUHIRXQGLQ EHWZHHQ&HOOVL]HZLWKLQJURXSVFKDQJHGZLWKGHSWKZLWKDFRQWLQXRXVSDWWHUQUHODWHGWRWKHLU PHDQVL]HWKHVPDOOHVWFHOOVLQFUHDVHGLQYROXPHZKLOHWKHODUJHVWFHOOVGHFUHDVHG7KHYHUWLFDO DOLJQPHQWRISK\WRSODQNWRQJURXSVSUHFOXGHVFRQVLGHULQJWKH'&0DVDVLQJOHHQWLW\2YHUORRNLQJ WKHGLIIHUHQWLDOGLVWULEXWLRQFRXOGOHDGWRHUURUVZKHQGHVFULELQJWKHDEXQGDQFHVRISK\WRSODQNWRQ JURXSVLQWKH'&0OD\HU
Chapter 2 71 Introduction 7KHGHHSFKORURSK\OOPD[LPXP'&0LVDVXEVXUIDFHOD\HUHQULFKHGLQFKORURSK\OO&KOW\SLFDO RIVWUDWL¿HGPDULQHDQGIUHVKZDWHUERGLHV,WPLJKWEHWKHUHVXOWRIGLIIHUHQWSURFHVVHVDQGPD\ SUHVHQWGLIIHUHQWFKDUDFWHULVWLFV&XOOHQ,QWHPSHUDWHDUHDVWKH'&0GLVDSSHDUV LQZLQWHUZKHQPL[LQJWDNHVSODFHDQGUHDSSHDUVDIWHUWKHVSULQJEORRPZKHQVWUDWL¿FDWLRQLV HVWDEOLVKHG7KHG\QDPLFVRIWKLVNLQGRI'&0KDYHEHHQGHVFULEHGLQWKHOLWHUDWXUH(VWUDGDet al., 0LJQRWet al.%ULHÀ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et al./LFFDUGRet al.SK\WRSODQNWRQNHHSVGHSOHWLQJWKHQXWULHQWV LQWKHHXSKRWLF]RQHDQGGHHSHQLQJWKH'&0,QFRQFOXVLRQGXULQJDUHODWLYHO\ORQJSHULRGRIWKH \HDUWKH'&0FRUUHVSRQGVWRDGHHSELRPDVVPD[LPXP'%0LQWHPSHUDWHDUHDV ,W KDV EHHQ ORQJ UHFRJQL]HG WKDW SK\WRSODQNWRQ 9HQULFN DQG KHWHURWURSKLF EDFWHULRSODQNWRQ6XQDJDZDet al.FRPPXQLWLHVDWWKH'&0DQGLQWKHRYHUO\LQJPL[HG OD\HUDUHGLIIHUHQWUHÀ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¿QHVFDOHVWUXFWXUHRIWKH '&0SUREDEO\EHFDXVHRIWKHGLI¿FXOWLHVWRREWDLQVDPSOHVZLWKKLJKYHUWLFDOUHVROXWLRQ6SHFLDO SURFHGXUHVKDYHEHHQGHVLJQHGWRVDPSOHVPDOOVFDOHYHUWLFDOVWUXFWXUHVRIWKLQOD\HUV/XQYHQ et al.EXWWKH\KDYHQRWEHHQH[WHQGHGDQGDGDSWHGWRVWXG\WKH¿QHVWUXFWXUHRIWKHRSHQ ocean DCM. +HUHZHXVHGDVLPSOH&7'SURFHGXUHWRREWDLQVDPSOHVHYHU\PDQGWHVWWKHK\SRWKHVLV WKDW WKH '&0 LV QRW D VLQJOH KRPRJHQHRXV HFRORJLFDO HQWLW\ 7R WKDW DLP ZH VWXGLHG WKH YHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQRISK\WRSODQNWRQZLWKLQWKH'&0OD\HULQRIIVKRUHZDWHUVRIWKHQRUWKDQG QRUWKZHVWHUQ,EHULDQSHQLQVXODEHORQJLQJWRWKHELRJHRJUDSKLF1RUWK$WODQWLF'ULIW3URYLQFHRI
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 72 /RQJKXUVW,QWKLVDUHDZLQWHUPL[LQJUHDFKHVFDP6RPDYLOODet al.ZHOO EHORZWKHQXWULFOLQHDQGWKHSRVWHULRUUHVWUDWL¿FDWLRQEHJLQQLQJDURXQG0DUFKSURGXFHVDPDUNHG VSULQJEORRP6XPPHULVFKDUDFWHUL]HGE\DSURJUHVVLYHVWUHQJWKHQLQJRIVWUDWL¿FDWLRQIROORZLQJ WKHW\SLFDOWHPSRUDOSDWWHUQRIWKH1RUWK$WODQWLF/LQGHPDQQDQG6W-RKQ2XUVWXG\ZDV SHUIRUPHGGXULQJWKHVXPPHUSHULRGRIVWURQJWKHUPDOVWUDWL¿FDWLRQFKDUDFWHUL]HGE\WKHSUHVHQFH RIDPDUNHG'&0ORFDWHGDWWKHPGHSWKLQWHUYDO Material and Methods 6DPSOHVZHUHREWDLQHGGXULQJWKHOHJVRIWKHFUXLVH,QGHPDUHVDW$YLOpV&DQ\RQ$&DQG *DOLFLD%DQN*%LQWKHQRUWKDQGQRUWKZHVWHUQZDWHUVRIWKH,EHULDQ3HQLQVXODUHVSHFWLYHO\ LQ VXPPHU RQ ERDUG WKH 59 7KDODVVD )LJ &DVW ORFDWLRQ VDPSOH SDUDPHWHUV DQG FKDUDFWHULVWLFVRIWKH'&0OD\HUDUHGHVFULEHGLQ7DEOH7KH$&VDPSOLQJVWDWLRQVZHUHORFDWHG RQWKHFRQWLQHQWDOVKHOIWKHVORSHDQGWKHDE\VVDOSODQH7KH*%VWDWLRQVZHUHDOOORFDWHGLQDQ RSHQRFHDQDUHD7KHVDPSOLQJHTXLSPHQWFRQVLVWHGRID&7'SUR¿OHUD)OXRURPHWHU:(7ODEV (&2$)/DQGDERWWOH1LVNLQURVHWWH7RREWDLQGHWDLOHGSUR¿OHVRIWKH'&0GHHSFKORURSK\OO PD[LPXPWKH1LVNLQERWWOHVZHUHFORVHGHYHU\VHFRQGVGXULQJWKHXSFDVWDWDFRQVWDQWDVFHQW UDWHRIPVLHHYHU\P7KH¿UVWVDPSOHEHORZWKH'&0ZDVFKRVHQRQWKHEDVLVRI WKHGRZQFDVWÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OH$QDGGLWLRQDOVXUIDFHZDWHUVDPSOHZDVFROOHFWHG,QWKH*%DQ Figure 1.0DSRIWKHVDPSOLQJVWDWLRQV%DWK\PHWULFLVREDWKVUHSUHVHQWDQGPGHSWKV6WDWLRQVDQG LQWKH$YLOpV&DQ\RQDQGVWDWLRQVDQGLQWKH*DOLFLD%DQNFRUUHVSRQGWRVWDWLRQV$%&DQG'LQ&KDSWHU UHVSHFWLYHO\
Chapter 2 73 LQWHUPHGLDWHVDPSOHZDVFROOHFWHGLQWKHPLGGOHRIWKHPL[HGOD\HU,UUDGLDQFHPHDVXUHPHQWVZHUH QRWDYDLODEOHGXULQJWKHFUXLVH7RUHFRQVWUXFWWKHLUUDGLDQFHSUR¿OHVZHDVVXPHGWKDWWKHGHSWKRI WKH'&0SHDN=DCMZDVORFDWHGDWWKHVXUIDFHLUUDGLDQFH1DYDUURDQG5XL]0LJQRW et al.$QDWWHQXDWLRQFRHI¿FLHQW.3$5IRUHDFKSUR¿OHZDVREWDLQHGDV.3$5 =DCM and WKHYHUWLFDOLUUDGLDQFHSUR¿OHHVWLPDWHGIURP(] ([.[]ZKHUH=DCMLVWKHGHSWKRIWKH '&0(DQG(]DUHWKHLUUDGLDQFHVDWVXUIDFHDQGDWGHSWK]DQG.LVWKH.3$5. 23 Table 1. Sample location, parameters analyzed and main characteristics of the DCM layer. Cast Coordinates (W, N) Date Parameters analyzed Depth (m) Chl a max (mg m-3) Width (m) Asymmetry 48 06.2745, 43.7565 29/07 FCM, HPLC 32 1.59 11 -0.048 52 06.2693, 44.0028 30/07 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients, FISH, Microscopy 54 0.628 39 -0.109 55 06.3852, 43.7555 31/07 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients 22 1.87 17 0.252 66 06.2718, 44.1720 02/08 FCM, HPLC 59 0.411 65 0.390 73 05.6977, 44.0425 04/08 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients, FISH, Microscopy 42 1.22 13 0.886 75 11.2572, 43.1665 07/08 FCM, HPLC 54 0.417 32 -0.020 80 12.3895, 43.1682 08/08 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients, FISH, Microscopy 56 0.449 36 0.218 83 11.7078, 42.9993 09/08 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients, FISH 52 0.507 27 -0.053 88 12.1622, 42.8353 10/08 FCM, HPLC 65 0.616 26 0.082 92 11.4838, 42.8332 11/08 FCM, HPLC 38 0.487 24 0.287 101 12.1630, 42.6675 13/08 FCM, HPLC, Nutrients 58 0.474 30 0.068 Variables analyzed )RUQXWULHQWDQDO\VLVP/RIXQ¿OWHUHGVDPSOHZHUHIUR]HQDQGNHSWDW&LPPHGLDWHO\DIWHU VDPSOLQJ,QRUJDQLFQXWULHQWVZHUHDQDO\]HGE\VWDQGDUGQXWULHQWWHFKQLTXHVZLWKD6.$/$56DQ 3OXV$XWRDQDO\]HU'HWHFWLRQOLPLWVIRUWKHGLIIHUHQWPROHFXOHVZHUHLQPPROP12), 1232DQG6L2). )RUÀRZF\WRPHWU\DQDO\VLVP/RIVDPSOHZHUH¿[HGZLWKSDUDIRUPDOGHK\GHSOXV JOXWDUDOGHK\GHÀDVKIUR]HQLQOLTXLGQLWURJHQDQGNHSWDWí&7KHDQDO\VLVZDVSHUIRUPHG ZLWKD)$&6&DOLEXUÀRZF\WRPHWHU%'%LRVFLHQFHVHTXLSSHGZLWKDODVHUHPLWWLQJDWQP 7KHÀRZUDWHZDVFDOLEUDWHGGDLO\E\ZHLJKWWRHVWLPDWHFHOOFRQFHQWUDWLRQV$VROXWLRQRIȝP ÀXRUHVFHQWODWH[EHDGVUHI)0ROHFXODU3UREHVZDVDGGHGDVDQLQWHUQDOVWDQGDUGVRWKDW DOOFHOOXODUYDULDEOHVZHUHUHODWHGWRÀXRUHVFHQWEHDGVYDOXHV Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus ÀRZF\WRPHWU\FHOOFRXQWVZHUHFRQYHUWHGWRFDUERQ&DIWHUHVWLPDWLQJWKHLUFHOOYROXPHIURPWKH UHODWLYHVLGHVFDWWHUVLJQDODVGHVFULEHGLQ&DOYR'tD]DQG0RUiQDQGXVLQJWKHDYHUDJH YDOXHRIIJ&P:RUGHQet al.
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 80 Figure 4.9HUWLFDOSUR¿OHVRISLJPHQWV¿OOHGFLUFOHVERWWRP[D[LVQJ/DQGFHOOFRXQWVHPSW\FLUFOHVDQGWULDQJOHVWRS[D[LVFHOOP/PHDVXUHGE\ÀRZF\WRPHWU\ ),6+ DQG OLJKW PLFURVFRS\ 3HU SHULGLQLQ )XFR IXFR[DQWKLQ ¶KH[ ¶KH[DQR\OR[\IXFR[DQWKLQ ¶EXW ¶EXWDQR\OR[\IXFR[DQWKLQ 9LRO YLROD[DQWKLQ =HD ]HD[DQWKLQ'9DGLYLQ\OFKORURSK\OOa, Chl aFKORURSK\OOa6\QSynechococcus'LQRGLQRÀDJHOODWHV'LDWGLDWRPV&RFFRFRFFROLWKRSKRULGV3U\PVPDOOP SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV3HODJSHODJRSK\WHV&KORURFKORURSK\WHV3URProchlorococcus.1RWHWKHFKDQJHVLQVFDOHV)OXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHVDUHSUHVHQWHGDVJUH\DUHDVIRUUHIHUHQFH ZLWKRXWVFDOHWRVKRZWKHVKDSHRIWKHSUR¿OH,QWKH¶KH[FRFFRVDQG3U\PSORWVWKHRIIVHWWRS[D[LVFRUUHVSRQGVWRFHOOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVRIVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHV
Chapter 2 81 Figure 4. Cont.
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 82 Figure 5.&KDQJHVLQWKHSLJPHQWPDUNHUFRQWHQWSHUFHOODVDIXQFWLRQRIWKH LUUDGLDQFH7ULDQJOHVDUHH[FOXGHGIURPWKHFXUYH¿WWLQJGDWDVHHWH[WIRUGHWDLOV 5 SQ =HD[DQWKLQZDVVWURQJO\FRUUHODWHGZLWKSynechococcus in the AC area 5 SQ ZKHUHWKHFRQWULEXWLRQRIRWKHUJURXSVFKORURSK\WHVDQGProchlorococcus) WRWKH]HD[DQWKLQSRROZDVPLQRURUDEVHQW,QPDQ\FDVHVWKHUHZDVFHOOSKRWRDFFOLPDWLRQZLWK GHSWKGXHWRFKDQJHVLQWKHLUUDGLDQFHOHYHO:HIRXQGDQH[SRQHQWLDOLQFUHDVHLQWKHFHOOSLJPHQW PDUNHUFRQWHQWZLWKGHFUHDVLQJLUUDGLDQFHIRUProchlorococcus, SynechococcusSHODJRSK\WHV VPDOO SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV GLQRÀDJHOODWHV DQG GLDWRPV )LJ EXW QRW VLJQL¿FDQW FKDQJHV IRU FKORURSK\WHV,QWHUHVWLQJO\SLJPHQWVDQGFRXQWVIRUWKLVODWHUJURXSGLGQRWVKRZDGHHSPD[LPXP DVVWURQJDVWKHRWKHUJURXSV7KHVHUHODWLRQVKLSVEHWZHHQFHOOSLJPHQWFRQWHQWDQGLUUDGLDQFH ZHUHXVHGWRHVWLPDWHYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHVRIFHOOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVIURPSLJPHQWV
Chapter 2 83 Photoacclimation &KDQJHVLQSLJPHQWSHUFHOORU&ZLWKGHSWKZHUHREVHUYHGIRUPRVWJURXSV)LJV6+RZ WKRVHFKDQJHVDIIHFWHGHDFKJURXSLVGHVFULEHGQH[W,QProchlorococcusWKHSKRWRDFFOLPDWLRQ SDUDPHWHUVLQGLFDWHGWKDW'9&KOaSHUProchlorococcusZDVIJFHOO7DEOHVLPLODU WRWKHUHSRUWHGE\9HOGKXLVDQG.UDD\7KHVHYDOXHVDUHHTXLYDOHQWWR&WR '9&KOaUDWLRRI,QSynechococcus]HD[DQWKLQSHUFHOOZDVIJFHOODYDOXHZHOO DERYHWKHIJFHOOUHSRUWHGE\.DQDet alWKHUHSRUWHGE\%LGLJDUHet al. DQGWKHUHSRUWHGE\0RRUHet al+RZHYHULQWHUPVRIPJJWKHPHDQYDOXH RILVLQWKHWRUDQJHSURYLGHGE\/LXet al7KHUHDUHQRUHSRUWVIRUGLUHFWSLJPHQW FRQWHQWLQSHODJRSK\WHVQHLWKHUIRUWKHQRQFDOFLI\LQJVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHV$QGHUVHQet al. KRZHYHUUHSRUWHGFRUUHODWLRQVEHWZHHQ&KOaDVFULEHGWRSHODJRSK\WHVDQGSHODJRSK\WHV cells and Chl aDVFULEHGWRSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVDQGVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVFHOOV$URXJKH[HUFLVH FRXOGEHPDGHEXWZLWKVRPHFDXWLRQEHFDXVHWKHLQWHUFHSWVRIWKHVHFRUUHODWLRQVDOWKRXJKVPDOO ZHUHQRW]HUR7KHVORSHVRI&KOaYHUVXVFHOOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVUHSRUWHGZHUHDQGIJFHOO UHVSHFWLYHO\7RREWDLQWKHFRQWHQWRI¶EXWIXFRDQG¶KH[IXFRSHUFHOOWKRVH&KOaYDOXHV VKRXOGEHGLYLGHGE\WKH¶EXWIXFRWR&KOaUDWLRIRUSHODJRSK\WHVZKLFKZDVDFFRUGLQJWR $QGHUVHQDQGE\WKH¶KH[IXFRWR&KOaUDWLRIRUSU\PQHVLRSK\WHV7KXVYDOXHVRI IJFHOORI¶EXWIXFRIRUSHODJRSK\WHVDQGIJFHOORI¶KH[IXFRIRUSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVDUH REWDLQHG&RQVLGHULQJWKHODUJHUVL]HRISU\PQHVLRSK\WHVDURXQGWLPHV7DEOHWKHYDOXHV HVWLPDWHGLQRXUVWXG\DQGIJFHOORUDQGIJ&UHVSHFWLYHO\7DEOH6DSSHDU 25 Table 3. Parameters of photoacclimation for pigment cell-1 and pigment C-1 versus percent irradiance. See text for equation. P max P min k R2 Mean±S.D. DVChl a per Pro fg cell-1 mg g-1 4.2734 26.93 0.3264 12.51 1.077 0.2745 0.87 0.47 1.50±1.14 21.3±6.05 Zeax per Syn fg cell-1 mg g-1 0.7118 --- 0.4856 --- 0.4018 --- 0.11 --- 0.631±0.166 4.90±1.30 Viol per chloro fg cell-1 mg g-1 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1.38±0.84 1.81±1.02 19'but-fuco per pelago fg cell-1 mg g-1 119.98 68.22 62.77 30.17 0.878 0.892 0.37 0.49 82.3±24.2 43.0±13.9 19'hex-fuco per prym fg cell-1 mg g-1 301.6 85.28 67.1 15.31 0.144 0.4215 0.32 0.87 193.8±78.9 48.4±22.8 Per per dino fg cell-1 462.17 50.57 0.2153 0.45 333±139 Fuco per diat fg cell-1 2809.6 827.6 0.6713 0.71 1659±643 *Violaxanthin per chlorophyte versus irradiance failed to adjust. Zeaxanthin per C-1 in Synechococcus failed to adjust. Changes in pigment per C content were not calculated for dinoflagellates and diatoms.
