Biochem. J. (2002) 367, 491–497 (P in ed in G ea B i ain) 491
Cloning o hio edoxin h educ ase and cha ac e iza ion o he hio edoxin
educ ase– hio edoxin hsys em om whea
An onio J. SERRATO, Juan M. PE
;
REZ-RUIZ and F ancisco J. CEJUDO1
Ins i u o de Bioquı!mica Vege al y Fo osı!n esis, Cen o de In es igaciones Cien ı! icas Isla de la Ca uja, A da Ame
! ico Vespucio s/n, 41092 Se illa, Spain
Thio edoxins ha e ubiqui ous p o eins educed by NADPH–
hio edoxin educ ase (NTR). They a e able o educe disulphides
in a ge p o eins. In monoco s, hio edoxins haccumula e a
high le el in seeds and show a p edominan localiza ion in he
nucleus o seed cells. These esul s sugges ha he NTR–
hio edoxin hsys em p obably plays an impo an ole in seed
physiology. To da e, he s udy o his sys em in monoco s is
limi ed by he lack o in o ma ion abou NTR. In he p esen
s udy, we desc ibe he cloning o a ull-leng h cDNA encoding
NTR om whea (T i icum aes ium). The polypep ide deduced
om his cDNA shows close simila i y o NTRs om
A abidopsis, con ains FAD- and NADPH-binding domains and
a disulphide p obably in e ac ing wi h he disulphide a he
ac i e si e o hio edoxin h. Whea NTR was exp essed in
Esche ichia coli as a His- agged p o ein. The abso p ion spec um
o he pu i ied ecombinan p o ein is ypical o la oenzymes.
Fu he mo e, i showed NADPH-dependen hio edoxin h e-
INTRODUCTION
Thio edoxins a e ubiqui ous p o eins wi h molecula mass o
12–13 kDa, which a e ound in bac e ia, unicellula euka yo es,
and plan and animal cells. These p o eins ha e a conse ed
ac i e si e, WCGPC, con aining a edox disulphide b idge [1].
Thio edoxins a e able o educe speci ic disulphide b idges in
a ge p o eins, hence egula ing he ac i i y o hese p o eins.
Th ee hio edoxin ypes ha e been desc ibed in plan s [2]. Two o
hem, hio edoxins mand , encoded by nuclea genes, a e
loca ed in he chlo oplas and a e educed by e edoxin hio-
edoxin educ ase using pho osyn he ic educing powe . These
hio edoxins educe speci ic disulphide b idges and, in his way,
egula e he ac i i y o enzymes o he Cal in cycle. The e o e
hio edoxins play an essen ial ole in he con ol o pho osyn he ic
ca bon me abolism [3]. The hi d ype, hio edoxin h, is ound in
he cell cy oplasm o mos plan o gans. Reduc ion o hio edoxin
hdepends on NADPH and is ca alysed by NADPH– hio e-
doxin educ ase (NTR) [2,4]. In he las ew yea s, hio edoxin h
sys ems speci ic o mi ochond ia ha e been iden i ied in yeas [5],
mammal cells [6,7] and A abidopsis haliana [8].
NTR is a la oenzyme ha ca alyses he ans e o elec ons
om NADPH, ia FAD and a edox-ac i e disulphide, o he
disulphide b idge o hio edoxins h. Like hio edoxins h, NTR is
widely dis ibu ed in p oka yo ic and euka yo ic cells; howe e ,
wo g oups o NTR ha e e ol ed wi h di e en molecula and
kine ic cha ac e is ics [4]. P oka yo es ha e a lowe -molecula -
Abb e ia ions used: DTNB, 5,5h-di hiobis-(2-ni obenzoic acid); IPTG, isop opyl β-D- hiogalac oside; NTR, NADPH– hio edoxin educ ase; TRXh,
hio edoxin h.
1To whom co espondence should be add essed (e-mail jcejudo!us.es).
duc ion ac i i y, hus con i ming ha he cDNA clone epo ed
in he p esen s udy encodes whea NTR. Using he His- agged
NTR and TRXhA (whea hio edoxin h), we success ully econ-
s i u ed he whea NTR– hio edoxin hsys em in i o, as shown
by he insulin educ ion assay. A polyclonal an ibody was aised
agains whea NTR a e immuniza ion o abbi s wi h he
pu i ied His- agged p o ein. This an ibody e icien ly de ec ed a
single polypep ide o he co esponding molecula mass in seed
ex ac s and i allowed he analysis o he pa e n o accumula ion
o NTR in di e en whea o gans and de elopmen al s ages.
NTR shows a wide dis ibu ion in whea , bu , su p isingly, i s
accumula ion in seeds is low, in con as wi h he le el o
hio edoxins h.
Key wo ds: Esche ichia coli, ge mina ion, hio edoxin mu an ,
T i icum.
mass NTR, which consis s o wo iden ical subuni s (app ox.
35 kDa) o ming a homodime in i s na i e o m. The c ys al
s uc u e o NTR om Esche ichia coli con ains h ee delin-
ea ed domains in each o he subuni s, he FAD, NADPH and
cen al domain [9]. In he con e sion in o he educed o m, he
NADPH domain o a es wi h espec o he FAD domain [10].
In con as , NTR om mammal cells consis s o a homodime
o subuni s wi h a la ge molecula mass (app ox. 55 kDa).
The human enzyme con ains he unusual selenocys eine as he
penul ima e esidue a he C- e minus [11,12], which is ac i e in
he ca alysis [13].
