scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Invariant complex structures on 6-nilmanifolds classification, Frölicher spectral sequence and special Hermitian metrics

Abstract

We classify invariant complex structures on 6-dimensional nilmanifolds up to equivalence. As an application, the behaviour of the associated Frölicher sequence is studied as well as its relation to the existence of strongly Gauduchon metrics. We also show that the strongly Gauduchon property and the balanced property are not closed under holomorphic deformation.

Read accessible full text

Invariant complex structures on 6-nilmanifolds classification, Frölicher spectral sequence and special Hermitian metrics

Author: Ceballos González, Manuel; Otal Germán, Antonio; Ugarte Vilumbrales, Luis; Villacampa Gutiérrez, Raquel
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-014-9548-4
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/b6c15c95-b8d8-4dd4-9930-3a892c7e5180/download
a Xi :1111.5873 5 [ma h.DG] 10 Oc 2014
INVARIANT COMPLEX STRUCTURES ON 6-NILMANIFOLDS:
CLASSIFICATION, FR ¨
OLICHER SPECTRAL SEQUENCE AND
SPECIAL HERMITIAN METRICS
M. CEBALLOS, A. OTAL, L. UGARTE, AND R. VILLACAMPA
Abs ac . We classi y in a ian complex s uc u es on 6-dimensional nilman-
i olds up o equi alence. As an applica ion, he beha iou o he associa ed
F ¨oliche sequence is s udied as well as i s ela ion o he exis ence o s ongly
Gauduchon me ics. We also show ha he s ongly Gauduchon p ope y and
he balanced p ope y a e no closed unde holomo phic de o ma ion.
1. In oduc ion
Le gbe a Lie algeb a endowed wi h an endomo phism J:g−→ gsuch ha
J2=−Id. The endomo phism Jis a complex s uc u e i he in eg abili y condi ion
[JX, JY ] = J[JX, Y ] + J[X, JY ] + [X, Y ]
is sa is ied o any X, Y ∈g; equi alen ly, he i-eigenspace g1,0o Jin gC=g⊗RC
is a complex subalgeb a o gC. Nilpo en Lie algeb as gadmi ing a complex s uc-
u e we e classi ied by Salamon [28] up o dimension 6. Mo e ecen ly, And ada,
Ba be is and Do i classi ied in [2] he 6-dimensional Lie algeb as gha ing a com-
plex s uc u e Jo abelian ype, ha is, he complex subalgeb a g1,0is abelian, o
equi alen ly [JX, JY ] = [X, Y ] o any X, Y ∈g.
A ela ed ques ion is o de e mine he complex s uc u es on a gi en Lie algeb a
gup o isomo phism in he ollowing sense. Two complex s uc u es Jand J′on g
a e equi alen i he e exis s an au omo phism F:g−→ go he Lie algeb a such
ha J=F−1◦J′◦F. The la e condi ion is equi alen o say ha F, ex ended
o gC, sa is ies F(gJ
1,0)⊂gJ′
1,0. I C(g) deno es he space o complex s uc u es on g
hen C(g)/Au (g) pa ame izes he equi alence classes o complex s uc u es on g.
A classi ica ion o abelian complex s uc u es in dimension 6 is gi en in [2]. Some
pa ial esul s on nilpo en Lie algeb as can be ound in se e al pape s [6, 19, 30, 31],
al hough o ou knowledge he e is no comple e classi ica ion o complex s uc u es
on 6-dimensional nilpo en Lie algeb as. This is ou i s goal he e.
The classi ica ion o complex s uc u es on nilpo en Lie algeb as p o ides a
classi ica ion o in a ian complex s uc u es on nilmani olds. Le M= Γ Gbe a
nilmani old, i.e. a compac quo ien o a simply-connec ed nilpo en Lie g oup G
by a la ice Γ o maximal ank. I Jis a complex s uc u e on he Lie algeb a go
G, hen i gi es ise o a le -in a ian complex s uc u e on Gwhich descends o a
complex s uc u e on he quo ien Min a na u al way. Se e al in e es ing aspec s
o his complex geome y ha e been in es iga ed, as o ins ance he Dolbeaul
cohomology [7, 13, 26], complex de o ma ions [6, 8, 20, 27] o he exis ence o
special He mi ian me ics [16, 30]. Recen ly, i is p o ed in [4] ha he canonical
1
2
bundle o any complex nilmani old is holomo phically i ial and some applica ions
o hype complex geome y a e gi en.
As a i s applica ion o he classi ica ion o complex s uc u es we s udy he be-
ha iou o he F ¨oliche sequence [17]. Recall ha he F ¨oliche sequence E (M, J)
o a complex mani old (M, J) is he spec al sequence associa ed o he double com-
plex (Ωp,q(M, J), ∂, ¯
∂), whe e ∂+¯
∂=dis he decomposi ion, wi h espec o J, o
he ex e io di e en ial d. The i s e m E1(M, J) is p ecisely he Dolbeaul coho-
mology o (M, J) and a e a ini e numbe o s eps he sequence con e ges o he
de Rham cohomology o M. The i s examples o compac complex mani olds o
which E26∼
=E∞we e independen ly ound in [9] and [21]. The examples in [9] a e
complex nilmani olds o complex dimension 3, which is he lowes possible dimen-
sion o which he F ¨oliche sequence can be non-degene a e a E2. Mo e ecen ly,
Rollenske has cons uc ed in [25] complex nilmani olds o which he sequence {E }
can be a bi a ily non-degene a e. The beha iou o he F ¨oliche sequence has been
s udied o some o he complex mani olds [14, 29], bu as a as we know i s gene al
beha iou o complex nilmani olds has no been s udied, al hough some pa ial e-
sul s can be ound in [10, 11, 12]. He e we s udy he F ¨oliche spec al sequence o
gene al in a ian complex s uc u es on a 6-dimensional nilmani old. A ema kable
consequence o his s udy is he exis ence o a compac complex mani old on which
he ∂¯
∂-lemma ails bu E1∼
=E∞and he Hodge diamond is symme ic.
As a second applica ion o he classi ica ion o complex s uc u es we conside
s ongly Gauduchon (sG o sho ) me ics in he sense o Popo ici [22, 23]. Any
balanced He mi ian me ic is sG and any sG me ic is a Gauduchon me ic [18].
In [24] he ela ion be ween he degene a ion o he F ¨oliche sequence a E1and
he exis ence o sG me ics is s udied, showing ha hese wo no ions a e un ela ed.
We s udy he exis ence o sG o balanced me ics on 6-nilmani olds in ela ion o
he gene al beha iou o he F ¨oliche sequence. Mo eo e , Popo ici p o ed in [23]
ha he sG p ope y o compac complex mani olds is open unde holomo phic
de o ma ions, and conjec u ed in [24] ha he sG p ope y and he balanced p op-
e y o compac complex mani olds a e closed unde holomo phic de o ma ions. We
cons uc a coun e example o bo h closedness conjec u es.
The pape is s uc u ed as ollows. In Sec ion 2 we i s e iew some gene al ac s
abou complex s uc u es on a 6-dimensional nilpo en Lie algeb a g. By [28] such
gmus be isomo phic o h1,...,h16,h−
19 o h+
26 (see Theo em 2.1 o a desc ip ion
o he Lie algeb as). O special in e es is h5because i co esponds o he eal
Lie algeb a unde lying he Iwasawa mani old, whose complex geome y is s udied
in [19]. Fo he i s six een classes he complex s uc u e is necessa ily o nilpo en
ype in he sense o [13]. We classi y he non-abelian nilpo en complex s uc u es
on 2-s ep and 3-s ep nilpo en Lie algeb as in Sec ions 2.1 and 2.2, espec i ely.
Then, using he classi ica ion o non-nilpo en complex s uc u es ob ained in [31]
as well as he classi ica ion o abelian s uc u es gi en in [2], we p esen in Tables 1
and 2 o Sec ion 3 he comple e classi ica ion o complex s uc u es on 6-dimensional
nilpo en Lie algeb as up o equi alence.
Since Jequi alen o J′implies ha he e ms in he associa ed F ¨oliche se-
quences a e isomo phic, as an applica ion we s udy he gene al beha iou o he
F ¨oliche sequence E (Γ G, J) in Sec ion 4 (see Theo em 4.1 o de ails). We ind
ha E26∼
=E∞i and only i he unde lying Lie algeb a g∼
=h13,h14 o h15. Mo e-
o e , E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞ o any Jwhen g∼
=h13 o h14. In con as , h15
has a ich complex geome y wi h espec o F ¨oliche sequence because i admi s
3
complex s uc u es o which E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞,E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞o e en
E16∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞. In Example 4.8 we gi e a amily J o non-equi alen
complex s uc u es on h15 along which he F ¨oliche sequence has hese h ee be-
ha iou s. We also show ha a nilmani old wi h unde lying Lie algeb a h6has a
complex s uc u e wi h degene a e F ¨oliche sequence and sa is ying hp,q
¯
∂=hq,p
¯
∂ o
e e y p, q ∈N, which p o ides an answe o a ques ion ecen ly posed in [3] (see
P oposi ion 4.3).
