scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Teaching Structural Analysis through design, building and testing

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an innovative teaching experience in the area of structural analysis in the mechanical engineering program of the Universidad de Sevilla, Spain. The teaching methodology used is aimed at motivating students to learn by promoting the design, calculation, building, and testing of structures. This method not only trains students to make calculations, but also develops skills that allow them to understand how structures function. The project includes subjects taught in the third and fifth year of the course. In their third year, students begin their structural training studying structural analysis, where they learn the basics by designing, building, and testing balsa wood structures. Students have access to computer software when optimizing the design of their models before building and testing them in the laboratory. After this first approach to structural analysis, students receive training on more advanced concepts. A few examples of such concepts are the dynamic behavior of structures and instabilities in specific types of structures such as plates and laminar structures, and in structural materials such as steel and concrete. Before completing their studies, students are exposed to a project-based teaching methodology in the area of experimental structural analysis, where students deal with similar projects to those they will face as professionals after graduating. This paper explains the advantages of this methodology for teaching in engineering.

Read accessible full text

Teaching Structural Analysis through design, building and testing

Author: Solís Muñiz, Mario; Romero Ordóñez, Antonio; Galvín, Pedro
Publisher: ASCE
Year: 2012
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000097
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/52ad8645-aad9-40ca-9747-9cf43fef6304/download
Teaching S uc u al Analysis h ough design, building and es ing
M. Solís, A. Rome o, P. Gal ín
Escuela Técnica Supe io de Ingenie os, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Camino de los Descub imien os s/n, 41092, Se illa, Spain
[email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac
This pape p esen s he esul s o an inno a i e eaching expe ience in he a ea o s uc u al analysis in he Mechanical
Enginee ing cou se o he Uni e sidad de Se illa, Spain. The eaching me hodology used is aimed a mo i a ing
s uden s o lea n by p omo ing he design, calcula ion, building and es ing o s uc u es. This me hod no only ains
s uden s o make calcula ions bu also de elops skills ha allow hem o unde s and how s uc u es unc ion. The
p ojec includes subjec s augh in he hi d and i h yea o he cou se. In hei hi d yea , s uden s begin hei
s uc u al aining wi h he subjec S uc u al Analysis, in which hey lea n he basics by designing, building and
es ing balsa wood s uc u es. S uden s ha e access o compu e so wa e o op imize he design o hei models be o e
building and es ing hem in he labo a o y. A e his i s app oach o S uc u al Analysis, s uden s ecei e aining on
mo e ad anced concep s. A ew examples o such concep s a e he dynamic beha io o s uc u es and ins abili ies in
speci ic ypes o s uc u es such as pla es and lamina s uc u es and in s uc u al ma e ials such as s eel and conc e e.
Be o e comple ing hei s udies, s uden s a e exposed o a p ojec -based eaching me hodology again in he subjec
Expe imen al S uc u al Analysis. In his subjec , s uden s deal wi h simila p ojec s o hose hey will ace as
p o essionals a e g adua ing. This pape explains he ad an ages o his me hodology o eaching in enginee ing.
INTRODUCTION
A he School o Enginee ing o he Uni e sidad de Se illa, s uden s lea n S uc u al Analysis be ween he
hi d and i h yea o he Mechanical Enginee ing cou se. In hi d yea , all he s uden s o he cou se lea n
he basics o he subjec ; in ou h and i h yea , s uden s who ha e chosen o specialize in S uc u al
Analysis gain g ea e knowledge abou he beha io o s uc u es. An inno a i e eaching expe ience o his
cou se was launched some yea s ago o mo i a e s uden s o lea n by p omo ing he design, calcula ion,
building and es ing o s uc u es. Simila inno a i e eaching app oaches ha e been also p e iously
es ablished in o he ins i u ions (Glynn and Fe gusson 1994; Rome o and Muse os, 2002; Hadim and Esche
2002; Elazouni and Raslan 2003; Un e wege 2005). This no only ains s uden s o make calcula ions bu
also de elops skills ha allow hem o unde s and how s uc u es unc ion.
The inno a i e eaching expe ience has been se up be o e he new Eu opean Highe Educa ion A ea
(EHEA) was es ablished in he School o Enginee ing o he Uni e sidad de Se illa. I was o iginally
p omo ed by he au ho s, bu a e wo yea s i was p oposed as an inno a ion p ojec acco ding o he
Teaching Me hodologies Renew P og am o he Uni e sidad de Se illa. This P og am supplied unding o
acqui ing new eaching acili ies (lap ops, digi al d awing able s) and he ungible goods o he
expe imen al es s (s eel ba s, sand, cemen , wi es, s ain gages, e c.). The new EHEA eaching me hodology,
applied o p ac ical lessons, equi e no only an inc ease in human esou ces bu also an inc ease in eaching
expenses.
