scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Minimum number of different distances defined by a finite number of points

Abstract

We study the minimum number of different distances defined by a finite number of points in the following cases: a) we consider metrics different from the euclidean distance in the plane, b) we consider the euclidean distance but restricted to subsets of the plane of special interest, c) we consider other topological surfaces: the cylinder and the flat torus. All these results extend those obtained by Erdös and other mathematicians for the euclidean distance in the plane.

Read accessible full text

Minimum number of different distances defined by a finite number of points

Author: Albujer Brotons, Alma Luisa; Segura Gomis, Salvador
Year: 2004
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/986143f1-b557-4a88-bd42-f18addc00c9e/download
Minimum numbe o di e en dis ances de ined by a ini e numbe o
poin s
Albuje , A. aand Segu a Gomis, S. a
aDepa amen o de An´alisis Ma em´a ico, Uni e sidad de Alican e, Campus de San Vicen e del Raspeig, E-03080-Alican e,
Spain
Abs ac
We s udy he minimum numbe o di e en dis ances de ined by a ini e numbe o poin s in he ollowing cases:
a) we conside me ics di e en om he euclidean dis ance in he plane, b) we conside he euclidean dis ance
bu es ic ed o subse s o he plane o special in e es , c) we conside o he opological su aces: he cylinde
and he la o us. All hese esul s ex end hose ob ained by E d¨os and o he ma hema icians o he euclidean
dis ance in he plane.
Key wo ds: dis ances, me ics, in ege la ice, la o us, cylinde
1. In oduc ion
In 1946 [4] E d¨os posed he ollowing p oblem:
le (n) deno e he minimum numbe o dis inc
dis ances ha can occu among he n(n−1)
2dis-
ances be ween ndis inc poin s in he plane; wha
can we know abou (n)?
Fo small alues o ni is easy o compu e (n)
and many imes he numbe (n) is a ained o
di e en con igu a ions. Le us see he i s exam-
ples.
...............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(3) = 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
........
(4) = 2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
..............
..............
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(5) = 2 (6) = 3
E d¨os ob ained asymp o ic es ima es o (n).
The i s asymp o ic es ima e was
cn1/2< (n)< c n
(ln n)1/2
Email add esses: [email protected] (Albuje , A.),
Sal ado .Segu [email protected] (Segu a Gomis, S.).
E d¨os conjec u ed ha (n)> cn1−ε o each
ε > 0 and o e ed 500$ o a p oo o a disp oo .
E d¨os conjec u e is s ill open. The las imp o e-
men was made by Szeme ´edi (1992) who p o ed
ha (n)> cn4/5([2]).
(n) can be in es iga ed in dimension Rd
wi h d > 2. Fo d= 3 he bes bounds a e
cn4/3log log n < (n) ([5]) and (n)< n3/2+o(1)
([3]).
Recen ly B aß([1]) de e mined (n) exac ly in
dimension d= 4.
The e a e also bounds o gene al dimensions.
The aim o his communica ion is o ex end
E d¨os p oblem o o he ambien spaces.
a) Fi s we conside me ics di e en om he
euclidean dis ance in he plane.
b) Then we conside also he euclidean dis ance
bu es ic ed o subse s o he plane o spe-
cial in e es (poin s o he in ege la ice and
poin s o a ional coo dina es).
c) Finally we conside E d¨os p oblem in o he
opological spaces.
20 h EWCG Se ille, Spain (2004)
20 h Eu opean Wo kshop on Compu a ional Geome y
2. E d¨os p oblem conside ing a bi a y
dis ances in he plane
In he plane we can de ine many dis ances. Le
us ecall ha a dis ance in he plane is a map
d:R2×R2→R
such ha
i) d(x, y)≥0, d(x, y) = 0 i x=y
ii) d(x, y) = d(y, x)
iii) d(x, z)≤d(x, y) + d(y, z)
An in e es ing way o de ine a me ic in he plane
is as ollows.
Le us de ine he gauge unc ion g(K, x) o a
closed, con ex se K ela i e o an o igin 0 as
g(K, x) = in {λ:x∈λK, λ > 0}
I is easy o p o e ha i Kis a p ope con-
ex body and 0 ∈in K, he unc ion m(x, y) =
g(K, x −y) almos de ines a dis ance in he plane.
The condi ion ha is iola ed is he symme y con-
di ion m(x, y) = m(y, x) ha holds only i Kis
cen ally symme ic.
So a closed, cen ally symme ic, con ex se K
wi h 0 ∈in K de ines a me ic ([7]).
All hese me ics gene a e he euclidean opol-
ogy.
In he pa icula case ha he se K ha
induce his me ic is a squa e o he ype
h(p, 0),(0, p),(−p, 0),(0,−p)i, hen we ob ain he
amous axi-cab me ic which is also known as
he Manha an me ic. This me ic is pa icula ly
ele an o ou analysis.
The axi-cab me ic can also be de ined as
dT((x1, y1),(x2, y2)) = |x2−x1|+|y2−y1|
We a e going i s o es ima e he minimum num-
be o dis inc dis ances wi h he axi-cab me ic.
We begin showing in able 1 ha he axi-cab
me ic p o ides di e en alues o (n) han hose
alues a ained wi h he euclidean me ic.
(n) Euclidean me ic Taxi-cab me ic
3 1 1
4 2 1
5 2 2
6 3 2
7 3 2
Table 1
Some alues o (n) wi h he axi-cab me ic
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
(3) = (4) = 1 (5) = ... = (9) = 3
Now we a e going o es ima e p ecisely (n).
Lemma 1 Conside ing he axi-cab me ic
(n)≤ ⌈√n⌉−1
PROOF. Le Lbe he la ice gene a ed by he
ec o s (1,1) and (1,-1). Le pbe an in ege numbe
and le Kpbe he poin se de e mined by Kp=
L∩h(0,0),(p−1,−(p−1)),(2(p−1),0),(p−1, p−
1)i.
Conside K⌈√n⌉. This se con ains a leas n
poin s since ⌈√n⌉ · ⌈√n⌉ ≥ √n·√n=n, so we
can always choose npoin s in K⌈√n⌉. As he poin s
in K⌈√n⌉de e mine ⌈√n⌉ − 1 di e en dis ances
among hem, (n)≤ ⌈√n⌉−1

