Di e en e ec s o unexpec ed changes in en i onmen al condi ions on
p epulse inhibi ion in a s and humans
L.G. De la Casa1, A. Fe nandez1, J. La au i2, A. Mena1,
A. Puen es1, E. Quin e o1, and N. Schmajuk2
1 Depa men o Expe imen al Psychology, Uni e si y o Se ille, 41018 Se ille,
Spain
2 Depa men o Psychology and Neu oscience, Duke Uni e si y, Du ham, NC
27708, Uni ed S a es
Add ess co espondence o:
L.G. De la Casa
Dp . Psicologia Expe imen al
Facul ad de Psicología
C/ Camilo José Cela, s/n
41018 Se illa (Spain)
Tel.: (34) 954557682
Fax: (34) 954551784
E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac
The educ ion o he s a le esponse o an audi o y s imulus caused by
he p esen a ion o ano he s imulus o lowe in ensi y closely p eceding i , a
phenomenon known as p epulse inhibi ion (PPI), can be modula ed by changes
in dopamine gic ac i i y. Schmajuk, La au i, De la Casa, and Le in (2009)
demons a ed ha his dopamine gic modula ion o PPI in a s can be
in luenced by manipula ing he expe imen al con ex , speci ically by in oducing
changes in he ambien ligh ing condi ion ha include no el elemen s. In his
pape we analyse he e ec s o in oducing changes in con ex illumina ion on
PPI in male a s (Expe imen 1) and humans (Expe imen 2). The esul s wi h
a s showed a educ ion o PPI when he illumina ion condi ion swi ched om
da k o ligh , bu no om ligh o da k. In he expe imen wi h human
pa icipan s he educ ion o PPI occu ed o bo h changes in illumina ion
condi ions. The animal expe imen esul s a e in e p e ed in e ms o compe ing
explo a o y beha io ha appea when he con ex is illumina ed a e he da k-
ligh ansi ion; while in he case o human pa icipan s a pe cep ual and/o
a en ional mechanism a e bo h illumina ion ansi ions is p oposed, which may
esul in a educed p ocessing o he p epulse and subsequen lowe PPI.
Keywo ds: P epulse inhibi ion; No el y; Dopamine; Ra s; Humans.
1. In oduc ion.
The s a le esponse includes, among o he beha io s, he in olun a y
con ac ion o he skele al muscles and occu s a e he p esen a ion o a
s imulus o some in ensi y [1,2]. Typically, he s a le esponse is assessed by
quan i ying he in ensi y o muscle con ac ion a e he s imulus p esen a ion.
The s a le esponse is suscep ible o modula ion h ough a ious manipula ions
such as he epea ed p esen a ion o he s imulus, which can lead o habi ua ion
o sensi iza ion o he esponse [3,4], he induc ion o a pa icula emo ional
s a e p io o s imulus p esen a ion [5,6] o o changes in en i onmen al
condi ions in which he s imulus is p esen ed [7]. Ano he o m o modula ion o
he s a le esponse ha has ecei ed much a en ion om esea che s in he
ield o psychophysiology in he las decades is p epulse inhibi ion (PPI), a
phenomenon ha occu s when a s imulus o lowe in ensi y p ecedes he
p esen a ion o a s a ling s imulus, esul ing in he educ ion o he esponse o
he la e [8]. The occu ence and in ensi y o PPI depends on a numbe o
a iables such as he ime in e al be ween he p epulse and pulse s imuli [9],
hei in ensi y [10] o he backg ound noise le el in which he s imuli a e
p esen ed [11].
PPI is belie ed o e lec senso imo o ga ing abili ies, i.e., he abili y o
espond o po en ially ele an s imuli, simul aneously inhibi ing he p ocessing
o o he s imuli and/o esponses ha migh hinde he in-dep h p ocessing o a
s imulus unde analysis [12]. Acco ding o his poin o iew, PPI would e lec
an e ec i e inhibi ion o he mo o esponse o he s imulus o g ea e in ensi y
(pulse), ensu ing an in-dep h analysis o he p epulse s imulus (which p eceded
he pulse p esen a ion), and hus ep esen ing a simple example o
senso imo o modula ion [13].
