Pa hai a Pas pipa kul; H we Ko
A icle
The e icacy o mone a y and iscal policies on economic
g ow h: E idence om Thailand
Economies
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
MDPI – Mul idisciplina y Digi al Publishing Ins i u e, Basel
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Pa hai a Pas pipa kul; H we Ko (2025) : The e icacy o mone a y and iscal
policies on economic g ow h: E idence om Thailand, Economies, ISSN 2227-7099, MDPI, Basel,
Vol. 13, Iss. 1, pp. 1-17,
h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/economies13010019
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/329299
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Academic Edi o : Gab iela Dob o ˘a
Recei ed: 20 Decembe 2024
Re ised: 10 Janua y 2025
Accep ed: 11 Janua y 2025
Published: 15 Janua y 2025
Ci a ion: Pas pipa kul, P., & Ko, H.
(2025). The E icacy o Mone a y and
Fiscal Policies on Economic G ow h:
E idence om Thailand. Economies,
13(1), 19. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
economies13010019
Copy igh : © 2025 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license
(h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/
licenses/by/4.0/).
A icle
The E icacy o Mone a y and Fiscal Policies on Economic
G ow h: E idence om Thailand
Pa hai a Pas pipa kul and H we Ko *
Facul y o Economics, Chiang Mai Uni e si y, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac : This s udy empi ically explo es he dynamic e ec o MP and FP on he economic
g ow h o Thailand om Q1:2003 o Q2:2024. In his s udy, da a analysis was conduc ed
using an ad anced sequence o he econome ic modeling app oach o gua an ee ha
he es ima ed esul s we e mo e consis en and eliable. Fi s , we used Bayesian addi i e
eg ession ees (BART) and Bayesian a iable selec ion (BASAD) me hods o de e mine
mac o ac o s wi h he highes p obabili ies in luencing g ow h, in addi ion o mone a y and
iscal policy ools du ing he s udied pe iods. Second, we used he ime- a ying coe icien s
seemingly un ela ed equa ion (TVSURE) model o examine he economic impac o MP
and FP. Las , we also employed he Ma ko swi ching eg ession (MSR) model no only o
suppo he indings om he TVSURE model bu also o p opose policy ecommenda ions
based on egime du a ions and ansi ions emp ed by MP and FP. The main esul s om
bo h TVSURE and MSR e eal he ollowing: (1) MP is mo e consis en wi h expec ed
g ow h ou comes while FP is s onge when localized, (2) MP is mo e e ec i e in sus aining
long pe iods o high g ow h, (3) FP is signi ican ly s onge in eco e ing om ecessions,
and (4) he coo dina ion o MP and FP has a simila pe o mance o MP alone bu wi h
sho e ansi ion pe iods. This s udy makes an empi ical con ibu ion o he ongoing
deba e on he e ec i eness o MP and FP in boos ing g ow h and aiding in he eco e y
om ecessions in he case o Thailand. In addi ion, his s udy no only acknowledged
ce ain limi a ions bu also ecommended policies o sus ain he Thai economy.
Keywo ds: mone a y policy; iscal policy; g ow h; TVSURE; Ma ko swi ching; Thailand
1. In oduc ion
Mone a y and iscal policies a e implemen ed as c i ical ins umen s o d i e a na ion
owa d economic p ospe i y. This pape ag ees ha mone a y policy (MP) and iscal policy
(FP) a e essen ial o main aining sus ainable economic g ow h, mode a ing in la ion,
ensu ing deb sus ainabili y, and achie ing balanced public inances. Fo many coun ies,
go e nmen s a e esponsible o iscal ools and cen al banks, while, on he o he hand,
handling mone a y ools o espond o any ex e nal shocks such as global inancial and
heal h c ises. These kinds o c ises a e uly de imen al o he economy. Fo example,
ollowing he co ona i us (COVID-19) pandemic, China’s coo dina ed economic e i al
p oduced signi ican spillo e e ec s globally ha a ec ed no only he economic g ow h
bu ene gy demand in uppe -middle and also high-income na ions (Yuan e al.,2022).
In mode n days, he combina ion o MP and FP plus a o able in es men condi ions
is qui e impo an o ou pu g ow h and social de elopmen in line wi h he long- e m
g ow h pa h. In ac , Behe a e al. (2024) a gued he need o an e ec i e s a egy o add ess
ex eme e en s like he COVID-19 pandemic. Fundamen ally, MP and FP sha e he same
Economies 2025,13, 19 h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/economies13010019
Economies 2025,13, 19 2 o 17
objec i e o s imula ing public wel a e, simila o o he mechanisms o public policies.
Mo eo e , one s udy ound e idence o a subs i u ion associa ion be ween policies (A onso
e al.,2019). Go e nmen s and cen al banks mus collabo a e closely o ake ac ions ha
p e en he signi ican decline in economic ac i i ies. Fiscal sus ainabili y is essen ial in
suppo ing he ini ia i es o mone a y au ho i ies. Cen al banks, h ough implemen ing
mone a y policies, aim o sa egua d p ice s abili y and go e nmen s h ough adjus ing
iscal policies ha egula e mo e e enue, p op ia e expendi u es, and a oid budge de ici s
o c ea e sa is ac o y condi ions o economic de elopmen . While MP and FP may ha e
di e en goals, a mode a e mone a y expansion should be implemen ed alongside a bal-
anced iscal policy excep in ex ao dina y economic ci cums ances (Chuguno e al.,2021).
Fo ins ance, cen al banks in ad anced economies shi ed o uncon en ional measu es due
o he ze o lowe bound, while iscal ools showed limi ed consolida ion e o s a e he
2008 inancial c isis (Sil a & Viei a,2017). In addi ion, A o a e al. (2022) suppo ed he
use o an op imal combina ion o MP and FP o achie e sus ainable g ow h, pa icula ly in
e ms o demand g ow h and p ice s abili y. Thei s udy sugges ed ha FP should ake a
leading ole wi h mone a y and ade policies, ac ing h ough adjus men s as needed. They
a gued ha his policy coo dina ion can s abilize he economy and g ow h o he long
e m based on he qua e ly da ase o India om Q1:1996–97 and Q4:2019–2020.
