scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Performance and robustness of regional image segmentation driven by selected evolutionary and genetic algorithms: Study on MR articular cartilage images

Abstract

The analysis and segmentation of articular cartilage magnetic resonance (MR) images belongs to one of the most commonly routine tasks in diagnostics of the musculoskeletal system of the knee area. Conventional regional segmentation methods, which are based either on the histogram partitioning (e.g., Otsu method) or clustering methods (e.g., K-means), have been frequently used for the task of regional segmentation. Such methods are well known as fast and well working in the environment, where cartilage image features are reliably recognizable. The well-known fact is that the performance of these methods is prone to the image noise and artefacts. In this context, regional segmentation strategies, driven by either genetic algorithms or selected evolutionary computing strategies, have the potential to overcome these traditional methods such as Otsu thresholding or K-means in the context of their performance. These optimization strategies consecutively generate a pyramid of a possible set of histogram thresholds, of which the quality is evaluated by using the fitness function based on Kapur's entropy maximization to find the most optimal combination of thresholds for articular cartilage segmentation. On the other hand, such optimization strategies are often computationally demanding, which is a limitation of using such methods for a stack of MR images. In this study, we publish a comprehensive analysis of the optimization methods based on fuzzy soft segmentation, driven by artificial bee colony (ABC), particle swarm optimization (PSO), Darwinian particle swarm optimization (DPSO), and a genetic algorithm for an optimal thresholding selection against the routine segmentations Otsu and K-means for analysis and the features extraction of articular cartilage from MR images. This study objectively analyzes the performance of the segmentation strategies upon variable noise with dynamic intensities to report a segmentation's robustness in various image conditions for a various number of segmentation classes (4, 7, and 10), cartilage features (area, perimeter, and skeleton) extraction preciseness against the routine segmentation strategies, and lastly the computing time, which represents an important factor of segmentation performance. We use the same settings on individual optimization strategies: 100 iterations and 50 population. This study suggests that the combination of fuzzy thresholding with an ABC algorithm gives the best performance in the comparison with other methods as from the view of the segmentation influence of additive dynamic noise influence, also for cartilage features extraction. On the other hand, using genetic algorithms for cartilage segmentation in some cases does not give a good performance. In most cases, the analyzed optimization strategies significantly overcome the routine segmentation methods except for the computing time, which is normally lower for the routine algorithms. We also publish statistical tests of significance, showing differences in the performance of individual optimization strategies against Otsu and K-means method. Lastly, as a part of this study, we publish a software environment, integrating all the methods from this study.

Read accessible full text

Performance and robustness of regional image segmentation driven by selected evolutionary and genetic algorithms: Study on MR articular cartilage images

Author: Kubíček, Jan
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22176335
Source: https://dspace.vsb.cz/bitstreams/77c8a47c-e74c-44c1-bc54-9f1bad1a2bbf/download
Ci a ion: Kubicek, J.; Va yso a, A.;
Ce ny, M.; Hanca o a, K.; Oczka, D.;
Augus ynek, M.; Penhake , M.;
P okop, O.; Scu ek, R. Pe o mance
and Robus ness o Regional Image
Segmen a ion D i en by Selec ed
E olu iona y and Gene ic
Algo i hms: S udy on MR A icula
Ca ilage Images. Senso s 2022,22,
6335. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
s22176335
Academic Edi o : Pawel S umillo
Recei ed: 6 July 2022
Accep ed: 18 Augus 2022
Published: 23 Augus 2022
Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al
wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in
published maps and ins i u ional a il-
ia ions.
Copy igh : © 2022 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
senso s
A icle
Pe o mance and Robus ness o Regional Image Segmen a ion
D i en by Selec ed E olu iona y and Gene ic Algo i hms:
S udy on MR A icula Ca ilage Images
Jan Kubicek 1,*, Alice Va yso a 1, Ma in Ce ny 1, K is yna Hanca o a 1, Da id Oczka 1,
Ma in Augus ynek 1, Ma ek Penhake 1, Ond ej P okop 2and Radomi Scu ek 3
1
Depa men o Cybe ne ics and Biomedical Enginee ing, VŠB—Technical Uni e si y o Os a a, 17.lis opadu
2172/15, Po uba, 708 00 Os a a, Czech Republic
2MEDIN, a.s., Vlacho icka 619, 592 31 No e Mes o na Mo a e, Czech Republic
3Depa men o Secu i y Se ices, Facul y o Sa e y Enginee ing, VŠB—Technical Uni e si y o Os a a, ul.
Lumi o a 3, 700 30 Os a a, Czech Republic
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac :
The analysis and segmen a ion o a icula ca ilage magne ic esonance (MR) images
belongs o one o he mos commonly ou ine asks in diagnos ics o he musculoskele al sys em o
he knee a ea. Con en ional egional segmen a ion me hods, which a e based ei he on he his og am
pa i ioning (e.g., O su me hod) o clus e ing me hods (e.g., K-means), ha e been equen ly used
o he ask o egional segmen a ion. Such me hods a e well known as as and well wo king in he
en i onmen , whe e ca ilage image ea u es a e eliably ecognizable. The well-known ac is ha
he pe o mance o hese me hods is p one o he image noise and a e ac s. In his con ex , egional
segmen a ion s a egies, d i en by ei he gene ic algo i hms o selec ed e olu iona y compu ing
s a egies, ha e he po en ial o o e come hese adi ional me hods such as O su h esholding o
K-means in he con ex o hei pe o mance. These op imiza ion s a egies consecu i ely gene a e
a py amid o a possible se o his og am h esholds, o which he quali y is e alua ed by using he
i ness unc ion based on Kapu ’s en opy maximiza ion o ind he mos op imal combina ion o
h esholds o a icula ca ilage segmen a ion. On he o he hand, such op imiza ion s a egies
a e o en compu a ionally demanding, which is a limi a ion o using such me hods o a s ack o
MR images. In his s udy, we publish a comp ehensi e analysis o he op imiza ion me hods based
on uzzy so segmen a ion, d i en by a i icial bee colony (ABC), pa icle swa m op imiza ion
(PSO), Da winian pa icle swa m op imiza ion (DPSO), and a gene ic algo i hm o an op imal
h esholding selec ion agains he ou ine segmen a ions O su and K-means o analysis and he
ea u es ex ac ion o a icula ca ilage om MR images. This s udy objec i ely analyzes he pe -
o mance o he segmen a ion s a egies upon a iable noise wi h dynamic in ensi ies o epo a
segmen a ion’s obus ness in a ious image condi ions o a a ious numbe o segmen a ion classes
(4, 7, and 10), ca ilage ea u es (a ea, pe ime e , and skele on) ex ac ion p eciseness agains he
ou ine segmen a ion s a egies, and las ly he compu ing ime, which ep esen s an impo an ac-
o o segmen a ion pe o mance. We use he same se ings on indi idual op imiza ion s a egies:
100 i e a ions and 50 popula ion. This s udy sugges s ha he combina ion o uzzy h esholding
wi h an ABC algo i hm gi es he bes pe o mance in he compa ison wi h o he me hods as om he
iew o he segmen a ion in luence o addi i e dynamic noise in luence, also o ca ilage ea u es
ex ac ion. On he o he hand, using gene ic algo i hms o ca ilage segmen a ion in some cases
does no gi e a good pe o mance. In mos cases, he analyzed op imiza ion s a egies signi ican ly
o e come he ou ine segmen a ion me hods excep o he compu ing ime, which is no mally lowe
o he ou ine algo i hms. We also publish s a is ical es s o signi icance, showing di e ences in he
pe o mance o indi idual op imiza ion s a egies agains O su and K-means me hod. Las ly, as a
pa o his s udy, we publish a so wa e en i onmen , in eg a ing all he me hods om his s udy.
Keywo ds:
medical image segmen a ion; a icula ca ilage; egional segmen a ion; ABC; PSO; DPSO;
O su h esholding; K-means clus e ing
Senso s 2022,22, 6335. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/s22176335 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/senso s
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 2 o 38
1. In oduc ion
Medical image segmen a ion ep esen s one o he essen ial p ocedu es in medical
image analysis. The me hods, belonging in he a ea o medical image segmen a ion, play
an impo an ole o he image a ea decomposi ion wi h he ocus image unde s anding.
Such me hods enable wo impo an issues: (1) he ex ac ion o mo phological ea u es o
objec s o in e es and (2) he consequen ex ac ion o a ious ea u es o such objec s wi h
he aim o he quan i ica ion o biological issues [
1
–
7
]. In his con ex , we a e ou inely
ocused on ei he geome ical pa ame e s o image egions such as he a ea, pe ime e ,
diame e , o cu a u e pa ame e s o in ensi y pa ame e s, including a s a is ic es ima ion
o he in ensi y spec um o quan i y he image su ace [
8
,
9
]. No ha ing au oma ed
image segmen a ion me hods, clinical expe s would ha e o pe o m medical issues
segmen a ion manually by con ou ing objec s o in e es . Such a p ocedu e would be
su ely linked wi h subjec i e e o depended on he skills o he indi idual physician.
On he o he hand, manual con ou ing plays an impo an ole in he objec i iza ion o
au oma ed image segmen a ion me hods, whe e manual anno a ion no mally se es as
a gold s anda d o objec i ely e alua e he segmen a ion pe o mance based on selec ed
e alua ion pa ame e s such as he index o co ela ion, he mean squa ed e o (MSE), he
s uc u al simila i y index (SSIM), and many o he s [10–14].
Image segmen a ion includes a lo o me hods a ying in hei ma hema ical s a egy
and he aim o he segmen a ion. Edge de ec ion ep esen s one o he mos con en ional
me hods o he au oma ic con ou ing o objec s o in e es . He e, we ecognize mul iple
p inciples such as he maximum o he i s de i a i e, o he ze o c ossing de ec o s [
15
–
17
].
These me hods a e no mally linked wi h wo main limi a ions. Fi s ly, hey pe o m he
segmen a ion o he whole image ega dless o he ocus on a pa icula objec o in e es
and mainly hey a e p one o in ensi y a ia ions as he impac o image noise, which
may signi ican ly in luence he segmen a ion quali y. The e o e, hese me hods a e o en
comple ed wi h smoo hing il e s o imp o e he segmen a ion quali y. Mo e sophis ica ed
segmen a ion echniques ep esen ac i e shape models such as ac i e con ou s o le el
se me hods, which a e capable o ocusing on a pa icula objec o in e es and wi hin
a p ede ined numbe o i e a ions pe o m he g adual de ec ion o geome ical ea u es
o objec s o in e es . One o he majo limi a ions o hese me hods is i s compu ing ime,
because hey use a highe numbe o i e a ions, and he compu ing ime is also depended
on image esolu ion [18,19].
