Testicular Germ Cell Tumours and Proprotein Convertases

  Citation: Velado-Eguskiza, A.; Gomez-Santos, L.; Badiola, I.; Sáez, F.J.; Alonso, E. Testicular Germ Cell Tumours and Proprotein Convertases. Cancers 2022,14, 1633. https:// doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071633 Academic Editor: Dominik T. Schneider Received: 27 January 2022 Accepted: 10 March 2022 Published: 23 March 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). cancers Review Testicular Germ Cell Tumours and Proprotein Convertases Aitziber Velado-Eguskiza 1, Laura Gomez-Santos 1, Iker Badiola 1,2, Francisco JoséSáez 1 and Edurne Alonso 3,* 1Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain; [email protected] (A.V.-E.); [email protected] (L.G.-S.); iker[email protected] (I.B.); [email protected] (F.J.S.) 2Nanokide Therapeutics SL, 48940 Leioa, Spain 3Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-945-013-029 Simple Summary: Despite the high survival rate of the most common neoplasia in young Caucasian men: Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (TGCT), the quality of life of these patients is impaired by the multiple long-term side effects of their treatment. The study of molecules that can serve both as diagnostic biomarkers for tumor development and as therapeutic targets seems necessary. Proprotein convertases (PC) are a group of proteases responsible for the maturation of inactive proproteins with very diverse functions, whose alterations in expression have been associated with various diseases, such as other types of cancer and inflammation. The study of the immune tumor microenvironment and the substrates of PCs could contribute to the development of new and necessary immunotherapies to treat this pathology. Abstract: Testicular Germ Cell Tumours (TGCT) are widely considered a “curable cancer” due to their exceptionally high survival rate, even if it is reduced by many years after the diagnosis due to metastases and relapses. The most common therapeutic approach to TGCTs has not changed in the last 50 years despite its multiple long-term side effects, and because it is the most common malignancy in young Caucasian men, much research is needed to better the quality of life of the many survivors. Proprotein Convertases (PC) are nine serine proteases responsible for the maturation of inactive proproteins with many diverse functions. Alterations in their expression have been associated with various diseases, including cancer and inflammation. Many of their substrates are adhesion molecules, metalloproteases and proinflammatory molecules, all of which are involved in tumour development. Inhibition of certain convertases has also been shown to slow tumour formation, demonstrating their involvement in this process. Considering the very established link between PCs and inflammation-related malignancies and the recent studies carried out into the immune microenvironment of TGCTs, the study of the involvement of PCs in testicular cancer may open up avenues for being both a biomarker for diagnosis and a therapeutic target. Keywords: testicular cancer; Testicular Germ Cell Tumours (TGCT); seminoma; spermatogenesis; Proprotein Convertases (PCs) 1. Introduction Testicular Germ Cell Tumours (TGCTs) have been of historic relevance for various reasons. Ninety percent of patients diagnosed with metastatic TGCT in 1946 died within a year. Now, however, that statistic has been reversed and the vast majority of patients are cured [ 1 , 2 ]. As a result, TGCT has been proposed as a potential model to find a therapy for the rest of the cancer types [ 3 ]. In fact, TGCT tumours played an invaluable role in the establishment of cancer as a stem cell disease. Perhaps because of the aforementioned survival rate, no one has developed better drugs for the treatment of these disorders Cancers 2022,14, 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14071633 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Cancers 2022,14, 1633 2 of 19 since the 1970s, even though the most used therapeutic strategies have harmful long term consequences [4,5]. Regardless, there is currently an active push for more research regarding TGCTs to minimize the harmful effect this disease family has on the lives of young men all over the world and that is reflected with the publication of several review papers around that general topic [ 6 , 7 ]. In this review, we also aim to explore the current status of TGCTs in a molecular and clinical setting. We propose to approach the proprotein convertase (PC) family as possible molecules of interest in this disease, since both subjects may be linked to a proinflammatory tumour microenvironment (TME). 2. Testicular Germ-Cell Tumours (TGCT) Germ Cell Tumours (GCTs) originate from germ cells, usually in the gonads (testes and ovaries), but they can also be found elsewhere in the central nervous system, pelvis, thorax, abdomen and mediastinum [ 8 ]. TGCTs are the second most common form of Germ Cell Tumour after benign ovarian teratomas and account for more than 90% of neoplasms found in testicles [ 8 , 9 ]. Their incidence has been on the rise since the 1970s, and even though they have an extremely high survival rate, it shrinks considerably by 30 years after the diagnosis, due to metastases and relapses (15–30% of patients) [ 10 – 13 ]. Taking that into consideration, it is important to study these tumours and understand their development as well as the best clinical paths for their treatment. The different types of TGCTs have usually been classified following morphological criteria into two categories: seminomas and non-seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours (NSGCTs). Of those two, NSGCTs are less common but more aggressive and heterogeneous. They are categorised into four histological types: embryonal carcinoma, yolk-sac carcinoma, choriocarcinoma and teratoma; most tumours present more than one cell category, making them harder to treat. Analysing TGCT incidence by age, two different spikes can be identified (Figure 1). The first peak is in patients aged 25–29 years old, even though these demographical groups have a higher incidence of other malignancies as well. That first peak is due to nonseminomas, mainly yolk-sac tumours and teratomas. The second peak is due to seminomas and is observed between 30 and 39 years of age. Furthermore, there is a clear difference of almost 10 years between the peak incidence of non-seminomas and seminomas [8]. Figure 1. Graph depicting TGCT incidence per 1,000,000 by age group and histology using data from the EUROCARE study, published in 2017 by Annalisa Trama and Franco Berrino [8]. 