scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in a cohort of 20,575 arthroplasty patients

Jämsä, Pyry,Jämsen, Esa,Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka,Kalliovalkama, Jarkko,Eskelinen, Antti,Oksala, Niku

Abstract

© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)

Full text

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iort20 Download by: [Tampere University] Date: 17 July 2017, At: 23:47 Acta Orthopaedica ISSN: 1745-3674 (Print) 1745-3682 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iort20 Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in a cohort of 20,575 arthroplasty patients Pyry Jämsä, Esa Jämsen, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Jarkko Kalliovalkama, Antti Eskelinen & Niku Oksala To cite this article: Pyry Jämsä, Esa Jämsen, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Jarkko Kalliovalkama, Antti Eskelinen & Niku Oksala (2017) Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in a cohort of 20,575 arthroplasty patients, Acta Orthopaedica, 88:4, 370-376, DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1301743 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1301743 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. View supplementary material Published online: 15 Mar 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 392 View related articles View Crossmark data 370 Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 Risk factors associated with acute kidney injury in a cohort of 20,575 arthroplasty patients Pyry JÄMSÄ 1, Esa JÄMSEN 1,2, Leo-Pekka LYYTIKÄINEN 2,3,4, Jarkko KALLIOVALKAMA 1,2, Antti ESKELINEN 1*, and Niku OKSALA 2,5* 1 Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement; 2 School of Medicine, University of Tampere; 3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Tampere; 4 Fimlab Laboratories; 5 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and life sciences, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. * Shared senior authorship. Correspondence: Pyry.jamsa@fi mnet.fi Submitted 2016-10-0. Accepted 2017-01-23. © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) DOI 10.1080/17453674.2017.1301743 Background and purpose — Patients developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) are at risk of higher morbidity and mortality. In arthroplasty patients, many preand perioperative factors are associated with AKI but some of the risk factors are unclear. We report the incidence of postoperative AKI, the conditions associated with it, and survival rates in AKI patients. Patients and methods — We obtained data from 20,575 consecutive hip or knee arthroplasties. Postoperative AKI, occurring within 7 days after the operation, was defi ned using the risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage (RIFLE) criteria. We analyzed independent risk factors for AKI using binary logistic regression. In addition, we reviewed the records of AKI patients and performed a survival analysis. Results — The AKI incidence was 3.3 per 1,000 operations. We found preoperative estimated glomerular fi ltration rate, ASA classifi cation, body mass index, and duration of operation to be independent risk factors for AKI. Infections, paralytic ileus, and cardiac causes were the predominant underlying conditions, whereas half of all AKI cases occurred without any clear underlying condition. Survival rates were lower in AKI patients. Interpretation — Supporting earlier results, existing renal insuffi ciency and patient-related characteristics were found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Furthermore, duration of operation was identifi ed as an independent risk factor. We suggest careful renal monitoring postoperatively for patients with these risk factors. ■ Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects 0.5–5.2% of joint replacement recipients and it is an independent risk factor for chronic renal impairment, increased morbidity, and death (Ympa et al. 2005, Jafari et al. 2010, Coca et al. 2012, Kimmel et al. 2014, Perregaard et al. 2016). AKI increases in-hospital mortality but the adverse effects of AKI can also occur late (Lafrance and Miller 2010). The preoperative risk factors associated with postoperative AKI in arthroplasty patients include elevated