scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position

Abstract

Objective: Our aim is to evaluate the capacity of intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU) with pushing in the prediction of difficulty of fetal extraction in vacuum assisted deliveries. Prospective, observational study performed (2/2015–8/2015) on 75 nulliparous women, ≥37 weeks with singleton pregnancies at full dilatation who had ITU-with-pushing performed, previous to vacuum-placement for fetal extraction. Working on the translabial sagittal-plane, we assessed: Angle-Progression (AoP), Progression-Distance (PD) and Head-Direction (HD); in the axial plane we evaluated: Midline-Angle (MLA) and Head-Perineum-Distance (HPD). Vacuum extractions were classified as easy-difficulty (ED) (≤3 vacuum-pulls), difficult-unsuccessful (DD) (43 vacuum-pulls). We did not assess occipito-posterior-presentations. Results: Seventy nulliparous were studied (44-ED,26-DD). We observed no differences in obstetric, neonatal or intrapartum characteristics between the two study groups, with the following exceptions: newborn weight (3272 ± 438 g versus 3540 ± 372 g; p ¼ 0.011) and number of vacuum-pulls (1.4-ED-vs-4.4-DD; p50.0005). AoP-pushing was 143.9◦ ± 14.6◦ in ED and 115.1 ◦ ± 12.9 ◦ Introduction in DD (p 5 0.0005); Head-Up was 79.5% versus 38.4% (p 5 0.0005); PD-Pushing was 42.7 ± 11.3 mm versus 30.4 ± 9.8 mm (p50.0005); MLA-Pushing was 27.6◦± 26.6◦ versus 57.5◦±26.5◦(p¼0.025); HPD-Pushing was 40.8 ± 10.0 mm versus 47.4 ± 10.9 mm (p ¼ 0.039). Conclusion: We identified that the presence of an AoP-Pushing4128◦ predicts an Easy-Vacuum- Delivery (≤3 Vacuum-Pulls) in 485% of cases (Sen 80%–FPR 9.3%).

Read accessible full text

Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position

Author: Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio; Borrero González, Carlota; Aquise, Adriana; García Mejido, José Antonio; Gutiérrez, Laura; Fernández Palacín, Ana
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2016
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/85605a9b-bfa0-4195-a31a-b0f68b3837c9/download
Depósi o de in es igación de la Uni e sidad de Se illa
h ps://idus.us.es/
Es a es la e sión acep ada del a ículo publicado en:
This is a accep ed manusc ip o a pape published in:
The Jou nal o Ma e nal-Fe al & Neona al Medicine (2016)
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816
Copy igh :
El acceso a la e sión publicada del a ículo puede eque i la susc ipción de la
e is a.
Access o he published e sion may equi e subsc ip ion.
“This is an Accep ed Manusc ip o an a icle published by Taylo & F ancis in
[The Jou nal o Ma e nal-Fe al & Neona al Medicine] on [2016],
a ailable
a : h ps://doi.o g/[10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816].”
The
Jou nal
o
Ma e nal-Fe al
&
Neona al
Medicine
In apa um anslabial ul asound wi h pushing
used o p edic he di icul y in acuum-assis ed
deli e y o e uses in non-occipu pos e io
posi ion
José An onio Sainz, Ca lo a Bo e o, Ad iana Aquise, José An onio Ga cía-
Mejido, Lau a Gu ie ez & Ana Fe nández-Palacín
To ci e his a icle: José An onio Sainz, Ca lo a Bo e o, Ad iana Aquise, José An onio Ga cía-
Mejido, Lau a Gu ie ez & Ana Fe nández-Palacín (2016) In apa um anslabial ul asound
wi h pushing used o p edic he di icul y in acuum-assis ed deli e y o e uses in non-
occipu pos e io posi ion, The Jou nal o Ma e nal-Fe al & Neona al Medicine, 29:20,
3400-3405, DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816
ORIGINAL
ARTICLE
In apa um anslabial ul asound wi h pushing used o p edic he
di icul y in acuum-assis ed deli e y o e uses in non-occipu pos e io
posi ion
Jose´ An onio Sainz1,2, Ca lo a Bo e o1, Ad iana Aquise1, Jose´ An onio Ga c´ıa-Mejido1, Lau a Gu ie ez1, and
Ana Fe na´ndez-Palac´ın3
1
Depa men o Obs e ics and Gynecology, Valme Uni e si y Hospi al, Se ille, Spain,
2
Depa men o Obs e ics and Gynecology, Uni e si y o
Se ille, Spain, and
3
Bios a is ics Uni , Depa men o P e en i e Medicine and Public Heal h, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain
Keywo ds
In apa um ul asound, labo , pushing, anspe ineal ul asound, acuum deli e y
Abs ac
Objec i e: Ou aim is o e alua e he capaci y o in apa um anslabial ul asound (ITU) wi h pushing in he p edic ion o di icul y o e al
ex ac ion in acuum assis ed deli e ies. P ospec i e, obse a ional s udy pe o med (2/2015–8/2015) on 75 nullipa ous women,
≥37 weeks wi h single on p egnancies a ull dila a ion who had ITU-wi h-pushing pe o med, p e ious o acuum-placemen o e al
ex ac ion. Wo king on he anslabial sagi al-plane, we assessed: Angle-P og ession (AoP), P og ession-Dis ance (PD) and Head-Di ec ion
(HD); in
he axial plane we e alua ed: Midline-Angle (MLA) and Head-Pe ineum-Dis ance (HPD). Vacuum ex ac ions we e classi ied as easy-di icul y (ED)
(≤3 acuum-pulls), di icul -unsuccess ul (DD) (43 acuum-pulls). We did no assess occipi o-pos e io -p esen a ions.
