scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Academic literacy, genres and competences: a didactic model for teaching English to translation students

Abstract

Academic literacy has been the subject of many publications in the last decade. Yet, the practices to develop it still need to be carefully contextualised, in accordance with the field of studies, the academic context, and even the language in which they are to be implemented. The aim of this work is to develop a didactic model that caters for the needs of (mainly advanced) students of a Certified Translation course. Achieving an acceptable standard of academic literacy involves linguistic and extra-linguistic –discursive, sociocultural, metacognitive–competences, together with translation competence. Additionally, the study of English from a contrastive perspective –regarded as a problemsolving task and applied at the lexical, syntactic, textual and sociocultural levels– is deemed unavoidable. This didactic model has an ESP (English for Specific purposes) and textual approach. The approach suggested for the implementation of this model includes metacognitive and metalinguistic reflection, cognitive and linguistic recognition and production, text analysis, design and assessment, discussion, negotiation, and social interaction.

Read accessible full text

Academic literacy, genres and competences: a didactic model for teaching English to translation students

Author: Liendo, Paula; Palmira Massi, María
Publisher: Grupo de investigación La lengua inglesa en el ámbito universitario PAI: HUM 0397), en coedición con la Facultad de Filología de la UNED: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Year: 2017
DOI: 10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/3ba77183-96fe-4bf2-bf6a-7890c2e0c88f/download
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
251 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Es udios de
lingüís ica inglesa aplicada
ACADEMIC LITERACY, GENRES AND COMPETENCES:
A DIDACTIC MODEL FOR TEACHING ENGLISH TO
TRANSLATION STUDENTS
ALFABETIZACIÓN ACADEMICA, GÉNEROS Y COMPETEN-
CIAS: UN MODELO DIDÁCTICO PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DEL
INGLÉS A ESTUDIANTES DE TRADUCCIÓN
Paula J. Liendo
Uni e sidad Nacional del Comahue, A gen ina
[email p o ec ed]
Ma ía Palmi a Massi
Uni e sidad Nacional del Comahue, A gen ina
[email protected]
DOI: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy has been he subjec o many publica ions in he
las decade. Ye , he p ac ices o de elop i s ill need o be ca e ully
con ex ualised, in acco dance wi h he ield o s udies, he academic
con ex , and e en he language in which hey a e o be implemen ed.
The aim o his wo k is o de elop a didac ic model ha ca e s
o he needs o (mainly ad anced) s uden s o a Ce i ied T ansla ion
cou se. Achie ing an accep able s anda d o academic li e acy in ol es
linguis ic and ex a-linguis ic –discu si e, sociocul u al, me acogni i e–
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
252
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
compe ences, oge he wi h ansla ion compe ence. Addi ionally, he
s udy o English om a con as i e pe spec i e – ega ded as a p oblem-
sol ing ask and applied a he lexical, syn ac ic, ex ual and sociocul u al
le els– is deemed una oidable.
This didac ic model has an ESP (English o Speci ic pu poses) and
ex ual app oach. The app oach sugges ed o he implemen a ion o his
model includes me acogni i e and me alinguis ic e lec ion, cogni i e and
linguis ic ecogni ion and p oduc ion, ex analysis, design and assessmen ,
discussion, nego ia ion, and social in e ac ion.
Key wo ds: didac ic model; academic li e acy; ansla ion aining;
ansla ion compe ence
La al abe ización académica es un ema sob e el cual mucho
se ha publicado en los úl imos diez años. Sin emba go, poco se ha
esc i o sob e las p ác icas necesa ias pa a lle a la a cabo. Pa a ello, es
undamen al desa olla ac i idades con ex ualizadas con espec o al á ea
de especialización, el en o no académico e incluso el idioma en el que se
impa i án.
Es e a ículo desa olla un modelo didác ico pa a sa is ace los
eque imien os de es udian es a anzados de la ca e a de T aduc o
Público en idioma inglés. En es e caso, un ni el acep able de al abe ización
académica implica la adquisición de dis in as compe encias lingüís icas y
ex a-lingüís icas, como la discu si a, la sociocul u al y la me acogni i a,
además de la compe encia aduc o a. Asimismo, en es e con ex o es
imp escindible abo da el es udio del idioma ingles desde una pe spec i a
con as i a, que lo conside a una ac i idad de esolución de p oblemas
aplicada a ni el léxico, sin ác ico ex ual y sociocul u al.