The neu al ci cui y ha egula es bo h he s a le esponse o audi o y
s imuli as well as PPI has been cha ac e ized in de ail [8]. The neu al sys ems
o bo h he s a le esponse and PPI a e modula ed by a numbe o
neu o ansmi e s such as dopamine, GABA, glu ama e and ace ylcholine,
which egula e he magni ude o he s a le esponse and i s inhibi ion [8].
Zhang e al. [18] s udied he e ec o indi ec dopamine (DA) agonis s on PPI in
a s, and showed ha amphe amine adminis a ion esul ed in a dec ease in he
magni ude o PPI. S udies wi h schizoph enic pa ien s, a diso de cha ac e ized
among o he hings by a hype ac i i y o he dopamine gic sys em, suppo he
hypo hesis ela ing ele a ed dopamine elease wi h PPI a enua ion [21].
In addi ion o pha macological manipula ions, he e a e en i onmen al
changes ha can cause changes in dopamine gic ac i i y, such as he exposu e
o a no el s imulus o con ex [22,23]. An inc ease in co ical dopamine gic
ac i i y in a s indica es ha a no el s imulus is p esen ed o he animal, an
e ec ha is no ound wi h neu al o habi ua ed s imuli [24]. Wi h ega ds o he
subco ical dopamine sys em, he elease o dopamine in he nucleus
accumbens is ela ed o he pe cep ion o no el y [25].
Acco ding o he esul s p esen ed abo e, ex e nal changes in ol ing
he in oduc ion o new elemen s in he expe imen al si ua ion, such as a
manipula ion o he illumina ion condi ion in he a ea whe e he subjec is
loca ed, would impac he dopamine gic ac i i y and p oduce a modula ing
e ec on PPI [26]. Ou aim in his pape is o analyze he e ec ha
en i onmen al changes –namely, a a ia ion in he illumina ion condi ions- ha e
on he s a le esponse and PPI in bo h a s and humans. Based on he esul s
epo ed by Schmajuk e al [26] we expec ha exposu e o no el en i onmen al
si ua ions would p oduce a ansien inc ease in dopamine elease in bo h
co ical and subco ical egions [24] and he e o e cause a educ ion in PPI in
bo h a s and humans. Howe e , i is possible ha he e ec s on PPI may
depend on he ype o no el s imulus ha appea s in he expe imen al si ua ion,
since p e ious esul s wi h a s indica e ha PPI is educed a e a da k o ligh
ansi ion, bu no when he change is om ligh o da k [26]. I is possible ha
his lack o symme y in animals is es ic ed o he ansi ion om da k o ligh
due o he inc ease in su ounding isual s imuli ha occu s wi h a sudden
illumina ion inc ease.
2. Expe imen 1
The i s expe imen is designed o ep oduce he esul s ob ained by
Schmajuk e al. [26], namely he educ ion o he s a le esponse and PPI a e
a change o illumina ion in he expe imen al condi ion. Some changes o he
Schmajuk e al. [26] design we e in oduced in his expe imen : i s , a 90 dB
SPL p epulse was used ins ead o a 70 dB SPL s imulus, since in pilo s udies
in ou labo a o y no consis en PPI was ound wi h he la e p epulse in ensi y.
A second majo change was he use o male a s in ou expe imen , hus
elimina ing he sou ce o a iabili y ela ed o he ho monal changes ha occu
pe iodically in emale a s in es us unc ion [27], ha ha e been shown o
in luence PPI [28]. Thi d, in ou expe imen s Wis a a s we e used, ins ead o
he Sp ague-Dawley s ain es ed in Schmajuk e al. [26]. Fou h, in ou
expe imen he animals we e main ained unde a egula ligh -da k cycle,

ins ead unde a e e sed cycle ( hus, in ou expe imen he animals we e es ed
in hei ligh phase). A inal impo an change in he design was ha his
expe imen used a be ween-subjec s design in which each g oup o animals
ecei ed only one o he en i onmen al changes (ligh o da k [L/D] o da k o
ligh [D/L]) e sus he wi hin-subjec design used in Schmajuk e al. [26].