While bo h mone a y policy (MP) and iscal policy (FP) a e widely conside ed as
signi ican con ibu o s owa ds imp o ing he mac oeconomic s abili y, hei e icacy in
sus aining g ow h o he Thai economy emains insu icien ly explo ed. Mo eo e , gi en
he challenges Thailand aces, such as household deb , aging popula ion, in la ion, poli ical
unce ain y, and global economic headwinds, he coun y also pu sues oppo uni ies in
digi al ans o ma ion and sus ainable de elopmen . Howe e , no empi ical s udy has
been conduc ed on he e icacy o MP and FP ollowing hese c ises in Thailand. The e o e,
we use he la es a ailable da a o examine he e ec s o mone a y and iscal policies along
wi h o he mac o a iables on he Thai economy. The empi ical indings a e ob ained
h ough his p esen s udy by using TVSURE and MSR models; his s udy examines he
e ec i eness o MP in sus aining long- e m g ow h and FP in acili a ing a apid eco e y
du ing economic down u ns in he case o Thailand. This pape con ibu es o he exis ing
empi ical li e a u e by explo ing he mac o e ec s o MP and FP shocks, wi h a ocus on
acking economic g ow h and he po en ial in luence o a comp ehensi e se o a iables.
This pape is s uc u ed as ollows: i begins wi h a e iew o ecen empi ical s udies,
ollowed by a sec ion on he da a and me hods o s udy used o da a analysis. The esul s
and discussions a e hen p esen ed. Finally, conclusions and policy ecommenda ions a e
p o ided a he end.
2. Recen Empi ical S udies on MP and FP in Rela ion o G ow h
The e has been ex ensi e empi ical esea ch on he ela ionship be ween mone a y
policy (MP), iscal policy (FP), and economic g ow h ac oss di e en coun ies. Howe e ,
he exis ing li e a u e p esen s inconsis encies, wi h some s udies showing posi i e impac s,
while o he s epo nega i e and na u al ela ionships. As Andini (2024) no es, he nexus
be ween hese policies and g ow h depends on many ac o s including he e ogenei y,
sample size, esea ch me hods, con ol a iables, and o he ela i e elemen s. These
a ying ac o s may be a cause behind he mixed indings obse ed in he li e a u e. In his
sec ion, we e iewed some o he ecen empi ical s udies in his ield o iden i y he gaps
his s udy seeks o ill.
One o he mos ele an empi ical s udies conduc ed by Tan e al. (2020) ound he
exis ence o a nega i e ela ionship be ween economic g ow h and he money ma ke a e
(as a ool o MP) and a posi i e link wi h go e nmen spending (as a ool o FP) in Thailand
Economies 2025,13, 19 3 o 17
om Q1:1990 o Q1:2017. They concluded ha FP is mo e e ec i e in Thailand compa ed
o Malaysia and Singapo e. Bu his conclusion appea s biased as i only conside ed wo
explana o y ac o s impac ing he eal GDP. Addi ionally, he esul s showed he ou comes
a e asymme ic, wi h MP and FP being mu ually dependen . In con as , Chuguno
e al. (2021) empi ically in es iga ed he impac o FP and MP on economic g ow h in 19
eme ging coun ies om 1995 o 2018. They ound (1) he gene al go e nmen spending has
a nega i e ela ionship wi h he pe capi al GDP g ow h, (2) he e ec o public spending
on economic de elopmen depends on h ee ac o s like ins i u ions’ quali y, expendi u e
composi ion, and iscal a chi ec u e, and (3) he e is a p o en need o maximize he sha e
o p oduc i e expendi u es. Based on hese esul s, hey ecommended using adap i e
ools in MP o achie e bo h in e media e and inal in la ion a ge s. Simila ly, Ozili (2024)
used seconda y annual da a o 22 coun ies be ween 2011 and 2018 o in es iga e he
impac o mone a y, iscal, and egula o y policies on sus ainable de elopmen while
con olling o economic g ow h. His indings showed he ollowing: (1) economic policy
imp o es sus ainable de elopmen in de eloping and non-Eu opean coun ies bu has
a nega i e e ec in de eloped and Eu opean coun ies, (2) expansiona y MP suppo s
SDG6, (3) expansiona y iscal policy boo s SDG3: Good Heal h and Well-Being and SDG7:
A o dable and Clean Ene gy bu ha ms SDG6: Clean Wa e and Sani a ion, (4) egula o y
policy ha is being designed o imp o e go e nance enhances SDG3 and SDG6, and
(5) changes o hese policies lead o changes in sus ainable de elopmen .
Rega ding exchange a e egimes, one s udy conduc ed by I o and Kawai (2024) ound
ha (1) mone a y policy is e ec i e in inc easing eal GDP g ow h unde a lexible exchange
a e egime bu no unde inancially open ixed a e egime, (2) MP is mos e ec i e in
cu bing in la ion and in la ion ola ili y unde a lexible exchange a e egime, and (3) FP
posi i ely a ec s GDP g ow h unde a lexible exchange a e egime, and in la ion ola ili y
unde a inancially closed ixed a e egime helps achie e p ice s abili y in inancially open
economies. These indings we e based on he sample o 61 de eloping and eme ging
economies om 1971 o 2020. When conside ing mone a y and iscal policies in luencing
sus ainable de elopmen , i a ies ac oss coun ies and egions. Al hough he quali a i e
documen analysis o Abeyseke a (2024) on he ole o mone a y, iscal, and public policies
on SDGs be o e and a e he COVID-19 pandemic, public policy was seen as a signi ican
d i e o sus ainable de elopmen in S i Lanka. In con as , MP and FP we e p ima ily
di ec ed owa d economic eco e y e o s. Dinh e al. (2024) examined he e ec o MP and
FP on sus ainable de elopmen om 2005 o 2020 using a panel da ase o 33 de eloping
and 7 de eloped coun ies. The s udy ound ha MP as measu ed by he money supply and
in la ion nega i ely a ec s sus ainable de elopmen , while o eign exchange ese es and
inancial s abili y ha e a posi i e impac wi h p obabili ies o 89.6 pe cen in de eloped and
92.5 pe cen in de eloping coun ies. FP as measu ed by go e nmen spending posi i ely
suppo s sus ainable de elopmen wi h a p obabili y o 99.7 pe cen in bo h de eloped and
de eloping coun ies. Meanwhile, ax income inc eases sus ainable de elopmen wi h a
100 pe cen p obabili y in de eloped coun ies bu shows a 60.9 pe cen p obabili y o a
nega i e e ec in de eloping coun ies.