Es e modelo didác ico es á anclado en las á eas de inglés pa a
p opósi os especí icos y el análisis del discu so. El en oque p opues o
incluye la e lexión me acogni i a y me alingüís ica, el econocimien o y
la p oducción a ni el cogni i o y lingüís ico, así como el análisis de ex os,
y diseño y e aluación de ac i idades que incluyen discusión, negociación
e in e acción.
Palab as cla e: modelo didác ico; al abe ización académica; o mación
de aduc o es; compe encia aduc o a
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
253 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
1. In oduc ion
Academic li e acy (AL) has been he ocus o ex ensi e esea ch and deba e
in he las wo decades. I has shaped educa ional policies wo ldwide by
eaching he speci ici ies o w i ing o each discipline. Uni e si y p og ams
in La in Ame ica ha e also s a ed o include AL de elopmen as pa o
hei cu icula (Ca lino, 2005 & 2013; Desinano, 2009; Na a o, 2012;
Pa odi, 2005 & 2010). This a icle is based on he indings o Resea ch
P ojec D-100, en i led “La comunicación académica: es a egias pa a el
análisis y la p oducción ex ual” (2014-2017), which deals wi h eading
and w i ing p ac ices and he dissemina ion o knowledge a Uni e sidad
Nacional del Comahue and has as i s main aim he de elopmen o o al and
w i en discou se in academic and p o essional con ex s.
AL encompasses many di e en compe ences and ex ends ac oss
a ious ields. S udies in AL ha e ocused on ins i u ional policies,
class oom p ac ice and eaching objec i es, among o he a eas. Ca lino
(2013), Desinano (2009) and Na a o (2012), o ins ance, ag ee on he
need o de elop he so-called “academic compe ences” in s uden s, bo h in
hei mo he ongue and in a second o o eign language. AL li e a u e is
ex ensi e and easily a ailable, bo h locally and in e na ionally. Howe e , i
is also wo h men ioning ha he p ac ices equi ed o he de elopmen o
he compe ences needed ine i ably ha e o be con ex ualised. The e o e,
di e en ma e ials should be designed, depending on he ield o s udies,
he academic con ex , and e en he language ( he mo he ongue, o a
second o o eign language) in which hey a e o be implemen ed. Some
au ho s (Ca lino, 2013; P io & Bilb o, 2011) e en pu academic li e acy
on a pa wi h second language acquisi ion, due o he encul u a ion p ocess
in ol ed in bo h. This p ocess can be de ined as he acquisi ion o he
s a egies needed o pe o m a social ac i i y success ully while ac ually
aking pa in i .
The aim o his wo k is o p esen a didac ic model designed o
de elop AL and applied o he ad anced English cou ses o he T ansla ion
P og am a Facul ad de Lenguas, Uni e sidad Nacional del Comahue.
This model, called modelo/p oceso–p oduc o/ alo ación –in English,
he sample/p ocess–p oduc /assessmen [SPPA] model (Massi & Liendo,
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
254
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
2016), was de eloped as pa o he D-100 esea ch p ojec o s uden s
o he Teache - aining P og am. This wo k explo es how o bes apply
his model o s uden s o he T ansla ion P og am a he same acul y
and uni e si y. This model looks in o he compe ences and s a egies ha
s uden s need o de elop, as well as he po en ial ields o knowledge
hey may ha e o add ess. Addi ionally, i gi es p io impo ance o he
pa icipan s in he ac s o communica ion in ol ed and he academic
communi y in which such communica ion akes place. In o he wo ds, he
elemen s o any he o ical communica ion a e o be conside ed: who is
w i ing/saying wha , o whom, and o wha pu pose.
The nex sec ion summa ises he heo e ical ene s on which he
SPPA model elies – he o ical and ex ual p agma ics, he con as i e
pe spec i e, and English o T ansla ion Pu poses [ETP].
2. Theo e ical F amewo k
In o de o design a comp ehensi e model o he de elopmen o academic
compe ence a uni e si y, some ames o e e ence and analy ical ca ego ies
om cu en app oaches o Academic W i ing ha e been adop ed. One o
hem is W i ing ac oss he Cu iculum (WAC), pu o wa d by Cha les
Baze man (2005, 2012, 2013). WAC encou ages he exploi a ion o he
he o ical and epis emic po en ial o w i ing in e e y ield o knowledge
and subjec a uni e si y. Baze man sees w i ing as mul idimensional –
including linguis ic, logical, he o ical, emo ional, pe sonal, social, and
e e en ial aspec s– and sus ains ha gen es and iden i y (bo h disciplina y
and pe sonal) a e closely linked and mu ually dependen . He claims ha
we, as w i e s, eso o bo h o he dynamic o ganisa ion o he wo ld.
