B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
Michael Paschalis, S a os F angoulidis, Space in he Ancien No el.
Ancien Na a i e Supplemen um 1. G oningen: Ba khuis & The
Uni e si y Lib a y G oningen, 2002. Pp. xi , 192. ISBN 90-807390-2-2.
EUR 50.00.
Con ibu o s: D. Kons an, C. Conno s, M. M. Winkle , S. J. Ha ison, L. G a e ini, M.
Zimme man, S. Panayo akis, J. Pe kins, M. Paschalis, R. P. Ma in, N. W. Sla e , S.
F angoulidis
Re iewed by Juan Ma os, Uni e si y o Se illa (juanma os @us.es)
Wo d coun : 2103 wo ds
This is a collec ion o pape s o iginally p esen ed a an in e na ional con e ence held in
Re hymnon and o ganized by he Depa men o Philology o he Uni e si y o C e e on
May 14-15, 2001.1 This mee ing was he i s o he biennial RICAN (Re hymnon
In e na ional Con e ences on he Ancien No el),2 which in end o con inue he adi ion
o GCN (G oningen Colloquia on he No el).
Since his book also appea s as he i s supplemen o a new elec onic jou nal, Ancien
Na a i e (hence o h AN), wi h which i sha es some ea u es, i makes sense o in oduce
bo h oge he : he a icles published in AN appea on i s websi e wi h ee access o
abs ac s and e iews (a websi e e e y schola in e es ed in ancien no el should isi ) and
hey a e subjec o discussion o some mon hs; a e a yea he au ho s e ise hei pape s
and hey a e de ini i ely edi ed bo h in a p in ed e sion o he jou nal and on he websi e.
The same p ocedu e is ollowed o he chap e s o he supplemen s. An abs ac o e e y
pape in his book and b ie cu icula o all he con ibu o s can be ound on his web page.
As usual in his kind o books, he quali y and o iginali y o he a icles and e en he ways
hey i he subjec o he compila ion a e a he di e se. Ne e heless mos o he a icles
do ac ually encompass he idea o space, pa ly because i is used in such a b oad sense
ha i comp ises, o ins ance, ci ies and coun ies (G a e ini, Ha ison), oads and a els
(Zimme man) and e en he oom included in some buildings (Panayo akis, Pe kins). Ye ,
al hough i may always be alleged ha e e y hing happens somewhe e, i is di icul o
disco e any link be ween he heme o space and some o he pape s (Winkle and
F angoulidis, o example).
As he c i e ion o ga he ing hese a icles was hei ela ion o a heme, he e is no an
equi able dis ibu ion o pape s among he ex an ancien no els: he e a e no con ibu ions
abou Pe onius, o example, bu he e a e six i ems de o ed o Apuleius Me amo phoses,
while Cha i on, Longus, and Apollonius o Ty e, Achilles Ta ius and Philos a us ( oge he ),
and he Apoc yphal Ac s o Apos les a e each s udied in a single chap e .
In he i s pape ("Na a i e Spaces"), Da id Kons an asce ains a no able di e ence
be ween Roman and G eek na a i e in he ac ha La in no els es ic hemsel es o a
single ac ion space ( he na a o always ollows he cen al cha ac e ), while among he
B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
h p://bmc .b ynmaw .edu/2003/2003-10-01.h ml
1 de 5 22/10/2014 10:31
G eek no els, hose o Xenophon o Ephesus, Cha i on, and Longus shi hei ocus
among se e al ac ion spaces. His s udy o he de ices used by G eek w i e s o change
locale (pp. 4-9) and his a emp s o explain hem as ways o exp ess aspec s o he
na a i e a e ema kable. Finally, Kons an inds in his o iog aphy a possible sou ce o his
echnique o swi ching spaces: his aspec o he in luence o his o iog aphy3 upon G eek
no el dese ed, in my opinion, mo e space han only a pa ag aph and he inal conclusions.
