Priegaidžių defonologizacijos tendencijos Gervėčių tarmėje

LITHUANIAN LINGUISTICS QUESTIONS, XXX (1993) PERIFERICAL LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE DIARCHEMS Danguolė MIKULĖNIENĖ DEPHONOLOGIZATION TENDENCES IN THE GERVECIUS DIARCHEM § 1. The dialect of Gervėčiai district attracts the attention of linguists not only with archaisms, but also with innovations. Like other islands separated from the larger Lithuanian language area, it is, in the words of Z. Zinkevičius, a natural laboratory for the study of various phases of language mixing and decay (Zinkevičius, 1966, p. 29). Gervėčiai dialect features described by P. Arumas (Arumaa, 1930), J. Kardelytė (1975), T. Sudnik (Cyanuk,1975), A. Vidugirio (1972, 1974, 1989), J. Lipskienės (1972, 1989), E. Grinaveckienės (1973), A. Romančiuuk (Pomanuyk, 1988), A. Jonaitytės (1989) ir and other linguists. Based on the jų works, it is not difficult to identify changes in the language of the speakers of that dialect. 8 2. In terms of pronunciation, the Gervėčiai dialect is very close to other eastern highlanders of Vilnius. (for details see Kardelytė, 1975, p. 6; Jonaitytė, 1989, p. 230). Local Lithuanians, especially the older generation, distinguish perfectly between — the adverbs ir tvirtapradę tvirtagalę (plg. Zinkevičius, 1966, p. 33; Kardelytė, 1975, p. 13)1, Be described cases of ir prepositional prepositional preposition, J. Kardelytė's monograph and other linguistic works still mention the middle preposition, characteristic of vowels i, u, in the accentuated position elongated to semivocal i., (vi.sas, t. bū.va)?. That middle prefix is related to su the elongation of the short vowel ("half length"), therefore considered a quantitative characteristic of the accentuated vowel (plg. Garšva, 1977, p. 77-78). Thus, phonetically, ši the middle prefix is a — prefix: the ne phonetic su contradictions with the prefixes of long accented syllables do ji not form (plg. Kazlauskas, 1968, p. 6; Girdenis, 1981, p. 188-189; Garšva, 1982, p. 65). § 3. This is the only time that the long-term effect of the antidepressants has been observed. Į ją ir taken into account in claiming that In the Gervėčiai area, as well as in other eastern outskirts of the Lithuanian language area, a firmly established "in all cases nicely distinguished from the stern" (Zinkevičius, 1966, p. 33; See also dialect texts — Lithuanian, 1970, p. 394-395; Kardelytė, 1975, p. 120-140). 1 Pricgaidziy, as a phenomenon unique to Lithuanian, was abandoned T. Sudnik in monograph (Cyauux, where 1975), the phonological ti systems of all Belarusian, Lithuanian Polish dialects spread in one area are pologically approximated. ir The middle preposition mark indicates the place of accent in non-Lithuanian words, such as: ir 0 Citar’ Place.v'iškai &itd.us’u, On the marking of the middle preposition in other cases (Zr. Zinkevičius, 1974). 95 The phonological system of the dialect remains unchanged. However, in the presence of Slavic languages, it is subject to ji various factors that hinder the system. tr yellow 84. Since the language of the local inhabitants of the Gervėčiai area is not homogeneous from a sociolinguistic point of view, at least three groups of language users can be distinguished: 1) Lithuanian inhabitants, who do not know or almost do not know Belarusian (they refuse to tell about the home, baking bread, growing flax in the local dialect — "I don't even know"); |; 2) Lithuanians who speak Lithuanian at home, but who, in addition