Baze man goes beyond he linguis ic aspec o w i ing which
implies amilia i y wi h a language and he abili y o use i e ec i ely. He
ocuses on he cogni i e pe spec i e o w i ing, claiming ha , as lea ne s
w i e, a “wo k memo y” is c ea ed. S a egies g adually become mo e and
mo e “au oma ic” in his “memo y”, and his allows o g ea e a en ion
o he p ocess o c ea ing “ ex ” (discu si e and he o ical aspec s). This
shi s he ocus om he p oduc o he p ocess o w i ing, and i os e s
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
255 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
a sociocul u al iew o he p ocess, whe e ad ancemen s in w i ing ake
place h ough socialisa ion in di e en g oups, o ganisa ions o ins i u ions.
This link be ween he ex and he social con ex enables unde s anding
o gen e peculia i ies, po en ial signi ica ions, objec i es, a ge audience,
discu si e iden i y, and posi ioning (Baze man, 2013).
This social cons uc i is pe spec i e p o ides ca ego ies o he
iden i ica ion o he key mechanisms o con ex ualisa ion as well as o he
ecogni ion o he gen e o any gi en discou se. I eso s o ca ego ies om
G abe and Kaplan’s (1998) psico-socio-linguis ic model o w i ing. This
model, g ounded in e hnog aphy, sociolinguis ics and con as i e he o ic,
a ou s conside a ion o he si ua ion o condi ions in which he w i ing
p ocess akes place. Acco ding o his model, hese ques ions should be
asked be o e se ing ou o w i e:
- Who’s w i ing?
- Wha ?
- Who o?
- Wha o ?
- Why?
- When?
- Whe e?
- How?
(G abe & Kaplan, 1998)
Ano he ame o e e ence adop ed is Gen e Theo y (Swales, 1990
& 2004; Bha ia, 2004; Swales & Feak, 2011), since i is ele an o he
classi ica ion o ex - ypes and use o he language o speci ic pu poses.
Academic discou se (also called disciplina y o specialised scien i ic
discou se [discu so cien í ico disciplina o especializado, Pa odi, 2005:
26] is a case o “speci ic-pu pose” discou se, as i encompasses all he
ex s ha i he speci ic con en ions o a discu si e communi y. These
speci ic-pu pose ex s show ways o unde s anding di e en aspec s o
eali y wi h di e se scopes, in o de o enuncia e knowledge and ans o m

ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
256
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
i (Sca damalia & Be ei e , 1992), o build and ebuild knowledge (Swales,
2004; Baze man, e al.; Ca lino, 2005). Swales´ ene s (2004) also eso
o discou se analysis ca ego ies such as global ex ual s uc u e o
mac os uc u e –which obse es adequacy o con ex , au ho ’s in en ion
and in o ma ion scanning be o e ex ualiza ion pe se, mic os uc u e –
which in ol es choices in e ms o heme de elopmen , egis e and
lexico-g amma ical inpu , as well as he o e all unc ion o he ex wi hin
i s a ge communi y.
The au ho s p esen ed sha e a common iew o academic w i ing
as a p ocess guided by he communica i e si ua ion o which i is pa and
he discou se communi y in which i is inse ed. They also p opose ce ain
con en ional ea u es which cha ac e ise communica ion pa e ns wi hin a
speci ic social g oup.
3. Model P oposal: Desc ip ion o he SPPA Model
This model in ol es wo main s ages. The i s one – he sample/p ocess
s age– s a s wi h he analysis o “sample” ex s which a e hema ically
ela ed o a speci ic subjec . The ex s a e u he decons uc ed in o hei
linguis ic, ex ual, pa a ex ual, and con ex ual componen s; and hese
a e analysed and ca ego ised o he c ea ion o a linguis ic and ex ual
“ ese oi ”, which is subsequen ly eso ed o du ing he w i ing p ocess.
The second s age –p oduc /assessmen – in ol es he ealisa ion o he
communica i e pu pose o w i ing, and he ex s p oduced by he s uden s
a e ead by hei a ge audiences –be hose ellow s uden s, he eache ,
o somebody beyond he academic communi y–, who will p o ide hei
assessmen in e ms o linguis ic, discu si e and con ex ual adequacy and
allow o emedial ed a ing and eassessmen .