Resul s: Se en y nullipa ous we e s udied (44-ED,26-DD). We obse ed no di e ences in obs e ic, neona al o in apa um
cha ac e is ics be ween he wo s udy g oups, wi h he ollowing excep ions: newbo n weigh (3272 ± 438 g e sus 3540 ± 372 g; p ¼
0.011) and
numbe o acuum-pulls (1.4-ED- s-4.4-DD; p50.0005). AoP-pushing was 143.9◦ ± 14.6◦ in ED
and 115.1
◦
± 12.9
◦
in DD (p
5
0.0005); Head-Up was 79.5% e sus 38.4% (p
5
0.0005); PD-Pushing
was 42.7 ± 11.3 mm e sus 30.4 ± 9.8 mm
(p50.0005); MLA-Pushing was 27.6◦± 26.6◦ e sus 57.5◦±26.5◦(p¼0.025); HPD-Pushing was 40.8 ± 10.0 mm e sus 47.4 ± 10.9 mm (p ¼ 0.039).
Conclusion: We iden i ied ha he p esence o an AoP-Pushing4128◦ p edic s an Easy-Vacuum- Deli e y (≤3 Vacuum-Pulls) in 485% o cases
(Sen 80%–FPR 9.3%).
In oduc ion
Digi al examina ion is subjec i e and un eliable in he e alua ion o he deg ee o engagemen and posi ion o he e al head
du ing labo [1]. In apa um anslabial ul asound (ITU) has p o ed o be an objec i e ool o p edic he ype o deli e y ha
will ake place when used in second s age o labo . ITU has also begun o be used wi h he aim o p edic ing he di icul y o
ins umen a ion in e al ex ac ion, since ins umen al deli e ies a e associa ed wi h an inc ease in ma e nal and neona al
mo bidi y [2–9]. Achie ing a success ul ins umen a ion will esul in a educ ion o his inc eased mo bidi y (subdu al o
ce eb al hemo hage, con- ulsions, mechanical en ila ion) [10–12].
Ou g oup [13] assessed he capaci y o ITU in he p edic ion o di icul y o e al ex ac ion in acuum assis ed deli e ies. I
p e ious o acuum placemen , an angle o p og ession ≤120◦, a ho izon al o downwa ds head di ec ion, and a midline
angle ≥35◦ was iden i ied, he p obabili y o a ‘‘di icul ’’ deli e y, hus mo e han 3 pulls needed o achie e e al ex ac ion, is
o 85% [13]. Now, we aim o e alua e his ITU’s p edic i e capaci y o ins umen a ion di icul y wi h acuum, in he expulsion
s age wi h pushing (angle o p og ession, p og ession dis ance, head di ec ion, midline angle and head pe ineum dis ance).
Ma e ial and me hod
P ospec i e, obse a ional s udy was ca ied ou be ween Feb ua y 2015 and Augus 2015, a Valme’s Uni e sis y Hospi al in
Se ille, on 75 p egnan women a e m, admi ed o ou deli e y uni du ing second s age o labo , and who equi ed
ins umen a ion o comple e e al ex ac ion. Th oughou hese 7 mon hs (Feb ua y–Augus 2015) a Valme’s Hospi al we
ha e had a o al o 2625 deli e ies, wi h a win a e o 1.8% (47 cases), a cesa ean sec ion a e o 20.1% (527 cases) and a
15.1% o ins umen al deli e ies (398 cases, 320 acuum-assis ed deli e ies (80.4%) and 78 o ceps-assis ed deli e ies (19.5%)).
All 75 pa ien s sha ed he ollowing cha ac e is ics: low isk, a e m single on p egnancy (37–42), in nullipa ous, du ing
ac i e second s age o labo , wi h up u ed memb anes and e us in cephalic p esen a ion and including bo h spon- aneous and
induced ini ia ion o labo cases. P egnancies in ol ing se ious ma e nal o e al pa hology we e excluded om he s udy. A
acuum was used o e al ex ac ion, al hough deli e y could ha e been comple ed ei he aginally o abdominally (cesa ean
sec ion).
