The Rural Digital Divide in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe-Recommendations from a Scoping Review

in o ma ics Re iew The Ru al Digi al Di ide in he Face o he COVID-19 Pandemic in Eu ope—Recommenda ions om a Scoping Re iew Miguel-Ángel Es eban-Na a o 1, Miguel-Ángel Ga cía-Madu ga 2,* , Tama a Mo e-Nadal 1 and An onia-Isabel Nogales-Bocio 1 1Depa men o Jou nalism and Communica ion, Uni e si y o Za agoza, 50009 Za agoza, Spain; mes eban@uniza .es (M.-Á.E.-N.); mo e@uniza .es (T.M.-N.); anogales@uniza .es (A.-I.N.-B.) 2Depa men o Business Adminis a ion, Uni e si y o Za agoza, 50018 Za agoza, Spain *Co espondence: madu ga@uniza .es Recei ed: 21 Oc obe 2020; Accep ed: 3 Decembe 2020; Published: 5 Decembe 2020   Abs ac : The COVID-19 pandemic has e ealed he digi al ulne abili y o many ci izens o he u al wo ld. This a icle iden i ies and analyzes he p oposals made by academic li e a u e o o e come he digi al di ide in he Eu opean u al wo ld o he i e-yea pe iod 2016–2020. A scoping e iew has been ca ied ou acco ding o he PRISMA me hodology in he wo dimensions o he digi al di ide: access and connec i i y, and use and exploi a ion. Online da abases we e used o iden i y scien i ic a icles om which, a e sc eening, 28 key documen s we e selec ed. The esul s upda e Salemink sys ema ic e iew o a icles published be ween 1991 and 2014 on digi al and u al de elopmen in Wes e n coun ies and i also in ends o go beyond by ex ac ing ecommenda ions. A a ie y o poli ical, social, educa ional, echnical and economic issues has been exposed, wi h a common emphasis on he empowe men o u al popula ions. The indings p o ide ac ionable e idence and p oposals o acili a e decision-making in cu en policy in o ma ion o o e come u al digi al di ide. F om hem, se en ecommenda ions ha could ha e a wide and apid impac o minimize he e ec s o he COVID-19 pandemic linked o he u al digi al di ide a e syn hesized. Th ee lines o ac ion in he medium e m a e also p oposed: he e alua ion o na ional and egional public policies; he conside a ion o digi al inclusion as a po en ial ins umen o educe u al depopula ion; and he aining in ad anced digi al skills o imp o e he social communica ion p ocesses, conside ed key o p omo e empowe men and en ep eneu ship. Keywo ds: u al communi ies; digi al di ide; digi al inclusion; scoping e iew; COVID-19 pandemic; Eu ope 1. In oduc ion 1.1. Con ex : The Digi al T ans o ma ion o Socie y and he COVID-19 The Eu opean Council s a ed in he Lisbon S a egy (23 and 24 Ma ch 2000) ha In o ma ion and Communica ion Technologies (ICT) we e he basis o a compe i i e, dynamic, and knowledge-based economy. This documen , also known as he Lisbon Agenda, was he u ning poin o he ad ancemen o he in o ma ion socie y and he bi h o e-go e nmen policies in he Eu opean Union. This p ojec o in o ma ion socie y was ounded on he c ea ion, dis ibu ion, use, and euse o in o ma ion h ough ICT, p omo ing wide access o knowledge, opening up new ways and oppo uni ies o pa icipa e in social li e, g owing in a sus ainable way wi h mo e and be e jobs, and c ea ing he condi ions o g ea e p ospe i y and social cohesion [1]. In o ma ics 2020,7, 54; doi:10.3390/in o ma ics7040054 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/in o ma ics In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 2 o 18 Fi een yea s la e , he EU Digi al Single Ma ke S a egy launched The eGo e nmen Ac ion Plan 2016–2020, wi h h ee policy p io i ies: upg ading he public adminis a ion wi h ICT, using key digi al enable s; achie ing in e ope able digi al public se ices o allow c oss-bo de mobili y, simpli ying he access o ma ke s, inc easing con idence and s imula ing compe i ion; and acili a ing easy digi al in e ac ion be ween adminis a ions and ci izens and businesses [ 2 ]. This ac ion plan es ablishes he ollowing unde lying p inciples: digi al ision by de aul , “once only” p inciple, inclusi eness and accessibili y, openness and anspa ency, c oss-bo de le el by de aul , in e ope abili y by de aul and us wo hiness and secu i y [ 3 ]. The coun ies o he Eu opean Union ha e designed, based on his ac ion plan and i s an eceden s, hei own na ional and egional e-go e nmen plans, being a di e en s ages o implemen a ion. Simul aneously, he Eu opean Union has aken decisi e ac ions o es ablish an open in e ne , wi hou which he in o ma ion socie y would be a allacy. This open in e ne means he ecogni ion o he “abili y o end-use s o access and dis ibu e in o ma ion o un applica ions and se ices o hei choice”, whene e hey comply wi h legal obliga ions and do no jeopa dize he secu i y and in eg i y o he ne wo k; and ha p o ide s o in e ne access “shall no block, slow down, al e , es ic , in e e e wi h, deg ade o disc imina e” speci ic con en , applica ions o se ices [ 4 ]. The aise o use and p o i o in o ma ion, espec ul o in ellec ual p ope y igh s, o c ea e new knowledge, es ablish new social in e ac ions and minimize social ba ie s, would no be possible wi hou a legal ame based on hese p inciples. The c ea ion o a hype -connec ed Eu opean socie y h ough applica ions, ne wo ks and social media in a sa e, open, c ea i e, and eliable echnological en i onmen is nowadays a p io i y objec i e o he gene al policy and inno a ion p og ams o he Eu opean Union [5]. The yea 2020 will go down in his o y o he g ea boos ha he in o ma ion socie y, e-go e nmen and social hype -connec i i y had in Eu ope due o he social dis ancing measu es o he popula ion, and e en con inemen , adop ed by he majo i y o he na ional go e nmen s. Telewo king has g own exponen ially h oughou he se ice sec o . The digi iza ion o he economy and elec onic comme ce has made signi ican p og ess. Public se ices ha e closed o es ic ed physical access o o ices and ha e es ablished ha many p ocesses and o mali ies can be ca ied ou exclusi ely digi ally. Ci izens ha e been o ced o in e ac h ough ICT o access essen ial se ices such as educa ion and heal hca e. Social media has become o many people he main means o access o in o ma ion, he majo