scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Performance Evaluation of Objective Quality Assessment Methods for Omnidirectional Images Under Emerging Compressions

Abstract

This paper presents a unique study of objective and subjective image quality assessment (IQA) of 360 degrees images, distorted by emerging and legacy compressions - AV1 Image File Format (AVIF), Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG), High Efficiency Image File Format (HEIC), JPEG XL from the cross-lab experiments carried out by two universities. The performance evaluation of objective conventional IQA methods relied on statistical data analysis employing not only traditional approaches with correlation coefficients but also advanced techniques such as Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, which offers several statistical advantages. The comprehensive statistical examination presented, utilizing an outcome from the subjective experiment with 66 observers, confirmed that the performance of specific IQA metrics depends not only on the image features but also on the applied image compression algorithm. Overall, the study examined nine IQA objective metrics. For instance, when evaluating distortion caused by the AVIF and HEIC codecs, the Multi-Scale Structural Similarity (MS-SSIM) metric exhibited the best performance, while the Feature Similarity chrominance (FSIMc) metric excelled in assessing JPEG-based compressions. Additionally, detailed outcomes of the subjective experiments, including eye-tracking data, are available in a public dataset. This study provides previously unexplored insights into the performance of conventional objective metrics for 360 degrees images degraded by emerging image codecs. The presented results suggest suitable metrics for specific application scenarios (codecs) and, along with the dataset, lay the groundwork for further research on new objective quality assessment methods for omnidirectional images under emerging compressions.

Read accessible full text

Performance Evaluation of Objective Quality Assessment Methods for Omnidirectional Images Under Emerging Compressions

Author: Šimka, Marek; Polák, Ladislav; Novotný, Martin; Kufa, Jan; Fliegel, Karel
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 2024
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3478793
Source: https://dspace.vut.cz/bitstreams/c152a733-ee7a-4d1c-908d-085fd2bc6c24/download
Recei ed 21 Augus 2024, accep ed 7 Oc obe 2024, da e o publica ion 11 Oc obe 2024, da e o cu en e sion 24 Oc obe 2024.
Digi al Objec Iden i ie 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3478793
Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y
Assessmen Me hods o Omnidi ec ional
Images Unde Eme ging Comp essions
MAREK SIMKA 1, LADISLAV POLAK 1, (Membe , IEEE), MARTIN NOVOTNY 2, JAN KUFA 1,
AND KAREL FLIEGEL 2, (Membe , IEEE)
1Depa men o Radioelec onics, Facul y o Elec ical Enginee ing and Communica ion, B no Uni e si y o Technology, 61600 B no, Czech Republic
2Depa men o Radioelec onics, Facul y o Elec ical Enginee ing, Czech Technical Uni e si y in P ague, 166 27 P ague, Czech Republic
Co esponding au ho : Ma ek Simka ([email p o ec ed])
This wo k was suppo ed in pa by he In e nal G an Agency o B no Uni e si y o Technology unde P ojec FEKT-S-23-8191; in pa by
he G an Agency o he Czech Technical Uni e si y in P ague unde P ojec SGS23/185/OHK3/3T/13 and P ojec
SGS23/186/OHK3/3T/13; and in pa by he Minis y o Educa ion, You h and Spo s o he Czech Republic, unde P ojec LTT20004.
ABSTRACT This pape p esen s a unique s udy o objec i e and subjec i e image quali y assessmen
(IQA) o 360◦images, dis o ed by eme ging and legacy comp essions - AV1 Image File Fo ma (AVIF),
Join Pho og aphic Expe s G oup (JPEG), High E iciency Image File Fo ma (HEIC), JPEG XL om he
c oss-lab expe imen s ca ied ou by wo uni e si ies. The pe o mance e alua ion o objec i e con en ional
IQA me hods elied on s a is ical da a analysis employing no only adi ional app oaches wi h co ela ion
coe icien s bu also ad anced echniques such as Recei e Ope a ing Cha ac e is ic (ROC) analysis, which
o e s se e al s a is ical ad an ages. The comp ehensi e s a is ical examina ion p esen ed, u ilizing an
ou come om he subjec i e expe imen wi h 66 obse e s, con i med ha he pe o mance o speci ic
IQA me ics depends no only on he image ea u es bu also on he applied image comp ession algo i hm.
O e all, he s udy examined nine IQA objec i e me ics. Fo ins ance, when e alua ing dis o ion caused
by he AVIF and HEIC codecs, he Mul i-Scale S uc u al Simila i y (MS-SSIM) me ic exhibi ed he bes
pe o mance, while he Fea u e Simila i y ch ominance (FSIMc) me ic excelled in assessing JPEG-based
comp essions. Addi ionally, de ailed ou comes o he subjec i e expe imen s, including eye- acking da a,
a e a ailable in a public da ase . This s udy p o ides p e iously unexplo ed insigh s in o he pe o mance o
con en ional objec i e me ics o 360◦images deg aded by eme ging image codecs. The p esen ed esul s
sugges sui able me ics o speci ic applica ion scena ios (codecs) and, along wi h he da ase , lay he
g oundwo k o u he esea ch on new objec i e quali y assessmen me hods o omnidi ec ional images
unde eme ging comp essions.
INDEX TERMS Omnidi ec ional image (360◦), 360-deg ee con en , i ual eali y, objec i e quali y
assessmen , subjec i e es , pe cep ual image quali y.
I. INTRODUCTION
The p oli e a ion o imme si e echnologies such as i ual
and augmen ed eali y (VR and AR) has escala ed he
need o supe io omnidi ec ional con en . Omnidi ec ional
images, simply called 360◦images, p o ide use s wi h a ull
The associa e edi o coo dina ing he e iew o his manusc ip and
app o ing i o publica ion was And ea F. Aba e .