A peculia ea u e o he hio edoxin hsys em in plan s is he
la ge numbe o genes encoding o hio edoxin h, a leas i e in
A abidopsis [14], which a e in ol ed in mul iple unc ions, as
shown by unc ional complemen a ion o yeas mu an s [15]. In
ce eals, hio edoxin his abundan in seeds. Since hio edoxin h
inac i a es inhibi o s o hyd oly ic enzymes [16] and ac i a es
se ine p o eases a ea ly s ages o ge mina ion [17], i has been
p oposed ha hey play an impo an ole as a signal o ce eal
seed ge mina ion. Fu he analysis o hio edoxins hin
ge mina ing and de eloping whea seeds e ealed hei accumu-
la ion in he nuclei o aleu one and scu ellum cells [18], sugges ing
he possibili y ha hese p o eins in e ac wi h nuclea ac o s, as
is he case in mammal and yeas cells [19,20]. The cu en
e idence poin s o he hypo hesis ha he hio edoxin hsys em
is an impo an componen o monoco seed biology. Howe e ,
he unde s anding o his sys em in seeds is limi ed, because no
#2002 Biochemical Socie y
492 A. J. Se a o, J. M. Pe
! ez-Ruiz and F. J. Cejudo
desc ip ion o ce eal NTR has been epo ed so a . To ou
knowledge, he only NTR cloned om plan s is om A. haliana
[21]. The c ys al s uc u e o his enzyme was es ablished, so ha
he e ia y s uc u e and kine ic pa ame e s a e known [22].
Howe e , no hing is known abou he pa e n o exp ession o
NTR in A abidopsis. We we e in e es ed in de e mining he
unc ion o he NTR– hio edoxin hsys em in ce eal seeds. Fo
ha pu pose, we ha e isola ed a ull-leng h cDNA clone om
whea encoding a deduced polypep ide wi h close simila i y o
NTR. The p o ein, exp essed in E.coli, is a la oenzyme show-
ing NTR ac i i y. In addi ion, we ha e aised a polyclonal an i-
body agains he whea enzyme, which was used o analyse he
pa e n o exp ession o NTR in whea plan s and seeds.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plan ma e ial
Whea (T i icum aes ium c . Chinese Sp ing) plan s we e g own
in a g eenhouse unde con olled condi ions on a mix u e o
pea e miculi e (3:1). De eloping seeds we e ha es ed a 18
days pos an hesis (18 d.p.a.), ozen in liquid ni ogen and
s o ed a k80 mC un il used. Ma u e seeds we e allowed o
ge mina e a oom empe a u e on il e pape soaked wi h wa e
unde s e ile condi ions o 4 days, and he aleu one laye ,
scu ellum and s a chy endospe m we e ca e ully dissec ed. Shoo s
and oo s o Wes e n-blo analysis we e dissec ed om 2–4-day-
old seedlings, and ma u e lea es om 7-week-old plan s. All
eagen s we e o analy ical g ade and we e pu chased om
Sigma.
Whea NTR cDNA cloning
A cDNA lib a y (app ox. 300000 plaque- o ming uni s) con-
s uc ed in λg 11 wi h polyadenyla ed [poly(A)+] RNA om
whea aleu one cells was sc eened wi h an i-NTR polyclonal
an ibodies aised agains he spinach enzyme (kindly p o ided by
D F. J. Flo encio) as desc ibed in [23]. The ou posi i e clones
ob ained we e pu i ied and he sizes o hei cDNA inse s we e
analysed. A e subcloning in pGEM ec o s (P omega), inse s
we e sequenced in bo h s ands. To ob ain he ull-leng h
sequence, he oligonucleo ide (5h-GACCGCGACTGCCACCG-
3h) was designed o pe o m apid ampli ica ion o cDNA ends
using he Ma a hon cDNA syn hesis ki (ClonTech) and o al
RNA om di e en whea issues. A ull-leng h cDNA was
ob ained, cloned in pGEM ec o and sequenced in bo h s ands
using he T7 Sequenase 2.0 DNA sequencing ki (USB, Cle eland,
OH, U.S.A.).
Exp ession o NTR in E. coli and p oduc ion o polyclonal
an ibodies
Whea NTR was exp essed in E.coli as a His- agged polypep ide.
To ha end, he coding sequence was ampli ied om he cDNA
using he oligonucleo ide 5h-GAGAGGATCCATGGAGGA-
GGCGGCCG-3h, which added a BamHI si e (unde lined) a
he pu a i e ini ial Me esidue, and he oligonucleo ide
5h-GAGAAAGCTTTAGTCAATCAGTCTTCCCTTCC-3h,
which added a HindIII si e (unde lined) a he 3h-end. The PCR
agmen was hen diges ed wi h BamHI and HindIII and
subcloned in pQE-30 exp ession ec o (QIAexp ess exp ession
sys em; Qiagen). The esul ing plasmid, e med pQE-TaN , was
in oduced in E.coli XL1-Blue, which was ou inely g own in he
p esence o 2%(w ) glucose o a oid exp ession o he whea
p o ein be o e induc ion. Exp ession o he ecombinan p o ein
was induced by incuba ion o ans o med E.coli XL1-Blue cells
o 3 h a 30 mC in glucose- ee Lu ia–Be ani medium supple-
men ed wi h 0.1 mM isop opyl β-- hiogalac oside (IPTG). The
o e exp essed p o ein was pu i ied by Cu#+a ini y ch oma o-
g aphy in p e-packed Hi-T ap a ini y columns (Pha macia,
Uppsala, Sweden) acco ding o he manu ac u e ’s ins uc ions.