In sec ion 5 we s udy he exis ence o sG me ics on 6-dimensional nilmani olds
endowed wi h an in a ian complex s uc u e and show ha he unde lying Lie
algeb a mus be isomo phic o h1,...,h6o h−
19. I is also p o ed ha he exis ence
o sG me ic implies he degene a ion o he F ¨oliche sequence a E2. Using [32] we
gi e in P oposi ion 5.5 a classi ica ion o complex s uc u es ha ing sG me ics bu
no admi ing any balanced me ic, as well as a classi ica ion o nilpo en complex
s uc u es admi ing balanced me ic (see Table 3). Based on he complex geome y
o he Lie algeb a h4, in Theo em 5.9 we show ha nei he he sG p ope y no
he balanced p ope y o compac complex mani olds a e closed unde holomo phic
de o ma ion.
2. Nilpo en complex s uc u es on 6-dimensional
nilpo en Lie algeb as
Gi en a Lie algeb a g, le g∗
Cbe he dual o he complexi ica ion gCo g. I J:g−→ g
is an endomo phism such ha J2=−Id, hen he e is a na u al big adua ion
induced on V∗g∗
C=⊕p,q Vp,q(g∗), whe e he spaces V1,0(g∗) and V0,1(g∗), which
we shall also deno e by g1,0and g0,1, a e he eigenspaces o he eigen alues ±i
o Jas an endomo phism o g∗
C, espec i ely. Now, i d:V∗g∗
C−→ V∗+1 g∗
Cis
he ex ension o he complexi ied ex e io algeb a o he usual Che alley-Eilenbe g
di e en ial, hen i is well known ha Jis a complex s uc u e i and only i
π0,2◦d|g1,0≡0, whe e π0,2:V2g∗
C−→ V0,2(g∗) deno es he canonical p ojec ion.
We shall ocus on nilpo en Lie algeb as (NLA o sho ). Salamon has p o ed
in [28] he ollowing equi alen condi ion o he in eg abili y o Jon a 2n-dimensional
NLA g:Jis a complex s uc u e on gi and only i g1,0has a basis {ωj}n
j=1 such
ha dω1= 0 and
dωj∈ I(ω1,...,ωj−1), o j= 2,...,n,
whe e I(ω1,...,ωj−1) is he ideal in V∗g∗
Cgene a ed by {ω1,...,ωj−1}.
Recall ha a complex s uc u e Jon a 2n-dimensional NLA gis nilpo en [13]
i he e exis s a basis {ωj}n
j=1 o g1,0sa is ying dω1= 0 and
(1) dωj∈^2hω1,...,ωj−1, ω1,...,ωj−1i, o j= 2,...,n.
An impo an special class o nilpo en complex s uc u es is he abelian class con-
sis ing o hose s uc u es Jsa is ying [JX, JY ] = [X, Y ], o all X, Y ∈g, o
equi alen ly d(g1,0)⊂V1,1(g∗). They a e also cha ac e ized by he ac ha he
subalgeb a g1,0is abelian.
In six dimensions, he classi ica ion o NLAs in e ms o he di e en ypes o
complex s uc u es ha hey admi is as ollows.
4
Theo em 2.1. [28, 30] Le gbe an NLA o dimension 6. Then, ghas a complex
s uc u e i and only i i is isomo phic o one o he ollowing Lie algeb as:
h1= (0,0,0,0,0,0),
h2= (0,0,0,0,12,34),
h3= (0,0,0,0,0,12 + 34),
h4= (0,0,0,0,12,14 + 23),
h5= (0,0,0,0,13 + 42,14 + 23),
h6= (0,0,0,0,12,13),
h7= (0,0,0,12,13,23),
h8= (0,0,0,0,0,12),
h9= (0,0,0,0,12,14 + 25),
h10 = (0,0,0,12,13,14),
h11 = (0,0,0,12,13,14 + 23),
h12 = (0,0,0,12,13,24),
h13 = (0,0,0,12,13 + 14,24),
h14 = (0,0,0,12,14,13 + 42),
h15 = (0,0,0,12,13 + 42,14 + 23),
h16 = (0,0,0,12,14,24),
h−
19 = (0,0,0,12,23,14 −35),
h+
26 = (0,0,12,13,23,14 + 25).
Mo eo e :
(a)Any complex s uc u e on h−
19 and h+
26 is non-nilpo en ;
(b)Fo 1≤k≤16, any complex s uc u e on hkis nilpo en ;
(c)Any complex s uc u e on h1,h3,h8and h9is abelian;
(d)The e exis bo h abelian and non-abelian nilpo en complex s uc u es on
h2,h4,h5and h15;
(e)Any complex s uc u e on h6,h7,h10,h11,h12,h13,h14 and h16 is no
abelian.
Rema k 2.2. He e we use he usual no a ion, i.e. o ins ance h2= (0,0,0,0,12,34)
means ha he e is a basis {ej}6
j=1 sa is ying de1=de2=de3=de4= 0,
de5=e1∧e2,de6=e3∧e4; equi alen ly, he Lie b acke is gi en in e ms o
i s dual basis {ej}6
j=1 by [e1, e2] = −e5, [e3, e4] = −e6.
Le gbe a Lie algeb a endowed wi h wo complex s uc u es Jand J′. We ecall
ha Jand J′a e said o be equi alen i he e is an au omo phism F:g−→ go
he Lie algeb a such ha J′=F−1◦J◦F, ha is, Fis a linea au omo phism
such ha F∗:g∗−→ g∗commu es wi h he Che alley-Eilenbe g di e en ial d
and Fcommu es wi h he complex s uc u es Jand J′. The la e condi ion is
equi alen o say ha F∗, ex ended o he complexi ied ex e io algeb a, p ese es
he big adua ions induced by Jand J′.
No ice ha i g1,0
Jand g1,0
J′deno e he (1,0)-subspaces o g∗
Cassocia ed o Jand
J′, hen he complex s uc u es Jand J′a e equi alen i and only i he e is a
C-linea isomo phism F∗:g1,0
J−→ g1,0
J′such ha d◦F∗=F∗◦d.
In dimension 6, by Theo em 2.1, i he NLA gadmi s complex s uc u es hen all
o hem a e ei he nilpo en o non-nilpo en . The classi ica ion o abelian complex
s uc u es up o equi alence is ob ained in [2], whe eas he non-nilpo en complex
s uc u es a e classi ied in [31] (see Sec ion 3 o de ails). The e o e, i emains o
s udy he equi alence classes o non-abelian nilpo en complex s uc u es. In o de
o p o ide such classi ica ion, ou s a ing poin is he ollowing educ ion o he
nilpo en condi ion (1).
P oposi ion 2.3. [30] Le Jbe a nilpo en complex s uc u e on an NLA go
dimension 6. The e is a basis {ωj}3
j=1 o g1,0sa is ying
(2) 


dω1= 0,
dω2=ǫ ω1¯
1,
dω3=ρ ω12 + (1 −ǫ)A ω1¯
1+B ω1¯
2+C ω2¯
1+ (1 −ǫ)D ω2¯
2,
whe e A, B, C, D ∈Cand ǫ, ρ ∈ {0,1}.
5
He e ωjk ( esp. ωjk) means he wedge p oduc ωj∧ωk( esp. ωj∧ωk), whe e
ωkindica es he complex conjuga ed o ωk. F om now on, we shall use a simila
abb e ia ed no a ion o “basic” o ms o a bi a y bideg ee.
No ice ha in he equa ions (2) he complex s uc u e is no abelian i and
only i ρ= 1. Nex we s udy he 2-s ep and 3-s ep cases in Sec ions 2.1 and 2.2,
espec i ely.
2.1. Non-abelian complex s uc u es in he 2-s ep case. Any 6-dimensional
2-s ep NLA ghas i s Be i numbe a leas 3, and i i is equal o 3 hen necessa ily
he coe icien ǫin (2) is non-ze o. We conside i s ly ǫ= 0, i.e. he Lie algeb a has
i s Be i numbe ≥4, and we will inish he sec ion by conside ing he emaining
case ǫ= 1.
