Full text
243 Ponto-Caspian amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and their microsporidian parasites recently established in Sweden Tomasz Rewicz1, Andrea Desiderato1, Jennie Barthel Svedén2, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska1, Tomasz Mamos1, Ulf Bjelke3 1 DepartmentofInvertebrateZoologyandHydrobiology,UniversityofLodz,Banachastr.,12/16,90-237,Łódź,Poland 2 County Administrative Board of Stockholm, Box 22067, SE-104 22 Stockholm, Sweden 3 Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Almas allé 8E, Box 7016, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden Corresponding author: Tomasz Rewicz ([email protected]) Copyright: © Tomasz Rewicz et al. This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International – CC BY 4.0). Research Article Abstract The invasive amphipods Dikerogammarus villosus, D. haemobaphes and Pontogammarus robustoides, which originate from the Ponto-Caspian region, are amongst Europe’s most ecologically disruptive amphipods and have recently been detected in Sweden, marking their northernmost record and indicating a concerning expansion of their range. This study employed DNA barcoding to confirm the species identifications, assess population structure and trace the origins of these recently introduced populations. To improve the detection resolution in the case of D. villosus, we designed specific primers targeting two additional mitochondrial markers at genes ND5 and ATP8, enabling precise identification of the probable source populations, based on known European invasion routes and their phylogeographic structure. Our analysis identified the Western Group of D. villosus as being present in Sweden, with a probable introduction from the large lakes in the foothills of the Alps, possibly via sailing boats that were transported overland. Meanwhile, P. robustoides and D. haemobaphes appear to have invaded from the eastern and southern Baltic regions — including the Baltic States, Vistula Lagoon and Szczecin Lagoon — possibly via ballast water, ship hulls or floating debris. Additionally, we detected microsporidian infections in all three species, identifying Dictyocoela muelleri and D. berillonum as associated parasites. Given the ecological risks posed by these invasive species, coordinated monitoring, particularly along the Baltic coast, is essential for enabling rapid response efforts in the Nordic region. Key words: Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, Dikerogammarus villosus, mitochondrial marker, Pontogammarus robustoides, range expansion, source of introduction Introduction Freshwater ecosystems are invaluable, harbouring about 6% of global species despite covering only 0.01% of Earth’s water resources and 0.80% of its surface (Strayer and Dudgeon 2010). They play important environmental, economic, cultural and scientific roles and are aesthetically valuable elements of the landscape, which is fundamental for tourism (Dudgeon et al. 2006; Hall and Härkönen 2006; Harrison et al. 2010). However, these vital ecosystems are severely threatened, surpassing the biodiversity loss of terrestrial habitats (Hadwen et al. 2012; Venohr et al. 2018). Reports show that only 40% of EU waters meet satisfactory ecological status (European Environmental Agency 2018). Inland waters, particularly lakes, Academic editor: Adam Petrusek Received: 18 March 2025 Accepted: 24 August 2025 Published: 2 October 2025 Citation: Rewicz T, Desiderato A, Svedén JB, Bacela-Spychalska K, Mamos T, Bjelke U (2025) PontoCaspian amphipods (Crustacea, Amphipoda) and their microsporidian parasites recently established in Sweden. NeoBiota 101: 243–275. https://doi.org/10.3897/ neobiota.101.153292 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025) DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota
244 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden are highly susceptible to biological invasions driven by various human activities (Gherardi 2007; Ricciardi and MacIsaac 2011). Commercial shipping facilitates the introduction of alien species primarily through biofouling (Lacoursière-Roussel et al. 2016) and ballast waters (Briski et al. 2012), while recreational activities like angling (Carpio et al. 2019), boating (Podwysocki et al. 2024), canoeing (Anderson et al. 2014) and diving, also contribute to the introduction and spread of invasive species (Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2013). Additionally, intentional releases further exacerbate the situation (Keller et al. 2009), posing a significant threat to the ecological balance of lakes worldwide. Invasive alien species receive considerable attention in Scandinavia and Northern Europe. In that region, freshwater ecosystems are relatively young, having developed over the past 10,000–15,000 years, following the retreat of the last ice sheet (Berglund 1979). The Nordic region is a global hotspot for lakes, along with northern North America and parts of Russia (Messager et al. 2016). Approximately 9% of Sweden’s territory consists of freshwaters, with 97,500 lakes and 298,000 smaller waterbodies (0.2–1 ha) (Henriksen et al. 1998; Verpoorter et al. 2012). However, glaciation has stripped soils, leaving exposed bedrock and resulting in generally low nutrient and calcium levels in many waterbodies, which may explain the absence or rarity of benthic crustaceans, especially Amphipoda, in calcium-poor regions of Sweden (Sahlén Zetterberg and Fölster 2022). According to Sweden’s NOBANIS database (Nobanis 2024), 2,497 alien species, including 453 arthropods, have been recorded in the country. Amongst these are a few dozen freshwater aquatic arthropod species recorded in lakes and other watercourses. Four invasive amphipods: Chelicorophium curvispinum (Leppänen et al. 2017), Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, D. villosus and Pontogammarus robustoides (Artfakta Sweden 2025) have been detected prior to 2025. Amphipods may be harmful invasive species due to their potential to outnumber native invertebrate species, leading to a decline in native biodiversity (Jazdzewski et al. 2004; Piscart et al. 2010; Dick et al. 2013). Additionally, tube-building amphipods can alter habitat structures and ecosystem processes, causing significant ecological changes in invaded areas (Rigolet et al. 2014). Amongst invasive amphipods, those originating from the Ponto-Caspian region (Azov, Black, Caspian and Aral seas and adjacent area) pose a significant threat to inland European waters (Bij de Vaate et al. 2002; Grabowski et al. 2007; Soto et al. 2023); up to 40% of those have spread outside their native range during the last century (Copilaș-Ciocianu et al. 2023a). Ponto-Caspian species, which have evolved in environments with frequent fluctuations of salinities, water level and temperature, possess unique biological features favourable for survival under unstable conditions, making them successful invaders (Cristescu et al. 2003; Cristescu and Hebert 2005; Copilaș-Ciocianu and Sidorov 2022; Copilaș-Ciocianu et al. 2023a). Their invasive spread, facilitated by such anthropogenic activities as increased shipping, boating, canal construction and intentional introductions, has led to the establishment of vital populations and, subsequently, competitive superiority over native species, resulting in declines and extinctions along invasion corridors (Leuven et al. 2009). They have used three main European migratory corridors (Bij de Vaate et al. 2002), transferring genetically distinct populations from isolated areas in their native range to new territories. Amongst invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipods, D. villosus, D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides are the most successful invaders, which have colonised the majority of the main inland waterbodies of Europe within less than 30 years (Rewicz et al.
