scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Corporate entrepreneurship and rent creation: an integration of perspectives

Abstract

Firms engage in corporate entrepreneurship to increase competitiveness and sustain performance through rejuvenation, renewal, and redefinition of their organizations, markets, or industries. This is challenging to most firms, since it often involves new relations to customers, suppliers and contact with less familiar industries. The reward for successful CE engagement should be a more profitable firm. However, the potential to new value creation and competitive advantages may originate from different sources within the firm and is quite complex. Thus, even if the relationship between CE and performance has been well researched and documented, there seem to be less understanding of the reasons why CE may produce superior performance. CE may leverage several bases of competitive advantage. This conceptual study argues that these bases may be explored through the entrepreneurial orientation (EO), resource based (RBV) and dynamic capability (DC) perspectives. The study links the RBV, EO and DC perspectives respectively to Richardian, Entrepreneurial and Austrian rents. Each of these perspectives may thus provide their unique insight into how entrepreneurship may create new rent streams and improve performance in firms. In total the study contributes to further understanding of how and why CE may lead to superior performance in firms.

Read accessible full text

Corporate entrepreneurship and rent creation: an integration of perspectives

Author: Grande, Jorunn
Publisher: Universidad de Sevilla
Year: 2011
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/bafb90cd-8fca-4df2-826e-bd4b90dfef57/download
1
Pape o he ESU-con e ence a Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain, 12 - 17 Sep embe
2011
Co po a e en ep eneu ship and en c ea ion: an in eg a ion o
pe spec i es
Jo unn G ande
Con ac in o ma ion:
Jo unn G ande
No d-T øndelag Uni e si y College
Se icebox 2501
7729 S einkje
No way
E-mail: jo unn.g ande@hin .no
2
ABSTRACT
Fi ms engage in co po a e en ep eneu ship o inc ease compe i i eness and sus ain
pe o mance h ough eju ena ion, enewal, and ede ini ion o hei o ganiza ions, ma ke s,
o indus ies. This is challenging o mos i ms, since i o en in ol es new ela ions o
cus ome s, supplie s and con ac wi h less amilia indus ies. The ewa d o success ul CE
engagemen should be a mo e p o i able i m. Howe e , he po en ial o new alue c ea ion
and compe i i e ad an ages may o igina e om di e en sou ces wi hin he i m and is qui e
complex. Thus, e en i he ela ionship be ween CE and pe o mance has been well
esea ched and documen ed, he e seem o be less unde s anding o he easons why CE may
p oduce supe io pe o mance. CE may le e age se e al bases o compe i i e ad an age. This
concep ual s udy a gues ha hese bases may be explo ed h ough he en ep eneu ial
o ien a ion (EO), esou ce based (RBV) and dynamic capabili y (DC) pe spec i es. The s udy
links he RBV, EO and DC pe spec i es espec i ely o Richa dian, En ep eneu ial and
Aus ian en s. Each o hese pe spec i es may hus p o ide hei unique insigh in o how
en ep eneu ship may c ea e new en s eams and imp o e pe o mance in i ms. In o al he
s udy con ibu es o u he unde s anding o how and why CE may lead o supe io
pe o mance in i ms.
1 INTRODUCTION
Fi ms engage in co po a e en ep eneu ship (CE) o inc ease compe i i eness and sus ain
pe o mance h ough eju ena ion, enewal, and ede ini ion o hei o ganiza ions, ma ke s,
o indus ies (Co in and Miles, 1999). This is challenging o mos i ms, since i o en
in ol es new ela ions o cus ome s, supplie s and con ac wi h less amilia indus ies. The
ewa d o success ul CE engagemen should be a mo e p o i able i m. Howe e , he
po en ial o new alue c ea ion and compe i i e ad an ages may o igina e om di e en
sou ces wi hin he i m and is qui e complex. E en i he ela ionship be ween CE and
pe o mance has been well esea ched and documen ed, he e is acco ding o Co in and Miles
(1999) less unde s anding o he easons why CE may p oduce supe io pe o mance. To
ex end knowledge on his issue his concep ual s udy pe cei e CE o be an o e a ching
pe spec i e and ool o analysing how new p o i ( en ) may be c ea ed and cap u ed by i ms
engaging in en ep eneu ial ac i i ies. Unde he CE umb ella he en ep eneu ial o ien a ion
(EO), esou ce based iew (RBV) and dynamic capabili y (DC) pe spec i es a e in eg a ed
since each o hem may ep esen a unique sou ce o sus aining compe i i e ad an age and
supe io pe o mance in i ms.
The pape p oceeds as ollows. Fi s he con en o CE and i s link o pe o mance is
explained. Then he concep o en and a ious ypes/sou ces o en a e explained and linked
o heo ies o CE (EO, RBV and DC). This is ollowed by a b ie iew o he con en EO,
RBV and DC pe spec i es. The pape ends by discussing and concluding on how hese
pe spec i es each yield unique insigh bu oge he also complemen ing insigh , on how and
why CE may lead o supe io pe o mance in i ms.