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 84 WRGHSDUWOHVVIURPWKHDYHUDJHFRQWHQWRISLJPHQWSHU&LQWKHFHOOVRIERWKJURXSV,WVKRXOGEH QRWHGWKDWWKHUHLVDFRQWULEXWLRQRIFRFFROLWKRSKRUHVDURXQG7DEOH)LJ6WRWKH¶KH[ IXFRDWWULEXWHGWRVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVQRWDFFRXQWHGLQ7DEOH67RRXUNQRZOHGJHWKLVLVWKH ¿UVWWLPHWKDWYLROD[DQWKLQLVXVHGDVWKHVSHFL¿FSLJPHQWPDUNHURIFKORURSK\WHV$PHDQYDOXH RIYLROD[DQWKLQWR&KOaFRXOGEHHVWLPDWHGIRU3UDVLQRSK\FHDH/DWDVDet al.DJURXS EHORQJLQJWRFKORURSK\WHVDQGSUREDEO\GRPLQDWLQJWKLVFODVVLQFRDVWDODQGRSHQRFHDQ1RWet al.'LYLGLQJWKDWUDWLRE\WKHYLROD[DQWKLQFRQWHQW7DEOHDPHDQRIZZ& to Chl aZRXOGUHVXOWIRUFKORURSK\WHV Depth distribution 7KHZHLJKWHGPHDQGHSWKGLVWULEXWLRQRIHDFKSK\WRSODQNWRQJURXSLQGLFDWHGDSUHIHUHQFHIRU DGLIIHUHQWSRVLWLRQZLWKLQWKH'&0KLQWLQJDSUHIHUHQFHIRUGLIIHUHQWHFRORJLFDOQLFKHVZLWKLQ WKH '&0 &HUWDLQ YHUWLFDO DOLJQPHQW FDQ EH LGHQWL¿HG )LJ Prochlorococcus RFFXSLHG SUHIHUHQWLDOO\WKHVKDOORZHVWSDUWVRIWKH'&0OD\HUDQGSHODJRSK\WHVWKHGHHSHVW7KHGHSWK GLVWULEXWLRQ RI GLQRÀDJHOODWHV DQG Synechococcus WKH QH[W VKDOORZHVW JURXSV ZDV GLIIHUHQW IURP FKORURSK\WHV GLDWRPV DQG SHODJRSK\WHV Synechococcus ZDV QRW VWDWLVWLFDOO\ GLIIHUHQW IURPWKHVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVZKLFKZHUHORFDWHGVKDOORZHUWKDQGLDWRPVDQGSHODJRSK\WHV &KORURSK\WHVSUHVHQWHGDEURDGYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQDQGZHUHQRWGLIIHUHQWO\ORFDWHGIURPVPDOO SU\PQHVLRSK\WHV GLDWRPV DQG SHODJRSK\WHV 2YHUDOO LW FRXOG EH GLVWLQJXLVKHG WZR JURXSV SHODJRSK\WHV DQG GLDWRPV ZLWK D SUHIHUHQFH IRU WKH GHHS '&0 OD\HU DQRWKHU WKUHH JURXSV (ProchlorococcusGLQRÀDJHOODWHVDQGSynechococcusZLWKDSUHIHUHQFHIRUWKHVKDOORZ'&0 OD\HUDQGFKORURSK\WHVDQGVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVLQEHWZHHQ Figure 6. :HLJKWHG GHSWK GLVWULEXWLRQ RI SK\WRSODQNWRQ JURXSV UHIHUUHG WR WKH ZHLJKWHG GHSWK GLVWULEXWLRQ RI &KO a. 6LJQL¿FDQW GLIIHUHQFHV DPRQJ JURXSV HVWLPDWHGE\WKHFRQ¿GHQFHLQWHUYDO RIWKHPHDQDUHUHSUHVHQWHGE\GLIIHUHQW OHWWHUV7KHKRUL]RQWDOEDULQVLGHWKHER[ LQGLFDWHVWKHPHGLDQWKHER[LQFOXGHVWKH WK WK SHUFHQWLOH LQWHUYDO DQG WKH ZKLVNHUVLQFOXGHWKHH[WUHPHYDOXHV
Chapter 2 85 Discussion 7KHQHZVDPSOLQJVWUDWHJ\SURSRVHGKHUHDOORZVLQYHVWLJDWLQJWKHYHUWLFDOVWUXFWXUHLQWKHZDWHU FROXPQZLWKFDPHWHUUHVROXWLRQ7KHYHUWLFDOVDPSOLQJRIWKHZDWHUFROXPQKDVIROORZHG WZRVWUDWHJLHVUHSUHVHQWLQJGLIIHUHQWREMHFWLYHVWKDWUHTXLUHGLIIHUHQWPHWKRGRORJLHV7KHVWXG\RI WKLQOD\HUVIRFXVHVRQQDUURZVWUXFWXUHVRIXSWRDIHZPHWHUVWKLFNPZLWKPHFKDQLVPVRI IRUPDWLRQDQGFKDUDFWHULVWLFVGLIIHUHQWIURPW\SLFDO'&0+RGJHVDQG)UDWDQWRQL'XUKDP DQG6WRFNHU6DPSOLQJLVSHUIRUPHGZLWKVSHFL¿FGHYLFHVFDSDEOHRIUHVROYLQJVFDOHVRI FPZLWKRXWDIIHFWLQJWKRVHVWUXFWXUHV/XQYHQet al.2QWKHRWKHUKDQGWKHPRVWXVXDO RFHDQLFVWXGLHVSHUIRUPERWWOHVDPSOLQJZLWKLQWHUYDOVLQWKHRUGHURIVHYHUDOPHWHUVDQG PRUH+RZHYHUVKDOORZS\FQROLQHVWKHUPRFOLQHVQXWULFOLQHVDQG'&0VWUXFWXUHVHQFRPSDVV GHSWKLQWHUYDOVDURXQGP)LJV7DEOH7KHVHVWUXFWXUHVDUHQRWDGHTXDWHO\VDPSOHG ZLWKWKHVWUDWHJLHVVSHFL¿HGDERYHEHFDXVHWKLQOD\HUVGHYLFHVZRXOGEHFRPHXQPDQDJHDEOH ODUJHDQGWKHPLQWHUYDOVXVXDOO\XVHGZKHQVDPSOLQJZLWKERWWOHVPLVVWKHUHVROXWLRQQHHGHG WRDGHTXDWHO\GHVFULEHWKRVHVWUXFWXUHV:HKDYHVKRZQWKDWZLWKDPVVSHHGWRFDUU\D ERWWOHURVHWWHXSDQGFORVLQJWKHERWWOHVZLWKRXWVWRSSLQJFRXOGVDWLVIDFWRULO\UHVROYHWKHQXWULFOLQH DQGWKHGLIIHUHQWSK\WRSODQNWRQHFRORJLFDOQLFKHVZLWKLQWKHPGHSWKLQWHUYDOHPEUDFHGE\ PRVWRIWKH'&0OD\HUVRIRXUVWXG\7DEOH$VDFDXWLRQDU\QRWHWKH¿QHYHUWLFDOVWUXFWXUH LVXQGRXEWHGO\GLVWXUEHGDQGVPHDUHGE\WKHHTXLSPHQWWKXVSUHYHQWLQJWKHVWXG\RISURSHUWKLQ OD\HUVZLWKWKLVV\VWHP 7KHFRPELQDWLRQRIJURXSSLJPHQWPDUNHUVÀRZF\WRPHWU\RSWLFDOPLFURVFRS\DQG),6+DOORZHG WKH VWXG\ RI WKH ¿QH YHUWLFDO GLVWULEXWLRQ RI Prochlorococcus, Synechococcus FKORURSK\WHV SHODJRSK\WHVSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVGLDWRPVDQGGLQRÀDJHOODWHVProchlorococcusZHUHDEVHQWLQWKH $YLOpV&DQ\RQDUHVXOWDOUHDG\UHSRUWHGIRUWKLVSHULRGRIWKH\HDU&DOYR'tD]et al.$OO JURXSVSUHVHQWHGPLQLPXPFHOODEXQGDQFHVDWWKHVXUIDFHDQGDPD[LPXPFORVHWRWKH'&0 )LJ7KHUHIRUHWKH'&0ZDVDOVRDGHHSELRPDVVPD[LPXP'%0/VHQVX&XOOHQ DQGDVVXFKZLOOEHFRQVLGHUHGWKURXJKRXWWKLVGLVFXVVLRQ,WLVLQWHUHVWLQJWRQRWHWKDWWKHFHOO GLVWULEXWLRQLVQRWYHUWLFDOO\V\PPHWULFDODURXQGWKH'&0)LJ7KLVUHVXOWLQGLFDWHVWKDWLQ JHQHUDOFHOOVWHQGWRDFFXPXODWHSUHIHUHQWLDOO\LQWKHXSSHUSDUWRIWKH'&0OD\HUGLIIHUHQWIURP DPRUHV\PPHWULFDOYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQRI&KOa7KLVGLIIHUHQFHZDVDUHVXOWRIWKHLQFUHDVHRI Chl aSHUFHOOZLWKGHSWKGXHWRSKRWRDFFOLPDWLRQSURFHVVHV+DGWKLVSKRWRDFFOLPDWLRQQRWEHHQ FRUUHFWHGWKHSLJPHQWSUR¿OHZRXOGKDYHOHGWRDQHUURQHRXVGHHSHUGLVWULEXWLRQRIFHOOVRIWKHVH JURXSV 3K\WRSODQNWRQ JURXSV DOLJQHG YHUWLFDOO\ LQ D FRQVLVWHQW ZD\ XQGHU WKH VXPPHU VWUDWL¿FDWLRQ FRQGLWLRQVLQRXUVWXG\DUHDVXJJHVWLQJWKDWWKH\KDYHFHUWDLQHFRORJLFDOSUHIHUHQFHVIRUGLIIHUHQW QLFKHVZLWKLQWKH'&0)LJZKHUHYHUWLFDOJUDGLHQWVRIQXWULHQWVOLJKWDQGWHPSHUDWXUHDUH VWURQJHVW,QWKHIROORZLQJZHLQYHVWLJDWHWKHUHDVRQVIRUWKLVGLIIHUHQWLDOYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQ DFFRUGLQJ WR WKH PRVW FRPPRQ H[SODQDWLRQ IRU WKH H[LVWHQFH RI D GHHS ELRPDVV PD[LPXP
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 86 GLIIHUHQFHVLQORVVHVWRSUHGDWRUVJURZWKDQGVLQNLQJRUPLJUDWLRQDPRQJWKHGLIIHUHQWJURXSVRI SK\WRSODQNWRQ&XOOHQ 'LIIHUHQWLDOVLQNLQJKDVEHHQFRQVLGHUHGLQPRGHOLQJVWXGLHVDVDPDLQIDFWRULQÀXHQFLQJWKH IRUPDWLRQDQGPDLQWHQDQFHRID'&0+RGJHVDQG5XGQLFN'LMNVWUD1RWDJJUHJDWHG SK\WRSODQNWRQLQFUHDVHGVLQNLQJVSHHGVKDYHEHHQUHODWHGWRSRRUQXWULWLRQDOVWDWXV%LHQIDQJDQG +DUULVRQ:DLWHet al.*HUHFKWet al.DQGVL]H6PD\GD:DLWHet al. 5LFKDUGVRQDQG-DFNVRQ6L]HLVFRQVLGHUHGDJRRGSUR[\IRUJUDYLWDWLRQDOVLQNLQJEHFDXVH RIWZRUHDVRQVVLQNLQJVSHHGLVGLUHFWO\UHODWHGWRWKHVTXDUHRIWKHSDUWLFOHUDGLXVDFFRUGLQJWR 6WRNHV¶ODZDQGQXWULHQWXSWDNHDWORZFRQFHQWUDWLRQVSHQDOL]HVFHOOVZLWKKLJKYROXPHWRVXUIDFH UDWLRODUJHSDUWLFOHV,QRXUVWXG\FHOOVL]HZLWKLQJURXSVFKDQJHGZLWKGHSWKZLWKDTXLWHVXUSULVLQJ EXWFRQVLVWHQWSDWWHUQUHODWHGWRWKHLUPHDQVL]H)LJVDQG67DEOH6Prochlorococcus, WKHVPDOOHVWFHOOVLQFUHDVHGWKHLU&FRQWHQWDERXWWLPHVIURPVXUIDFHWRGHHSHVWVDPSOH7KH increase in SynechococcusWKHQH[WVPDOOHVWJURXSZDVDERXWWLPHV+RZHYHUSHODJRSK\WHV Figure 7.&KDQJHVLQ&FRQWHQWSHUFHOODVD IXQFWLRQRIWKHLUUDGLDQFH
Chapter 2 87 DQGVPDOOPSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVUHYHUVHGWKLVWUHQGDQGGHFUHDVHGWKHLU&FRQWHQWZLWKGHSWK &KORURSK\WHVWKHVPDOOHVWSLFRHXNDU\RWHVRIRXUVWXG\GLGQRWVKRZFRQVLVWHQWFKDQJHVLQ& FRQWHQW7KHUDQJHRIVL]HFODVVHVLQGLQRÀDJHOODWHVDQGGLDWRPVZDVWRRFRDUVHWRVKRZDUHOLDEOH FKDQJHRIVL]HZLWKLUUDGLDQFH7KHVWURQJHVWFKDQJHLQVL]HIRUDOOJURXSVRFFXUUHGEHWZHHQ DQGLUUDGLDQFHOHYHO)LJ67DEOH6,QVXPPDU\FKDQJHVLQFHOOYROXPHZLWKGHSWKZLWKLQ FODVVHVIROORZHGDFRQWLQXRXVWUHQGUHODWHGWRWKHLURYHUDOOVL]HWKHVPDOOHVWFHOOVLQFUHDVHGWKHLU YROXPHZLWKGHSWKWKHPRVWZKLOHWKHODUJHVWFHOOVGHFUHDVHGWKHLUYROXPHWKHPRVW)LJ7DEOH 6:HFXUUHQWO\GRQRWKDYHDQH[SODQDWLRQIRUWKLVFOHDUDQGFRQVLVWHQWSDWWHUQDOVRUHSRUWHGE\ &DVH\et al7KHVHDXWKRUVVXJJHVWHGWKDWWKHLQFUHDVHZLWKGHSWKLQProchlorococcus is due WRWKHLQFUHDVHLQSKRWRV\QWKHWLFVWUXFWXUHVXQGHUORZLUUDGLDQFH+RZHYHUWKHSKRWRDFFOLPDWLRQ UHVSRQVHZDVWKHVDPHIRUDOOJURXSVZKLOHWKHVL]HUHVSRQVHZDVQRWOHDYLQJWKHGHFUHDVHLQ YROXPHRISHODJRSK\WHVDQGVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVZLWKGHSWKXQH[SODLQHG,QVSLWHRIDOOWKLV YDULDELOLW\WKHVL]HRISK\WRSODQNWRQFODVVHVGLVWLQJXLVKHGKHUHGLGQRWRYHUODSDWDQ\JLYHQGHSWK 7KHDYHUDJHVL]HLQFUHDVHGLQWKHIROORZLQJRUGHUProchlorococcus, SynechococcusFKORURSK\WHV SHODJRSK\WHVSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVGLQRÀDJHOODWHVDQGGLDWRPV$OWKRXJKWKHUHDUHVRPHVLPLODULWLHV WKLVGLVWULEXWLRQGRHVQRWPDWFKWKHYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQREVHUYHGIRUWKHVHJURXSV)LJ7KH KLJKHUWKDQH[SHFWHGSRVLWLRQRIGLQRÀDJHOODWHVFRXOGEHH[SODLQHGE\WKHLUVZLPPLQJDELOLW\WR VHDUFKIRUZHOOOLWOD\HUVVHHEHORZ+RZHYHUDPDLQGLVFUHSDQF\LVWKHVLPLODUGHHSGLVWULEXWLRQ RIWKHODUJHGLDWRPVDQGSHODJRSK\WHVZKLFKVRPHKRZLQYDOLGDWHVWKHGLIIHUHQWLDOVLQNLQJWKHRU\ XQOHVVWKHGHQVLW\RISHODJRSK\WHVLVH[FHSWLRQDOO\KLJK Figure 8.6XPPDU\RIFKDQJHVLQFHOOYROXPHYHUVXVWKHLUDYHUDJHVL]H&KDQJHVLQFHOOYROXPHDUHUHSUHVHQWHGDVWKH VORSHRIFHOOYROXPHLQWKHLUUDGLDQFHOHYHOVVHH)LJ6(UURUEDUVLQGLFDWH6'
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 88 $QRWKHUSRLQWWRH[SORUHLVDJURXSVHOHFWLYHGHSWKGHSHQGHQWJUD]LQJ:HGRQRW¿QGVSHFL¿F UHDVRQVWRDVVXPHDGLIIHUHQWLDOWRSGRZQFRQWUROWRSURGXFHWKHSUHVHQWHGSUR¿OHV)LJV 3UHGDWRUDYRLGDQFHKDVEHHQGHVFULEHGE\VZLPPLQJSK\WRSODQNWRQIRUDQR[LFODNHV3HGUyV$OLy et al.EXWVXFKDQH[WUHPHHQYLURQPHQWIRUKHWHURWURSKLFIHHGLQJFDQQRWEHHQYLVLRQHGKHUH )LJVDQG$OVRWR[LQSURGXFLQJSK\WRSODQNWRQPLJKWUHGXFHLQJHVWLRQUDWHVRISUHGDWRUV WKXVSURGXFLQJDELRPDVVLQFUHDVHRIVXFKSK\WRSODQNWRQ7XUQHUDQG7HVWHU%R\Get al., 7KHSUHGRPLQDQWODUJHSK\WRSODQNWRQ!PLQRXUVDPSOHVFRUUHVSRQGHGWRWKHJHQXV Chaetoceros VJ Hyalochaete, Leptocylindrus, Proboscia, Rhizosolenia, Pseudo-nitzschia JURXS delicatissima, Nitzschia bicapitataW\SHDQGVRPHIXVLIRUPSHQQDWHVGLDWRPVGymnodinium and CeratiumGLQRÀ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¿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ÀXHQFHDSRWHQWLDOGLIIHUHQFHLQJURZWKUDWHVRIWKH GLIIHUHQWSK\WRSODQNWRQJURXSVEXWZHFRXOGWU\WRFRPSDUHVRPHPDLQWUDLWVIURPWKHJURXSV ZLWKWKHYDULDEOHFRQGLWLRQVRIWKH'&0OD\HUDQGPDNHVRPHUHDVRQDEOHVSHFXODWLRQVDERXW WKHDOLJQPHQWIRXQG,Q WKHRU\ DOO JURXSVVKRXOGSUHIHUVKDOORZHU EHWWHU LOOXPLQDWHG ZDWHUV ProchlorococcusZHUHFDSDEOHWRVWD\WKHVKDOORZHVWDERYHWKHQXWULHQWULFKGHSWKVLQGLFDWLQJ WKHLUZHOONQRZQDELOLW\WRFRSHLQORZQXWULHQWFRQGLWLRQV3DUWHQVN\et al./DWDVDet al., SynechococcusDOVRUHPDLQHGLQWKHPRUHLOOXPLQDWHGZDWHUVRIWKH'&0OD\HU7KHZLGH GLVWULEXWLRQRISynechococcusKLQWV WKHLU SUHIHUHQFHIRUPHVRWURSKLFFRQGLWLRQV3DUWHQVN\ et al./DWDVDet al.EXWDOVRWKHLUSODVWLFLW\WRVXUYLYHLQORZQXWULHQWHQYLURQPHQWV 3DHUOet al.'LQRÀDJHOODWHVZHUHWKHHXNDU\RWHVZLWKWKHVKDOORZHVWGLVWULEXWLRQE\IDU 6DPSOLQJZDVSHUIRUPHGDOZD\VDWQLJKWWKXVWKHXVXDOH[SODQDWLRQWKDWYHUWLFDOPLJUDWLRQVE\ GLQRÀDJHOODWHVDUHSHUIRUPHGWRREWDLQQXWULHQWVDWGHSWKDWQLJKWIROORZHGE\VZLPPLQJWRZDUGV WKHVXUIDFHGXULQJWKHGD\FDQQRWEHDSSOLHGKHUH7KHVKDOORZGLVWULEXWLRQRIGLQRÀDJHOODWHV KDVEHHQDWWULEXWHGWRWKHSUHVHQFHRIPL[RWURSKLFDQGKHWHURWURSKLFIRUPV(VWUDGD,I WKLVZDVWKHFDVHWKHGHVFULEHGSRSXODWLRQZRXOGEHIRUPHGE\PL[RWURSKLFIRUPVVLQFHWKHLU DEXQGDQFHZDVEDVHGRQWKHLUSLJPHQWPDUNHUFRQFHQWUDWLRQSXUHKHWHURWURSKLFIRUPVZHUHQRW
Chapter 2 89 GHWHFWHG7KHVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVFRQVLGHUHGKHUHGRQRWLQFOXGHFRFFROLWKRSKRUHVEXWEHORQJ WRWKHQRQFDOFLI\LQJSRSXODWLRQVGHVFULEHGE\SLJPHQW$QGHUVHQet al.1RWet al. and molecular (Liu et al.DSSURDFKHV7KHVKDOORZSRVLWLRQRIVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHVLQ UHODWLRQWRRWKHUSLFRHXNDU\RWLFDOJDHDJUHHVZLWKRWKHUUHVXOWV&DEHOORet al.&KDSWHU'XSRQWet al.7KH\DSSHDUWRKDYHPL[RWURSKLFDELOLWLHV8QUHLQet al=XENRY7DUUDQ WKHUHIRUHSUHVHQWLQJDQRWKHUDUJXPHQWVXSSRUWLQJWKHLUUHODWLYHO\VKDOORZSRVLWLRQDZD\ IURPWKHQXWULHQWULFKHVWFRQGLWLRQVDWGHSWK 7KHPLGGOHSRVLWLRQRIFKORURSK\WHVVKRXOGEHDWWULEXWHGWRWKHLUEURDGYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQZLWK DQRWYHU\SURQRXQFHGSHDNDWWKH'&0DQGVRPHWLPHVWZRPD[LPDVHSDUDWHGE\VHYHUDOPHWHUV ZLWKLQWKLVOD\HU)LJ&DEHOORet al&KDSWHU7KHVHVSHFLDOGLVWULEXWLRQKLQWVWKHSUHVHQFHRI WZRYHUWLFDOO\VHJUHJDWHGSRSXODWLRQVRIFKORURSK\WHVLQWKH'&0OD\HU$VFRQFOXGHGE\&DEHOOR et al.,&KDSWHUWKHFRDUVHWD[RQRPLFUHVROXWLRQDWWKHGLYLVLRQOHYHODOWKRXJKSURYLGHVVRPH YDOXDEOH LQIRUPDWLRQ GRHV QRW XQYHLO WKH FRPSOHWH SK\VLRORJLFDO GLYHUVLW\ RI SK\WRSODQNWRQ )LQDOO\ LW LV VRPHKRZ VXUSULVLQJ WKH VLPLODU SRVLWLRQLQJ RI GLDWRPV DQG SHODJRSK\WHV $Q LQWULJXLQJUHVXOWLVWKHUHODWLYHO\VKDOORZSRVLWLRQRIWKHODUJHGLDWRPVLIWKHWKHRU\WKDWODUJH FHOOVUHTXLUHKLJKHUQXWULHQWFRQFHQWUDWLRQVWKDQVPDOORQHVLVFODLPHG2XUH[SODQDWLRQLVWKDW WKHSRVLWLRQRIGLDWRPVLVGXHWRWKHLUDELOLW\WRFDSWXUHQXWULHQWSXOVHVIURPEHORZ'LDWRPVDUH ZHOOFDSDEOHWRUDSLGO\XSWDNHDQGVWRUHQXWULHQWVWKDWZLOOEHXVHGODWHURQ/RPDVDQG*LOEHUW 7R]]Let al.1XWULHQWSXOVHVDUHRIWHQLQYRNHGLQWKH'&0OD\HUDVDUHVXOWRILQWHUQDO ZDYHVDQGPHVRVFDOHHGGLHV0F*LOOLFXGG\et al.8]et al.7KXVGLDWRPVVKRXOG EHZHOODGDSWHGWRWKULYHLQWKLVSXOVLQJHQYLURQPHQW*ROGPDQDQG0F*LOOLFXGG\DQG FRXOGPDQDJHWRVWD\DERYHWKHLUWKHRUHWLFDOGHSWKLIMXVWFRQVWDQWQXWULHQWGLIIXVLRQZDVWDNLQJ SODFH 7KHUH DUH LQFUHDVLQJ HYLGHQFHV WKDW SHODJRSK\WHV FDQ XVH WKH ORZOLJKW KLJKQXWULHQW FRQGLWLRQVW\SLFDORIWKH'&03K\VLRORJLFDOH[SHULPHQWVVKRZHGWKHLUORZOLJKWSKRWRV\QWKHWLF characteristics (Timmermans et al'LPLHUet al.DQGJHQHWLFDQDO\VLVFRQ¿UPHGD YHU\KLJKQXPEHURIJHQHVLQYROYHGLQWKHIRUPDWLRQRIOLJKWKDUYHVWLQJFRPSOH[HV*REOHUet al., DQGLQWKHDVVLPLODWLRQRIQLWURJHQ'XSRQWet al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rochlorococcusVKDOORZHVWGLVWULEXWLRQ DQGSHODJRSK\WHVGHHSHVWGLVWULEXWLRQZLWKDYHU\VLPSOHFDOFXODWLRQ&HOOFRQFHQWUDWLRQVDQG ELRPDVVRIWKHVHJURXSVZHUHFRQVLGHUHGLQ¿YHVDPSOHVDERYHEHORZDQGDWWKH'&0 SHDNFRPSULVLQJDERXWPRIWKH'&0OD\HUZKLFKLVDW\SLFDOUHVROXWLRQLQRFHDQRJUDSKLF
