scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Two parallel pathways connect glutamine metabolism and mTORC1 activity to regulate glutamoptosis

Abstract

Glutamoptosis is the induction of apoptotic cell death as a consequence of the aberrant activation of glutaminolysis and mTORC1 signaling during nutritional imbalance in proliferating cells. The role of the bioenergetic sensor AMPK during glutamoptosis is not defined yet. Here, we show that AMPK reactivation blocks both the glutamine-dependent activation of mTORC1 and glutamoptosis in vitro and in vivo. We also show that glutamine is used for asparagine synthesis and the GABA shunt to produce ATP and to inhibit AMPK, independently of glutaminolysis. Overall, our results indicate that glutamine metabolism is connected with mTORC1 activation through two parallel pathways: an acute alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent pathway; and a secondary ATP/AMPK-dependent pathway. This dual metabolic connection between glutamine and mTORC1 must be considered for the future design of therapeutic strategies to prevent cell growth in diseases such as cancer.

Read accessible full text

Two parallel pathways connect glutamine metabolism and mTORC1 activity to regulate glutamoptosis

Author: Bodineau, Clément; Tomé, Mercedes; Murdoch, Piedad del Socorro; Courtois, Sarah; Durán Díaz, Raúl V.; Sciacovelli, Marco
Publisher: Nature Research
Year: 2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/5f4edb22-e5bb-4b04-8852-8d962a3639ad/download
ARTICLE
Two pa allel pa hways connec glu amine
me abolism and mTORC1 ac i i y o egula e
glu amop osis
Clémen Bodineau 1,2, Me cedes Tomé1, Sa ah Cou ois 3, Ana S. H. Cos a 4,5, Ma co Sciaco elli 4,
Benoi Rousseau6, Elodie Richa d7, Pie e Vache 7, Ca los Pa ejo-Pé ez8, Emilie Bessede3, Ch is ine Va on3,
Pie e Soubey an7, Ch is ian F ezza 4, Piedad del Soco o Mu doch1,9, Vic o H. Villa 10 &
Raúl V. Du án 1,2,7✉
Glu amop osis is he induc ion o apop o ic cell dea h as a consequence o he abe an
ac i a ion o glu aminolysis and mTORC1 signaling du ing nu i ional imbalance in p o-
li e a ing cells. The ole o he bioene ge ic senso AMPK du ing glu amop osis is no defined
ye . He e, we show ha AMPK eac i a ion blocks bo h he glu amine-dependen ac i a ion
o mTORC1 and glu amop osis in i o and in i o. We also show ha glu amine is used o
aspa agine syn hesis and he GABA shun o p oduce ATP and o inhibi AMPK, indepen-
den ly o glu aminolysis. O e all, ou esul s indica e ha glu amine me abolism is connec ed
wi h mTORC1 ac i a ion h ough wo pa allel pa hways: an acu e alpha-ke oglu a a e-
dependen pa hway; and a seconda y ATP/AMPK-dependen pa hway. This dual me abolic
connec ion be ween glu amine and mTORC1 mus be conside ed o he u u e design o
he apeu ic s a egies o p e en cell g ow h in diseases such as cance .
h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 OPEN
1Cen o Andaluz de Biología Molecula y Medicina Regene a i a—CABIMER, Consejo Supe io de In es igaciones Cien íficas, Uni e sidad de Se illa,
Uni e sidad Pablo de Ola ide, Se ille, Spain. 2Ins i u Eu opéen de Chimie e Biologie, INSERM U1218, Uni e si é de Bo deaux, Pessac, F ance. 3Bo deaux
Resea ch in T ansla ional Oncology, INSERM U1053, Uni e si é de Bo deaux, Bo deaux cedex, F ance. 4Medical Resea ch Council Cance Uni , Hu chison/
MRC Resea ch Cen e, Box 197, Camb idge Biomedical Campus, Uni e si y o Camb idge, Camb idge, UK. 5Cold Sp ing Ha bo Labo a o y, Cold Sp ing
Ha bo , NY, USA. 6Se ice Commun des Animale ies, Animale ie A2, Uni e si y o Bo deaux, Bo deaux, F ance. 7INSERM U1218, Ins i u Be gonié,
Bo deaux, F ance. 8Ins i u o de Bioquímica Vege al y Fo osín esis, Consejo Supe io de In es igaciones Cien íficas, Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se ille, Spain.
9Depa amen o de Bioquímica Vege al y Biología Molecula , Uni e sidad de Se illa, Se ille, Spain. 10 CRUK Bea son Ins i u e, Glasgow, UK.
✉email: [email p o ec ed]
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 1
1234567890():,;
Among all amino acids, glu amine is he mos abundan in
he blood1–3. The impo ance o glu amine o cance cells
g ow h has been ex ensi ely desc ibed and linked o i s
ole as a p ecu so o α-ke oglu a a e (αKG) o sus ain he i-
ca boxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Indeed, glu amine is mainly me a-
bolized h ough glu aminolysis in a wo-s ep eac ion: fi s he
enzyme glu aminase (GLS) ca alyzes he hyd olysis o glu amine
o glu ama e; and hen glu ama e is con e ed o αKG h ough an
oxida i e deamina ion eac ion ca alyzed by he enzyme glu a-
ma e dehyd ogenase (GDH). Ano he amino acid, leucine, ac s as
an allos e ic ac i a o o he second enzyme, being consequen ly
necessa y o glu aminolysis induc ion4,5.
Al hough glu amine can pa icipa e in he syn hesis o di e en
amino acids h ough he p oduc ion o glu ama e, only aspa -
agine equi es glu amine o de no o syn hesis. Aspa agine syn-
he ase (ASNS) is he enzyme ha con e s glu amine and
aspa a e in o glu ama e and aspa agine in an ATP-dependen
manne 6. ASNS exp ession is up egula ed du ing amino acid
s a a ion h ough he ac i a ion o ac i a ing ansc ip ion ac o
4 (ATF4)7. Aspa agine has been iden ified as an exchange amino
acid ac o ha egula es he se ine/ h eonine kinase mammalian
a ge o apamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), nucleo ide bio-
syn hesis and p oli e a ion7.
The ole o GABA shun is a bypass o wo s eps o he TCA
cycle, whe ein GABA is syn hesized om glu ama e by a GAD1-
encoded deca boxylase, ansamina ed in o succinic semi-
aldehyde, and me abolized in o he TCA cycle in e media e
succina e8. In addi ion o i s ole as a neu o ansmi e , GABA
has been de ec ed in a wide ange o pe iphe al issues9and
ecen ly linked o cas a ion- esis an p os a e cance p og ession
h ough he egula ion o nuclea and ogen ecep o by GABA10.
