Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
w
ww.else ie .es/e mbe
Assessing
he
o igins,
e olu ion
and
p ospec s
o
he
li e a u e
on
dynamic
capabili ies:
A
bibliome ic
analysis
Gema
Albo -Mo an a,
An onio
L.
Leal-Rod íguezb,∗,
Vicen e
Fe nández-Rod íguezb,
An onio
A iza-Mon esb
aUni e si y
o
Se ille,
Depa men
o
Business
Adminis a ion
and
Ma ke ing,
A da.
Ramón
y
Cajal
1,
41018
Se ille,
Spain
bUni e si y
Loyola
Andalucía,
Depa men
o
Business
Managemen ,
C/Ene gía
Sola
1,
41014
Se ille,
Spain
a
i
c
l
e
i
n
o
A icle
his o y:
Recei ed
17
Janua y
2017
Recei ed
in
e ised
o m
12
June
2017
Accep ed
14
June
2017
A ailable
online
18
July
2017
JEL
classifica ion:
M0
M1
M2
Keywo ds:
Dynamic
capabili ies
Bibliome ic
analysis
Web
o
Science
a
b
s
a
c
The
pu pose
o
his
s udy
is
o
se e
as
o ien a ion
and
guidance
o
academics
ha
a e
s a ing
o
cu en ly
de eloping
hei
esea ch
wi hin
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
in
o de
o
enhance
hei
knowledge
abou
which
a e
he
key
scien ific
jou nals,
au ho s
and
a icles
shaping
his
opic.
This
pape
p esen s
a
bibliome ic
analysis
on
dynamic
capabili ies,
making
use
o
he
Web
o
Science
da abase
o
pe o m
i .
This
analysis
comp ises
undamen al
issues
such
as
(i)
he
numbe
o
s udies
published
pe
yea ,
(ii)
he
coun ies
wi h
he
highes
a e
o
p oduc i i y,
(iii)
he
mos
p olific
and
influen ial
au ho s,
(i )
assess-
men
o
s udies
ci ing
dynamic
capabili ies,
and
( )
he
mos
p oduc i e
jou nals
on
dynamic
capabili ies
and
ecen
s udies
on
his
opic.
Resul s
e eal
an
exponen ial
g ow h
in
he
numbe
o
publica ions
on
dynamic
capabili ies
o
he
2000–2012
pe iod.
Al hough,
since
2012
his
g ow h
has
decele a ed,
he
numbe
o
publica ions
on
his
opic
emains
no ewo hy.
This
s udy
b ings
use ul
in o ma ion
o
hose
academics
and
p ac i ione s
a emp ing
o
analyze
and
deepen
wi hin
his
pa icula
field
o
esea ch,
a
he
same
ime
ha
p o ides
some
insigh s
conce ning
he
u u e
de elopmen
and
p og ess
o
he
dynamic
capabili ies
opic
in
he
managemen ,
business
and
economics
academic
li e a u e.
©
2017
AEDEM.
Published
by
Else ie
Espa˜
na,
S.L.U.
This
is
an
open
access
a icle
unde
he
CC
BY-NC-ND
license
(h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1.
In oduc ion
Resea ch
on
dynamic
capabili ies
(DC)
s ands
amongs
he
mos
p olific
s eams
o
esea ch
wi hin
he
field
o
managemen
o
he
las
wo
decades.
This
migh
be
explained
by
he
high
impo ance
and
awa eness
ha
he
s a egic
managemen
li e -
a u e
has
de o ed
o
his
opic.
Al hough
he
esea ch
domain
o
dynamic
capabili ies
has
become
one
o
he
mos
ac i e
in
he
s a egic
managemen
field,
se e al
c i icisms
ha e
a oused
a guing
he
exis ence
o
some
con o e sy
and
con usion
a ound
his
concep .
In
ac ,
he
au ho s
a e
s ill
looking
o
he
na u e
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
i s
an eceden s
o
d i e s,
i s
ou comes
and
he
o ganiza ional
and
manage ial
p ocesses
and
p ocedu es
unde lying
his
concep
(Cepeda
&
Ve a,
2007;
Teece,
2007)
and
he e
exis s
a
lack
o
ag eemen
conce ning
he
concep ualiza ion
o
his
opic.
Howe e ,
his
lack
o
ag eemen ,
been
aken
in o
∗Co esponding
au ho .
E-mail
add esses:
[email p o ec ed]
(G.
Albo -Mo an ),
[email p o ec ed]
(A.L.
Leal-Rod íguez),
[email p o ec ed]
(V.
Fe nández-Rod íguez),
[email p o ec ed]
(A.
A iza-Mon es).
accoun ,
should
no
p e en
us
om
a emp ing
o
iden i y
in
his
s udy
he
mos
ele an
au ho s,
jou nals
and
publica ions
wi hin
he
dynamic
capabili ies
li e a u e
wi h
he
aim
o
building
a
e e ence
amewo k
o
u u e
esea che s
ha
migh
con ibu e
o
s eng hen
and
uni y
his
concep .
Despi e
he
widesp ead
di usion
and
in e es
a oused
by
his
opic,
li le
a en ion
has
been
paid
un il
his
momen
o
he
pe -
inence
o
building
a
amewo k
ha
b ings
he
main
cu en s
and
s udies
in
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
In
his
line,
se -
e al
li e a u e
e iews
ha e
been
made
(Amb osini
&
Bowman,
2009;
Di
S e ano,
Pe e a ,
&
Ve ona,
2010;
Eas e by-Smi h,
Lyles,
&
Pe e a ,
2009).
Ne e heless,
ew
pape s
like
he
w i en
by
Vogel
and
Gü el
(2013)
en i led
“The
dynamic
capabili ies
iew
in
s a e-
gic
managemen :
a
bibliome ic
e iew”
could
be
highligh ed
as
an
a emp
o
de elop
a
bibliome ic
e iew
o
his
concep .
Howe e ,
hese
au ho s
use
di e en
me hods
o
measu e
and
analyze
he
esea ch
ou comes,
such
as
co-ci a ion
and
bibliog aphic
coupling,
mo e
aimed
a
de ec ing
in e ex ual
linkages
exis ing
be ween
academic
publica ions
due
o
he
e e encing
beha iou
o
schola s.
In
addi ion,
hese
au ho s
documen
co-ci a ion
analysis,
while
his
echnique
migh
be
also
applied
o
addi ional
bibliog aphic
i ems
(i.e.,
au ho s
o
academic
jou nals).
We
aim
o
co e
his
gap,
by
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.004
2444-8834/©
2017
AEDEM.
Published
by
Else ie
Espa˜
na,
S.L.U.
This
is
an
open
access
a icle
unde
he
CC
BY-NC-ND
license
(h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-
nd/4.0/).
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
43
analyzing
u he
hese
complemen a y
sou ces
o
bibliog aphic
in o ma ion.
Hence,
he
main
pu pose
o
ou
s udy
is
o
o ien
esea che s
and
enable
a
wide
unde s anding
and
g asp
o
he
dynamic
capa-
bili ies
opic.
This
pape
migh
se e
as
an
in oduc o y
e e ence
and
p elimina y
app oach
o
new
esea che s
a ge ing
o
become
amilia
wi h
he
li e a u e
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
To
his
aim,
he
a icle
in ends
o
cla i y
he
concep
o
dynamic
capabili ies
and
subsequen ly
de elops
a
bibliome ic
analysis
o
he
exis -
ing
esea ch
on
dynamic
capabili ies,
ying
o
elucida e
which
iew
be e
desc ibes
he
e olu ion
o
his
opic
du ing
a
pe iod
o
24
yea s
(1991–2015),
helping
his
way
o
cla i y
he
concep
and
applica ions
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
The
bibliome ic
analy-
sis
leads
us
o
acknowledge
who
a e
he
mos
influen ial
au ho s,
which
a e
he
mos
p o use
jou nals,
which
coun ies
hold
he
high-
es
a e
o
p oduc i i y,
wha
has
been
he
numbe
o
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies
pe
yea ,
he
s udies
ci ing
dynamic
capabili-
ies,
o
he
ecen
ad ances
on
his
opic.
The
pape
p oceeds
as
ollows.
The
nex
sec ion
p esen s
he
he-
o e ical
backg ound,
whe e
we
in end
o
shed
some
ligh
owa d
he
concep
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
on
he
basis
o
p io
ela ed
s udies.
The
hi d
sec ion
comp ises
a
desc ip ion
o
he
esea ch
me hodology.
The
o h
sec ion
p esen s
he
esul s
o
he
bib-
liome ic
analysis.
Finally,
he
fi h
sec ion
b ings
oge he
he
discussion,
and
di ec ions
o
u u e
esea ch.
2.
Concep ual
amewo k
Al hough
mul iple
defini ions
can
be
ound
in
he
li e a u e
(Table
1
ga he s
he
mos
widely
ecognized
o
hem),
dynamic
capabili ies
can
be
defined
as
he
capaci y
ha
enables
a
fi m
o
in eg a e,
build,
and
econfigu e
in e nal
and
ex e nal
compe en-
cies
o
add ess
apidly
changing
en i onmen s.
This
is
he
sense
in
which
Teece,
Pisano,
and
Shuen
(1997)
in oduced
he
e m
o
dynamic
capabili ies
in
he
a icle
en i led
“Dynamic
capabili ies
and
s a egic
managemen ”.
This
pape
is
conside ed
he
mos
influen ial
s udy
on
dynamic
capabili ies,
oge he
wi h
a
ecen ly
de eloped
new
amewo k
o
dynamic
capabili ies
(Teece,
2007,
2014).