The ollowing p oposi ion p o ides a u he educ ion o he equa ions (2) when
ǫ= 0 and he s uc u e is no complex-pa allelizable. Recall ha Jis complex-
pa allelizable i [JX, Y ] = J[X, Y ], o all X, Y ∈g, o equi alen ly d(g1,0)⊂
V2,0(g∗). These s uc u es a e he na u al complex s uc u es o complex Lie alge-
b as, and in six dimensions hey co espond o ǫ=A=B=C=D= 0 and he
possible Lie algeb as a e h1( o ρ= 0) and h5( o ρ= 1).
P oposi ion 2.4. Le Jbe a complex s uc u e on a 2-s ep NLA go dimension 6
wi h i s Be i numbe ≥4. I Jis no complex-pa allelizable, hen he e is a basis
{ωj}3
j=1 o g1,0such ha
(3) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ρ ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2+D ω2¯
2,
whe e ρ∈ {0,1},λ∈Rsuch ha λ≥0, and D∈Cwi h Im D≥0. Mo eo e , i
we deno e x=Re Dand y=Im D, hen:
(i) I λ=ρ, hen he Lie algeb a gis isomo phic o
(i.1) h2, o y > 0;
(i.2) h3, o ρ=y= 0 and x6= 0;
(i.3) h4, o ρ= 1,y= 0 and x6= 0;
(i.4) h6, o ρ= 1 and x=y= 0;
(i.5) h8, o ρ=x=y= 0.
(ii) I λ6=ρ, hen he Lie algeb a gis isomo phic o
(ii.1) h2, o 4y2>(ρ−λ2)(4x+ρ−λ2);
(ii.2) h4, o 4y2= (ρ−λ2)(4x+ρ−λ2);
(ii.3) h5, o 4y2<(ρ−λ2)(4x+ρ−λ2).
P oo . In [30, Lemma 11] i is p o ed ha unde hese condi ions he e is a basis
{σj}3
j=1 o g1,0such ha
(4) dσ1=dσ2= 0, dσ3=ρ σ12 +σ1¯
1+B σ1¯
2+D σ2¯
2,
whe e B, D ∈Cand ρ∈ {0,1}.
I B6= 0 hen we can ake any non-ze o solu ion zo ¯zB
|B|=z, and he equa-
ions (4) educe o (3) wi h λ=|B|wi h espec o he new basis {ω1=z σ1, ω2=
¯z σ2, ω3=|z|2σ3}.
Conside now B=λwi h λ∈R≥0in (4). I D6= 0, hen wi h espec o he
new basis {ω1=−¯
D σ2, ω2=σ1+λ σ2, ω3=¯
D σ3}we ge (3) wi h ¯
Dins ead
o D.
Finally, he second pa o he p oposi ion ollows di ec ly om [30, P oposi-
ion 13]. 

6
F om now on we conside ρ= 1. By P oposi ion 2.4 any wo complex s uc u es
on he Lie algeb a h6a e equi alen . Thus, i emains o classi y up o equi alence
he non-abelian s uc u es Jon h2,h4and h5. Any such Jis iden i ied wi h a iple
(1, λ, D) h ough equa ions (3) wi h ρ= 1, λ≥0 and Im D≥0.
We will say ha wo iples (1, λ, D) and (1, λ′, D′) a e equi alen , deno ed by
(1, λ, D)∼(1, λ′, D′), i he co esponding s uc u es Jand J′a e equi alen . So,
he p oblem educes o classi y iples (1, λ, D) up o equi alence.
Lemma 2.5. Le us conside wo iples (1, λ, D)and (1, , E)as abo e.
(i) I D= 0 hen, (1, , E)∼(1, λ, 0) i and only i =λand E= 0.
(ii) I D6= 0 hen, (1, , E)∼(1, λ, D)i and only i he e exis non-ze o
complex numbe s e, such ha E=De/¯eand
(5) | |2
¯e−1(¯
D¯e−De)2= (λ¯
− )(λ¯
D¯e − De ¯
).
P oo . The s uc u e equa ions co esponding o he iples (1, λ, D) and (1, , E)
a e
dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λω1¯
2+Dω2¯
2,
dσ1=dσ2= 0, dσ3=σ12 +σ1¯
1+ σ1¯
2+Eσ2¯
2,
whe e λ, ≥0 and Im D, Im E≥0. Then (1, , E)∼(1, λ, D) i and only i he e
exis s an au omo phism o he Lie algeb a p ese ing he complex equa ions, i.e.
he e is (mij )∈GL(3,C) such ha σi=P3
j=1 mij ωjand
dσi=
3
X
j=1
mij dωj, i = 1,2,3.
These condi ions a e equi alen o
σ1=a ω1+b ω2, σ2=c ω1+ ω2, σ3=m31 ω1+m32 ω2+e ω3,
and
(6)















(I) e=a −bc,
(II) e=|a|2+ a¯c+E|c|2,
(III) λe =a¯
b+ a ¯
+Ec ¯
,
(IV) 0 = ¯ab + b¯c+E¯c ,
(V) De =|b|2+ b ¯
+E| |2.
No ice ha m13 =m23 = 0, e6= 0 and he coe icien s m31 and m32 a e no
ele an .
I is s aigh o wa d o see ha coe icien mus be non-ze o (o he wise λ=
and D=E) and so we can exp ess aas
a=e+bc
.
Fi s o all, le us suppose ha D= 0. Replacing ain (IV) and using (V) we
ob ain ha b= 0 and he e o e E= 0 by equa ion (V). Combining (I) and (III) we
ge ha λ = ¯
. Since λand a e eal non-nega i e numbe s, we conclude ha
λ= , i.e. (1, λ, 0) de ines an equi alence class o e e y λ≥0. This comple es he
p oo o (i).
7
We suppose nex ha D6= 0. In o de o sol e (6) we ans o m i in o an
equi alen sys em by doing he ollowing subs i u ions. Replacing ain equa ion
(IV) and using (V) we can exp ess
¯c=−b¯e
De.
Nex , in (II) we can subs i u e aand cand use again (V) o ob ain ha
De =E¯e,
which implies in pa icula |D|=|E|. No ice ha since D6= 0 we can assume
E6=¯
Dby P oposi ion 2.4. Now, ¯c=−b/E. P oceeding in a simila way in
equa ion (III) we ge
¯
b=λ − ¯
1−D/ ¯
E.
Finally, using he exp essions o a,b,cabo e, equa ion (V) is equi alen o (5).
The e o e, gi en e, ∈C−{0}sa is ying De =E¯eand (5), i is always possible o
ind a, b, c ∈Csuch ha sys em (6) is sa is ied. 
Rema k 2.6. As a consequence o Lemma 2.5 (ii), when D6= 0 a necessa y
condi ion o (1, , E) o be equi alen o (1, λ, D) is ha |D|=|E|. Mo eo e ,
o ind an equi alen complex s uc u e (1, , E) i su ices o ind ≥0 and e, ∈
C−{0}sa is ying (5), because Eis necessa ily gi en by E=De/¯e.
Co olla y 2.7. Le E6=¯
D. I (1, , E)∼(1, λ, D) hen, =λi and only i E=D.
P oo . By hypo hesis Dcanno be ze o, so we a e in case (ii) o Lemma 2.5. Suppose
i s ha λ= in (5), i.e.
(¯
D¯e−De)2| |2
¯e−1=λ2(¯
− )( ¯
D¯e −De ¯
).
The igh hand side o he p e ious equali y is a eal numbe . I i is ze o hen
e=| |2(o he wise De =¯
D¯ewould imply E=¯
D); hus, eis a eal numbe and
since E=De/¯ewe conclude ha D=E. On he o he hand, i i is a non-ze o
eal numbe , hen | |2
¯e−1 mus be a eal numbe and hen e∈Rand again D=E.
Con e sely, le us suppose ha E=D6= 0. In his case e∈Rand by (5) we
can exp ess i as
e=| |2−(λ¯
− )(λ¯
D − D ¯
)
(¯
D−D)2.
No ice ha by hypo hesis D6=¯
E=¯
D. To ensu e ha e∈Ri mus happen ha
(λ¯
− )(λ¯
D − D ¯
)∈Ro equi alen ly,
| |2(λ2− 2)( ¯
D−D) = 0.
As (¯
D−D)6= 0 he only possibili y o sol e he p e ious equa ion is λ= .
F om he p e ious esul s i ollows ha i emains o conside he case when
D6= 0 and λ6= . The nex lemma p o ides a simpli ica ion o equa ion (5).
Lemma 2.8. Le us suppose ha λ6= ,D=x+iy 6= 0 and e∈C−{0}. Then,
(1, λ, D)∼(1, , De/¯e)i and only i
(7) 4y2−( 2−λ2)(4x+ 2−λ2)≥0.
8
P oo . By Lemma 2.5 (ii), we know ha (1, λ, D)∼(1, , De/¯e) i and only i (5)
is sa is ied. This condi ion eads, wi h espec o H=De, as
(¯
H−H)2¯
D| |2−¯
H=¯
H(λ¯
− )(λ ¯
H− ¯
H).