Ca he ine Conno s's main pu pose in "Cha i on's Sy acuse and i s His o ies o Empi e" is o
demons a e ha his no el can con ibu e o ou unde s anding o cons uc ions o G eek
iden i y unde he Roman Empi e (p. 13). A e adducing he in luence o his o iog aphy
upon he no el, as well as he ough connec ions be ween i s plo and he ac ual his o y o
Sy acuse, Conno s aces links be ween Augus us and Sy acuse on one hand and Cha i on
and he impe ial amily on he o he o sugges some c yp ic allusions in he no el o he
Roman ule s. He conclusions may be s imula ing, hough hey a e highly specula i e;4
bu , i he e is allego ical suppo o Augus us's e sion o he empi e (p. 24), I wonde
why i should appea so hidden in he no el, e en i i is supposed o be an "eli e G eek
esponse o Roman Empi e." Ma in Winkle 's "Ch ono ope and locus amoenus in Daphnis
and Chloe and Pleasan ille" is a compa ison o his ancien no el and he 1998 ilm by
Ga y Ross. Al hough he e a e no di ec in luences, hey sha e some majo hemes, no ably
sexual awakening; besides, he mo ie uses some classical mo i s such as he locus
amoenus. Winkle no ices hese and o he pa allels and commen s on hem. This kind o
pape dealing wi h connec ions be ween ancien no els and mode n ilms,5 may p oduce
some s imula ing obse a ions, and his seems hei sole pu pose; bu om he poin o
iew o ancien na a i e, i a ely adds o ac ual p og ess in ou unde s anding o he ex s.
S ephen Ha ison in his "Li e a y Topog aphy in Apuleius' Me amo phoses" s udies bo h
allusions o o he ex s h ough opog aphy and he way some place-names insinua e o
in oduce hemes and ideas in o he no el (p. 40). This a icle includes a good look a he
whole ex h ough examples and mixes a comple e su ey o p e ious schola ship wi h
some ema kable sugges ions. Mos o hese allusions occu in he inse ed ales and,
he e o e, he mainly s udies hose o A is omenes, Thelyph on, he obbe s, and, o cou se,
Cupid and Psyche. His conclusions con incingly demons a e ha Apuleius uses
opog aphy as a me hod o in e ex ual allusion.
Luca G a e ini begins his "Co in h, Rome, and A ica: a Cul u al Backg ound o he Tale
o he Ass" by obse ing ha Apuleius changed d ama ically he geog aphy o Lucius's
s o y when adap ing he G eek o iginal: he main cha ac e comes om Co in h ins ead o
Pa ae and his me amo phosis in o a human being akes place in Cench eae nea his na i e
ci y, no in Thessalonike; and especially, while he a els in he Onos a e clea ly headed o
he no h, he se ings in he La in ex a e comple ely unde ined be ween Hypa a (books
i-iii) and Co in h (book x). The inal loca ion in Rome is also an Apuleian inno a ion.
G a e ini's a icle deals wi h he easons o hese changes. A e a b ie su ey o easons
p oposed o Co in h as he se ing o Lucius' con e sion, he poin s o he his o y o he
ci y and chie ly i s amous des uc ion in 146 BC; hus, he ela ionship be ween he
Roman Empi e and he Hellenic wo ld would p obably be he mos ob ious idea coming
in o he mind o he La in o G eek public o Apuleius when eading abou his own. As
o Rome, G a e ini a gues ha he Me amo phoses was no necessa ily w i en o a
Roman audience6, and e en some conc e e e e ences o he ci y o Rome could be easily
unde s ood by any lea ned eade in A ica o elsewhe e in he Empi e. He a gues
con incingly o a "Romanocen ic" iew o he no el bu in a e y b oad sense, as a ex
in ended no only o a Roman audience bu o any li e a e public h oughou he Empi e.
By examining oads as an impo an elemen o space in Apuleius' no el, Maaike
Zimme man a emp s o show in he pape ("On he Road in Apuleius Me amo phoses")
B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
h p://bmc .b ynmaw .edu/2003/2003-10-01.h ml
2 de 5 22/10/2014 10:31
how he obse a ions o he na a o abou he oads he has o a el along a e meaning ul
when ela ed o he emo ional s a es o he p o agonis . Following he cou se o Lucius's
jou ney, Zimme man highligh s, o ins ance, he associa ion o 'slippe y oads' and he
degene a e p ies s o Dea Sy ia. She inally sugges s, hough e y cau iously (p. 95), ha
di icul oads ha e a possible symbolic alue as oads o i ue. I his is only en a i e, Z.
does succeed in showing ' ha he mo al conno a ions a ached o he oads desc ip ions
inc ease', especially om he nin h book onwa ds. He conclusions a e cau ious as hey a e
a ac i e.
