scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Parental involvement, depression, and sexual experiences across adolescence : a cross-sectional survey among adolescents of different ages

Savioja, Hanna,Helminen, Mika,Fröjd, Sari,Marttunen, Mauri,Kaltiala-Heino, Riittakerttu

Full text

Parental involvement, depression, and sexual experiences across adolescence: a cross-sectional survey among adolescents of different ages Hanna Savioja a , Mika Helminen b,c , Sari Fröjd c , Mauri Marttunen d and Riittakerttu Kaltiala-Heino a,e a School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; b Science Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland; c Faculty of Social Sciences/Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; d Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; e Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland ABSTRACT Background: Early sexual activity and multiple sexual partners are deemed risky sexual behaviors and connected to mental disorders such as depression. Parent–adolescent relationship is connected both to risky sexual behaviors and depression. Objective: To ascertain if there is a connection between parental involvement and adolescent sexual behavior in different age groups from early to late adolescence, and the role of depression in this association. Methods: Data from School Health Promotion Study, a crosssectional school survey in Finland from the years 2010 and 2011 with 186,632 adolescents as informants was used. We examined the association of sexual behaviors and parental involvement with self-reported depression, at first separately and then in the same model. Analyses were conducted in seven age groups, separately for girls and boys. The main outcomes were analyzed by χ 2 test and logistic regression. Results: Among both girls and boys, low level of parental involvement was connected to having experienced sexual intercourse and, among those sexually active, reporting more sexual partners in early and middle adolescence. Parental involvement and depression were independently associated with the sexual behaviors studied and had only a slight modifying effect on each other in this context. Conclusion: Promoting parental involvement in adolescents’lives is likely to be beneficial to adolescents’sexual health. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 27 February 2017 Accepted 20 April 2017 KEYWORDS Adolescence; risky sexual behavior; depression; parental involvement; selfreported measures Introduction Sexual development in adolescence requires maturation in physical, psychological, and social domains. Emotional development takes place over a much longer period than does physical and cognitive development (Steinberg, 2005). First intercourse is often © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. CONTACT Hanna Savioja [email protected] School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017 VOL. 5, NO. 1, 258–275 https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2017.1322908 characterized as sexual debut. It is normative and developmentally appropriate to have experiences of intercourse in late adolescence, while sexual debut in early adolescence can be seen as problem behavior (Madkour, Farhat, Halpern, Godeau, & Gabhainn, 2010; Savioja, Helminen, Fröjd, Marttunen, & Kaltiala-Heino, 2015). Early sexual activity is connected to risky sexual behaviors such as a greater number of sexual partners and failure to use contraception, which in turn exposes these adolescents to unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (Edgardh, 2000,2002; Kotchick, Shaffer, Forehand, & Miller, 2001;O’Donnell, O’Donnell, & Stueve, 2001). What is more, a large body of research shows that sexual activity per se among early and middle adolescents, and sexual risk-taking in particular, are connected to low socioeconomic status, living without both parents, and conflicts between parents and between parent and adolescent (Boislard P & Poulin, 2011; Davila et al., 2009; Kotchick et al., 2001; Madkour et al., 2010; Miller, Benson, & Galbraith, 2001; Wight, Williamson, & Henderson, 2006). All these correlates suggest that early and risky sexual activity are indicative of developmental problems rather than of rapid and favorable maturation. In addition to sociodemographic family characteristics, research on early and/or risky sexual behavior in adolescence has focused on aspects of parenting as a risk/protective factor. Low level of parental monitoring is connected to early sexual activity, more sexual partners, and less condom use, while conversely higher levels of parental monitoring are a protective factor (DiClemente, Wingood, Crosby, Sionean, et al., 2001; Markham et al., 2010; Meschke, Bartholomae, & Zentall, 2002; Wight et al., 2006). In the USA, it was found that adolescents spending more time alone at home and with less supervision than their peers were more likely to be sexually active, and among boys the amount of unsupervised time also correlated with more lifetime sexual partners (Cohen, Farley, Taylor, Martin, & Schuster, 2002). Adolescents whose parents know their friends and whereabouts are less likely to have engaged in risky sexual behaviors (Coley, Votruba-Drzal, & Schindler, 