Linksniuojamųjų priešdėlio „*pa-“ vedinių kirčiavimas

LITHUANIAN LINGUISTICS QUESTIONS, XXXIV (1994) LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE DIARCHEMS AND THEIR STUDIES Danguolė MIKULĖNIENĖ LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE DIARCHEMS AND THEIR STUDIES Danguolė MIKULĖNIENĖ LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE DIARCHEMS AND THEIR STUDIES The prefix po (< *pa) is historically related to two prefixes of the present Lithuanian language -poir -pa-. They can both be considered as paalomorphs of the same prefix *paalo: paatitinka. weak, post-—strong degree of realization (Mikulėnienė, Žeižienė, 1994). This is evident from the pronunciation of the consonant Vedic. Prepositional subjunctives, both nouns and adjectives, are always pronounced in the preposition and only according to the paradigm of constant pronunciation, cf. podukra (1), popietė (1), požemis (1), posuris, -ė(1). The prefix pa is characterized by a mobile consonant, cf. pamergė ė (3P), pagirijs (32), pavakarė (3% by, papilnis, -ė (3P). There are several cases of the root pronoun, pakalnė (2) and pakdlné (1), pakrantė (1) and pakraritė (2). Variants of the root pronunciation, such as pajūris (1), patėvis (1), pastiolé (1), often have a prepositional —fixed or movable—pronunciation variant in dialects, cf. pūjūris (1), patėvis (1), pasuolė (3P): pasuolę. Thus, the abundance of variants encourages the search for motives that could have led to different development of the accentuation of the prefix *. 82. In order for *to have the prefix po-, the vowel a had to be long. Later it may have been shortened —*pa-> pa-(Zinkevičius, 1981, pp. 186—187). Then poir should reflect two chronologically different layers of Vedic, and the older allomorph po-, in its form closer to the preposition po-(Kazlauskas, 1968, p. 54). §3. On the other hand, it seems that the opposite direction of development was also possible: as a result of the change of vowels, * helped to emerge from *pd (cf. Fraenkel, 1962, p. 635; Bammesberger, 1992, p. 49, etc.). In the latter case, the prefix pair of the Latvian, Lithuanian and Prussian languages, possibly used as a conjunction, pa, survived in the western Lithuanian dialects, cf. : Tiktai pro tas duris taukš pa taukš Slnt; That you everywhere for many pošiee: ducks for ducks, chickens for chickens Jrb; Kakarykū pa kakarykū always the same song Kv; He still so pa so NdZ (also Sb, Skr —see LKZ IX I; Būga, 1961, pp. 132—133). In addition, the prefix is not only characteristic of Baltic languages — cf. Slavic behind the preposition po and Latin pė-(pėsitus) next to the person < *pė-s(1)-no (Fraenkel, 1962, p. 635). Therefore, Lithuanian and Prussian post-(in Latvian it is not) should be considered newer *. J. Endzelynas also considered the Prussian prefix po (Endzelin, 118 1944, p. 146). 84. It is plausible that these allomorphs may have also appeared at the same time. This is due to the inequalities in the position of the prefix in relation to the consonant. For example, this explains the variability of the Prussian prepositions no/na, po/pa, pro/pra (Mažiulis, 1981, pp. 253—254). The conflict between *pair and *pd may have arisen from the unequal accentual rank of the base words. When the Vedic accent was formed, the root of the oxytonic (or mobile) word found itself in an unpronounced position, so the prefix had to become the strong morpheme *pa-, which later became the allomorph pd-(podukra < *pa-dukr- -a). The unaccented * pūs could be short (or abbreviated), and the baritone root retained the vedic