As ega ds he use o new In o ma ion and Communica ion Technologies, he i ual eaching pla o m o he
Uni e sidad de Se illa is used. This kind o e-lea ning pla o ms is used by many ins i u ions o online
eaching and lea ning. The i ual pla o m is use ul o help s uden s and eache s sha e in o ma ion, assess
knowledge, manage discussion o ums, e c., bu does no eplace on-si e eaching and lea ning. In he
subjec s deal wi h in his pape , all he documen s used in he eaching a e a ailable o s uden s on he
pla o m. The pla o m is also used o include a desc ip ion o he p ac ical classes, audio isual ma e ials,
ques ions o s uden s o assess hei own knowledge on he subjec s and o he documen s o in e es .
The new eaching expe ience has been in oduced in wo di e en subjec s o he cou se, so i is only
pa ially applied du ing he cou se. These kind o new eaching me hodologies help s uden s o acqui e
p ac ical knowledge by hemsel es, so hey a e especially sui able o enginee ing educa ion. Howe e , hei
o e all implemen a ion in o a whole enginee ing cou se exhibi s se e al d awbacks ha should be
conside ed. T adi ional eaching and lec u ing is necessa y o a oid skipping undamen al knowledge and o
acqui e i hie a chically when necessa y. An in e es ing disse a ion abou bene i s and d awbacks o
pa ially and o e all implemen a ion o hese me hodologies can be ound in he wo k o Pe ene e al
(2000). The e a e also examples o pa ially in oduced PBL o some Mechanical Enginee ing subjec s
(Hadim and Esche 2002), and how i educes he amoun o adi ional lec u ing, mo ing opics om
adi ional lea ning o PBL.
This pape desc ibes he con en s, pu pose, me hodology and esul s o his inno a i e eaching in S uc u al
Analysis and Expe imen al S uc u al Analysis subjec s a he Uni e sidad o Se illa, which co esponds o
hi d and i h yea o Mechanical Enginee ing cou se, espec i ely. The in oduc ion o his kind o eaching
se es as a basis o he implemen a ion o new eaching me hodologies ha p epa e s uden s o li elong
lea ning, acco ding o he new Eu opean Highe Educa ion A ea: p oblem and p ojec -based lea ning (PBL),
coope a e lea ning, cogni i e app en iceship, lea ning how o lea n, and p omo ing ans e sal skills such as
wo k in a eam and w i ing and o al communica ion abili ies (Hadim and Esche 2002; Dunlap and G abinge
2003; F ank e al 2003).
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SUBJECT: PRACTICAL CLASSES AND PROBLEM-BASED
LEARNING
In hi d yea o he Mechanical Enginee ing cou se, s uden s lea n he basic concep s o S uc u al Analysis,
including he lexibili y and s i ness me hods and how o use hem o calcula e he displacemen s and
s esses s uc u es unde go when hey a e subjec ed o hei design loads. Be o e his new eaching
expe ience was in oduced, s uden s who passed his subjec seemed o be eady o s a o s udy mo e
complex issues such as ins abili ies and dynamics and o unde s and he o mula ion o he ini e elemen
model. Howe e , s uden s did no ha e he imp ession ha he knowledge hey had gained would be use ul
o design, analyze and build a eal s uc u e. To change his pe cep ion, wo se ies o p ac ical classes we e
in oduced: a compu e class and a labo a o y class. In he compu e class, s uden s use a compu e p og am
o analyze he s eel ame o an indus ial building using he s i ness me hod. In he labo a o y class (Fig. 1),
s uden s es and measu e displacemen s and s esses in a small s eel uss when i is subjec ed o a known
o ce. Mo eo e , s uden s compa e he da a measu ed expe imen ally wi h he alues hey can p edic when
using he S uc u al Analysis me hods hey ha e lea n . This shows hem ha he ac ual beha io o he
s uc u e ma ches he heo e ical concep s hey lea ned ea lie .
