scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Effectiveness of a Transdiagnostic Guided Internet-Delivered Protocol for Emotional Disorders Versus Treatment as Usual in Specialized Care: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Anxiety disorders and depression (emotional disorders) are highly prevalent mental disorders. Extensive empirical evidence supports the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for the treatment of these disorders. However, there are still some barriers related to their dissemination and implementation, which make it difficult for patients to receive these treatments,especially in public health care settings where resources are limited. Recent advances in improving CBT dissemination encompass different perspectives. One is the transdiagnostic approach, which offers treatment protocols that can be used for a range of emotional disorders. Another approach is the use of the internet to reach a larger number of people who could benefit from CBT. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and acceptability of a transdiagnostic internet-delivered protocol(EmotionRegulation) with human and automated guidance in patients from public specialized mental health care settings. Methods: A 2-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to compare the effectiveness of EmotionRegulation with treatment as usual (TAU) in specialized mental health care. In all, 214 participants were randomly assigned to receive either EmotionRegulation (n=106) or TAU (n=108). Measurement assessments were conducted at pre- and postintervention and at a3-month follow-up. Results: The results revealed the superiority of EmotionRegulation over TAU on measures of depression (d=0.41), anxiety(d=0.35), and health-related quality of life (d=−0.45) at posttreatment, and these gains were maintained at the 3-month follow-up.Furthermore, the results for expectations and opinions showed that EmotionRegulation was well accepted by participants. Conclusions: EmotionRegulation was more effective than TAU for the treatment of emotional disorders in the Spanish publicmental health system. The implications of this RCT, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed. González-Robles, Alberto; Díaz-García, Amanda; García-Palacios, Azucena; Roca, Pablo; Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni; Botella, Cristina

Read accessible full text

Effectiveness of a Transdiagnostic Guided Internet-Delivered Protocol for Emotional Disorders Versus Treatment as Usual in Specialized Care: Randomized Controlled Trial

Author: González-Robles, Alberto; Ramos-Quiroga, Josep Antoni; García-Palacios, Azucena; Díaz-García, Amanda; Roca, Pablo; Botella, Cristina
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.2196/18220
Source: https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/101137/files/texto_completo.pdf
O iginal Pape
E ec i eness o a T ansdiagnos ic Guided In e ne -Deli e ed
P o ocol o Emo ional Diso de s Ve sus T ea men as Usual in
Specialized Ca e: Randomized Con olled T ial
Albe o González-Robles1, PhD; Amanda Díaz-Ga cía1, PhD; Azucena Ga cía-Palacios1,2, PhD; Pablo Roca3, MSc;
Josep An oni Ramos-Qui oga4,5,6,7, PhD; C is ina Bo ella1,2, PhD
1Depa men o Basic and Clinical Psychology, and Psychobiology, Uni e si a Jaume I, Cas ellón de la Plana, Spain
2CIBER Fisiopa ología Obesidad y Nu ición (CIBERObn), Ins i u o Ca los III, Mad id, Spain
3Depa men o Pe sonali y, Assessmen , and Clinical Psychology, Uni e sidad Complu ense de Mad id, Mad id, Spain
4Depa men o Psychia y, Hospi al Uni e si a i Vall d'Heb on, Ba celona, Spain
5G oup o Psychia y, Men al Heal h and Addic ions, Vall d'Heb on Resea ch Ins i u e (VHIR), Ba celona, Spain
6Biomedical Ne wo k Resea ch Cen e on Men al Heal h (CIBERSAM), Ba celona, Spain
7Depa men o Psychia y and Fo ensic Medicine, Uni e si a Au ònoma de Ba celona, Ba celona, Spain
Co esponding Au ho :
Albe o González-Robles, PhD
Depa men o Basic and Clinical Psychology, and Psychobiology
Uni e si a Jaume I
Sos Bayna A enue, Campus del Riu Sec
Resea ch II Building, Labpsi ec
Cas ellón de la Plana, 12071
Spain
Phone: 34 964387646 ex 7646
Email: [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac
Backg ound: Anxie y diso de s and dep ession (emo ional diso de s) a e highly p e alen men al diso de s. Ex ensi e empi ical
e idence suppo s he e icacy o cogni i e beha io al he apy (CBT) o he ea men o hese diso de s. Howe e , he e a e
s ill some ba ie s ela ed o hei dissemina ion and implemen a ion, which make i di icul o pa ien s o ecei e hese ea men s,
especially in public heal h ca e se ings whe e esou ces a e limi ed. Recen ad ances in imp o ing CBT dissemina ion encompass
di e en pe spec i es. One is he ansdiagnos ic app oach, which o e s ea men p o ocols ha can be used o a ange o
emo ional diso de s. Ano he app oach is he use o he in e ne o each a la ge numbe o people who could bene i om CBT.
Objec i e: This s udy aimed o analyze he e ec i eness and accep abili y o a ansdiagnos ic in e ne -deli e ed p o ocol
(Emo ionRegula ion) wi h human and au oma ed guidance in pa ien s om public specialized men al heal h ca e se ings.
Me hods: A 2-a med andomized con olled ial (RCT) was conduc ed o compa e he e ec i eness o Emo ionRegula ion
wi h ea men as usual (TAU) in specialized men al heal h ca e. In all, 214 pa icipan s we e andomly assigned o ecei e ei he
Emo ionRegula ion (n=106) o TAU (n=108). Measu emen assessmen s we e conduc ed a p e- and pos in e en ion and a a
3-mon h ollow-up.
Resul s: The esul s e ealed he supe io i y o Emo ionRegula ion o e TAU on measu es o dep ession (d=0.41), anxie y
(d=0.35), and heal h- ela ed quali y o li e (d=−0.45) a pos ea men , and hese gains we e main ained a he 3-mon h ollow-up.
Fu he mo e, he esul s o expec a ions and opinions showed ha Emo ionRegula ion was well accep ed by pa icipan s.
Conclusions: Emo ionRegula ion was mo e e ec i e han TAU o he ea men o emo ional diso de s in he Spanish public
men al heal h sys em. The implica ions o his RCT, limi a ions, and sugges ions o u u e esea ch a e discussed.
T ial Regis a ion: ClinicalT ials.go NCT02345668; h ps://clinical ials.go /c 2/show/NCT02345668
(J Med In e ne Res 2020;22(7):e18220) doi: 10.2196/18220
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 1h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
KEYWORDS
ansdiagnos ic; in e ne ; cogni i e beha io al he apy; emo ional diso de s; dep ession; anxie y; specialized ca e
In oduc ion
Diso de -Speci ic Cogni i e Beha io al The apy o
Emo ional Diso de s
Anxie y and dep essi e diso de s, also known as emo ional
diso de s (EDs) [1], ha e he highes p e alence a es among
psychological diso de s [2,3], and a e associa ed wi h subs an ial
cos s [4,5] and disabili y [6,7]. In he pas h ee decades,
esea ch e o s o dec ease he bu den o hese diso de s ha e
led o he de elopmen and e alua ion o cogni i e beha io al
ea men s in andomized con olled ials (RCTs) o each ED
(ie, diso de -speci ic p o ocols), such as dep ession [8,9] and
se e al anxie y diso de s, including gene alized anxie y diso de
(GAD) [10,11], panic diso de (PD) and ago aphobia (AG) [12],
social anxie y diso de (SAD) [13], and obsessi e compulsi e
diso de (OCD) [14].
Al hough he e is a la ge body o e idence showing he e icacy
and e ec i eness o diso de -speci ic cogni i e beha io al
he apy (CBT), in he pas 15 yea s, an inc easing numbe o
esea che s ha e ag eed ha he e a e some p oblems ha hinde
he op imal deploymen o hese ea men s. The main d awback
o diso de -speci ic ea men s s ems om he high como bidi y
a es obse ed among anxie y diso de s and be ween anxie y
diso de s and dep essi e diso de s, wi h como bidi y es ima es
o hese diso de s anging be ween 40% and 80% [15,16].
Thus, because diso de -speci ic ea men p o ocols ocus on
ea ing a speci ic diagnosis, he accompanying como bid
diso de s do no ecei e he apeu ic a en ion [17,18]. This
p oblem becomes clea e when we ake in o accoun esea ch
linking como bidi y o aspec s such as g ea e se e i y [3],
inc eased ch onici y a es [19], and a wo se clinical cou se [20].
Ano he p oblem wi h diso de -speci ic ea men s is ha
sub h eshold symp oms ha do no mee diagnos ic h esholds
o a pa icula diso de , bu migh be impo an o ea ,
no mally go un ea ed [17]. Simila ly, hese p o ocols do no
add ess diagnoses ha do no i any speci ic ca ego y, despi e
hei clinical ele ance, ha is, no o he wise speci ied (NOS)
anxie y and dep essi e diso de s [15]. Finally, each
diso de -speci ic ea men equi es he use o di e en
handbooks and p o ocols, which inc eases he economic cos s
and he amoun o aining needed o gain he knowledge and
skills necessa y o co e he a ay o anxie y and dep essi e
diso de s [17].
T ansdiagnos ic T ea men s o Anxie y and
Dep ession
T ansdiagnos ic ea men s ha e eme ged as an al e na i e o
he adi ional diso de -speci ic app oach ha has domina ed
CBT esea ch o he pas 30 yea s. T ansdiagnos ic ea men s
ha e been de eloped and es ed in se e al RCTs o anxie y
diso de s [21-24] and anxie y and dep essi e diso de s [25-27],
and hei numbe con inues o g ow. Mo eo e , he e icacy and
e ec i eness o ansdiagnos ic ea men s ha e been shown in
di e en me a-analy ic e iews, compa ing hem wi h di e en
con ol g oups, such as wai ing lis , a en ion con ol, and
ea men as usual (TAU) [28-31], wi h pooled e ec sizes
(Hedges g) in he medium o la ge ange o o e all measu es
o anxie y (0.65-0.82) and dep ession (0.79-0.84). Mo eo e ,
an addi ional me a-analysis epo ed equi alen e ec s o
ansdiagnos ic ea men s (g=1.06) and diso de -speci ic
ea men s (d=0.95) on anxie y ou comes [32]. Howe e , hese
me a-analyses include a numbe o mixed s udies o di e en
o ien a ions, such as heo y-based ansdiagnos ic ea men s
and ailo ed CBT. The e o e, hese s udies make i di icul o
de e mine he e ec i eness o each o ien a ion (eg, he
e ec i eness o heo y-based ansdiagnos ic ea men s). The
e ec i eness o ansdiagnos ic ea men s has also been shown
in a me a-analysis by Ga cía-Escale a e al [33], wi h pooled
e ec sizes o g=0.80 o anxie y and g=0.72 o dep ession.