2 CORPORATE ENTREPRENEURSHIP (CE)
Based on he expec ed posi i e in luence on he enewal and pe o mance in exis ing i ms,
en ep eneu ial e o s in an o ganiza ional se ing ha e ecei ed inc eased a en ion among
schola s in he las decades (Mille , 1983; Co in and Sle in, 1989; Lumpkin and Dess, 1996;
Wiklund, 1999; Wiklund and Shephe d, 2003; 2005). I should be no ed ha a ange o e ms
and de ini ions a e used o desc ibe en ep eneu ial e o s wi hin an o ganiza ional con ex .
3
Te ms o en used a e in ap eneu ship (An oncic and His ich, 2003), s a egic enewal
(Sha ma and Ch isman, 1999), co po a e en ep eneu ship (Zah a, 1995) and en ep eneu ial
o ien a ion (Lumpkin and Dess, 1996). This s udy has selec ed he e m co po a e
en ep eneu ship (CE) as an o e a ching pe spec i e and label o en ep eneu ial e o s inside
exis ing i ms. The de ini ion o Sha ma and Ch isman’s (1999, p. 18) is u he adap ed,
which s a es ha CE is “… he p ocess whe eby an indi idual o a g oup o indi iduals, in
associa ion wi h an exis ing o ganiza ion, c ea e a new o ganiza ion o ins iga e enewal o
inno a ion wi hin ha o ganiza ion”. CE is hus conside ed a p ocess whe e an indi idual o
g oup o indi iduals, in he con ex o an exis ing i m, c ea e inno a i e esou ce
combina ions (El ing, 2005). CE hus ecognises ha he en ep eneu ial ini ia i e has
eme ged om o wi hin an al eady exis ing o ganisa ion a he han appea ing only as an
independen indi idual ac . In addi ion o equi ing indi iduals wi h pa icula en ep eneu ial
beha iou wi hin he i m, he i m mus also possess an o ganisa ional en i onmen ha
ole a es and suppo s hese ac i i ies (El ing, 2005).
By b owsing h ough he li e a u e we ind desc ip ions o he con en like;
o ganiza ional c ea ion (Sha ma and Ch isman, 1999), p ocesses and ac i i ies ha leads o
new en y (Lumpkin and Dess, 1996), inno a ion and en u ing (Zah a, 1993), depa ing om
he cus oma y (An oncic and His ich, 2003), c ea ion o new weal h h ough new combina ion
o esou ces (Gu h and Ginsbe g, 1990), p oac i e inno a ions and isk aking (Mille , 1983).
These all desc ibe how en ep eneu ship may be unde aken inside an exis ing i m.
2.1 CE and pe o mance
Fi ms engage in co po a e en ep eneu ship o inc ease compe i i eness and sus ain
pe o mance h ough eju ena ion, enewal, and ede ini ion o hei o ganiza ions, ma ke s,
o indus ies (Co in and Miles, 1999). This is challenging o mos i ms, since i o en
in ol es new ela ions o cus ome s, supplie s and con ac wi h businesses in o he indus ies.
Howe e , he ewa d o success ul CE engagemen should be a mo e p o i able i m. The
ela ionship be ween CE and pe o mance has been well esea ched and documen ed, bu
acco ding o Co in and Miles (1999) he e is less unde s anding o he easons why CE may
p oduce supe io pe o mance. When expec ed e u ns a e no ob ained his migh indica e a
lack o unde s anding o wha cons i u es he po en ial o igins o c ea ing new compe i i e
ad an age in his sec o .
Co in and Miles (1999) a gue ha he e a e seeds o compe i i e ad an age in each o
hei ou ypologies. They also sugges ha hese ad an ages a e ela ed o he o ganiza ional
ac ions behind he CE phenomenon which again a e o en linked o ecognized bases o
compe i i e ad an age. They u he claim ha all ypologies o CE will ep esen
app op ia e, de ensible, and alue enhancing beha io o all i ms in any gi en compe i i e
con ex . The la e a gumen also sugges s ha mo e conse a i e i ms should bene i om
CE beha io and s a egies, e en i o he schola s ha e had less con idence in his (Ha ,
1992; Sma and Conan , 1994). Co in and Miles (1999) u he explain ha an o ganiza ional
eju ena ion in gene al may imp o e he i m’s implemen a ion o a new di e si ica ion
s a egy ha al eady has led o some imp o emen in pe o mance and hus u he op imize
bene i s om his s a egy.
Hamel and P ahalad (1989) also a gue ha CE will le e age mul iple bases o i s
ad an age, since high pe o mance o en a e he esul s o i ms ha a e able o “laye ”
se e al bases o i m compe i i e ad an age. Finally, Al a ez and Buseni z (2001) explain
ha h ough be e en ep eneu ial e o s and skills, i ms may u ilize hei esou ces mo e
e icien ly by disco e ing al e na i e uses o possessed esou ces and inc ease hei awa eness
owa ds new oppo uni ies in he en i onmen . In o al his sugges s ha CE should ha e a
4
g ea po en ial o gi ing impo an insigh on which a e c i ical esou ces and capabili ies o
making a m en ep eneu ship success ul.
This s udy builds on and ex ends abo e heo y by discussing he concep o en as he
ou come o co po a e en ep eneu ship. Explo ing he concep o en may aid he
unde s anding o di e en po en ial sou ces o new compe i i e ad an ages and hus indica e
how new income s eams and supe io pe o mance may be c ea ed in i ms. This should
con ibu e o a be e unde s anding on how and why CE may lead o supe io pe o mance.