Based on he p e ious esul s ob ained by Schmajuk e al. [26], we
expec ha he illumina ion change would p oduce an a enua ion o PPI, bu
only when he change in ol es a ansi ion om da k o ligh .
2.1. Me hod
2.1.1. Subjec s
Six een male Wis a a s, expe imen ally naï e, pa icipa ed in his
expe imen . The mean weigh a he s a o he expe imen was 342 g . ( ange
297-410). Food and wa e we e a ailable ad libi um h oughou he expe imen .
Ra s we e indi idually housed in he colony wi h a egula ligh -da k cycle o
12:12 hou s. All es ing occu ed du ing he 12-h ligh pe iod (s a ing a 10:00
AM). Fou days be o e he s a o he expe imen al sessions, each o he
animals was handled 5 minu es daily.
2.1.2. Appa a us and s imuli
Fou Panlab chambe s (model LE 111) designed o de ec and eco d
he s a le esponse in a s we e used. Each chambe was enclosed in a sound-
p oo module (model LE 116), and inside each chambe a pe spex cylinde o 8
cm in diame e was a ached o he loo o he expe imen al chambe , es ing
on a pla o m ha egis e ed and eco ded each animal’s mo emen . A
loudspeake was p esen a he op o each chambe , which p oduced a
cons an backg ound whi e noise o 65 dB SPL. The pulse s imulus was a 20
ms, 120 dB SPL whi e noise, and he p e-pulse was a 20 ms, 90 dB SPL whi e
noise. The lead in e al in he p epulse-pulse ials was 100 ms, and he in e -
ial in e al was 30 sec (+/- 5). A 24V, 2W key ligh (ligh in ensi y o
app oxima ely 180 lx) was loca ed on he le side o he chambe .
Vib a ions o he Plexiglas enclosu e caused by he whole-body s a le
esponse o he animal we e con e ed in o analog signals by a piezoelec ic
uni a ached o he pla o m. These signals we e digi ized and s o ed by a
compu e as a linea pa ame e . The a e age s a le ac i i y was measu ed in a
100-ms ime window s a ing a he onse o he sound s imulus, whe eas he
a e age baseline ac i i y was measu ed by selec ing he highes esponse in
he in e al be ween ials.
2.1.3. P ocedu e
Fo he L/D g oup (n = 8) he key ligh inside he expe imen al chambe
was on om he beginning o he expe imen , while in he case o he D/L g oup
(n = 8) he key ligh was o . Once he a s we e in oduced in he expe imen al
chambe s, hey wen h ough a 5-minu e acclima ion pe iod in which he only
audi o y s imula ion p esen ed was he cons an 65-dB SPL backg ound noise,
which emained h oughou he expe imen . Following he acclima ion pe iod, 4
pulse-alone s imuli we e p esen ed wi h a mean in e - ial in e al ITI o 30 sec.
A e 6.5 addi ional minu es, 6 pulse-alone and 6 p epulse-pulse ials we e
andomly p esen ed, wi h a mean ITI o 30 sec (+/- 5). In p epulse-pulse ials
he in e al be ween he p epulse and pulse was 100 ms. Following his
sequence o ials, he change in ligh ing condi ion (ligh o da k o ice e sa,
depending on he g oup) was in oduced, and he same 6 pulse-alone and 6
p epulse-pulse ial sequence was p esen ed.
