Full text
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER Percolation Phenomena For New Magnetic Composites And Tim Nanocomposites Materials Ahmed THABET Nanotechnology Research Centre, Faculty of Energy Engineering, Aswan University, 81528 Aswan, Egypt [email protected] DOI: 10.15598/aeee.v13i5.1369 Abstract. This paper presents a theoretical investigation in order to obtain new composite and nanocomposite magnetic industrial materials. The effective conductivity and thermal effective conductivity have been predicted by adding various types and percentages of conductive particles (Al2O3, MgO, ZnO, Graphite etc.) to the main matrices of Epoxy, Iron and Silicon for formulating new composite and nanocomposite industrial materials. The characterization of effective conductivity of new polymeric composites has been investigated with various applied forces, inclusion types and their concentrations. In addition, the effect of inclusion types and their concentrations on the effective thermal conductivities of thermal interface nanocomposite industrial materials has been explained and discussed. Keywords Composites, conductivity, magnetic, nanocomposites, percolation, thermal interface materials. 1. Introduction Percolation theory is a general model for the description of statistical processes and it has become a common method in the investigations of pre-breakdown processes in solids. Also, nanoparticle size can formulate new composite and thermal interface nanocomposite industrial materials by nanotechnology science that made huge enhancement in the magnetic properties of the composite materials which will affect the performance of the industrial applications. Polymeric composites made with particles such as conductive, ferroelectric or metal particles are some of the important engineering materials used for resistors, switching devices, conducting pastes, components in the xerographic machine and separators in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Percolation theory predicts that various characteristics of a percolating system are related to the probability of occupation of sites within the percolation lattice, by power law relations, and that the exponents of these power relations are universal regardless of the system. The previous work has shown that percolation theory is an appropriate tool for understanding finite size effects in 3D cluster films [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The analytical studied models have been enabled to optimize the structure and arrangement of the polymeric composite materials. Based on fundamental physical principles, it can quantify the effective conductivity of the suggested polymeric industrial composites. Such models will enable one to optimize the structure and arrangement of the material [6], [7]. The electrical characteristics of electrical conductive adhesives are close to properties of a filler. Metal particles are widely used as conductive fillers in common electrical conductive adhesives formulations due to their lower resistivity and good process. The characteristic of electrical conductivity of a composite by volume fraction of particles has already been studied by previous researchers [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In fact, the magnetic or dielectric loss in insulating materials can be used to dissipate the electromagnetic energy in the EM-absorbers, and the combination of high electrical conductivity and high permeability is effective to shield the EM waves. However, the high-content metal granular composite material may show metallic electrical conduction due to the percolation effect of embedded particles [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Composite and nanocomposite industrial materials are being explored as shielding materials for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and electromagnetic interference (EMI) applications. In these systems, in addition to particle/matrix conductivities and volume loading of the particles in the matrix, the randomness of distribution, polydispersivity as well as interfacial thermal resistance plays a role in determining c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 558