360◦pano amic iew o a scene, deli e ing an imme si e
and cap i a ing isual expe ience. Recen ly, subs an ial ile
sizes o omnidi ec ional images p esen hu dles in s o age,
ansmission, and ende ing. To add ess hese challenges
e ec i ely, i is c ucial o u ilize e icien comp ession
echniques ha p o ide high lexibili y while p ese ing
he pe cep ual quali y o he comp essed 360◦images [1].
Mo eo e , o assess he equi ed Quali y o Expe ience (QoE)
VOLUME 12, 2024
2024 The Au ho s. This wo k is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion-NonComme cial-NoDe i a i es 4.0 License.
Fo mo e in o ma ion, see h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 150419
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
o human obse e s, eliable me hods able o de e mine he
isual quali y o omnidi ec ional images a e i al [2],[3].
Nowadays, he assessmen o he 360◦images isual
quali y has become a p ominen esea ch a ea wi hin he
image quali y assessmen (IQA) domain [4]. Objec i e
me ics, which ely on ma hema ical models, a e designed o
gauge he pe cep ual quali y o comp essed images. Howe e ,
mos me ics we e designed and uned o con en ional
2D images, so he e emains a gap o esea ch on he
pe o mance o hese me hods o 360◦images [5] o
de elopmen o no el me hods uned o his ype o con en s.
These me ics ake in o accoun ac o s such as spa ial and
angula dependencies, s uc u al simila i y, colo accu acy,
ex u e p ese a ion, and isual ideli y. Con e sely, IQA
h ough subjec i e means in ol es conduc ing es s in a
con olled labo a o y en i onmen , whe e human obse e s
p o ide hei subjec i e e alua ions o he pe cei ed quali y
o dis o ed images when iewed wi h a head-moun ed
display (HMD) [6].
In ecen yea s, subs an ial p og ess has been made in he
ield o IQA due o esea ch e o s [7]. One ongoing a ea
o esea ch ocuses on de eloping app op ia e me hodologies
o assessing he QoE o VR-based con en . The ele ance
o his esea ch is e idenced by nume ous pape s add essing
IQA in he con ex o 360◦ isual con en , using ei he
objec i e [8] o subjec i e [9],[10] me hods. The impo ance
o e alua ing he pe cep ual quali y o 360◦images ex ends
beyond echnical conside a ions. I has a di ec impac on
he o e all use QoE in VR-based applica ions. By com-
p ehending he pe cep ual ac o s ha in luence image
quali y and le e aging bo h objec i e and subjec i e me hods,
i becomes possible o op imize comp ession algo i hms and
ansmission echniques. This op imiza ion esul s in he
deli e y o high-quali y 360◦images while minimizing he
p esence o no iceable deg ada ions.
A. RELATED WORKS
The impo ance o examining he pe o mance o omnidi-
ec ional IQA (OIQA) h ough bo h objec i e and subjec i e
me hods is e iden om he conside able amoun o exis ing
esea ch. A comp ehensi e o e iew o he ecen s udies
de o ed o IQA (including subjec i e es s) o 2D omnidi ec-
ional images can be ound in Table 1.
A s udy [11] in oduced a es bed o conduc ing subjec i e
assessmen s o omnidi ec ional isual con en . This es bed
collec ed Mean Opinion Sco e (MOS) a ings, iewing
di ec ion da a, and ime spen by up o 48 pa icipan s
using he Absolu e Ca ego y Ra ing wi h Hidden Re e ence
(ACR-HR) me hod. Hal e alua ed equi ec angula o ma ,
and hal assessed cubic p ojec ion images. The MOS esul s
a o ed he equi ec angula o ma o supe io image quali y.
Upenik and e al. in [5] p o ided a s udy compa ing wo
ypes o objec i e ull- e e ence (FR) me ics - adi ional
o 2D con en and specialized me ics o 360◦images.
They comp essed ou s ill images om a ideo da ase by
using Join Pho og aphic Expe s G oup (JPEG), JPEG2000.
and High E iciency Video Coding (HEVC) codecs. While
hey p ima ily used OIQA me ics based on Peak Signal- o-
Noise Ra io (PSNR), me ics IQA like S uc u al Simila i y
Index Measu e (SSIM), Mul i-Scale S uc u al Simila i y
(MS-SSIM), and Visual In o ma ion Fideli y in he pixel
domain (VIFp) consis en ly yielded be e quali y a ings.
No ably, VIFpou pe o med heo he s, wi ha Pea sonLinea
Co ela ion Coe icien (PLCC) alue o 0.8994.
In he wo k [12], he esea che s add ess he challenge o
quali y assessmen o 360◦images. They c ea ed an OIQA
da abase wi h 16 sou ce images and 320 deg aded images,
comp essed using JPEG and JPEG2000. They compa ed nine
FR-IQA me ics. The s udy highligh s he impo ance o
image de ails in he VR expe ience and sugges s using isual
saliency o OIQA. The disad an age is only 20 subjec s
based on he legacy ITU-R BT.500-11 ecommenda ion
designed o TV images, which is no s a is ically su icien
o VR con en .
Au ho s in [13] ga he ed he la ges 360-deg ee image
da ase o da e, known as CVIQD2018, wi h 528 comp essed
images using common coding s anda ds. The goal o he
esea ch was o es i exis ing OIQA me hods could e alua e
comp essed omnidi ec ional image quali y. They used i e
no- e e ence (NR) IQA me ics, en adi ional FR-IQA
me ics, and h ee PSNR-based me ics o 360◦images.