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 96 /RPDV0:DQG*LOEHUW30&RPSDULVRQVRIQLWUDWHXSWDNHVWRUDJHDQGUHGXFWLRQLQ PDULQHGLDWRPVDQGÀDJHOODWHVJ. Phycol. 36± /RQJKXUVW$(FRORJLFDO*HRJUDSK\RIWKH6HD$FDGHPLF3UHVV6DQ'LHJR /XQYHQ0*XLOODXG-)<RXpQRX$&UDVVRXV03%HUULF5/H*DOO(et al. 1XWULHQWDQGSK\WRSODQNWRQGLVWULEXWLRQLQWKH/RLUH5LYHUSOXPH%D\RI%LVFD\)UDQFHUHVROYHG E\DQHZ¿QHVFDOHVDPSOHUEstuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 65± 0F*LOOLFXGG\'-5RELQVRQ$56LHJHO'$-DQQDVFK+:-RKQVRQ5'LFNH\7' et al.,QÀXHQFHRIPHVRVFDOHHGGLHVRQQHZSURGXFWLRQLQWKH6DUJDVVR6HDNature 394 ± 0HQGHQ'HXHU6DQG/HVVDUG(-&DUERQWRYROXPHUHODWLRQVKLSVIRUGLQRÀDJHOODWHV GLDWRPVDQGRWKHUSURWLVWSODQNWRQLimnol. Oceanogr. 45± 0LJQRW$&ODXVWUH+8LW]-3RWHDX$2UWHQ]LR)'DQG;LQJ;8QGHUVWDQGLQJ WKHVHDVRQDOG\QDPLFVRISK\WRSODQNWRQELRPDVVDQGWKHGHHSFKORURSK\OOPD[LPXPLQROLJRWUR SKLFHQYLURQPHQWV$%LR$UJRÀRDWLQYHVWLJDWLRQGlob. Biogeochem. Cycles 28± 0RRUH/5*RHULFNH5DQG&KLVKROP6:&RPSDUDWLYHSK\VLRORJ\RISynechococcus and Prochlorococcus,QÀXHQFHRIOLJKWDQGWHPSHUDWXUHRQJURZWKSLJPHQWVÀXRUHVFHQFHDQG DEVRUSWLYHSURSHUWLHVMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 116± 1DYDUUR*DQG5XL]-+\VWHUHVLVFRQGLWLRQVWKHYHUWLFDOSRVLWLRQRIGHHSFKORURSK\OO PD[LPXPLQWKHWHPSHUDWHRFHDQGlob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27± 1RW)/DWDVD00DULH'&DULRX79DXORW'DQG6LPRQ1$VLQJOHVSHFLHV Micromonas pusilla3UDVLQRSK\FHDHGRPLQDWHVWKHHXNDU\RWLFSLFRSODQNWRQLQWKH:HVWHUQ(Q JOLVK&KDQQHOAppl. Environ. Microbiol. 70± 1RW)/DWDVD06FKDUHN59LSUH\0.DUOHVNLQG3%DODJXp9et al3URWLVWDQ DVVHPEODJHVDFURVVWKH,QGLDQ2FHDQZLWKDVSHFL¿FHPSKDVLVRQWKHSLFRHXNDU\RWHVDeep Sea Res. I 55± 3DHUO5:-RKQVRQ.6:HOVK50:RUGHQ$=&KDYH])3DQG=HKU-3'LI IHUHQWLDOGLVWULEXWLRQVRISynechococcusVXEJURXSVDFURVVWKH&DOLIRUQLDFXUUHQWV\VWHPFront. Microbiol. 2± 3DUWHQVN\)+HVV:5DQG9DXORW'ProchlorococcusDPDULQHSKRWRV\QWKHWLFSURND U\RWHRIJOREDOVLJQL¿FDQFHMicrobiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63± 3HGUyV$OLy&0DVVDQD5/DWDVD0*DUFt&DQWL]DQR-DQG*DVRO-03UHGDWLRQ E\FLOLDWHVRQDPHWDOLPQHWLFCryptomonasSRSXODWLRQIHHGLQJUDWHVLPSDFWDQGHIIHFWVRIYHUWLFDO PLJUDWLRQJ. Plankton Res. 17± 5LFKDUGVRQ7/DQG-DFNVRQ*$6PDOOSK\WRSODQNWRQDQGFDUERQH[SRUWIURPWKHVXU IDFHRFHDQScience 315±
Chapter 2 97 5LHEHVHOO85HYLOO$7+ROGVZRUWK'*DQG9RONPDQ-.7KHHIIHFWVRIYDU\LQJ &2FRQFHQWUDWLRQRQOLSLGFRPSRVLWLRQDQGFDUERQLVRWRSHIUDFWLRQDWLRQLQEmiliania huxleyi. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64± 6PD\GD7-7KHVXVSHQVLRQDQGVLQNLQJRISK\WRSODQNWRQLQWKHVHDOcean. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 8± 6RPDYLOOD5*RQ]iOH]3ROD&5XL]9LOODUUHDO0DQG0RQWHUR$/0L[HGOD\HU GHSWK0/'YDULDELOLW\LQWKHVRXWKHUQ%D\RI%LVFD\'HHSHQLQJRIZLQWHU0/'VFRQFXUUHQW ZLWKJHQHUDOL]HGXSSHUZDWHUZDUPLQJWUHQGV"Ocean Dyn. 61± 6WURP6/LJKWDLGHGGLJHVWLRQJUD]LQJDQGJURZWKLQKHUELYRURXVSURWLVWVAquat. Microb. Ecol. 23± 6XQDJDZD6&RHOKR/3&KDIIURQ6.XOWLPD-5/DEDGLH.6DOD]DU*et al. 6WUXFWXUHDQGIXQFWLRQRIWKHJOREDORFHDQPLFURELRPHScience 348 6YHUGUXS+82QFRQGLWLRQVIRUWKHYHUQDOEORRPLQJRISK\WRSODQNWRQJ. Cons. int. Explor. Mer 18± 7D\ORU-5DQG)HUUDUL56KXWGRZQRIWXUEXOHQWFRQYHFWLRQDVDQHZFULWHULRQIRUWKH RQVHWRIVSULQJSK\WRSODQNWRQEORRPVLimnol. Oceanogr. 56± 7LPPHUPDQV.5YDQGHU:DJW%9HOGKXLV0-:0DDWPDQ$DQGGH%DDU+-: 3K\VLRORJLFDOUHVSRQVHVRIWKUHHVSHFLHVRIPDULQHSLFRSK\WRSODQNWRQWRDPPRQLXP SKRVSKDWHLURQDQGOLJKWOLPLWDWLRQJ. Sea Res. 53±. 7R]]L66FKR¿HOG2DQG)DONRZVNL3+LVWRULFDOFOLPDWHFKDQJHDQGRFHDQWXUEX OHQFHDVVHOHFWLYHDJHQWVIRUWZRNH\SK\WRSODQNWRQIXQFWLRQDOJURXSVMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 274 ± 7XUQHU-DQG7HVWHU37R[LFPDULQHSK\WRSODQNWRQ]RRSODQNWRQJUD]HUVDQGSHODJLFIRRG ZHEVLimnol. Oceanogr. 42± 8QUHLQ)0DVVDQD5$ORQVR6iH]/DQG*DVRO-06LJQL¿FDQW\HDUURXQGHIIHFW RIVPDOOPL[RWURSKLFÀDJHOODWHVRQEDFWHULRSODQNWRQLQDQROLJRWURSKLFFRDVWDOV\VWHPLimnol. Oceanogr. 52± 8QUHLQ)*DVRO-01RW))RUQ,DQG0DVVDQD50L[RWURSKLFKDSWRSK\WHVDUHNH\ EDFWHULDOJUD]HUVLQROLJRWURSKLFFRDVWDOZDWHUVISME J 8± 8WHUP|KO+=XU9HUYROONRPPQXQJGHUTXDQWLWDWLYHQ3K\WRSODQNWRQ0HWKRGLNMitteilungen/Internationale Vereinigung für Theor. und Angew. Limnol. 9± 8]%0<RGHU-$DQG2V\FKQ\93XPSLQJRIQXWULHQWVWRRFHDQVXUIDFHZDWHUVE\WKH DFWLRQRISURSDJDWLQJSODQHWDU\ZDYHVNature 409± 9DLOODQFRXUW5'0DUUD-6HNL033DUVRQV0/DQG%LGLJDUH55,PSDFWRID F\FORQLFHGG\RQSK\WRSODQNWRQFRPPXQLW\VWUXFWXUHDQGSKRWRV\QWKHWLFFRPSHWHQF\LQWKHVXE WURSLFDO1RUWK3DFL¿F2FHDQDeep Sea Res. I 50±
Phytoplankton groups within the DCM 98 9HOGKXLV0DQG.UDD\*9HUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQDQGSLJPHQWFRPSRVLWLRQRIDSLFRSODQ NWRQLFSURFKORURSK\WHLQWKHVXEWURSLFDO1RUWK$WODQWLFDFRPELQHGVWXG\RI+3/&DQDO\VLVRI SLJPHQWVDQGÀRZF\WRPHWU\Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 68± 9HQULFN(/7KHYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQRIFKORURSK\OODQGSK\WRSODQNWRQVSHFLHVLQWKH 1RUWK3DFL¿FFHQWUDOHQYLURQPHQWJ. Plankton Res. 10± 9HQULFN(/3K\WRSODQNWRQVSHFLHVVWUXFWXUHLQWKHFHQWUDO1RUWK3DFL¿F YDULDELOLW\DQGSHUVLVWHQFHJ. Plankton Res. 21± :DLWH$)LVKHU$7KRPSVRQ3DDQG+DUULVRQ3-6LQNLQJUDWHYHUVXVFHOOYROXPH UHODWLRQVKLSVLOOXPLQDWHVLQNLQJUDWHFRQWUROPHFKDQLVPVLQPDULQHGLDWRPVMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 157± :RUGHQ$=1RODQ--.DQG3DOHQLN%$VVHVVLQJWKHG\QDPLFVDQGHFRORJ\RIPDULQH SLFRSK\WRSODQNWRQ7KHLPSRUWDQFHRIWKHHXNDU\RWLFFRPSRQHQWLimnol. Ocean. 49± :ULJKW6:DQG0DQWRXUD5)&*XLGHOLQHVIRUFROOHFWLRQDQGSLJPHQWDQDO\VLVRI¿HOG VDPSOHV,Q-HIIUH\6:0DQWRXUD5)&DQG:ULJKW6:HGVPhytoplankton pigments in oceanographhy: guidelines to modern methods81(6&23DULVSS± =DSDWD05RGULJXH])DQG*DUULGR-/6HSDUDWLRQRIFKORURSK\OOVDQGFDURWHQRLGV IURPPDULQHSK\WRSODQNWRQDQHZ+3/&PHWKRGXVLQJDUHYHUVHGSKDVH&FROXPQDQGS\ULGLQH FRQWDLQLQJPRELOHSKDVHVMar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 195± =XENRY09DQG7DUUDQ*$+LJKEDFWHULYRU\E\WKHVPDOOHVWSK\WRSODQNWRQLQWKH 1RUWK$WODQWLF2FHDQNature 455±
Chapter 3
Chapter 3 101 Chapter 3 Global distribution and vertical patterns of a prymnesiophytecyanobacteria obligate symbiosis Summary A marine symbiosis has been recently discovered between prymnesiophyte species and the unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium UCYN-A. At least 2 different UCYN-A phylotypes exist, the clade UCYN-A1 in symbiosis with an uncultured small prymnesiophyte and the clade UCYN-A2 in symbiosis with the larger Braarudosphaera bigelowii. We targeted the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 symbiosis by double CARD-FISH (CAtalyzed Reporter DepositionFluorescence In Situ Hybridization) and analyzed its abundance in surface samples from the 0$/$63,1$FLUFXPQDYLJDWLRQH[SHGLWLRQ2XUXVHRIDVSHFL¿FSUREHIRUWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WH partner allowed us to verify that this algal species virtually always carried the UCYN-A symbiont, indicating that the association was also obligate for the host. The prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 symbiosis was detected in all ocean basins, displaying a patchy distribution with abundances (up to 500 cells ml-1WKDWFRXOGYDU\RUGHUVRIPDJQLWXGH$GGLWLRQDOYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHVWDNHQDWWKH1( Atlantic showed that this symbiosis occupied the upper water column and disappeared towards WKH'HHS&KORURSK\OO0D[LPXPZKHUHWKHELRPDVVRIWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WHDVVHPEODJHSHDNHG Moreover, sequences of both prymnesiophyte partners were searched within a large 18S rDNA metabarcoding dataset from the Tara-Oceans expedition around the world. This sequence-based analysis supported the patchy distribution of the UCYN-A1 host observed by CARD-FISH, and highlighted an unexpected homogeneous distribution (at low relative abundance) of B. bigelowii in the open ocean. Our results demonstrate that partners are always in symbiosis in nature and show contrasted ecological patterns of the two related lineages. Ana M. Cabello, Francisco M. Cornejo-Castillo, Nicolas Raho, Dolors Blasco, Montserrat Vidal, Stéphane Audic, Colomban de Vargas, Mikel Latasa, Silvia G. Acinas and Ramon Massana (2015). Global distribution and vertical patterns of a prymnesiophyte-cyanobacteria obligate symbiosis. ISME J. Doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.147
Chapter 3 103 Introduction 6\PELRVLVEHWZHHQF\DQREDFWHULDDQGHXNDU\RWLFRUJDQLVPVLVDZLGHVSUHDGSKHQRPHQRQUHSRUWHG both in land and in aquatic systems (Rai et al., 2002). In the marine environment, cyanobacteria appear associated with multicellular organisms, such as ascidians and sponges, and with singleFHOOHG RUJDQLVPV VXFK DV GLDWRPV GLQRÀDJHOODWHV UDGLRODULDQV DQG WLQWLQQLGV &DUSHQWHU DQG Foster, 2002; Foster et al. 7KHVH ¿QGLQJV GHULYH IURP PLFURVFRSLF REVHUYDWLRQV DQG RIWHQWKHPXWXDOEHQH¿WEHWZHHQWKHKRVWDQGWKHV\PELRQWLVSRRUO\XQGHUVWRRG*HQHUDOO\LWLV assumed that the cyanobacteria provides organic carbon to the host through photosynthesis, while the host provides a stable and secure environment. Diazotrophic cyanobacteria symbionts can in addition provide nitrogen-derived metabolites through N2¿[DWLRQDVKDVEHHQGHPRQVWUDWHGLQ some diatom species (Foster et al., 2011). A related and particular symbiosis has been recently described between two uncultured SLFRSODQNWHUVDVPDOOȝPSU\PQHVLRSK\WHDQGWKHXQLFHOOXODUGLD]RWURSKLFF\DQREDFWHULD UCYN-A (Thompson et al. *HQRPLFV UHYHDOHG WKDW 8&<1$ ODFNHG NH\ PHWDEROLF pathways commonly shared by diazotrophic cyanobacteria, such as oxygenic photosynthesis and the Calvin cycle, suggesting it was an obligate symbiont (Zehr et al., 2008; Tripp et al., 2010). Indeed, QDQR6,06GHPRQVWUDWHGWKDWWKHV\PELRQWJDYH¿[HGQLWURJHQWRWKHKRVWDQGREWDLQHGRUJDQLF carbon in return (Thompson et al.7KH6U'1$SU\PQHVLRSK\WHVHTXHQFHLGHQWL¿HG by single cell analysis (Thompson et al., 2012), was identical to an environmental sequence from WKH6RXWK3DFL¿F6KLet al., 2009) and related (98.2%) to Braarudosphaera bigelowii, a coastal QDQRSODQNWRQLFFRFFROLWKRSKRUH+DJLQRet al., 2009). Later, endosymbiotic UCYN-A was also discovered in B. bigelowii E\7(0 REVHUYDWLRQV+DJLQR et al. 3K\ORJHQHWLFDQDO\VHV using the UCYN-A nitrogenase (nifH) gene revealed at least three distinct clades, UCYN-A1, $DQG$7KRPSVRQet al.DQGKLJKOLJKWHGVSHFL¿FLW\EHWZHHQKRVWDQGV\PELRQW pairings, suggesting co-evolution between symbionts and hosts (Bombar et al., 2014; Thompson et al., 2014). Thus, the clade UCYN-A1 was associated with an open ocean small prymnesiophyte (hereafter UCYN-A1 host), and the clade UCYN-A2 was associated with the coastal and larger B. bigelowiiKHUHDIWHU8&<1$KRVWZKLOVWQRKRVWKDVEHHQ\HWSURSRVHGIRU8&<1$ (QYLURQPHQWDOVXUYH\VRInifH genes indicated a rather global distribution of this symbiosis in the oceans (Moisander et al., 2010). Further reports showed that the distinct UCYN-A clades were widespread and often coexisted (Thompson et al., 2014). Nevertheless, microscopic observations of the symbiosis or sequencing data of the prymnesiophytes verifying this widespread distribution are still scarce. Recently, a double CARD-FISH (CAtalyzed Reporter Deposition-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) approach targeting UCYN-A and prymnesiophyte cells, allowed visualization DQGTXDQWL¿FDWLRQRIWKLVDVVRFLDWLRQLQWKH1RUWK$WODQWLF.UXSNHet al., 2014a,b). Later, the VDPHGRXEOH&$5'),6+WHFKQLTXHEXWVSHFL¿FDOO\WDUJHWLQJWKHWZRGLIIHUHQWSU\PQHVLRSK\WH