3 OUTCOMES OF CE – GENERATION OF RENTS
In classical economics he abili y o gene a e en has ea ly been conside ed one o he mos
impo an a ibu e o esou ces and he e m en s has been used as a common denomina o
o p o i s o esou ce owne s. As explained ea lie , engagemen in CE is expec ed o inc ease
he i ms’ po en ial o gene a e new en and supe io p o i s in i ms. In gene al en may be
e e ed o as “excess e u ns o esou ces ha a e limi ed in supply” (Schoemake , 1990, p.
1178) o as “ e u n in excess o a esou ce owne ’s oppo uni y cos abo e-no mal a es o
e u n” (Mahoney and Pandian, 1992, p. 364). Thus, i is he p opo ion o ea nings in excess
o he minimum cos needed o en e a speci ic indus y. Ren s may be gene a ed om
possessing sca ce and unique esou ces in a s a ic wo ld, bu migh also a ise om inno a i e
e o s dis up ing his s a ic pic u e acco ding o Schumpe e ’s heo y on c ea i e des uc ions
(Al a ez and Ba ney, 2004; Schumpe e , 1939). Thus he de ini ion and desc ip ion a ious
ype o en s may hus aid us in he p ocess o unde s anding why some i ms ea n p o i and
some i ms no (o a lo less).
P o i s ha o igina e om unique esou ces may be ela ed o economic en s. The
nine een h cen u y B i ish economis Da id Rica do ound ha when esou ces a e sca ce,
di e in quali y and a e mo e o less accessible hey ha e a po en ial o gene a e en s o hei
esou ce owne s (Galunic and Rondan, 1998; Knudsen, 2003). Rica do de eloped his heo y
on en based on examples om ag icul u e whe e he obse ed di e ences in p o i s o
landowne s ela ed o di e en quali y o land. This ype o en is commonly labelled
Rica dian en . Some esou ces a e limi ed in supply and may also a y in quali y such hey
a e mo e expensi e o ex ac o ha es compa ed o o he s. Rica dian en may hus include
alue a ached o owne ship o aluable land, loca ional ad an ages, pa en s and copy igh s
(Mahoney and Pandian, 1992). Depending on he s eng h o he isola ing mechanisms1
(ba ie s o imi a ion), he s abili y in supply o demand, esou ce owne s ( i ms) may be able
o sus ain his en .
Ano he sou ce o new alue c ea ion may ise om en ep eneu ial e o s in i ms.
P e ious ad an ages based on unique esou ces may be des oyed in long un, and o sus ain
p o i and compe i i eness i ms need o ind new ways o gene a ing en . Rica dian en
ypically e lec s a s a ic pic u e and ma ke s in equilib ium. Howe e , when his s a ic pic u e
is dis up ed, o ins ance by a Schumpe e ian inno a ion, Rica dian en s may also change
(Da och e al., 2005). A new disco e y o a esou ce (i.e. a me al subs i u e), inno a ions o
change in consume needs may lea e p e iously aluable esou ces obsole e and useless such
ha p e ious Rica dian en s e apo a e. To su i e and sus ain compe i i eness he i m hen
need o ind new sou ces o gene a e p o i .
In pe iods o u bulen and changing en i onmen s i ms hus need o c ea e new en
h ough explo a ion o new oppo uni ies, isk aking, inno a ions and p o-ac i e e o s in
1 Fo a comp ehensi e o e iew o isola ing mechanisms se able 1 in Mahoney and Pandian and also Al a ez and
Ba ney 2004.
5
o de o su i e. This en is called en ep eneu ial o Schumpe e ian en a e he wo k o
Schumpe e on dis up i e inno a ions (Galunic and Rondan, 1998; Mahoney and Pandian,
1992). Al a ez (2007) explains ha en ep eneu ial en is e u ns p ima ily o isk and
unce ain y, and de ines i o be “ he alue c ea ed when economic ac o s combine esou ces
in new and di e en ways, and when hese esou ce combina ions a e no known ex an e”
(Al a ez, 2007, p. 431). The posi i e income e ec s ela ed o en ep eneu ial ac i i ies may
he e o e be ela ed o he gene a ion o en acc uing om new inno a ions and ma ke
dis up ions. In his way new esou ces o new uses o esou ces may be disco e ed.
When looking a he sus ainabili y o he newly c ea ed en ep eneu ial en , pa s o i
a e explained as inhe en ly sel -des uc i e due o di usion o knowledge. O he pa s o he
en ep eneu ial en may howe e con ain a new Rica dian en and hus a mo e las ing en ,
eme ging om he disco e y o new aluable esou ce combina ions unique o he i m
(Da och e al., 2005; Al a ez and Ba ney, 2004). En ep eneu ial en s may hus be di ided
in wo main pa s; paymen o a bi age and o inno a ions (Ross and Wes g en, 2005;
Al a ez, 2007)2. A bi age occu s in a si ua ion whe e ”an economic ac o al eady con ols
all esou ces necessa y o gene a e he en s associa ed wi h a ma ke oppo uni y” (Al a ez
and Ba ney, 2004, p. 624), while an inno a ion e lec s shi s in ei he demand o supply
cu es. Ren s om a bi age a e ypically mo e ulne able o compe i ion and hus likely o
dissipa e as an inno a ion di uses in he ma ke .