2.1. Tumour Classification An early problem in the study of TGCTs was the different terminology used for their classification by different research groups. Until recently, their classification was morphology-based but it was updated in 2016 by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to reflect the latest studies and the epidemiological similarities or differences between Cancers 2022,14, 1633 3 of 19 certain types of tumours [ 14 ] (Table 1). According to this nomenclature, Testicular Germ Cell Tumours are classified based on their relationship with the germ cell neoplasia In Situ (GCNIS): a group of malignant intratubular germ cells with seminoma-like morphology that appear in the spermatogenic niche and precede most TGCTs. Then, GCTs are classified in two main groups: GCNIS-derived tumours and not GCNIS-derived tumours [14]. Table 1. World Health Organization (WHO) classification of TGCT, adapted [14]. Germ Cell Tumors Derived from Germ Cell Neoplasia In Situ Non-invasive germ cell neoplasia Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) Specific forms of intratubular germ cell neoplasia Tumors of single histological type (pure forms) Seminoma Seminoma with scyncytiotrophoblast cells Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors Embryonal carcinoma Yolk sac tumor, postpubertal-type Trophoblastic tumors Choriocarcinoma Non-choriocarcinomatous trophoblastic tumors Placental site trophoblastic tumor Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor Cystic trophoblastic tumor Teratoma, postpubertal-type Teratoma with somatic-type malignancy Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors of more than one histologycal type Mixed germ cell tumors Germ cell tumors of unknown type Regressed germ cell tumors Germ Cell Tumors Unrelated to GCNIS Spermatocytic tumor Teratoma, prepubertal-type Dermoid cyst Epidermoid cyst Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (monodermal teratoma) Mixed teratoma and yolk sac tumor, prepubertal-type Yolk sac tumor, prepubertal-type The most closely related to GCNIS would be pure seminomas, which maintain the same histology. From there, another type of classification that is often used in clinics arises, which divides tumours into seminomatous or non-seminomatous. This is especially important for treatments because seminoma cells are sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [15–17]. The distinction between morphology and epidemiology-based classifications is most notably seen in the case of teratomas and yolk sac tumours. There is no significant morphological difference between the preand post-pubertal types, but the tumours seen in children more often lack the markers associated with GCNIS that are prevalent in tumours seen after puberty. Therefore, although they were previously considered to be a single disorder, we now know that there are considerable epidemiological and molecular differences [14]. In fact, the most prominent theory on the origin of GCNIS states that there is some kind of tumorigenic event in utero during embryogenesis, which impairs the maturation of primordial stem cells into spermatogonia [ 18 ]. Those cells are identified as GCNIS and remain unchanged until puberty, when alterations in their molecular environment lead to malignancy. GCNIS could be considered as the precursor of most post-pubertal TGCTs and is usually treated as a stage 0 cancer. Cancers 2022,14, 1633 4 of 19 The seminomatous/non-seminomatous nomenclature is still used today and normally differentiates between pure seminoma (seminomatous tumours) and every other type of TGCT (non-seminomatous) [ 19 ]. For the treatment of mixed tumours the nonseminomatous approach has a better prognosis, as these types of cancer present more aggressive characteristics [19]. 2.1.1. Seminoma Seminoma is the most common TGCT, accounting for 50% of all cases beyond puberty [ 9 ]. In fact, this malignancy is fairly uncommon during infancy and in people older than 50 years, even though it continues to be the most common form of TGCT in the latter, as the incidence of the rest of TGCTs decreases further [9,20]. As is the case with all single cell-type tumours, all pure seminoma cells have the same reaction to the therapeutic strategies used on them, with radiotherapy being the most effective. In addition, about 80% of diagnoses are made during stage I, so the survival rate of seminoma patients is exceptionally high [12,21]. However, it is important not to underestimate the severity of seminoma, especially with regard to the long-term effects of the treatments used, both on the physical and mental health of patients. The main challenge for seminoma patients is not to improve survival per se, but to develop sensitive and specific biomarkers to safely identify this less threatening form of cancer and thus avoid the overtreatment of patients, mainly with cisplatin-based chemotherapy [ 22 ]. Given that seminoma patients are often young men, the focus of research should be on preserving their quality of life and reproductive health. 2.1.2. NSGCTs Non-seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours, as mentioned before, are classified into four main histological categories: embryonal carcinoma, yolk-sac tumours, choriocarcinoma, and teratoma. Nevertheless, these tumours do not usually appear in a pure form, and most NSGCTs are mixed cell tumours [ 23 ]. As a consequence, the histological analysis of the primary tumour is of great importance to determine which cell types are present and in what proportion. That information is important for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment selection. Similar to seminoma, 50% of NSGCTs are initially diagnosed as stage I cancer [ 24 ]. In addition, if left untreated, around 30% of patients will relapse due to previously unnoticed metastases to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes [25]. 2.2. Risk Factors Gonad developmental processes and genetic predisposition have been described as key factors associated with TGCT, which explains why they are so common amongst younger people. The main risk factor identified, especially in the case of seminoma, is cryptorchidism (problem with the descent of the testes, leaving one or both of them outside the scrotum). The prevalence of TGCT increases between 3.7and 7.5-fold in these patients; in fact, between 5% and 10% of testicular cancer patients have a history of cryptorchidism [ 26 , 27 ]. This is probably because the testicle is in an unfavourable molecular environment for its development, which can lead to GCNIS [9]. Other prominent risk factors include a previous tumour in the contralateral testicle, especially in the preceding 5 years (24.5to 27.5-fold increase) with a family history of TGCT, which has been linked to various candidate genes, some of which are also related to cryptorchidism [9,28–30]. It has been observed that the cells from GCNIS are really hard to distinguish from germ cells in intersex gonads, which present a delay in their maturation. One theory suggests that these abnormal cells become GCNIS, which would explain why between 25% and 30% of people with gonadal dysgenesis and a Y chromosome develop a GCT [14,31]. Cancers 2022,14, 1633 5 of 19 Lastly, an increased risk of developing a TGCT has also been linked to abnormalities of the germ cell lines that lead to hypofertility and infertility [ 32 , 33 ]. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear whether there is a direct causal relationship or a third element that leads to both impaired fertility and an increased risk of TGCT [34]. A considerable part of TGCTs could be due to environmental factors. In fact, it has been proven that exposure to certain environmental factors during foetal development or early infancy leads to the appearance of GCNIS from gonocytes with impaired maturation, as previously described in people with intersex characteristics [ 35 , 36 ]. The relationship between impaired gonadal development and GCNIS-mediated tumorigenesis is evident, as a lot of these tumours share morphological characteristics like deficient spermatogenesis, tubular shrinking, peritubular sclerosis, immature Sertoli cells, interstitial expansion, hyalinised tubules and microlithiasis [37,38]. In summary, the data suggest that TGCTs are a developmental type of cancer that adheres to a “gene-environment” model, in which there are obvious genetic and epigenetic components that lead to tumorigenesis under the right (or wrong) environmental conditions [39]. 2.3. Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment When a suspicious testicular mass is discovered, the first step is to analyse certain tumoral biomarkers and carry out a trans-scrotal ultrasonography. If the imaging shows a mass that is suspected of being malignant, an inguinal orchiectomy would be carried out for further diagnosis. It is usually recommended not to damage the scrotum during the procedure, as it can lead to complications during treatment, but recent meta-analyses discard these negative effects at least for short-term survival [40,41]. The most common primary therapeutic approach, a radical orchiectomy, is performed when the affected testicle is completely extracted [ 19 ]. That leads to the loss of the entire organ, which is problematic if the contralateral testicle has already been removed or in young patients. Therefore, in certain cases, research groups have proposed partial orchiectomies or testis-sparing surgery (TSS) to minimise endocrine and psychological negative effects and preserve fertility [ 42 ]. TSS is proposed especially in cases of suspected benign tumours and in relapses when the contralateral testicle has already been removed to maintain endocrine function. This practice has been regarded as unnecessary or dangerous due to the risk of relapse compared to radical orchiectomy, but a meta-analysis of multiple studies has shown a relapse rate of only 7.5%, which disappears when adjuvant local radiotherapy is applied (except in radio-resistant teratomas) [41]. If the initial diagnosis was stage I cancer, the same biomarkers investigated at the start of the diagnosis are followed up until normalisation. If levels do not return to normal, some kind of metastasis is confirmed, and the diagnosis shifts to a later stage. Adjuvant therapies are considered depending on the diagnosis and evolution of the serum biomarker. All of the information is taken together, and patients are classified into three main categories of prognosis: good, intermediate or poor. This classification (Table 2) was developed by the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) in 1997 [43]. The most common paths after orchiectomy are the following: active surveillance, systemic therapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Systemic therapeutic strategies like chemotherapy are usually reserved for higher risk cases when there is already metastasis, due to the possibility of further complications for the patients [ 5 ]. RPLND is preferred as the treatment for stage I or II teratomas but is also avoided when possible because of its frequent damaging effects on the reproductive health of the patients [ 44 ]. Multiple studies have been carried out to assess the risks associated with the different therapeutic approaches, and a recent meta-analysis published in 2021 by Pierorazio et al. [ 45 ] summarises these studies and underlines the importance of considering the long-term toxicities when choosing the best path forward from case to case. Cancers 2022,14, 1633 6 of 19 Table 2. TGCT prognosis classification guidelines by the IGCCCG [ 43 ]. The IGCCCG stratifies stage III patients according to three groups: good prognosis, intermediate prognosis, and poor prognosis. AFP: alpha-fetoprotein, hCG: human chorionic gonadotropin, LDH: lactic dehydrogenase and PFS: progression-free survival. GOOD PROGNOSIS Non-seminoma Seminoma Testis/retroperineal primary tumor And No non-pulmonary visceral metastases And Good markers (all of): AFP< 1000 ng/mL hCG< 5000 iu/L (1000 ng/mL) LDH< 1.5 ×upper limit of normal 56% of non-seminomas 5 years PFS 89% 5 year survival 92% Any primary site And No non-pulmonari visceral metastases And Normal AFP, any hCG and any LDH 90% of Seminomas 5 years PFS 82% 5 year survival 86% INTERMEDIATE PROGNOSIS Non-seminoma Seminoma Testis/retroperitoneal primary And No non-pulmonary visceral metastases And Intermediate markers (any of): AFP ≥1000 and ≤10,000 ng/mL hCG ≥5000 iu/L and ≤50,000 iu/L LDH ≥1.5 ×N and ≤10 ×N 28% of non-seminomas 5 years PFS 75% 5 year survival 80% Any primary siite And Non pulmonary visceral metastases And Normal AFP, any hCG, any LDH 10% of seminomas 5 years PFS 67% 5 year survival 72% POOR PROGNOSIS Non-seminoma Seminoma Mediastinal primary Or Non-pulmonary visceral metastases Or Poor markers (any of): AFP > 10,000 ng/mL hCG > 50,000 iu/L (10,000 ng/mL) LDH > 10 ×upper limit of normal 16% of non-seminomas 5 year PFS 41% 5 year survival 48% No patients classified as poor prognosis 2.4. TGCT Molecular Markers Molecular markers are useful to track the progress of the treatments used and distinguish between different types of tumours during the diagnostic process. These can be detected through histological analysis by biopsy and by biochemical tests of blood or urine samples. In the case of TGCT, decisions are made based on the patient’s family history and the presence of a few markers with limited diagnostic and prognostic value which have been the same for decades [ 46 ]. Further study of this field could lead to a finer sorting of patients according to the potential risks of each treatment. In addition, more precise and less aggressive treatments than cisplatin-based chemotherapy could be developed Cancers 2022,14, 1633 7 of 19 because this is the treatment that is widely used today, whose risks and side effects are really negative for the patient [5,22]. 