Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darybos tendencijos seniausioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje

ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ Institute of the Lithuanian Language Research fields: historical anthroponomastics, historical toponomastics. TENDENCIES IN THE FORMATION OF JONIŠKIS MEN’S PERSONAL NAMES IN LITHUANIA’S OLDEST JONIŠKIS BAPTISMAL REGISTER BOOK, 1599–1621 Tendencies in the Formation of Male Personal Names in Joniškis in Lithuania’s Oldest Joniškis Baptism Register, 1599–1621 ABSTRACT Among the most valuable documents for the historical anthroponomastics of Lithuanian townspeople in the 16th–18th centuries are town books of acts, inventories, church registration books (of baptisms, marriages, and deaths), and other historical sources of the period. Particularly appealing, in chronological terms, is the Joniškis baptismal register book of 1599–1621, now known to be unique and the oldest in Lithuania. This article analyzes, from the perspective of word formation, 168 male personal names of Joniškis residents (the second elements of two-part recorded names) collected from this book. KEYWORDS: Joniškis, resident of Joniškis, baptismal register book, historical anthroponomastics, historical personal name, word formation. ANNOTATION City registry books, inventories, church record books (for baptism, marriage, death records) and other historical sources are among the most valuable 16th–18th century documents of the historical anthroponymy of Lithuanian townspeople. A chronologically unique Joniškis baptism record book of 1599–1621, which is currently the oldest known book of this type in Lithuania, is especially noteworthy. The article addresses 168 male personal Straipsniai / Articles 177 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ names from Joniškis (the second components of binary names) collected from this book from the perspective of word formation. KEYWORDS: Joniškis, Joniškis resident, baptism record book, historical anthroponymy, historical anthroponym, word-formation. INTRODUCTION The historical anthroponyms of the inhabitants of the old Joniškis parish have already begun to be studied. First, some Lithuanian personal-name forms were published from the oldest baptismal register book in Lithuania, that of Joniškis parish for 1599–1621 (Garliauskas 1998: 152–153). Somewhat later, the few records of Joniškis men with Lithuanian appellatives, collected from this ecclesiastical source, were discussed (Ragauskaitė 1999: 155). An analysis of 186 personal names of people from Joniškis from the same period established that among the reconstructed Lithuanian anthroponyms of non-baptismal-name origin, nicknames were the most frequent, while among the reconstructed personal names of baptismal-name origin, most derived from various forms of Christian names (Ragauskaitė 2004: 16–17). A later publication discussed the functioning of Lithuanian suffixes in the anthroponyms of Joniškis women from the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries (Garliauskas 2004: 21–22; Ragauskaitė 2005: 66–67). An in-depth analysis of 122 personal names showed that 32 (26%) were recorded with the Lithuanian suffixes -aičia, -yčia, -ienė, -(i)učia, while the remainder had the Slavic suffixes -ova, -ona. Three personal names (2.46%) with a Polish-type -sk- suffix were classified as derivatives with the ending -a. The reconstructed forms of 32 Joniškis women’s anthroponyms were compared with modern Lithuanian surnames. As many as 28 (87.5% of all reconstructed forms) are known in today’s name stock (Ragauskaitė 2015: 74; 2016: 64–65). An examination of the records of male inhabitants of villages in the Joniškis parish baptismal register for 1599–1621 established that some of their second anthroponyms were of Lithuanian origin (Ragauskaitė 2019: 25–26; 2019a: 57; 2019b: 81–82). Given the distinctive features of naming in Joniškis parish (of men and women), including the formation and origin of their proper names, research on the town’s historical anthroponymy appears timely and worth continuing. The aim of this article is to discuss the recording practices for men from Joniškis in 1599–1621 and to analyze in detail their 168 personal names (the second members of binary names) from the perspective of word formation. The objectives of this article are: 1) to examine the first members (given names) of binary records; 2) to identify the most productive suffixes of the second anthroponyms; 3) to reconstruct personal-name forms with Lithuanian derivational formants and compare them with modern Lithuanian surnames; 4) to determine how many and what kinds of Joniškis anthroponyms are no longer used in today’s name stock. 