Howe e , o u he comple e he eaching, a hi d p ac ical class was in oduced. In his class, s uden s ha e
o design, analyze, build and es a s uc u e made o wooden popsicle s icks. Each g oup o wo s uden s is
only equi ed o ul ill a ce ain objec i e wi h he s uc u e. The es o he pa ame e s a e ee and designed
by he s uden s hemsel es. Fo example, he i s yea his me hodology was used, he building had o b idge
a span o 50 cm (Fig.2), and a poin load is applied a he middle o he span. The second yea , a 50cm long
can ile e ype s uc u e had o bea a load loca ed a i s ee end poin (Fig. 3). The hi d yea , he s uc u e
had o co e a squa e space o 400x400mm, simply suppo ed a i s ou co ne s, and a uni o m load was
applied o e he s uc u e (Fig. 4).
Simila PBL expe iences ha e been de eloped using ei he wooden s icks, ca dboa d o e en ealis ic
s uc u al elemen s o a eal s uc u e. The e a e also in e es ing p e ious expe iences ha a e limi ed o he
design and analysis s ages o an enginee ing p ojec , including he analy ical and nume ical app oach o he
p oblem bu no he building s age (Hadim and Esche, 2002).
This PBL makes s uden s ace he kind o p oblems hey may encoun e when hey design a s uc u e as
p o essionals. These p oblems ange om no ha ing all he da a a ailable o how o join ba s co ec ly o
p e en he join s om being he weakes poin s in he s uc u e. A his s age o hei aining, s uden s a e
no amilia ye wi h he ins abili y p oblems s uc u es may ha e. Ye , hey ha e o sol e p oblems wi h ba s
whose comp ession s ess can cause buckling and ha equi e sec ions wi h a g ea e adius o gy a ion o
a oid buckling. They also ha e o deal wi h he h ee dimensional na u e o he s uc u e, despi e hey ha e
analyzed a simpli ied wo dimensional model o he s uc u e, as i is usual in a p o essional design.
The e o e, hey ha e o in oduce addi ional ba s in o de o a oid an uns able esponse due o he e ec s o
geome ic and load i egula i ies.
Each g oup o wo s uden s analyzes, builds and es s he s uc u es, wi h he con inuous assis ance o he
eache s o he subjec , which os e s echnical discussions. Once he s uden s ag ee on he ype o s uc u e
hey wan o design o sol e he p oblem, hey s a o make hei calcula ions, which some imes o ce hem
o change he ype o s uc u e hey had planned. Once hey ha e designed and analyzed he s uc u e, hey
a e p o ided wi h he building ma e ials: wooden s icks, glue and, o hose who need hem, wi es ha a e
used as ie ods in he s uc u es. The mechanical p ope ies o such ma e ials a e a ailable and he s uden s
also ha e he choice o pe o ming a bending es o comp ession es on any ype o ba hey design. The
ma e ial in he labo a o y is a ailable o he s uden s o building he s uc u e.
Once he s uc u e is eady, s uden s ha e o submi a epo on he p ojec explaining he design, calcula ion
and building p ocess. They es ima e he b eaking load o he s uc u e based on he esul s ob ained wi h a
compu e p og am using he s i ness me hod. The epo has o be de ended in on o he eache s o he
subjec be o e he es ha will lead he s uc u e o collapse. The p ac ical class assessmen is de e mined by
he design o he s uc u e, he a io be ween he b eaking load and he weigh o he s uc u e, and he a io
be ween he ac ual b eaking load and ha p edic ed by he s uden s acco ding o hei calcula ions.
Wi h his PBL me hodology, s uden s apply p io knowledge and acqui e new knowledge ha would be
o he wise ou o he scope o he subjec . They also ge some addi ional and impo an skills, such as
knowledge managemen , and a social cons uc i ism lea ning app oach (K ajcick e al 1999; F ank e al
2003) is also achie ed. Each g oup o wo s uden s designs, analyzes and builds hei own s uc u e, bu
knowledge and in o ma ion is no only sha ed be ween hose wo s uden s bu also be ween o he g oups.
The e a e spon aneous echnical discussions be ween di e en g oups o s uden s, and eache s a e usually
equi ed o ake pa in hem, al hough eache s usually encou age s uden s o discuss be ween hem and y
o sol e he echnical di icul ies ollowing hei own c i e ia, gi ing hem as less in o ma ion as possible o
a oid e oneous conclusions. The accu acy and dep h o he explana ions gi en by eache s o each g oup
depends on he equi emen s and he le el o knowledge eached by he g oup. The e o e, s uden s lea n how
o iden i y a ailable in o ma ion, selec use ul in o ma ion and s o e i , de elop knowledge om he
in o ma ion gi en and ans e i when necessa y.