to their mother tongue, also speak Belarusian and Polish (the middle and younger generations speak Russian); 3) non-Lithuanian inhabitants who learned Lithuanian in mixed families. Understandably, the Lithuanian language used by each group is very different, as is the degree of proficiency and use of other languages. However, when comparing the ir language characteristics of the representatives of all groups, the newly emerging dialectal changes are evident. They need not only to be observed, recorded or modelled, but also to be predicted — to foresee their possible effect on the dialect pronunciation system. to 85. In the speech of the informants of the first group, both long accented vowels and bilingual prefixes are clearly audible (see text 1). They are pronounced in all accent positions: at the end of the word (žirgais /arkl'ais /t'enais /tais /san'aū /tai /ragai / klanafi gaiž' / ai / vel'n'ai žinoti), in / the penultimate syllable (4.rkl’us gina ei.nam is’imd.ud’e’s) at / the beginning of / the word / ir (p'ė.reina / p'ė.rn'eš'u)), Thus, the difference realized in all cases between the firm-pronounced and the ir firm-pronounced accent shows that the dialectal pronunciation system is well preserved. 86. J. Kazlauskas- 's opinion, south, southwest ir east In Lithuanian dialects, the lengthening of the accentuated diphthong ar point is apparently related to su the accent, o the — su shortening to the accentuated position (Kazlauskas, 1968, p. 8-9). Thus, the opposition of whims can be interpreted as a quantitative contrast of the ir two-voiced elements. Then the strong-beginning diphthong prefix can be understood as the opposite of the long first short second accents ir (4R=! U'), o strong-vow- — el as an opposition of short first and long second (aR"= 1)4, Lithuanians of Gervėčiai district, like many 87. eastern Highlanders, pronounce strong-vowir el diphthongs shorter at the end of the word, without extending the second accent. Compared to, for jų example, the pronunciation of the su Southwestern Highlanders, this is heard as a more open sound that has lost its ir quantity. Then the accented point loses its length, the testiné prefix becomes its allotone, o also called the middle prefix by linguists: aR“ = aR.) t.y. = ple. Gerullis, 1930, p. 48-49). Wty Pig 3 Cia tar aka imasi i ig ; ia chassis 3 i p i “These are examples of only accentuatsu ed diphthongs (mixed diphthongs a eR and compound diphthongs), whose consonants iš are perfectly distinguished by the ears of all dialects ny k Quantitative designation "European Atlas of Languages" ("Atlas li | ini characters Jlmurmermecxnt, 1981,c.28. + 200” (Atlas linquarum Europae") conventional + —Assigned (long) diphthong spot, 7 — mekirchiated (short) diphthong, accentuated, "Y but lost its length ("half length") diphthong point. 96 This intermediate prefix — the allotone of the solid prefix — is neither phonetically nor phonologically identical to that intermediate prefix — the indicator of the short vowel elongated by an accent (see 8 2)°). 