This
e m
is
s ill
used
in
ou
days,
al hough,
o e
he
yea s,
many
a e
he
au ho s
who
ha e
a emp ed
o
edefine
and
expand
he
con-
cep
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
adjus ing
i
o
he
pa icula
con ex
o
he
momen .
Au ho s
such
as
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000),
Zollo
and
Win e
(2002),
Hel a
and
Pe e a
(2003),
Zo
(2003),
Win e
(2003),
Zah a,
Sapienza,
and
Da idsson
(2006),
Teece
(2007),
Hel a
e
al.
(2009)
o
Cepeda
and
Ve a
(2007),
among
o he s,
ha e
con-
ibu ed
wi h
hei
pa icula
iew
and
unde s anding
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Howe e ,
hey
ha e
ailed
o
p o ide
a
concise
and
comp ehensi e
defini ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies
and
i s
concep-
ualiza ion
has
no
eached
consensus
ye
(P o oge ou,
Caloghi ou,
&
Lioukas,
2012).
Consequen ly,
his
has
p oduced
some
misunde -
s andings.
Mo e
ecen ly,
Pe e a ,
Di
S e ano,
and
Ve ona
(2013)
poin
ou
ha
he
o igin
o
such
con usion
appea ed
e y
soon,
be ween
he
publica ion
o
wha
hey
called
“seminal
pape s”
–
Teece
e
al.
(1997)
and
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000)
–.
Wha
is
ce ain
is
ha ,
al hough
he
concep
is
bo n
and
de elops
linked
o
s a egic
managemen ,
he
li e a u e
shows
how
esea che s
ha e
paid
g ea
a en ion
o
i s
ela ionship
wi h
an
inc easingly
b oad
a ie y
o
aspec s,
which
join ly
wi h
i s
possible
applica ions
o
di e en
a eas,
has
c i ically
a ec ed
he
defini ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
In
his
line,
we
can
find
defini ions
such
as
he
one
p o ided
by
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000)
ha
p esen s
dynamic
capabili ies
as
specific
and
iden ifiable
p ocesses
ha
especially
comp ise
he
de elopmen
o
p oduc s,
s a egic
decision-making,
and
manage-
men
o
alliances.
Subsequen ly,
Zah a
e
al.
(2006)
define
dynamic
capabili ies
as
he
fi m’s
abili y
o
econfigu e
o ganiza ional
esou ces
and
ou ines
in
he
o m
ha
imagined
and
conside ed
o
be
app op ia e
whe eby
he
main
decisions.
Whe eas,
in
hei
la e
s udy,
Hel a
e
al.
(2009,
p.
4)
define
hem
as
“ he
abili y
o
pe o m
a
ask
in
leas
minimally
accep able
manne ”.
In
an
e o
o
unde s and
he
na u e
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
Zollo
and
Win e
(2002)
and
Win e
(2003)
dis inguish
be ween
wo
ypes
o
ou ines:
he
fi s
deals
wi h
he
fi m’s
ope a ional
ac i i y
–
“ope a ional
ou ines”
–
and
he
la e
in ol es
he
modifica ion
o
ope a ing
ou ines
–
“dynamic
capabili ies”
–.
Dynamic
and
ope a ional
capabili ies
di e
in
hei
pu poses
and
in ended
ou comes
(Hel a
&
Win e ,
2011).
Ope a ional
capabili-
ies
comp ise
he
fi m’s
ope a ional
unc ioning,
being
also
labeled
Table
1
Defini ions
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Au ho
Defini ion
Teece
and
Pisano
(1994,
p.
537)
Timely
esponsi eness
and
apid
and
flexible
p oduc
inno a ion,
along
wi h
he
managemen
capabili y
o
e ec i ely
coo dina e
and
edeploy
in e nal
and
ex e nal
compe ences.
Teece
e
al.
(1997,
p.
516)
The
fi m’s
abili y
o
in eg a e,
build,
and
econfigu e
in e nal
and
ex e nal
compe ences
o
add ess
apidly
changing
en i onmen s.
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000,
p.
1006)
The
fi m’s
p ocesses
ha
use
esou ces-specifically
he
p ocesses
o
in eg a e,
econfigu e,
gain,
and
elease
esou ces- o
ma ch
and
e en
c ea e
ma ke
change;
dynamic
capabili ies
hus
a e
he
o ganiza ional
and
s a egic
ou ines
by
which
fi ms
achie e
new
esou ce
configu a ions
as
ma ke s
eme ge,
collide,
spli ,
e ol e
and
die.
Teece
(2000,
p.
36)
The
abili y
o
sense
and
hen
seize
oppo uni ies
quickly
and
p oficien ly.
G i fi h
and
Ha ey
(2001,
p.
597)
Dynamic
Capabili ies
is
a
combina ion
o
esou ces
ha
a e
di ficul - o-imi a e,
including
e ec i e
coo dina ion
o
in e -o ganiza ional
ela ionships,
on
a
global
basis
ha
can
p o ide
a
fi m
compe i i e
ad an age.
Zollo
and
Win e
(2002,
p.
340)
A
dynamic
capabili y
is
a
lea ned
and
s able
pa e n
o
collec i e
ac i i y
h ough
which
he
o ganiza ion
sys ema ically
gene a es
and
modifies
i s
ope a ing
ou ines
in
pu sui
o
imp o ed
e ec i eness.
Lee,
Lee,
and
Rho
(2002,
p.
734)
Dynamic
capabili ies
a e
concei ed
as
a
sou ce
o
sus ainable
ad an age
in
Schumpe e ian
egimes
o
apid
change.
Adne
and
Hel a
(2003,
p.
1012)
The
capabili ies
wi h
which
manage s
build,
in eg a e,
and
econfigu e
o ganiza ional
esou ces
and
compe ences.
Hel a
and
Pe e a
(2003,
p.
999)
Dynamic
capabili ies
do
no
di ec ly
a ec
ou pu
o
he
fi m
in
which
hey
eside,
bu
indi ec ly
con ibu e
o
he
ou pu
o
he
fi m
h ough
an
impac
in
ope a ional
capabili ies
Win e
(2003,
p.
991)
Those
(capabili ies)
ha
ope a e
o
ex end,
modi y,
o
c ea e
o dina y
capabili ies.
Zah a
e
al.
(2006,
p.
918)
The
abili ies
o
econfigu e
a
fi m’s
esou ces
and
ou ines
in
he
manne
en isioned
and
deemed
app opia e
by
i s
p incipal
decision-make (s).
Hel a
e
al.
(2009,
p.
4)
The
abili y
o
pe o m
a
ask
in
leas
minimally
accep able
manne .
Teece
(2007,
p.
1319) Dynamic
capabili ies
can
be
disagg ega ed
in
he
capaci y
(a)
o
sense
and
shape
oppo uni ies
and
h ea s,
(b)
o
seize
oppo uni ies,
and
(c)
o
main ain
compe i i eness
h ough
enhancing,
combining,
p o ec ing,
and,
when
necessa y,
econfigu ing
he
business
en e p ise’s
in angible
and
angible
asse s.
Pa lou
and
El
Sawy
(2011,
p.
239)
Dynamic
capabili ies
ha e
been
p oposed
as
a
means
o
add essing
u bulen
en i onmen s
by
helping
manage s
ex end,
modi y,
and
econfigu e
exis ing
ope a ional
capabili ies
in o
new
nes
ha
be e
ma ch
he
en i onmen .
Hel a
and
Ma in
(2015,
p.
1)
The
capabili ies
wi h
wich
manage s
c ea e,
ex end,
and
modi y
he
ways
in
which
fi ms
make
a
li ing-helps
o
explain
he
ela ionship
be ween
he
quali y
o
manage ial
decisions,
s a egic
change,
and
o ganiza ional
pe o mance.
44
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
“how
we
ea n
a
li ing
now”
capabili ies
(Cepeda
&
Ve a,
2007).
In
con as ,
Hel a
and
Pe e a
(2003,
p.
999)
a gue
ha
“dynamic
capabili ies
do
no
di ec ly
a ec
ou pu
o
he
fi m
in
which
hey
eside,
bu
indi ec ly
con ibu e
o
he
ou pu
o
he
fi m
h ough
an
impac
in
ope a ional
capabili ies”.
Teece
(2007)
ecognizes
in
u n
ha
ope a ional
capabili ies
help
an
o ganiza ion’s
echnical
fi ness
by
ensu ing
i s
day- o-day
ope a ional
e ficiency,
whe eas
dynamic
capabili ies
help
o
sus ain
a
fi m’s
e olu iona y
fi ness,
he eby
c ea ing
long- un
compe i i e
success.
Besides,
Pa lou
and
El
Sawy
(2011)
p opose
ha
dynamic
capabili ies
migh
help
manage s
o
ex end,
modi y,
and
econfigu e
exis ing
ope a ional
capabili ies
in
u bulen
en i onmen s.
Ce ainly,
mos
s udies
amed
wi hin
he
dynamic
capabil-
i ies
iew
(DCV)
highligh
he
s ong
connec ion
be ween
his
se
o
highe
o de
esou ces
and
capabili ies,
namely
dynamic
capabili ies,
and
he
a ainmen
and
enewal
o
compe i i e
ad an-
ages
(Vi as-López,
2005).
Fo
ins ance,
au ho s
like
Camisón
and
Fo és
(2010)
and
Leal-Rod íguez
and
Roldán
(2013)
label
dynamic
capabili ies
o
e e
o
he
se
o
o ganiza ional
compe encies
ha
allows
fi ms
o
gene a e
alue
and
o
le e age
compe i-
i e
ad an ages
h ough
s a egic
managemen
p ocesses,
while
Ma elo-Land oguez,
Ba oso-Cas o,
and
Cepeda-Ca ión
(2011)
p opose
ha
o ganiza ions
a e
able
o
inc ease
cus ome
alue
by
iden i ying
and
e ec i ely
os e ing
adequa e
combina ions
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Fu he mo e,
dynamic
capabili ies
may
g an
fi ms
he
necessa y
doses
o
flexibili y
ha
migh
enable
hem
o
adjus
o
unce ain
and
changing
scena ios
and
o
de elop
p od-
uc ,
p ocess
and
manage ial
inno a ions
(Singh,
Singh-Obe oi,
&
Singh-Ahuja,
2013).