Acco ding o Al a ez (2007), i is no e iden ha i ms a e able o app op ia e all en
ha may be gene a ed om disco e ies and inno a ions. The eason is ha he alue o
en ep eneu ial en s may no be known when hey a e c ea ed, and depending on how easy
he new in en ions a e o imi a e, compe i o s migh also cap u e pa o his en . This means
ha en ep eneu ial ale ness may c ea e new en s eams o he i m, bu i is no always
ob ious how i ms should op imize he ad an age o hei new inno a ion. A c i ical issue is
he i ms’ abili y o app op ia e he en ha is gene a ed h ough hei en ep eneu ial and
inno a i e e o s (Al a ez, 2007). This ulne able pa o en ep eneu ial en may be called
Aus ian o Monopoly en , which makes a connec ion o supe io managemen and he abili y
o p o ec he i m om compe i ion (Al a ez and Ba ney, 2004). Fo ins ance, he knowledge
o and use o e ec i e isola ing mechanisms as well as he building o new s a egic alliances
migh help he i m in p o ec ing he en om dilu ion o agg essi e compe i o s (Teece e al.,
1997). Op imal app op ia ion o en may equi e e ec i e in eg a ion o new esou ces and
knowledge, and migh demand signi ican changes in he ope a ion o he i m. The i ms’
abili y o e ec i ely ini ia e and e ec ua e changes is hus likely o be o c i ical impo ance
in op imizing app op ia ion o en .
The abo e discussion o en should yield u he insigh in o he unique elemen s in CE
ha may c ea e compe i i e ad an age and supe io p o i o business en e p ises. I shows
ha he po en ial o new alue c ea ion and compe i i e ad an ages may o igina e om
di e en sou ces wi hin he i m and is qui e complex. To op imize bene i s om business
eju ena ion i ms need knowledge o esou ces, en ep eneu ial e o s and he app op ia ion
o en . Explo ing hese undamen s should hus ha e a g ea po en ial o adding u he in-
dep h insigh in o se e al dis inguishable sou ces o p o i when i ms engage in new business
models.
When i ms engage in co po a e en ep eneu ship se e al sou ces o p o i may hus be
ac i a ed as sugges ed by Table 1, which indica e a link be ween di e en ypes o en s and
2 En ep eneu ial en is o en called Schumpe e ian o Aus ian en based on hese wo pa s. These e ms migh hus
ha e di e en con en , bu is o en used in e changeably in li e a u e and he p ecise meaning o en migh di e
be ween au ho s (Schoemake , 1990). Fo ins ance, Aus ian en is o en ela ed o he a bi age pa o en ep eneu ial
en (Da och e al., 2005), bu some imes he En ep eneu ial and Schumpe e ian en is also used in he labeling his
pa o en .

6
heo ies o CE. Fi s o all he e is a en ha based on paymen o unique esou ces. Second,
he e is en s ha based on paymen o inno a ion, isk and unce ain y. Finally addi ional
en s may be gained om supe io managemen and a bi age s a egies which op imize
app op ia ion o en ha may dissipa e o compe i o s. To ge u he insigh in o hese
di e en sou ces p o i and en his s udy has in eg a ed he EO, RBV and DC pe spec i es o
ge a be e unde s anding o how CE may le e age se e al sou ces o p o i (as explained by
Hammel and P ahalad, 1989). These pe spec i es all ocus on explaining how i ms may
sus ain hei compe i i e ad an age and gain supe io p o i s, bu hey also gi e each hei
dis inc piece o in o ma ion owa ds inc eased knowledge and unde s anding in o he
complex issue o how new alue is c ea ed, app op ia ed and sus ained. Table 1 gi es an
o e iew o a ious ypes o en and hei ela ion he scien i ic pe spec i es o EO, RBV
and DC. This illus a es ha he h ee pe spec i es may each be ela ed o hei unique sou ce
o en c ea ion in i ms. The EO, RBV and DC pe spec i es a e p esen ed and discussed in
he nex sec ions in his chap e .