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER the effective conductivity of the composite material [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Predictive modelling based on fundamental physical principles is critical to developing new TIMs, since it can be used to quantify the effect of particle volume fractions and arrangements on the effective thermal conductivity. Such models will enable one to optimize the structure and arrangement of the material [24], [25], [26], [27]. Thermal interface materials (TIMs) have been widely adopted to minimize the thermal interface resistance between the rough surfaces of heat generating components and the heat dissipation devices. Most of TIMs are made of polymers with thermally conductive particles distributed inside to enhance the thermal conductivity. There are various kinds of approaches to calculate the effective thermal conductivity of the two-phase composite systems. The effective thermal conductivity of TIMs is affected by many factors, such as the thermal conductivity of filler particles, the thermal conductivity of the matrix, the volume fraction of filler particles, and the particle size distribution of filler particles and so on [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. For this paper we have used recent analytical models for estimating effective conductivity of new suggested polymeric composite industrial materials that have been enhanced in their characterization response with respect to particle types and their concentrations and so forces applied to these materials. A detailed analysis of the nanostructure characteristics that influence the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs is included in the goals of this paper. Thus, their characterization response with respect to types and concentrations of selected nanoparticles has been enhanced. 2. Theoretical Models 2.1. Polymetric Composites Percolation theory, the objective of which is to characterize the connectivity properties in random geometries and to explore them with respect to physical processes consideration, the percolation types is forming continuous network of particles in conductive polymeric composite which is completely satisfied. In the technological applications, it can be predicted conductivity of polymeric composite specimen considering a spherical particle that subjected in classical mixing rules of particles with main matrices for determining the effective conductivity of composites if the inclusion phase is dispersed in the matrix phase random distribution [6], it will be as follows: σ=σ0·(x−xc)t,(1) where σ0is the proportionality constant, xis the volume concentration of conducting phase, xcis the critical concentration of conducting phase, tis the exponential factor for percolation and tunnelling percolation. Also, there is proposed an applied force on polymeric composite material that has been used to formulate theoretical models for predicting an effective conductivity of polymeric composites; it corresponds to average sensibility [7]. σ=h R·A=4·h π·D2·R0·F−α,(2) where his the height of polymeric composite specimen, Dis the diameter of polymeric composite specimen, R0 is the initial resistance of polymeric composite specimen, αis the volume of particles inside the matrix. However, the variation of electric resistance due to mechanical load applied on the sample’s special area of contact between particles increases and cuts the distances between particles located in parallel rows. So, Fig. 1 shows a schematic layout of the polymeric composite specimen with different volume fractions of particles. Fig. 1: Schematic layout for polymeric composite specimen with particles [7]. However, the conducting elements are in geometric contact, the theory predicts that the critical exponent tis less than two and the process is called percolation; percolation refers to the flow of current through random resistor networks. When the conducting elements are not in geometric contact, the inter-particle tunnelling is dominant. Thus, this research studies the percolation phenomenon in polymeric composites with various cost-fewer particles and configuration analytical model parameters. 2.2. Thermal Interface Materials (TIM) This paper also focuses on applied theoretical models for estimating thermal conductivity of nanocomposite industrial materials consisting of nano-sized nanocrystalline particles embedded in different matrices. c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 559
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER Based on the following mathematical model [25], [26], [27], that has been used for predicting an effective thermal conductivity of thermal interface materials nanocomposites; Fig. 2 shows the cylindrical region between two spherical particles. There is proposed a point of contact between two particles in a thermal flux density across the surface of particles in random arrangement of the matrix. Thus, there can be predicted thermal conductance between spherical particles without distortion with respect to the volume fraction of particles in the matrix (Φ), the thermal conductivity of particles (kp), the thermal conductivity of matrix (km), radii of two local sphere surfaces (R1and R2), and factors of the ability of forming continuous network of fillers in the matrix (C1, and C2) and via (0:1) as follows [26]: Keff =5.2933 2·π·kp·R1+1 π·km·aln1+ R2 ha +5.2933 2·π·kp·R2−1 , (3) where R=α·a, (4a) a=2·R1·R2 R1+R2 ,(4b) α= 5.0539 ·ϕ2 −7.3994 ·ϕ+ 3.203.