2.4.1. Histological Markers One of the easiest forms of tumour analysis is the study of biopsies. In this way, a sort of snapshot is taken of a section of the tumour at a specific point in time. These sections can be analysed using immunohistochemical tools to look for specific molecules. One of the most searched molecules is the transcription factor OCT 3 4 (also known as POU5F1 and Oct4), which is regarded as one of the key regulators of pluripotency and is specific to primordial germ cells [ 47 , 48 ]. If detected in adult testes, it implies the presence of GCNIS, a seminoma or embryonal carcinoma [47,48]. Ninety per cent of TGCTs across all different types have been observed to present an isochromosome of 12p or i(12p) [ 49 ]. Even in the other 10% of cases, there is usually an excess of genetic material in the p arm of chromosome 12, which implies a relationship between the genes encoded there and TGCT, both of gonadal and extragonadal origin [ 50 ]. Furthermore, this chromosomal anomaly is also present in in situ carcinomas like GCNIS, so it seems to be useful as a biomarker during the first stages of tumorigenesis or even its cause [ 51 ]. In addition, a higher number of copies of i(12p) is connected to more aggressive tumours, so this marker can provide information about both diagnosis and prognosis [ 52 ]. Some genes present in i(12p) that have been observed to appear mutated in different GCT and linked to TGCT development are the oncogene KRAS and the protooncogenes KIT and NRA [53]. Some problems make the use of histological markers in cancer more difficult. First, there is a need for a biopsy, which implies an invasive procedure and at least certain short-term risks. In addition, biopsies only provide information from a certain section of the tumour which, due to tumour heterogeneity, is not always representative of the whole, and from a precise moment in time, which limits their prognostic value. Therefore, the limited biomarker search for TGCT has recently focused on molecules present in blood and plasma, which is considered a non-invasive liquid biopsy. 2.4.2. Blood Plasma Markers Proteins Three main proteins present in blood samples have been used for decades in the diagnosis, prognosis and surveillance of TGCTs: α -fetoprotein (AFP), the β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin ( β -hCG) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) [ 19 ]. When a testicular tumour is suspected, a measurement of these three molecules in the blood of the patient is taken and the changes in those levels are monitored from the very beginning to the end of the treatment to look for possible changes [ 19 ]. Nevertheless, neither of them is specific for TGCT diagnosis so they cannot be considered perfect diagnostic tools. Elevated levels of β -hCG can also indicate a diagnosis of other cancers such as prostate, bladder, urethra or kidney cancers [ 54 ]. In addition, only 5–40% of seminoma tumours are positive for this marker and it does not provide prognostic information [55,56]. Elevated AFP levels are usually linked to NSGCTs [ 19 , 57 ]. In fact, the detection of higher than usual AFP in a cancer previously described as a pure seminoma indicates mixed characteristics overlooked until that point and alters the diagnosis and therapeutic approach accordingly [ 19 ]. However, high levels of AFP have also been observed in hepatocellular carcinomas, cirrhotic livers and patients with hepatitis [57]. LDHvaluesaregenerallyusedtoassesstheprognosisofdisseminatednon-seminomatous tumours before, during and after treatment [ 19 , 58 ]. While roughly half of all advanced testicular cancer patients present higher than average LDH plasma levels, this biomarker is even less specific for testicular cancer than the previous two, so decisions regarding therapeutic approaches are never taken based on it alone [19]. Cancers 2022,14, 1633 8 of 19 Nucleic Acids Studies over the last two decades have sparked an interest over nucleic acid biomarkers in plasma and blood, specifically micro RNA (miRNA) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) [ 46 , 59 ]. ctDNA is genetic material released into the blood stream from tumour cells through necrosis, apoptosis or other biological processes. Recent publications have argued that its analysis would paint a picture of the status of the tumour at a certain point in time and, while other techniques lack analytic value due to tumour heterogeneity, ctDNA could give information about the more aggressive clones [ 46 ]. Moreover, it is quite useful to identify patients with TGCTs even if the usual biomarker levels are normal, either by measuring its blood concentration or analysing its methylation patterns [ 60 ]. Nevertheless, it requires the use of very sophisticated and sensitive technology and a highly skilled technical workforce, which makes it difficult to use in clinical settings. Another type of liquid biopsy would be circulating tumour cells (CTCs), which are separated from the primary tumour during metastasis and enter the blood flow [ 46 ]. A recent publication detected CTCs in 18% of TGCT patients and linked it to a more aggressive illness [ 61 ]. In general, the detection of these could be considered a sign of active metastasis and thus worse prognosis, but its wider application has not been proven yet. Recent findings in this field are related to serum microRNA or miRNA. These are small non-coding RNA molecules of around 22 nucleotides that interact with messenger RNA as a kind of regulation system that takes part in numerous regulatory processes, including malignant transformation [ 62 ]. Like i(12p), miR-371a-3p appears in elevated concentrations in 90% of TGCTs [ 63 ]. This last miRNA molecule is present in blood plasma and its level variations are more representative than AFP and β -hCG variations for TGCT monitoring. Even though it is not a completely specific marker, its representative value increases when combining its analysis with other miRNA molecules [ 64 ]. Other miRNA molecules have been identified as possible markers with diagnostic and prognostic value, as well as being useful to monitor the efficacy of therapies in real time. Plasma levels of miR-371 have been proven to be linked to active malignancy in NSGCT patients that have already undergone chemotherapy [ 65 ]. To maximise their prognostic or diagnostic value, miRNA markers are often analysed in clusters. The serum biomarkers are mainly used in prognosis of TGCTs, but they can be also used for diagnosis. In fact, if these molecules appear in abhorrent concentrations after an orchiectomy, they can indicate previously overlooked metastatic sites [ 66 ]. Furthermore, they allow clinicians to get information without the use of invasive techniques, to paint a moving picture of the development of the disease and guide possible treatment changes. 