245 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden 2014; Jażdżewska et al. 2020; Copilaș-Ciocianu et al. 2023a, 2023b), exerting a detrimental impact on local benthic communities. Dikero gammarus spp. have even earned the nicknames ‘killer shrimp’ or ‘demon shrimp’ due to their severe impacts on local fauna, making them some of the most threatening invasive invertebrates in freshwater ecosystems (Bacela-Spychalska and Van der Velde 2013; Rewicz et al. 2014; Warren et al. 2021). Pontogammarus robustoides is also a large (up to 21 mm) invasive amphipod that significantly impacts the native species communities, occupying a relatively high trophic position due to its mixed diet of animal prey and plant detritus (Bacela-Spychalska and Van der Velde 2013). All three species are known to be the hosts of a variety of microsporidian parasites (Ovcharenko et al. 2010; Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2012, 2018; Bojko et al. 2019; Warren et al. 2023), which are dangerous hitchhikers during the invasion process and are amongst the most common ones out of the diversity of recognised microand macro-parasites in Amphipoda (Bojko and Ovcharenko 2019; Bojko et al. 2022; Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2023). These highly reduced unicellular parasites (e.g. lacking mitochondria and possessing small ribosomes) infect both vertebrate and invertebrate species (Vávra and Lukeš 2013). Their transmission modes can be vertical, horizontal or both (Stentiford and Dunn 2014), with diverse impacts on host populations, from decreasing the predatory pressure of the host on native communities (horizontally transmitted) (Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2012) to increasing the potential for fast host population growth by, for instance, feminising the host (some vertically transmitted) (Slothouber Galbreath et al. 2004). Finally, if infected host amphipods get introduced into a new area, they may serve as a new threat to native fauna and serve as vector for the parasites to local species. Molecular methods, such as DNA barcoding and environmental DNA (eDNA) analyses, provide precise tools for the accurate identification and detection of freshwater invasive species, including various amphipod taxa (Blackman et al. 2017; Thomas et al. 2020; Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. 2022). The markers most often used in barcoding, such as mitochondrial genes for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and 16S rRNA in the case of animals, often show intraspecific variability levels which allow population-scale analysis. For instance, the genetic variation of mtDNA markers observed in D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides was high enough to make it possible to infer their colonisation history (Jażdżewska et al. 2020; Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. 2023b). On the other hand, intraspecific variation in mtDNA markers of D. villosus is low and does not allow for population studies for the determination of colonisation pathways, as has been shown by Rewicz et al. (2015a). Recent studies have provided mitochondrial genomes (Mamos et al. 2021; Macher et al. 2023), which can be used as source data for the identification of highly variable regions and developing molecular markers that show variability on an intraspecific level. Such new markers, in combination with eDNA-based biomonitoring (Bommerlund et al. 2023), may provide important information about the origin and dispersal of invasive species (Andres et al. 2023a, 2023b). Phylogeographic and population genetics data for all three species have been obtained across their invaded and native ranges (Rewicz et al. 2015a, 2017; Jażdżewska et al. 2020; Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. 2022, 2023b). In the case of D. villosus, the two distinct invasive populations, one derived from the Danube and the other from the Dnieper, have been detected in Central and Western Europe. These populations exhibit genetic differentiation and are allopatrically distributed, with no indication of diminished genetic diversity relative to their respective source regions (Rewicz et al. 2015a, 2017).