178 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbos tendencijos senosioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje The following principal methods will be used to classify and evaluate historical anthroponymic data for the inhabitants of Joniškis: descriptive, comparative, and, in part, statistical¹. It will be necessary to identify the most common naming model, determine the most frequent personal-name suffixes, and describe the quantitative relationship between patronymic and non-patronymic groups of anthroponyms. The material for this article was collected from the old Joniškis baptismal register book for 1599–1621. It was created three decades after the Council of Trent, held on 11 November 1563. It was at this council that it was decided to introduce baptismal and marriage registers in Catholic countries (Garliauskas 2010: 4; 2016: 17). The manuscript source’s original title is “Liber Baptisatoru[m]² || Ecc[esi]ae Parochialis Jani=||scensis ab Anno 159. – || usq[ue] ad An[num] || 1621. –”. Another title is written on the flyleaf: “CATA: || LOGS. || BAPTISA: || RVM. EC: || CLESIAE. || IANI: || SCEN: || SIS”. Benediktas Sviechovskis was parish priest of the Church of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Joniškis from 1594 to 1621. It was at his initiative that this ecclesiastical source began to be written in 1599 (LKD 79). Several people wrote the manuscript book in Latin and Polish. The formulas in the baptismal entries changed gradually (Garliauskas 1998: 139; 2004: 21–22; 2012: 72; Žilys 2012: 126–127; Ragauskaitė 2015: 56). A total of 168 binary male names were extracted from this historical document. The following section discusses the naming practices of the inhabitants of Joniškis. 1. THE NAMING SITUATION OF THE PEOPLE OF JONIŠKIS 1.1. It is important to define precisely which anthroponyms recorded in the church source can be attributed to the inhabitants of Joniškis. The key criteria for identifying the personal names of townspeople have already been discussed (Ragauskaitė 1999: 146; 2000: 94; 2001: 124; 2002: 32–34; 2003: 82; 2004: 8–9; 2005: 18–23; 2006: 81–82; 2009: 227–228; 2014a: 9–10; 2015: 59–61). Various references helped distinguish the people of Joniškis in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries: Lat. de Ciuitate ‘from the town’, Lat. de Ciuitate Ianizek, E ciuitate Ianizki ‘from the town of Joniškis’, Lat. de Janiszki ‘from Joniškis’, Pol. Janiski ‘Joniškis’, Pol. Z miasta ‘from the town’, etc., for example: 1599 Martini Baltuszkačia de Janiszki gen. sg. ĮNŠ 1v³; 1617 Parentes Petrus Budraitis <...> de ciuitate Janiszki ĮNŠ 195v; 1618 Par[entes] Jakub Cekutis <...> de Ciuitate Ianizke ĮNŠ 221v; 1603 E ciuitate Janiszki <...> Pat[rini] Gasparus Czepaitis 1 Apie šių metodų taikymą, tiriant istorinę antroponimiją, dar žr. Ragauskaitė 2005: 31. 2 Abbreviations recorded in the manuscript have been expanded. The missing text is indicated in square brackets. When presenting personal names, an effort is made to preserve the forms recorded in the original historical document. 3 All personal names presented in the article are taken from the registers. Each is accompanied by the year in which the anthroponym was recorded, the abbreviation of the historical source, and the folio number. Straipsniai / Articles 179 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ JÑ 39; 1618 Godfather Baler Zgobtarz from the town of Ianibek JÑ 20v; 1602 Janiszki <...> Gregorius Daugwilaitis JÑ 35; 1617 Godfather Vrbanas Giednawaytis from the town of Janiszek JÑ 20v; 1599 Stanislaus Jonaitis <...> all from Janiszkie JÑ 1; 1609 From the town <...> Parent Jerzy Kuialis JÑ 113; 1620 From the town <...> Kum Piotr Mißutis JÑ 42; 1618 Godfather Jerzy Nocâjis from the town of Ianibek JÑ 220; 1617 Godfather Czapos Petrajis from the town of Ianibek JÑ 208; 1617 Peter Jan Skatlis from the town of Janiszek JÑ 20v; 1599 Jokuba {s}ure⁴ <...> all from Janiszkie, gen. sg. JÑ 1; 1618 Godfather Baroβ Sγie <...> from the town of Ianibek JÑ 217v; 1620 Kum Grzegorz Worpnik <...> From the town JÑ 250v; 1617 Godfather Mikolaj Zemió{c} from the town of Janiszek JÑ 200. The streets (Dvaro, Šiaulių, Upytės, Vokiečių, Žagarės, etc.) are specified (see also Ragauskaitė 2015: 59), where the people of Joniškis lived (parents of baptized infants, godparents), for example: 1619 Kum Wojciech Baltrukaitis <...> z miata Zagorskiej Vlici JÑ 232v; 1621 K[um] z miata Vlici dworne iacub Cubius JÑ 262; 1621 Z Miata Vlici Vpickei R[odzic] Adam Grigaitis JÑ 265v; 1621 K[um] z miata Vlici bawelskei Wojciech Iurgaitis JÑ 267; 1621 Z Miata Vlici Niemieki <...> K[um] Mikolai Kiepietuis JÑ 267v; 1621 Z Miata Vlici bawelskei R[odzic] Ian Kow JÑ 268; 1616 Z Miasta z ulicy Zagorskiej Pawel Macais JÑ 192; 1616 z ulicy Niemiekej z miasta jendrej Mazutais JÑ 192v; 1621 K[um] Anton Powilaitis <...> z ulicy bawelskei JÑ 63; 1621 Tomasz Radwilis z miasta Vlici dworne JÑ 266; 1620 K[um] Piotrz Stanulaitis z Vlicy vpickiej z Ianibek JÑ 256; 1621 K[um] z miata Vlici Vpickei Iacub bukuitis JÑ 265; 1621 K[um] z miata Vlici szawleskei Grig Trumpatis JÑ 268; 1619 Kum Grig Walentinas z miata Vlici Vpickej JÑ 235v. 1.2. The first members of the two-element naming model are most often traditional Christian names, for example: 1621 Adam JÑ 265v – cf. present-day name Adõmas (LVKŽ 61); 1600 Ambrosius JÑ 10v; 1621 Ambrozei JÑ 264v – cf. present-day name Ambraziejus (LVKŽ 73); 1599 Andrem JÑ 1v; 1621 Iendrei JÑ 264v; 1616 jendrej JÑ 192v – cf. present-day name Andriejus (LVKŽ 74); 1604 Annusa gen. sg. JÑ 48; 1617 Ian JÑ 206; 1617 Ianos JÑ 199; 1602 Ioannes JÑ 34v; 1617 Ian JÑ 200v; 1599 Ioanes JÑ 1v; 1600 Ioannis JÑ 8v – cf. present-day name Jõnas (LVKŽ 208); 1621 Anton JÑ 263 – cf. present-day name Antãnas (LVKŽ 76); 1602 Augustinus JÑ 36v – cf. present-day name Augustinas (LVKŽ 85); 1620 Baltromiej JÑ 255v; 1599 Baltromieius JÑ 3v; 1616 Baltromiej JÑ 191v; 1600 Bartholomæus JÑ 8v; 1618 Bartomey JÑ 214, 214v; 1599 Bartlomieus JÑ 2v – cf. present-day name Baltramiejus (LVKŽ 89); 1621 Casper JÑ 270; 1617 Caspos JÑ 198v; 1619 Kaper JÑ 224 – cf. present-day name Kãsp aras (LVKŽ 222); 1601 Florian[us] JÑ 24v – cf. present-day name Florijõnas (LVKŽ 158–159); 1600 Georg JÑ 16; 1600 Georgius JÑ 13v; 1602 Gregorius JÑ 35; 1620 Grzegorz JÑ 25v; 1621 Ieri JÑ 262v; 1620 Iery JÑ 248v; 4 Several source fragments (blurred by ink and the like) are marked in square brackets. 