body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and vascular diseases (Jafari et al. 2010, Weingarten et al. 2012, Bell et al. 2015). Also, age, preoperative kidney dysfunction, and the preoperative use of renin-angiotensin axis-blocking medication are associated with postoperative AKI in arthroplasty patients (Aveline et al. 2009, Kimmel et al. 2014, Nielson et al. 2014, Bell et al. 2015). Although the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ (ASA) physical status classifi cation system has a connection with AKI in orthopedic patients (Bell et al. 2015), it is not associated with AKI in arthroplasty patients (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014). Perioperative factors associated with AKI include general anesthesia and blood transfusions (Weingarten et al. 2012). Also, duration of operation has been reported to be longer in AKI patients, but not statistically signifi cantly so (Jafari et al. 2010, Weingarten et al. 2012, and Kimmel et al. 2014). The effects of non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs and concomitant use of diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers in arthroplasty populations is unclear (Lee et al. 2007, Fournier et al. 2014). Aminoglycosides (such as gentamycin) that are used as intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis or in cement may trigger AKI because of their nephrotoxicity (Curtis et al. 2005, Patrick et al. 2006, Lau and Kumar 2013, Ross et al. 2013, Bell et al. 2014, Craxford et al. 2014, Johansson et al. 2016) but otherwise, there are no data on the conditions or underlying reasons that trigger postoperative AKI in arthroplasty patients. We assessed the incidence and factors associated with AKI following hip and knee arthroplasty in a large Scandinavian cohort and report the specifi c conditions associated with AKI. We hypothesized that: (1) the Scandinavian population would have similar rates of AKI to those in other populations; and (2) the ASA classifi cation system (as a measure 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37010927 Ja msa D.indd 370 6/20/2017 5:25:14 PM6/20/2017 5:25:14 PM Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 371 of comorbidity) and duration of operation would show an association with AKI. Patients and methods The study was performed in a large publicly funded orthopedic hospital specialized in joint replacement surgery, with an annual number of arthroplasties exceeding 3,000. The study population comprised patients with hip or knee arthroplasties performed at the hospital between September 2002 and December 2011 (n = 20,575). 2,000 patients were excluded from the study (Figure 1). The remaining 18,575 patients were used for the analyses. Demographic data and patient information were obtained from a prospective joint replacement database and patient administration database. The following data were collected for analysis: sex, age, indication for operation, BMI, ASA classifi cation, anesthesia modality, prophylactic antibiotic, operated joint (hip or knee), duration of operation, fi xation method (cemented, cementless, hybrid), laterality (unilateral or bilateral operation), type of operation (primary or revision), and use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement (Tables 1 and 2). Preand postoperative serum creatinine (SCr) levels were obtained from the database of a local laboratory that provides our hospital, an adjacent university hospital, and the majority of the communities in the catchment area with laboratory services. The SCr level is routinely obtained as part of the pre-anesthesia evaluation carried out 1–2 months before the operation, but measurements taken within 6 months before the operation were approved. If multiple preoperative SCr measurements were recorded, the most recent SCr measurement was used. Postoperatively, SCr was measured for clinical indications only and not routinely. In our study, we took account of all postoperative SCr measurements taken ≤ 7 days after the operation, which was done in 5,609 operations (30%). These patients had lower eGFR preoperatively (76 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs 87 mL/min/1.73 m2), older mean age (76 years vs 67 years), higher ASA classifi cation (median 3 vs. 2), and a slightly longer