2009). On the other hand, positive, open parent–adolescent communication was connected to greater use of contraception (DiClemente, Wingood, Crosby, Cobb, et al., 2001; Stanton, Li, Pack, & Cottrell, 2002), postponing first sexual intercourse (Rai et al., 2003), and less sexual risk-taking in general (Wang et al., 2013). However, excessive perceived parental control or stricter parental rules were considered a risk factor for ever having sex in adolescence (Markham et al., 2010). The prevalence of depressive disorders rises significantly from childhood to adolescence (Costello, Erkanli, & Angold, 2006; Egger & Angold, 2006; Wichstrøm et al., 2012). Depression is almost twice as common among adolescent girls as among adolescent boys (Patton et al., 2014). Sexual activity in early adolescence is connected to depression (Hallfors et al., 2004; Jamieson & Wade, 2011; Kaltiala-Heino, Kosunen, & Rimpelä, 2003; Oshri, Tubman, & Jaccard, 2011; Valle, Roysamb, Sundby, & Klepp, 2009) and there is also evidence that this association persists until middle adolescence (Hallfors, Waller, Bauer, Ford, & Halpern, 2005;Savioja et al., 2015). This association has been shown to gradually disappear, and to be even reversed in late adolescence (Savioja et al., 2015), concurring with developmental theories (Moshman, 2011; Steinberg, 2005). Adolescents suffering from depressive symptoms are further at greater risk for sexual risk-taking (Brown et al., 2006; Donenberg, Emerson, & Mackesy-Amiti, 2011; Hallfors et al., 2004,2005; Kosunen, Kaltiala-Heino, Rimpelä, & Laippala, 2003; Langille, Asbridge, Kisely, & Wilson, 2012; Lehrer, Shrier, Gortmaker, & Buka, 2006; Mazzaferro et al., 2006; Mun, HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 259 Windle, & Schainker, 2008; Paxton & Valois, 2007; Rubin, Gold, & Primack, 2009; Seth et al., 2011; Turner, Latkin, Sonenstein, & Tandon, 2011). Positive aspects of parenting, such as parental involvement, appropriate monitoring and care together with sound interpersonal relations in a family are beneficial for an adolescent’s mental health (Burnett-Zeigler et al., 2012; Fröjd, Kaltiala-Heino, & Rimpelä, 2007; Yu, Clemens, Yang, Li, & Stanton, 2006). Adolescents whose parents know their friends and whereabouts are less likely to have depressive symptoms (Fröjd et al., 2007; Hamza & Willoughby, 2011). Depressive symptoms are more common among adolescents who have difficulties communicating with parents (Fletcher, 2004; Fröjd et al., 2007; Schwartz et al., 2012; Stanton, Li, & Galbraith, 2000; Yu et al., 2006). Depressed adolescents perceive parental monitoring to be at lower levels than average (Yu et al., 2006). To summarize, research has associated certain aspects of parenting/ parent–adolescent relationships with both adolescent depression and early and risky sexual behavior and has demonstrated an association between adolescent depression and sexual activity. Depression could explain the associations between parent–adolescent relationship and sexual behavior, or vice versa, or depression and aspects of parenting could be independently associated with sexual behavior. Schuster, Mermelstein, and Wakschlag (2013) did not find parental control or parent–adolescent communication to be significant factors for depressive symptoms and risky sexual behavior in adolescence. Wilson and Donenberg (2004) found that high-quality parent–adolescent sexual health communication was connected to less sexual risk-taking among adolescents receiving psychiatric treatment. These findings suggest an independent role of aspects of parenting in adolescent sexual behavior. The studies reviewed above have focused on slightly different aspects of parenting and parent–adolescent interaction. Terms describing aspects of parenting, such as involvement, monitoring, and care may also to some extent be used interchangeably, or at least they likely overlap, even if some focus more on limit setting and directing by parents, and others on showing interest and communicating positively. Nevertheless, it can be summarized that positive parental involvement that includes parental interest in and knowledge about the adolescent’s personal life, and good parent–adolescent communication have been connected to better outcomes regarding adolescents’sexual behavior and mental health. However, there are hardly any studies focusing simultaneously on the associations between all three factors, aspects of parenting, sexual behavior, and mental health in adolescence. Taking simultaneous account of all three factors can result in an important evidence base for promoting adolescent sexual health. The aim of this study was to ascertain if there is a connection between parental involvement and adolescent sexual behavior in different age groups from early to late adolescence, and the role of depression in this association. This study addressed the following questions: (1) Is parental involvement connected to adolescent sexual behavior, namely to having experienced sexual intercourse and having had sexual intercourse with five or more partners? (2) Do the possible associations between parental involvement and adolescent sexual behavior persist when depression is adjusted for? 260 