Aliquo s o he pu i ied p o ein we e used o immunize abbi s
a he Se ice o Animal P oduc ion (Uni e si y o Se ille,
Spain). The immune se um was used o pu i y an i-NTR by
P o ein A ch oma og aphy be o e use. No signal was de ec ed
when Wes e n blo s we e p obed wi h he p e-immune se um.
Cons uc ion o hio edoxin hC53S (Cys53 Se ) mu an and i s
exp ession in E. coli
The Cys&$ esidue o hio edoxin hac i e si e was mu a ed o
se ine. Si e-di ec ed mu agenesis was pe o med by PCR using
he His- agged TRXhA cDNA as empla e [18]. Two oligo-
nucleo ides we e designed complemen a y o he sequence o be
mu a ed, namely C53S-A (5h-CATGGTGTGGACCATCCCG-
CATCATGGCTC-3h) and C53S-B (5h-GAGCCATGATGCG-
GGATGGTCCACACCATG-3h), including a single change
(unde lined), which esul ed in he eplacemen o he Cys&$
esidue by Se . The PCR (1 cycle a 94 mC o 1 min; 16 cycles a
94 mC o 30 s, a 55 mC o 1 min and a 68 mC o 14 min) was
pe o med wi h P u polyme ase (S a agene). The PCR p oduc
was hen diges ed wi h DpnI o 1 h a 37 mC o elimina e he
me hyla ed empla e DNA. This DNA was used o ans o m E.
coli XL1-Blue. The esul ing mu an cDNA was sequenced in
bo h s ands o check o he co ec in oduc ion o he mu a ion
and ha no addi ional mu a ions we e gene a ed du ing he
p ocess.
Wes e n-blo analysis
Plan issues we e ozen in liquid ni ogen and g ound wi h a
mo a and pes le. C ude ex ac s we e p epa ed om he g ound
issue wi h ex ac ion bu e [50 mM T is HCl (pH 7.9) 0.2 mM
EDTA 0.5 mM PMSF]. The homogenized mix u e was cen i-
uged o 20 min a 15000 g. The esul ing supe na an con-
s i u ed he cell- ee ex ac and was s o ed a k20 mC.
P o ein samples we e subjec ed o SDS PAGE (10%gel) as
epo ed in [24] and elec o ans e ed o a ni ocellulose shee .
The shee was hen soaked in 15 mM T is HCl (pH 7.4) con-
aining 0.2 M NaCl (bu e A) and 5%(w ) d y powde ed milk
a oom empe a u e o a leas 1 h. A e o e nigh incuba-
ion a 4 mC wi h P o ein A-pu i ied an i-NTR (dilu ed 1:1000
in bu e A), shee s we e washed ou imes o 15 min each wi h
bu e A con aining 0.1%( ) Tween 20. Shee s we e hen
incuba ed o 1 h in he same bu e con aining a ini y-pu i ied
goa an i-( abbi IgG) alkaline phospha ase conjuga e dilu ed o
1:30000. Memb anes we e subsequen ly washed in bu e A. The
eac ion was isualized by imme sion in a de eloping solu ion
[20 ml o 100 mM T is HCl (pH 9.5), 5 mM MgCl#, 100 mM
NaCl, 3 mg o 5-b omo-4-chlo o-3-indolyl phospha e and 6 mg
o Ni o Blue Te azolium].
NTR and hio edoxin ac i i y assays
NTR ac i i y was de e mined by he educ ion o 5,5h-di hiobis-
(2-ni obenzoic acid) (DTNB) by he me hod o Holmg en and
Bjo
$ ns ed [25]. NTR ac i i y was also assayed by i s abili y o
educe hio edoxin h, which educes insulin disulphides using he
u bidime ic assay me hod as desc ibed p e iously [18]. E.coli
hio edoxin was pu chased om Sigma.
#2002 Biochemical Socie y
493Thio edoxin educ ase om monoco s
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Isola ion o a cDNA clone encoding NTR om whea
A whea cDNA lib a y cons uc ed wi h poly(A)+RNA isola ed
om aleu one cells o 1-day-imbibed seeds was sc eened wi h
polyclonal an ibodies aised agains NTR om spinach lea es.
Fou posi i e clones we e ob ained and pu i ied. All o hem
con ained sho inse s, app ox. 300 bp, showing a high deg ee o
simila i y o he C- e minus o NTR om A. haliana [21]. To
ob ain he ull-leng h cDNA, an oligonucleo ide was designed
o pe o m apid ampli ica ion o cDNA ends using RNA isola ed
om di e en whea seedling issues as empla e. A 1045 bp
cDNA clone was ob ained om oo RNA (EMBL Nucleo ide
Sequence Da abase accession no. AJ421947). This cDNA con-
ained a single open eading ame encoding a deduced poly-
pep ide o 331 esidues, wi h an expec ed molecula mass o
34.903 kDa and pI 5.79.