Unlike he abo emen ioned me a-analyses, his s udy has he
pa icula i y ha i only included heo y-based ansdiagnos ic
ea men s. The main cha ac e is ic o heo y-based
ansdiagnos ic ea men s, also known as mechanis ically
ansdiagnos ic ea men s o ansdiagnos ic ea men s based
on sha ed mechanisms[34], is ha hey a e designed o add ess
he common psychopa hological p ocesses unde lying anxie y
and dep ession. Among he mechanis ically ansdiagnos ic
ea men s o EDs, he Uni ied P o ocol (UP) [35,36] s ands
ou as one o he mos empi ically suppo ed ansdiagnos ic
p o ocols o anxie y and dep ession [23,37,38]. The UP is a
CBT ansdiagnos ic p o ocol de eloped o add ess he
unde lying psychopa hological p ocesses ha a e common o
anxie y and dep essi e diso de s, wi h a pa icula ocus on
neu o icism, (low) ex a e sion, and emo ion dys egula ion,
which ha e been shown o play a key ole in he onse and
main enance o hese diso de s [39,40]. Thus, he main goal o
he UP is o each pa ien s s a egies o egula e hei emo ions
in a mo e adap i e way h ough he ollowing co e ea men
modules: (1) p esen - ocused emo ional awa eness, (2) cogni i e
lexibili y, (3) iden i ica ion and p e en ion o emo ional
a oidance pa e ns, (4) inc easing awa eness and ole ance o
emo ion-elici ed physical sensa ions, and (5) g aded
(in e ocep i e and si ua ional) exposu e p ocedu es. The o e all
e icacy o he UP was i s shown in an RCT whe e i was
compa ed wi h a wai lis con ol g oup [23] and, mo e ecen ly,
in a la ge RCT whe e i was compa ed wi h well-es ablished
diso de -speci ic CBT p o ocols o anxie y diso de s [37]. In
addi ion, some esea ch shows he long- e m e ec s o he UP
[41] and i s abili y o p oduce changes in he empe amen
dimensions o beha io al inhibi ion (BI) and beha io al
ac i a ion (BA) [42]. BI and BA ha e been concep ualized as
2 neu ological sys ems ep esen ing mo i a ional endencies
ha a e sensi i e o h ea and ewa d en i onmen al cues,
espec i ely [43]. These aspec s ha e been in ima ely linked o
neu o icism and nega i e a ec and ex a e sion and posi i e
a ec [42]. Ano he ea men app oach ha includes p inciples
o componen s ha could be use ul o a ge EDs is dialec ical
beha io al he apy (DBT) [44,45]. DBT ini ially eme ged as a
heo e ical model and a ea men app oach o he ea men o
suicidal beha io s and bo de line pe sonali y diso de , wi h he
gene al aim o eaching s a egies o change pa e ns o emo ion
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 2h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
dys egula ion [46]. O he ange o s a egies, DBT places a
special emphasis on inc easing expe ien ial awa eness and
accep ance (mind ulness wha and how echniques), bu i also
includes beha io al s a egies such as he opposi e ac ion,
designed o diminish dis ess by engaging in beha io s o ac ions
opposi e o hose associa ed wi h nega i e emo ions [44]. Mo e
ecen ly, DBT skills ha e been adap ed and success ully applied
o se e al anxie y and dep essi e diso de s [47,48], which
sugges s ha hey could be used in a ansdiagnos ic manne o
imp o e he symp oma ology o hese diso de s. Fo example,
DBT p inciples may be combined wi h o he e idence-based
componen s (eg, componen s o he UP) o s eng hen hei
e ec i eness. The s a egy o in eg a ing CBT p inciples and
componen s om di e en e idence-based he apies and
o ien a ions is consis en wi h he no ion o p ocess-based CBT,
de ined by Ho mann and Hayes [49]. As he au ho s s a e,
“mode n CBT places much less ocus on p o ocols o
synd omes and mo e ocus on e idence-based p ocesses linked
o e idence-based p ocedu es” [49].
In e ne -Deli e ed In e en ions
In he pas wo decades, one o he mos e iden e o s made
by esea che s has been o ake ad an age o he possibili ies
o e ed by in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies o
imp o e he assessmen and ea men o psychological
diso de s. A clea example would be he use o he in e ne o
inc ease he dissemina ion o empi ically suppo ed
psychological ea men s o anyone in need [50]. Resea ch has
shown p omising and compelling e idence ha
in e ne -deli e ed psychological in e en ions a e e ec i e o
a a ie y o psychosocial p oblems, including anxie y and
dep essi e diso de s [51,52]. The main ad an ages o
in e ne -deli e ed ea men s o e adi ional deli e y me hods
(eg, ace- o- ace he apy) include widesp ead access and
dissemina ion [53], a nons igma izing way o ecei ing
psychological ea men [54], and inc eased cos -e ec i eness
[55].
Resea ch has shown ha ansdiagnos ic in e ne -deli e ed
ea men s a e mo e e ec i e han con ol g oups [29] and ha
hese ea men s a e a leas as e ec i e as indi idual and g oup
ace- o- ace ansdiagnos ic ea men s [33]. Howe e , mos o
he exis ing li e a u e on ansdiagnos ic ea men s is limi ed
o s udies conduc ed in communi y se ings, wi h ew s udies
ca ied ou in public con ex s such as p ima y o specialized
ca e [21]. Indeed, o ou knowledge, no ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed ea men s o anxie y and dep ession ha e
been conduc ed in specialized public men al heal h ca e. This
is somewha su p ising because ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed ea men s in his pa icula se ing could
ha e se e al ad an ages o bo h clinicians and he pa ien s
a ending hese cen e s. Fi s , anxie y and dep essi e diso de s
a e diso de s wi h he highes p e alence a es [2,3]. Second,
esou ces in hese se ings a e usually sca ce, which a ec s bo h
he quan i y and he quali y o he men al heal h ca e p o ided
[56]. Thi d, a la ge pe cen age o pa ien s wi h anxie y and
dep essi e diso de s do no ecei e ea men in men al heal h
ca e cen e s [57]. In he speci ic case o Spain, mos pa ien s
a ending public men al heal h uni s su e om anxie y and
dep essi e diso de s [58], he a io o clinical psychologis s o
pa ien s is one o he lowes in Eu ope [59], and pa ien s ha e
o endu e long wai lis s o ecei e ea men [60]. Fou h,
ansdiagnos ic ea men s can be p o ided a a lowe cos (eg,
in e ms o aining) [61]. Finally, he use o he in e ne can
help imp o e men al heal h se ices, o ins ance, by educing
he wai ing pe iod o ecei e ace- o- ace ea men [62] o by
implemen ing hese ea men s as pa o a s epped-ca e model
ha akes pa ien s’p o iles and needs in o accoun . Thus, each
pa ien can be assigned he mos app op ia e ea men [63],
lea ing ace- o- ace he apy o hose pa ien s who a e less
likely o bene i om in e ne -deli e ed in e en ions.
This S udy
Taking all o his in o conside a ion, in his s udy, an RCT was
conduc ed o es he e ec i eness o a ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed p o ocol o ED (Emo ionRegula ion),
compa ed wi h TAU p o ided in Spanish public specialized
men al heal h ca e. Emo ionRegula ion includes componen s
o he UP and he skills om DBT (eg, mind ulness wha and
how echniques), and i was designed o a ge a wide ange o
EDs, including majo dep essi e diso de (MDD), dys hymic
diso de (DD), PD, AG, SAD, GAD, OCD, anxie y NOS, and
dep ession NOS. I was hypo hesized ha (1) he
Emo ionRegula ion g oup would ou pe o m he TAU g oup
on measu es o o e all anxie y and dep ession, empe amen
(ie, BI and BA), and heal h- ela ed quali y o li e (QoL) a
pos ea men ; (2) hese pos ea men changes would be
main ained a ollow-up; (3) a signi ican ly g ea e clinical
change would be obse ed in Emo ionRegula ion compa ed
wi h TAU; and (4) pa icipan s in he Emo ionRegula ion g oup
would a e he ea men as accep able (sco es on expec a ions
and opinion ≥7/10).
Me hods
S udy Design
A 2-a med RCT was conduc ed. Pa icipan s we e andomly
assigned in a 1:1 a io o one o he ollowing 2 condi ions: (1)
Emo ionRegula ion and (2) TAU. Pa icipan s we e s a i ied
by p incipal diagnosis, pe o ming block andomiza ion in
blocks o 4 o ensu e ha all he p incipal diagnoses we e
equally ep esen ed ac oss condi ions. Compu e -gene a ed
andom numbe sequences we e ob ained using s a is ical
so wa e (Epida 4.1, Sou ceFo ge). This ask was pe o med
by an independen esea che who was unawa e o he
cha ac e is ics o he s udy.
The s udy was conduc ed in compliance wi h he s udy p o ocol,
he Consolida ed S anda ds o Repo ing T ials (CONSORT)
s a emen [64,65], he CONSORT o Elec onic and Mobile
HEal h Applica ions and onLine TeleHeal h guidelines [66],
and he Decla a ion o Helsinki and good clinical p ac ice. A
ull desc ip ion o he s udy p o ocol has been epo ed
elsewhe e [67]. The RCT ob ained e hical app o al om he
E hics Commi ee o Uni e si a Jaume I (Cas ellón, Spain) and
he Clinical Resea ch E hics Commi ees o 3 hospi als
(Conso cio Hospi ala io P o incial de Cas ellón, Hospi al
Uni e si a io de la Ribe a, and Hospi al Uni e si a io Vall
d’Heb on). The s udy p o ocol was egis e ed a
ClinicalT ials.go (NCT02345668) on July 27, 2015. The
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 3h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
du a ion o he in e en ion pe iod was 18 weeks o pa icipan s
in bo h condi ions, and pa icipan s’assessmen s we e conduc ed
a p e- and pos ea men and a 3- and 12-mon h ollow-ups.
Bo h he in e en ion (Emo ionRegula ion) and he assessmen
ins umen s, excep he diagnos ic in e iew, we e deli e ed
h ough a web pla o m designed by ou esea ch g oup [68].
All ans e ed da a we e secu ed ia Ad anced Enc yp ion
S anda d-256 enc yp ion. S udy esea che s conduc ing
pos ea men and ollow-up assessmen s (ie, diagnos ic
in e iews) we e blinded o he pa icipan s’ ea men
condi ions. To ensu e blinding o he e alua o s, pa icipan s
we e in o med ha an independen esea che would con ac
hem o conduc ollow-up assessmen s, and hey we e asked
no o disclose he ea men condi ion o which hey had been
alloca ed. This s udy epo s p e- o pos ea men da a and da a
a 3-mon h ollow-up.
Sample Size
Se e al s udies we e conside ed o he calcula ion o he
expec ed sample size [23,69,70]. On he basis o a minimum
powe o 0.80 in a 1- ailed es (ie, es o di e ences be ween
2 independen means), an α o .05, and an es ima ed d opou
a e o app oxima ely 30%, a sample size o 78 pa icipan s pe
condi ion was de e mined o de ec a pos ea men e ec size
o 0.40 (Cohen d) be ween he 2 condi ions. In addi ion, based
on he li e a u e [71,72], an es ima ed d opou a e o
app oxima ely 30% was expec ed. Thus, he inal sample size
was se a 100 pa icipan s pe condi ion ( o al o 200
pa icipan s). The G*Powe so wa e ( e sion 3.1.9.4,
Hein ich-Heine-Uni e si ä ) was used o calcula e he sample
size [73].
Pa icipan s
Pa icipan s we e ec ui ed om adul ou pa ien s a ending
Spanish public specialized men al heal h ca e se ices (men al
heal h uni s) o seek psychological and/o psychia ic ea men
be ween July 2015 and June 2019. Ini ial ec ui men was
pe o med by clinical psychologis s and psychia is s wo king
in hese cen e s, and i ook place in 3 di e en hospi als:
Conso cio Hospi ala io P o incial de Cas ellón (Cas ellón de
la Plana), Hospi al Uni e si a io de la Ribe a (Valencia), and
Hospi al Uni e si a io Vall d’Heb ón (Ba celona). Rec ui men
was pe o med as ollows: (1) once psychia is s and clinical
psychologis s had iden i ied a po en ial candida e, hey o e ed
he pa ien he possibili y o pa icipa ing in he s udy and
desc ibed he s udy cha ac e is ics o him o he ; (2) pa ien s
who we e in e es ed in pa icipa ing ga e hei in o med w i en
consen , and he clinician illed ou a documen wi h he
pa icipan s’ sociodemog aphic and clinical cha ac e is ics
(mo eo e , in his s age, pa icipan s we e p o ided wi h a
documen con aining in o ma ion abou he s udy); (3) one o
he esea che s in ol ed in he s udy con ac ed he pa icipan s
by phone o schedule a ace- o- ace appoin men o e alua e
eligibili y c i e ia using a s uc u ed diagnos ic in e iew; and
(4) whene e a pa icipan me he eligibili y c i e ia, an
independen esea che (unawa e o he s udy cha ac e is ics)
was con ac ed o implemen andomiza ion, and pa icipan s
comple ed he emaining assessmen ins umen s (sel - epo ed
ques ionnai es) h ough web-based su eys.