246 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Designing a reliable molecular tool for the rapid detection of a specific group of D. villosus could provide a better understanding of their invasiveness (Hupało et al. 2018; Podwysocki et al. 2024, 2025b; Jermacz et al. 2025). This study aims to: a) use DNA barcoding to assess the genetic diversity of the recently established invasive amphipods D. villosus, D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides in Sweden; b) design primers for variable mitochondrial markers to determine the source populations of the killer shrimp D. villosus; c) investigate whether populations of D. villosus, D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides are infected by microsporidian parasites, which are common hitchhikers during invasion and assess their potential impact on the host invasion process. Materials and methods Sampling in Sweden The littoral invertebrate fauna of Swedish lakes and streams was surveyed through environmental monitoring programmes and the three species included in this study were discovered via these surveys and shared via online repositories. The initial discovery of D. villosus in Sweden (Bjelke and Tomasson 2023) was made in 2023, based on material collected in 2022. Dikerogammarus haemobaphes was first identified in 2023, but a re-examination of older samples revealed its presence at one locality as early as 2017 (Artfakta Sweden 2025). Pontogammarus robustoides was recorded for the first time in 2023 (Artfakta Sweden 2025). Freshly sampled material of gammarids for molecular studies was obtained through kick-sampling with a benthic hand-net. Subsequently, the amphipods were preserved in 96% ethanol and later identified in the laboratory to the species level. Individuals of D. villosus were collected in Lake Vättern (58.290°N, 14.643°E) on 24 February 2023 by Ulf Bjelke. Individuals of D. haemobaphes were collected in Lake Tullingesjön, close to Stockholm (59.221°N, 17.877°E) on 28 April 2023 by Jennie Barthel Svedén and Joakim Pansar. Individuals of P. robustoides were collected in Lake Mälaren, close to Stockholm (59.504°N, 17.789°E) on 28 October 2023 by Ulf Bjelke. Additional sampling in Europe To test for the source populations of these individuals, the additional samples of the three species coming from native and invaded range collected during different sampling campaigns spanning from 2013 to 2019 (Fig. 1, Suppl. materials 1, 2) were used. All the samples are stored in the Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz. DNA extraction, DNA barcoding Samples were processed either in the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB), Guelph, Canada or in the Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz (UniLodz) (see Suppl. material 2 for each specimen details). DNA extraction was done at UniLodz according to the method of Bacela-Spychalska et al. (2018), to ensure that microsporidian DNA was co-extracted properly with the host DNA. Amplification of standard
247 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden animal DNA barcode gene region (COI) (Hebert et al. 2003) and sequencing were done following Morhun et al. (2022). The Barcode Index Number (BIN; Ratnasingham and Hebert (2013)) method, part of the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD; Ratnasingham and Hebert (2007)), was used for molecular species identification through DNA barcoding. Newly-submitted sequences were compared with those already available in BOLD. Sequences were clustered on the basis of molecular divergence using algorithms designed to detect discontinuities between the clusters. Each cluster was assigned a unique BIN, either matching an existing BIN or a newly-created one if the submitted sequences did not align with known BINs. All BINs are registered in BOLD. Selecting the new markers and primers designed for Dikerogammarus villosus As Rewicz et al. (2015b) have pointed out, the COI marker is not variable enough to distinguish the molecular groups of D. villosus in Europe. To avoid a complicated and costly procedure involving the testing of microsatellite markers, two new markers for D. villosus were prepared. To design them, the most SNP-rich mitogenome coding fragments identified by Mamos et al. (2021) were targeted when comparing mitogenomes of D. villosus from Poland, England and Turkiye (populations from both the Eastern and Western Groups sensu Rewicze et al. 2015 and an isolated group from the native region). The Primer 3 software was used to design new primers for the amplification of the new markers (Untergasser et al. 2012). Figure 1. Geographic distribution of sequenced individuals analysed in this study. New data (triangles) and public database sequences (circles) are shown for Dikerogammarus villosus (black), D. haemobaphes (yellow) and Pontogammarus robustoides (blue). The locations of the Swedish records used in this study are encircled. Further details can be found from Suppl. material 1.
248 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden The first marker is located in the gene coding for the NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain five protein (ND5, 5047 bp to 5990 bp of the complete mitochondrial genome, GenBank accession number: OK173836). To amplify it, newly-designed primers: ND5DvF (forward; 5'-GATGTAGCTATTTTATTAAGG-3') and ND5DvR (reverse; 5'-TTCCTCCCAACAATGTCAC-3') were used. The second marker (position 1994 bp to 2864 bp of OK173836) encompassed fragments of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COX2, 397 bp), full sequences of genes for tRNA-Lys, tRNA-Asp, an ATP synthase membrane subunit 8 (ATP8) and partial sequence of the gene coding ATP synthase membrane subunit 6 (ATP6; 307 bp). For the amplification of this region, the newlydesigned primers: C2ATPDvF (forward; 5'-CCTTTTGGAGACTGATAACAG-3'), C2ATPDvR (reverse; 5'-CAAGTGAGAGTGTAAAAATTAAC-3') were used. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturing step at 94 °C for 3 min was followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 47 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 2 min. Primers were checked for their specificity for D. villosus against other gammarids, using mitogenomes available from Mamos et al. (2021) in silico and empirically through the PCR reaction with samples of D. villosus, D. haemobaphes, D. bispinosus, Obesogammarus crassus and Pontogammarus robustoides, as other prominent invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipods occurring together with the target species in sympatry in the invaded range in Europe (Morhun et al. 2022; Macher et al. 2023). Data assembly and analysis The newly-obtained sequences of amphipods were edited, aligned with MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) and trimmed using Geneious v.10.2.6 (Kearse et al. 2012) and deposited in GenBank (COI: PP390747–PP391012, PV135977–PV136006; ATP8: PP420950–PP421043; ND5: PP390565–PP390658) and BOLD (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007). Additional COI sequences with relevant voucher information of D. haemobaphes (Cristescu and Hebert 2005; Grabner et al. 2015; Sket and Hou 2018; Jażdżewska et al. 2020; Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. 2022, 2023b; Morhun et al. 2022) and P. robustoides (Cristescu et al. 2003; Cristescu and Hebert 2005; Hou et al. 2011, 2014; Sket and Hou 2018; Csabai et al. 2020; Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. 2022, 2023b) that are publicly accessible through the public dataset DS-SWEAMP (https:// doi.org/10.5883/DS-SWEAMP) on the BOLD (www.boldsystems.org) were used. The haplotype relationship was visualised through Median-Joining Networks (MJN) using PopART (Leigh and Bryant 2015). Networks for D. villosus were constructed from different datasets: 94 COI sequences (605 bp), as well as for 94 ND5 and ATP8 sequences (855 bp, 758 bp, 1613 bp concatenated) and, in the last approach, 94 sequences of ND5, ATP8 and COI (2,218 bp concatenated). Network for D. haemobaphes was constructed based on 643 COI sequences (543 bp) and network for P. robustoides was constructed based on 201 COI sequences (574 bp). Individuals of D. villosus were a priori assigned to the invasion routes, according to Rewicz et al. (2015a). Samples from the Danube and Dnieper deltas presented in Suppl. material 1 represent the native ranges of the species, reflecting the origin of the Western and Eastern Groups. Samples from the Oder and the Vistula reflect the endpoints of invasions of those groups so far, as presented by Rewicz et al. (2015a) and together they should encompass the majority of the known molecular diversity of those populations. For the main lineage