A e some obse a ions abou he igu e o he absen mo he in he omance o
Apollonius, S elios Panayo akis ("The Temple and he B o hel: Mo he s and Daugh e s in
Apollonius o Ty e") discusses he 'con as ing bu iden ical' (p. 104) ad en u es o
Apollonius' wi e and hei daugh e , who en e he emple o Diana in Ephesus and he
b o hel o P iapus in My ilene espec i ely: bo h keep hei chas i y and pu i y, and he
young woman e ains he i gini y un il she is ound by he own a he . As o he heme o
he i gin kidnapped and sold o a pimp, Panayo akis examines i s possible li e a y sou ces
and p oposes as i s o igin he P os i u e- u ned-P ies ess igu e, exploi ed in a declama ion
by Seneca he Elde : his cha ac e will eappea also in he Ac s o Ch is ian Ma y s,
no ably in he accoun o Sain Agnes' ma y dom. I is inally a gued ha he e olu ion o
Apollonius' wi e om mo he o p ies ess may be in luenced by he idea o a Vi gin Mo he
like he Ch is ian Vi gin Ma y. Though his is no wholly conclusi e, he e a e many
emp ing sugges ions in P.'s in e p e a ion o he way mo he and daugh e ans o m
hemsel es and he loca ions hey occupy.
In "Social Geog aphy in he Apoc yphal Ac s o he Apos les", Judi h Pe kins exposes how
some spaces o he pagan wo ld, like he bed ooms o women o , abo e all, p isons, a e
ans o med by he i up ion o Ch is ians, who hus des oy social bounda ies and ejec
he ju idical o de , " ea anging he spa ial bases o communi y" (p. 129).
Michael Paschalis' "Reading Space: A Re-examina ion o Apuleian ekph asis" can be
di ided in o a i s , gene al pa conce ning he concep o sophis ic ekph asis and a
second, conc e e sec ion abou i s employmen in a amous piece o desc ip ion in
Apuleius' Me amo phosis, Diana and Ac aeon in II.4. As o he beginning, he de ini ion
o his idea agains he classical ekph asis (132-134), and he ixing o i s double ole as
in e p e a ion and discu si e exposi ion o a wo k o a (p. 134) a e i ep oachable
a gumen s. The analysis o he Apuleian ekph asis is also in e es ing, bu he inal
sugges ion ha he pe son desc ibing he g oup is Lucius-auc o is somewha mo e
p oblema ic, as is he applica ion o hese conclusions o o he desc ip ions in he no el
which a e di e en enough om each o he o dese e indi idual ea men .
Richa d P. Ma in ("A Good Place o Talk: Discou se and Topos in Achilles Ta ius and
Philos a us") examines ini ially se e al landscapes in Leucippe and Clei ophon: he
pain ing o Eu opa desc ibed by he i s na a o in 1.1.3; he amoenus g o e he en e s o
hea he young man's s o y (1.2.3) -- a good place o alk; he ga den whe e Clei ophon
mee s his belo ed and whose e o ic na u e is ema ked on page 151 (1.15.1-2); he accoun
o palms alling in lo e each o he (1.17.3.5), and he beau y o Leucippe's ace ega ded
as a lowe y meadow. Th ee mo e passages by di e se au ho s a e ci ed o de ine he
ea u es o Achilles Ta ius' landscapes: he beginning o Longus' Daphnis and Chloe, which
p o ides a con as in he ac ha i is a pain ed na a i e ha inspi es he s o y; he
He oikos by Philos a us, an impo an ex acco ding o M. o ecognizing he allego ical
igu e o he ga dene as he na a o and in e p e e o numinous landscape. Finally, a
amous place, Phaed us 229b-230d, supplies bo h he adi ional pa allel o a locus
amoenus ull o eligious and e o ic implica ion and he opposi e o he no el when
Soc a es ejec s Phaed us' my hical in e p e a ion.
B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
h p://bmc .b ynmaw .edu/2003/2003-10-01.h ml
3 de 5 22/10/2014 10:31
In "Space and Displacemen in Apuleius", Niall W. Sla e seeks o disce n a pa e n o
pe sis en displacemen in he Golden Ass, illus a ing how A is omenes and Soc a es a e
bo h displaced by hei ad en u es, as Thelyph on in book II. Geog aphical de ails in hese
wo inse s o ies do no p o ide an accu a e idea o mo ion bu a sense o he subjec ion o
cha ac e s o displacemen (p. 172). Since Lucius does no end his wande ing in his own
ci y, Co in h, bu con inues his jou ney o Rome, he also ollows he pa e n o
displacemen : he way his is o be elucida ed should be u nished by compa ison wi h he
o me ales.