Pa icipan s we e selec ed based on he ollowing inclusion
c i e ia: (1) aged 18 yea s o olde ; (2) abili y o unde s and and
ead Spanish; (3) ha ing access o he in e ne a home and an
email add ess; (4) mee ing Diagnos ic and S a is ical Manual
o Men al Diso de s, Fou h Edi ion (DSM-IV) diagnos ic
c i e ia [74] o ED (ie, MDD, DD, dep ession NOS, PD, AG,
SAD, GAD, anxie y NOS, and OCD); (5) p o iding w i en
in o med consen ; (6) no su e ing om a se e e men al
diso de (schizoph enia, bipola diso de , and alcohol and/o
subs ance dependence diso de ); (7) no p esen ing a high isk
o suicide; (8) no su e ing om a disabling medical disease
ha p e en ed he pa icipan om ca ying ou he
psychological ea men ; and (9) no ecei ing ano he
psychological ea men du ing he s udy (in he expe imen al
g oup). Pha macological ea men was allowed, bu pa icipan s
had o be aking he same dose du ing he 2 mon hs be o e
en olling in he s udy. In addi ion, pa icipan s in he
expe imen al g oup whose medica ion was inc eased o changed
du ing he s udy pe iod we e excluded om he ial (dec eases
in pha macological ea men we e accep ed). The e was no
mone a y compensa ion o pa icipa ion in he s udy unde any
o he ea men condi ions.
Ins umen s
Clinical Ou comes
Diagnosis In e iew
Clinical diagnoses we e ob ained using he mini-in e na ional
neu opsychia ic in e iew (MINI) e sion 5.00 [75,76], a b ie
s uc u ed diagnos ic psychia ic in e iew o he assessmen
o key DSM-IV and In e na ional Classi ica ion o Diseases,
10 h Re ision, diagnoses.
P incipal Ou comes
Beck Dep ession In en o y, Second Edi ion
Beck dep ession in en o y, second edi ion (BDI-II) [77,78], is
a sel - epo ques ionnai e wi h 21 i ems abou he di e en
symp oms cha ac e izing MDD, added oge he o ob ain he
o al sco e, which can be a maximum o 63 poin s. The
ins umen has shown good in e nal consis ency (α=.76-.95).
The Spanish e sion also showed high in e nal consis ency
(α=.87) o bo h he gene al and clinical popula ions (α=.89).
C onbach α o he BDI-II in his s udy was .90.
Beck Anxie y In en o y
The Beck anxie y in en o y (BAI) [79,80] is a 21-i em
sel - epo scale ha assesses anxie y, wi h a maximum sco e
o 63 poin s. Each i em has a 4-poin se e i y scale ( om no
a all o se e ely) ha add esses symp oms expe ienced du ing
he p e ious week. P e ious alida ion s udies ha e shown an
in e nal consis ency anging om 0.85 o 0.94 as well as
con e gen and di e gen alidi y. The Spanish e sion o he
BAI has demons a ed high in e nal consis ency (α=.93).
C onbach α o he BAI in his s udy was .92.
Seconda y Ou comes
Beha io al Inhibi ion Scale and Beha io al Ac i a ion Scale
The beha io al inhibi ion scale (BIS) and beha io al ac i a ion
scale (BAS) [81,82] con ains 20 i ems a ed om 1 o 4, wi h
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 4h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
7 BIS subscale i ems ha e alua e emo ional esponses o
indi iduals o impending nega i e e en s and 13 BAS i ems
ha e alua e he beha io al and emo ional esponses o
indi iduals o po en ially posi i e e en s. The BIS and BAS
ha e shown good eliabili y in indi iduals wi h EDs (α=.73-.92)
and good con e gen and disc iminan alidi y as indica o s o
empe amen . The in e nal consis ency o he Spanish e sion
anges be ween 0.65 and 0.82. C onbach α o he BIS and BAS
subscales in his s udy we e .61 and .80, espec i ely.
Quali y o Li e Eu oQoL-5D-3L Ques ionnai e
Quali y o li e Eu oQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) ques ionnai e
[83,84] is a gene ic ins umen ha measu es heal h- ela ed QoL
and consis s o 2 pa s. Pa 1 assesses sel - epo ed p oblems
in each o he ollowing 5 domains: mobili y, sel -ca e, daily
ac i i ies, pain/discom o , and anxie y/dep ession. Each domain
is di ided in o 3 le els o se e i y co esponding o no p oblems,
some p oblems, and ex eme p oblems, yielding a
popula ion-based p e e ence sco e o socie al index (SI). A o al
o 243 heo e ically possible heal h s a es can be ob ained, and
he SI is calcula ed on he basis o hese heal h s a es. Values
ange om 1 (bes heal h s a e) o 0 (dea h). Howe e , his index
may also p o ide nega i e alues ha co espond o heal h s a es
pe cei ed as wo se han dea h. U ili y sco es o hese heal h
s a es we e assigned using he a ailable Spanish popula ion
a i s. Pa 2 eco ds he subjec s’ sel -assessed heal h on a
isual analog scale (VAS), a 10-cm e ical line on which he
bes and wo s imaginable heal h s a es sco e 100 and 0,
espec i ely. In his s udy, heal h- ela ed QoL was assessed
using he VAS.
Diso de -Speci ic Measu es
Diso de -speci ic symp oms we e e alua ed using 4 di e en
sel - epo ques ionnai es. Symp oms o GAD we e assessed
using he Penn S a e Wo y Ques ionnai e [85,86]. PD and AG
symp oms we e e alua ed using he Panic Diso de Se e i y
Scale, Sel -Repo ed [87,88]. SAD symp oms we e e alua ed
using he Social In e ac ion Anxie y Scale [89,90], and OCD
symp oms we e assessed using he Obsessi e Compulsi e
In en o y-Re ised [91,92]. All 4 ins umen s ha e shown
adequa e psychome ic p ope ies in bo h he o iginal and
Spanish alida ions. C onbach αs o hese scales in his s udy
we e .78, .89, .80, and .91, espec i ely. Mo e de ails abou
hese assessmen ins umen s ha e been desc ibed elsewhe e
[67].
T ea men Accep abili y
Expec a ions and Opinions o T ea men Scales
These ques ionnai es we e adap ed om he s udy by Bo ko ec
and Nau [93]. Each scale is made up o 5 i ems, a ed om 0
(no hing a all) o 10 (comple ely), which ask how logical he
ea men seems o be (How logical do you hink his ea men
is?), o wha ex en i sa is ies he pa ien (How sa is ied a e
you wi h he ea men ?), whe he he pa ien would ecommend
i o a pe son wi h he same p oblem (To wha ex en do you
eel con iden ecommending his ea men o a iend who has
he same p oblems?), whe he i could be used o ea o he
psychological p oblems (To wha ex en do you hink his
ea men could be use ul in ea ing o he psychological
p oblems?), and i s use ulness o he pa ien ’s p oblem (To
wha ex en do you hink his ea men will be/was help ul o
you?). The expec a ion scale was applied a e he ea men
a ionale was explained. I s objec i e is o measu e subjec i e
pa ien expec a ions ega ding his ea men . The opinion scale
was adminis e ed when he pa ien had comple ed he ea men ,
and i was designed o assess sa is ac ion wi h his ea men .
T ea men s
Emo ionRegula ion
Following andomiza ion, pa icipan s in he ea men condi ion
we e con ac ed ia elephone by a esea che who p o ided ee
access o Emo ionRegula ion, a 12-module ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed p o ocol o he ea men o ED, namely,
MDD, DD, dep ession NOS, PD, AG, GAD, SAD, anxie y
NOS, and OCD. The p o ocol is deli e ed h ough a web
pla o m [68] designed by ou esea ch g oup. Access o he
web pla o m is h ough a unique use name-passwo d
combina ion and is a ailable 24 hou s a day. The ea men was
i s de eloped as a manualized ansdiagnos ic ea men
p o ocol wi h handbooks o bo h pa ien and he apis and hen
adap ed o be deli e ed h ough a web-based pla o m. The web
pla o m has success ully been used in p e ious RCTs explo ing
he e icacy o in e ne -deli e ed ea men s o se e al
diso de s, such as dep ession [94] and lying phobia [95].
The main co e componen s a e based on he UP [35,36], bu
he p o ocol also con ains ea men s a egies de i ed om
DBT [46]. The p incipal aim o he ea men componen s in
Emo ionRegula ion is o lea n and p ac ice adap i e ways o
egula e emo ions om a ansdiagnos ic pe spec i e, wi h he
ollowing ea men componen s: p esen - ocused emo ional
awa eness, cogni i e lexibili y, emo ional a oidance and
emo ion-d i en beha io s, and exposu e p ocedu es
(in e ocep i e and si ua ional). The p o ocol also con ains a
module o acili a e he pa ien ’s engagemen wi h he he apy
(mo i a ion o change), a module wi h psychoeduca ion abou
emo ions, and a elapse p e en ion module. Rega ding he DBT
componen s, g ea e emphasis was placed on he p esen - ocused
emo ional awa eness componen by adap ing and including
s a egies such as he wha and how echniques and he concep
o adical accep ance. Mo eo e , he opposi e ac ion was
in eg a ed in o he ea men as a way o add ess emo ion-d i en
beha io s. Emo ionRegula ion includes a Welcome module ha
con ains gene al in o ma ion abou he p o ocol and i s goals
as well as ecommenda ions o bene i ing om i and 12
ea men modules (desc ibed in Table 1).
The modules a e sequen ial o enable s ep-by-s ep mo emen
h ough he p og am. The p og am du a ion can a y among
he use s, and pa icipan s had access o he p o ocol o a
maximum pe iod o 18 weeks. Mo eo e , pa icipan s we e
allowed o use he p og am any ime hey wan ed du ing he
ial pe iod (ie, du ing he ollow-up pe iods).
Rega ding guidance, all pa icipan s in his condi ion ecei ed
he apis and au oma ed suppo . The apis suppo consis ed
o (1) an ini ial ace- o- ace session o explain he cha ac e is ics
o he s udy and adminis e he diagnos ic in e iew o con i m
he eligibili y c i e ia, (2) an ini ial phone call encou aging
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 5h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X

pa icipan s o s a he in e en ion a e he baseline
assessmen s had been comple ed, (3) 1 weekly b ie phone call
(maximum o 10 min) du ing he ea men pe iod, and (4) a
inal phone call (once he ea men had ended) o emind
pa icipan s ha hey would be allowed o use he p og am a
any ime du ing he ial pe iod and ha hey would be con ac ed
o ollow-up assessmen s. Au oma ed suppo consis ed o 2
weekly ex messages eminding pa icipan s abou he
impo ance o comple ing he homewo k asks and encou aging
hem o e iew he ea men modules. Tex messages we e sen
h ough a secu e web pla o m [96]. This web pla o m was
only used o send ex messages (unidi ec ionally) wi h
p ede ined con en s, and hey did no include pe sonal
in o ma ion ha could ha e iden i ied he pa icipan s.
Addi ional de ails abou he ea men and suppo p o ocols,
as well as o he unc ionali ies o he web-based pla o m, ha e
been published elsewhe e [67]. Finally, i is impo an o no e
ha all pa icipan s in his condi ion we e allowed o con inue
o ecei e TAU, bu only o moni o ing o pha macological
ea men . Pa icipan s who ecei ed o he o ms o ea men
du ing he s udy pe iod (eg, psychological ea men ) o who
expe ienced inc eases o changes in pha macological ea men
we e excluded om he analyses.
Table 1. T ea men modules and hei objec i es.
Objec i eModule
P o ides a amewo k abou he ole o emo ion egula ion in EDa.1. In oduc ion o ea men
To analyze p os and cons o changing, emphasize he impo ance o being mo i a ed, and help o es ablish
signi ican li e goals.
2. Mo i a ion o change and goal se ing
P o ides psychoeduca ion abou he oles and unc ions o emo ions and ains he pa ien o ack he
3 componen s o emo ional expe iences.