accent (pasdulis < *pa-suulis). It also had to be shortened and *pa-, lost the accent for some reasons. In all cases, the derivatives belonged to the paradigm of constant pronunciation (Mikulėnienė, 1992, p. 12). If the prefix is derived from the long allomorph, the derivatives of the mobile pronunciation appear chronologically newer, and, conversely, they become archaic if the possibility of the short *pdgalim is recognized. In other words, since ancient times in Lithuanian there may have been at least several patterns of the prefix *pavedinių pronunciation. For example, nouns formed from baritone- -pronounced words (B) —sdulé, berzs, ranka, bald... — can be pronounced three ways in dialects (see diagram 1): with a constant root (Py), with a constant prefix (P) or with a mobile accent (K). 1 diagram ‘B 0 Pi P K P, P K' pasdulis pasaulis ae podukra? os pabérzis = paberžė péakis 053 paakys paranke 37 posparnis pdasparnis pasparne pabalys te sa pakaklijs P; = *pa-& baritone root P. = *pa-& oxytonine root 1 Py = *pé& & baritoniné root (?) P = *pi-& oxytoniné root Vedic words derived from movable accents (O) — eye, wing, neck, daughter, etc. — also differ in three-fold accentuation: they are pronounced constantly in the prefix po-(P|) or pa-(P,), thus may have acquired a movable accent (K'). 86. The antiquity of pronunciation types is proved by hydronyms with the prefix *pa-, cf. : 1 The only example in Latvian is trm. J. Endzelins felt doubtful (Endzelins, 1951, p. 665). ? The variant with the prefix pa-(padukra, LKŽ IX 59) is unpronounced. 119 Pi—Pašivis Gdz, Srauto int. : Sword pv. Ms; "R.I.P. Black". : Skdisté ež. Pnmk; Pagulbis ež. Out - plg. Gulbis ež. Mlt, swan, swan; Pabambis Šln —plg. Bamboo Smn; Pagėrvis Jz, Alšios int. —plg. Gėrvė adv., Gėrvė Rdn; P, —Pūdegla Sd, Kiršino int. —plg. Krtv; Papūdžiai Krtn — stump, feathers; Paupis Dkšt, part of Dysnykščio ežeras —ūpė, paupis; : K —Pamolys ez. Mlt - plg. Clay Skdv, clay; Padubė Pn, Padubės k., Juodos kr. : Dubos k. Pn; Pakojijs (also Pakojis) ez. Ons: Kėja ez. We; P' —Pėažvintė Trgn: Ažvintis ež. Trgn; P' —Pddaubis End, Letauso int. —dauba, padaubis; Pashilis ez. Ds — cold, cool; K' —Pašilė Vp, Širvintos kr. —shilas, pasilé; Pašakijs Zmt, Siesarties int. —plg. Shake, Saka 'the branching of the river' and others (Vanagas, 1970, pp. 218—222; 1981, pp. 236—264). §7. Comparing the derivatives of constant pronunciation, it is clear that only one type (P) can be directly related to the long-vowel *pa-, but it is the least affected by hydronyms —the only unquestionable example is Pdažvintė, but it also differs from the others in the two-syllabic stem. Elsewhere, the prefix is reconstructed with the short (or abbreviated) *pd both in the pronounced (Py and P) and unpronounced (Py) positions, thus a newer phenomenon than *panelaikytinas. 88. Thus, the reasons for the variety of Vedic pronunciation probably lie not only in the different layers from a diachronic point of view — they can be explained primarily by area (respectively dialect) differences. Thus, the assumption cannot be ruled out that next to *pa-(pronounced) there could also be *pa- (unpronounced), and next to *pd-(pronounced) —*nd-(pronounced), zr. 2 diagram. 