2.1.4. Resul s
A p elimina y 4 x 2 ANOVA (T ials x Condi ion: D/L s. L/D) conduc ed
on mean s a le esponses o he 4 pulse-alone ials p esen ed a he beginning
o he session e ealed no signi ican main e ec s o in e ac ions (all ps>.19)
Figu e 1 shows s a le esponses (exp essed in a bi a y uni s) o pulse-
alone and p epulse-pulse ials du ing he expe imen al phase. I also shows
mean esponse du ing in e ial in e als (no s imulus ials) compu ed by
collapsing he maximum spon aneous esponse by con iguous Pulse and
P epulse-pulse ITIs. Panel A p esen s he s a le esponses o a s in g oup
L/D, in which he i s block o ials ook place wi h he key ligh on, and he
second block wi h he key ligh o . Panel B shows he esul s o a s in g oup
D/L, in which he illumina ion condi ions we e e e sed. As seen in bo h panels
o Figu e 1, du ing he i s block he di e ence be ween esponses o pulse-
alone and p epulse-pulse ials (i.e., PPI) emained cons an . Howe e , he
in oduc ion o changes in illumina ion condi ions had a di e en ial e ec on he
s a le esponse in pulse-alone ials: while no change was obse ed in g oup
L/D (Panel A), PPI disappea ed ansien ly in g oup D/L du ing he i s ials in
he p esence o ligh (immedia ely a e he ansi ion) o g adually eco e o e
he emaining ials (panel B). The esponses du ing he no-s imulus pe iods
emains low and s able ac oss he en i e du a ion o he expe imen , hus
disca ding any possible loo e ec o he s a le esponse on he expe imen al
ials, bu showing a gene al inc ease a e he illumina ion ansi ion.
-----------------------------------------
Figu e 1 abou he e
-----------------------------------------
These imp essions we e con i med by a subsequen s a is ical analysis.
Speci ically, a 6 x 2 x 2 x 2 ANOVA es (T ials x T ial ype: pulse-alone s.
p epulse-pulse x Posi ion: i s block o six ials s. second block x G oup: L/D
s. D/L, wi h he i s h ee ac o s being wi hin-subjec ) on mean s a le
esponses e ealed a signi ican main e ec o T ial Type, F(1,14) = 35.54; p <
.001, η2 = .72, e lec ing he o e all PPI e ec . A signi ican T ials x Posi ion
in e ac ion was also ound, F(5,70) = 6.77; p < .001, η2 = .33, due o a gene al
end o s a le ampli ude o dec ease ac oss ials in he i s block o six ials,
and o inc ease in he second block. Finally, he 3-way T ial ype x Posi ion x
G oup in e ac ion was also signi ican , F(1,14) = 7.61; p < .05, η2 = .35. No
addi ional signi ican main e ec s o in e ac ions be ween ac o s we e ound (all
ps>.09). In o de o iden i y he sou ce o he 3-way in e ac ion, we conduc ed
sepa a e 2 x 2 ANOVAs (T ial ype x Posi ion) o L/D and o D/L g oups. The
ANOVA o he L/D g oup e ealed only a signi ican main e ec o T ial ype,
F(1,7) = 14.05; p < .01, η2 = .66, due o he gene al e ec o PPI. The ANOVA
es on mean s a le esponses o he D/L g oup e ealed a signi ican main
e ec o T ial ype, F(1,7) = 21.95; p < .01, η2 = .77, due o he PPI e ec , and a
end owa d a signi ican T ial ype x Block in e ac ion was ound, F(1,7) = 4.84;
p = .064, η2 = .35. The in e ac ion e lec s a end owa ds a lowe s a le
esponses in pulse-alone ials in he i s block o ials (mean = 42.24, SEM =
in e ac ion was also signi ican , F(3,66) = 3.26; p < .05, η2 = .13, e lec ing he
o e all dec ease o he s a le esponse ac oss ials due o habi ua ion in he
p e- ansi ion block ha did no appea in he pos - ansi ion ials, whe e he
s a le esponse was al eady habi ua ed. No addi ional main e ec s o
in e ac ions we e ound o be signi ican (all ps>.11).
Figu e 2 shows mean s a le esponses o pulse-alone and p epulse-
pulse ials, exp essed in a bi a y uni s. Panel A p esen s he s a le esponse
o g oup D/L ( he i s ials in da kness and he las es s in he p esence o
ligh ), while Panel B shows hese esponses o g oup L/D (wi h he i s six
ials in he p esence o ligh and he las six in he da k). In bo h cases, he
esponse pa e n was simila , wi h mo e in ense esponses in he i s six pulse-
alone ials compa ed o p epulse-pulse ials ( e lec ing he PPI) and an
inc ease in esponse o p epulse-pulse ials in he second block o ials, a e
he in oduc ion o he illumina ion change ( om ligh o da k o om da k o
ligh ).
