Kelios pastabos dėl hibr. „stigavoti“

LITHUANIAN KALBOTYROS QUESTIONS, XXX (1993) PERIFERICAL LITHUANIAN LANGUAGES ARTICLES Notes. Reviews KELIOS REMARKS ON HIBR. stigavoti Hibr. stigavoti "to assert, to affirm, to believe (ref. argue, object)" and the Vedic jo (įstigavoti, pastigavoti, par-/per-stigavodti, susistigavoti; stigavėjimas, stigavoné) common rather widespread ir in the Žemaičių dialect (especially in northwestern dialects) word. Tą rodo ir LKŽ (XIII illustrative 770). examples of the word stigavoti lizde are presented here in as many as fourteen places of the Žemaičių iš dialektas, the majority of which consists of northwestern Žemaičiai (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U). This word and the Vedic jo not rare ir 19 a. culture ir literature representatives of Samogitians, who S. wrote in Samogitian, Daukanto ir M. In the writings of Valančius. This is also seen iš There are many more sentences in the LKŽ, which can be found in the dictionary. There is only confusion about the spelling of this word. LKŽ raised the normative form of this word in the root long su j-stygavoti, next to indicating the form ir su short - stigavati. However, the illustrative material gives the opposite picture. Northwestern Samogitians pronounce the word stigavoti ir jo vedinius shortly. su i. LKŽ indicated du cases with long i from southern Žemaičiai (stygavds, įstygavolja] Užv, Up), although we have an example here ir su short i (stigavdjo Rs). S. Daukanto ir M. The forms used by Valančius have also been written in the short form su i (plg. J. Balčikonis, J. Talmantas, Z. Zinkevičius edited jų writings! , A. "Dictionary of S. Daukanto Writings" (in Lithuanian). In LKŽ examples from M. Valančius’ writings are also given with the short i (stigavojo, susistigavojo, stigavoné), while iš S. It is written in two ways (stigavoti, susistigavo, but stygavojimas- ). However, writing with a long i has no basis. This is clearly shown by the dialect of S. Daukanto region, and it is unreliable to rely solely on his writing, because S. Daukanta wrote the long and short vowels inconsistently. The illustrative example of LKŽ, which is taken from S. Daukanto "Darby", confirms this (here the letter y usually marks the short extended i, cf.: Wyinog tu wiru stygawoyimas nieka nie darodis, p. 20). The examples given from old dictionaries or other writings also support the short i. Parallel to the long and short i are given the forms of this word from M. 1 See Valančiaus raštai. The dictionary was edited and added by J. Balčikonis. K., 1931. 481; Daukantas S. Lithuanian way. Edited and dictionary added by J. tas. K., 1935. P. 353; Daukantas S. Selected Writings. Compiled by M. Lukšienė, text prepared by Z. Zinkevičius. V., 1955. P. 465. 2000) and the dictionary of A. Simanas Daukanto writings (typewritten in the Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language Institute). P. 99. 3 Simanas Daukantas. Work on the Old Lithuanian and Žemaičių 1822. Prepared for printing by Vaclovas and Mykolas BirZiskiai.K., 1929. 214 The Niedermann dictionary was probably created by combining the two word slots of this dictionary (NdŽ99). In addition to the example with the long i from "Tėvynės Sargas" given by LKŽ, the dictionary catalog from the same source contains a sentence where this word is written with the long i: jisai jug stigavoja apie mūsų probočių dievobaimingumą (1901, IV-VII). V, 14). to Since the illustrative material suggests that the heading should highlight the form with the short i, it is not clear why the reverse has been done. It is possible to think that the hybrid. stigavoti with the long i adapted to the word stfgauti "to say, to express an opinion, to confirm" (LKZ XIII, 769), which is indicated to the first meaning of stigavoti, but also the raising of this word with the long i of the root raises doubts. With the long stitching, the LKZ is illustrated by three examples: from J. Balvočius' writings, J. Basanavičius' collection of tales (from there the example of stitching is given) and S. Daukanto "Works". However, the example given by S. Daukanto from "Darbai" with the long i as in the first case is not accurate, because it only gives the notation. In fact, even the example of S. Daukantas is not suitable here, because not the past tense form of the word stigauti is in the sentence mentioned, but the present tense of the verb stigavoti. This is clear from the context: Pinkerson's stygawolja] sawa rasztuse jog Eurley yr Sarmatay winos gimynies buwa yr wina megis kalbieja. The same is said by the second famous wir's Maltbrun in a stanza... (p. 11). So is it not more reliable to rely on the gender of stigauti (with the short i of the root) given by the dictionaries of A. Kuršaitis, M. Miežinis, M. Niedermann, giving the form of writing with the long stigauti as adjacent. But plg. LKŽ (XIII) given words of that root: įsistigti "obstinately confirm" (p. 773), stiginti "confirm" (p. 771), stiguoti (p. 774). Birutė Vanagienė