Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland

BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies, Language Planning Department, Reykjavik, Iceland BETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: ON LANGUAGE SITUATION AND LANGUAGE POLICY IN CONTEMPORARY ICELAND ABSTRACT Iceland’s literary tradition, conservative linguistic heritage and ideologies of linguistic purism have been a major strand in Icelandic national identity. The preservation of linguistic and literary continuity is a principal objective of overtly expressed Icelandic culture policies. At the same time, the advent of globalisation has entailed increased everyday presence of an international language, along Icelandic, in important spheres of modern life. There are concerns that this has impact on reading habits, linguistic input, and language environment in general. Against this background, the present paper offers a description of prevailing Icelandic language ideologies, modern linguistic practices, language policies, and the possibilities and limitations of present-day language management efforts. KEYWORDS: language management, language policies, language ideologies, Icelandic, prestige planning. ANOTACIJA Islandijos literatūrinė tradicija, konservatyvus kalbinis paveldas ir kalbinio purizmo ideologijos – svarbi Islandijos nacionalinės tapatybės dalis. Išsaugoti kalbinį ir literatūrinį tęstinumą yra pagrindinis atvirosios Islandijos kultūros politikos tikslas. Tačiau dėl globalizacijos svarbiose šiuolaikinio gyvenimo srityse vis labiau įsigali tarptautinė kalba. Tai kelia susirūpinimą, nes kinta skaitymo įpročiai, veikiamas kalbos tvarumas ir kalbos aplinka apskritai. Atsižvelgiant į šį kontekstą, šiame straipsnyje aprašomos vyraujančios islandų kalbos ideologijos, aptariama šiuolaikinė kalbinė praktika, kalbos politika ir šių dienų kalbos tvarkymo galimybės bei apribojimai. ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: kalbos vadyba, kalbos politika, kalbos ideologijos, islandų kalba, prestižo planavimas. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 2 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 1. LANGUAGE SITUATION 1.1. Historical background Icelandic is a North Germanic (‘Nordic’) language. Structurally it is close to Modern Faroese, and to some Western Norwegian dialects. More distant Nordic relatives are Swedish, Danish, and Eastern Norwegian / Norwegian Bokmål. Modern Icelandic bears strong resemblance to its linguistic ancestor, Old Norse, which was spoken in the ninth to the thirteenth century in Scandinavia, the Faroes, and Iceland, in some parts of Britain, and in other places where the Vikings and Nordic merchants travelled in medieval times. Voluminous texts in Old Norse / Early Icelandic are preserved, and many of them are held in high regard, such as the socalled Family Sagas, the Poetic Edda, Sagas of Kings, etc. These texts were mostly written in the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, mainly in Iceland, and partly in Norway. The language of the texts is still broadly accessible today to the average reader of Modern Icelandic, without specialization in linguistics or literary studies. This is because Modern Icelandic retains most Old Norse grammatical categories and basic vocabulary, while considerable changes have taken place in the phonological system. 1.2. Linguistic characteristics Modern Icelandic nouns, adjectives, pronouns and the numerals 1–4 have four grammatical cases. There are three grammatical genders for nouns, adjectives, most pronouns and the numerals 1–4. Verbs are conjugated according to tense, person, number, mood and voice. Thus, structurally, Icelandic has largely kept many of the Old North Germanic grammatical characteristics. One feature of Modern Icelandic is also worth mentioning: the personal name system. Most Icelanders still use patronymics, or matronymics, i.e., you can choose between using your father’s or your mother’s first name to form your last name, with son ‘son’ or dóttir ‘daughter’ added. As an example, my father’s first name was Kristinn, thus I am Kristinsson, while my sisters’ surname is Kristinsdóttir. While most Icelanders use their fathers’ or mothers’ first names for their surnames, some people do use family names, as is the most common custom in Western Europe (e.g., Jóhanna Schram), or a mixture of both methods (e.g., Jóhanna ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 3 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 Adolfsdóttir Schram). Another interesting characteristic of the Icelandic name custom is that you never address people by their surname alone; the default is the first name(s), only optionally followed by a surname. This holds for all members of society, regardless of their status and position. Icelandic is virtually without dialects as such, i.e. in the most common sense of the term ‘dialect’. There is however a particular “Northern accent”, which broadly means that a number of people in the centre of Northern Iceland tend to pronounce intervocalic stops with stronger postaspiration than most other Icelandic speakers normally do. It is a bit of a mystery why such a large and sparsely populated island as Iceland is not divided into clearly separated dialectal regions. Most variation in Icelandic is determined by genre, by medium of communication, by situation, and closeness of conversation participants. Icelandic has a long history of coining domestic neologisms, and there are myriads of such neologisms in everyday use. Examples: sími ‘telephone’, tölva ‘computer’, fíkill ‘addict’, dagskrá ‘program’, ráðstefna ‘conference’, and so on and so forth. This entails that people who speak the Scandinavian languages (Danish, Norwegian, Swedish) or other Germanic languages, have to make an extra effort in learning Modern Icelandic, as they can not readily decipher the meaning of e.g. Icelandic newspaper texts, since the proportion of so-called international vocabulary is relatively low (particularly in printed material), while native neologisms have been coined as substitutes. 