249 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden of D. haemobaphes, we assigned individuals to the invasion route, according to Jażdżewska et al. (2020). We indicated other lineages (not invasive so far), based on information from Jażdżewska et al. (2020) and Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. (2022). Pontogammarus robustoides lacks any comprehensive phylogeographical studies, so we divided it into major regional groups, based on the recommendations of Csabai et al. (2020) and Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. (2023b). The genetic diversity of the studied markers and taxa was evaluated by determining haplotype count (k) and haplotypic diversity (h), following the methodology proposed by Nei (1987). The calculations were performed using DnaSP v.5 software (Librado and Rozas 2009). To evaluate the differences between the studied molecular markers and between the two invasion routes (comprising the native range) of D. villosus and the Swedish population, an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was conducted with 10,100 permutations on each gene with Arlequin v.3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Three groups were tested, the Eastern, the Western and Sweden, for a total of nine populations (i.e. four per route + Sweden). The analyses were conducted using both a strictly orthogonal design, considering only the groups and a nested one, including the differences between individual populations sampled within each group. Both approaches were used to provide a more robust analysis and comprehensive understanding of the molecular variance. The F-statistics were calculated from haplotype frequencies using 10,100 permutations to assess the significance of the pairwise comparisons. Microsporidia screening Specimens of D. villosus, D. haemobaphes, and P. robustoides from Sweden were tested for the presence of microsporidian intracellular parasites. Microsporidian DNA was co-extracted together with the host DNA and amplification of microsporidian partial 16S rDNA was performed via PCR using microsporidia — specific primers V1f (forward) and 530r (reverse) (Vossbrinck et al. 1993; Baker et al. 1994). Detailed protocols describing reaction conditions and agarose gel checking followed Kobak et al. (2021). All infected individuals were selected for further microsporidian SSU rDNA, ITS and partial LSU rDNA operon amplification for more accurate taxonomic identification. We used the microsporidia — specific primer pair V1f and 580r (reverse) (Weiss et al. 1994). In some cases, when we could not obtain sufficiently long fragments in one reaction, we amplified them as the two overlapping amplicons using primer pairs: Vif with MC3r (Ovcharenko et al. 2010) and Hg4f (Gatehouse and Malone 1998) with 580r (details presented by Bacela-Spychalska et al. (2018)). In cases when the amplification of the long fragment was unsuccessful, we sequenced the initial short fragment, which is adequate for general parasite species determination (Quiles et al. 2020). Microsporidia identification The obtained sequences were checked with a BLAST search (Altschul et al. 1990). As all our sequences were identified as Dictyocoela spp., 434 other available Dictyocoela sequences from GenBank with a minimum length of 500 bp and four other microsporidian species as an outgroup were added to our dataset sequences (Suppl. material 3), based on published studies (Nilsen et al. 1998; Hogg
250 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden et al. 2002; Terry et al. 2004; Lovy et al. 2009; Ovcharenko et al. 2010; Bojko et al. 2015; Stentiford et al. 2017; Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2018; Park et al. 2020). This dataset was used to illustrate the relationship between our sequences and as many available Dictyocoela spp. sequences in GenBank as possible, with the use of Bayesian Inference. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT7 software (Katoh and Standley 2013) with the E-IONS-I algorithm using the legacy gap penalty option, incorporated in Geneious v.10.2.2 (Kearse et al. 2012). To improve the tree resolution and species identification, we refined our dataset by removing all short sequences and leaving an alignment of SSU rDNA, ITS and partial LSU rDNA (sequence length 970–1,767 bp, final alignment length 1,930 bp) and single representatives of haplotypes. Both phylogenetic reconstructions were performed using Bayesian Inference implemented in MrBayes plugin v. 2.2.4 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) integrated in Geneious v.10.2.2. The best-fitting model of nucleotide substitution was determined with ModelTest-NG v.0.1.7 (Darriba et al. 2020). We used the General Time Reversible (GTR) model with gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity (+G) and the proportion of invariable sites (+I). The MCMC was set to 1,100,000 iterations with 100,000 burn-in and four heated chains, sampled every 200 iterations. Runs parameters reached satisfactory effective sampling sizes (ESS > 100). Fifty percent majority-rule consensus trees were constructed. Newly-obtained sequences of microsporidian SSU, ITS and partial LSU rDNA fragments were edited, aligned and trimmed using Geneious v.10.2.6 (Kearse et al. 2012) and deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PP074278–PP074300 and PV170728–PV170732. Results Sampling campaigns and monitoring Extensive sampling campaigns, conducted by the local authorities after the initial findings of D. villosus in Lake Vättern, showed its presence at 26 sites (Bjelke and Tomasson 2023; Bjelke 2024). This invasive species was a dominant community member in nine of them. Forty-two sites, including the whole northern and eastern banks of the lake, remained uncolonised by D. villosus (Fig. 2). Dikerogammarus haemobaphes has so far been detected at two sites in Lake Mälaren. Additional occurrences have been recorded in Lakes Albysjön and Tullingesjön, which are close to Lake Mälaren and drain into it. In contrast, P. robustoides, also discovered in 2023, appears to be spreading more rapidly in Lake Mälaren, having been recorded from at least eight sites already (Bjelke 2024). Molecular identification of Amphipoda We used a COI mtDNA barcoding marker and confirmed the morphological identification of D. villosus. Thirty-two individuals collected in Sweden were assigned to BIN BOLD:AAI9938, which contains all known European individuals of D. villosus. Twenty-six individuals of D. haemobaphes were assigned to BIN BOLD:AEO1330, the most widespread and invasive lineage occurring in Europe. All 30 individuals of P. robustoides were assigned to BIN BOLD:AAB7665, which is currently the only known BIN grouping COI sequences of this species.