O e all, pa icipa ion o s uden s in his p ac ical class also p o ides hem wi h aluable aining in
addi ional skills such as p ojec and ime managemen since he p ocess o designing and building he
wooden s uc u e is qui e simila o a small-scale eal enginee ing p ojec . In addi ion, he w i en epo and
i s o al p esen a ion help s uden s imp o e hei w i en and o al communica ion skills.
I mus be poin ed ou ha his PBL me hodology also implies a conside able eaching load o eache s. An
a e age ime o 3 hou s o assis ance is equi ed o each g oup o s uden s, who ask eache s o help as hey
need i . S uc u es a e es ed a he end o he yea ; each es akes abou hal an hou . These scheduled es s
a e cu en ly he only amoun o ime ha is o icially ecognized as a eaching wo k, since assis ance o
s uden s is o icially conside ed as pa o he gene al suppo ime ha eache s mus de o e o all hei
s uden s. This means ha , o e all, eache s mus cu en ly spend ex a ime equi alen o 50% o o icially
ecognized ime. Fo una ely, his si ua ion will be a leas pa ially co ec ed wi h he new EHEA, which
p omo es and ecognizes his kind o eaching me hodology and he s uden suppo i equi es.
Resul s o su eys conduc ed by he Uni e sidad de Se illa on his subjec in 2009 and 2010 a e included in
Table 1. Resul s o he subjec S uc u al Analysis a e compa ed o hose o he o e all subjec s o he
S uc u al Analysis Depa men , he whole Mechanical Enginee ing cou se and he whole Uni e si y. I can
be obse ed ha he e alua ion o he subjec is sa is ac o y when compa ed o o he subjec s. Un o una ely,
no esul s p io o he implemen a ion o he PBL me hodology a e a ailable o analyze he change b ough
abou by his me hodology in s uden s’ pe cep ion o he subjec . In 2010, he e alua ion o he subjec was
less a o able, especially in aspec s ela ed o o ice hou s and o ganiza ion o he subjec . This was due o
he ac ha he e we e ewe human esou ces o ha yea and eache s had o spend oo much ime
p epa ing and o ganizing he p ac ical lessons o he subjec s S uc u al Analysis and Expe imen al S uc u al
Analysis. Thus, i was di icul o hem o assis all he s uden s as hey equi ed. Fo una ely, addi ional
human esou ces a e a ailable o yea 2011 and be e p og amming and schedules ha e been designed by
lea ning om p e ious expe ience, so be e esul s han hose o 2010 a e expec ed. These esul s sugges
ha his kind o eaching equi es a special dedica ion o lec u es, o ice hou s, p ac ical lessons and close
con ac wi h s uden s, hence why eaching e alua ion esul s a e mo e sensi i e o he a ailable human
esou ces han classical eaching.
Resul s ob ained wi h his PBL me hodology ha e been e y good. Al hough PBL may no imp o e exam
sco es, an inc ease was obse ed bo h in he a e o s uden s ha passed he exam and he exam sco es o he
s uden s ha pa icipa ed in he PBL me hodology, which is op ional o hem o now. The PBL
me hodology may no be sui able o e e y s uden (Rosen eld and Rosen eld 1999). The e o e, he p ac ical
class may gi e s uden s wi h lowe g ade esul s in egula s udies he oppo uni y o imp o e G ade Poin
A e age (GPA), whe eas i does no a ec nega i ely he GPA o s uden s wi h usual highe g ade esul s.
Table 2 includes pass a es and GPA o s uden s ha pa icipa ed and did no pa icipa e in he PBL
app oach. GPA was e alua ed om 5 o 10 poin s, wi h 5 poin s meaning passing he exam. Da a co espond
o he yea s he au ho s ha e been in ol ed in his subjec (2008 o 2011). The PBL me hodology was i s
in oduced in 2009. The able shows ha exam sco es emained simila o s uden s ha did no pa icipa e in
he hi d p ac ical lesson, whe eas much be e esul s we e obse ed o s uden s ha ook pa in i .
Mo eo e , s uden s pa icipa ing in he p ojec ge in ol ed o such an ex en ha many o hem eel
encou aged o specialize in S uc u al Analysis. This encou aging e ec has also been no iced in p e ious
PBL eaching expe iences (F ank e al 2003).
In hei specializa ion in ou h and i h yea , s uden s lea n he dynamic beha io o s uc u es and
ins abili ies, speci ic ypes o s uc u es such as pla es and lamina s uc u es, and s uc u al ma e ials such as
s eel and conc e e. Finally, be o e comple ing hei Mechanical Enginee ing s udies, s uden s a e exposed
again o a p ojec -based eaching me hodology in he subjec Expe imen al S uc u al Analysis.
EXPERIMENTAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Va ious eaching and assessmen sys ems ha e been used in he subjec Expe imen al S uc u e Analysis
since i was included in he cu iculum. Ye , i has always ocused on PBL me hodology. I is a las -yea
subjec aimed o each specialized p ac ical knowledge, based on he concep s lea ned ea lie in o he
subjec s o he same a ea o knowledge. This p io knowledge and he ma u i y o s uden s in he inal yea s
o he cou se make i easie o implemen he eaching me hodology o he subjec . Mo eo e , he in-pe son
45 hou s o he subjec a e di ided in o 15 hou s o heo e ical classes and 30 hou s o p ac ical classes
which a e o ganized o g oups o a maximum o ou s uden s. This expe imen al and p ac ical eaching

app oach is sui able o applying PBL.
The eaching me hodology used has always been simila . Ye , he e ha e been changes in he o ganiza ion o
he wo k s uden s ha e o do, wi h a ia ions in he app oach and he assessmen me hods. These changes
ha e been aimed a enhancing he achie emen o he objec i es planned bu a e also necessa y o keep
eache s s imula ed and mo i a ed, e en hough hese changes equi e an addi ional e o om hem. The e
a e app oxima ely 3 p ac ical lessons ha change om one yea o ano he , and i is es ima ed ha nea ly 30
hou s a e needed o a eache o app op ia ely se up a new p ac ical lesson. P epa a ion wo k includes
acqui ing he necessa y ma e ials (senso s, so wa e, wi es, p obes, e c.), de eloping he necessa y so wa e
applica ions, pe o ming ial es s, analyzing he expe imen al esul s and inally se ing he objec i es and
planning he ac i i ies o he p ac ical lesson when pe o med by he s uden s.
Changes in he p ac ical lessons om one yea o ano he also p e en s uden s om copying ma e ials,
esul s and expe iences om s uden s o p e ious yea s, which would hampe he de elopmen o he subjec
and unde mine he c edibili y o s uden s’ wo k.
Ini ially, s uden s in he p ac ical class had o p epa e a sho esea ch p ojec on he beha io o a single
s uc u al elemen du ing he school yea : ein o ced conc e e beams ex e nally s eng hened wi h s ips o
Ca bon Fibe Rein o ced Polyme (CFRP, Fig. 5). The wo k included a ious ypes o es s, ins umen s, and
so on. The pu pose o his me hodology was o ge s uden s o comple e a long- e m p ojec du ing he whole
school yea applying p io and new knowledge o s udy and analyze a new p oblem o hem and d aw
conclusions abou i . This in ol ed acing si ua ions o unce ain y and isking making mis akes in a new
endea o . A he end o he yea , s uden s had o p esen a w i en epo on he wo k pe o med and p esen
i publicly in on o he eache s.
This o iginal app oach ecei ed g ea in e es and made i possible o o ganize he con en o he subjec , a
complex ask gi en ha i was he i s ime i was going o be augh . Changes in he p ac ical class we e
subsequen ly made o ob ain be e pe o mance, mo i a ion and lea ning in s uden s. A se ies o independen
p ac ical assignmen s we e chosen o ewa d egula wo k by he s uden s, illus a e heo e ical con en s and
consolida e he mos impo an ideas ela ed o he subjec . This change also add essed he s uden s’ eques
o ha e g ea e o de and egula i y in he wo k pe o med du ing he yea , which implied ha ing ongoing
assessmen .
Va ious p ac ical exe cises ha e been pe o med o e he yea s. In he p ac ical classes, each s uden
de elops his o he skills in he labo a o y. The aim is o deal wi h mos o he elemen s one may ace in
expe imen al s uc u al analysis: p og amming languages (LabView and Ma lab), unc ioning and use o
senso s (displacemen senso s, s ain gages, accele ome e s, geophones, lase ib ome e s), cha ac e is ics
and se up o da a acquisi ion sys ems and es ing machines, es design and assembly, and e en pa icipa ion
in es s on eal s uc u es (dynamic beha io o b idges, ib a ion om ail and oad a ic, e c.). As an
addi ional ac i i y, he e a e ield isi s o companies and acili ies ela ed o he s uc u es inso a as
possible.
Some o he con en s o he di e en p ac ical lessons ha ha e been done in he subjec a e lis ed below:
Ins alla ion o s ain gages on s eel and conc e e specimens (Fig.6 and Fig. 7)
Assessmen o he cons i u i e law o conc e e, s eel, ma ble, polyme s, e c, h ough ensile o
comp ession es s, measu ing s ains wi h s ain gages and displacemen senso s.