2 schema *pa-(kirč- .): *pi-(kirč.) = *pa-(nekiré.): *pd-(nekire.) In! || TO VAS BE river), P P (FP, P K (K) Examples: pasaulis (1) pasdulis (1) paakys (3°) podukra (1) pasparnis (1) pabérzis (1) paberi (3°) pdakis (1) Padegla (1) Pagijuis (1) Pašilė (3P) Péazvinté (1) Pasilis (1) Paskdistis (1) Pasakjs (3°) §9. There are also some differences in the morphology of the vertebrae. There are many examples of this in the North-East dialect of the Žemaičių mudininkai, for example. : Py —pakėjos (1): kėja (1), pakrūmė (1): krūmas (1), pakūgė (1): konus (1), paldvė (1): Idva (1), pasdulé (1) '1. the earth, the world; 2. humanity': sdulé 120 (1); pamalčiai (1): millai irk by —pajuris (1)s ki (1): jura (1), pasonis (|): šonas (1), pales, palėvis lévas (1) (1): (3) 3 ir kt; K — leg (37) * 4”. message (1); pakunys ia") ‘screamer’? : kunas (1); I", —daughter (1), daughter-in-law (1): cf. daughter (2), daughter (3); 1 %, —tail (1): neck (A), tail (|): side (A); K' —beard (3) 'beard' beard (A) "beard", beards (39). kraštas (A), pamiskys (3): miškas (A), pariugija (39): ryžiai (A) and others (Vitkauskas, 510. It seems that Larpusavyje is not different. The Vedic pronunciation system of the piety and eastern Vilnius dialects (according to A. 1976). Salis' division, the western and eastern dzuky). In these dialects there are almost no nouns that are constantly pronounced in the prefix pa-, i.e. Pa and 5 types, plg,. : Pi — butt (1): bucket (1); patella (1), patella (1): leg (1), panosé (1): nose (1), etc. (Naktinienė, Paulauskienė, Vitkauskas, 1988) and pakdusis (1): kausys (3), pakoja (1): koja (1), panosė (1): nosis (1) and others (Petrauskas, Vidugiris, I’) —pakalnas (1) "pakalnė- ': mountain (1), pakupelis (1): kūpela (1) (Naktinienė, Paulauskienė, Vilkauskas, 1988); K — passenger 3") 1. leg; 2. place about feet': foot (1) (Naktinie1985); ne, Paulauskienė, Vitkauskas, 1988) and papieoys (3"): meadow (1) (Petrauskas, Vidugiris, 1985, p. 184); I”, —pdakis in both dialects (1): akis (A); stepmother (1), stepdaughter (1); pésunis (1): without (3); Kins pakallé (3M): kaklas (1), pakelė (39): kėlias (A), pakranlys (31) Ges krantas (A) and others (Naktiniene, Paulauskienė, Vilkauskas, 1988) and pabarzdé (3"): barzda (A), pasvirnygs (31): svirnas (1), pagurklys (32) T: gurklijs (3) and others (Petrauskas, Vidugiris, 1985). The I’-type trace pakalnas indicates that the patterns of prepositional pronunciation in these dialects have probably disappeared due to morph(fo)nologiniy reasons —changes in the Vedic stem and pronunciation paradigm (Stundžia, 1981, p. 60), cf. pakalnė (1), pakalnė (2), pakalnė (37) and pakalnis (1), pakalnis (2), pakalinijs (3°) (see LKZ IX 146—147; LKA I 178—179). all. Over time, the pronunciation of some basic words of the soldiers could also change in the dialect (Standžia, 1984, pp. 86—90). Therefore, for example, the derivative pakdusis (1) LD I base word pronunciation see $13. | Šidia variant pažasniai (1) (Vilkauskas, 1976, p. 252). "The first variant — the pack (1) (Vilkauskas, 1976, p. 235). © Second variant —pakrdanizs (1) (Naktimene, Paulauskienė, Vitkauskas, 1988, p. 239). “ The first variant is the “pagūrklis” (1) (Petrauskas, Vidugiris, 1985, p. ISI). synchronously associated with even su several accentuation-- different forms: kdušas kaušas kausgs zr. (1), (3), (3), §9—10. i §12. Many of the basic words and Vedic ju pronunciation are found in these old scriptures.] For example, next to M. A number of nouns that have retained the premonition of the strongly rooted baritone root (P1) — pafdulis (pafdulo, pafūulo, pa[dul i, pafduliie), pakdlnes (as a hill), hill (for a hill) ® , 1935, p. 80—81, 109), — prefix ir pronunciation variant detected (Py) — pdfaulis (pdfaulo, pdfaului). j $13. Over twenty P; types of Vedic su limbs -ė ((i)ié-kamieniy) ar. ba -is ((i)id-strains) submitted F. "Kurschat, plg. 1883), pabalkė (:. balis), padomė (: dūmai), pajūrės (: jūros, jūros), pakinkės (r