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 104 host phylotypes made it possible to distinguish both types of associations and to observe their cooccurrence in the subtropical South Atlantic (Cornejo-Castillo et al., submitted). The emerging picture derived from the above studies was that the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A association showed a tendency for being more abundant in oligotrophic warm waters, but the environmental drivers explaining its distribution are still poorly understood. In this sense, quantifying the symbiosis by both CARD-FISH and 18S rDNA metabarcoding in a large set of samples covering a wide geographic range help evaluating accurately its distribution in marine ecosystems. ,QWKLVZRUNZHVWXGLHGWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRI8&<1$DQG8&<1$KRVWVLQVDPSOHVUHSUHVHQWDWLYH of the World’s major oceans. First, we targeted the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 symbiosis by GRXEOH &$5'),6+ XVLQJ WKH VSHFL¿F SUREH IRU WKH 8&<1$ KRVW &RUQHMR&DVWLOOR et al., VXEPLWWHGDQGWKHJHQHUDOSUREH8&<1$WDUJHWLQJDOOFODGHVRI8&<1$.UXSNHet al., 7KLV),6+VHWXSZDVXVHGWRTXDQWLI\FHOODEXQGDQFHVLQVXUIDFHZDWHUVWUDFNHGGXULQJ WKH0$/$63,1$H[SHGLWLRQWRDQDO\]HYHUWLFDOGLVWULEXWLRQVLQWKH1($WODQWLFQHDUWKH,EHULDQ Peninsula, and to evaluate whether the host can appear without the cyanobacteria. Second, we analyzed the global distribution of both hosts within an 18S rDNA metabarcoding dataset from the Tara-Oceans expedition sampled at surface and DCM depths (de Vargas et al., 2015). The aim RIWKLVZRUNZDVWRFRQ¿UPWKHEURDGGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WH±8&<1$DVVRFLDWLRQ evaluate its putative ecological niche and provide further evidence about the obligatory dependence of both symbiont and host. Materials and methods Oceanographic cruises We analyzed data from three independent cruises. The MALASPINA circumnavigation expedition WRRNSODFHIURP'HFHPEHUWR-XO\RQERDUGWKH59HespéridesDQGWUDFNHGVXEWURSLFDO DQG WURSLFDO ODWLWXGHV RI WKH$WODQWLF ,QGLDQ DQG 3DFL¿F RFHDQV VHH )LJXUH 6D IRU D PDS RI stations). The Tara2FHDQVH[SHGLWLRQ.DUVHQWLet al.WRRNSODFHIURP6HSWHPEHUWR March 2012 on board the TaraVFKRRQHUDQGHQFRPSDVVHGDGLIIHUHQWWUDFNRQWKHVDPHRFHDQV SOXVWKH0HGLWHUUDQHDQ6HDDQGVXEDQWDUFWLFZDWHUV)LJXUH6E7KH,1'(0$5(6FUXLVH WRRNSODFHLQVXPPHU-XO\$XJXVWRQERDUGWKH59Thalassa ,)5(0(5,(2 LQWKH1($WODQWLFQHDUWKH,EHULDQSHQLQVXOD)LJXUH6D)RU0$/$63,1$DQG,1'(0$5(6 sampling and acquisition of hydrological variables are detailed below. Seawater sampling, DNA extract collection and 18S rDNA sequencing for the Tara-Oceans expedition is described in detail elsewhere (de Vargas et al., 2015).
Chapter 3 105 Sampling procedures during MALASPINA and INDEMARES cruises 'XULQJ WKH 0$/$63,1$ FUXLVH VXUIDFH VDPSOHV a P IRU &$5'),6+ DQG FKORURSK\OO D DQDO\VLVZHUHFROOHFWHGZLWKD/1LVNLQERWWOHDWDURXQGQRRQLQVWDWLRQVPLQLPXPERWWRP depth ~2 000 m). Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) casts were performed from surface to PHVRSHODJLFGHSWKVZLWKD6HDELUG3OXVSUREHPRXQWHGRQDERWWOH1LVNLQURVHWWHDQGZDWHU ZDVWDNHQDWVHYHUDOGHSWKVIRUQXWULHQWDQDO\VLV,QWKH,1'(0$5(6FUXLVHYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHV ZHUHWDNHQDWRIIVKRUHVWDWLRQVLQWKH$YLOéVFDQ\RQVWDWLRQV$%DQGWKH*DOLFLDQ%DQNVWDWLRQV &'&DVWVZHUHSHUIRUPHGDIWHUVXQVHWZLWKD&7'SUR¿OHU¿WWHGZLWKD)OXRURPHWHU:(7ODEV (&2$)/DQGDERWWOH1LVNLQURVHWWH%DVHGRQWKHGRZQFDVWÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHVHDZDWHU was collected at 7-8 depths from below the Deep Chlorophyll Maximum (DCM) to surface (~5 m), with higher frequency above the DCM. For chlorophyll a determination, aliquots of 250 ml 0$/$63,1$ RU / ,1'(0$5(6 ZHUH ¿OWHUHG WKURXJK :KDWPDQ *)) ¿OWHUV PP diameter) and stored at -20ºC until extraction on board or in the lab, respectively. Samples for LQRUJDQLF QXWULHQWVZHUH GUDZQLQWR SRO\HWK\OHQHYLDOV DQGNHSW IUR]HQXQWLO DQDO\VLV)RUWKH &$5'),6+DVVD\PODOLTXRWVIRU0$/$63,1$RUPODOLTXRWVIRU,1'(0$5(6ZHUH ¿[HGZLWKIRUPDOGHK\GHRU¿QDOFRQFHQWUDWLRQUHVSHFWLYHO\¿OWHUHGRQP SRUHVL]H1XFOHRSRUH¿OWHUVPPGLDPHWHUDQGNHSWIUR]HQXQWLOSURFHVVHG Chlorophyll a and inorganic nutrient measurements 'XULQJ0$/$63,1$SLJPHQWVZHUHH[WUDFWHGE\SODFLQJWKH¿OWHUVLQPORIDFHWRQH DW&IRUKDQGGHWHUPLQLQJWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHRIWKHH[WUDFWLQD7XUQHU'HVLJQVÀXRURPHWHU <HQWVFKDQG0HQ]HO$&KORURSK\OODVWDQGDUG6LJPD$OGULFKZDVXVHGWRFDOLEUDWHWKH ÀXRURPHWHUDQGQRSKDHRSK\WLQFRUUHFWLRQZDVDSSOLHG)RU,1'(0$5(6VDPSOHVSLJPHQWV ZHUHH[WUDFWHGZLWKDFHWRQHVRQLFDWHGNHSWDW&IRUKDQGFOHDUHGE\¿OWUDWLRQWKURXJK *))¿OWHUV7RWDOFKORURSK\OODZDVGHWHUPLQHGE\+3/&IROORZLQJWKHSURFHGXUHGHVFULEHGE\ Latasa (2014). In MALASPINA samples, nitrate (NO -) concentration was measured spectrophotometrically ZLWKD 6NDODUDXWRDQDO\]HU 6NDODU6$1SOXV IROORZLQJVWDQGDUG SURFHGXUHV*UDVVKRIIet al., 1999; Moreno-Ostos, 2012), and phosphate (PO4 ) concentration was measured manually with a 3HUNLQ(OPHUVSHFWURSKRWRPHWHU)RU,1'(0$5(6ERWKQXWULHQWVZHUHPHDVXUHGZLWKD6NDODU DXWRDQDO\]HU'HWHFWLRQOLPLWVZHUHȝ0IRU12 -DQGȝ0IRU324 13UDWLRVZHUH FDOFXODWHGIURPWKHUDWLREHWZHHQVLJQL¿FDQWVORSHYDOXHVP < 0.05) of nitrate and phosphate across the nutricline. Dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus (DON and DOP) were estimated as the difference between total (TN and TP) and inorganic values. TN and TP concentrations ZHUHGHWHUPLQHGE\QLWUDWHDQGSKRVSKDWHPHDVXUHVGRQHDIWHUDONDOLQHDQGDFLGLFSHUVXOSKDWH R[LGDWLRQUHVSHFWLYHO\*UDVVKRIIet al., 1999; Moreno-Ostos, 2012).
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 112 Figure 4 Contribution of prymnesiophytes to total community reads (a) and contribution of UCYN-A1 host (b) and UCYN-A2 host (c) to total prymnesiophyte reads at surface and DCM depths of Tara-Oceans stations (V9 rDNA metabarcoding data). DCM depth was plotted in panel (c). Only stations having both surface and DCM samples are shown (29 out of 40). In the 11 stations not shown here, the percentage of prymnesiophytes to total community reads DWVXUIDFHZDVVLPLODURQDYHUDJH Prymnesiophytes 4791618222325303234363841425264656672767885 100 102 111 122 123 124 Reads contribution (%) 0 5 10 15 20 25 UCYN-A1 host 4791618222325303234363841425264656672767885 100 102 111 122 123 124 Reads contribution (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 25 30 35 UCYN-A2 host Station (Tara-Oceans) 4791618222325303234363841425264656672767885 100 102 111 122 123 124 Reads contribution (%) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DCM depth (m) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 surface DCM DCM depth a b c in samples inside and outside a given range of the environmental variables (Table 1). Abundances ZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\KLJKHULQVDPSOHVZLWKWHPSHUDWXUHVORZHUWKDQ&DQGSKRVSKDWHORZHUWKDQ ȝ01RGLIIHUHQFHVLQDEXQGDQFHVZHUHIRXQGEHWZHHQVDPSOHVZLWKQLWUDWHFRQFHQWUDWLRQV below and above the median value observed in all samples (0.27 ȝ0RUEHWZHHQVDPSOHVZLWK 13UDWLRVEHORZRUDERYH0RUHRYHUV\PELRVLVDEXQGDQFHVZHUHQRWVLJQL¿FDQWO\GLIIHUHQW LQROLJRPHVRRUHXWURSKLFZDWHUVDOWKRXJKWKH\ZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\ORZHULQXOWUDROLJRWURSKLF stations.
Chapter 3 113 Figure 5 Cell counts of the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 symbiosis versus (a) total chlorophyll, (b) temperature, (c) nitrate, (d) phosphate, (e13UDWLRf) DOP and (g) DON measured in surface waters during the MALASPINA (white GRWVDQG,1'(0$5(6EODFNGRWVFUXLVHV5HJUHVVLRQOLQHVDUHSORWWHGLQFDVHVGLVSOD\LQJDVLJQL¿FDQWUHODWLRQVKLS (P < 0.05). Vertical distribution pattern in the water column The vertical distribution of the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 symbiosis was studied in detail in IRXUYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHVLQWKH1($WODQWLF)LJXUH$VWUDWL¿HGZDWHUFROXPQZDVREVHUYHGLQDOO FDVHVZLWKD'&0SHDNFRXSOHGWRWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKHQXWULFOLQHDQGGHSWKVDERYHWKH'&0 KDYLQJORZQLWUDWHDQGSKRVSKDWHFRQFHQWUDWLRQVȝ012; 0.075 ȝ0324). At selected depths, symbiosis counts together with total prymnesiophyte counts were obtained by GRXEOHDQGVLQJOH&$5'),6+DVVD\VUHVSHFWLYHO\,QDOOSUR¿OHV8&<1$KRVWFHOOVRFFXSLHG the upper water column and decreased towards the DCM, where they disappeared. The decrease in V\PELRVLVDEXQGDQFHVDSSHDUHGPRUHFRXSOHGWRWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHJUDGLHQWWKDQ to the beginning of the nutricline. On the contrary, the other prymnesiophyte cells, not involved LQV\PELRVLVSHDNHGDWWKH'&0DQGZHUHSUHVHQWWKURXJKRXWWKHSKRWLFZDWHUFROXPQ6WDWLRQ %ODFNHGWKHVXUIDFHVDPSOHVEXWLWVYHUWLFDOSDWWHUQZDVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHRWKHUWKUHHSUR¿OHV The abundance and contribution of the UCYN-A1 host varied between the two regions sampled. +LJKHVWDEXQGDQFHVZHUHVHHQLQWKHXSSHUZDWHUFROXPQRIVWDWLRQ$FHOOVPO-1 on average) in the Avilés canyon region, where they represented on average 70% of the prymnesiophyte cells XSWRDWP,QWKH*DOLFLDQ%DQNUHJLRQ8&<1$KRVWDEXQGDQFHVWRFHOOVPO-1 on average) had a lower contribution to total prymnesiophytes (8-16% on average). Malaspina cruise Indemares cruise Chla (mg m-3) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Log abundances (cells ml-1) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Temperature (ºC) 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Phosphate (μM) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Nitrate (μM) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 DOP (μM) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 DON (μM)N/P ratio 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 4 6 8 10 12 a b c d e f g y = -0.114x + 4.157 R2 = 0.168 y = -4.086x + 1.857 R2 = 0.171 Log abundances (cells ml-1)
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 114 Table 1: Averaged abundances of symbiosis inside and outside of a given range of values for temperature, phosphate, QLWUDWH13UDWLRDQGFKORURSK\OOa. Thresholds for temperature and inorganic nutrients were around the median value LQWKH0$/$63,1$DQG,1'(0$5(6VXUIDFHVDPSOHVLQRUGHUWRREWDLQDQHTXDOQXPEHURIVDPSOHVLQHDFK category. Chlorophyll a UDQJHVZHUHHVWDEOLVKHGDFFRUGLQJWRWKHWURSKLFZDWHUFODVVL¿FDWLRQRI6KXVKNLQDet al., 1997. LQGLFDWHVZKHQDEXQGDQFHVYDOXHVZHUHVLJQL¿FDQWO\GLIIHUHQW(P <0.05; Mann-Whitney test) inside and outside the corresponding range. abundances (cells ml-1) number of samples in range out range in range out range ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---------- Variable Range Average SD Average SD n n Temperature < 25C (*) 21 120 7 25 33 29 PO4 3- < 0.08 M (*) 61 118 6 14 30 26 NO3 - < 0.27 M 57 119 24 67 28 29 N/P ratio < 16 72 135 13 22 26 18 TChla (1) < 0.06 mg m-3 (*) 3 17 43 18 9 52 TChla (2) 0.06-0.1 mg m-3 64 20 27 18 16 45 TChla (3) 0.1-0.3 mg m-3 35 19 39 18 30 31 TChla (4) > 0.3 mg m-3 28 11 38 19 6 55 (1) Ultraoligotrophic, (2) Oligotrophic, (3) Mesotrophic, (4) Eutrophic The vertical distribution of the symbiosis could also be inferred by the contribution of UCYN-A host reads in surface versus DCM samples of the Tara-Oceans cruise. Considering only the stations with high UCYN-A1 host abundance in surface samples (stations 76, 78 in the South Atlantic; VWDWLRQLQWKH*LEUDOWDU6WUDLWDQGVWDWLRQLQWKH5HG6HDWKHFRQWULEXWLRQDWWKH'&0ZDV about 150 times lower (Figure 4b). In the other stations where UCYN-A1 host was scarce at surface, it was equally scarce at the DCM. By contrast, UCYN-A2 host was detected at similar DEXQGDQFHLQVXUIDFHDQG'&0VDPSOHVLQDOOVWDWLRQVZKHUHLWDSSHDUHGDYHUDJHGVXUIDFH'&0 UDWLRRI)LJXUHF7KHFRQWULEXWLRQRI8&<1$KRVWZDVRQO\VLJQL¿FDQWO\ORZHU at the DCM (as compared with surface) in stations where the DCM was deeper than 60 m (MannWhitney Test; P = 0.001, n= 29), a difference not seen for total prymnesiophytes (Figure 4a).