H. SAVIOJA ET AL. (3) Are the associations between parental involvement, depression, and adolescent sexual behavior similar or different among early, middle, and late adolescents? (4) Are the possible associations in (1), (2), and (3) similar among adolescent boys and girls? In light of the existing literature, we hypothesized that low levels of parental involvement reported by adolescents would be associated with more experiences of sexual intercourse and more sexual risk-taking in early and middle adolescence. Depression could be a cause and also a consequence of both adolescent’s early and risk-taking sexual behavior and of low parental involvement. Low parental involvement and depression could each independently be associated with adolescents’early and risky sexual behaviors or one of them could cancel out the other when studied simultaneously. We left the hypothesis open as to whether depression would partially or totally explain the possible associations between parentalinvolvementandsexualbehaviors.Although depression is more common among girls than boys, the association between depression and experience of sexual intercourse has been shown to be quite similar across genders (Savioja et al., 2015). We therefore anticipated no major gender differences in the associations to be studied. However, because of the known gender differences in the prevalence of adolescent depression, we still deemed it worthwhile to conduct the analyses separately for girls and boys. Materials and methods This study used the data of the Finnish School Health Promotion Study (SHPS), which is a nationwide classroom survey dealing with health behaviors and is based on self-reported measures (www.thl.fi/kouluterveyskysely). Every student answered the questionnaire anonymously. The SHPS has been conducted yearly since 1995. Originally only 14to 16-year-old secondary school students responded to the survey, but since 1999 the survey has also been conducted among upper secondary and vocational school students (16–20 years old). Until 2011, the SHPS was carried out in alternate years in western parts of Finland and eastern parts and then the results of two consecutive years were combined to represent the whole of Finland. The SHPS was granted approval by the ethics committees of Pirkanmaa Hospital District and the National Institute of Health and Welfare. This study utilized the data of the SHPS from 2010 to 2011 including all the age groups, 14to 20-year-olds, included in the study. In Finland the vast majority, 99% of 14to 16-year-old adolescents attend secondary school. Although compulsory education ends after secondary school, attendance at upper secondary education, where students are typically 16–18 years old, is about 93%. Accordingly, the data of the SHPS covered the majority of 14to 18-year-old Finnish adolescents. Students aged 19–20 were not so well represented in the study because they have usually already graduated from the schools at which the study is conducted. Students attending school on the study day responded to the survey. Students absent on the survey day (10–15%) were not contacted. Furthermore, a slight loss of potential respondents was due to the fact that not every school participates in the SHPS. The survey was sent to every municipality, and each municipality decided if the schools in their area would participate in the survey. The final coverage of the 2010–2011 study was 80% of all 14to 16-year-old secondary school students, 73% of 16to 18-year-old HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 261 upper secondary school students, and 43% of 16to 18-year-old vocational school students in the whole of Finland. 1 The total number of respondents was 186,632 of whom 92,478 (49.6%) were boys and 94,154 (50.4%) were girls. The respondents cannot be identified from the data. Sexual activity was elicited by the question ‘Have you ever had sexual intercourse?’The response alternatives were ‘yes’and ‘no’. In the whole sample (n= 186,632), 36.9% of the girls and 32.7% of the boys had experienced sexual intercourse. In Finland, girls experience their first sexual intercourse at age 16.5 on average and boys at age 17.5. 2 The number of sexual partners was elicited by the question ‘How many sexual partners have you had sexual intercourse with?’The response alternatives were ‘one’,‘two’,‘three or four’, and ‘five or more’. The number of sexual partners was analyzed as a dichotomized variable, the cutpoint being in five or more sexual partners, which, according to earlier research, was regarded as risky sexual behavior (Kaltiala-Heino, Fröjd, & Marttunen, 2015). Among those adolescents who were sexually active (n= 65,063), 15.2% of the girls and 16.9% of the boys reported having had intercourse with five or more sexual partners. Depressive symptoms were measured with a Finnish modification of the short (13item) Beck Depression Inventory (Beck & Beck, 1972; Beck, Rial, & Rickels, 1974), Raitasalo's modification of the BDI (R-BDI) (Raitasalo, 2007). The Beck Depression Inventory is a widely used scale with established validity and reliability among both adults and adolescents (Beck et al., 1974; Bennett et al., 1997; Olsson & Von Knorring, 1997). The 13item BDI has been