7
Table 1 Ren c ea ion and heo ies o CE
Types o en and hei con en
In elec ual
oo s
Theo ies o CE
Rica dian en
(May include Ma shallian o Pa e ian en s)
 Ren s ea ned om esou ces in ixed o limi ed
supply
 Paymen s o esou ces and capabili ies ha a e
unique o he i m and canno be inc emen ally
dissipa ed
 Rica dian en s migh be des oyed by a
Schumpe e ian inno a ion
Rica do,
1821
Ma shall,
1920
Resou ces-based iew
(RBV)
Explains e u ns o
unique esou ces
En ep eneu ial en
(Also called Schumpe e ian en and includes
Aus ian en )
 Is he ” alue c ea ed when economic ac o s
combine esou ces in new and di e en ways,
and when hese esou ce combina ions a e no
known ex an e” (Rumel , 1987)
 Ren s c ea ed when new esou ces o uses o
esou ces (new esou ce combina ions) is
disco e ed
 A e e u ns o isk and unce a in y (Al a ez,
2007)
 Composed o Rica dian and Aus ian en s;
paymen s o inno a ions and a bi age
Schumpe e ,
1934
Rumel , 1987
En ep eneu ial
o ien a ion (EO)
Explains e u ns o
inno a ions, isk and
unce ain y
Aus ian and/o monopoly en
(En ep eneu ial en ha is no Rica dian)
 Enables app op ia ion o en (Aus ian en s)
subjec o dissipa ion by imi a o s and
a ac ing en y by compe i o s (Al a ez and
Ba ney, 2004)
 DC p o ec s Aus ian en om compe i o s by
applying isola ing mechanisms
 Cap u e en by de eloping a bi age
s a egies (Ross and Wes g en, 2006)
Schumpe e ,
1934
Teece e al.,
1997
Dynamic capabili y
(DC)
Explains e u ns o
supe io managemen
8
4 PERSPECTIVES OF CE
4.1 En ep eneu ial o ien a ion (EO)
Due o he inc eased a en ion o en ep eneu ship inside exis ing i ms he concep
en ep eneu ial o ien a ion (EO) has eme ged as an impo an de ice o s udying, desc ibing
and e alua ing en ep eneu ial e o s wi hin exis ing i ms he las wo decades. Lumpkin
and Dess (1996, p. 136) explain EO as “… he p ocesses, p ac ises, and decision-making
ac i i ies ha lead o new en y”, and u he ha i “… in ol es he in en ions and ac ions o
key playe s unc ioning in a dynamic gene a i e p ocess aimed a new- en u e c ea ion”. EO
is he e o e used o cha ac e ize a se o ela ed p ocesses in i ms, including a a ie y o
ac i i ies ela ed o iden i ica ion o new oppo uni ies and subsequen in es men in he
esou ce base (Al a ez and Buseni z, 2001). In sho , he li e a u e de ines EO as a i m le el
phenomenon (Lumpkin and Dess, 1996) and is also o en desc ibed as he mind-se o i ms
in ol ed in he pu sui o new en u es (Rauch, Wiklund, F ese and Lumpkin, 2004).
The ield seems o ag ee o concep ualize EO as ha ing om h ee (Co in and Sle in,
1989; Wiklund, 1999; Madsen, 2007) o i e dimensions (Lumpkin and Dess, 1996; Hughes
and Mo gan, 2007) ha migh a y independen ly o each o he . These a e 1) a p opensi y o
ac au onomously, 2) a willingness o inno a e, 3) a willingness o ake isks, 4) a endency o
ac agg essi ely owa ds compe i o s and 5) a p o-ac i i y owa ds ma ke oppo uni ies
(Lumpkin and Dess, 1996). He e au onomy is unde s ood as he independen ac ions
unde aken by en ep eneu ial leade s o eams o b ing abou a new en u e and see i
ealized. The inno a i e dimension cap u es he endency owa d emb acing and suppo ing
c ea i i y and expe imen a ion, echnological leade ship, no el y and R&D in he
de elopmen o p oduc s, se ices and p ocesses. The au onomy and inno a i eness
dimensions also ep esen an ale ness o p o i oppo uni ies and exe cising o supe io
judgemen and in ui ion in he i m (Ross and Wes g een, 2006). The isk- aking dimension
e lec s an accep ance o unce ain y and isk ela ed ac i i ies and is ypically cha ac e ized
by esou ce commi men o unce ain ou comes and ac i i ies. This e lec s ha alue is
c ea ed om he abili y o ake isk and bea unce ain y (Ross and Wes g een, 2006).
Compe i i e agg essi eness con eys he in ensi y wi h which a i m chooses o compe e and
i s’ e o s o su pass compe i o s. Finally, p o-ac i eness is ela ed o a o wa d-looking
pe spec i e whe e companies ac i ely seek o an icipa e oppo uni ies o de elop, and a e
eage o in oduce new p oduc s in he ma ke o ob ain i s mo e ad an ages and shape he
di ec ion o he en i onmen . I di e s om he compe i i e agg essi e dimension in ha i is
no di ec ed owa ds compe i o s bu ela es mo e o ma ke oppo uni ies (Lumpkin and Dess,
1996). As shown in Table 1 his pe spec i e may be linked o en ep eneu ial en which may
p o ide a u he unde s anding o why EO may lead o supe io pe o mance in i ms.
4.1.1 EO and pe o mance
The main assump ion behind he EO concep is ha all i ms all along an ac ion con inuum
ha anges om highly conse a i e o highly en ep eneu ial (Ba inge and Bluedo n,
1999). En ep eneu ial i ms a e explained as being isk aking, inno a i e and p oac i e,
whe eas mo e conse a i e i ms a e desc ibed as isk a e se, less inno a i e and ypically
adop a “wai and see pos u e” (Ba inge and Bluedo n, 1999). I ollows om his ha i ms
wi h an en ep eneu ial o ien a ion a e mo e likely o in oduce as well as gain om
inno a ions han mo e conse a i e i ms. The p edominan e idence in li e a u e also shows
ha i ms wi h a high sco e on en ep eneu ial o ien a ion pe o m be e han i ms wi h a
lowe sco e (Co in and Sle in, 1991; Wiklund, 1999; Wiklund and Shephe d, 2003; 2005;
9
Keh, Nguyen and Ng, 2007; Madsen, 2007). A s udy o business ounde s by F ank, Luege
and Ko unka (2007) ound a posi i e ela ionship be ween isk p opensi y and success. They
a ibu e his posi i e e ec o a g ea e isk p opensi y o be an indi ec lea ning e ec o
acing isk, and explain ha his is likely o inc ease bo h he “abili y and willingness o he
ounde o handle isky si ua ions” (F ank, Luege and Ko unka, 2007, p. 242).