180 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbos tendencijos senyoje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje 1618 Jerzỹ JNŠ 20; 1617 Jurgis JNŠ 19; 1609 Jerzỹ JNŠ 13 – cf. the modern name Jùrgis (LVKŽ 215); 1621 Iacub JNŠ 265; 1618 Iakub JNŠ 221v; 1621 Iacob JNŠ 267v; 1600 Iacobi gen. sg. JNŠ 10, 13v; 1599 Jokuba gen. sg. JNŠ 1 – cf. the modern name Jokūbas (LVKŽ 207); 1599 Lucæ gen. sg. JNŠ 1v – cf. the modern name Lùkas (LVKŽ 255); 1617 Lukaf JNŠ 208v – cf. the modern name Lukóšius (LVKŽ 255); 1621 Marcin JNŠ 63; 1599 Martini gen. sg. JNŠ 1v; 1617 Martins JNŠ 205; 1617 Martinus JNŠ 204v – cf. the modern name Martýnas (LVKŽ 264–265); 1620 Marek JNŠ 242 – cf. the modern name Mórkus (LVKŽ 279); 1599 Mathieum JNŠ 2v; 1599 Mathiæ gen. sg. JNŠ 2; 1599 Motieaus gen. sg. JNŠ 4 – cf. the modern name Motiejus (LVKŽ 279–280); 1621 Mikolai JNŠ 267v; 1618 Mikolay JNŠ 215; 1618 Mikolay JNŠ 221; 1619 Mikolay JNŠ 233; 1617 Mikolaj JNŠ 199v; 1600 Nicolai JNŠ 10; 1601 Nicolaus JNŠ 25 – cf. the modern name Mikalõjus (LVKŽ 270); 1601 Paulus JNŠ 22v – cf. the modern name Paulius (LVKŽ 298); 1606 Pawel JNŠ 86v; 1617 Pawel JNŠ 207v; 1617 Pawlos JNŠ 202; 1599 Powis JNŠ 4 – cf. the modern name Póvilas (LVKŽ 4); 1599 Petri gen. sg. JNŠ 1v; 1617 Petros JNŠ 197v; 1601 Petrus JNŠ 22v; 1617 Petrus JNŠ 195v; 1617 Piotr JNŠ 205v; 1620 Piotr JNŠ 257v – cf. the modern name Pẽtras (LVKŽ 299); 1602 Sebaftianus JNŠ 33v; 1617 Sebestian JNŠ 197v – cf. the modern name Sebastijõnas (LVKŽ 25); 1621 Simon JNŠ 268; 1600 Simonis JNŠ 10v – cf. the modern name Sìmonas (LVKŽ 29); 1599 Stanislaus JNŠ 1; 1600 Stanisla[u]s JNŠ 9; 1620 Stanislaw JNŠ 242; 1617 Stanislaw JNŠ 204; 1617 Stanifław JNŠ 206 – cf. the modern name Stanislovas (LVKŽ 335); 1600 Stephanus JNŠ 10 – cf. the modern name Štéponas (LVKŽ 36); 1621 Tomaf JNŠ 266 – cf. the modern name Tamõšius (LVKŽ 341); 1617 Vrbanes JNŠ 200v – cf. the modern name Ùrbonas (LVKŽ 200v); 1601 Valentini JNŠ 20; 1599 Valentinum JNŠ 4; 1600 Valentinus JNŠ 8 – cf. the modern name Valentinas (LVKŽ 363); 1620 Wenslaw JNŠ 254v – cf. the modern name Václovas (LVKŽ 355); 1621 Woiciech JNŠ 267; 1619 Woyciech JNŠ 232v – cf. the modern name Vaitiekus (LVKŽ 361). Several abbreviations of canonical baptismal names were observed, e.g.: 1601 Genis JNŠ 19v – cf. the modern name Gẽnis (LVKŽ 174) < Eugenijus (LVKŽ 153); 1619 Grig JNŠ 235v; 1617 Gryg JNŠ 207; 1617 Grygas JNŠ 204; 1617 Gryg JNŠ 201v – cf. the modern name Grìgas (LVKŽ 188) < Grigãlius (LVKŽ 188); 1599 Stasus JNŠ 2 – cf. the modern name Stãsis (LVKŽ 335) < Stanislovas (LVKŽ 335); 1621 Walenti JNŠ 268; 1618 Walenty JNŠ 214 – cf. the modern names Vá l entas, Valentas (LVKŽ 363). There were occasional forms of diminutive names derived from abbreviations of Christian names, e.g.: 1599 Banulis JNŠ 4v – cf. the modern names Bãnis, Banỹs (LVKŽ 95) < Benediktas (LVKŽ 95); 1601 Matulis JNŠ 28v – cf. the modern name Mãtas (LVKŽ 265) < Motiejus (LVKŽ 279–280); 1617 Mikutis JNŠ 195v – cf. the modern name Mikas (LVKŽ 270) < Mikalõjus (LVKŽ 270); 1602 Valulis JNŠ 38v – cf. the modern name Valỹs (LVKŽ 364) < Valentinas (LVKŽ 363). The second elements of the recorded male naming constructions are personal names with and without suffixes, which are analyzed below from the perspective of word formation. Straipsniai / Articles 181 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ 2. WORD-FORMATION FEATURES OF JONIŠKIS MEN’S ANTHROPONYMS 2.1. The personal names of the people of Joniškis from 1599–1621 are divided into two groups: 1) anthroponyms with the Lithuanian patronymic suffixes -aitis, -ėnas, -(i)onis, -(i)ūnas, -utis5 and the Slavic patronymic suffixes -evič, -ovič, with the suffix -iškis, with the diminutive suffixes -elis, -ulis, -utis, and with Polish-type -sk- suffixes; and 2) anthroponyms without these suffixes. Surnames were thus classified from a word-formation perspective in Vilija Maciejauskienė’s study Kriunų parapijos XVII–XVIII amžiaus antroponimai (Maciejauskienė 1993: 40). This classification was influenced by the specific nature of the word formation of historical anthroponyms. It is argued that only historical personal names, but not historical surnames, can be analyzed down to a morphologically indivisible structure. Similarly, anthroponyms recorded in the early seventeenth-century registers of marriages and baptisms of St John’s Church in Vilnius were analyzed (derivatives formed with endings and suffixes, and compounds were distinguished) (Zinkevičius 197: 235–242). The word formation of the personal names of sixteenth-century Kaunas townspeople was examined according to these principles (Ragauskaitė 2005: 98–101). Daiva Sinkeviūtė likewise assessed anthroponyms from a word-formation perspective (2006: 241–242; 2006a: 342–348; 2009: 348–350; 2016: 24–41; 2018: 119–129; 2018a: 303–325). Studies of the formation of Lithuanian surnames show that all surnames developed from various personal names—patronymics, names of nickname origin, old Lithuanian dithematic and monothematic anthroponyms, and others (Maciejauskienė 1997: 102). Thus surnames also preserve the word-formation features of those personal names. Therefore, surnames should be called primary forms and not treated as derivatives. The suffixes in the structure of surnames are inherited from anthroponyms and should therefore not be called derivational affixes (Žemienė 1999: 225–226; 