To ensu e usabili y, hey conduc ed subjec i e es ing wi h
20 subjec s using he single-s imulus (SS) me hod. Among
he 13 FR-IQA me ics used, SSIM, In o ma ion con en
weigh ed SSIM (IW-SSIM), and Visual Saliency-Induced
Index (VSI) achie ed he highes consensus wi h subjec i e
sco es. The s udy concludes ha ce ain objec i e me ics o
2D images a e s ill alid and obus o 360◦images.
In [14], simila o [13], he au ho s used he same
image da abase and conside ed p io subjec i e es esul s.
Addi ionally, hey explo ed a mul i-channel con olu ional
neu al ne wo k (CNN) o no- e e ence quali y assessmen o
360◦images. This model pe o med simila ly o FR me ics
and ou pe o med all me ics in he CVIQD2018 da abase
o AVC (as H.264) and JPEG comp ession dis o ion.
Howe e , he s udy lacked basic in o ma ion abou he
es ed sequences (selec ed ypes and amoun s) and elied on
sco es om only 20 subjec s acco ding o ITU-R BT.500-11
ecommenda ion.
A new pe cep ual quali y me ic o VR-based con en ,
e med VA-PSNR, was p oposed in [15]. I in eg a es
PSNR wi h a saliency map de i ed om eal head mo e-
men da a, add essing iewe isual a en ion. This me ic
ep esen s an ad ancemen o e he Weigh ed Sphe ical
PSNR (WS-PSNR) me ic o 360◦con en . By conside ing
iewe in e ac ions and isual a en ion, i acknowledges key
ac o s in omnidi ec ional con en pe cep ion. The me ic was
es ed on images also dis o ed wi h he HEVC In a ame
(HEVC-I) codec as a a ian o comp ess s ill images.
Howe e , one limi a ion is he eliance on empi ical isual
da a, which may no always be eadily accessible. Despi e
150420 VOLUME 12, 2024
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
TABLE 1. Su ey o he exis ing s udies on IQA (objec i e & subjec i e) o 2D omnidi ec ional images.
his, he s udy o e s a p omising a enue o e alua ing
omnidi ec ional con en quali y, wi h u he esea ch needed
o alida e i s applicabili y in di e se scena ios and con en
ypes.
In [16], a no el deep lea ning app oach o OIQA, called
DeepVR-IQA, was in oduced. The model demons a es
supe io pe o mance, accu a ely es ima ing pixel quali y and
deli e ing an excellen o e all assessmen . Achie ing his
high pe o mance necessi a ed aining on subjec i e a ings
o up o 720 s imulus, esul ing in a s ong co ela ion wi h
subjec i e sco es, e ec i ely cap u ing image cha ac e is ics
a ec ing isual quali y. A d awback o his me hod is i s
demand o a subs an ial olume o aining da a, which could
be challenging in ce ain applica ions.
The pape [17] examines he impac o display cha ac-
e is ics and human a en ion on 360◦images, c ea ing a
da ase ha includes subjec i e e alua ions o hese images.
The au ho s p opose he so-called CPBQA amewo k,
which combines he Blind/Re e enceless Image Spa ial
Quali y E alua o (BRISQUE) and he In eg a ed Local
Na u al Image Quali y E alua o (IL-NIQE). This amewo k
in eg a es global and local quali y ea u es o cubemaps
o blind quali y assessmen . Fu u e esea ch in his a ea
will ocus on de eloping mo e e icien ea u e ex ac ion
me hods and explo ing he e ec o ho spo maps on image
quali y.
The pu pose o wo k [18] was o unde s and human pe -
cep ion o 360◦image quali y. Subjec i e a ings and iewing
beha io da a unde di e se condi ions we e collec ed,
ocusing on he co ela ion be ween iewing condi ions, non-
uni o m dis o ions, and subjec i e sco es. They in oduced
a no el OIQA model based on a ResNe -50 CNN, inco po-
a ing mul i-scale ea u e ex ac ion and quali y p edic ion
modules. In compa ison wi h o he me ics, hei p oposed
model ou pe o med in mos cases, excep o scena ios
in ol ing Gaussian noise deg ada ion.
Au ho s in [19] and [20] es ablished a new model o
blind/NR OIQA (BOIQA). A colo desc ip o ha e lec s
colo in o ma ion was used. O e all, he model should exhibi
a g adien e lec ion as global s uc u al ea u es and g ay
le els wi h local s uc u al ea u es. They did no ga he hei
own subjec i e a ings bu es ed he model on [12],[13] da a.
The BOIQA wi h suppo ec o eg ession is p omising,
bu he e is scope o mo e alida ion wi h a mo e obus
model [22].
Duan and e al. in he s udy [21] ocused on OIQA o
speci ic s i ching- ela ed in luences. The aw 12 images we e
co up ed du ing he s i ching p ocess namely colo , geome -
ic, blu , and ghos ing dis o ion. Following hese dis o ions
in e wined wi h he acquisi ion o omnidi ec ional con en
and subjec i e a ings by 20 esponden s, hey p oposed a
model sepa a ely o FR and NR OIQA. The impac o
comp ession was no conside ed.
B. ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
F om he abo e elabo a ed s a e-o - he-a (SoA), i is
possible o de i e he ollowing conclusions. Recen ly, he
OIQA-based s udies s ill do no conside eme ging image
comp ession algo i hms and ela ed speci ic comp ession
a i ac s, namely JPEG XL [23], High E iciency Image File
Fo ma (HEIC) [24] and AV1 Image File Fo ma (AVIF)
[25]. Nex , an analysis o con en ional (non-CNN models)
objec i e me ics o OIQA wi h ex ensi e subjec i e es s
has no been p o ided so a . In pa icula , ho ough s a is ical
pe o mance e alua ion beyond co ela ion coe icien s is
also lacking. Conce ning all he a o emen ioned gaps in he
p io a , he main con ibu ions o ou wo k a e summa ized
as ollows:
•Applicabili y alida ion o eme ging image comp ession
algo i hms (HEIC, JPEG XL, AVIF) o 360◦images.