Tha s udy epo ed ha GABA shun is up egula ed in esponse
o he ac i a ing phospho yla ion o GAD65 by he PI3K pa h-
way. In a di e en cance ype, he inc eased up ake and me a-
bolism o GABA in b eas o b ain me as a ic cells was linked o
an inc ease o NADH le els in he mic oen i onmen con e ing
a p oli e a i e ad an age o he umo 11.
P e iously, ou esul s demons a ed ha glu amine, and mos
pa icula ly i s ca abolic con e sion o αKG h ough glu amino-
lysis, ac i a es mTORC1 a he sho and long- e m5,12. mTORC1
is a majo signaling hub ha in eg a es di e en inpu s, such as
nu ien s, oxygen, ene gy, and g ow h ac o s, o egula e he
me abolic pa hways con olling cell g ow h and p oli e a ion13.
As mTORC1 is o e -ac i a ed in 80% o solid umo s14, di e en
analogs o i s inhibi o apamycin ha e been de eloped o inhibi
mTORC1 in pa ien s. A a clinical le el, he esul s emain
modes and a clea need o co- he apies has been desc ibed15–17.
Ou p e ious wo k de e mined ha he ac i a ion o mTORC1 by
glu aminolysis du ing nu i ional imbalance lead o he anom-
alous inhibi ion o au ophagy and a subsequen o m o apop osis
named glu amop osis12,18. Bu s ill, he impac o glu amine
me abolism on he bioene ge ic s a us o he cells du ing long-
e m mTORC1 ac i a ion and glu amop osis induc ion emains
o be defined.
Euka yo es ha e de eloped a sys em o sense low ATP le els
ia ano he se ine/ h eonine kinase, he AMP-ac i a ed p o ein
kinase (AMPK) complex. Unde low in acellula ATP le els,
AMP o ADP can di ec ly bind o he γ egula o y subuni o
AMPK, leading o a con o ma ional change ha allows he ac i-
a ing phospho yla ion o AMPK13. Once ac i a ed, AMPK
edi ec s he me abolism owa ds he inc ease o ca abolism and
he dec ease in anabolism h ough phospho yla ion o down-
s eam key p o ein pa hways, ul ima ely leading o mTORC1
inhibi ion13.
He ein, we epo ha he amino acid glu amine is su ficien o
sus ain he p oduc ion o ATP in absence o any o he amino
acid, ollowing a glu aminolysis-independen mechanism. Du ing
glu amine su ficiency, ASNS and GABA shun a e esponsible o
me abolizing glu amine o gene a e ATP and o inhibi AMPK.
Thus, ou esul s indica e ha glu amine ac i a es mTORC1
ollowing a wo b anches mechanism: a sho - e m mechanism
in ol ing αKG p oduc ion, and a long- e m mechanism in ol ing
ASNS, GABA, and AMPK.
Resul s
Glu aminolysis sus ains he p oduc ion o ATP o inhibi
AMPK and o ac i a e mTORC1. P e iously, we showed ha he
addi ion o leucine and glu amine (“LQ ea men ”) o amino
acid-s a ed cells is su ficien o ac i a e glu aminolysis and
subsequen ly mTORC15,19. To be e unde s and he ole o he
bioene ge ic s a us o he cell in his pa hway, we fi s in es iga ed
i LQ ea men impac ed he p oduc ion o ATP in he cell and
he ac i a ion o AMPK. Confi ming ou p e ious obse a ions,
sho - e m (2 h) amino acid s a a ion had no e ec in he le els
o ATP in cul u ed cells. Howe e , we obse ed ha , a longe
imes, amino acid wi hd awal significan ly dec eased ATP/ADP
a io in U2OS and HCT116 cellula models (Fig. 1A, B and
Supplemen a y 1A, B). LQ addi ion in amino acid-s a ed cells
sus ained he le els o ATP a 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h (Fig. 1C
and Supplemen a y 1C–E). By con as , he addi ion o me hio-
nine o a ginine, wo amino acids which ha e been epo ed o
ac i a e mTORC1 a sho - e m, did no sus ain he p oduc ion
o ATP (Supplemen a y 1F, G). Measu emen s o glu amine and
leucine le els in he medium indica ed ha hese amino acids
emained ully a ailable e en a e 72 h o LQ ea men (Sup-
plemen a y 1H–I). In ag eemen o hese p e ious obse a ions,
we also obse ed ha LQ ea men inc eased he basal espi a-
ion o U2OS cells compa ed o amino acid s a a ion (Fig. 1D).
The maximal oxygen consump ion a e (OCR) was also inc eased
in he p esence o LQ, which esul ed in an inc ease o ATP
p oduc ion linked o espi a ion (Fig. 1E). Thus, we concluded
ha long- e m glu aminolysis, e en in he absence o any o he
amino acid, was su ficien o inc ease he espi a o y capaci y and
he p oduc ion o ATP in he cell.
We nex in es iga ed i he obse ed p oduc ion o ATP in LQ-
ea ed cells had any impac on he phospho yla ion o AMPK.
The emo al o amino acids om he cul u e medium led o he
inhibi ion o mTORC1 in U2OS cells, as b oadly epo ed
be o e20, bu concomi an ly i led also o he phospho yla ion o
AMPK a h eonine 172 (Fig. 1F), in ag eemen wi h he obse ed
dec ease in ATP le els. Acco dingly, he phospho yla ion o
AMPK was e e ed by he addi ion o LQ, which again
co ela ed wi h he inc ease in ATP le els in his condi ion
(Fig. 1F). The LQ-induced inhibi ion o AMPK was obse ed a
24, 48, and 72 h (Fig. 1G). Long- e m ac i a ion o mTORC1
downs eam o AMPK du ing LQ ea men was confi med by
he phospho yla ion o i s a ge p o eins S6K, S6, and 4EBP1
(Fig. 1F, G), and by i s ansloca ion a he su ace o he lysosome
using LAMP2 (Fig. 1H, I) o CD63 (Supplemen a y 1J, K) as
lysosomal ma ke s. To confi m a mechanis ic ole o AMPK
du ing LQ-media ed mTORC1 ac i a ion a long- e m, we
in es iga ed he s a us o mTORC1 by he addi ion o he AMPK
ac i a o AICAR in LQ- ea ed U2OS and HCT116 cells. As
obse ed in Fig. 1J and Supplemen a y 1L, eac i a ion o AMPK
using AICAR was su ficien o p e en he LQ-media ed
ac i a ion o mTORC1. Simila esul s we e ob ained by
ans ec ing a MYC- agged cons i u i ely ac i e o m o AMPK
(CA-AMPK, kindly p o ided by P o . Benoi Violle , Pa is,
F ance) (Fig. 1K) o using o he AMPK ac i a o s, such as
me o min o A769662 (Fig. 1L). Su p isingly, he abla ion o
AMPK using AMPK−/−MEFs (again, kindly p o ided by P o .
