scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Furstenberg sets for a fractal set of directions

Abstract

In this paper we study the behavior of the size of Furstenberg sets with respect to the size of the set of directions defining it. For any pair α, β ∈ (0, 1], we will say that a set E ⊂ R2 is an Fαβ-set if there is a subset L of the unit circle of Hausdorff dimension at least β and, for each direction e in L, there is a line segment e in the direction of e such that the Hausdorff dimension of the set E∩ e is equal to or greater than α. The problem is considered in the wider scenario of generalized Hausdorff measures, giving estimates on the appropriate dimension functions for each class of Furstenberg sets. As a corollary of our main results, we obtain that dim(E) ≥ max {α + β 2 ; 2α + β − 1} for any E ∈ Fαβ. In particular we are able to extend previously known results to the “endpoint” α = 0 case.

Read accessible full text

Furstenberg sets for a fractal set of directions

Author: Molter, Úrsula María; Rela, Ezequiel
Publisher: American Mathematical Society
Year: 2012
DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-11111-0
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/436bed37-0e1f-4592-8ee0-82ccd7e14e2e/download
a Xi :1009.0481 1 [ma h.CA] 2 Sep 2010
FURSTENBERG SETS FOR A FRACTAL SET OF
DIRECTIONS
URSULA MOLTER AND EZEQUIEL RELA
Abs ac . In his no e we s udy he beha io o he size o Fu s en-
be g se s wi h espec o he size o he se o di ec ions defining i . Fo
any pai α, β ∈(0,1], we will say ha a se E⊂R2is an Fαβ -se i
he e is a subse Lo he uni ci cle o Hausdo ff dimension a leas β
and, o each di ec ion ein L, he e is a line segmen ℓein he di ec-
ion o esuch ha he Hausdo ff dimension o he se E∩ℓeis equal
o g ea e han α. The p oblem is conside ed in he wide scena io o
gene alized Hausdo ff measu es, gi ing es ima es on he app op ia e di-
mension unc ions o each class o Fu s enbe g se s. As a co olla y o
ou main esul s, we ob ain ha dim(E)≥max α+β
2; 2α+β−1
o any E∈Fαβ. In pa icula we a e able o ex end p e iously known
esul s o he “endpoin ” α= 0 case.
1. In oduc ion
In his a icle we a e in e es ed in he s udy o dimension p ope ies o
Fu s enbe g se s associa ed o ac al se s o di ec ions. Le us in oduce he
de ini ion o ou objec o s udy. In he sequel, we will deno e wi h dim(E)
he Hausdo dimension o he se E.
De ini ion 1.1. Fo α, β in (0,1], a subse Eo R2will be called an Fαβ-se
i he e is a subse Lo he uni ci cle such ha dim(L)≥βand, o each
di ec ion ein L, he e is a line segmen ℓein he di ec ion o esuch ha he
Hausdo dimension o he se E∩ℓeis equal o g ea e han α.
This gene alizes he classical de ini ion o Fu s enbe g se s, when he
whole ci cle is conside ed as se o di ec ions. Fo L=S, which is a pa ic-
ula case o β= 1, we eco e he classical class Fαo α-Fu s enbe g se s,
and he bes known esul is
(1) max α+1
2; 2α≤γ(α)≤1
2+3
2α, α ∈(0,1].
whe e γ(α) = in {dim(E) : E∈Fα}. In [MR10] and [MR] he abo e
inequali ies a e p o ed in he gene al se ing o dimension unc ions, allowing
he ex ension o he endpoin α= 0 o some class o gene alized Fu s enbe g
se s.
Una oidable e e ences on his ma e a e [Wol99], [Wol03], [KT01] and
[Tao].
1991 Ma hema ics Subjec Classi ica ion. P ima y 28A78, 28A80.
Key wo ds and ph ases. Fu s enbe g se s, Hausdo ff dimension, dimension unc ion,
Kakeya se s.