The mos ex ensi e a ea o he medical image segmen a ion is egional image segmen-
a ion. These me hods no mally enable medical image decomposi ion in o a p ede ined
numbe o egions [
20
,
21
]. Such a egion is pe cei ed as a ini e numbe o image poin s
(pixels o oxels) ha mu ually sha e simila ea u es. This p ede e mines ha such e-
gionally o ien ed me hods a e able o well ecognize biological issues o in e es wi hin
indi idual egions. Rega ding he na u e o egional segmen a ion, we ecognize so called
nonin e p e ed me hods, which no mally u ilize con en ional segmen a ion s a egies and
only enable a decomposi ion o he image poin s in o indi idual egions wi hou in e -
p e ing he con en o indi idual egions [
22
–
24
]. Nowadays, he ecen ends in medical
image egional segmen a ion a e mainly ocused on so called in e p e ed me hods, enabling
he in e p e a ion o indi idual de ec ed objec s. Such me hods no mally use seman ic
segmen a ion [
25
,
26
]. Among he bene i s o such me hods, i is impo an o men ion ha
hese me hods equi e aining on huge da ase s, which may be a limi a ion in he con ex
o medical image a ailabili y [27–30].
In his pape , we p o ide a comp ehensi e insigh in he o m o a compa a i e analy-
sis o selec ed e olu iona y op imiza ion algo i hms and gene ic algo i hms pe o mances,
which a e used o he uning o con en ional segmen a ion s a egies o achie e a maximal
pe o mance unde a ious image condi ions and de e io a ion by image noise. In his
s udy, we compa e he pe o mance o op imized segmen a ion s a egies wi h he elemen s
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 3 o 38
o a i icial in elligence (e olu iona y and gene ic algo i hms) wi h con en ional s a egies
based on he ha d h esholding (O su me hod) and nonhie a chical clus e ing (K-means).
This analysis should objec i ely poin ou on he pe o mance and impac o mode n op i-
miza ion me hods wi h a i icial in elligence as om he iew o segmen a ion pe o mance
and obus ness unde addi i e noise and also compu ing ime, which is an impo an ac o
o each segmen a ion p ocedu e ega ding complex e ec i i y. This objec i iza ion analysis
in es iga es he obus ness and compu ing equi emen s o indi idual segmen a ion s a e-
gies p o ided unde he in luence o a ious ypes o addi i e de e minis ic noise wi h
dynamical in ensi y. Tha enables he s udy o he pe o mance o indi idual op imiza ion
echniques and i s de e mining pa ame e s along g adually de e io a ed condi ions and
shows he dynamical ea u es o obus ness o indi idual me hods. Besides he analysis o
pe o mance, we also publish he applica ion o egional segmen a ion o ca ilage ea u es
ex ac ion. As a pa o ou esea ch, we publish a es ing so wa e en i onmen , in eg a ing
indi idual me hods o egional segmen a ion wi h he possibili ies o selec indi idual
s ee ing segmen a ion pa ame e s. The so wa e applica ion enables he applica ion o a i-
ous de e minis ic noise gene a o s wi h he se ings o he noise pa ame e s, which con ol
noise in ensi y o simula e image deg ada ion o he es ing o indi idual segmen a ion
s a egies obus ness. This applica ion also enables he segmen a ion accu acy e alua ion
based on selec ed objec i iza ion pa ame e s, which a e also used in his s udy o e alua e
he segmen a ion pe o mance.
The o ganiza ion o he pape is ollowing. In Sec ion 2, we p o ide ecen no es and
ad ances in he a ea o medical image segmen a ion. In Sec ion 3, we in oduce indi idual
segmen a ion s a egies, guidelines o es ing o hese me hods, and da ase s o MR images
o a icula ca ilage used in his s udy. Sec ion 4is aimed on quan i a i e esul s, p o iding
a comp ehensi e insigh on he e ec i i y, obus ness, and limi a ions o segmen a ion
me hods. Sec ion 5is aimed on complex conclusions, discussion, and u u e ends o
his s udy.
2. Recen Wo k
In his sec ion, we ou line he con en ional p ocedu es, se ing o a spa ial image
domain decomposi ion, which is ou inely used as a undamen al ool o medical issues
iden i ica ion. The e a e a ious ma hema ical app oaches, which may be used o he
a o emen ioned image decomposi ion, including mainly echniques based on his og am
pa i ioning, edge de ec o s, con ou s acing, analysis pixel’s ela ionships, me hods o
a i icial in elligence, and o he s [30–38].
One o he mos popula echniques, and i is also he aim o his pape , is he egional
image segmen a ion bases on he his og am h esholding. These me hods no mally allow
o a his og am decomposi ion bases on ei he one, o mul iple h esholds, de ining indi-
idual image egions [
37
,
38
]. He e, one o he mos popula me hods is his o ically O su
segmen a ion, which de ines indi idual h esholds based on he minimiza ion o in a-class
in ensi y a iance and he maximiza ion o in e -class a iance [39–41].
O he popula a eas o egional medical image segmen a ion is clus e ing analysis.
He e, he mos popula me hods a e based on he nonhie a chical clus e ing such as K-
means o uzzy C-means (FCM) segmen a ion [
42
,
43
]. These me hods usually measu e
dis ance-based pa ame e s be ween indi idual pixels and clus e ( egion) cen oids o he
pixel’s classi ica ion [
44
,
45
]. Such me hods a e capable o pe o ming image decomposi ion
in o a ious isola ed classes based on hei ea u es as a le el o simila i y be ween he pixel
in ensi y and he cen oid [
46
–
50
]. O cou se, apa om he men ioned app oaches, he e
a e plen y o o he s, which a e no mally used o medical image segmen a ion, including
edge de ec o s, ou lining image boa de s, he me hods o consecu i e egions o ming,
such as egion g owing, o spli ing me hods, wa e shed o wa ele ans o ma ion, and
o he s [
51
–
53
]. O cou se, in ecen imes, one o he mos popula segmen a ion me hods
deals wi h a ious applica ions o machine and deep lea ning, enabling seman ic segmen a-
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 4 o 38
ion ins ead o he segmen a ion wi hou in e p e a ion as i is ypical in many con en ional
app oaches [54–68].
These ou ine app oaches, as we ou lined ea lie , a e usually easily implemen ed wi h
a easonable compu ing ime, on he o he hand hey no mally su e om ce ain limi a-
ions, which may ha e a signi ican in luence on hei e ec i i y and obus ness as well.
In he compa ison wi h con en ional segmen a ion me hods such as O su h esholding,
which is based on he ha d selec ion o indi idual h esholds in his og ams, we p oposed
schemes on h esholding s a egies u ilizing op imiza ion echniques o op imal h esholds
selec ion om a ious h esholds combina ions. This is supposed o be a mo e e ec i e
app oach, which be e e lec s a pixel’s dis ibu ion inside de ined egions. Fu he mo e,
we p o ide analysis o obus ness o each es ed me hod upon dynamic a ious noise
in luence o objec i ely show dynamic ea u es o pe o mance when an image domain is
g adually de e io a ed by addi i e noise. On he o he hand, we a e awa e ha e olu ion
s a egies and a gene ic algo i hm may ha e a signi ican in luence on he compu ing ime.
The e o e, we also publish ime complexi y analysis, showing hei complexi y. All he
op imized me hods we pu in a con as wi h he con en ional app oaches such as O su
h esholding and he K-means me hod o objec i ely poin ou di e ences in segmen a ion
pe o mance in he con ex bene i s and limi a ions o using e olu iona y and gene ic
algo i hms o a ious numbe s o h esholds and o he s ee ing op imiza ion pa ame e s
o hese op imiza ion echniques.
3. Ma e ials and Me hods
Recen ly, a ious implemen a ions o e olu iona y and gene ic op imiza ion s a egies
ha e inc eased in popula i y o sol ing a ious enginee ing p oblems in he a ea o
op imal se ings o s ee ing pa ame e s o a ious p ocedu es. The main aim o his pape
is o objec i ely poin ou on he e ec i i y and obus ness (a le el o s abili y in a ious
image en i onmen ) o selec ed h esholding-based egional segmen a ion s a egies, being
op imized wi h e olu iona y compu ing me hods (ABC and PSO wi h i s a ian s: FPSO
( uzzy pa icle swa m op imiza ion) and DPSO (Da winian pa icle swa m op imiza ion))
and gene ic algo i hms as om he iew o hei e ec i i y o segmen a ion, ea u es
ex ac ion, and also ime complexi y. On he o he hand, ABC algo i hm is used in he
combina ion wi h uzzy h esholding, which o ms indi idual segmen a ion egions based
on he membe ship unc ions o each egion, whe e pixels a e classi ied in o egions based
on he membe ship alues as we desc ibe u he . This is also an impo an issue o his
s udy as shows he impac o uzzy h esholding besides con en ional ha d h esholding
his og am pa i ioning.
In he con as o he op imized me hods, we pu wo selec ed con en ional segmen-
a ion app oaches, which ha e been conside ed o a long ime as s anda ds o medical
image segmen a ion, as hey we e used in plen y o esea ch s udies, dealing wi h a -
ious objec de ec ions om medical images. The i s one is O su h esholding, which
is he implemen a ion o so-called ha d his og am h esholding, and he second me hod
is K-means, which de ines segmen ed egions based on he nonhie a chical clus e ing.
Implemen a ion o hese ou ine segmen a ion s a egies, which u ilize a ious p inciples
o image segmen a ion, poin ou on di e ences in pe o mance be ween non-hie a chical
clus e ing and h esholding o egional image segmen a ion. In a gene al way, we de ine
he op imiza ion p oblem o a se o h esholds:
T={T1,T2, . . . , Tn}(1)
In such con igu a ion, we sea ch o an op imal combina ion o indi idual h esholds
(
T1
,
T2
,
. . .
,
Tn
), de ining indi idual segmen ed egions, which he bes sa is ies op imiza-
ion c i e ia, which in e olu iona y and gene ic algo i hms is gi en by i ness unc ion,
which is desc ibed u he . As he de ini ion o i ness unc ion, we use a measu e o en opy
(Kapu en opy), which well de ines pixel’s dis ibu ions in segmen ed egions.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 5 o 38
3.1. Segmen a ion Me hods
In his sec ion, we in oduce indi idual segmen a ion s a egies. He e, we desc ibe he
e olu iona y s a egies based on he ABC and PSO (and i s a ian s) and gene ic algo i hms
o his og am-based h esholding. In con as wi h hese s a egies, we pu he con en ional
me hods based on he ha d h esholding (O su h esholding) and K-means, which classi ies
pixels in o egions based on a simila i y (Euclidean dis ance) wi h egion’s cen oid. These
con en ional me hods do no con ain any op imiza ion elemen s, so i would be in e es ing
o compa e he pe o mance o op imiza ion s a egies wi h hese segmen a ion ou ines.
In o de o objec i ely epo he e ec i i y and obus ness o indi idual me hods, we
employ selec ed de e minis ic noise gene a o s wi h dynamic noise in ensi y (con olled by
hei s ee ing pa ame e s). Dynamical noise impac is mani es ed by g adual de e io a ion
and modi ica ion o pixel’s in ensi y dis ibu ion, which supposedly should ha e impac
on he segmen a ion obus ness as we p o ide modeling in he sec ion esul s. In o de
o p o ide such analysis, we employ Gaussian, sal and peppe , speckle, and Rician noise
gene a o s wi h dynamical ange o hei noise impac .
In o de o objec i ely measu e he noise impac o he segmen a ion pe o mance o
indi idual s udied me hods, we employ selec ed e alua ion pa ame e s, which a e ocused
on measu ing a le el o simila i y o di e ence be ween he na i e segmen a ion (wi h
a ze o le el o added noise) and espec i e noise le el. This app oach enables objec i e
pe o mance e alua ion o s udied segmen a ion s a egies. Fo his analysis we use he
ollowing objec i iza ion pa ame e s: s uc u al simila i y (SSIM), mean squa ed e o
(MSE), co ela ion coe icien (CORR), and signal noise a io (SNR). Figu e 1 ep esen s a
whole es ing en i onmen , which is he main aim o his pape , including applica ion o
noise gene a o s, segmen a ion s a egies, and pa ame e s o e alua ion.