251 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Newly-designed primers for ATP8 and ND5 markers were amplified from all individuals from Sweden and also for selected reference samples from Poland and Ukraine (Suppl. material 1). The primers exhibited full specificity for D. villosus and did not amplify any closely-related species. We showed that COI alone could not discriminate between Western and Eastern Groups as the most common haplotype overlaps between the routes (Table 1, Suppl. material 6). The newly-designed ND5 and ATP8 markers individually revealed only a single haplotype shared between specimens from both the Western and Eastern Groups, their concatenation providing greater resolution. This combined dataset produced unique haplotype combinations that allowed us to determinate the geographic origin of D. villosus individuals, as shown in the Median Joining Network (Fig. 3A). The specimens from Sweden were assigned to two haplotypes; one corresponded to a haplotype detected in the Western Route (Oder, Danube), the other was a private haplotype differentiated by one base pair. Adding COI to the dataset further increased the Figure 2. Results of D. villosus sampling in the Lake Vättern area by the local environmental agency in 2024. The colour of the dots represents the stage of invasion: white — no records; orange — a few individuals, but not the dominant species; red — dominant species.
258 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden the Danube and north-western part of the Black Sea as revealed by Jażdżewska et al. (2020), none of which are invasive in mainland Europe so far and all of them are cryptic regarding their morphological features. Furthermore, haplotypes discovered in Sweden do not correspond to haplotypes specific to the Southern Corridor sensu Bij de Vaate et al. 2002 (Fig. 3B). Instead, the most probable sources of the introduction to the Stockholm area appear to be either from the east or south of the Baltic, including Riga Bay, Vistula Lagoon, Gulf of Gdańsk, Szczecin Lagoon or Rügen. These areas harbour D. haemobaphes populations (Jazdzewski et al. 2004; Dobrzycka-Krahel et al. 2016; Meßner and Zettler 2018; Copilaș-Ciocianu et al. 2023a) capable of tolerating brackish water conditions. Haplotypes discovered in the Swedish population seem to be the most common ones present in the southern Baltic Region. The high dispersal capacities of invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipods have facilitated their successful colonisation of Europe (Copilaș-Ciocianu et al. 2023a) and the North American Great Lakes (Witt et al. 1997). The most plausible mechanisms for translocating D. haemobaphes across the Baltic Sea include transport in the ballast water of commercial vessels or attachment to smaller tourist vessels. This species has previously demonstrated its capacity to cross sea barriers, having reached Great Britain in 2012 (Aldridge 2013; Constable and Birkby 2016). The low salinity of the Baltic Sea offers a favourable environment for D. haemobaphes, eliminating physiological barriers to its spread. Moreover, the Baltic Sea is a busy maritime region with extensive commercial and recreational traffic and Stockholm maintains direct connections with Gdańsk and several Baltic and German ports, which may constitute source areas for introductions (Liebuvienė and Čižiūnienė 2021; Baran and Neumann 2023). Experimental studies by Dobrzycka-Krahel and Graca (2014) indicate that D. haemobaphes prefers salinities of around 7 PSU (though it is also known to be a successful invader in freshwater environments). Such a value matches the salinity levels in the Stockholm region and the Gulf of Riga, which are approximately 7 PSU in open seawater and much lower, even down to freshwater level, in gulfs and estuaries (Jaspers et al. 2021; Pinseel et al. 2022). This enhances the probability of establishment of the new populations. Furthermore, the attachment ability of this species to ropes and rough surfaces is superior even to other Ponto-Caspian species and greatly outperforms native gammarids (Bacela-Spychalska 2016). Pontogammarus robustoides, another successful invasive amphipod of Ponto-Caspian origin, has expanded its European range in recent years, with new records from Estonia (Copilaş-Ciocianu and Šidagytė-Copilas 2022), Hungary (Csabai et al. 2020) and the Netherlands (Moedt and van Haaren 2018). Similar to D. haemobaphes, its discovery in the Lake Mälaren area in 2023 represented a substantial range extension and the first occurrence across the Baltic Sea. Despite its widespread invasion, a comprehensive phylogeographic study of P. robustoides in its non-native range is still lacking. Studies of mitochondrial COI data from Csabai et al. (2020) confirmed that the Hungarian population originates from the Danube Basin. Copilaş-Ciocianu et al. (2023b) compared native and Baltic populations, supporting the hypothesis that this species was introduced directly to the Baltic States. Initially, P. robustoides became acclimatised in the Kaunas Water Reservoir (WR), Lithuania (Jażdżewski 1980; Vaitonis et al. 1990; Arbačiauskas et al. 2017). From there, it was either deliberately introduced into other waterbodies and neighbouring countries prior to the late 1980s or naturally
259 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden dispersed throughout much of the Baltic Basin and beyond (Arbačiauskas et al. 2011; Moedt and van Haaren 2018; Meßner and Zettler 2021). Primary sources of these translocations were the newly-built Dnieper and Simferopol water reservoirs in Ukraine, which were stocked with specimens from the Dnieper-Bug Estuary where the species is native (Gasiunas 1972; Arbačiauskas et al. 2017). Swedish individuals were assigned to two haplotypes: one dominant in the Baltic Region and Dnieper and a second, newly-identified haplotype clustering with others from the same area (Fig. 3C). This finding supports the most probable scenario — similar to that of D. haemobaphes — that P. robustoides was translocated to the Stockholm area from the south-eastern Baltic Region, such as the Baltic States, Vistula Lagoon and Szczecin Lagoon. Pontogammarus robustoides seems to have spread much faster than D. haemobaphes in the Lake Mälaren area. Although it was first detected six years later than the latter species (2023 to 2017), it has already been reported from many more localities and its spread is more dynamic (Suppl. materials 4, 7). Importance of tracking invaders at the population level Traditionally, research on invasive species has focused on species-level characteristics to identify traits associated with invasiveness and predict potentially invasive species (Peoples and Goforth 2017). However, recent studies have shifted towards a population-level perspective, emphasising the dynamics of individual populations within invasive species (Haubrock et al. 2024; Sousa et al. 2024). This shift is appropriate in the case of D. villosus, where Rewicz et al. (2015a) highlighted genetic variability within source populations and isolation between Eastern and Western Groups in Europe, which may significantly influence their invasion success. Subsequently, Hupało et al. (2018) have demonstrated differing metabolic responses in Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs), showing that the Eastern Group invests more resources into cellular defence under thermal stress, potentially increasing its environmental tolerance and thus increasing its potential for invasiveness. Podwysocki et al. (2025a; 2025b; in press) have revealed differences in food preferences, dispersal capacity and morphology between these two D. villosus molecular groups. These findings underscore the importance of rapidly tracking the origin of invasive species populations. Our newly-designed markers offer a promising solution with the potential for population-specific monitoring using environmental DNA (eDNA) and previously collected specimens for the rapid differentiation of the two groups. Additionally, an admixture of the Western and Eastern Groups is possible, forming intraspecific hybrids. This scenario has been found to be plausible in Poland, where a gap of no more than 50 km wide in the Notecki Canal separates the two groups (T. Rewicz, A. Desiderato, unpublished data). Given the connectivity of waterbodies and the invader dispersal abilities in Sweden, similar scenarios cannot be excluded. The Eastern Group currently occupies coastal areas of the south-eastern Baltic (Copilaş-Ciocianu and Šidagytė-Copilas 2022), potentially following a route similar to D. haemobaphes in its spread to Scandinavia. Jermacz et al. (2025) tested the metabolic response of both D. villosus groups and their hybrid to temperature increases and oxygen deficiency. Results suggest that, while large individuals and the Western Group are more sensitive to environmental stressors, intraspecific hybridisation may enhance the invaders’
260 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden environmental tolerance. These findings align with observations by Brauer et al. (2023) and Kulmuni et al. (2024), who reported that hybridisation facilitates adaptation to rapid environmental changes, reducing vulnerability to climate change. Hybridisation may also enhance genetic variation within populations and contribute to hybrid vigour, as Facon et al. (2005) have suggested. Microsporidia hitchhikers and implications for the freshwater biodiversity in Sweden The impact of invasive parasites on ecosystems can be as harmful as that of their invasive hosts (Prenter et al. 2004). The ongoing global spread of invasive crustaceans increases the risk of co-transporting symbiotic organisms (Bojko et al. 2021). Ponto-Caspian amphipods have been extensively studied for various pathogens, including acanthocephalans (Emde et al. 2012), trematodes (Warren et al. 2023), viruses (Bojko et al. 2019) and especially microsporidia (Wattier et al. 2007; Ovcharenko et al. 2010; Green Etxabe et al. 2015; Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2018, 2023; Burgess and Bojko 2022). In this study, we detected two predominantly vertically transmitted microsporidian species, Dictyocoela berillonum and D. muelleri (Terry et al. 2004), infecting primarily D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides, but also identified in D. villosus, newly established in Sweden. These parasite species are amongst the most commonly observed in invasive amphipods, with haplotypes and clades (Fig. 4) corresponding to those previously identified in D. haemobaphes and Pontogammarus robustoides in both their native and colonised ranges (Grabner et al. 2015; Green Etxabe et al. 2015; Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2018; Burgess and Bojko 2022). Furthermore, D. berillonum is associated with intersexuality observed in D. haemobaphes males (Green Etxabe et al. 2015). Such intersex specimens may carry fertilised eggs in their brood pouches (Bacela et al. 2009). However, there is no evidence for sex ratio distortion in infected populations, thus the promotion of the host invasion by enhanced population growth is not expected, as in the case of Crangonyx pseudogracilis and its vertically transmitted and sex-distorting parasite Fibrillanosema crangonycis (Slothouber Galbreath et al. 2004). The haplotypes identified in this study grouped within clades typical for the Ponto-Caspian hosts (Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2018). This further supports the scenario of the two microsporidian species having been introduced together with their invasive hosts. As the two species are predominantly vertically transmitted parasites, we may expect a low level of threat to the native fauna, as the probability of being transmitted to naive hosts is low. On the other hand, we cannot exclude some levels of horizontal transmission (see Wilkinson et al. (2011)). Interestingly, the two horizontally transmitted Cucumispora dikerogammari and C. ornata, which are specific to Dikerogammarus spp. (Ovcharenko et al. 2010; Bojko et al. 2015), have not yet been detected in Sweden. This scenario of not being detected aligns with the hypotheses of parasite release and founder effects (Phillips et al. 2010), including the loss of molecular diversity in host species. Such effects were observed during the invasion of D. villosus in Great Britain, where, despite extensive sampling, C. dikerogammari has not been found even 15 years post-invasion (Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2013; Arundell et al. 2015). It is worth mentioning some limitations of the detection method used in this study. Co-infection by different microsporidian species within a single host individual is not uncommon and can hinder successful sequencing. This was the most