This esea ch is pa ially suppo ed by G an s: PICT2006-00177, PIP 11220080100398
and UBACyT X149.
1
2 URSULA MOLTER AND EZEQUIEL RELA
The pu pose o his no e is o s udy how he pa ame e βa ec s he
bounds abo e. Mo eo e , by using gene al Hausdo measu es, we will
ex end he inequali ies (1) o he ze o dimensional case.
F om ou esul s we will de i e he ollowing p oposi ion.
P oposi ion 1.2. Fo any se E∈Fαβ, we ha e ha
(2) dim(E)≥max α+β
2; 2α+β−1, α, β > 0.
I is no ha d o p o e P oposi ion 1.2 di ec ly, bu we will s udy his
p oblem in a wide scena io and de i e i as a co olla y. We also ema k
ha ou esul s a e consis en wi h he ones in [Mi 02], whe e he au ho
p o es, essen ially, he second bound o he case α= 1, β∈(0,1].
The e is a na u al way o gene alize his p oblem by looking a dimension
unc ions ha a e no necessa ily powe unc ions ([Hau18]). Le us begin
wi h he no ion o dimension unc ions.
1.1. Dimension Func ions.
De ini ion 1.3. The ollowing class o unc ions will be called dimension
unc ions.
H:= {h: [0,∞)→[0 : ∞),non-dec easing, igh con inuous, h(0) = 0}.
The impo an subclass o hose h∈H ha sa is y a doubling condi ion
will be deno ed by Hd:
Hd:= {h∈H:h(2x)≤Ch(x) o some C > 0}.
Rema k 1.4. Clea ly, i h∈Hd, he same inequali y will hold (wi h some
o he cons an ) i 2 is eplaced by any o he λ > 1. We also ema k ha any
conca e unc ion i ially belongs o Hd. Also no e ha he mono onici y
o himplies ha C≥1.
I one only looks a he powe unc ions, he e is a na u al o al o de
gi en by he exponen s. I we deno e wi h hα(x) = xα, hen hαis, in some
sense, smalle han hβi and only i α < β. In Hwe also ha e a na u al
no ion o o de , bu we can only ob ain a pa ial o de .
De ini ion 1.5. Le g, h be wo dimension unc ions. We will say ha gis
dimensionally smalle han hand w i e g≺hi and only i
lim
x→0+
h(x)
g(x)= 0.
We also ema k ha we will be pa icula ly in e es ed in he special sub-
class o dimension unc ions ha allows us o classi y ze o dimensional se s,
ha means, ha his in his class i i is smalle han any o he unc ions
xα,α > 0.
De ini ion 1.6. A unc ion h∈Hwill be called “ze o dimensional dimen-
sion unc ion” i h≺hα o any α > 0. We will deno e by H0 he subclass
o hose unc ions.
FURSTENBERG SETS FOR A FRACTAL SET OF DIRECTIONS 3
As usual, he h-dimensional (ou e ) Hausdo measu e Hhwill be de ined
as ollows. Fo a se E⊆Rnand δ > 0, w i e
Hh
δ(E) = in (X
i
h(diam(Ei)) : E⊂∞
[
i
Ei,diam(Ei)< δ).
The h-dimensional Hausdo measu e Hho Eis de ined by
Hh(E) = sup
δ>0Hh
δ(E).
We ema k ha , e en hough hey would no lead o he exac same mea-
su es, we will conside unc ions g, h such ha he e exis cons an s c, C
wi h 0 < c ≤g(x)
h(x)≤C < ∞ o all x > 0 o be equi alen . In ha case we
w i e g≡h.
To measu e he “dis ance” be ween o dimension unc ions, we in oduce
he ollowing no ion:
De ini ion 1.7. Le g, h ∈Hwi h g≺h. De ine he “gap” be ween gand
has
(3) ∆(x) = h(x)
g(x).