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4
2NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://d oi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions
Benoi Violle ) also p e en ed he LQ-media ed ac i a ion o
mTORC1 (Supplemen a y 1M). This esul sugges ed ha , in
addi ion o ac ing as a nega i e egula o o mTORC1, he
p esence o AMPK is necessa y o he connec ion be ween
glu amine me abolism and mTORC1, unde sco ing he complex-
i y o he me abolic adap a ions in hese ci cums ances.
We also confi med ha his AMPK- egula ed ac i a ion o
mTORC1 du ing long- e m LQ ea men had a di ec physio-
logical impac in he cell in e ms o au ophagy ac i a ion, a key
p ocess du ing glu amop osis induc ion12. As obse ed in Fig. 1M,
N, LQ- ea ed U2OS cells s ably exp essing he au ophagic
epo e GFP-LC3 displayed an inc ease o GFP-LC3 agg ega es
upon AMPK eac i a ion using AICAR, me o min, o A769662.
Consis en ly, eac i a ion o AMPK using hese di e en
ac i a o s also dec eased he le els o endogenous p62 and
LC3I, inc easing LC3II o ma ion (Fig. 1L), well-known au op-
hagy ma ke s. We also e alua ed he au ophagic flux using
bafilomycin A1 (Ba A1) o ap he o ma ion o au ophago-
somes. The inhibi ion o au ophagy using Ba A1 led o a g ea e
accumula ion o p62 and LC3I in cells ea ed wi h LQ. Howe e ,
35
35
45
70
55
55
70
70
70
35
25
25
55
70
15
10
55
55
55
70
55
15
10
70
55
70
55
35
25
25
35
35
35
*
0
5
10
15
20
OCR
(pmol/min/ g p o ein)
-LQ+
0
20
40
60
80
100
% GFP-LC3
agg ega es
-LQ AICAR
Me o min
A769662
+ LQ
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
* *
0 2 4 8 12 24
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
ATP/ADP a io
*
hou s
-AA
N.S
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
ATP/ADP a io
+-+-AA
2h 72h
C
*
AB
FG
-LQ
AICAR Me o min A769662--
+LQ
-AA
K
H
+AA
-AA
+LQ
LAMP2 mTORC1 me ged
LQ
Ac in
S6-pS235/236
S6K
S6
24h
S6K-pT389
AMPK-pT172
+-+-+-
48h 72h
-AA
AMPK
E
-
-AICAR
LQ
-AA
+
-
-
+
+
+
AMPK-pT172
AMPK
S6K-pT389
S6K
S6-pS235/236
S6
Ac in
IJ
L
Ac in
LC3I/II
p62
AICAR
Me o min
A769662
LQ
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
S6-pS235/236
S6
AMPK-pT172
AMPK
S6K-pT389
S6K LQ
AICAR
Ba A1
+
-
-
-
-
-
p62
LC3I/II
Ac in
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Pea son co ela ion
coe icien
Colocalisa ion be ween
LAMP2 and mTORC1
+
-
-
-
-
+
AA
LQ
**
M
LQ
AA
+
-
-
-
-
+
Rap o -pS792
S6
S6-pS235/236
AMPK-pT172
S6K-pT389
S6K
4EBP1-pT37/46
4EBP1
AMPK
Ac in
Rap o
0 102030405060708090100
0
10
20
30
40
Time (minu es)
OCR
(pmol/min/ go p o ein)
-AA
+LQ
Oligo
FCCP
Ro +
An A
***
***
CD
O
AA
LQ
CA-AMPK
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
EV
Ac in
S6
CA-AMPK
S6-pS235/236
N
-++++
-AA
70
70
55
70
70
35
35
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
ATP/ADP a io
-+ LQ
24h
-+
48h
-+
72h
-AA
***
135
55
35
135
70
70
55
70
70
35
25
35
55
35
48
15
15
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 3
eac i a ion o AMPK using AICAR concomi an ly o Ba A1 and
LQ did no accumula e p62 a he same le el (Fig. 1O), and
es o ed he le els o LC3II. Al oge he , hese esul s showed ha
long- e m LQ ea men was su ficien o inc ease he le els o
ATP, leading o he inhibi ion o AMPK. AMPK inhibi ion in
LQ- ea ed cells led o he subsequen ac i a ion o mTORC1 and
he inhibi ion o au ophagy, wo majo p ocesses con olling
glu amop osis.
AMPK inhibi ion is necessa y o glu amop osis bo h in i o
and in i o. Nex , we assessed he ole o AMPK in he induc ion
o apop osis ollowing he ac i a ion o mTORC1 by glu ami-
nolysis du ing nu i ional imbalance, i.e., glu amop osis. In
ag eemen wi h ou p e ious esul s12, long- e m LQ ea men in
absence o any o he amino acid dec eased cell iabili y (Fig. 2A,
B). The LQ-induced inc ease in cell dea h was p e en ed by
AMPK eac i a ion using AICAR, me o min, o A769662
(Fig. 2A, B). Fu he , a clonogenic assay confi med ha he
pha macological eac i a ion o AMPK p e en ed LQ-media ed
cell dea h induc ion (Fig. 2C, D). AMPK eac i a ion was also
su ficien o p e en apop osis induced by LQ, as de e mined by
he dec ease in he double annexin V/PI s aining obse ed by flow
cy ome y (Fig. 2E, F), and by he dec ease in he p o-apop o ic
ma ke s clea ed PARP and clea ed caspase 3 (Fig. 2G). On he
con a y, AMPK abla ion did no inc ease he induc ion o cell
dea h du ing amino acid wi hd awal, as mTORC1 inhibi ion and
subsequen au ophagy ac i a ion unde hese condi ions p e-
en ed glu amop osis (Supplemen a y 2A). This esul u he
posi ioned mTORC1/au ophagy downs eam o AMPK du ing
glu amop osis induc ion. These esul s we e confi med using
ATG5−/−MEFs in which he impai men o au ophagy com-
ple ely abolished he capaci y o AICAR o p omo e cell su i al
du ing amino acids s a a ion (Fig. 2H, I) as au ophagy is
necessa y as su i al mechanism. Thus, AMPK inhibi ion
ups eam o mTORC1/au ophagy was necessa y o glu a-
mop osis in i o.