SPPA – S age 1 (SP)
As s a ed abo e, he i s hal o he p ocess combines me hodological
app oaches o he analysis o au hen ic ex s. I is di ided in o wo pa s, S
(sample o ex analysis), and P (p ocess o d a ing). In he i s (sample)
pa , ex s a e ega ded as samples: no as ixed con aine s o p omp s o
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
257 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
imi a e –as i has been he case in o he app oaches– bu as a sou ce o
obse able da a ha posi ion he lea ne s wi hin he communica i e ac
and allow hem o iden i y and analyse he he o ical ea u es dic a ed by
he discou se communi y whe e communica ion occu s. In didac ic e ms,
sample ex s guide lea ne s unequi ocally as ega ds he con en ions o
di e en gen es, he linguis ic esou ces and s a egies ha wo k bes when
p oducing a ce ain ex - ype, and he expec a ions on hei inal ou pu .
The analysis o he samples is guided by wo kshee s wi h asks ha
aim o sys ema ize obse able linguis ic egula i ies. Ac i i ies ocus on
he con ex ualisa ion o he he o ical si ua ion: he speake /w i e , he
opic (wha i is abou , including he p o undi y o he discussion and
he ecipien ’s expec ed p io knowledge), he a ge audience (who o ,
including he deg ee o in imacy wi h hem, hei social s a us and ole, and
he sha ed knowledge o he wo ld) and he pu pose (why and wha e ec
he ex is expec ed o ha e on he ecipien ).
Then, he samples a e explo ed in e ms o ex ual o ganisa ion
(mac os uc u e), p o o ypical o ganisa ion (supe s uc u e), linguis ic
ea u es and s a egies ( he ex p oduce ’s selec ion o lexis and syn ax o
mic os uc u e), and g aphic ea u es (pa a ex ual o non- e bal elemen s).
The o e all aim o hese ac i i ies is o de elop awa eness o he e iden
co espondence be ween a gen e, i s hema ic con en and i s linguis ic
ealisa ion. Figu e 1 illus a es he s eps co e ed a his s age.
S (Sample)
Gen e
Iden i ica ion o con ex
Pu pose o p agma ic aim
In e locu o o audience
Who? Wha ? ( heme) To whom? (audience) Why?
(pu pose) How?
Mac os uc u e and supe s uc u e
Resou ce/in o ma ion selec ion and p o o ypical
o ganiza ion
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
258
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
Mic os uc u e: he o ical choices
Linguis ic ea u es (lexis, syn ax)
G aphic ea u es
Pa a ex ual o s uc u al elemen s ( i les, cap ions), g aphs,
pic u es (non- e bal codes)
Fig. 1. S eps o he analysis and ca ego iza ion o au hen ic ex s used as samples
The p oposed asks a e ealised h ough ac i i ies such as p e-
eading asks (con ex ualiza ion and p edic ion), s a emen o pu pose o
eading, o mal analysis o ypical gen e ea u es, coope a i e e alua ion
o comp ehension, and cons uc ion o con ex ualized social in e p e a ions
h ough g oup discussion, among o he s. Once he ini ial eading pa
is comple e, w i ing is add essed om a p ocess-o ien ed pe spec i e.
Re lec ion upon he he o ical composi ion o ex s ac s as a igge o ex
p oduc ion. Discussion o he con ex o si ua ion, he opic and he gen e o
he new ex will esul in p elimina y planning, he ac i a ion o p e ious
knowledge and he selec ion o opic acco ding o he po en ial audience.
All hese s eps will lead o a i s d a , which will be submi ed o se e al
e ision si ua ions by he w i e himsel unde he eache s’ supe ision.
This will esul in ed a ing and eph asing. Finally, he ex will be
assessed by pee lea ne s. I is wo h no ing ha ub ics will esemble eal
con ex s and common uses wi hin he communi y beyond he class oom.
The ollowing igu e illus a es he s eps o his p ocess-o ien ed app oach
o w i ing.
P (P ocess)
Tex design 1 – indi idual (planning – d a ing – e ision –
ed a ing – sel -assessmen )
Tex design 2 – pai -wo k (pee assessmen )
Edi ing, e ision and ed a ing o own and pee wo k
Fig. 2. S eps and ac i i ies in a p ocess-o ien ed app oach o w i ing
SPPA - S age 2 (PA)
The nex s age in he implemen a ion o he SPPA model ocuses
on he p oduc –o he s uden s’ inal ou pu (P). This is when he
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
259 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
communica i e unc ion o w i ing is ealised; and i migh be ela ed
o an educa ional con ex –as wi h academic essays, whose eade s and
e alua o s will be he s uden s’ eache s and pee s– o a eal-li e con ex
–as, o example, when s uden s w i e an academic a icle o e iew o
publica ion in a gene al in e es magazine o academic jou nal.