This es ima e is no only an uppe bound bu a
p ecise de e mina ion o he minimum numbe o
dis inc dis ances:
Lemma 2 Conside ing he axi-cab me ic
(n)≥ ⌈√n⌉−1
PROOF. We a e going o gi e a ske ch o he
p oo :
We conside he “me ic ci cum e ences”, which
in ou case a e squa e-shaped, as he locus o he
poin s ha a e a dis ance om a poin p∈R2:
S(p, ) = {x∈R2:dT(p, x) = }
Now we a e going o loca e he maximum num-
be o poin s who de ine a mos mdis ances among
Ma ch 25-26, 2004 Se ille (Spain)
hem. As we a e always dealing wi h a ini e num-
be o poin s, he e would be a leas wo poin s
a,bsuch ha he dis ance be ween hem is he
maximum possible. All he o he s poin s should
be loca ed in he in e sec ion o m“me ic ci -
cum e ences” cen e ed a aand m“me ic ci cum-
e ences” cen e ed a b. I we do no wan o in-
c ease he numbe o di e en dis ances, he adius
o hese “me ic ci cum e ences” a e {id(a,b)
m}m
i=1.
The e a e wo possible si ua ions:
i) All he “me ics ci cum e ences” in e sec
p ope ly. In his case as hey ha e he pseudodisc
p ope y ( he e a e a mos wo p ope in e sec-
ions o each pai o pseudodiscs), hen we ob ain
ha he maximum numbe o possible poin s is
gi en by (m+ 1)2and hey a e dis ibu ed in a
ansla ed o he squa e Km+1. F om his con ig-
u a ion we ob ain ou lowe bound.
ii) The e a e some pai s o “me ic ci cum e -
ences” ha do no in e sec p ope ly bu a e an-
gen . In his case hey a e angen along a s aigh
line segmen . Conside ing he ends o his s aigh
line segmen and aking he “me ic ci cum e -
ences” cen e ed a hese ends we conclude ha
he e a e no mo e han (m+1)2possible loca ions.
So we also each he same lowe es ima e.