•E alua ion o objec i e con en ional IQA me hods in
e ms o 360◦images co up ed by eme ging codecs.
VOLUME 12, 2024 150421
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
•Ex ensi e subjec i e expe imen s conduc ed by wo lab-
o a o ies, coupled wi h s a is ical analysis by Recei e
Ope a ing Cha ac e is ic (ROC) me hodology, ep esen
an ad anced app oach o pe o mance e alua ion.
•In luence e alua ion o he HMDs and es condi ions on
he QoE by c oss-lab s udy (in e -lab co ela ion [26]).
•P o iding new anno a ed da ase ,1including MOS
alues, aw sco es, and eye- acking da a, as a igo ous
ex ension o ou p e ious wo k [27].
To he bes o ou knowledge, a simila s udy wi h he
de ined objec i es has no been p o ided so a .
C. ORGANIZATION OF THE PAPER
The s uc u e o he pape is ou lined as ollows. In oduc ion
o he s udy p o ided in his pape , he elabo a ion o he
SoA, and he main con ibu ions o his wo k a e included
in Sec ion I. The cha ac e is ics o e e ence 360◦images,
he codecs con igu a ion, and objec i e quali y assessmen
a e p esen ed in Sec ion II. The comple e subjec i e es
me hodology is desc ibed in Sec ion III. The main esul s o
bo h objec i e and subjec i e s udies a e gi en in Sec ion IV.
Finally, Sec ion Vconcludes he pape .
II. OBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF 360◦IMAGES
This sec ion p o ides de ails on he e e ence images, he
image codecs, and hei con igu a ions and speci ica ions o
he objec i e quali y me ics applied.
A. OMNIDIRECTIONAL IMAGE DATA
In his s udy, i e ca e ully selec ed e e ence 360◦images
and hei dis o ed a ian s we e used om he open da abase
OMNIQAD [28]. A p e iew o hese images is depic ed in
Fig. 1. The Sigh s image was used only in he aining session
o he subjec i e es . The de ailed p ope ies o he e e ence
images, including esolu ion and spa ial in o ma ion (SI)
[29], a e a ailable in Table 2. All hese 360◦images we e
selec ed ollowing expe iewing sessions wi h di e en
ea u es, esul ing in di e se esponses om he used image
codecs. Acco ding o he a ge bi pe pixel (bpp), see
Table 3, a o al o 100 images was e alua ed, as he e
we e 19 dis o ed a ian s o each e e ence image, and he
e e ence image was also included.
B. CODING CONFIGURATIONS
As men ioned abo e, comp ession was pe o med wi h
one legacy s ill image codec (JPEG) and h ee eme ging
comp ession algo i hms, namely: JPEG XL, HEIC, and
AVIF. The JPEG XL is he mos ecen successo o JPEG
wi h highe lexibili y and comp ession e iciency. HEIC
and AVIF, based on licensed HEVC and license- ee AV1
ideo codecs espec i ely, a e eme ging image o ma s. I was
shown ha o con en ional 2D images, JPEG XL, HEIC, and
1h ps://zenodo.o g/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7607070
2h ps://gi hub.com/Telecommunica ion-Telemedia-Assessmen /SITI
FIGURE 1. Snapsho s o he e e ence 360◦images (*Image used only in
he aining session o subjec i e p ocedu e).
TABLE 2. Speci ica ions o he e e ence omnidi ec ional images.
TABLE 3. Desc ip ion o he selec ed a ian s o comp essed images.
AVIF excel in achie ing small ile sizes while p ese ing he
high isual quali y o he images [23],[24],[25].
As a ep esen a i e o abled JPEG-based comp ession,
he JPEG XT [30] e e ence so wa e3has been used. Image
comp ession wi h he AVIF and JPEG XL codecs has been
ealized using he liba codec and libjxl lib a ies in FFmpeg.4
In he case o he HEIC codec, he GIMP52.10.32 g aphics
edi o was used. I mus be no ed ha he selec ed imple-
men a ions o hese image comp ession s anda ds ha e been
used o ob ain ep esen a i e image deg ada ion, and no o
e alua e he ac ual codec pe o mance. The con igu a ions
and se ings o he encode s we e mainly ela ed o de ining
he inpu image, he coding lib a y, and he quan iza ion
pa ame e . Basically, i was a de aul se ing o each
implemen a ion, hus o he pa ame e s emained unchanged.
3h ps://jpeg.o g/jpegx /so wa e.h ml
4h ps://www. mpeg.o g/
5h ps://www.gimp.o g/
150422 VOLUME 12, 2024
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
C. OBJECTIVE QUALITY METRICS
In his s udy, we u ilized a ious objec i e quali y me ics
o quan i y he dis o ion in he examined 360◦images. Key
among hese we e he e e ence me ics, speci ically FR-
IQA me ics, including PSNR, SSIM, MS-SSIM, Fea u e
Simila i y ch ominance (FSIMc), G adien Magni ude Sim-
ila i y De ia ion (GMSD), VIFp, and Video Mul i-Me hod
Assessmen Fusion (VMAF). The PSNR, SSIM [31], and
VMAF6sco es we e ob ained by FFmpeg amewo k using
he la i and lib ma lib a ies, espec i ely. The MS-SSIM
[32] and VIFp [33] me ics we e compu ed in MATLAB
using an a ailable sc ip .7The FSIMc me ic was used
acco ding o [34], and GMSD was u ilized in i s o iginal o m
as in oduced in [35].