Demi as (2023) s udied he e ec i eness o expansiona y MP and FP in 55 de eloped
and 55 de eloping coun ies om 2007 o 2026 by using an A ellano–Bond GMM model.
The esul s showed ha MP is mo e e ec i e han FP in de eloped coun ies and FP in
de eloping coun ies suppo s agg ega e demand. Mo eo e , Azad e al. (2021) explo ed
he economic impac o MP and FP o Canada om Q1:1990 o Q4:2020 by using he
egime-swi ching model and s uc u al VAR model. They ound ha FP has been mo e
ac i e han MP o boos ing sho - e m economic ac i i y, bu causes ising in e es a es,
lowe in es men , and highe in la ion in he long e m. Fu he mo e, Ba ayneh e al. (2024)
Economies 2025,13, 19 4 o 17
empi ically in es iga ed MP and FP on US economic g ow h om Q1:1964 o Q3:2021 by
using an un es ic ed VAR model. They ound ha he ede al budge de ici (FP) and
money supply, ede al unds a e, and exchange a e (MP) ha e no long- e m ela ionship
wi h g ow h. In he sho e m, expansiona y MP and FP posi i ely a ec economic
g ow h, while he exchange a e shows no signi ican e ec . Addi ionally, he inancial
c isis and COVID-19 pandemic we e ound o ha e a nega i e impac on he US economy
o he s udied pe iods. Fu he mo e, Nu u (2020) s udied he e ec s o MP and FP
shocks in he Sou h A ican economy by using a s uc u al ec o au o eg essi e (SVAR)
model o he pe iods o Q2:1994 o Q2:2014. His indings showed ha MP igh ening
educes eal economic ac i i ies and leads o exchange a e dep ecia ion. Fo FP, he
go e nmen spending mul iplie inc eased as he ax mul iplie was close o ze o on impac
and s a is ically insigni ican . His s udy emphasized he p esence o he impo an ole o
MP and FP in in luencing economic ac i i ies and pollical decision-making.
In addi ion, Adegboyo e al. (2021) ound ha FP s imula es Nige ia’s economic
g ow h in he long un wi h go e nmen spending bu his is no consis en in he sho
un. Go e nmen e enue, howe e , was no ound o a ec g ow h. On he o he hand,
mone a y policies showed ha he money supply does no a ec g ow h, bu an inc ease in
in e es a es posi i ely in luence g ow h be ween 1985 and 2020. The au ho s sugges ed
ha policymake s use in e es a es and iscal policies o boos sho - e m economic g ow h
o Nige ia. F om 1960 o 2020 in Nige ia, he exchange a e and money supply had a
posi i e and signi ican link wi h g ow h, while he in e es a e showed a posi i e bu
insigni ican ela ionship and he in la ion a e had a nega i e and insigni ican impac
(Donald e al.,2024). Mo eo e , Isaiah e al. (2024) and Dodo e al. (2024) bo h examined he
economic impac o MP and FP o he same coun y (Nige ia) o he pe iods be ween 1991
and 2022 and om 1981 o 2017, espec i ely. FP had a posi i e and signi ican e ec on
g ow h while MP nega i ely a ec s i (Dodo e al.,2024). Isaiah e al. (2024) no ed MP was
weak compa ed o FP in i s impac on Nige ia’s economy while esul ing in high in la ion
and exchange a e ola ili y. Mwale and Mulenga (2024) also ound ha 1 pe cen inc eases
in ax e enue ha e a posi i e and signi ican long- e m impac on g ow h by 3.36 pe cen ,
while ex e nal deb and public expendi u e ha e nega i e e ec s by 1.17 pe cen and 0.003
pe cen , co espondingly, be ween 1991 and 2021 in Nige ia. In he sho e m, i showed 1
pe cen inc eases in ax e enue causes a g ow h decline by 0.003 pe cen and 6.14 pe cen ,
espec i ely.
Las bu no leas , Andini (2024) also a gued ha he economic g ow h– iscal policy
nexus can be a ied, showing posi i e, nega i e, o neu al esul s depending on ac o s
such as he e ogeneous condi ions, in e media e a iables, esea ch me hods, sample size,
and de elopmen le el o coun ies s udied, and many mo e. The s udy ound he e ec o
go e nmen spending, axa ion, and deb on g ow h emains unclea , including in epo s
by Nguyen e al. (2024), whe eas hey ound FP as measu ed by public expendi u e had a
la ge impac on economic g ow h han MP as measu ed by b oad money (M2) be ween
1996 and 2021 in Vie nam. In addi ion, Aisyah e al. (2024) examined he FP-economic
g ow h nexus in Indonesia and ound a close and posi i e ela ionship. The e was a long-
un posi i e nexus be ween inc eases and dec eases in go e nmen spending and economic
g ow h be ween 1970 and 2019 in Somalia (Ali e al.,2024). In ano he empi ical s udy by
Kim e al. (2021) on a simila opic o he case o China, hey ound local spending has
a la ge impac on ou pu g ow h han cen al spending be ween 1985 and 2016. I also
showed a shi om in as uc u e in es men s o R&D-d i en g ow h in ecen yea s. Ne
axes and public deb in China we e also ound o in luence he long- un g ow h.
The exis ing li e a u e e iewed showed he mixed indings o he economic impac
o MP and FP o di e en economies. Mo eo e , mos o hem end o na owly ocus
Economies 2025,13, 19 5 o 17
on ei he MP o FP alone so ha hey seem o o e look and igno e he conside a ion o
a ious mac oeconomic ac o s. We belie e hese indings may be subjec o signi ican
biases. The need o he e ec i e and ca e ul coo dina ion o MP and FP in o de o educe
h ea s o mac oeconomic s abili y is clea . The e o e, his s udy adop s a mone a y– iscal
mix app oach o mo e comp ehensi ely examine he e ec s o hese policies on he Thai
economy be ween he i s qua e o 2003 o he second qua e o 2024 by using an
ad anced sequence o econome ic modeling me hods.