1.3. Language beliefs among members of the speech community Grammatical, orthographic and lexical purism is a central theme of Icelandic language attitudes and ideologies as has been shown repeatedly in opinion polls and investigations into language discourses (cf., e.g., Ottósson 1990, Árnason 2006, Vikør 2010, Leonard, Árnason 2011, Kristinsson 2014, Jökulsdóttir et al. 2019). Language use is often discussed by lay people, and many tend to hold strong opinions, for example when it comes to choosing between different suggestions for new words in the vocabulary. A number of speakers regularly express their worries for what they perceive as deterioration of proper Icelandic language, among the younger generation. While protectionist language ideologies prevail in Iceland, I think that such ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 4 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 attitudes primarily focus on the forms of language, while status issues, i.e. threats to the loss of domains of use, have caused less concern among the general public (cf. Kristinsson 2014). Due to geography, majority of common speakers of Icelandic were for centuries (esp. in 1400–1800) hardly ever exposed to long-term language contact situations. Contact situations with Danish, and later English speaking groups, became gradually more common in the 19th and 20th centuries. Iceland was occupied by English speaking Allied forces in 1940, and a NATO military base was established and run for many decades after the war. Since the midtwentieth century, fear of English influence on the Icelandic language has fuelled discourses on domestic language purity. This has not least concerned terminology and modern renewal of lexicon. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, linguistic purism became an important, and influential, feature of Icelandic language attitudes and linguistic practices. Language purism became a significant factor of the self-identity of Icelanders as a nation. Earlier, the main target of purification were loanwords from Danish, while English loans have been the major concern since the latter half of the 20th century. This is evident in nationalist language political discourses. Even the mere existence of Icelanders as a separate nation and their right to independence has been linked with the Icelandic language, preferably in its most ‘pure’ form (i.e., as close as possible to Old Norse, the linguistic stage of the medieval Nordic literary Golden Age). 1.4. Current language situation Icelandic is used in all aspects of daily life in Iceland: in the government system, in parliament, as medium of instruction in schools (also in tertiary education), in companies, sports, mass media, etc. Publications in Icelandic are massive, for a nation of only about 360,000 people; about 1,000 book titles were published in Icelandic in 2019, an increase compared to previous years. There was a 50% increase in the publishing of books for youths and children in 2019 compared to 2018. Some printed traditional newspapers seem to struggle while written news portals on the web are thriving. There are a number of radio stations and a handful of nation wide TV stations. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 5 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 While Icelandic is the official language of state and municipalities, there is only one recognized traditional minority language in Iceland, namely Icelandic Sign Language, the first language of about 300 people. The population of Iceland has recently become much more multifaceted than before. In about a quarter of a century, the proportion of immigrants has increased from less than 2% of the total population to about 14% (Statistics Iceland 2020). Some have acquired Icelandic citizenship while most inhabitants of foreign origin are citizens of other countries, who have (temporary) residence permit in Iceland. Poles are by far the largest single group of immigrants, and the second largest are Lithuanians. About 5% of people living in Iceland are Polish citizens (19,000 people in 2019), and about 1% of the population are Lithuanian citizens (4,000 people in 2019; Statistics Iceland 2020). In 2016, 12.6% of children at pre-primary school age in Iceland had another language than Icelandic as home language, and there are at least about 50 different home languages in the country (Jónsdóttir et al. 2018: 10). Some estimates have figures as high as 100 different home languages. While the status of Icelandic as official language is uncontested, and it is the principal language of daily communication, some branches of the Icelandic labour market have clearly become multilingual, such as tourist services, maintenance, and construction. Many immigrants do their best to learn to speak Icelandic. The demographic changes have entailed that Icelandic spoken with a foreign accent is part of everyday language practices. The Icelandic national broadcast media is no exception. This situation is new to a large section of traditional Icelandic speakers. Foreign speakers of Icelandic often complain that when native Icelanders hear them speak with