F om his de ini ion and he de ini ion o pa ial o de , we always ha e
ha limx→0∆(x) = 0, and he e o e he speed o con e gence o ze o can
be seen as a no ion o dis ance be ween gand h.
Now we p esen he p oblem. Le us begin wi h he de ini ion o Fhg-se s.
Le hand gbe wo dimension unc ions. A se E⊆R2is a Fu s enbe g se
o ype hg, o an Fhg-se , i he e is a subse Lo he uni ci cle such ha
Hg(L)>0 and, o each di ec ion ein L, he e is a line segmen ℓein he
di ec ion o esuch ha Hh(ℓe∩E)>0.
No e ha his hypo hesis is s onge han he one used o de ine he
o iginal Fu s enbe g-αse s. Howe e , he hypo hesis dim(E∩ℓe)≥αis
equi alen o Hβ(E∩ℓe)>0 o any βsmalle han α. I we use he wide
class o dimension unc ions in oduced abo e, he na u al way o de ine Fh-
se s would be o eplace he pa ame e s β < α wi h wo dimension unc ions
sa is ying he ela ion h≺h. Bu equi ing E∩ℓe o ha e posi i e Hh
measu e o any h≺himplies ha i has also posi i e Hhmeasu e (Theo em
42, [Rog70]). The e o e, his de ini ion is he na u al gene aliza ion o he
F+
αβ class de ined below.
De ini ion 1.8. Fo each pai α, β in (0,1], a subse Eo R2will be called
an F+
αβ-se i he e is a subse Lo he uni ci cle such ha Hβ(L)>0 and,
o each di ec ion ein L, he e is a line segmen ℓein he di ec ion o esuch
ha Hα(ℓe∩E)>0.
Now, o he sake o cla i y in he p oo o ou esul s, we will pe o m he
same educ ion made in [MR10]. A s anda d pigeonhole a gumen allows us
o wo k wi h he ollowing de ini ion.
De ini ion 1.9. Le hand gbe wo dimension unc ions. A se E⊆R2
is a Fu s enbe g se o ype hg, o an Fhg-se , i he e is a subse Lo he
uni ci cle such ha Hg(L)>0 and, o each di ec ion ein L, he e is a line
4 URSULA MOLTER AND EZEQUIEL RELA
segmen ℓein he di ec ion o esuch ha Hh
δ(ℓe∩E)>1 o all δ < δE o
some δE>0 wi h δEdepending only on E.
Following he in ui ion sugges ed by P oposi ion 1.2, one could conjec u e
ha i Ebelong o he class Fhg hen an app op ia e dimension unc ion o
Eshould be dimensionally g ea e han h2g
id and h√g(whe e id is he iden i y
unc ion). This will indeed be he case, and we will p o ide some es ima es
on he gap be ween hose conjec u ed dimension unc ions and a gene ic es
unc ion h∈H o ensu e ha Hh(E)>0. In addi ion we illus a e wi h
some examples. We will conside he wo esul s sepa a ely. Namely, o a
gi en pai o dimension unc ions g∈Hand h∈Hd, in Sec ion 3 we ob ain
su icien condi ions on a es dimension unc ion h∈H,h≻h2g
id o ensu e
ha Hh(E)>0 o any se E∈Fhg. In Sec ion 4 we conside he analogous
p oblem o h≻h√g. The nex sec ion summa izes some p elimina y esul s
o be used in ou p oo s and addi ional no a ion. Finally, in Sec ion 5 we
b ie ly discuss he app op ia e no ion o size o he se o di ec ions de ining
he Fu s enbe g classes.
2. P elimina ies
In his sec ion we include some p elimina y and echnical esul s needed
in he sequel. We will use he no a ion A.B o indica e ha he e is a
cons an C > 0 such ha A≤CB, whe e he cons an is independen o A
and B. By A∼Bwe mean ha bo h A.Band B.Ahold. As usual, by
aδ-co e ing o a se Ewe mean a co e ing o Eby se s Uiwi h diame e s
no exceeding δ.