Howe e , some scien is s a gue ha a high EO also migh lead o ad e se e ec s o he
i m in ce ain si ua ions (Sma and Conan , 1994; Ha , 1992). I is easy o unde s and ha
he isk dimension migh ha e bo h nega i e and posi i e e ec s on pe o mance. A
willingness o ake on mo e isk means a g ea e chance o gains as well as losses, and i
migh ake ime o lea n om i . P e ious s udies sugges ha an ex emely high EO also
migh ha e nega i e e ec s on pe o mance, indica ing ha a mode a ely high EO, including
mode a e isk, mode a e inno a ion and mode a e p o-ac i i y migh be mos p o i able
(Bhuian e al., 2005). Wo h no ing also is ha when acing u bulen ma ke s some esou ces
such as access o inancial capi al, migh indi ec ly in luence he ela ionship be ween EO and
pe o mance and in his way limi he ad e se e ec s o isk.
4.2 The esou ce based iew (RBV)
En ep eneu ship in ol es new esou ce combina ions (Bu gelman, 1983). He e he RBV
ocuses on he uniqueness o esou ces as c i ical o c ea ing new en s eams o i ms
(Al a es, 2007; Al a ez and Ba ney, 2004). The esou ce based iew (RBV) has eme ged as
an impo an pe spec i e and ins umen o unde s anding, inding and e alua ing possible
business oppo uni ies and esou ce needs in i ms (Pen ose, 1959; Ba ney, 2002). The RBV
builds on he ounda ion ha he c i ical elemen s o s a egic change and c ea ion o long un
compe i i e ad an ages o en a e ound in he in e nal esou ce con igu a ion o he i m
(Rumel , 1991; Bo ch, Huse and Sennese h, 1999). In he ea ly wo k, Pen ose (1959) a gued
ha e en i i ms ha e simila ac o endowmen s, he e exis di e en mechanisms o
esou ces combina ion and u iliza ion ha esul s in he e ogenei y among i ms. Mo e ecen
s a egy esea ch also indica es ha he e a e g ea e di e ences in p o i s be ween i ms
wi hin an indus y compa ed o he di e ences ha exis be ween indus ies. By iden i ying
and acqui ing esou ces ha a e c i ical o he de elopmen o demanded p oduc s, i ms may
ea n abo e no mal ea nings (We ne el , 1984). Thus he RBV app oach ocuses on en s
s emming om owne s o sca ce esou ces ha a e i m speci ic a he han he p o i s based
on posi ioning in p oduc ma ke s (Teece e al., 1997). The seminal elemen s o he RBV
app oach a e hen ound in Pen ose’s “The Theo y o he G ow h o he Fi m” (Pen ose
1959), bu he ea lies a emp s o desc ibe and apply i as an independen pe spec i e a e
ound in Rumel (1984), Teece (1984), We ne el (1984) and Ba ney (1986). Since hen,
esea ch wi hin he RBV has ecei ed g ea a en ion om schola s bo h empi ically and
concep ually and is now pe cei ed o be one o he mos widely accep ed heo e ical
pe spec i es wi hin he ield o s a egic managemen (P iem and Bu le , 2001; Newbe ,
2007).
Acco ding o he RBV he i m’s abili y o build new compe i i e ad an ages and explo e
new ma ke s depends on i s a ailable esou ces and i s abili y o de elop bo h physical and
human esou ces (Ba ney, 1991; 2002). The RBV concep ualizes he i m as a bundle o
esou ces, whe e di e en esou ces a y in hei impo ance o gene a ing added alue o he
i m. The main message in he RBV is ha i ms wi h aluable, a e and inimi able (VRI)
esou ces ha e he po en ial o achie e supe io pe o mance (Ba ney, 1991; 2002). This
means ha he esou ces mus possess some kind o alue o capaci y ha gi es ad an ages o
he i m compa ed o o he s. In his way some i ms may be be e i han o he s o pu sue
16
Co in, J.G. and Sle in, D.P. (1989). S a egic managemen o small i ms in hos ile and
benign en i onmen s. S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 10, 75-87.
Co in, J.G. and Sle in, D.P. (1991). A concep ual model o en ep eneu ship as i m
beha io . En ep eneu ship Theo y and P ac ice, 16(1), 7-25.
Co in, J.G., G een, K. M. and Sle in, D. P. (2006). S a egic P ocess E ec s on he
En ep eneu ial O ien a ion-Sales G ow h Ra e Rela ionship. En ep eneu ship Theo y
and P ac ice, 30(1), 57-81.
Da och, J., Miles, M.P and Paul, C.W. (2005). Co po a e en u ing and en cycle.
Techno a ion, 25(12), 1437-1442.