3. Resea ch Me hodology
In his s udy, da a analysis was conduc ed using an ad anced sequence o econome ic
modeling app oach o gua an ee ha he es ima ed esul s we e mo e consis en and
eliable. We ini ially used Bayesian addi i e eg ession ees (BART) and Bayesian a iable
selec ion (BASAD) me hods o de e mine mac o ac o s wi h he highes p obabili ies o
in luencing g ow h in addi ion o mone a y and iscal policy ools du ing he s udied
pe iods. While bo h he BART and BASAD me hods a e s ill weak a choosing be ween
ele an and i ele an a iables, he inal selec ion o a iables was based on a mix-o de
app oach be ween he wo models. This way, we imp o e he consis ency o bo h he BART
and BASAD models by selec ing be ween ele an and i ele an a iables o he inal
a iable selec ion based on a mix-o de echnique be ween he wo models. Secondly, we
p oceeded he ime- a ying coe icien s seemingly un ela ed equa ion (TVSURE) model
o examine he economic impac o MP and FP. Finally, we used he Ma ko swi ching
eg ession (MSR) model no only o suppo he indings om he TVSURE model bu also
o p opose policy ecommenda ions based on egime du a ions and ansi ions. In o de
o suppo he indings om he ime- a ying seemingly un ela ed eg ession equa ions
(TVSURE) model and o de e mine whe he MP, FP, o he coo dina ion o MP and FP is
mo e e ec i e in sus aining g ow h, we de eloped h ee empi ical equa ions o u he
examine he egime-shi ing e ec o MP and FP on he Thai economy. Fo his o be
achie ed, we employed he Ma ko swi ching eg ession (MSR) model. Since TVSURE and
MSR a e linea models, we applied a log ans o ma ion o he inal selec ed a iables o
he s udy in o de o linea ize he ela ionships be ween he a iables. This way, i helps us
o be e i he model by making nonlinea ela ionships mo e linea and by s abilizing he
a iance. Figu e 1 ep esen s he concep ual amewo k o he s udy.
Economies2025,13,xFORPEERREVIEW5o 17
omac oeconomics abili yisclea .The e o e, hiss udyadop samone a y– iscalmix
app oach omo ecomp ehensi elyexamine heeffec so hesepolicieson heThaiecon‐
omybe ween he i s qua e o 2003 o hesecondqua e o 2024byusinganad anced
sequenceo econome icmodelingme hods.
3.Resea chMe hodology
In hiss udy,da aanalysiswasconduc edusinganad ancedsequenceo econome ic
modelingapp oach ogua an ee ha hees ima ed esul swe emo econsis en and elia‐
ble.Weini iallyusedBayesianaddi i e eg ession ees(BART)andBayesian a iablese‐
lec ion(BASAD)me hods ode e minemac o ac o swi h hehighes p obabili ieso in lu‐
encingg ow hinaddi ion omone a yand iscalpolicy oolsdu ing hes udiedpe iods.
Whilebo h heBARTandBASADme hodsa es illweaka choosingbe ween ele an and
i ele an a iables, he inalselec iono a iableswasbasedonamix‐o de app oachbe‐
ween he womodels.Thisway,weimp o e heconsis encyo bo h heBARTandBASAD
modelsbyselec ingbe ween ele an andi ele an a iables o he inal a iableselec ion
basedonamix‐o de echniquebe ween he womodels.Secondly,wep oceeded he ime‐
a yingcoe icien sseeminglyun ela edequa ion(TVSURE)model oexamine heeco‐
nomicimpac o MPandFP.Finally,weused heMa ko swi ching eg ession(MSR)model
no only osuppo he indings om heTVSUREmodelbu also op oposepolicy ecom‐
menda ionsbasedon egimedu a ionsand ansi ions.Ino de osuppo he indings
om he ime‐ a yingseeminglyun ela ed eg essionequa ions(TVSURE)modeland o
de e minewhe he MP,FP,o hecoo dina iono MPandFPismo ee ec i einsus aining
g ow h,wede eloped h eeempi icalequa ions o u he examine he egime‐shi inge ‐
ec o MPandFPon heThaieconomy.Fo his obeachie ed,weemployed heMa ko
swi ching eg ession(MSR)model.SinceTVSUREandMSRa elinea models,weapplied
alog ans o ma ion o he inalselec ed a iableso hes udyino de olinea ize he e‐
la ionshipsbe ween he a iables.Thisway,i helpsus obe e i hemodelbymaking
nonlinea ela ionshipsmo elinea andbys abilizing he a iance.Figu e1 ep esen s
heconcep ual amewo ko hes udy.
Figu e 1. Concep ual amewo k o his s udy.
Economies 2025,13, 19 6 o 17
3.1. Bayesian Addi i e Reg ession T ees (BART) Model
BART is a me hod ha is being used o de e mine po en ial inpu p edic o s in luenc-
ing he dependen a iable o he s udy based on he pos e io inclusion p obabili ies o
a iables. This model is a non-pa ame ic one, by inco po a ing he Bayesian echnique,
i s de eloped by Chipman e al. (2010) and which is la e implemen ed in R e sion 4.4.1.
by Kapelne and Bleich (2016). The model has bo h ad an ages and disad an ages. One o
he p os o using his model is being able o handle nonlinea da ase s. This model consis s
o h ee componen s: 1. addi i e ees; 2. p io speci ica ion; and 3. a s ochas ic p ocess o
pos e io dis ibu ion so i is also known as he sum o ees. Va iables a e anked based
on hei a e age pos e io inclusion p obabili ies. One o he cons is ha his model only
p oduces a small ac ion o he a ia ion o he o e all ela ionship ha can be explained.
In his s udy, we used he “Ba Machine” package in RS udio e sion 4.4.1 in o de o apply
his me hod.
3.2. Bayesian Va iable Selec ion (BASAD) Model
As p oposed, addi ionally, we used he “basad” package in RS udio o selec he
a iables wi h highe pos e io inclusion p obabili ies, in luencing he dependen a iables
o his s udy. This me hod was i s in oduced by Na ise y and He (2014), which was
la e implemen ed in R p og amming by Xiang and Na ise y (2022). I also esul s in he
same pe o mance as he BART model by combining adap i e sampling wi h a Bayesian
amewo k. This me hod can be compu a ionally in ensi e when he model space is
la ge and sensi i e o he choice o p io s. Ne e heless, i is a use ul ool wi h which o
de e mine he mos ele an a iables whe e he e is unce ain y abou he model s uc u e
o pa ame e s. Since bo h BART and BASAD ha e hei own weaknesses and s eng hs, his
s udy will adop a mix-o de selec ion app oach u ilizing hese wo me hods in choosing
he mos in luen ial inpu a iables, in addi ion o MP and FP ools.