88.It is true that both consonant prepositions primarily denote quantitative changes in the accentuated vowel, but they are expressed differently: the allophone of the short accentuated vowel is associated with the increase of i (+ elongation), the allophone of the continuous one — with its decrease (elongation)®. It is possible to say that the test-precautionary alloton in question is a positional variant of the continuous precautionary. In local monolingual Lithuanian, it is usually heard at the end of a word, before a pause, when the intonation of a phrase or sentence falls, e.g. p'irm'aū * /paskui *« /beveik ~ (see text 1). In the language of bilingual and trilingual informants such cases are even more frequent (see texts 2, 3). § 9. The appearance of the strong-end preposition in this allophone at the end of the word is a natural phenomenon of prosody, which has its origin in the tendency to neutralize prepositions, which is characteristic of the end of the word in general (cf. Girdenis, 1981, p. 191). Thus, when discussing the prosodic system of the Gervėčiai dialect, it is necessary to take into account how the contradiction of whims is realized in non-terminal (i.e., word stem) syllables. And the second. Changes in the amount of the accentuated diphthong spot at the end of the word may be a stimulus for further dephonologization of the consonants, i.e. for the disappearance of their contradiction in other, non-terminal, syllables of the word. In bilingual and trilingual Lithuanian, the changes in the prepositional ending of the strong-end word are much more frequent and pronounced. In this case, the often accentuated diphthong is pronounced by transferring the pressure from the second syllable to the first component, in other words, aR = aR (21 = 1), e.g.: vaikdj / labaj /vaikai 4 vaistai. The first point is often elongated after the accent, i.e. aR = AR (J VD: V), e.g. jina.i /daug'a.u /p'irm'a.u /labai /dabar / san'a.u /t'e.va.i /vaika.i /luggv'a.u (see texts 2, 3). Then the strong-end diphthong prefix differs from the "strong-- end only by the uneven realization of the first point, cf. an RC" Uira“RC.8- )). The strongly accentuated vowel is pronounced more intensely, more suddenly, but the auditory difference, for example, between 4.u and a.u is not particularly pronounced, cf. d.uk and a.uk (« dū.k »). Its most important characteristic is the duration (see more. I'pymasene, Crymaxas, 1987, 97-98). § 11. In the speech of the informants of the second group, this common phenomenon of prosody is recorded not only at the end of the word, but also in the penultimate syllable position, e.g.: i e. /skaito. /ska.usmo. I'm gonna take it. /rė.ik'a /ri.pko.m / I'l.pksma /sti.gk'ai (See texts 2, 3). 5 Salys referred to both cases as secondary continuous deception (Salys, 1992, p. 125). The second term is particularly suitable for the inverted prefix alloton. 6 Apparently, taking this into account, Z. Zinkevičius considers the middle prefrontal cortex as a hysterogenic prefrontal cortex (Zinkevičius, 1966, p. 36), but then its distinctive features are completely unclear. Furthermore, so far it has not been demonstrated that in both cases of intermediate prefixes the same sound can be found quantitatively and qualitatively, as it should be in the case of heterogeneous prefixes. 97 Thus, the dialect-specific phonetic contradiction of the 4'R:a R" in bilingual and trilingual Lithuanian has already been considerably expanded —4. R:4R (LU: = you). ; 8 12. In particular, the voice pressure is often transferred to the first fret in mixed diphthongs, e.g. pi.IBo. /sū.gk'ai /ri.gpko- .m /k'etv'i.rtu. /deši.mts /ji.rg’i /I'i.gksma /v'isū.r (see texts 2, 3). This suggests that the dephonologization of consonants is strongly supported by the surrounding Slavic languages: in the case of the Gudian and Polish languages, only the vowel is considered to be the nucleus of the pronounced syllable (mixed diphthongs are not present in these languages). Thus, the base of the accentuated syllable of Lithuanian words —the mixed diphthong— regardless of its prefix, is already treated as a combination of the elongated vowel and the requested consonant, cf. pf" (“x R= —8 U) and pirkt (i. R = Xa) This idea is supported by the study of the third group of informant language. They pronounce accentuated diphthongs in the same way — the pressure of the voice is always concentrated in the first component (see text 4). 