The pa icipa ion o AMPK in glu amop osis was also
in es iga ed in i o using implan ed umo s in xenog a mouse
models. Two di e en coho s o mice we e implan ed in he igh
do sal flank wi h HCT116 cells. Mice we e ea ed wi h ei he
ehicle o wi h a cell-pe meable αKG de i a i e, dime hyl-αKG
(DMKG) o induce glu amop osis in i o. Mice we e hen co-
ea ed wi h he mTORC1 inhibi o emsi olimus (a apamycin
de i a i e) o wi h me o min. Fi s , he induc ion o mTORC1
by DMKG was assessed by he analysis o S6 phospho yla ion in
hese umo s. As expec ed, he injec ion o DMKG in mice
induced he ac i a ion o mTORC1. A dec ease o S6 phospho -
yla ion and hus mTORC1 ac i a ion was obse ed in mice co-
ea ed wi h emsi olimus o me o min (Fig. 2J, K and
Supplemen a y 2B). Second, he in i o induc ion o glu amop-
osis was assessed by immunohis ochemical analysis o clea ed
caspase 3. We confi med ha DMKG ea men induced an
inc ease in apop o ic cell dea h in xenog a umo s in i o, as
assessed by caspase 3 clea age (Fig. 2L–M and Supplemen-
a y 2C). This is a alida ion o he physiological ele ance o
glu amop osis in i o, confi ming ha glu amop osis can be used
as a po en ial ool o induce umo al cell dea h in i o.
Fu he mo e, as shown in Fig. 2L–M and Supplemen a y 2C,
we also confi med ha he inhibi ion o mTORC1 using
emsi olimus p e en ed glu amop osis in i o, simila o wha
we obse ed in cul u ed cells12. This esul alida ed he
physiological model by which he abe an ac i a ion o mTORC1
du ing nu i ional imbalance induces apop o ic cell dea h in
animal models. Finally, and o no e, AMPK eac i a ion using
me o min which was confi med by IHC on T172 AMPK
phospho yla ion (Supplemen a y 2D, E) was simila ly su ficien
o p e en glu amop osis in i o (Fig. 2L–M and Supplemen-
a y 2C). Al oge he , hese da a confi med he necessi y o AMPK
inhibi ion o glu amop osis induc ion bo h in i o and in i o.
Glu aminolysis is no necessa y o LQ-media ed ATP p o-
duc ion. A e confi ming he capaci y o LQ o sus ain ATP
le els, we in es iga ed he possible ole o glu aminolysis, he
main pa hway o ca abolise glu amine, in he p oduc ion o ATP
in esponse o LQ. Fo his pu pose, and ollowing a loss-o -
unc ion app oach, we inhibi ed GLS ei he pha macologically o
gene ically (using wo di e en inhibi o s, BPTES and DON, o
RNA-in e e ence media ed knockdown). We hen in es iga ed
he capaci y o LQ ea men o induce ATP le els in GLS-
inhibi ed cells. Su p isingly, he inhibi ion o GLS did no p e en
he p oduc ion o ATP in esponse o LQ in U2OS, HCT116 o
HEK293 cells (Fig. 3A, B and Supplemen a y 3A, B). Confi ming
Fig. 1 Glu aminolysis sus ains he p oduc ion o ATP o inhibi AMPK and o ac i a e mTORC1. A ATP/ADP a io o U2OS cells incuba ed in he
p esence o he absence o all amino acids o 2 o 72 h. Fed cells (C) a e used as con ol. BATP/ADP a io o U2OS cells incuba ed in absence o amino
acid o he indica ed ime. CATP/ADP a io o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ du ing he indica ed imes.
DOCR analysis by Seaho se® echnology o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence (blue) o absence (pu ple) o LQ du ing 72 h. OCR
was measu ed ei he in basal condi ions o a e he injec ion o oligomycin, FCCP, and o enone/an imycin A. Da a a e mean ± SEM o h ee biologically
independen expe imen s pe o med wi h fi e eplica es. EBasal espi a ion used o d i e ATP p oduc ion as de e mined by OCR quan ifica ion o da a
ob ained in (D). FImmunoblo o mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke s (S6K, S6, and 4EBP1 phospho yla ion) and AMPK phospho yla ion o U2OS cells incuba ed
wi h o wi hou amino acids, in he p esence o absence o LQ du ing 72 h. GImmunoblo o mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke s (S6K and S6 phospho yla ion) and
AMPK phospho yla ion o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ du ing 24, 48, o 72 h. HImmunofluo escence
mic oscopy cap ions o U2OS cells incuba ed wi h o wi hou amino acids, in he p esence o absence o LQ du ing 72 h. Cells we e s ained agains LAMP2
(lysosomal ma ke , ed), mTORC1 (g een) and DAPI (blue). Scale ba ep esen s 10 µm. IQuan ifica ion o he colocaliza ion be ween LAMP2 and
mTORC1 as shown in (H). Pe son’s R alue was e alua ed using ImageJ coloc2 plugin on 25 ROI in h ee biologically independen expe imen s (75 ROI in
o al pe condi ion). JImmunoblo o mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke s (S6K and S6 phospho yla ion) and AMPK phospho yla ion o amino acid-s a ed U2OS
cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ, wi h o wi hou AICAR, du ing 72 h. KImmunoblo analysis o mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke (S6
phospho yla ion) o U2OS cells exp essing a myc- agged, cons i u i ely ac i e AMPK mu an in he p esence o absence o amino acids and LQ as
indica ed. LImmunoblo o au ophagy (p62 and LC3-I/II) and mTORC1 (S6K and S6 phospho yla ion) ma ke s o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed
in absence o p esence o LQ, AICAR, me o min o A769662 o 72 h, as indica ed. MFluo escence mic oscopy cap ions o GFP-LC3 exp essing amino
acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ, wi h o wi hou AICAR, me o min o A769662 o 72 h. Au ophagosome o ma ion
upon GFP-LC3 agg ega ion was assayed using con ocal mic oscopy. The scale ba ep esen s 10 µm. NQuan ifica ion o he numbe o GFP-LC3 do s pe
cell o cap ions ob ained in (M). >100 cells we e coun ed pe expe imen . OImmunoblo analysis o au ophagy ma ke s (p62 and LC3I/II) o U2OS cells
ea ed wi h LQ, AICAR and/o Bafilomycin A1 as indica ed o 72 h. G aphs show mean alues ± SEM (n=3 biologically independen expe imen s). *p<
0.05 (ANOVA analysis ollowed by a pos hoc Bon e oni es ). Sou ce da a a e p o ided as a Sou ce Da a file.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4
4NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://d oi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions
his esul , silencing GDH did no impai he p oduc ion o ATP
in LQ- ea ed cells ei he (Fig. 3C). Thus, glu aminolysis did no
show a necessa y ole o he capaci y o LQ o sus ain ATP le els.