3.3. Time-Va ying Coe icien s Seemingly Un ela ed Equa ion (TVSURE) Model
Seemingly un ela ed equa ions (SURE) models de eloped by Zellne (1962) a e ex en-
sions o linea eg essions o a mul i-equa ion amewo k. In his s udy, a TVSURE wi h
wo equa ions model was employed ollowing Casas and Fe nandez-Casal (2022). This
model w aps ime- a ying o dina y leas squa es ( OLS) and ime- a ying gene alized
leas squa es ( GLS) o es ima e he coe icien s o TVSURE. One o he ad an ages o his
model is ha i can es ima e each equa ion independen ly, assuming no c oss-equa ion
e o co ela ions. In ou SURE model, he ollowing wo equa ions we e included:
lgdp =α10 +α11lm2 +α12lpi s +α13lin +α14lusd obah +α15lunemp +ε1 (1)
lgdp =α20 +α21lgo e +α22lgo exp +α23lgo deb +α24lunemp +ε2 (2)
whe e lgdp = he loga i hm o he GDP g ow h a e, lm2 = he loga i hm o he money
supply (m2), lpi s = he loga i hm o he policy in e es a es, lin = he loga i hm o he
consume p ice in la ion, lusd obah = he loga i hm o he exchange a e (US dolla agains
Thai bah ), and lunemp = he loga i hm o he unemploymen a e ( a iable selec ed by he
mix-o de a iable selec ion app oach).
In his model we applied, he ime- a ying a iance–co a iance ma ix o wo o mo e
se ies is es ima ed nonpa ame ically using he ‘ Reg’ package. E(
γi ,γi′ ′)=σii′
when
Economies 2025,13, 19 7 o 17
= ’, and ze o o he wise. This allows he a iance–co a iance ma ix o be ime- a ying
wi h he ollowing exp ession a any gi en ime (qua e ):
Σ =
σ11
σN1
.
.
.
σN1
σ12
σ22
...
σN2
· · ·
· · ·
· · ·
σ1N
σ2N
.
.
.
σNN
(3)
Since he ma ix is assumed o be locally s a iona y, i s linea es ima o is de ined by
he ollowing:
ech∼
Στ=
T
∑
=1
ech(γτ
γ )Kh( −τ)s2−s1(τ− )
s0s2−s2
1
(4)
whe e
sj=∑T
=1τ− )jKb(τ− )
o j = 0, 1, 2;
Kb(·)
is a symme ic ke nel unc ion ha
assigns a highe weigh o alues close o he ocal poin (
τ
= /T); and b is he bandwid h
pa ame e . A single bandwid h is used ac oss all co-mo emen s, ensu ing ha
∼
Στ
emains
posi i e-de ini e.
3.4. Ma ko Swi ching Reg ession (MSR) Model
In o de o suppo he indings om he TVSURE model, we u he conduc ed a
egime-swi ching analysis ha was i s p oposed by Gold eld and Quand (1973) and
Hamil on (1989), and u he ound in Pe lin (2015). Following Sanchez-Espiga es and
Lopez-Mo eno (2022), we used he ‘MSwM’ package in RS udio o es ima e he egime
shi ing ela ionships be ween policies and g ow h. Le he Ma ko swi ching eg ession
(MSR) model wi h wo egimes be exp essed as ollows:
γ1, =β1,1 ∗x1, +β1,2 ∗x2, +· · · +β1,i ∗xi, +ϵ1, (5)
γ2, =β2,1 ∗x1, +β2,2 ∗x2, +· · · +β2,i ∗xi, +ϵ2, (6)
wi h
ϵ1, ∼N0, σ2
1, 1(7)
ϵ2, ∼N0, σ2
2, 2(8)
Co a iance(ϵ1, ,ϵ2, )=0 (9)
whe e
γ1, and γ2,
ep esen dependen a iables,
xi,
ep esen s all inpu p edic o s o
independen a iables,
βi
ep esen s he mean o he pa ame e s o be es ima ed,
σ1
,
σ2
a e
esiduals o egime 1 and egime 2, and ϵ1, ,ϵ2, a e he e o e ms.
4. Da a and Empi ical Resul s
4.1. Da a Desc ip i e
The s udy used he seconda y qua e ly ime se ies da a as ob ained om he CEIC
da abase h ough he Chiang Mai Uni e si y Ne wo k o he pe iods o Q1:2003 o Q2:2024.
The analysis ocused on economic g ow h measu ed as GDP g ow h as he dependen a i-
able and included a ange o independen a iables a anged by he policy domain. B oad
money, he policy in e es a e, he in la ion a e, and he exchange a e we e conside ed as
MP ools while go e nmen e enue, expendi u e, and deb we e aken as FP ools. In e -
media e ac o s we e also conside ed as hey ha e po en ial indi ec and di ec e ec s on
he economic g ow h o Thailand; hese a e consume con idence in he p esen and u u e,
gold p ice, diesel p ice, gasoline 95 p ice, impo s, expo s, household deb , unemploymen
Economies 2025,13, 19 8 o 17
a e, o eign di ec in es men , elec ici y gene a ion, and a dummy a iable o accoun o
he economic impac o he 2008 inancial c isis and he ecen COVID-19 pandemic. The
selec ion o policy a iables in his s udy is d i en by he exis ing li e a u e emphasizing
hei heo e ical ele ance and empi ical signi icance in mac oeconomic esea ch. Va iables
such as he consume con idence index (p esen and u u e) we e included o accoun o
household and business expec a ions while he gold p ice se es as a p oxy o inancial
s abili y and in la iona y ends. Impo s and expo s measu e ade openness and ex e nal
demand, while diesel and gasoline p ices ep esen inpu cos s in luencing p oduc ion and
in la ion. Va iables such as household deb , unemploymen , FDI, and elec ici y gene a ion
we e included as hey e lec domes ic c edi condi ions, labo ma ke dynamics, in es -
men g ow h, and indus ial ac i i ies, espec i ely. A dummy a iable o ex e nal shocks
accoun s o majo dis up ions including he 2008 inancial c isis and COVID-19 pandemic.