Simila ly,
Chaha baghi,
Adc o ,
and
Willis
(2005)
a gue
ha
a
s a egical
combina ion
o
o ganiza ional
ans-
o mabili y
and
dynamic
capabili ies
a e
i al
in
explaining
he
o ganiza ions’
su i al
and
enewal.
In
spi e
o
he
possible
disc epancies,
om
he
ini ial
con-
ibu ions
(Eisenha d
&
Ma in,
2000;
Teece
e
al.,
1997;
Zollo
&
Win e ,
2002)
i
al eady
appea s
a
ai ly
sha p
ag eemen
on
he
co e
elemen s
ha
define
dynamic
capabili ies:
(i)
le el
o
en i onmen al
change,
(ii)
o ganiza ional
p ocesses
o
ou ines,
(iii)
esou ces
configu a ion,
(i )
manage s’
decision
making,
and
( )
lea ning
mechanisms
(Fukuzawa,
2015).
As
we
ha e
said
be o e,
Table
1
p esen s
se e al
defini ions
o
dynamic
capabili ies
employed
in
key
s udies.
3.
Me hod
Bibliome ic
analysis
is
a
discipline
ha
consis s
on
he
applica ion
o
s a is ical
me hods
o
e alua e
de elopmen s
and
knowledge
enhancemen
ega ding
a
specific
subjec
and
he
assessmen
o
he
scien ific
quali y
and
influence
o
he
dis inc
wo ks
and
sou ces
(Bouyssou
&
Ma chan ,
2011;
Daim,
Rueda,
Ma in,
&
Ge ds i,
2006).
Wi h
ega d
o
he
adi ional
li e a u e
e iew,
his
ype
o
analysis
is
an
inno a i e
me hodology
(De
Bakke ,
G oenewegen,
&
Den
Hond,
2005).
This
analysis
p o ides
use ul
in o ma ion
o
hose
academics
and
p ac i ione s
a emp ing
o
analyze
and
deepen
wi hin
his
pa -
icula
field
o
esea ch
(Duque-Oli a,
Ce e a
Taule ,
&
Rod íguez
Rome o,
2006),
as
bibliome ic
analysis
de e mines
an
a ay
o
significan
indica o s
o
measu ing
he
bibliog aphic
ma e ial.
By
i ue
o
he
bibliome ic
analysis,
esea che s
migh
access
and
expand
hei
knowledge
wi h
ega d
o
key
indica o s
such
as
he
numbe
o
publica ions,
he
mos
p olific
au ho s,
he
coun ies
whe e
his
field
o
esea ch
is
mo e
popula
o
he
jou nals
ha
de o e
mo e
a en ion
o
publishing
issues
e e ed
o
his
pa icula
opic.
O he
indica o s
o
be
used
o
measu -
ing
a
esea che ’s
influence
a e
he
o al
numbe
o
publica ions,
numbe
o
ci a ions,
ci a ions/pape s
a io
(Hi sch,
2005)
o
he
h-index1(Me igó,
Mas-Tu ,
Roig-Tie no,
&
Ribei o-So iano,
2015).
Acco ding
o
Podsako ,
MacKenzie,
Podsako ,
and
Bach ach
(2008)
he
numbe
o
s udies
measu es
he
p oduc i i y
and
he
num-
be
o
ci a ions
cons i u es
a
good
p oxy
as
o
he
esea che ’s
influence.
The
fi s
s ep
o
bibliome ic
analysis
in ol es
iden i ying
hose
da abases
ha
would
be
mo e
use ul
o
he
s udy
(Albo -Mo an
&
Ribei o-So iano,
2015).
This
s udy
elies
on
he
use
o
he
Thom-
son
Reu e s
Web
o
Science
(WOS)
da abase,
o me ly
ISI
Web
o
Knowledge,
which
is
an
online
scien ific
in o ma ion
assis an
ha
includes
scien ific
documen s
and
esea ch
pape
ac oss
all
dis-
ciplines.
This
da abase
pe mi s
esea che s
o
access
o
esea ch
pape s
and
o he
documen s
om
scien ific
jou nals
and
books
in
all
fields
o
science
(Albo -Mo an
&
Ribei o-So iano,
2015).
The
jou nals
indexed
in
he
WOS
ha e
associa ed
an
impac
ac o
in
he
Jou nal
Ci a ion
Repo
(JCR).
This
analysis
was
ca ied
ou
in
Janua y
2016,
h ough
he
access
o
he
WOS
da abase.
This
s udy
analyzes
scien ific
esea ch
o
he
pe iod
1991–2015.
The
o al
amoun
o
esea ch
s udies
analyzed
on
his
pape
comp ises
he
a eas
o
business,
managemen
and
economics
in
he
WOS.
To
measu e
he
exis ing
publica ions,
Cada id-Higui a,
Awad,
Ca dona,
and
Jaime
(2012)
define
h ee
ypes
o
indica o s:
quan i y,
quali y
and
s uc u al.
The
fi s
indica o
measu es
p o-
duc i i y
in
e ms
o
he
numbe
o
publica ions,
while
he
second
indica o
measu es
he
impac
o
a
publica ion
in
ela ion
o
he
numbe
o
ci a ions.
Besides,
s uc u al
indica o s
measu e
he
con-
nec ions
exis ing
be ween
he
di e en
wo ks
and
au ho s.
While
o he
ela ed
s udies
such
as
he
one
de eloped
by
Vogel
and
Gü el
(2013)
ha e
ocused
on
s uc u al
indica o s,
his
pape
co e s
he
wo
fi s
ypes
o
indica o s
in
o de
o
measu e
wha
a e
he
pub-
lica ions
ha
en ail
g ea e
ecogni ion
wi hin
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies
and
se e
as
guidance
o
u he
esea ch.
4.
Resul s
This
sec ion
p esen s
he
findings
o
he
bibliome ic
analy-
sis
o
he
scien ific
esea ch
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
This
s udy
ocuses
on
documen s
published
be ween
1991
and
2015
wi hin
he
managemen ,
economics
and
business
ca ego ies.
The
s a ing
yea ,
1991,
was
chosen
because
i
is
when
he
fi s
s udy
dealing
wi h
dynamic
capabili ies
was
published,
acco dingly
wi h
he
Web
o
Science.
This
pape
is
en i led
“New
echnology
adop ion
in
an
inno a i e
ma ke place:
Mic o-
and
mac o-le el
decision
making
models”
and
was
published
in
he
In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Fo ecas -
ing
by
B idges,
Coughlan,
and
Kalish
(1991).
This
opic
comp ehends
3852
s udies
published
in
he
Web
o
Science
un il
he
end
o
2015,
which
includes
2808
a icles,
793
p oceedings
pape s,
265
e iews,
64
edi o ial
ma e ial,
14
book
e iews,
11
book
chap e s
and
2
co ec ions.
This
s udy
uses
he
ollowing
bibliome ic
indica o s:
•Numbe
o
dynamic
capabili ies
esea ch
documen s
published
be ween
1991
and
2015.
•Coun ies
wi h
he
highes
a e
o
p oduc i i y.
•Au ho s
wi h
he
highes
ci a ion
a e.
•Jou nals
wi h
mo e
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
•The
mos
ci ed
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
•Recen
mos
ci ed
a icles
on
dynamic
capabili ies
(2012–2015).
1The
h-index
is
an
academic
au ho -le el
me ic
ha
in ends
o
measu e
he
le -
els
o
p oduc i i y
and
ci a ion
impac
o
a
schola ’s
publica ions.
The
index
is
based
on
he
se
o
he
au ho ’s
mos
ci ed
pape s
and
he
numbe
o
ci a ions
ecei ed
in
o he
publica ions.
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
45
Table
2
Annual
numbe
o
s udies
in
dynamic
capabili ies.
R
Yea
Numbe
o
publica ions
1
1991
2
2
1992
6
3
1993
12
4
1994
9
5
1995
11
6
1996
19
7
1997
25
8
1998
29
9
1999
15
10
2000
47
11
2001
57
12
2002
60
13
2003
78
14
2004
101
15
2005
129
16
2006
179
17
2007
260
18
2008
308
19
2009
308
20
2010
354
21
2011
390
22
2012
397
23
2013
395
24
2014
353
25
2015
307
4.1.
Yea
o
publica ion
The
opic
o
dynamic
capabili ies
appea s
in
academic
esea ch
in
1991.
Table
2
and
Fig.
1
p esen
he
numbe
o
publica ions
pe
yea
on
dynamic
capabili ies
since
1991.
Du ing
he
fi s
yea
he e
we e
only
wo
published
s udies
wi hin
he
Web
o
Science.
Du -
ing
he
ollowing
wen y- ou
yea s,
he
annual
olume
o
s udies
has
been
con inually
inc easing.
Since
2004
his
expansion
became
mo e
significan
wi h
an
annual
inc ease
un il
he
eco d
o
397
s udies
published
in
2012.
The
escala ion
in
publica ions
om
2004
can
be
explained
by
wo
ac o s:
he
inc ease
o
esea ch
pape
submissions
o
con e ences
and
scien ific
jou nals,
and
he
de el-
opmen
o
in e ne ,
enabling
access
o
in o ma ion
sou ces
and
new
ends
o
esea ch
(Me igó
e
al.,
2015).