--------------------------------------
Figu e 2 abou he e
--------------------------------------
A mixed 6 x 2 x 2 x 2 ANOVA (T ials x T ial ype: pulse-alone s.
p epulse-pulse x Posi ion: i s block o six ials s. second block x G oup: L/D
s. D/L, he i s h ee ac o s being wi hin-subjec ) e ealed signi ican main
e ec s o T ials and T ial ype, F(5,110) = 8.67; p < .001, η2 = .29, and F(1,22) =
32.44; p < .001, η2 = .60, espec i ely. The main e ec o T ials e lec s a
gene al dec ease o he s a le esponse ac oss ials due o a habi ua ion

p ocess; he main e ec o T ial ype was due o an o e all PPI e ec , wi h
highe s a le esponse o pulse-alone han p epulse-pulse ials (mean = 0.56,
SD = 0.38, and mean = 0.42, SD = 0.30, espec i ely). The T ials x T ial ype
in e ac ion was also signi ican , F(5,110) = 2.36; p < .05, η2 = .10, e lec ing a
dec ease o s a le in ensi y ac oss ials o he Pulse-alone, bu no o he
P epulse-Pulse ials. The T ial ype x Posi ion was also signi ican , F(1,22) =
14.39; p = .001, η2 = .40, due o he PPI e ec ob ained in he i s block o ials
ha anished on he second block. Finally, he T ials x T ial ype x Posi ion
in e ac ion was signi ican , F(5,110) = 4.06; p < .01, η2 = .16. An explo a ion o
his 3-way in e ac ion e ealed i was due o a dec ease ac oss ials o he PPI
e ec on he i s block o ials, and an absence o such PPI e ec on he
second block o ials. No addi ional main e ec s o in e ac ions we e ound o
be signi ican (all ps>.16)
4. Discussion
The esul s o bo h expe imen s show ha he p esen a ion o a no el
s imulus, speci ically he in oduc ion o a change in ambien illumina ion
condi ions, has an impo an e ec on he s a le esponse and PPI. In he i s
expe imen we ound ha he s a le esponse o a s in pulse-alone ials
dec eases as a esul o no el y –bu only a e he change was om da k o
ligh -, causing a dec ease PPI. In Expe imen 2, changes in illumina ion
condi ions – ega dless o hei di ec ion- caused an inc ease in he s a le
esponse on p epulse-pulse ials in humans, and a consequen dec ease in
PPI. Al hough yielding a simila ou come in e ms o PPI educ ion, he esul s o
bo h expe imen s a e clea ly di e en a ending o he way in which changes in
en i onmen al condi ions a ec he s a le esponse in pulse-alone and
p epulse-pulse ials.
The esul s o animal expe imen s ep oduce exac ly hose ob ained by
Schmajuk e al. [26], namely he dec ease in s a le esponse in pulse-alone
ials. Al hough ou Expe imen 1 did no o e any di ec neu obiological da a,
he beha io al da a a e consis en wi h he hypo hesis ha conside s he
obse ed s a le educ ion o he pulse media ed by he elease o dopamine in
he NAC induced by he in oduc ion o a no el s imulus ( he change in ambien
illumina ion). Acco ding o his iew, he ac i a ion o he dopamine gic sys em
would lead o he de elopmen o explo a o y beha io s ha would compe e
wi h he gene a ion o s a le esponses in pulse-alone ials, hus dec easing
hei ampli ude [26]. Se e al indings suppo his hypo hesis: Fi s , he e is
expe imen al e idence showing ha inc eased explo a o y beha io is
nega i ely co ela ed wi h he in ensi y o he s a le esponse o in ense s imuli
[32]; in addi ion, se e al s udies ha e e ealed ha con ex ual changes
in ol ing no el y a e posi i ely co ela ed wi h inc eased dopamine elease in
he NAC [33,34]. Thus, when Sp ague-Dawley a s we e exposed o an
un amilia no el en i onmen , an inc ease o dopamine loca ed in he NAC ha
pe sis s o abou 25 seconds was obse ed [35] Rebec e al. (1997). Using
mic odialysis s udies, dopamine elease in he NAC inc eased when Long-
E ans a s we e exposed o an en i onmen con aining no el objec s [36]. Such
phasic dopamine inc ease seems o be linked o he ac i i y o neu ons in
Ven al Subiculum (VS), since neu ons in his egion ac i a e glu ama e
ecep o s in he VTA (Ven al Tegmen al A ea) ha esul s in an inc ease o
dopamine in he NAC o no el s imuli. The e is also he possibili y ha VS di ec
glu ama e gic p ojec ions o neu ons o he NAC induce an inc ease in
dopamine o no el y, o ha i is ela ed o a ci cui in ol ing VS p ojec ions o
he p e on al co ex, which in u n in ol es glu ama e gic p ojec ions o VTA
[36]. In he case o change in he ambien illumina ion condi ion om ligh o
da k, i is possible ha he explo a o y beha io s ha compe e wi h he s a le
esponse in pulse-alone ials do no appea since he numbe o isual s imuli
a ailable o explo a ion in his condi ion dec eases. This possibili y was
con i med by he analysis o explo a o y beha io conduc ed on wo ials be o e
and a e he illumina ion change: an inc ease in explo a o y beha io was
obse ed only in he Da k- o-Ligh g oup.