Chapter 3 115 Figure 6 'HSWKSUR¿OHVRIK\GURORJLFDOYDULDEOHVULJKWDQGGLVWULEXWLRQLQGHSWKRIWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WH±8&<1$ V\PELRVLV EODFN GRWV DQG WKH UHVW RI WKH SU\PQHVLRSK\WH FRPPXQLW\ ZKLWH GRWV OHIW IRU WKH ,1'(0$5(6 VWDWLRQVLQWKH1($WODQWLF6WDWLRQV$DQG%FRUUHVSRQGWRWKH$YLOpVFDQ\RQUHJLRQVWDWLRQV&DQG'FRUUHVSRQGWR WKH*DOLFLDQ%DQNUHJLRQ7KHJUH\VKDGHGDUHDUHSUHVHQWVWKHÀXRUHVFHQFHSUR¿OHUHFRUGHGDWHDFKVWDWLRQ(UURUEDUV represent standard errors. st. A Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 abundance (cells ml-1) 0 200 400 600 800 UCYN-A1 host other prymnesiophytes st. B Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 0 100 200 300 400 st. C Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 0 300 600 900 1200 st. D Fluorescence ru. 0246810 Depth (m) 0 20 40 60 0 300 600 900 1200 01234567 PO43- (μM) 0.00.1 0.20.3 0.40.5 0.6 Temp Temperature (ºC) 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 NO3- (μM) NO3PO43-
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 116 Discussion Characterization of the partnership Microscopic observations revealed a population size spectra and phenotype consistent with SUHYLRXVUHSRUWVZLWKVPDOOSU\PQHVLRSK\WHKRVWFHOOVRIPW\SLFDOO\ZLWKRQHF\DQREDFWHULDO UCYN-A1 symbiont (Thompson et al..UXSNHet al., 2014a). On the other hand, the cell VL]HRIWKH8&<1$KRVWLQRSHQRFHDQVDPSOHVZDVPFOHDUO\VPDOOHUWKDQWKDWGHVFULEHG LQFRDVWDOVLWHVDERXWȝP7KRPSVRQet al., 2014; Hagino et al.7KLVLVLQDJUHHPHQW with a greater contribution of B. bigelowiiUHDGVLQWKHȝPVL]HIUDFWLRQDVFRPSDUHGZLWKWKH PIUDFWLRQLQWKHTara-Oceans metabarcoding data analysed here, as well as of UCYN-A2 reads in the same smaller size fraction in metagenomic samples of the South Atlantic (CornejoCastillo et al., submitted). The hypothesis about the obligatory dependence of UCYN-A with its host (Tripp et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2012; Bombar et al., 2014) has been recently reinforced with the strong coupling REVHUYHGLQWKHWUDQVIHURIFDUERQDQGQLWURJHQPHWDEROLWHVEHWZHHQSDUWQHUFHOOV.UXSNHet al., 2014b). On the other hand, the possibility of a free-living population of the host could not be HYDOXDWHGVLQFHWKH),6+SUREHXVHGLQSUHYLRXVVWXGLHV.UXSNHet al., 2014a) targeted the whole SU\PQHVLRSK\WHDVVHPEODJHDQGQRWWKHVSHFL¿FKRVWSK\ORW\SHV2XUXVHRIDVSHFL¿FSUREHIRU the UCYN-A1 host allowed us to validate that this association was also obligatory for the host since i) we never observed a free living population of targeted prymnesiophytes in the absence of UCYN-A and ii) counts of free partner cells, when detected, were correlated, suggesting a disruption of the association due to sample manipulation (Thompson et al.,.UXSNHet al., 7RRXUNQRZOHGJHWKLVLVRQHRIWKHIHZFDVHVVKRZLQJDQREOLJDWRU\GHSHQGHQF\RID SK\WRSODQNWRQ VSHFLHV DQG LWV V\PELRQW 7KH KLJK GHJUHH RI VSHFL¿FLW\ EHWZHHQ SDUWQHUV DQG the reductive evolution of the UCYN-A genomes (Bombar et al., 2014) are features analogous to those observed in some freshwater diatom species, which harbor N2¿[LQJF\DQREDFWHULDDV endosymbionts that are inseparable from the host and transferred to daughter cells during host cell GLYLVLRQ1DND\DPDet al., 2014). The UCYN-A symbiont of B. bigelowii is also an endosymbiont as observed by transmission electron microscopy (Hagino et al.,DQGLWLVOLNHO\WKDWWKH prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 association presents analogous structural properties. In our study, about 97% of the hosts carried a single UCYN-A1 cell. This supports previous REVHUYDWLRQVIURPWKH1RUWK3DFL¿F7KRPSVRQet al.DQGWKH1RUWK$WODQWLF.UXSNHet al., D7KHUHIRUHZHFRQVLGHUWKDWWKH8&<1$KRVWUDWLRLVWKHPRVWSODXVLEOHDVVXPSWLRQ for estimating N host requirements and metabolite exchanges between partner cells and evaluating the contribution of this partnership to N2¿[DWLRQ,QDGGLWLRQZHVXJJHVWWKDWWKHSUHVHQFHRIWZR UCYN-A1 cells per host may derive from repartition of symbionts before host cell division. We PDGHSXQFWXDOFDSWXUHVRIKRVWFHOOVOLNHO\GLVSOD\LQJGLIIHUHQWVWDJHVRIFHOOGLYLVLRQ )LJXUH 6,WLVNQRZQIURP¿HOG-DFTXHWet al.DQGODERUDWRU\VWXGLHV-DFTXHWet al., 2001)
Chapter 3 117 WKDWSKRWRV\QWKHWLFSLFRHXNDU\RWHVGLYLGHGXULQJDYHU\VKRUWWLPHZLQGRZMXVWEHIRUHRUGXULQJ WKHGDUNSHULRG:HGHWHFWHGWZRFHOOVSHUKRVWPRVWO\LQ,1'(0$5(6VDPSOHVZKLFKZHUH collected after sunset and thus the symbiotic population could be in active cell division. In the future, microscopic observations during diel cycles coupled with transcriptomic analyses would shed light on the division mechanisms within this symbiosis. A widespread distribution of the symbiosis in the marine ecosystem The distribution obtained based on CARD-FISH counts, together with the 18S rDNA metabarcoding from the circumglobal expedition Tara-Oceans, expands the geographic distribution of the symbiosis and presents contrasted ecological patterns of both types. The UCYN-A1 host appeared in few spots of high abundance and was undetected in ~56% of CARD-FISH surface samples. The distribution of this host based on V9 reads supported this patchy distribution. Although the metabarcoding method has a much lower detection limit than the CARD-FISH method, we could not detect the presence of UCYN-A1 host reads in a substantial number of stations (~62%). The 8&<1$KRVWZDVGHWHFWHGRQO\RFFDVLRQDOO\E\&$5'),6+OLNHO\EHFDXVHLWVDEXQGDQFHZDV below the detection threshold, consistent with reported cell abundances of B. bigelowii of up to 1 cells ml-1LQPDULQHV\VWHPV.RQQRet al., 2007). This limitation to obtain a reliable signal of the UCYN-A2 host was offset with the metabarcoding approach. Thus, the UCYN-A2 host showed an unexpected homogeneous distribution at low relative abundance in the open ocean, with targeted reads detected throughout Tara-Oceans samples. Our CARD-FISH observations expanded the geographic coverage of UCYN-A1 in symbiosis to the South Atlantic gyre and the southern Indian Ocean. In these regions, no records of the prymnesiophyte phylotypes or UCYN-A were documented previously, except occasional detections of UCYN-A nifH sequences (no clade distinction) in the Benguela upwelling system, in the Arabian Sea and near Madagascar (Mazard et al., 2004; Moisander et al., 2010; Sohm et al.,D0RUHRYHURXUPHWDEDUFRGLQJDQDO\VLVUHSUHVHQWHGWKH¿UVWGHWHFWLRQRIERWKKRVWVLQ WKH5HG6HDDQGZLGHQHGWKHSUHVHQFHRIWKH8&<1$KRVWLQWKH6RXWK3DFL¿FWKH$UDELDQ Sea and the Mediterranean Sea, where only few nifH clones of UCYN-A2 were reported (ManAharonovich et al., 2007). Previous reports showed that B. bigelowii usually occurred in low VDOLQLW\QXWULHQWULFKFRDVWDOZDWHUV.RQQRet al., 2007; Hagino et al.,DOWKRXJKLWZDVDOVR UHSRUWHGLQWKH6DUJDVVR6HD*DDUGHU+XOEXUW2XUVWXG\UHLQIRUFHVWKHSUHVHQFHRI B. bigelowiiLQV\PELRVLVZLWK8&<1$LQRSHQRFHDQVWDWLRQVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH¿QGLQJRInifH copies of the UCYN-A2 phylotype in the open sea (Thompson et al., 2014). In the ocean, cyanobacterial diazotrophs generally show a consistent pattern in depth with higher DEXQGDQFHVLQWKHXSSHUHXSKRWLF]RQH*RHEHOet al., 2010; Moisander et al., 2010). Recurring VXPPHUEORRPVRIWKHVHGLD]RWURSKVDUHUHSRUWHGLQWKH1RUWK3DFL¿FVXEWURSLFDOJ\UH'RUHet
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 118 al., 2008) usually related to shallow mixing conditions that ensure the solar energy needed for QLWURJHQ¿[DWLRQ$UHFHQWVWXG\VKRZHGWKDWWKH8&<1$V\PELRVLVDSSHDUHGODUJHO\UHVWULFWHG WRWKHXSSHUZDWHUFROXPQZKHUH13UDWLRVZHUHEHORZ.UXSNHet al., 2014a). Our highly UHVROYHGYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHVVKRZWKDWLWKHSU\PQHVLRSK\WH±8&<1$V\PELRVLVRFFXSLHVQXWULHQW depleted surface waters, and ii) its abundance decreases in the shallow DCM. This pattern suggests DGHSHQGHQFHRQOLJKWLQWHQVLW\DQGRUDQRXWFRPSHWLWLRQRIWKHV\PELRWLFSRSXODWLRQE\RWKHU QRQGLD]RWURSKLFVSHFLHVWKDWEHQH¿WIURPWKHLQFUHDVHGQXWULHQWDYDLODELOLW\DWWKHQXWULFOLQH7KLV vertical pattern is comparable to that observed for UCYN-A1 nifH gene abundances in station ALOHA (Church et al.,QWKHVHYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHVEHWZHHQ4-106 nifH copies per L (roughly equivalent to 10-1 000 cells ml-1ZHUHTXDQWL¿HGLQWKHZHOOOLWQXWULHQWGHSOHWHGXSSHU waters, and abundances decreased in the DCM to 102-10 nifH copies per L (~1 cell ml-1). Environmental controls of cyanobacterial diazotrophs in the ocean In our study, no environmental factor explained unambiguously the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A1 distribution in surface waters. Presence or absence of the symbiosis occurred under similar environmental conditions (Figure S4). Previous reports point to temperature as a driver of the distribution of cyanobacterial diazotrophs (Church et al., 2008; Moisander et al., 2010). Particularly for UCYN-A, nifH gene abundances have been reported to be higher in temperature ranges from 19 to 24ºC (Langlois et al., 2008; Church et al., 2008). Our study, with detections at a thermal range RI&UHYHDOHGDZHDNQHJDWLYHUHODWLRQVKLSEHWZHHQV\PELRVLVDEXQGDQFHDQGWHPSHUDWXUH agreeing with previous reports. Limiting nutrients such as iron or phosphate might also control the distribution of cyanobacterial diazotrophs (Moore et al., 2009; Sohm et al., 2011b). Indeed, KLJKHUDEXQGDQFHVRIGLD]RWURSKVKDYHEHHQOLQNHGWRRFHDQLFDUHDVZKHUHWKHVHQXWULHQWVDUH VXSSOLHGIURPGXVWGHSRVLWLRQRIDGMDFHQWGHVHUWDUHDV5LGDPHDQG*XLHX7\UUHOOet al., &DSRQHet al., 2005; Mahowald et al., 2009). The patches of symbiosis observed in this study in the eastern North Atlantic, the western coast of Australia or even near Hawaii, could be explained by deposition events, since high dissolved Fe concentrations have been reported in these areas (Brown et al., 2005; Langlois et al., 2012). Patchiness seems to be a common feature of diazotrophic populations (Church et al.*RHEHOet al., 2010) and UCYN-A is regarded as very dynamic over small spatio-temporal scales (Robidart et al., 2014). The regional dominance of different diazotrophic groups can be related to distinct temperature and nutrient requirements (Church et al., 2008; Langlois et al., 2008). For instance, in the tropical North Atlantic, Trichodesmium was dominant in the warmer western side whereas UCYN-A was PRUHDEXQGDQWLQWKHFRROHUHDVWHUQVLGHQHDU&DSH9HUGH,VODQGV*RHEHOet al., 2010). During the MALASPINA expedition, a similar picture for the distribution of UCYN-A and Trichodesmium within this basin was observed, with these two diazotrophic groups dominating in different regions (see Fernández-Castro et al. in press for a Trichodesmium distribution map). In addition, N2
Chapter 3 119 ¿[DWLRQUDWHVPHDVXUHGGXULQJWKH0$/$63,1$H[SHGLWLRQGLGQRWFRUUHODWHZLWKTrichodesmium abundances (Fernández-Castro et al., in press), but we noticed that regions of enhanced N2¿[DWLRQ rates as in the western South Atlantic or the eastern Indian ocean were coupled to the presence of the prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A association. A recent latitudinal study along the eastern Australian coast also described a community shift from Trichodesmium in the north to unicellular diazotrophs in the south where the highest N2¿[DWLRQUDWHVZHUHUHSRUWHG5DHVet al., 2014). Different ecological strategies between the two related lineages Our results obtained by FISH counts and metabarcoding sequences in a large set of marine samples demonstrated that the two types of prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis were widespread in the photic layer of the world ocean. We observed that UCYN-A2 host was homogeneously distributed at both surface and DCM but in low abundance, whereas UCYN-A1 host was only detected in some hotspots of very high abundance at surface, suggesting different ecological strategies. We hypothesize that UCYN-A1 host could follow the r strategy, with fast growth under favourable FRQGLWLRQVVXFKDVXQSUHGLFWDEOHHYHQWVRIGXVWGHSRVLWLRQRUWKHRQVHWRIWKHUPDOVWUDWL¿FDWLRQ XVLQJVXUIDFHOLJKWIRUWKHHQHUJ\GHPDQGLQJSURFHVVRIQLWURJHQ¿[DWLRQ2QWKHRWKHUKDQGWKH 8&<1$KRVWFRXOGIROORZWKHNVWUDWHJ\DOVRNQRZQDVVWUHVVWROHUDQWVSHFLHVE\5H\QROGV 1997), persisting at low abundances and being more competitive in stable and low resource FRQGLWLRQV,QWKLVVHQVHWKHVPDOO8&<1$KRVWVHHPVH[FOXGHGLQWKH'&0OLNHO\EHFDXVH RWKHUVSHFLHVDUHPRUHHI¿FLHQWLQZDWHUVZLWKKLJKHUQXWULHQWVDQGGLPPHUOLJKWZKLOHWKLVGHSWK limitation could be less severe in the UCYN-A2 host, which seems to be less affected by changes in the light regime (Thompson et al., 2014). A better understanding of the role of UCYN-A GLD]RWURSK\DORQJWKHYHUWLFDOSUR¿OHPD\FHUWDLQO\EHQH¿WIURPWUDQVFULSWLRQDOSUR¿OHVRIWKHVH populations, including the mechanisms of the host to regulate UCYN-A activity. Overall, further studies on the biogeochemical role of the UCYN-A diazotrophy may need to include contrasted ecological differences among the different lineages. Acknowledgements )LQDQFLDO VXSSRUW KDV EHHQ SURYLGHG E\ WKH 6SDQLVK 0LQLVWU\ RI (FRQRP\ DQG &RPSHWLWLYLW\ WKURXJK SURMHFW &RQVROLGHU,QJHQLR 0DODVSLQD &6' WR &0' )/$0( &*/WR50DQG3$1*(120,&6&*/%26WR6$*$0&DEHOOR ZDVUHFLSLHQWRID6SDQLVK)3,JUDQW%(6:HDFNQRZOHGJHDOOWKHWHFKQLFLDQV UHVHDUFKHUV FUHZ DQG FKLHI VFLHQWLVWV RI WKH GLIIHUHQW FUXLVHV IRU FROODERUDWLRQ :H WKDQN 0 *DOLQGRDQG3GHOD)XHQWHIRUQXWULHQWDQDO\VLV5/RJDUHVIRUVHTXHQFHDGYLFH56LPyDQG -0*DVROIRUXVHIXOFRPPHQWVRQWKHPDQXVFULSWDQG%)HUQiQGH]&DVWURDQG%0RXULxRIRU sharing unpublished data.