Fu he confi ming his conclusion, we also obse ed ha he
addi ion o DMKG o amino acid-s a ed cells did no sus ain he
p oduc ion o ATP o a simila ex en han LQ ea men (Fig. 3D
and Supplemen a y 3C, D). Hence, glu aminolysis was nei he
necessa y no su ficien o sus ain ATP p oduc ion. The lack o
dec ease on ATP le els upon glu aminolysis inhibi ion co ela ed
wi h an absence o AMPK eac i a ion (Fig. 3E, F), confi ming
ha glu aminolysis did no media e he connec ion be ween LQ
and he ATP/AMPK axis.
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cell dea h %
+
--
-AA
AICAR
-
++
--
--
+
MEF
ATG5-/-
*
MEF
ATG5+/+
*
0
20
40
60
80
100
Viabili y %
-
-+
--
+LQ
AICAR
+
+
*
MET
TEM
Vehicle
-DMKG +DMKG
S6-pS235/236
MET
TEM
Vehicle
-DMKG +DMKG
cCas3
+LQ-LQ
AICAR Me o min A769662--
A
-
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
LQ
AICAR
C
+LQ
-LQ
AICAR
Me o min A769662
-
F
H
I
-
+
+
+
-AA
-
-
LQ
AICAR
S6
cPARP
cCasp 3
S6K-pT389
S6K
S6-pS235/236
AMPK-pT172
AMPK
Ac in
G
B
DE
-LQ
AICAR
Me o min
A769662
+LQ
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
L
M
1.84%1.84% 12.04%12.04%
BAX
0
1
2
3
4
5
S6-pS235/236
IHC isual sco e
-
-
-
-
+
-
DMKG
Temsi olimus
Me o min
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
**
0
1
2
3
4
5
cCaspase 3
IHC isual sco e
-
-
-
-
+
-
DMKG
Temsi olimus
Me o min
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
**
cPARP
AA
AICAR
+
-
cCasp 3
ATG5-ATG12
Ac in
-
-
-
+
+
-
MEF ATG5+/+
-
-
-
+
MEF ATG5-/-
J
K
Rap o -pS792
Rap o
-AA
-AA
0
10
20
30
40
50
% La e apop o ic cells
-
* *
100
15
20
70
70
55
135
135
70
70
25
25
55
70
15
25
35
55
0
50
100
150
200
250
Numbe o colonies
-
-+
--
++
+LQ
AICAR
* *
82.34%82.34% 3.78%3.78%
4.81%4.81% 29.93%29.93%
64.29%64.29% 0.97%0.97%
0.90%0.90% 3.41%3.41%
95.04%95.04% 0.65%0.65%
1.44%1.44% 5.21%5.21%
1.00%1.00%92.35%92.35%
0.78%0.78% 4.90%4.90%
93.04%93.04% 1.28%1.28%
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 5

Glu amine is su ficien o sus ain ATP le els, bu no o ac i-
a e mTORC1. Du ing LQ ea men , leucine addi ion plays an
allos e ic ac i a ion ole o GDH, necessa y o αKG p oduc ion5,21.
As we concluded ha glu aminolysis did no a ec he ATP/AMPK
pa hway, we hen assessed whe he leucine had any ole in ATP le els
du ing LQ ea men . Fo his pu pose, we ea ed amino acid-s a ed
U2OS, HCT116 and HEK293A cells wi h glu amine o leucine, and
subsequen ly measu ed ATP le els. Unlike leucine, glu amine alone
was su ficien o sus ain ATP le els in all h ee cell lines (Fig. 4Aand
Supplemen a y 4A, B). Confi ming his esul , we obse ed ha basal
espi a ion o he cells in amino acid s a a ion did no change in
esponse o leucine addi ion (Fig. 4B). Howe e , cells in he p esence
o glu amine showed a significan inc ease o he espi a o y ac i i y,
independen ly o he p esence o he absence o leucine (Fig. 4B).
Simila ly, glu amine su ficiency induced a clea inc ease o he OCR
linked o ATP p oduc ion by he mi ochond ia o mee he ene ge ic
needs o he cell (Fig. 4C). This inc ease o ATP le els by glu amine
alone also co ela ed wi h an inc ease o endoplasmic e iculum cal-
cium pool due o he ac i i y o he sa coendoplasmic e iculum Ca2+
ATPase (SERCA) (Supplemen a y 4C). In a simila manne , and
co ela ing wi h ATP le els, a s ong dec ease o AMPK phospho -
yla ion was obse ed upon glu amine addi ion o o he wise amino
acid-deple ed cells, while he addi ion o leucine did no educe he
phospho yla ion s a us o AMPK (Fig. 4D and Supplemen a y 4D).
Fig. 2 AMPK inhibi ion is necessa y o glu amop osis bo h in i o and in i o. A Rep esen a i e mic oscopy images o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells
incuba ed in absence o p esence o LQ, AICAR, me o min, o A769662 o 72 h, as indica ed. Scale ba ep esen s 100 µm. BCell iabili y as es ima ed by
a ypan blue exclusion assay o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ and AICAR du ing 72 h. CRep esen a i e
images o clonogenic assay o U2OS cells ea ed as in (B). DColony quan ifica ion o images ob ained in (C). EQuan ifica ion o la e apop osis popula ion
o h ee biologically independen expe imen s (double posi i e, annexin V and PI) as ob ained in (F) o he indica ed condi ion. FFlow cy ome y analysis
o annexin V/PI s aining o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed wi h o wi hou LQ in combina ion wi h AICAR, me o min, o A769662 du ing 72 h.
GImmunoblo o he p o-apop o ic ma ke s (BAX, clea ed caspase 3, and clea ed PARP), mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke s (Rap o , S6K, and S6
phospho yla ion), and AMPK phospho yla ion o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o absence o LQ, wi h o wi hou AICAR, du ing
72 h. HCell iabili y as es ima ed by a ypan blue exclusion assay o ATG5+/+and ATG5−/−MEFs incuba ed in he p esence o absence o amino acids
(AA) and AICAR du ing 72 h. IImmunoblo analysis o p o-apop o ic ma ke s o ATG5+/+and ATG5−/−MEFs incuba ed as in (H). J–LRep esen a i e
immunohis ochemis y mic oscopy pic u es (×40 magnifica ion) o xenog a umo s o mice ea ed as indica ed (TEM: Temsi olimus; MET: Me o min).