The sequence o he deduced polypep ide and he alignmen
wi h o he NTR sequences is shown in Figu e 1. The whea
enzyme shows he highes le el o simila i y o NTRs om
A abidopsis. I con ains a pu a i e FAD-binding domain o med
by wo mo i s (ma ked wi h * in Figu e 1): he mo i GxGxxA
( esidues 17–22, whea numbe ing), a he N- e minal egion o
he p o ein, and he mo i TxxxxVFAAGD ( esidues 283–293)
a he C- e minus. These wo mo i s o ming he FAD-binding
domain a e conse ed in NTR om plan s and unicellula
euka yo es. Howe e , he mo i GxGxxA is eplaced by GxGxxG
in he E.coli enzyme (Figu e 1). An NADPH-binding domain
(GxGxxA, esidues 164–169) was also ound in he whea NTR
(indica ed by a owheads in Figu e 1), which is conse ed in all
he NTRs compa ed he e. Finally, he ac i e si e o he whea
NTR (ma ked wi h a box in Figu e 1) con ains a disulphide b idge
( esidues 145 and 148, whea numbe ing) po en ially in e ac ing
wi h he hio edoxin hac i e si e WCGPC [18]. The NTR ac i e
si e p esen s a pe ec ma ch when compa ed wi h he mo e
closely ela ed NTRs, bu he whea enzyme shows a peculia i y,
he conse a i e change o Th ( esidue 143), which is eplaced
by he Se esidue in NTR om he o he sou ces (Figu e 1). In
he A abidopsis enzyme, his Se esidue and Asp"$* (A abidopsis
numbe ing) bind ia a wa e molecule o N-5 o he isoalloxazine
ing [22]. I is no expec ed ha he Th esidue a ha posi ion
in he whea enzyme will ha e any signi ican e ec on NTR
ac i i y. In summa y, he p o ein deduced om he cDNA
desc ibed in his epo con ains he cha ac e is ics o bac e ial
and plan NTRs.
A phylogene ic ee was cons uc ed compa ing NTR
sequences om di e en sou ces (Figu e 2). The whea enzyme
appea s g ouped wi h wo NTRs om A abidopsis ( e med A.
haliana A and B espec i ely) in a b anch including NTRs om
unicellula euka yo es. The hi d pu a i e NTR iden i ied in he
A abidopsis genome ( e med A. haliana C), al hough g ouped
wi h hese NTRs, shows a weake ela ionship. The e o e he
phylogene ic analysis e eals a close ela ionship o dico and
monoco NTRs and a weak ela ionship wi h mammal NTRs. O
he wo g oups o NTR ha ha e e ol ed [4], i is clea ha he
plan and lowe euka yo es belong o he bac e ial- ype g oup.
Exp ession o whea NTR in E. coli and cha ac e iza ion o he
ecombinan p o ein
To ob ain de ini i e e idence ha he whea cDNA epo ed he e
encodes o an enzyme wi h NTR ac i i y, he coding sequence
was subcloned in pQE-30 exp ession ec o , gene a ing he
plasmid pQE-TaN , so ha whea NTR was p oduced as a N-
e minus His- agged polypep ide. This app oach was chosen o
acili a e he pu i ica ion o he ecombinan whea NTR,
a oiding possible con amina ion wi h he E.coli enzyme, which
shows simila ea u es and migh be co-pu i ied wi h he whea
enzyme. E.coli XL1-Blue was ans o med wi h plasmid pQE-
TaN and wi h pQE-30 ec o as con ol. SDS PAGE analysis
o soluble p o eins ex ac ed om E.coli (pQE-TaN ) ha had
been induced wi h IPTG shows he o e exp ession o a poly-
pep ide wi h he expec ed molecula mass o 36.4 kDa, including
he His ag (Figu e 3A, lane 2), which was no p esen in E.coli
cells ans o med wi h he exp ession ec o wi hou inse
(Figu e 3A, lane 1). Abou hal o he exp essed p o ein was
ound in he pelle ( esul s no shown), indica ing ha pa o his
p o ein is p obably o ming inclusion bodies. Since he soluble
supe na an con ained a signi ican amoun o he whea enzyme,
we used his soluble ex ac as he s a ing ma e ial o pu i y he
His- agged NTR by Cu#+a ini y ch oma og aphy. This p o-
cedu e yielded a highly pu i ied enzyme, based on SDS PAGE
analysis (Figu e 3A, lane 3). In spi e o losing pa o he enzyme
in inclusion bodies, he o e all yield o his p ocess was 1.6 mg l
o cul u e. To es whe he he whea NTR is an FAD enzyme,
as sugges ed by he sequence compa ison, we pe o med an
abso p ion spec um o he pu i ied p o ein (Figu e 3B). The
spec um is ypical o la op o eins showing cha ac e is ic ab-
so p ion maxima a 270, 378 and 454 nm, clea ly showing ha
he exp essed p o ein is a la oenzyme.
To con i m ha his la oenzyme co esponded o whea
NTR, we es ed i s abili y o educe whea hio edoxin hini o.
Fo ha pu pose, we used he u bidime ic insulin p ecipi a ion
assay [25]. Whea hio edoxin h(pu i ied His- agged TRXhA
[18]) was able o educe insulin, p o ided ha NTR and NADPH
we e p esen in he eac ion mix u e (Figu e 4). The eloci y o
he eac ion, as shown by he inc ease in A'&!, was dependen
on he concen a ion o NTR a sa u a ing concen a ions o
TRXhA and NADPH and did no occu in he absence o ei he
NTR o NADPH. The e o e, hese esul s con i m ha he
cloned cDNA encodes o whea NTR, a la oenzyme, which
e icien ly educes whea hio edoxin husing NADPH as elec on
dono . Fu he mo e, hese esul s show ha he whea NTR–
hio edoxin hsys em is e icien ly econs i u ed in i o using
pu i ied His- agged componen s. Fu he e idence ha he whea
NTR– hio edoxin his unc ional in i o was ob ained by he
cons uc ion o he hio edoxin hmu an C53S, in which he Cys
esidue (Cys&$) o he whea TRXhA ac i e si e was mu a ed o
he Se esidue. This mu a ion comple ely abolished he
unc ionali y o he sys em, as obse ed when he wild- ype
hio edoxin hwas eplaced by C53S mu an polypep ide in he
insulin educ ion assay (Figu e 5).