2.4.3. Recent Discoveries and Future Prospects Several attempts have been made to find possible additions to the classically used marker proteins, e.g., Placental Alkaline Phosphatase (PLAP), TRA-1-60, Neuro-specific Enolase (NSE), Lectin-reactive AFP and N-glycans, but most of them have not been as useful as initially thought, due to high false-positive rates (TRA-1-60 and NSE), elevated levels in smokers (PLAP) or the inability to actually deliver in clinical settings [46]. There has been some progress regarding histological markers, even though these are only useful after orchiectomy. Some examples of that are the chromatin architectural factors of the HMGA family, the transcriptional repressor PATZ, the developmental regulator GPR30 and the cell cycle regulator Aurora B kinase. These have diagnostic value when analysing the histology of the tumours, and GPR30 and Aurora B Kinase are currently being studied in the hope of creating novel therapeutic approaches [67]. Recent in vitro studies show that TR4 transcription factor overexpression could be a useful biomarker for case to case prognosis in pure seminoma [ 68 ]. This molecule is linked to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is a known step in metastatic process, but further studies are needed to validate its usefulness in vivo . However, the most promising field of study in TGCT biomarkers is still that of miRNAs, and multiple groups have focused their research on them. Cancers 2022,14, 1633 9 of 19 The field of study of TGCTs has been underexplored due to its less malignant nature. The further study of possible biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic value would enable clinicians to better assess the benefits of adjuvant therapies against their drawbacks. In fact, offering adjuvant therapies to all stage I testicular cancers would over-treat those who would not develop further disorders (about 70% of them) [ 46 ]. That overtreatment increases the risk of second malignancies, toxicity and cardiovascular disease just in the case of cisplatin-based chemotherapy [ 22 ]. Better stratification of patients could lead to a lower need for radiation imaging techniques, which in turn increase the risk of further malignancies [ 46 ]. Much remains to be studied; considering the connection of TGCTs with faulty spermatogenesis, it could be interesting to learn more about these mechanisms and their molecular basis to search for possible candidate molecules or therapeutic targets. 2.5. Spermatogenesis: Key Points to Consider Before proceeding with the main topic of interest, it is useful to have a brief reminder about the biogenesis of the male gamete, since there are interesting aspects to take into account when assessing the possible molecular targets, both therapeutic and diagnostic, related to testicular cancer. Spermatogenesis takes place in the epithelium of seminiferous tubules with the physical support of Sertoli cells and hormonal support of interstitial Leydig cells. Testosterone production by Leydig cells kick-starts the first division of spermatogonial stem cells. The first meiotic division results into two secondary spermatocytes and the second meiotic division into four round spermatids interwoven by their cytosol and cytoskeletons, because of incomplete cytokinesis. Four round haploid spermatids are transformed in four spermatozoa (the male gamete) in a process called spermiogenesis. It consists of three main events: nucleus compaction, acrosome formation and flagella development. These events are accompanied by a severe structural restructuring, partial cytoplasm removal and mitochondria reorganisation. During this process, the cells move from the base to the lumen of the seminiferous tubule, where the mature spermatids are released. During spermiogenesis, the cytoskeleton plays an important role in the structural reorganisation and biogenesis processes of the acrosome, a pouch-like organelle where the hydrolytic enzymes necessary for the fertilisation of eggs are stored. It results from the fusion of pre-acrosomal vesicles migrating from the trans Golgi network in the anterior region of the nucleus [ 69 ]. The cytoskeleton forms the acrosome-acroplaxome-manchette, a structure that is necessary to transport the pre-acrosomal vesicles to the proximity of the nuclear envelope [ 70 , 71 ]. It is a key structure essential for the reorganisation of the cytoplasm, the structural changes of the nucleus itself and the elongation of the cell [ 71 ]. There are other relevant cytoskeletal structures in spermiogenesis, like the axoneme of the flagellum. All of them are critical to achieve the correct outcome of elongated spermatids; in cases of structural problems, these result in spermatozoid malformations, also known as teratozoospermia [72]. A huge percentage of people suffering from TGCTs had a history of abnormal spermatogenesis [ 73 ]. This implies at least a partial relationship between tumorigenesis and anomalies during spermatogenesis. Preliminary data from our research group in teratospermic mice have shown high levels of PCSK6, an indicator of metastasis risk in various types of cancer. Therefore, there is still a lot to know about spermatogenesis, the molecular pathways that contribute to it and its relation to TGCT development. Considering the lack of specific biomarkers for seminoma, this process could be a good starting point to identify new candidate molecules. 3. Proproteine Convertases (PCs) as Molecular Targets for Testicular Cancer The function of numerous proteins is regulated by intricate mechanisms necessary for the correct functioning of the cell. This includes the post-translational modifications of proteins. With the discovery of proinsulin in 1967, it became clear that some proteins of Cancers 2022,14, 1633 16 of 19 36. Kristensen, D.G.; Nielsen, E.J.; Jorgensen, A.; Skakkebæk, N.E.; Meyts, E.R.-D.; Almstrup, K. Evidence that active demethylation mechanisms maintain the genome of carcinoma in situ cells hypomethylated in the adult testis. Br. J. Cancer 2013 ,110, 668–678. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 37. Hoei-Hansen, C.E.; Meyts, E.R.-D.; Daugaard, G.; Skakkebaek, N.E. Carcinoma in situ testis, the progenitor of testicular germ cell tumours: A clinical review. Ann. Oncol. 2005,16, 863–868. [CrossRef] 38. Hoei-Hansen, E.C.; Holm, M.; Meyts, E.R.; Skakkebaek, E.N. Histological evidence of testicular dysgenesis in contralateral biopsies from 218 patients with testicular germ cell cancer. J. Pathol. 