Everyday nationalism in individualised political practices. Young left-wing Basque nationalists experiencing the nation in changing times

Article Ethnicities 2026, Vol. 0(0) 1–21 © The Author(s) 2026 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/14687968261418291 journals.sagepub.com/home/etn Everyday nationalism in individualised political practices. Young left-wing Basque nationalists experiencing the nation in changing times Ane Larrinaga 1 , Eki Etxebarria 1 and Jon Azkune 1  Abstract This article is based on a qualitative case study focusing on the ways in which young leftwing nationalists in the Basque Country experience the nation in different areas of their lives, outside of political organisations. The analysis shows, on the one hand, the emergence of individualisation processes of youth practices in the current project of reconstruction and reformulation of left-wing Basque nationalism and the incorporation of these practices into everyday life. On the other hand, it confirms the diversification of meanings attributed to the nation, which runs parallel to the inclusion of global political agendas of the contemporary social movements in this current of nationalism, and the plurality of interests and positions which the different young nationalists use to assert their agency. Keywords everyday nationalism, individualisation, Basque nationalist left, youth agency, Basque country 1 Faculty of Social and Communication Sciences, University of the Basque Country/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (EHU), Leioa, Spain Corresponding author: Eki Etxebarria, Sarriko Faculty of Economics and Business, University of the Basque Country, Lehendakari Agirre Hiribidea, 83, 48015 Bilbao (Bizkaia), Spain. Email: [email protected] Data Availability Statement included at the end of the article. The context. The decline of the contentious mobilisation cycle of the Basque nationalist left after armed violence The following text aims to analyse the various different ways in which some young people affiliated with the nationalist left experience the nation on a daily basis in the new postETA political cycle. It will consider both the influence of the Basque political scene – following the weakening of contentious activism –and some political transformations in the global context, which increasingly sees a progressively individualised youth political culture. A case study always refers to a “here and now”that only makes sense within a historical context. Since the 1980s, the part of the Basque Country that sits within the Spanish state –Hegoalde –has been the scene of a cycle of nationalist mobilisation. This mobilisation strategy has been led by a conglomerate of political organisations and social movements from the nationalist left, linked to the armed organisation ETA, which ceased its activity in 2011 and was formally dissolved in 2018. The political forces of the Basque nationalist left had their origins in the 1960s, in the anti-Franco struggle in Spain, the decolonisation processes in countries of the global south, and the rise of neo-Marxist political currents and new social movements. Their emergence brought with it a redefinition of the nation and Basque national identity: the integration of values associated with the Basque working class into the national struggle and the adoption of the Basque language and culture as distinctive elements of identity. A network of community organisations, and social movements, including the nationalist unions (Etxebarria et al., 2025) have participated in the post-Franco mobilisation strategy, albeit at different times and to different degrees, with successive fractures caused primarily by the armed activity. This strategy was initially characterised by a desire to break with the autonomous order deriving from the Spanish Constitution, by the fusion of the struggle for independence with the social struggle into the same political project, and, gradually, by the incorporation of alternative values and practices from global social movements such as feminism and environmentalism. In the 2010s, the delegitimisation and disappearance of ETA, the impact of globalisation and its challenges, and the experience of the referendums in Scotland and Catalonia opened up avenues for a transition by the nationalist left to embracing democratic pathways towards secession and the virtual construction of a Basque state. In recent years, various local and global events have triggered a shift in the political framework in the Basque Country. On the one hand there is the crisis in the political path of the governing Christian-Democratic nationalists of PNV Basque Nationalist Party  in the Basque Autonomous Community, reflected initially by the Great Economic Recession of 2008 and subsequently by the COVID-19 pandemic, which highlighted the shortcomings of the Basque public system (healthcare, education, housing, etc.) and the exhaustion of the autonomous model due to the failure of successive Spanish governments to transfer powers. On the other hand there is the disappearance of ETA and the reformulation of the nationalist left, shifting from a policy of mobilisation and confrontation towards integration with municipal, regional, and state institutions and a tacit acceptance of the rules of the game in the current political system, which has turned the nationalist left into the direct electoral competitor of conservative nationalism. 