(4c) log Keff =ϕ·C2·log kp+ (1 −ϕ)·log(C1·km).(5) Fig. 2: Schematic diagram for cylindrical region between two spherical particles [26]. The effective thermal conductivity Keff of nanoparticles/nonmagnetic matrix composite can then be calculated using the above theories based on their types and concentrations. Considering, influences of the ability of forming continuous network of fillers in base matrices will be completely satisfied, then; the performance of effective thermal conductivities for various suggested new magnetic nanocomposites has been shown in this research. Tab. 1: Electric and thermal properties of suggested particles and industrial materials. Materials Conductivity (S·m−1) Thermal Conductivity K (W·(m·K)−1) Graphite 3·105200 Fe 10780.2 ZnO 1.69 ·10721 MgO 10840 Al2O31014 35 Si 1.56 ·10−3148 Epoxy 10−12 1.04 Glass 10−15 1.2 PTFE 10−16 0.25 3. Suggested Materials Polymeric composites made a huge enhancement in the electric, dielectric and electromagnetic properties which will affect the performance of the industrial applications at a configuration sample of d=h= 0.01 m. All selected nanoparticles, in this research, have been spherically shaped and sized as 10 nm diameter for every grain size. The main electrical and thermal description properties of the usage of particles have been depicted in Tab. 1; these particles have been used for enhancing electric properties of polymeric composite and nanocomposite industrial materials. 4. Results and Discussions This research has used recent theoretical models for estimating effective conductivity and effective thermal conductivity of new suggested nanocomposite thermal interface industrial materials. The following results have been reported for new suggested composite and nanocomposite industrial materials that have been enhanced in their characterization response with respect to particle types and their concentrations and so forces applied to new suggested materials. 4.1. Effect of Percolation Phenomena in New Polymeric Composites Figure 3 shows enhancing the effective conductivity of Epoxy Polymeric composite materials by adding various percentages of iron particles in random distributions to Epoxy composites. However, the effective conc 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 560
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER ductivity of Iron/Epoxy polymeric composite materials decreased gradually by increasing the percolation factor of the polymeric composite materials. As shown in Fig. 4, Al2O3particles have higher effectiveness for increasing the effective conductivity of Epoxy Polymeric composite materials than Iron particles. Figure 5 Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective conductivity [s · m-1] * 106 0 2 4 6 8 10 Percolation Factor=1 Percolation Factor=2 Percolation Factor=3 Fig. 3: Effective conductivity of Iron/Epoxy polymeric composites. shows enhancing the effective conductivity of epoxy polymeric composite materials by adding various percentages of (Graphite, SiO2, and MgO) particles in random distributions at a certain percolation factor 1.8. It is cleared that SiO2particles have increased the effective conductivity of Epoxy Polymeric composite materials higher than MgO and Graphite particles. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective conductivity [s · m-1] * 1012 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percolation Factor=1 Percolation Factor=2 Percolation Factor=3 Fig. 4: Effective conductivity of Al2O3/Epoxy polymeric composites. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective conductivity [s · m-1]*106 10-4 10-2 100 102 104 Graphite/Epoxy Composite MgO/Epoxy Composite SiO2/Epoxy Composite Fig. 5: Effective conductivity of Epoxy Polymeric composites. 4.2. Effect of Applied Forces on Polymeric Composites Figure 6 shows increasing the effective conductivity of Epoxy composite materials by adding various percentages of SiO2particles in random distributions, also; the effective conductivity of SiO2/Epoxy composite materials increased gradually by increasing applied force on the composite material specimens. The Effectiveness of applied forces on the effective conductivity of SiO2/Epoxy composite materials appears whenever the percentage/s of SiO2increased in the polymeric composites. Applied force [Newton] 0 30 60 90 120 150 Effective conductivity [m · s-1 ] 102 103 104 105 Volume fraction=0.1 Volume fraction=0.3 Volume fraction=0.5 Volume fraction=0.7 Volume fraction=0.9 Fig. 6: Effective conductivity of SiO2/Epoxy composites. c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 561