The esul s o Expe imen 2 wi h human pa icipan s exhibi a di e en
pa e n om hose ob ained wi h animals. Fi s , he PPI educ ion e ec a e he
in oduc ion o he illumina ion change was symme ical, i.e., i was obse ed in
changes om da k o ligh as well as om ligh o da k. A second impo an
di e ence wi h he esul s ob ained in he expe imen wi h a s is ela ed o he
o igin o he obse ed educ ion in PPI. While o oden s PPI dec eased as a
consequence o a educ ion o he s a le esponse in he i s pulse-alone ials
a e he in oduc ion o he en i onmen al illumina ion change, in humans he
educ ion was due o an inc ease in s a le esponses in he i s p epulse-pulse
ials ollowing he illumina ion change. An addi ional di e ence be ween a s
and humans esul s is ela ed o he leng h o he e ec ha was es ic ed o
he i s wo ials in he expe imen wi h a s, bu ex ended ac oss he six pos -
change ials in he expe imen wi h humans. Howe e , as can be seen in
Figu e 2, he s a le educ ion o he Pulse, p obably due o habi ua ion, had
con ibu ed o he appa en a enua ion o PPI.
The e o e, acco ding o he expe imen al esul s, he cause o he
obse ed PPI educ ion in humans is necessa ily di e en om ha obse ed in
oden s, since all changes (no only ha induced by he eme gence o no el
s imuli in he en i onmen in oduced in he ligh condi ion, bu also he change
caused by he disappea ance o cues when he ligh was u ned o ) educed
PPI. An impo an ac o o conside when analyzing hese di e ences is ela ed
o he magni ude o he ligh sou ce used in he expe imen s wi h oden s and
humans. While in Expe imen 1 he s imulus used was a 2 W ligh , in he case
o Expe imen 2 a 36 W LED bulb loca ed 100 cm abo e he head o he
pa icipan s was employed. I is possible ha he illumina ion p o ided in he
oden ’s case could ha e acili a ed he appea ance o an o ien ing esponse o
he no el s imuli, causing he obse ed educ ion in PPI [26], whe eas in he
human expe imen , he mo e salien ligh could ha e launched pe cep ual
and/o a en ional p ocesses in addi ion o he ones exhibi ed by oden s. Thus,
a possible explana ion –albei specula i e- o ou esul s, is ha he
in oduc ion o se e e en i onmen al changes in he human expe imen may
ha e empo a ily changed he de ec ion h eshold o audi o y s imuli.