Samples we e s ained agains S6-pS235/236 (J) and clea ed caspase 3 (L). Scale ba s ep esen 100 µm. K–MIHC isual sco e o S6-pS235/236 (K) and
caspase 3 (M) o images om (J) and (L), espec i ely. The uppe and lowe limi s o he boxes ep esen qua iles, wi h he line wi hin he boxes
indica ing he median and he whiske s showing he ex emes (n≥10 images pe ea men ). G aphs show mean alues ± SEM (n=3 biologically
independen expe imen s). *p< 0.05 (ANOVA analysis ollowed by a pos hoc Bon e oni es ). Sou ce da a a e p o ided as a Sou ce Da a file.
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
LQ
siC l
siGDH
+
-
+
N.S
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
LQ
siC l
siGLS1
+
-
+
N.S
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
+
-
LQ
BPTES
DON
+
-
+
*
-
-
LQ
BPTES
Ac in
S6
S6K
AMPK
AMPK-pT172
S6-pS235/236
S6K-pT389
-AA
+
-
+
+DON
LQ
-AA
-
-
Ac in
AMPK
AMPK-pT172
S6-pS235/236
S6
S6K-pT389
S6K
+
-
+
+
A
BC
DE F
Ac in
GLS1
siC l
siGLS1
Ac in
GDH
siC l
siGDH
55
55 35
35
70
70
55
70
70
25
25
55
70
70
55
70
70
35
25
25
45
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
-
+
-
-
+
LQ
DMKG
**
Fig. 3 Glu amine is su ficien o sus ain ATP le els, bu no o ac i a e mTORC1. A ATP/ADP a io o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he
p esence o absence o LQ wi h o wi hou BPTES o DON du ing 72 h. B,CGLS o GDH exp essions we e knocked down using small in e e ing RNA
(siRNA) in U2OS cells o 48 h. Cells we e hen ea ed wi h LQ o 72 h and he ATP/ADP a io was measu ed. Sc amble non- a ge ing siRNA was used as
a con ol. Immunoblo s o GLS o GDH le els a e p esen ed as a con ol o he knockdown. DATP/ADP a io o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells ea ed wi h
LQ o DMKG o 72 h. E,FImmunoblo o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells ea ed wi h o wi hou LQ in combina ion wi h BPTES (E) o DON (F) o 72 h.
Ac i i y ma ke s o AMPK and mTORC1 we e analysed. G aphs show mean alues ± SEM (n=3 biologically independen expe imen s). *p< 0.05 (ANOVA
analysis ollowed by a pos hoc Bon e oni es ). Sou ce da a a e p o ided as a Sou ce Da a file.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4
6NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://d oi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions
Simila o wha was obse ed o LQ ea men (Fig. 3B, C), glu a-
minolysis inhibi ion by GLS1 o GDH knockdown did no a ec he
capaci y o glu amine su ficiency o induce ATP le els in U2OS and
HCT116, confi ming ha glu aminolysis was no necessa y o
glu amine-dependen ATP p oduc ion (Supplemen a y 4E–H). I is
wo h no ing ha nei he glu amine alone no leucine alone (in
absence o any o he amino acid) we e su ficien o ac i a e mTORC1
a e 72 h in ei he U2OS o HCT116 cells (Fig. 4D and Supple-
men a y 4D). Consis en ly, mTORC1 localiza ion a he su ace o he
lysosome was only obse ed in he p esence o bo h leucine and
glu amine, bu i was no obse ed i only one o hese amino acids
we e added (Fig. 4E, F and Supplemen a y 4I, J). In a simila manne
0
5
10
15
20
OCR
(pmol/min/ gp o ein)
-
-
+
-
L
Q
-
+
+
+
*
RagB WT
Q
RagB GTP
Ac in
S6
S6K
S6-pS235/236
S6K-pT389
-AA
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
L
Q
Ac in
S6
S6K-pT389
S6K
-
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
AMPK-pT172
AMPK
-AA
S6-pS235/236
A
D
C
E
G
F
JH
0 102030405060708090100
0
10
20
30
40
Time (minu es)
OCR (pmol/min/μg o p o ein)
S
L
Q
LQ
Oligo
FCCP Ro +
An A
B
*-
-
Q
L
+
-
+
+
Ac in
LC3I/II
p62
I
-
-
+
-
+
+
Q
L
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Pea son co ela ion
coe icien
Colocalisa ion be ween
LAMP2 and mTORC1
-
-
+
-
-
+
L
Q
+
+
*
L
Q
-
LQ
LAMP2 mTORC1 me ged
*
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
-
+
-
-
+
L
Q
+
+
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
% GFP-LC3
agg ega es
-
-
+
-
+
+
Q
L
55
70
55
70
70
70
25
35
25
55
70
15
55
70
70
35
35
25
35
Fig. 4 Glu amine me abolism ac i a es mTORC1 ollowing wo pa allel, necessa y b anches. A ATP/ADP a io o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells
incuba ed wi h leucine and/o glu amine du ing 72 h. BOCR analysis by Seaho se® echnology o amino acid-s a ed (pu ple) U2OS cells incuba ed wi h
leucine ( ed) and/o glu amine (Q g een, LQ blue) du ing 72 h. OCR was measu ed ei he in basal condi ions o a e he injec ion o oligomycin, FCCP, and
o enone/an imycin A. Da a a e mean ± SEM o h ee biologically independen expe imen s pe o med wi h fi e eplica es. CBasal espi a ion used o d i e
ATP p oduc ion as de e mined by OCR quan ifica ion o da a ob ained in (B). DImmunoblo o mTORC1 ac i i y ma ke s (S6K and S6 phospho yla ion)
and AMPK phospho yla ion o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed wi h leucine and/o glu amine du ing 72 h. EImmunofluo escence mic oscopy
cap ions o U2OS cells incuba ed wi h leucine and/o glu amine du ing 72 h. Cells we e s ained agains LAMP2 (lysosomal ma ke , ed), mTORC1 (g een)
and DAPI (blue). Scale ba ep esen s 10 µm. FQuan ifica ion o he colocaliza ion be ween LAMP2 and mTORC1 as shown in (E). Pe son’s R alue was
e alua ed using ImageJ coloc2 plugin on 25 ROI in h ee biologically independen expe imen s (75 ROI in o al pe condi ion). GFluo escence mic oscopy
cap ions o GFP-LC3 exp essing amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o glu amine and/o leucine du ing 72 h. Au ophagosome
o ma ion upon GFP-LC3 agg ega ion was assayed using con ocal mic oscopy. The scale ba ep esen s 10 µm. HQuan ifica ion o he numbe o GFP-LC3
do s pe cell o cap ions ob ained in (G). >100 cells we e coun ed pe expe imen . IImmunoblo o au ophagy (p62 and LC3-I/II) ma ke s o amino acid-
s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed in he p esence o glu amine and/o leucine du ing 72 h. JU2OS cells we e ans ec ed wi h RagB WT plasmid o RagB 54 L
plasmid. Amino acid-s a ed cells we e hen incuba ed wi h o wi hou glu amine o 72 h. Downs eam a ge s o mTORC1 (S6K and S6 phospho yla ion)
we e assessed by immunoblo . G aphs show mean alues ± SEM (n=3 biologically independen expe imen s). *p< 0.05 (ANOVA analysis ollowed by a
pos hoc Bon e oni es ). Sou ce da a a e p o ided as a Sou ce Da a file.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 7
han o LQ, glu amine le els we e measu ed in he cell cul u e
medium du ing glu amine su ficiency condi ion o e i y he a ail-
abili y o his amino acid e en a e 3 days o ea men
(Supplemen a y 4K). Au ophagy analysis downs eam o mTORC1
also confi med he inabili y o glu amine su ficiency o ac i a e
mTORC1. Thus, long- e m glu amine addi ion did no inhibi
au ophagy ac i a ion du ing amino acid s a a ion, as assessed by he
au ophagy epo e GFP-LC3 by con ocal mic oscopy, and by
immunoblo analysis o he au ophagic endogenous ma ke s p62 and
LC3I/II. In con as , and as shown p e iously, he addi ion o bo h
leucine and glu amine s ongly dec eased he numbe o GFP-LC3
agg ega es and inc eased p62 le els in U2OS cells (Fig. 4G–I).