In Sec ion 3 he main ool will be an L2es ima e o he Kakeya maximal
unc ion o gene al measu es. Fo an in eg able unc ion on Rn, he Kakeya
maximal unc ion a scale δwill be Kδ( ) : Sn−1→R,
Kδ( )(e) = sup
x∈Rn
1
|Tδ
e(x)|ZTδ
e(x)| (x)|dx e ∈Sn−1,
whe e Tδ
e(x) is a 1 ×δ- ube (by his we mean a ube o leng h 1 and c oss
sec ion o adius δ) cen e ed a xin he di ec ion e.
The es ima e we need is he main esul o [Mi 02]. The e he au ho
p o es (Theo em 3.1) he ollowing.
P oposi ion 2.1. Le µbe a Bo el p obabili y measu e on Ssuch ha
µ(B(x, )) .ϕ( ) o some non-nega i e unc ion ϕ o all ≪1. De-
ine he Kakeya maximal ope a o Kδas usual:
Kδ( )(e) = sup
x∈Rn
1
|Tδ
e(x)|ZTδ
e(x)| (x)|dx, e ∈Sn−1.
Then we ha e he es ima e
(4) kKδk2
L2(R2)→L2(S,dµ).C(δ) = Z1
δ
ϕ(u)
u2du.
Rema k 2.2. I should be no ed ha i we choose ϕ(x) = xs, hen we
ob ain as a co olla y ha
(5) kKδk2
L2(R2)→L2(S,dµ).δs−1.
FURSTENBERG SETS FOR A FRACTAL SET OF DIRECTIONS 5
In he special case o s= 1, he bound has he known loga i hmic g ow h:
kKδk2
L2(R2)→L2(S,dµ)∼log(1
δ).
This esul will be used in Sec ion 3, whe e he hypo heses imposed on
a se E o being an Fhg se gua an ee, ia F os man’s lemma, ha he e
exis s a p obabili y measu e µon he se o di ec ions Lwi h µ(B ).g( )
o any ball B (see [Ma 95]). Le us ema k ha (5) sugges s ha he
cons an C(δ) plays, in he gene al case, he ole o g
id (δ).
In Sec ion 4 we pe o m a mo e combina o ial kind o p oo . We in oduce
he no ion o δ-en opy o a se Ein he nex de ini ion
De ini ion 2.3. Le E⊂Rnand δ∈R>0. The δ-en opy o Eis he
maximal possible ca dinali y o a δ-sepa a ed subse o E. We will deno e
his quan i y wi h Nδ(E).
The main idea is o ela e he δ-en opy o some no ion o size o he se .
Clea ly, he en opy is essen ially he Box dimension o he Packing dimen-
sion o a se (see [Ma 95] o [Fal03] o he de ini ions) since bo h concep s
a e de ined in e ms o sepa a ed δballs wi h cen e s in he se . Howe e , o
ou p oo we will need o ela e he en opy o a se o some quan i y ha
has he p ope y o being (in some sense) s able unde coun able unions.
One choice is he e o e he no ion o Hausdo con en , which enjoys he
needed p ope ies: i is an ou e measu e, is ini e, and e lec s he en opy
o a se in he ollowing manne . Recall ha he g-dimensional Hausdo
con en o a se Eis de ined as
(6) Hg
∞(E) = in (X
i
g(diam(Ui) : E⊂[
i
Ui).
No e ha he g-dimensional Hausdo con en Hg
∞is clea ly no he same
han he g-dimensional Hausdo measu e Hg. In ac , hey a e he measu es
ob ained by applying Me hod I and Me hod II (see [Ma 95]) espec i ely o
he p emeasu e ha assigns o a se A he alue g(diam(A)).