I is easy o see ha he a gumen in he p oo
o lemma 2 holds o all me ics gene a ed by he
gauge unc ion o a cen ally symme ic, con ex
se ; as he equali y sign is a ained in he case ha
he body which gene a es he me ic is a squa e,
we can conclude he ollowing co olla y:
Co olla y 3 Among all me ics gene a ed by a
closed, cen ally symme ic, con ex se K, he me -
ics ha gi e he smalles alues o (n)a e hose
in which he me ic is gene a ed by he gauge unc-
ion co esponding o a squa e.
Fo ins ance he axi-cab me ic o he maximum
me ic de ined as
d((x1, y1)(x2, y2)) = max{|x2−x1|,|y2−y1|}
Co olla y 3 does no hold o gene al me ics. Fo
example, le us conside he so called pos o ice
me ic
d((x1, y1)(x2, y2)) = d2((x1, y1),(0,0))
+d2((0,0),(x2, y2))
whe e d2s ands o he euclidean dis ance in he
plane. In his case i is easy o see ha we can
a ange in ini e poin s so ha each pai o hem is
a dis ance one; so (n) = 1 o all n.
(0,0)
3. The minimum numbe o dis inc
dis ances p oblem wi h he euclidean
dis ance in he in ege la ice
I we conside E d¨os p oblem es ic ed o he
in ege la ice we ob ained di e en alues o (n)
as he ollowing able shows:
(n) Plane In ege la ice
3 1 2
4 2 2
5 2 3
6 3 4
7 3 4
Table 2
Some alues o (n) in he in ege la ice
In gene al, we ha e he ollowing uppe bound:
Lemma 4 In he in ege la ice
(n)≤(⌈√n⌉−2)(⌈√n⌉+ 1)
2
PROOF. Le Lbe he in ege la ice and le
Pnbe he poin se Pn=L∩ h(0,0),(0,⌈√n⌉ −
1),(⌈√n⌉ − 1,0),(⌈√n⌉ − 1,⌈√n⌉ − 1)i.Pncon-
ains a leas npoin s.We can compu e he numbe
o dis inc dis ances by conside ing only he dis-
ances be ween (0,0) and he he es o he poin s
below he diagonal o he squa e. Then we ha e a
mos 2 + 3 + ... + (⌈√n⌉ − 1) dis inc dis ances,
20 h Eu opean Wo kshop on Compu a ional Geome y
ha is he sum o he e ms o an a i hme ic p o-
g ession, so (n)≥2 + 3 + ... + (⌈√n⌉ − 1) =
⌈√n⌉(⌈√n⌉−1)
2−1 = (⌈√n⌉−2)(⌈√n⌉+1)
2
(0,0)

The alues o (n) i we es ic o he in ege
la ice a e he same ha i we es ic o he poin s
wi h a ional coo dina es because a ini e numbe
o poin s wi h a ional coo dina es a e included in
an in ege la ice gene a ed by he ec o s (q, 0)
,(0, q) whe e qis he leas common denomina o o
he coo dina es o he poin s ha we a e conside -
ing.
This es ima e o (n) can be applied o com-
pu e s, because he compu e sc een can be ep e-
sen ed as a ini e numbe o poin s wi h a ional
coo dina es.
4. E d¨os p oblem o o he opological
spaces
The i s ma hema icians o conside his p ob-
lem in o he opological spaces we e E d¨os, Hick-
e son and Pach ([6]) who s udied he case o he
sphe e.
We a e going o conside wo o he pa icula
opological su aces: he cylinde and he la o us.
As we can see in able 3, o small alues o nwe
ob ain he same alues o (n) in bo h opological
su aces, bu his do no occu o g ea e alues
o n.
(n) Plane Cylinde Fla o us
3 1 1 1
4 2 1 1
5 2 2 2
6 3 2 2
Table 3
Some alues o (n) in di e en opological su aces
Now, we can gi e uppe bounds o bo h opo-
logical su aces.
Lemma 5 In he la o us
(n)≤(⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋+ 2)(⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋−1)
2
Lemma 6 In he cylinde
(n)≤(⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋+ 2)(⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋−1)
2
+(⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋)(⌈√n⌉−⌊⌈√n⌉/2 + 1⌋)
We omi he p oo s because hey a e simila o
he p oo o lemma 3. We ha e o conside a pa -
icula la ice and in e sec i wi h he opological
su aces, as he igu e shows. Then, by some a i h-
me ic compu a ions, we ob ain he bounds.
Fla To us Cylinde
Re e ences
[1] B aß, P.: On he maximum numbe o uni dis ances
among npoin s in dimension ou , In ui i e geome y
(Budapes , 1995), 277–290, Bolyai Soc. Ma h. S ud., 6,
J´anos Bolyai Ma h. Soc., Budapes , 1997.
[2] Chung, F. R. K., Szeme di, E. and T o e , W. T.:
The numbe o di e en dis ances de e mined by a
se o poin s in he Euclidean plane, Disc e e Comp.
Geome y 7(1992), 1–11.
[3] Cla kson, K., Edelsb unne , H., Guibas, L., Sha i ,
M. and Welzl, E.:Combina o ial complexi y bounds o
a angemen s o cu es and sphe es, Disc e e Comp.
Geome y 5(1990), 90–160.
[4] E d¨os, P.: On se s o dis ances o npoin s, Ame . Ma h.
Mon hly 53 (1946), 248–250.
[5] E d¨os, P.:On se s o dis ances o npoin s in Euclidean
space, Magya Tudom´anyos Akad´emia M´a ema ikai
Ku a ´o In ´eze K¨ozlem´enyei 7(1960), 165–169.
[6] E d¨os, P. , Hicke son, D. and Pach J.: A p oblem o Leo
Mose abou epea ed dis ances on he sphe e, Ame .
Ma h. Mon hly 96 (1989), 569–575.
[7] Guggenheime , H. W.: Applicable geome y, Robe E.
K iege Publishing Co., Inc. , Hun ing on, New Yo k,
1977.