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
ATP/ADP a io
Q
BPTES
siC l
siASNS
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
N.S *
GABA
Aspa agine
Glu ama e
Aspa a e
Ci a e
NAA
Alanine
Glu amine
Mala e
Py u a e
Se ine
Isoleucine
O ni hine
Glucose
Palmi a e
S ea a e
Lac a e
So bi ol
F uc ose
αKG
Leucine
KMV/KIC
GSH
Glycine
Thymine
Lysine
Th eonine
Me hionine
Phenylalanine
Valine
A ginine
Aconi a e
2
1
0
-1
-2
Row Z-sco e
AMPK-pT172
Q
BPTES
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
AMPK
ASNS
Ac in
siC l siASNS
+
-
-
-
-
-
AA
L
Q
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
siC l
ASNS
Ac in
siASNS
AB
C
DE
F
G
HI
+ L + [U13C]Q+AA + [U
13C]Q + [U13C]Q
+AA + [15N2]Q
+
[15N2]Q
+L +
[15N2]Q
AA
BPTES
S6
Ac in
S6-pS235/236
ASNS
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
siC l siASNS
AMPK
AMPK-pT172
S6K
S6K-pT389
4EBP1
4EBP1-pT37/46
0
1106
2106
3106
Ion coun s
Glu
m+5
(17)
(30)
(22)
**
0
110
5
210
5
Ion coun s
GABA
m+4
(7)
(45)
(32)
**
0
2105
4105
6105
8105
Asn
m+4
(34)
(28)
(33)
* *
0
1104
2104
3104
4104
5104
Asp
m+4
(14)
(21)
(15)
**
0
2104
4104
6104
8104
Ci a e
m+4
(7)
(20)
(3)
**
1104
2104
0
Mala e
m+4
(8)
(21)
(8)
*
0
1106
2106
3106
4106
Ion coun s
(35)
(59)
(51)
Glu
15N
**
0
2104
4104
6104
3105
4105
5105
(33)
(59)
(35)
Asp
15N
**
0
2103
4103
1105
2105
3105
4105
(17)
(41)
(23)
Asn
15N2
**
0
1104
2104
3104
1105
2105
(39)
(21) (24)
Asn
15N
*
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
ATP/ADP a io
-
-
+
-
-
+
Q
DMKG
+
+
* *
55
35
70
55
55
55
55
35
70
100
70
35
25
25
25
55
55
70
55
55
0
5
10
15
20
ASNS mRNA le els (RU)
N.S
*
*
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
Q
L
BPTES
DMKG
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4
8NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://d oi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions
I is well documen ed ha he e-addi ion o leucine alone o
10–30 m a e a sho - e m amino acid s a a ion (1–2h) is
su ficien o ac i a e mTORC122–25. Howe e , ou da a showed
ha his eac i a ion o mTORC1 disappea ed a e longe
s a a ion pe iods (>4 h o amino acid s a a ion) (Supplemen-
a y 4L), which co ela ed wi h a s ong dec ease o glu amine
in acellula le els ollowing 4 h o amino acid s a a ion
(Supplemen a y 4M). In con as , e-addi ion o bo h leucine
and glu amine ac i a ed mTORC1 e en a e longe pe iods o
amino acid s a a ion (Supplemen a y 4N). These esul s suppo
a model by which leucine alone ac i a es mTORC1 a e sho -
e m amino acid s a a ion hanks o he emaining pool o
in acellula glu amine. I has been p oposed elsewhe e ha
in acellula glu amine is equi ed o leucine up ake26. Howe e ,
ou da a showed ha , in ou se up, in acellula le els o leucine
we e no significan ly a ec ed by he co-addi ion o glu amine in
s a ed cells (Supplemen a y 4O), sugges ing ha in acellula
glu amine was no necessa y o leucine up ake. Ra he , ou da a
sus ained a model by which leucine only ac i a es mTORC1 by
coope a ing wi h glu amine o ac i a e glu aminolysis.
Glu amine me abolism ac i a es mTORC1 ollowing wo pa -
allel, necessa y b anches. In ligh o ou esul s, we in es iga ed
he possibili y ha wo pa allel pa hways connec glu amine and
mTORC1: a p e iously epo ed glu aminolysis-dependen
b anch; and an ATP-dependen bu GLS/GDH-independen
b anch. We p e iously showed ha glu aminolysis ac i a es
mTORC1 ia RagB. Thus, αKG gene a ion by glu aminolysis
inc eases GTP loading o RagB, leading o mTORC1 ansloca-
ion o he su ace o he lysosome5. I is documen ed ha he
o e exp ession o a cons i u i ely GTP-bound mu an a ian o
RagB (RagB-GTP mu an ) is su ficien o o ce he ansloca ion
o mTORC1 o he su ace o he lysosome e en in amino acid-
s a ed cells27. The exp ession o his RagB-GTP mu an is su -
ficien o ac i a e mTORC1 in amino acid-s a ed cells a sho
imes (1–2h)
5,27. Howe e , we obse ed ha RagB-GTP mu an
exp ession did no ac i a e mTORC1 in amino acid-s a ed cells
a longe imes (72 h, Fig. 4J and Supplemen a y 4P). S ikingly,
he combina ion o bo h RagB-GTP exp ession and glu amine
addi ion induced he ull ac i a ion o mTORC1 a 72 h, as
de e mined by he phospho yla ion o he downs eam a ge s
S6K and S6 (Fig. 4J). Simila esul s we e ob ained using a RagD-
GDP mu an , which also up egula es he lysosomal ansloca ion
o mTORC1 (Supplemen a y 4P). Opposi e o wha we obse ed
wi h glu amine, he combina ion o bo h RagB-GTP and leucine
did no induce he ac i a ion o mTORC1 signaling (Supple-
men a y 4Q). These esul s u he sus ained a model by which
glu aminolysis (ac i a ed by bo h glu amine and leucine) is
necessa y o p oduce αKG and o induce he Rag-media ed
ansloca ion o mTORC1 a he su ace o he lysosome. On he
o he hand, glu amine, independen ly o GLS and GDH, sus ains
he p oduc ion o ATP and he inhibi ion o AMPK, necessa y o
he ull ac i a ion o mTORC1 a he su ace o he lysosome,
media ed by he mTORC1 coac i a o Rheb28.