mean duration of operation (105 min vs. 100 min) than patients with no SCr measurement done during the fi rst 7 postoperative days. Of these patients, 39% (2,210) were male and 22% (1,222) had revision arthroplasty. There were also 5,361 patients (29%) who lacked postoperative laboratory followup after discharge from our unit because their home county used a different laboratory. We included these patients in our analysis to maximize the number of AKI cases and therefore to maximize statistical power. As the characteristics of these patients differed slightly from those of the patients who were examined in our laboratory (data not shown), we excluded these patients from the sensitivity analysis to eliminate a possible source of bias. We used SCr to classify all the patients into one of the RIFLE classifi cations (risk, injury, failure) or into a non-AKI group (Bellomo et al. 2007). We assumed that the patients who were not tested for postoperative SCr would not have had postoperative AKI. To maintain high specifi city, those patients who were in the risk of AKI class were classifi ed as not having AKI. We used preoperative SCr to calculate the estimated glomerular fi ltration rate (eGFR) using the CKD-EPI formula (Levey et al. 2009). In patients who developed AKI (class I or F according to the RIFLE criteria), we reviewed the medical records in order to defi ne the possible preand postoperative risk factors associated with AKI (Table 4), and the outcome of AKI. We classifi ed the outcome as spontaneous return of kidney function, loss of kidney function, or end-stage kidney disease. Statistics For the statistical analyses, we identifi ed the AKI cases using the criteria described above. Furthermore, we used all the nonAKI patients as a control group. 95% confi dence interval (CI) for the incidence rate of postoperative AKI was calculated using the Wilson score interval. The relationship between potential risk factors and AKI was analyzed using univariable binary logistic regression. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed using the enter method to minimize bias. To create a multivariable model, we used a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to establish a causal relationship between variables and to fi nd a minimal adjustment set to minimize bias. Due to the complexity of the causal relationships among all variables associated with AKI, we used the Dagitty tool (Textor et al. 2011) to create the multivariable model. We chose duration of operation as an exposure variable and AKI as an outcome variable. The Dagitty model showed that BMI, fi xation technique, bilateral operation, and operation type and joint was the minimal suffi cient adjustment set to minimize bias. We also included the ASA classifi cations and preoperative eGFR in the multivariable model according to clinical experience (see Supplementary data) and because these variables were interesting for our study hypothesis. We performed a sensitivity analysis that included only the minimal adjustment set to make sure that the results remained unchanged when the ASA classifi cations and eGFR were added to the model. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the effect of AKI on survival rates. The results were considAnalyzed (n = 18,575): – primary arthroplasties, 15,943 – revision arthroplasties, 2,632 Eligible hip and knee arthroplasties September 2002 – December 2011 (n = 20,575) Excluded (n = 2,000): – lacking preoperative SCr, 1,031 – emergency operations, 969 Figure 1. Exclusion of patients. 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37110927 Ja msa D.indd 371 6/20/2017 5:25:14 PM6/20/2017 5:25:14 PM 372 Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 ered statistically signifi cant when the p-value was < 0.05. As the incidence of AKI is very low, all the odds ratios provided can be interpreted as relative risk (RR) unless otherwise stated. We used SPSS 21 software for the statistical analysis. Ethics In Finland, ethical committee approval is not required in retrospective studies with no human subjects, such as this one. The study was accepted by Pirkanmaa hospital district (ETL-code 13501) on Mar 1, 2013. Funding and potential confl ict of interest We are grateful for the fi nancial support for the project given