Keli mažmožiai dėl „Mažmožių 5, 6“
Full text
Minutes Linguistics Lithuanica LIV (2006), 107 - 126 Notes Remarks Keli maZmoiZiai south Mazmoziy 5, 6 Vytautas Vitkauskas’ observations dél purposery helonymy research case forced me to once again open the archived cards with live language Lithuanian j helonyms and to analyze the su i8 mentioned problematic issues, especially that before 3 ir deCentury jo some could say, because it was necessary to identify the creations of more than one person. ir ir 10 000 Like a classy vandenvardziy. Mazmozyje 5 V. Vitkauskas claims that in my dissertation article? ir submitted GelZélé in Pelkévardia, near Raudény ir Gelziké are new, instantaneous, metaphorict. y. po al, after the war drained the great Gelzés marsh local people only called local names rinkéjais su ja Gelzele ir Gelzike, 0 the young name book collector, it's a real Helonimo. Gelzé variants, Once again i8nagryzév the data of the living language shows that the new, already well war appeared pelkénádzím can be po considered only form Gelzélé, who, as correctly raSo V. Vitkauskas, uZraSyta 1982 m. Svendriy village. The author's specified named object was b. — about 100 ha plain. So it is obvious that Gelzélé is the vein of the primary marshland The Gelzé variant. I found the statement that it is only a momentary, false name, still raises doubts, because, first, it is impossible to verify the evidence, to secondly, the ar Lithuanian living language toponymics, thus helonymia, covers ir almost all of Lithuania. XX a. collected locally names. The history of the creation of the marsh name Gelziké is quite different. It is certainly neither a new, final, instantaneot. y. XX a. us, nor metaphorical place name. It is also sometimes 2 called the "Sweet Potato". 1936 m. Raudeény girininkijos Zemés \ Zr, Notes. Minutes Linguistics Lithuanica 51, 2004, 113-114. ° Zr. Bilkis, Lietuviy L. priesaginés darbų helonimai. PhD thesis, Vilnius: Institute of Lithuanian Language, Vytautas Magnus University, 2008. 1998; L. Minutes Linguistics Lithuanica 41, 1999, 51-95. * By the V. way, according to Vitkauskas, forms Gelzélé ir "I'm a Red Riding Hood". Svendriy k., more true in that village i§ was recorded only the first. 107
Notes In the nomenclature questionnaire it is stated that Gelziké is a 2.5 ha* moss-covered swamp (i. e. marsh -L. B.), bordering the big swamp (i. e. marsh -L. B.) GelZe, interspersed with miskq i 10-ame kvadrate'. Dar karta This name of the marsh is found in the card of the non-residential place name database of the living language compiled by the interwar Names and Placenames Commission, where it is indicated that the marsh is near the village of Paraudziy. Thus GelZiké is an old, authentic marsh name, and the younger names in the dictionary do not matter. In MazmoiZyje 6 V. Vitkauskas reproaches that in the already mentioned helonimiy studies i§ Zemaiciy and aukStai¢iy vilniskiy ploty my is presented polysyllabic vediniy with suffix -élis, although in these Snektos i§ bisyllabiy, and i8 polysyllabic vediniy Zodziy-formed derivatives use only the suffix - Ellis. Also criticized is the possibility that some multi-stemmed helonymy with -elis could have had the same origins in Latvian and Slavic languages, and concluded with the fact that the specialists of toponymy do not know the origins of these names. su -élis, -elis geography. First of all, I want to say that I know the geography of the country very well. Problem In this case, it is completely different. NemaiZa dalis minéty ploty i§ uZra’yty daugiaskiemeniy helonimy vietovardZiy suffix in the file su - Alis. Even linguists are concerned about them, so while studying helonyms it was not possible to determine such a presentation in the living language. Perhaps the local name collectors themselves standardized them, especially since in common language such toponyms are traditional? Provided su -élis, e.g. Svencionéliai, Gedziunéliai, Mielagénéliai. On the other hand, some helonyms, especially uZraSytus already in the first half of the 20th century, with -élis could be iStarti and the local inhabitants themselves, influenced by the common language. Thus, this is not only ne a linguistic, but also a sociolinguistic problem, as long as the researcher has to decide: -elis, -élis usage areas to reconstruct the helonima as it should be, or to take into account the data provided in the compilation®. * E.g. -The area of the Gelzés marsh was several hundred hectares in the interwar period! 5 Such data were recorded by forester Stasys Rimkeviéius and presented by eigulys Benys Taraskus. ® I have even come to that area (Lifikmeny), where both trisyllables and polysyllables Adjective used in words -el, I know ir my mother tongue well Snacks. ’ Such a tradition was formed in the interwar period by Antanas Salys, Juozas Baléikonis and others. * e.g., in synchronic studies of oikonymy construction, sunorminuoti place names are analyzed, todél ir is polycystic Zodziy made oikonimy igskiriama only prepositions108
Notes It should also be added that V. Vitkauskas incorrectly interprets my ability dél latviy or slavy kalby jtakos. First of all, I do not claim anywhere that Zemai¢iy and aukStaitiu vilniSkiy -elis —respectively Latvian and Slavic language consequences. I am just trying to find an explanation, why multi-family helonyms with -elis are found in places where there should already be a deminutive suffix -élis: south, narrow east of Lithuania and in the territory around Zelva, Alanta, Ridninkai’. At least some of these helonyms -elis (-elé) could certainly have arisen from Slavification, cf. similar structures in Lithuanian names of places of residence and personal names in Slavic Saltines: Trafzkunele" 1744, 1771, Traszkunele 1775, 1784 = lit. Troskiiné liai (vs. Tro8kiiny sen.), Wilunele 1784 = lit. Vildnéliai (village, Jiezno district); 1689) 1689 – Jan van Eyck, Dutch painter (d. 1626) 1626 – Wenceslaus II of Poland (b. 1628) 1628 – Jaroslav I of Bohemia (b. Zemaitélis and so on. Laimutis Bilkis Lithuanian Language Institute P. Vileisio g. 5, 10308 Vilnius, Lithuania About the new final forms of the 3rd person verbs It has long been known that the 3rd person forms of the 3rd person verbs in Lithuanian, undifferentiated by number, correspond to pure vowel stems and there is no evidence that they ever had finals. This characteristic of Lithuanian language is considered by Pisani, Toporov, Ivanov, Schmalstieg and many others to be particularly important for the reconstruction of the action-adverbial origins and for linguistic typology. It is clearly reflected in the synchronous Lithuanian verb system, where the vowel stems of the 3rd person form the basis for many forms. ga -élis (r. Razmukaité, M. Lietuvos priesaginiai oikonimai. Doctoral dissertation, Vilnius: Institute of Lithuanian Language, Vytauto Didžiojo University, 1998, 34-35, 36-40). ° Zr. Bilkis, L. Lietuviy priesaginiai deminutyviniai helonimai. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 41, 1999, 70. 1 Historical place names are provided from the Historical Place Names File of the Names Division. 4 Historical personal names are presented in i8 Historical personal names file of the Namebook section. 109