Taking eal and imagina y pa s in he exp ession abo e we ob ain
(8) 








4H2
2(H1−x| |2) = | |2( 2−λ2)H2
2+| |2( 2+λ2)H2
1
−2λ ( 2
1− 2
2)H2
1−4λ H1H2 1 2,
4H2
2(y| |2−H2) = 2λH2 H1( 2
1− 2
2) + 2 H2 1 2−λ| |2H1,
whe e H=H1+iH2and = 1+i 2. Obse e ha H26= 0, o he wise we ge a
con adic ion using he i s equa ion o (8).
Subs i u ing he second equa ion o (8) in he i s one and eplacing Hby De,
we can exp ess he sys em (8) as



e2
1( 2−λ2) + 4ye1e2+e2
2( 2−λ2+ 4x) = 0,
2H2(y| |2−H2) = λ H1( 2
1− 2
2) + 2 H2 1 2−λ| |2H1,
(9)
whe e e=e1+ie2.
To sol e he i s equa ion in (9) as a second deg ee equa ion in e1we need he
disc iminan o be g ea e han o equal o 0, i.e. 4y2−( 2−λ2)(4x+ 2−λ2)≥0,
which is p ecisely condi ion (7).
Now, suppose ha (7) holds. Then we ob ain ha
e1=e2β
λ2− 2, e =e2β
λ2− 2+i,
whe e β= 2y+p4y2−( 2−λ2)(4x+ 2−λ2) and e2is de e mined by he second
equa ion in (9). 
Co olla y 2.9. Le us suppose ha λ6= and D=x+iy 6= 0. I (7) holds hen
(1, λ, D)∼1, , D β2−(λ2− 2)2
β2+ (λ2− 2)2+2β(λ2− 2)
β2+ (λ2− 2)2i,
whe e β= 2y+p4y2−( 2−λ2)(4x+ 2−λ2).
Compa ing he inequali ies (ii.1) and (ii.2) in P oposi ion 2.4 wi h he condi-
ion (7), we obse e ha o h2and h4i is possible o ake = 1 in he p e ious
co olla y in o de o ge equi alences wi h he complex s uc u es (i.1) and (i.3),
espec i ely. The e o e, using Co olla y 2.7, we conclude:
P oposi ion 2.10. Le us conside he amily o complex s uc u es
(10) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+ω1¯
2+D ω2¯
2,Im D≥0.
Then:
(i) Any non-abelian complex s uc u e on h2is equi alen o one and only one
s uc u e in (10) wi h Im D > 0;
(ii) Any non-abelian complex s uc u e on h4is equi alen o one and only one
s uc u e in (10) wi h D∈R−{0}.
The classi ica ion o complex s uc u es on h5 equi es a mo e sub le s udy.
9
Lemma 2.11. Any non-abelian complex s uc u e on h5which is no complex-
pa allelizable belongs o one o he ollowing amilies:
(I) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2+iy ω2¯
2,whe e 0≤2y < |1−λ2|;
(II) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+ (x+iy)ω2¯
2,whe e 4y2<1 + 4x.
Mo eo e ,
(i) he s uc u es in amily (I) a e non-equi alen ;
(ii) he s uc u es in amily (II) a e non-equi alen ;
(iii) a s uc u e (1, λ, iy)in amily (I) is equi alen o a s uc u e in amily (II)
i and only i 2λ2∈[0,1) and 2y∈[λ2,1−λ2).
P oo . Le us conside a complex s uc u e gi en by (1, λ, D =x+i y) on h5, i.e.
4y2<(1 −λ2)(4x+ 1 −λ2),
acco ding o P oposi ion 2.4 (ii.3). I λ2≥2x, hen (1, λ, D)∼(1,√λ2−2x, i|D|)
because (7) exp esses simply as 4|D|2≥0 and i i ially holds. On he o he hand,
i λ2<2x, hen (1, λ, D)∼(1,0, E), whe e Eis gi en in Co olla y 2.9, because in
his case 4y2+λ2(4x−λ2)≥0, ha is, condi ion (7) is sa is ied.
To s udy u he equi alences, i is clea ha s uc u es in amily (I) a e non-
equi alen and he same holds o s uc u es in amily (II). Now le us conside he
iples (1, λ, iy) and (1,0, E). Then, (7) exp esses simply as
(11) 4y2≥λ4.
Condi ion o amily (I) implies ha 4y2<(1 −λ2)2, which is equi alen o 4y2−
λ4<1−2λ2, so i 2λ2≥1 hen (11) does no hold. Now, i 0 ≤λ2<1
2
hen he condi ion o amily (I) is equi alen o y < 1
2−λ2
2, and he e o e when
2y∈[λ2,1−λ2) he iple (1, λ, iy) in amily (I) is equi alen o he iple (1,0, E =
−1
2(λ2−p4y2−λ4i)) in amily (II). 
P oposi ion 2.12. Any non-abelian complex s uc u e on h5which is no complex-
pa allelizable is equi alen o one and only one s uc u e in he ollowing amilies:
(I) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2+D ω2¯
2,
whe e Re D= 0 and 


0≤2Im D < λ2,0< λ2<1
2;o
0≤2Im D < |1−λ2|,1
2≤λ2.
(II) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12+ω1¯
1+D ω2¯
2,whe e 4(Im D)2<1+4 Re D.
To inish his sec ion, i emains o s udy he case o 2-s ep NLAs gwi h i s
Be i numbe equal o 3, which co esponds o ǫ= 1 in (2).
P oposi ion 2.13. Le Jbe a nilpo en complex s uc u e on an NLA ggi en
by (2) wi h ǫ= 1, i.e.
dω1= 0, dω2=ω1¯
1, dω3=ρ ω12 +B ω1¯
2+C ω2¯
1,
wi h ρ∈ {0,1}and B, C ∈Csuch ha (ρ, B, C)6= (0,0,0). Then gis 2-s ep
nilpo en i and only i B=ρ= 1 and C= 0. In such case gis isomo phic o h7
and all he complex s uc u es a e equi alen .
16
(c) I g∼
=h5and Jis a complex s uc u e on h5gi en in Table 1, hen:
(c.1) E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞when Jis complex-pa allelizable;
(c.2) E1∼
=E∞i and only i Jis no complex-pa allelizable and ρD 6= 0;
mo eo e , E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞when ρD = 0.
(d) I g∼
=h16 o h+
26, hen E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞ o any J.
(e) I g∼
=h13 o h14, hen E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞ o any J.
( ) I g∼
=h15 and Jis a complex s uc u e on h15 gi en in Table 1, hen:
( .1) E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞, when c= 0 and |B−ρ| 6= 0;
( .2) E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞, when ρ= 1 and |B−1| 6=c6= 0;
( .3) E16∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞, when ρ= 0 and |B| 6=c6= 0.
P oo . The p oo is s aigh o wa d and we only gi e i explici ly o he case ( ),
ha is, g∼
=h15, because i is he mos in iguing case whe e di e en non- i ial
beha iou s can be p oduced.
We will use he no a ion E|k|
=⊕p+q=kEp,q
. Since E|k|
∞∼
=Hk
dR, i is clea ha
dim E|k|
≥bk= dim Hk
dR o all k, and he equali ies hold i and only i E ∼
=E∞.
Recall ha b1(h15) = 3, b2(h15) = 5 and b3(h15) = 6 (see [28]).
Fo he calcula ion o he i s e m E1, ha is, he Dolbeaul cohomology,
by he Se e duali y i su ices o s udy he spaces Ep,q
1=Hp,q
¯
∂ o (p, q) =
(1,0),(0,1),(2,0),(1,1),(0,2),(3,0) and (2,1).
Le Jbe a complex s uc u e on h15 gi en in Table 1. I Jis abelian hen
(B, c) = (0,1) o (1, c) wi h c6= 1, he e o e
(18)
H1,0
¯
∂=h[ω1]i, H2,0
¯
∂=h[ω12], δc
0[ω13]i, H3,0
¯
∂=h[ω123]i,
H0,1
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1],[ω¯
2],[ω¯
3]i, H0,2
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1¯
2],[ω¯
1¯
3],[ω¯
2¯
3]i,
H1,1
¯
∂=h(1 −δc
0)[ω1¯
2],[ω1¯
3], δc
0[ω2¯
1],[Bω2¯
2+ω3¯
1], δc
0[ω3¯
2]i,
H2,1
¯
∂=hδc
0[ω12¯
1],[ω12¯
2],[ω12¯
3],[Bω13¯
2−cω23¯
1], δc
0[ω13¯
3]i,
whe e δc
0is equal o 0 i c6= 0, and equals 1 i c= 0. Since dim E|1|
1= 4 >3 =
b1(h15) we ge ha E16∼
=E∞ o any abelian J.