channel o communica ion and e en in some cases he only way o social in e ac ion. E e y hing indica es ha hese ans o ma ions ha e come o s ay. This accele a ion o he digi iza ion o human ela ionships, which began mo e han h ee decades ago, is he cen al ac o o social change oday, a he han he ac i sel o he ac ion o an exogenous elemen , such as he heal h c isis caused by COVID-19. The expansion o he in o ma ion socie y depends on some hing mo e han jus he conjunc u al p esence o an accele a ing ca alys . Fi s and o emos , ci izens a e equi ed o ha e access o ICTs, be compe en in hei use, and be able o bene i om i . Howe e , he COVID-19 pandemic has highligh ed he digi al ulne abili y o many ci izens in hese h ee dimensions: connec i i y, use and exploi a ion; and i has also e ealed he se ious consequences o ha ulne abili y: he pandemic has caused a si ua ion in which he access o he in e ne seems o ha e become necessa y e en o su i al, especially i i is ela ed o heal h issues [ 6 ]. In a si ua ion wi h s ic measu es o social and physical dis ancing, he access o new digi al se ices, p o ided o da e h ough ace- o- ace o by phone, equi es o he applican o be connec ed o he in e ne and o know how o in e ac wi h ICT. Consequen ly, hose on he w ong side o he digi al di ide a e comple ely le ou o hese se ices, ha ing a g ea e isk o social exclusion. As s a ed by he Wo ld Summi on he In o ma ion Socie y [7], only when all he people and communi ies can c ea e, consul , use and sha e in o ma ion and knowledge hey ha e he necessa y equi emen s o p omo ing sus ainable de elopmen and imp o ing hei quali y o li e. Mo e ecen ly, he h ee ypes o social exclusion he digi al di ide can cause ha e been syn hesized: poli ical, in he exe cise o ci il and human igh s; pa icipa ion in social ac i i ies, being dep i ed o in o ma ion and e ec i e communica ion wi h o he ci izens; and economic, In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 3 o 18 as access o be e educa ion is educed and he e o e p o essional aining is downg aded and he isk o unemploymen and low income inc eases [8]. Al hough he e is a long adi ion o deba e on he digi al di ide, he e is now enewed in e es , ele ance, and u gency o in es iga e his issue. In o ma ion Science and Communica ion S udies, as places o in e disciplina y mee ings ha analyzes e e y hing ela ed o he de elopmen o in o ma ion and communica i e p ocesses in he socie y and in a special way he ela ionships be ween social and communica i e changes, canno emain obli ious o he p oblems ha gene a e he gap and i s digi al ulne abili y. 1.2. Backg ound: Digi al Di ide and Digi al Inclusion Digi al di ide is cu en ly unde s ood as he di e ence be ween indi iduals, companies, egions, and coun ies in he access and use o ICT [ 9 ]. I consis s o a di e ence o app oach o echnological ools and se ices such as mobile elephony, compu e s and he in e ne ha gene a es an inequali y o oppo uni ies o sa is y needs and imp o e li ing condi ions, which is in ole able in a democ a ic socie y. This concep has been popula since 1995 when i was used in he Falling h ough he Ne epo o he U.S. Depa men o Comme ce o exp ess unequal access o eme ging ICT be ween and wi hin coun ies [10]. The digi al di ide had wo dimensions in i s s udies abou he subjec , one ela ed o whom has access o echnology and ano he ha emphasizes inequali y in he skills o use echnology among hose who ha e access, as Riggins and Dewan [ 11 ] i s s a ed in hei pionee ing s udy, now classic, on esea ch ends in his ma e . La e esea che s, such as De’ e al. [ 6 ], decompose he use dimension in o wo: echnical skills, on he one hand, and high-le el use in complex si ua ions such as educa ion and comme ce, on he o he . In con as , he concep o digi al inclusion eme ged e e ing o he objec i e and he p ocess o implemen ing measu es by a go e nmen o a public o p i a e en i y o b ing he knowledge and use o ICT close o hose who do no al eady ha e i [ 12 ]. The e is a consensus ha he deba e on digi al inclusion is no only abou people being connec ed, bu i should also ocus on he deg ee and models o use o ITC [ 13 ] and he condi ioning ac o s [ 14 ]. Hence, ac ions o b idge he digi al di ide mus be di ec ed owa ds di e se aspec s, depending on he di e ences a ising om he a ailable esou ces o access ICT o om geog aphic, demog aphic, educa ional, socioeconomic and cul u al dispa i ies ha condi ion he abili y and skills o use hese echnologies. The un o eseen and sudden phenomenon o he COVID-19 pandemic has highligh ed in all i s awness he eali y whe e he digi al di ide no only has a social na u e bu also a e i o ial di e ence ha o e laps as a second laye o each o hese speci ic s a ing si ua ions in a ans e sal and decisi e way. This is he digi al e i o ial di ide, which occu s no only be ween coun ies bu also wi hin hem, be ween u ban and u al a eas, and in pa icula be ween unpopula ed o low-popula ion e i o ies compa ed o he es . Depending on he place o esidence, access o he in e ne will be a ailable o no and ha access will be o highe o lowe quali y, ega dless o he demog aphic and socioeconomic p o ile o he indi idual o use g oup. The pa adox o his e i o ial di e ence is ha u al communi ies need mo e and be e digi al connec i i y o compensa e o hei emo eness, bu he ac we ace is ha hese communi ies a e gene ally less and wo se connec ed by echnologies and, he e o e, hei inhabi an s and hei companies a e less digi ally included. Fo example, u al b oadband co e age is lowe han na ional co e age in all he s a es o he Eu opean Union wi hou excep ion, and jus o e a hal o u al households (52.3%) had access o nex -gene a ion high-speed se ices in 2018 [15]. In sho , he digi al di ide in connec i i y and use is g ea e among he u al popula ion, which also has by means o hei age a g ea e exposu e o he isks and consequences o COVID-19, c ea ing an impo an pocke o ma ginaliza ion and social exclusion. Olde adul s in u al a eas a e among he mos likely o be le ou o any c ea i e and echnologically based adap a ion o mee