2002: 12–14; 2017: 167–168; Maciejauskienė 2001: 167–187; Bartkutė 2004: 118; Ragauskaitė 2005: 98–101; 2018: 106). The personal names of the inhabitants of Joniškis from the late sixteenth to the early seventeenth century (the second elements of the two-member naming model) are reconstructed from patronymics and anthroponyms of non-patronymic origin. Their reconstructed forms are marked with an asterisk and listed alphabetically. The anthroponyms on which the reconstructed personal-name form is based are then listed alphabetically by form. Where no exact equivalents could be found in the modern name inventory, several anthroponyms with the corresponding root are provided. In Slavicized personal names, the Slavic patronymic suffixes -evič, -ovič are often written, but it is thought that in the living Lithuanian language they may have 5 Earlier studies of seventeenth-century personal names have provided almost no evidence of the use of this suffix. The suffix -uitis is “called a patronymic suffix. This is also supported, among other things, by its frequent attestation in seventeenth-century personal names from Gruzdžiai” (Maciejauskienė 2010: 820). 182 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darybos tendencijos seniausioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje to use Lithuanian patronymic suffixes (‑aitis, ‑ėnas, ‑onis, ‑ūnas) (Macijauskienė 1994: 25–30; Ragauskaitė 1999: 148–149; 2018a: 59). 2.2. In the 1599–1621 baptismal register of Joniškis parish, 168 personal names of Joniškis residents (men) were in use. Of these, 140 (83%) were assigned to the aforementioned first group. This group is considerably larger. Anthroponyms with suffixes are presented according to suffix productivity: ‑aitis (spelling varies: ‑aitis, ‑aytis, ‑aytis, ‑ajtis, ‑oytis) – 72 personal names (42.85% of all Joniškis anthroponyms), e.g.: *Bakšūnaitis: 1618 Bokʃunay‑tis JNŠ 216. For bakš‑ cf. present-day surnames Bakšà, Bakšáitis, Bakšis, Bakšys, Bakšauskas, Bakševičius (LPŽ I 163; *Baltrušaitis: 1619 Baltrušaitis JNŠ 232v. For baltruš‑ cf. present-day surnames Baltrušà, Baltruškevičius (LPŽ I 181); *Baltušaitis: 1599 Balt{kuʃ}kaia gen. sg. JNŠ 1v – 1617 Botuʃkaitis JNŠ 205. For bal‑tušk‑ cf. present-day surnames Baltušà, Baltuškevičius, Baltušõnis (LPŽ I 182); *Bernotaitis: 1618 Bern{u}tays JNŠ 215v. For bernot‑ cf. present-day surnames Bernotas, Bernotavičius, Bernotėnas, Bernotònis (LPŽ I 240); *Budraitis: 1618 Budratis JNŠ 215; 1617 Budratis JNŠ 195v. Cf. present-day surname Budraitis (LPŽ 329); *Builaitis: 1600 Builaitis JNŠ 9. For buil‑ cf. present-day surnames Būlis, Būlys (LPŽ I 335); *Čepaitis: 1600 Cʒepaitis JNŠ 13v; 1603 Cʒepaitis JNŠ 9. Cf. present-day surname Čepaitis (LPŽ I 410); *Daugilaitis: 1602 Daugilaitis JNŠ 35. Cf. present-day surname Daugilaitis (LPŽ I 470); *Dešrnaitis: 1618 Deʃrnay[tis] JNŠ 215. For dešr‑ cf. present-day surnames Dešrà, Dešraitis, Dešrys, Dešrius (LPŽ I 487); *Grigaitis: 1621 Grigaitis JNŠ 265v, 266v. Cf. present-day surname Grigaitis (LPŽ I 710); *Gudaitis: 1620 Gudaitis JNŠ 254v. Cf. present-day surname Gudaitis (LPŽ I 735); *Jonaitis: 1620 Janaitis JNŠ 242; 1620 Ionaitis JNŠ 248v; 1618 Ionaytis JNŠ 211v, 215v; 1599 Jonaitis JNŠ 1, 3v, 4v – 1600 Jonaitis JNŠ 8v – 1601 Jonaitis JNŠ 19v, 22v – 1617 Jonaitis JNŠ 197v. Cf. present-day surname Jonaitis (LPŽ I 841); *Jonkūnaitis: 1620 Iankunaitis JNŠ 255v. For jonkūn‑ cf. present-day surname Jonkūnas (LPŽ I 843); *Jonulaitis: 1602 Janulaitis JNŠ 38v. Cf. present-day surname Jonulaitis (LPŽ I 844); *Jurgaitis: 1621 Iurgaitis JNŠ 267. Cf. present-day surnames Jūrgaitis, Jūrgaitis, Jurgaitis, Jurgaitis (LPŽ I 866); *Krikštonaitis: 1601 Kriʃtonaytis JNŠ 20. Cf. present-day surname Krikštonaitis (LPŽ I 1076); *Kvederaitis: 1620 Quederaitis JNŠ 254v. Cf. present-day surname Kvederaitis (LPŽ I 1147); *Latvaitis: 1620 Latwaytis JNŠ 254v. Cf. present-day surname Latvaitis (LPŽ II 29); *Macaitis: 1616 Macaitis JNŠ 192. Cf. present-day surname Macaitis (LPŽ II 121); *Martynaitis: 1601 Martynaitis JNŠ 20. Cf. present-day surname Martynaitis (LPŽ II 167); *Matulaitis: 1599 Matulaitis JNŠ 2; 1599 Mothulaitis JNŠ 4. Cf. present-day surname Matulaitis (LPŽ II 183); *Mažutaitis: 1616 Maʒutais JNŠ 192v. For mažut‑ cf. present-day surnames Mažutà, Mažutavičius, Mažutis (LPŽ II 193); *Memeisaitis: 1600 Memeis[a]ia gen. sg. JNŠ 10. For mem‑ cf. present-day surnames Memis, Memys (LPŽ II 208); *Mišutaitis: 1620 Miʃutaitis JNŠ 242. For mišut‑ cf. present-day surname Mišutis (LPŽ II 258); *Nocaitis: 1618 Nocaitis JNŠ 220. For noc‑ cf. present-day surnames Nocys, Nocius Straipsniai / Articles 183 ALMA RAGUSKAITĖ (LPŽ II 331); *Nosutaitis: 1620 Nobutytis ĮNŠ 257v. For nos- cf. present-day surnames Noseckas, Nõselis, Nosėičiùs, Nosỹs (LPŽ II 336, 337); *Pacaitis: 1600 Pacaitis ĮNŠ 10. Cf. present-day surname Pacáitis (LPŽ II 359); *Petraitis: 1620 Petraitis ĮNŠ 252v – 1621 Petraitis ĮNŠ 270; 1617 Petraitis ĮNŠ 202, 208; 1618 Pietraitis ĮNŠ 209v – 1619 Pietraitis ĮNŠ 24. Cf. present-day surname Petráitis (LPŽ II 437); *Petrušaitis: 1618 Pietrubaitis ĮNŠ 210. Cf. present-day surname Petrušis (LPŽ II 444); *Povailaitis: 1621 Povaitis ĮNŠ 260v, 263, 264v. Cf. present-day surnames Póvailaitis, Povílaitis (LPŽ II 496); *Radilaitis: 1617 Radwailaitis ĮNŠ 204. For radil- cf. present-day surnames Radvilà, Ràdila, Radvìlas, Radvilėvičius (LPŽ II 554); *Rapsaitis: 1599 Rapszaicia gen. sg. ĮNŠ 4. For rapš- cf. present-day surname Rapšys (LPŽ II 574); *Rimgailaitis: 1617 Rymgailis ĮNŠ 197v. For