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER 4.3. Effect of Nanoparticles on Magnetic TIMs Figure 7 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs iron nanocomposites that increased by adding various percentages of silicon and graphite in random distributions. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 0 50 100 150 200 Fe+Si Fe+Graphite Fe+Glass Fe+PTFE Fig. 7: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Iron/Polymer nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. It is noticed that the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs iron nanocomposites decreased by adding various percentages of glass and PTFE in random distribution, but graphite nanoparticles have higher effectiveness for increasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in iron matrix with respect to silicon. However, PTFE has higher effectiveness for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in iron matrix with respect to Glass nanoparticles. Figure 8 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs iron nanocomposite that decreased by adding various percentages of nanoparticles of oxides (Al2O3, ZnO, MgO) in random distributions to iron matrix material. But, MgO nanoparticles have higher ability for increasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in iron matrix with respects to Al2O3and ZnO nanoparticles. 4.4. Effect of Nanoparticles on Polymeric TIMs Figure 9 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Silicon nanocomposite materials that increased by adding various percentages of graphite nanoparticles in random distributions to iron matrix material. However, the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Silicon nanocomposite materials Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Fe+Al2O3 Fe+ZnO Fe+MgO Fig. 8: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Iron/Oxides nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. decreased by adding various percentages of Iron and Graphite nanoparticles in by random distributions to iron matrix material. It is cleared that Graphite nanoparticles are more effective for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in silicon matrix with respect to Iron nanoparticles. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Si+Fe Si+Graphite Fig. 9: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Silicon/Metal nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. Figure 10 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Silicon nanocomposite materials that decreased by adding various percentages of nanoparticles of oxides (Al2O3, ZnO, MgO) in random distributions to silicon matrix material. However, MgO nanoparticles are more effective for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in iron matrix with respect to Al2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles. Figure 11 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Epoxy nanocomc 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 562
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Si+Al2O3 Si+ZnO Si+MgO Fig. 10: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Silicon/Oxides nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 0 50 100 150 200 250 Epoxy+Fe Epoxy+Al Epoxy+Co Epoxy+Ni Epoxy+Graphite Fig. 11: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Epoxy/Metal nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. posite materials that increased by adding various percentages of Aluminum, iron, silicon, graphite, cobalt, and nickel nanoparticles in random distributions to Epoxy matrix material. Whatever, iron nanoparticles are more effective for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites in Epoxy matrix with respect to other nanoparticles. Figure 12 shows the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Epoxy nanocomposite materials that increased by adding various percentages of nanoparticles of oxides (Al2O3, ZnO, MgO) in random distributions to Epoxy matrix material. Note that MgO nanoparticles are more effective in Epoxy matrix for increasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites with respect to Al2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles. Figure 13 shows the effective thermal conductivity of Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Epoxy+Al2O3 Epoxy+ZnO Epoxy+MgO Fig. 12: Effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Epoxy/Oxide nanocomposites with various nanoparticles. TIMs Epoxy nanocomposite materials that increased by adding various percentages of glass nanoparticles in random distributions to Epoxy matrix material. However, the effective thermal conductivity of TIMs Epoxy nanocomposite materials decreased by adding various percentages of PTFE nanoparticles in random distributions to Epoxy matrix material. Volume fraction [-] 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Effective thermal conductivity [W · (m · K)-1] 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Epoxy+Glass Epoxy+Teflon PTFE Fig. 13: Effective thermal conductivity of Epoxy/Insulator nanocomposites. 5. Conclusions Percolation tunnelling factor is an important factor for indication of the flow of current through random resistor networks, especially the effective conductivity of c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 563