This s age in ol es e ision wo k –indi idually, in pai s o in
small g oups– o assess hema ic p og ession and allow o ed a ing, i
necessa y. Now lea ne s a e asked o ocus on he p o o ypical ea u es
o gen e, con ex ual adequacy and use o he language, wi h he aim o
de eloping me acogni i e –me alinguis ic and me adiscu si e– s a egies
and enhancing au onomy. A e wa ds s uden s a e in ol ed in indi idual
e lec ion and ed a ing, and e en ually hey a e asked o e ie e a inal
e sion. This s age is summa ised in Figu e 3, below.
P (P oduc )
Indi idual, pai o g oup e ision
( ocus on p o o ypical ea u es o gen e, con ex ual
adequacy and use o he language)
Indi idual e- eading ( e lec ion and ed a ing)
Submission o w i en ex
Fig. 3. S eps o he p oduc s age
The las pa o S age 2, he ac ual assessmen o he w i ing p oduc
(A), in ol es bo h eache and lea ne s in a inal decons uc ion o he ex :
who has w i en wha o whom, si ua ed in which discu si e communi y,
and wha he in en ion o he w i e and e ec on he eade a e, as shown in
he mic o ex ual selec ion o linguis ic inpu . This e alua ion ma e ializes
h ough he eedback ecei ed om pee s and eache s. This is done h ough
ela i ely s anda dised commen s –p e iously ag eed upon by eache and
s uden s– unde ou main ca ego ies: con en ( ask achie emen , o he
success ul ealisa ion o communica ion: adjus men o ub ics, hemes and
sub hemes, ex ype and language unc ion); ex o ganiza ion (cohe ence
and cohesion, adequacy o egis e and one in e ms o he a ge audience,
layou o ex and pa a ex , pa ag aph de elopmen and opicaliza ion, use
o s anda d ex ual con en ions –such as salu a ions in co espondence);
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
266
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
g ouped in hema ic uni s, which a e o ganised acco ding o g ading and
sequencing c i e ia –namely, linguis ic complexi y, skills and s a egies
in oduced– bu each uni is o ganized a ound a main heme o “ ield”,
in Hallidayan e ms (Bake , 1992), and di e en sub- hemes. The ields
a e selec ed in acco dance wi h lea ne s’ expec ed disciplina y in e es s:
echnical, scien i ic, jou nalis ic, comme cial, legal, and cul u al /li e a y,
among o he s.
An in e disciplina y ocus is also encou aged, so ha a imes,
wi hin one heme (such as “ he digi al wo ld”), some ex s ela e wo
sub- hemes: one which is ela ed o he ield, and one ha is no ( o
ins ance, an edi o ial abou Ame ican p esiden ial candida es’ use o social
media and he digi al di ide). Fo o ganisa ional easons, and o enhance
s uden s’ me adiscu si e compe ences, he ex s selec ed a e di ided in o
wo ca ego ies; gene al in e es [GI] and academic o specialised in e es
[AI]. Gene al in e es ex s a e d awn mainly om websi es and he mass
media, and deal wi h cu en issues o egional, na ional o in e na ional
ele ance. AI ex s a e selec ed om academic jou nals, specialised books,
p o essional blogs, wo k manuals, legal ex s, and go e nmen websi es.
As s a ed be o e, all ex s a e analysed as po en ial Sou ce Tex s (ST), in
hei con ex o occu ence and wi h a speci ic ansla ion commission in
mind. Thus, all p agma ic and discu si e a iables, such as sou ce, pu pose,
a ge audience and in ended eac ion, egis e , one, s eng h o claim,
and engagemen and a i ude ma ke s (Swales & Feak, 2011), among
o he ea u es, a e aken in o accoun . In addi ion, a dynamic app oach o
equi alence is also adhe ed o when i comes o he discussion o po en ial
ansla ion p oblems and he selec ion o speci ic linguis ic inpu o
in e linguis ic, in alinguis ic o in e semio ic (Jakobson, in Ha im, 2013
and Ha im & Munday, 2004).