2003,200, 370–374. [CrossRef] 39. Lobo, J.; Gillis, A.J.M.; Jerónimo, C.; Henrique, R.; Looijenga, L.H.J. Human Germ Cell Tumors are Developmental Cancers: Impact of Epigenetics on Pathobiology and Clinic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019,20, 258. [CrossRef] 40. Schmoll, H.-J.; Jordan, K.; Huddart, R.; Pes, M.P.L.; Horwich, A.; Fizazi, K.; Kataja, V. Testicular seminoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2010,21, v140–v146. [CrossRef] 41. Patel, H.D.; Gupta, M.; Cheaib, J.G.; Sharma, R.; Zhang, A.; Bass, E.B.; Pierorazio, P.M. Testis-sparing surgery and scrotal violation for testicular masses suspicious for malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2020 , 38, 344–353. [CrossRef] 42. Foster, R.S. Organ sparing surgery for malignant germ cell tumor of the testis: Editorial comment. J. Urol. 2001 ,166, 2165. [CrossRef] 43. Mead, G.M. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: A prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 1997,15, 594–603. [CrossRef] 44. Baniel, J.; Sella, A. Complications of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer: Primary and post-chemotherapy. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 1999,17, 263–267. [CrossRef] 45. Pierorazio, P.M.; Cheaib, J.G.; Patel, H.D.; Gupta, M.; Sharma, R.; Zhang, A.; Tema, G.; Bass, E.B. Comparative Effectiveness of Surveillance, Primary Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy and Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for the Management of Early Stage Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review. J. Urol. 2021,205, 370–382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 46. Leão, R.; Ahmad, A.E.; Hamilton, R.J. Testicular Cancer Biomarkers: A Role for Precision Medicine in Testicular Cancer. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2019,17, e176–e183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 47. De Jong, J.; Looijenga, L.H.J. Stem cell marker OCT3/4 in tumor biology and germ cell tumor diagnostics: History and future. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2006,12, 171–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 48. De Jong, J.; Stoop, H.; Dohle, G.R.; Bangma, C.H.; Kliffen, M.; Van Esser, J.W.J.; Bent, M.V.D.; Kros, J.M.; Oosterhuis, J.W.; Looijenga, L.H.J. Diagnostic value of OCT3/4 for pre-invasive and invasive testicular germ cell tumours. J. Pathol. 2005 ,206, 242–249. [CrossRef] 49. Samaniego, F.; Rodriguez, E.; Houldsworth, J.; Murty, V.V.V.S.; Ladanyi, M.; Lele, K.P.; Chen, Q.; Dmitrovsky, E.; Geller, N.L.; Reuter, V.; et al. Cytogenetic and molecular analysis of human male germ cell tumors: Chromosome 12 abnormalities and gene amplification. Genes, Chromosom. Cancer 1990,1, 289–300. [CrossRef] 50. Rodriguez, E.; Houldsworth, J.; Reuter, V.E.; Meltzer, P.; Zhang, J.; Trent, J.M.; Bosl, G.J.; Chaganti, R.S.K. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of i(12p)-negative human male germ cell tumors. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 1993,8, 230–236. [CrossRef] 51. Haillot, O.; Fetissof, F.; Janin, P.; Lanson, Y. Carcinoma in situ of the testis. Prog. Urol. 1992,2, 680–688. 52. Duncan, A.M.V. Isochromosome of Chromosome 12: Clinically Useful Marker for Male Germ Cell Tumors. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990,82, 1433. [CrossRef] 53. Shen, H.; Shih, J.; Hollern, D.P.; Wang, L.; Bowlby, R.; Tickoo, S.K.; Thorsson, V.; Mungall, A.; Newton, Y.; Hegde, A.M.; et al. Integrated Molecular Characterization of Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Cell Rep. 2018,23, 3392–3406. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 54. Sheth, N.A.; Saruiya, J.N.; Ranadive, K.J.; Sheth, A.R. Ectopic Production of Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin by Human Breast Tumours. Br. J. Cancer 1974,30, 566–570. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 55. Butcher, D.N.; Gregory, W.M.; Gunter, P.A.; Masters, J.R.; Parkinson, M.C. The biological and clinical significance of HCGcontaining cells in seminoma. Br. J. Cancer 1985,51, 473–478. [CrossRef] 56. Mirimanoff, R.; Shipley, W.; Dosoretz, D.; Meyer, J. Pure Seminoma of The Testis: The Results of Radiation Therapy in Patients with Elevated Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Titers. J. Urol. 1985,134, 1124–1126. [CrossRef] 57. Friedlander, T.W.; Small, E. Testicular Cancer. In Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology, 6th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1442–1467. ISBN 9780323476744. [CrossRef] 58. Gilligan, T.D.; Seidenfeld, J.; Basch, E.M.; Einhorn, L.H.; Fancher, T.; Smith, D.C.; Stephenson, A.J.; Vaughn, D.J.; Cosby, R.; Hayes, D.F. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males with Germ Cell Tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010,28, 3388–3404. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 59. Lin, S.Y.; Linehan, J.A.; Wilson, T.G.; Hoon, D.S. Emerging Utility of Urinary Cell-free Nucleic Acid Biomarkers for Prostate, Bladder, and Renal Cancers. Eur. Urol. Focus 2017,3, 265–272. [CrossRef] 60. Ellinger, J.; Wittkamp, V.; Albers, P.; Perabo, F.G.; Mueller, S.C.; von Ruecker, A.; Bastian, P.J. Cell-Free Circulating DNA: Diagnostic Value in Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Cancer. J. Urol. 2009,181, 363–371. [CrossRef] 61. Nastaly, P.; Ruf, C.; Becker, P.; Bednarz-Knoll, N.; Stoupiec, M.; Kavsur, R.; Isbarn, H.; Matthies, C.; Wagner, W.; Höppner, D.; et al. Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014,20, 3830–3841. [CrossRef] 62. Hayes, J.; Peruzzi, P.P.; Lawler, S. MicroRNAs in cancer: Biomarkers, functions and therapy. Trends Mol. Med. 2014 ,20, 460–469. [CrossRef] Cancers 2022,14, 1633 17 of 19 63. Dieckmann, K.-P.; Spiekermann, M.; Ruf, C.G.; Oechsle, K.; Belge, G. Is measuring serum levels of microRNA miR-371a-3p superior to the classical biomarkers of testicular germ cell tumors? J. Clin. Oncol. 2015,33, 376. [CrossRef] 64. Murray, M.J.; Bell, E.; Raby, K.L.; Rijlaarsdam, M.; Gillis, A.J.M.; Looijenga, L.; Brown, H.; Destenaves, B.; Nicholson, J.C.; Coleman, N.S. A pipeline to quantify serum and cerebrospinal fluid microRNAs for diagnosis and detection of relapse in paediatric malignant germ-cell tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2016,114, 151–162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 65. Leão, R.; Van Agthoven, T.; Figueiredo, A.; Jewett, M.A.; Fadaak, K.; Sweet, J.; Ahmad, A.E.; Anson-Cartwright, L.; Chung, P.; Hansen, A.; et al. Serum miRNA Predicts Viable Disease after Chemotherapy in Patients with Testicular Nonseminoma Germ Cell Tumor. J. Urol. 2018,200, 126–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 66. Vasdev, N.; Moon, A.; Thorpe, A.C. Classification, epidemiology and therapies for testicular germ cell tumours. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013,57, 133–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 67. De Martino, M.; Chieffi, P.; Esposito, F. miRNAs and Biomarkers in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021,22, 1380. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 68. Chen, Y.; Lu, J.; Xia, L.; Xue, D.; Yu, X.; Shen, D.; Xu, L.; Li, G. Testicular orphan receptor 4 promotes tumor progression and implies poor survival through AKT3 regulation in seminoma. Cancer Sci. 2018,109, 384–394. [CrossRef] 69. Escalier, D.; Gallo, J.-M.; Albert, M.; Meduri, G.; Bermudez, D.; David, G.; Schrevel, J. Human acrosome biogenesis: Immunodetection of proacrosin in primary spermatocytes and of its partitioning pattern during meiosis. Development 1991 ,113, 779–788. [CrossRef] 70. Kierszenbaum, A.L.; Rivkin, E.; Tres, L.L. Acroplaxome, an F-Actin–Keratin-containing Plate, Anchors the Acrosome to the Nucleus during Shaping of the Spermatid Head. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003,14, 4628–4640. [CrossRef] 71. Kierszenbaum, A.L.; Rivkin, E.; Tres, L.L. Cytoskeletal track selection during cargo transport in spermatids is relevant to male fertility. Spermatogenesis 2011,1, 221–230. [CrossRef] 72. Bizkarguenaga, M.U. Distribución de Las Proteínas Acrosómicas GCNF y Sp56 en Ratones Infértiles Gopc y En un Modelo de Globozoospermia Inducida Mediante Bloqueo de GOPC. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Leioa, Spain, 2018. 73. Baker, J.A.; Buck, G.M.; Vena, J.E.; Moysich, K.B. Fertility patterns prior to testicular cancer diagnosis. Cancer Causes Control 2005 , 16, 295–299. [CrossRef] 74. Steiner, D.F.; Cunningham, D.; Spigelman, L.; Aten, B. Insulin Biosynthesis: Evidence for a Precursor. Science 1967 ,157, 697–700. [CrossRef] 75. Seidah, N.G. The Proprotein Convertases, 20 Years Later. In Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 23–57. [CrossRef] 76. Seidah, N.; Gaspar, L.; Mion, P.; Marcinkiewicz, M.; Mbikay, M.; Chrétien, M. cDNA Sequence of Two Distinct Pituitary Proteins Homologous to Kex2 and Furin Gene Products: Tissue-Specific mRNAs Encoding Candidates for Pro-Hormone Processing Proteinases. DNA Cell Biol. 1990,9, 415–424. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 77. Anderson, E.D.; Molloy, S.S.; Jean, F.; Fei, H.; Shimamura, S.; Thomas, G. The Ordered and Compartment-specific Autoproteolytic Removal of the Furin Intramolecular Chaperone Is Required for Enzyme Activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2002 ,277, 12879–12890. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 78. Bergeron, F.; Leduc, R.; Day, R. Subtilase-like pro-protein convertases: From molecular specificity to therapeutic applications. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2000,24, 1–22. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 79. Artenstein, A.W.; Opal, S.M. Proprotein Convertases in Health and Disease. New Engl. J. Med. 2011,365, 2507–2518. [CrossRef] 80. Bassi, D.E.; Fu, J.; de Cicco, R.L.; Klein-Szanto, A.J. Proprotein convertases: “Master switches” in the regulation of tumor growth and progression. Mol. Carcinog. 2005,44, 151–161. [CrossRef] 81. Siegfried, G.; Descarpentrie, J.; Evrard, S.; Khatib, A.-M. Proprotein convertases: Key players in inflammation-related malignancies and metastasis. Cancer Lett. 2020,473, 50–61. [CrossRef] 82. Hubbard, F.C.; Goodrow, T.L.; Liu, S.C.; Brilliant, M.H.; Basset, P.; Mains, R.E.; Klein-Szanto, A.J. Expression of PACE4 in chemically induced carcinomas is associated with spindle cell tumor conversion and increased invasive ability. Cancer Res. 1997 , 57, 5226–5231. 83. Bassi, D.E.; Mahloogi, H.; De Cicco, R.L.; Klein-Szanto, A. Increased Furin Activity Enhances the Malignant Phenotype of Human Head and Neck Cancer Cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2003,162, 439–447. [CrossRef] 84. Khatib, A.-M.; Siegfried, G.; Prat, A.; Luis, J.; Chrétien, M.; Metrakos, P.; Seidah, N.G. Inhibition of Proprotein Convertases Is Associated with Loss of Growth and Tumorigenicity of HT-29 Human Colon Carcinoma Cells: Importance of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor processing in IGF-1-mediated functions. J. Biol. Chem. 2001,276, 30686–30693. [CrossRef] 85. Dubois, C.M.; Blanchette, F.; Laprise, M.-H.; Leduc, R.; Grondin, F.; Seidah, N.G. Evidence that Furin Is an Authentic Transforming Growth Factor-β1-Converting Enzyme. Am. J. Pathol. 2001,158, 305–316. [CrossRef] 86. Arsenault, D.; Lucien, F.; Dubois, C.M. Hypoxia enhances cancer cell invasion through relocalization of the proprotein convertase furin from the trans-golgi network to the cell surface. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012,227, 789–800. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 87. Siegfried, G.; Basak, A.; Cromlish, J.A.; Benjannet, S.; Marcinkiewicz, J.; Chrétien, M.; Seidah, N.G.; Khatib, A.-M. The secretory proprotein convertases furin, PC5, and PC7 activate VEGF-C to induce tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2003 ,111, 1723–1732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Cancers 2022,14, 1633 18 of 19 88. Khatib, A.-M.; Siegfried, G.; Chrétien, M.; Metrakos, P.; Seidah, N.G. Proprotein Convertases in Tumor Progression and Malignancy: Novel Targets in Cancer Therapy. Am. J. Pathol. 2002,160, 1921–1935. [CrossRef] 89. Xu, B.; Li, S.; Fang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Song, D.; Zhang, S.; Cai, Y. Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Promotes Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Suppresses Apoptosis by Facilitating MAPK Signaling Pathway Through HSP70 Up-Regulation. Front. Oncol. 2021,10, 1. [CrossRef] 90. Chen, C.; Gupta, P.; Parashar, D.; Nair, G.G.; George, J.; Geethadevi, A.; Wang, W.; Tsaih, S.-W.; Bradley, W.; Ramchandran, R.; et al. ERBB3-induced furin promotes the progression and metastasis of ovarian cancer via the IGF1R/STAT3 signaling axis. Oncogene 2020,39, 2921–2933. [CrossRef] 91. Wang, P.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Pan, J. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 6 activates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and Wnt family member 3A pathways and promotes inï¿ 1 2 vitro proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018,16, 145–150. [CrossRef] 92. He, Z.; Thorrez, L.; Siegfried, G.; Meulemans, S.; Evrard, S.; Tejpar, S.; Khatib, A.-M.; Creemers, J.W.M. The proprotein convertase furin is a pro-oncogenic driver in KRAS and BRAF driven colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2020,39, 3571–3587. [CrossRef] 93. Mercapide, J.; De Cicco, R.L.; Bassi, D.E.; Castresana, J.S.; Thomas, G.