social and o he needs du ing his c isis. Addi ionally, as people s ay home o slow he sp ead o COVID-19, inequali ies in he loneliness o u al senio s a e exace ba ed, especially among hose who do no ha e oppo uni ies In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 4 o 18 o connec i ually [ 16 ]. In e ne access can be seen as a public good ha is equi ed o p o ide he popula ion wi h o he public se ices, such as heal h, educa ion, social se ices, and e-go e nmen . As Philip e al. desc ibed [ 17 ], he digi al di ide has become a ace o well-es ablished exclusion in u al communi ies and, in a as -changing economy, emo e mic o-businesses a e a isk o being le behind. The digi al di ide no only inc eases he isks o social exclusion du ing he pandemic in he u al a eas, bu also p e en s aking ad an age o oppo uni ies de i ed om he social change ha is occu ing. Fo example, elewo k has g own signi ican ly in he Eu opean Union, eaching an a e age o 39% in Ap il o all coun ies. Al hough i is o eseeable ha a e he COVID-19 c isis his pe cen age will be educed, i is also e y likely ha i will main ain highe a es in all coun ies, age g oups, gende and popula ion si es han be o e he c isis. Howe e , elewo k may lead o wha a echnical epo by he Eu opean Commission has cha ac e ized in May 2020 as a new digi al di ide, ounded on he ype o se lemen condi ions: only 29% o wo ke s li ing in he u al wo ld ha e accessed elewo k compa ed o 44% o hose li ing in la ge ci ies and 35% in he subu bs du ing he pandemic. Simul aneously, i is expec ed ha in he long e m he demand o accommoda ion, o ice space and ca e ing and heal h se ices in me opoli an a eas may shi o small ci ies and u al a eas [18]. Telewo king can help balance he cu en di e ences in g ow h and de elopmen be ween he u al and u ban wo lds. Connec i i y and inc eased use o echnology a e also i al o small businesses in he u al en i onmen , basically ag icul u al and li es ock acili ies and p ocessing companies, o ans o m hei p oduc s, o o e come he limi a ions o hei loca ion and o ace he challenges in in eg a ing in o e-comme ce ne wo ks. Howe e , hese and o he oppo uni ies will be los i he connec i i y o he u al wo ld is no imp o ed. 2. Ru al Digi al Di ide: S a e o he A The ea ly s a e o he a o Riggins and Dewan on he digi al di ide [ 11 ] examined he e ec s o he wo meanings o his concep (gap in access and inequali y in abili y o use) om h ee le els o analysis: indi idual, o ganiza ional, and global. The heo e ical pe spec i e adop ed, he esea ch me hodology used, and he key esul s ob ained by he esea ch ca ied ou up o ha da e we e s udied in each le el. This showed he li le esea ch exis ing in he ield o he digi al di ide om a e i o ial pe spec i e o ocused on he speci ic p oblems o he u al wo ld, excep o Zhang and Wol ’s economic easibili y analysis [ 19 ] on he cos -e ec i e a o dable p oposal o combine high gain an ennas, dynamically s ee able beam o ming an ennas, and mul ihop ou ing o p o ide high-speed wi eless in e ne access in u al o emo e a eas. Riggins and Dewan [ 11 ] also sugges ed wel e esea ch opics o conduc a mo e in-dep h examina ion o he digi al di ide and how i a ec s ci izens, manage s and economies, which ha e had b oad echoes in la e li e a u e; bu none o hei ecommenda ions we e ela ed o he digi al di ide be ween u ban and u al wo lds. Howe e , due o he social in e es o he ma e , nume ous s udies on he digi al di ide in he u al wo ld we e unde aken, becoming he subjec h ee yea s ago o a sys ema ic e iew o 157 a icles published be ween 1991 and 2014 on digi al and u al de elopmen in Wes e n coun ies, mainly ocused on he aspec s o connec i i y and inclusion [ 20 ]. Rega ding he i s aspec , i was e iden ha public policies aimed a he implemen a ion o imp o emen o echnological in as uc u es in he u al wo ld a e gene ally sensi i e o he needs o hese e i o ies, bu hei achie emen s a e quickly obsole e by apid echnological de elopmen , as hey a e mo e eac i e han an icipa ing and no e y sensi i e o ma ke ailu e. Obs acles o he adop ion and use o echnologies a ising om he exis ence o a lowe a e age le el o educa ion and compu e skills in u al a eas han u ban ones we e p o en. Gene ic policies in his ield we e concluded o neglec pa icula local needs, as no all u al communi ies a e he same, so i was p oposed ha u u e esea ches should ocus on speci ic communi ies, while add essing connec i i y and inclusion issues o suppo mo e pe sonalized public policies. This idea has been aken up o Aus alia, indica ing ha na ional policies could be e In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 5 o 18 educe digi al inequali y be ween he u ban and u al wo ld by suppo ing and empowe ing local solu ions [21]. The e is a consensus in he academic li e a u e ha poo u al elecommunica ion in as uc u es hinde u al de elopmen , inc ease egional g ow h gaps, and ul ima ely a ec he compe i i eness o na ional economies [ 20 ]. Howe e , i is also ue ha digi al inequali y is also a e lec ion o p e ious social inequali ies [ 22 ], as impo an as you h mig a ion, geog aphical isola ion, and lack o economic esou ces in he case o u al communi ies. These phenomena can be decisi e, since, e en wi h b oadband access o he in e ne , many u al communi ies may be unable o exploi he ull po en ial o his echnology and emain a a disad an age compa ed o ci ies [ 23 ]. I has also been no ed ha e en when b oadband eaches a u al communi y, many esiden s do no pa icipa e in he mode n online socie y due o a lack o capaci y o e en willingness o adap o new echnologies [ 24 ]. Ha ing access o digi al connec ions does no imply ha people use hem [ 25 ]. Due o his, he adop ion o digi al echnologies in he u al wo ld has been conside ed he esul o he in e ac ion o indi idual ac o s such as pe sonali y, mo i a ions, o inno a i e capaci y, wi h o he con ex ual ac o s o sociocul u al na u e [ 26 ]. F om his backg ound, he need o implemen digi al educa ion p og ams aimed a media ing agen s who can ac as anima o s o ulne able g oups has also been deduced, a o ing hei digi al and social inclusion [27]. O he sys ema ic e iews ca ied ou on he digi al di ide be ween companies [ 9 ] and on he app oach o he p oblem wi h a social pe spec i e [ 12 ] ha e no conside ed he u al e i o ial ac o . Nei he has he sys ema ic e iew o s udies on he second and hi d le els o he digi al di ide (mas e ing o in e ne sea ch skills and ob aining angible esul s om in e ne use) published by Schee de e al. [ 28 ] pay a en ion o he e i o ial o igin gap. The e ec s o he digi al di ide ha e no been conside ed by he g owing body o li e a u e on he use o social ne wo ks in isk and c isis communica ion ei he [29]. 