3.1.1. O su Th esholding
O su me hod [
66
] is one o he sophis ica ed h esholding me hods, which is based on
he numbe o egions selec ed, O su me hod algo i hm de e mines he op imal h esholds
acco ding o he his og am. Image segmen a ion uses he classi ica ion o pixels in o
segmen a ion egions. The basis o he me hod is he s a is ical pa ame e o a iance,
which cha ac e izes he a iabili y o indi idual pixels in he image. The c i e ia o his
classi ica ion include minimizing he in a-class a iance o maximizing he in e -class
a iance. O su me hod uses his og am h esholding o de ine he numbe o egions. I
sea ches o he segmen a ion class wi h he smalles a iance, i.e., he op imally chosen
h eshold. This echnique is classi ied as a s a is ical me hod because i wo ks based on he
s a is ical pa ame e o a iance, which cha ac e izes he a iabili y o he dis ibu ion o
indi idual pixels in he image. The equa ion o calcula ion o he wi hin-class a iance a
any h eshold is:
σ2( )=ωbg(T)σ2
bg(T)+ω g(T)σ2
g(T), (2)
whe e
ωbg( )
and
ω g( )
a e he p obabili y o numbe o pixels o each class a h eshold
T and σ2is a iance o colo alues (pixels). The a iance is ep esen ed by equa ion:
σ2( )=∑(xi−x)2
N−1, (3)
whe e
xi
p esen s pixel alue in g oup o bg o g and
x
p esen s he mean pixel alue in
g oup o bg o g and N ep esen s he numbe o pixels.

Senso s 2022,22, 6335 6 o 38
Figu e 1. Complex gene al lowcha o es ing en i onmen o segmen a ion e alua ion.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 7 o 38
ωbg and ω g a e calcula ed by:
ωbg =PBG(T)
Pall , (4)
ω g =PFG(T)
Pall , (5)
whe e P
BG
is coun o backg ound pixels a h eshold T, P
FG
is coun o o eg ound pixels
a h eshold T, and Pall is he o al coun o pixels in image.
O su me hod can be ex ended o a mul i egional segmen a ion scheme [
67
], whe e
mo e h esholds a e de ined. In his con igu a ion, he image his og am is di ided in o
equal a eas, and o each such a ea he own h eshold is de ined. Finally, he o iginal image
is segmen ed by using all hese h esholds. Supposing we ha e Limage in ensi ies in he
ange:
[0, 1, 2, . . . , L]
and he pa ame e ps ands o he numbe o h esholds. A wid h o
one a ea is de ined as he a io:
a=L
p(6)
Op imal h esholds (P) o indi idual a eas a e de ined as he maximiza ion o in e -
class a iance:
Pp=maxpσ2( )(7)
3.1.2. K-Means
K-means me hod [
68
] is classi ied as a non-hie a chical clus e ing me hod. K-means
me hod allows assigning indi idual pixels in o segmen a ion classes o which hey belong
based on dis ance. I uses nonhie a chical clus e ing o pixels assignmen and sea ches o
he minimum dis ance be ween he pixel and he selec ed cen e o g a i y (cen oid). A
gi en pixel is hen assigned o he egion o which i has he smalles dis ance. The mos
commonly used me ic is Euclidean, which measu es he dis ance o pixels in he ea u e
space acco ding o he ollowing equa ion:
D(→
x,→
y) = q∑n
i=1(xi−yi)2, (8)
whe e
→
x
,
→
y
a e he ea u e ec o s,
D(→
x,→
y)
is he esul ing dis ance, nis he dimension o
he space, xand ya e he pixel coo dina es.
Pixel xiis assigned o class yiacco ding o he ollowing ela ion:
yi=a gminj
xi−µj
(9)
The ollowing ec o ecalcula ion calcula es he new alues o he ec o s
µj
as he
mean alues om he pixels x
i
ha we e classi ied in o he class de e mined by he ec o
µj. The new alue o µjis calcula ed acco ding o equa ion:
µj=1
nj∑n
i=1,y1=j(xi), (10)
whe e n
j
deno es he numbe o pixels and x
i
classi ied in he second s ep in o he class
de e mined by he ec o
µj
. The ec o classi ica ion and ecalcula ion s eps a e epea ed
un il a leas one ec o x
i
is classi ied in o a di e en class han i was classi ied in he
p e ious s ep. The pixel in each class ha possesses he maximum equency is de e mined
as he cen oid. The disad an age o his me hod is ha by assigning objec s o each class,
i can only de e mine whe he he objec belongs o he clus e o no . The e o e, K-means
is classi ied as a ha d app oach echnique.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 8 o 38
3.1.3. ABC E olu iona y Op imiza ion
ABC algo i hm o a i icial bee colony is an algo i hm ha belongs o he algo i hms
based on he swa ming beha io o animals. Speci ically, i is he beha io o bees looking
o ood. The p inciple o he algo i hm is ha i ies o p o ide he bes app oxima e
solu ion wi h low compu a ional equi emen s. The bees unc ion as a whole in a ce ain
way and he alloca ion o he di e en oles in he communi y is au oma ic. These a e he
employed bees (EB), he onlooke bees (OB), and he scou s (SB) whose ask is o imp o e
he o e all ood esou ces. The basic pa ame e s o ABC include he numbe o ood
sou ces, he limi , and he numbe o i e a ions. The limi de e mines a e how many
i e a ions a wo ke will abandon hei solu ion i hey ha e no been able o imp o e i .
The o alpopula ion(SN)consis so anequalnumbe o EBsandOBs,wi heachEBha ingone
empo a y solu ion R
i
adjacen o he solu ion X
i
. Pa ame e X
i
= {X
i
, 1, X
i
, 2,
. . .
,X
i
,p} ep esen s
he i- h solu ion in he swa m o bees, whe e p ep esen s he numbe o pa ame e s ha
a e op imized. In he i s s age o he algo i hm, hese wo solu ions a e compa ed using
he i ness unc ion and i he solu ion o he i ness unc ion R
i
is be e , i is kep as he
new solu ion om his pai . O he wise, no change occu s. This is done o each o he pai s
X
i
and R
i
. I is necessa y o apply a selec ion limi L
speci ying he maximum numbe o
a emp s in selec ing a solu ion Xiin case an op imal solu ion Ricanno be ound.
Howe e , i an op imal solu ion canno be ound e en a e exhaus ing L
, we conside
i as a bu n -ou solu ion. The second s age is essen ially an ex ension o EB. I wo ks wi h
OB in which he exis ing indi idual solu ions a e es ed om di e en pe spec i es. The
mo e op imal solu ion should ha e a highe alue o P
i
. A e selec ing he ood sou ce X
i
,
a neighbo ing ood sou ce R
i
is de e mined and hei i ness alues a e compa ed. The las
pa is he scou s sea ching o new ood sou ces ins ead o deple ed sou ces. The p ocess
o e alua ing solu ions is i e a i e, in mos cases 100 cycles a e applied. The ou pu o
his op imiza ion me hod is he se o all admissible solu ions, whe e in he inal s ep he
solu ion possessing he maximum alue o Piis selec ed.
3.1.4. PSO E olu iona y Op imiza ion
PSO, o pa icle swa m op imiza ion, is an e olu iona y op imiza ion compu ing
echnique inspi ed by he social beha io o bi ds and ish swa ms. This me hod uses a
popula ion o pa icles ha ly in an i egula mo ion h ough a gi en space a a ce ain
speed. The posi ion o each agen is gi en by he ec o x
i
, and i s mo emen co esponds
o he eloci y i. The pa icle eloci y is de e mined as ollows:
i( ) = i( −1) + c1∗ and1(pi−xi( −1)) + c2∗ and2(pg−xi( −1)), (11)
whe e c
1
and c
2
a e posi i e numbe s, and
1
and and
2
deno e andom numbe s om
he ange 0 o 1. Equa ion is composed o h ee pa s. The ine ia and a ac ion o he
bes - ound posi ion o a gi en pa icle p
i
, and we deno e he alue o he i ness unc ion
a his posi ion by p
bes
. This a ac ion is mul iplied by a andom weigh c
1∗
and
1
and
is called he memo y o he pa icle. The hi d pa o he equa ion is he a ac ion o he
bes - ound posi ion o he pa icle p
g
, and we deno e he co esponding i ness alue by
g
bes
. The a o emen ioned a ac ion is again mul iplied by a andom weigh c
2∗
and
2
and
is called sha ed in o ma ion, o also sha ed knowledge. Each indi idual emembe s hei
p e ious bes alue and he bes alue o hei neighbo s. The agen s he e o e use he
in o ma ion om he bes pa icle, and he e o e his algo i hm is mo e memo y e icien
han he gene ic algo i hm.
3.1.5. FPSO E olu iona y Op imiza ion
FPSO s ands o uzzy pa icle swa m op imiza ion. I is a modi ied PSO algo i hm
using uzzy logic heo y. The posi ion and eloci y o he pa icles in his algo i hm a e
de ined o ep esen he ela ionship be ween he uzzy and he a iables. Fuzzy logic
con olle wi h wo inpu s and one ou pu imp o es he pe o mance o PSO. The wo
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 9 o 38
inpu a iables ep esen cu en bes pe o mance e alua ion (CBPE) and cu en ine ia
weigh . The ou pu a iable is change in ine ia weigh . CBPE needs o be no malized
acco ding o he ollowing o mula:
NCBPE =CBPE −CBPEmin
CBPEmax −CBPEmin , (12)
whe e CBPE
min
is he ue minimum and CBPE
max
ep esen s he subop imal CBPE. CBPE
no maliza ion is used o make he algo i hm applicable o a wide ange o op imiza ion
p ocesses. A non-op imal CBPE is conside ed o be any solu ion wi h a CBPE g ea e han
o equal o CBPE
max
. These uzzy a iables a e de ined as uzzy se s wi h nine ules o a
uzzy sys em.
3.1.6. DPSO E olu iona y Op imiza ion
DPSO is a Da winian algo i hm ex ending he PSO algo i hm by na u al selec ion and
su i al o he i es o inc ease he abili y o escape om local op ima. Da winian pa icle
swa m op imiza ion (DPSO) allows many swa ms o es solu ions o exis a any poin in
ime. Each swa m wo ks like a egula PSO algo i hm, excep ha i uses na u al selec ion
(Da winian su i al o he i es ) o enhance he abili y o escape om a local op imum.