shown to be a valid method for identifying depressive symptoms among adolescents (Beck & Beck, 1972; Beck et al., 1974; Bennett et al., 1997; KaltialaHeino, Rimpela, Rantanen, & Laippala, 1999). The Finnish version, R-BDI, is equivalent to the original 13-item BDI, but to every item an opening question and one positive response alternative have been added. The scoring is as in the original 13-item version (Kaltiala-Heino et al., 1999). Each item is scored 0–3 and the maximum score is 39. Adolescents with a sum score of 0–4 were categorized as non-depressed, those scoring 5–7as mildly depressed, 8–15 as moderately depressed and those scoring 16 and over as severely depressed. Scores indicating moderate or severe depression (8 or more) are referred to as self-reported depression. Moderate or severe self-reported depression was present in 16.9% of the girls and 7.7% of the boys. Parental involvement was measured with three questions. The first question was ‘Do your parents know most of your friends?’with response alternatives ‘they both know’ (coded for the analyses (=2), ‘only father knows’(=1), ‘only mother knows’(=1), and ‘neither of them knows’(=0)). The second question was ‘Do your parents know about your whereabouts on Friday and Saturday nights?’with response alternatives ‘always’ (=2), ‘sometimes’(=1), and ‘mostly not’(=0). The third question was ‘Are you able to talk with your parents about matters important to you?’with response alternatives ‘often’(=3), ‘fairly often’(=2), ‘now and then’(=1), and ‘hardly ever’(=0). A sum score was formed of the responses so that the maximum score was 7. Scores 0–3 were referred to as low parental involvement, scores 4–5 to as average parental involvement, and scores 6–7 to as high parental involvement. Of the girls (boys), 17.7% (18.4%) reported low, 44.7% (44.3%) average, and 37.6% (37.2%) high parental involvement. The sociodemographic variables used were family structure (living with mother and father vs. in any other family constellation) and mother’s and father’s highest educational 262 H. SAVIOJA ET AL. qualification (comprehensive school only/ upper secondary school or vocational school/ upper secondary school or vocational school and further vocational studies/university or university of applied sciences). Data analysis Distributions are given above for having experienced sexual intercourse, for parental involvement, and for depression in the whole sample, and for having had five or more partners for intercourse among those sexually active, separately for girls and boys. Bivariate associations between having experienced sexual intercourse and parental involvement, and, among those who were sexually active, having had five or more partners for intercourse and parental involvement were examined with cross-tabulations and significance was tested with χ 2 test/Fisher’s exact test where appropriate. In all the analyses we used all available data. Those participating in the survey may have occasionally skipped some questions, and due to this, there may be slight variation in number of respondents in different analyses. Multivariate associations were studied using logistic regression. Having experienced sexual intercourse was entered as the dependent variable. First, depression (yes vs. no) and then parental involvement (high/average/low, using high as reference category) were entered each alone as independent variables. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Next depression and parental involvement were entered simultaneously, yielding adjusted ORs (95% CI) (Model 1). Finally, sociodemographic variables were adjusted for (Model 2). The analyses were run separately for boys and girls, among the whole sample and stratified for age group (age in years: 14/15/16 …). Age groups 19 and 20 were combined because of their smaller size and because they were less representative than age groups 14–18. Among those reporting they were sexually active, similar analyses were performed using risk-taking sexual behavior (having had five or more partners for intercourse) as the dependent variable. Because of the large data size, and to avoid bias due to multiple testing, we set the limit for statistical significance at p< .01. Attrition Of the respondents, 1230 (0.7%) had skipped questions on parental involvement items, 31 (0.0%) had skipped the depression scale, and 4929 (2.6%) had not responded on if they had experienced sexual intercourse. Of those who had experienced intercourse, 449 (0.7%) had not reported with how many different partners they had had intercourse. Not responding on parental involvement questions and experience of intercourse were more common among boys (3.1% vs. 2.1% and 0.9% vs. 0.4%, respectively; in both, p< .001). Non-response in all was statistically significantly associated with younger age (mean (SD), but in practice, differences in age between those responding and those skipping were negligible: non-response to parental involvement 16.1 (1.2) vs. 16.3 (1.3); nonresponse to depression scale 16.2 (1.3) vs. 16.3 (1.3); and non-response to experience of intercourse 16.2 (1.2) vs. 16.3 (1.3). Among those who had experienced intercourse, non-response on number of partners was more common among boys (1.0% vs. 0.4%, p< .0001), and those not responding were slightly younger (mean (SD) 16.3 (1.3) vs. 16.9 (1.2) years, p< .001). HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 263 Results Bivariate associations Across age groups 14–18, the proportion of those who had experienced sexual intercourse was lowest among adolescents who reported high parental involvement. Experience of sexual intercourse was more common among those reporting average parental involvement, and most common among those reporting low parental involvement (Table 1). Differences between parental involvement groups were greater in the younger age groups. Among sexually active girls, reporting five or more partners for intercourse was more common in the average parental involvement group than in the high parental involvement group, and most common in the low parental involvement group. This was seen in all age groups (Table 2). Among sexually active boys, the proportion of those reporting five or more partners for intercourse was higher in the group with low parental involvement than among those reporting high parental involvement, but no such systematic differences were seen between high and average parental involvement group (Table 2). In the whole sample, 44.5% of depressed adolescents had had sexual intercourse, while among non-depressed adolescents, the figure was 34.6% (p≤.001). Among sexually active adolescents, 25.1% of depressed adolescents had had five or more partners for intercourse, while among non-depressed respondents the figure was 14.4% (p≤.001). Multivariate associations between parental involvement, depression, and sexual behavior In the whole sample, ORs for having experienced intercourse were increased in the average parental involvement group and highest in the low parental involvement group, among both boys and girls. The finding persisted when depression, and finally sociodemographics were adjusted for (Table 3). Among those sexually active, ORs for risk-taking sexual behavior (five or more partners) were increased in those who reported low parental involvement among both boys and girls, and this persisted when depression, and finally sociodemographics were adjusted for (Table 4). Table 1. Proportions (% (n/N)) of those having experienced sexual intercourse among adolescents with high, average, and low parental involvement. High parental involvement Average parental involvement Low parental involvement p-Value Age (years) Girls 14 6.8 (378/5530) 12.6 (861/6834) 26.0 (708/2720) <.001 15 16.2 (1375/8511) 23.7 (2613/11016) 38.3 (1678/4383) <.001 16 34.2 (2884/8435) 40.4 (4019/9938) 50.8 (2012/3960) <.001 17 50.5 (4092/8107) 55.9 (4840/8657) 63.4 (2064/3256) <.001 18 63.8 (2056/3225) 64.2 (2196/3423) 69.6 (960/1379) <.001 19–20 78.2 (583/746) 79.8 (863/1082) 83.4 (456/547) .064 all 32.9 (11368/34554) 37.6 (15392/40950) 48.5 (7878/16245) <.001 Age (years) Boys 14 8.2 (462/5625) 13.3 (830/6226) 25.4 (576/2266) <.001 15 16.2 (1379/8524) 21.6 (2242/10384) 32.8 (1406/4287) <.001 16 31.1 (2496/8021) 35.3 (3431/9715) 43.1 (1712/3971) <.001 17 44.6 (3375/7574) 47.9 (4163/8188) 53.6 (1972/3683) <.001 18 53.9 (1640/3041) 58.5 (2126/3616) 63.4 (1089/1719) <.001 19–20 66.8 (270/404) 73.8 (484/656) 73.2 (300/410) .038 all 29.0 (9622/33189) 33.8 (13276/39285) 43.2 (7055/16335) <.001 Note: Statistically significant differences are shown in bold. 264 H. SAVIOJA ET AL. Multivariate analyses stratified for age ORs for having experienced sexual intercourse among 14to 16-year-old girls were increased among those with depression and among those reporting average and low parental involvement when depression and parental involvement were studied separately (Table 3 crude ORs), simultaneously (Table 3 Model 1), and after sociodemographic variables were adjusted for (Table 3 Model 2). Experience of sexual intercourse was also associated with average and low parental involvement among 17-year-old girls. In age groups 18 and 19–20, associations between low parental involvement and having experienced sexual intercourse were leveled out in the multivariate models. Among boys aged 14–16 ORs for having experienced sexual intercourse were increased among those displaying depression as well as among those reporting average and low parental involvement, when depression and parental involvement were entered separately (Table 3 crude ORs), simultaneously (Table 3 Model 1), and after adjusting for sociodemographic variables (Table 3, Model 2). An association between low parental involvement and having experienced intercourse also persisted among 17and 18-year-olds in the multivariate models. After age 17, depression was no longer associated with experience of intercourse among boys. Among the oldest, 19to 20-year-old boys, adjusting for sociodemographics leveled out associations between parental involvement and having experiences sexual intercourse. Among sexually active girls, ORs for reporting five or more partners for intercourse were increased among those displaying depression and among those reporting low parental involvement in all 15to 20-year-olds when each of these variables was entered into the model alone (Table 4 crude ORs) or simultaneously (Table 4 Model 1). After further adjusting for