by the Finnish Arthroplasty Association (Suomen Artroplastiayhdistys) in 2012. No competing interests declared. Results 58 cases of AKI were identifi ed in 18,575 patients. Among the 13,214 patients whose specimens were tested by our hospital laboratory, 44 AKI cases were identifi ed and the incidence of AKI was 3.3 per 1,000 operations (95% CI: 2.5– 4.5). Of the 58 patients with AKI, 43 had injuryand 15 had failure-stage AKI. In univariable analysis, the risk factors for AKI preoperatively were age, BMI, ASA classifi cation, SCr, eGFR, and hemoglobin value (Table 1), and perioperatively the risk factors were operation type and intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis (Table 2). The multivariable model showed that duration of operation, ASA classifi cation, BMI, and preoperative eGFR were independent risk factors for postoperative AKI (Table 3). Table 1. Association between preoperative factors and AKI; univariable regression results Incidence 1,000 per Descriptor All patients a AKI non-AKI operations OR (95% CI) p-value Age, median (range) 69 (14–102) 76 (41–88) 69 (14–102) 1.05 (1.02–1.08) 0.001 Sex Female 11,650 (63) 33 11,617 2.8 Reference Male 6,925 (37) 25 6,900 3.6 1.3 (0.76–2.1) 0.4 Body mass index (missing, n = 1,719) median, (range) 28.6 (14–59) 31.6 (24–43) 28.6 (14–59) 1.1 (1.0–1.1) 0.001 < 25 3,551 (21) 6 3,545 1.7 Reference 25–30 6,760 (40) 14 6,746 2.1 1.2 (0.47–3.2) 0.7 30–35 4,496 (27) 14 4,482 3.1 1.9 (0.71–4.8) 0.2 > 35 2,049 (12) 12 2,037 5.9 3.5 (1.3–9.3) 0.01 Joint Hip 8,821 (47) 23 8,798 2.6 Reference Knee 9,754 (53) 35 9,719 3.6 1.4 (0.8–2.3) 0.2 ASA classifi cation (missing, n = 132) 1 1,477 (8) 0 1,477 0.0 2 8,427 (46) 9 8,418 1.1 Reference b < 0.001 3 8,046 (44) 40 8,006 5.0 5.5 (2.7–11) < 0.001 4 492 (3) 7 485 14.4 16 (5.9–43) < 0.001 Preoperative SCr 70 (25–1,125) 78 (49–150) 70 (25–1,125) 1.004 (1.00–1.01) 0.007 Preoperative eGFR, median (range) c 85 (3–160) 68 (30–108) 85 (3–160) 0.97 (0.95–0.98) < 0.001 1 (> 90 mL/min) 6,519 (35) 9 6,510 1.4 Reference 2 (60–89 mL/min) 9,917 (53) 29 9,888 2.9 2.1 (1.0–4.5) 0.05 3 (30–59 mL/min) 2,023 (11) 19 2,004 9.4 6.9 (3.1–15) < 0.001 4 (15–29 mL/min) 81 (0.4) 1 80 12.5 9.0 (1.1–72) 0.04 5 (< 15 mL/min) 35 (0.2) 0 35 0 – – Preoperative hemoglobin, (missing, n = 72) median (range) 138 (76–189) 135 (103–163) 138 (80–189) 0.97 (0.95–0.99) 0.001 Preoperative anemia d No 16,423 (88) 47 16,376 2.9 Reference Yes 2,080 (11) 11 2,069 5.3 1.9 (0.96–3.6) 0.07 Diagnosis Primary osteoarthritis 15,467 (83) 47 15,420 3.0 Reference Other diagnosis 3,073 (17) 10 3,063 3.3 1.1 (0.54–2.1) 0.8 a In this column, numbers mean number of patients and percentage in parentheses unless otherwise stated. b ASA classes 1 and 2 were combined for the regression analysis. c eGFR calculated using CKD-EPI formula. d Anemia was defi ned as hemoglobin < 117 g/L in women and < 134 g/L in men. 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37210927 Ja msa D.indd 372 6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 373 Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine whether these results were also valid in the primary arthroplasty group (n = 15,943). Multivariable analysis demonstrated the same independent risk factors for AKI as identifi ed in the original analysis. We also repeated the analysis with adjustment for only the variables in the minimal suffi cient adjustment set, and the results remained unchanged, confi rming that both duration of operation and BMI were independent risk factors for AKI. In the third sensitivity analysis, we excluded all 5,361 patients (14 of 58 AKI cases) with a different laboratory register in their community and thus possibly lacking a 7-day postoperative laboratory follow-up. This analysis showed the same independent risk factors for AKI. A potential cause of AKI was identifi ed in 28 cases. The most common conditions were postoperative infections in 15 patients, cardiac causes in 5 patients, and pseudo-obstruction in 5 patients. In 28 cases, no specifi c cause could be identifi ed retrospectively. Most patients had several factors that possibly contributed to the development of AKI (Table 4). 2 of the AKI patients had no patient records concerning the postoperative period, so the reason for AKI could not be found. 