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER polymeric composites. Compressive forces applied to the polymeric composite material specimens enhance the effective conductivity of polymeric composites materials. The effective conductivity and thermal conductivity of industrial polymeric composite materials can be controlled by using various conductive types and percentages of particles in random distributions, which depends on the types and percentages of costfewer particles. Al2O3particles are more effective for increasing effective conductivity of the composite materials with respect to Iron, SiO2, and MgO particles. As a predicting guide for industry manufactures, it can be obvious that graphite nanoparticles are more effective for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites with respect to silicon nanoparticles; however, MgO nanoparticles are more effective for increasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites with respect to Al2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles. For Epoxy TIMs nanocomposites, it can be obvious that iron nanoparticles are more effective for decreasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites with respect to other studied nanoparticles; however, MgO nanoparticles are more effective for increasing thermal conductivity of nanocomposites with respect to Al2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles. Acknowledgment The present work was supported by Erasmus Mundus Project between Aswan University, Egypt and Politecnico Di Torino University, Italy. References [1] OKAMOTO, T., M. KOYAMA, Y. INOUE, N. TAKAHASI and S. NAKAMURA. Percolation Phenomena of Field Grading Materials Made of Two Kinds of Filler. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulating Materials. Himeji: IEEE, 2001, pp. 83–86. ISBN 4-88686-0532. DOI: 10.1109/ISEIM.2001.973569. [2] DUNBAR, A. D. F., J. G. PARTRIDGE, M. SCHULZE, S. SCOTT and S. A. BROWN. Measurement of the Conductivity Exponent in Random Percolating Networks of Nanoscale Bismuth Clusters. In: IEEE International Conference on MEMS. NANO and Smart Systems Proceedings. Banff, Alberta: IEEE, 2003, pp. 350– 356. ISBN 0-7695-1947-4. DOI: 10.1109/ICMENS.2003.1222023. [3] GAMBINO, R. J., S. LIANG, K. SHINODA, J. COLMENARES-ANGULO and S. SAMPATH. Transition from GMR to AMR at the Percolation Threshold in Ferrite-Magnetic Alloy Composites. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2012, vol. 48, iss. 11, pp. 2765–2768. ISSN 0018-9464. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2201918. [4] WASSELYNCK, G., D. TRICHET and J. FOULADGAR. Determination of the Electrical Conductivity Tensor of a CFRP Composite Using a 3-D Percolation Model. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2013, vol. 49, iss. 5, pp. 1825–1828. ISSN 0018-9464. DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2241039. [5] DAVIS, J. A., D. K. BROWN and W. HENDERSON. Fractal Electrode Formation in Metal–Insulator Composites Near the Percolation Threshold. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology. 2013, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 725–733. ISSN 1536125X. DOI: 10.1109/TNANO.2013.2271905. [6] SALVADORI, M. C., F. S. TEIXEIRA, M. CATTANI, A. NIKOLAEV, K. P. SAVKIN, E. M. OKS, H. K. PARK, L. PHILLIPS, K. M. YU and I. G. BROWN. On the electrical conductivity of Ti-implanted alumina. Journal of Applied Physics. 2012, vol. 111, iss. 6, pp. 063714.1–063714.4. ISSN 0021-8979. DOI: 10.1063/1.3697900. [7] OLTEAN, I. D. and D. L. MOTOC. Factors influencing the electrical conductivity of composites with iron particles. In: IEEE International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM). Brasov: IEEE, 2012, pp. 124–129. ISBN 978-1-4673-1650-7. DOI: 10.1109/OPTIM.2012.6231895. [8] MAMUNYA, Y. P, V. V. DAVYDENKO, P. PISSIS and E. V. LEBEDEV. Electrical and Thermal Conductivity of Polymers Filled with Metal Powder. European Polymer Journal. 2002, vol. 38, iss. 11, pp. 1887–1897. ISSN 0014-3057. DOI: 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00064-2. [9] BOUDENNE, A., L. IBOS, M. FOIS, J. C. MAJESTE and E. GE’HIN. Electrical and Thermal Behavior of Polypropylene Filled with Copper Particles. Composites Part A. 2005, vol. 36, iss. 11, pp. 1545–1554. ISSN 1359-835X. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.005. [10] TEE, D., M. MARIATTI, A. AZIZAN, C. SEE and K. F. CHONG. Effect of Silane-Based Coupling Agent on the Properties of Silver Nanoparticles Filled Epoxy Composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2007, vol. 67, iss. 11–12, pp. 2584–2591. ISSN 0266-3538. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.007. c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 564