The WS-PSNR [36] and C as e Pa abolic P ojec ion
PSNR (CPP-PSNR) [37] we e chosen as special FR-OIQA
me ics ailo ed o equi ec angula p ojec ion con en . These
objec i e me hods ha e been applied by he command ool.8
The selec ion o he applied objec i e IQA me hods is
based on he mos commonly used con en ional (non-CNN
models) me ics men ioned in he ele an p io a [5],
[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],
[21] dealing wi h 360◦image quali y (see in Subsec ion I-A).
This will es ablish he applicabili y and pe o mance o hese
me ics e en o images comp essed wi h eme ging codecs.
III. SUBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF 360◦IMAGES
This sec ion desc ibes he subjec i e es p ocedu e, including
de ails o he es condi ions, equipmen , and subjec s.
A. EXPERIMENTAL ENVIRONMENT AND SETUP
The subjec i e es s we e conduc ed in wo labo a o ies
wi h con olled iewing condi ions. One is he Depa men
o Radioelec onics (DREL) a he B no Uni e si y o
Technology (BUT), while he o he is DREL a he Czech
Technical Uni e si y in P ague (CTU). Among o he s, such
a c oss-lab s udy acili a es a mo e complex e alua ion
o a ious ac o s, such as HMD used, on he o e all use s’
QoE.
In he subjec i e expe imen s ealized a he BUT, he
Oculus Ri S9HMD was u ilized as a VR headse . I ea u es
an LCD panel wi h a esolu ion o 1280×1440 (pe eye),
a e esh a e o 80Hz, and a Field o View (FoV) o 88◦. The
headse was connec ed o a lap op unning Oculus so wa e.
To ensu e com o able iewing o images om a ious
di ec ions, obse e s we e p o ided wi h swi el chai s.
A he CTU he HTC Vi e P o Eye10 HMD was used. This
HMD has an OLED display wi h a esolu ion o 1440×1600
(pe eye), a e esh a e o 90Hz, and a isible FoV o 110◦.
A headse is also equipped wi h eye- acking senso s. The
6h ps://gi hub.com/Ne lix/ ma
7h ps://gi hub.com/sa a ab/image-quali y- ools
8h ps://gi hub.com/Samsung/360 ools
9h ps:// -compa e.com/headse /oculus i s
10h ps://www. i e.com/au/p oduc / i e-p o-eye/specs/
used HMD was connec ed o a PC (HP Z230 wo ks a ion wi h
RTX 2060 GPU) unning a es applica ion.
B. SUBJECTIVE EXPERIMENT PROCEDURE
Following heITU-T P.919[38] ecommenda ion,we adop ed
he ACR-HR me hodology wi h a i e-le el a ing scale
(1-bad, 2-poo , 3- ai , 4-good, and 5-excellen ) o IQA o
360◦images. In con as o con en ional subjec i e expe -
imen s (wi h PC moni o , TV display, e c.), en i onmen al
ac o s such as iewing dis ance and ligh ing condi ions a e
no equi ed o be conside ed. The expe imen p ocedu e,
in bo h labs, consis s o wo pa s - aining and es sessions.
1) BUT
The aining session aimed o in oduce he subjec i e
expe imen and amilia ize he pa icipan s wi h he VR
echnology and omnidi ec ional images. The es p inciple
and he pu pose o he expe imen we e explained ini ially.
Subsequen ly, a ques ionnai e ga he ed basic in o ma ion
abou pa icipan s (age, gende , wea ing glasses, e c.).
Nex , a ision sc eening assessed isual acui y using he
Snellen cha and colo sensi i i y h ough he Ishiha a
es . A e amilia izing wi h he HMD, each pa icipan
iewed i e sample images showcasing 360◦con en ,
speci ically comp essed a ian s o he Sigh s image (see
Fig. 1* )), se ing as aining examples. This p ocess helped
pa icipan s unde s and how o p o ide pe cep ual quali y
a ings.
The aining session is ollowed by he es one. I s
imeline is depic ed in Fig. 2. Each es s imulus ( es ed
image), including he e e ence, was p esen ed one a a
ime in a pseudo- andom o de . Obse e s had a maximum
iewing ime o 15seconds o less, depending on he
obse e ’s decision. Subsequen ly, a o ing pe iod was ini i-
a ed, displaying a a ing scale on a g ay backg ound. Du ing
his ime, subjec s e bally communica ed hei subjec i e
sco es, which we e eco ded by he expe imen e on a PC.
Sequence ansi ions we e au oma ed a e 15 seconds o
manually ad anced by he expe imen e using a con olle ,
ensu ing consis en condi ions o each subjec . On a e age,
pa icipan s ook 19minu es o comple e he subjec i e
expe imen es session. Obse e s had he op ion o expedi e
he p ocess by submi ing hei quali y sco e be o e he
ime limi . Mo eo e , subjec s could eques a pause a
any ime o a b eak and es , e ec i ely a oiding iewing
a igue.
FIGURE 2. The imeline o he subjec i e es wi h he ACR-HR me hod
(TS1 ep esen s he i s es ed s imulus, TS2 he second es ed s imulus).
Du ing he o ing in e al, a g ay backg ound wi h a a ing scale was
displayed.
VOLUME 12, 2024 150423

M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
2) CTU
As a he BUT, he es was di ided in o wo pa s.