When Jis no abelian, i.e. ρ= 1, he Dolbeaul cohomology g oups a e
(19)
H1,0
¯
∂=h[ω1], δB
0δc
0[ω3]i, H2,0
¯
∂=h[ω12], δc
0[ω13]i, H3,0
¯
∂=h[ω123]i,
H0,1
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1],[ω¯
2]i, H0,2
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1¯
3],[ω¯
2¯
3]i,
H1,1
¯
∂=h(Bc +δB
0)[ω1¯
2],[ω1¯
3+ω2¯
2],[Bω1¯
3−ω3¯
1], δc
0[ω2¯
1], δc
0[ω3¯
2]i,
H2,1
¯
∂=hδc
0[ω12¯
1],[ω12¯
2],[c ω12¯
3+ω13¯
2],[Bω12¯
3+ω23¯
1], δc
0[ω13¯
3+ω23¯
2]i,
whe e δB
0has a simila de ini ion as o δc
0abo e. No ice ha he coe icien Bc+δB
0
is non-ze o excep o B6= 0 and c= 0. Thus, dim E|2|
1≥6>5 = b2(h15) and so
E16∼
=E∞also o any non-abelian J.
In o de o p o e ( .1) we need o s udy independen ly he abelian and he non-
abelian complex s uc u es wi h c= 0 and B6=ρon h15. We s a wi h he abelian
ones. In his case, by Table 1 we can suppose B= 1 and om (18) i ollows ha
he dimensions o E|2|
1and E|3|
1a e
dim E|2|
1= 9 >5 = b2(h15),dim E|3|
1= 12 >6 = b3(h15).

17
Fo he ollowing d1-homomo phisms E0,1
1
d1
−→ E1,1
1
d1
−→ E2,1
1
d1
−→ E3,1
1, he classes
[ω¯
3], [ω1¯
3], [ω3¯
2], [ω13¯
3] ha e linea ly independen images. On he o he hand, o
E0,2
1
d1
−→ E1,2
1
d1
−→ E2,2
1
d1
−→ E3,2
1, he images o he classes [ω¯
2¯
3], [ω3¯
2¯
3], [ω2¯
2¯
3+ω3¯
1¯
3]
and [ω13¯
2¯
3] a e also independen . Coun ing dimensions o E|k|
2we ge ha
dim E|1|
2≤dim E|1|
1−1 = 3 = b1(h15), dim E|2|
2≤dim E|2|
1−4 = 5 = b2(h15),
dim E|3|
2≤dim E|3|
1−6 = 6 = b3(h15), dim E|4|
2≤dim E|4|
1−4 = 5 = b4(h15),
dim E|5|
2≤dim E|5|
1−1 = 3 = b5(h15).
This implies ha E2∼
=E∞because necessa ily dim E|k|
2=bk(h15) o all k.
I ρ= 1 and c= 0, hen B6= 1 and by (19) we ha e dim E|1|
1=b1(h15) + δB
0.
So E|1|
1∼
=E|1|
∞when B6= 0. Fo B= 0, since d1([ω3]) 6= 0 and d1([ω3¯
1¯
2¯
3]) 6= 0, we
conclude ha dim E|1|
2≤dim E|1|
1−1 = 3 = b1(h15) and dim E|5|
2≤dim E|5|
1−1 =
3 = b1(h15), and he e o e, E|k|
2∼
=E|k|
∞i k= 1 o k= 5.
Now, o B6= 1 we ha e ha dim E|2|
1= 8 + δB
0>5 = b2(h15), dim E|3|
1= 12 >
6 = b3(h15), dim E|4|
1= 8 + δB
0>5 = b4(h15).In o de o conclude ha E2∼
=E∞
i su ices o obse e ha o he ollowing homomo phisms
E1,1
1
d1
−→ E2,1
1
d1
−→ E3,1
1, E0,2
1
d1
−→ E1,2
1
d1
−→ E2,2
1
he classes [ω1¯
3+ω2¯
2], [ω3¯
2], [ω13¯
3+ω23¯
2], [ω¯
2¯
3], [ω3¯
2¯
3] and [Bω2¯
2¯
3+ω3¯
1¯
3] ha e
linea ly independen images.
Fo case ( .2), we conside ρ= 1 and |B−1| 6=c6= 0. As dim E|1|
1= 3 = b1(h15),
we ge ha E|1|
1∼
=E|1|
∞. Now, o he map E0,2
2
d2
−→ E2,1
2we ha e d2([ω¯
2¯
3]) =
h∂ω2¯
3+1−¯
B
cω3¯
2i=|B−1|2−c2
c[ω12¯
2]6= 0, because ω12¯
26=¯
∂β2,0+∂γ1,1 o any
β2,0and any ¯
∂-closed γ1,1. Hence,
b2(h15)≤dim E|2|
3≤dim E|2|
2−1≤dim E|2|
1−1 = 6 −1 = 5 = b2(h15)
and we conclude ha E|2|
∞∼
=E|2|
36∼
=E|2|
2∼
=E|2|
1.
Simila ly, d2:E1,2
2−→ E3,1
2is non-ze o ( o ins ance, d2([ω3¯
1¯
3+Bω2¯
2¯
3]) 6= 0).
Thus,
b3(h15)≤dim E|3|
3≤dim E|3|
2−2≤dim E|3|
1−2 = 8 −2 = 6 = b3(h15)
and we conclude ha E|3|
∞∼
=E|3|
36∼
=E|3|
2∼
=E|3|
1. By he same a gumen
b4(h15)≤dim E|4|
3≤dim E|4|
2−1≤dim E|4|
1−1 = 6 −1 = 5 = b4(h15)
and he e o e E|4|
∞∼
=E|4|
36∼
=E|4|
2∼
=E|4|
1. Summing up all he in o ma ion, we
conclude ha E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞in case ( .2).
Fo he las case ( .3), we i s obse e ha d1([ω¯
3]) = −c[ω1¯
2]−¯
B[ω2¯
1]. Since his
class is ze o i and only i c ω1¯
2+¯
Bω2¯
1∈¯
∂(V1,0) = hω1¯
1, Bω1¯
2+c ω2¯
1i, i.e. |B|=c,
he map d1:E0,1
1−→ E1,1
1is non-ze o. The e o e, dim E|1|
2≤dim E|1|
1−1 = 3, i.e.
E|1|
16∼
=E|1|
2∼
=E|1|
∞. Mo eo e , since d2([ω¯
2¯
3]) 6= 0, we deduce ha
b2(h15)≤dim E|2|
3≤dim E|2|
2−1≤dim E|2|
1−2 = 7 −2 = 5 = b2(h15),
so E|2|
∞∼
=E|2|
36∼
=E|2|
26∼
=E|2|
1. Analogously, d2([ω3¯
1¯
3+Bω2¯
2¯
3]) 6= 0, which implies
b3(h15)≤dim E|3|
3≤dim E|3|
2−2≤dim E|3|
1−2 = 8 −2 = 6 = b3(h15),
18
and we conclude ha E|3|
∞∼
=E|3|
36∼
=E|3|
2∼
=E|3|
1. We also ha e
b4(h15)≤dim E|4|
3≤dim E|4|
2−1≤dim E|4|
1−2 = 7 −2 = 5 = b4(h15),
and he e o e E|4|
∞∼
=E|4|
36∼
=E|4|
26∼
=E|4|
1. Consequen ly, E16∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞in
case ( .3). 
Rema k 4.2. Le (M= Γ G, J) be a 6-dimensional nilmani old endowed wi h an
in a ian complex s uc u e Jand suppose ha g=h7. In [27, Theo em 4.4] i is
p o ed ha he e is a dense subse o he space o all in a ian complex s uc u es
o which he complex nilmani old admi s he s uc u e o p incipal holomo phic
bundle o ellip ic cu es o e a Kodai a su ace, bu his is no ue o all complex
s uc u es. In ac , he in a ian complex s uc u e Jmay no be compa ible wi h
he la ice Γ (see [27, Example 1.14]), so one canno ensu e he exis ence o he
isomo phism (17), and hence o a canonical isomo phism be ween Ep,q
(g, J) and
Ep,q
(M, J), o any in a ian Jon he nilmani old M. Howe e , no ice ha up o
equi alence he e is only one complex s uc u e on h7and i can be p o ed ha i
sa is ies ha he sequence degene a es a he i s s ep, i.e. E1(h7)∼
=E∞(h7).