2Ethnicities 0(0) The participation of the left-wing coalition Euskal Herria Bildu, which acts as a parent political force in regional and state institutions, has given rise to certain tensions between the practices of the increasingly centralised and bureaucratised political organisation and the grassroots movements, as well as the demobilisation of youth organisations, the emergence of a political dissident youth organization, and the attenuation of the systems of conflictive collective politics that were spearheaded by young people in the recent past, repertoires that included street fighting or kale borroka, demonstrations, clashes with the police and low-intensity violence. However, the makeup of this coalition is new, and non-nationalist left-wing forces are participating for the first time in favour of the right to self-determination. This initiative is part of the discursive reformulation of the nationalist left developed over the last decade, and two elements stand out. On the one hand, the discourse about the strategies to be followed is framed in terms of democracy and democratic rights. In this way, the uniqueness of the nation loses discursive centrality when faced with the demand for the democratic rights needed by all political communities –in the sense of demos –so that they can freely decide their future, beyond their national identity (Odriozola et al., 2020). On the other hand, the term nation has been replaced by the concept of sovereignty, a multidimensional and protean term associated with power relations, which has been adapted to changing historical frameworks (Conversi, 2020)and whichhasbeentakenonbythisnationalist movement. The coalition currently defines itself as pro-sovereignty and pro-independence. The fact that sovereignty can be interpreted at various levels (personal, cultural, political) and with different meanings within the same signifier has allowed a multitude of actors to reinterpret its meanings from their social perspectives, uniting under the same conceptual framework of sovereignty. Thus, beyond national sovereignty and the right to decide, references to activist agendas specific to contemporary social movements have been integrated into both the coalition’s organisational documents and the work of intellectuals close to the movement, for example, in terms of the construction of feminist sovereignty, economic, social, and transformative sovereignty, cultural and linguistic sovereignty, food sovereignty, small-scale agricultural sovereignty, and digital sovereignty. The prominence of feminism is highlighted, due to the strength the feminist movement has acquired in Basque society. Ernai, the strongest youth political organisation on the nationalist left after its refounding, declares itself a pro-independence, socialist, and feminist organisation. This scenario will serve as the starting point for the study of everyday nationalism (EN, hereafter). As until now EN and banal nationalism have focused especially on settled political contexts (Bonikowski, 2016), the most urgent challenges in this field are twofold, in the opinion of Goode (2020).First,todevelop a clearer understanding of their relationship with contentious forms of nationalism. The second, with which Skey and Antonsich (2017) also agree, include the incidence of global phenomena in the approach. This article aims to take into consideration both aspects for discussion, starting with the contextual situation described, and focusing on the changes produced in the strategy of left nationalism in the Basque Country. Larrinaga et al. 3 Methodology This study focuses on the ways in which a specific social group, disaggregated within the conglomerate that constitutes “ordinary people”–in this case, young people from the Basque nationalist left –can creatively, adaptively, and consciously (re)construct the nation and attribute new meanings to it in a changing political landscape. It is based on a broader qualitative study carried out among 72 young people in Hegoalde regarding their political learning and practices following the end of armed violence. Participants were informed about the research objectives and the mechanisms followed to ensure data protection during the research process. For the purposes of this article, we considered an intentional sample of 25 young people and young adults between the ages of 18 and 35. The criterion for choosing this sample was the practice of multiactivism, that is, simultaneous participation in the organisational and informal areas of the nationalist left as well as in other sectoral social movements in the present or in the past. The broad age range chosen was intended to include narratives from people whose political learning and practices developed both before and immediately after the end of ETA’sarmed activity. The data collection technique was in-depth interviews, which lasted from one and a half to 2 h, and attempted to capture these young people’s life experience. The semi-structured interviews focused on four thematic sections: (1) early nationalist political socialisation and the acquisition of the nationalist habitus in the family, community, and school settings; (2) early life itineraries among peers and understanding of initial forms of activist engagement; (3) perceptions of national identity and the meanings attributed to the nation; (4) the various practical manifestations of nationalist activism, both collective and individual. What all these young participants have in common is the fact that they were socialised from a very early age in spheres within the same political universe of the nationalist left and have participated in these spheres in the past or currently. This highly diverse political space is made up, on the one hand, of a large constellation of formal entities –youth, student, and union political organisations. On the other hand, it encompasses a wide variety of constantly changing informal spaces, movements, and popular and community initiatives of a political, cultural, social, and economic nature, as well as gaztetxes (selfmanaged youth centres), local youth assemblies, spaces occupied by squatters, etc., which constitute the community