Du ing he aining session, he subjec s we e sea ed (a
s a iona y chai was used a he CTU), in oduced o
he es p inciple, and amilia ized wi h he con ols o
he subjec i e expe imen applica ion. Subsequen ly, he
subjec s illed ou he ques ionnai e ga he ing hei pe sonal
in o ma ion (iden ical o he BUT). In opposi ion o he BUT,
no ision sc eenings we e held wi h he subjec s du ing he
aining session a he CTU, and he subjec s we e asked
o epo e en ual ision de iciencies i known. Subjec s
wi h diagnosed ision de iciencies we e no included in he
s udy.
The en i e es session was au oma ed wi h an applica ion
de eloped a he CTU using Uni y Engine.11 Each pa icipan
was shown comp essed 360◦con en (also wi h hidden
e e ence) in andomized o de and one a a ime. The display
ime o one s imulus (one 360◦image) was limi ed o
10second. I he subjec s ound ha hey did no need o use
he whole ime o obse e he s imulus, hey could close hei
eyes o a longe pe iod o ime (0.5s), which was de ec ed
ia eye- acke and led o a educ ion in obse a ion ime.
A e his pe iod passed, he GUI o he e alua ion was
displayed. I consis ed o se e al cubes wi h aded s imulus
in he backg ound. Subjec s had o selec he subjec i ely
pe cei ed image quali y on he i e-le el a ing scale ( he
g een cube ep esen ed he bes -pe cei ed quali y, while he
ed one ep esen ed he lowes image quali y). The ime o he
e alua ion phase was no limi ed. A e he subjec i e a ing
was done, ano he s imulus was shown. This p ocedu e was
epea ed o all es ed images.
On a e age, subjec s ook app oxima ely 21minu es o
comple e he es session. Fou da a iles we e s o ed
om each pa icipan . These iles, in addi ion o pe cei ed
subjec i e sco es, con ain logged head and eye mo emen
da a. The eye- acking da a a e p o ided wi hin he da abase
and could be used in u u e esea ch (e.g., o ain an objec i e
model). To p o ide as much com o as possible o he
subjec s, each o hem could eques a b eak wi hin he es
session. Howe e , no one ook his oppo uni y du ing he
subjec i e expe imen .
C. SUBJECTS
In his s udy, a o al o 36 non-expe subjec s (34 males and
2 emales) om he BUT and 30 (20 males and 10 emales)
om he CTU pa icipa ed in subjec i e OIQA expe imen s.
The age o all subjec s anged om 18 o 29 yea s. Fo he
BUT labo a o y, he mean and median age we e 22.14 and
22 yea s, espec i ely, and o he CTU, he mean was
20.67 and he median 20 yea s. All obse e s had a no mal
o co ec ed- o-no mal ision. Some indi iduals used diop ic
glasses and wo e hem along wi h he headse du ing he
es . In o al, 66 subjec s exceeded he minimum equi emen
11h ps://uni y.com/p oduc s/uni y-engine
FIGURE 3. Co ela ion o he MOS sco es ( om he me ged da ase )
ob ained om subjec i e expe imen s conduc ed a he CTU and BUT
labo a o ies.
FIGURE 4. O e all MOS a ings wi h 95 % CIs ob ained using ACR-HR o
di e en bpp alues. The g een- illed a ea be ween wo ho izon al lines
co esponds o 95 % CI o he hidden e e ence image.
o 28 pe sons as pe ITU-T P.919 ecommenda ion [38].
Fu he mo e, based on his ecommenda ion, no addi ional
sc eening o pa icipan s was necessa y om a s a is ical
s andpoin , gi en he la ge numbe o subjec s in ol ed. As a
esul , no u he pos -sc eening was conduc ed, aside om
he addi ional physiological impac ques ionnai e discussed
in Subsec ion IV-B).
150424 VOLUME 12, 2024
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
FIGURE 5. S a is ical pe o mance analysis o objec i e me ics o all da a. AUC, C0and hei signi icance plo s o Di e en /Simila and Be e /Wo se
ROC analyses. The whi e boxes indica e ha he me ic in he ow is signi ican ly be e , black boxes- signi ican ly wo se, and g ay ep esen s ha he
me ic in he ow is nei he signi ican ly be e no wo se compa ed o he me ic in he column. The C0quan i ies he pe cen age success (co ec
ecogni ion) in iden i ying he image wi h he be e quali y om a speci ic pai . The e o ba s a e 95% CI. The speci ic me ics a e ma ked as ollows:
1 - PSNR, 2 - SSIM, 3 - FSIMc, 4 - GMSD, 5 - VIFp, 6 - VMAF, 7 - MS-SSIM, 8 - WS-PSNR, 9 - CPP-PSNR.
IV. RESULTS OF THE STUDY
This sec ion p esen s he ou comes o he subjec i e es s,
encompassing MOS sco es, e alua ion o physiological
impac s on he use , and a compa ison o esul s be ween
labo a o ies. Nex , objec i e and subjec i e quali y assess-
men o 360◦images a e comple ed by ex ensi e s a is ical
analysis.
A. SUBJECTIVE RESULTS
Each pa icipan ’s subjec i e sco e was collec ed and p o-
cessed o de i e he MOS alue, along wi h addi ional
s a is ical da a. The mean sco e o a gi en s imulus was
calcula ed as [39]:
¯uk=1
N
N
X
i=1
uik ,(1)
whe e ukis he subjec i e sco e gi en by obse e i o
s imulus k, and Nis he numbe o obse e s.