813. Dephonologization of bilingual adverbs — a spreading dialect phenomenon. This is evidenced by the data of an experiment conducted with younger native residents*. When asked to read a text, informants who have graduated from a Lithuanian school easily recognize heterotones — words that differ in prepositions, e.g.: šauk and Salik, auk and afik, kaušo and kaūšo, kaukė and kaūkė. However, when trying to pronounce them correctly, they often make a mistake in the case of a strong preposition: they always emphasize the first accent of the diphthong. Especially often, — apparently because of the similarity to the Belarusian oy, — dephonologizes the strong-end afi“ (=> a.u): ša.uk, a.uk, ka.ušo. §14. Thus, when comparing the informant language of all groups, it is obvious how the prefixes of pronounced diphthongs are currently dephonologised. In the speech of the representatives of each group, changes in prosody were detected, which can be considered as a certain degree of decay of the contradiction of whims, cf.: \/-—-=| “= YUu= 2 (&U). §15. It may be assumed that, with the presence of phonological opposition Ziy in diphthongs, the pronunciation of long kirdiuoty vowels will also change. However (at least at the moment) this is not the case: both monolingual and bilingual (trilingual) native Lithuanians most clearly realize both —both the strong and testing prepositions, e.g. su s'imir s"'Ū's' im, m'inkšto- 'kas and šešto kasd. ara conjunction symbol for sum. 8 The experiment was carried out in the summer of 1988 by Dr L. Grumadié. Informant: Jo¢ Valda, born in 1950 in Petrikai village, Lithuanian; Queen Valentina, drink. 1954 in the village of Gudyniai, Lithuanian. The tape record is played in the phonothèque of the Department of Language History and Dialectology of the Lithuanian Language Institute. Record registration No. 673. This fact supports Packer’s assertion that the prefixes of pronounced long vowels and doubles do not have the same phonetic Dns (Pakerys, 1982, p. 154). i Furthermore, this confirms once again that in the eastern Highlands the prepositions of eu vowels were not only pronounced but also pronounced (see Zinkevičius, 1974, pp. 93-94; Eidukaitienė, 1977, pp. 18-23). 98 ; As the process of dephonologization expands, the contradiction of long accentuated vowel prefixes will also disappear in the dialect, but for some time both prefixes — long accentuated vowels — will still exist in the language of the native inhabitants, retaining the phonetic features of prefixes for the longest time (cf. Labov, 1978, p. 297). and § 16. The disintegration of the PriegaidZiy opposition shows that, under the influence of Belarusian and Polish —languages, the PriegaidZiy of the Gervėčiai district dialect gradually loses the distinctive function of the most important —vowel, therefore in the long run it can become only = additional phonetic character of the long accentuated vowel (respectively of the diphthong). = ir (see section 4.4). (see diagram). Schema Voice ca = -=2 Voice Ge