Distribution of a prymnesiophyte–UCYN-A symbiosis 120 Supplementary material Figure S1 Map of stations in the MALASPINA (a) and the Tara-Oceans (b) circumnavigation H[SHGLWLRQV7KHVWDWLRQVLQWKH,1'(0$5(6FUXLVHDUHVKRZQLQWKH5HJLRQ5LQSDQHO(a). ÝS ÝS EQ ÝN ÝN ÝWÝWÝ ÝE Ocean Data View 77 76 74 71 69 68 66 64 61 58 55 52 49 47 45 44 41 38 35 32 30 28 26 24 22 19 17 15 12 9 8 63 146 144 141 139 137 134 131 130 127 126 124 120 116 113 110 107 104 101 100 98 95 92 89 86 83 81 A B CD R1 R1 ÝS ÝS EQ ÝN ÝN ÝWÝWÝ ÝE Ocean Data View 123 125 124 122 98 111 100 102 109 36 38 41 42 45 52 64 65 66 67 68 70 72 76 78 82 84 85 R2 34 32 30 25 23 22 18 16 9 11 7 420 R2 a) b)
Chapter 3 121 Figure S2 (SLÀXSUHVFHQFH PLFURVFRS\ LPDJH RI SU\PQHVLRSK\WHOLNH FHOO QRW ODEHOHG E\ WKH UPRYM69 probe harbouring a labeled UCYN-A cell, co-occuring with a labeled host cell (from MALASPINA station 68). Upper panel correspond to DAPI signal (blue-labeled nucleous) and lower panel corresponds to the combined signal of the UPRYM69 probe (green-labeled host under EOXHOLJKWH[FLWDWLRQDQG8&<1B$SUREHUHGODEHOHGV\PELRQWXQGHUJUHHQOLJKWH[FLWDLRQ Figure S3 (SLÀXSUHVFHQFHPLFURVFRS\LPDJHRID%ELJHORZLLFHOOZKHUHWKH8&<1$V\PELRQW seems to be detached from the host. The image corresponds to the combined signal of the DAPI stain (blue-labeled nucleus), the UBRADO69 probe (grenn-labeled host under blue light excitation) DQG8&<1$SUREHUHGODEHOHGV\PELRQWXQGHUJUHHQOLJKWH[FLWDWLRQ UCYN-A labeled host non-labeled host UCYN-A 5 µm 5 µm
Chapter 4
Chapter 4 131 Chapter 4 *OREDO GLVWULEXWLRQ DQG LQWUDVSHFL¿F YDULDELOLW\ RI PDULQH SHODJRSK\WHV Ana M. Cabello, Ramiro Logares, Sarah Romac and Ramon Massana. 6XPPDU\ Pelagophytes are important components of marine photosynthetic picoeukaryote assemblages and are widely distributed across the oceans. Molecular surveys based on ribosomal genes suggest WKDWSHODJRSK\WHVKDYHDORZHYROXWLRQDU\GLYHUVL¿FDWLRQZLWKPRVWHQYLURQPHQWDOVHTXHQFHV being nearly identical to cultured species, in particular Pelagomonas calceolata. To assess the inWUDVSHFL¿FYDULDELOLW\ZLWKLQWKLVVSHFLHVDQGYDOLGDWHWKHSUHYDOHQFHRIRWKHUJHQHUDZHDQDO\]HG SHODJRSK\WHS\URWDJVFRQWDLQLQJWKH¿QDOSDUWRIWKH6U'1$aESDQGWKHFRPSOHWH,76 UHJLRQaESLQDZLGHDUUD\RIPLFURELDODVVHPEODJHVIURPWKHHSLSHODJLFRFHDQLQFOXGLQJ open ocean sites in major basins and European coastal sites. Most pelagophyte species were found in our dataset and we detected a novel and still-uncultured species. The majority of pyrotags aDI¿OLDWHGWRPelagomonas calceolata and Aureococcus spp. P. calceolata was dominant LQPRVWVDPSOLQJVLWHVZKLFKFRQ¿UPVWKHEURDGGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVVSHFLHVLQPDULQHV\VWHPV whereas Aureococcus VSSWHQGHGWREHUHVWULFWHGWRFRDVWDOVLWHV$QDO\VLVRI,76VHTXHQFHVD SK\ORJHQHWLFPDUNHUPRUHUHVROXWLYHWKDQWKH6U'1$LQGLFDWHGORZLQWUDVSHFL¿FYDULDELOLW\ within P. calceolata and Aureococcus spp. and suggested the existence of cosmopolitan species without geographical differentiation. Overall, our study highlighted the low genetic diversity of pelagophytes in the global surface ocean.
Chapter 4 133 Introduction Marine photosynthetic protists include a huge taxonomic diversity, with representatives in all but RQHWKHRSLVWKRNRQWDGLYLVLRQVRIWKHHXNDU\RWLFWUHHRIOLIH&DURQet al.1RWet al. They are important members of the eukaryotic plankton, and form the majority of cells within WKHSLFRDQGQDQRVL]HIUDFWLRQVP1RWet al.0DVVDQD7RJHWKHU with cyanobacteria, photosynthetic protists are responsible for half of the primary production on (DUWK)LHOGDQGDUHPDLQSOD\HUVRIWKHFDUERQELRORJLFDOSXPS$VUHYHDOHGE\PROHFXODU VXUYH\VLQLWLDOO\EDVHGRQ6DQJHUVHTXHQFLQJ'tH]et al.0RRQYDQGHU6WDD\et al. 0F'RQDOGet al./HSqUHet al.6KLet al.DQGUHFHQWO\RQKLJKWKURXJKSXW VHTXHQFLQJCheung et alGH9DUJDVet al.0DVVDQDet al.WKLVDVVHPEODJHLV GRPLQDWHGE\GLQRÀDJHOODWHVGLDWRPVKDSWRSK\WHVPDPLHOORSK\WHVSUDVLQRSK\WHVFKU\VRSK\WHV DQGSHODJRSK\WHV$PRQJWKHPSHODJRSK\WHVDUHRQHRIWKHPDMRUFRQWULEXWRUVWRWRWDOFHOOFRXQWV LQWKHVPDOOHVWVL]HIUDFWLRQP1RWet al.-DUGLOOLHUet al.*UREet al. DQGDUHJOREDOO\GLVWULEXWHGLQWKHVHDERWKDWFRDVWDODQGRSHQRFHDQVLWHV.LUNKDPet al. This group has been suggested to be a major player in the process of nitrate assimilation (Dupont et al., 2015). Due to their relevance in the world’s ocean, pelagophytes deserve further studies on their diversity and ecology. Pelagophytes are marine VWUDPHQRSLOHDOJDHLQWHJUDWHGLQWKH&ODVV3HODJRSK\FHDH$QGHUVHQet al.EDVHGRQJHQHWLFXOWUDVWUXFWXUDODQGSLJPHQWGDWD'H<RHet al.6DXQGHUVet al., 7KHFODVVLQFOXGHVWZRRUGHUV0RVWPHPEHUVZLWKSODQNWRQLFFRFFRLGIRUPVDUHSODFHG in the order Pelagomonadales, whereas members presenting colonial forms growing on shallow ZDWHUVVXEVWUDWHVDUHDOOSODFHGLQWKHRUGHU6DUFLQRFKU\VLGDOHV$GOet al.:\QQHet al., 3ODQNWRQLFSHODJRSK\WHVUDQJHLQFHOOVL]HVEHWZHHQDQGP9DXORWet al. DQGDUHUHSUHVHQWHGE\JHQHUDZLWKRQHVSHFLHVHDFKPelagomonas calceolata, Pelagococcus subviridis, Aureococcus anophagefferens, Aureoumbra lagunensis and Ankylochrysis lutea. P. calceolata seems to be the most abundant and widespread pelagophyte. This species has been UHSHDWHGO\LVRODWHGIURPWKH$WODQWLF3DFL¿FDQG,QGLDQRFHDQVPXOWLSOHVWUDLQVDUHGHSRVLWHGLQ WKH5RVFRII&XOWXUH&ROOHFWLRQ/H*DOOet al.DQGHQYLURQPHQWDOSHODJRSK\WH6U'1$ VHTXHQFHVDUHRIWHQLGHQWLFDOWRP. calceolata6KLet al.0DVVDQDet al.$UHFHQW metagenomic study retrieved the chloroplast genome of P. calceolataDQGUHFRQ¿UPHGWKHXELTXLW\ RIWKLVDOJDHLQPDULQHV\VWHPV:RUGHQet al. 2WKHUHFRORJLFDOO\UHOHYDQWVSHFLHVDUH Aureococcus anophagefferens and Aureoumbra lagunensis, known to cause harmful brown tide EORRPVLQFRDVWDOZDWHUVRIIWKH86HDVWFRDVWDQGWKH*XOIRI0H[LFR*REOHUDQG6XQGD 'HWDLOHGHFRSK\VLRORJLFDODQGJHQRPLFVWXGLHVKDYHEHHQFRQGXFWHGRQERWKVSHFLHV2QJet al., *REOHUet al. 'HVSLWHUHFHQWDGYDQFHVWKHH[WHQWRIWKHGLYHUVLW\ZLWKLQSHODJLFSHODJRSK\WHVVSHFLHVDVZHOO as their distribution on a global scale have not been investigated in detail. To address this, group-
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 134 VSHFL¿FPROHFXODUDSSURDFKHVDQGWKHULJKWFKRLFHRISK\ORJHQHWLFPDUNHUVDUHIXQGDPHQWDO0RVW EXONFRPPXQLW\DSSURDFKHVDUHEDVHGRQQXFOHDUHQFRGHGJHQHV6U'1$ DQGLQDPLQRU H[WHQWRQSODVWLGHQFRGHGJHQHV6U'1$rbcL or psbA)URPWKHVHDSSURDFKHVSHODJRSK\WHV VHHP WR KDYH H[SHULHQFHG D ORZ HYROXWLRQDU\ GLVYHUVL¿FDWLRQ FRPSDUHG WR RWKHU VWUDPHQRSLOH DOJDHVXFKDVGLDWRPVRUFKU\VRSK\WHV3HUQLFHet al.7KHXVHRIPRUHYDULDEOHPDUNHUV VXFKDVLQWHUQDOWUDQVFULEHGVSDFHUV,76RIWKHULERVRPDORSHURQFDQLQFUHDVHWKHSK\ORJHQHWLF UHVROXWLRQWRHYDOXDWHSK\ORJHQHWLFLQIHUHQFHVIRUVSHFLHVDQGJHQXVOHYHOV&ROHPDQDQG VWXG\LQWUDVSHFL¿FYDULDELOLW\5RGUtJXH]0DUWtQH]et al. Here we combined group-sSHFL¿FSULPHUVDQGKLJKWKURXJKSXWVHTXHQFLQJWRVWXG\SHODJRSK\WH diversity and biogeography at species and intraspecies levels in samples collected in major ocean EDVLQVGXULQJWKH0DODVSLQDH[SHGLWLRQDQGLQ(XURSHDQFRDVWDOVLWHVGXULQJWKH%LR0DU.VSURMHFW (QYLURQPHQWDO'1$IURPSLFRDQGQDQRSODQNWRQDVVHPEODJHVZDVXVHGWRJHQHUDWHSHODJRSK\WH S\URWDJVFRQWDLQLQJSDUWLDO6IXOOOHQJWK9UHJLRQDQGFRPSOHWH,762XUDSSURDFKDOORZHG IRUWKH¿UVWWLPHWRIXOO\FKDUDFWHUL]HWKHFRPSRVLWLRQRISHODJRSK\WHDVVHPEODJHVLQVDPSOHVRI WKHJOREDORFHDQSUHVHQWLQJWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRI¿YHSHODJLFJHQHUDLQFOXGLQJVSHFLHVOHVVWKDQ VLPLODUWRWKHFORVHVW*HQ%DQNVHTXHQFH$QHZFODGHZLWKRXWDFXOWXUHGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHZDV DOVRGHWHFWHG,QDGGLWLRQ,76VHTXHQFHVUHYHDOHGDQXQH[SHFWHGO\ORZLQWUDVSHFL¿FYDULDELOLW\ and lack of geographical differentiation within P. calceolata. 0DWHULDODQGPHWKRGV Sampling and DNA extraction from microbial assemblages 6HDZDWHUVDPSOHV ZHUHFROOHFWHG LQ (XURSHDQFRDVWDO VLWHV DVSDUW RIWKH BioMarKs Project KWWSELRPDUNVHXDQGRSHQRFHDQVLWHVYLVLWHGGXULQJWKH0$/$63,1$FLUFXPQDYLJDWLRQ H[SHGLWLRQKWWSVFLHQWL¿FH[SHGLFLRQPDODVSLQDHV&RDVWDOVLWHVZHUHQHDUE\*LMyQ*XOIRI %LVFD\%ODQHV0HGLWHUUDQHDQ1DSOHV0HGLWHUUDQHDQ9DUQD%ODFN6HD2VOR1RUWK6HD 6NDJHUUDN DQG 5RVFRII (QJOLVK &KDQQHO 2SHQ RFHDQ VLWHV ZHUH DW VXEWURSLFDO DQG WURSLFDO ODWLWXGHVRIWKH$WODQWLF,QGLDQDQG3DFL¿FRFHDQV:DWHUVDPSOHVZHUHFROOHFWHGDWVXUIDFHDQGDW WKH'HHS&KORURSK\OO0D[LPXP'&0ZLWK1LVNLQERWWOHVDWWDFKHGWRDURVHWWHHTXLSSHGZLWKD &7'SUREHDQGDÀXRURPHWHUDQGSDVVHGWKURXJKȝP mesh to remove large plankton. Twenty OLWHUVBioMarksRUVL[OLWHUV0$/$63,1$RISUH¿OWHUHGVHDZDWHUZDVWKHQVHULDOO\¿OWHUHG WKURXJKȝPDQGȝPPPGLDPHWHURUȝPPPGLDPHWHUSRUHVL]HSRO\FDUERQDWH ¿OWHUVZLWKDSHULVWDOWLFSXPS)LOWHUVZLWKWKHQDQRSODQNWRQIUDFWLRQȝPRQO\LQ%LR0DU.V VDPSOHVDQGWKHSLFRSODQNWRQIUDFWLRQȝP in BioMarKsPLQ0$/$63,1$ZHUH WKHQÀDVKIUR]HQLQOLTXLG1DQGVWRUHGDW&XQWLO'1$H[WUDFWLRQ
Chapter 4 135 '1$H[WUDFWLRQIURPBioMarks¿OWHUVZDVGRQHZLWKWKH1XFOHR6SLQ51$NLW0DFKHUH\1DJHO +RHUGW)UDQFHDVGHWDLOHGLQ0DVVDQDet al.)RU0$/$63,1$¿OWHUV'1$H[WUDFWLRQ was performed with the standard phenolchloroform protocol as explained in Pernice et al. ,QEULHIPLFURELDOELRPDVVZDVVXEMHFWHGWRHQ]\PDWLFGLJHVWLRQVZLWKO\VR]\PHDQGWKHQZLWK 3URWHLQDVH.DQGVRGLXPGRGHF\OVXOIDWHWKHUHVXOWLQJO\VDWHXQGHUZHQWWZRVWHSVRIWKHVWDQGDUG SKHQROFKORURIRUPH[WUDFWLRQDQGWKHDTXHRXVSKDVHZDVSXUL¿HGDQGFRQFHQWUDWHGLQDQ$PLFRQ 8OWUDXQLW0LOOLSRUHWRREWDLQȝORI'1$H[WUDFW$OOH[WUDFWVZHUHTXDQWL¿HGZLWKD 1DQRGURS1'VSHFWURSKRWRPHWHU1DQR'URS7HFKQRORJLHV,QF:LOPLQJWRQ'(86$DQG FKHFNHGE\HOHFWURSKRUHVLVRQDDJDURVHJHO 'HVLJQDQGRSWLPL]DWLRQRISHODJRSK\WHVSHFL¿FSULPHUV :H QHZO\ GHVLJQHG WKH SHODJRSK\WH VSHFL¿F IRUZDUG SULPHU 3(/$) ¶$7&$&&77**7&**&$*¶DWWKHHQGRIWKH6U'1$JHQHSRVLWLRQVRIP. calceolata ()ESXSVWUHDPWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKH9UHJLRQ7KLVSULPHUwas designed ZLWKWKH$5%SDFNDJHKWWSZZZDUEKRPHGHXVLQJDGDWDEDVHRIHXNDU\RWLFVHTXHQFHV LQFOXGLQJSHODJRSK\WHV,WZDVYHU\UREXVWLQVLOLFRPDWFKLQJDOOWDUJHWVHTXHQFHVH[FHSWLQJA. lagunensis 8PLVPDWFKDQGZLWKDWOHDVWWRLQWHUQDOPLVPDWFKHVZLWKDOOQRQWDUJHW VHTXHQFHV ,W ZDV DOVR FKHFNHG IRU IRUPDWLRQ RI SULPHU GLPHUV JXDQLQHF\WRVLQH FRQWHQW DQG WKHRUHWLFDOPHOWLQJWHPSHUDWXUHZLWKWKH2OLJR$QDO\VLVDQG3ORWWLQJ7RROZZZRSHURQFRP 7KHIRUZDUG3(/$)SULPHUZDV XVHGLQFRPELQDWLRQZLWKWKH XQLYHUVDOHXNDU\RWLFUHYHUVH SULPHU65¶ &*&7*&*77&77&$7&*¶ORFDWHGDWWKHEHJLQQLQJRIWKH6U'1$WR DPSOLI\SHODJRSK\WHVHTXHQFHVFRQWDLQLQJWKH¿QDOSDUWRIWKH6U'1$DERXWESDQGWKH FRPSOHWH,76ZLWKH[SHFWHGDPSOLFRQVL]HRIaESEDVHGRQ6DQG,76VHTXHQFHVRI P. calceolata()DQG$)3&5FRQGLWLRQVZHUHRSWLPL]HGRQ'1$H[WUDFWVIURP Pelagomonas calceolata&&03Aureococcus anophagefferens&&03Sarcinochrysis marina&&03DQGAureoumbra lagunensis&&03DQGHQYLURQPHQWDO'1$IURPWKH Mediterranean Sea. Pyrosequencing (QYLURQPHQWDO '1$ ZDV XVHG DV WHPSODWH IRU 3&5 DPSOL¿FDWLRQ ZLWK 3(/$) DQG 65 SULPHUV7KHUHYHUVHSULPHUKDGDEDUFRGHDQGERWKSULPHUVZHUHDGDSWHGIRUS\URVHTXHQFLQJ 3&5 UHDFWLRQV O FRQWDLQHG [ 0DVWHU 0L[ 3KXVLRQ® +LJK)LGHOLW\ '1$ 3RO\PHUDVH )LQQ]\PHV0RIHDFKSULPHUJO%RYLQH6HUXP$OEXPLQDQGQJRI'1$7KH 3&5SURJUDPKDGDQLQLWLDOGHQDWXUDWLRQVWHSDW&GXULQJPLQF\FOHVRIVHFDW&