3. Resea ch P oblem: Ending he Gap o he Ru al Digi al Di ide The desc ibed accele a ion o he p ocess o digi iza ion o socie y, oge he wi h he possible esu gence o he COVID-19 pandemic o he likelihood o o he c isis si ua ions equi ing es ic ing mobili y, coincidence in common spaces and physical con ac be ween pe sons, will equi e om ci izens a uni e sal, in ensi e, con inuous and, e en exclusi e, use o ICT. A he same ime, public au ho i ies a e obliged o design policies, make decisions, and implemen u gen and quickly e ec i e measu es ha minimize digi al gaps o any kind, including hose o e i o ial o igin, especially in he u al a eas. I such wo k is no ca ied ou , he e will be an inequali y o ci izens and e i o ies in hei pa icipa ion in he in o ma ion and knowledge socie y. Eps ein e al. [ 30 ] sugges ed ha he digi al di ide esea ch no only co e s a a ie y o ideas abou he na u e o he p oblem i sel , bu also deals wi h he manne in which i should be esol ed, being he mos esponsible elemen o doing so. The s udy on spa ial dimensions o his di ide and hei solu ion is needed gi en he inc easing impo ance o b oadband o he de elopmen o disad an aged u al communi ies [ 31 ]. As Mack e al. ecen ly concluded [ 32 ], he digi al di ide emains a opic o global esea ch inqui y and a ocal conce n o policymake s, pa icula ly wi h ega d o u al a eas. The e o e, helping o de e mine which analyses we e ca ied ou abou u al digi al di ide and which policies, decisions and measu es based on scien i ic s udies ha e been p oposed, wi h pa icula a en ion o hose o p omp implemen a ion in iew o he cu en pandemic, has become a esea ch p oblem o ob ious scien i ic and social ele ance. The pandemic has gi en ise o abundan scien i ic li e a u e, ocused, among o he s, on opics as a ied as he a ailabili y o in as uc u e o gene a e economic g ow h and social oppo uni ies wi hou comp omising en i onmen al p o ec ion [ 33 ] o he in e connec ions be ween COVID-19, he ood sys em and he ci cula economy [ 34 ]. The e a e also case s udies on The Ru al Digi al Di ide, wi h empowe men as he heo e ical lens and ocused on non-Eu opean eali ies [ 8 ]. The aim o ou esea ch is o p o ide an o e iew o he ecommenda ions made by he academic li e a u e in he In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 6 o 18 i e-yea pe iod 2016–20 o o e come he digi al di ide in he Eu opean u al wo ld by ca ying ou a scoping e iew. F om he selec ed documen s, h ee esea ch ques ions will be elucida ed: • RQ1: In which a eas has he academic li e a u e p oposed o ac o o e come he u al digi al di ide in Eu ope? • RQ2: Wha ecommenda ions based on social esea ch me hods and echniques ha e been p oposed? • RQ3: Can ecommenda ions o b oad and apid impac , which may be applicable o he cu en si ua ion, be dis inguished? The de ined empo al scope is ag eed o collec only s udies ca ied ou a e he apid deploymen o 4G mobile phone echnology, which a e i s in oduc ion in majo ci ies du ing 2012 and 2013 had al eady eached mo e han 90% o he e i o y in mos Eu opean Union coun ies by he end o 2016 [ 35 ]. The 20 imes highe ansmission speed o 4G echnology han 3G and i s lowe la ency in da a ansmission, led o he gene aliza ion o he sma phone and he con e sion o solu ions based on he wi ing o depopula ed e i o ies in echnically obsole e and economically ine icien . Focusing on publica ions ha ma ch 4G echnology has g ea e social ele ance, as i will allow o pu he ocus on inding sui able ecommenda ions o he p esen momen . Likewise, om a pe spec i e o scien i ic ele ance, he scoping e iew will allow o check i he esea ch on he digi al di ide in he u al wo ld has e ol ed owa ds he s udy o pa icula si ua ions p oposed by Salemink e al. [20]. 4. Ma e ials and Me hods Sys ema ic e iews o syn hesize exis ing knowledge in a discipline o on a subjec a e e y adequa e o acili a e decision-making, so hey a e inc easingly used [ 36 ]. Scoping e iew is a ype o sys ema ic e iew ha is e ealed as a use ul me hodology o p o iding ac ionable and ele an e idence e icien ly when ime o cos ac o s a e impo an [ 37 ]. Scoping e iews espec he key p inciples o sys ema ic e iews, including he clea s a emen o he objec i es o he e iew, he p e-de ini ion o eligibili y c i e ia, he assessmen o he alidi y o esul s and he sys ema ic p esen a ion o esul s [ 38 ], wi h he excep ion ha p ocesses a e accele a ed and op imized. In si ua ions whe e u gen decisions a e equi ed, go e nmen s, s akeholde s in he heal h sys em, in e na ional o ganiza ions and ci il socie y eques apid e iews [ 39 ]. Addi ionally, he scoping e iew ques ions a e use ul o b ing oge he e idence om he e ogeneous sou ces and knowledge a eas [ 40 ]. Fo hese easons, he publica ion o his kind o epo has become commonplace in a wide a ie y o a eas in ecen yea s [ 41 ]. Fo example, Communica ion S udies has pa icipa ed in his ac ual esea ch end, wi h 70 e isions on communica ion issues since 2015 un il June 2020, acco ding o he Scopus da abase. These e isions a e igo ous and explici in he me hod and, he e o e, sys ema ic, bu hey make concessions o he b ead h o dep h o he e iew p ocess by limi ing some aspec s. Se e al alid echniques a e used in o de o achie e his, such as sho ening he s udy ime, ca e ully ocusing he ques ion, using less sophis ica ed sea ching s a egies, es ic ing he amoun o g ey li e a u e, o ex ac ing only key a iables [ 42 ]. Consequen