3. Unde s anding he ole o emo ions
Aims o ain he pa ien in nonjudgmen al emo ional awa eness (ie, mind ulness wha and how skills)
and he accep ance o emo ional expe iences.
4. Nonjudgmen al emo ional awa eness and
accep ance o emo ional expe iences
To con inue o p ac ice he accep ance o emo ional expe iences and inc ease awa eness o physical
sensa ions, hough s, emo ions, and daily ac i i ies.
5. P ac icing p esen - ocused awa eness
Focuses on he iden i ica ion o maladap i e ways o hinking (ie, hinking aps).6. Lea ning o be lexible
Aims o each he pa ien s s a egies o modi y hinking aps (ie, cogni i e eapp aisal). I also p o ides
in o ma ion abou in usi e hough s and how o deal wi h hem.
7. P ac icing cogni i e lexibili y
Aims o each he pa ien s o iden i y he emo ion a oidance s a egies ha con ibu e o he main enance
o ED.
8. Emo ional a oidance
To lea n he concep o EDBsband eplace hei maladap i e EDB wi h o he mo e adap i e beha io s.9. Emo ion-d i en beha io s
To each he ole o physical sensa ions in he emo ional esponse and p o ide aining in in e ocep i e
exposu e.
10. Accep ing and acing physical sensa-
ions
To build exposu e hie a chies o help he pa ien s begin o ace si ua ion-elici ed a oided emo ions.11. Facing emo ions in he con ex s in
which hey occu
To e iew wha pa ien s ha e lea ned h oughou he p og am, schedule he u u e p ac ice o he lea ned
s a egies, and each he pa ien how o iden i y and cope wi h u u e high- isk si ua ions.
12. Relapse p e en ion
aED: emo ional diso de .
bEDBs: emo ion-d i en beha io s.
T ea men as Usual
TAU was ea men as deli e ed in cu en daily p ac ice by
psychia is s and clinical psychologis s in he men al heal h
cen e s in Spain. TAU in his s udy was p o ided by 3 hospi als:
Conso cio Hospi ala io P o incial de Cas ellón (Cas ellón de
la Plana), Hospi al Uni e si a io de la Ribe a (Valencia), and
Hospi al Uni e si a io Vall d’Heb on (Ba celona). To maximize
he ex e nal alidi y o his RCT, pa icipan s in his condi ion
we e allowed o ecei e ei he psychia ic ea men (ie,
p esc ip ion and moni o ing o an idep essan and/o anxioly ic
medica ion), psychological ea men (including case
managemen , g oup psycho he apy, empa hic lis ening, and/o
suppo i e counseling), o a combina ion o bo h. The equency
o isi s du ing he 18-week ea men pe iod a ied depending
on he ype o ea men (ie, psychia ic o psychological)
p o ided o he pa icipan . Pa ien s in he TAU condi ion who
we e al eady ecei ing any o he a o emen ioned ea men s a
he ime o en ollmen we e in o med ha hey would con inue
o ecei e hese se ices du ing he ea men pe iod.
Fu he mo e, pa icipan s ecei ing a ea men o he han hose
p o ided in he men al heal h uni we e excluded om he ial.
All pa icipan s alloca ed o TAU we e o e ed ee access o
he ea men pla o m a e he s udy ended.
The apis s and T ea men Fideli y
The ea men and suppo p o ocols we e adminis e ed by
doc o al s uden s wi h a leas wo yea s o expe ience in he
diagnosis, psychological assessmen , and applica ion o CBT
o di e en ED. Se e al s eps we e aken o ensu e ea men
ideli y. Fi s , he apis s had p e iously been ained in he
applica ion o he ea men modules. Second, a suppo p o ocol
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 6h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
(ie, weekly phone calls and au oma ed ex messages) was
de eloped o be applied o all he pa icipan s in he
Emo ionRegula ion condi ion. This suppo p o ocol has been
b ie ly desc ibed ea lie , bu mo e de ails can be ound in he
s udy by González-Robles e al [67]. Thi d, o inc ease diagnosis
eliabili y, all he apis s in ol ed in he pa icipan s’assessmen
we e ained in he applica ion o he diagnos ic in e iew
(MINI).
Da a Analysis Plan
All analyses we e pe o med using he S a is ical Package o
Social Sciences e sion 25.
Fi s , chi-squa e es s o ca ego ical da a and independen
samples es s o con inuous da a we e pe o med o con i m
ha he e we e no signi ican di e ences be ween he g oups
a baseline on any o he sociodemog aphic and clinical
a iables.
In en ion- o- ea (ITT) analyses we e pe o med ollowing
Newman’s guidelines [97], using maximum likelihood (ML)
es ima ion h ough he expec a ion maximiza ion impu a ion
me hod. To handle missing da a, we ollowed he p ocedu e
sugges ed by Hai e al [98]. Fi s , we explo ed he ypes o
missing da a and de e mined ha da a we e missing a he
cons uc le el. On he basis o his, we concluded ha he da a
we e suscep ible o impu a ion. Second, he quan i y o missing
da a was analyzed o ensu e ha none o he measu es exceeded
he ecommended limi s o implemen his me hod [99]. Thi d,
Li le’s missing comple ely a andom (MCAR) es s we e
ca ied ou o analyze he pa e n o missing da a, concluding
ha all missing da a we e MCAR (X225=28.7; P=.28). Finally,
a sensi i i y analysis was pe o med on he main ou comes o
compa e he esul s o he pe -p o ocol sample (ie, comple e s)
wi h he impu ed alues. This analysis e ealed ha he ML
es ima ion was no likely o p oduce biased es ima ions in he
main analyses, eaching he same conclusions in bo h he
comple e s and he impu ed da ase (pe -p o ocol: FBAI
(1,127)=6.1; P=.02; and FBDI (1,127)=15.54; P<.001; ITT: FBAI
(1,197)=4.79; P=.03; and FBDI (1,197)=12.97; P<.001).
To es he i s hypo hesis and con ol o baseline di e ences,
analyses o co a iance (ANCOVAs) we e pe o med o compa e
he e ec s o he g oups on measu es o anxie y, dep ession,
empe amen , and heal h- ela ed QoL, aking condi ion as he
be ween-subjec a iable and he p e ea men sco es as
co a ia es. The use o ANCOVAs o he analysis has been
ecommended by se e al au ho s as a mo e powe ul ool o
analyze da a in s udies wi h andomized designs [100,101].
To es he second hypo hesis, a 2 (condi ion:
Emo ionRegula ion s TAU) × 3 ( ime: p e ea men s
pos ea men s 3-mon h ollow-up) mixed analysis o a iance
(ANOVA) was pe o med o es whe he he di e ences
be ween Emo ionRegula ion and TAU (ie, be ween-subjec s
ac o s) we e main ained a ollow-up (ie, wi hin-subjec ac o ).
The ollowing assump ions o he mixed ANOVA we e
analyzed: no mali y (Shapi o-Wilk es ), homoscedas ici y
(Le ene es ), independence (nonpa ame ic Runs es ), and
sphe ici y (Mauchly es ). The deg ees o eedom we e
co ec ed using G eenhouse-Geisse whene e he sphe ici y
assump ion was iola ed. Mo eo e , pai wise
Bon e oni-co ec ed es s we e used o pos hoc compa isons.
To compu e he magni ude o bo h wi hin-g oup and
be ween-g oup changes, e ec sizes (Cohen d) we e calcula ed
by di iding he di e ences be ween means by he pooled SD.
E ec sizes we e in e p e ed acco ding o Cohen con en ion:
e ec sizes o 0.20 a e conside ed low, e ec sizes o 0.50 a e
conside ed medium, and e ec sizes o 0.80 and abo e a e
conside ed la ge [102].
To es he hi d hypo hesis, we explo ed he clinical signi icance
o he changes achie ed by he pa icipan s as well as po en ial
de e io a ion a es using Jacobson and T uax’s eliable change
index (RCI) [103] o he main ou come measu es (BDI-II and
BAI) in he comple e sample o pos ea men and ollow-up
measu emen s. Fi s , he cu o poin s o he pos ea men and
ollow-up sco es we e de e mined o be wi hin he ange o a
unc ional dis ibu ion. The RCI was hen calcula ed o es he
clinically signi ican change, wi h an RCI o |1.96| o g ea e
(P<.05). Finally, bo h c i e ia we e aken in o accoun o classi y
pa icipan s in o he ollowing 4 ca ego ies: (1) eco e ed: when
he change is signi ican ly eliable (RCI≥|1.96|; P<.05) and he
pos ea men sco e is loca ed wi hin he ange o he unc ional
dis ibu ion (mean [SD 2]), (2) imp o ed: when he change is
signi ican ly eliable bu he pos ea men sco e is below he
unc ional le el, (3) no changed: when he change is no
signi ican ly eliable and he pos ea men sco e does no each
he unc ional le el, and (4) de e io a ed: when he change is
signi ican ly eliable bu he pos ea men sco e is wo se han
he p e ea men sco e.
Finally, o es he ou h hypo hesis, he sco es on expec a ions
and opinions we e analyzed by calcula ing means and SDs o
each o he i ems on he expec a ion and opinion o ea men
scales. In addi ion, 1-way ANOVAs we e pe o med o analyze
he signi icance o he di e ences be ween expec a ions and
opinions.
Resul s
Pa icipan Flow and A i ion
A lowcha o he s udy pa icipan s is displayed in Figu e 1.
A o al o 326 pa ien s exp essed in e es in he s udy, 281 o
whom we e assessed o eligibili y. O hese 281, 67 pa icipan s
we e excluded om he s udy. A o al o 214 pa icipan s we e
andomized o ei he Emo ionRegula ion (n=106) o TAU
(n=108). In addi ion, 7 pa ien s in each condi ion wi hd ew om
he s udy be o e he p e ea men assessmen . Consequen ly,
hese pa icipan s we e no included in any o he analyses.
Rega ding a i ion, 35 pa icipan s in he Emo ionRegula ion
condi ion (35/106, 33.0%) and 34 in he TAU condi ion (34/108,
31.5%) d opped ou o he s udy ( easons o d opou a e shown
in Figu e 1). In addi ion, 3 pa icipan s in he Emo ionRegula ion
condi ion had o be excluded om he ial because o a change
in hei pha macological ea men du ing he ea men pe iod.
Pos ea men da a we e ob ained om 63 pa icipan s (63/99,
64%) in he Emo ionRegula ion condi ion and om 67
pa icipan s (67/101, 66.3%) in he TAU condi ion. Follow-up
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 7h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
da a we e collec ed om 51 pa icipan s (51/99, 52%) in he
Emo ionRegula ion condi ion and 56 pa icipan s (56/101,
55.4%) in he TAU condi ion. Finally, 99 pa icipan s in he
Emo ionRegula ion g oup and 101 pa icipan s in he TAU
condi ion we e included in he ITT analysis.
Figu e 1. Flowcha o pa icipan s. ED: emo ional diso de ; DSM-IV-TR; Diagnos ic and S a is ical Manual o Men al Diso de s, Fou h Edi ion,
Tex Re ision; ITT: in en ion- o- ea .
Baseline Cha ac e is ics
Pa icipan s (N=200) had a mean age o 38.44 yea s (SD 10.80;
ange 18-68), and hey we e mos ly emales (138/200, 69.0%).
Table 2 p o ides he sociodemog aphic and clinical
cha ac e is ics o bo h condi ions a baseline. The e we e no
signi ican di e ences be ween he Emo ionRegula ion and
TAU g oups a baseline on any o he sociodemog aphic and
clinical cha ac e is ics. Mo eo e , no signi ican di e ences
we e ound o medica ion, p incipal diagnosis, numbe o
como bid diagnoses, o clinical se e i y on any o he measu es.
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 8h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
Table 2. Demog aphic and clinical cha ac e is ics o he sample a baseline (N=200).