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 136 VHFDW&DQQHDOLQJWHPSHUDWXUHVHFDW&DQGD¿QDOVWHSDW&IRUPLQ3&5 SURGXFWVZHUHFKHFNHGRQDDJDURVHJHODQG3&5WULSOLFDWHVZHUHSRROHGWRJHWKHUSXUL¿HGDQG HOXWHGOZLWKWKH3&5&OHDQ8S.LW0DFKHUH\1DJHODQGTXDQWL¿HGZLWK4XELWGV'1$ %5$VVD\.LW ,QYLWURJHQ$ERXW QJRI '1$ DPSOLFRQVZHUHVHQW WR*HQRVFRSH KWWS ZZZJHQRVFRSHFQVIU)UDQFHIRUS\URVHTXHQFLQJRQD*6)/;7LWDQLXPV\VWHP/LIH 6FLHQFHV86$XVLQJWKHUHYHUVHSULPHU Pyrotag processing 5DZ VHTXHQFHV REWDLQHG WKURXJK VHTXHQFLQJ S\URWDJV ZHUH SURFHVVHG LQ 4,,0( &DSRUDVRet al.IROORZLQJVWDQGDUGSURFHGXUHVDVLQ/RJDUHVet al3\URWDJVZHUH GHPXOWLSOH[HG XVLQJ WKH EDUFRGH LGHQWL¿HU LQ WKH UHYHUVH SULPHU 3\URWDJV ES ORQJ KDYLQJXSWRPLVPDWFKHVZLWKSULPHU65DQGZLWKKRPRSRO\PHUVQRORQJHUWKDQEDVHV ZHUH UHWDLQHG ORQJHU KRPRSRO\PHUV ZHUH QRW LGHQWL¿HG LQ WKH DPSOL¿HG UHJLRQ )RU TXDOLW\ FKHFNHUURUVZHUHFRPSXWHGLQVOLGLQJZLQGRZVRIESDQGVHTXHQFHVZHUHWUXQFDWHGDWWKH ¿UVWZLQGRZKDYLQJORZTXDOLW\VFRUH3KUHGDYHUDJHDQGUHWDLQHGLIORQJHUWKDQES 3\URWDJVSDVVLQJWKHTXDOLW\FKHFNS\URWDJVZHUHGHQRLVHGE\'H1RLVHUYHUVLRQ 5HHGHUDQG.QLJKWDQGFOXVWHUHGLQWR278V2SHUDWLRQDO7D[RQRPLF8QLWVDW VLPLODULW\ E\ 8&/867 278V FRQWDLQLQJ RQO\ RQH S\URWDJ ZHUH UHPRYHG UHVXOWLQJ LQ S\URWDJVFOXVWHUHGLQ278V4XDOLW\FKHFNGHQRLVLQJDQGFOXVWHULQJZDVGRQHZLWK 4,,0( ,QRUGHUWRKRPRJHQL]HDPSOLFRQOHQJWKVZHUHWDLQHGWKH278VZKRVHUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVHTXHQFH FRYHUHGWKHFRPSOHWH9UHJLRQLGHQWL¿HGDVWKRVHKDYLQJXSWRPLVPDWFKHVZLWKWKHHXNDU\RWLF 9SULPHU)/DQH6WRHFNet al.7KLVVWHSZDVGRQHZLWK$5%DQGUHWDLQHG 278V7D[RQRPLFDVVLJQPHQWRIWKHVH278VZDVSHUIRUPHGE\%/$67LPSOHPHQWHGLQ4,,0( DWVLPLODULW\WKUHVKROGDJDLQVWWKH359UHIHUHQFHGDWDEDVH*XLOORXet al.DQGE\ ORFDO%/$67DJDLQVWSHODJRSK\WH66DQJHUVHTXHQFHVLQFOXGLQJDOOFXOWXUHGJHQHUDDQG WKHLUXQFXOWXUHGUHODWLYHV)LQDOO\278VWKDWUHSUHVHQWHGS\URWDJVRILQLWLDO VHWZHUHDVVLJQHGWRSHODJRSK\WHVZKLOHWKHUHPDLQLQJ278VDI¿OLDWHGWRRWKHUHXNDU\RWHV PRVWO\GLQRÀ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
Chapter 4 137 WD[RQRPLFDVVLJQPHQWDQGREVHUYHWKHH[WHQWRIWKHYDULDELOLW\ZLWKLQWKHP7KHWUHHGLVSOD\HG PDLQFODGHVWD[RQRPLFDOO\DVVLJQHGWRSHODJRSK\WHJHQHUDDQGWRDQRYHOFODGHVHHDOVR)LJ EF455763_Pelagomonas calceolata OTU6927_17051 U40927_Pelagophyte CCMP1395 (Pelagococcus sp.) OTU4123_222 (t1) OTU7457_209 (t2) GU196150_Endosymbiont OTU53_610 OTU334_2374 (t1) OTU1537_620 (t2) OTU1044_109 (t3) NOVEL AF117777_Aureococcus anophagefferens OTU6363_9797 (t1) OTU2760_1377 (t3) JQ420084_Aureococcus sp. OTU1564_949 FJ973363_Ankylochrysis lutea OTU390_1564 (t1) OTU7323_1599 (t2) OTU1564_949 (t2) OTU1350_250 (t3) EU247837_Pelagophyte CCMP2097 U40258_Aureoumbra lagunensis AB183669_Chrysocystis sp. U78032_Pulvinaria sp. U78033_Sarcinochrysis marina 0.05 Figure 1. 0D[LPXPOLNHOLKRRGSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHRIWKHSHODJRSK\WH9W\SHVLGHQWL¿HGLQ RXUGDWDVHWFRGHGDV278QXPEHUDQGWKHQXPEHURIS\URWDJVWKH\LQFOXGHDQG*HQ%DQNFORVHVWUHODWLYHVLQEROG'LIIHUHQW9W\SHVZLWKLQDJHQXVDUHLQGLFDWHGDVWWRUW%RRVWUDS YDOXHVIURPUHSOLFDWHVDERYHDUHVKRZQ Results General description of the dataset :HDQDO\]HGSHODJRSK\WHVSHFL¿FS\URWDJVRISDUWLDO6U'1$DQGFRPSOHWH,76IURP(XURSHDQ FRDVWDOVLWHVDQGRSHQRFHDQVLWHVIURPWKH$WODQWLFVLWHVWKH,QGLDQVLWHVDQGWKH3DFL¿F VLWHV$WHDFKVWDWLRQ VXUIDFH DQGRU'&0 GHSWKVZHUH VDPSOHGIRU WKHSLFRSODQNWRQDQG DGGLWLRQDOO\IRUWKHQDQRSODQNWRQLQFRDVWDOVLWHV,QRUGHUWRDVVLJQWD[RQRPLFDOO\WKHVHTXHQFHV obtained and compare the different samples based on pelagophyte diversity, we retained only 278VLQFOXGLQJFRPSOHWH9DQG,76UHJLRQV278VDQGIXUWKHUFOXVWHUHGWKHPEDVHGRQ WKH9UHJLRQVLQFHDODUJHYDULDELOLW\ZDVH[SODLQHGE\WKH,76UHJLRQ7KH¿QDOQRUPDOL]HG WDEOHRI278VUHSUHVHQWHGVDPSOHVIRUWKHSLFRSODQNWRQDQGIRUWKHQDQRSODQNWRQ
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 144 :HSHUIRUPHGWKHVDPHDQDO\VLVIRUWKH,76YDULDQWVLQAureococcus. $WRWDORIDQG 278VZHUHGH¿QHGZLWKLQW\SHVDQGUHVSHFWLYHO\DQGZHVHOHFWHGWKHPRVWDEXQGDQW278V !RIWRWDOS\URWDJVRIHDFKW\SHWREXLOGDSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHH)LJD6HTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFH EHWZHHQDOORIWKHPZDVRQDYHUDJH7KHWUHHFOXVWHUHGGLIIHUHQWLDOO\WKH,76YDULDQWVRI each Aureococcus9W\SHDQGGLVSOD\HGWZRGLVWLQFWFODGHVZLWKLQWKHW\SHYDULDQWFODGHV $DQG%6HTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHZDVZLWKLQW\SHDQGZLWKLQW\SHZLWKLQ FODGH$RQDYHUDJH7RH[SORUHLIWKHYDULDQWVRIWKHVHFODGHVKDYHDQHFRORJLFDOPHDQLQJZH UHSUHVHQWHGWKHLUFRQWULEXWLRQLQWKHGLIIHUHQWVDPSOHV)LJE&ODGH%PDLQO\UHSUHVHQWHG E\RQH278ZDVGRPLQDQWRUHYHQWKHXQLTXHUHSUHVHQWDWLYHLQPRVWVDPSOHV2QWKH RWKHUKDQGFODGH$DSSHDUHGZHOOUHSUHVHQWHGLQDIHZFRDVWDOVLWHV*LMyQDQG%ODQHVDQGZHUH virtually absent in the others. They also appeared in the two open ocean sites where Aureococcus W\SHZDVGHWHFWHG5HJDUGLQJ,76YDULDQWVRIAureococcusW\SHVDQGQRGLIIHUHQWLDOVLJQDO ZDVGHWHFWHG7\SHZDVYLUWXDOO\UHSUHVHQWHGE\RQO\RQH,76YDULDQWZKLOHW\SHZDVRQO\ GHWHFWHGLQWKHSLFRDQGQDQRVL]HIUDFWLRQRIDVLQJOHVLWHLQ5RVFRII Aureococcus1_ID6363_8978 Aureococcus1_ID1962_277 Aureococcus1_ID5503_230 Others OSLO09 OSLO10 GIJON BLANES NAPLES10 VARNA 0 20 40 60 80 100 pyrotags contribution (%) OTU2760_780 OTU5820_177 OTU7936_333 OTU1564_932 Aureococcus3 Aureococcus2 Clade 1A Clade 1B 69 60 66 100 52 A B NNN S D A1 I3 I4N N N N N N N S D S D S S S S D S D D S D Figure 7. (a) 0D[LPXPOLNHOLKRRGSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHRIWKHPRVWDEXQGDQW,76YDULDQWVZLWKLQHDFK9W\SHGHWHUmined in Aureococcus7\SHSUHVHQWHGWZRGLIIHUHQWFODGHV$DQG%%RRVWUDSYDOXHVIURPUHSOLFDWHV DERYHDUHVKRZQ (b)&RQWULEXWLRQRI,76YDULDQWVRIAureococcusW\SHWRWRWDOS\URWDJVRIWKLVW\SHLQVDPSOHV ZKHUHWKLVW\SHZDVGHWHFWHGDERYHS\URWDJV7KH,76VHTXHQFHRIPelagococcusVSW\SHZDVXVHGDVRXWJURXS QRWVKRZQ1DQRSODQNWRQVDPSOHVDUHLQGLFDWHGDV³1´6DPSOLQJGHSWKLVLQGLFDWHGDV³6´VXUIDFHRU³'´'&0 2SHQRFHDQVDPSOHVDUHODEHOOHGIROORZLQJ)LJ
Chapter 4 145 Discussion $FRPSOHWHYLHZRIODUJHVFDOHSHODJRSK\WHGLYHUVLW\XVLQJJURXSVSHFL¿FSULPHUV ,QWKLVVWXG\ZHKDYHHYDOXDWHGIRUWKH¿UVWWLPHSHODJRSK\WHGLYHUVLW\XVLQJDJURXSVSHFL¿F DSSURDFK,QSUHYLRXVZRUNVSHODJRSK\WHGLYHUVLW\ZDVVWXGLHGWKURXJKEXONDSSURDFKHVXVLQJ XQLYHUVDOHXNDU\RWLFSULPHUVIRU6RU6U'1$JHQHV)XOOHUet al./H*DOOet al. Shi et al.,QWKHVHVWXGLHVPelagomonas calceolataVHHPHGWREHWKHXQLTXHDEXQGDQW PHPEHURIWKLVJURXS2XUUHVXOWVFRQ¿UPWKDWLQVRPHFLUFXPVWDQFHVLQGHHGP. calceolata was the XQLTXHSHODJRSK\WHVSHFLHVVXFKLQODUJHRFHDQLFDUHDVRIWKH3DFL¿F2FHDQ+RZHYHUE\XVLQJ SHODJRSK\WHVSHFL¿FSULPHUVZHDOVRKLJKOLJKWHGRWKHUJHQHUDWKDWPLJKWEHHTXDOO\LPSRUWDQWRU even dominate the assemblages like AureococcusVSSRUWKH1RYHOJURXS ,QWKHSUHYLRXVVWXGLHVRQSLFRHXNDU\RWLFFRPPXQLW\FRPSRVLWLRQLQ(XURSHFRDVWDOZDWHUVWKH few pelagophyte clones detected were identical to P. calceolata ERWK LQ WKH (QJOLVK &KDQQHO 5RPDULDQG9DXORWDQGWKH0HGLWHUUDQHDQ6HD'tH]et al.0DVVDQDet al. Marie et al.0F'RQDOGet al.%\FRQWUDVWRXUGDWDVKRZWKDWLWLVLQWKHVHFRDVWDO waters where most pelagophyte genera are represented, in particular the unprecedent distribution and abundance of Aureococcus,WLVDOVRUHPDUNDEOHWKHFRQWULEXWLRQRIAnkylochrysis in Oslo and 9DUQDZDWHUVaLQWKHQDQRSODQNWRQDJHQXVVHHPLQJO\UHODWHGWR$UWLFZDWHUV.LUNKDPet al.%DO]DQRet al.DQGWKHSUHVHQFHRIDQRYHOJURXS$OVRVXUSULVLQJZDVWKHGHWHFWLRQ RIWKHXQFXOWXUHGHQGRV\PELRQWRIGLQRÀDJHOODWHV'DXJEMHUJet al.,ZKLFKFRXOGEHDIUHH OLYLQJFHOOLQRXUVDPSOHVRUGHULYHIURPKRVWFHOOVaPORQJEURNHQGXULQJ¿OWUDWLRQ,W interesting to note that in a previous study of psbA transcripts from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, SHODJRSK\WHVZHUHWKHVHFRQGPRVWDFWLYHSK\WRSODQNWRQJURXSDQGZHUHGRPLQDWHGE\VHTXHQFHV YHU\FORVHVLPLODUEXWQRWLGHQWLFDOWRP.calceolata0DQ$KDURQRYLFKet al. so also suggesting new diversity as found in our study. $OO SUHYLRXV GDWD ZHUH EDVHG RQ FORQLQJ DQG VHTXHQFLQJ DQ DSSURDFK WKDW ZDV DIIHFWHG E\ VHTXHQFHXQGHUVDPSOLQJ+LJKWKURXJKSXWDSSURDFKHVVXUSDVVWKLVOLPLWDWLRQDQGDODUJHVFDOH study on protist diversity has been recently presented as one of the outcomes of the Tara-Oceans FLUFXPQDYLJDWLRQH[SHGLWLRQGH9DUJDVet al7KLVVWXG\WDUJHWHGWKH9UHJLRQRIWKH6 U'1$E\,OOXPLQDVHTXHQFLQJRISODQNWRQVDPSOHVIURPVHYHUDOVL]HIUDFWLRQVLQFOXGLQJWKH SLFRSODQNWRQ P 3HODJRSK\WH VHTXHQFHV ZHUH H[WUDFWHGXVLQJWKH QHZ GDWDVHW KWWS GRLSDQJDHDGH3$1*$($:H IRXQG WKDW WKH YDVW PDMRULW\ RI WKH a PLOOLRQ SHODJRSK\WH WDJV FOXVWHUHG LQ D VLQJOH 278 ZKLFK ZDV LGHQWLFDO WR Pelagomonas calceolata$GGLWLRQDO%/$67VHDUFKHVXVLQJRXU9W\SHVUHWULHYHGAnkylochrysisW\SH VLPLODULW\ DV WKH VHFRQG PRVW DEXQGDQW 278 RI WDJV DQG D VHW RI 278V VLPLODUWRWKHRWKHU9W\SHVDWYHU\ORZDEXQGDQFHOHVVWKDQWDJVZKLFKFRXOGEHHQGRZHG WR VHTXHQFLQJ HUURUV$ SODXVLEOH H[SODQDWLRQ IRU WKH DEVHQFH RI Aureococcus spp. within the 7DUDGDWDVHWLVWKDWLWVPRVWDEXQGDQWW\SHSUHVHQWVRQHPLVPDWFKZLWKWKHHXNDU\RWLFSULPHU
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 146 5$PDUDO=HWWOHUet al.XVHGLQ7DUDWKHIRUZDUGHXNDU\RWLFSULPHU)PDWFKHG DOOSHODJRSK\WHV7KLVELDVFRXOGDOVRH[SODLQWKHSUHYLRXVUHVXOWVXVLQJFORQLQJDQGVHTXHQFLQJ LQFRDVWDOZDWHUV0DVVDQDet alVLQFHWKHVDPHPLVPDWFKH[LVWHGLQWKHSULPHUXVHG,Q DUHFHQWVWXG\RQ(XURSHDQFRDVWDOZDWHUVXVLQJS\URVHTXHQFLQJDQGHXNDU\RWLFSULPHUVIURP WKH9UHJLRQRIWKH6U'1$0DVVDQDet alWKHWZRGRPLQDQW278VZHUHLGHQWLFDO to P. calceolata and Aureococcus anophagefferensW\SHEHLQJWKHODWWHUVSHFLHVGRPLQDQWRU XQLTXHLQDIHZRIWKHVDPSOHVGDWDQRWVKRZQ Thus, our work offers a new picture of pelagophyte assemblages in coastal and open ocean waters RYHUFRPLQJWKHREYLRXVELDVRIXQLYHUVDOSULPHUV8VLQJWKH9UHJLRQDVDSUR[\IRUVSHFLHVZH GHWHFWHGRQO\GLIIHUHQWW\SHV7KUHHRIWKHPZHUHXQUHODWHGWRFXOWXUHGRUHQYLURQPHQWDO9 VHTXHQFHVDQGFRQIRUPHGDQHZFOXVWHUUHIHUUHGDVWKH1RYHOJURXS2WKHUW\SHVZHUHUHODWHG to the described genera Pelagococcus, Aureococcus and Ankylochrysis and were not previously IRXQGLQHQYLURQPHQWDOVXUYH\V$VZHRQO\FKHFNHGWKH6PDUNHUZHFDQQRWGLVFDUGWKDWWKLV QHZGLYHUVLW\ZDVSUHYLRXVO\REVHUYHGWKURXJKRWKHUPDUNHUV)RULQVWDQFHWKHpsbAVHTXHQFHV mentioned before that were similar but not identical to P.calceolata 0DQ$KDURQRYLFKet al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¿FYDULDELOLW\RIWKHWZRPRVWDEXQGDQWVSHFLHVLQRXU GDWDVHWPelagomonas calceolata and AureococcusW\SHDQGORRNHGZKHWKHUWKLVYDULDELOLW\ZDV GLVWULEXWHGJHRJUDSKLFDOO\E\GHSWKRUE\VL]HIUDFWLRQ ,QWKHFDVHRIP. calceolata, all assemblages studied were formed by the same variants at the same IUHTXHQFLHVVR ZH FRXOG QRW GLVWLQJXLVK EHWZHHQSRSXODWLRQV IURP GLVWLQFW VLWHV7KLVSDWWHUQ FRXOGEHH[SODLQHGE\WZRDOWHUQDWLYHVFHQDULRV7KH¿UVWZDVWKDWWKH,76GLGQRWRIIHUHQRXJK resolution to distinguish populations, which would need other genetic markers to be detected. The second scenario was that we were indeed seeing that P.calceolata formed a worldwide population. 7KHORZYDULDELOLW\REVHUYHGLQWKH,76RIWKLVVSHFLHVFDOFXODWHGDVVHTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHZDV FRPSDUDEOHWRWKDWREVHUYHGLQRWKHUVSHFLHVZLWKDZRUOGZLGHGLVWULEXWLRQ5RGUtJXH]0DUWLQH] et al ,QWKHODWHU VWXG\WKHFODGHV$DQG (RIWKH 0$67JURXSHDFKSURSRVHG WR EHDVLQJOHVSHFLHVVKRZHGDYHUDJHGVHTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHRIa0$67VSHFLHVZHUHDOVR ZLGHVSUHDG LQ PDULQH V\VWHPV DQG VKRZHG KLJK JHQH ÀRZ EHWZHHQ YHU\ GLVWDQW JHRJUDSKLF