ly, hey in ol e ewe s akeholde s, ewe discussions, ewe i e a ions, and g ea e use o he p e ious lessons lea ned [ 43 ]. The p epa a ion o such e iews is an impo an challenge, due o he di icul y o esponding in he sho e m, wi h scien i ic igo and wi h a s anda d o anspa ency accep able o e e y hing conce ned, al hough hese di icul ies do no unde mine hei alidi y [44]. Acco ding o he ecommenda ions o Ha ling e al. [ 45 ], his esea ch on he u al digi al di ide is cha ac e ized by he anspa ency o he me hod ollowed and he cla i y o i s pu pose. The e iew was ca ied ou in acco dance wi h he P e e ed Repo ing I ems o Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-Analyses PRISMA p o ocol [ 46 ]. PRISMA was de eloped by a g oup o expe s who iden i ied he minimum c i e ia o sys ema ic e iews o high-quali y scien i ic publica ions. A PRISMA checklis is a ailable In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 7 o 18 o inc ease i s anspa ency [ 47 ], which has been used o acili a e aceabili y o he en i e p ocess ollowed in gene al and he low o in o ma ion in pa icula . Once he esea ch opic was de ined, a ou -s age p ocess was ollowed: iden i ica ion o ele an s udies, selec ion o s udies, mapping o da a, and syn hesis and epo ing o he esul s. The inal p oduc is a na a i e p esen a ion, wi h minimal s a is ical da a, ha p o ides in o ma ion o con ibu e o he esea ch, p ac ice and policy, and which, in addi ion o he in insic alue ha his has in i sel , can se e as a s a ing poin o u u e esea ches [ 48 ]. The inclusion and exclusion c i e ia we e speci ied and documen ed, as desc ibed in Table 1. I was decided o use esea ch pape s published in academic jou nals o in p oceedings o scien i ic con e ences be ween 2016 and 2020 in English, F ench o Spanish. Monog aphs and chap e s edi ed in collec i e books we e excluded because hei di usion and impac ac o a e much mino . The o icial li e a u e, s a us epo s and opinion pieces in magazines we e no conside ed because ou pu pose was o iden i y and analyze p oposals based on scien i ic s udies. Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion c i e ia. Inclusion C i e ia Exclusion C i e ia • Resea ch pape s published in academic jou nals o in p oceedings o scien i ic con e ences •Published in he pe iod o 2016–2020 •W i en in English, F ench o Spanish •Monog aphs •Chap e s edi ed in collec i e books •O icial li e a u e, s a us epo s and opinion pieces in magazines On 15 June 2020, an exhaus i e sea ch was ca ied ou on he ollowing bibliog aphical e e ence da abases: Scopus, Web o Science, P oQues , GoogleSchola , InDICEs CSIC and Cai n. To cons uc he op imal sea ch equa ion, e ms ela ed o he digi al di ide, he u al wo ld, and depopula ion we e sea ched and combined, bo h in English, Spanish, and F ench, he adequacy o which was es ed in Scopus wi h he ollowing esul s: 1. The sea ch “digi al di ide” in o i le, abs ac , and keywo ds esul ed in 6353 documen s. This high igu e is an indica o o he exis ence o ex ensi e e minological s anda diza ion, so he compound e m was conside ed adequa e. 2. Nex , wi hin he esul s, a icles o iginally w i en in Spanish and F ench we e sea ched o ob ain equi alen e ms ha would allow sea ching da abases in hose languages (InDICEs CSIC, Cai n and Google Schola ). The esul s we e “b echa digi al” wi h 32 documen s and “ ac u e numé ique” wi h 19 sea ched documen s. 3. The e ms selec ed o he scope o analysis o he digi al di ide chosen we e h ee. A e sea ching wi hin he esul s o he wo d “ u al”, we p oceeded o selec he mos app op ia e e ms “ u al communi ies” wi h 25,817 esul s in he i le, abs ac , and keywo ds, and “ u al a eas” wi h 131,729 esul s in he en i e da abase. The speci ic e m “depopula ion” was also added o a oid possible silences, which yielded 4760 esul s. 4. The ollowing sea ch equa ion was conside ed alid o exp ess he seman ic con en o he in o ma ion eques : (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digi al di ide”)) AND (((TITLE-ABS-KEY (“ u al a eas”)) OR (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“ u al communi ies”))) OR (TITLE-ABS-KEY (depopula ion))). Resul : 479 documen s. 5. To de elop he de ini i e sea ch equa ion, we included limi e s ha we e app op ia e o he inclusion c i e ia o ime and ype o publica ion. The exp ession o he equa ion acco ding o he Scopus in e oga ion language was his: (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“digi al di ide”)) AND (((TITLE-ABS-KEY (“ u al a eas”)) OR (TITLE-ABS- KEY (“ u al communi ies”))) OR (TITLE-ABS-KEY (depopula ion))) AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2020) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2019) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2016)) AND (LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE, “j”) OR LIMIT-TO (SRCTYPE, “p”)). Resul : 131 documen s. In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 8 o 18 Sea ches wi h he help o his equa ion o i s analogs in F ench and Spanish in he es o he da abases, app op ia e o he speci ic in e oga ion languages, yielded a o al o 419 e e ences. These esul s o he sea ches we e expo ed o he EndNo e e e ence manage so wa e: 91 duplica e i ems we e emo ed, lea ing he sample a 328 e e ences. An e idence examina ion based on he i le and he abs ac was pe o med o he selec ion o he s udies. Six y pape s we e excluded because hey did no mee he objec i e o he s udy om he pe spec i e o he social sciences o because hey we e no based on he use o a quan i a i e, quali a i e, o mixed esea ch me hod and echniques. Then, an e alua ion o he deg ee o in e es o he 268 documen s selec ed was ca ied ou , disca ding 117 documen s ocused on expe iences o p oblems o non-Eu opean coun ies oge he wi h 123 mo e ha eluded he p oposal and in e en ion ac ions o o e come he digi al di ide. As a inal esul , 28 documen s we e selec ed o he quali a i e syn hesis. Figu e 1shows he inclusion decision low diag am wi h he s eps o he e iew decision p ocess (iden i ica ion, selec ion, eligibili y, and