Howe e ,
om
2012
o
2015,
he
numbe
o
publica ions
has
expe ienced
a
sligh
dec ease,
which
may
sugges
ha
al hough
he
numbe
o
publica ions
is
s ill
conside able,
he
opic
migh
be
en e ing
a
ma u i y
phase.
4.2.
Coun ies
wi h
he
highes
a e
o
p oduc i i y
Table
3
shows
he
wen y
coun ies
wi h
he
highes
a e
o
p oduc i i y
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
Such
a e
o
p oduc i i y
is
Table
3
Top
20
coun ies
wi h
he
highes
a e
o
p oduc i i y.
Rank
Coun y
TP
TC
C/P
h-Index
1
USA
1277
77,806
60.93
123
2
England
499
11,059
22.16
52
3
China
420
1461
3.48
19
4
Spain
261
2789
10.69
23
5
Ge many
213
3041
14.28
25
6
Canada
205
6186
30.18
41
7
Aus alia
192
1820
9.48
21
8
I aly
180
3028
16.82
28
9
Taiwan
170
1298
7.64
18
10
Ne he lands
165
3569
21.63
34
11
Finland
128
1338
10.45
19
12
F ance
128
5991
46.80
33
13
Sweden
112
6177
55.15
20
14
Denma k
86
2670
31.05
24
15
Swi ze land
71
1773
24.97
18
16
Sou h
Ko ea
60
1370
22.83
14
17
No way
54
1078
19.96
18
18
Singapo e
53
1188
22.42
18
19
Japan
44
2144
48.73
12
20
Tu key
44
367
8.34
9
measu ed
h ough
di e en
indica o s:
i.e.,
he
numbe
o
esea ch
a icles
published
(TP),
he
o al
numbe
o
ci a ions
ecei ed
by
he
published
a icles
(TC),
a e age
ci a ions
pe
a icle
published
(C/P),
and
finally,
he
h-index,
used
o
measu e
he
quali y
o
esea ch
ou pu
on
he
basis
o
he
numbe
o
ci a ions
ecei ed.
The
Uni ed
S a es
s ands
as
he
leading
coun y
in
he
anking
o
coun ies
wi h
mos
s udies
published
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
I
is
also
he
fi s
qualified
in
he
ankings
o
coun ies
wi h
mos
ci a ions,
highes
a e age
ci a ions
pe
a icle,
and
highes
h-index.
Be ween
1991
and
2015,
schola s
om
he
USA
p oduced
1277
documen s
wi h
77,806
ci a ions,
60.93
ci a ions
pe
a icle,
and
h-index
o
123.
This
seems
easonable,
gi en
he
dimensions
o
he
Uni ed
S a es
and
ha
No h
Ame ican
au ho s
ha e
adi ionally
had
g ea e
access
o
scien ific
jou nals
and
da abases
han
au ho s
om
o he
coun ies.
England
and
China
occupy
he
second
and
hi d
posi ions
wi h
499
and
420
s udies
espec i ely.
Ne e heless,
despi e
accoun -
ing
420
publica ions,
China
has
a
low
C/P
o
3.48
poin s,
whe eas
some
coun ies
placed
behind
hold
a
supe io
C/P
index,
such
as
he
case
o
Spain
ha
holds
a
10.69
C/P
index
wi h
up
o
261
publica-
ions.
This
leads
us
o
poin
ou
ha
despi e
he
quan i y
o
Chinese
publica ions
on
his
opic
is
ce ainly
significan ,
pe haps
hey
a e
o
mino
academic
wo h,
which
migh
explain
i s
lowe
a e
o
ci a ions
pe
publica ion.
The
coun y
wi h
he
highes
h-index
is
he
USA,
ollowed
by
England
and
Canada.
In
he
case
o
p oduc i i y
a ing
(C/P),
he
USA
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Fig.
1.
Numbe
o
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies
published
be ween
1991
and
2015.
46
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
Table
4
Top
10
coun ies
in
p oduc i i y
pe
yea .
Yea
USA
England
China
Spain
Ge many
Canada
Aus alia
I aly
Taiwan
Ne he lands
1991
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1992
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1993
6
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1994
4
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
1995
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1996
13
4
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1997
15
4
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
1998
13
1
0
0
1
2
0
2
1
1
1999
7
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
2000
28
8
0
0
2
3
1
1
2
1
2001
35
9
0
0
0
2
1
3
1
6
2002
33
8
1
0
0
4
1
0
0
3
2003
30
10
3
2
3
3
4
3
1
4
2004
49
13
8
3
0
7
5
1
3
6
2005
54
20
13
2
3
10
5
6
1
4
2006
68
18
22
8
13
12
6
6
7
4
2007
75
35
48
12
15
14
11
8
7
9
2008
87
44
60
14
19
8
11
8
14
16
2009
118
44
50
12
10
17
10
14
6
14
2010
111
42
42
33
17
23
13
18
29
15
2011
112
38
27
42
20
22
20
16
21
11
2012
125
49
35
38
27
26
27
20
23
23
2013
94
54
31
40
28
16
28
28
20
15
2014
92
49
41
31
20
25
18
13
17
19
2015
91
46
39
23
32
7
29
25
17
12
is
ollowed
Sweden
and
Japan
as
he
coun ies
wi h
mo e
ci a ions
pe
a icle.
The
case
o
Japan
is
in e es ing,
as
i
is
a
coun y
wi h
a
high
a e
o
ci a ions
pe
a icle
published,
despi e
ha ing
only
44
s udies.
This
could
be
eflec ing
he
high
quali y
o
Japanese
s udies
o
he
exis ence
and
main enance
o
a
powe ul
esea ch
ne wo k.
Then,
Table
4
shows
he
e olu ion
o
he
numbe
o
s udies
pub-
lished
wi hin
each
o
he
en
mos
p oduc i e
coun ies
since
1991.
Du ing
he
nine ies,
mos
a icles
appea ing
in
jou nals
indexed
in
he
Thomson
Reu e s
Web
o
Science
we e
published
in
he
USA.
Since
2000
i
can
be
obse ed
a
significan
p oli e a ion
in
he
num-
be
o
publica ions.
I
is
expec ed
ha
he
numbe
o
publica ions
on
dynamic
capabili ies
will
con inue
globally
g owing
du ing
he
nex
yea s,
bu
a
a
mo e
mode a e
pace
han
du ing
he
2005–2015
pe iod.
4.3.
Au ho s
wi h
highes
ci a ion
a e
Many
au ho s
om
a
wide
ange
o
o igins
ha e
ca ied
ou
esea ch
on
dynamic
capabili ies
and
published
hei
findings
in
scien ific
jou nals
indexed
in
he
Thomson
Reu e s
Web
o
Science.
In
his
sec ion,
we
show
he
mos
impac ul
au ho s
on
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Table
5
analyzes
he
numbe
o
a icles
pub-
lished
(TP),
he
o al
numbe
o
ci a ions
ecei ed
by
he
published
a icles
(TC),
a e age
ci a ions
pe
a icle
published
(C/P),
and
he
h-index.
This
anking
also
poin s
ou
he
coun y
whe e
he
au ho s
de elop
hei
esea ch
ac i i y.
The
mos
p olific
au ho
on
he
opic
is
Da id
J.
Teece
wi h
up
o
se en een
scien ific
a icles.
Besides,
he
au ho
wi h
g ea es
numbe
o
ci a ions
and
mo e
ci a ions
pe
a icle
published
is
Teece
wi h
7130
ci a ions.
O e
he
yea s,
Teece
pe o med
s udies
ha
ha e
significan ly
con ibu ed
o
new
heo ies
de elopmen .
I
should
be
ema ked
ha
mos
o
hese
esea che s
wo k
in
he
USA
and
England.
None heless,
a
ema kably
impo an
numbe
o
au ho s
wo k
in,
China
and
se e al
Eu opean
coun ies.
4.4.
Mos
p oduc i e
jou nals
The
Thomson
Reu e s
Jou nal
Ci a ions
Repo
(JCR)
indexes
sci-
en ific
jou nals
o
di e en
esea ch
a eas.
Hence,
i
e eals
he
dis inc
jou nals
ha
ha e
published
esea ch
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
Conc e ely,
in
his
case,
we
ha e
limi ed
ou
s udy
o
he
jou nals
belonging
o
he
business,
managemen
and
economics
a eas.
Iden i ying
wha
a e
he
jou nals
ha
ha e
been
adi ionally
publishing
esea ch
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies
becomes
a
c i -
ical
issue
in
o de
o
decide
which
jou nals
o
ead
when
de eloping
a
e iew
o
he
li e a u e.
In
his
ein,
Table
6
p esen s
he
op
20
jou nals
wi h
he
highes
p oduc i i y
on
dynamic
capabili ies
esea ch.
Th ee
jou nals
a e
no ewo hy:
“S a egic
Managemen
Jou nal”
wi h
160
a icles,
“O ganiza ion
Science”
wi h
100
a i-
cles,
and
“In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Technology
Managemen ”
wi h
88
a icles.
Table
6
also
shows
he
2015
JCR
impac
ac o
associa ed
o
each
jou nal.
The
impac
ac o
is
no mally
used
o
know
he
ela i e
impo ance
o
a
jou nal
wi hin
a
pa icula
esea ch
field.
Thus,
academic
jou nals
wi h
highe
impac
ac o
end
o
be
conside ed
mo e
impac ul.
In
his
s udy,
he
jou nal
wi h
he
highes
impac
ac o
is
“Jou nal
o
Managemen ”
wi h
a
sco e
o
6.051
poin s.