P alue es (d )
X2(d )
T ea men as usual
(n=101)
Emo ionRegula ion egula ion
(n=99)
Va iable
.800.25 (198)N/Aa
38.25 (11.03)38.64 (10.61)Age (yea s), mean (SD)
.26N/A1.3 (1)Sex, n (%)
66 (65.3)72 (72)Female
35 (34.7)27 (27)Male
.78N/A1.1 (3)Ma i al s a us, n (%)
26 (25.7)22 (22)Single
65 (64.4)63 (63)Ma ied o pa ne ed
10 (9.9)14 (14)Di o ced o widowed
.35N/A2.1 (2)Educa ion, n (%)
36 (35.6)26 (26)Basic s udies
35 (34.7)41 (41)Seconda y s udies
30 (29.7)32 (32)Uni e si y s udies
.77N/A3.3 (6)Occupa ion, n (%)
11 (10.9)9 (9)S uden
9 (8.9)6 (6)Housekeepe
36 (35.6)45 (45)Employed
22 (21.8)23 (23)Unemployed
17 (16.8)13 (13)O wo k
6 (5.9)3 (3)Re i ed
.91N/A1.0 (4)Mon hly income (€), n (%)
28 (27.7)27 (27)None
16 (15.8)20 (20)<641.40 (US $699.45)
38 (37.6)32 (32)641.40-1282.80 (US $699.46-
1398.89)
17 (16.8)18 (18)1282.81-2565.60 (US $1398.90-
2797.78)
2 (2.0)2 (2)>2565.60 (US $2798.78)
.95N/A2.7 (8)P incipal diagnosis, n (%)
26 (27.7)23 (23)GADb
13 (12.9)16 (16)AGc
5 (5.0)9 (9)PDd
4 (4.0)4 (4)SADe
12 (12.0)8 (8)OCD
22 (21.8)20 (20)MDDg
6 (5.9)7 (7)DDh
9 (8.9)10 (10)Anxie y NOSi
3 (3.0)2 (2)Dep ession NOS
N/AN/AN/AComo bid diagnoses, n
1810GAD
56PD
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 9h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
[23,27,36,110-112]. Speci ically, a combina ion o he
componen s o he UP and DBT egula ion skills was ound o
be mo e e ec i e han TAU in ea ing ED. Second, as a as
we know, his is he i s s udy o explo e a ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed ea men in public specialized men al heal h
ca e. As men ioned ea lie , mos esea ch on ansdiagnos ic
web-based ea men s has been conduc ed in communi y
se ings, wi h a ew o hese s udies ca ied ou in p ima y ca e
[108]. The esul s showed ha he in e en ion was ound o be
mo e e ec i e han TAU on he measu es o gene ic dep ession,
anxie y, and QoL. These esul s a e consis en wi h he li e a u e
showing he supe io i y o CBT o e TAU. Fo ins ance, a
me a-analysis showed ha CBT ou weighed TAU, wi h e ec
sizes in he medium ange on measu es o gene ic anxie y
(Hedges g=0.70) and dep ession (Hedges g=0.69) [70]. As
su p ising as hese da a migh seem, he u h is ha cu en
public men al heal h se ices s ill ha e o deal wi h a numbe
o ba ie s ha hinde app op ia e ca e deli e y, such as
excessi e wai ing imes o access men al heal h ca e [60], low
equency o sessions [113], o inadequa e ollow-up ca e [56].
Mo eo e , he lack o aining in e idence-based ea men s
among p o essionals u he adds o his p oblem [114]. Finally,
in Spain, se e al RCTs ha e been conduc ed using he in e ne
o p o ide e idence-based ea men s, showing ha hey a e
e ec i e o he ea men o ED and, in pa icula , dep ession,
in communi y samples [94] and p ima y ca e [115,116], and
o he s a e unde way [117]. This s udy demons a ed ha an
in e ne -deli e ed p o ocol o ED was e ec i e in public
specialized ca e, a se ing wi h a high demand, bu much less
explo ed, hus adding o he li e a u e on hese ea men s o
ED. Fu he mo e, he use o TAU as he con ol condi ion may
help o answe he ques ion o “whe he a new ea men o an
e idence-based psycho he apy eally su passes in ou come
e ec s wha is o dina ily done a a gi en clinic” [118], hus
helping o make clinicians, esea che s, and policy make s awa e
o he limi a ions and aspec s ha should be imp o ed in his
speci ic se ing.
Limi a ions
Al hough he esul s o his RCT a e p omising, hey should be
in e p e ed in ligh o he ollowing limi a ions. Fi s , al hough
se e al measu es we e aken o minimize a i ion (eg, guidance
was p o ided o all he pa ien s pa icipa ing in
Emo ionRegula ion), he numbe o pa ien s who d opped ou
o he s udy was high (a ound 35%). Howe e , his p opo ion
was close o wha is ypically obse ed in he li e a u e on
in e ne -deli e ed psychological ea men s (ie, app oxima ely
30%-35%) [71]. Mo eo e , a i ion in he TAU condi ion was
simila (34/108, 31.5%). Second, his RCT was no powe ed o
de ec di e ences in diso de -speci ic measu es (ie, o GAD,
PD o AG, SAD, and OCD). The e o e, u u e s udies ha mee
he minimum le els o s a is ical powe o de ec di e ences in
hese measu es a e wa an ed. Thi d, al hough he equency o
he session in TAU was low and mos pa ien s in his condi ion
we e ecei ing only pha maco he apy (as obse ed by he
esea che s), hese da a we e no moni o ed du ing he ial.
Finally, he esul s o accep abili y (ie, expec a ions and
opinions) migh no be en i ely ep esen a i e because da a om
pa ien s who d opped ou o he in e en ion we e no included
in hese analyses.
Conclusions and Fu u e Di ec ions
The e ec i eness o a mechanis ically ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -deli e ed p o ocol o ED was compa ed wi h TAU in
public specialized men al heal h ca e. Al hough he esul s a e
p omising, mo e esea ch in specialized ca e should be
conduc ed o ex end he indings ob ained in his s udy. Fi s ,
esea ch on p edic o s and mode a o s o ea men ou comes
and d opou in his speci ic se ing can help o delinea e he
p o iles o pa icipan s who a e mo e likely o bene i om hese
ea men s and help o answe he classic ques ion, “wha
ea men , by whom, is mos e ec i e o his indi idual wi h
ha speci ic p oblem, unde which se o ci cums ances?” [119].
Mo eo e , we belie e ha he in eg a ion o p inciples om
di e en e idence-based p o ocols (eg, componen s o he UP
and DBT) can be a powe ul s a egy ha should guide u u e
esea ch on e idence-based psycho he apy. This s a egy is in
line wi h p ocess-based CBT and he new ounda ional ques ion
p oposed by Ho mann and Hayes [49] ( ie, “Wha co e
biopsychosocial p ocesses should be a ge ed wi h his clien
gi en his goal in his si ua ion, and how can hey mos
e icien ly and e ec i ely be changed?”) . Second, despi e he
huge ad ances expe ienced by he ield o in e ne -deli e ed
ea men s in he pas wo decades, high d opou a es emain
a majo challenge in he ield. To con inue o imp o e cu en
and u u e in e ne -deli e ed in e en ions, u u e s udies should
s i e o include d opou s in he analysis o accep abili y using
bo h quali a i e and quan i a i e app oaches. Mo eo e , o
ensu e he in eg i y, quali y, and eplicabili y o hese s udies,
adhe ence o exis ing esea ch guidelines is o pa amoun
impo ance in his endea o . Thi d, al hough we did no assess
he accep abili y o clinicians in ol ed in he RCT (ie,
psychia is s, clinical psychologis s, and nu ses), i is wo h
men ioning ha some o hem e used o pa icipa e in he
ec ui men p ocess, which migh e lec nega i e a i udes
owa d in e ne -deli e ed in e en ions among hese
p o essionals. In his scena io, esea ch e o s should be made
o in o m clinicians and s a e holde s abou he bene i s o
in e ne -deli e ed ea men s, especially because hey a e seen
as au ho i y igu es and, he e o e, hei a i udes can ha e a
majo impac on pa ien s’ pe cep ions. Finally, al hough he
need o e icacy s udies is ou o doub , we belie e ha i is o
pa amoun impo ance o conduc mo e implemen a ion esea ch
[120]. These s udies may p o ide a much deepe unde s anding
o implemen a ion a iables ha can ei he acili a e o hampe
he e ec i e up ake o e idence-based p o ocols in eal clinical
p ac ice, such as he a i udes o clinicians and o he
p o essionals owa d in e ne -deli e ed ea men s, o
economical and logis ic aspec s ha a e di icul o implemen .
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 16h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X

Acknowledgmen s
The au ho s would like o hank Conso cio Hospi ala io P o incial de Cas ellón, Hospi al Uni e si a io de la Ribe a, and Hospi al
Uni e si a io Vall d’Heb ón o hei in aluable con ibu ion o his s udy. This esea ch was conduc ed wi h he inancial suppo
o g an s P1-1B2014-43 (Uni e si a Jaume I, Cas ellón), a PhD g an om he Minis y o Educa ion, Cul u e and Spo s
(FPU13/00576), and CIBER Fisiopa ología de la Obesidad y Nu ición-ISCIII CB06/03/0052. The unde s had no ole in he
s udy design, da a collec ion and analysis, decision o publish, o p epa a ion o he manusc ip .
Con lic s o In e es
None decla ed.
Mul imedia Appendix 1
Desc ip i e s a is ics and e ec sizes o diso de -speci ic measu es.
[DOCX File , 14 KB-Mul imedia Appendix 1]
Mul imedia Appendix 2
CONSORT-eHEALTH (V 1.6.1).
[PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 1256 KB-Mul imedia Appendix 2]
Re e ences
1. Bullis J, Boe che H, Saue ‐Za ala S, Fa chione T, Ba low D. Wha is an emo ional diso de ? A ansdiagnos ic mechanis ic
de ini ion wi h implica ions o assessmen , ea men , and p e en ion. Clin Psychol Sci P ac 2019 Ma 14;26(2):e12278
[FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12278]
2. Kessle RC, Be glund P, Demle O, Jin R, Me ikangas KR, Wal e s EE. Li e ime p e alence and age-o -onse dis ibu ions
o DSM-IV diso de s in he na ional como bidi y su ey eplica ion. A ch Gen Psychia y 2005 Jun;62(6):593-602. [doi:
10.1001/a chpsyc.62.6.593] [Medline: 15939837]
3. Kessle RC, Chiu WT, Demle O, Me ikangas KR, Wal e s EE. P e alence, se e i y, and como bidi y o 12-mon h DSM-IV
diso de s in he na ional como bidi y su ey eplica ion. A ch Gen Psychia y 2005 Jun;62(6):617-627 [FREE Full ex ]
[doi: 10.1001/a chpsyc.62.6.617] [Medline: 15939839]
4. Andlin-Sobocki P, Wi chen H. Cos o anxie y diso de s in Eu ope. Eu J Neu ol 2005 Jun;12(Suppl 1):39-44. [doi:
10.1111/j.1468-1331.2005.01196.x] [Medline: 15877777]
5. Cuijpe s P, Beekman AT, Reynolds CF. P e en ing dep ession: a global p io i y. J Am Med Assoc 2012 Ma
14;307(10):1033-1034 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.271] [Medline: 22416097]
6. Bax e AJ, Vos T, Sco KM, Fe a i AJ, Whi e o d HA. The global bu den o anxie y diso de s in 2010. Psychol Med 2014
Aug;44(11):2363-2374. [doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003243] [Medline: 24451993]
7. Fe a i AJ, Cha lson FJ, No man RE, Pa en SB, F eedman G, Mu ay CJ, e al. Bu den o dep essi e diso de s by coun y,
sex, age, and yea : indings om he global bu den o disease s udy 2010. PLoS Med 2013 No ;10(11):e1001547 [FREE
Full ex ] [doi: 10.1371/jou nal.pmed.1001547] [Medline: 24223526]
8. Cuijpe s P, an S a en A, Ande sson G, an Oppen P. Psycho he apy o dep ession in adul s: a me a-analysis o compa a i e
ou come s udies. J Consul Clin Psychol 2008 Dec;76(6):909-922. [doi: 10.1037/a0013075] [Medline: 19045960]
9. Hollon SD, Ponniah K. A e iew o empi ically suppo ed psychological he apies o mood diso de s in adul s. Dep ess
Anxie y 2010 Oc ;27(10):891-932 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1002/da.20741] [Medline: 20830696]
10. Bo ko ec T, Ruscio A. Psycho he apy o gene alized anxie y diso de . J Clin Psychia y 2001;62(Suppl 11):37-42;
discussion 43 [FREE Full ex ] [Medline: 11414549]
11. Co in R, Ouime AJ, Seeds PM, Dozois DJ. A me a-analysis o CBT o pa hological wo y among clien s wi h GAD. J
Anxie y Diso d 2008;22(1):108-116. [doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.002] [Medline: 17321717]