inclusion) acco ding o he PRISMA s anda d. In o ma ics 2020, 7, x 8 o 18 he quali a i e syn hesis. Figu e 1 shows he inclusion decision low diag am wi h he s eps o he e iew decision p ocess (iden i ica ion, selec ion, eligibili y, and inclusion) acco ding o he PRISMA s anda d. Figu e 1. Flowcha o inclusion decisions. Sou ce: The Au ho s om PRISMA s anda d. 5. Recommenda ions Rela ed o Access and Connec i i y The esul s o he analysis o academic li e a u e abou he u al digi al di ide in Eu ope in he las i e yea s allow ob aining ele an answe s o he h ee p oposed esea ch ques ions. Fi s , he e is a comp ehensi e analysis o all dimensions o he digi al di ide, bu he a icles a e specialized in one o hem: echnical o social. In gene al, he s udies cen e ed on he social dimension a e ocused mo e on aspec s ela ed o he exploi a ion o he in e ne o p omo e pe sonal and e i o ial de elopmen , han in he aining on echnical skills in ICT. Seen as a whole, he li e a u e co e s he main aspec s o he gene al en i onmen o he u al digi al di ide, con igu ing, in a ce ain way, a PEST analysis: poli ical, economic, social, and echnological. Second, mos o he s udies a e no limi ed o explaining and analyzing he s a e o a u al communi y o a social g oup, bu also p opose speci ic in e en ion measu es, which has made i possible o de elop se en ecommenda ions o he sho e m and new lines o esea ch and social in e en ion in he medium e m, which a e summa ized in he conclusions sec ion. Finally, despi e he ac ha s udies we e ob iously ca ied ou wi hou he ho izon o he cu en pandemic si ua ion, mos o hese ecommenda ions and lines o ac ion can be ca ied ou quickly because hey do no equi e s uc u al changes, bu a he de e mined and coo dina ed go e nmen ac ions. 5.1. B oadband as an Essen ial Requi emen Ru al a eas emain a a disad an aged posi ion due o poo connec i i y, a p oblem ha needs o be add essed by go e nmen s o co ec imbalances, encou age p oac i e a i udes, and limi he Figu e 1. Flowcha o inclusion decisions. Sou ce: The Au ho s om PRISMA s anda d. 5. Recommenda ions Rela ed o Access and Connec i i y The esul s o he analysis o academic li e a u e abou he u al digi al di ide in Eu ope in he las i e yea s allow ob aining ele an answe s o he h ee p oposed esea ch ques ions. Fi s , he e is a comp ehensi e analysis o all dimensions o he digi al di ide, bu he a icles a e specialized in one o hem: echnical o social. In gene al, he s udies cen e ed on he social dimension a e ocused mo e on aspec s ela ed o he exploi a ion o he in e ne o p omo e pe sonal and e i o ial de elopmen , han in he aining on echnical skills in ICT. Seen as a whole, he li e a u e co e s he main aspec s o he gene al en i onmen o he u al digi al di ide, con igu ing, in a ce ain way, a PEST analysis: poli ical, economic, social, and echnological. Second, mos o he s udies a e no limi ed o explaining and analyzing he s a e o a u al communi y o a social g oup, bu also p opose speci ic in e en ion measu es, which has made i possible o de elop se en ecommenda ions o he sho e m and In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 9 o 18 new lines o esea ch and social in e en ion in he medium e m, which a e summa ized in he conclusions sec ion. Finally, despi e he ac ha s udies we e ob iously ca ied ou wi hou he ho izon o he cu en pandemic si ua ion, mos o hese ecommenda ions and lines o ac ion can be ca ied ou quickly because hey do no equi e s uc u al changes, bu a he de e mined and coo dina ed go e nmen ac ions. 5.1. B oadband as an Essen ial Requi emen Ru al a eas emain a a disad an aged posi ion due o poo connec i i y, a p oblem ha needs o be add essed by go e nmen s o co ec imbalances, encou age p oac i e a i udes, and limi he b ain d ain o quali ied people mo ing o u ban a eas, o en ou side he coun y. Wilson and Hopkins [ 49 ] highligh he need o ocus on he mos disad an aged a eas o a oid u he inequali ies in he coun yside and hey p opose o ac egion by egion, a he han on he echnological in as uc u e o he a ea. Besides, hey emphasize ha in es men in echnology should no be seen as he goal, bu as he means o achie e many o he imp o emen s ha can “ escue” u al a eas. B oadband is a key echnology ha no only ensu es connec i i y, bu also has a decisi e impac on companies’ abili y o inno a e and g ow [ 50 ]. The absence o b oadband leads small ag i- ood companies o ake a passi e app oach o g ow h oppo uni ies, pa icula ly posing a se ious ba ie o di e si ica ion and in e na ionaliza ion. In hei s udy on mic o and small u al en e p ises (Ru al Public Access Wi-Fi Se ice (PAWS) p ojec ), Philip and Williams [ 23 ] analyze mic o and small en e p ises in he ag icul u e, ou ism and a sec o s, concluding ha , in o de o ensu e he u u e o mic o and small u al en e p ises, he quali y o connec i i y and digi al skills a e undamen al, and so he o me is necessa y o enable he la e . They also a gue ha small and mic o u al en e p ises canno be igno ed in echnological de elopmen p og ams, and mo e esea ch should be ca ied ou o s udy he ela ionship be ween connec i i y and he de elopmen o u al economy. In con as o he indings desc ibed, he e alua ion wo k o Du i ie e al. [ 51 ] o he Au e gne è s hau d é bi p og amme in F ance concludes ha he deploymen o ibe and high speed has no signi ican ly s imula ed he c ea ion o en e p ises, ha ing a ec ed posi i ely only o he c ea ion o companies in speci ic sec o s: hos el y; public adminis a ion, educa ion, heal h and social wo k; and o he ac i i ies in he se ices sec o . While he deploymen o ibe and high speed does no appea o be su icien on i s own o d i e u al economic de elopmen , i may be a le e o de elopmen when ce ain condi ions, ela ed o he e i o ial economic con ex and design o digi al policy, a e me [ 51 ]. F om he opposi e pe spec i e, he exis ence o as e in e ne echnologies can e en inc ease he u ban– u al digi al di ide, as hey a e mo e expensi e and di icul o ob ain in u al a eas [52]. 