Newly uncovered relief fragments of Queen Setibhor: A queenly decorative theme with unusual features

Newly uncovered relief fragments of Queen Setibhor: Aqueenly decorative theme with unusual features Hana Vymazalová ABSTRACT The work that has recently been carried out at Djedkare’sroyal cemetery at South Saqqara has brought to light new evidence from the pyramid complex of Queen Setibhor, the wife of King Djedkare. Located to the north ‑east of the king’spyramid, this monument is of particular interest for its unusual architectural fea‑ tures. The newly uncovered evidence makes it possible to bring the discussion on this extraordinary queen slightly further, focusing not only on the monument’sarchitecture but also on the remains of its decorative programme. This article presents some of the newly uncovered relief fragments from the queen’spyramid complex. The reliefs, which very likely come from the portico, belonged to adecorative theme showing the queen, whose figure is not preserved, with her female attendants and female offering bearers. Other similar depictions are attested in smaller fragments from other parts of the queen’smonument. Parallels to this de‑ piction can be found in other monuments of Old Kingdom queens, indicating that such adecorative theme was one of the usual queenly decorative programmes. The relief fragments also provide new evidence on the titles and epithets of Queen Setibhor, above which awinged solar disc with two uraei was carved. This evidence further underlines the exceptional role played by Queen Setibhor in the late Fifth Dynasty. KEYWORDS Saqqara– pyramid complex– Djedkare– Setibhor– relief– queen– titles– epithets– winged solar disc– female attendants– female offering bearers ةيداع ريغ تازيمم تاذ ةكلمل رظنم عوضوم :ًاثيدح اهنع فشكلا مت روح بيإ تس ةكلملل رظانم اياقب اڤولازاميڤ اناه صخلم نم ةديدج ةلدأ نع ةراقس بونج ىف عراكدج كلملاب ةصاخلا ةيكلملا ةنابجلاب ًارخؤم اهؤارجإ مت ىتلا ةيرثلأا لامعلأا تفشك ىقرشلا لامشلا ىلإ عقت ىتلاو ،ةكلملل ةيمرهلا ةعومجملا ربتعتو .عراكدج كلملا ةجوز ،روح بيإ تس ةكلملل ةيمرهلا ةعومجملا ،ًارخؤم اهنع فشكلا مت ىتلا ةلدلأا حيتت ثيح .ةفولأم ريغ ةيرامعم تامس نم هب زيمتت امل ةصاخ ةيمهأ تاذ ،كلملا مره نم لوح بصني نل ةرملا هذه زيكرتلا نأ لاإ ،هحرط قبس امع لصفمو مدقتم لكشب ةيئانثتسلاا ةكلملا هذه لوح شاقنلا حرط ةيناكمإ ةفشتكملا رظانملا اياقب نم ًاضعب ةلاقملا هذه حرطت .اهرظانم جمانرب اياقب ىلع نكلو ،ةيمرهلا ةعومجملل ةيرامعملا تازيمملا دبعملاب صاخلا لخدملا قاور نم ًاءزج ام ًاموي تناك اهنأ حجرُي ىتلا ،رظانملا ىمتنتو .ةكلملل ةيمرهلا ةعومجملا نم ًاثيدح .نيبارقلا تلاماحو اهتامداخ ةبحاصمب ،اهتئيه ىلع روثعلا متي مل ىتلاو ،ةكلملا رهظُي رظنم عوضوم ىلإ ،ةكلملل ىزئانجلا نكميو .ةكلملل ةيمرهلا ةعومجملا ىف ىرخأ نكامأب كلذو ،ًامجح رغصأ اهنكلو ،ةلثامم ىرخأ رظانم اياقب ىلع روثعلا مت امك اذه لثم نأ ىلإ ريشي امم ،ةميدقلا ةلودلا تاكلم ضعبل ةيمرهلا تاعومجملا ىف كلذو ،رظنملا اذه عم هباشت هجوأ ىلع روثعلا ىتلا رظانملا اياقب مدقت كلذ ىلإ ةفاضلإابو .ةميدقلا ةلودلا تاكلمل ةداتعملا شوقنلا جمارب رصانع دحأ ناك ىفرخزلا عوضوملا .نييكلم نيلص مضي حنجملا سمشلا صرقل ليثمت اهقوف روُص ىتلاو ،روح بيإ تس ةكلملا باقلأ لوح ةديدج ةلدأ اهيلع رثع .ةسماخلا ةرسلأا رخاوأ ىف روح بيإ تس ةكلملا هتبعل ىذلا ىئانثتسلاا رودلا ىلع ةلدلأا كلت دكؤتو اذه PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021, 107–125 108 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 ةلادلا تاملكلا – تامداخ – حنجملا سمشلا صرق – توعن – باقلأ – ةكلم – شقن – روح بيإ تس – عراكدج – ةيمره ةعومجم – ةراقس نيبارق تلاماح INTRODUCTION The exploration of the pyramid complex of King Djedkare in South Saqqara and of the sur‑ rounding cemetery has brought to light new evidence on the late Fifth Dynasty. The documen‑ tation work that has recently been carried out in the king’sfunerary temple has revealed many interesting architectural details preserved in this monument (see above all Megahed– Jánosi 2017 and 2020; Megahed– Jánosi– Vymazalová 2017, 2018 and 2019). At the same time, apart of the neighbouring queen’sfunerary temple was uncovered during the exploration of the north side of the king’sprecinct (Megahed– Jánosi– Vymazalová 2019: 23–34), which included evidence on the name and title of its owner, the king’swife Setibhor (Megahed– Jánosi– Vy‑ mazalová 2019: 32–33; Megahed– Vymazalová 2020a). Atomb with one of the earliest decorated burial apartments has recently been uncovered in the cemetery near the queen’smonument, providing indications on the development of architectural and artistic forms in this period (Megahed– Vymazalová 2019). The monument of Queen Setibhor has attracted the attention of scholars since 1952, when Ahmed Fakhry uncovered the funerary temple on the east side of the pyramid. No evidence on the owner was then uncovered (for decades, she was referred to as an “anonymous queen”), but many architectural features in this monument pointed to arather exceptional status of its owner (see the discussions in Moursi 1987; Jánosi 1989; Jánosi 1996: 36–37). After ashort initial season of survey conducted in the queen’scomplex by the current mission prior to the “Lotus Revolution” (Megahed 2011), the work returned to the queen’smonument in 2018, when aportico and several other rooms were uncovered along the south side of the queen’spyramid during the cleaning of the area at the north ‑east part of the king’sfunerary temple (Megahed– Jánosi– Vymazalová 2019: 23–34). During the exploration of the queen’smonument, anumber of relief fragments and blocks with reliefs have been uncovered in the queen’spyramid complex– some in 1952 by Ahmed Fakhry and others in 2010 and 2018 by the current Egyptian mission. Only afew relief frag‑ ments have been published. They show various decorative themes, including those that are typical of Old Kingdom monuments, such as offerings, the slaughter of sacrificial animals, personifications of funerary estates, etc. (see Moursi 1987; Megahed 2011); some fragments seem to show parts of the queen’sfigure (Megahed– Vymazalová 2021). Some of the relief fragments from the queen’sfunerary temple, however, contain themes that do not seem to be so usual for aqueen’smonument (Megahed– Vymazalová 2020b). THE 2020 SONDAGE In the spring of 2020, asondage was undertaken between the north wall of the funerary temple of King Djedkare and the south part of the temple of Queen Setibhor, in the central part of the so ‑called T.g area (for the T.g area and its exploration, see Megahed– Jánosi– Vymazalová 2019: 109HANA VYMAZALOVÁ 19–33). The sondage was carried out immediately to the south of the queen’stemple portico, to the south of its preserved pavement, where acluster of stones was documented in 2018 (fig. 1). The work reached ca. 1.5 m below the level of the temple’spavement, and it extended several meters to the south of the portico. The debris of this area consisted of limestone pieces and chips with asmall amount of yellow sand in the upper part, which gradually increased at lower levels and towards the south part of the sondage. During this work, several blocks of white limestone and red granite were uncovered in the sondage, together with afew smaller fragments, which seem to have belonged to the queen’smonument. Considering their location, these blocks and fragments possibly came from the walls and roofing of the portico, but their original position within the queen’smonument still needs to be confirmed in future after the conclusion of the work. Only afew blocks were revealed in 2020 before the mission had to stop its work due to the COVID‑19 pandemic; several more blocks on the site are waiting for the next season to be uncovered. THE NEWLY UNCOVERED RELIEF FRAGMENTS The newly uncovered blocks from the 2020 spring season are of white limestone and contain depictions and inscriptions carved in fine low relief. They may have come from the upper part of one of the walls of the portico. Fig. 1 The central part of the T.g area showing the cluster of stones to the south of the queen’s portico (photo H. Vymazalová) 110 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 One large block has been found split into three pieces, which can be matched together (DJ 451A–B and DJ 465). In addition, several fragments of smaller size may have belonged to the same depiction as well (DJ 442, DJ 453A–B, DJ 455, DJ 462). The depiction is particularly interesting for two main reasons: i) it contains inscriptions including titles and epithets of Queen Setibhor, some of them previously unattested; ii) the decoration includes motifs with aclearly royal connotation. DJ 451A–B AND DJ 465 (FIG. 2) 116 × 83 × 30 cm, 117 × 82 × 30 cm, 55 × 60 × 28 cm Three parts of alarge limestone block, which belonged to the theme of the queen overseeing the offering bringers. This block features the top of the scene, showing awinged solar disc with two uraei above the queen’stitles and epithets. Above this scene, there used to be the Xkrw ‑frieze, which covered another layer of the blocks; some traces of re ‑carving are visible on the top of the block DJ451A. The figure of the queen, of which only the top of her head is preserved on this block, was carved underneath the inscription, and female attendants and offering bearers are depicted on both sides of her. The queen’stitles and epithets are written in seven columns, reading from right to left: 1mAA @r %tX 2wr[t Hts wrt Hzt] 3smrt @r 4mrt @wt‑@r ra nb 5imAxwt 6mrrt nTrw nbw 7Hmt nzwt %t ‑ib‑ @r – “1She who sees Horus and Seth, 2Great [one of the Hts ‑sceptre, Great of Praise], 3Com‑ panion of Horus, 4Beloved of Hathor every day, 5Revered, 6Beloved of all the gods, 7King’swife, Setibhor”. This inscription increases the number of this queen’sattested titles and epithets (see also Megahed– Vymazalová 2020a: 1035). It offers alarger variety than the previously uncovered complete inscription on the queen’sgranite column, which reads: mAA @r %tX wrt Hts wrt Hzt Hmt nzwt mrt.f– “She who sees Horus and Seth, Great one of the Hts ‑sceptre, Great of Praise, King’swife, Setibhor” (Megahed– Jánosi– Vymazalová 2019: 32). The newly attested parts of the queen’stitulary in this relief are rather interesting. Unlike smrt @r (Jones 2000: 897, no. 3293), which appears quite often with Old Kingdom queens, the epithet mrt @wt‑@r ra nb in this particular form is so far unattested. We can, however, find similarly constructed epithets with the ra ‑nb ‑element with the slightly earlier Queen Khent‑ kausII1 and Princess Khekeretnebty2 as well as with the somewhat later Queens Nebet3 and MeretitesII.4 The former three cases refer to kings, not deities, while the last one shows the ra ‑nb ‑element in two different epithets, both of which refer to deities. The earliest attested epi‑ thet in the form mrt + deity + ra nb, referring to Hathor, is Queen Setibhor’s. The Sixth Dynasty 1 For Khentkaus, the epithet has the form mrt Nfr ‑ir ‑kA ‑Ra ra nb (Borchardt 1909: 68, fig. 73), which, however, refers to the king ‑husband, not agoddess like in Setibhor’scase. 2 The epithet is only partly preserved: […] Izzi ra nb (Verner– Callender 2002: 28, fig. B15), and it is again the king who is mentioned here. 3 Aslightly different attestation, as the epithet does not stand by itself but is associated with the king’swife’stitle Hmt nzwt mrt.f ra nb (Callender 2011: 200; Munro 1993: Taf. 30). 4 Two different attestations, including mrt +Hwty nTrw ra nb and Hzt.s @wt‑@r ra nb (see Callender 2011: 291). The former is the closest parallel to Setibhor’stitle, whereas the latter has Hzt.sinstead of mrt but refers to Hathor. 111HANA VYMAZALOVÁ MeretitesII held two similar epithets, mrt + deity + ra nb and Hzt.s+ deity + ra nb, the former with Thoth and the latter with Hathor. This seems to correspond to the high importance of Hathor in association with Old Kingdom queens, which is reflected in the decoration of their pyramid complexes (Jánosi 1996: 151–152; see also Jéquier 1933: 15, fig. 8). Another epithet from Setibhor’sinscription, the epithet mrrt nTrw nbw (Jones 2000: 446, no. 1670), is usually used for kings (Callender 2011: 264). Nevertheless, it is also attested later with Queen AnkhenespepyII (Gardiner– Peet– Černý 1955: pl. IX). Setibhor seems to be