Using di e en p epa a ions o he ones employed in he p esen
expe imen s (e.g., c oss-modal oddball asks), e idence o he e ec s o
p esen ing dis ac ing s imuli on he p ocessing o s imuli o di e en senso y
modali y wi h human pa icipan s has been epo ed. Thus, using mainly
audi o y [37] and ac ile [38] s imuli, hese esea che s showed he exis ence o
wha hey call “pos -no el dis ac ion”, a p ocess ha e lec s he need o
edi ec a en ional esou ces om a no el o a a ge s imulus in he
expe imen al si ua ion [39]. Al hough admi edly specula i e, in addi ion o his
dis ac ing e ec , he in oduc ion o changes in ambien illumina ion condi ions
in Expe imen 2 may igge a second e ec ela ed o he a en ional shi
caused by he p esen a ion o an unexpec ed isual s imulus, which would slow
he p ocessing o an audi o y s imulus appea ing immedia ely a e wa ds [40-
41]. This slowing e ec , which esul s in inc eased esponse imes in eac ion
ime asks, appea s o be mo e signi ican when he s imuli p esen ed a e
unexpec ed [42]. In his case, he obse ed PPI would no indica e a
senso imo o ga ing e ec , bu e lec a ailu e o de ec he p epulse.
F om a psychophysiological pe spec i e, he dopamine gic ac i a ion
p oduced by he p esen a ion o no el s imuli can be ound on he basis o
di e en esponses gi en by pa icipan s h oughou he s udy. As men ioned
abo e, he e is a s ong co ela ion be ween dopamine elease in he nucleus
accumbens and he no el e ec o he con ex [33,34]. A dopamine-induced
dec ease in PPI when subjec s a e exposed o no el si ua ions could be
bene icial in he p esence o salien and possible ha m ul s imuli.

Re e ences.
[1] B own P, Ro hwell JC, Thompson PD, B i on TC, Day BL, Ma sden CD.
New obse a ions on he audi o y s a le e lex in man. B ain
1991;114:1891-902.
[2] Yeomans JS, F ankland PW. The acous ic s a le e lex: neu ons and
connec ions. B ain Res Re , 1995;21:301-14
[3] Da is, M, File, SE. In insic and ex insic mechanisms o habi ua ion and
sensi iza ion: implica ions o he design and analysis o expe imen s. In:
Peeke HVS, and Pe ino ich L, edi o s. Habi ua ion, Sensi iza ion, and
Beha io , New Yo k: Academic P ess; 1984, p. 287–323.
[4] Ison, JR, and Ho man, HS. Re lex modi ica ions in he domain o s a le: II.
The anomalous his o y o a obus and ubiqui ous phenomenon. Psychol
Bull 1983;94:3-17.
[5] Saba inelli, D, B adley, MM, Lang, PJ. A ec i e s a le modula ion in
an icipa ion and pe cep ion. Psychophysiology, 2001;38:719-22
[6] Mille , MW, Pa ick CJ, Le ens on, GK. A ec i e image y and he s a le
esponse: P obing mechanisms o modula ion du ing pleasan scenes,
pe sonal expe iences, and disc e e nega i e emo ions. Psychophysiology,
2002;39:519-29
[7] Ho man, HS, Ison, JR. Re lex modi ica ion in he domain o s a le: I. Some
empi ical indings and hei implica ions o how he ne ous sys em
p ocesses senso y inpu . Psychol Re 1980;87:175-89
[8] La au i, J, Schmajuk, N. P epulse inhibi ion mechanisms and cogni i e
p ocesses: a e iew and model. In: Le in ED, edi o . Neu o ansmi e
in e ac ions and cogni i e unc ion, Basel, Swi ze land: Bi khauese Ve lag;
2006, p. 245-78.
[9] Reijme s LG, Pee e s BW. E ec s o acous ic p epulses on he s a le e lex
in a s: a pa ame ic analysis. B ain Res, 1994;661:174-80.
[10] Yee, B, Chang, T, Pie opaolo, S, Feldon, J. The exp ession o p epulse
inhibi ion o he acous ic s a le e lex as a unc ion o h ee pulse s imulus
in ensi ies, h ee p epulse s imulus in ensi ies, and h ee le els o s a le
esponsi eness in C57BL6/J mice. Beha B ain Res, 2005;163:265–267.
[11] Ison JR, Hammond GR. Modi ica ion o he s a le e lex in he a by
changes in he audi o y and isual en i onmen s. J Comp Physiol Psych
1972;75:435–52.
[12] G aham, FK. The mo e o less s a ling e ec s o weak p es imula ion.