The subjec i e es ou pu s om he CTU and BUT
labs we e me ged o join e alua ion, conside ing he
negligible di e ences p edic ed due o HMD o condi-
ions a ia ions [6],[26]. S a is ical analysis, speci ically a
non-pa ame ic Wilcoxon Signed-Rank es [40], alida ed
hese minimal di e ences (p- alue=6.99−16) based on he
MOS sco es o bo h labs. Fig. 3illus a es he o e all
co ela ion be ween all esul ing MOS alues om he
CTU and BUT. Addi ionally, co ela ion coe icien s (wi h
α=0.05), as PLCC=0.9654, Spea man Rank Co ela ion
Coe icien (SRCC) wi h a alue o 0.9534, and also Kendall
Rank Co ela ion Coe icien (KRCC) o 0.8286, we e
calcula ed om bo h labo a o ies, con i ming e y high in e -
lab co ela ion.
The esul s om he subjec i e es s conduc ed in hese
labo a o ies we e me ged and ollowed by a comp ehensi e
analysis o he MOS sco es. To compa e he indi idual com-
p ession algo i hms in e ms o subjec i e quali y assessmen ,
he MOS alues we e e alua ed agains e e ence images.
These p ocessed subjec i e esul s a e shown in Fig. 4, which
isually p esen s he MOS sco es o he i e e e ence
images, accompanied by 95% con idence in e als (CI).
B. PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPACTS
Wi hin he subjec i e expe imen , pa icipan s we e su eyed
using a ques ionnai e o assess he impac o HMD iewing
360◦images on hei physical s a e as an addi ional a ibu e
o he QoE. The pa icipan s comple ed a Simula o Sickness
Ques ionnai e (SSQ) based on [41], cap u ing speci ic phys-
iological pa ame e s (gene al discom o , a igue, headache,
eyes ain, di icul y ocusing, inc eased sali a ion, swea ing,
nausea, di icul y concen a ing, ullness o head, blu ed
ision, dizzy (eyes open), dizzy (eyes closed), e igo,
s omach awa eness, bu ping). Whe eby each symp om was
a ed on a h ee-le el scale (0-none, 1-sligh , 2-mode a e,
3-se e e).
Be o e and a e he subjec i e es , each olun ee
comple ed he ques ionnai e. The esul s showed ha 360◦
images had no signi ican nega i e e ec s on pa icipan s in
compa ison o obse a ions epo ed while wa ching 360◦
ideos [6]. Fo he mos equen ly occu ing impac s, he
e alua ion was conduc ed o he en i e da abase (based
on 66 esponden s). On a e age, a 1-le el impai men in
headache, ullness o head, blu ed ision, and gene al
discom o was no ed by 26% o use s. The mos equen
impac (38%) was a 1-le el shi in eyes ain. None o he
con olled pa ame e s had a 2-le el in luence on mo e han
7% o esponden s.
C. OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT
Se e al s a is ical analysis me hods we e employed o assess
he pe o mance o he objec i e measu es o each eme ging
image comp ession algo i hm and he e e ence omnidi ec-
ional image ypes. Commonly used s a is ical me hods in he
IQA domain [15],[18],[42] a e PLCC, SRCC, KRCC, and
Roo Mean Squa ed E o (RMSE).
In his s udy, he p ima y analysis in ol ed calcula ing
he A ea unde Cu e (AUC) and co ec classi ica ion
C0 alues using Di e en /Simila and Be e /Wo se s a is ical
ROC me hods [43]. This ROC app oach o e s se e al
enhancemen s o e con en ional s a is ical me hods. I allows
o compa ing objec i e me hods as applied in eal-wo ld
scena ios wi hou he need o map di e en scales, educes
VOLUME 12, 2024 150425
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
TABLE 4. Pe o mance o objec i e me hods in e ms o AUC, C0, PLCC, SRCC, and KRCC by e e ence images and by each comp ession algo i hm on he
me ged da ase .
dependency on he e ec s o me ic ange, and enables
he combina ion o o he da ase s, as demons a ed in
his wo k. Addi ionally, i conside s he s a is ical signi -
icance o subjec i e sco es and de e mines he s a is ical
signi icance o pe o mance di e ences. Fu he mo e, he
s a is ical analysis o he s udy was ex ended o include
PLCC (wi hou non-linea mapping), SRCC, and KRCC
me hods. An alpha-le el o α=0.05 was applied in he
s a is ical analysis, and he p- alue was examined o assess
eliabili y. The majo i y o he analysis esul s e en me an
alpha-le el o less han 1 %. Consequen ly, he null hypo he-
sis could be ejec ed in all cases, con i ming hei s a is ical
signi icance.
The Di e en /Simila analysis assesses he me ic’s abili y
o dis inguish signi ican ly di e en pai s om simila ones,
while he Be e /Wo se analysis de e mines i s capabili y
150426 VOLUME 12, 2024
M. Simka e al.: Pe o mance E alua ion o Objec i e Quali y Assessmen Me hods
o co ec ly iden i y he s imulus o highe quali y in a
pai . The C0pe cen age indica es how o en he model
co ec ly ecognizes he highe quali y s imulus. As desc ibed
in [43], Be e /Wo se analysis, along wi h he C0calcula ion,
is conduc ed solely o pai s iden i ied as di e en in he
ini ial s ep o he ROC analysis. The de e mina ion o whe he
pai s a e di e en is based on he cumula i e dis ibu ion
unc ion (CDF) o he no mal dis ibu ion.
G aphical esul s o he ROC analysis, including AUC and
he pe cen age o C0 alues o each objec i e me ic ac oss
he en i e da ase , a e depic ed in Fig. 5. Addi ionally, sum-
ma ized esul s o he pe o mance e alua ion o objec i e
quali y assessmen me hods, epo ed o indi idual e e ence
images and codecs, a e p esen ed in Table 4.
The s a is ical analysis highligh s he SSIM, FSIMc, VIFp,
and MS-SSIM (labeled as No. 2, 3, 5, and 7) as he
op-pe o ming me ics o he es ed use case scena ios.