Ac i i ies a his s age include analy ical ques ions designed
speci ically o he kind o inpu (w i en, o al o audiomedial), bu all
ocusing on he discussion o :
lmain he o ical ea u es: gen e, ex - ype, pu pose, a ge
audience, and in ended audience eac ion;
lgen e con en ions and p o o ypical o ganiza ion: s anda dized ex -

ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
267 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
speci ic linguis ic inpu (opening salu a ions in co espondence,
an assessmen a he end o a e iew); cohe ence and cohesion;
me hod o pa ag aph de elopmen ; use o punc ua ion; hema ic
o ganisa ion and in o ma ion low; use o boos e s and hedges;
p edominan one and egis e ; and use o i ony and o he igu es
o speech;
l ea u ed ph ases and clauses: in alinguis ic ansla ion
(pa aph ase); in e linguis ic ansla ion (wi h commission
speci ica ions such as skopos, con ex o publica ion, in ended
audience); and discussion o po en ial ansla ion p oblems.
Addi ionally, sample ex s w i en by o me s uden s a e included, o
se e as inspi a ion, as well as o es ablish a benchma k as o he linguis ic
and discu si e complexi y expec ed.
The second s ep o his s age (p ocess w i ing) in ol es w i ing om
a p ocess-o ien ed s andpoin . The e is a ocus on one ex - ype in pa icula
in each uni , in he W i ing sec ion, bu w i ing –as well as speaking– is
an essen ial pa o e e y ask. E e y w i ing ask is a p oduc ion ask
which spins o p e ious ac i i ies. Lea ne s a e expec ed o use he
disc e e- ocus linguis ic inpu hey ha e collec ed in he p e ious s age
(ac i a ion o linguis ic and discu si e knowledge). I mus be no ed ha
such asks a e always “si ua ed”: guidelines a e gi en as o he medium o
communica ion, he s a us and ole o he w i e , he pu pose, he audience,
and he in ended e ec . Fo ins ance, in he uni on Digi al Media, a e
a gene al-in e es a icle on he pe asi eness o sel ies and he ise o
na cissism, s uden s w i e an academic essay discussing some humo ous
ca oons. They a e asked o iden i y he po en ial sou ce o he ca oons,
he a ge eade ship and bias, o s a e which o he sub- hemes discussed
in he a icle hey illus a e, and o iden i y po en ial ansla ion p oblems
o publica ion wi h a simila eade ship and bias.
The e is also a W i ing sec ion a he end o each uni , exclusi ely
de o ed o he p oduc ion o a ex o a pa icula ype, wi h speci ic
he o ical ea u es: a de ined heme, pu pose, a ge audience, and in ended
e ec . In he case o he uni ci ed abo e, The Digi al Media, he ask
in ol es w i ing news s o ies. Be o e he ac ual w i ing, a discussion is
held o ei he sys ema ise o ecycle s uden s´ knowledge o he he o ical
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
268
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
ea u es o his ype o ex . Fo his pu pose, no es a e p o ided wi h
w i ing ips, he s ylis ic and he o ical ea u es o success ul news s o ies,
and s ylis ic op ions ega ding p o o ypical o ganisa ional models, leng h
o sen ences and pa ag aphs, choice o ac i e o passi e oice, a ia ion
be ween quo es and epo ed speech, use o ac onyms, o eign wo ds,
and idioma ic exp essions, among o he s, depending on he newspape
publishing i (quali y o abloid), i s eade ship ( a ge audience) and bias
(pu pose and in ended e ec ). Following he s eps desc ibed in Figu e 2,
s uden s plan, d a , e iew, ed a and assess hei own p oduc ion and
hen submi a inal d a .
5.2. S age 2 – P oduc /Assessmen
The s uden s´ inal d a is now pu o he es when i is sha ed wi h
o he s uden s and he eache s. In o de o enhance lea ne s´ au onomy,
me acogni ion and lea ning- o-lea n s a egies, he amoun o pee and g oup
edi ing be o e u ning in hei wo k o g ading is high a he beginning
o he academic yea and is g adually educed, un il s uden s a e asked o
comply wi h a w i en assignmen in class wi hin a gi en ime amewo k
and wi hou ecei ing any eedback om hei pee s. This p og ession
owa ds indi idual wo k p epa es s uden s o a inal exam, which is a
cou se equi emen , wi hou unde mining hei con idence and mo i a ion.