Psychophysiology 1975;12:238-48.
[13] Swe dlow NR, B a DL, Geye MA. Animal models o de icien
senso imo o ga ing: wha we know, wha we hink we know, and wha we
hope o know soon. Beha Pha macol, 2000;11:185–204.
[14] Da is, M. (1984). The mammalian s a le esponse. In RC Ea on, edi o .
Neu al mechanisms o s a le beha io . New Yo k: Plenum; 1984, p. 287-
342.
[15] Da is M, Gendelman D, Tischle M, Gendelman, P. A p ima y acous ic
s a le ci cui : lesion and s imula ion s udies. J Neu osci 1982;6:791–805
[16] Lei ne , DS, Cohen, ME. Role o he in e io colliculus in he inhibi ion o
acous ic s a le in he a . Physiol Beha , 1985;84:65-70.
[17] Swe dlow NR, and Geye , MA. P epulse inhibi ion o acous ic s a le in a s
a e lesions o he pedunculopon ine egmen al nucleus. Beha Neu osci,
1993;107:104–17.
[18] Zhang J, Fo ks am C, Engel JA, S ensson L. Role o dopamine in p epulse
inhibi ion o acous ic s a le. Psychopha macology, 2000;149:181-8.
[19] Ralph, RJ, Va y, GB, Wang, Y, Ca on, MG, Rubins ein, M, G andy, DK,
e al. The dopamine D2, bu no D3 o D4, ecep o sub ype is essen ial o
he dis up ion o p epulse inhibi ion p oduced by amphe amine in mice. J
Neu osci, 1999;19:4627-33.
[20] Schwa zkop SB, B uno JP, Mi ab T. E ec s o halope idol and SCH
23390 on acous ic s a le and p epulse inhibi ion unde basal and s imula ed
con- di ions. P og Neu o-Psychopha, 1993;17:1023–36.
[21] B a D, S one C, Callaway E, Geye M, Glick I, and Bali L. P es imulus
e ec s on human s a le e lex in no mals and schizoph enics.
Psychophysiology 1978;15:339-43
[22] Ho i z JC. Mesolimboco ical and nig os ia al dopamine esponses o
salien non- ewa d e en s. Neu oscience 2000;96:651–6
[23] Bassa eo V, De Luca MA, Di Chia a, G. Di e en ial exp ession o
mo i a ional s imulus p ope ies by dopamine in nucleus accumbens shell
e sus co e and p e on al co ex. J Neu osci 2002;22:4709–19.
[24] Feens a, MGP, Bo e blom, MHA, Mas enb oek, S. Dopamine and
no ad enaline elease in he p e on al co ex in he ligh and da k phase:
E ec s o no el y and handling and compa ison o he nucleus accumbens.
Neu oscience 2000;100:111-7.
[25] Van de Els , MCJ, Roubos, EW, Ellenb oek, BA, Veening, JG, Cools, AR.
Apomo phine-suscep ible a s and apomo phine-unsuscep ible a s di e in
he y osine hyd oxylase-immuno eac i e ne wo k in he nucleus accumbens
co e and shell. Exp B ain Res, 2005;160:418-23.
[26] Schmajuk NA, La au i JA, De la Casa LG, Le in ED. A enua ion o
audi o y s a le and p epulse inhibi ion by unexpec ed changes in ambien
illumina ion h ough dopamine gic mechanisms. Beha B ain Res,
2009;197:251-61
[27] T opp, J, Ma kus, EJ. Sex di e ences in he dynamics o cue u iliza ion and
explo a o y beha io . Beha B ain Res, 2001;119:143-54
[28] Koch, M. Senso imo o ga ing changes ac oss he es ous cycle in emale
a s. Physiol Beha 1998;64:625-8.
[29] G illon, C, Pellowski, M, Me ikangas, KR, Da is, M. Da kness acili a es he
acous ic s a le e lex in humans. Biol Psychia y 1997;42:453-60
[30] Walke , DL, Da is, M. Anxiogenic e ec s o high illumina ion le els
assessed wi h he acous ic s a le esponse in a s. Biol Psychia ,
1997;42:461-71.