the earliest attested female holder of this epithet in the Old Kingdom. It can be noticed that the attested titles and epithets of Queen Setibhor are not comparable to those of the queens ‑mothers, for instance Neferhetepes and KhentkausII (for their titles, see Callender 2011: 161–163, 175–177; see also Roth 2001: passim), and no evidence suggesting that Setibhor was aking’smother has been found yet (Megahed– Vymazalová 2020a: 1034–1037). The shape of the tomb, i.e. the pyramid complex, cannot be an indication for amother/wife status of its owner (Jánosi 1992: 56). On the other hand, Setibhor’sattested titulary seems to be in good agreement with the titles of the wives of the kings of the Fifth Dynasty, for instance Nebet and Khenut, who lived slightly later than Setibhor (for these queen’stitles, see Callender 2011: 192–193, 200, 205). Fig. 2 Three matching fragments of a block, DJ451A–B and DJ465 (photo P. Košárek, drawing E.Majerus) 112 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 Besides the inscription, the relief also shows aparticularly interesting decorative motif of awinged sun disc, which is depicted above the queen’sinscription. Awinged disc was first attested in the royal monuments from the time of Snofru (Ćwiek 2003: 83) and awinged sun disc with two uraei can first be found in evidence from the reign of Nyuserre (Schonkwiler 2014: 67, 89). The winged sun disc was closely associated with the concept of each ruler’sin‑ carnation of Horus and his deceased predecessors (Gardiner 1944: 46–52; Ćwiek 2003: 345), being acombination of the sun (Re), the falcon (Horus) and Nekhbet and Wadjet protecting the Two Lands (see Gardiner 1944: 48–49; Ćwiek 2003: 314–315 and footnote 1302; Schonkwiler 2014: 3, 91). In some attested examples, we can find amention of Behdety on the sides of the depiction (Jéquier 1933: 42, fig. 22), which clearly indicates that the motif referred to this form of Horus (see also Schonkwiler 2014: passim; see also, for instance, Werbrouck 1941; Borrego Gallarde 2004). Due to its kingship ‑associated symbolism, the motif of the winged sun disc is not very com‑ mon in the monuments of queens in the Old Kingdom (for brief information on the decoration of the funerary temples of the queens, see Jánosi 1996: 123–180). This can be due to the bad state of preservation of these tombs. There are, however, some attested examples dating to the Sixth Dynasty. We can find the winged sun disc, for instance, on the granite lintel of the entrance to the monument of IputII (Jéquier 1933: 42, fig. 22), where it is, however, carved above the inscription that refers to both the king and the queen. Asimilar example with references to the king is known from the pyramid complex of Nubunet (Labrousse 1999: 133). On the other hand, the winged sun disc in the monument of Queen AnkhenespepyII refers to queen as the mother of King Pepy II, so the king’sauthority is present here as well (Labrousse 1999: 153; Callender 2011: 259 fig. 99). Two attested examples from the monument of Queen MeretitesII also shows this motif (Labrousse 1999: 147; Berger‑El Naggar 2005: 29 fig. 20; the second block is yet unpublished) and the preserved parts of the following inscription clearly include the king’scartouche. Yet another example of awinged sun disc has been recorded above the figure of Queen Sebutet in the relief from the tomb of Reheryshefnakht from south Saqqara (Ber‑ ger‑El Naggar– Labrousse 2005: 16, fig. 2; Stünkel 2006: 152–153; Stünkel 2018: 351–353, 470–471). Very small fragments of the same motif come from the monuments of Queens Behenu (yet unpublished) and Inenek (Payraudeau 2015: 211, fig. 1).5 These Sixth Dynasty examples thus seem to refer to the queens’ connection to the king. On the other hand, the motif of the winged sun disc with uraei on the block from the monument of Setibhor seems to be associated with the queen only, and no reference to any king is preserved on these relief fragments.6 At the moment, we cannot entirely exclude that areference to the king may have existed in the bottom part of the scene, which is not pre‑ served. However, the winged sun disc with uraei constitutes yet another indication of Queen Setibhor’sspecial position in the late Fifth Dynasty, as she is the earliest queen for whom this 5 Iwould like to thank Philippe Collombert and Marie ‑Noëlle Fraisse for kindly sharing with me the information on the unpublished blocks uncovered by the French archaeological mission at the site of Pepy I’spyramid complex at Saqqara. 