5.2. The Role o Go e nmen s in Connec i i y S a e aid measu es o b oadband ha e lou ished in he Eu opean Union, bu knowledge o he e ec i eness and e iciency o his policy is ex emely sca ce. In ac , he digi al b oadband gap be ween he Membe S a es o he Union and he less de eloped u al a eas has no been elimina ed [ 53 ]. Ma eucci [ 54 ] highligh s a posi i e balance be ween he p os and cons o public in e en ion, as when looking a he pe o mance o auc ion p ices and he cos accoun ing o public wo ks i seems ha s a e in e en ion was ca ied ou in a non-dis o ing and ma ke - iendly manne . Besides, in acquisi ions, despi e being ocused on echnical quali y, he e was also a pa icula ocus on g ea e e iciency, which b oadly con i ms he adequacy o he Eu opean Union’s p ocu emen law. Ma eucci [ 54 ] also poin s ou impo an c i icisms, such as he ac ha he e olu ion o echnology (5G, In e ne o Things, Indus y 4.0, e c.) equi es as e deploymen h oughou he e i o y o he la es gene a ion ne wo ks, as a echnological p e equisi e o he launch o se ices. Go e nmen s ha e also been c i icized o ine icien implemen a ions, lack o cus ome ocus and poo conside a ion o isk ac o s and po en ial obs acles [ 55 ]. I has al eady been designa ed, as Salemink e al. emphasized [ 20 ], ha policies aimed a imp o ing echnological access in u al a eas ha e been unde p ized due o hei gene ic na u e and lack o an icipa ion o u u e echnological In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 16 o 18 26. Co ea, T.; P á ez, I. Digi al Inclusion in Ru al A eas: A Quali a i e Explo a ion o Challenges Faced by People om Isola ed Communi ies. J. Compu . Media . Commun. 2016,21, 247–263. [C ossRe ] 27. P é ez-Calle, B.; Ma a-Lazo, C.; Nogales-Bocio, A.I. Diseño de un p oyec o de capaci aci ó n en compe encias digi ales de los colec i os ulne ables, mediado es en educaci ó n pe manen e y MYPES-PYMES en A ag ó n. Index Comun. 2020 ,10, 75–96. A ailable online: h ps://jou nals.s u.ca/indexcomunicacion/index.php/ indexcomunicacion/a icle/ iew/497 (accessed on 26 June 2020). [C ossRe ] 28. Schee de , A.; an Deu sen, A.; an Dijk, J. De e minan s o In e ne skills, uses and ou comes. A sys ema ic e iew o he second- and hi d-le el digi al di ide. Telema . In o m. 2017,34, 1607–1624. [C ossRe ] 29. Rasmussen, J.; Ihlen, O. Risk, c isis, and social media: A sys ema ic e iew o se en yea s’ esea ch. No d. Re . 2017,38, 1–17. [C ossRe ] 30. Eps ein, D.; Nisbe , E.C.; Gillespie, T. Who’s Responsible o he Digi al Di ide? Public Pe cep ions and Policy Implica ions. In . Soc. 2011,27, 92–104. [C ossRe ] 31. S o e , S. Ru al in e ne connec i i y. Telecommun. Policy 2001,25, 331–347. [C ossRe ] 32. Mack, E.; Du on, W.H.; Rika d, R.V.; Yankele ich, A. Mapping and measu ing he in o ma ion socie y: A social science pe spec i e on he oppo uni ies, p oblems, and p ospec s o b oadband In e ne da a in he Uni ed S a es. In . Soc. 2019,35, 57–68. [C ossRe ] 33. D’Adamo, I.; Rosa, P. How Do You See In as uc u e? G een Ene gy o P o ide Economic G ow h a e COVID-19. Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 4738. [C ossRe ] 34. Giudice, F.; Ca e a, R.; Mo one, P. COVID-19, he Food Sys em and he Ci cula Economy: Challenges and Oppo uni ies. Sus ainabili y 2020,12, 7939. [C ossRe ] 35. BEREC. BEREC and RSPG Join Repo on Facili a ing Mobile Connec i i y in “Challenge A eas” (Repo BoR (17) 256). Body o Eu opean Regula o s o Elec onic Communica ions. 2017. A ailable online: h ps://be ec.eu opa.eu/eng/documen _ egis e /subjec _ma e /be ec/download/0/7574-be ec-and- spg-join - epo -on- acili a _0.pd (accessed on 1 Augus 2020). 36. Bosch-Capblanch, X.; La is, J.N.; Lewin, S.; A un, R.; Rø ingen, J.-A.; D öschel, D.; Beck, L.; Abalos, E.; El-Ja dali, F.; Gilson, L.; e al. Guidance o E idence-In o med Policies abou Heal h Sys ems: Ra ionale o and Challenges o Guidance De elopmen . PLoS Med. 2012,9, e1001185. [C ossRe ] 37. T icco, A.C.; An ony, J.; Za in, W.; S i le , L.; Ghassemi, M.; I o y, J.; Pe ie , L.; Hu on, B.; Mohe , D.; S aus, S.E. A scoping e iew o apid e iew me hods. BMC Med. 2015,13, 224. [C ossRe ] 38. Langlois, E.V.; S aus, S.E.; Mijumbi-De e, R.; Lewin, S.; T icco, A.C. The need o apid e iews o in o m heal h policy and sys ems. In Rapid Re iews o S eng hen Heal h Policy and Sys ems: A P ac ical Guide; T icco, A.C., Langlois, E.V., S aus, S.E., Eds.; Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion: Gene a, Swi ze land, 2017. 39. T icco, A.C.; Za in, W.; Nincic, V.; Rios, P.; Khan, P.A.; Ghassemi, M.; Mo iwala, S.S.; Pham, B.; Oli e , S.; S aus, S.E.; e al. Engaging policy-make s and heal h sys ems manage s in he conduc o apid e iews. In Rapid Re iews o S eng hen Heal h Policy and Sys ems: A P ac ical Guide; T icco, A.C., Langlois, E.V., S aus, S.E., Eds.; Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion: Gene a, Swi ze land, 2017. 40. Pe e s, M.D.; God ey, C.; McIne ney, P.; Baldini Soa es, C.; Khalil, H.; Pa ke , D. Chap e 11: Scoping Re iews (2020 e sion). In Joanna B iggs Ins i u e Re iewe ’s Manual; Edoa do, A., Zacha y, M., Eds.; Joanna B iggs Ins i u e: Adelaide, Aus alia, 2020. 41. Plüddemann, A.; A onson, J.K.; Onakpoya, I.; Heneghan, C.; Mah ania, K.R. Rede ining Rapid Re iews: A Flexible F amewo k o Res ic ed Sys ema ic Re iews. BMJ E id. Based Med. 2018 ,23, 201–203. [C ossRe ] 42. G an , M.J.; Boo h, A. A ypology o e iews: An analysis o 14 e iew ypes and associa ed me hodologies. Heal h In . Lib . J. 2009,26, 91–108. [C ossRe ] 43. Oli e , S.; Wilson, M.; Melendez-To es, G.J.; Bangpan, M.; Dickson, K.; Vigu s, C. Selec ing apid e iew me hods o complex ques ions ela ed o heal h policy and sys em imp o emen s. In Rapid Re iews o S eng hen Heal h Policy and Sys ems: A P ac ical Guide; T icco, A.C., Langlois, E.V., S aus, S.E., Eds.; Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion: Gene a, Swi ze land, 2017; pp. 55–70. 