sociodemographics, these findings persisted in all age groups except the oldest (19–20), where only depression was associated with risk-taking sexual behavior (Table 4 Model 2). In 14-year-old girls, only depression was statistically significantly associated with experience of intercourse with multiple partners, and this finding persisted after adjusting for sociodemographics (Table 4). Table 2. Proportions (% (n/N)) of those having had five or more sexual partners among sexually active adolescents with high, average, and low parental involvement. High parental involvement Average parental involvement Low parental involvement p-Value Girls Age (years) 14 6.4 (24/373) 7.4 (63/856) 12.5 (88/702) <.001 15 5.1 (69/1365) 7.6 (197/2592) 12.5 (208/1669) <.001 16 9.9 (285/2879) 11.4 (456/4006) 16.2 (325/2004) <.001 17 14.3 (585/4086) 15.6 (751/4283) 22.0 (451/2052) <.001 18 17.6 (362/2051) 21.4 (468/2190) 27.6 (263/954) <.001 19–20 31.5 (183/581) 33.9 (292/861) 42.1 (191/454) <.001 all 13.3 (1508/11335) 14.5 (2227/15328) 19.5 (1526/7835) <.001 Boys Age (years) 14 13.9 (62/445) 19.1 (154/806) 31.7 (178/562) <.001 15 12.9 (176/1360) 12.6 (277/2194) 24.0 (334/1389) <.001 16 12.8 (318/2477) 12.3 (419 / 3407) 19.9 (336/1690) <.001 17 14.5 (487/3362) 13.0 (537/4141) 20.3 (397/1954) <.001 18 18.1 (295/1633) 18.3 (387/2110) 25.9 (281/1083) <.001 19–20 29.6 (80/270) 32.6 (157/481) 42.4 (126/197) .003 all 14.9 (1418/9547) 14.7 (1931/13139) 23.7 (1652/6975) <.001 Note: Statistically significant differences are shown in bold. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 265 Among sexually active boys, similarly, reporting five or more partners for intercourse was associated with depression and low parental involvement among 14to 18-yearolds when each of these independent variables was entered into the model alone (Table 4 crude ORs) or simultaneously (Table 4, Model 1). In 14and 15-year-olds, Table 3. ORs (95% CI) for having experienced sexual intercourse according to self-reported depression (yes vs. no) and parental involvement (average vs. high, low vs. high), stratified for age groups. Girls Boys Girls Boys 14 Sociodemographics controlled for Crude Depression 2.7 (2.4–3.0)** 4.7 (4.1–5.4)** Average involvement 2.0 (1.7–2.2)** 1.7 (1.5–1.9)** Low involvement 4.8 (4.2–5.5)** 3.8 (3.3–4.4)** M1 Depression 1.9 (1.7–2.1)** 3.6 (3.1–4.1)** M2 1.8 (1.6–2.1)** 3.4 (2.9–4.0)** Average involvement 1.8 (1.6–2.0)** 1.6 (1.4–1.8)** 1.7 (1.5–2.0)** 1.5 (1.3–1.7)** Low involvement 3.8 (3.3–4.4)** 2.9 (2.5–3.4)** 3.3 (2.8–3.9)** 2.6 (2.2–3.0)** 15 Crude Depression 2.0 (1.9–2.2)** 2.6 (2.3–2.8)** Average involvement 1.6 (1.5–1.7)** 1.4 (1.3–1.5)** Low involvement 3.2 (3.0–3.5)** 2.5 (2.3–2.8)** M1 Depression 1.6 (1.5–1.7)** 2.3 (1.8–2.3)** M2 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** 1.9 (1.7–2.1)** Average involvement 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** 1.4 (1.3–1.5)** 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** 1.3 (1.2–1.4)** Low involvement 2.8 (2.5–3.0)** 2.2 (2.0–2.4)** 2.4 (2.2–2.6)** 2.0 (1.8–2.2)** 16 Crude Depression 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** 1.6 (1.4–1.8)** Average involvement 1.3 (1.2–1.4)** 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** Low involvement 2.0 (1.8–2.1)** 1.7 (1.6–1.8)** M1 Depression 1.3 (1.2–1.4)** 1.4 (1.3–1.6)** M2 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** 1.3 (1.2–1.5)** Average involvement 1.3 (1.2–1.4)** 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** 1.2 (1.2–1.3)** 1.2 (1.1–1.2)* Low involvement 1.9 (1.7–2.0)** 1.6 (1.5–1.7)** 1.7 (1.6–1.8)** 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** 17 Crude Depression 1.1 (1.1–1.2)** 1.1 (1.0–1.2) Average involvement 1.2 (1.2–1.3)** 1.1 (1.1–1.2)** Low involvement 1.7 (1.6–1.8)** 1.4 (1.3–1.6)** M1 Depression 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.1) M2 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.9 (0.8–1.0) Average involvement 1.2 (1.2–1.3)** 1.1 (1.1–1.2)** 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** 1.0 (1.0–1.2) Low involvement 1.7 (1.6–1.8)** 1.4 (1.3–1.6)** 1.5 (1.4–1.7)** 1.3 (1.2–1.5)** 18 Crude Depression 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) Average involvement 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** Low involvement 1.3 (1.1–1.5)** 1.5 (1.3–1.7)** M1 Depression 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) M2 0.9 (0.8–1.0) 1.0 (0.8–1.1) Average involvement 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.2 (1.1–1.3)** 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 1.2 (1.1–1.3)* Low involvement 1.3 (1.2–1.5)** 1.5 (1.3–1.7)** 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)** 19–20 Crude Depression 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.8 (0.6–1.1) Average involvement 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.4 (1.1–1.8) Low involvement 1.4 (1.1–1.9) 1.4 (1.0–1.8) M1 Depression 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 0.7 (0.5–1.0) M2 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 0.7 (0.5–1.0) Average involvement 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.4 (1.1–1.9)* 1.1 (0.9–1.4) 1.3 (1.0–1.8) Low involvement 1.5 (1.1–2.0)* 1.5 (1.1–2.0) 1.3 (1.0–1.8) 1.3 (0.9–1.9) All Crude Depression 1.4 (1.3–1.4)** 1.7 (1.7–1.8)** Average involvement 1.2 (1.2–1.3)** 1.3 (1.2–1.3)** Low involvement 1.9 (1.8–2.0)** 1.9 (1.8–1.9)** M1 Depression 1.2 (1.1–1.2)** 1.5 (1.4–1.6)** M2 1.1 (1.1–1.2)* 1.4 (1.3–1.5)* Average involvement 1.2 (1.2–1.2)** 1.2 (1.2–1.3)** 1.2 (1.1–1.2)* 1.2 (1.1–1.2)* Low involvement 1.8 (1.8–1.9)** 1.7 (1.7–1.8)** 1.6 (1.5–1.7)* 1.6 (1.5–1.6)* Note: First, crude ORs are given. In Model 1 (M1), depression and parental involvement are entered as independent variables, and in Model 2 (M2), sociodemographic variables are adjusted for. **ORs statistically significant at level p< .001. *At level .01 < p< .001. 