This
jou nal
is
ollowed
by,
“Jou nal
o
Managemen
S udies”
wi h
4.260
poin s.
Finally,
in
hi d
place
we
find
“Jou nal
o
Ope a ions
Managemen ”
ha
has
an
impac
ac o
o
4.000
poin s.
4.5.
The
50
mos
ci ed
s udies
Finally,
in
he
Web
o
Science
we
can
obse e
a
majo
p opo -
ion
o
con ibu ions
on
dynamic
capabili ies
wi h
a
high
influence
on
business
esea ch.
Table
7
p esen s
a
lis
wi h
he
50
mos
ci ed
s udies
abou
his
opic.
The
mos
ci ed
a icle
has
ecei ed
almos
5164
ci a ions.
This
specific
s udy,
en i led
“Dynamic
capabili ies
and
s a egic
managemen ”,
was
de eloped
by
he
au ho s
Teece,
Pisano
and
Shuen
and
was
published
in
1997.
The
second
a icle
in
he
anking
is
he
wo k
“Knowledge
o
he
fi m,
combina i e
capabili ies,
and
he
eplica ion
echnology”,
published
by
Kogu
and
Zande
(1992),
which
ecei es
3336
ci a ions
in
o al.
Sub-
sequen ly,
in
he
hi d
place,
he
au ho s
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000)
published
he
a icle
“Dynamic
capabili ies:
Wha
a e
hey?”
which
holds
2529
ci a ions.
An
impo an
p opo ion
o
he
mos
ci ed
a icles
in
his
field
in ol e
heo e ical
wo ks
aimed
a
he
concep ualiza ion
and
de elopmen
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Plen y
o
hese
wo ks
we e
ca ied
ou
by
eminen
academic
au ho i ies
in
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
o
ins ance:
Da id
J.
Teece,

G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
47
Table
5
Mos
impo an
au ho s
in
he
li e a u e
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
Rank
Au ho s
Coun y
TP
TC
c/P
h-Index
1
Teece
DJ
USA
17
7130
419.41
13
2
Foss
NJ
No way
14
620
44.29
9
3
Hi
MA
USA
14
1875
133.93
13
4
Volbe da
HW
Ne he lands
14
904
64.57
9
5
Win e
SG
USA
14
2686
191.86
11
6
Hel a
CE
USA
13
1821
140.08
9
7
Zah a
SA
USA
13
2495
191.92
8
8
Li
Y China
12
75
6.25
5
9
Jacobides
MG
England
11
625
56.82
9
10
Tushman
ML
England
11
1816
165.09
10
11
Ve ona
G
I aly
11
292
26.55
7
12
W igh
M
England
11
650
59.09
8
13
Camison
C
Spain
10
118
11.8
7
14
Geo ge
G England
10
2162
216.2
9
15
G o e
V
USA
10
800
80
8
16
Mahoney
JT
USA
10
527
52.7
7
17
Zollo
M
I aly
10
1875
187.5
8
18
Bowman
C England
9
513
57
9
19
Eisenha d
KM
USA
9
3065
340.56
8
20
Lewin
AY
USA
9
425
47.22
8
Ka hleen
M.
Eisenha d ,
Je ey
A.
Ma in,
Mau izio
Zollo,
Sidney
G.
Win e ,
Shake
A.
Zah a,
among
many
o he s.
Mo eo e ,
acco d-
ingly
wi h
E iksson
(2014),
he
majo i y
o
empi ical
s udies
we e
published
a e
2005,
indica ing
ha
his
concep
s ill
cap u e
he
academics’
in e es
and
ha
he
s udy
o
his
opic
is
qui e
ecen .
4.6.
The
55
mos
ci ed
s udies
be ween
2012
and
2015
To
be
able
o
know
he
endencies
on
he
field
o
dynamic
capa-
bili ies
we
ca ied
ou
an
analysis
o
he
a icles
published
in
he
Web
o
Science
du ing
he
las
ou
yea s
(2012–2015).
To
his
aim,
we
ha e
chosen
he
a icles
ha
ha e
been
ci ed
a
leas
once.
Table
8
shows
he
a icle’s
i le,
he
name
o
he
au ho ,
he
da e
o
publica ion
and
he
ype
o
s udy.
Pe e a
e
al.
(2013)
sugges
ha
dynamic
capabili ies
ha e
been
concep ualized
in
wo
cu en s
o
in es iga ion,
e olu iona y
and
ecological.
One
school
belongs
o
Teece
and
i s
companions
and
he
o he
one
o
Eisenha d
and
Ma -
in.
Teece’s
school
cen e s
on
he
ole
played
by
en ep eneu s
and
manage ial
eams,
while
Eisenha d
and
Ma in’s
school
b ings
a
mo e
ecological
ision
aced
o
empi ical
s udies
(A nd
&
No be ,
2015).
This
disag eemen
implies
some
consequences
as
o
he
e alua ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Among
he
la e
mos
ele an
publica ion
in
he
Web
o
Science
we
can
highligh
“The
de e minan s
o
g een
p oduc
de elopmen
pe o mance:
G een
dynamic
capabili ies,
g een
ans o ma ional
leade ship,
and
g een
c ea i i y”,
om
he
au ho s
Chen
and
Chang
(2013)
ha
iden ifies
mo e
wi h
Eisen-
ha d
and
Ma in’s
ecological
school.
In
his
a icle
he
au ho s
s udy
he
influence
o
dynamic
capabili ies
in
he
pe o mance
o
g een
p oduc
de elopmen .
We
also
find
a icles
mo e
linked
wi h
he
e olu iona y
school
o
dynamic
capabili ies,
such
as
“Dynamic
Capabili ies:
ou ines
e sus
en ep eneu ial
ac ion”,
by
Teece
(2012),
“Supplying
la ge
fi ms:
The
ole
o
en ep eneu ial
and
dynamic
capabili ies
in
small
businesses”,
om
he
au ho s
Woldesenbe ,
Ram,
and
Jones
(2012),
o
“Technology
change
and
dynamic
en ep eneu ial
capabili ies”,
om
he
au ho s
Lanza
and
Passa elli
(2014).
These
a icles
ocus
on
in oducing
he
concep
o
dynamic
en ep eneu ial
capabili ies,
and
in
ying
o
unde s and
how
en ep eneu ship
and
dynamic
capabili ies
can
d i e
fi m
pe o mance.
Besides,
we
also
iden i y
a icles
mo e
ocused
on
senio
managemen
eams,
o
ins ance,
“Execu i e
decision
making:
Linking
dynamic
manage ial
capabili ies
o
he
esou ce
po olio
and
s a egic
ou comes”,
by
Beck
and
Wie sema
(2013),
which
con ibu es
o
he
unde s anding
o
he
dynamic
managemen
capabili ies
h ough
he
de elopmen
o
a
model
ha
in eg a es
dynamic
managemen
capabili ies
wi h
o ganiza ional
s a egy
and
pe o mance.
Table
6
Jou nals
wi h
g ea e
numbe
o
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
Rank
Numbe
o
publica ions
Jou nals
Impac
ac o
2015
1
160
S a egic
Managemen
Jou nal
3.341
2
100
O ganiza ion
Science
3.360
3
88
In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Technology
Managemen
0.625
4
82
Indus ial
Ma ke ing
Managemen
1.930
5
75
Resea ch
Policy
3.470
6
70
Jou nal
o
Managemen
S udies
4.260
7
66
Jou nal
o
Business
Resea ch
2.129
8
60
Techno a ion
2.243
9
59
Managemen
Decision
1.429
10
58
Indus ial
and
Co po a e
Change
1.327
11
53
In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Ope a ions
P oduc ion
Managemen
2.252
12
53
Jou nal
o
P oduc
Inno a ion
Managemen
2.086
13
47
Jou nal
o
Wo ld
Business
2.811
14
39
IEEE
T ansac ions
on
Enginee ing
Managemen
1.454
15
39
Jou nal
o
In e na ional
Business
S udies
3.620
16
38
Technology
Analysis
S a egic
Managemen
0.845
17
37
Jou nal
o
Managemen
6.051
18
37
Long
Range
Planning
2.936
19
37
R&D
Managemen
1.190
20
36
B i ish
Jou nal
o
Managemen
2.188
48
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
Table
7
The
mos
ci ed
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies.
Rank
TC
Au ho s
Ti le
Type
o
s udy
1
5164
Teece
e
al.
(1997)
Dynamic
capabili ies
and
s a egic
managemen
Concep ual
2
3336
Kogu
and
Zande
(1992) Knowledge
o
he
fi m,
combina e
capabili ies,
and
he
eplica ion
echnology
Concep ual
3
2529
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000)
Dynamic
capabili ies:
wha
a e
hey?
Concep ual
4
1787
Le in hal
and
Ma ch
(1993)
The
Myopia
o
Lea ning
Concep ual
5
1702
Zah a
and
Geo ge
(2000)
Abso p i e
capaci y:
a
e iew,
econcep ualiza ion,
and
ex ension
Concep ual
6
1456
G an
(1996)
P ospe ing
in
dynamically-compe i i e
en i onmen s:
o ganiza ional
capabili y
as
knowledge
in eg a ion
Concep ual
7
1285
Zollo
and
Win e
(2002)
Delibe a e
lea ning
and
he
e olu ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies
Empi ical/quan i a i e
8
976
Gula i,
Noh ia,
and
Zahee
(2000) S a egic
ne wo ks Concep ual
9
972
Teece
(2007)
Explica ing
dynamic
capabili ies:
he
na u e
and
mic o ounda ions
o
(sus ainable)
en e p ise
pe o mance
Concep ual
10
941
Dye
and
Nobeoka
(2000)
C ea ing
and
managing
a
high-pe o mance
knowledge-sha ing
ne wo k:
he
Toyo a
case
Empi ical/quali a i e
11
898
Ge e fi,
Humph ey,
and
S u geon
(2005)
The
go e nance
o
global
alue
chains
Concep ual
12
891
Kogu
and
Zande
(1996)
Wha
fi ms
do?