Die ickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989). Asse s ock accumula ion and sus ainabili y o compe i i e
ad an age. Managemen Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
Du a, D., Na asimhan, O. and Raji , S. (2005). Concep ualizing and measu ing capabili ies:
me hodology and empi ical applica ion. S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 26(3), 277–285.
Eas e by-Smi h, M., Lyles, M. A. and Pe e a , M. A. (2009). Dynamic capabili ies: cu en
deba es and u u e di ec ions. B i ish Jou nal o Managemen , 20(s1), S1-S8.
Eisenha , K. and Ma in, J.K. (2000). Dynamic Capabili ies: Wha a e hey? S a egic
managemen Jou nal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
El ing, T. (2005). Co po a e en ep eneu ship and en u ing. ISEN In e na ional S udies in
En ep eneu ship, Sp inge , US.
F ank, H., Luege , M. and Ko unka, C. (2007). The signi icance o pe sonali y in business
s a -up in en ions, s a -up ealiza ion and business success. En ep eneu ship &
Regional De elopmen , 19, 227-251.
Galunic, D.C. and Rondan, S. (1998). Resou ce ecombina ions in he i m: knowledge
s uc u es and he po en ial o Schumpe e ian inno a ion. S a egic Managemen
Jou nal, 19(12), 1193-1201.
G ande, J. 2008. Linking en ep eneu ial o ien a ion and dynamic capabili ies: esea ch issues
and al e na i e models. In ”The Dynamics be ween En ep eneu ship, En i onmen and
Educa ion.” Eds. Ky ö, P. and Fayolle, A. Edwa d Edga Publishing. (pp. 220-244).
G an , R.M. (1991). The esou ce-based heo y o compe i i e ad an age: implica ions o
s a egy o mula ion. Cali o nia Managemen Re iew, 33, 114-135.
G an , R.M. (1996). P ospe ing in dynamic-compe i i e en i onmen s: o ganiza ional
capaci y as knowledge in eg a ion. O ganiza ion Science, 7(4), 375-387.
Gu h, W.D. and Ginsbe g, A. (1990). Gues edi o s’ in oduc ion: Co po a e en ep eneu ship.
S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 11 (Summe SI), 5-16.
Hamel, G and P ahalad C.K. 1989. S a egic In en , Ha a d Business Re iew, 67 (May/June),
63-76.
Ha , S.L. (1992). An in eg a i e amewo k o s a egy-making p ocesses. Academy o
Managemen Re iew, 17(2), 327-351.
Hel a , C. and Pe e a , M., (2009). Unde s anding dynamic capabili ies: p og ess along a
de elopmen al pa h, S a egic O ganiza ion 7(1), 91-102.
Hel a , C., Finkels ein, S., Mi chell, W., Pe e a , M.A., Singh, H., Teece, D. and Win e , S.
(2007). Dynamic Capabili ies unde s anding s a egic change in o ganiza ions. Malden,
MA: Blackwell.
Jun, Z. (2006). De elopmen o heo y on en ep eneu ial o ien a ion: empi ical e idences
om Hebei, China and Flande s, Belgium. Doc o al disse a ion. Depa men o
Managemen and En ep eneu ship, Ghen Uni e si y, Belgium.
Keh, H.T., Nguyen, T.T.M., and Ng, H.P. (2007). The e ec s o en ep eneu ial o ien a ion
and ma ke ing in o ma ion on he pe o mance o SMEs. Jou nal o Business Ven u ing,
22 (4), 592-611.

17
Knudsen, D. (2003). Aligning co po a e s a egy and e-p ocu emen ools. In e na ional
Jou nal o Physical Dis ibu ion & Logis ics Managemen , 33(8), 720-734.
Lewin, S.E., and Phelan, P. (1999). An Aus ian heo y o he i m. Re iew o Aus ian
Economics, 13(1), 59-79.
Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996), Cla i ying he En ep eneu ial O ien a ion Cons uc
and Linking i o Pe o mance, Academy o Managemen Re iew, 21 (1), 1-8.
Madsen, E.L. (2007). The signi icance o sus ained en ep eneu ial o ien a ion on
pe o mance o i ms - A longi udinal analysis. En ep eneu ship & Regional
De elopmen , 19, 185-204.
Madsen, E.L., Alsos, G.A., Bo ch, O.J., Ljungg en, E. and B as ad, B. (2006). De eloping
en ep eneu ial o ien a ion – he ole o dynamic capabili ies and in angible esou ces.
The RENT-con e ence 2006, B yssels, Belgium.
Mahoney, J. T. and Pandian, J. R. (1992). The esou ce-based iew wi hin he con e sa ion o
s a egic managemen . S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 13(5), 363-380.
McKel ie, A., Da idsson, P. (2009). F om esou ce base o dynamic capabili ies: An
in es iga ion o new i ms. B i ish Jou nal o Managemen , 20, 63-80.
Mille , D. (1983). The co ela es o en ep eneu ship in h ee ypes o i ms. Managemen
Science, 29 (7), 770-91.
Nelson, R.R. and Win e , S. (1982). An e olu iona y heo y o economic change. Camb idge,
Mass., Belknap P ess.
Newbe , S.L. (2005). New i m o ma ion: A dynamic capabili y pe spec i e. Jou nal o
Small Business Managemen , 43(1), 55-77.