In [3] he au ho s posed he ollowing p oblem: o cons uc a compac complex
mani old such ha E1∼
=E∞and hp,q
¯
∂=hq,p
¯
∂ o e e y p, q ∈Nbu o which he
∂¯
∂-lemma does no hold. Since nilmani olds do no sa is y he ∂¯
∂-lemma, unless
hey a e complex o i, he ollowing esul p o ides a solu ion.
P oposi ion 4.3. Le Jbe any in a ian complex s uc u e on a nilmani old M
wi h unde lying Lie algeb a isomo phic o h6. Then E1(M)∼
=E∞(M)and he
Hodge numbe s sa is y
h0,0
¯
∂(M) = 1,
h1,0
¯
∂(M) = 2, h0,1
¯
∂(M) = 2,
h2,0
¯
∂(M) = 2, h1,1
¯
∂(M) = 5, h0,2
¯
∂(M) = 2,
h3,0
¯
∂(M) = 1, h2,1
¯
∂(M) = 5, h1,2
¯
∂(M) = 5, h0,3
¯
∂(M) = 1,
h3,1
¯
∂(M) = 2, h2,2
¯
∂(M) = 5, h1,3
¯
∂(M) = 2,
h3,2
¯
∂(M) = 2, h2,3
¯
∂(M) = 2,
h3,3
¯
∂(M) = 1.
P oo . Any complex s uc u e Jon h6is equi alen o he complex s uc u e gi en
in Table 1, ha is, ρ=λ= 1 and D= 0. I s Dolbeaul cohomology g oups Hp,q
¯
∂
o (p, q) = (1,0),(0,1),(2,0),(1,1),(0,2),(3,0) and (2,1) a e
H1,0
¯
∂=h[ω1],[ω2]i, H2,0
¯
∂=h[ω12],[ω13]i, H3,0
¯
∂=h[ω123]i,
H0,1
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1],[ω¯
2]i, H0,2
¯
∂=h[ω¯
1¯
3],[ω¯
2¯
3]i,
H1,1
¯
∂=h[ω1¯
2],[ω2¯
1],[ω2¯
2],[ω1¯
3+ω3¯
2],[ω3¯
1+ω3¯
2]i,
H2,1
¯
∂=h[ω12¯
2],[ω13¯
1],[ω12¯
3+ω23¯
1],[ω12¯
3−ω23¯
2],[ω13¯
2]i.
By Se e duali y we ge he abo e Hodge diamond which is symme ic. Mo eo e ,
dim E|1|
1= 4 = b1(h6),dim E|2|
1= 9 = b2(h6),dim E|3|
1= 12 = b3(h6),
so he F ¨oliche spec al sequence degene a es a he i s s ep. 
19
The ollowing esul shows ha he e a e many complex nilmani olds o which
he F ¨oliche spec al sequence is s able unde small de o ma ions o he complex
s uc u e.
P oposi ion 4.4. Le M= Γ Gbe a 6-dimensional nilmani old endowed wi h
an in a ian complex s uc u e J, and le gbe he Lie algeb a o G. I g∼
=
h1,h3,h6,h8,h9,h10,h11,h12,h13,h14,h16,h−
19 o h+
26, hen dim Ep,q
(M, J)is s able
unde small de o ma ions o J o any p, q and any ≥1.
P oo . By [26, Theo em 2.6], all small de o ma ions o he complex s uc u e Ja e
again in a ian complex s uc u es. P oceeding as in he p oo o Theo em 4.1, i
can be p o ed ha i g6∼
=h2,h4,h5o h15, hen dim Ep,q
(M) does no depend on
he in a ian complex s uc u e on M o any p, q and any ≥1, so i is s able
unde small de o ma ions o J.
Rema k 4.5. The 6-dimensional nilmani olds wi h unde lying Lie algeb a isomo -
phic o h2,h4,h5o h15 a e he only ones ha ha e bo h abelian and non-abelian
complex s uc u es (see Table 1). Mo e gene ally, le Mbe a 2n-dimensional nil-
mani old, g he unde lying Lie algeb a, Jan abelian complex s uc u e and J′a
non-abelian in a ian complex s uc u e on M. I is well known ha Jis abelian i
and only i he e is a basis {ω1,...,ωn}o in a ian o ms o ype (1,0) sa is ying
∂ωj= 0 o 1 ≤j≤n; he e o e, by [7] one has ha h0,1
¯
∂(M, J) = nbecause (17)
holds o abelian s uc u es. Howe e , o J′we ha e dim H0,1
¯
∂(g, J′)< n and, i
an isomo phism like (17) holds, hen he Hodge numbe sa is ies h0,1
¯
∂(M, J′)< n.
Thus, he exis ence o Jand J′on a nilmani old Mmigh lead o he non-s abili y
o dim E0,1
1unde small de o ma ions. A na u al ques ion a ises in his con ex :
is he F ¨oliche spec al sequence s able unde small de o ma ions i and only i
he nilmani old does no admi bo h abelian and non-abelian complex s uc u es?
P oposi ion 4.4 abo e gi es an a i ma i e answe o n= 3.
Nex we p o ide some examples o explici amilies o complex s uc u es on nil-
mani olds co esponding o h5and h15 along which he F ¨oliche sequence a ies. In
Co olla ies 5.11 and 5.12 below, u he p ope ies o he F ¨oliche spec al sequence
on nilmani olds a e shown.
Example 4.6. Le Jbe a non complex-pa allelizable and non-abelian complex
s uc u e on h5gi en in Table 1 wi h non-degene a e F ¨oliche sequence, i.e. E1≇
E∞ o J. We will cons uc a amily o complex s uc u es J by de o ming he
p e ious one, i.e. J0=J, such ha he F ¨oliche spec al sequence degene a es a
he i s s ep o any 6= 0. Acco ding o Theo em 4.1, Jhas complex s uc u e
equa ions o he o m
dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2,
o some non-nega i e λ6= 1, whe e {ω1, ω2, ω3}is a (1,0)-basis o J. Wi h espec
o he eal basis {e1,...,e6}gi en by
e1+i e2=ω1,1
1 + λ(e3−e1) + i
1−λ(e2+e4) = ω2, e5+ie6=ω3,
he complex s uc u e Jexp esses as
Je1=−e2, Je3=−2
1−λe2−1+λ
1−λe4, Je5=−e6,
Je2=e1, Je4=−2
1+λe1+1−λ
1+λe3, Je6=e5.
20
Fo any ∈[0,1
2), conside he complex s uc u e J gi en by
J e1=4d(1−λ)
α2e1−1−λ2
αe2−2d(1−λ)2
α2e3+8d2(1−λ)
α3e4,
J e2=1−λ2
αe1+2d(1−λ2)
α2e4,
J e3=−2d
(1−λ)2e1−2α
(1−λ2)(1−λ)e2−(1+λ)2
αe4,
J e4=−2(1−λ)
αe1+2d
1−λ2e2+(1−λ)2
αe3−4d(1−λ)
α2e4,
J e5=2d
1−λ2e5−4d2+(1−λ2)2
α(1−λ2)e6,
J e6=α
1−λ2e5−2d
1−λ2e6,
whe e α=p(1 −λ2)2−4d2, and
d( , λ) = 








, i λ= 0,
λ2/4,i λ2∈(0,1/2),
(1 −λ2)/4,i λ2∈[1/2,1),
− (1 −λ2)/4,i λ2>1.
No ice ha J0=J. Now, he o ms
ω1
=1−λ2
αe1+2d(1−λ2)
α2e4+i e2,
ω2
=1−λ
α(e3−e1)−2d(1−λ)
α2e4+i
1−λ2d
αe1+e2+(1−λ2)2
α2e4,
ω3
=e5−2d
αe6+i1−λ2
αe6,
sa is y J ωk
=i ωk
o k= 1,2,3, i.e. {ω1
, ω2
, ω3
}is a basis o ype (1,0) o J .
Fu he mo e, wi h espec o his basis he complex s uc u e equa ions a e
dω1
=dω2
= 0, dω3
=ω12
+ω1¯
1
+λ ω1¯
2
+D ω2¯
2
,
wi h D=i d( , λ). Acco ding o Theo em 4.1, he F ¨oliche spec al sequence
degene a es i and only i D6= 0, i.e. i and only i > 0. In conclusion, Jcan be
de o med in o a non-abelian complex s uc u e wi h E1∼
=E∞.
Co olla y 4.7. Le M= Γ Gbe he nilmani old unde lying he Iwasawa mani old,
i.e. g∼
=h5. Le Jbe a non complex-pa allelizable and non-abelian complex s uc u e
on Mgi en in Table 1 wi h E16∼
=E∞. Then, Jcan be de o med in o an in a ian
complex s uc u e wi h degene a e F ¨oliche spec al sequence.
The Lie algeb a h15 has a ich complex geome y wi h espec o he F ¨oliche
sequence and in he nex example we cons uc a amily J along which he h ee
cases in ( ) o Theo em 4.1 a e ealized.