6 It is worth mentioning that awinged sun disc without areference to the king is attested in queenly monuments from the Middle Kingdom at Dahshur, for instance at the lintel above the entrance to the north chapel of Khnemetneferhedjet Weret I(Stünkel 2018: 470–471). See also the above ‑mentioned example of Sebutet. 113HANA VYMAZALOVÁ decorative motif is attested. Even though no evidence available indicates that she would have held titles of aruler or titles of aking’smother/regent, her monument and elements of her decorative programme emphasise her special status with kingly features (Moursi 1987; Jánosi 1989; Megahed 2011; Megahed– Vymazalová 2020a; Megahed– Vymazalová 2020b). Underneath the queen’sinscription, the scene follows with asmall part of the top of the head of the queen’sfigure, depicted facing right. The preserved part of the figure shows that the queen wore ahairband decorated with stripes, tied at the back of her head with two papyrus ‑shaped endings. This type of headband is well attested for queens (as well as non ‑royal women) in the Old Kingdom (Cherpion 1989: 67–68, critère 44; Stehelin 1966: 146–154; see also Megahed– Vymazalová 2020b for other attestations of this feature from Setibhor’smonument). Agroup of female offering bearers is depicted on asmaller scale in several registers on the right part of the block in front of the queen. They are facing left towards the queen and are separated from her figure by means of avertical hieroglyphic inscription reading: int nDt ‑Hr Apd xt nbt nfrt […] – “Bringing gifts of birds, all good things […]”. Another inscription was carved above them, of which only in[t] has been preserved. Two figures were carved in the upper register, of which the first is shown carrying birds in both of her hands, while the second one is partly lost and her gifts are no longer visible. The following register also contained two figures, but only the tops of their heads are preserved on this block. Behind the queen on the left side of the block, another group of female attendants is de‑ picted on the same scale as the previous group. Only the first register with three female figures is preserved. The outline behind them indicates that this is the left end of the entire scene. The attendants are facing right and carrying various offerings in their hands. The inscription above them reads: 1[…] xt nbt 2[…] nfrt Sddt 3[…] m pH– “1[…] All good things 2[…] taken 3[…] from the border district”. The left edge of the block, further to the left of the outline, contains asmall part of anoth‑ er scene, which features apart of awing and atail of ahovering falcon, Behdety, facing left (for the protective falcon, see also Megahed– Vymazalová 2020b: 73–74; further Schonkwiler 2014: passim). Except for the falcon’sfeathers, nothing is preserved of this second scene, but it is possible that Behdety was depicted above the queen’sfigure (see also the discussion in Megahed– Vymazalová 2020b: 73–74). Such examples are known from the Sixth Dynasty, with the earliest attested so far being the depiction of Iput I, the mother of Pepy I(Firth– Gunn 1926 II: pl. 56, no. 2), and Wedjebten, the wife of Pepy II (Jéquier 1928: 15–16, fig. 9; see also Schonkwiler 2014: 34) The following fragments have been found in the same area as the previously discussed larger pieces. Based on the scale of the figures and the general features of the reliefs, these fragments may have belonged to the right side of the previously discussed block, or to another similar scene showing female offering bearers. DJ 442 (FIG. 3) 37 × 41 × 10 cm This fragment features the remains of two figures of offering bearers facing left. The former figure is entirely lost, but we can see apart of abundle of lotuses, which were most likely draped over her left arm. Concerning the other figure, her body and legs are preserved. The 114 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 small traces of bird feet indicate that this female figure was holding abird on her right forearm, on which abag was also hanging, and she had ajar on arope in her left hand. The vertical line behind this figure shows that this was the right end of the register. DJ 453A–B (FIG. 3) 12 × 16 × 16.5 cm Asmall part of afemale figure has survived on these two small matching relief fragments. She was facing left, and only apart of her body, her left shoulder and left arm are preserved on the fragments. She was holding along thin object in her hand(s), possibly ahandle of afan.7 7 For comparison, see the tomb of Nebet (for instance Munro 1993: Taf. 14 bottom register, three first female behind the queen). Fig. 3 Relief fragments DJ 442, DJ 453a+b, DJ 455 and DJ 462 (photo P. Košárek, drawing E. Majerus) 115HANA VYMAZALOVÁ DJ 455 (FIG. 3) 22.5 × 23 × 6.5 cm Asmall relief fragment with the remains of two female figures facing left. Both calves and feet are preserved of the front figure, whereas only the top of one foot has survived of the other figure. DJ 462 (FIG. 3) 19 × 18 × 7.5 cm This small relief fragment shows apart of afemale figure facing left. Her head and shoulders are preserved on the fragment. She was holding avessel in her left hand in front of her chest. In addition to these recently uncovered relief fragments from the 2020‑sondage to the south of the queen’stemple portico, it is possible to find some other examples that feature female attendants and offering bearers. These were discovered during earlier excavation seasons in the east as well as south parts of the queen’sprecinct. OTHER SIMILAR DEPICTIONS FROM THE EAST SIDE OF THE QUEEN’S MONUMENT Among Queen Setibhor’sreliefs, no fragments showing female attendants have been published by Mohamed Moursi, but several can be found among the finds from Fakhry’sexcavation in box no. 103, which is labelled as el ‑ma‘bad el ‑malekah– “the queen’stemple”. These fragments were found in 1952 in the funerary temple on the east side of the queen’spyramid. The precise place of discovery of these fragments is, however, unknown.8 1/2258 (FIG. 4) 38 × 34 cm This fragment features parts of two female figures facing left, with parts of their bodies pre‑ served. The females are dressed in long gowns. The front figure has her left arm along her body, while her right arm is not visible– it was probably bent across her chest. Asmall part of the hieroglyph m is preserved in front of this female. The second figure is almost entirely lost; only her belly and thighs have partly survived. In front of her, there is avertical hieroglyphic inscription: imy(t)‑rA xnr(wt) Hs(wt)– “(female) overseer of musical performers and singers”.9 8 The reliefs found by Ahmed Fakhry are labelled only with the numbers under which they were registered, whereas the “DJ” numbers come from the excavations of the current mission. 9 For adiscussion on the xnrwt, see for instance Guegan (2020: 112–116). For the title, see also Jones (2000: 303, no. 1106); the arm determinative occurs in the Hswt– “singers” (see Jones 2000: 302, no. 1105). 122 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 Setibhor’sprecincts in the coming seasons. We are hoping that each new piece of evidence will help us bring this preliminary/partial discussion on Queen Setibhor and her unusual monument further. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was written with the support of the Programme for the Development of Study at Charles University, no. Q11: Complexity and Resilience: Ancient Egyptian Civilisation in Multidisciplinary and Multicultural Perspective, and the non ‑investment subsidy no. MSMT‑1‑VEG2021, no. 227/2021‑8. The exploration of the site was also supported by the Czech Science Foundation grant no. GA18‑03708S: Transformation of the Ancient Egyptian Society in the Late Fifth Dynasty According to the Evidence from Djedkare’sPyramid Complex. BIBLIOGRAPHY Berger‑El Naggar, Catherine 2005 “Cultes de reines et cultes privés dans le cimetière de la famille royale de Pépy Ier”, in: Pantalacci, Laure– Berger‑El Naggar, Catherine (eds.). Des Néferkaré aux Montouhotep: travaux archéologiques en cours sur la fin de la VIe dynastie et la Premiere Période Intermédiaire, Paris: Maison de l’Orient [Travaux de la Maison de l’Orient 40]. Berger‑El Naggar, Catherine– Labrousse, Audran 2005 “La tombe de Rêhérychefnakht à Saqqâra ‑Sud, un chaînon manquant?”, Bulletin de la société française d’égyptologie 164, pp.14–28. Borrego Gallarde, FranciscoL. 2004 “Remarques sur le dieu Béhédety dans l’Ancien Empire”, Trabajos de Egiptología. Papers on Ancient Egypt 3, pp. 7–40. Borchardt, Ludwig 1909 Das Grabdenkmal des Königs Nefer ‑ir ‑ke ‑re c , Leipzig: Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung [Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient ‑Gesellschaft 5; Ausgrabungen der Deutschen Orient‑ ‑Gesellschaft in Abusir 1902–1904. Bd. 5]. Callender, Vivienne Gae 2011 In Hathor’sImageI. The Wives and Mothers of Egyptian Kings from Dynasties I–VI, Prague: Charles Uni‑ versity in Prague, Faculty of Arts. Cherpion, Nadine 1989 Mastabas et hypogées d’Ancien Empire. Le problème de la datation, Bruxelles: Connaissance de l’Égypte ancienne [Étude 2]. Ćwiek, Andrzej 2003 Relief Decoration of the Royal Funerary Complexes of the Old Kingdom. Studies in the Development, Scene Content and Iconography, Warsaw: Warsaw University (unpublished Ph.D. thesis). 123HANA VYMAZALOVÁ Dunham, Dows– Simpson, William Kelly 1974 The Mastaba of Queen Mersyankh III G 7530–7540, Boston: Museum of Fine Arts [Giza Mastabas 1]. Firth, CecilM.– Gunn, Battiscombe G. 1926 Teti Pyramid Cemeteries I–II, Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale [Excavations at Saqqara]. Gardiner, Alan H. 1944 “Horus the Behdetite”, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 30, pp. 23–60. Gardiner, Alan H.– Peet, Thomas E.– Černý, Jaroslav 1955 The Inscriptions of SinaiII. Translations and Commentary, London: Egypt Exploration Society, Geoffrey Cumberlege, Oxford University Press [Excavation Memoir Egypt Exploration Society 45]. Guegan, Izold 2020 “The men of the xnr”, Prague Egyptological Studies XXV, pp. 111–127. Jacquet ‑Gordon, Helen 1962 Les noms des domaines funéraires sous l’Ancien Empire égyptien, Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale [Bibliothèque d’étude 34]. Jánosi, Peter 1989 “Die Pyramidenanlage der ‘Anonymen Königin’ des Djedkare ‑Isesi”, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Abteilung Kairo 45, pp. 187–202. 1992 “The Queens of the Old Kingdom and Their Tombs”, The Bulletin of the Australian Centre for Egyp‑ tology 3, pp. 51–57. 1996 Die Pyramidenanlagen der Königinnen. Untersuchungen zu einem Grabtyp des Alten und Mittleren Reiches, Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [Untersuchungen der Zweigstelle Kairo des österreichischen Archäologischen Institutes 13; Denkschriften der Gesamtakademie 13]. Jéquier, Gustave 1928 La pyramide d’Oudjebten, Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale [Fouilles à Saqqarah]. 1933 Les pyramides des reines Neit et Apouit, Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale [Fouilles à Saqqarah]. Jones, Dilwyn 2000 An Index of Ancient Egyptian Titles, Epithets and Phrases of the Old Kingdom, Oxford: Archaeopress [British Archaeological Reports International Series 866]. Labrousse, Audran 1999 Pyramides des reines, une nouvelle nécropole à Saqqâra, Paris: Hazan. Leclant, Jean– Minault ‑Gout, Anne 2000 “Fouilles et travaux en Égypte et au Soudan, 1998–1999”, Orientalia. Nova Series 69/3, pp. 209–329. Megahed, Mohamed 2011 “The Pyramid Complex of ‘Djedkare’sQueen’ in South Saqqara: Preliminary Report 2010”, in: Bárta, Miroslav– Coppens, Filip– Krejčí, Jaromír (eds.). Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2010, Prague: Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Arts, pp. 616–634. 124 PRAGUE EGYPTOLOGICAL STUDIES XXVI/2021 Megahed, Mohamed– Jánosi, Peter 2017 “The Pyramid Complex of Djedkare at Saqqara ‑South, Recent Results and Future Prospects”, in: Bárta, Miroslav– Coppens, Filip– Krejčí, Jaromír (eds.). Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2015, Prague: Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, pp. 237–256. 2020 “Exploration of the pyramid complex of King Djedkare: 2019 fall season”, Prague Egyptological Studies XXV, pp. 90–102. Megahed, Mohamed– Jánosi, Peter– Vymazalová, Hana 2017 “Djedkare’sPyramid Complex: Preliminary Report of the 2016‑Season”, Prague Egyptological Studies XIX, pp. 37–52. 2018 “Djedkare’sPyramid Complex: Preliminary Report of the 2017‑Season”, Prague Egyptological Studies XXI, pp. 34–44. 2019 “Exploration of the pyramid complex of King Djedkare: Season 2018”, Prague Egyptological Studies XXIII, pp. 12–36. Megahed, Mohamed– Vymazalová, Hana 2019 “The tomb of Khuwy at Djedkare’sroyal cemetery at South Saqqara. Preliminary report on the 2019 spring season”, Prague Egyptological Studies XXIII, pp. 37–48. 2020a “Notes on the newly discovered name of Djedkare’squeen”, in: Kamrin, Janice– Bárta, Miroslav– Ikram, Salima– Lehner, Mark– Megahed, Mohamed (eds.). Guardian of Ancient Egypt: Studies in Honor of Zahi Hawass, Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Arts, pp. 1024–1041. 2020b “Neues zum Pyramidenbezirk der Königin Setibhor, die Gemahlin des Königs Djedkare ‑Isesi”, Sokar 39, pp. 64–79. 2021 “Several relief fragments of female figures from the pyramid complex of Djedkare’squeen at south Saqqara”, in: Legros, Rémi (ed.). Dans les pas d’Imhotep. Mélanges offerts à Audran Labrousse, Leuven– Paris– Bristol: Peeters [Orient & Méditerranée 36], pp. 43–48. Moursi, Mohamed 1987 “Die Ausgrabungen in der Gegend um die Pyramide des +_‑KA ‑Ra ‘I%%J’ bei Saqqara”, Annales du Service des antiquités de l’Égypte 71, pp. 185–193. Munro, Peter 1993 Der Unas ‑Friedhof Nord ‑WestI. Topographisch ‑historische Einleitung. Das Doppelgrab der Königinnen Nebet und Khenut, Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern. Payraudeau, Frédéric 2015 “Remarques sur quelques titres des reines de l’Ancien Empire jusqu’à l’époque ptolémaïque”, in: Legros, Rémi (ed.). Cinquante ans d’éternité. Jubilé de la Mission archéologique française de Saqqâra, Le Caire: Institut français d’archéologie orientale [Bibliothèque d’étude162], pp. 209–226. Roth, Silke 2001 Die Königsmütter des Alten Ägypten von der Frühzeit bis zum Ende der 12. Dynastie, Wiesbaden: Harras‑ sowitz [Ägypten und Altes Testament 46]. Schonkwiler, RandyL. 2014 The Behdetite: AStudy of Horus the Behdetite from the Old Kingdom to the Conquest of Alexander, Chicago: The University of Chicago (unpublished Ph.D. thesis). 125HANA VYMAZALOVÁ Staehelin, Elisabeth 1966 Untersuchungen zur ägyptischen Tracht im Alten Reich, Berlin: Bruno Hesling [Münchner Ägyptolo‑ gische Studien 8]. Stünkel, Isabel 2006 “The Relief Decoration of the Cult Chapels of Royal Women in the Pyramid Complex of Senusret III at Dahshur”, in: Bárta, Miroslav– Coppens, Filip– Krejčí, Jaromír (eds.). Abusir and Saqqara in the Year 2005: Proceedings of the Conference Held in Prague (27 June– 5 July 2005), Prague: Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, pp. 147–166. 2018 The Decoration of the North Chapel of Khnemetneferhedjet Weret Iat Dahshur, Bonn: Rheinischen Friedrich ‑Wilhelms ‑Universität zu Bonn (unpublished,Ph.D. thesis). Verner, Miroslav– Callender, Vivienne Gae 2002 Djedkare’sFamily Cemetery, Prague: Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles Univer‑ sity– Set Out [Abusir VI]. Werbrouck, Marcel 1941 “Apropos du disque ailé”, Chronique d’Égypte 32, pp. 165–171. Hana Vymazalová Czech Institute of Egyptology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University; [email protected]