In he Di e en /Simila me hod (see Fig. 5a), he same
signi icance is no iceable o he SSIM, FSIMc, and MS-
SSIM me ics. On he o he hand, in he Be e /Wo se analysis
(see Fig. 5b), he Signi icance plo emphasizes he SSIM
as he bes pe o me (indica ed by whi e boxes in ow 2),
meaning ha i images a e di e en in a pai , hen his me ic
is he bes a ecognizing he s imulus wi h be e quali y.
No ably, he VIFp s ands ou among o he me ics wi h a
C0 alue (acco ding o Fig. 5c), o e 89%, ep esen ing he
highes pe cen age o decision co ec ness o he s imulus
wi h he be e quali y.
In he con ex o OIQA, he me ics u ilized in his s udy
ailed o su pass he op-pe o ming FR-IQA me ics in
any examined scena io, despi e being speci ically de eloped
o omnidi ec ional con en [18]. Only o images deg aded
by he JPEG codec did he WS-PSNR and CPP-PSNR
exhibi pe o mance compa able o he leading FR-IQA
me hods.
The de ailed esul s o speci ic images and codecs ( e e
o Table 4) indica e ha he pe o mance o me ics a ies
acco ding o image ea u es bu p ima ily depends on he
applied comp ession algo i hm. As expec ed, pe o mances
di e ac oss indi idual e e ence images. The e o e, he
esul s in his con ex a y conside ably among images. Fo
example, he highes alues o he Hokkaido image we e
achie ed by he SSIM, o he Biscayne image by he FSIMc
and GMSD, o he Flowe s image by he FSIMc, VIFp, and
VMAF, o he Telescope image by he PSNR, and o he
T ains image by he SSIM and FSIMc.
The e ec o he applied comp ession algo i hm on he
pe o mance o he analyzed me ics is signi ican . No ably,
he MS-SSIM eme ged as he op pe o me o AVIF and
HEIC comp essed images (highligh ed in bold in Table 4),
and also showed s ong e iciency o JPEG-based codecs,
a leas in one ype o analysis. In con as , he FSIMc
excelled o JPEG and JPEG XL bu was less e ec i e o
AVIF comp ession. Howe e , when conside ing he summa y
esul s o all comp ession algo i hms (see he ‘‘All’’ column
in Table 4), he SSIM and VIFp me ics pe o med bes
o e all, e en hough o he me ics we e mo e e ec i e o
speci ic codecs.
These insigh s in o he pe o mance o objec i e me ics
a e consis en wi h indings om ela ed wo ks. Fo ins ance,
s udies [5] and [16] epo ed ha he VIFp me ic achie ed
he bes o e all esul s acco ding o PLCC and SRCC o
dis o ions caused by JPEG, HEVC, and JPEG2000 codecs.
Simila ly, he FSIMc was iden i ied as he op pe o me
in s udy [19], while he SSIM was he bes in s udy [14],
bo h using he same da abase wi h JPEG, HEVC, and AVC
comp essions. Howe e , he pe o mance o objec i e me ics
o assessing he quali y o images comp essed wi h AVIF and
JPEG XL codecs canno be compa ed o o he esul s, as no
simila s udies ha e been published so a . This gap is one o
he main mo i a ions and con ibu ions o ou wo k.
V. CONCLUSION
Image quali y is a key ac o in achie ing an op imal
expe ience o he use , as low image quali y can deg ade he
imme si e expe ience o 360◦con en and educe he o e all
QoE. The e o e, assessing image quali y is c ucial o he
de elopmen o VR con en and echnologies.
This pape p o ides a unique s udy on objec i e and
subjec i e OIQA o images dis o ed by eme ging and legacy
comp ession algo i hms (AVIF, JPEG XL, HEIC, and JPEG).
The c oss-lab expe imen s, conduc ed by wo independen
labs, in ol ed a subs an ial numbe o 66 subjec s. This
ex ensi e pa icipa ion enhances he s a is ical eliabili y
o he ou comes and enables he e alua ion o po en ial
di e ences be ween he esul s ob ained in he wo labs.
Impo an ly, he s udy con i ms a signi ican co ela ion o
he esul s om bo h labs, al hough di e en HMDs we e
used.
The p ima y ocus was on e alua ing he pe o mance o
con en ional (non-CNN models) objec i e FR me hods when
applied o con en a ec ed by eme ging JPEG XL, HEIC,
and AVIF codecs. This s udy employed a s a is ical ROC
app oach, which, due o i s s eng hs, allowed o a mo e
comp ehensi e analysis han is commonly pe o med. The
esul s con i m he applicabili y o con en ional objec i e
me ics o 360◦images dis o ed by speci ic eme ging
codecs. This was achie ed h ough igo ous s a is ical
analysis, which no only elied on commonly used co ela ion
measu es bu also inco po a ed s a is ically powe ul ROC
me hods (Di e en /Simila and Be e /Wo se) wi h AUC and
C0ou pu s. The analyses e ealed a ying e iciencies o
me ics based on e e ence images. In speci ic applica ion
scena ios, MS-SSIM demons a ed high pe o mance o
AVIF comp ession, while VIFp, MS-SSIM, and FSIMc
excelled o he HEIC codec. Fo JPEG XL, MS-SSIM and
FSIMc we e op imal, and o JPEG, FSIMc, and VIFp p o ed
he mos e ec i e. In summa y, ac oss all scena ios, SSIM,
FSIMc, VIFp, and MS-SSIM consis en ly eme ged as he
bes -pe o ming me ics.
Fu he mo e, his s udy expands upon ou p io esea ch
[28]. I in oduces ex ensi e da a om la ge-scale subjec i e
VOLUME 12, 2024 150427