TU long short long short į 4 (sighs) (undialectize- ~ d) dialectized undialectized dialectized undialectized \ ~~ ~ The latter is typical of neighbouring Slavic languages. O J. In = Kazlauskas’s opinion, given the small functional load of whims, such a situation = may be fatal for the further development of the kitch. (Kazlauskas, 1968, p. 9). Ne for one = The Gervėčiai — dialect is a possible thing, for all ir Lithuanian Slavic border languages Texts 10 The language differences of the informants were tried to be recorded with the most accurate phonetic transcription. Therefore, the following rarer signs are used: a — "faded", short, vowel allophone, 2e' a open, long, vowel — allophone, distracted, backward e vowel £ — allophone, e p — sulūpintas, consonant v allophone, w — abiliipinis, consonant v allophone. 10 All texts recorded L. Grumadienės ir A. Romanchuk 1988 m. in the summer. The tape recorder was encrypted by the author of the article. 99 The softness of the consonant is indicated by an apostrophe at the top of the letter (except for the always soft j). In front of a qualitatively unchanged vowel of the front row, the consonant ir may be hard. It is not known whether the species is endemic to, for example, the United States. The intonation of the phrase is # — indicated by arrows: ascending, * — falling. 1 | # nid. « Right, + jacket. sani žmoėn'ęs | + ka(b) bū. Bo pirmati~ | it takes # | ~ Go. | + j6ja * nakt¢igonen | + no. it iseidaBo'm su horses * The ploughman's income * | + joja “* nakc'igo'nę'n gan'f'c' drkl'us ~ jau sako' ras'(s')iku'raė'na | itu' ū.gn'i“ jir | paskui ~ | * | + I'm sorry. išna 7 ké'k'is * t'enais | + są'ko" | dūoda * kūrric"" | + kūrija | * sa'ko. | papery * and | shitty. gi * Pap’ irosūs | ~ dude | + 100 mg/ | * day | + It's not a bad thing, but it's a | E bad thing. * | ma * [...] | kap ~ kur@na~ | [...] | # nu] 1 kitU6m'et | jau eina su arkl'ais * | jaū + jo jam | j6jam ~ p'er ši.ta | p'er 1 raitūs * | jaū ~ tė'k'is geras | Bo“ to'k'is ~ k'el'a s *« būwa | tai sū'ko | ba'lo'n kė'k'on *« un.gr'uvam | kad d e.gali > ~ išli.s'c' | if sp os Jo Zirgai.s * namd'n | kap san'aū. * | my: * mom'i te dar pa.sako'- jjo. | kap + san'aū * bū.wo | tai # t'eis'i'bę' = bū.wo | [...] | 7 gina | prie I ūp'ęs * p'éreina | p'rijeina | stėdį bard'nas * k'ė'kis | ragai + | są.ko. | « d'i.d'el'i | + sa'ko. 1998. pp. 10. |title= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) |url= is empty (help) * and | sa'ko. I don't care. can b'ev'eik * i3lu's'c' from this" kla'no" | then already + kap po' d#v'iTikto's * va'lando- 's jau | jaū + c'iej gai3 ‘ai * jau u pradeda ~ g'iedė'c'i€ | then + an'iss jau | Sitiei + v'el'n'ai ar kas * | kuf 7 an'i's ~ prapūolę' | tadū * žmo'gūs | sa'ko" I ~ šla'p'ias I * in's'ima.ud'e's | + ko'k'o's jau je'gd's be'k'o's n'ė.turi | + kdlek anas ateina * namūosan | # mamt'it'- ę' vis is pa.sakorjo" * šit'ep | [...] | A a3 tai ~ žinaū | m'enū * | + ac'im'in't- 'e i’ jū's X | . Lukaitians Genė, b. 1923 m. Record k. registrations No. 673. 2 | mgs iš X Three. | # Me's p'ė.tr'ikuosa gimem | Fa. + iSd.ug'i. ir &a ~ You're getting married. | jinnai tai ~ ne ~ | ma.no. + t'é'vas tai ča *X g'i.nvi.s | 7 0. It's even | out of the way! 'on'ū' [Celebration] * | nobody ~ Vietūv'iškai | ~ column gi | [..] # ma ‘su’ it’s a child + Instead, it's 100 KI'#ga | L; ] + bu.Bo. “X d'id'ė.s'r'is | bt Yeah, yeah, yeah. g'i much'a.u + buy'ti | n'ė.t dy x parent ru | I'm gonna get you. ” i A ~ k'ito'k'i. | ” I'll be gi there. labaj ~ gra.zu.s | labai yid’eln ~ mE 3a S bt.Bo. | Good morning, my dear. Bo p'ė.tr'ikai | daba.r ~ b'i.