Newbe , S.L. (2007). Empi ical esea ch on he esou ce-based iew o he i m: An
assessmen and sugges ions o u u e esea ch. S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 28 (2),
121-146.
Newbe , S.L. (2008). Value, a eness, compe i i e ad an age, and pe o mance: a
concep ual-le el empi ical in es iga ion o he esou ce-based iew o he i m. S a egic
Managemen Jou nal, 29(7), 745-768.
Pen ose, E. (1959). The heo y o he g ow h o he i m. Basil Blackwell, London.
P iem, R.L. and Bu le , J.E. (2001). Is he esou ce-based “ iew” a use ul pe spec i e o
s a egic managemen esea ch? Academy o Managemen Re iew, 26(1), 22–40.
Rauch, A., J. Wiklund, M. F ese and G.T. Lumpkin (2004). En ep eneu ial o ien a ion and
pe o mance: Cumula i e empi ical e idence. The 23 d Babson College
En ep eneu ship Resea ch Con e ence, Glasgow, UK, 4-6 June 2004.
Ross, R. B. and Wes g en, R. E. (2005). Economic e u ns o en ep eneu ial beha io .
Jou nal o Ag icul u al and Applied Economics, 38(2), 403-419.
Rumel , R.P. (1984). Towa ds a s a egic choice o he i m. In Lamb, R.B. (ed), Compe i i e
S a egic Managemen . P en ice Hall, Englewood Cli s, NJ. Pp. 556-570.
Rumel , R.P. (1987). Theo y, s a egy, and en ep eneu ship. In Teece, D.J. (ed.) The
Compe i i e Challenge. Ballinge : Camb idge, MA, 137–158.
Rumel , R.P. (1991). How much does indus y ma e ? S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 12(3),
167-185.
Schoemake , P.J.H. (1990). S a egy, complexi y and economic en . Managemen Science. 36
(10), 1178-1192.
Schumpe e , J.A. (1934). The heo y o economic de elopmen . Camb idge, Mass: Ha a d
Uni e si y P ess.
Schumpe e , J.A. (1954). His o y o economic analysis. Ox o d Uni e si y P ess, New Yo k.
Sha ma, P. and Ch isman, J.J. (1999). Towa d a Reconcilia ion o he de ini ional issues in
he Field o Co po a e En ep eneu ship. En ep eneu ship Theo y and P ac ice, 23 (3),
11-27.
18
Si mon, D.G, Hi , M.A. and I eland, R.D. (2007). Managing i m esou ces in dynamic
en i onmen s o c ea e alue: looking inside he black box. Academy o Managemen
Re iew, 32 (1), 273-292.
Sma , D.T. and Conan , J.S. (1994). En ep eneu ial o ien a ion, dis inc i e ma ke ing
compe encies and o ganiza ional pe o mance. Jou nal o Applied Business Resea ch, 10,
28-38.
Teece, D.J. (1984). Economic analysis and s a egic managemen . Cali o nia Managemen
Re iew, 26(3), 87-110.
Teece, D.J. (2007). Explica ing dynamic capabili ies: he na u e and mic o ounda ions o
(sus ainable) en e p ise pe o mance. S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 28(13), 1319-50.
Teece, D.J., Pisano G. and Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabili ies and s a egic managemen .
S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 18(7), 509-533.
We ne el , B. (1984). A esou ce-based iew o he i m. S a egic Managemen Jou nal,
5(2), 171-180.
Wiklund, J. (1999). The sus ainabili y o he en ep eneu ial o ien a ion - pe o mance
ela ionship. En ep eneu ship Theo y and P ac ice, 24(1), 37-48.
Wiklund, J. and D. Shephe d (2003). Knowledge-based esou ces, en ep eneu ial o ien a ion,
and he pe o mance o small and medium-sized businesses. S a egic Managemen
Jou nal, 24(13), 1307-1314.
Wiklund, J. and D. Shephe d (2005). En ep eneu ial o ien a ion and small business
pe o mance: a con igu a ional app oach. Jou nal o Business Ven u ing, 20(1), 71-91.
Win e , S. G. 2003. Unde s anding dynamic capabili ies. S a egic Managemen Jou nal,
24(10), 991-995.
Zah a, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., and Da idsson, P. (2006). En ep eneu ship and Dynamic
Capabili ies: A e iew, Model and Resea ch Agenda. Jou nal o Managemen S udies,
43(4), 917-955.
Zah a, S.A. (1993). En i onmen , co po a e en ep eneu ship, and inancial pe o mance: A
axonomic app oach, Jou nal o Business Ven u ing, 8(4), 319-340.
Zah a, S.A. and Co in, J.G. (1995). Con ex ual in luences on he co po a e en ep eneu ship
pe o mance ela ionship - a longi udinal analysis. Jou nal o Business Ven u ing, 10 (1),
43-58.
Zollo, M. and Win e , S.G. (2002). Delibe a e lea ning and he e olu ion o dynamic
capabili ies. O ganiza ion Science, 13(3), 339-51.
Zo , C. (2003). Dynamic capabili ies and he eme gence o in a-indus y di e en ial i m
pe o mance: Insigh s om a simula ion s udy. S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 24(2),
97-125.