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER [11] FATANG, T., X. QIAO, J. CHEN and H. WANG. Effects of coupling agents on the properties of epoxy-based electrically conductive adhesives. International Journal Adhesion &Adhesives. 2006, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 406–413. ISSN 0143-7496. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.06.005. [12] ZULKARNAIN, M., M. MARIATTI and I. A. AZID. Prediction studies on percolation threshold behavior of silver filled epoxy composite for electrically conductive adhesives applications. In: Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium (IEMT). Penang: IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–6. ISBN 978-1-4244-3392-6. DOI: 10.1109/IEMT.2008.5507799. [13] MATTEI, J. L., D. BARIOU, A. CHEVALIER and M. L. FLOC’H. Gyroresonance in unsaturated composite bodies: Experiments and theory. Journal of Applied Physics. 2000, vol. 87, iss. 1, pp. 4975–4977. ISSN 0021-8979. DOI: 10.1063/1.373220. [14] TROTSENKO, O., A. TOKAREV, A. GRUZD, T. ENRIGHTA and S. MINKO. Magnetic field assisted assembly of highly ordered percolated nanostructures and their application for transparent conductive thin films. Nanoscale. 2015, vol. 7, iss. 16, pp. 7155–7161. ISSN 6861-6861. DOI: 10.1039/C5NR00154D. [15] LEE, S. J., Y. B. KIM, K. S. LEE, D. J. BYUN and S. W. KIM. Effect of annealing temperature on electromagnetic absorption properties of crystalline Fe-Si-Al alloy powderpolymer composites. Physica status solidi. 2007, vol. 204, iss. 12, pp. 4121–4124. ISSN 1862-6319. DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200777303. [16] KASAGI, T., T. TSUTAOKA and K. HATAKEYAMA. Dielectric properties of Permalloy granular composite materials. Journal of The European Ceramic Society. 2010, vol. 30, iss. 2, pp. 401–406. ISSN 0955-2219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.011. [17] MCLACHLAN, D. S., M. BLASZKIEWICZ and R. E. NEWNHAM. Electrical resistivity of composites. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1990, vol. 73, iss. 8, pp. 2187–2203. ISSN 15512916. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07576.x. [18] TSUTAOKA, T., A. TSURUNAGA, T. KASAGI, K. HATAKEYAMA and M. Y. KOLEDINTSEVA. Electromagnetic properties of metal granular composite materials for EMC applications. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC). Pittsburgh: IEEE, 2012, pp. 411–425. ISBN 978-14673-2061-0. DOI: 10.1109/ISEMC.2012.6351812. [19] NAN, C. W., R. BIRRINGER, D. R. CLARKE and H. GLEITER. Effective Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Composites with Interfacial Thermal Resistance. Journal of Applied Physics. 1997, vol. 81, no. 10. pp. 6692–6699. ISSN 00218979. DOI: 10.1063/1.365209. [20] ZHANG, X., S. KANUPARTHI, G. SUBBARAYAN, B. G. SAMMAKIA and S. TONAPI. Hierarchical Modeling and Trade-Off Studies in Design of Thermal Interface Materials. In: Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Integration and Packaging of MEMS, NEMS, and Electronic Systems collocated with the ASME 2005 Heat Transfer Summer Conference. San Francisco: ASME, 2005, pp. 17–22. ISBN 0-7918-42002. DOI: 10.1115/IPACK2005-73259. [21] ZHANG, X. and G. SUBBARAYAN. A Constructive Approach for Heterogeneous Material Modeling and Analysis. Computer Aided Design &Applications. 2004, vol. 1, iss. 1–4, pp. 171–178. ISSN 1686-4360. DOI: 10.1080/16864360.2004.10738256. [22] KANUPARTHI, S., X. ZHANG, G. SUBBARAYAN, B. SAMMAKIA, A. GOWDA and S. TONAPI. Full-Field Simulations of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials: Separating the Effects of Random Distribution from Interfacial Resistance. In: IEEE Conference Thermal and Thermo-mechanical Phenomena in Electronics Systems Conference. San Diego: IEEE, 2006, pp. 1276–1282. ISBN 0-78039524-7. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2006.1645492. [23] WU, D., R. QIANG, J. CHEN, C. LIU, M. KOLEDINTSEVA and J. DREWNIAK. Numerical Modeling of Periodic Composite Media for Electromagnetic Shielding Application. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Honolulu: IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–7. ISBN 1-4244-1349-4. DOI: 10.1109/ISEMC.2007.216. [24] KANUPARTHI, S., G. SUBBARAYAN, B. SAMMAKIA and T. SIEGMUND. Microstructural Characteristics Influencing the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials. In: IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems ITHERM. Orlando: IEEE, 2008, pp. 227–237. ISBN 978-1-42441700-1. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2008.4544275. [25] KANUPARTHI, S., G. SUBBARAYAN, T. SIEGMUND and B. SAMMAKIA. An Efficient Network Model for Determining the Effective thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials. IEEE Transactions on c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 565
ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT VOLUME: 13 |NUMBER: 5 |2015 |DECEMBER Components and Packaging Technologies. 2008, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 611–621. ISSN 1521-3331. DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2008.2001839. [26] DAN, B., B. G. SAMMAKIA and G. SUBBARAYAN. On Refining the Parameters of a Random Network Model for Determining the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials. In: IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm). Las Vegas: IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-1-4244-53429. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2010.5501349. [27] RENUKAPPA, N. M., RASHMI, K. N. SHIVAKUMAR, M. MANJUNATHA and P. S. KUMARAN. Effect of TiO2and OMMT nanofiller on Thermal Conductivity and Heat Deflection Temperature of Nanodielectric composites. In: IEEE 10th International Conference on the Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials (ICPADM). Bangalore: IEEE, 2012, pp. 24– 28. ISBN 978-1-4673-2852-4. DOI: 10.1109/ICPADM.2012.6318913. [28] YUE, C., Y. ZHANG, J. LIU, Z. CHENG and J. FAN. Numerical Investigation on the Effect of Filler Distribution on Effective Thermal Conductivity of Thermal Interface Material. In: IEEE International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology &High Density Packaging ICEPTHDP. Shanghai: IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–5. ISBN 978-14244-2739-0. DOI: 10.1109/ICEPT.2008.4606971. [29] KANUPARTHI, S., G. SUBBARAYAN, T. SIEGMUND and B. SAMMAKIA. The Effect of Polydispersivity on the Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials. IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies. 2009, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 424–434. ISSN 15213331. DOI: 10.1109/TCAPT.2008.2010502. [30] DAN, B., B. G. SAMMAKIA, S. KANUPARTHI, G. SUBBARAYAN and S. MALLAMPATI. The Study of the Polydispersivity Effect on the Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials to Refine the Random Network Model. In: IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm). San Diego: IEEE, 2012, pp. 1242–1249. ISBN 978-1-4244-9533-7. DOI: 10.1109/ITHERM.2012.6231564. [31] DAN, B., B. G. SAMMAKIA, G. SUBBARAYAN, S. KANUPARTHI and S. MALLAMPATI. The Study of the Polydispersivity Effect on the Thermal Conductivity of Particulate Thermal Interface Materials by Finite Element Method. IEEE Transactions on Components. Packaging and Manufacturing Technology. 2013, vol. 3, iss. 12, pp. 2068–2074. ISSN 21563950. DOI: 10.1109/TCPMT.2013.2286996. [32] ZANDEN, C., X. LUO, L. YE and J. LIU. Fabrication and characterization of a metal matrix polymer fiber composite for thermal interface material applications. In: 19th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC). Berlin: IEEE, 2013, pp. 286–292. ISBN 978-1-4799-2271-0. DOI: 10.1109/THERMINIC.2013.6675196. [33] OUCHETTO, O., S. ZOUHDI, A. BOSSAVIT, G. GRISO and B. MIARA. Modeling of 3-D Periodic Multiphase Composites by Homogenization. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 2006, vol. 54, iss. 6, pp. 2615–2619. ISSN 0018-9480. DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2006.872928. About Authors Ahmed THABET was born in Aswan, Egypt in 1974. He received the B.Sc. (FEE) Electrical Engineering degree in 1997 and M.Sc. (FEE) Electrical Engineering degree in 2002 both from Faculty of Energy Engineering, Aswan, Egypt. Ph.D. degree had been received in Electrical Engineering in 2006 from El-Minia University, Minia, Egypt. He joined with Electrical Power Engineering Group of Faculty of Energy Engineering in Aswan University as a Demonstrator at July 1999, until; he held Associate Professor Position at October 2011 up to date. His research interests lie in the areas of analysis and developing electrical engineering models and applications, investigating novel nano-technology materials via addition nano-scale particles and additives for usage in industrial branch, electromagnetic materials, electroluminescence and the relationship with electrical and thermal ageing of industrial polymers. On 2009, he had been a Principle Investigator of a funded project from Science and Technology development Fund “STDF” for developing industrial materials of ac and dc applications by nano-technology techniques. He has been established first Nano-Technology Research Centre in the Upper Egypt. c 2015 ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 566