266 H. SAVIOJA ET AL. King, P. S., Berg, C. A., Butner, J., Butler, J., & Wiebe, D. (2014). Longitudinal trajectories of parental involvement in type 1 diabetes and adolescents’adherence. Health Psychology,33, 424–432. doi:10.1037/a0032804.Longitudinal Kosunen, E., Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelä, M., & Laippala, P. (2003). Risk-taking sexual behaviour and self-reported depression in middle adolescence –a school-based survey. Child: Care, Health and Development,29, 337–344. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12904241 Kotchick, B., Shaffer, A., Forehand, R., & Miller, K. S. (2001). Adolescent sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective. Clinical Psychology Review,21, 493–519. Retrieved from http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11413865 Langille, D., Asbridge, M., Kisely, S., & Wilson, K. (2012). Risk of depression and multiple sexual risk-taking behaviours in adolescents in nova scotia, Canada. Sexual Health,9, 254–260. Retrieved from http://www.publish.csiro.au/?paper=SH11029 Lehrer, J., Shrier, L., Gortmaker, S., & Buka, S. (2006). Depressive symptoms as a longitudinal predictor of sexual risk behaviors among US middle and high school students. Pediatrics,118, 189– 200. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1320 Madkour, A. S., Farhat, T., Halpern, C. T., Godeau, E., & Gabhainn, S. N. (2010). Early adolescent sexual initiation as a problem behavior: A comparative study of five nations. Journal of Adolescent Health,47, 389–398. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.008 Markham, C. M., Lormand, D., Gloppen, K. M., Peskin, M. F., Flores, B., Low, B., & House, L. D. (2010). Connectedness as a predictor of sexual and reproductive health outcomes for youth. The Journal of Adolescent Health,46(3 Suppl), S23–S41. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.11.214 Mazzaferro, K. E., Murray, P. J., Ness, R. B., Bass, D. C., Tyus, N., & Cook, R. L. (2006). Depression, stress, and social support as predictors of high-risk sexual behaviors and STIs in young women. The Journal of Adolescent Health,39, 601–603. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.02.004 Meschke, L. L., Bartholomae, S., & Zentall, S. R. (2002). Adolescent sexuality and parent-adolescent processes: Promoting healthy teen choices. Journal of Adolescent Health,31,264–279. doi:10. 1016/S1054-139X(02)00499-8 Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. (2001). Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: A research synthesis. Developmental Review,21(1), 1–38. doi:10.1006/drev.2000.0513 Moshman, D. (2011). Adolescent rationality and development: Cognition, morality, and identity (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Mun, E. Y., Windle, M., & Schainker, L. M. (2008). A model-based cluster analysis approach to adolescent problem behaviors and young adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology,20, 291–318. doi:10.1017/S095457940800014X Olsson, G., & Von Knorring, A.-L. (1997). Beck’s depression inventory as a screening instrument for adolescent depression in Sweden: Gender differences. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica,95, 277–282. Oshri, A., Tubman, J. G., & Jaccard, J. (2011). Psychiatric symptom typology in a sample of youth receiving substance abuse treatment services: Associations with self-reported child maltreatment and sexual risk behaviors. AIDS and Behavior,15, 1844–1856. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-9890-5 O’Donnell, L., O’Donnell, C. R., & Stueve, A. (2001). Early sexual initiation and subsequent sexrelated risks among urban minority youth: The reach for health study. Family Planning Perspectives,33, 268–275. Patton, G. C., Coffey, C., Romaniuk, H., Mackinnon, A., Carlin, J. B., Degenhardt, L., …Moran, P. (2014). The prognosis of common mental disorders in adolescents: A 14-year prospective cohort study. Lancet,383, 1404–1411. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62116-9 Paxton, R., & Valois, R. (2007). Associations between depressed mood and clusters of health risk behaviors. American Journal of Health Behavior,31, 272–283. Retrieved from http://www. ingentaconnect.com/content/png/ajhb/2007/00000031/00000003/art00005 Rai, A. a, Stanton, B., Wu, Y., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cottrell, L., …Burns, J. (2003). Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: An analysis of six cross-sectional data sets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 108–118. doi:10. 