Analysis o he ope a ion o displacemen senso s and calib a ion acco ding o a e e ence senso .
Analysis o he ope a ion and use o a uni e sal es ing machine, simpli ied calib a ion o
displacemen and o ce measu emen s.
Analysis o he lexu al beha io o conc e e beams, CFRP ein o ced conc e e beams and s eel
beams, including displacemen s, s ains, cu a u es and bending momen s (Fig. 7).
Expe imen al analysis o a uss, measu ing s ains, displacemen s and o ces
Use o accele ome e s and geophones. Ob aining accele a ions om eloci ies h ough in eg a ion o
il e ed accele a ion signals.
Modal analysis o conc e e and s eel beams
Vib a ion based damage de ec ion in a s eel beam wi h a simula ed c ack
Modal analysis o a simple s uc u e (s eel beam) unde a mo ing load (Fig. 8)
Ope a ional modal analysis o one o he b idges c ossing he Guadalqui i Ri e , Fig. 9 and. 10
Analysis o na u al equencies and mode shapes o p og essi ely c acked ein o ced conc e e beams
(Fig. 11)
To da e, he subjec includes wel e labo a o y wo k sessions conduc ed in small g oups o a maximum o
ou s uden s. This is essen ial o success ul in ol emen o s uden s in he labo a o y wo k and
unde s anding o he con en s augh . A e his, each g oup o ou s uden s is di ided in o wo g oups o
wo, so each pai o s uden s p epa es epo s on he wo k pe o med e e y week, and he con en s o hese
epo s a e o ally p esen ed and discussed wi h he es o he s uden s. Be o e he o al p esen a ion, hey
mus send an elec onic e sion o he w i en epo o he eache s.
A he beginning o he school yea , eache s gi e s uden s a model ou line o he epo s. This ou line
consis s o he ollowing i ems: in oduc ion, undamen al o heo e ical aspec s, expe imen al se up, esul s,
discussion and conclusions. F om ha poin , he con en s and s yle o he w i en epo s a e designed by
each g oup o s uden s, acco ding o he expe imen al da a and no es ha hey ake du ing he p ac ical
lessons. Fo he o al p esen a ions, a p ojec o and a blackboa d a e a ailable o he s uden s. Each g oup o
wo s uden s has 15 minu es o he p esen a ion, and 5 addi ional minu es a e alloca ed o answe ing
ques ions om eache s o o discussion wi h he es o he s uden s.
Du ing hese o al sessions, eache s gi e s uden s ad ice abou he con en s and s yle o he w i en epo s
and o al p esen a ions. The o de in which he g oups make hei p esen a ions is changed om one week o
ano he , so no g oup bene i s om sys ema ically speaking be o e o a e ano he g oup.
Hence, he p ac ical classes, p epa a ion o epo s and o al p esen a ion o he wo k done a e aimed a
s eng hening s uden s’ skills in o al and w i en exp ession, eamwo k, analysis, syn hesis, sel -c i icism and
knowledge managemen , apa om he lea ning o con en s di ec ly ela ed o he subjec . The subjec is
he e o e di ided in o se e al small inqui y-based lea ning uni s (Tami 1990, F ank e al 2003), in which
s uden s a e suppo ed by eache s and hei eamma es o sol e and in e p e a eal p oblem by hemsel es,
once he p oblem is ou lined in a p ac ical class.
Al hough assessmen is ongoing, s uden s also ha e a w i en exam, which includes ques ions on he
heo e ical con en o he subjec and he wo k pe o med in he p ac ical sessions. The exam is usually
simple ( he heo e ical con en o he subjec is no long o complica ed) and only akes one hou . The g ade
ob ained in he exam ep esen s 30 pe cen o he inal g ade; he emaining 70 pe cen is gi en by he g ade
ob ained in he p ac ical exe cises. The assessmen o he subjec also includes a sel -assessmen sys em o
e i y he deg ee o ag eemen be ween he g ades gi en by he eache s and hose p oposed by he s uden s.
In his sel -assessmen sys em, s uden s p opose a g ade o hemsel es and he es o hei ellow s uden s
in he p ac ical classes, whose wo k hey a e e y amilia wi h. The esul o his sel -assessmen expe ience
has been posi i e, wi h de ia ions ypically less han one poin compa ed o he g ades p oposed. G ades
gi en by eache s in he p ac ical sessions usually ma ch hose p oposed by he s uden s. The e a e plans o
use he sel -assessmen sys em so ha s uden s can quali y he g ades in he nea u u e; he aim is o use
g ades gi en by s uden s o modi y hose p oposed by eache s, ewa ding s uden s who ha e wo ked he
mos and penalizing hose who ha e wo ked less, acco ding o he s uden s’ c i e ia.