Howe e , he inal inpu p edic o s in addi ion o he co e MP and FP a iables we e
de e mined by using a mix-o de a iable selec ion app oach based on Bayesian a iable
selec ion me hods. A b ie summa y o each a iable co e ing i s da a sou ce, symbol, and
uni o measu emen is p o ided in Table A1 (Appendix A). Table 1p o ides summa y
s a is ics o a iables. Mos key a iables a e no mally dis ibu ed andom numbe s om
he Ja que–Be a es .
Table 1. Summa y s a is ics o a iables.
Va iable Mean Median
Maximum
S d. De .
Skewness
Ku osis Ja que-Be a
P obabili y
GDPR 3.104535 3.330000 15.37000 3.7072711 −
0.664509
6.889547 60.53995 0.000000
M2 461,919.9 494,137.5 764,771.3 190,260 −
0.069521
1.713010 6.004507 0.050204
PIRS 2.037442 1.710000 5.00000 1.086429 0.853642 3.342133 10.86422 10.86422
INF 94.06686 95.18500 104.7100 6.854254 −
0.254482
1.812263 6.983317 0.050205
USDTOBAHT 34.25605 33.37000 42.75000 29.81000 0.863062 2.896293 10.71510 0.004712
GOVREV 5171.011 5424.320 8502.670 1758.804 −
0.186334
2.107033 3.354971 0.186843
GOVEXP 15,342.19 16,721.17 24,405.23 5861.325 −
0.376450
1.894641 6.409423 0.040571
GOVDEBT 129,198.2 119,179.3 278,724.1 73,986.53 0.691077 2.350258 8.358168 0.015313
HHDEBT 70.62814 79.98000 95.51000 18.49546 −
0.335635
1.524223 9.418872 0.009010
CCIP 59.44593 59.03500 98.7000 17.41705 0.069541 2.604494 0.6294494 0.729848
CCIF 79.66221 81.75000 113.37000 13.57932 −
0.485427
3.424758 4.02400 0.133721
GOLDPR 580.4464 600.4900 1106.380 235.4623 −
0.170788
2.172168 2.873760 0.237668
DIESELPR 0.782558 0.845000 1.120000 0.195918 −
0.929205
3.070649 12.39361 0.002036
GASOLINEPR 1.073256 1.120000 1.610000 0.321780 −
0.480058
2.534044 4.081194 0.129951
IMPORT 60.63372 61.62500 76.82000 7.265874 −
0.077723
2.603427 0.650138 0.722478
EXPORT 65.69779 66.69500 78.38000 5.293297 −
0.973120
5.157833 30.25801 0.00000
UNEMP 1.271512 1.125000 2.87000 0.523930 1.105516 3.854745 20.13565 0.000042
FDI 2.422791 2.840000 6.4700000 2.245742 −
1.733698
8.868026 166.4693 0.00000
ECG 44,515.54 45,333.56 63,721.96 8407.443 −
0.098914
2.018411 3.592838 0.165892
EXTS 0.220930 0.00000 1.00000 0.417307 1.34524 2.809898 26.07137 0.000002
Sou ce: au ho s’ own es ima ion.
4.2. Va iables Selec ion by Using BART, BASAD, and Mix-O de App oaches
Acco ding o he li e a u e, he e a e many ac o s di ec ly and indi ec ly a ec ing
economic g ow h, bu he e is unce ain y abou ac o s a signi ican le els o speci ic ime
pe iods. We, he e o e, i s used he Bayesian addic i e eg ession ees (BART) me hod o
ind which o he inpu con ol a iables mos signi ican ly in luenced g ow h in Thailand
du ing he s udied pe iods. Secondly, we applied he Bayesian a iable selec ion wi h
adap i e me hod (BASAD) o enhance he a iable selec ion, and, inally, conduc ed a mix-
o de selec ion u ilizing BART and BASAD. Bo h me hods a e based on pos e io inclusion
p obabili ies o inpu p edic o s ha explain he dependen a iable o he s udy. In his
way, we can assu e a good a iable selec ion app oach be o e p oceeding wi h he inal
es ima ion. In Table 2, he a iables a e shown in he o de o hei inclusion p obabili ies,
Economies 2025,13, 19 15 o 17
Appendix A
Table A1. Sou ce o da a, symbol, and uni o measu emen o a iables used in his s udy.
Va iables Symbol Uni Sou ce
Real G oss Domes ic P oduc G ow h GDPR % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
(accessed on 2 Decembe 2024)
Money Supply, M2 (B oad Money) M2 US dolla million CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Policy In e es Ra e PIRS % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
In la ion, Consume P ice Index INF 2019 = 100 CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Exchange Ra e (1 US dolla o Bah ) USDTOBAHT Bah pe USD CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Go e nmen Re enue GOVREV US dolla million CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Go e nmen Expendi u e GOVEXP US dolla million CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Go e nmen Deb GOVDEBT US dolla million CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Consume Con idence Index: P esen CCIP Poin CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Consume Con idence Index: Fu u e CCIF Poin CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Gold P ice, 99.99% pu e s anda d GOLDPR US dolla CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Diesel P ice, base wholesale alue DIESELPR US dolla CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Gasoline 95 p ice, base e ail alue GASOLINEPR US dolla CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Impo s % o Nominal GDP IMPORT % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Expo s % o Nominal GDP EXPORT % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Household Deb % o Nominal GDP HHDEBT % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Unemploymen Ra e UNEMP % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
FDI % o Nominal GDP FDI % CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Elec ici y Gene a ion o al Gwh ECG Gwh CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
Ex e nal Shocks Dummy Va iable aEXTS 0 and 1 CEIC, h ps://www.ceicda a.com
No e:
a
indica es he p esence and absence o ex e nal shock e en s, whe eas 0 indica es absen pe iods wi h no
inancial c isis and COVID-19 pandemic, and 1 indica es p esen pe iods o inancial c isis which occu ed in
Q1:2007 and Q4:2008 wo ldwide and COVID-19 impac be ween Q1:2020 and Q4:2021.