rimgail- cf. present-day surname Rimgaila (LPŽ II 609); *Staniulaitis: 1600 Staniulaitis ĮNŠ 8 – 1602 Staniulaitis ĮNŠ 38v – 1621 Staniulaitis ĮNŠ 265v. Cf. present-day surname Staniuláitis (LPŽ II 802); *Strasaitis: 1600 Strasaitis ĮNŠ 10v. For stras- cf. present-day surname Strasėvičius (LPŽ II 830); *Šlupaitis: 1620 Słupaitis ĮNŠ 250v. For šlup- cf. present-day surname Šlùpas (LPŽ II 957); *Trumpaitis: 1621 Trumpaitis ĮNŠ 268. Cf. present-day surname Trumpáitis (LPŽ II 1073); *Valentinaitis: 1619 Walentinaitis ĮNŠ 235v. For valentin- cf. present-day surnames Valentinas, Valentinãvičius (LPŽ II 1150). -utis (spelled: -utis, -utys, -uys, -ujis) – 25 anthroponyms (14.60%), e.g.: *Byvainis: 1617 Biwoynis ĮNŠ 206. For byvain- cf. present-day surnames Byvainis, Byvainis (LPŽ I 269); *Buškutis: 1617 Buszkutis ĮNŠ 201v. For bušk- cf. present-day surnames Buška, Buškas, Buškevičius, Buškus (LPŽ I 363); *Celkutis: 1618 Celkuytis ĮNŠ 221v. For celk- cf. present-day surnames Celka, Celkavičius, Celkys, Celkėnas, Celkovskas (LPŽ I 377); *Dagutis: 1618 Dogutis ĮNŠ 214. For dag- cf. present-day surnames Dãgis, Dagỹs (LPŽ I 444); *Gabrutis: 1601 Gabritis ĮNŠ 25. For gabr- cf. present-day surname Gabráitis (LPŽ I 601); *Jonulutis: 1620 Ianulutis ĮNŠ 248v. For jonul- cf. present-day surname Jonuláitis (LPŽ I 844); *Karputis: 1616 karputis ĮNŠ 189. For karp- cf. present-day surname Karpáitis (LPŽ I 931); *Kezutis: 1602 Kezuitis ĮNŠ 36v. For kez- cf. present-day surnames Kezis, Kezys, Kežùnas (LPŽ I 982); *Kragutis: 1599 Kragitis ĮNŠ 2v – 1602 Kragitis ĮNŠ 35. For krag- cf. present-day surname Krãgas (LPŽ I 1062); *Kurapkutis: 1602 Kurapkuitis ĮNŠ 33v. For kurapk- cf. present-day surname Kurapkáitis (LPŽ I 1131); *Lasutis: 1621 Lasutis ĮNŠ 267v. For las- cf. present-day surnames Lasáuskas, Lasãvičius, Lasis, Lasỹs (LPŽ II 25); *Latvutis: 1617 Latwujtis ĮNŠ 196. For latv- cf. present-day surname Latvėnas (LPŽ II 29); *Mekutis: 1617 Mekutis ĮNŠ 197v. For mek- cf. present-day surnames Mėkas, Mėkelis (LPŽ II 203); *Petelutis: 1620 Petutis ĮNŠ 259. For petel- cf. present-day surname Petelis (LPŽ II 434); *Pūkutis: 1617 Pukuitis ĮNŠ 208v. For pūk- cf. present-day surname Pūkais (LPŽ II 527); *Radvilutis: 1621 Radwuilutis ĮNŠ 266. For radvil- cf. present-day surnames Radvilà, Ràdila, Radvìlas, Radvilėvičius (LPŽ II 554); *Rugutis: 1617 Rugutis ĮNŠ 204v. For rug- cf. present-day surname Rugáitis 184 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbos tendencijos senosioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje (LPŽ II 633); *Slekutis: 1617 slekutis JNŠ 201v. Regarding slėk-, compare the contemporary surname Slėkas (LPŽ II 763); *Šukuitis: 1621 šukuitis JNŠ 265; 1617 Šukuitis JNŠ 206v. Regarding šuk-, compare the contemporary surname Šukaitis (LPŽ II 986); *Trasuitis: 1621 Trafuitis JNŠ 262v. Regarding tras-, compare the contemporary surname Trasaitis (LPŽ II 1062). –inas (written: –(i)un, –(i)unas, –(i)uns, –un, –unos, –uonis) – 15 personal names (8.92%), e.g.: *Bartkūnas: 1599 Bartkūns JNŠ 4. Compare the contemporary surname Bartkūnas (LPŽ I 204); *Berčiūnas: 1606 berčiuņas JNŠ 86v. Compare the contemporary surname Berčiūnas (LPŽ I 235); *Ginkūnas: 1601 Ginkuns JNŠ 28v. Regarding gink-, compare the contemporary surname Ginkus (LPŽ I 671); *Gumbiūnas: 1619 Gumbun JNŠ 233. Regarding gumb-, compare the contemporary surnames Gūmbelis, Gūmbinas, Gūmis (LPŽ I 742); *Jonkūnas: 1621 Iankun JNŠ 263. Compare the contemporary surname Jonkūnas (LPŽ I 843); *Laukūnas: 1621 Laukun JNŠ 268. Regarding lauk-, compare the contemporary surnames Laikis, Laukys (LPŽ II 32); *Mikalojūnas: 1619 Mikaloįuns JNŠ 232. Compare the contemporary surname Mikalojūnas (LPŽ II 227); *Norkūnas: 1617 Norkūns JNŠ 204. Compare the contemporary surname Norkūnas (LPŽ II 334); *Pociūnas: 1600 Pocuns JNŠ 10. Compare the contemporary surname Pociūnas (LPŽ II 483); *Rašiūnas: 1619 Rasçun JNŠ 233. Regarding raš-, compare the contemporary surnames Raščs, Raščus (LPŽ II 578); *Rimkūnas: 1618 Rymkun JNŠ 222. Compare the contemporary surname Rimkūnas (LPŽ II 610); *Stankūnas: 1617 Stankuns JNŠ 197v. Compare the contemporary surname Stankūnas (LPŽ II 804); *Tamošiūnas: 1600 Thomošuns JNŠ 10v. Compare the contemporary surname Tamošiūnas (LPŽ II 1016); *Vaitkūnas: 1621 watkun JNŠ 269v. Compare the contemporary surname Vaitkūnas (LPŽ II 1141); *Venckūnas: 1617 wenckuns JNŠ 198v. Compare the contemporary surname Venckūnas (LPŽ II 1187). –eiv (written –(i)ewic) – 7 personal names (4.16%), e.g.: 1617 Ianuiewicz JNŠ 205v, 1617 Mikoliewicz JNŠ 204v, 1621 Paulkiewicz JNŠ 264, 1618 Pruniewicz JNŠ 215, 1618 Zemeyewicz JNŠ 221. –ovič (written: –(i)owicz, –(i)owicz) – 7 anthroponyms (4.16%), e.g.: 1618 Bunowicz JNŠ 215v, 1621 Czapowicz JNŠ 264v, 1620 Marc{ib}owicz JNŠ 247v, 1618 marcinowicz JNŠ 216, 1617 Mikuciowicz JNŠ 196, 1618 Narutowicz JNŠ 221v, 1617 piotrowicz JNŠ 200. –enas (written –(i)en) – 1 personal name (0.59%), e.g.: *Šinkėnas: 1599 Szin-kiena gen. sg. JNŠ 1v. Regarding šink-, compare the contemporary surnames Šinka, Šinkas, Šinkauskas, Šinko-nis (LPŽ II 934). –onis (written –on) – 1 anthroponym (0.59%), e.g.: *Sidaugonis: 1600 Sidaugonia gen. sg. JNŠ 10v. Regarding sidaug-, compare the contemporary surname Sidauga (LPŽ II 709). Studies of Lithuanian historical anthroponyms have shown that derivatives with the Lithuanian patronymic suffixes –aitis, –ėnas, –onis, –ūnas have defined areas of usage (Salys 1933: 169; Maciejauskienė 1977: 161–163; 1991: 242; Ragauskaitė 2014: 330). This confirms the