2 patients with AKI underwent postoperative dialysis for less than 4 weeks and both recovered their kidney function. Thus, neither of these patients was classifi ed in the loss of kidney function group or the end-stage kidney disease group. Mortality was substantially higher in AKI patients than in non-AKI patients throughout the follow-up (Figure 2). Discussion Despite the fact that preoperative kidney dysfunction according to eGFR is common in our Scandinavian population (65% of the patients had eGFR < 90 mL/min), AKI is rare (with an incidence of 3.3 per 1,000 arthroplasties). We found that duration of operation, preoperative eGFR, ASA class, and BMI were all independent risk factors for postoperative AKI. However, half of all cases of AKI occurred without any underlying Table 2. Association between perioperative factors and AKI; univariable regression results incidence per 1,000 Descriptor All patients a AKI Non-AKI operations OR (95% CI) p-value Operation type Primary 15,943 (85) 44 15,899 2.8 Reference Revision 2,632 (15) 14 2,618 5.3 1.9 (1.1–3.5) 0.03 Knee operation type Unicondylar 607 (6) 1 606 1.7 Reference Total 9,147 (94) 34 9,113 3.7 2.3 (0.31–17) 0.4 Bilateral operation No 16,908 (91) 55 16,853 3.3 Ref Yes 1,667 (9) 3 1,664 1.8 0.55 (0.17–1.8) 0.3 Prothesis fi xation method (missing n = 1,410) Cementless 4,107 (24) 6 4,101 1.4 Reference 0.2 Hybrid 2,595 (15) 7 2,591 2.7 1.9 (0.62–5.5) 0.3 Total cement 10,460 (61) 35 10,425 3.4 2.3 (0.96–5.5) 0.06 Use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement (missing, n = 589) Gentamycin 11,764 (94) 40 11,724 3.4 Tobramycin 541 (4) 0 541 0 Other 164 (1) 0 164 0 Antibiotic prophylaxis (missing, n = 592) Cefuroxime 17,714 (99) 48 17,666 2.7 Reference 0.005 Clindamicin 207 (1) 3 204 14.7 5.4 (1.7–17) 0.005 Other 62 (0.3) 1 61 16.4 6.0 (0.82–44) 0.08 Anesthesia modality (missing, n = 105) Spinal 2,077 (11) 4 2,073 1.9 Reference 0.8 Continuous spinal 1,710 (9) 7 1,703 4.1 6.3 (0.66–61) 0.2 Combined spinal epidural 14,302 (77) 44 14,258 3.1 3.0 (0.41–23) 0.4 General 287 (2.0) 1 286 3.5 8.3 (0.52–133) 0.6 Other 94 (0.5) 0 94 0 1 Duration of operation b (missing, n = 110) median (range) 10 (10–68) 12 (6–25) 10 (10–68) 1.0 (1.0–1.1) 0.07 a In this column, numbers mean number of patients and percentage in parentheses unless otherwise stated. b Duration in 10-min intervals (time from incision to end of wound closure). 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37310927 Ja msa D.indd 373 6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM 374 Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 cause identifi ed. The survival of patients with AKI was worse than that of non-AKI patients. The incidence of AKI was lower than that reported by other groups (3.3 per 1,000 vs. 5.5 per 1,000 vs. 52 per 1,000) (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014). This might be due to lower BMI (29 vs. 32 and 31), a smaller proportion of general anesthesia (1.5% vs. 6.1% and 60%), a larger proportion of ASA class 1 patients (8.0% vs. 4.8% and 2.8%), and shorter duration of operation (100 min vs 157 min vs 119 min) in our cohort compared to the other cohorts (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014). The incidence of AKI was lower compared to Perregaard et al. 2016 (3.3 per 1,000 vs. 21.9 per 1,000). Unlike in our study, they included mild-stage AKI in their analysis, which probably explains the difference. We found that BMI was an independent risk factor for AKI, a fi nding supported by previous studies (Jafari et al. 2010. Kimmel et al. 2014). An association has also been shown between lower eGFR and AKI (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014, Bell et al. 2015). In univariable analysis, preoperative renal impairment increased doubled the risk of AKI by 2-fold, when eGFR was lower than 90 mL/min and increased it by 7-fold when eGFR was lower than 60mL/min. The indidence of AKI was higher following revision than after primary surgery, but the association was lost in multivariable analysis, probably because revision arthroplasty patients had more factors associated with AKI. In our population, patients undergoing revision arthroplasty generally had a longer duration of operation and a higher ASA class. Some case reports have suggested that