Fo u u e e e ence, we s a e he ollowing es ima e o he δ-en opy o
a se wi h posi i e g-dimensional Hausdo con en as a lemma.
Lemma 2.4. Le g∈Hand le Abe any se . Le Nδ(A)be he δ-en opy
o A. Then Nδ(A)≥Hg
∞(A)
g(δ).
P oo . Le {xi}N
i=1 be a maximal δ-sepa a ed subse . By maximali y, we
can co e Awi h balls B(xi, δ). The e o e, o he g-dimensional Hausdo
con en Hg
∞, we ha e he bound
(7) Hg
∞(A)≤
N
X
iHg
∞(B(xi, δ)) ≤Ng(δ)
and i ollows ha Nδ(A)≥N≥Hg
∞(A)
g(δ).
O cou se, his esul is meaning ul when Hg
∞(A)>0. We will use i in
he case Hg(A)>0 which is equi alen o Hg
∞(A)>0. Fo a de ailed s udy
o he p ope ies o Hgand Hg
∞see [Del02] and [Del03].

6 URSULA MOLTER AND EZEQUIEL RELA
No e ha he lemma abo e only equi es he ini eness and he subaddi-
i i y o he Hausdo con en . The ele an ea u e ha will be needed in
ou p oo is he σ-subaddi i i y, which is a p ope y ha he Box dimension
does no sha e.
Now we in oduce he ollowing no a ion and a echnical lemma.
De ini ion 2.5. Le b={bk}k∈Nbe a dec easing sequence wi h lim bk= 0.
Fo any amily o balls B={Bj}wi h Bj=B(xj; j), j≤1, and o any
se E, we de ine
(8) Jb
k:= {j∈N:bk< j≤bk−1},
and
(9) Ek:= E∩[
j∈Jb
k
Bj.
In he pa icula case o he dyadic scale b={2−k}, we will omi he supe -
sc ip and deno e
(10) Jk:= {j∈N: 2−k< j≤2−k+1}.
The nex lemma in oduces a echnique used in [MR10] o decompose he
se o all di ec ions.
Lemma 2.6. Le Ebe an Fhg-se o some h,g∈Hwi h he di ec ions in
L⊂Sand le a={ak}k∈N∈ℓ1be a non-nega i e sequence. Le B={Bj}
be a δ-co e ing o Ewi h δ < δEand le Ekand Jkbe as abo e. De ine
Lk:= e∈S:Hh
δ(ℓe∩Ek)≥ak
2kak1.
Then L=∪kLk.
The p oo ollows di ec ly om he summabili y o a.
3. The Kakeya ype bound
In his sec ion we p o e a gene alized e sion o he announced bound
dim(E)≥2α+β−1 o E∈Fαβ. We ha e he ollowing heo em.
Theo em 3.1 (hg →h2g
id ).Le g∈H,h∈Hdbe wo dimension unc ions
and le Ebe an Fhg-se . Fo δ > 0, le C(δ)be as in (4). Fo any h∈H
such ha X
kqh2(2−k)C(2−k)
h(2−k)<∞,Hh(E)>0.
P oo . Le E∈Fhg and le {Bj}j∈Nbe a co e ing o Eby balls wi h
Bj=B(xj; j). We need o bound Pjh(2 j) om below. Since his non-
dec easing, i su ices o ob ain he bound
(11) X
j
h( j)&1
o any h∈Hsa is ying he hypo hesis o he heo em.
De ine a={ak}by a2
k=h2(2−k)C(2−k)
h(2−k). Also de ine, as in he p e ious
sec ion, o each k∈N,Jk={j∈N: 2−k< j≤2−k+1}and Ek=
FURSTENBERG SETS FOR A FRACTAL SET OF DIRECTIONS 7
E∩∪j∈JkBj. Since by hypo hesis a∈ℓ1, we can apply Lemma 2.6 o ob ain
he decomposi ion o he se o di ec ions as L=SkLkassocia ed o his
choice o a.