The se o s anda dised commen s men ioned abo e ega ding
con en , ex o ganisa ion, linguis ic choices and mechanical aspec s, as
well as he se o ca ego ies in he edi ing guidelines, ha e p o ed ex emely
use ul, since hey ha e acili a ed and accele a ed he iden i ica ion and
subsequen edi ing o e o s and slips. Howe e , i has been obse ed ha
some s uden s con inued making simila mis akes, and so a Sel -Assessmen
Cha [SAC] was in oduced. This unc ions as an e o log, whe e s uden s
ill in a able wi h he con es ed chunk ( he pa o he ex wi h he iden i ied
mis ake), he ca ego y, he a e o ecu ence (how many imes hey ha e
made such mis ake), an edi ed e sion, and he po en ial sou ce o he
mis ake. This may be help ul in e ms o linguis ic de elopmen , bu i is
also e y impo an o ainee ansla o s, as edi ing is a undamen al pa
o hei u u e p ac ice. The same can be said abou he chance o ew i ing
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
269 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
and ed a ing: lea ne s ha e s a ed o welcome his oppo uni y as a way o
de eloping hei linguis ic awa eness and imp o ing hei a i ude owa ds
mis akes.
6. S uden s’ and eache s’ opinions on he SPPA model and u he
discussion
Two ques ionnai es ha e been illed by he s uden s o Lengua Aplicada a la
T aducción II and III a e comple ion o each e m in he las wo academic
yea s (n 28), and hei answe s show a gene al accep ance o he model.
A e y high pe cen age [89%] o esponden s belie e ha he ailo -made
ma e ials a e use ul and ele an ; 93% conside he op ions o pee wo k a
he d a ing, edi ing and ed a ing s ages bene icial and all o hem ha e
s a ed a posi i e app aisal o he de elopmen o hei linguis ic and ex ual
awa eness.
F om he eache s’ pe spec i e, ha ing been in cha ge o he same
g oup o s uden s o wo consecu i e yea s, despi e o he po en ial
d awbacks, has allowed o a con inuous assessmen o hei p og ess in
e ms o linguis ic, discu si e, s a egic, and me acogni i e compe ences. I
has also e ealed he need o ocus mo e on s uden s’ me alinguis ic skills,
since he eaching eams o bo h subjec s ha e obse ed he pe sis ence o
ce ain ypes o mis akes in some s uden s, despi e ha ing add essed he
linguis ic issue om a disc e e poin , a ex ual –and mo e communica i e–
and a e lec i e –o pos -p oduc ion pe spec i e. As a consequence, he use
o he SAC was in oduced his yea , oge he wi h he analysis o ex s om
a ious sou ces –uni e si y websi es, ansla ion s yle manuals– and g ades
o complexi y abou edi ing and p oo eading.
Ano he aspec o conside in u he s udies is lea ne s’ a ying
deg ees o backg ound knowledge and acqui ed s a egies as hey each
he speci ic subjec s o language o ansla ion pu poses ( he las h ee
yea s o he i e-yea cou se). Changes in he cu iculum we e in oduced
only ou yea s ago, and an assessmen o he e ec i eness o such changes
is s ill o be made. This is going o a ec he e alua ion o he linguis ic
backg ound and needs o he s uden s.
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
270
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
E en ually, i is expec ed ha wi h a clea e ocus on academic
w i ing and he ele ance o con ex ualisa ion, u he in oads can be made
ac oss he cu iculum o he T ansla ion P og am in o de o con inue
sensi ising lea ne s abou he p ocedu al, immanen na u e o w i ing as
well as i s social na u e, and hus he una oidable need o conside he
he o ical elemen s –who, o whom, wha , why, wha o – when eading,
w i ing –and ob iously, ansla ing– any ype o ex .
Re e ences
Bake , M. (1992). In O he Wo ds. New Yo k: Rou ledge. h ps://doi.
o g/10.4324/9780203327579
Baze man, C. (2005). Handbook o esea ch on w i ing: his o y, socie y, school,
indi idual, ex . New Yo k: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Baze man, C. (2012). Géne os ex uales, ipi icación y ac i idad. Basich Pe al a,
K; Pe ales Escude o, M.; Téllez Méndez, B. A. & Vázquez Ahumada,
A. ( ansla o s). Puebla, Mexico: Facul ad de Lenguas. Benemé i a
Uni e sidad Au ónoma de Puebla. ISBN 978-607-487-464-8.
Baze man, C. (2013). Unde s anding he li elong jou ney o w i ing de elopmen .
Jou nal o he S udy o Educa ion and De elopmen , 36[4], 421-441.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1174/021037013808200320
Baze man, C. Li le, J., Be hel, L., Cha kin, T., Fouque e, D. & Ga u is, J. (2005).
Re e ence Guide o W i ing ac oss he Cu iculum. Indiana: Pa lo P ess.
Bha ia, V. K. (2004). Wo lds o w i en discou se. A gen e-based iew. New Yo k:
Con inuum.