The p inciple o he solu ion sea ch is ha i i is heading owa ds a local op imum,
hen he sea ch o a solu ion in ha egion is e mina ed, and he sea ch o ano he a ea
begins. Each swa m is moni o ed a e e y s ep. I swa ms imp o e, hey a e ewa ded. The
ewa d is o ex end he li e ime o he pa icles o o p oduce o sp ing. I swa ms s agna e,
hey a e punished. The punishmen consis s o sho ening he li e ime o he swa m o
emo ing pa icles. A e he emo ing he pa icle, ins ead o being se o ze o, he coun e
is ese o a alue app oaching he h eshold numbe , acco ding o:
SCC(Nkill)=SCmax
C1−1
Nkill+1, (13)
whe e N
kill
ep esen s a numbe o dele ed pa icles om he swa m,
SCmax
C
ep esen s
ha he maximum numbe o swa ms mus no be exceeded. Whe eas he new swa m is
c ea ed wi h a p obabili y based on he equa ion:
p=
NS, (14)
whe e pis he p obabili y, is a andom numbe in he in e al 0 o 1, NS ep esen s he
numbe o swa ms. Each swa m is e alua ed using he i ness unc ion o all pa icles. In
his way, i is possible o analyze he o e all s a e o he swa ms sepa a ely and hus upda e
he neighbo hood and indi idual bes posi ions o each pa icle. New pa icles a e c ea ed
i a new global solu ion is ound. Con e sely, pa icle ex inc ion occu s i he swa m does
no ind a mo e sui able s a e in a de ined numbe o s eps.
3.1.7. Gene ic Algo i hms-Based Op imiza ion
Gene ic algo i hms a e based on na u al p ocesses wi h g adual elimina ion and
subsequen selec ion o he mos sui able solu ions. I is a combina ion be ween biology
and ma hema ics. Pa e ns om li ing na u e a e used, which ini ially wo k by chance
and g adually p oduce be e solu ions. These pa e ns a e hen applied using a ma h-
ema ical model o a a ie y o echnical applica ions, including image p ocessing using
segmen a ion echniques.
Gene ic algo i hms use special p ocedu es o ind he op imal solu ion using selec ion,
c osso e , and mu a ion ope a ions. They s a wi h andom selec ion and sea ch o new,
be e solu ions; he mos op imal solu ion is hen selec ed om he esul s. All algo i hms
include a i ness unc ion ha p o ides in o ma ion abou he quali y o he solu ion. Each
app oach has speci ic pa ame e s ha mus be se . Examples a e he numbe o egions, he
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 16 o 38
Figu e 5.
Example o p o on-dense sequence o in es iga ion o a icula ca ilage wi h ea ly ca ilage
loss. The i s ow shows a sequence o h ee na i e images om he MR da ase and he second ow
ep esen s image RoIs, ocusing on ca ilage a ea, whe e he ed squa es poin ou MR signal change
in ca ilage s uc u e ha indica e he ea ly ca ilage loss.
3.3. De e minis ic A i icial Noise Gene a o s
In o de o p o ide he analysis o obus ness o indi idual segmen a ion echniques,
we employ a ious image noise gene a o s, which simula e g adual de e io a ion o spa ial
image a ea by using hei s ee ing pa ame e s, as we desc ibe u he . Fo ou analysis, we
use he ollowing noise gene a o s: Gaussian noise, speckle noise, sal and peppe noise,
and Rician noise.
3.3.1. Gaussian Noise
Gaussian noise ep esen s whi e s a is ical noise. This ype o noise is due o na u al
sou ces such as ambien empe a u e. The dis ibu ion o Gaussian noise is uni o m in he
image and a ec s all pixels wi h he same in ensi y. I is a no mal dis ibu ion o noise
dis ibu ion in he image. Gaussian noise can be de ined using he ollowing o mula:
G(x) = 1
σ√2π
e
(x−µ)2
2σ2, (24)
whe e x ep esen s he luminance o he noise,
σ2
is he a iance, and
µ
ep esen s
he mean.
3.3.2. Speckle Noise
Speckle noise is a common noise ha occu s in all cohe en imaging sys ems (lase s,
acous ic sys ems, ul asound). The cause o his noise is he in e e ence o a signal ha
has a di e en phase when e u ning om he a ge . This noise is displayed in he image
as da k pixels wi h a highe b igh ness alue. The inpu pa ame e is he speckle noise
a iance. Speckle noise can be desc ibed by he o mula ion:
J=I+n∗I, (25)
whe e Ip esen s he inpu image, Jis he noise dis ibu ion in he inpu image, and n
p esen s uni ied ze o mean alue o he noise in inpu image.

Senso s 2022,22, 6335 17 o 38
3.3.3. Sal and Peppe Noise
Sal and peppe ep esen s impulse noise. The image deg ada ion akes place a se e al
pixels in he image, wi h he pixel ca ying no in o ma ion abou he o iginal alue. The
pixel alues in he image a e eplaced by alues o 255 o 0. Thus, his noise is ep esen ed
in he image as whi e and black do s esembling sal and peppe . The inpu pa ame e o
se ing he noise is he densi y. This noise is mos o en no iceable du ing da a ansmission.
3.3.4. Rician Noise
Rician noise ep esen s he mos ypical noise in images aken by magne ic esonance.
Rician noise is based on Gaussian noise in ha he eal and imagina y pa s o he signal a e
co up ed by an unco ela ed ze o mean. The magni ude o Rician noise can be exp essed
using he ollowing o mula:
M=q(I+n1)2+n2
2, (26)
whe e M ep esen s he signal magni ude, I ep esen s he o iginal image wi h negligible
noise in ensi y, and
n1
and
n2
a e Gaussian noise a iables wi h ze o mean and equal
a iance
σ2
n
. He e, we can de ine he p obabili y densi y unc ion (PDF) o an image, which
is co up ed by Rician dis ibu ion by he ollowing way:
pM|I,σ2
n=M
σ2
n
exp−M2+I2
2σ2
nI0IM
σ2
nu(M)(27)
In his de ini ion,
I0(.)
depic s he 0 h o de o modi ied Bessel unc ion o he i s
kind, and he pa ame e u(.) s ands o Hea iside s ep unc ion [56].
3.4. Applica ion and Se ings o Noise Gene a o s
Fi s ly, we in oduce he se ings o noise de e minis ic gene a o s, which a e used in
his s udy. Each o he noise gene a o s is de e mined by i s s ee ing pa ame e s, which
de e mine he noise in ensi y. We use a g adual ascended sequence o he noise in ensi ies
o e ec i ely simula e he segmen a ion pe o mance deg ada ion upon inc easing he
le el o he noise-based image de e io a ion. In he Gaussian noise (G), we use a cons an
dispe sion (
σ2=
0.01) and a iable mean alue o he noise (
µ
), in he sal and peppe (SaP)
noise we p o ide es ing o a iable noise densi y (d) and o speckle (Sp) and Rician noise
(Ric), we con ol he noise in ensi y ia he pa ame e a iance (
σ2
). Fo he pu poses o
es ing, we use 20 noise le els o simula e he segmen a ion pe o mance (Table 2).
Table 2. De ini ion o noise gene a o s o segmen a ion pe o mance analysis.
Noise Gene a o
Numbe o Regions G: (σ2=
0.01
), (µ)SaP: (d)Sp: (σ2) Ric: (σ2)
4 0.01–0.2 0.17–0.33 0.01–0.2 0.02–0.4
7 0.01–0.2 0.17–0.33 0.01–0.2 0.02–0.4
10 0.01–0.2 0.17–0.33 0.01–0.2 0.02–0.4
We g adually applied he noise gene a o s wi h he ange o he noise in ensi y pa-
ame e s o a i icially simula e he noise impac on he pixel’s dis ibu ion. As we s a ed
ea lie , o each noise, we se 20 le els on he noise in ensi y. Tha means each na i e
MR image con ains in o al 21 images o es ing o segmen a ion algo i hms (1 na i e
image + 20 noise le els). Fo each image, we de ined a mul idimensional a ay, whe e
all hese noisy images a e s o ed. In he ollowing ou pu s: Figu es 6–9, we p o ide
he examples o g adual de e io a ion o indi idual noise gene a o s, which we used o
he es ing.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 18 o 38
Figu e 6.
Applica ion o Gaussian noise on na i e MR ca ilage image wi h in ensi ies ( om le ):
na i e image, σ2=0.01, µ= {0.005, 0.01}.
Figu e 7.
Applica ion o Rician noise on na i e MR ca ilage image wi h in ensi ies ( om le ): na i e
image, σ2={0.2, 0.4}.
Figu e 8.
Applica ion o sal and peppe noise on na i e MR ca ilage image wi h in ensi ies ( om
le ): na i e image, d={0.2, 0.4}.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 19 o 38
Figu e 9.
Applica ion o speckle noise on na i e MR ca ilage image wi h in ensi ies ( om le ):
na i e image, σ2={0.2, 0.4}.
3.5. E alua ion Pa ame e s
All he pe o mance cha ac e is ics a e cons uc ed by he way we use he segmen a-
ion o na i e MR images as a gold s anda d agains indi idual segmen a ion in indi idual
noise le els. This app oach enables objec i e measu emen o he noise in luence o each
noise le el. This inally shows dynamical ea u es o pe o mance wi hin con inuous deg a-
da ion by image noise wi h a iable in ensi y. The ollowing pa ame e s a e conside ed o
his s udy.
SSIM o s uc u al simila i y index [
59
] is a pa ame e ha allows us o objec i ely
exp ess he simila i y o wo images xand yusing a me ic. This pa ame e is de ined by
he ollowing o mula:
SSIM (x,y)=2µxµy+C12σxy +C2
µ2
x+µ2
y+C1σ2
xσ2
yC2, (28)
whe e C
i
=
(k,l)2
, whe e l ep esen s he dynamic ange o pixel alues, k<< 1 a e small
cons an s wi h alues usually 0.02,
µ
ep esen s he weigh ed a e age o he xand y
images, and
σ
ep esen s he co a iance o xand y. These componen s in he o mula
allow o compa e be ween xand yimages: b igh ness (l), con as (c), and ex u e (s). The
compa ison me hod ex ac s s uc u al in o ma ion om he scene. This pa ame e akes
alues om
−
1 o 1, wi h 1 ep esen ing he absolu e ma ch be ween he xand yimages.
He e, we conside ha x ep esen s he segmen a ion wi h ze o le el o addi i e noise and
y ep esen s he segmen a ion ou pu wi h espec i e le el o he noise.
Co ela ion coe icien ep esen s he linea co ela ion be ween wo images xand y.
The co ela ion coe icien is de ined as he a io o he co a iance o he a iables xand y
mul iplied by hei s anda d de ia ions. The Pea son pai wise co ela ion coe icien can
be exp essed using he ollowing equa ion:
=∑(xi−x)·(yi−y)
(n−1)sxsy, (29)
whe e s
x
and s
y
ep esen s anda d de ia ions and
x
and
y
ep esen he a i hme ic mean o
each o he a iables xand y. The co ela ion coe icien akes alues om
−
1 o +1, and he
close he absolu e alue o he co ela ion coe icien is o one, he close he ela ionship
be ween he a iables x,y. The highe he alue, he be e he segmen a ion pe o mance.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 20 o 38
SNR o signal o noise a io is a pa ame e ha allows us o exp ess he a io o
use ul powe o useless powe o a signal (image). This pa ame e is de ined by he
ollowing equa ion:
SNR =10log10 ·
∑M
i=1∑N
j=1g2
i,j − 2
i,j
∑M
i=1∑N
j=1gi,j − i,j2(30)
SNR o signal o noise a io is a pai whe e
gi,j
ep esen s he o iginal (gold s an-
da d) segmen a ion (wi hou addi i e noise) and
i,j
is he segmen ed image wi h espec-
i e addi i e noise le el. The SNR quan i y is decibels (dB). SNR alues can be in e -
p e ed in he o m he highe SNR alues we achie e o espec i e segmen a ion, he
be e ag eemen wi h he gold s anda d we ha e, and be e segmen a ion pe o mance
we achie e.