Kine ic pa ame e s o whea NTR
To de e mine he Km o NADPH and NADH, we used he
DTNB educ ion assay [25]. Al hough whea NTR was able o
use NADH, he Kmo he enzyme o NADPH is h ee o de s o
magni ude lowe (Table 1). Since NTR showed a simila Vmax
wi h bo h NADPH and NADH (Table 1), we conclude ha , as
expec ed, he in ioelec on dono o whea NTR is mos
p obably NADPH.
The u bidime ic insulin p ecipi a ion assay e ealed ha he
Km alue o whea NTR o whea hio edoxin hwas 7.6 µM
(Table 1), which is highe han 1 µM p e iously epo ed o he
A abidopsis enzyme [21]. Sequence simila i y and he in i o
cha ac e iza ion o he NTR– hio edoxin hsys em allow us o
p opose a eac ion mechanism simila o hose p e iously de-
sc ibed o E.coli and A abidopsis sys ems [22]. Acco ding o his
model, i should be expec ed ha whea NTR is able o in e ac
#2002 Biochemical Socie y
494 A. J. Se a o, J. M. Pe
! ez-Ruiz and F. J. Cejudo
Figu e 1 Mul iple alignmen o hio edoxin educ ase om di e en sou ces
The p o ein sequence deduced om he whea cDNA (Ta; accession no. AJ421947) was aligned wi h closely simila NTR sequences sea ched in EMBL and SWISSPROT da abases using he
p og am BioEdi sequence alignmen edi o [30]. The accession numbe s a e: A. haliana, A NTRA (AAB86519), A NTRB (CAB54874), A NTRC (AAB84351); Schizosaccha omyces pombe, Schp
(CAA17692); Saccha omyces ce e isiae, Sce 1 (P29509), Sce 2 (AAA64747.1); Neu ospo a c assa, Neuc (P51978); mi ochond ial NTR om S. ce e isiae, mi Sce (P38816); Pencillium
ch ysogenum, Pench (P43496) and E. coli (P09625). The FAD-binding domain is indica ed by * and he NADPH-binding domain by >, and he Cys esidues a he ac i e si e ma ked wi h
a box a e in bold ace.
#2002 Biochemical Socie y
495Thio edoxin educ ase om monoco s
Figu e 2 The phylogene ic ee o NTRs om di e en sou ces
The phylogene ic ee was cons uc ed using he p og am CLUSTALW (www.ebi.ac.uk/clus alw/),
wi h NTR sequences sea ched in EMBL and SWISSPROT da abases. The accession numbe s
a e: A. haliana (A, AAB86519; B, CAB54874; C, AAB84351); S. pombe (CAA17692); S.
ce e isiae (1, P29509; 2, AAA64747.1; mi ochond ial, P38816); N. c assa (P51978); P.
ch ysogenum (P43496); Zymomonas mobilis (AF124757); Haemophilus in luenzae (P43788);
Ye sinia pes is (NPI404967); E. coli (P09625); Neisse ia meningi idis (NPI284253); Bacillus
sub ilis (NPI391359); The mo oga ma i ima (NPI228678); S ep ococcus mu ans (JC2311);
The moplasma olcanium (NPI110989); Plasmodium alcipa um (CAA60574); Mus musculus
(AAH13688); Homo sapiens (1, XPI049211; 2, AAH07489; 3, S66677; 4, NPI006431).
and educe E.coli hio edoxin. The esul s p esen ed in Table 1
show ha his is he case; howe e , whea NTR shows a poo
eac i i y wi h he bac e ial enzyme, as e ealed by he highe Km
(36 µM) and lowe Vmax. The esul s epo ed he e o he whea
NTR a e in ag eemen wi h p e iously epo ed da a o he
A abidopsis enzyme [21], con i ming ha , in spi e o he s uc u al
ela ionship be ween plan and E.coli NTRs, he plan enzyme
shows a poo eac i i y wi h bac e ial hio edoxin. These esul s
u he suppo he close ela ionship o A abidopsis and whea
NTR.
Exp ession pa e n o NTR in whea
To analyse he pa e n o accumula ion o NTR in di e en
whea issues and de elopmen al s ages, an an ibody was aised
agains whea NTR. This an ibody e icien ly de ec ed amoun s
as low as 2 ng o he pu i ied His- agged enzyme in Wes e n-blo
analysis (Figu e 6A). In p o ein ex ac s om ma u e whea
seeds, he an ibody de ec ed a single polypep ide wi h he
expec ed molecula mass o 35 kDa (Figu e 6A). I should be
no ed ha he sligh ly di e en elec opho e ic mobili y is due o
he His ag o he ecombinan enzyme. Acco ding o he in ensi y
o he band de ec ed in he Wes e n-blo analysis, we could
es ima e a con en o app ox. 1–2 ng µg o p o ein ex ac s om
ma u e whea seeds.