kinka), pakūgė (: kūgis), pakūlfė (: kūlpė, kūlfis), palowė (: ldwa); pajūrio (: jūros, jūrės), pakdupis (: kdupas), pakrel lis krė/ las), (: pakrūmis krūmas), pamūiris (: mūras), Papėlkiai (: pėlkė), pal dulis (: (: I dulė), pal iénis (: [iéna] 9, bridge. The rear is different with a (: padded foot). į At the jų slope of Zindés (: žandas), pakdlnis (: kalnas), pal tégis (/"tégas- ", (: patéwis tėwas), sign, but iš F. Kuršaitis written forms — vns. (dgs.) denominator and vns. (dgs.) the — adjective remains unclear nė accentin the paradigm of the base word. Ancient writings testify at least some of the jų former baritones, — for example, the mountain (see section 4.4). 8 [tégas ([tégu, st'ogais], tėwas (Tėwai, Tėwū, T'ėwams, T'ėwus) (Buch, 1961, p. 14; A handbag, 1964, p. 211—237; Zinkevičius, 1975, p. 17—18). 3 814. F. Kuršaitis wrote one ir other type of noun, P9 diacriticsJamas in the prefix, stepmother mėtė, -efs; — also see pg. (: female, -6s) 19, pdodé (: skin, ida) ". | The pronunciation of the prefix is su probably related to the movable accent of the base word: yes F. The dictionary of Kuršaitis pronounces some derivatives derived from circumflex iš nouns with a short root, ar e.g. pūdugnės, -iū dūgnas), (: pūnagės, -iū nūgas), pūpetės, (: -cžiū petjs, pėcžio); (: paaulis au/'is, -iés) pa/ parnis (: "*, (: /"pafnas), and the author's uncut barb = *beard (: beard, calf -68), calf, (: half-god -68), (: Diéwas) 13. Dad M. The prepositional pronunciation variant pdfaulis of many scripts could be linked to a noun of the mobile su paradigm [aute (Skardzius, 9 8 M. The mountains are — covered with barren grassland. mountains (kūlnai, kalnų, kalnams, kalnus, katnop, kūtnop) (Skardžius, 1935, p. 30, 132). 9 F. In the Kuršių dictionary, the prepositional sign of the firm-end is written above the second ie diphthong dot — - Yeah. ; M. Daukša spelled constan- — tly mdte (mint, woman, womane[p, women, mėoterų, mdterump, mdterimus, women Skardžius, 1935, p. 127). 11 7 5 Both versions of the base word are not conjugated in the Dictionary. 12 Salia presents the form paau/ iai, -iū (= * 100 mg/ day) 13 Plg. leggings, demigod (LKZ IX 18,48). 122 nos paribio dialekto inovacija, Pig saulė (3) (Petrauskas, Vidugiris, 1985, p. 229), la. trm. saddle (verbal information of D. Markusas and A. Sarkanis) **, as well as sun (Mažiulis, 1981, p. 14). Other derivatives of the same root in F. Kuršaitis are pronounced according to the paradigm of mobile pronunciation (K'), for example, padirwe (5 dire, -6s) 13, pakakle (: kiklas), pakelé (: kélias), pakifké (: kifka, -6s) 1°, pakrem/lė ( krem/lė, -ės), palazdés, -džiū (: lazda, -08), papilwe (: pitwas), paragé (: ragas), pal tale (: /tūlas), pawarde (: ‘wardas), Ypazalté (: Zal te, -és); pabalis (: bala, -6s) 18, pabulis (: bulis, -ies), pakaklis (: kūklas), pakelijs (: kėlias), pakiemįs (: kiemas), pakraftys (: kraftas), paligys (: liga, -6s), patworys tworad, -0s). (: 816. Nouns made from circumfleksinés or short root baritons also have a mobile accent (K), for example, padalgė (: dalgis), pafpwentės, -ežiū (: Bwenté, -ės), pawartė, -ės (: warftai) “*, pagiris (: girė, -és; giria, -i0s) 29, palapys (: lapas), pamarys (: mdrés, -riu;. marios, -riū), paupys (: ūpė, -€s). Thus, the mobile verb could be generalized to all circumflex and short root derivatives, regardless of the accent paradigm of their base word (see Otrebski, 1965, p.20). 