MSE, o mean squa ed e o , is a pa ame e ha can be used o objec i ely e al-
ua e image quali y. This pa ame e exp esses he deg ee o mean squa ed e o be-
ween he o iginal image and he segmen ed image. This pa ame e is de ined by he
ollowing o mula:
MSE =1
MN
M
∑
i=1
N
∑
j=1xi,j −yi,j2, (31)
whe e M ep esen s he image size in he ho izon al di ec ion, N ep esen s he image size
in he e ical di ec ion,
xi,j
co esponds o a pixel in he segmen ed image a coo dina es i
and j, and
yi,j
co esponds o a pixel in he o iginal image a coo dina es i and j. Fo his
pa ame e , he lowe he alue, he g ea e he simila i y be ween he images. P ac ically,
we compu e he squa ed di e ences be ween he pixels, ha ing he same coo dina es in
he segmen a ion ma ixes. Consequen ly, hese di e ences a e summed up, and las ly, i s
mean alue is compu ed. By his way, we compu e he mean quad a ic di e ence be ween
he gold s anda d segmen a ion and espec i e noise le el segmen a ion.
The segmen a ion esul s (mul i egional segmen a ion) a e e alua ed ia labeling
ma ix, whe e each egion has a unique numbe . This numbe ep esen s an in e al o
in ensi y alues, which a e classi ied in o a speci ic egion. Thus, his can be in e p e ed as a
ans o ma ion o a se o in ensi y alues om he image spa ial a ea in o he egion index.
The e alua ion pa ame e s e lec pixel eclassi ica ion among indi idual such egions
by he in luence o addi i e noise. By adding addi i e noise wi h g adually inc easing
in ensi y, a espec i e pixel will ha e signi ican ly di e en in ensi y alue when compa ing
wi h he si ua ion wi hou addi i e noise. The e o e, such pixels may be eclassi ied in
a di e en egion. The e alua ion o pixel-wise pa ame e s such as SNR o MSE, e lec
he impac o change o pixels assignmen among indi idual egions. The main aim o
hese pa ame e s is e lec ing he impac be ween change o pixel’s assignmen in adjacen
egions ( his is only small change on noise impac ) and he shi be ween mo e egions,
whe e we can suppose a highe noise impac . This si ua ion i s ly e lec s he change o
pixel egion eassignmen , bu also he shi o pixel in ensi y by addi i e noise. Finally,
he e alua ion pa ame e s quan i y he impac o a pixel’s assignmen change and hus
objec i ely e alua e a obus ness o a espec i e pixel’s classi ica ion upon he image noise
wi h g adual in ensi y. The highe shi be ween egions is egis able, he bigge impac on
e alua ion pa ame e s is, which quan i y he pe o mance and obus ness o he egional
segmen a ion upon dynamic noise in ensi y.
4. Resul s
In his sec ion, we in oduce quan i a i e esul s o es ing analyzed h esholding-
based segmen a ion s a egies. He e, we p o ide se e al ypes o cha ac e is ics o p o ide
an objec i e iew o he segmen a ion pe o mance and limi a ions. We p o ide examples
o g aphical compa isons o he segmen a ion me hods, which show he in luence o he
a iable image noise o segmen a ion maps. Fo he gene a ion o he segmen a ion maps,
we use an a i icial colo coding. Whe e each single colo ep esen s one egion o he
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 21 o 38
segmen a ion model. To p o ide a complex iew on he segmen a ion pe o mance, we p o-
ide his es ing o a a iable numbe o segmen a ion classes because his pa ame e has
a subs an ial e ec on he segmen a ion pe o mance. One o he impo an pe o mance
ea u es is he ime complexi y, hus we p o ide ime equi emen s o indi idual segmen-
a ion me hods. This aspec is subs an ially impo an when pe o ming a simul aneous
segmen a ion o a s ack o MR images. In o de o show a s a is ical signi icance be ween
he ou ine me hods and op imized segmen a ion models, we p o ide he s a is ical es ing
o signi icance o p- alues o median es s. The las quan i a i e analysis deals wi h he ex-
ac ion o clinically impo an ca ilage ea u es including he a ea, pe ime e , and ca ilage
skele on. He e, we show di e ences o au oma ic segmen a ion and he gold s anda ds.
Las ly, we p o ide a p esen a ion o he so wa e en i onmen , which in eg a es indi idual
epo ed segmen a ion s a egies wi h he possibili y o selec ing s ee ing pa ame e s o
segmen a ion.
4.1. Quan i a i e Segmen a ion E alua ion
G adual noise dynamics has a subs an ial e ec on he pixel’s dis ibu ion as we
men ion in he p e ious examples. In ou s udy, we u ilize his ac o es he obus ness o
segmen a ion s a egies o jus i y he impac o op imiza ion elemen s o he pe o mance
o egional segmen a ion as we desc ibe u he .
The i s analysis, which we p o ide is aimed on he g aphical e alua ion o he
analyzed segmen a ion me hods unde g adual inc easing noise in luence. Based on such
esul s, we can subjec i ely obse e clea ly isible no able di e ences in indi idual me hods
in segmen a ion maps. As he example, we p o ide he compa ison (Figu es 10 and 11) o
all he me hods o sal and peppe noise wi h h ee le els o densi y: 0.1, 0.5, and 0.7 and
Rician noise wi h h ee se ings: σ2={0.1, 0.5, 0.7}.
The segmen a ion esul s a e in e p e ed in he o m o segmen a ion maps in he
colo spec um (Figu es 10 and 11). The in e p e a ion o hese colo maps is ha each
segmen a ion egion in he segmen a ion map is ep esen ed by a single alue. Thus, he
numbe o colo s co esponds wi h he numbe o egions. Each such egional model can
be in e p e ed as a ans o ma ion o he scale o in ensi y alues o he numbe o egions.
Fo ins ance, 8-bi images (256 in ensi y alues) a e ans o med in o ou in ensi ies
(segmen a ion model wi h ou egions). The main aim o his analysis is o objec i ely
epo how he dis ibu ion o a pixel’s assignmen in o indi idual egions a e modi ied
unde he in luence o addi i e noise agains he gold s anda d (segmen a ion wi hou
addi i e noise in luence).
Based on such expe imen al esul s, i is no iceable ha an inc easing noise in ensi y
can signi ican ly impai he quali y o he segmen a ion esul s. Fo lowe noise le els he
segmen a ion esul s poin ou on a good pe o mance, o example he ABC algo i hm does
no exhibi mo e signi ican signs o he noise. On he o he hand, highe le els o noise
cause signi ican impai men o he segmen a ion model consis ency. In o de o objec i ely
jus i y his ac , we u he p o ide a obus es ing o hese segmen a ion me hods based
on he men ioned e alua ion pa ame e s, o objec i ely show he change o segmen a ion
pe o mance among indi idual me hods, and also how he numbe o egions in luence he
dynamic o segmen a ion pe o mance. To be e jus i y he es ing scheme, we p o ide
es ing on ou ine app oaches o O su h esholding and K-means clus e ing. He e, we
only se he numbe o he segmen a ion egions. Con a ily, in he e olu iona y s a egies,
including ABC, PSO, DPSO, and FPSO, we use a uni ied numbe o i e a ions, 100 (PSO
1
,
GA
1
and ABC
1
) and 500 (PSO
2
, GA
2
and ABC
2
), and a popula ion size o 50 (PSO
1
, GA
1
and ABC1) and 200 (PSO2, GA2and ABC2).

Senso s 2022,22, 6335 22 o 38
Figu e 10.
Compa ison o egional segmen a ion models wi h ou egions, which a e in e p e ed by
ou a ious single colo s o h ee le els o sal and peppe noise: om le na i e image and noise
densi y
d={0.1, 0.5, 0.7}
. All he e olu ion s a egies (ABC, PSO, DPSO, and FPSO) ha e he same
se ings: 100 i e a ions and 50 popula ions.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 23 o 38
Figu e 11.
Compa ison o egional segmen a ion models wi h ou egions, which a e in e p e ed
by ou a ious single colo s o h ee le els o Rician noise: om le na i e image and noise
densi y
σ2={0.1, 0.5, 0.7}
. All he e olu ion s a egies (ABC, PSO, DPSO, and FPSO) ha e he same
se ings: 100 i e a ions and 50 popula ions.
He e, we p o ide he quan i a i e compa ison o indi idual op imiza ion echniques
o image h esholding-based egional segmen a ion agains selec ed con en ional seg-
men a ion app oaches, including O su ha d h esholding and K-means nonhie a chical
clus e ing o egional segmen a ion. We p o ide dynamical ea u e ex ac ions o hese
me hods, epo ing e ec i i y o each noise le el and obus ness in he o m o he end
o he e alua ion pa ame e s upon addi i e noise wi h dynamic in ensi y, measu ed by he
mean squa ed e o (MSE), he index o co ela ion (CORR), he s uc u al simila i y index
(SSIM), and he signal o noise a io (SNR). As he example, we p o ide hese cha ac e is ics
(Figu es 12–15) o he segmen a ion models wi h ou egions. The p o ided cha ac e is ics
a e cons uc ed o 1000 images, whe e he esul s o each le el o each noise a e a e aged.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 24 o 38
Figu e 12.
Dynamical ea u es o Gaussian noise in luence o egional segmen a ion e ec i i y and
obus ness based on he MSE, SSIM, CORR, and SNR.
Figu e 13.
Dynamical ea u es o Rician noise in luence o egional segmen a ion e ec i i y and
obus ness based on he MSE, SSIM, CORR, and SNR.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 25 o 38
Figu e 14.
Dynamical ea u es o sal and peppe noise in luence o egional segmen a ion e ec i i y
and obus ness based on he MSE, SSIM, CORR, and SNR.
Figu e 15.
Dynamical ea u es o speckle noise in luence o egional segmen a ion e ec i i y and
obus ness based on he MSE, SSIM, CORR, and SNR.
Judging by he expe imen al esul s, signi ican di e ences in e ec i i y among in-
di idual me hods a e no able. The ends o he pa ame e s o simila i y (SSIM, CORR,
and SNR) o O su and K-means exhibi signi ican ly lowe alues when compa ing wi h
he e olu iona y algo i hms. Tha indica es he no able wo se esul s o hese ou ine algo-
i hms in he compa ison wi h he op imiza ion echniques. The highe hese pa ame e s
a e, he be e he pe o mance o espec i e segmen a ion is achie ed. On he o he hand,
hese ou ine app oaches om he iew o MSE exhibi he mos apid inc easing end
when compa ing wi h op imiza ion echniques. This is also a sign o he much wo se
e ec i i y o O su and K-means agains he elemen s o a i icial in elligence.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 32 o 38
Figu e 19.
Example o epo om he SW o egional segmen a ion es ing. This epo con ains he
segmen a ion esul s o all he in eg a ed segmen a ion echniques unde sal and peppe noise wi h
densi y 0.1.