21
Example 4.8. On h15, le us conside he eal basis {e1,...,e6}gi en in Theo-
em 2.1 and he ollowing amily o complex s uc u es
J e1=−s3(3 −sin )(7 + 3 sin )
(5 + sin )(11 −sin )e2,
J e3=s3(3 −sin )(11 −sin )
(5 + sin )(7 + 3 sin )e4,
J e5=−s(11 −sin )(7 + 3 sin )
3(3 −sin )(5 + sin )e6,
whe e ∈R. Le
4ω1
=p(11 −sin )(5 + sin )e1+ip3(3 −sin )(7 + 3 sin )e2,
8ω2
= (5 + sin )(7 + 3 sin )e3−ip3(5 + sin )(3 −sin )(11 −sin )(7 + 3 sin )e4,
and
128 ω3
= (5 + sin )(7 + 3 sin )h3(3 −sin )p(11 −sin )(5 + sin )e5
+i(11 −sin )p3(3 −sin )(7 + 3 sin )e6i.
Then, {ω1
, ω2
, ω3
}is a (1,0)-basis o J sa is ying
dω1
= 0, dω2
=ω1¯
1
, dω3
=1−sin
2ω12
+ 2 ω1¯
2
+1 + sin
4ω2¯
1
.
I sin = 1, he coe icien o ω12
anishes and he e o e J is an abelian com-
plex s uc u e ha is equi alen o he one gi en by (ρ, B , c ) = (0,1,1
4) (see
Lemma 2.14). I sin 6= 1, hen we can no malize he coe icien o ω12
and he
complex s uc u e equa ions can be w i en in o m (14) as
dω1
= 0, dω2
=ω1¯
1, dω3
=ω12
+4
1−sin ω1¯
2
+1 + sin
2(1 −sin )ω2¯
1
,
i.e. hey a e de e mined by he iple (ρ, B , c ) = 1,4
1−sin ,1+sin
2(1−sin ). Now, con-
ce ning he F ¨oliche spec al sequence o he amily {J } ∈R, by Theo em 4.1 ( )
we ge
•I sin = 1, hen (ρ , B , c ) = (0,1,1
4) and he e o e E16∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞.
•I sin =−1, hen (ρ , B , c ) = (1,2,0) and E16∼
=E2∼
=E∞.
•I |sin | 6= 1, E1∼
=E26∼
=E3∼
=E∞.
As a consequence o his example, in he ollowing esul we show ha o ≥2
he dimension o he e m Ep,q
(J ) in gene al is nei he uppe no lowe semi-
con inuous unc ion o . This is in deep con as wi h he case = 1, as i is well
known he uppe semicon inui y o he Hodge numbe s dim Hp,q
¯
∂(J ) wi h espec
o along a de o ma ion.
Co olla y 4.9. Le Mbe a nilmani old wi h unde lying Lie algeb a h15 endowed
wi h he in a ian complex s uc u es J gi en in Example 4.8. Then,
dim E0,2
2(Jπ
2) = 3 >2 = dim E0,2
2(J ),dim E1,1
2(Jπ
2) = 2 <3 = dim E1,1
2(J ),

22
and
dim E0,2
3(Jπ
2) = 2 >1 = dim E0,2
3(J ),dim E1,1
3(Jπ
2) = 2 <3 = dim E1,1
3(J ),
o any ∈(π
2,3π
2). The e o e, he dimensions o he e ms E1,1
2(J )and E1,1
3(J )
a e no uppe semi-con inuous unc ions o , and he dimensions o he e ms
E0,2
2(J )and E0,2
3(J )a e no lowe semi-con inuous unc ions o .
P oo . I ollows di ec ly om he p oo o Theo em 4.1 aking in o accoun ha o
=π
2 he complex s uc u e lies in case ( .3) and o any ∈(π
2,3π
2) he s uc u es
J lie in case ( .2). 
5. S ongly Gauduchon and balanced He mi ian me ics
Le (M, J) be a complex mani old o complex dimension n. A He mi ian me ic g
on (M, J) can be desc ibed by means o a posi i e de ini e smoo h o m Ω on M
o bideg ee (1,1) wi h espec o J. We will use his app oach in wha ollows and
we will e e o Ω as a He mi ian s uc u e o as a He mi ian me ic indis inc ly.
A He mi ian s uc u e Ω is s ongly Gauduchon (sG o sho ) i ∂Ωn−1is ¯
∂-
exac [22, 23]. In pa icula , any balanced He mi ian s uc u e (i.e. dΩn−1= 0) is
sG, and any sG me ic is a Gauduchon me ic [18], ha is, Ωn−1is ∂¯
∂-closed o
equi alen ly he Lee o m is co-closed.
Nex we suppose ha (M= Γ G, J) is a nilmani old endowed wi h an in a ian
complex s uc u e. I is p o ed in [15] ha (M= Γ G, J) has a balanced me ic i
and only i i has an in a ian one. Mo eo e , by using he symme iza ion p ocess
gi en in [5] (see also [15], [30] and [32, P oposi ion 3.2]) one easily a i es a :
P oposi ion 5.1. (M= Γ G, J)has an sG me ic i and only i i has an in a ian
one.
The e o e, he exis ence o sG me ics on (M= Γ G, J) is educed o he exis-
ence a he Lie algeb a le el go G.
Co olla y 5.2. Le Ωbe an in a ian He mi ian s uc u e on (M= Γ G, J). I
Jis abelian, hen Ωis sG i and only i i is balanced.
P oo . Le gbe he Lie algeb a o G. Fi s we p o e ha ¯
∂(Vn,k(g∗)) = 0 o e e y
1≤k≤n. Le us conside a decomposable o m α∈Vn,k(g∗) gi en by α=β∧γ,
whe e β∈Vn,0(g∗) and γ∈V0,k(g∗). Since gis nilpo en and Jis abelian, one
has ha dβ = 0 and dγ ∈V1,k(g∗), so in pa icula βand γa e ¯
∂-closed. Hence,
¯
∂α = (¯
∂β)∧γ+ (−1)nβ∧(¯
∂γ) = 0.
Now, he s a emen in he co olla y ollows di ec ly om P oposi ion 5.1 and om
he p e ious p ope y o k=n−2, i.e. ¯
∂(Vn,n−2(g∗)) = 0. 
F om now on we conside n= 3.
P oposi ion 5.3. Le M= Γ Gbe a 6-dimensional nilmani old endowed wi h an
in a ian complex s uc u e J. The e exis s an sG me ic on (M= Γ G, J)i and
only i he Lie algeb a go Gis isomo phic o h1,...,h6o h−
19.
P oo . By P oposi ion 5.1 i su ices o s udy he in a ian case. By [30], he
undamen al 2- o m o any J-He mi ian me ic is gi en by
(20) 2 Ω = i( 2ω1¯
1+s2ω2¯
2+ 2ω3¯
3) + uω1¯
2−¯uω2¯
1+ ω2¯
3−¯ ω3¯
2+zω1¯
3−¯zω3¯
1,
23
whe e coe icien s 2, s2, 2a e non-ze o eal numbe s and u, , z ∈Csa is y 2s2>
|u|2,s2 2>| |2, 2 2>|z|2and 2s2 2+ 2Re (i¯u¯ z)> 2|u|2+ 2| |2+s2|z|2.
Le us s a wi h he non-nilpo en case. F om (16)
2∂Ω = (iǫ ∓iz)ω12¯
1∓i ω12¯
2+ (u−¯u−ǫ 2)ω13¯
1+ (is2± 2)ω13¯
2+
ω13¯
3+ (is2∓ 2)ω23¯
1
and he e o e
4∂Ω∧Ω = iǫ(s2 2−| |2)±( 2u+ 2¯u+i ¯z−i¯ z)ω123¯
1¯
2+u −is2zω123¯
1¯
3.
Di ec compu a ions show ha ¯
∂(V3,1(g∗)) = hω123¯
1¯
3i. I he He mi ian s uc u e
(J, Ω) is sG hen
∓iǫ(s2 2−| |2) = 2(u+ ¯u) + i ¯z−i¯ z.
Since he le -hand side is pu ely imagina y and he igh -hand side is eal, we ge
ha ǫ= 0 and he e o e g∼
=h−
19.
Fo he nilpo en case, le us conside he gene al complex equa ions (2). Now,
he undamen al 2- o m o any J-He mi ian me ic is gi en also by (20). Using [30,
Lemma 17 and P oposi ion 25], we ge
4∂Ω∧Ω=(1 −ǫ)¯
A(s2 2−| |2) + ¯
B(i 2u+ ¯ z)−¯
C(i 2¯u− ¯z)
+ (1 −ǫ)¯
D( 2 2−|z|2)ω123¯
1¯
2−ǫ(s2 2−| |2)ω123¯
1¯
3.