817. Manifestations of such generalization have already been observed in the writings of K. Donelaitis, cf. pagiris (P'agirri, pa(g)ir'yj, pagir'eis) and patworis (Patwor'- ij) (Buch, 1961, p. 818. First of all, the mobile paradigm had to distinguish the Vedic words made from words of mobile pronunciation. This is evidenced by the only such example in M. Daukšos writings pakampė (pūkampe, pakampes, pakampemis, pakampé[- n]) (Skardzius, 1935, p. 109). In 1605, the anonymous catechism derivative paZemé ’pozemis’ is written with two accents —pa3éme[- ni (Zinkevičius, 1975, p. 42). If two syllables are not a proofreading error (cf. Girdenis, 1984), then such a dgs. The pronunciation of the iliative supports the hypothesis that the prefixed derivative first had to take over the accent of the non-prefixed word. For example, nuopelnas, -ai, in the opinion of P. Skardžys, originated from *nuopelnas, -ai t (as pelnas, -at), cf. M. Daukša nūpelnėp, nūpėlną, nūpelndi, nipeini, nūpelnūmp, nipelndmus, nūpelnimus, nipelnis, nūpelndis (Skardžius, 1935, 14 This variant is not mentioned in older sources (see Mūlenbacha, 1927—1929, pp. TT2—773; ®opTynaTos, 1993, p. 206), but it is not new. 15 in M. Daukšos dirwd (dirwos, dirwoie, dirwo[e; dirwdie) (Skardžius, 1935,p. 85 The LKZ (V 884) contains only kiska (2). In the dictionary of F. Kuršaitis there is also paža/tis, -ies (: ža/tis, -ies). 18 See bullet (2) and bullet (4), zr. LKZ (I 579-580). The form of the Vedic noun is uncorrupted in F. Kuršaitis's dictionary. 20 The dictionary also presents giria, -16s (Kuschat, 1883, p. 124). 123 p. 45) žr The 1605 Catechism of Nouns also shows that the consonant was in the Vedic root. kilinininkai —paldyku "relics", priepuolu "attacks" (Zinkevičius, 1975, p. 35), —may have been later moved to the prefix (cf. palaikai (32): palaikus, priepuolis (1). Thus, the strong position of the Vedic prefix was not formed immediately. 619. There is no evidence of such a pronunciation of the prepositional derivatives, except in F. Kuršaitis’s paddngés, -iū (Kurschat, 1883, p. 283), but then it would have to be recognized that there was an acute and mobile accent paradigm of the base word, which could have replaced the previous baritone, cf. padingés, -iū < “ dangūs, -aūs: dangų < * dang-us, -aus (cf. Klimavičius, 1970, p. 192— 193747. The double pronunciation of this basic noun is also shown in old writings, cf. M. Daukša dągūs (degdus, daguia, deguié, dagus (n. pl.), dagų, degimus, dągu Jė, dagujJė, degufid) and dągus (dąagaus, degaus, dgguic, dagun) (Skardzius, 1935, p. 123—124), as well as the forms of the anonymous Catechism of 1605 dungdus, Dungaūs, Dungaūs, dungidm, dungiy, dungin, dungifd, Dunguo fd, Dunguo- [nu and Dūnguy (loc. sg.), dingun (Zinkevičius, 1975, p. 25). Other nouns derived from a fixed-end root or a multi-syllable stem, IF. In Kuršių kalba, they are pronounced with a mobile accent (K'): pagalwe (: galwa, -6s), pagerkle (: gerklė, -ės); pawakarys (: wikaras), pawandenygs (: wandi, -ens). 520. Several possible hypotheses about the origin of the base word sky and its pronunciation paradigms translate. According to F. Kuršaitis, in this and several other derivatives of the Pr-type root crossword we can already see the acute metatonia, cf. dangūs, -iū (: dangūs, -aūs) and Pakir/"niai (: Kirf na, -6s), palidukis (: liaūkos, -u), pavėrf mis (; merf" me, is J, paunlnis (: wilnas, -iės). In addition to these, K. Buga (1959, pp. 406-407, 412-413) also refers to the phenomenon of change of moods as pakdrmpėmas (: corner), pakrantė (: kranlas), pakridusé (: pears); 100 mg/ day (: Dijsną, -os), palubis (: tūbą, lubd). The circumflex of the base word of these Vedic texts usually arguments for Yamas synchronously — the most