P io o ins umen al deli e y, once in ac i e second s age o labo , up u ed memb anes and ull dila a ion, ITU was used
o pe o m an e alua ion o e al head posi ion [14]. The ITU was pe o med wi h he p egnan woman in li ho omy posi ion
and unde emp y bladde condi ions. Cap u e was ob ained by placing he ansduce wi h a anslabial insona ion a a
anspe ineal le el. Since he pubic symphisis would be used as he e e ence longi u- dinal axis, we ensu ed i s whole leng h
was included in he cap u e. Angle o p og ession (AoP) was used as he angle be ween he longi udinal axis o he pubic
symphysis and he angen line o e al skull’s con ou [15]. Pubis middle line can be iden i ied by he p esence o he ib o-
ca ilaginous disk and capsule [16] (Figu e 1); p og ession dis ance (PD) – as he dis ance (mm) be ween he
in apubic
symphisis and he lowes edge o e al skull
[17] (Figu e 2); and Head Di ec ion (HD) – as he angle esul ing om he union o a pe pendicula line o pubic’s bone majo
axis and a pe pendicula line o e al’s head wides ans e se diame e ; angles ≥30◦ co espond o ‘‘upwa d’’
di ec ions,
≤0◦
co espond
o
‘‘downwa d’’ di ec ions, and angles be ween 0◦ and 30◦ co espond o ho izon al
di ec ions [18]; we e he sonog aphic pa ame e s e alua ed, which we e measu ed bo h in es and wi h pushing du ing
ma e nal con ac ion.
We hen u ned ou ansduce o swi ch om he midsagi al o an axial plane, allowing us o iden i y e al’s b ain midline.
We used his iew o e alua e he midline angle (MLA; de ined as he angle be ween he an e opos e io axis o he pel is and
he e al’s b ain midline) [19], bo h a es and wi h pushing. To assess hese pa ame e s, we used a Toshiba Famio 8 (Tokyo,
Japan) ul asound machine wi h a 3.75 MHz con ex p obe. In apa um ul asound e alua ion was ca ied ou by wo senio
obs e icians, wi h mo e han 5 yea s o expe ience in obs e ic ul asonog aphy.
Once his in apa um ul asound assessmen was com- ple ed, e al ex ac ion was pe o med by o he wo senio
obs e icians, wi h mo e han 15 yea s o expe ience in ope a i e deli e ies. In all cases, a me al acuum (Bi d’s cup 50 mm, 80
KPa) was used o inalize aginal deli e y, wi hou aking in o accoun he p e iously eco ded ul asound da a obs e icians
pe o ming e al ex ac ion had no in o ma ion abou ITU esul s p e iously eco ded. In all cases, a me al acuum (Bi d’s cup
50 mm, 80 KPa) was used o inalize aginal deli e y, wi hou aking in o accoun he p e iously eco ded ul asound da a as
obs e icians pe o ming e al ex ac ion had no in o ma ion abou ITU esul s p e iously eco ded. Placemen o he suc ion
cup o e he lexion poin was conside ed a oiding capu succedaneum and apid nega i e p essu e (o e 2 minu es)
applica ion o he acuum (un il 0.6–0.8 kg/cm2). Vacuum ac ion is pe o med in he momen o con ac ion along wi h
ma e nal push, a a a e o 2–3 acuum ac ions pe con ac ion and wi hou associa ing K is elle maneu e [20,21]. The
p ocedu e was abandoned a e 3 cup slides o 15 minu es wi hou achie ing e al ex ac ion [22].
Acco ding o he numbe o acuum pulls needed o comple e he deli e y, ins umen a ion was classi ied as ‘‘easy’’ (3 o
less pulls), di icul (mo e 3 pulls) o impossible ( aginal e al ex ac ion was no achie ed and a cesa ean sec ion had o be
pe o med) [18,23]. All cases o occipi o- pos e io posi ion we e excluded om ou e alua ion. The s udy was app o ed by
local e hics and esea ch commi ees, and all pa icipan s we e p e iously asked o sign an in o med consen .
A e deli e y, bo h ma e nal and neona al mo bidi y and mo ali y da a we e collec ed. P esence o pe ineal ea s, u e ine
a ony, bleeding deg ee and need o pos pa um su ge y we e he ma e nal pa ame e s eco ded. New bo n da a egis e ed
we e: e al weigh , Apga es esul (a 1 and 5 min), e al pH a bi h, p esence o neona al mo bidi y (cephalohaema oma,
b achial plexus palsy, e c.), admission o neona alogy and neona al mo ali y.