Eigh yea s a e his subjec wi h his PBL me hodology was i s in oduced, esul s can be conside ed
excellen , wi h high a ings om s uden s and eache s. Su eys ha e been conduc ed a he end o each
academic yea on he quali y o he eaching (o ganiza ion o he subjec , heo e ical and p ac ical con en s,
assessmen sys em, eache assessmen , e c.) and he e alua ion o he subjec om s uden s is excellen .
Table 3 includes a summa y o he esul s o he su eys. Each i em o he able is a ed by each s uden om
0 (wo s ) o 10 (bes ). The able includes he co esponding a e age alue ob ained o each i em and o
each yea . Acco ding o he su eys, s uden s spend a ound 60 hou s o p epa e he epo s (5 hou s each
epo ) and 10 hou s o p epa e he w i en exam. Tha makes a o al o 115 hou s, including he a endance o
in-pe son classes. This a sligh ly bigge amoun o he es ima ed dedica ion o 87.5-105 hou s acco ding o
he Eu opean C edi T ans e and accumula ion Sys em (ECTS) es ablished in he Uni e sidad de Se illa.
Ne e heless, esul s o he su eys show ha s uden s welcome his ype o lea ning, e en i i equi es
g ea e e o and dedica ion om hem.
CONCLUSIONS
This pape p esen s he esul s o an inno a i e eaching expe ience in he a ea o s uc u es in he
Mechanical Enginee ing cou se o he Uni e sidad de Se illa. The eaching me hodology used is aimed a
mo i a ing s uden s o lea n h ough p ac ical expe iences ha in oduce c oss-cu ing issues in he aining
o s uden s. S uden s espond e y posi i ely o his kind o eaching. Teache s eel mo i a ed and sa is ied
wi h he use o hese new me hodologies, in spi e o he ime i akes o pu hem in o p ac ice. Mo eo e ,
eache s ecei e con inuously new ideas; hey also become li elong lea ne s and enjoy a be e wo king
en i onmen wi h s uden s (K ajcick e al 1999).
Applied eaching me hodologies a e also app op ia e in he Eu opean Highe Educa ion A ea. Howe e ,
gi en he e o his ype o me hodologies equi es om eache s, hey can only be implemen ed in small
g oups o s uden s. This is he case o Expe imen al S uc u al Analysis, a las -yea subjec , bu no o
S uc u al Analysis, a compulso y subjec , whe e i was only possible o implemen his me hodology as
olun a y addi ional wo k. To gene alize his ype o me hodology as compulso y wo k, i would be
necessa y o inc ease he human and economic esou ces a ailable o each he subjec . Such an inc ease
would be ully jus i ied conside ing he imp o emen in he quali y o eaching p o ided by hese
expe iences. Howe e , a sui able p opo ion o adi ional lec u ing should be kep o hie a chically acqui e
he necessa y undamen al knowledge in dep h (Pe ene e al 2000).
REFERENCES
Apa icio, A.C. and Ruiz-Te an, A.M. (2007). "T adi ion and Inno a ion in Teaching S uc u al Design in
Ci il Enginee ing." J.P o l.Issues in Eng g.Educ.and P ac ., 133(4), 340-349.
Dunlap, J.C. and G abinge , S. (2003). "P epa ing S uden s o Li elong Lea ning: A Re iew o Ins uc ional
Fea u es and Teaching Me hodologies." Pe o mance Imp o emen Qua e ly, 166-25.
Elazouni, A.M. and Raslan, M.S. (2003). "Foo b idge: P ojec o Implemen Managemen Func ions a
AASTMT." J.P o l.Issues in Eng g.Educ.and P ac ., 129(1), 44-51.
Eu opean Commision (2004). Eu opean c edi ans e and accumula ion sys em (ECTS). Key ea u es,
O ice o O icial Publica ions o he Eu opean Communi ies, Luxembou g.
Gal ín, P. and Domínguez, J. (2007). "Dynamic analysis o a cable-s ayed deck s eel a ch b idge." J. Cons .
S eel Res., 63(8), 1024-1035.
Hadim, H. A. and Esche, S.K. (2002), “Enhancing he enginee ing cu iculum h ough p ojec -based
lea ning.” P oc. 32nd ASEE/IEEE F on ie s in Educa ion Con e ence, ASEE/IEEE, Bos on.