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.P. Correction: Inhibition of Furin-mediated Processing Results in Suppression of Astrocytoma Cell Growth and Invasiveness. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019,25, 2674. [CrossRef] 94. He, Z.; Khatib, A.-M.; Creemers, J.W. Loss of the proprotein convertase Furin in T cells represses mammary tumorigenesis in oncogene-driven triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020,484, 40–49. [CrossRef] 95. Li, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; He, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, S.; Fu, J.; Fu, S.; Chen, H.; Fu, J.; et al. COVID-19 disease and malignant cancers: The impact for the furin gene expression in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021,17, 3954–3967. [CrossRef] 96. He, Z.; Khatib, A.-M.; Creemers, J.W.M. The proprotein convertase furin in cancer: More than an oncogene. Oncogene 2022 ,41, 1252–1262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 97. Longuespée, R.; Couture, F.; Levesque, C.; Kwiatkowska, A.; Desjardins, R.; Gagnon, S.; Vergara, D.; Maffia, M.; Fournier, I.; Salzet, M.; et al. Implications of Proprotein Convertases in Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation and Tumor Progression: Insights for PACE4 as a Therapeutic Target. Transl. Oncol. 2014,7, 410–419. [CrossRef] 98. Panet, F.; Couture, F.; Kwiatkowska, A.; Desjardins, R.; Guérin, B.; Day, R. PACE4 is an important driver of ZR-75-1 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer proliferation and tumor progression. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2017,96, 469–475. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 99. Couture, F.; D’Anjou, F.; Desjardins, R.; Boudreau, F.; Day, R. Role of Proprotein Convertases in Prostate Cancer Progression. Neoplasia 2012,14, 1032-IN6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 100. D’Anjou, F.; Routhier, S.; Perreault, J.-P.; Latil, A.; Bonnel, D.; Fournier, I.; Salzet, M.; Day, R. Molecular Validation of PACE4 as a Target in Prostate Cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2011,4, 157-IN9. [CrossRef] 101. Torii, S.; Yamagishi, T.; Murakami, K.; Nakayama, K. Localization of Kex2-like processing endoproteases, furin and PC4, within mouse testis by in situ hybridization. FEBS Lett. 1993,316, 12–16. [CrossRef] 102. Gyamera-Acheampong, C.; Mbikay, M. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4 in mammalian fertility: A review. Hum. Reprod. Updat. 2009,15, 237–247. [CrossRef] 103. Tadros, H.; Chrétien, M.; Mbikay, M. The testicular germ-cell protease PC4 is also expressed in macrophage-like cells of the ovary. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2001,49, 133–152. [CrossRef] 104. Gyamera-Acheampong, C.; Tantibhedhyangkul, J.; Weerachatyanukul, W.; Tadros, H.; Xu, H.; van de Loo, J.-W.; Pelletier, R.-M.; Tanphaichitr, N.; Mbikay, M. Sperm from Mice Genetically Deficient for the PCSK4 Proteinase Exhibit Accelerated Capacitation, Precocious Acrosome Reaction, Reduced Binding to Egg Zona Pellucida, and Impaired Fertilizing Ability1. Biol. Reprod. 2006 ,74, 666–673. [CrossRef] 105. Korniluk, A.; Koper-Lenkiewicz, O.; Kemona, H.; Dymicka-Piekarska, V. From inflammation to cancer. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2017 ,186, 57–62. [CrossRef] 106. Wessler, S.; Aberger, F.; Hartmann, T.N. The sound of tumor cell-microenvironment communication—Composed by the Cancer Cluster Salzburg research network. Cell Commun. Signal. 2017,15, 20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 107. Chovanec, M.; Cierna, Z.; Miskovska, V.; Machalekova, K.; Kalavska, K.; Rejlekova, K.; Svetlovska, D.; Macak, D.; Spanik, S.; Kajo, K.; et al. Systemic immune-inflammation index in germ-cell tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2018 ,118, 831–838. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 108. Imamoglu, G.I.; Eren, T.; Baylan, B.; Karaçin, C. May High Levels of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Hematologic Inflammation Markers Suggest a Further Stage in Testicular Tumours? Urol. Int. 2019,103, 303–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 109. Olcucu, M.T.; Karamik, K.; Yilmaz, K.; Okuducu, Y.; Cakir, S.; Ates, M. Preoperative Inflammation Markers and De Ritis Ratio in Predicting Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Patients with Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2020 ,30, 1041–1046. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 110. Birbrair, A. Tumor Microenvironments in Organs: From the Brain to the Skin—Part A. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [CrossRef] 111. Kalavska, K.; Schmidtova, S.; Chovanec, M.; Mego, M. Immunotherapy in Testicular Germ Cell Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2020 ,10, 1–9. [CrossRef] 112. Silvan, U.; Díez-Torre, A.; Moreno, P.; Arluzea, J.; Andrade, R.; Silió, M.; Aréchaga, J. The spermatogonial stem cell niche in testicular germ cell tumors. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013,57, 185–195. [CrossRef] 113. Song, Y.; Qi, X.; Kang, J.; Wang, X.; Ou, N.; Zhu, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, X. Identification of new biomarkers in immune microenvironment of testicular germ cell tumour. Andrologia 2021,53, e13986. [CrossRef] Cancers 2022,14, 1633 19 of 19 114. Fankhauser, C.D.; Curioni-Fontecedro, A.; Allmann, V.; Beyer, J.; Tischler, V.; Sulser, T.; Moch, H.; Bode, P. Frequent PD-L1 expression in testicular germ cell tumors. Br. J. Cancer 2015,113, 411–413. [CrossRef] 115. Cheng, X.; Dai, H.; Wan, N.; Moore, Y.; Vankayalapati, R. Interaction of Programmed Death-1 and Programmed Death-1 Ligand-1 Contributes to Testicular Immune Privilege. Transplantation 2009,87, 1778–1786. [CrossRef] 116. Jennewein, L.; Bartsch, G.; Gust, K.; Kvasnicka, H.; Haferkamp, A.; Blaheta, R.; Mittelbronn, M.; Harter, P.N.; Mani, J. Increased tumor vascularization is associated with the amount of immune competent PD-1 positive cells in testicular germ cell tumors. Oncol. Lett. 2018,15, 9852–9860. [CrossRef] 117. Cierna, Z.; Mego, M.; Miskovska, V.; Machalekova, K.; Chovanec, M.; Svetlovska, D.; Hainova, K.; Rejlekova, K.; Macak, D.; Spanik, S.; et al. Prognostic value of programmed-death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) in testicular germ cell tumors. Ann. Oncol. 2016,27, 300–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 118. Tomé, M.; Pappalardo, A.; Soulet, F.; López, J.J.; Olaizola, J.; Leger, Y.; Dubreuil, M.; Mouchard, A.; Fessart, D.; Delom, F.; et al. Inactivation of Proprotein Convertases in T Cells Inhibits PD-1 Expression and Creates a Favorable Immune Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019,79, 5008–5021. [CrossRef] [PubMed]