base of the nationalist left. The young people interviewed possess a high level of education and significant political capital derived from their early initiation into politics and accumulated experience. The intentional sampling took into account factors considered relevant to ensure a diversity of viewpoints. Participants were selected from different organisations and movements and with different sociodemographic characteristics, such as sex/gender, the demographic weight of the territorial area where they live, urban/rural kinship, language of communication, and type of school attended. In the sample of selected participants, 12 identify as women, 12 as men, and 1 as non-binary. They come from the different territories of Hegoalde: 10 interviews were conducted in Bizkaia, nine in Gipuzkoa, four in Navarre, and two in Alava. In terms of language, 21 interviews were conducted in Basque and four in Spanish. 4Ethnicities 0(0) Taking into account the objective stated in the introductory section, the starting point of the analysis presented below is summarised in two hypotheses that will be studied based on the discourse produced in the interviews: (1) the emergence of individualised youth political practices in the project of national (re)construction, and their progressive incorporation into daily life as a process of adaptation to the new post-ETA Basque scenario; (2) the diversification of meanings attributed to the nation and Basque national identity, parallel to the integration of the global political agendas of social movements. Everyday nationalism and political individualisation in young people According to Helled and Pala (2025), one of the characteristics of the nation and nationalism is their permanence over time. The adaptive plasticity of nationalism has also been pointed out by authors such as Conversi (2020), who underscores the changing historical trajectory of the concept of sovereignty in nationalism. Resilience is a property based on the national habitus, which is often transmitted by the family from early childhood onward, in a context of unnoticed nationalism (Delmotte and Duchesne, 2024). Bourdieu’s concept is that habitus is a set of dispositions incorporated and shared by individuals in a group in their process of socialisation, which correspond to the objective social structures that generated them. These cognitive elements associated with social regularities are translated into individual and collective practices that function within a shared common sense (Bourdieu, 1990). However, in periods of change or crisis in structural conditions, there is a breakdown in this shared sense of the world and, consequently, a mismatch in the inherited habitus, a sort of disarticulation between the practices incorporated by individuals or social groups and the social or political conditions. In these volatile periods of hysteresis, instances of mismatch can generate greater awareness, which allows individuals to become agents capable of questioning the normativity implicit in the habitus –that which has been taken for granted until then –and consciously and strategically adapt to new conditions (Bourdieu, 1990,2000). Specifically, national resilience indicates the set of dispositions that social agents can implement to (re)generate attachment to a national community both in routine contexts and in contexts of change (Helled and Pala, 2025). One manifestation of routine persistence is the national reproduction known as banal nationalism (Billig, 1995). Research on everyday nationalism in recent decades cannot be understood without the seminal contribution of Michael Billig (1995), who transformed the study of the field of nationalism by recognising that nationalism can be an unnoticed facet of everyday life, devoid of citizen agency. Although influenced by this turn, the approach that today is known as “everyday nationalism”focuses mainly on the way in which ordinary people reproduce or actively challenge the nation through ordinary everyday practices (Fox and Miller-Idriss, 2008; Goode, 2020). In fact, this vision is part of a critical reading of Billig’s notion of nation. In first place, unlike Billig’s internally homogenous and defined-as-singular nation, the new revisions have put the emphasis on the ethnic, racial and religious diversity of nations (Fox, 2017;Hearn and Antonsich, 2018;Skey, 2009). Secondly, compared with the idea of a stable state-based nation, in which people are passive consumers of subliminal messages Larrinaga et al. 5 directed from top to bottom, these new ideas cover plural understandings of the nation. This, far from constituting a unified environment, is also considered the product of daily contestation and disagreement, so that we are faced with dynamic, ambiguous processes made up of multiple ordinary voices in conflict (Antonsich, 2020;Brubaker, 2006; Edensor, 2020;Fox and Miller-Idriss, 2008;Goode, 2020;Skey, 2009). Finally, along with the reproductive capacity of the nation by the leading elites, recent approaches have begun to focus on the social practices through which ordinary people recreate the nation in the routines and habits of everyday life (Goode and Stroup, 2015;Vucetic and Hopf, 2020). Since Fox and Miller-Idriss (2008) proposed a research agenda within these parameters, recent studies on EN have oriented the focus of this academic field towards the analysis of nationalism, which is no longer seen only as a political project, but also as a cognitive, affective and discursive category that appears in daily practice (Bonikowski, 2016). In the opinion of some authors, the research programme should not propose the existence of an exclusive binomial banal nationalism/everyday nationalism (Fox, 2017; Fox, in Uzun and Dede, 2022), but intersections and relations of complementarity between