conclusions of an earlier study of the 17th century, namely that “the greatest concentration of derivatives with the suffix –aitis is observed in Samogitia and Western Aukštaitija, although personal names formed with it have also been recorded in various other parts of Lithuania” (Maciejauskienė 1991: 242). Straipsniai / Articles 185 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ At least 4 personal names in this group have diminutive suffixes. It is claimed that “diminutives were sometimes also used as patronymics” (Zinkevičius 1977: 238). Thus, these suffixes may also have a patronymic meaning (Maciejauskienė 1991: 227; 1993: 43; Ragauskaitė 2005: 100–101). They are presented according to the frequency of the derivatives: -(i)ulis (written -(i)ulis) – 2 anthroponyms (1.19%), e.g.: *Aidulis: 1600 Aidulis JNŠ 13v. Compare the contemporary surname Aidùlis (LPŽ I 69); *Geniulis: 1600 Geniulis JNŠ 14. Regarding gen-, compare the contemporary surnames Genònis, Genis, Genỹs, Geniūnas, Geniùs (LPŽ I 652). -utis (written -utis) – 2 personal names (1.19%), e.g.: *Mikutis: 1620 Mi- kutis JNŠ 25v. Compare the contemporary surname Mikutis (LPŽ II 236); *Pramutis: 1599 Pramutis JNŠ 1v. A surname of this origin is no longer in use. -elis (written -(i)elis) – 1 personal name (0.59%): *Žiogelis: 1616 Žiogelis JNŠ 19v. Compare the contemporary surnames Žiogelis, Žiogelis, Žiogelis (LPŽ II 1337). Four (2.38%) personal names with the suffix –iškis were found (written: -isk, -isk, -iszk, -iszkis), e.g.: *Jukìškis: 1600 Jukiszkia gen. sg. JNŠ 16. Regarding juk-, compare the contemporary surnames Jukãvičius, Jùkelis, Jukėnas, Jukẽvičius (LPŽ I 852); *Magerkiškis: 1620 Magerkiskis JNŠ 24. A surname of this origin is no longer in use; *Mikiškis: 1617 Mikiskis JNŠ 197v. Regarding mik-, compare the contemporary surnames Mikus, Mikỹs (LPŽ II 228, 229); *Pūkiškis: 1621 Pukisk JNŠ 268. Regarding pūk-, compare the contemporary surname Pūkus (LPŽ II 528). This suffix may also have performed a patronymic function if its derivative comes from another anthroponym (Zinkevičius 1977: 241; Maciejauskienė 1991: 228). Applying the principles discussed above, 92 distinct personal names of Joniškis residents with Lithuanian suffixes were first reconstructed from the 123 anthroponyms attested in the source. Three (1.78%) personal names bearing a suffix of the -sk- type were counted. These are: 1620 Krupskỹ JNŠ 253v, 1600 Sotowski JNŠ 16, 1617 Wierzbicki JNŠ 200. It is believed that the -sk- type suffix was sometimes replaced by the patronymic suffix -ovič. Some of these occupational names may have been borrowed, while others may have been formed locally from place names or arisen in some other way (Zinkevičius 1977: 57, 63). 2.3. Another group of anthroponyms recorded in the source is of non-patronymic origin. Only 28 (17%) were counted. This group comprises compound words and derivatives formed with endings. Fifteen forms of proper names in this group were discussed, out of the 17 personal names with Lithuanian derivational formatives recorded in the source. These are: *Balčius: 1601 Balčius JNŠ 22v. Compare the contemporary surname Balčius (LPŽ I 170); *Čebatorius: 1617 C₃obator{o}š JNŠ 199. Compare the contemporary surname Čebatorius (LPŽ I 403); *Dičkus: 1600 Dicuf JNŠ 8v; 1604 Diczaus gen. sg. JNŠ 48. Compare the contemporary surname Dičkus (LPŽ I 490); *Eigridas: 1617 Eigeri JNŠ 201v. Compare the contemporary surname Eigridas (LPŽ I 565); *Gulbė: 1617 Gulbe JNŠ 204. Compare the contemporary surname Gulbė (LPŽ I 740); *Kriaucius: 1599 Kraucius JNŠ 1v. Regarding kriauč-, compare the contemporary surnames Kriaučelis, Kriaučiavičius, Kriaučionis, Kriaučiukas, Kriaučiūnas (LPŽ I 1073); *Kubilius: 1621 Cubilus JNŠ 262; 1620 Kubilus JNŠ 255v. Compare the contemporary surname Kubilus (LPŽ I 1097–1098); 186 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbo tendencijos senocioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje *Milydis: 1617 Mielydis JNŠ 207. Cf. the surname with the stem milyd- in the plural form Mīlydas, Mīlydas, Milydas (LPŽ II 246); *Skurka: 1600 Skurka JNŠ 10. Cf. the surname with the stem Skūka (LPŽ II 756); *Šapnაგis: 1599 Šapnagis JNŠ 2. Cf. the surnames Šapnagis, Šapnagas (LPŽ II 887); *Tūnas: 1602 Tumas JNŠ 34v. Cf. the surname Tūmas (LPŽ II 1081); *Zavalka: 1617 Zaułka JNŠ 195v. For the stem zavalk-, cf. the surnames Zavadaitis, Zavadaukas, Žaivis (LPŽ II 1278), etc. 2.4. After examining the personal names of Joniškis residents from the late 16th and early 17th centuries from the perspective of their formation, their reconstructed forms were also compared with present-day Lithuanian surnames. It emerged that 43 (40%) are still in use today. A further 51 anthroponyms (48% of all those reconstructed) have present-day surname equivalents of the same origin but different formation. The remaining 13 (12%) reconstructed personal names have no equivalent in the present-day Lithuanian name stock: *Dovikaitis (JNŠ 2v), *Gednavais (JNŠ 200v), *Gupeluitis (JNŠ 263), *Kepetis (JNŠ 267v), *Magerkis (JNŠ 242), *Paginais (JNŠ 25), *Pramūtis (JNŠ 1v), *Skiurbaitis (JNŠ 266), *Sliudutis (JNŠ 254v), *Sliuna (JNŠ 22v), *Vilnakis (JNŠ 270v), *Zaltra (JNŠ 268), *Žaudaitis (JNŠ 206). 3. CONCLUSIONS 1. A total of 168 compound designations of Joniškis men were selected from the 1599–1621 Joniškis baptismal register. Their first members are Christian names. Various forms were used (full traditional forms, abbreviations, and their diminutive derivatives). 