1016/S1054-139X(03)00179-4 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 273 Raitasalo, R. (2007). Mood questionnaire. Finnish modification of the short form of the beck depression inventory measuring depression symptoms and self-esteem. Studies in Social Security and Health,86, 87. Rubin, A. G., Gold, M., & Primack, B. (2009). Associations between depressive symptoms and sexual risk behavior in a diverse sample of female adolescents. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology,22, 306–312. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2008.12.011 Savioja, H., Helminen, M., Fröjd, S., Marttunen, M., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2015). Sexual experience and self-reported depression across the adolescent years. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine,3, 337–347. doi:10.1080/21642850.2015.1101696 Schuster, R. M., Mermelstein, R., & Wakschlag, L. (2013). Gender-specific relationships between depressive symptoms, marijuana use, parental communication and risky sexual behavior in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,42, 1194–1209. doi:10.1007/s10964-0129809-0 Schwartz, O. S., Dudgeon, P., Sheeber, L. B., Yap, M. B. H., Simmons, J. G., & Allen, N. B. (2012). Parental behaviors during family interactions predict changes in depression and anxiety symptoms during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,40,59–71. doi:10.1007/s10802011-9542-2 Scott, L. N., Whalen, D. J., Zalewski, M., Beeney, J. E., Pilkonis, P., Hipwell, A. E., & Stepp, S. D. (2013). Predictors and consequences of developmental changes in adolescent girls’self-reported quality of attachment to their primary caregiver. Journal of Adolescence,36, 797–806. doi:10. 1016/j.adolescence.2013.06.005 Seth, P., Patel, S. N., Sales, J. M., DiClemente, R. J., Wingood, G. M., & Rose, E. S. (2011). The impact of depressive symptomatology on risky sexual behavior and sexual communication among African American female adolescents. Psychology, Health & Medicine,16, 346–356. doi:10.1080/13548506.2011.554562 Stanton, B., Li, X., Pack, R., & Cottrell, L. (2002). Longitudinal influence of perceptions of peer and parental factors on African American adolescent risk involvement. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine,79, 536–548. Retrieved from http://link. springer.com/article/10.1093/jurban/79.4.536 Stanton, B. F., Li, X., & Galbraith, J. (2000). Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: A randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health,26(1), 18–26. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X99000221 Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development,71, 1072–1085. Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9(2), 69–74. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005 Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology,52,83–110. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/jcep/2001/00000002/00000001/ art00006 Turner, A. K., Latkin, C., Sonenstein, F., & Tandon, S. D. (2011). Psychiatric disorder symptoms, substance use, and sexual risk behavior among African-American out of school youth. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,115(1-2), 67–73. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.10.012 Valle, A.-K., Roysamb, E., Sundby, J., & Klepp, K. I. (2009). Parental social position, body image and other psychosocial determinants and first sexual intercourse among 15and 16-year olds. Adolescence,44, 479–498. Van Loon, A. J. M., Tijhuis, M., Picavet, H. S. J., Surtees, P. G., & Ormel, J. (2003). Survey nonresponse in the Netherlands: Effects on prevalence estimates and associations. Annals of Epidemiology,13, 105–110. Wang, B., Stanton, B., Li, X., Cottrell, L., Deveaux, L., & Kaljee, L. (2013). The influence of parental monitoring and parent–adolescent communication on Bahamian adolescent risk involvement: A three-year longitudinal examination. Social Science & Medicine,97, 161–169. Wichstrøm, L., Berg-Nielsen, T. S., Angold, A., Egger, H. L., Solheim, E., & Sveen, T. H. (2012). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines,53, 695–705. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02514.x 274 H. SAVIOJA ET AL. Wight, D., Williamson, L., & Henderson, M. (2006). Parental influences on young people’s sexual behaviour: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Adolescence,29, 473–494. doi:10.1016/j. adolescence.2005.08.007 Wilson, H., & Donenberg, G. (2004). Quality of parent communication about sex and its relationship to risky sexual behavior among youth in psychiatric care: A pilot study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45, 387–395. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10. 1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00229.x/full Yu, S., Clemens, R., Yang, H., Li, X., & Stanton, B. (2006). Youth and parental perceptions of parental monitoring and parent-adolescent communication, youth depression, and youth risk behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal,34, 1297–1310. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sbp/sbp/2006/00000034/00000010/art00010 HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE 275