ASNS and GABA shun a e al e na i e pa hways o me abolize
glu amine. So a , ou esul s indica ed ha glu amine su ficiency
p oduces ATP h ough mi ochond ial ac i i y, bu glu aminolysis
was no necessa y o his. To unco e he pa hways in ol ed in
glu amine-induced ATP p oduc ion, we pe o med a me abo-
lomics analysis (Fig. 5A). We obse ed ha , du ing amino acid
s a a ion (72 h), he le els o a la ge numbe o me aboli es
d opped. Addi ion o leucine did no es o e he as majo i y o
hem, again confi ming ha leucine has mos ly an allos e ic ole,
no ha ing a significan impac on he me abolism o he cell by
i sel . In con as , he addi ion o glu amine changed comple ely
he pa e n, allowing us o iden i y a g oup o me aboli es which
le els aised e y high, pa icula ly GABA, aspa agine, glu ama e
and aspa a e (Fig. 5A and Supplemen a y 5A–F). This esul
indica ed an inc eased syn hesis o aspa agine, media ed by he
ac i i y o ASNS, esponsible o he p oduc ion o aspa agine
and glu ama e om glu amine and aspa a e (Supplemen-
a y 5G). To expe imen ally es his possibili y, we aced glu-
amine du ing glu amine su ficiency in U2OS cells using [U13C]-
glu amine. As expec ed, we obse ed an accumula ion o bo h
glu ama e m +5 and aspa agine m +4 in he in acellula ex ac
o U2OS cells a e 72 h o ea men . Fu he , glu amine su fi-
ciency also p oduced m +4 labeled aspa a e (Fig. 5B), indica ing
ha aspa a e used by ASNS was indeed o igina ed ( ecycled)
om he glu ama e h ough oxaloace a e gene a ion a he TCA
cycle. Glu ama e p oduced by ASNS was u he con e ed in o
aspa a e likely h ough he ac i i y o he enzyme aspa a e
ansaminase (GOT1) (Supplemen a y 5G). In pa allel, we also
incuba ed amino acid-s a ed cells in he p esence o [15N2]-
glu amine o 72 h. In ag eemen wi h ou p e ious obse a ions,
we obse ed a la ge accumula ion o 15N-aspa agine, confi ming
he implica ion o ASNS in he me aboliza ion o glu amine
du ing glu amine su ficiency (Fig. 5C). The p oduc ion o bo h
15N-aspa a e and 15N-aspa agine in his condi ion finally
Fig. 5 ASNS and GABA shun a e al e na i e pa hways o me abolize glu amine. A Hea map ep esen a ion o me aboli e le els, as de e mined by
LC–MS analysis, in amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed wi h glu amine and/o leucine. The hea map was c ea ed wi h Me aboAnalys 3.0 wi h he
o al pools o he de ec ed me aboli es. B13C-labeled me aboli e le els, as de e mined by LC–MS analysis, in U2OS cells incuba ed wi h o wi hou all
amino acids o leucine alone as indica ed, in he p esence o (U)-13C-glu amine du ing 72 h. To al ion coun s o glu ama e m +5, aspa agine m +4,
aspa a e m +4, GABA m +4, ci a e m +4, and mala e m +4 a e g aphed. The pe cen age o labeling wi h espec o o al me aboli e le els is shown in
pa en hesis o each me aboli e. C15N-labeled me aboli e le els, as de e mined by LC–MS analysis, in U2OS cells incuba ed wi h o wi hou all amino acids
o leucine alone as indica ed, in he p esence o 15N2-glu amine du ing 72 h. Ion coun s o 15N -glu ama e, 15N -aspa agine, 15N aspa a e, and 15N2-
aspa agine a e plo ed. The pe cen age o labeling ela i e o he o al me aboli e is shown in pa en hesis o each me aboli e. DASNS exp ession was
knocked down using small in e e ing RNA (siRNA) in U2OS cells du ing 48 h. Cells we e hen ea ed wi h glu amine and BPTES as indica ed o 72 h and
he ATP/ADP a io was measu ed. Sc amble non- a ge ing siRNA was used as a con ol. Immunoblo o ASNS le els is p esen ed as a con ol o he
knockdown. EImmunoblo analysis o AMPK phospho yla ion in U2OS cells ea ed as in (D). FRela i e mRNA exp ession le els o ASNS as de e mined
by qPCR in amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed as indica ed du ing 72 h. GATP/ADP a io o amino acid-s a ed U2OS cells incuba ed wi h
glu amine and/o DMKG du ing 72 h. HImmunoblo analysis o mTORC1 downs eam a ge (S6K, S6, and 4EBP1 phospho yla ion) and AMPK
phospho yla ion in U2OS cells incuba ed du ing 24 h in he p esence o all amino acids wi h dual inhibi ion o GLS and/o ASNS. ASNS exp ession was
knocked down using small in e e ing RNA (siRNA) in U2OS cells du ing 48 h. Sc amble non- a ge ing siRNA was used as a con ol. Cells we e hen
incuba ed in he p esence o absence o all amino acids and/o BPTES as indica ed du ing 24 h. ISchema ic ep esen a ion o he wo b anches model
connec ing glu amine me abolism and mTORC1 signaling. G aphs show mean alues ± SEM (n=3 biologically independen expe imen s). *p< 0.05
(ANOVA analysis ollowed by a pos hoc Bon e oni es ). Sou ce da a a e p o ided as a Sou ce Da a file.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 ARTICLE
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2021) 12:4814 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41467-021-25079-4 | www.na u e.com/na u ecommunica ions 9