We will apply he maximal unc ion inequali y o a weigh ed union o
indica o unc ions. Fo each k, le Fk=[
j∈Jk
Bjand de ine he unc ion
:= h(2−k)2kχFk.
We will use he L2no m es ima es o he maximal unc ion. We can
compu e di ec ly he L2no m o :
k k2
2=h2(2−k)22kZ∪JkBj
dx
.h2(2−k)22kX
j∈Jk
2
j
.h2(2−k)#Jk,
since j≤2−k+1 o j∈Jk. The e o e
(12) k k2
2.#Jkh2(2−k).
The same a gumen s used in he p oo o Theo em 3.1 in [MR10] allows us
o ob ain a lowe bound o he maximal unc ion. Essen ially, he maximal
unc ion is poin wise bounded om below by he a e age o o e he ube
cen e ed on he line segmen ℓe o any e∈Lk. The e o e, we ha e he
ollowing bound o he (L2, µ) no m. He e, µis a measu e suppo ed on L
ha obeys he law µ(B(x, )≤g( ) o any ball B(x, ) gi en by F os man’s
lemma.
(13) kK2−k+1 ( )k2
L2(dµ)&a2
kµ(Lk) = µ(Lk)h2(2−k)C(2−k)
h(2−k).
Combining (13) wi h he maximal inequali y (4), we ob ain
µ(Lk)h2(2−k)C(2−k)
h(2−k).kK2−k+1 ( )k2
2.C(2−k+1)k k2
2≤C(2−k)k k2
2.
We also ha e he bound (12), which implies ha
µ(Lk)
h(2−k).#Jk.
Now we a e able o es ima e he sum in (11). Le hbe a dimension
unc ion sa is ying he hypo hesis o Theo em 3.1. We ha e
X
j
h( j)≥X
k
h(2−k)#Jk
&X
k
µ(Lk)≥µ(L)>0.

Co olla y 3.2. Le Ean F+
αβ-se . I his any dimension unc ion sa is ying
(14) h(x)≥Cx2α+β−1logθ(1
x)
8 URSULA MOLTER AND EZEQUIEL RELA
o θ > 2, hen Hh(E)>0.
P oo . I ollows di ec ly, since in his case we ha e C(δ).δβ−1, and he e-
o e he sum in Theo em 3.1 is
X
ksh2(2−k)C(2−k)
h(2−k).X
ks2−k2α2−k(β−1)
h(2−k)
≤X
ks2−k(2α+β−1)
(2−k)2α+β−1logθ(2k)
=X
k
1
kθ
2
<∞.

Rema k 3.3. No e ha he bound dim(E)≥2α+β−1 o E∈Fαβ ollows
di ec ly om his las co olla y.
4. The combina o ial bound
In his sec ion we deal wi h he bound hg →h√g, which is he signi ican
bound nea he endpoin α=β= 0 and gene alizes he bound dim(E)≥
β
2+α o E∈Fαβ. No e ha he second bound in (2) is meaningless
o small alues o αand β. We will conside sepa a ely he cases o h
being ze o dimensional o posi i e dimensional. In he nex heo em, he
addi ional condi ion on h e lec s he posi i i y o he dimension unc ion.
We belie e ha i would be help ul o ci e, wi hou he p oo s, wo ele-
an lemmas used in [MR10].
The i s is a “spli ing lemma”, which says ha a linea se wi h posi i e
h-dimensional mass can be spli ed in o wo well sepa a ed linea subse s.
Lemma 4.1. Le h∈H,δ > 0,Ian in e al and E⊆I. Le η > 0be such
ha h−1(η
8)< δ and Hh
δ(E)≥η > 0. Then he e exis wo subin e als I−,
I+ ha a e h−1(η
8)-sepa a ed and wi h Hh
δ(I±∩E)&η.