vancomycin-, tobramycin-, and gentamycin-impregnated bone cements may also induce AKI (Curtis et al. 2005, Patrick et al. 2006, Lau and Kumar 2013, Johansson et al. 2016). In our study, aminoglycoside bone cement (94% gentamycin) was used in all patients and still we had a low rate of AKI. Furthermore, AKI rates were similar between cementless, hybrid, and fully cemented arthroplasties. Our study validates ASA class as an independent risk factor for AKI in arthroplasty patients. This is in accordance with cohorts comprising patients undergoing a large variety of orthopedic operations, including various arthroplasties, fractures, and osteotomies (Bell et al. 2015). Previous studies on arthroplasty patients (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014) again included multiple morbidities in the multivariable model alongside the ASA class, which might explain why ASA class was not a signifi cant predictor of AKI in these studies. Our odds ratios in different ASA classes were high, and we suggest that readers should not interpret these results as relative risk. Table 3. Multivariable regression results Descriptor OR (95% CI) p-value Duration of operation a 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.003 ASA classifi cation 1 and 2 Reference 3 4.4 (1.8–11) 0.002 4 13 (3.7–46) < 0.001 Bilaterality Unilateral Reference Bilateral 0.31 (0.06–1.6) 0.2 Body mass index 1.1 (1.0–1.1) 0.02 Fixation technique Cementless Reference Hybrid 1.7 (0.56–5.1) 0.3 Total cement 1.2 (0.39–3.7) 0.8 Joint Hip Ref Knee 1.0 (0.43–2.5) 1 Operation type Primary Reference Revision 0.46 (0.12–1.7) 0.2 Preoperative eGFR b 0.98 (0.97–1.0) 0.03 a Duration in 10-min intervals (from incision to end of wound closure). b eGFR calculated using CKD-EPI formula. Table 4. Factors possibly contributing to development of AKI in 58 patients Risk factor Frequency (missing) ASA class ≥ 3 47 (2) Baseline BP ≤ 80 mmHg a 14 (4) Blood transfusion 14 (5) BMI ≥ 30 26 (12) Duration ≥ 120 min 30 (2) eGFR ≤ 90 mL/min 49 Medication combination b 10 (9) Perioperative NSAIDs 20 (9) Preoperative anemia c 11 Use of vasoactives d 22 (4) a Perioperative blood pressure. b Concomitant use of 3 or more of the following drugs in perioperative period: diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), NSAIDs. c Anemia was defi ned as hemoglobin < 117 g/L in women and < 134 g/L in men. d Atropine or etilefrine. Figure 2. Survival curve, with all-cause mortality as endpoint. 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37410927 Ja msa D.indd 374 6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 375 We are the fi rst group to fi nd that duration of operation was a strong and independent risk factor for AKI. Other studies that have found an insignifi cant association between duration of operation and AKI were case-control studies with smaller control groups (Jafari et al. 2010, Kimmel et al. 2014) or smaller cohort studies (Weingarten et al. 2012). In our study population, the incidence of AKI almost doubled when the duration of surgery exceeded 120 min. Clinical experience shows that prolonged surgery is usually caused by perioperative problems, and longer duration has plenty of associations with other perioperative factors (for example, blood transfusions, cooling, coagulopathies, and use of anesthetics) that could mediate AKI. However, the systemic infl ammation caused by increased tissue damage due to the prolonged duration of the operation and prolonged tourniquet use could also be the explanation (Andres et al. 2003, Basile et al. 2012). Concerning antibiotic prophylaxis, earlier studies have shown an association between gentamycin and AKI (Ross et al. 2013, Bell et al. 2014, Craxford et al. 2014, Johansson et al. 2016). In our cohort, gentamycin was rarely used. Instead of gentamycin, the secondary option for cefuroxime was clindamycin. However, in the AKI patients, only 3 patients received clindamycin, so signifi cant results in univariable analysis concerning clindamycin should be viewed with caution. Whenever AKI occurred, its outcome was good—with only 2 of the 58 AKI patients receiving dialysis, and neither of them for more than 4 weeks. This result is in accordance with the earlier literature. Jafari et al. (2010) reported that 7 out of 98 of their AKI patients