S a is ical analysis was pe o med using IBM SPSS S a is ics so wa e e sion 22 (A monk, NY). We de e mined means and
s anda d de ia ion o nume ic a iables, and pe cen ages o quali a i e a iables. Compa isons o nume ic a iables
be ween ins umen a ion di icul y g oups (easy, di icul and impossible) we e ca ied ou using S uden ’s - es . The
compa isons o he quali a i e a iables be ween he g oups we e ca ied ou using he Chi- squa e es . We de e mined a eas
unde he ROC cu es o he ul asound a iables s udied and hei 95% con idence in e als, and we iden i ied he cu o
poin s ha p edic ed an a leas 85% chance o easy deli e y.
Figu e 1. (A) Angle o P og ession a es . (B) Angle o P og ession wi h pushing.
Figu e 2. (A) P og ession dis ance a es .
(B) P og ession dis ance wi h pushing.
Resul s
We analyzed 75 p egnan women in labo wi hou p e ious his o y o aginal deli e y. 5 cases we e excluded om he
analysis: 2 due o occipi o pos e io e al posi ion iden i ied in he in apa um ul asound e alua ion, 2 due o e al ex ac ion
using a di e en ins umen o he han acuum ex ac o and 1 case because o incomple e ul asound da a collec ion.
Table 1 displays bo h ma e nal and labo cha ac e is ics, and neona al esul s o ou s udy popula ion (70 p egnan women),
di ided acco ding o ins umen a ion di icul y (easy, di icul -impossible ins umen a ion). All pa ien s had epidu al analgesia
adminis e ed and e al ex ac ion was comple ed by acuum-assis ed deli e y. Two new-bo ns we e admi ed o Neona ology
uni : he i s one due o jaundice, ecei ing 48 h o ligh he apy, while he second one p esen ed mild espi a o y dis ess,
and was discha ged in he i s 24 h. Fi e cases o ailed acuum-assis ed deli e y a e included in he ‘‘di icul -impossible
ins u- men a ion’’ g oup, equi ing c-sec ion o comple e e al ex ac ion. A e age
ma e nal age o his g oup was
29.1
±
6.5 yea s, wi h a mean ges a ional age o 39.2
±
1.5 weeks, 4.6
±
1.4 acuum pulls and a mean bi h weigh o 3620
±
390 g ams. No cases o neona al mo bidi y we e egis e ed in his g oup.
In apa um ul asound pa ame e s a e displayed in Table 2, desc ibing gene al and indi idual s udy g oup (easy and
di icul -impossible ins umen a ion) esul s.
In Figu es 3 and 4, we display he ROC cu es o he angle o p og ession and p og ession dis ance wi h pushing, in o de o
p edic he di icul y o aginal deli e y wi h acuum. The pa ame e s used in p edic ing he di icul y o ope a i e deli e y wi h
acuum using ITU, bo h a es and wi h pushing, we e: angle o p og ession 120.5◦ and 128◦, p og ession dis ance 35.5 mm
and 37.5 mm and midline angle 43◦ and 28◦ espec i ely (Table 3).

Table 1. Ma e nal and neona al cha ac e is ics in 70 p egnancies equi ing acuum deli e y.
Easy acuum
Di icul -Impossible
acuum deli e y
To al (n ¼ 70)
deli e y (n ¼ 44)
(n ¼ 26)
p
Ma e nal age (yea s)
29.7 ± 5.9
29.7 ± 6.6
29.6 ± 5.0
0.9
Ma e nal BMI (kg/m2)
25.07 ± 5.0
25.03 ± 4.4
25.35 ± 8.0
0.8
Ma e nal smoking (≥1 ciga e e/day)
3 (4.2%)
2 (4.5%)
1 (3.8%)
0.64
Ges a ional pa hology
9 (12.9%)
6 (13.6%)
3 (11.5%)
0.8
Ges a ional age a bi h (weeks)
39.4 ± 1.4
39.2 ± 1.5
39.8 ± 1.4
0.1
Numbe o induced labo s
17 (24.6%)
8 (18.6%)
9 (34.6%)
0.16
Es ima ed e al weigh (g)
3386.4 ± 364.2
3251.1 ± 351.0
3563.0 ± 305.8
0.001
Cause o ins umen a ion
0.9
P olonged second s age
55 (78.6%)
34 (77.4%)
20 (77.0%
Ma e nal exhaus ion
6 (8.5%)
4 (9.0%)
3 (11.5%)
Fe al dis ess
9 (12.8%)
6 (13.6%)
3 (11.5%)
Du a ion o 1s s age o labo (hou s)
7.8 ± 3.2
7.4 ± 3.2
8.4 ± 3.1
0.18
Du a ion o 2nd s age o labo (hou s)
2.3 ± 0.7
2.2 ± 0.7
2.4 ± 0.7
0.07
Numbe C-sec ions o comple e deli e y
5 (7.1%)
0 (0%)
5 (19.2%)
0.005
Numbe o acuum pulls
2.4 ± 1.6
1.4 ± 0.5
4.4 ± 1.1
50.0005
Ma e nal mo bidi y
1 (1.4%)
0 (0%)
1 (3.8%)
1
U e ine a ony
1 (1.4%)
0 (0%)
1 (3.8%)
1
O he s
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Sex o newbo n ( emales)
34 (48.5%)
21 (47.7%)
13 (50%)
0.9
Newbo n Weigh (g)
3372 ± 432
3272 ± 438
3540 ± 372
0.011
APGAR 1 minu e
8.8 ± 1.0
8.9 ± 1.0
8.5 ± 1.1
0.07
APGAR 5 minu es
9.9 ± 0.2
10 ± 0
9.9 ± 0.4
0.06
Umbilical co d a e y pH
7.25 ± 0.7
7.26 ± 0.6
7.23 ± 0.5
0.525
Pe ina al mo ali y
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
–
Pe ina al mo bili y
2 (2.9%)
0 (0%)
2 (7.7%)
0.135
Con ol o he in ensi e ca e neona ology uni
2 (2.9%)
0 (0%)
2 (7.7%)
0.135
O he s
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Table 2. In apa um anspe ineal ul asound da a in 70 p egnancies equi ing acuum deli e y.