The Wes e n-blo analysis o he same amoun o p o ein
ex ac s om di e en issues shows a high accumula ion o
Figu e 3 Pu i ica ion and abso p ion spec um o whea His- agged NTR
p oduced in E. coli
(A) Analysis o an SDS/PAGE gel s ained wi h Coomassie B illian Blue R-250 ha was loaded
wi h he supe na an o ex ac s (20 µg o p o ein) om pQE-30 wi hou inse (lane 1), o pQE-
TaN (lane 2) a e IPTG induc ion. Lane 3, pu i ied His- agged TaNTR (1 µg o p o ein) a e
Cu2+a ini y ch oma og aphy. (B) Abso p ion spec um o he pu i ied His- agged TaNTR. The
spec um was eco ded using a 5 µM NTR solu ion in 100 mM K-phospha e bu e (pH 7.0)
a oom empe a u e.
Figu e 4 Insulin educ ion assay o he whea NTR– hio edoxin hsys em
The incuba ion mix u e con ained he indica ed concen a ion o NTR, 3 µM His- agged TRXhA,
0.5 mg/ml insulin, 150 mM NADPH, 2 mM EDTA and 100 mM po assium phospha e bu e
(pH 7.0). The basal line was also ob ained when NADPH was omi ed om he eac ion
mix u e.
#2002 Biochemical Socie y

496 A. J. Se a o, J. M. Pe
! ez-Ruiz and F. J. Cejudo
Figu e 5 E ec o eplacemen o he wild- ype hio edoxin hby he C53S
mu an on he ac i i y o he NTR– hio edoxin hsys em
Assays we e pe o med in 100 mM po assium phospha e bu e (pH 7.0) con aining 50 nM
NTR, 150 mM NADPH, 0.5 mg/ml insulin, 2 mM EDTA and 3 µM o ei he wild- ype o
mu an C53S hio edoxin h, as indica ed.
Table 1 Kine ic pa ame e s o whea NTR
Whea hio edoxin hco esponds o His- agged TRXhA and was pu i ied as desc ibed in [18].
E. coli hio edoxin was pu chased om Sigma. The Kmand Vmax alues o hio edoxin we e
de e mined using he insulin educ ion assay. The Kmand Vmax alues o NADPH and NADH
we e de e mined using he DTNB assay.
Subs a e Km
Vmax
(µmol :min−1:mg o p o ein−1)
NADPH 0.4 µM 1.43
NADH 0.6 mM 1.38
Thio edoxin h7.6 µM 1.43
Thio edoxin (E. coli )36µM 0.42
NTR in ege a i e issues, in shoo s and oo s om 2–4-day-old
seedlings, and in lea es om ma u e plan s (Figu e 6B). The
con en o NTR was lowe in seeds, ei he in ma u e seeds (MS
in Figu e 6B) o in de eloping seeds ha es ed a 18 d.p.a.
(DS in Figu e 6B). An ea lie epo has desc ibed a ela i ely
in a iable con en o NTR in he endospe m o whea g ains
a e ge mina ion [26]. We ha e analysed he con en o NTR in
he di e en issues o ge mina ing seeds; o ha pu pose, he
aleu one laye , scu ellum and s a chy endospe m om seeds up
o 4 days o imbibi ion we e ca e ully dissec ed. Figu e 6(C)
shows a highe con en o NTR in he scu ellum, which sligh ly
inc eased du ing he ime a e imbibi ion. The aleu one cells
con ained a lowe con en o NTR, which simila ly inc eased
a e ge mina ion (Figu e 6C). Su p isingly, he an ibody
de ec ed wo bands in p o ein ex ac s om he s a chy endo-
spe m. The band co esponding o he 35 kDa subuni showed
a sligh dec ease, p obably due o he p o eoly ic ac i i y in he
s a chy endospe m du ing he ime a e imbibi ion [27]. I is no
clea whe he he uppe band de ec ed by hese an ibodies is
ac ually NTR. This polypep ide shows a clea inc ease in s a chy
endospe m ex ac s om seeds a e 2 days o imbibi ion, which
hen p og essi ely disappea ed (Figu e 6C). Since his poly-
pep ide was no de ec ed in ex ac s om aleu one o scu ellum
cells, i is unlikely ha i is syn hesized and sec e ed om hese
issues. I is equally unlikely ha i is syn hesized in he s a chy
endospe m, which is a dead issue in seeds a e ge mina ion [28].
Figu e 6 Wes e n-blo analysis o NTR accumula ion in whea
(A) P o ein ex ac s (15 µg) om ma u e whea seeds and inc easing amoun s (2, 10 and
50 ng) o he pu i ied His- agged TaNTR. (B) An equal amoun o ex ac s (15 µg o p o ein)
om de eloping seeds a 18 d.p.a. (DS), ma u e seeds (MS), oo s and shoo s om 2–4-day-
old seedlings, o lea es (L) om 7-week-old plan s. Molecula -mass ma ke s a e shown on he
le -hand side. (C) P o ein ex ac s (15 µg) om scu ellum, aleu one laye o s a chy endospe m
dissec ed om seeds a e 1–4 days o imbibi ion we e subjec ed o SDS/PAGE, elec o-
ans e ed on o ni ocellulose shee s and p obed wi h whea an i-NTR an ibodies.
The e o e his band may co espond o non-speci ic de ec ion by
he an ibodies in ex ac s om he s a chy endospe m o he
union o NTR wi h ano he p o ein in he p ocess o deg ada ion.
The p esence o se e al NTR genes in plan s is no su p ising.