šk'i i. jau ~ gražėja | po" pazero' # už mus laba(j) jau bū. po “ dTku | vajkai c'a sus'ied'ijo.i + | ar TE Anise X Rai rijo. I've been « playing with su the s'iern'ič'ka'- = s. | n'ezino.m | + no one knows. X“ | I'm sorry. + | ar ti' san‘ai + kū ti give. | kap ~ san'a.u | taj + Silag'eTes t; is your * va.re. e. | va | ugn’iés + pa.d’eda apac’di | + Slagieles is taken care of. = X cut the same as before. | iš š'ilag'ę' Fu ~ labaj gi g'er'i vaistai « | « iš "'I'm not going | anywhere,'" + he said. IX | + ar * | ~ I'm sorry, I'm sorry. gi “ | from the + hood of | * the p.I.Bo. 10 “ sKa.usmo | Vanda Petrikienė, born 1922. The 674th registered in Petrikų k. 3 I'm 7 years old and I'm good. I'm 7 years old and I'm good. I'm 7 years old and I'm good. I'm 7 years old and I'm good. I'm 7 years old and I'm good. Bo. ma.no. b'iedn'i | + aštūon'i vaikai * bū.Bo.m | + nebit.Bo. ka.m labai = d'i.rpt | tai i kap + ži on | pa.v'iž3'ui * | kap ~ tévas k'xTas'i X ugks'ci | + eina kū.lt'ie | m'iež'us gi kū. "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" "I'll be there for you" * « cold | + one long * | it "children v'is'i * un p'@¢o | # ni. It's a good thing that you're here. It's a good thing that you're here. ~ padooda vaika.m *« | aštuon'i.- em vaiki.m kapo ” padi®da v'ienu' + bl'i'nu' | tai po gabal'ū' ki “ ras'(s")ila.už'i ir «X n'gr | tadū la.uk'a v'ę'1' v'is'i | iša.l'k'i. kap tie ~ pa.ukš'č'- ai | ir r kita 7 | 7 Kitu suvdlge | + ir tr@du | ~ ir k KetCvirtu. | moma + reads. | + reads. 2000. pp. 10. |access-- date= requires |url= (help) ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z. 1999. pp. 10. |access-- date= requires |url= (help) ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae af ag ae 1999. "S.A.S.E.- L.E.L.E.L.- E.L.E.L.E.- L.E.L.E.L.- E.L.E.L.E.- L.E.L.E.L.- E.L.E.L.E.- L.E.L.E.L.- E.L.E.L.E.- L.E.L.E.L.- E.L.E.L.E.- L.E.". ~ sa'ko. "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" "I'm Not Alone" | + nothing. | + a3 dar išv'i.rs'u X buzd's tad | po'tam jau ~ azsr'ep’ tie | ni tai jau tadū pal'ič.ka + t'ė'vu | vajkd.m + dav’arda ‘da. | and téip already = be. 2000. pp. 10. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac 1990. pp. 10. "O.K., I'm a little bit shy". Bo'm jau 7 jaun'i.mas jau |» m’é.rgo.s | b'ernai * | kat ir ~ sū.g'k'ai g'i' venom | + labaj bū. "Bo. ~ ri. pksma | v'isė'k'u ~ g'ies'm'ū * a g'iedėjjom | kap ~ įšeis'i per 1 va. kara | tai į vistl.r X | v'isūosa šo'nūosa * jauni.mas | [...] | dar | ~ ré'do’s lnggv’d.u ir geriu | 101 "G'i'va'na * Zmén'e's | al'e dainū' taj ner > | v'isū.r + ti'ka | kat) kė" k'is ~ g'i.rtas kūr = ažb'l'a.una | tai v v'i.sa | Mažeikienė Marija, gim. 1923 m. Record k. registrations No. 674. 4 |a.š + at'(t)ek'é jau tri.zd'ešumt pirmajiem * m'@tais s | is'imė* k'au jau | ~ jū.u trec'ais m'@tais aš *« kalbėjau | pė.r # d'v'ejū.s metū.s aš * is'imé’ k'au | [...] | kap = at't'ekéjau | tadū aš * i(š')s' im'o'k'au J to + juok'ę.s'i iž mane * | ti ži.no.ma | kap * n'emoė'k'i | aš + ir r teip da.r n'egal'ū pasaki? "Ve th.viskoi | tikrai " | teip ~ kl'@'gam | kap m'ė's * Ca | kI'@'gam | visi # kalba | mūsų. "klI'dga | a k'itap kap jai | c'a gi. 7 Nlettuv'- ūr n'elabai da. uk * k'iė.mu. | ale + k'i.ek išv'i.rto. o. jau X | ~ ižguda.po. k'iek | prieg ma.n * pometei | ta jau gerv'éc'- uos jau_daug- 'ati.s'a gh.didkai * KlI'& ga | # gudin'i'kuose | gaigal'Uose | vat | = tU4.s'e ke.mUd.s- 'e | [...] | nu kap at'tekéjo. ~ gū.d'e.s | katard's n'end'ri + | irgi mu'stik | katard's X n‘ékalba | [...] | 3.2 ~ from single. 