Coo dina ion,
iden i y,
and
lea ning
Concep ual
13
774
Benne
and
Tushman
(2003)
Exploi a ion,
explo a ion,
and
p ocess
managemen :
he
p oduc i i y
dilemma
e isi ed
Concep ual
14
756
Gula i
(1995)
Social
s uc u e
and
alliance
o ma ion
pa e ns:
a
longi udinal
analysis
Concep ual
15
708
Gula i
(1999)
Ne wo k
loca ion
and
lea ning:
he
influence
o
ne wo k
esou ces
and
fi m
capabili ies
on
alliance
o ma ion
Empi ical/quan i a i e
16
703
Ami
and
Zo
(2001)
Value
c ea ion
in
e-business
Empi ical/quali a i e
17
700
Win e
(2003)
Unde s anding
dynamic
capabili ies
Concep ual
18
699
O likowski
(2002)
Knowing
in
p ac ice:
enac ing
a
collec i e
capabili y
in
dis ibu ed
o ganizing
Empi ical/quan i a i e
19
677
Baum,
Calab ese,
and
Sil e man
(2000)
Do
no
go
i
alone:
alliance
ne wo k
composi ion
and
s a ups’
pe o mance
in
Canadian
bio echnology
Empi ical/quan i a i e
20
667
Hel a
and
Pe e a
(2003)
The
dynamic
esou ce-based
iew:
capabili y
li ecycles
Concep ual
21
655
Maskell
and
Malmbe g
(1999)
Localised
lea ning
and
indus ial
compe i i eness
Concep ual
22
622
Ancona
and
Caldwell
(1992)
Demog aphy
and
design-p edic o s
o
new
p oduc
em
pe o mance
Empi ical/quan i a i e
23
612
Gold
and
A ind
Malho a
(2001) Knowledge
managemen :
an
o ganiza ional
capabili ies
pe spec i e Empi ical/quan i a i e
24
591
Mel ille,
K aeme ,
and
Gu baxani
(2004)
Re iew:
in o ma ion
echnology
and
o ganiza ional
pe o mance:
an
in eg a i e
model
o
IT
business
alue
Concep ual
25
534
Sub amaniam
and
Yound
(2005)
The
influence
o
in ellec ual
capi al
on
he
ypes
o
inno a i e
capabili ies
Empi ical/quan i a i e
26
523
Sambamu hy,
Bha adwaj,
and
G o e
(2003)
Shaping
agili y
h ough
digi al
op ions:
econcep ualizing
he
ole
o
in o ma ion
echnology
in
con empo a y
fi ms
Concep ual
27
499
Ca lile
(2004)
T ans e ing,
ansla ing,
and
ans o ming:
an
in eg a i e
amewo k
o
managing
knowledge
ac oss
bounda ies
Concep ual
28
497
T ipsas
and
Ga e i
(2000)
Capabili ies,
cogni ion,
and
ine ia:
e idence
om
digi al
imaging
Empi ical/quali a i e
29
486
Makadok
(2001)
Towa d
a
syn hesis
o
he
esou ce-based
anddynamic-capabili y
iews
o
en
c ea ion
Concep ual
30
472
Si mon,
Hi ,
and
I eland
(2007)
Managing
fi m
esou ces
in
dynamic
en i onmen s
o
c ea e
alue:
looking
inside
he
black
box
Concep ual
31
470
W igh ,
Dun o d,
and
Snell
(2001)
Human
esou ces
and
he
esou ce
based
iew
o
he
fi m
Empi ical/quan i a i e
32
458
Wade
and
Hulland
(2004)
Re iew:
he
esou ce-based
iew
and
in o ma ion
sys ems
esea ch:
e iew,
ex ension,
and
sugges ions
o
u u e
esea ch
Concep ual
33
445
Danneels
(2002)
The
dynamics
o
p oduc
inno a ion
and
fi m
compe ences
Empi ical/quali a i e
34
421
Williamson
(1999)
S a egy
esea ch:
go e nance
and
compe ence
pe spec i es
Concep ual
35
392
Knigh
and
Ca usgil
(2004)
Inno a ion,
o ganiza ional
capabili ies,
and
he
bo n-global
fi m
Empi ical/quan i a i e
36
379
B usoni,
P encipe,
and
Pa i
(2001)
Knowledge
specializa ion,
o ganiza ional
coupling,
and
he
bounda ies
o
he
fi m:
why
do
fi ms
know
mo e
han
hey
make?
Concep ual
37
378
DeCa olis
and
Deeds
(1999)
The
impac
o
s ocks
and
flows
o
o ganiza ional
knowledge
on
fi m
pe o mance:
an
empi ical
in es iga ion
o
he
bio echnology
indus y
Empi ical/quali a i e
38
372
Lo enzoni
and
Lippa ini
(1999)
The
le e aging
o
in e fi m
ela ionships
as
a
dis inc i e
o ganiza ional
capabili y:
a
longi udinal
s udy
Empi ical/quan i a i e
39
367
A agón-Co ea
and
Sha ma
(2003)
A
con ingen
esou ce-based
iew
o
p oac i e
co po a e
en i onmen al
s a egy
Concep ual
40
350
Teece
(2010)
Business
Models,
Business
S a egy
and
Inno a ion
Concep ual
41
341
Jansen,
Van
Den
Bosch,
and
Volbe da
(2005)
Managing
po en ial
and
ealized
abso p i e
capaci y:
how
do
o ganiza ional
an eceden ’s
ma e ?
Empi ical/quan i a i e
42
329
Rai,
Pa nayakuni,
and
Se h
(2006)
Fi m
pe o mance
impac s
o
digi ally
enabled
supply
chain
in eg a ion
capabili ies
Empi ical/quan i a i e
43
326
Zah a
e
al.
(2006)
En ep eneu ship
and
dynamic
capabili ies:
a
e iew,
model
and
esea ch
agenda
Concep ual
44
321
Newbe
(2007)
Empi ical
esea ch
on
he
esou ce-based
iew
o
he
fi m:
an
assessmen
and
sugges ions
o
u u e
esea ch
Empi ical/quan i a i e
45
319
La ie
(2006)
The
compe i i e
ad an age
o
in e connec ed
fi ms:
an
ex ension
o
he
esou ce-based
iew
Concep ual
46
319
Hel a
(1997)
Know-how
and
asse
complemen a i y
and
dynamiccapabili y
accumula ion:
he
case
o
R&D
Empi ical/quan i a i e
47
315
Hi ,
Bie man,
Shimizu,
and
Kochha
(2001)
Gues
edi o s’
in oduc ion
o
he
special
issue
–
S a egic
en ep eneu ship:
en ep eneu ial
s a egies
o
weal h
c ea ion
Empi ical/quali a i e
48
308
Raisch
and
Bi kinshaw
(2008)
O ganiza ional
ambidex e i y:
an eceden s,
ou comes,
and
mode a o s
Concep ual
49
294
Collis
and
Mon gome y
(1995)
Compe ing
on
esou ces-S a egy
in
he
1990s
Empi ical/quali a i e
50
292
Smi h
and
Tushman
(2005)
Managing
s a egic
con adic ions:
a
op
managemen
model
o
managing
inno a ion
s eams
Concep ual
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
49
Table
8
The
mos
ci ed
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies
be ween
2012
and
2015.
Rank
Au ho
A icle
Type
o
s udy
1
Pen land
e
al.
(2012)
Dynamics
o
o ganiza ional
ou ines:
a
gene a i e
model
Empi ical
2
Pe i
(2012)
P ojec
po olios
in
dynamic
en i onmen s:
o ganizing
o
unce ain y
Quali a i e
case
s udy
3
Teece
(2012)
Dynamic
Capabili ies:
ou ines
e sus
en ep eneu ial
ac ion
Concep ual
4
Jacobides
and
Win e
(2012)
Capabili ies:
s uc u e,
agency,
and
e olu ion
Concep ual
5
Camisón
and
Mon o -Mi
(2012)
Measu ing
inno a ion
in
ou ism
om
he
Schumpe e ian
and
he
dynamic-capabili ies
pe spec i es
Concep ual
6
Vogel
and
Gü el
(2013)
The
dynamic
capabili y
iew
in
s a egic
managemen :
a
bibliome ic
e iew
Bibliome ic
me hods
7
Kinds öm,
Kowalkowski,
and
Sandbe g
(2013)
Enabling
se ice
inno a ion:
a
dynamic
capabili ies
app oach
Quali a i e
case
s udy
8
Beske
(2012)
Dynamic
capabili ies
and
sus ainable
supply
chain
managemen
Concep ual
9
Teece
(2014)
A
dynamic
capabili ies-based
en ep eneu ial
heo y
o
he
mul ina ional
en e p ise
Concep ual
10
Hsu
and
Wang
(2012)
Cla i ying
he
e ec
o
in ellec ual
capi al
on
pe o mance:
he
media ing
ole
o
dynamic
capabili y
Empi ical
11
Ko
and
Mesko
(2013)
Dynamic
manage ial
capabili ies:
configu a ion
and
o ches a ion
o
op
execu i es’
capabili ies
and
he
fi m’s
dominan
logic
Concep ual
12
A go e
and
Ren
(2012)
T ansac i e
memo y
sys ems:
a
mic o ounda ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies
Concep ual
13
Biedenbach
and
Mülle
(2012)
Abso p i e,
inno a i e
and
adap i e
capabili ies
and
hei
impac
on
p ojec
and
p ojec
po olio
pe o mance
Quali a i e–quan i a i e
14
Schilke
(2014)
On
he
con ingen
alue
o
dynamic
capabili ies
o
compe i i e
ad an age:
he
nonlinea
mode a ing
e ec
o
en i onmen al
dynamism
Empi ical
15
P o oge ou
e
al.