Va iable
To al (n ¼ 70)
Easy acuum
deli e y (n ¼ 44)
Di icul -Impossible
acuum deli e y
(n ¼ 26)
p
Angle o P og ession a es (◦)
123.8 ± 16.5
132.5 ± 11.6
109.2 ± 12.7
0.0005
≥120◦
55.7% (39)
84% (37)
7.6% (2)
0.0005
5120
◦
44.3% (31)
15.9% (7)
92.3% (24)
0.0005
Angle o P og ession wi h pushing (◦)
133.5 ± 19.7
143.9 ± 14.6
115.1 ± 12.9
0.0005
≥120◦
72.5% (50)
95.4% (42)
30.7% (8)
0.0005
5120
◦
27.5% (19)
4.6% (2)
65.3% (17)
0.0005
Head di ec ion a es
Up
62.8% (44)
81.3% (35)
34.6% (9)
0.0005
Ho izon al-down
36.2% (25)
18.7% (8)
65.3% (17)
0.0005
Head di ec ion wi h pushing
Up
45 (66.2%)
83.3% (35)
38.4% (10)
0.0005
Ho izon al-down
23 (33.8%)
16.7% (7)
61.5% (16)
0.0005
P og ession dis ance a es (mm)
34.3 ± 16.4
36.9 ± 12.3
30.0 ± 21.1
0.002
P og ession dis ance wi h pushing (mm)
38.2 ± 12.3
42.7 ± 11.3
30.4 ± 9.8
0.0005
Midline angle a es (◦)
45.6 ± 26.8
37.6 ± 24.6
57 ± 26.3
0.0001
≤45◦
59.1% (39)
71.4% (30)
34.6% (9)
0.0005
445
◦
40.9% (27)
28.6% (112)
55.6% (15)
0.0005
Midline angle wi h pushing (◦)
37.2 ± 26.7
27.6 ± 26.6
57.5 ± 26.5
0.025
≤45◦
66.7% (37)
73% (27)
34.6% (9)
0.34
445
◦
33.3% (23)
26% (9)
63.4% (17)
0.34
Numbe o acuum pulls
2.4 ± 1.6
1.4 ± 0.5
4.4 ± 1.1
0.0005
Figu e 3.Angle o P og ession ROC cu e o p edic he di icul y o aginal deli e y wi h acuum ex ac ion.
Figu e 4.The p og ession dis ance ROC cu e o p edic he di icul y o aginal deli e y wi h acuum ex ac ion.
Table 3. P edic i e abili y o he di icul y o ins umen al deli e y wi h acuum using in apa um anspe ineal ul asound a es and wi h pushing.
ITU a es
Cu o s
Sensi i i y
(%)
False-posi i e
a e (%)
ITU wi h pushing
Cu o s
Sensi i i y
(%)
False-posi i e
a e (%)
AoP
120.5◦
92.3
11.6
AoP
128◦
84
9.3
P og ession dis ance
35.5 mm
84.6
39.5
P og ession dis ance
37.5 mm
76.9
32.6
Midline angle
43◦
70.8
31.7
Midline angle
28◦
91.7
33.3
Discussion
Using ‘‘ma e nal push’’ be o e an ins umen al-assis ed deli e y is a usual p ac ice ca ied ou by obs e icians
in o de
o de e mine he le el o he e al p esen a ion (ACOG e al s a ion) and i s deg ee o engagemen [24]. Dupuis e al. [1]
epo s ha , when aginal examina ion was ca ied ou , we o en ail in he co ec e alua ion o hese pa ame e s. Fo his
eason, in apa um anspe ineal ul a- sound has been in oduced as an a emp o imp o e he assessmen o he deli e y
p og ession [24].