both approaches. As Goode (2020) points out, EN and banal nationalism appear as if they were two sides of the same coin: the nationalism that we see in social practices is recognised as everyday, while the omnipresent and unnoticed nationalism that persists in the background is treated as banal. In order to overcome the ambiguities generated by the concept of “the everyday”, Goode (2020) identifies three central dimensions that help to limit and define EN: (a) the nature of the agents who, in terms of social status, are considered non-elites or “ordinary people”, (b) the contexts within which they exercise their agency, that is to say, routine, informal action and (c) the scale of the observed social interaction, in terms of practices instead of social structures. The question of the demarcation of EN refers us to classic questions in the social sciences such as the different manifestations of agency, the context of the exercise of this agency –at macroand micro-social levels –and the question of reproduction and change, with their consequent potential conflict. According to Fox and Van Ginderachter (2018), top-down perspectives that give more importance to great structural forces to explain the emergence and maintenance of modern nations are complemented by a bottom-up analysis of the daily practices, modes and habits that reproduce the nation in daily life. In this sense, they assert that “the masses”are not (only) receptacles for nationalist messages, but (also) active agents in their consumption, production, appropriation and manipulation of their own particular versions of the nation. In this way, they conclude, ordinary people think about the nation, interpret the nation, consume the nation and sometimes reject, resist, ignore and avoid the nation. As a result, these practices contribute to the reproduction and legitimisation, or to the dismantling and weakening of national forms of belonging. Moreover, these practices are constructed and developed within a framework of meanings. According to Hearn and Antonsich (2018), the EN can be defined by the objective of studying the acts of creation of meaning by agency. This agency manifests itself in multiple ways in everyday life: in the field of work, consumption, leisure, food and sport. Precisely by focusing on these spaces, the EN approach seeks to understand the 6Ethnicities 0(0) meaning that nations acquire for ordinary people and the meanings that people attribute to them in their daily lives (Hearn and Antonsich, 2018). The act of foregrounding common-sense practices and components of the population shows a clear inclination of EN analyses towards social constructivism (Vucetic and Hopf, 2020). Nevertheless, some authors warn against the danger of keeping macrostructural approaches separate from the micro-investigation of everyday life, and of opposing agency and institution. Accordingly, Hearn and Antonsich (2018) consider that individual agency must be studied in relation to organisational and institutional contexts, and the structural processes it is part of. Therefore, the study of national practices based on routine and common sense cannot ignore the need for nationalists to adapt to the systemic changes that characterise contemporary societies. Along these lines, today’s experiences of EN cannot be separated from the structural processes of individualisation that drive individuals to construct their lives within the realm of everyday life. Indeed, social and political practices –especially those of young people –are influenced by the cultural processes of individualisation of late modernity. The impact of global neoliberal economic policies, whose influence has increasingly imposed itself on the political sphere, the growing inability of political parties to perform their functions of mediation between citizens and political systems (Mair, 2013), as well as the resulting lack of legitimacy of these systems (Castells, 2019), have been decisive factors in the development of this process. The confluence of these currents contributes to a permanent resizing of the previous boundaries between the political and the social, which is reflected in the daily lives of the population. (Bauman, 2001;Beck, 1996;Beck and Beck-Gersheim, 2002;Furlong and Cartmel, 2007). These processes of individualisation cause changes in what Beck and Beck-Gersheim call self-politics and what Giddens calls life-politics (1991). Both are models of action that appear as a response to the increasingly restricted options for democratic agency in the face of neoliberal capitalism and in the face of the participatory closure of liberal democratic systems. In these circumstances, young people are attempting to open up spaces –physical, virtual, social, and political –to activate a broader type of citizenship (Cuzzocrea and Collins, 2015;Larrinaga et al., 2023;Stolle et al., 2008) and anticipate new social models through creative individualised practices (Larrinaga et al., 2025;Reedy et al., 2016). Consequently, forms of politicisation of leisure, consumption, employment, digital activity, and other aspects of everyday life have increased, allowing them to affirm young people’s agency and self-realisation (Kyroglou and Henn, 2017). Consequently, there has been an emergence in Western political systems of individualised commitments related to ways of life that were previously considered “non-political”. These individualised practices reflect a progressive migration towards new niches of activity and identity situated in a liminal space between the personal, the social, and the political. As a result, these spaces are also connected to the most ordinary ways of experiencing nationality in everyday life. However, although young contemporaries share the influence exerted by the aforementioned structural processes, these