261 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden probable reason for the failed sequencing attempts in three D. haemobaphes individuals that were identified as infected. Advances in sequencing technologies, such as the use of high-throughput platforms like Oxford Nanopore, may help overcome these limitations. Parallel sequencing of all present strains within a sample could significantly increase the accuracy and reliability of microsporidian detection. Further scenarios for invasive Crustacea in Sweden Dikerogammarus spp. and P. robustoides can spread within Sweden, as their fast dispersal amongst other lake systems is well-documented (Bacela-Spychalska et al. 2013; Podwysocki et al. 2024). Presumably increased international mobility of recreational boating is a major contributing factor (Anderson et al. 2014, 2015; Smith et al. 2020, 2023). One of the limiting factors in Swedish waterbodies may be calcium availability, as it is essential for amphipod survival, as shown by previous studies by Rukke (2002), Zehmer et al. (2002) and Cairns and Yan (2009). While lakes such as Vättern and Mälaren have relatively high calcium levels that support amphipods, many Swedish lakes remain unsuitable for both native and non-native benthic crustaceans (Sahlén Zetterberg and Fölster 2022). Even where colonisation occurs, these species may fail to establish. Median calcium concentration in Swedish lakes is 7 mg/l (Sahlén Zetterberg and Fölster 2022), while many benthic crustaceans require at least 5 mg/l. A significant number of lakes fall below this threshold and lack native or alien amphipods, but others are sufficiently rich in calcium and nutrients to sustain them. Such natural environmental barriers may postpone or block further spread of invasive crustaceans. This possibility underscores the importance of countermeasures such as the “check, clean and dry” (Rothlisberger et al. 2010) strategy to curb their spread. In Sweden, there is a high level of awareness of these countermeasures and the programme was launched there in 2023 (Bjelke 2024). Including these species and updating the list with new or potential newcomers in Sweden’s invasive species monitoring programmes could further increase public awareness, as the littoral invertebrate fauna of Swedish lakes and streams is surveyed through these programmes. This programme also led to the discovery of the three species studied here, even though these programmes cover only a small fraction of Swedish freshwater systems. On the other hand, no systematic littoral monitoring exists for Sweden’s extensive Baltic coastline. Consequently, numerous undiscovered localities likely harbour these and other invasive alien species, particularly in the Swedish part of the Baltic Sea. In particular, Lake Mälaren and its surrounding areas, due to high tourist activity and the presence of Sweden’s largest freshwater port, may serve as a hotspot or gateway for invasive species. Generally, in southern Sweden, we have already detected four Ponto-Caspian amphipods—Dikerogammarus haemobaphes, D. villosus, Pontogammarus robustoides and Chelicorophium curvispinum, as well as two mysid species, Hemimysis anomala and Limnomysis benedeni (Suppl. material 7). Notably, people who are engaged in outdoor activities could act as both potential vectors for the dispersal of invasive species and as citizen scientists, playing a critical role in monitoring and managing such species in freshwater ecosystems (Crall et al. 2013; Phillips et al. 2021). By reporting observations, collecting data and raising public awareness, citizen scientists complement professional research efforts and contribute to the early detection and prevention of invasions (Roy‐Dufresne et al. 2019; Larson et al. 2020).
262 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Conclusions Using DNA barcoding, our study has demonstrated that Sweden’s freshwater ecosystems have been invaded by three ecologically damaging invasive species: Dikerogammarus villosus, D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides. Data from mtDNA markers suggests that all three species were probably introduced during single events with a limited number of individuals, indicated by the reduced molecular diversity within populations, but using two different vectors, recreational boats and shipping from the Baltic. Newly-designed molecular markers identified the Western Group as the source population for D. villosus in Sweden. Additionally, haplotype distribution and dispersal potential of D. haemobaphes and P. robustoides suggest eastern or southern Baltic Regions, such as the Baltic States, Vistula Lagoon and Szczecin Lagoon, as the sources from which these species were introduced to Sweden. All the species were found to be carriers of microsporidian parasites, which may pose an additional threat to Nordic ecosystems. Finally, our study contributes to the understanding of biological invasions at the population level. This fine scale is becoming invaluable for developing effective conservation strategies. Moreover, coordinated monitoring efforts, particularly along the Baltic coast, may be key to enabling a rapid response to new invasive species in Swedish waters. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Michał Grabowski, Alicja Konopacka, Remi Wattier, Krzysztof Podwysocki, Łukasz Trębicki and Joakim Pansar for their support with field sampling and Julita Nawrocka for her assistance with laboratory work. Additional information Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Ethical statement No ethical statement was reported. Use of AI No use of AI was reported. Funding This study was partially supported by the National Science Centre (Poland), projects number 2018/31/D/NZ8/03061; 2017/01/X/NZ8/01086; the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant N N304 350139; and internal funds from the University of Lodz. Tomasz Rewicz received additional support through a Scholarship from the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (NAWA) under the Bekker Program (project number PPN/BEK/2018/1/00162/U/00001). Author contributions Conceptualization: TR, KBS, AD, UB. Data curation: TR, TM, KBS. Formal analysis: TR, AD, KBS, TM. Funding acquisition: TR. Investigation: TR. Methodology: TR, TM, KBS, AD. Project administration: TR. Resources: JBS, TM, UB. Software: AD, TM. Supervision: TR, UB. Validation: TR, KBS. Visualization: TR, KBS, JBS. Writing - original draft: TR, TM, AD, KBS. Writing - review and editing: TR, JBS, AD, KBS, UB, TM.