The Food and D ug Adminis a ion (FDA) wa ned o he use o acuum and po en ial e al complica ions, such as
in ac anial hema oma and subgaleal hemo hage [25].
Popula ion s udies la e epo ed ha in ac anial hemo hage
occu ed in one pe : 1900 spon aneous aginal bi hs, 860 ope a i e deli e ies wi h acuum, 664 ope a i e deli e ies
wi h o ceps and 333 cesa ean sec ions a e a ailed
ins umen al deli e y [9]. Fu he mo e, an inc ease in ma e -
nal
mo bidi y is desc ibed in ope a i e deli e ies when compa ed wi h spon aneous ones, exis ing a signi ican associa ion
be ween an inc ease in III and IV deg ee ea s in acuum and o ceps assis ed deli e ies [2].
Cu en ly we can use ITU o e alua e he p og ession o he second s age o labo , as well as p edic he ype o deli e y
ha will ake place (spon aneous, ins umen al o cesa ean). Ba be a e al. [15] and Kalache e al. [25] epo ha an angle
o p og ession ≥120◦ is associa ed wi h spon aneous aginal deli e y in 90% o cases. Ghi e al. [19] and To kildsen e al. [26]
desc ibe ha an upwa ds di ec ion o he head, accompanied by an angle o o a ion545◦ and a pe ineum-head dis ance ≤40
mm p edic s spon aneous aginal deli e y in 90% o cases. Yousse e al in 2012 in oduced
he e alua ion o he e al head-symphysis dis ance in he second s age o Labo , desc ibing he ease o i s assessmen and i s
use ulness o p edic he mode o deli e y [27]. Ghi e al. epo ha in spon aneous aginal bi h cases, he angle o
p og ession, p og ession dis ance and head–symphysis dis ance show a signi ican imp o emen when e alua ed in he second
s age o labo , p edic ing an adequa e deli e y e olu ion [28,29].
In he app aisal o ITU’s capaci y o p edic di icul y o e al ex ac ion in an ope a i e deli e y wi h acuum, we iden i ied
ha , i p e ious o acuum placemen , an angle o p og ession ≤120◦, a ho izon al o downwa ds head di ec ion,
and a midline angle ≥35◦ was iden i ied, he p obabili y o a ‘‘di icul ’’ deli e y, hus mo e han 3 pulls needed o achie e
e al ex ac ion, is o 85% [13]. In an a emp o imp o e ITU’s p edic i e capaci y, we e alua ed hese sonog aphic pa ame e s
(angle o p og ession, p og ession dis ance, head di ec ion, midline angle and head-pe ineum dis ance) wi h pushing, obse ing
an adequa e in a- (0.99–0.98) and in e - (0.93–0.77) obse e co ela ion [30], enabling i o be applied o clinical p ac ice.
Rega ding his, Hen ich e al. [18] e alua ed ITU wi h pushing, obse ing ha all ‘‘di icul ’’ cases in his se ies (5 cases)
had a ho izon al o downwa ds head di ec ion and 60% (3/5 cases) exceeded he in apubic line. Simila ly, Lau e al. [31]
desc ibed how hose cases which ended in aginal ope a i e deli e y wi h acuum p esen ed highe p og ession angles, han
hose which equi ed cesa ean sec ion o comple e e al ex ac ion. Fu he mo e, Cue a
e al. [20] compa ed ITU’s
pa ame e s a es and wi h pushing o p edic he di icul y in o ceps-assis ed deli e ies, obse ing ha he bes sonog aphic
p edic o s a e angle o p og ession and head di ec ion, bo h wi h pushing, and concluding ha an angle o
p og ession4138◦ wi h pushing is a eliable indica o o easy aginal deli e y
wi h o ceps.
Compa ing ITU’s pa ame e s o he p edic ion o easy deli e y wi h acuum, we obse ed ha hese a y i ealized in es
and wi h pushing: angle o p og ession and midline angle a y by a mean o 10◦, p og ession dis ance by 6 mm and head-
pe ineum dis ance by 2 mm. Howe e , only he angle o p og ession, head di ec ion and p og ession dis ance, all h ee o hem
e alua ed wi h pushing, ha e p o ed o be adequa e p edic o s o he di icul y o e al ex ac ion wi h acuum (P50.0005),
unlike midline angle and head-pe i- neum dis ance, ha do no me he c i e ia o be conside ed eliable indica o s.