processes do not affect all of them in the same way. The intersectional perspective reveals the complex ways in which inequalities of gender, class, or nationality interact to shape individuals’social opportunities and constraints regarding social positions in terms of political power and resources (Atewologun, 2018; Larrinaga et al. 7 Banks, 2021). Furthermore, various youth groups are also constrained by the political traditions and institutional formations of their particular time and place. These factors determine the dispositions or habitus necessary to act as political agents. In the case of youth activism, the contexts of sub-state national conflict in which nationalist symbolic struggles are resolved constitute useful case studies for analysing the influence of changing structural currents on inherited habitus and the consequent change of youth agency to suit new environments (Larrinaga and Amurrio, 2023). Our objective is to apply this approach to nationalist youth agency, and analyse the way in which young people habitually and adaptively experience, construct, and reinvent the nation in response to changes occurring both in the Basque social and political scene –the transition of the Basque nationalist left after the end of ETA’s political violence –and in the global scenario of individualised politics, focusing on the emergence of some individualised practices that this adaptation acquires. Analysis In the analysis, the following processes were identified. The adaptation of the inherited national habitus: Hysteresis and creative reflexivity The habitus inherited through family, community, and school socialisation by the young nationalists participating in this research was shaped by cognitive constructs, worldviews, emotions, and internalised practices that defined their identity within a specific national community and at a given historical moment. The generative capacity of the habitus and its concordance with the demands of a specific socio-political model allowed these young people to develop relevant political practices within that model and to attribute meaning and coherence to them throughout their childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. This habitus was reinforced from adolescence onward, translating into contentious political practices consistent with the existing ideas in the political universe of reference. After living abroad, I realized that X [the Basque population] was a very dynamic group of people. There was always something to do. My parents were also activists. So it was something we experienced. I remember some events from my childhood (…), violent clashes [with the police] in the street, like when they killed two [ETA] militants. All of that has been part of the landscape (…). In X, there have always been people from the feminist movement, from social movements, around me; ultimately, it is industrial. And it has given me that perspective (…) When they arrested my father [one of the founders of a Basque-language newspaper closed down by the Spanish government], that was a turning point (…) From then on, I began to be a political activist (…). I was 13 years old (Female, 25, economist, member of the of social and transformative economy cooperative). However, the habitus previously internalised by young activists has become dysfunctional in times of change. The transformations that have occurred in the socio-political space have been the result of both internal factors –the disappearance of ETA’s violence, 8Ethnicities 0(0) the strategic shift of the nationalist left –and external factors –socio-political currents and global challenges. This context has given young activists socialised in contentious mobilisations the challenge of adapting their inherited habitus and lived experiences to a new reality. They find themselves in a moment of hysteresis, which occurs when the dispositions of their habitus are at odds with collective expectations. With the political shift of left-wing nationalism, the regular functions established for its basis have been profoundly disrupted. In short, there is no longer any concordance between the dispositions acquired by young activists during their socialisation and the current demands of the new political landscape. Thus, the need for resilience emerges as a process for generating positive adaptation in a hitherto unexplored context. Until this adaptation is achieved, an interval similar to anomie occurs, in which people become aware of the dysfunctionality of their habitus. A process of collective reflexivity opens up within organisations and movements, paralleling individual reflexivity. Some young people participate in the reformulation of youth movements and organisations. Other young people withdraw from collective and organised activism, and, to the extent that the acquired habitus is transposable to various spheres of life, they transfer their activist capital to individualised political practices in everyday life. In my opinion, that change of political cycle has had an influence. It’s not just that ETA has given up its weapons. I think it coincides with the processes of transformation of the 21st century (...). The youth movement was in a moment of “we are going to reflect on ourselves, we are going to put the focus on our relationships, we are going to establish new networks...”and we were coming out of a phase of response to repression. Like, the movement was different, ready to pass to a more constructive phase (Female, 27, nationalist left-wing feminist organisation). In terms of agency, the political capital accumulated in the form of reflective dispositions and cognitive resources has allowed them –especially the older ones –to evaluate events and seek coherence between the values of the recent past and those of today. Thus, in the