Ca lino, P. (2005). Esc ibi , lee y ap ende en la uni e sidad. Una in oducción a
la al abe ización académica. Buenos Ai es: Fondo de Cul u a Económica.
Ca lino, P. (2013). Al abe ización académica diez años después. Re is a Mexicana
de In es igación Educa i a, 2012: 18-57. h p://www. edalyc.o g/a iculo.
oa?id=14025774003.
Cuélla Láza o, C. (2004). Un nue o en oque de la aducción en la enseñanza
comunica i a de las lenguas. He meneus: Re is a de la Facul ad de
T aducción e In e p e ación de So ia, 41-57.
ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
271 Paula J. Liendo y Ma ía Palmi a Massi
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Desinano, N. (2009). Los alumnos uni e si a ios y la esc i u a académica.
Análisis de un p oblema. Rosa io: Homo Sapiens.
Cloue , R. (2010). Lengua inglesa aplicada a la aducción. G anada: Coma es.
De Felipe Bo o, M. (2004). Re isión del concep o de no ma en los Es udios de
T aducción. He mēneus, 6, 59-74.
G abe, W. & Kaplan, R. (1998). Theo y & P ac ice o w i ing. New Yo k:
Longman.
Ha im, B. (2013). Teaching and Resea ching T ansla ion. 2nd edi ion. New Yo k:
Rou ledge.
Ha im, B. & Munday, J. (2004). T ansla ion: An Ad anced Cou sebook. New
Yo k: Rou ledge.
House, J. (2009). T ansla ion. Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Hu ado Albi , A. (2011). T aducción y T aduc ología. Mad id: Cá ed a.
Liendo, P. (2015). ETP (English o T ansla ion Pu poses): Why? Wha ? How?
P oceedings o El conocimien o como espacio de encuen o, e ce
cong eso nacional. Facul ad de Lenguas, Uni e sidad Nacional del
Comahue, A gen ina. ISBN 978-987-604-418-9.
Man edi, M. (2008). T ansla ing Tex and Con ex : T ansla ion S udies and
Sys emic Func ional Linguis ics. Vol. 1: T ansla ion Theo y. Quade ni
del CeSLiC. Func ional G amma S udies Fo Non-Na i e Speake s o
English. ISSN 1973-2228.
Massi, M.P. & Liendo, P. (2016). Al abe ización Académica y Géne os
Discu si os en el Ámbi o Uni e si a io. Escena io Educa i o, Re is a
T ansdisciplina ia de Educación. Vol. 1 N°1, Janua y-June 2015, 45-58.
ISSN: 2443-4493.
Na a o, F. (2012). Al abe ización a anzada en A gen ina. Pun os de con ac o con
la enseñanza-ap endizaje del español académico como L2. Re is a Neb ija
de Lingüís ica Aplicada, 12.
Nida, E. A. (1964). Towa d a Science o T ansla ing. Leiden: E.J. B ill.
No d, C. (1997). T ansla ing as a Pu pose ul Ac i i y. Manches e : S . Je ome
Publishing.

ELIA 17, 2017, pp. 251-272
272
DOI:h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.11
Academic li e acy, gen es and compe ences: a didac ic model o ...
Pa odi G. (ed) (2005). Discu so especializado e ins i uciones o mado as. Valpa aíso:
Ediciones Uni e si a ias de Valpa aíso.
Pa odi, G. (ed) (2010). Al abe ización académica y p o esional en el siglo XXI:
lee y esc ibi desde las disciplinas. San iago de Chile: Edi o ial A iel.
P io , P. & Bilb o, R. (2011). Academic encul u a ion: De eloping li e a e p ac ices
and disciplina y iden i ies. In Cas elló, M. & Donahue, C. (eds.), Uni e si y
w i ing: Sel es and ex s in academic socie ies, S udies in W i ing, olume
24 (pp.19-31). London: Eme ald.
Sca damalia, M. & Be ei e , C. (1992). Dos modelos explica i os de los p ocesos
de composición esc i a. In ancia y Ap endizaje, 58, 43-64. h ps://doi.o g/1
0.1080/02103702.1992.10822332
Swales, J. M. (1990). Gen e analysis: English in academic and esea ch
se ings. Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Resea ch gen es: explo a ions and applica ions. Camb idge:
Camb idge Uni e si y P ess. h ps://doi.o g/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2011). Na iga ing academia: w i ing suppo ing
gen es. Ann A bo : The Uni e si y o Michigan P ess. h ps://doi.
o g/10.3998/mpub.3073304
Fi s e sion ecei ed: June 2017
Final e sion accep ed: Oc obe 2017