In A abidopsis, a leas h ee di e en genes encode pu a i e
NTRs (Figu e 1). One o hem, e e ed o as A NTRB in Figu e
1 (accession no. CAB54874), p e iously epo ed by Jacquo e
al. [21], encodes o a p o ein o 35 kDa and shows a close
simila i y (76%) o he whea NTR epo ed he e. A second one,
e e ed o as A NTRA in Figu e 1 (accession no. AAB86519),
encodes o a mi ochond ial NTR [8] and, he e o e, is p obably
no de ec ed in ou Wes e n-blo analysis. Finally, a hi d gene
encoding a pu a i e NTR, e e ed o as A NTRC in Figu e 1,
was iden i ied in A abidopsis (accession no. AAB84351). As
shown by he phylogene ic analysis, his gene shows a lowe le el
o simila i y (52%) and encodes a p o ein wi h a deduced
molecula mass o 58.3 kDa. I he monoco s con ain a simila
NTR gene, ei he i is no exp essed in whea o i has no been
de ec ed by he an ibody used in he p esen s udy.
In e es ingly, he Wes e n-blo analysis o he accumula ion o
NTR shows a wide dis ibu ion o his enzyme in mos whea
issues as i occu s in hio edoxin h. Al hough i is ema kable
ha he e is a low con en o NTR in seeds, whe e hio edoxins
haccumula e a high le el [18], NTR accumula es in scu ellum
and aleu one cells o seeds a e ge mina ion, in ag eemen wi h
he inc ease in hio edoxins hin hese impo an issues o he
ge mina ing seeds [18]. These esul s sugges an impo an ole o
he NTR– hio edoxin hsys em o he success o ge mina ion.
To da e, h ee hio edoxins hha e been desc ibed in whea
#2002 Biochemical Socie y
497Thio edoxin educ ase om monoco s
[18,29], bu i is likely ha mo e hio edoxins ha e p esen . To
unde s and ully he ole o he NTR– hio edoxin hsys em in
seeds o ce eals, i is necessa y o de e mine whe he hey show
any speci ici y o exp ession in he di e en o gans and also o
es he eac i i y o each o hese hio edoxins hwi h NTR.
This wo k was suppo ed by g an no. BMC2001-2366 om Minis e io de Ciencia
y Tecnologı!a, Spain and g an no. CVI-182 om Jun a de Andalucı!a, Spain. We hank
Rocı!o Rod ı!guez o help in he pu i ica ion o he ecombinan NTR and C53S
hio edoxin hmu an , D F. J. Flo encio o he gi o spinach an i-NTR an ibodies,
and D Ma ı!a T. Ruı!z o a c i ical eading o he manusc ip .
REFERENCES
1 Jacquo , J.-P., Lancelin, J.-M. and Meye , Y. (1997) Thio edoxins: s uc u e and
unc ion in plan cells. New Phy ol. 136, 543–570
2 Schu
$ mann, P. and Jacquo , J.-P. (2000) Plan hio edoxin sys ems e isi ed.
Annu. Re . Plan Physiol. Plan Mol. Biol. 51, 371–400
3 Buchanan, B. B. (1991) Regula ion o CO2assimila ion in oxygenic pho osyn hesis:
he e edoxin/ hio edoxin sys em. Pe spec i e on i s disco e y, p esen s a us and
u u e de elopmen . A ch. Biochem. Biophys. 288,1–9
4 Williams, C. H., A sco , L. D., Mu
$lle , S., Lennon, B. W., Ludwig, M. L., Wang,
P.-F., Veine, D. M., Becke , K. and Schi me , R. H. (2000) Thio edoxin educ ase.
Two modes o ca alysis ha e e ol ed. Eu . J. Biochem. 267, 6110–6117
5 Ped ajas, J. R., Kosmidou, E., Mi anda-Vizue e, A., Gus a sson, J.-A., W igh , A. P. H.
and Spy ou, G. (1999) Iden i ica ion and unc ional cha ac e iza ion o a no el
mi ochond ial hio edoxin sys em in Saccha omyces ce e isiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274,
6366–6373
6 Spy ou, G., Enma k, E., Mi anda-Vizue e, A. and Gus a sson, J.-A. (1997) Cloning and
exp ession o no el mammalian hio edoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2936–2941
7 Mi anda-Vizue e, A., Damdimopoulus, A. E., Ped ajas, J. R., Gus a sson, J. A. and
Spi ou, G. (1999) Human mi ochond ial hio edoxin educ ase cDNA cloning,
exp ession and genomic o ganiza ion. Eu . J. Biochem. 261, 405–412
8 Laloi, C., Rayapu an, N., Cha ie , Y., G ienenbe ge , J.-M., Bonna d, G. and Meye ,
Y. (2001) Iden i ica ion and cha ac e iza ion o a mi ochond ial hio edoxin sys em in
plan s. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14144–14149
9 Ku iyan, J., K ishna, T. S. R., Wong, L., Guen he , B., Pahle , A., Williams, J , C. H.
and Model, P. (1991) Con e gen e olu ion o simila unc ion in wo s uc u ally
di e gen enzymes. Na u e (London) 352, 172–174
10 Lennon, B. W., Williams, J , C. H. and Ludwig, M. L. (2000) Twis s in ca alysis:
al e na ing con o ma ions o Esche ichia coli hio edoxin educ ase. Science 289,
1190–1194
11 Tamu a, T. and S ad man, T. C. (1996) A new selenop o ein om human lung
adenoca cinoma cells: pu i ica ion, p ope ies, and hio edoxin educ ase ac i i y.