S a os F angoulidis' "The Laugh e Fes i al as a Communi y In eg a ion Ri e in Apuleius'
Me amo phoses" is basically chap e I.3 o his book Roles and Pe o mances in Apuleius'
Me amo phoses.7 F angoulidis' aim is o disca d he in e p e a ion o his passage as a
scapegoa i ual and p opose iewing i as an in eg a ion i e by which he communi y o
Hypa a adop s Lucius as one o i s membe s. Ne e heless, he e uses he honou s he
magis a es o e him and, hus, declines his inclusion in o he ci y. F's easoning agains he
conside a ion o Lucius as a pha makos is ully c edible; I am no so su e abou his own
p oposal, bu I am mos scep ical abou links be ween Laugh e Fes i al and his
me amo phosis in o an ass (p. 187).
E e y chap e ends wi h i s own bibliog aphy and he whole wo k has been comple ed wi h
wo use ul, hough no exhaus i e, indices: an Index loco um and a Gene al index. The
book i sel has been ca e ully p oduced and I ha e no iced only e y ew ypog aphical
e o s.8
Since mos o he pape s assembled in his book conce n Apuleius' Me amo phoses, i will
be e y use ul o hose in e es ed in his au ho : one can ind new pe spec i es and ideas
abou he Golden Ass h oughou he whole wo k. Bu i could also a ac he a en ion o
hose schola s gene ally in e es ed in he ancien no el: despi e di e ences in app oach and
quali y among he pa s, he whole de ini ely dese es conside a ion.
No es:
1. Excep ions a e he con ibu ions o Ca he ine Conno s and Judi h Pe kins ( ead in
ICAN a G oningen July 25-30, 2000) and ha o S elios Panayo akis.
2. The second has jus aken place, on 19-20 May 2003: see i s summa y and a b ie
epo by Ken Dowden in he websi e a Ancien Na a i e. I s publica ion will become he
second supplemen um o AN.
3. Abou he ela ionship be ween na a i e and his o iog aphy and he use no elis s
(especially Cha i on) make o His o y, see he bibliog aphy in Kos an's no e 14 (p. 10) and
Conno s' no e 3 (p. 14).
4. Fo example, I ind i oo isky o base an iden i ica ion be ween wo cha ac e s
(The on in 1.7.1 and Caesa in Plu . Caes. 32,5-6) on a p o e bial ph ase; he ques ions
abou Pe sius a e eally p o oca i e, as Conno s he sel a i ms.
5. This is one o he main esea ch in e es s o P o esso Winkle , bu I am also hinking
o Paula James's "Keeping Apuleius in he Pic u e. A Dialogue be ween Buñuel's Disc ee
Cha m o he Bou geoisie and The Me amo phoses o Apuleius" (Ancien Na a i e 1,
2000-2001, 185-207).
6. His easoning agains Ken Dowden's "The Roman Audience o The Golden Ass" (in J.
Ta um (ed.), The Sea ch o he Ancien No el, Bal imo e-London, 1994, 419-434) is qui e
pe suasi e.
7. Published in S u ga : J. B. Me zle , 2001. F angoulidis no es (p. 187, n. 25) ha "an
analysis o he Laugh e Fes i al om he G eimasian pe spec i e o Roles and
B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
h p://bmc .b ynmaw .edu/2003/2003-10-01.h ml
4 de 5 22/10/2014 10:31
Pe o mances appea s in my ecen book". In my opinion, i would be mo e accu a e o say
ha i is simply a p e ious e sion, because he aim, he a gumen s and many pa ag aphs o
he chap e and he a icle a e he same; see, o ins ance, p. 51 and p. 178 espec i ely.
8. Some epea ed wo ds, o ins ance (see no e 9 on page 17), o li le slips like hose on
p. 22, penul ima e line, o p. 121, line 11.
Read
La es Index o
2003 Change G eek
Display A chi es Books A ailable o
Re iew BMCR
Home
HTML gene a ed a 13:28:53, F iday, 03 Ap il 2009
B yn Maw Classical Re iew 2003.10.01
h p://bmc .b ynmaw .edu/2003/2003-10-01.h ml
5 de 5 22/10/2014 10:31