44. Wa , A.M.; Came on, A.; S u m, L.; La hlean, T.; Babidge, W.J.; Blamey, S.; Facey, K.; Hailey, D.; No de haug, I.; Madde n, G.J. Rapid e iews e sus ull sys ema ic e iews: An in en o y o cu en me hods and p ac ice in heal h echnology assessmen . In . J. Technol. Assess. Heal h Ca e 2008,24, 133–139. [C ossRe ] 45. Ha ling, L.; Guise, J.M.; Ka o, E.; Ande son, J.; Belinson, S.; Be line , E.; D yden, D.M.; Fea he s one, R.; Mi chell, M.D.; Mo u’Apuaka, M.; e al. A axonomy o apid e iews links epo ypes and me hods o speci ic decision-making con ex s. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2015,68, 1451–1462.e3. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 17 o 18 46. Mohe , D.; Libe a i, A.; Te zla , J.; Al man, D.G. The PRISMA G oup. P e e ed Repo ing I ems o Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-Analyses: The PRISMA S a emen . BMJ 2009,339, b2535. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 47. O’B ien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Le ac, D.; Bax e , L.; T icco, A.C.; S aus, S.; Wicke son, L.; Naya , A.; Mohe , D.; O’Malley, L. Ad ancing scoping s udy me hodology: A web-based su ey and consul a ion o pe cep ions on e minology, de ini ion and me hodological s eps. BMC Heal h Se . Res. 2016 ,16, 305. [C ossRe ] [PubMed] 48. Pe e son, J.; Pea ce, P.F.; Fe guson, L.A. Unde s anding scoping e iews: De ini ion, pu pose, and p ocess. J. Am. Assoc. Nu se P ac . 2017,29, 12–16. [C ossRe ] 49. Wilson, R.; Hopkins, J. The Changing Shape o Sco land’s Digi al Di ide. Eu . Coun ys. 2019 ,11, 563–583. [C ossRe ] 50. Bowen, R.; Mo is, W. The digi al di ide: Implica ions o ag ibusiness and en ep eneu ship.Lessons om Wales. J. Ru al S ud. 2019,72, 75–84. [C ossRe ] 51. Du i ie , C.; T uche , S.; Mauh é , N.; Mba ek, M. D é ploiemen du è s hau d é bi e c é a ion d’en ep ises dans les zones u ales: Une é alua ion du p og amme Au e gne è s hau d é bi . É conomie P é ision 2018 , 214, 97–139. [C ossRe ] 52. Räisänen, J.; Tuo inen, T. Digi al inno a ions in u al mic o-en e p ises. J. Ru al S ud. 2020 ,73, 56–67. [C ossRe ] 53. Polykalas, S.E.; Vlachos, K.; Ellinas, G. Technologies and a chi ec u es o b oadband Digi al Di ide elimina ion. In P oceedings o he 24 h In e na ional Con e ence on Telecommunica ions (ICT), Limassol, Cyp us, 3–5 May 2017; pp. 1–6. [C ossRe ] 54. Ma eucci, N. The EU S a e aid policy o b oadband: An e alua ion o he I alian expe ience wi h i s gene a ion ne wo ks. Telecommun. Policy 2019,43, 101830. [C ossRe ] 55. Meije e, S.; Tambo ce a, T. In o ma ion communica ion echnologies as enable o u al de elopmen . In P oceedings o he 2017 In e na ional Con e ence “Economic Science o Ru al De elopmen ”, Jelga a, La ia, 27–28 Ap il 2017; pp. 110–115. 56. Szeles, M.R. New insigh s om a mul ile el app oach o he egional digi al di ide in he Eu opean Union. Telecommun. Policy 2018,42, 452–463. [C ossRe ] 57. Salemink, K.; S ijke , D. The pa icipa ion socie y and i s inabili y o co ec he ailu e o ma ke playe s o deli e adequa e se ice le els in u al a eas. Telecommun. Policy 2018,42, 757–765. [C ossRe ] 58. Ie oli, C.; Belliggiano, A.; Ma andola, D.; Milone, P.; Ven u a, F. In o ma ion and communica ion in as uc u es and new business models in u al a eas: The case o Molise egion in I aly. Eu . Coun ys. 2019,11, 475–496. [C ossRe ] 59. Schnei , J.R.; Xion, Y. A cos s udy o ixed b oadband access ne wo ks o u al a eas. Telecommun. Policy 2016,40, 755–773. [C ossRe ] 60. Pe ei a, J.P.R. B oadband access and digi al di ide. In New Ad ances in In o ma ion Sys ems and Technologies; Rocha, Á ., Co eia, A.M., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Cos anzo, S., Eds.; Sp inge : Cham, Swi ze land, 2016; pp. 363–368. 61. Ge li, P.; Wainw igh , D.; Whalley, J. In as uc u e in es men on he ma gins o he ma ke : The ole o niche in as uc u e p o ide s in he UK. Telecommun. Policy 2017,41, 743–756. [C ossRe ] 62. Kup iyano a, M.; D ono , V.; Go do a, T. Digi al Di ide o Ru al Te i o ies in Russia. AGRIS On-line Pap. Econ. In . 2019,11, 85–90. [C ossRe ] 63. C uz-Jes ú s, F.; Oli ei a, T.; Bacao, F. The Global Digi al Di ide: E idence and D i e s. J. Glob. In . Manag. 2018,26, 1–26. [C ossRe ] 64. Chiha, A.; Van de Wee, M.; Colle, D.; Ve b ugge, S. Techno-economic iabili y o in eg a ing sa elli e communica ion in 4G ne wo ks o b idge he b oadband digi al di ide. Telecommun. Policy 2020 ,44, 101874. [C ossRe ] 65. Richmond, W.; Rade , S.; Lanie , C. The “Digi al Di ide” o u al small businesses. J. Res. Ma k. En ep. 2017,19, 94–104. [C ossRe ] 66. Robe s, E.; Ande son, B.A.; Ske a , S.; Fa ing on, J. A e iew o he u al-digi al policy agenda om a communi y esilience pe spec i e. J. Ru al S ud. 2017,54, 372–385. [C ossRe ] 67. Vico-Bosch, A.; Rebollo-Ca al á n, A. Impac o digi al inclusion policies in he use o social ne wo ks o u al women. P ism. Soc. 2018,21, 263–281. [C ossRe ] In o ma ics 2020,7, 54 18 o 18 68. Mo ales, N. The challenge o he digi al di ide and elde ly in Spanish u al a eas. The case o Cas illa y Leon. Fonseca J. Commun. 2016,13, 169–189. [C ossRe ] 69. Mo ales, N. ICT and pupils o u al a eas: Be ween he digi al gap and inclusi e educa ion. Bo d ó n Re . Pedagog. 2017,69, 41–56. [C ossRe ] 70. A mas-Quin a, F.X.; Lois-Gonzalez, R.C.; Macia-A ce, X.C. Ad anced In e ne Se ices: New oppo uni ies o u al e i o ial de elopmen . An. Geog . Uni . Complu . 2018,38, 271–287. [C ossRe ] 71. S á nchez, F. Ru al blended educa ion. P oyec o de educaci ó n semip esencial pa a ena la despoblaci ó n de las zonas u ales. 3C TIC Cuad. Desa o. Apl. TIC 2019,8, 74–95. [C ossRe ] 72. Pe i, C. Ru al lib a ies and he human igh o in e ne access. In Ru al and Small Public Lib a ies: Challenges and Oppo uni ies; Eme ald Publishing Limi ed: Bingley, UK, 2017; Volume 43, pp. 13–35. [C ossRe ] 73. Ti ziu, A. P omo ing social inno a ion in u al a eas h ough li ing labs. In P oceedings o he 4 h ACADEMOS Con e ence, Bucha es , Romania, 15–18 June 2017; A ailable online: h ps://pape s.ss n.com/ sol3/pape s.c m?abs ac _id=2992217 (accessed on 27 June 2020). Publishe ’s No e: MDPI s ays neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in published maps and ins i u ional a ilia ions. © 2020 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/).