P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 1006–1011
12 Gladishe , V. N., Jeang, K. T. and S ad man, T. C. (1996) Selenocys eine iden i ied as
he penul ima e C- e minal esidue in human placen al gene. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 93, 6146–6151
Recei ed 15 Janua y 2002/8 July 2002; accep ed 9 July 2002
Published as BJ Immedia e Publica ion 8 July 2002, DOI 10.1042/BJ20020103
13 A sco , L. D., G ome , S., Schi me , R. H., Becke , K. and Williams, C. H. (1997) The
mechanism o hio edoxin educ ase om human placen a is simila o he
mechanisms o lipoamide dehyd ogenase and glu a hione educ ase and is dis inc
om he mechanism hio edoxin educ ase om Esche ichia coli. P oc. Na l. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 94, 3621–3626
14 Ri e a-Mad id, R., Mes es, D., Ma inho, P., Jacquo , J. P., Deco ignies, P., Miginiac-
Maslow, M. and Meye , Y. (1995) E idence o i e di e gen hio edoxin h
sequences in A abidopsis haliana. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 5620–5624
15 Mouaheb, N., Thomas, D., Ve doucq, L., Mon o , P. and Meye , Y. (1998) In i o
unc ional disc imina ion be ween plan hio edoxins by he e ologous exp ession in he
yeas Saccha omyces ce e isiae. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 3312–3317
16 Jiao, J., Yee, B. C., Wong, J. H., Kob ehel, K. and Buchanan, B. B. (1993)
Thio edoxin-linked changes in egula o y p ope ies o ba ley α-amylase/sub ilisin
inhibi o p o ein. Plan Physiol. Biochem. 31, 799–804
17 Besse, I., Wong, J. H., Kob ehel, K. and Buchanan, B. B. (1996) Thiocalsin: a
hio edoxin-linked, subs a e-speci ic p o ease dependen on calcium. P oc. Na l. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 93, 3169–3175
18 Se a o, A. J., C espo, J. L., Flo encio, F. J. and Cejudo, F. J. (2001) Cha ac e iza ion
o wo hio edoxins hwi h p edominan localiza ion in he nucleus o aleu one and
scu ellum cells o ge mina ng whea seeds. Plan Mol. Biol. 46, 361–371
19 Hi o a, K., Ma sui, M., Iwa a, S., Nishiyama, A., Mo i, K. and Yodoi, J. (1997) AP-1
ansc ip ional ac i i y is egula ed by a di ec associa ion be ween hio edoxin and
Re -1. P oc. Na l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 3633–3638
20 Izawa, S., Maeda, K., Sugiyama, K., Mano, J., Inoue, Y. and Kimu a, A. (1999)
Thio edoxin de iciency causes he cons i u i e ac i a ion o Yap1, an AP-1-like
ansc ip ion ac o in Saccha omyces ce e isiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28459–28464
21 Jacquo , J.-P., Ri e a-Mad id, R., Ma inho, P., Kolla o a, M., Le Ma echal, P.,
Miginiac-Maslow, M. and Meye , Y. (1994) A abidopsis haliana NADPH hio edoxin
educ ase cDNA cha ac e iza ion and exp ession o he ecombinan p o ein in
Esche ichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 1357–1363
22 Dai, S., Saa inen, M., Ramaswamy, S., Meye , Y., Jacquo , J.-P. and Eklund, H.
(1996) C ys al s uc u e o A abidopsis haliana NADPH dependen hio edoxin
educ ase a 2.5 A
H esolu ion. J. Mol. Biol. 264, 1044–1057
23 Samb ook, J., F i sch, E. F. and Mania is, T. (1989) Molecula Cloning: A Labo a o y
Manual, 2nd edn., Cold Sp ing Ha bo Labo a o y P ess, Cold Sp ing Ha bo , NY
24 Schagge , H. and on Jagow, G. (1987) T icine-sodium dodecyl sul a e-
polyac ylamide gel elec opho esis o he sepa a ion o p o eins in he ange om 1
o 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166, 368–379
25 Holmg en, A. and Bjo
$ ns ed , M. (1995) Thio edoxin and hio edoxin educ ase.
Me hods Enzymol. 252, 199–208
26 Lozano, R. M., Wong, J. H., Pe e s, A., Kob ehel, K. and Buchanan, B. B. (1996) New
e idence o a ole o hio edoxin hin ge mina ion and seedling de elopmen .
Plan a 200, 100–106
27 Domı!nguez, F. and Cejudo, F. J. (1995) Pa e n o endop o eolysis du ing whea seed
ge mina ion. Physiol. Plan . 95, 253–259
28 Young, T. E. and Gallie, D. R. (1999) Analysis o p og ammed cell dea h in whea
endospe m e eals di e ences in endospe m de elopmen be ween ce eals. Plan Mol.
Biol. 39, 915–926
29 Gau ie , M.-F., Lullien-Pelle in, V., de Lamo e-Gue
! y, F., Gui ao, A. and Joud ie , P.
(1998) Cha ac e iza ion o whea hio edoxin hcDNA and p oduc ion o an ac i e
T i icum aes i um p o ein in Esche ichia coli. Eu . J. Biochem. 252, 314–324
30 Hall, T. A. (1999) BioEdi : a use - iendly biological sequence alignmen edi o and
analysis p og am o Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Se . 41, 95–98
#2002 Biochemical Socie y