Chapter 4 147 UHJLRQV5RGUtJXH]0DUWLQH]et alVXSSRUWLQJWKHK\SRWKHVLVRIQRGLVSHUVDOOLPLWDWLRQRI VRPHPDULQHSODQNWRQLFSRSXODWLRQVLQWKHRFHDQ)LQOD\7KHVHREVHUYDWLRQVVXSSRUWRXU second hypothesis, and in the case of P. calceolataWKHJHQHÀRZUDWHDPRQJGLVWDQWSRSXODWLRQV PLJKWEHPXFKKLJKHUVLQFHZHREVHUYHGDVLPLODUIUHTXHQF\IRUDOO,76YDULDQWVHYHU\ZKHUH 1HYHUWKHOHVVPRUHDQDO\VLVFRXOGEHGRQHWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHIUHTXHQFLHVREVHUYHGDOORZHGWR GHWHUPLQHDJHRJUDSKLFDOURXWHIRUWKHGLVWULEXWLRQRIWKLVVSHFLHV$QRWKHUH[DPSOHRIDQDOJDO VSHFLHVZLWKRXWJHRJUDSKLFDOSDWWHUQREVHUYHGZLWKWKH,76PDUNHULVWKDWRIWKHUDSKLGRSK\WH Heterosigma akashiwo&RQQHOO7KLVVSHFLHVVKRZHGQHDUO\LGHQWLFDO,76VHTXHQFHVLQ LVRODWHVIURP$WODQWLFDQG3DFL¿FEDVLQVDQGWKLVZDVDWWULEXWHGWRDUHFHQWGLVSHUVDOLQJHRORJLFDO WLPHVSRVVLEOHE\KXPDQYHFWRUV 7KHDQDO\VLVRI,76YDULDQWVLQAureococcus VSSPDLQWDLQHGWKHGLVWLQFW9W\SHVDQGUHYHOHG WZR VXEFODGHV ZLWKLQ W\SH $V LQ Pelagomonas ORZ LQWUDVSHFL¿F YDULDELOLW\ ZDV REVHUYHG for Aureococcus W\SHYLUWXDOO\RQO\RQHYDULDQWDQGW\SHVHTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHRI 1HYHUWKHOHVVZLWKLQAureococcusW\SHWZRGLIIHUHQWFODGHVZHUHGLVSOD\HGZLWKDVLJQL¿FDQW VHTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHDPRQJWKHWZRLQGLFDWLYHRIWZRGLIIHUHQWVSHFLHV7KLVLVFRQVLVWHQW ZLWKWKHLQWHUFODGHGLYHUJHQFHREVHUYHGLQ0$67DQGEHWZHHQGLQRÀDJHOODWHVSHFLHV in Peridinium VSS.LPet al5RGUtJXH]0DUWtQH]et al+HUHWKHAureococcus W\SHGLVWLQFWYDULDQWVKDGDJHRJUDSKLFDOPHDQLQJZLWKFODGH%EHLQJGRPLQDQWDQGZLGHVSUHDG DQGFODGH$IRXQGLQSDUWLFXODUFRDVWDOVLWHV&ODGH$DOVRDSSHDUHGLQWZRRSHQRFHDQVLWHVDQG IXUWKHUDQDO\VLVVKRXOGEHGRQHWRGHWHUPLQHLIWKHVHVLWHVKDGFRDVWDOLQÀXHQFH Concluding remarks 2XU VWXG\ SRLQWV RXW WKH LPSRUWDQFH RI SHUIRUPLQJ GLYHUVLW\ VWXGLHV XVLQJ D JURXS VSHFL¿F approach. Excepting Aureoumbra, all planktonic pelagophyte genera were found in European coastal waters, including new diversity within these genera and also a novel clade. Moreover, WKH 9 UHJLRQ DOORZHG WR GLIIHUHQWLDWH YDULDQWV UHODWHG WR SDUWLFXODU FRDVWDO VLWHV VXFK LQ WKH case of Aureococcus. The important contribution of Aureococcus anophagefferens in European coastal systems is of ecological relevance, since this species can form harmful algal blooms in DQWKURSRJHQLFDOO\PRGL¿HGZDWHUVEHLQJUHFHQWO\UHSRUWHGDVWKHFDXVDWLYHDJHQWRIHPHUJHQW QHZEURZQWLGHVLQFRDVWDOVLWHVRI&KLQD=KDQJet al'HVSLWHRXUVSHFL¿FDSSURDFKDQG KLJKWKURXJKSXWVHTXHQFLQJSRZHUZHRQO\IRXQGFOHDUHYLGHQFHIRUWKHH[LVWHQFHRIGLIIHUHQW SHODJRSK\WHW\SHVZRUOGZLGH0RUHRYHUWKHORZDPRXQWRI,76VHTXHQFHGLYHUJHQFHZRUOGZLGH in P. calceolata and AureococcusVSSZDVDOVRUHPDUNDEOH7KH,76YDULDELOLW\LQP. calceolata GLG QRW VKRZ GLIIHUHQWLDWHG JHRJUDSKLFDO SRSXODWLRQV VR ZH K\SRWKHVL]H WKDW WKLV VSHFLHV KDV DZRUOGZLGHSRSXODWLRQ)LQDOO\ZHQRWHWKDWSHODJRSK\WHVKDYHH[SHULHQFHGORZHYROXWLRQDU\ GLYHUVL¿FDWLRQDVKDVSUHYLRXVO\EHHQREVHUYHGLQRWKHUZLGHVSUHDGSLFRHXNDU\RWHVVXFKDVWKH 0$67JURXS
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 148 $FNQRZOHGJHPHQWV )LQDQFLDOVXSSRUWKDVEHHQSURYLGHGE\WKH(XURSHDQSURMHFWVBioMarks(5$QHW %LRGLYHUVD0,&52%)32&($1DQG'(927(6)3(19 DQG WKH 6SDQLVK SURMHFWV 0DODVSLQD &6' 0(& DQG )/$0( &*/ 0,&,11$0&DEHOORZDV UHFLSLHQWRID6SDQLVK )3,JUDQW%(6:H acknowledge all the technicians, researchers, crew and chief scientists of the different cruises for FROODERUDWLRQ:HWKDQN)0&RUQHMRIRUGDWDWUHDWPHQWDGYLFH
Chapter 4 149 6XSSOHPHQWDU\PDWHULDO 4056_6_Aureococcus3 5572_1_Ankylochrysis1 6633_3_Aureococcus1 5459_4_Aureococcus1 7982_7_Pelagomonas 1508_23_Pelagomonas 6316_4_Ankylochrysis1 1658_1_Aureococcus1 3319_7_Pelagomonas 1943_1829_Pelagomonas 5696_26_Pelagomonas 4368_2_Pelagomonas 6363_9697_Aureococcus1 2760_1377_Aureococcus3 1564_949_Aureococcus2 7959_4_Pelagomonas 7738_4_Ankylochrysis2 5583_1_Novel1 7847_2_Novel1 434_1_Ankylochrysis2 1733_14_Aureococcus1 4671_3_Ankylochrysis1 2870_7_Ankylochrysis1 3317_8_Other 2071_8_Ankylochrysis3 7323_1599_Ankylochrysis2 1350_250_Ankylochrysis3 3715_8_Pelagomonas 946_2_Aureococcus1 1804_10_Pelagomonas 604_1_Pelagomonas 6751_14_Aureococcus1 5832_10_Pelagomonas 391_34_Pelagomonas 2206_3_Aureococcus3 7123_71_Pelagomonas 179_5_Aureococcus1 6456_9_Ankylochrysis3 8131_5_Pelagomonas 390_1564_Ankylochrysis1 5654_10_Pelagomonas 4128_3_Ankylochrysis1 4338_2_Symbiont 1576_3_Aureococcus1 6284_3_Aureococcus1 5462_5_Aureococcus1 334_2374_Novel1 2609_24_Ankylochrysis3 7806_1_Aureococcus3 7781_2_Aureoumbra 7511_15_Pelagomonas 2117_3_Pelagomonas 7697_1_Symbiont 2781_45_Pelagomonas 7538_9_Novel2 2650_2_AnkylochrysisX 4718_5_Aureococcus1 1393_12_Pelagomonas 7457_209_Pelagococcus2 1537_620_Novel2 5084_4_Aureococcus1 725_3_Aureococcus2 1947_28_Pelagococcus1 3607_5_Aureococcus1 8234_6_Pelagomonas 2153_8_Pelagomonas 1044_109_Novel3 4406_1_Novel1 960_1_Aureococcus2 8601_7_Aureococcus1 2872_3_Aureococcus2 5477_20_Pelagomonas 7143_1_Aureococcus1 8427_4_Pelagomonas 309_2_Novel1 4123_222_Pelagococcus1 118_3_Pelagomonas 4964_2_Pelagomonas 2568_3_Aureococcus2 6927_15222_Pelagomonas 5182_1_Aureococcus2 8062_1_Aureococcus2 5911_22_Aureococcus1 2773_4_Novel1 2233_6_Pelagomonas 53_610_Symbiont 1686_1_Aureococcus1 7471_4_Aureococcus2 0.05 Figure S1. 0D[LPXPOLNHOLKRRGSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHEDVHGRQWKH9UHJLRQRISHODJRSK\WH278VLQRXU GDWDVHW6HTXHQFHFRGHVDUHWKH278QXPEHUWKHQXPEHURIS\URWDJVLWLQFOXGHVDQGWKHWD[RQRPLFDVVLJQDWLRQ 5HSUHVHQWDWLYH278VRIWKH9W\SHVDUHLQEROG
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 150 0.03 2096_1_P.calceo 4433_6_P.calceo 8214_18_P.calceo 3955_2_P.calceo 2638_16_P.calceo 4558_2_P.calceo 6679_1057_P.calceo 262_18_P.calceo 3923_16_P.calceo 700_5_P.calceo 8621_148_P.calceo 8097_7_P.calceo 2149_5_P.calceo 2652_21_P.calceo 7630_52_P.calceo 231_34_P.calceo 2989_23_P.calceo 3137_8_P.calceo 3983_13_P.calceo 605_7_P.calceo 4835_74_P.calceo 1293_10_P.calceo 478_4_P.calceo 2139_7_P.calceo 3785_1_P.calceo 8401_191_P.calceo 5230_26_P.calceo 2055_64_P.calceo 6927_12365_P.calceo 1430_1_P.calceo 4381_3_P.calceo 4377_3_P.calceo 2141_489_P.calceo 6437_1_P.calceo 1943_1798_P.calceo 495_3_P.calceo 4112_8_P.calceo 1888_12_P.calceo 827_71_P.calceo 8202_18_P.calceo 2417_5_P.calceo 1623_11_P.calceo 44_11_P.calceo 7186_33_P.calceo 5828_2_P.calceo 8489_13_P.calceo 1858_56_P.calceo 3070_32_P.calceo 5927_74_P.calceo 5200_6_P.calceo 6748_61_P.calceo 7076_2_P.calceo 1454_2_P.calceo 4155_4_P.calceo 7336_23_P.calceo 6138_22_P.calceo 2344_6_P.calceo 3033_28_P.calceo 8432_17_P.calceo Figure S2. 0D[LPXPOLNHOLKRRGSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHEDVHGRQ,76VHTXHQFHVRIDOO278VFOXVWHUHGLQWKHUHSUHVHQWDWLYH9W\SHRIPelagomonas calceolata7KHVL[PRUHDEXQGDQW278VDUHFRORUHGDFFRUGLQJWR)LJ
Chapter 4 151 0.5 1962_277_Aureococcus 2604_4_Aureococcus 6495_5_Aureococcus 6807_1_Aureococcus 3130_4_Aureococcus 8435_6_Aureococcus 5381_5_Aureococcus 5967_6_Aureococcus 3568_9_Aureococcus 5105_8_Aureococcus 2732_3_Aureococcus 4379_1_Aureococcus 2688_2_Aureococcus 5503_779_Aureococcus 2981_4_Aureococcus 4889_33_Aureococcus 3914_15_Aureococcus 757_3_Aureococcus 547_2_Aureococcus 3530_2_Aureococcus 3077_43_Aureococcus 7700_1_Aureococcus 1504_2_Aureococcus 6363_8978_Aureococcus 52_5_Aureococcus 5822_1_Aureococcus 6719_2_Aureococcus 5423_2_Aureococcus 5795_11_Aureococcus 4018_2_Aureococcus 4329_8_Aureococcus 6949_2_Aureococcus 7869_7_Aureococcus Figure S3.0D[LPXPOLNHOLKRRGSK\ORJHQHWLFWUHHEDVHGRQ,76VHTXHQFHVRIDOO278VFOXVWHUHGLQWKHUHSUHVHQWDWLYH9W\SHRIAureococcus7KHWKUHHPRUHDEXQGDQW278VDUHFRORUHGDFFRUGLQJWR)LJ
Low global diversity of marine pelagophytes 152 5HIHUHQFHV Adl, S.M., Simpson, A.G.B., Lane, C.E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S.S., et al. (2012) The UHYLVHGFODVVLÀFDWLRQRIHXNDU\RWHVJ Eukaryot Microbiol. 59: 429–493. Amaral-Zettler, L.A, McCliment, E.A, Ducklow, H.W., and Huse, S.M. (2009) A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS One 4: e6372. Andersen, R.A., Sounders, G.W., Paskind, M.P., and Sexton, J.P. (1993) Ultrastructure and 18S rRNA gene sequence for Pelagomonas calceolata gen. et sp. nov. and the description of a new algal class, the Pelagophyceae classis nov. J Phycol 29: 701–715. Balzano, S., Marie, D., Gourvil, P., and Vaulot, D. (2012) Composition of the summer photosynthetic pico and nanoplankton communities in the Beaufort Sea assessed by T-RFLP and sequences of the 6U51$JHQHIURPÁRZF\WRPHWU\VRUWHGVDPSOHVISME J 6: 1480–1498. Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K., et al. (2010) QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7: 335–336. Caron, D. A., Countway, P.D., Jones, A.C., Kim, D.Y., and Schnetzer, A. (2012) Marine Protistan Diversity. Ann Rev Mar Sci 4: 467–493. Cheung, M.K., Au, C.H., Chu, K.H., Kwan, H.S., and Wong, C.K. (2010) Composition and genetic diversity of picoeukaryotes in subtropical coastal waters as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. ISME J 4: 1053-1059. Coleman, A.W. (2003) ITS2 is a double-edged tool for eukaryote evolutionary comparisons. Trends Genet 19: 370–375. Connell, L.B. (2000) Nuclear ITS region of the alga Heterosigma akashiwo (Chromophyta: 5DSKLGRSK\FHDHLVLGHQWLFDOLQLVRODWHVIURP$WODQWLFDQG3DFLÀFEDVLQV0DU%LRO136: 953–960. Daugbjerg, N., Jensen, M.H., and Hansen, P.J. (2013) Using Nuclear-encoded LSU and SSU rDNA Sequences to identify the eukaryotic endosymbiont in Amphisolenia bidentata (Dinophyceae). Protist 164: 411–422. de Vargas, C., Audic, S., Henry, N., Decelle, J., Mahé, F., Logares, R., et al. (2015) Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 348: 1261605. De Yoe, H.R., Stockwell, D.A., Bidagare, R.R., Latasa, M., Johnson, P.W., Hargraves, P.E., and Suttle, C.A. (1997) Description and characterization of the algal species Aureoumbra and Aureococcus to the Pelagophyceae. J Phycol 33: 1042–1048.
Chapter 4 153 Díez, B., Pedrós-alió, C., and Massana, R. (2001) Study of genetic diversity of eukaryotic picoplankton in different oceanic regions by small-subunit rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 2932–2941. Dupont, C.L., McCrow, J.P., Valas, R., Moustafa, A., Walworth, N., Goodenough, U., et al. (2015) *HQRPHVDQGJHQHH[SUHVVLRQDFURVVOLJKWDQGSURGXFWLYLW\JUDGLHQWVLQHDVWHUQVXEWURSLFDO3DFLÀF microbial communities. ISME J 9: 1076–1092. )LHOG&%%HKUHQIHOG0-5DQGHUVRQ-7DQG)DONRZVNL3*3ULPDU\3URGXFWLRQRI WKH%LRVSKHUH,QWHJUDWLQJ7HUUHVWULDODQG2FHDQLF&RPSRQHQWVScience 281± Finlay, B.J. (2002) Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296: 1061–1063. Fuller, N., Campbell, C., Allen, D., Pitt, F., Zwirglmaier, K., Le Gall, F., et al. (2006) Analysis of photosynthetic picoeukaryote diversity at open ocean sites in the Arabian Sea using a PCR biased towards marine algal plastids. Aquat Microb Ecol 43: 79–93. Gobler, C.J., Berry, D.L., Dyhrman, S.T., Wilhelm, S.W., Salamov, A., Lobanov, A. V, et al. (2011) Niche of harmful alga Aureococcus anophagefferens revealed through ecogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108: 4352–4357. Gobler, C.J. and Sunda, W.G. (2012) Ecosystem disruptive algal blooms of the brown tide species, Aureococcus anophagefferens and Aureoumbra lagunensis. Harmful Algae 14: 36–45. Gobler, C.J., Lobanov, A. V, Tang, Y.-Z., Turanov, A. a, Zhang, Y., Doblin, M., et al. (2013) The central role of selenium in the biochemistry and ecology of the harmful pelagophyte, Aureococcus anophagefferens. ISME J 7: 1333–1343. *URE & +DUWPDQQ 0 =XENRY 09 DQG 6FDQODQ '- ,QYDULDEOH ELRPDVVVSHFLÀF primary production of taxonomically discrete picoeukaryote groups across the Atlantic Ocean. Environ. Microbiol. 13: 3266–3274. Guillou, L., Bachar, D., Audic, S., Bass, D., Berney, C., Bittner, L., et al. (2013) The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): A catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 41: 597–604. -DUGLOOLHU/=XENRY093HDUPDQ-DQG6FDQODQ'-6LJQLÀFDQW&22À[DWLRQE\VPDOO prymnesiophytes in the subtropical and tropical northeast Atlantic Ocean. ISME J 4: 1180–1192. Kim, E., Wilcox, L., Graham, L., and Graham, J. (2004) Genetically distinct populations of the GLQRÁDJHOODWHPeridinium limbatum in neighboring Northern Wisconsin lakes. Microb Ecol 48: 521–527.