transition from contentious to more routine practices, their repositioning process is accompanied by narratives in which they reason and argue the foundations and potential repercussions of change. On the one hand, they fear the weakening of the mobilising capacity of youth organisations, a progressive demobilisation and, consequently, a privatisation, individualisation and dissolution of collective nationalist youth practice in everyday life; on the other hand, they recognise the opportunities offered by other forms of doing politics that facilitate alliances with various different political actors, who are potential allies in the national construction project. As a backdrop, it is possible to see a weakening of adherence to political organizations in the declarations of some young people. My generation will be one of the last to be active in the situation of conflict (...). Previously, the contradictions were very evident, they were there, and it was easier to take a position and become active. As at the moment there is no such explicit conflict (...) This has the consequence of not getting involved in politics. So, I see it as a challenge to maintain references and make contradictions flourish, as otherwise it will be more difficult to mobilise people. Before, the repression was very visible (Male, 26, teacher, self-managed squatter community). Larrinaga et al. 9 Conclusions This article suggests the analytical relevance of disaggregating distinct groups among what has been termed “ordinary people”(Goode, 2020) within the EN paradigm. The analysis has focused on highly politicised youth groups who are not part of the political elites and who participate or have participated in a constellation of nationalist left-wing organizations and movements in the Basque Country at a time of political change. This change stems from the disbanding of the armed organisation ETA and the strategic shift of the Basque nationalist left following its integration into existing political institutions. One of the consequences has been the attenuation of the contentious, mobilising politics of youth organisations and their adaptation to the new political cycle, leaving behind what Billig (1995) called the “hot”nationalist passion typical of times of social unrest. The structure of the analysis presented in this article corresponds to the implementation of the hypotheses put forward in the Methodology section. More specifically, this structure has enabled an evaluation of the hypotheses by establishing a sequence of three analytical moments. First, it has allowed us to identify, in the youth narratives recorded in the interviews, processes of reflection and repositioning in relation to contentious collective activism. This process has been accompanied by a certain weakening of formal association with nationalist youth organisations. Second, it has enabled us to detect the expansion of the nationalist discursive framework of young activists, which considers various different forms of oppression within the same political project and, consequently, the adoption of agendas from other contemporary movements. Thus, we have been able to argue that both processes have created a context favourable to the emergence of youth political practices that can develop not only within traditional political organisations but also outside them, even on an individual basis. Based on a Bourdieusian framework, it has been emphasised that a change in the political landscape favours the adaptation at a collective and individual level of the national habitus and the activist political habitus inherited during primary socialisation to new contexts and to both local and global dimensions. As far as the initially acquired habitus can be transposable, some young nationalists have transferred the accumulated political capital to practices carried out in everyday life, giving them political meaning. In these spaces, they act as routine updaters of the nation, attributing new meanings to it. In terms of adaptation in the global dimension, young nationalists are no exception to the influence exerted on younger generations by the cultural currents of neoliberalism and individualisation, and by the dynamics of the capitalist labour market. In this respect, leftwing nationalist movements, whose values are linked to social justice, sustainability, and gender equality, tend to share the same principles and agendas promoted by numerous social movements on the global stage, which appeal to all contemporary young people. In fact, the connection between nationalist movements and feminism, climate action, and anti-capitalist struggles is not entirely new in Basque nationalism, but the development of more conciliatory discourses and the practical construction of new, more consistent spaces of convergence after the disappearance of ETA are (Iraola et al., 2023). Our analysis goes into further depth here, highlighting first that the changing political landscape has generated a political opportunity structure conducive to the integration of new actors and political demands into the left-wing nationalist movement, while ignoring 16 Ethnicities 0(0) the contradictions previously caused by the practice of armed violence. The integration of this diversity of demands has been facilitated by the adaptive effect that Gombar and others call cognitive resonance (Gombar, 2025), that is the process that allows for the alignment of principles that reinforce and modernise preexisting values in the nationalist ideology, enabling the maintenance of cognitive coherence. As Chevallier and Itçaina (2024) remind us, the politics of left-wing Basque nationalism has shaped a “culture of citizen opposition”, penetrating different areas of social and economic life that bring it closer to other struggles. Secondly, the analysis