12. Mi e K. A me a-analysis o he e icacy o psycho- and pha maco he apy in panic diso de wi h and wi hou ago aphobia.
J A ec Diso d 2005 Sep;88(1):27-45. [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.05.003] [Medline: 16005982]
13. Mayo-Wilson E, Dias S, Ma anezouli I, Kew K, Cla k DM, Ades AE, e al. Psychological and pha macological in e en ions
o social anxie y diso de in adul s: a sys ema ic e iew and ne wo k me a-analysis. Lance Psychia y 2014 Oc ;1(5):368-376
[FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70329-3] [Medline: 26361000]
14. Ös L, Ha nen A, Hansen B, K ale G. Cogni i e beha io al ea men s o obsessi e-compulsi e diso de . A sys ema ic
e iew and me a-analysis o s udies published 1993-2014. Clin Psychol Re 2015 Aug;40:156-169. [doi:
10.1016/j.cp .2015.06.003] [Medline: 26117062]
15. B own TA, Campbell LA, Lehman CL, G isham JR, Mancill RB. Cu en and li e ime como bidi y o he DSM-IV anxie y
and mood diso de s in a la ge clinical sample. J Abno m Psychol 2001 No ;110(4):585-599. [doi:
10.1037//0021-843x.110.4.585] [Medline: 11727948]
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 17h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
16. K oenke K, Spi ze RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Löwe B. Anxie y diso de s in p ima y ca e: p e alence, impai men ,
como bidi y, and de ec ion. Ann In e n Med 2007 Ma 6;146(5):317-325. [doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004]
[Medline: 17339617]
17. Ba low DH, Allen LB, Choa e ML. Towa d a uni ied ea men o emo ional diso de s - epublished a icle. Beha The
2016 No ;47(6):838-853. [doi: 10.1016/j.be h.2016.11.005] [Medline: 27993336]
18. McManus F, Sha an R, Coope Z. Wha does a ansdiagnos ic app oach ha e o o e he ea men o anxie y diso de s?
B J Clin Psychol 2010 No ;49(P 4):491-505. [doi: 10.1348/014466509X476567] [Medline: 19878622]
19. Ho meije -Se ink MK, Ba elaan NM, an Megen HJ, Penninx BW, Ca h DC, an den Hou MA, e al. Clinical ele ance
o como bidi y in anxie y diso de s: a epo om he Ne he lands s udy o dep ession and anxie y (NESDA). J A ec
Diso d 2012 Ma ;137(1-3):106-112 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.008] [Medline: 22240085]
20. Rapapo MH, Cla y C, Fayyad R, Endico J. Quali y-o -li e impai men in dep essi e and anxie y diso de s. Am J Psychia y
2005 Jun;162(6):1171-1178. [doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1171] [Medline: 15930066]
21. Be ge T, U ech A, K iege T, S olz T, Schulz A, Vincen A, e al. E ec s o a ansdiagnos ic unguided In e ne in e en ion
(' elib a') o anxie y diso de s in p ima y ca e: esul s o a andomized con olled ial. Psychol Med 2017 Jan;47(1):67-80.
[doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002270] [Medline: 27655039]
22. Dea BF, S aples LG, Te ides MD, Ka in E, Zou J, Johns on L, e al. T ansdiagnos ic e sus diso de -speci ic and
clinician-guided e sus sel -guided in e ne -deli e ed ea men o gene alized anxie y diso de and como bid diso de s:
a andomized con olled ial. J Anxie y Diso d 2015 Dec;36:63-77 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.09.003]
[Medline: 26460536]
23. Fa chione TJ, Fai holme CP, Ella d KK, Boisseau CL, Thompson-Hollands J, Ca l JR, e al. Uni ied p o ocol o
ansdiagnos ic ea men o emo ional diso de s: a andomized con olled ial. Beha The 2012 Sep;43(3):666-678 [FREE
Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.be h.2012.01.001] [Medline: 22697453]
24. No on PJ, Hope DA. P elimina y e alua ion o a b oad-spec um cogni i e-beha io al g oup he apy o anxie y. J Beha
The Exp Psychia y 2005 Jun;36(2):79-97. [doi: 10.1016/j.jb ep.2004.07.002] [Medline: 15814078]
25. Fo man EM, He be JD, Moi a E, Yeomans PD, Gelle PA. A andomized con olled e ec i eness ial o accep ance
and commi men he apy and cogni i e he apy o anxie y and dep ession. Beha Modi 2007 No ;31(6):772-799. [doi:
10.1177/0145445507302202] [Medline: 17932235]
26. Johansson R, Bjö klund M, Ho nbo g C, Ka lsson S, Hesse H, Ljó sson B, e al. A ec - ocused psychodynamic
psycho he apy o dep ession and anxie y h ough he in e ne : a andomized con olled ial. Pee J 2013;1:e102 [FREE
Full ex ] [doi: 10.7717/pee j.102] [Medline: 23862104]
27. Ti o N, Dea BF, Schwencke G, And ews G, Johns on L, C aske MG, e al. T ansdiagnos ic in e ne ea men o anxie y
and dep ession: a andomised con olled ial. Beha Res The 2011 Aug;49(8):441-452. [doi: 10.1016/j.b a .2011.03.007]
[Medline: 21679925]
28. Newby JM, McKinnon A, Kuyken W, Gilbody S, Dalgleish T. Sys ema ic e iew and me a-analysis o ansdiagnos ic
psychological ea men s o anxie y and dep essi e diso de s in adul hood. Clin Psychol Re 2015 Aug;40:91-110 [FREE
Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.cp .2015.06.002] [Medline: 26094079]
29. Newby JM, Twomey C, Li SS, And ews G. T ansdiagnos ic compu e ised cogni i e beha iou al he apy o dep ession
and anxie y: a sys ema ic e iew and me a-analysis. J A ec Diso d 2016 Jul 15;199:30-41. [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.018]
[Medline: 27060430]
30. Păsă elu CR, Ande sson G, No dg en LB, Dob ean A. In e ne -deli e ed ansdiagnos ic and ailo ed cogni i e beha io al
he apy o anxie y and dep ession: a sys ema ic e iew and me a-analysis o andomized con olled ials. Cogn Beha
The 2017 Jan;46(1):1-28. [doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1231219] [Medline: 27712544]
31. Reinhol N, K ogh J. E icacy o ansdiagnos ic cogni i e beha iou he apy o anxie y diso de s: a sys ema ic e iew
and me a-analysis o published ou come s udies. Cogn Beha The 2014;43(3):171-184. [doi: 10.1080/16506073.2014.897367]
[Medline: 24646219]
32. Pea l SB, No on PJ. T ansdiagnos ic e sus diagnosis speci ic cogni i e beha iou al he apies o anxie y: a me a-analysis.
J Anxie y Diso d 2017 Ma ;46:11-24. [doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.07.004] [Medline: 27466074]
33. Ga cía-Escale a J, Cho o P, Valien e R. E icacy o ansdiagnos ic cogni i e-beha io al he apy o anxie y and dep ession
in adul s, child en and adolescen s: a me a-analysis. Re Psicopa ol Psicol Clin 2016;21(3):147-175 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.5944/ ppc. ol.21.num.3.2016.17811]
34. Saue -Za ala S, Gu ne CA, Fa chione TJ, Boe che HT, Bullis JR, Ba low DH. Cu en de ini ions o ' ansdiagnos ic' in
ea men de elopmen : a sea ch o consensus. Beha The 2017 Jan;48(1):128-138. [doi: 10.1016/j.be h.2016.09.004]
[Medline: 28077216]
35. Ba low D, Ella d K, Fai holme C, Fa chione TJ, Boisseau CL. Uni ied P o ocol o T ansdiagnos ic T ea men o Emo ional
Diso de s: Wo kbook. New Yo k, USA: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess; 2011.
36. Ba low D, Fa chione T, Fai holme C, Ella d KK, Boisseau CL. T ea men s ha wo k. In: Uni ied P o ocol o T ansdiagnos ic
T ea men o Emo ional Diso de s: The apis Guide. New Yo k, USA: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess; 2011.
37. Ba low DH, Fa chione TJ, Bullis JR, Gallaghe MW, Mu ay-La in H, Saue -Za ala S, e al. The uni ied p o ocol o
ansdiagnos ic ea men o emo ional diso de s compa ed wi h diagnosis-speci ic p o ocols o anxie y diso de s: a
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 18h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
andomized clinical ial. JAMA Psychia y 2017 Sep 1;74(9):875-884 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1001/jamapsychia y.2017.2164] [Medline: 28768327]
38. S eele SJ, Fa chione TJ, Cassiello-Robbins C, Ame aj A, Sbi S, Saue -Za ala S, e al. E icacy o he Uni ied P o ocol o
ansdiagnos ic ea men o como bid psychopa hology accompanying emo ional diso de s compa ed o ea men s a ge ing
single diso de s. J Psychia Res 2018 Sep;104:211-216 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychi es.2018.08.005] [Medline:
30103069]
39. B own TA, Ba low DH. A p oposal o a dimensional classi ica ion sys em based on he sha ed ea u es o he DSM-IV
anxie y and mood diso de s: implica ions o assessmen and ea men . Psychol Assess 2009 Sep;21(3):256-271 [FREE
Full ex ] [doi: 10.1037/a0016608] [Medline: 19719339]
40. Ba low DH, Saue -Za ala S, Ca l JR, Bullis JR, Ella d KK. The na u e, diagnosis, and ea men o neu o icism. Clin
Psychol Sci 2013 Oc 14;2(3):344-365. [doi: 10.1177/2167702613505532]
41. Bullis JR, Fo une MR, Fa chione TJ, Ba low DH. A p elimina y in es iga ion o he long- e m ou come o he uni ied
p o ocol o ansdiagnos ic ea men o emo ional diso de s. Comp Psychia y 2014 No ;55(8):1920-1927 [FREE Full
ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.016] [Medline: 25113056]
42. Ca l JR, Gallaghe MW, Saue -Za ala SE, Ben ley KH, Ba low DH. A p elimina y in es iga ion o he e ec s o he uni ied
p o ocol on empe amen . Comp Psychia y 2014 Aug;55(6):1426-1434 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.015] [Medline: 24933653]
43. G ay J. The Psychology o Fea and S ess. Camb idge, UK: Camb idge Uni e si y; 1987.
44. Neacsiu A, Bohus M, Linehan M. Dialec ical beha io he apy: an in e en ion o emo ion dys egula ion. In: G oss JJ,
edi o . Handbook o Emo ion Regula ion. New Yo k, USA: Guil o d P ess; 2014:491-508.