I , as men ioned p e iously, an angle o p og ession4120◦, an upwa ds head di ec ion and a midline angle535◦ we e
iden i ied in an ITU e alua ion pe o med a es be o e
acuum applica ion, he p obabili y o acing an easy acuum deli e y (≤ 3 pulls) was485% [13].
As main s eng hs o ou s udy, a p ospec i e analysis has
been highligh ed, he ac ha in apa um ul asound assess- men was pe o med by wo senio obs e icians wi h g ea
expe ience in sonog aphic e alua ion, and ha deli e ies we e assis ed by obs e icians who we e blinded o da a collec ed in he
in apa um ul asound e alua ion pe o med p io o he ins umen a ion wi h acuum. Fu he mo e, we can now s a e ha
he sole iden i ica ion o an angle o p og ession wi h pushing4128◦ aduces a p obabili y o 485% o easy acuum deli e y,
wi h a alse posi i e a e o 9.3%. No e ha by using his 128◦ as he cu o o he angle o p og ession wi h pushing o
iden i y cases o di icul ins umen a ion wi h acuum, we s ill ha e a 16% o cases in which despi e we p edic a ‘‘di icul ’’
ins umen a ion (5128◦) we will end up acing an ‘‘easy’’ deli e y.
Once again, we p o e ha aginal examina ion ails o iden i y he deg ee o cephalic engagemen , acco ding o Dupuis
e al. [1] o 15.9% when ca ied ou by expe ienced obs e icians. In ou s udy we obse ed ha he cases o di icul
acuum deli e ies had a mean AoP a es o 109◦, which acco ding Tu chek e al. s udies [32] co espond o a head
s a ion o 0.5–1 cm and whe e ope a i e deli e ies should no be pe o med. Recen ly, we ha e published ha he p esence
o an AoP wi h pushing less han 100◦ is a e y un a o able si ua ion o a emp a aginal deli e y [33]. This obse a ion
ein o ces he u ili y anspe ineal in apa um could ha e in deli e y assis ance, especially in hose cases whe e we
suspec a di icul ins umen a ion may be equi ed. We conside he small numbe o cases in ou se ies as a limi a ion o he
esul s o ou s udy, and belie e i is necessa y o ca y ou u he s udies o ce i y he u ili y o ITU as a p edic o o
he di icul y o e al ex ac ion in
acuum-assis ed deli e ies.
Decla a ion o in e es
The au ho s epo no con lic s o in e es . The au ho s alone a e esponsible o he con en and w i ing o his a icle.
Re e ences
1.
Dupuis O, Sil ei a R, Zen ne A, e al. Bi h simula o : eliabili y o ans aginal assessmen o e al head s a ion as de ined by he Ame ican
College o Obs e icians and Gynecologis s classi ica- ion. Am J Obs e Gynecol 2005;192:868–74.
2.
Johanson RB, Menon BKV. Vacuum ex ac ion e sus o ceps o assis ed aginal deli e y. Coch ane Da abase Sys Re 2010;2: CD000224. doi:
10.1002/14651858.CD000224.pub2
3.
Majoko F, Ga dene G. T ial o ins umen al deli e y in hea e e sus immedia e caesa ean sec ion o an icipa ed di icul assis ed bi hs.
Coch ane Da abase Sys Re 2012;10:CD005545.
4.
Mu phy DJ, Liebling RE, Ve i y L, e al. Ea ly ma e nal and neona al mo bidi y associa ed wi h ope a i e deli e y in second s age o labou :
a coho s udy. Lance 2001;13:1203–7.
5.
Con ag SA, Cli on RG, Bloom SL, e al. Neona al ou comes and ope a i e aginal deli e y e sus cesa ean deli e y. Am J Pe ina ol 2010;27:493–
9.
6.
Eason E, Lab ecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. P e en ing pe ineal auma du ing childbi h: A sys ema ic e iew. Obs e Gynecol 2000;95:464–71.
7.
Sul an AH, Kamm MA, Ba am CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphinc e auma du ing ins umen al deli e y. In J Gynaecol Obs e 1993; 43:263–70.
8.
Chadwick LM, Pembe on PJ, Ku inczuk JJ. Neona al subgaleal haema oma: associa ed isk ac o s, complica ions and ou come. J Paedia Child
Heal h 1996;32:228–32.
9.
Towne D, Cas o MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbe WM. E ec o mode o deli e y in nullipa ous women on neona al in ac anial inju y. N Engl
J Med 1999;341:1709–14.
10.
Bi d GC. The impo ance o lexion in acuum ex ac o deli e y. B J Obs e Gynaecol 1976;83:194–200.
11.
Vacca A, Kei se MJNC. Ins umen al aginal deli e y. In: Chalme s I, Enkin M, Kei se MJNC, eds. E ec i e ca e in p egnancy and childbi h.
Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess; 1989:1216–33.
12.