highlights the increasingly individualised materialisation and integration of the programmes of progressive movements by current nationalist activists into their daily lives. Thus, collective practices mediated by youth organisations and individualised practices coexist today within the nationalist left. And, thirdly, it confirms that this insertion of new actors and causes into the nationalist discursive and programmatic framework is giving rise to reformulations of the Basque national identity by young people who, from a variety of positions and social oppressions, are experiencing and (re)defining the nation in an intersectional and fluid way, quite distinct from the ethno-linguistic formulation that has predominated since the 1960s. This process has been possible thanks to the existence of young individuals who incorporate intersectional identities (Banks, 2021), applying a critical praxis grounded in intersectional analysis in their lives to guide their practices. The study confirms the resilient, changing, and dynamic nature of the nation and the historical nature of its permanent (re)construction at both collective and individual levels. It also highlights the importance, in addition to organisational and institutional bodies, of the everyday and individualised spheres of youth life as a favourable space for this process of modernisation. Despite the limitations that any qualitative sample has in terms of its representativeness, this study represents, on the one hand, a contribution to the potential development of a qualitative database of everyday nationalist practices for the purposes of comparative analysis. Moreover, it opens a path for future research into the process of reformulation that Basque nationalism is currently undergoing within this cycle of change. ORCID iDs Eki Etxebarria https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5866-4254 Jon Azkune https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8085-8175 Funding The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Declaration of conflicting interests The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Data Availability Statement Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Larrinaga et al. 17 References Antonsich M (2020) Everyday nation in times of rising nationalism. Sociology 54(6): 1230–1237. Atewologun D (2018) Intersectionality Theory and Practice. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Banks N (2021) Intersectional identities and analysis. In: Berik G and Kongar E (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics. Routledge, pp. 118–126. Bauman Z (2001) The Individualized Society. Polity Press. Beck U (1996) Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Polity Press. Beck U and Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Individualization. Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. Sage. Billig M (1995) Banal Nationalism. Sage. Bonikowski B (2016) Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology 42: 427–449. Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press. Bourdieu P (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford University Press. Brubaker R (2006) Nationalism Reframed. Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press. Castells M (2019) Rupture: The Crisis of Liberal Democracy. Polity Press. Chevallier T and Itçaina X (2024) Left nationalism in the French Basque country: from civic opposition to critical participation. Nations and Nationalism 31(4): 1035–1051. Conversi D (2020) Sovereignty in changing world: from Westfalia to food sovereignty. Globalizations 13(4): 484–498. Cuzzocrea V and Collins R (2015) Collaborative individualization? Peer-to-peer action in youth transitions. Young 23(2): 136–153. Delmotte F and Duchesne S (2024) Banal nationalism for babies: the early transmission of national habitus to children in the family. In: Gabriel N (ed) International Comparisons in Learning and Education. Springer, pp. 81–106. Edensor T (2020) National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Routledge. Etxebarria E, Azkune J and Zaldua I (2025) Social movement unionism in a national conflict context: the cases of Basque unions ELA and LAB. Employee Responsabilities and Rights Journal. Ahead of print 13 October 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-025-09554-4. Fox JE (2017) The edges of the nation: a research agenda for uncovering the taken-for-granted foundations of everyday nationhood. Nations and Nationalism 23(1): 26–47. Fox JE and Miller-Idriss C (2008) Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities 8(4): 536–563. Fox J and Van Ginderachter M (2018) Introduction: everyday nationalism’s evidence problem. Nations and Nationalism 24(3): 546–623. Furlong A and Cartmel F (2007) Young People and Social Change: New Perspectives. Open University Press. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press. Gombar M (2025) From cognitive dissonance to cognitive resonance: a sociological framework for psychological alignment in the algorithmic age. Open Journal of Social Sciences 13: 628–649. Goode JP (2020) Everyday nationalism in world politics: agents, contexts, and scale (guest editor’s introduction). Nationalities Papers 48(6): 974–982. 