Table A2. Regime-swi ching ela ionships be ween iscal policy and economic g ow h in Thailand.
Va iable
High-G ow h Regime Slow-G ow h Regime
Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value
In e cep 7.1710 4.9724 1.4422 0.1492 3.4056 1.1901 2.8616 0.004 **
Log (Go e ) 0.4867 1.0815 0.4500 0.6527 −0.4190 0.1972 −2.1247 0.033 *
Log (Go exp) −1.0422 2.6324 −0.3959 0.6922 1.3432 0.2723 4.9328 0.00 ***
Log (Go deb ) −0.0134 1.5557 −0.0086 0.9931 −0.9901 0.1422 −6.9627 0.00 ***
Log (Unemp) −0.0228 0.7916 −0.0288 0.9770 0.8976 0.1568 5.7245 0.00 ***
Residual 0.82 0.17
No es: * s a is ically signi ican ; ** s ongly signi ican ; and *** highly signi ican .
Table A3. Regime-swi ching ela ionships be ween mone a y policy and economic g ow h in Thailand.
Va iable High-G ow h Regime Slow-G ow h Regime
Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value
In e cep 49.3401 32.0146 1.5412 0.1233 32.3281 1.3251 24.3967 0.00 ***
Log (M2) −0.9626 3.0892 −0.3116 0.7553 1.7602 0.0823 21.3876 0.00 ***
Log (Pi s) −0.8359 0.8221 −1.0168 0.3092 −0.2371 0.0799 −2.9675 0.003 **
Log (In ) −5.9509 16.3619 −0.3637 0.7161 −12.9511 0.2360 −54.8775 0.00 ***
Log (Usd obah ) −2.3175 5.7257 −0.3637 0.7161 1.4545 0.3478 4.1820 0.00 ***
Log (Unemp) −0.4771 1.1489 −0.4153 0.6779 0.3199 0.1571 2.0363 0.041 *
Residual 0.86 0.22
No es: * s a is ically signi ican ; ** s ongly signi ican ; and *** highly signi ican .
Economies 2025,13, 19 16 o 17
Table A4. Regime-swi ching ela ionships be ween mone a y and iscal policies and economic g ow h
in Thailand.
Va iable High-G ow h Regime Slow-G ow h Regime
Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value Es ima e S d. E o T-Value p-Value
In e cep 153.2249 19.1336 8.0082 0.00 *** 12.4480 1.6729 7.4410 0.00 ***
Log (Go e ) 0.6956 1.2370 0.5623 0.5739 0.0718 0.1951 0.3680 0.7128
Log (Go exp) −0.4243 3.3246 −0.1276 0.8984 −0.0622 0.2800 −0.2221 0.8242
Log (Go deb ) 7.5714 2.1502 3.5213 0.00 *** −1.3462 0.1217 −11.0616 0.00 ***
Log (M2) −6.7573 3.0856 −2.1899 0.028 * 3.0902 0.1029 30.0311 0.00 ***
Log (Pi s) −0.0336 0.7302 −0.0460 0.9633 −0.1281 0.0703 −1.8222 0.0684
Log (In ) −29.6392 10.1052 −2.9331 0.003 ** −9.6450 0.2771 −34.8069 0.00 ***
Log (Usd obah ) −5.6265 1.8111 −3.1067 0.001 ** 2.3378 0.3594 6.5047 0.00 ***
Log (Unemp) −1.0373 1.1267 −0.9207 0.3572 0.4934 0.1594 3.0954 0.001 **
Residual 0.75 0.17
No es: * s a is ically signi ican ; ** s ongly signi ican ; and *** highly signi ican .
Re e ences
Abeyseke a, I. (2024). The in luence o iscal, mone a y, and public policies on sus ainable de elopmen in S i Lanka. Sus ainabili y,
16, 580. [C ossRe ]
Adegboyo, O. S., Keji, S. A., & Fasina, O. T. (2021). The impac o go e nmen policies on Nige ia economic g ow h (case o iscal and
mone a y and ade policies). Fu u e Business Jou nal,7(1), 59. [C ossRe ]
A onso, A., Al es, J., & Balho e, R. (2019). In e ac ions be ween mone a y and iscal policies. Jou nal o Applied Economics,22(1), 132–151.
[C ossRe ]
Aisyah, S., Sua manayasa, I. N., E endi, E., Widias u i, B. R., & Ha sono, I. (2024). The impac o iscal policy on economic g ow h:
A case s udy o Indonesia. Managemen S udies and En ep eneu ship Jou nal,5(2), 3773–3782.
Ali, A. O., Mohamed, J., & Mohamed, M. O. (2024). Asymme ic modeling o he iscal policy-economic g ow h nexus in Somalia.
Cogen Economics & Finance,12(1), 2312372. [C ossRe ]
Andini, M. (2024). The in luence o iscal policy on economic g ow h. Jou nal o Economics, Managemen and Finance,3(1), 1–9. [C ossRe ]
A o a, N., Monga, S., & Sha ma, D. (2022). Coo dina ion o mone a y and iscal policies o g ow h wi h p ice s abili y in a pos -
COVID-19 Indian economy. Economic Pape s,41(3), 247–259. [C ossRe ]
Azad, N. F., Se le is, A., & Xu, L. (2021). COVID-19 and mone a y- iscal policy in e ac ion in Canada. The Qua e ly Re iew o Economics
and Finance,81, 376–384. [C ossRe ]
Ba ayneh, K. I., Aleqap, M. M., & Salama , W. A. (2024). The impac o iscal and mone a y policies on economics g ow h: An empi ical
s udy o he USA. Mon engeg in Jou nal o Economics,20(3), 113–126.
Behe a, C., Ra h, B. N., & Mish a, P. K. (2024). The impac o mone a y and iscal s imulus on s ock e u ns du ing he COVID-19
Pandemic. Jou nal o Asian Economics,90, 101680. [C ossRe ]
Casas, I., & Fe nandez-Casal, R. (2022). Reg: Time- a ying Coe icien s in Mul i-Equa ion Reg ession in R. The R Jou nal,14(1), 79–100.