4.3. Clinical Impo an Fea u es Ex ac ion o A icula Ca ilage
Based on he epo ed analysis o he segmen a ion pe o mance, mos ly he com-
bina ion o uzzy h esholding wi h he ABC e olu iona y algo i hms appea ed as he
bes segmen a ion s a egy, judging by epo ed objec i iza ion pa ame e s and mainly
p o ided s a is ical es s o signi icance. In his subsec ion, we would like o p o ide he las
analysis o selec ed ea u es ex ac ion o a icula ca ilage om MR images based on he
uzzy h esholding wi h he ABC algo i hm. The aim o his analysis is i s ly compu ing a
mul i egional segmen a ion model, allowing o a decomposi ion o he MR image in o a
ini e numbe (in his case i e) segmen a ion egions. Consequen ly, a egion, ep esen ing
he a icula ca ilage, is selec ed (Figu e 20) as he egion o in e es , while he es o
he segmen a ion egions a e supp essed om he segmen a ion model (Figu e 20). By
his selec ion scheme, we ob ain a bina y segmen a ion model, exclusi ely classi ying he
a icula ca ilage om he es o he issues in he MR images. Figu e 20 also p esen s
a mul i egional segmen a ion o a pa o a icula ca ilage ( emo al ca ilage) a ec ed
by os eoa h i is o I. g ade, which is no able by wo segmen ed lobes o he a icula
ca ilage, and be ween hem is a gap, whe e he ca ilage is missing. To objec ize he
quali y o he a icula ca ilage ex ac ion and he p eciseness o he epo ed ea u es,
we ex ac ed he same ea u es o he gold s anda d manual segmen a ion o a icula
ca ilage. Consequen ly, he ea u e di e ences a e compa ed o quan i y he segmen a ion
e ec i i y o a icula ca ilage de ec ion. No e ha we used he ollowing se ings o he
ABC algo i hm: 100 i e a ions and popula ion size 50. The ollowing ca ilage ea u es a e
conside ed o e alua ion:
•Ca ilage a ea
—a o al coun o he pixels, belonging o he model o a icula ca ilage.

Senso s 2022,22, 6335 33 o 38
•Ca ilage pe ime e
—a pe ime e o he ca ilage model. He e, we used Sobel edge
ope a o o he de ec ion o ca ilage bo de s, and consequen ly coun ed he bo de
pixels.
•Skele on o ca ilage— he de ec ion o ca ilage skele on and compu ing i s leng h.
Figu e 20.
Example o segmen a ion esul s o a icula ca ilage and i s ea u es ex ac ion based
on uzzy h esholding wi h ABC op imiza ion: (
a
) gold s anda ds by manual anno a ion, (
b
) bina y
segmen a ion, (
c
) na i e MR image wi h a ea o in e es indica ed by he g een squa e ( op) and
mul i egional segmen a ion wi h 4 egions (bo om), whe e yellow con ou s e lec wo lobes o
a icula ca ilage om egion o in e es , and (
d
) bina y ex ac ion o a icula ca ilage used wi h
he gold s anda d ( ed con ou ).
Based on he segmen a ion o m as bina y images, ep esen ing ex ac ed a icula
ca ilage and i s espec i e ea u es, we compu e desc ip i e s a is ics, poin ing ou on
indi idual dis ibu ion’s e o unc ions, which show pe cen ual di e ences o indi idual
ea u es, and a dis ibu ion o alues o he indi idual pa ame e s o segmen a ion pe o -
mance (SSIM and index o co ela ion). He e, he e alua ion pa ame e s we e compu ed
be ween he gold s anda d bina y image and he esul s o he uzzy h esholding wi h
he ABC algo i hm. Figu e 21 p o ides a g aphical ep esen a ion o he dis ibu ions o
di e ences o ca ilage ea u es and he dis ibu ion o alues o pe o mance pa ame e s
o uzzy so h esholding wi h ABC op imiza ion.
Based on he esul s o he quan i a i e analysis o di e ence unc ion o he ex ac ed
ea u es, we did no achie e signi ican di e ences be ween he gold s anda d images and
uzzy so h esholding wi h he ABC algo i hm. Mos ly he dis ibu ions o di e ence
unc ion a e kep unde 6% o di e ence. Based on his analysis, we p o ide he desc ip i e
cha ac e is ics (Table 13), which epo s he median and s anda d de ia ion o each pa am-
e e . Based on hese esul s, he bes esul in median di e ence is achie ed o he ea u e
o skele on leng h (2.42%); con a ily, he wo s median di e ence is achie ed o he a ea
(4.12%). F om he iew o measu ing a iabili y (s anda d de ia ion) o he di e ence
unc ion, he lowes di e ence is achie ed o he skele on (1.38%) in he con as wi h he
pa ame e a ea, whe e he di e ence was he wo s (2.44%). The second s udied aspec is
he pe o mance pa ame e s: he index o co ela ion and he SSIM. He e, we achie ed a
highe median o co ela ion (0.94), whe e he median o he SSIM was 0.89. Fu he mo e,
om he iew o s anda d de ia ion, ep esen ing he concen a ion o alues is be e han
he index o co ela ion (0.017), while in SSIM we achie ed 0.028.
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 34 o 38
Figu e 21.
E alua ion o pe cen age di e ence dis ibu ions o uzzy so h esholding wi h ABC
algo i hm (agains manual segmen a ion) o ca ilage ea u es: a ea, pe ime e , and skele on and
dis ibu ions o pe o mance pa ame e s: index o co ela ion and SSIM.
Table 13.
Desc ip i e s a is ic o di e ence unc ions o ex ac ed ea u es, whe e he bes esul s a e
indica ed as g een and he wo s as ed.
Ca ilage Fea u es Median Di (%) S anda d De ia ion Di (%)
A ea 4.12 2.44
Pe ime e 3.51 1.85
Skele on 2.42 1.38
5. Discussion and Conclusions
Based on he p o ided esul s, signi ican di e ences among indi idual me hods
can be obse ed. In such compa isons, ou ine me hods show signi ican ly wo se esul s
when compa ing wi h he e olu iona y algo i hms. Along hese cha ac e is ics, we also
p o ide he a e age alues o all he noise le els o p o ide a global iew on all he
s udied me hods. By his s a is ical compa ison, in mos cases he ABC algo i hm seems
o be he mos e ec i e. On he o he hand, he use o he gene ic algo i hm o medical
image segmen a ion s a egies does no gi e sa is ac o y esul s. Fu he mo e, his s a egy
is enough ime demanding. We also s udied he ime complexi y o all he s udied
me hods o h ee di e en numbe o segmen a ion egions. He e, we can conclude ha
he inc easing numbe o egions inc eases he ime complexi y. These compa isons also
b ing no able di e ences among ou ine me hods and op imiza ion s a egies. The ou ine
me hods a e less ime demanding in he con as wi h he op imiza ion s a egies, which is
p edic able because he e olu ion s a egies usually ep esen complex p ocedu es. The
in e es ing no able ac om his s udy is he compa ison be ween he ha d h esholding-
based app oaches wi h PSO and i s a ian s and so h esholding wi h he ABC algo i hm.
Mos ly, so h esholding o e came he concep o ha d h esholding. In his iew, he so
h esholding appea s as mo e e icien . On he o he hand, he ha d h esholding s a egies
in his s udy a e less ime demanding. I is impo an o men ion ha he quan i a i e
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 35 o 38
cha ac e is ics o he segmen a ion pe o mance a e ep esen ed by he end cha ac e is ics
(Figu es 14–17) o he e alua ion pa ame e s, including he index o co ela ion, SSIM,
MSE, and SNR. Ideally, hese cha ac e is ics would be ep esen ed by a mono onous end
clea ly de ining a p og ess o he segmen a ion pe o mance upon dynamic noise. The
eal esul s some imes show ce ain a ia ions in he o m o local oscilla ions whe e he
complex ends do no ha e o be always mono onous. This may be caused by he ac ha
upon a ious noise in ensi ies, indi idual segmen a ion egions a e di e en ly a ec ed by
addi i e noise, which con ibu es o he o al e ec i i y. This phenomenon is connec ed
wi h he ac ha he noise gene a o s wo k on he p inciple o andom de ini ion o noise.
Al hough his s udy e eals a complex iew o selec ed aspec s o he employmen o
e olu iona y compu ing me hods and gene ic algo i hms o medical image segmen a ion,
he e a e s ill open issues o u he esea ch in his a ea. In he u u e esea ch, i would
be wo h s udying in de ail a ious se ings o popula ion size and he numbe o i e a ions
in he con ex o hei impac on he segmen a ion accu acy. The u he impo an aspec is
he de ini ion o c i e ia o he e alua ion o he mos sui able h eshold se ings. He e,
we use Kapu en opy as he i ness unc ion. Ne e heless, o he al e na i es may be
plausible. Fo ins ance, using a local s a is ic o a iabili y o pixel’s dis ibu ion inside o
egions appea s o be a easonable al e na i e. Based on hese open issues we would like o
build u u e esea ch in his a ea.
Au ho Con ibu ions:
Concep ualiza ion, J.K., O.P. and A.V.; me hodology, M.P. and M.C.; so wa e,
R.S. and D.O.; alida ion, K.H., M.P. and M.A.; o mal analysis, K.H. and R.S.; in es iga ion, K.H. and
D.O.; esou ces, M.P. and M.A.; da a cu a ion, M.C. and O.P.; w i ing—o iginal d a p epa a ion, J.K.
and A.V.; w i ing— e iew and edi ing, M.P.; isualiza ion, M.C. and M.A.; supe ision, R.S.; p ojec
adminis a ion, M.P. and M.C.; unding acquisi ion, M.P. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he
published e sion o he manusc ip .
Funding:
This pape was suppo ed by p ojec No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17 049/0008441, Inno a-
i e The apeu ic Me hods o Musculoskele al Sys em in Acciden Su ge y wi hin he Ope a ional
P og amme Resea ch, De elopmen and Educa ion inanced by he Eu opean Union and by he
s a e budge o he Czech Republic. The wo k and he con ibu ions we e suppo ed by he p ojec
SV4502261/SP2022/98 ‘Biomedical Enginee ing sys ems XVIII’. P ojec Resea ch and de elopmen
o he new MEDIMONITOR sys em o in elligen p ognosis o ecas ing—CZ: Výzkum a ý oj
no ého sys ému MEDIMONITOR p o in eligen níp ognózo ání ý oje diagnóz-OPPIK–MPO:
CZ.01.1.02/0.0/0.0/20_321/0024858. This publica ion has been p oduced wi h he suppo o he
In eg a ed In as uc u e Ope a ional P og am o he p ojec : C ea ion o a Digi al Biobank o sup-
po he sys emic public esea ch in as uc u e, ITMS: 313011AFG4, co- inanced by he Eu opean
Regional De elopmen Fund. This s udy was suppo ed by he esea ch p ojec The Czech Science
Founda ion (TACR) No. TL02000313 De elopmen o in elligen neu o- ehabili a ion sys em o
pa ien s wi h acqui ed b ain damage in ea ly s ages o ea men .
Ins i u ional Re iew Boa d S a emen : No applicable.
In o med Consen S a emen :
No applicable. We used he MR images om publicly a ailable
da abase The Os eoa h i is Ini ia i e.