18 Ethnicities 0(0) Goode JP and Stroup D (2015) Everyday nationalism: constructivism for the masses. Social Science Quaterly 96(3): 717–739. Hearn J and Antonsich M (2018) Theoretical and methodological considerations for the study of banal and everyday nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 24(3): 594–605. Helled A and Pala C (2025) Adaptating Nations: National Resilience Between Contemporary Statehood and Identity. Palgrave Macmillan. Iraola I, Bergantiños N, Epelde M, et al. (2023) Is the national question a problem for social movements? Activist discourses from the Basque Country. Ethnopolitics 24(3): 24–259. Kyroglou G and Henn M (2017) Political consumerism as a neoliberal response to youth political disengagement. Societies 7(34): 1–16. Larrinaga A and Amurrio M (2023) Legacy and rupture. The political learning of young left-wing Basque nationalists in the post-ETA period. Young 31(1): 22–37. Larrinaga A, Odriozola O, Amurrio M, et al. (2023) Exploring new citizenship practices: the meaning of young activists’political engagement in the Basque Country. In: Zabalo J, Filibi I and Escajedo San-Epifanio L (eds) Made-to-Measure Future(s) for Democracy? Views From the Basque Atalaia. Springer, pp. 217–239. Larrinaga A, Iraola I, Odriozola O, et al. (2025) Prefigurative politics and sub-state nationalist movements. The case of young Basque-nationalist left activists. Social Identities 31(4): 510–526. Mair P (2013) Ruling de Void. the Hollowing of Western Democracy. Verso. Odriozola O, Iraola I and Zabalo J (2020) A rolling stone gather no moss: evolution and current trends of Basque nationalism. In: Kostov C (ed) Separatism and Regionalism in Modern Europe. Logos Verlag Berlin, pp. 39–71. Reedy P, King D and Coupland C (2016) Organizing for individuation: alternative organizing politics and new identities. Organization Studies 37(11): 1553–1573. Skey M (2009) The national in everyday life: a critical engagement with Michael Billig’s thesis of banal nationalism. The Sociological Review 57(2): 331–346. Skey M and Antonsich M (eds) (2017) Everyday Nationhood. Theorising Culture, Identity and Belonging After Banal Nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan. Stolle D, Quintelier E, Harell A, et al. (2008) What does politics mean to you? Young citizens and extra-parliamentary forms of political action Conference on ‘youth and politics: Strange bedfellows? Comparative perspectives on political socialization’, Bruges, Belgium, July 2008, pp. 3–4. Uzun Avci E and Dede K (2022) Interview with Jon Fox on being an “everyday nationhood scholar”. Journal of Cultural Studies 9(2): 309–324. Vucetic S and Hopf T (2020) Everyday nationalism and making identity count. Nationalities Papers 48(6): 1000–1014. Appendix . Interview outline Sociodemographic data of the person interviewed Process of socialisation Larrinaga et al. 19 ·Family transmission. Political and cultural capital - Presence of nationalist traditions and/or presence of left-wing values in the family environment - Historical memory - Experience of political repression - Background of community activism, participation in associations, unions and/or social movements by parents or relatives - Language of family communication ·Influence of the school model - Linguistic model chosen - Public/private/religious school. Associated values ·The political opportunity structure of the local environment - Presence of community and nationalist networks (cultural, social, leisure, etc.), participatory dynamics, organised civil society, industrial or social conflict ·Political learning among equals - Youth cultures, social and leisure models, music and cultural consumption - Initiation in informal community networks (local youth assemblies, selfmanaged youth centres, concerts and protest parties) and/or in formal organisations (student, political). Political pathways for youth. - Initial forms of acquisition and internalisation of activist dispositions (habitus) and experience of the nation in youth contexts Feelings attributed to the basque nation ·Representations of the nation - Predominance of some of the dimensions of the nation: ethnic-cultural dimension, civic-territorial dimension, class dimension, gender-nation, etc., in terms of youth ·Perception of generational differences in the definition of the nation ·Possibilities of experiencing the nation - in political and/or everyday contexts - through collective and/or individualised action - through formal and/or informal participation ·Perception of the global political, cultural and economic currents that condition the lives of the younger generations and their relationship with the national conflict. Experiences of multiactivism ·Diagnosis of the main problems affecting Basque youth today and their transfer to activist experiences ·Account of activist experiences in the organisational and community constellation of the nationalist movement - in the strictly political or partisan area - in other areas: culture, language, education, transforming economy, cooperativism, self-management, feminism, ecology, food sovereignty. ·Ways of understanding the intersection between nationalist activism and other types of sectoral activism in the youth experience 20 Ethnicities 0(0) - Perception of shared values between different movements - Experiences in movements. Local and global vision - Seen from the point of view of gender and class. Perceptions about the change of strategy by the Basque nationalist left ·Interpretations about the situation before and after the end of the armed conflict - The internal causes of change - The influence of global factors ·Perceived and experienced changes in nationalist political practices - Account of the practices of contentious and non-contentious youth nationalist activism in the period of armed violence - Comparison with current activist experiences - Perception of the internal debate processes of youth organisations in the period of change. Evaluation of conflicts and dissidences. ·Perception of the challenges of the Basque youth nationalist movements today - Evaluation of the processes of depoliticisation. Experiences of political withdrawal. - Possibilities of experiencing the nation in the current context. - Evaluation of political commitment and its involvement in daily life today. Collective commitment and individualised commitment. Larrinaga et al. 21