Mažmožiai 9–13

Notes Kymenow (Selections) 3, 136), then Kyménai galéty biti dél kary ir grésmés atsikélusiy jotvingiy village. Vladas Zulys Completed 2006 10 09 Tako g. 1-7 LT-53356 Akademija, Kaunas region, Lithuania MazmoiZis 9 may 1926 During the reform of the land, its special Board did not want to officially use the nobleman's glorious name. One such village was described in Vilkaviskis county in Zaliosios vals¢iuje near Rural vegetation Siidava (not even in the local name file (files) not broken). He revived, only later recognized in a known form Siduva ir replaced as a place 3° name by analogy (plg. Ilguva, Lithuania, Saukuvé and others. ). Simui The Queen has no such history, he never used a place name. su ir Zemés reform board remarks, todél Siidava is jo mentioned in the book Balpraeitis ty istoriniuose Saltiniuose, II, Vilnius: t. Lietuviy language institute, 2005, p. 267, as didelés vertés age fact, but ir is mety 1926 Zemétvarkininky formation, dél some analogy in the ra8tutes made Sidava, common language according to many -uva prepositional place-names used in Siiduva live language as if it was not used in (3*), that form, no one did not draw it, ir although it was correctly formed, but historically be Salt. MazmozZis 10 In Zemaitijos, in the Ventos river basin, there was a large swamp Debésnos pl. (tariama d'eb'é.snas, d'eb'é.snu, puo d'eb'esnds Pavandené, Uzventis), so it is written even Zemaite in his fight), managed to get so ir Addition In the Puppy Book Vietovardziy Zodynas, 2003, p. 79. Netiketai Simas Karalitin takes ir platinum in an unlikely unhistorical form Debesna, Zr. Balty past in historic Saltiniai 1 67, III 27, 59 (i8 sec. rusy by Spruogi ir O. Trubaciova, JJeGecua the same II 302). 102 Notes MazmoiZis 11 What. Wild (piety aukStaitiy ir ryty aukStaitiy vilniskiy) Snektos have this regressive vowel assimilation -sti- > -sci- (no -Sc-). South to désnio nepaisymo Saulius Ambrazas in the article ,,South biidvardziy su priesaga -intelis (-é) kilmés’ (Baltistica 39 (1), p. 71) gives form tuséytelis (i§ OG 261 tus¢'it'el'is), not knowing that LKZ,,,, was 186 transcribed tustytelis primirses ir minéta regressive consonant assimilation. Ir more is jvariety transkribuoty piety aukStai¢iy (and the mornings of Vilnius) Zodziu. Tariama dir .Zas, t&u". Stas, tsirStimas (distant regressive assimilation). These are recent facts about the pronunciation, published in ir Elzbieta Mikalauskaitė- 's researches, Zr. Mikalauskaité, Lietuviy kalbos fonetikos darbai, 1975 (preface Antanas Pakerys), p. 115, transcribed transliterati- ~ ons, such as m'inkstis ir minkStimas, ~ vatkistsis vaikystis, etc. ~ ir Simo In the monumental work of Karalitino Balty past in historical Saltiniuose He, 2005, 187 transcribed forms ¢irstas, ciur Stas, CiurStumd cannot show any age or certainty of fact. MazmoiZis 12 Antanas She has collected a lot of dialectal vocabulary, but as an autodidact when it is inappropriately attached. ko It seemed to him that bakuizé, kumelé samana are some kind of prepositional ir derivatives, sodél sukiré,,bepriesaginius“ Zodzius handra8tio baka ‘bakiizé’ GQ, red. 184, F. Fortunatovas), kimé ‘kumelé’ (LKZ,, 866, pallid) ir A piece 161!), of me ‘samana’ (LKZ,.,). These are unsuccessful derivatives, many know this for a long time, but Wait. S. In the Royal Prestigious Store Balty past in historical Saltiniai as true data is indicated sama ,samana‘ is J (I 67). Be undoubtedly a non-existent linguistic fact that has no basis in Lithuanian. Mazmoiis 13 Young researcher Birutė KabaSinskaitės interesting book Lietuviy kalbos liaudies etymologija (Lithuanian language folk etymology) ir (Vilnius: Science ir encyclopedia publishing institute, provided in 1998) unpublished form pirs¥s 82 p. ,horse's grit, because many places Lienet 103 Notes in the tuva are provided by pirsys sf. pl. (1) prie Varniy (LKZ, 26 provides 2pirSis). The horses were usually ridden by men, who broadly say that there are pirSys, pirsims, that is, pirsys sm. sing. unknown iS location I know. In the book ir there are many typo errors: = brudZas briioZas, = ruézas rtiozas, = rasliava rasliava, Eerina = Ezeriina, ti lydziu tud = lydzit, skétra skétra = scom. (1) ir skétrd sf. (4), aFZuolas = driuolas, z. pudkai = puokat z. Vytautas Antanas Vitkauskas Lithuanian Language Institute P. Vileitium g. 5 LT-10308 Vilnius, Lithuania Again dél sintaksiniy rySiy in the year of distributi2006 on iéjo The fourth, revised edition of the current Lithuanian grammar. Whereas: The editor-in-chief of this grammar recently (Ambrazas 2005: 168) admitted that in previous DLKG licenses used morphological ,,... control ir For the study of the development of the syntactic system of ir conjugation in Lithuanian language, it was not very useful to look at how the types of conjugation are defined in the new, revised edition. It turns out that ir In this release, the same debugging, control and ir Fusion. Pacituosime i8 eilés ju apibrézimus: »Adjusting is the selection of the morphological form of the dependent ZodZio (vowel, consonant, genus) according to the Zodj... * (DLKG*, p. 480); »Management is the selection of a dependent Word, sqlygowana by the connectivity of the main Word. Valdomu Zodziu daZniausiai ema noun ivardziy ar verbs [.... It can go unchanged ir The shape of the zodiac’ (also, »Merging is the selection 480). of the form of the dependent Word according to its meaning, unconditioned by the connection of the main Word* For convenience, 481). let us compare the cited definitions ia with the definitions su given in previous editions. The definition of tuning, compared to previous releases, has su not changed, but the ir The definitions of fusion previously read as follows: »The control is the choice of the form of the dependent Zodz10 verb, conditioned by the conjugation of the main Zodz.“ (DLKG', 480). 104