F ank, M., La y, I. And Ela a, D. (2003), “Implemen ing he P ojec -Based Lea ning App oach in an
Academic Enginee ing Cou se.” In e na ional Jou nal o Technology and Design Educa ion, 13, 273–288.
Glynn, E.F. and Fe gusson, W.B. (1994). "Inno a i e In oduc ion o Ci il Enginee ing Cu iculum."
16
Fig. 5. Placing he laye o ca bon ibe on he ein o ced conc e e beams

17
Fig.6. Placing a s ain gage on a conc e e es specimen
18
Fig.7. Placing s ain gages on a s eel beam and i s subsequen bending es
19
Fig.8. Iden i ica ion o he modal pa ame e s o a s uc u e unde he e ec o a mo ing load
20
Fig. 9. Dynamic iden i ica ion o a eal s uc u e wi h GPS-synch onized accele ome e s
21
Fig.10. Measu ing ib a ions caused by oad a ic on a b idge

22
Fig.11. Applying damage de ec ion echniques o CFRP ein o ced conc e e beams wi h ex e nal
ein o cemen s
23
Tables
Subjec Depa men Cou se Uni e si y
2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010
O ganiza ion o eaching, con en s and
objec i es o he subjec 4,67 3,96 3,84 3,75 3,74 3,69 3,83 3,80
Teaching assis ance in o ice hou s 4,87 4,00 3,74 3,67 3,76 3,66 3,84 3,79
Schedule o o ice hou s 4,67 3,50 3,43 3,44 3,45 3,35 3,60 3,57
Cla i y o he lec u es and explana ions 4,75 4,03 3,55 3,54 3,53 3,49 3,67 3,66
In e es o he eache abou he
unde s anding o he s uden s 4,81 4,43 3,61 3,59 3,60 3,52 3,74 3,72
Use o ealis ic applica ions o explain he
subjec 4,69 4,23 3,67 3,64 3,71 3,65 3,84 3,82
The eache gi es use ul and help ul
in o ma ion when s uden s ask o i 4,75 4,43 3,81 3,79 3,87 3,80 3,94 3,91
The eache p omo es good wo k
en i onmen in he class oom 4,75 3,80 3,31 3,30 3,29 3,24 3,56 3,56
The eache mo i a es he s uden s 4,56 3,69 3,28 3,28 3,19 3,16 3,41 3,42
The eache is espec ul owa ds he s uden s 4,81 4,27 4,11 4,14 4,21 4,15 4,26 4,25
Assessmen me hodology and c i e ia 3,94 3,48 3,45 3,34 3,28 3,23 3,51 3,54
O e all e alua ion o he eache 4,69 4,03 3,62 3,57 3,57 3,52 3,72 3,71
Table 1. Resul s o su eys o pe o med by he Uni e sidad de Se illa o S uc u al Analysis
subjec . Each i em is a ed by each s uden om 0 (wo s ) o 5 (bes ).
24
Yea Wi hou PBL Wi h PBL
Pass
a e
GPA
5-7
GPA
7-9
GPA
9-10
Pass
a e
GPA
5-7
GPA
7-9
GPA
9-10
2008 42 85 13 1 -- -- -- --
2009 40 70 19 4 63 53 41 4
2010 46 91 9 0 71 47 38 16
2011 36 91 9 0 55 52 41 7
Table 2. Pe cen age o pass a es and di e en GPA anges o s uden s ha pa icipa e and do no
pa icipa e in he PBL app oach.
25
Yea 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Nº. S uden s 16 6 22 38 20 16 16 16 8
Subjec con en s 7,9 8,7 8,7 8,1 8,2 7,9 8,7 8,4 8,5
O ganiza ion 8,2 9,5 8,8 8,6 8,4 8,6 8,9 8,2 8,8
In e es o class 8,8 9,3 8,7 7,5 8,5 7,6 8,3 8,2 8,9
Assessmen sys em 8,9 8,8 8,3 8,1 8,6 8,4 8,1 7,8 8,0
Cla i y o he
explana ions o he
eache
8,9 9,0 8,5 8,3 8,7 8,9 9,2 8,7 9,3
O e all assessmen
o he eache 9,0 9,7 8,9 8,7 8,7 8,9 9,4 9,0 9,3
O e all assessmen
o he subjec 8,3 9,0 8,5 8,2 8,6 8,5 8,8 8,3 8,3
Table 3. Su ey esul s o he subjec Expe imen al Analysis o S uc u es. Each i em is a ed by each
s uden om 0 (wo s ) o 10 (bes )