Da a A ailabili y S a emen :
Da a a e used om publicly open clinical da abase The Os eoa h i is
Ini ia i e. The published SW applica ion o a icula ca ilage segmen a ion based on he analyzed
segmen a ion s a egies wi h op imiza ion algo i hms can be ound ia he link: h ps://www.d opbox.
com/sh/m hnili z1 ccz/AAATYhbioFPHX9x3cd6gVyUNa?dl=0 (accessed on 20 June 2022).
Con lic s o In e es : The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es .
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 36 o 38
Re e ences
1.
Deng, X.; Zhang, H.; Yang, Y. Ul asonic Image Segmen a ion Algo i hm o Thy oid Nodules Based on DPCNN. In P oceedings
o he 2021 In e na ional Con e ence on Medical Imaging and Compu e -Aided Diagnosis (MICAD 2021), Bi mingham, UK,
25–26 Ma ch 2022; Lec u e No es in Elec ical Enginee ing; Volume 784, pp. 163–174. [C ossRe ]
2.
Yang, X.; Xu, G.; Zhou, T. An e ec i e app oach o CT lung segmen a ion using egion g owing. J. Phys. Con . Se .
2021
,2082, 012001.
[C ossRe ]
3.
Fang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, M. Supe pixel/ oxel medical image segmen a ion algo i hm based on he egional in e linked alue.
Pa e n Anal. Appl. 2021,24, 1685–1698. [C ossRe ]
4.
Mang ulka , A.; Rane, S.B.; Sunnapwa , V. Au oma ed skull damage de ec ion om assembled skull model using compu e ision
and machine lea ning. In . J. In . Technol. 2021,13, 1785–1790. [C ossRe ]
5.
Le, N.; Bui, T.; Vo-Ho, V.-K.; Yamazaki, K.; Luu, K. Na ow Band Ac i e Con ou A en ion Model o Medical Segmen a ion.
Diagnos ics 2021,11, 1393. [C ossRe ]
6.
Filali, I.; Belkadi, M.; Aoudji , R.; Lalam, M. G aph weigh ing scheme o skin lesion segmen a ion in mac oscopic images. Biomed.
Signal P ocess. Con ol 2021,68, 102710. [C ossRe ]
7.
Rebouças, E.D.S.; de Medei os, F.N.S.; Ma ques, R.C.P.; Chagas, J.V.S.; Guima ães, M.T.; San os, L.O.; Medei os, A.G.; Peixo o, S.A.
Le el se app oach based on Pa zen Window and loo o log o edge compu ing objec segmen a ion in digi al images. Appl.
So Compu . 2021,105, 107273. [C ossRe ]
8.
Qi, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Guo, Y.; Yin, Y.; Gong, G.; Wang, L. Compu e -aided diagnosis and egional segmen a ion o nasopha yngeal
ca cinoma based on mul i-modali y medical images. In . J. Compu . Assis . Radiol. Su g. 2021,16, 871–882. [C ossRe ]
9.
Hu, Y.-C.; Mage as, G.; G ossbe g, M. Mul i-class medical image segmen a ion using one- s- es g aph cu s and majo i y o ing.
J. Med. Imaging 2021,8, 034003. [C ossRe ]
10.
Song, M.; Kim, Y. Manipula ing Re inal OCT da a o Image Segmen a ion based on Encode -Decode Ne wo k. In P oceed-
ings o he 2021 15 h In e na ional Con e ence on Ubiqui ous In o ma ion Managemen and Communica ion, IMCOM 2021,
Seoul, Ko ea, 4–6 Janua y 2021. [C ossRe ]
11.
Zheng, Z.; Oda, M.; Mo i, K. G aph Cu s Loss o Boos Model Accu acy and Gene alizabili y o Medical Image Segmen a ion. In
P oceedings o he 2021 IEEE/CVF In e na ional Con e ence on Compu e Vision Wo kshops (ICCVW), Mon eal, BC, Canada,
11–17 Oc obe 2021; pp. 3297–3306. [C ossRe ]
12.
Sheng, A.; Li, A.; Xia, J.; Ye, Y. Applica ion o MRI Image Based on Compu e Semiau oma ic Segmen a ion Algo i hm in he
Classi ica ion P edic ion o B eas Cance His ology. J. Heal h Eng. 2021,2021, 6088322. [C ossRe ]
13.
Cai, L.T.; Baida, M.; W en-Ja is, J.; Bou la, I.; Mukhe jee, P. Di usion MRI Au oma ed Region o In e es Analysis in S anda d
A las Space e sus he Indi idual’s Na i e Space. In P oceedings o he Compu a ional Di usion MRI: 12 h In e na ional
Wo kshop, CDMRI 2021, S asbou g, F ance, 1 Oc obe 2021; Volume 13006, pp. 109–120. [C ossRe ]
14.
Wang, L.; Song, T.; Ka ayama, T.; Jiang, X.; Shimamo o, T.; Leu, J.-S. Deep Regional Me as ases Segmen a ion o Pa ien -Le el
Lymph Node S a us Classi ica ion. IEEE Access 2021,9, 129293–129302. [C ossRe ]
15.
Ka iani, S.; Han, K.J.; Sohn, I. Ad e sa ial a acks and de enses on AI in medical imaging in o ma ics: A su ey. Expe Sys . Appl.
2022,198, 116815. [C ossRe ]
16.
Esengönül, M.; Ma a, A.; Bei ão, J.; Pi es, I.M.; Cunha, A. A Sys ema ic Re iew o A i icial In elligence Applica ions Used o
Inhe i ed Re inal Disease Managemen . Medicina 2022,58, 504. [C ossRe ]
17.
Loddo, A.; Pu zu, L. On he Reliabili y o CNNs in Clinical P ac ice: A Compu e -Aided Diagnosis Sys em Case S udy. Appl. Sci.
2022,12, 3269. [C ossRe ]
18.
A e y, E.; Sanelli, P.C.; Aboian, M.; Payab ash, S. Radiomics: A P ime on P ocessing Wo k low and Analysis. Semin. Ul asound
CT MRI 2022,43, 142–146. [C ossRe ]
19.
Gu, W.; Bai, S.; Kong, L. A e iew on 2D ins ance segmen a ion based on deep neu al ne wo ks. Image Vis. Compu .
2022
,120, 104401.
[C ossRe ]
20.
Abdou, M.A. Li e a u e e iew: E icien deep neu al ne wo ks echniques o medical image analysis. Neu al Compu . Appl.
2022,34, 5791–5812. [C ossRe ]
21.
Jeong, J.J.; Ta iq, A.; Adejumo, T.; T i edi, H.; Gichoya, J.W.; Bane jee, I. Sys ema ic Re iew o Gene a i e Ad e sa ial Ne wo ks
(GANs) o Medical Image Classi ica ion and Segmen a ion. J. Digi . Imaging 2022,35, 137–152. [C ossRe ]
22.
Zhang, J.; Li, C.; Rahaman, M.; Yao, Y.; Ma, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, T.; G zego zek, M. A comp ehensi e e iew o image
analysis me hods o mic oo ganism coun ing: F om classical image p ocessing o deep lea ning app oaches. A i . In ell. Re .
2022,55, 2875–2944. [C ossRe ]
23.
Bhalodiya, J.M.; Keung, S.N.L.C.; A ani is, T.N. Magne ic esonance image-based b ain umou segmen a ion me hods: A
sys ema ic e iew. Digi . Heal h 2022,8, 20552076221074122. [C ossRe ]
24.
Ahmed, S.M.; Ms a a, R.J. A Comp ehensi e Su ey on Bone Segmen a ion Techniques in Knee Os eoa h i is Resea ch: F om
Con en ional Me hods o Deep Lea ning. Diagnos ics 2022,12, 611. [C ossRe ]
25.
Ebe , L.; Dobay, A.; F anckenbe g, S.; Thali, M.; Decke , S.; Fo d, J. Image segmen a ion o pos -mo em compu ed omog aphy
da a in o ensic imaging: Me hods and applica ions. Fo ensic Imaging 2022,28, 200483. [C ossRe ]
26.
Guan, H.; Liu, M. Domain Adap a ion o Medical Image Analysis: A Su ey. IEEE T ans. Biomed. Eng.
2022
,69, 1173–1185.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
Senso s 2022,22, 6335 37 o 38
27.
Spada ella, G.; Pe illo, T.; Ugga, L.; Cuocolo, R. Radiomics in Ca dio ascula Disease Imaging: F om Pixels o he Hea o he
P oblem. Cu . Ca dio asc. Imaging Rep. 2022,15, 11–21. [C ossRe ]
28. Mun a ina, K.; Sho i , S.B.; Uddin, M.S. No es on edge de ec ion app oaches. E ol. Sys . 2022,13, 169–182. [C ossRe ]
29.
Mish a, I.; A a inda, K.; Kuma , J.A.; Kee hi, C.; Sh ee, R.D.; S ikuma , S. Medical Imaging using Signal P ocessing: A
Comp ehensi e Re iew. In P oceedings o he 2022 Second In e na ional Con e ence on A i icial In elligence and Sma Ene gy
(ICAIS), Coimba o e, India, 23–25 Feb ua y 2022; pp. 623–630. [C ossRe ]
30.
Ra i, A.; Khan, Z.; Aslam, F.; Jawed, S.; Sha ique, A.; Ali, H. A Re iew: Recen Au oma ic Algo i hms o he Segmen a ion o
B ain Tumo MRI. In AI and IoT o Sus ainable De elopmen in Eme ging Coun ies; Bouloua d, Z., Ouaissa, M., Ouaissa, M., El
Hime , S., Eds.; Lec u e No es on Da a Enginee ing and Communica ions Technologies; Sp inge : Cham, Swi ze land, 2022;
Volume 105, p. 522. [C ossRe ]
31.
Mo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, F.; Liao, Y. Re iew he s a e-o - he-a echnologies o seman ic segmen a ion based on deep lea ning.
Neu ocompu ing 2022,493, 626–646. [C ossRe ]
32.
Vizca a, J.C.; Bu lingame, E.A.; Hug, C.B.; Gol se , Y.; Whi e, B.S.; Tyson, D.R.; Sokolo , A. A communi y-based app oach o
image analysis o cells, issues and umo s. Compu . Med. Imaging G aph. 2022,95, 102013. [C ossRe ]
33.
Skupski, D.W.; Duzyj, C.M.; Scholl, J.; Pe ez-Delboy, A.; Ruhs alle , K.; Plan e, L.A.; Ha , L.A.; Paloma es, K.T.S.; Ajemian,
B.; Rosen, T.; e al. E alua ion o classic and no el ul asound signs o placen a acc e a spec um. Ul asound Obs e . Gynecol.
2022,59, 465–473. [C ossRe ]
34. Radhika, R.; Mahajan, R. Medical Image Enhancemen : A Re iew. P oc. In . Con . Da a Sci. Appl. 2022,288, 105–118. [C ossRe ]
35.
Zaki, M.Z.A.A.; Som, M.H.M.; Yazid, H.; Basa uddin, K.S.; Basah, S.N.; Ali, M.S.A.M. A Re iew on Edge De ec ion on
Os eogenesis Impe ec a (OI) Image using Fuzzy Logic. J. Phys. Con . Se . 2021,2071, 012040. [C ossRe ]
36.
Biswas, S.; Haz a, R. S a e-o - he-A Le el Se Models and Thei Pe o mances in Image Segmen a ion: A Decade Re iew. A ch.