[C ossRe ]
Chipman, H. A., Geo ge, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (2010). BART: Bayesian addic i e eg ession ees. Annals o Applied S a is ics,4(1),
266–298. [C ossRe ]
Chuguno , I., Pasichnyi, M., Ko o iy, V., Kane a, T., & Niki ishin, A. (2021). Fiscal and mone a y policy o economic de elopmen .
Eu opean Jou nal o Sus ainable De elopmen ,10(1), 42–52. [C ossRe ]
Demi as, T. (2023). The g ow h e ec o he expansiona y mone a y and iscal policies applied in he pe iods when he economies
sh ank: De eloped and de eloping coun ies cases. Eu asian Jou nal o Social Sciences,11(3–4), 95–114. [C ossRe ]
Dinh, L. Q., Oanh, T. T. K., & Ha, N. T. H. (2024). Financial s abili y and sus ainable de elopmen : Pe spec i es om iscal and
mone a y policy. In e na ional Jou nal o Finance and Economics,30(1), 1–18. [C ossRe ]
Dodo, F. E., Chijioke, U. J., & Gwandu, B. S. (2024). E ec o mone a y and iscal policies on economic g ow h in Nige ia. S udies in
Economics and In e na ional Finance,4(1), 37–49.
Donald, A. O., Joseph, O. U., & Julie, E. I. (2024). A co-in eg a ion app oach o assess he impac o Nige ia mone a y policy on
economic g ow h. In e na ional Jou nal o De elopmen Ma hema ics,1(3), 236–244.
Gold eld, S. M., & Quand , R. E. (1973). A Ma ko model o swi ching eg essions. Jou nal o Econome ics,1(1), 3–15. [C ossRe ]
Hamil on, J. (1989). A new app oach o he economic analysis o nons a iona y ime se ies and he business cycle. Econome ica,57(2),
357–384. [C ossRe ]
Economies 2025,13, 19 17 o 17
Isaiah, O., Mchael, N. O., Amako omo G ace, I., Valen ine, A. C., & Ideba, E. E. (2024). Applica ion o op imal con ol modelling
p ocedu e o de e mining he impac o he nige ian mone a y and iscal policies on i s economic g ow h. Asian Jou nal o
Economics, Finance and Managemen ,6(1), 74–87. A ailable online: h ps://p h.globalp esshub.com/ e iew-his o y/1486 (accessed
on 19 Decembe 2024).
I o, H., & Kawai, M. (2024). Mone a y and iscal policy impac s unde al e na i e ilemma egimes. Jou nal o In e na ional Money and
Finance,149, 103182. [C ossRe ]
Kapelne , A., & Bleich, J. (2016). ba Machine: Machine lea ning wi h bayesian addi i e eg ession ees. Jou nal o S a is ical So wa e,
70(4), 1–40. [C ossRe ]
Kim, J., Wang, M., Pa k, D., & Pe alco in, C. C. (2021). Fiscal policy and economic g ow h: Some e idence om China. Re iew o Wo ld
Economics,157, 555–582. [C ossRe ]
Mwale, R., & Mulenga, R. (2024). Fiscal policy and economic g ow h nexus: E idence om Zambia. Ame ican Jou nal o Economies,8(2),
15–39. [C ossRe ]
Na ise y, N. N., & He, X. (2014). Bayesian a iable selec ion wi h di using p io s. Ann. S a is ,42(2), 789–817. [C ossRe ]
Nguyen, K. T., Do, H. G., Nguyen, N. T. T., & Le, N. M. T. (2024). The impac s o mone a y and iscal policies on economic g ow h in
Vie nam. Mon eneg in Jou nal o Economics,20(4), 19–26.
Nu u, N. Y. (2020). Mone a y and iscal policy e ec s in Sou h A ican economy. A ican Jou nal o Economic and Managemen S udies,
11(4), 625–638. [C ossRe ]
Ozili, P. K. (2024). Economic policy o sus ainable de elopmen : Role o mone a y policy, iscal policy and egula o y policy. Ci cula
Economy and Sus ainabili y,4(4), 2625–2656. [C ossRe ]
Pe lin, M. (2015). MS_Reg ess—The MATLAB package o ma ko egime swi ching models. A ailable online: h ps://ss n.com/abs ac =17
14016 (accessed on 15 Decembe 2024).
Sanchez-Espiga es, J. A., & Lopez-Mo eno, A. (2022). Fi ing ma ko swi ching models, package ‘MSwM’. A ailable online: h ps://
c an. -p ojec .o g/web//packages//MSwM/MSwM.pd (accessed on 3 Decembe 2024).
Sil a, C. G. D., & Viei a, F. V. (2017). Mone a y and iscal policy in ad anced and de eloping coun ies: An analysis be o e and a e he
inancial c isis. The Qua e ly Re iew o Economics and Finance,63, 13–20. [C ossRe ]
Tan, C. T., Mohamed, A., Habibullah, M. S., & Chin, L. (2020). The impac s o mone a y and iscal policies on economic g ow h in
Malaysia, Singapo e and Thailand. Sou h Asian Jou nal o Mac oeconomics and Public Finance,9(1), 1–17. [C ossRe ]
Xiang, Q., & Na ise y, N. (2022). Package ‘basad’. CRAN. A ailable online: h ps://c an. -p ojec .o g/web/packages/basad/basad.pd
(accessed on 15 Decembe 2024).
Yuan, B., Leiling, W., Saydalie , H. B., Daga , V., & Ace edo-Duque, A. (2022). Tes ing he impac o iscal policies o economic
eco e y: Does mone a y policy ac as ca aly ic ool o economic Su i al. Economic Change and Res uc u ing,22, 2215–2235.
[C ossRe ]
Zellne , A. (1962). An e icien me hod o es ima ing seemingly un ela ed eg ession on es s o agg ega ion bias. Jou nal o he Ame ican
S a is ical Associa ion,57(298), 348–368. [C ossRe ]
Disclaime /Publishe ’s No e: The s a emen s, opinions and da a con ained in all publica ions a e solely hose o he indi idual
au ho (s) and con ibu o (s) and no o MDPI and/o he edi o (s). MDPI and/o he edi o (s) disclaim esponsibili y o any inju y o
people o p ope y esul ing om any ideas, me hods, ins uc ions o p oduc s e e ed o in he con en .