(2012)
Dynamic
capabili ies
and
hei
indi ec
impac
on
fi m
pe o mance
Empi ical
16
Chen
(2012)
The
syne gis ic
e ec s
o
IT-enabled
esou ces
on
o ganiza ional
capabili ies
and
fi m
pe o mance
Empi ical
17
Nie es
and
Halle
(2014)
Building
dynamic
capabili ies
h ough
knowledge
esou ces
Empi ical
18
Woldesenbe
e
al.
(2012)
Supplying
la ge
fi ms:
he
ole
o
en ep eneu ial
and
dynamic
capabili ies
in
small
businesses
Empi ical
19
Lin
and
Wu
(2014)
Explo ing
he
ole
o
dynamic
capabili ies
in
fi m
pe o mance
unde
he
esou ce-based
iew
amewo k
Empi ical
20
Egge s
and
Kaplan
(2013)
Cogni ion
and
capabili ies:
a
mul i-le el
pe spec i e
Concep ual
21
Jiao,
Alon,
Koo,
and
Cui
(2013)
When
should
o ganiza ional
change
be
implemen ed?
The
mode a ing
e ec
o
en i onmen al
dynamism
be ween
dynamic
capabili ies
and
new
en u e
pe o mance
Empi ical
22
Chak aba y
and
Wang
(2012)
The
long- e m
sus enance
o
sus ainabili y
p ac ices
in
MNCs:
a
dynamic
capabili ies
pe spec i e
o
he
ole
o
R&D
and
in e na ionaliza ion
Empi ical
23
Rodenbach
and
B e el
(2012)
CEO
expe ience
as
mic o-le el
o igin
o
dynamic
capabili ies
Empi ical
24
Hel a
and
Pe e a
(2015)
Manage ial
cogni i e
capabili ies
and
he
mic o unda ions
o
dynamic
capabili ies
Concep ual
25
Li
and
Liu
(2014)
Dynamic
capabili ies,
en i onmen al
dynamism,
and
compe i i e
ad an age:
e idence
om
China
Empi ical
26
Zhan
and
Chen
(2013)
Dynamic
capabili y
and
IJV
pe o mance:
he
e ec
o
exploi a ion
and
explo a ion
capabili ies
Empi ical
27
Wilden,
Gude gan,
Nielsen,
and
Lings
(2013)
Dynamic
capabili ies
and
pe o mance:
s a egy,
s uc u e
and
en i onmen
Empi ical
28
Jan unen,
Ellonen,
and
Johansson
(2012)
Beyond
appea ances
–
Do
dynamic
capabili ies
o
inno a i e
fi ms
ac ually
di e ?
Quali a i e
case
29
Ripollés
and
Blesa
(2012)
In e na ional
new
en u es
as
“small
mul ina ionals”:
he
impo ance
o
ma ke ing
capabili ies
Empi ical
30
Makkonen,
Pohjola,
Olkkonen,
and
Koponen
(2014)
Dynamic
capabili ies
and
fi m
pe o mance
in
a
financial
c isis
Quali a i e
case
s udy–quan i a i e
31
Chen
and
Chang
(2013)
The
de e minan s
o
g een
p oduc
de elopmen
pe o mance:
g een
dynamic
capabili ies,
g een
ans o ma ional
leade ship,
and
g een
c ea i i y
Empi ical
32
Chien
and
Tsai
(2012)
Dynamic
capabili y,
knowledge,
lea ning,
and
fi m
pe o mance
Empi ical
33
Ramí ez,
Ös e man,
and
G önquis
(2013)
Scena ios
and
ea ly
wa nings
as
dynamic
capabili ies
o
ame
manage ial
a en ion
Quali a i e
case
34
Den o d
(2013)
Building
knowledge:
de eloping
a
knowledge-based
dynamic
capabili ies
ypology
Concep ual
35
Co ne
and
Wu
(2012)
Dynamic
capabili y
eme gence
in
he
en u e
c ea ion
p ocess
Concep ual
36
Newey
e
al.
(2012)
The
ela ionship
be ween
dynamic
and
ope a ing
capabili ies
as
a
s age-ga e
p ocess:
insigh s
om
adical
inno a ion
Concep ual
37
Daniel,
Wa d,
and
F anken
(2014)
A
dynamic
capabili ies
pe spec i e
o
IS
p ojec
po olio
managemen
Concep ual
38
E iksson
(2014)
P ocesses,
an eceden s
and
ou comes
o
dynamic
capabili ies
Empi ical
39
Gal in,
Rice,
and
Liao
(2014)
Applying
a
Da winian
model
o
he
dynamic
capabili ies
iew:
insigh s
and
issues
Empi ical
40
Aga wal
and
Selen
(2013)
The
inc emen al
and
cumula i e
e ec s
o
dynamic
capabili y
building
on
se ice
inno a ion
in
collabo a i e
se ice
o ganiza ions
Empi ical
41
Yung
and
Lai
(2012)
Dynamic
capabili ies
in
new
p oduc
de elopmen :
he
case
o
Asus
in
mo he boa d
p oduc ion
Empi ical
42
Ko yak
e
al.
(2015)
En ep eneu ial
leade ship,
capabili ies
and
fi m
g ow h
Concep ual
43
Villa ,
Aleg e,
and
Pla-Ba be
(2014)
Explo ing
he
ole
o
knowledge
managemen
p ac ices
on
expo s:
a
dynamic
capabili ies
iew
Empi ical
44
Beck
and
Wie sema
(2013)
Execu i e
decision
making:
linking
dynamic
manage ial
capabili ies
o
he
esou ce
po olio
and
s a egic
ou comes
Concep ual
45
S adle ,
Hel a ,
and
Ve ona
(2013)
The
impac
o
dynamic
capabili ies
on
esou ce
access
and
de elopmen
Empi ical
46
Wang
e
al.
(2013)
Examining
he
ole
o
in o ma ion
echnology
in
cul i a ing
fi ms’
dynamic
ma ke ing
capabili ies
Empi ical
47
Wilden
and
Gude gan
(2015)
The
impac
o
dynamic
capabili ies
on
ope a ional
ma ke ing
and
echnological
capabili ies:
in es iga ing
he
ole
o
en i onmen al
u bulence
Empi ical
48
Di
S e ano,
Pe e a ,
and
Ve ona
(2014)
The
o ganiza ional
d i e ain:
a
oad
o
in eg a ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies
esea ch
Concep ual
49
Teece
(2014)
The
ounda ions
o
en e p ise
pe o mance:
dynamic
and
o dina y
capabili ies
in
AN
(Economi)
heo y
o
fi ms
Concep ual
50
Lanza
and
Passa elli
(2014)
Technology
change
and
dynamic
en ep eneu ial
capabili ies
Concep ual
51
A end
(2014)
En ep eneu ship
and
dynamic
capabili ies:
how
fi m
age
and
size
a ec
he
‘capabili y
enhancemen -SME
pe o mance’
ela ionship
Empi ical
52
E iksson
(2013)
Me hodological
issues
in
dynamic
capabili ies
esea ch
–
a
c i ical
e iew
Empi ical
53
Wang,
Jaw,
and
Tsai
(2012)
Building
dynamic
s a egic
capabili ies:
a
human
capi al
pe spec i e
Empi ical
54
A nd
and
No be
(2015)
E olu iona y
and
ecological
concep ualiza ion
o
dynamic
capabili ies:
iden i ying
elemen s
o
he
Teece
and
Eisenha d
schools
Concep ual
55
Piening
and
Salge
(2015)
Unde s anding
he
an eceden s,
con ingencies,
and
pe o mance
implica ions
o
p ocess
inno a ion:
a
dynamic
capabili ies
pe spec i e
Empi ical
50
G.
Albo -Mo an
e
al.
/
Eu opean
Resea ch
on
Managemen
and
Business
Economics
24
(2018)
42–52
In
ecen
yea s,
he e
ha e
appea ed
se e al
wo ks
ha
ocus
on
ma ke ing
and
echnological
capabili ies
such
as
“The
impac
o
dynamic
capabili ies
on
ope a ional
ma ke ing
and
echnological
capabili ies:
in es iga ing
he
ole
o
en i onmen al
u bulence”,
by
Wilden
and
Gude gan
(2014),
“In e na ional
new
en u es
as
“small
mul ina ionals”:
The
impo ance
o
ma ke ing
capabili ies”,
by
Ripollés
and
Blesa
(2012),
o
“Examining
he
ole
o
in o ma ion
echnology
in
cul i a ing
fi ms’
dynamic
ma ke ing
capabili ies”,
by
Wang,
Hu,
and
Hu
(2013).
This
la e
wo k
ocuses
on
wo
key
o ganiza ional
capabili ies
–
ma ke ing
and
echnological
–
ha
d i e
he
ac ions
h ough
which
he
company
can
ace
and
adap
o
a
changing
en i onmen ,
being
able
hence
o
enhance
i s
pe o mance.
5.
Discussion
and
u he
esea ch
Ou
analysis
p o ides
a
gene al
o e iew
o
he
exis ing
scien-
ific
esea ch
on
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies
be ween
1991
and
2015
in
e ms
o
publica ions
e ie ed
om
he
Web
o
Sci-
ence
(WOS)
da abase.