I is s aigh o wa d o e i y ha ¯
∂(V3,1(g∗)) = hρ ω123¯
1¯
2i, and he e o e, i he
He mi ian s uc u e (J, Ω) is sG hen ǫ= 0, i.e. g∼
=hi o i= 1,...,6. Mo eo e ,
i in addi ion ρ= 1, hen any J-He mi ian s uc u e is sG.
In conclusion, i he e exis s an sG me ic hen g∼
=h1,...,h6o h−
19. The
con e se ollows di ec ly om [30, Theo em 26] because hese Lie algeb as admi
balanced He mi ian me ics. 
Rema k 5.4. F om he p oo o he p e ious p oposi ion i ollows ha on h2,h4,h5
and h6, i Jis a non-abelian nilpo en complex s uc u e hen any in a ian J-
He mi ian me ic is sG. This is in con as wi h h−
19, whe e o any complex s uc u e
he space o balanced me ics is s ic ly con ained in he space o sG me ics, and
mo eo e he e a e He mi ian me ics which a e no sG. Fo ins ance, conside a
He mi ian me ic on h−
19 gi en by
Ω = i
2ω1¯
1+ (u2+z2+ 1)i ω2¯
2+ (u2+z2+ 1)i ω3¯
3+u
2(ω1¯
2−ω2¯
1) + z
2(ω1¯
3−ω3¯
1),
ha is, in (20) we ake = 1, = 0, uand z eal and s2= 2= 2(u2+z2+ 1):
•i u=z= 0 hen he me ic is balanced;
•i u= 0 and z6= 0 hen he me ic is sG bu no balanced;
•i u6= 0 hen he me ic is no sG.
No ice ha his indica es a con as be ween he sG and SKT geome ies, since
by [16] he exis ence o an SKT s uc u e on a 6-dimensional nilpo en Lie algeb a
depends only on he complex s uc u e.
The e exis compac complex mani olds ha ing sG me ics bu no admi ing
any balanced me ic [24, Theo em 1.8]. Nex we show he gene al si ua ion o
nilmani olds in dimension 6.
24
P oposi ion 5.5. Le M= Γ Gbe a 6-dimensional nilmani old wi h an in a ian
complex s uc u e Jsuch ha (M= Γ G, J)does no admi balanced me ics. I
(M= Γ G, J)has sG me ic, hen Jis non-abelian nilpo en and gis isomo phic
o h2,h4o h5. Mo eo e , acco ding o he classi ica ion in Table 1, such a Jis
gi en by: Re D+ (Im D)2≥1
4on h2;Re D≥1
4on h4; and λ= 0,Im D6= 0 o
λ=Im D= 0,Re D≥0on h5.
P oo . Any complex s uc u e on h6o h−
19 admi s balanced me ics. F om [32] we
ha e ha only h3and h5ha e abelian complex s uc u es Jadmi ing balanced
me ic. In ac , any such Jon h5admi s balanced He mi ian me ics, whe eas o h3
he complex s uc u e mus be equi alen o he choice o (−)-sign in Table 1. F om
Co olla y 5.2, i emains o s udy he non-abelian nilpo en complex s uc u es J
on h2,h4and h5. Since any such Jadmi s sG me ics by Rema k 5.4, nex we show
which o hem do no admi balanced me ics.
In he h ee cases he complex equa ions a e o he o m
(21) dω1=dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2+D ω2¯
2.
A simila a gumen as in he p oo o [32, P oposi ion 2.3] shows ha , up o equi -
alence, he undamen al 2- o m o any J-He mi ian me ic is gi en by
2 Ω = i(ω1¯
1+s2ω2¯
2+ 2ω3¯
3) + u ω1¯
2−¯u ω2¯
1,
whe e s2>|u|2and 2>0.
I D=x+iy and u=u1+iu2, he balanced condi ion is
(22) s2+x+iy =u2λ+iu1λ.
We dis inguish se e al cases depending on he alues o λ.
I λ6= 0 hen Ω is balanced i and only i u1=y/λ and u2= (s2+x)/λ. The
condi ion s2>|u|2is equi alen o s4+ (2x−λ2)s2+x2+y2<0 and i is easy o
see ha a non-ze o ssa is ying his condi ion exis s i and only i he disc iminan
o he p e ious equa ion as a second deg ee equa ion in s2is posi i e, i.e.
(23) λ4−4xλ2−4y2>0.
Acco ding o Table 1, non-abelian complex s uc u es on h2ha e λ= 1. In his
case (23) eads as x+y2<1/4, which means ha any Jsuch ha x+y2≥1
4
has no balanced me ics. Simila ly, o h4any Jsuch ha x≥1
4does no admi
balanced me ic.
Fo h5and λ6= 0 we ha e ha x= 0 by Table 1. Thus, he e is no balanced
me ics i and only i λ4≤4y2. Since y≥0, his is equi alen o λ2≤2y. Howe e ,
none o he h ee cases de ailed in Table 1 e i ies ha λ2≤2y, and he e o e any
complex s uc u e on h5wi h λ6= 0 admi s balanced me ics.
Finally, in he case λ= 0 on h5we ge ha he balanced condi ion (22) educes
o y= 0 and s2=−x > 0. F om Table 1 we ha e ha 0 <1+4x, i.e. x∈(−1
4,∞).
The e o e, i y6= 0 o y= 0, x ≥0 hen he e a e no balanced me ics. 
As poin ed ou by Popo ici [24], he degene a ion o he F ¨oliche sequence a E1
and he exis ence o sG me ics a e un ela ed. F om he s udy o he sG geome y
abo e and om Theo em 4.1 we ge :
Theo em 5.6. Le M= Γ Gbe a 6-dimensional nilmani old endowed wi h an
in a ian complex s uc u e J. I he e exis s an sG me ic hen he F ¨oliche
25
spec al sequence degene a es a he second le el, i.e. E2(M)∼
=E∞(M). Mo eo e ,
i he e exis s an sG me ic and g6∼
=h5, hen E1(M)∼
=E∞(M).
P oo . By P oposi ion 5.3, he Lie algeb a gunde lying M= Γ Gmus be iso-
mo phic o h1,...,h6o h−
19, so Theo em 4.1 implies ha he F ¨oliche sequence
degene a es a he second le el. The las asse ion ollows di ec ly by aking in o
accoun Co olla y 5.2 and Table 3 below. 
I is in e es ing whe he his esul holds in gene al, ha is:
Ques ion 5.7. Does he F ¨oliche spec al sequence degene a e a he second s ep
o any compac complex mani old Mo complex dimension 3admi ing an sG
me ic?
In he ollowing able we show he complex s uc u es J, up o equi alence, on
h1,...,h6 ha admi balanced He mi ian me ics. The classi ica ion ollows om
he p oo o P oposi ion 5.5.
Table 3: Classi ica ion o nilpo en complex s uc u es
admi ing balanced me ics
gAbelian s uc u es Non-Abelian Nilpo en s uc u es
h1dω2= 0, dω3= 0 —
h2—dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+ω1¯
2+ (x+iy)ω2¯
2,
y > 0, x +y2<1
4
h3dω2= 0, dω3=ω1¯
1−ω2¯
2—
h4—dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+ω1¯
2+x ω2¯
2,
x < 1
4, x 6= 0
dω2= 0, dω3=ω12
dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+λ ω1¯
2+ (x+iy)ω2¯
2,
dω2= 0,wi h (λ, x, y) sa is ying one o :
h5dω3=ω1¯
1+ω1¯
2+x ω2¯
2,•λ=y= 0, x ∈−1
4,0;
0≤x < 1
4•0< λ2<1
2,0≤y < λ2
2, x = 0;
•1
2≤λ2<1,0≤y < 1−λ2
2, x = 0;
•λ2>1,0≤y < λ2−1
2, x = 0.
h6—dω2= 0, dω3=ω12 +ω1¯
1+ω1¯
2
Mo i a ed by [24, Theo em 1.9] nex we s udy he ela ion be ween he degene -
a ion o he F ¨oliche spec al sequence and he exis ence o sG o balanced me ics.
The possibili ies a e well illus a ed in he ollowing de o ma ions o he complex
s uc u e co esponding o λ=x=y= 0 on a nilmani old wi h unde lying Lie
algeb a h5.
Example 5.8. Le us conside he Lie algeb a h5wi h he eal basis {e1,...,e6}
desc ibed in Theo em 2.1. Le us conside he complex s uc u e J0,0gi en by
J0,0e1=−e2, J0,0e3=−2e2−e4, J0,0e5=−e6,
J0,0e2=e1, J0,0e4=−2e1+e3, J0,0e6=e5.