'ik'u | ” sana jaū = TA sapt'i’ n’azda.$- um sapt'i' n'eli m'ž'tai = suv'gjo. | praita.m mę'n'as'i “ bū. "K'etv'i.- rto. | yes.a with para. | [...] | there is a vision. ~ ldika p'étrikai | + itas k'iėmas ir r gaspad“- or'ai ~ petrikai | T...] | + v'lenu' turd * | t6k'u va | ~ mažū.t'i. | « méiteli. | v'lenu. Shit. = _ma.rgu. "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "I'm not going anywhere" "K.I.T.C.H- .E.L.D.E.R- .S.". | ko.lei vaikai # atvaž'ūos | kū'lei + atv'a.š | tūri > la.uk | ~ kanos * s'ę.d'ės'i | Petrikienė Marija, born 1911 in Petrikų k. Record registrations No. 674. Literature ‘Arumaa P. Lithuanian oral texts from the Wilnae Area with prammatischen Notes. Dorpat, 1930. Fidukaitiené E. V. "Monographs on the Monopterygium (Monopterygiidae)". V., 1977. T. 28(1). P. 18-23. 102 Garšva K. Relationship of ir accentuation and vocalism in northwestern Panevėžys dialect J Issues of Lithuanian Areal Linguistics (Lithuanian Language Studies. T. 17). V., 1977. P. 76-88. Garšva K. Important features of the phonology of the North-West Panevėžiečiai II Baltistica, V., 1982. T. 18(1). P. 65-74. Gerullis G. Lithuanians Dialect studies. Leipzig, 1930. Girdenis A. Phonology. V., 1981. Grinaveckienė E. Some Feature of the verb in the Gervėčių dialect II Research on the verb in Baltic languages (Lithuanian Language Studies. T. 14). V., 1973. P. 221-229, Jonaitytė A. Dialect overview / Gervėčiai. V., 1989. P. 230-237. Kardelytė J. Gervėčių dialektas. V., 1975. Kazlauskas J. Historical grammar of the Lithuanian language. Pronunciation, noun, verb. V., 1968. Labov W. On the Use the of Present to Explain the Past // Readings in Historical Phonology. Chapters in the Theory of Sound Change. The Pennsylvania University Press, 1978. P. 275-312. Lithuanian language dialects. Chrestomatija. V., 1970. Lipskienė J. Phraseology of the Gervėčiai dialect | Lexical Research. (Lithuanian Language Studies. T. 13). V., 1972. P. 111-141. Lipskienė J. Gervėčiai dialect outliers / Language Relations ir Interaction. (Lithuanian Linguistics Issues. Vol. 28). V., 1989. P. 118-122. Pakerys A. Prosody of Lithuanian Common Language. V., Salys 1982. A. Writings. T. 4. Lithuanian language dialects. Roma, 1992. Vidugiris = A. Iš Semantic dialectisms of Gervėčiai dialect J Research of lexicon (Lithuanian Language Studies. T. 13). V., 1972. P. 19-29. Vidugiris A. Lexical dialectisms of Gervėčiai dialect J Lietuvos TSR Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. A Series. V., 1974. T. 1(46). P. 117-127. Vidugiris A. Iš development of linguistic contacts // Gervėčiai. V., 1989: P. 238254. Zinkevičius Z. Lithuanian dialectology. V., 1966. Zinkevičius Z. On the Assignment of Akite and Circumflex in Eastern Lithuanian Dialects Il Baltistica, 1974. T. 10(1). P. 93-94. Fpymasene JI., Crynmxa 5. /Junamuka OnnosHuMu CNOroBHX MHTOHALUMA B POHOIOrHYIECKHX CHCTEMAX AMAIEKTHOM H NOPOACKOH peun (Ha MaTEpHAJIE JIMTOBCKOTO aura) Il Proceedings XIth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences. August 1-7 1987. Tallinn. Vol. 5. P. 95-98. Jluursucruvecxuū atnac Esponu. Ham on broth. M., 1981. Pomauuyx A. Qamuiuu B yCIOBHAX MHOTOA3HYMA (HA MaTepuane roBOpPOB A. T'epsar u okpecriocrein) // Bilingualism in ir Lithuanian (Lithuanian Language Studies. T. 27). V., 1988. P. 55-66. Cyauux T. M. /JuanexTd AHTOBCKO-CNAaBAHCKOrO norpanmusa. Ogepru donoJiornseckux cucrem. M., 1975. 103