received dialysis, whereas Kimmel et al. (2014) reported that none of their AKI patients (AKI stage I or F, n = 22) received dialysis postoperatively. Although resolution of kidney function was common, the survival of patients with AKI was surprisingly poor, which warrants further research. In half of the cases, no specifi c cause or condition underlying the AKI was found. It is possible that a triggering factor for AKI in these patients might simply be the systemic stress caused by the operation. Postor preoperative infection, paralytic ileus, and cardiac causes were remarkable factors underlying AKI and served to explain almost half of the AKI cases. By preventing these factors, it might be possible to reduce rates of AKI. We do, however, acknowledge that in some cases the factors leading to AKI could not be identifi ed because of the retrospective nature of the study. The strength of the present study was the relatively large patient cohort compared to previous studies. We used a full, unselected cohort as controls in our analysis. Moreover, the underlying causes of AKI have not been adequately reported before. The study also had some limitations. Because the records of some patients were not available, there was a lack of information on the underlying reasons for their AKI. As SCr was measured for clinical indications and not routinely in all patients, it is probable that some AKI cases were not identifi ed. Thus, it is likely that more AKI cases would have been found if the SCr of all patients had been screened every day during the fi rst postoperative week. In the earlier literature, not all postoperative SCr levels were recorded either (Jafari et al. 2010), so the results are comparable. Kimmel et al. (2014) had postoperative SCr measured from every patient and reported remarkably higher rates of AKI than ours (52 per 1,000 vs. 3.3 per 1,000). In our study population, the incidence of AKI in patients for whom postoperative SCr was measured was much smaller (10 per 1,000 operations), although this incidence number is probably overstated due to selection bias. In summary, we found that high rates of AKI might be prevented if the risk profi le of patients is favorable. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found very low rates of AKI. The results suggest that the risk of developing AKI is elevated in patients with a duration of operation exceeding 120 min, higher BMI, ASA class ≥ 3, or impaired kidney function preoperatively (eGFR< 90 mL/min). We therefore suggest careful renal monitoring postoperatively for patients with these risk factors, in order to identify AKI. It is important to fi nd and optimize patients who are at risk of AKI already preoperatively, to prevent future kidney manifestations—and also to communicate the risk to the patient when considering a procedure aimed at improving quality of life in a high-risk patient. Supplementary data A directed acyclic graph is available as supplementary data in the online version of this article, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1301743. All the authors contributed to the design of the study. PJ collected the data. PJ, EJ, and LPL contributed to the editing of the data. PJ wrote the draft of the manuscript and revised the manuscript according to the corrections made by the other authors. Andres B M, Taub D D, Gurkan I, Wenz J F. Postoperative fever after total knee arthroplasty: the role of cytokines. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; (415): 221-31. Aveline C, Leroux A, Vautier P, Cognet F, Le Hetet H, Bonnet F. Risk factors for renal dysfunction after total hip arthroplasty. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2009; 28(9): 728-34. Basile D P, Anderson M D, Sutton T A. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury. Compr Physiol 2012; 2(2), 1303-53. Bell S, Davey P, Nathwani D, Marwick C, Vadiveloo T, Sneddon J, Patton A, Bennie M, Fleming S, Donnan PT. Risk of AKI with gentamicin as surgical prophylaxis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 25(11): 2625-32. Bell S, Dekker F W, Vadiveloo T, Marwick C, Deshmukh H, Donnan P T, Van Diepen M. Risk of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery-development and validation of a risk score and effect of acute kidney injury on survival: observational cohort study. BMJ 2015; 11; 351: h5639. Bellomo R, Kellum J A, Ronco C. Defi ning and classifying acute renal failure: from advocacy to consensus and validation of the RIFLE criteria. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33(3): 409-13. Coca S G, Singanamala S, Parikh C R. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int 2012; 81(5): 442-8. Curtis J M, Sternhagen V, Batts D. Acute renal failure after placement of tobramycin-impregnated bone cement in an infected total knee arthroplasty. Pharmacotherapy 2005; 25(6): 876-80. 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37510927 Ja msa D.indd 375 6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM 376 Acta Orthopaedica 2017; 88 (4): 370–376 Craxford S, Bayley E, Needoff M. Antibiotic-associated complications following lower limb arthroplasty: a comparison of two prophylactic regimes. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24(4): 539-43. Fournier J P, Sommet A, Durrieu G, Poutrain J C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Montastruc J L. More on the “Triple Whammy”: antihypertensive drugs, non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory agents and acute kidney injury - a case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance database. Ren Fail 2014; 36(7): 1166-8. Jafari S M, Huang R, Joshi A, Parvizi J, Hozack W J. Renal impairment following total joint arthroplasty: who is at risk? J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(6 Suppl): 49-53. Johansson S, Christensen O M, Thorsmark A H. A retrospective study of acute kidney injury in hip arthroplasty patients receiving gentamicin and dicloxacillin. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(6): 589-91. Kimmel L A, Wilson S, Janardan J D, Liew S M, Walker R G. Incidence of acute kidney injury following total joint arthroplasty: a retrospective review by RIFLE criteria. Clin Kidney J 2014; 7(6): 546-51. Lafrance J P, Miller D R. Acute kidney injury associates with increased longterm mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21(2): 345-52. Lau B P, Kumar V P. Acute kidney injury (AKI) with the use of antibioticimpregnated bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2013; 42(12): 692-5. Lee A, Cooper M G, Craiq J C, Knight J F, Keneally J P. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs on postoperative renal function in adults with normal renal function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18;(2): CD002765. Levey A S, Stevens L A, Schmid C H, Zhang Y L, Castro A F 3rd, Feldman H I, Kusek J W, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J. A new equation to estimate glomerular fi ltration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150(9): 604-12. Nielson E, Hennrikus E, Lehman E, Mets B. Angiotensin axis blockade, hypotension, and acute kidney injury in elective major orthopedic surgery. J Hosp Med 2014; 9(5): 283-8. Patrick B N, Rivey M P, Allington D R. Acute renal failure associated with vancomycinand tobramycin-laden cement in total hip arthroplasty. Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40(11): 2037-42. Perregaard H, Damholt M B, Solgaard S, Petersen M B. Renal function after elective total hip replacement - Incidence of acute kidney injury and prevalence of chronic kidney disease. Acta Orthop 2016; 87(3): 235-8. Ross A D, Boscainos P J, Malhas A, Wigderowitz C. Peri-operative renal morbidity secondary to gentamicin and fl ucloxacillin chemoprophylaxis for hip and knee arthroplasty. Scott Med J 2013; 58(4): 209-12. Textor J, Hardt J, Knüppel S. DAGitty: A graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 2011; 22(4): 745. Weingarten T N, Gurrieri C, Jarett P D, Brown D R, Berntson N J, Calaro R D Jr, Kor D J, Berry D J, Garovic V D, Nicholson W T, Schroeder D R, Sprung J. Acute kidney injury following total joint arthroplasty: retrospective analysis. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59(12): 1111-8. Ympa Y P, Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent J L. Has mortality from acute renal failure decreased? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med 2005; 118(8): 827-32 10927 Ja msa D.indd 37610927 Ja msa D.indd 376 6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM6/20/2017 5:25:15 PM