The second lemma is he combina o ial ing edien in he p oo o bo h
Theo em 4.3 and Theo em 4.6. This lemma p o ides an es ima e on he
numbe o lines wi h ce ain sepa a ion ha in e sec wo balls o a gi en
size.
Lemma 4.2. Le b={bk}k∈Nbe a dec easing sequence wi h lim bk= 0.
Gi en a amily o balls B={B(xj; j)}, we de ine Jb
kas in (8) and le
{ei}Mk
i=1 be a bk-sepa a ed se o di ec ions. Assume ha o each i he e a e
wo line segmen s I+
eiand I−
eilying on a line in he di ec ion ei ha a e
sk-sepa a ed o some gi en skDe ine Πk=Jb
k×Jb
k×{1, .., Mk}and Lb
kby
Lb
k:= (j+, j−, i)∈Πk:I−
ei∩Bj−6=∅I+
ei∩Bj+6=∅.
I 1
5sk> bk−1 o all k, hen
#Lb
k.bk−1
bk
1
sk#Jb
k2.
FURSTENBERG SETS FOR A FRACTAL SET OF DIRECTIONS 9
Wi h hese wo lemmas we a e now eady o p o e he main esul o his
sec ion. We ha e he ollowing heo em. Recall ha hα(x) = xα.
Theo em 4.3 (hg →h√g,h≻hα).Le g∈H,h∈Hdbe wo dimension
unc ions such ha h(x).xα o some 0< α < 1and le Ebe an Fhg-se .
Le h∈Hwi h h≺h√g. I X
kh(2−k)√g(2−k)
h(2−k)2α
2α+1 <∞, hen Hh(E)>0.
P oo . Le E∈Fhg and le {Bj}j∈Nbe a co e ing o Eby balls wi h Bj=
B(xj; j). De ine ∆ = h√g
hand conside he sequence a=n∆2α
2α+1 (2−k)ok.
Also de ine, as in he p e ious sec ion, o each k∈N,Jk={j∈N: 2−k<
j≤2−k+1}and Ek=E∩ ∪j∈JkBj. Since by hypo hesis a∈ℓ1, we can
apply Lemma 2.6 o ob ain he decomposi ion o he se o di ec ions as
L=SkLkassocia ed o his choice o a, whe e Lkis de ined as
Lk:= e∈S:Hh
δ(ℓe∩Ek)≥ak
2kak1.
We can apply Lemma 4.1 wi h η=ak
2kak1 o ℓe∩Ek. The e o e we ob ain
wo in e als I−
eand I+
e, con ained in ℓewi h
Hh
δ(I±
e∩Ek)&ak
ha a e h−1( ak)-sepa a ed o =1
16kak1.
Now, le {ek
j}Nk
j=1 be a 2−k-sepa a ed subse o Lk. Taking in o accoun
he es ima e o he en opy gi en in Lemma 2.4. We ob ain hen ha
(15) Nk&Hg
∞(Lk)
g(2−k).
De ine Πk:= Jk×Jk×{1, .., Nk}and
(16) Tk:= (j−, j+, i)∈Πk:I−
ei∩Ek∩Bj−6=∅I+
ei∩Ek∩Bj+6=∅.
The idea is o coun he elemen s o Tkin wo ways. I we ix a pai j−and
j+and coun o how many alues o i he iple (j−, j+, i) belongs o Tk,
we ob ain, by using Lemma 4.2 o he choice b={2−k}, ha
(17) #Tk.1
h−1( ak)(#Jk)2.
Second, ix i. In his case, we ha e by hypo hesis ha Hh
δ(I+
ei∩Ek)&ak,
so Pj+h( j+)&ak. The e o e,
ak.X
(j−,j+,i)∈Tk
h( j+)≤Kh(2−k),
whe e Kis he numbe o elemen s o he sum. The e o e K&ak
h(2−k).
The same holds o j−, so
(18) #Tk&Nkak
h(2−k)2
.