2. The 168 personal names examined (the second members of the two-member naming model) were divided into two groups: 1) anthroponyms with the Lithuanian patronymic suffixes -aitis, -ėnas, -(i)onis, -(i)ūnas, and -utis and the Slavic suffixes -evič and -ovič; those with the suffix -iškis; those with the diminutive suffixes -elis, -ulis, and -utis; and those with Polish-type suffixes in -sk-; and 2) anthroponyms without these suffixes. 3. The first group is considerably larger. It consists of 140 anthroponyms (83% of all second personal names). Patronymic derivatives with the suffixes -aitis (72, i.e. 42.85%) and -utis (25, i.e. 14.60%) are the most frequent among them. The second group comprises 28 personal names (17%). 4. A comparison of 107 reconstructed personal-name forms with present-day Lithuanian surnames showed that 43 (40%) are still in use today. A larger share, namely 51 (48% of all reconstructed forms), have present-day surname equivalents of the same origin but different formation. The remaining 13 (12%) are absent from the present-day name stock. Straipsniai / Articles 187 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ APPENDICES Fig. 1. Fragment from 1599 of the 1599–1621 Joniškis baptism register book (3 l.) 188 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darybos tendencijos seniausioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje Fig. 2. Fragment from 1600 of the 1599–1621 Joniškis baptism register book (6 1.) Straipsniai / Articles 189 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ Fig. 3. Fragment from 1618 of the 159–1621 Joniškis baptism register book (220v l.) 190 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbo tendencijos senosiose Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje SOURCE JÑS – Joniškis baptism register book, 1599–1621 (Liber Baptisarum || Ecclesiæ Parochialis Jani=||scensis ab Anno 1599. – || usque ad Annum || 1621. –). Lithuanian State Historical Archives, f. 1196, ap. 1, b. 76. LITERATŪRA Bartkutė Nerija 2004: Tikrinių daiktavardžių – vietovardžių ir asmenvardžių darybos reikšmė. – Onomastica Letica 2, 105–126. Garliauskas Vidas 1998: Lietuviškos oikonimų lytys nelietuviškuose XVI–XIX a. šaltiniuose. – Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 40, 123–204. Garliauskas Vidas 2004: XVI a. Molėtų bažnyčios krikšto ir santuokos metrikų knyga. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos institutas. Garliauskas Vidas 2010: Bažnyčių metrikų knygos Europos šalyse. – Gimtoji kalba 8, 3–12. Garliauskas Vidas 2012: Lietuvos katalikų bažnyčios metrikų knygų tyrimų gairės. – Atminties institucijų rinkiniai. Bibliotheca Lituana 2, sud. Arvydas Pacevičius. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 67–105. Garliauskas Vidas 2016: Senoji Joniškio bažnyčios metrikų knyga Europos ir Lietuvos kontekste. – Joniškio krašto kalendorius. Joniškis: Joniškio istorijos ir kultūros muziejus, 17. LKD – Lietuvos katalikų dvasininkai XIV–XVI a. Bažnyčios istorijos studijos 2, aut. Vytautas Ališauskas, Tomas Jaszczołt, Liudas Jovaiša, Mindaugas Paknys. Vilnius: Aidai, 2009. LPŽ I–II – Lietuvių pavardžių žodynas 1–2, aut. Vitalija Maciejauskienė, Marija Razmukaitė, Aleksandras Vanagas, ats. red. Aleksandras Vanagas. Vilnius: Mokslas, 1985–1989. LVKŽ – Lietuvių vardų kilmės žodynas, aut. Kazys Kuzavinis, Bronys Savukynas. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla, 1994. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 1977: Lietuvių asmenvardžių priesagų paplitimas XVII a. – Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 17, 159–168. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 1991: Lietuvių pavardžių sudarymas XIII–XVIII a. Vilnius: Mokslas. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 1993: Krikštų papijos XVII–XVIII a. asmenvardžiai. – Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 32: Baltų onomastikos tyrinėjimai, 34–99. Straipsniai / Articles 191 ALMA RAGUSKAITĖ Maciejauskienė Vitalija 1994: Lietuvių pavardės: raida ir kilmė (habilitacinis darbas). Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 1997: Dėl lietuvių pavardžių (asmenvardžių klasifikavimo). – Baltistica 32(1), 101–109. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 2001: Dėl lietuvių pavardžių vertinimo darybos požiūriu. – Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai / Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 44, 167–187. Maciejauskienė Vitalija 2010: Gruzdžių pavardės: istorija ir dabartis. – Gruzdžiai 2. Vilnius: Versmė, 818–844. Raguskaitė Alma 1999: XVI a. II pusės Kauno miestiečių lietuviškos kilmės asmenvardžiai. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 41, 145–158. Raguskaitė Alma 2000: XVII a. pirmosios pusės Kauno miestiečių asmenvardžių kilmė. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 43, 93–110. Raguskaitė Alma 2001: Kauno miestiečių pavardžių formavimasis XVI–XVII a. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 45, 123–143. Raguskaitė Alma 2002: XVII–XVIII amžių kauniečių (vyrų) pavardžių variantai. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbotyros klausimai 47, 31–40. Raguskaitė Alma 2003: XVI–XVII a. kauniečių moterų asmenvardžių daryba. – Vārds un tā pētišanas aspekti. Rāstu krājums 7, 82–92. Raguskaitė Alma 2005: XVI–XVII a. kauniečių asmenvardžiai. Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos instituto leidykla. Raguskaitė Alma 2006: Vietovardinės kilmės asmenvardžiai ir pravardžiai XVI a. Kauno aktų knygose. – Baltu filoloģija 15(1/2), 81–94. Raguskaitė Alma 2009: Kada susidarė kauniečių pavardės? – Kalba ir žmonės. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 226–232. Raguskaitė Alma 2014: Lietuvoje sudarytas rankraštinis tikrinių vardų registras (apie 1840–1843). – Archivum Lithuanicum 16, 323–340. Raguskaitė Alma 2014a: Kauno moterų asmenvardžiai XVI–XVII a. lietuvių istorinės antroponimijos kontekste. – Kauno istorijos metraštis 14, 7–17 Raguskaitė Alma 2015: Senosios Lietuvoje 159–1621 metų Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygos joniškiečių moterų asmenvardžiai lietuvių istorinės antroponimijos kontekste. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 73, 55–81. Raguskaitė Alma 2016: Iš Joniškio parapijos senojo vardo – moterų pavardės. – Joniškio krašto kalendorius. Joniškis: Joniškio istorijos ir kultūros muziejus, 64–65. 192 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX Joniškiečių vyrų asmenvardžių darbos tendencijos seniausioje Lietuvoje 1599–1621 m. Joniškio krikšto metrikų knygoje Ragauskaitė Alma 2018: XVII a. kėdainiečių asmenvardžių darbos tendencijos. – Baltų filologija 27, 101–118. Ragauskaitė Alma 2018a: XVII a. kėdainiečių lietuviškos kilmės asmenvardžiai. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 78, 53–75. Ragauskaitė Alma 2019: Iš Joniškio parapijos senojo vardyno: pravardinės kilmės pavardės. – Joniškio krašto kalendorius. Joniškis: Joniškio istorijos ir kultūros muziejus, 25–26. Ragauskaitė Alma 2019a: Iš Joniškio parapijos istorinio vardyno: lietuvių senieji dv kamieniai asmenvardžiai. – Joniškio krašto kalendorius. Joniškis: Joniškio istorijos ir kultūros muziejus, 57. Ragauskaitė Alma 2019b: Iš Joniškio parapijos istorinio vardyno: lietuvių senųjų dv kamienių asmenvardžių trumpiniai. – Joniškio krašto kalendorius. Joniškis: Joniškio istorijos ir kultūros muziejus, 81–82. Salys Antanas 1933: Asmenvardžiai. – Lietuviškoji enciklopedija 1. Kaunas: Spudos fondas, 1266–1270. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2006: Lietuvių dv kamienių asmenvardžių trumpiniai ir jų kilmės pavadės. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2006a: Dv kamienių vardų trumpinių paveldas vilniškių areale. – Baltistica 41(2), 341–342. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2009: Pastabos dėl žemaičių trumpinių kilmės pavardžių, kilusių iš vnd. Gedimas. – Baltistica 44(2), 347–353. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2016: Lietuvių dv kamienių vardų trumpinių kilmės asmenvardžiai ir jų kamienų užrašymo ypatybės Vilniaus naujųjų miestiečių ir laiduotojų 1661–1795 metų sąraše. – Archivum Lithuanicum 18, 221–254. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2018: Nežinomi Lietuvos Metrikos senieji lietuvių dv kamieniai asmenvardžiai. – Baltistica 53(1), 117–132. Sinkevičienė Daiva 2018a: Nežinomi Lietuvos Metrikos dv kamieniai asmenvardžiai su pirmaisiais apeliatyviniais dėmenimis. – Baltistica 53(2), 303–325. Zinkevičius Zigmas 1977: Lietuvių antroponimika. Vilniaus lietuvių asmenvardžiai XVII a. pradžioje. Vilnius: Mokslas. Žemienė Aušra 1999: Ragainės apskrities XVIII a. pab. – XIX a. pr. vyrų pavardžių darba. – Acta Linguistica Lithuanica / Lietuvių kalbos klausimai 41, 223–231. Žemienė Aušra 2002: XVIII–XIX a. Ragainės apskrities lietuvininkų pavardžių kilmė. Daktaro disertacijos santrauka. Vilnius: Vilniaus pedagoginis universitetas. Straipsniai / Articles 193 ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ Žemienė Aušra 2017: Mažosios Lietuvos asmenvardžiai (XVII–XIX a.). Vilnius: Technika. Žilys Saulius 2012: Bažnyčių metrikų knygos ir parapijiečių sąrašai Lietuvos mokslų akademijos Vrublevskių bibliotekos Rankraščių skyriuje: kilmė ir konfesiniai ypatumai. – Atminties institucijų rinkiniai. Bibliotheca Lituana 2, sud. Arvydas Pacevičius. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla, 123–154. Tendencies of Formation of Joniškis Male Personal Names in Lithuania’s Oldest Joniškis Baptism Record Book of 1599–1621 SUMMARY The article addresses 168 personal names of Joniškis male residents (second components of the binary name model) collected from the Joniškis baptism record book of 1599–1621 from the perspective of word-formation. Cristian names are used as the first components of this type of naming. Their various forms are recorded in the source (long canonical, abreviations and diminutive names). A total of 168 second anthroponyms selected for the analysis were divided into two groups: 1) personal names with the Lithuanian -aitis, -ėnas, -(i)onis, -(i)ūnas, -utis and Slavic -evič, -ovič patronymic suffixes, the suffix -iškis, the diminutive suffixes -elis, -(i)ulis, -utis and the Polish -sk- type suffixes and 2) personal names without these suffixes. The first group is far larger. It includes 140 (83% of all the second anthroponyms) personal names. They are dominated by anthroponyms with patronymic suffixes -aitis (72, i.e. 42.85%) and -utis (25, i.e. 14.60%). The second group is comprised of 28 (17%) personal names. After comparing 107 forms of reconstructed anthroponyms with contemporary Lithuanian surnames, it was observed that 43 (40%) of them are still known today. A greater part, i.e. 51 (48% of all the reconstructed forms), have the equivalents of the same origin but different word-formation among present-day surnames. The remaining 13 (12%) are no longer found among contemporary surnames. Įteikta 2019 m. gegužės 15 d. ALMA RAGAUSKAITĖ Lietuvių kalbos institutas Petro Vileišio g. 5, LT-10308 Vilnius, Lietuva [email protected] 194 Acta Linguistica Lithuanica LXX