This
pape
migh
se e
as
a
guide
o
u u e
esea che s
who
in end
o
de elop
s udies
on
dynamic
capabili ies,
and
need
o
acknowledge
which
academic
jou nals,
au ho s
and
a icles
should
be
add essed
o
a ain
a
p ope
heo e ical
ame-
wo k
wi hin
his
pa icula
field
o
s udy.
The
exhaus i e
bibliome ic
analysis
o
3852
documen s
ga h-
e ed
om
he
WOS
da abase
shows
ha
2808
a e
a icles.
The
mos
popula
scien ific
a icle
on
dynamic
capabili ies
is
“Dynamic
capabili ies
and
s a egic
managemen ”,
de eloped
by
Teece
e
al.
(1997).
The
coun y
esponsible
o
mos
esea ch
on
dynamic
capabili ies
is
he
USA
(1277
published
documen s),
which
may
owe
o
he
high
p opo ion
o
jou nals
based
in
he
USA.
The
jou nals
holding
mos
widely
published
esea ch
on
his
opic
is
he
“S a egic
Managemen
Jou nal”
(160
documen s),
ol-
lowed
by
he
jou nals
“O ganiza ion
Science”
(100
documen s)
and
“In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Technology
Managemen ”
(88
doc-
umen s).
The
mos
p olific
dynamic
capabili ies
au ho
is
Da id
J.
Teece
wi h
17
documen s.
The
esul s
o
he
bibliome ic
anal-
ysis
e eal
a
con inued
g ow h
in
he
numbe
o
documen s
ela ed
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
In
he
la e
yea
2015
we
can
find
307
publica ions
ha
p esen
empi ical
wo ks
aiming
o
de elop
new
heo ies
and
no el
app oaches.
Al hough
he e
a e
less
wo ks
han
on
he
p e ious
yea ,
i
is
s ill
a
ema kable
figu e.
This
s udy
highligh s
he
h ee
mos
ci ed
s udies
wi hin
his
opic,
which
can
be
conside ed
as
seminal
wo ks
ha
should
be
add essed
by
e e y
esea ch
wo k
in
his
field.
These
wo ks
a e
he
ollowing:
in
fi s
place,
“Dynamic
capabili ies
and
s a egic
man-
agemen ”,
om
he
au ho s
Teece
e
al.
(1997),
wi h
5164
ci a ions;
Secondly,
he
s udy
en i led
“Knowledge
o
he
fi m,
combina-
i e
capabili ies,
and
he
eplica ion
echnology”
(Kogu
&
Zande ,
1992),
wi h
3336
ci a ions.
And,
in
hi d
place,
“Dynamic
capabili-
ies:
Wha
a e
hey?”
om
Eisenha d
and
Ma in
(2000),
wi h
2529
ci a ions.
On
he
o he
hand,
his
pape
p esen s
he
s udies
wi h
mos
ci a ions
wi hin
he
2012–2015
pe iod.
Among
he
heo e ical
s ud-
ies
published
in
his
pe iod
we
can
highligh
a
s udy
o
p o ide
new
knowledge
on
he
backg ound,
con ingencies
and
consequences
o
pe o mance
di e ences
be ween
companies
in
he
success ul
p ocess
inno a ion,
based
on
he
app oach
o
dynamic
capabil-
i ies
(Piening
&
Salge,
2015),
o
a
s udy
by
E iksson
(2014)
ha
ocuses
on
h ee
a eas:
he
p ocesses,
an eceden s
and
ou comes
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Ne e heless,
he e
emains
a
endency
o
con ex ualize
he
concep s
o
dynamic
and
o ganiza ional
capabil-
i ies.
In
addi ion,
se e al
a icles
explain
he
e olu ion
o
dynamic
and
o ganiza ional
ou ines
(Newey,
Ve eynne,
&
G i fi hs,
2012;
Pen land,
Feldman,
Becke ,
&
Liu,
2012).
This
s udy
has
some
limi a ions.
The
fi s
limi a ion
is
ha
many
publica ions
on
dynamic
capabili ies
migh
appea
in
non-indexed
jou nals,
which
a e
una ailable
in
he
WOS
da abase.
F equen ly,
he
ci a ion
index
o
he
numbe
o
publica ions
measu es
quan-
i a i e
figu es,
despi e
he
ac ual
quali y
o
he
documen .
The
me e
ac
ha
an
au ho
is
impo an
o
ele an
pe suades
o he
au ho s
o
ci e
ha
au ho
wi hou
eading
he
a icle
o
de elop-
ing
a
decisi e
and
significan
iew
o
i s
con en
(Albo -Mo an
&
Ribei o-So iano,
2015).
Ano he
limi a ion
can
be
ha
he
esul s
gi e
a
pic u e
o
he
cu en
si ua ion,
howe e
hese
esul s
may
change
o e
ime,
especially
o
he
ecen
publica ions
o
he
las
wo- h ee
yea s
ha
s ill
ha e
o
g ow
conside ably.
And
finally,
his
s udy
is
de eloped
wi hin
a
specific
field
–
business,
man-
agemen
and
economics
–.
Consequen ly,
esea che s
should
be
cau ious
while
gene alizing
hei
conclusions.
Implica ions
o
u he
esea ch
a e
clea .
In
he
case
o
empi i-
cal
wo ks,
since
fi s
s udies
we e
published,
he e
can
be
obse ed
a
end
cha ac e ized
by
explo ing
he
ole
played
by
dynamic
capa-
bili ies
in
he
enhancemen
o
business
pe o mance.
Howe e ,
ecen
wo ks
ocus
on
mo e
cu en
issues
such
as
echnology;
ma -
ke ing;
he
en i onmen ;
he
ole
adop ed
by
en ep eneu s,
in e -
na ionaliza ion
issues
o
he
managemen
o
mul ina ionals
(A end,
2014;
Chen
&
Chang,
2013;
Hsu
&
Wang,
2012;
Teece,
2014).
O he
a icles
discuss
he
complemen a i ies
exis ing
be ween
dynamic
capabili ies
and
supply
chain
managemen
(Beske,
2012;
Ko yak
e
al.,
2015).
The e o e,
u he
esea ch
conduc ed
on
he
field
o
dynamic
capabili ies
should
be
less
ocused
on
he
a emp
o
link
DC
wi h
pe o mance
and
ad ance
owa d
he
assessmen
o
he
impac
exe ed
by
DC
on
he
abo e
men ioned
manage ial
issues.
Besides,
we
obse e
a
no ewo hy
e olu ion
o
he
published
a icles
in
his
field
o
esea ch.
Ini ially,
he
a icles
ocused
on
explaining
heo e ical
models
aimed
a
enabling
he
enhancemen
o
he
li e a u e
on
his
opic.
The
majo i y
o
empi ical
s udies
we e
published
a e
2005
(E iksson,
2014).
Fo
his
eason,
i
can
be
obse ed
ha
his
opic
s ill
a ises
high
doses
o
p esence
and
in e es
among
esea che s.
The
esul s
show
ha
despi e
he
li e a u e
is
qui e
agmen ed
and
shows
a
lack
o
consensus
in
ce ain
issues,
esea ch
de elopmen s
a e
con inually
p oli e a ing
and
expanding
he
numbe
o
app oaches
and
unde s anding
o
dynamic
capabili ies.
Fu he
esea ch
should
include
a icles
ha
do
no
con-
s ain
hei
scope
o
he
WOS,
elying
hence
on
he
use
o
o he
online
da abases,
as
o
example
Scopus
o
Google
Schola .
These
da abases
migh
con ain
s udies
published
in
jou nals
ha
a e
no
indexed
wi hin
he
ISI
Web
o
Science.
In
addi ion,
subsequen
bib-
liome ic
s udies
could
compa e
he
esul s
om
o he
da abases
wi h
hose
p esen ed
in
his
esea ch
o
pe o m
a
me a-analysis,
which
migh
enable
he
classifica ion
o
he
mos
ci ed
a icles
o
he
la es
a icles
in
di e en
ca ego ies.
Re e ences
Adne ,
R.,
&
Hel a ,
C.
E.
(2003).
Co po a e
e ec s
and
dynamic
manage ial
capabil-
i ies.
S a egic
Managemen
Jou nal,
24(10),
1011–1025.
Aga wal,
R.,
&
Selen,
W.
(2013).
The
inc emen al
and
cumula i e
e ec s
o
dynamic
capabili y
building
on
se ice
inno a ion
in
collabo a i e
se ice
o ganiza ions.
Jou nal
o
Managemen
&
O ganiza ion,
19(5),
521–543.
Albo -Mo an ,
G.,
&
Ribei o-So iano,
D.
(2015).
A
bibliome ic
analysis
o
in e -
na ional
impac
o
business
incuba o s.
Jou nal
o
Business
Resea ch,
69(5),
1775–1779.
Amb osini,
V.,
&
Bowman,
C.
(2009).
Wha
a e
dynamic
capabili ies
and
a e
hey
a
use ul
cons uc
in
s a egic
managemen ?
In e na ional
Jou nal
o
Managemen
Re iews,
11(1),
29–49.
Ami ,
R.,
&
Zo ,
C.
(2001).
Value
c ea ion
in
e-business.
S a egic
Managemen
Jou nal,
22(6–7),
493–520.
Ancona,
D.
G.,
&
Caldwell,
D.
F.
(1992).
B idging
he
bounda y:
Ex e nal
ac i i y
and
pe o mance
in
o ganiza ional
eams.
Adminis a i e
Science
Qua e ly,
634–665.
A agón-Co ea,
J.
A.,
&
Sha ma,
S.
(2003).
A
con ingen
esou ce-based
iew
o
p oac-
i e
co po a e
en i onmen al
s a egy.
Academy
o
Managemen
Re iew,
28(1),
71–88.