common or preserved variant of the pronunciation (as in the case of 819 of the sky discussed above). However, there is also a different pronunciation: for example, the root werf me, -ės written by F. Kuršaitis was probably a tvirtagalė (see Kurschat, 1876, p. 186), while in the writings of M. Daukša it is a tvirtapradė, see werfmé (werfmčės, wérfme, With the two-syllable nouns, P. Skardžius connects the final derivatives only from the point of view of pronunciation and emphasizes that "although many of their second part [...] can be used as separate nouns without prefixes [..], the heaven of them with the prefix above is vesting not from the same stem nouns, but from the same root nouns, but. from the corresponding prepositional verbs” (Skardžius, 1948, p. 454). *2 |. For Skardžius, the strong-rooted preposition seemed to be a new dialect phenomenon (Skardžius, 1985, p. 125). 124 wer[meié, wer[miū], and may even have had a constant accent —wér[mes (g. sg.) (Skardžius, p. 106). In addition to the more usual basic forms of mobile nouns kampas (4), krantas (4), liauka (4), or tūba (4), the following variants are mentioned and are constantly pronounced in dialects: kdmpa (1) (LKZ V 179), kdmpas (1) or even kūmpė (1) (LKA I 101,103), krdnta (1) (LKZ V 424—425), liduka (1) (Karaliūnas, 1968, p. 69) 23, tūbas (1) (Būga, 1959,p.413) 24. Also, the counseling room (2) is comparable only to darkness (4); tamsūs, -1 (4) (Vitkauskas, 1976, p. 249, 545), and patdmsé (1), patamsis (1) —with tdmsé (1), tamsa (1) or tdmsis (1); dark, —i (1,3) (Naktiniené, Paulauskienė, Vitkauskas, 1988, p. 251, 395). 822. The archaic nature of the Vedic root akita is beyond doubt—P; nouns such as pakrimé/pakrimis, palévé/paldvis, which are recorded in the whole area of the Lithuanian language (LKA III 36—37, map no.32). Variants of the strong-end that exist in dialects or in old writings suggest that many P; type of acute root derivatives may have retained an older pronunciation. And this is likely, because the noun root is not characterized by acute change of prepositions (Mikulėnienė, 1989, After changing the accentuation paradigm of the base word, the derivative reflects more archaic accentuation. For example, in the eastern Highlands the ingerkl is probably not related to gerklė (4): gerklę and not to gerklė (3): gėrklę (3) —in terms of pronunciation, the closer variant is * gerkl-a (> gėrkla, -os), cf. la. iėdzerklis (Būga, 1959, p. 413). The relationship between the possible base forms and their derivatives can be expressed as a sub-angle (1): angle (1) = sub-angle (37): angle (4). The Lithuanian nouns pasparnė ė (3P), pasparnys (30): sparnas (4) are related to la. pasparne: la. sparns (Buga, 1959, p. 407). Rebuilt by La. pasparne = lie. *paspdrné would allow * spdrn-a to be considered as a base word —like trm. kampa, mdisa, šėrna (Skardžius, 1968, p. 21), cf. lit. spirits (Fraenkel, 1965, p. 861). 824. With the circumflex root consonant F. Kuršaitis presents paraninė (: ranka, -os), palaūkis (: laūkas), pakolnis (: kulnas, -iės) and several derivatives, characterized by circumflex change of prepositions, —pabufnis (: burna, -6s), pakalnė (: kalnas). F. Kuršaitis interprets the nouns pakalnė and pakdlnis (see $13) differently: pakalnė —'die Niederung, die Gegend am kurishen Haff und den Memelmündungen'; pakdlnis — ‘an anberg, the foot of a mountain’ (Kurschat, 1883, p. 287). Since both could have been written from different dialects, it could also differ in the pronunciation of the base word, cf. 23 LKŽ (VII 392) indicates only the gland (4). The transition of nouns from one accent paradigm to another is still taking place in our time (see Stundžia, 1984). In the noun root, it can be used in the case of židpla: žioplas (= kudiša: kvaišo) and performs the function of significance (iconism) of the meaning. 