an accent, Icelanders are eager to code-switch into English. This of course can be a problem, firstly, as it shows lack of tolerance towards foreign accented speech, and, secondly, this behaviour also deprives the learners of their chances to practice their Icelandic in authentic conversations. It is also true that many of the foreigners are not necessarily fluent speakers of English. The advent of globalisation entails increased everyday presence of English in (social) media, commerce, academia, popular culture, digital technologies, etc. It is widely perceived ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 6 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 that this is bound to have effect on reading habits, linguistic input in the native language, and allocation of domains of language use in society at large. In a few domains of Icelandic society, English is commonly used (often parallel to Icelandic), for instance in the tourism industry, some businesses, in banking, and partially as mode of instruction at universities. Despite strong presence of English in such domains, Icelandic is without a doubt the principal daily language, it is the language of instruction in primary and secondary education, and it is by far the most common language of instruction at Icelandic universities and colleges. As is the case at universities in other Nordic countries, the native language has its stronghold at the Bachelor levels, while Master programs and Doctoral programs have higher percentages of English medium courses. An investigation in 2014 showed that about 10% of university courses were taught in English in Bachelor programs, and about 18% in English on average for Master programs (Kristinsson, Bernharðsson 2014). Interestingly, there is strong evidence (Arnbjörnsdóttir 2017) that Icelandic college students tend to overestimate their own English proficiencies, and that they struggle when they try to cope with academic English in their studies. 2. EVOLVING LANGUAGE ECOLOGY, AND LANGUAGE POLICY CHALLENGES In late modernity, Icelandic culture and society is facing choices and challenges as to language management, as concerns language corpus, language status and language acquisition planning (see, e.g., Kristinsson 2014, 2018). A team of researchers has been investigating linguistic practices and attitudes in Iceland the past three years (cf. Sigurjónsdóttir 2019). They are partly attempting to provide evidence that could inform sensible language management efforts to deal with and modify the present language situation, and partly to provide better theoretical insight into language acquisition, development and language contact, in general terms. There is thus ongoing research designed to shed further light on the current language situation in Iceland, not least the status of Icelandic vis à vis English. The overarching goal is to be able to inform the Icelandic public about to what extent they should be concerned for the prospects of Icelandic, and if the increased presence of English is having an influence on everyday Icelandic language use, grammar and semantics. There has been a feeling among some people, teachers for example, that something might be changing rapidly among school ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 7 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 children and youths, in the system of grammar, and in vocabulary. These vague concerns that have been expressed over the past one or two decades have mainly been based on anecdotes and such. An example of such anecdotal evidence: Researchers had found out that according to PISA measuring, the number of Icelandic children under the age of 15 who had difficulties in reading, evaluating and interpreting a text, had gone from 15% in the year 2000 to 22% in the year 2015. When the news broke in 2018, the Head of the Icelandic Teachers’ Union, Ragnar Pétursson, was cited in a newspaper article, as follows: “Ragnar has criticised local institutions for assigning too little time to […] Icelandic in the curriculum in elementary schools. However, what’s really saddening is that while Icelandic children spend a lot of time using technological devices that are mostly in English, parents don’t seem to take enough time to talk to them about what they see and read online. “I have been a teacher for 20 years and I can tell you that children have never lived in better conditions than now,” Ragnar says. “But we don’t give children enough of what really matters—time”” (Demurtas 2018). Overt policies that have been explicitly laid down in writing by Parliament and Government recently, include: (1) a detailed official language policy, in 2009 (Ministry of Education, Science and Culture 2009; ratified by Parliament), (2) a separate language legislation on Icelandic and Icelandic Sign Language, in 2011 (Althingi 2011), (3) an ambitious language technology program for 2018–2022 (Nikulásdóttir et al. 2017; Rannís 2018). The explicit aim of the language technology funding and programme is “to protect and support the Icelandic language as well as to facilitate the use of new information technologies in the Icelandic community, for the benefit of the public, institutions and companies” (Rannís 2018). ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 8 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 (4) In June 2019, a parliamentary resolution on Icelandic was unanimously passed by the Icelandic Parliament. A nationwide language awareness campaign (Áfram íslenska [Go Icelandic!]) is promoted in the resolution, the need to support teacher education is emphasised, as well as the aim of safeguarding Icelandic in the digital domains (Althingi 2019). While Icelandic is the first language of about 86% of the Icelandic population at present, comprehensive recent polls show that majority of Icelanders claim to hear and read some English on a regular basis, and many of them also claim to use English regularly. The information below is sought from some first results of the comprehensive investigation that has been mentioned earlier in this chapter: For Icelandic 3–5 years old children, about 60% watch English language programmes on channels such as Netflix and YouTube (Sigurjónsdóttir 2019). For the age group 3–12 years old children, about 50% play computer games in Icelandic, while the figure for English language computer games is about 75%; however, the younger children are more likely to play the Icelandic games (Nowenstein et al. 2018). As for adolescents and youths, research indicates that increased English language input among 16–20 years old speakers of Icelandic correlates positively with increased insecurity and non-standard use of subjunctive and indicative mood in the Icelandic verbal system (Thórsdóttir 2018). As was mentioned earlier, majority of Icelanders claim to hear and read some English on a regular basis, and many of them also claim to use English regularly. A survey which was carried out in 2002, showed that about 50% of the respondents at the time claimed to use English almost daily (i.e., read or write or speak English), while 25% of them answered “(almost) never” (Árnason 2006). As for formal or structured acquisition of English, it has been shown (Jóhannsdóttir 2018) that Icelandic children in the 4th grade, who are beginning to learn some English at school, acquire most of their English vocabulary outside of the classroom, based on their motivation to understand English television programmes and pop lyrics, and so on, and through computers, and through their communication with people who do not know Icelandic and communicate in English. In other words, English lessons at school are only a secondary mode of their acquisition of English. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 9 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 It is a possibility that the two codes, Icelandic and English, have reached some sort of healthy balance, i.e. in a stable parallel language situation, for a variety of encounters and domains in Iceland. The question is rather if this situation makes Icelandic “vulnerable” in Iceland, in terms of forms or function, or both. One possibility is that perhaps we are not necessarily just primarily experiencing English influence as such, on Icelandic forms and Icelandic domains – affecting and changing how Icelandic is used, and where and when it can be used; but rather that English is an additional code in the community. There could, in other words, be signs of emerging additive bilingualism, English in addition to Icelandic, rather than English “conquering” Icelandic as to domains of use, and as to proficiency in use. As discussed earlier, English is commonly used in Iceland, and, for some situations and domains, sometimes even rather than Icelandic. This happens e.g. in a variety of Icelandic customer services, such as in shops and restaurants, in districts in Reykjavik where there are many tourists and other foreign visitors. At the same time there is much metalinguistic discourse in the Icelandic speech community which reveals negative attitudes among Icelanders to such public use of English in Iceland. A newspaper article by the Icelandic novelist Ragnar Jónasson (2018) is an example of a rather typical description by native Icelanders who are concerned for the prospects of Icelandic: “At restaurants and coffee shops, people are frequently greeted in English rather than Icelandic, and often Icelandic will get you nowhere if you want to order food or drink. Companies use English names or are rebranding themselves in English. The importance of tourists to the economy is rapidly making English not only a second language in the service industry, but almost the first language.” Many examples of such overtly expressed negative attitudes, to what appears to be elevated status of English in public and social space in Iceland, can be found in Icelandic social media. Sometimes, social media commentators are even urging people to boycott shops and restaurants that do not have Icelandic speaking staff or that tend to advertise their commodities ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 16 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 Kristinsson Ari Páll 2014: Ideologies in Iceland: The Protection of Language Forms. – English in Nordic Universities: Ideologies and Practices, eds. A.K. Hultgren, F. Gregersen, J. Thøgersen, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 165–177. Kristinsson Ari Páll 2016: English Language as ‛Fatal Gadget’ in Iceland. – Why English? Confronting the Hydra, eds. P. Bunce, R. Phillipson, V. Rapatahana, R. Tupas, Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 118–128. Kristinsson Ari Páll 2018: National Language Policy and Planning in Iceland – Aims and Institutional Activities. – National Language Institutions and National Languages. Contributions to the EFNIL Conference 2017 in Mannheim, ed. G. Stickel, Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 243–249. Kristinsson Ari Páll, Bernharðsson Haraldur 2014: Íslenska og enska í íslensku háskólastarfi. – Orð og tunga 16, 93‒122. Leonard Stephen Pax, Árnason Kristján 2011: Language Ideology and Standardisation in Iceland. – Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, eds. T. Kristiansen, N. Coupland, Oslo: Novus, 91–96. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture 2009: Íslenska til alls. Tillögur Íslenskrar málnefndar að íslenskri málstefnu samþykktar á Alþingi 12. mars 2009, Reykjavik: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Nikulásdóttir Anna B., Guðnason Jón, Steingrímsson Steinþór 2017: Máltækni fyrir íslensku 2018–2022. Verkáætlun, Reykjavík: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Nowenstein Iris Edda, Guðmundsdóttir Dagbjört, Sigurjónsdóttir Sigríður 2018: Að tileinka sér móðurmál í tæknivæddum heimi. – Skíma 2018, 17–21. Óladóttir Hanna 2009: Shake, sjeik eller mjólkurhristingur? Islandske holdninger til engelsk språkpåvirkning, Oslo: Novus. Ottósson Kjartan G. 1990: Íslensk málhreinsun. Sögulegt yfirlit, Reykjavik: Íslensk málnefnd. Rannís 2018: The Strategic Research and Development Programme for Language Technology, Reykjavík: https://en.rannis.is/funding/research/the-strategic-researchand-development-programme-for-language-technology/ (accessed May 5, 2020). Sigurjónsdóttir Sigríður 2019: Ljáðu mér eyra. Framtíð íslenskunnar og málumhverfi ungra barna. – Skírnir 193, 47–67. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 17 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 Spolsky Bernard 2004: Language Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spolsky Bernard 2009: Language Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spolsky Bernard 2018/2019: A Modified and Enriched Theory of Language Policy (and Management). – Language Policy 18(3), 323–338 (first online September 5, 2018). Statistics Iceland 2020: http://www.hagstofa.is (accessed May 5, 2020). Thórsdóttir Elín 2018: Áhrif aukinnar enskunotkunar á íslenska málfræði. Breytileiki í háttanotkun og áhrif ílags, MA Thesis, University of Iceland. Vikør Lars S. 2010: Language Purism in the Nordic Countries. – International Journal of the Sociology of Language 204, 9‒30. Received: 19 12 2019 Accepted: 06 05 2020 ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 18 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 BETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: ON LANGUAGE SITUATION AND LANGUAGE POLICY IN CONTEMPORARY ICELAND Summary In late modernity, Icelandic culture and society is facing important choices and challenges as to language management. The advent of globalisation entails increased everyday presence of English in (social) media, commerce, academia, popular culture, digital technologies, etc., and there are concerns that this impacts, among other things, on reading habits, linguistic input, and allocation of linguistic domains in society at large. While Icelandic is the first language of about 86% of the Icelandic population at present, majority of Icelanders claim to hear, to read and use some English on a regular basis. About 60% of Icelandic 3–5 years old children watch English language programmes on channels such as Netflix and YouTube (Sigurjónsdóttir 2019). Concerns have been raised that such extensive English language environment on a daily basis is bound to have negative implications for traditional Icelandic language culture, i.e., firstly, for language attitudes in general, as English is favourably viewed, and, secondly, for the native grammar and lexicon, since it is suspected that linguistic input in Icelandic will decrease proportionally as English language input increases. In Icelandic language management, ignoring the impact of globalisation on contemporary linguistic repertoires is not an option, and again, neither is major negligence in preserving a rich linguistic and literary tradition which is perceived to be a unique cultural heritage. Thus, there is need for some balanced analysis of the possibilities and limitations of present-day language management efforts. One of the most important factors for safe navigation between Scylla and Charybdis is the development of Icelandic language corpora and affordable and accessible language technology infrastructure, and linguistic tools and technical gadgets based on written and spoken modern Icelandic, as well as computer games and films carrying Icelandic content which can appeal to children and youths in their native tongue. Other ways of supporting intergenerational transmission of written and spoken Icelandic include socioeconomic efforts that aim at facilitating more quality time for young families, preferably resulting in increased linguistic input in traditional Icelandic. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON. Between Scylla and Charybdis: on Language Situation and Language Policy in Contemporary Iceland | 19 doi.org/10.35321/bkalba.2020.93.02 BENDRINĖ KALBA 93 (2020) http://journals.lki.lt/bendrinekalba ISSN 2351-7204 Icelandic authorities have decided to do their best to live up to this challenge, among other things by allocating huge sums to a language technology program in 2018–2022, and through a fund that supports the publication of interesting books for youths and children. Iceland’s parliament (Althingi) unanimously passed a resolution in June 2019, on strengthening Icelandic as the official language in Iceland. The resolution highlights the need to raise awareness about the importance of the Icelandic language, its value and its uniqueness; and to promote teaching of Icelandic, paying special attention to non-native learners, and the principal goal is that Icelandic be used in all fields and domains in Icelandic society. ARI PÁLL KRISTINSSON Árni Magnússon Institute for Icelandic Studies Laugavegur 13, IS-101 Reykjavik [email protected]