Mola GD, Amoa AB, Edilyong J. Fac o s associa ed wi h success o ailu e in ials o acuum ex ac ion. Aus N Z J Obs e Gynaecol
2002;42:35–9.
13.
Sainz JA, Bo e o C, Fe na´ndez-Palac´ın A, e al. Ins umen a ion di icul y wi h acuum-assi ed deli e y in p imipa ous womens. J Ma e n
Fe al Neona al Med 2014;7:1–7.
14.
Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kame as N, e al. In apa um sonog aphy o de e mine he e al head posi ion. J Ma e n Fe al Neona al Med 2002;12:172–7.
15.
Ba be a AF, Pomba X, Pe ugino G, e al. A new me hod o assess e al head descen in labo wi h anspe ineal ul asound. Ul asound Obs e
Gynecol 2009;33:313–19.
16.
Duckelmann AM, Bambe g C, Michaelis SA, e al. Measu emen o e al head descen using he ’angle o p og ession’ on anspe ineal
ul asound imaging is eliable ega dless o e al head s a ion o ul asound expe ise. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2010;35: 216–22.
17.
Die z HP, Lanza one V. Measu ing engagemen o he e al head: alidi y and ep oducibili y o a new ul asound echnique. Ul asound Obs e
Gynecol 2005;25:165–8.
18.
Hen ich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, e al. In apa um anslabial ul asound (ITU): sonog aphic landma ks and co ela ion wi hsuccess ul
acuum ex ac ion. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2006;28: 753–60.
19.
Ghi T, Fa ina A, Ped azzi A, e al. Diagnosis o s a ion and o a ion o he e al head in he second s age o labo wi h in apa um anslabial
ul asound. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2009;33:331–6.
20.
Royal College o Obs e icians and Gynaecologis s. G een- op guideline n 26. Ope a i e Vaginal Deli e y. London: RCOG; 2011
21.
Sociedad Espan˜ola de Ginecologia y Obs e icia. P oSEGO. Pa o Ins umen al. Mad id: SEGO; 2013
22.
Mu phy DJ, Liebling RE, Pa el R, e al. Coho s udy o ope a i e deli e y in he second s age o labou and s anda d o obs e ic ca e. BJOG
2003;110:610–15.
23.
Cue as M, Bambe g C, Tobias P, e al. In apa um ul asound, a p edic i e me hod o complica ed ope a i e o´ ceps deli e y in non-
occipu pos e io deli e ies. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2014;43:687–92.
24.
Cunningham FG, Gan NF, Le eno KJ, e al. Mechanisms o no mal labo . In: Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gan NF, e al., eds. Williams
obs e ics. 21s ed. New Yo k: McG aw-Hill; 2001:419–39.
25.
Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, e al. T anspe ineal ul asound imaging in p olonged second s age o labo wi h occipi oan e io
p esen ing e uses: how well does he ‘angle o p og ession’ p edic he mode o deli e y? Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2009;33:326–30.
26.
To kildsen EA, Sal esen KA, Eggebo TM. P edic ion o deli e y mode wi h anspe ineal ul asound in women wi h p olonged i s s age o
labo . Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2011;37:702–8.
27.
Yousse A, Ma oni E, Ragusa A, e al. Fe al head–symphysis dis ance: a simple and eliable ul asound index o e al head s a ion in labo .
Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2013;41:419–24.
28.
Ghi T, Yousse A, Ma oni E, e al. In apa um anspe ineal ul asound assessmen o e al head p og ession in ac i e second s age o labo
and mode o deli e y. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2013;41:430–5.
29.
Gilboa Y, Ki ile i ch Z, Spi a M, e al. Head p og ession dis ance in p olonged second s age o labo : ela ionship wi h mode o deli e y and
e al head s a ion. Ul asound Obs e Gynecol 2013;41: 436–41.
30.
Sainz JA, Bo e o C, Fe na´ndez-Palac´ın A, e al. E alua ion o he in e and in a a iabili y o in apa um anspe ineal ul asound wi h
pushing. Ul asound e alua ion o he di icul y in ins umen- a ion o acuum-media ed aginal deli e y. J Ul asound Med in p ess.
31.
Lau WL, Leung WC, Chin R. Wha is he bes anspe ineal ul asound pa ame e o p edic ing success o acuum ex ac ion? Ul asound
Obs e Gynecol 2009;33:735–6.
32.
Tu schek B, B aun T, Chan aine F, Hen ich W. A s udy o p og ess o labou using in apa um anslabial ul asound, assessing head s a ion,
di ec ion, and angle o descen . BJOG 2011;118:62–9.
33.
Sainz JA, Bo e o C, Aquise A, e al. U ili y o in apa um anspe ineal ul asound o p edic cases o ailu e in acuum ex ac ion a emp and
need o cesa ean sec ion o comple e deli e y. J Ma e n Fe al Neona al Med 2015;5:1–5.