45. Neacsiu AD, He NR, Fang CM, Rod iguez MA, Rosen hal MZ. Iden i y dis u bance and p oblems wi h emo ion egula ion
a e ela ed cons uc s ac oss diagnoses. J Clin Psychol 2015 Ap ;71(4):346-361. [doi: 10.1002/jclp.22141] [Medline:
25534425]
46. Linehan M. Skills T aining Manual o T ea ing Bo de line Pe sonali y Diso de . New Yo k, USA: Guil o d P ess; 1993.
47. Ri schel LA, Lim NE, S ewa LM. T ansdiagnos ic applica ions o DBT o adolescen s and adul s. Am J Psycho he
2015;69(2):111-128. [doi: 10.1176/appi.psycho he apy.2015.69.2.111] [Medline: 26160618]
48. Bohus M, Dye AS, P iebe K, K üge A, Kleindiens N, Schmahl C, e al. Dialec ical beha iou he apy o pos - auma ic
s ess diso de a e childhood sexual abuse in pa ien s wi h and wi hou bo de line pe sonali y diso de : a andomised
con olled ial. Psycho he Psychosom 2013;82(4):221-233. [doi: 10.1159/000348451] [Medline: 23712109]
49. Ho mann SG, Hayes SC. The u u e o in e en ion science: p ocess-based he apy. Clin Psychol Sci 2019 Jan;7(1):37-50
[FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1177/2167702618772296] [Medline: 30713811]
50. Ande sson G. In e ne in e en ions: pas , p esen and u u e. In e ne In e 2018 Jun;12:181-188 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1016/j.in en .2018.03.008] [Medline: 30135782]
51. Ande sson G. In e ne -deli e ed psychological ea men s. Annu Re Clin Psychol 2016;12:157-179. [doi:
10.1146/annu e -clinpsy-021815-093006] [Medline: 26652054]
52. G i i hs KM, Fa e L, Ch is ensen H. The e icacy o in e ne in e en ions o dep ession and anxie y diso de s: a e iew
o andomised con olled ials. Med J Aus 2010 Jun 7;192(S11):S4-11. [Medline: 20528707]
53. Ande sson G, Ti o N. Ad an ages and limi a ions o In e ne -based in e en ions o common men al diso de s. Wo ld
Psychia y 2014 Feb;13(1):4-11 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1002/wps.20083] [Medline: 24497236]
54. G i i hs F, Lindenmeye A, Powell J, Lowe P, Tho ogood M. Why a e heal h ca e in e en ions deli e ed o e he in e ne ?
A sys ema ic e iew o he published li e a u e. J Med In e ne Res 2006 Jun 23;8(2):e10 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.2196/jmi .8.2.e10] [Medline: 16867965]
55. Donke T, Blanke s M, Hedman E, Ljó sson B, Pe ie K, Ch is ensen H. Economic e alua ions o in e ne in e en ions
o men al heal h: a sys ema ic e iew. Psychol Med 2015 Dec;45(16):3357-3376. [doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001427]
[Medline: 26235445]
56. Wang PS, Aguila -Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Ange meye MC, Bo ges G, B ome EJ, e al. Use o men al heal h se ices o
anxie y, mood, and subs ance diso de s in 17 coun ies in he WHO wo ld men al heal h su eys. Lance 2007 Sep
8;370(9590):841-850 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61414-7] [Medline: 17826169]
57. Kohn R, Saxena S, Le a I, Sa aceno B. The ea men gap in men al heal h ca e. Bull Wo ld Heal h O gan 2004
No ;82(11):858-866 [FREE Full ex ] [Medline: 15640922]
58. Mon illa JF, González C, Re olaza A, Dueñas C, Alameda J. Uso de se icios ambula o ios de salud men al en España:
consumo de ecu sos en el p ime año de asis encia a pacien es nue os. Re Asoc Esp Neu opsiq 2002 Dec(84):25-47.
[doi: 10.4321/s0211-57352002000400003]
59. Du o Ma ínez JC. La psicología clínica en la sanidad pública de la comunidad de Mad id: la insu icien e consolidación
de una p o esión sani a ia. Clínica y Salud 2016 Jul 1;27(2):45-50 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.clysa.2016.05.001]
60. Ma ín-Ju ado A, de la Gánda a Ma ín JJ, Cas o Ca bajo S, Mo ei a He nández A, Sánchez-He nández J. [Conco dance
analysis o e e als om p ima y ca e o men al heal h]. Seme gen 2012 Sep;38(6):354-359. [doi:
10.1016/j.seme g.2011.12.005] [Medline: 22935831]
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 19h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
61. McHugh RK, Mu ay HW, Ba low DH. Balancing ideli y and adap a ion in he dissemina ion o empi ically-suppo ed
ea men s: he p omise o ansdiagnos ic in e en ions. Beha Res The 2009 No ;47(11):946-953 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1016/j.b a .2009.07.005] [Medline: 19643395]
62. Spu geon JA, W igh JH. Compu e -assis ed cogni i e-beha io al he apy. Cu Psychia y Rep 2010 Dec;12(6):547-552.
[doi: 10.1007/s11920-010-0152-4] [Medline: 20872100]
63. Bowe P, Gilbody S. S epped ca e in psychological he apies: access, e ec i eness and e iciency. Na a i e li e a u e
e iew. B J Psychia y 2005 Jan;186:11-17. [doi: 10.1192/bjp.186.1.11] [Medline: 15630118]
64. Mohe D, Hopewell S, Schulz K, Mon o i V, Gø zsche PC, De e eaux P, e al. CONSORT 2010 explana ion and elabo a ion:
upda ed guidelines o epo ing pa allel g oup andomised ials. B Med J 2010 Ma 23;340:c869 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1136/bmj.c869] [Medline: 20332511]
65. Mohe D, Schulz KF, Al man DG, CONSORT. The CONSORT s a emen : e ised ecommenda ions o imp o ing he
quali y o epo s o pa allel g oup andomized ials. BMC Med Res Me hodol 2001;1:2 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1186/1471-2288-1-2] [Medline: 11336663]
66. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH G oup. CONSORT-EHEALTH: imp o ing and s anda dizing e alua ion epo s o
web-based and mobile heal h in e en ions. J Med In e ne Res 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.2196/jmi .1923] [Medline: 22209829]
67. González-Robles A, Ga cía-Palacios A, Baños R, Rie a A, Llo ca G, T a e F, e al. E ec i eness o a ansdiagnos ic
in e ne -based p o ocol o he ea men o emo ional diso de s e sus ea men as usual in specialized ca e: s udy p o ocol
o a andomized con olled ial. T ials 2015 Oc 31;16:488 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1024-3] [Medline:
26519046]
68. Labpsi ec. 2011. Psicología y Tecnología URL: h ps://psicologiay ecnologia.labpsi ec.es/ [accessed 2015-09-10]
69. Johansson R, Ande sson G. In e ne -based psychological ea men s o dep ession. Expe Re Neu o he 2012
Jul;12(7):861-9; quiz 870. [doi: 10.1586/e n.12.63] [Medline: 22853793]
70. Wa s SE, Tu nell A, Kladni ski N, Newby JM, And ews G. T ea men -as-usual (TAU) is any hing bu usual: a me a-analysis
o CBT e sus TAU o anxie y and dep ession. J A ec Diso d 2015 Ap 1;175:152-167. [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.025]
[Medline: 25618002]
71. And ews G, Cuijpe s P, C aske MG, McE oy P, Ti o N. Compu e he apy o he anxie y and dep essi e diso de s is
e ec i e, accep able and p ac ical heal h ca e: a me a-analysis. PLoS One 2010 Oc 13;5(10):e13196 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1371/jou nal.pone.0013196] [Medline: 20967242]
72. an Ballegooijen W, Cuijpe s P, an S a en A, Ka yo aki E, Ande sson G, Smi JH, e al. Adhe ence o in e ne -based and
ace- o- ace cogni i e beha iou al he apy o dep ession: a me a-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9(7):e100674 [FREE Full ex ]
[doi: 10.1371/jou nal.pone.0100674] [Medline: 25029507]
73. Faul F, E d elde E, Lang A, Buchne A. G*Powe 3: a lexible s a is ical powe analysis p og am o he social, beha io al,
and biomedical sciences. Beha Res Me hods 2007 May;39(2):175-191. [doi: 10.3758/b 03193146] [Medline: 17695343]
74. Ame ican Psychia ic Associa ion. Diagnos ic and S a is ical Manual o Men al Diso de s. Fou h Edi ion. Washing on,
DC: Ame ican Psychia ic Associa ion; 2000.
75. Sheehan DV, Lec ubie Y, Sheehan KH, Amo im P, Jana s J, Weille E, e al. The mini-in e na ional neu opsychia ic
in e iew (MINI): he de elopmen and alida ion o a s uc u ed diagnos ic psychia ic in e iew o DSM-IV and ICD-10.
J Clin Psychia y 1998;59(Suppl 20):22-33;quiz 34 [FREE Full ex ] [Medline: 9881538]
76. Fe ando L, Bobes J, Gibe J, Lecub ie Y. Mini in e na ional neu opsychia ic in e iew. In: Bobes J, Bousoño M, González
MP, edi o s. Manejo De Los T as o nos Men ales Y Del Compo amien o en A ención P ima ia. O iedo: Go e ; 1997.
77. Beck A, S ee R, B own G. Manual o he Beck Dep ession In en o y-II. San An onio, TX: Psychological Co po a ion;
1990.
78. Sanz J, Ga cía-Ve a MP. Adap ación española del In en a io pa a la Dep esión de Beck II (BDI-II): 3. P opiedades
psicomé icas en pacien es con as o nos psicológicos. Clin Salud 2005;16(2):121-142 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.6018/analesps.29.1.130532]
79. Beck A, S ee R. Beck Anxie y In en o y Manual. San An onio, TX: Psychological Co po a ion; 1993.
80. Magán I, Sanz J, Ga cía-Ve a MP. Psychome ic p ope ies o a Spanish e sion o he beck anxie y in en o y (BAI) in
gene al popula ion. Span J Psychol 2008 No ;11(2):626-640. [Medline: 18988448]
81. Ca e CS, Whi e TL. Beha io al inhibi ion, beha io al ac i a ion, and a ec i e esponses o impending ewa d and
punishmen : he BIS/BAS scales. J Pe s Soc Psychol 1994;67(2):319-333. [doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319]
82. Case as X, À ila C, To ubia R. The measu emen o indi idual di e ences in beha iou al inhibi ion and beha iou al
ac i a ion sys ems: a compa ison o pe sonali y scales. Pe s Indi id Di 2003 Ap ;34(6):999-1013. [doi:
10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00084-3]
83. Badía X. Eu oQol; un ins umen o pa a alo a la salud EQ-5D guía del usua io, e sión española. Med Clin 1999;114:6-14.
84. Badia X, Rose M, Mon se a S, He dman M, Segu a A. [The Spanish e sion o Eu oQol: a desc ip ion and i s applica ions.
Eu opean quali y o li e scale]. Med Clin (Ba c) 1999;112(Suppl 1):79-85. [Medline: 10618804]
85. Meye T, Mille M, Me zge R, Bo ko ec TD. De elopmen and alida ion o he Penn s a e wo y ques ionnai e. Beha
Res The 1990;28(6):487-495. [doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6] [Medline: 2076086]
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 20h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
86. Sandín B, Cho o P, Valien e R, Los ao L. Validación española del cues iona io de p eocupación PSWQ: es uc u a ac o ial
y p opiedades psicomé icas. RPPC 2009 Aug 1;14(2):- [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.5944/ ppc. ol.14.num.2.2009.4070]
87. Houck PR, Spiegel DA, Shea MK, Rucci P. Reliabili y o he sel - epo e sion o he panic diso de se e i y scale.
Dep ess Anxie y 2002;15(4):183-185. [doi: 10.1002/da.10049] [Medline: 12112724]
88. San acana M, Fullana MA, Bonillo A, Mo ales M, Mon o o M, Rosado S, e al. Psychome ic p ope ies o he Spanish
sel - epo e sion o he panic diso de se e i y scale. Comp Psychia y 2014 Aug;55(6):1467-1472. [doi:
10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.007] [Medline: 24850072]
89. Ma ick RP, Cla ke J. De elopmen and alida ion o measu es o social phobia sc u iny ea and social in e ac ion anxie y.
Beha Res The 1998 Ap ;36(4):455-470. [doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10031-6] [Medline: 9670605]
90. Zubeida I, Salinas JM, Sie a JC, Fe nández-Pa a A. Psychome ic p ope ies o he social in e ac ion anxie y scale and
sepa a ion c i e ion be ween Spanish you hs wi h and wi hou sub ypes o social anxie y. J Anxie y Diso d
2007;21(5):603-624. [doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.09.010] [Medline: 17084589]
91. Foa EB, Huppe JD, Leibe g S, Langne R, Kichic R, Hajcak G, e al. The obsessi e-compulsi e in en o y: de elopmen
and alida ion o a sho e sion. Psychol Assess 2002 Dec;14(4):485-496. [Medline: 12501574]
92. Fullana M, To ella-Feliu M, Case as X, Andión O, To ubia R, Ma aix-Cols D. Psychome ic p ope ies o he Spanish
e sion o he obsessi e-compulsi e in en o y-- e ised in a non-clinical sample. J Anxie y Diso d 2005;19(8):893-903.
[doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.10.004] [Medline: 16243637]
93. Bo ko ec TD, Nau SD. C edibili y o analogue he apy a ionales. J Beha The Exp Psychia y 1972 Dec;3(4):257-260.
[doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(72)90045-6]
94. Mi a A, B e ón-López J, Ga cía-Palacios A, Que o S, Baños RM, Bo ella C. An in e ne -based p og am o dep essi e
symp oms using human and au oma ed suppo : a andomized con olled ial. Neu opsychia Dis T ea 2017;13:987-1006
[FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.2147/NDT.S130994] [Medline: 28408833]
95. Campos D, B e ón-López J, Bo ella C, Mi a A, Cas illa D, Mo S, e al. E icacy o an in e ne -based exposu e ea men
o lying phobia (NO-FEAR Ai lines) wi h and wi hou he apis guidance: a andomized con olled ial. BMC Psychia y
2019 Ma 6;19(1):86 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2060-4] [Medline: 30841930]
96. Commi y I alia SRL. T endoo URL: h ps://www. endoo.es/ [accessed 2015-09-15]
97. Newman DA. Missing da a. O gan Res Me hods 2014 Sep 26;17(4):372-411. [doi: 10.1177/1094428114548590]
98. Hai J, Black W, Babin B, Ande son R. Mul i a ia e Da a Analysis: Wi h Readings. Se en h Edi ion. Ri e , NJ:
Pea son-P en ice Hall In e na ional Edi ion; 2014.
99. A ias R, Chacon J, Cas ellanos M. Analisis De Da os en Psicologia Y Ciencias De La Salud. Vol 1. Mad id, Spain: EOS
Ins i u o de O ien ación Psicológica; 2015.
100. an B eukelen GJ. ANCOVA e sus change om baseline: mo e powe in andomized s udies, mo e bias in non andomized
s udies [co ec ed]. J Clin Epidemiol 2006 Sep;59(9):920-925. [doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007] [Medline: 16895814]
101. Wein u K. Repea ed measu es analysis: ANOVA, MANOVA, and HLM. In: G imm LG, Ya nold PR, edi o s. Reading
and Unde s anding Mo e Mul i a ia e S a is ics. New Yo k, USA: Ame ican Psychological Associa ion; 2000:317-361.
102. Cohen J. S a is ical Powe Analysis o he Beha io al Sciences. Second Edi ion. Hillsdale, NJ: E lbaum; Dec 1988.
103. Jacobson NS, T uax P. Clinical signi icance: a s a is ical app oach o de ining meaning ul change in psycho he apy esea ch.
J Consul Clin Psychol 1991 Feb;59(1):12-19. [doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.1.12] [Medline: 2002127]
104. Dunn B, Ge man R, Khazano G, Xu C, Hollon SD, DeRubeis RJ. Changes in posi i e and nega i e a ec du ing
pha macological ea men and cogni i e he apy o majo dep essi e diso de : a seconda y analysis o wo andomized
con olled ials. Clin Psychol Sci 2019 No 7;8(1):36-51 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1177/2167702619863427]
105. González-Robles A, Ga cía-Palacios A, Baños R, Que o S, Bo ella C. Up egula ing posi i e a ec i i y in he ansdiagnos ic
ea men o emo ional diso de s: a andomized pilo s udy. Beha Modi 2019 Jan;43(1):26-55. [doi:
10.1177/0145445517735631] [Medline: 29047288]
106. Be PM, Hug enbu g JG, Penninx BW, Hoogendijk WJ. Side e ec s o an idep essan s du ing long- e m use in a na u alis ic
se ing. Eu Neu opsychopha macol 2013 No ;23(11):1443-1451. [doi: 10.1016/j.eu oneu o.2013.05.001] [Medline:
23726508]
107. G eenbe g RP, Cons an ino MJ, B uce N. A e pa ien expec a ions s ill ele an o psycho he apy p ocess and ou come?
Clin Psychol Re 2006 Oc ;26(6):657-678. [doi: 10.1016/j.cp .2005.03.002] [Medline: 15908088]
108. González-Robles A, Díaz-Ga cía A, Miguel C, Ga cía-Palacios A, Bo ella C. Como bidi y and diagnosis dis ibu ion in
ansdiagnos ic ea men s o emo ional diso de s: a sys ema ic e iew o andomized con olled ials. PLoS One
2018;13(11):e0207396. [doi: 10.1371/jou nal.pone.0207396] [Medline: 30440020]
109. Campos D, Mi a A, B e ón-López J, Cas illa D, Bo ella C, Baños RM, e al. The accep abili y o an in e ne -based exposu e
ea men o lying phobia wi h and wi hou he apis guidance: pa ien s' expec a ions, sa is ac ion, ea men p e e ences,
and usabili y. Neu opsychia Dis T ea 2018;14:879-892 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.2147/NDT.S153041] [Medline:
29636613]
110. No on PJ. A andomized clinical ial o ansdiagnos ic cogni e-beha io al ea men s o anxie y diso de by compa ison
o elaxa ion aining. Beha The 2012 Sep;43(3):506-517 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.be h.2010.08.011] [Medline:
22697440]
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 21h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X

111. Ti o N, And ews G, Johns on L, Robinson E, Spence J. T ansdiagnos ic in e ne ea men o anxie y diso de s: a
andomized con olled ial. Beha Res The 2010 Sep;48(9):890-899. [doi: 10.1016/j.b a .2010.05.014] [Medline: 20561606]
112. Ti o N, Dea BF, S aples LG, Te ides MD, Ka in E, Sheehan J, e al. Diso de -speci ic e sus ansdiagnos ic and
clinician-guided e sus sel -guided ea men o majo dep essi e diso de and como bid anxie y diso de s: a andomized
con olled ial. J Anxie y Diso d 2015 Oc ;35:88-102 [FREE Full ex ] [doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.08.002] [Medline:
26422822]
113. González-González S, González M, Ga cía M. Psychological ea men s ea u es and ou comes in Spanish public men al
heal h cen es. In e n Jou Psych Psycho The apy 2014;14(1):17-32 [FREE Full ex ]
114. Sha an R, Cla k DM, Fai bu n CG, A n z A, Ba low DH, Ehle s A, e al. Mind he gap: imp o ing he dissemina ion o
CBT. Beha Res The 2009 No ;47(11):902-909. [doi: 10.1016/j.b a .2009.07.003] [Medline: 19664756]
115. Mon e o-Ma ín J, A aya R, Pé ez-Yus MC, Mayo al F, Gili M, Bo ella C, e al. An in e ne -based in e en ion o dep ession
in p ima y ca e in Spain: a andomized con olled ial. J Med In e ne Res 2016 Aug 26;18(8):e231 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.2196/jmi .5695] [Medline: 27565118]
116. Rome o-Sanchiz P, Noguei a-A jona R, Ga cía-Ruiz A, Luciano JV, Campayo JG, Gili M, e al. Economic e alua ion o
a guided and unguided in e ne -based CBT in e en ion o majo dep ession: Resul s om a mul i-cen e , h ee-a med
andomized con olled ial conduc ed in p ima y ca e. PLoS One 2017;12(2):e0172741 [FREE Full ex ] [doi:
10.1371/jou nal.pone.0172741] [Medline: 28241025]
117. Sandín B, Valien e RM, Ga cía-Escale a J, Pineda D, Espinosa V, Magaz A, e al. P o ocolo uni icado pa a el a amien o
ansdiagnós ico de los as o nos emocionales en adolescen es a a és de in e ne (iUP-A): aplicación web y p o ocolo de
un ensayo con olado alea o izado. Re Psicopa ol Psicol Clin 2020 Jan 29;24(3):197. [doi: 10.5944/ ppc.26460]
118. Kazdin AE. T ea men as usual and ou ine ca e in esea ch and clinical p ac ice. Clin Psychol Re 2015 Dec;42:168-178.
[doi: 10.1016/j.cp .2015.08.006] [Medline: 26431668]
119. Paul GL. S a egy o ou come esea ch in psycho he apy. J Consul Psychol 1967 Ap ;31(2):109-118. [doi: 10.1037/h0024436]
[Medline: 5342732]
120. Theobald S, B andes N, Gyapong M, El-Saha y S, P oc o E, Diaz T, e al. Implemen a ion esea ch: new impe a i es and
oppo uni ies in global heal h. Lance 2018 No 17;392(10160):2214-2228. [doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32205-0] [Medline:
30314860]
Abb e ia ions
AG: ago aphobia
ANCOVA: analysis o co a iance
ANOVA: analysis o a iance
BA: beha io al ac i a ion
BAI: Beck Anxie y In en o y
BAS: beha io al ac i a ion scale
BDI-II: Beck dep ession in en o y, 2nd edi ion
BI: beha io al inhibi ion
BIS: beha io al inhibi ion scale
CBT: cogni i e beha io al he apy
CONSORT: Consolida ed S anda ds o Repo ing T ials
DBT: dialec ical beha io al he apy
DD: dys hymic diso de
DSM-IV: Diagnos ic and S a is ical Manual o Men al Diso de s, Fou h Edi ion
ED: emo ional diso de
EQ-5D-3L: Eu oQoL-5D-3L ques ionnai e
GAD: gene alized anxie y diso de
ITT: in en ion- o- ea
MCAR: missing comple ely a andom
MDD: majo dep essi e diso de
MINI: mini-in e na ional neu opsychia ic in e iew
ML: maximum likelihood
NOS: no o he wise speci ied
OCD: obsessi e compulsi e diso de
PD: panic diso de
QoL: quali y o li e
RCI: eliable change index
RCT: andomized con olled ial
SAD: social anxie y diso de
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 22h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X
SI: socie al index
TAU: ea men as usual
UP: Uni ied P o ocol
VAS: isual analog scale
Edi ed by G Eysenbach; submi ed 14.02.20; pee - e iewed by B Sandín, L Bücke ; commen s o au ho 24.03.20; e ised e sion
ecei ed 08.04.20; accep ed 08.04.20; published 07.07.20
Please ci e as:
González-Robles A, Díaz-Ga cía A, Ga cía-Palacios A, Roca P, Ramos-Qui oga JA, Bo ella C
E ec i eness o a T ansdiagnos ic Guided In e ne -Deli e ed P o ocol o Emo ional Diso de s Ve sus T ea men as Usual in
Specialized Ca e: Randomized Con olled T ial
J Med In e ne Res 2020;22(7):e18220
URL: h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220
doi: 10.2196/18220
PMID:
©Albe o González-Robles, Amanda Díaz-Ga cía, Azucena Ga cía-Palacios, Pablo Roca, Josep An oni Ramos-Qui oga, C is ina
Bo ella. O iginally published in he Jou nal o Medical In e ne Resea ch (h p://www.jmi .o g), 07.07.2020. This is an open-access
a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License (h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/),
which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k, i s published in he
Jou nal o Medical In e ne Resea ch, is p ope ly ci ed. The comple e bibliog aphic in o ma ion, a link o he o iginal publica ion
on h p://www.jmi .o g/, as well as his copy igh and license in o ma ion mus be included.
J Med In e ne Res 2020 | ol. 22 | iss. 7 | e18220 | p. 23h ps://www.jmi .o g/2020/7/e18220 (page numbe no o ci a ion pu poses)
González-Robles e alJOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
XSL
•
FO
Rende X