Compu . Me hods Eng. 2021,29, 2019–2042. [C ossRe ]
37.
Gaddam, V.K.; Boddapa i, R.; Kuma , T.; Kulka ni, A.V.; Bjo nsson, H. Applica ion o “OTSU”—An image segmen a ion me hod
o di e en ia ion o snow and ice egions o glacie s and assessmen o mass budge in Chand a basin, Wes e n Himalaya using
Remo e Sensing and GIS echniques. En i on. Moni . Assess. 2022,194, 337. [C ossRe ]
38.
Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, H.; Xie, S.; Wang, H. O su-Kmeans g a i y-based mul i-spo s cen e ex ac ion me hod o mic olens
a ay imaging sys em. Op . Lase s Eng. 2022,152, 106968. [C ossRe ]
39.
Deng, Q.; Shi, Z.; Ou, C. Sel -Adap i e Image Th esholding wi hin Nonex ensi e En opy and he Va iance o he G ay-Le el
Dis ibu ion. En opy 2022,24, 319. [C ossRe ]
40.
Uplaonka , D.S.; Vi upakshappa; Pa il, N. Modi ied O su h esholding based le el se and local di ec ional e na y pa e n
echnique o li e umo segmen a ion. In . J. Sys . Assu . Eng. Manag. 2022, 1–11. [C ossRe ]
41.
Kan ha el, R.; Dhaya, R.; Venusamy, K. De ec ion o Os eoa h i is Based on EHO Th esholding. Compu . Ma e . Con in.
2022
,71,
5783–5798. [C ossRe ]
42.
Ma heus, J.; G oble , H.; Abu-Mah ouz, A.M. A Re iew o Mo ion Segmen a ion: App oaches and Majo Challenges. In
P oceedings o he 2020 2nd In e na ional Mul idisciplina y In o ma ion Technology and Enginee ing Con e ence, IMITEC 2020,
Kimbe ley, Sou h A ica, 25–27 No embe 2020; pp. 1–8. [C ossRe ]
43.
Jayalakshmi, D.; Dheeba, J. Bo de De ec ion in Skin Lesion Images Using an Imp o ed Clus e ing Algo i hm. In . J. e-Collab.
2020,16, 15–29. [C ossRe ]
44.
Anilkuma , K.; Manoj, V.; Sagi, T. A su ey on image segmen a ion o blood and bone ma ow smea images wi h emphasis o
au oma ed de ec ion o Leukemia. Biocybe n. Biomed. Eng. 2020,40, 1406–1420. [C ossRe ]
45.
Chen, Z.; Guo, B.; Lib, C.; Liu, H. Re iew on Supe pixel Gene a ion Algo i hms Based on Clus e ing. In P oceedings o he 2020
IEEE 3 d In e na ional Con e ence on In o ma ion Sys ems and Compu e Aided Educa ion (ICISCAE), Dalian, China, 27–29
Sep embe 2020; pp. 532–537. [C ossRe ]
46.
Hu, X.; Chen, Q.; Ye, X.; Zhang, D.; Tang, Y.; Ye, J. Resea ch on he Region-G owing and Segmen a ion Technology o Mic o-Pa icle
Mic oscopic Images Based on Colo Fea u es. Symme y 2021,13, 2325. [C ossRe ]
47. Ali, N.H.; Abdullah, A.R.; Saad, N.M.; Muda, A.S.; Su ikno, T.; Jop i, M.H. B ain s oke compu ed omog aphy images analysis
using image p ocessing: A Re iew. IAES In . J. A i . In ell. (IJAI) 2021,10, 1048–1059. [C ossRe ]
48.
Ko d , J.; B achmann, P.; Limbe ge , D.; Lippe , C. In e ac i e Volume ic Region G owing o B ain Tumo Segmen a ion on
MRI using WebGL. In P oceedings o he Web3D 2021: 26 h ACM In e na ional Con e ence on 3D Web Technology, Pisa, I aly,
8–12 No embe 2021. [C ossRe ]
49.
Habib, H.; Amin, R.; Ahmed, B.; Hannan, A. Hyb id algo i hms o b ain umo segmen a ion, classi ica ion and ea u e ex ac ion.
J. Ambien In ell. Humaniz. Compu . 2022,13, 2763–2784. [C ossRe ]
50.
Rmili, M.; El Mou aouakkil, A.; Saleck, M.M. Hyb id Mammog am Segmen a ion Using Wa e shed and Region G owing. In
Ad ances in In o ma ion, Communica ion and Cybe secu i y; Maleh, Y., Alazab, M., Ghe abi, N., Tawalbeh, L., Abd El-La i , A.A.,
Eds.; Lec u e No es in Ne wo ks and Sys ems; Sp inge : Cham, Swi ze land, 2022; Volume 357, pp. 23–32. [C ossRe ]
51.
K ishnammal, P.M.; The ase, L.M.; De i, E.A.; Joany, R.M. Wa ele s and Con olu ional Neu al Ne wo ks-Based Au oma ic
Segmen a ion and P edic ion o MRI B ain Images. IOT Sma Sys . 2022,251, 229–241. [C ossRe ]
52.
Su, M.; Shi, W.; Zhao, D.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, J. A High-P ecision Me hod o Segmen a ion and Recogni ion o Shopping Mall
Plans. Senso s 2022,22, 2510. [C ossRe ]

Senso s 2022,22, 6335 38 o 38
53.
Luisi, J.D.; Lin, J.L.; Ame edes, B.T.; Mo amedi, M. Spa ial-Tempo al Speckle Va iance in he En-Face View as a Con as o
Op ical Cohe ence Tomog aphy Angiog aphy (OCTA). Senso s 2022,22, 2447. [C ossRe ]
54.
Khan, A.-M.; Haque, F.; Hasan, K.R.; Alajmani, S.H.; Baz, M.; Masud, M.; Nahid, A.-A. LLDNe : A Ligh weigh Lane De ec ion
App oach o Au onomous Ca s Using Deep Lea ning. Senso s 2022,22, 5595. [C ossRe ]
55.
Bai, K.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. A Pupil Segmen a ion Algo i hm Based on Fuzzy Clus e ing o Dis ibu ed In o ma ion. Senso s
2021,21, 4209. [C ossRe ]
56.
Shia, W.-C.; Hsu, F.-R.; Dai, S.-T.; Guo, S.-L.; Chen, D.-R. Seman ic Segmen a ion o he Malignan B eas Imaging Repo ing and
Da a Sys em Lexicon on B eas Ul asound Images by Using DeepLab 3+. Senso s 2022,22, 5352. [C ossRe ]
57.
Giang, T.T.H.; Khai, T.Q.; Im, D.-Y.; Ryoo, Y.-J. Fas De ec ion o Toma o Sucke Using Seman ic Segmen a ion Neu al Ne wo ks
Based on RGB-D Images. Senso s 2022,22, 5140. [C ossRe ]
58.
Ciecholewski, M.; Kassja´nski, M. Compu a ional Me hods o Li e Vessel Segmen a ion in Medical Imaging: A Re iew. Senso s
2021,21, 2027. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
59.
Zhu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Li, L.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, L.; Tao, H.; Qin, T. Resea ch on Classi ica ion Model o Panax no oginseng Tap oo s
Based on Machine Vision Fea u e Fusion. Senso s 2021,21, 7945. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
60.
Liu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Wang, J.; Guo, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J. Mul i-Scale Deep Neu al Ne wo k Based on Dila ed Con olu ion o
Spacec a Image Segmen a ion. Senso s 2022,22, 4222. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
61.
Kweon, J.; Yoo, J.; Kim, S.; Won, J.; Kwon, S. A No el Me hod Based on GAN Using a Segmen a ion Module o Oligodend oglioma
Pa hological Image Gene a ion. Senso s 2022,22, 3960. [C ossRe ]
62.
Yamanakkana a , N.; Choi, J.Y.; Lee, B. Mul iscale and Hie a chical Fea u e-Agg ega ion Ne wo k o Segmen ing Medical
Images. Senso s 2022,22, 3440. [C ossRe ]
63.
Ali, R.; Ha die, R.C.; Na ayanan, B.N.; Kebede, T.M. IMNe s: Deep Lea ning Using an Inc emen al Modula Ne wo k Syn hesis
App oach o Medical Imaging Applica ions. Appl. Sci. 2022,12, 5500. [C ossRe ]
64.
Jimenez-Cas año, C.A.; Ál a ez-Meza, A.M.; Agui e-Ospina, O.D.; Cá denas-Peña, D.A.; O ozco-Gu ié ez, A. Random Fou ie
Fea u es-Based Deep Lea ning Imp o emen wi h Class Ac i a ion In e p e abili y o Ne e S uc u e Segmen a ion. Senso s
2021,21, 7741. [C ossRe ]
65.
Ali, R.; Ha die, R.C.; Ragb, H.K. Ensemble Lung Segmen a ion Sys em Using Deep Neu al Ne wo ks. In P oceedings o he 2020
IEEE Applied Image y Pa e n Recogni ion Wo kshop (AIPR), Washing on, DC, USA, 13–15 Oc obe 2020; pp. 1–5. [C ossRe ]
66. O su, N. A h eshold selec ion me hod om g ay-le el his og ams. IEEE T ans. Sys . Man Cybe n. 1979,9, 62–66. [C ossRe ]
67.
Kubicek, J.; Valosek, J.; Penhake , M.; B yjo a, I.; G epl, J. Ex ac ion o Blood Vessels Using Mul ile el Th esholding wi h Colo
Coding. In Ad anced Compu e and Communica ion Enginee ing Technology; Sulaiman, H., O hman, M., O hman, M., Rahim, Y., Pee,
N., Eds.; Lec u e No es in Elec ical Enginee ing; Sp inge : Cham, Swi ze land, 2015; Volume 362, pp. 397–406. [C ossRe ]
68.
MacQueen, J. Some me hods o classi ica ion and analysis o mul i a ia e obse a ions. In P oceedings o he Fi h Be keley
Symposium on Ma hema ical S a is ics and P obabili y, Volume 1: S a is ics; Uni e si y o Cali o nia P ess: Be keley, CA, USA, 1967;
Volume 5.1, pp. 281–298.
69.
Kapu , J.N.; Sahoo, P.K.; Wong, A.K.C. A new me hod o g ay-le el pic u e h esholding using he en opy o he his og am.
Compu . Vis. G aph. Image P ocess. 1985,29, 273–285. [C ossRe ]
70.
Lang, C.; Jia, H. Kapu ’s En opy o Colo Image Segmen a ion Based on a Hyb id Whale Op imiza ion Algo i hm. En opy
2019,21, 318. [C ossRe ]
71.
NIMH Da a A chi e—OAI (The Os eoa h i is Ini ia i e). Na ional Ins i u es o Heal h. U.S. Depa men o Heal h and Human
Se ices. A ailable online: h ps://nda.nih.go /oai/ (accessed on 15 May 2022).
72.
Xue, Y.-P.; Jang, H.; By a, M.; Cai, Z.-Y.; Wu, M.; Chang, E.Y.; Ma, Y.-J.; Du, J. Au oma ed ca ilage segmen a ion and quan i ica ion
using 3D ul asho echo ime (UTE) cones MR imaging wi h deep con olu ional neu al ne wo ks. Eu . Radiol.
2021
,31, 7653–7663.
[C ossRe ]