125 pakdlné (1): kalnas, -ai (see section 4.4). 2 footnot- = e) pakalnė: mountain, -ai ?*. §25. Then K. Boogs (1959, p. 407) The submitted (: palove: lova), (: pasėstė sdstas), (: pakėjė kéja) are to be interpretar ed as analogous dialectal forms formed in another way. ( a $26. The assumption cannot be ruled out that nouns differing in circumflex metatony are later transformations, for example, mobile iš paradigms (K') derivatives that may have occurred due to the į cross-sectional shift mean The Shadows, pg. M. Daukšos bedieviui, -ė (bediewiui, bėdiewi, bediewiéi, bediewičii, bėdiewes, bediewiamus, bediewidmus, bėdiewius) ir bedieviui, (bedičwis, bedičwių, bedičwiamus) (Skardžius, 1935, p. 131). Analogously iš *beplaukis, -ė: bėplaukį, -ę leading beplaūkis, -ė, should change the preposition of the vedic root, cf. 4 bediévis: godless, godlessn- = ess, * godlessness, godlessness, godlessness, godlessness, godlessness. 4 Thus, diachronically, the automatic ne change of the prepositions of one morpheme, the shift of o the accent, characteristic of the whole verb stem, is visible here. { *blow-) — { *beplauk-}. Ji ir will have caused the circumflex to appear in the Vedic root: { *beplauk-} — { beplaūk-). ir §27. Apparently, in a similar way, the hill will ir have (* appeared pakaln-e > “pakdin-¢ > pakalné). O K. Samples of the book (zr. §25) indicate that such changes could have occurred only in oxytoniné ne but in baritoniné root ir derivatives. A In terms of work Change of type (:kdja) (is *pakaje) is close to kubilius kūbilas) changes, (: although the occurrence of circumflexive changes is usually based on the opposite direction of the crossword shift (plg. Stang, 1966, p. 145; Stundžia, 1981, p. 63—65). i 828. M. Variants of the word stranger (Jwetimmėteri, Jwetimdterei, Jwetimméterius) stranger ir (Jwetimmotéris) (Carcases, 1935, p. 130) indicate that at that time the Vedic metatony su pronunciation was not yet firmly established. This could have occurred in the prehistoric era. ir Functionally completely coincides with the ji displacement of the su join of the derivative į suffix during the formation of the join of the derivative suffix (plg. Coccrop, 1977, p. 625; Girdenis, 1972, p. 66 tt. ). It is similarly ir dated. t That circumflexive metatony of the prefix in nouns is a recent phenomenon is — proven by į dialectal facts: ir iš The material collected for the "Lithuanian Language Atlas" does not highlight the smoother area of the Vedic hill (LKA I 179). In general, the circumflexive change of prepositions is more common in the western Highland Zemgalish dialects ir (Lyberis, 1972, p. 43 tt. ). O The eastern ir southern Altays often pronounce the Vedic as they may be, having be preserved a — more archaic Vedic pronunciation system. 1 829. Sometimes cirkumfleksinée metatonia is associated only ne with the su morphological position of the prefix (resp. stem language) change, but ir the transition iš | of a derivative from one į part of the language (Brugmann, 1906, p. 112—113; Wijk, 1958, p. 34; Skardžius, 1943, p. 456). ) 830. In the spelled ancient writings no prefix was found after- (< *pa-) derivatives. Several nouns spelled F. In the Kuršių dictionary (podūkra, pépietis, | O PEN 26 jų differences in the meaning of these vedic in one dialect see more. (Claim, 1981, p. 61). 126