263 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Author ORCIDs Tomasz Rewicz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2085-4973 Andrea Desiderato https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3284-5529 Karolina Bacela-Spychalska https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-5107 Tomasz Mamos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0524-3015 Data availability All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information. References Aldridge D (2013) GB non-native organism rapid risk assessment for Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841). https://www.nonnativespecies.org/assets/Uploads/Rapid_RA_Dikerogammarus_haemobaphes.pdf Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 Anderson LG, White PC, Stebbing PD, Stentiford GD, Dunn AM (2014) Biosecurity and vector behaviour: Evaluating the potential threat posed by anglers and canoeists as pathways for the spread of invasive non-native species and pathogens. PLoS ONE 9: e92788. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0092788 Anderson LG, Rocliffe S, Haddaway NR, Dunn AM (2015) The role of tourism and recreation in the spread of non-native species: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10: e0140833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140833 Andres KJ, Lodge DM, Andrés J (2023a) Environmental DNA reveals the genetic diversity and population structure of an invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 120: e2307345120. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.2307345120 Andres KJ, Lodge DM, Sethi SA, Andrés J (2023b) Detecting and analysing intraspecific genetic variation with eDNA: From population genetics to species abundance. Molecular Ecology 32: 4118–4132. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17031 Arbačiauskas K, Višinskienė G, Smilgevičienė S, Rakauskas V (2011) Non-indigenous macroinvertebrate species in Lithuanian fresh waters, Part 1: Distributions, dispersal and future. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 12: 18. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2011075 Arbačiauskas K, Šidagytė E, Šniaukštaitė V, Lesutienė J (2017) Range expansion of Ponto-Caspian peracaridan Crustaceans in the Baltic Sea basin and its aftermath: Lessons from Lithuania. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 20: 393–401. Artfakta Sweden (2025) Artfakta Sweden. https://artfakta.se/ [accessed 12.02.2025] Arundell K, Dunn A, Alexander J, Shearman R, Archer N, Ironside JE (2015) Enemy release and genetic founder effects in invasive killer shrimp populations of Great Britain. Biological Invasions 17: 1439–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0806-y Bacela K, Konopacka A, Grabowski M (2009) Reproductive biology of Dikerogammarus haemobaphes: an invasive gammarid (Crustacea: Amphipoda) colonising running waters in Central Europe. Biological Invasions 11: 2055–2066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9496-2 Bacela-Spychalska K (2016) Attachment ability of two invasive amphipod species may promote their spread by overland transport. Aquatic Conservation 26: 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2565 Bacela-Spychalska K, Van der Velde G (2013) There is more than one ‘killer shrimp’: Trophic positions and predatory abilities of invasive amphipods of Ponto-Caspian origin. Freshwater Biology 58: 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12078
264 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Bacela-Spychalska K, Wattier RA, Genton C, Rigaud T (2012) Microsporidian disease of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus and the potential for its transfer to local invertebrate fauna. Biological Invasions 14: 1831–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0193-1 Bacela-Spychalska K, Grabowski M, Rewicz T, Konopacka A, Wattier R (2013) The ‘killer shrimp’ Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea, Amphipoda) invading Alpine lakes: Overland transport by recreational boats and scuba-diving gear as potential entry vectors? Aquatic Conservation 23: 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2329 Bacela-Spychalska K, Wróblewski P, Mamos T, Grabowski M, Rigaud T, Wattier R, Rewicz T, Konopacka A, Ovcharenko M (2018) Europe-wide reassessment of Dictyocoela (Microsporidia) infecting native and invasive amphipods (Crustacea): Molecular versus ultrastructural traits. Scientific Reports 8: 8945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26879-3 Bacela-Spychalska K, Wattier R, Teixeira M, Cordaux R, Quiles A, Grabowski M, Wroblewski P, Ovcharenko M, Grabner D, Weber D (2023) Widespread infection, diversification and old host associations of Nosema Microsporidia in European freshwater gammarids (Amphipoda). PLoS Pathogens 19: e1011560. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1011560 Baker MD, Vossbrinck CR, Maddox JV, Undeen AH (1994) Phylogenetic Relationships among Vairimorpha and Nosema Species (Microspora) Based on Ribosomal RNA Sequence Data. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 64: 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1006/ jipa.1994.1077 Baran K, Neumann T (2023) A Comparative Analysis of Seaports in Terms of the Development of Maritime Tourism in the Area of the Baltic Sea. Water (Basel) 15: 3721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ w15213721 Berglund BE (1979) The deglaciation of southern Sweden 13,500–10,000 B.P. Boreas 8: 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1979.tb00789.x Bij de Vaate A, Jazdzewski K, Ketelaars HAM, Gollasch S, Van der Velde G (2002) Geographical patterns in range extension of Ponto-Caspian macroinvertebrate species in Europe. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1159–1174. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-098 Bjelke U (2024) Invasion of alien crustaceans in Lakes Mälaren and Vättern. SLU Species Data Bank reports 33, Uppsala, 8 pp. https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/subw/artd/6-publikationer/43-.-kraftdjur/klar_invasion_frammande_kraftdjur.pdf Bjelke U, Tomasson L (2023) New invasive species discovered in Lake Vättern. https://www. havochvatten.se/arkiv/aktuellt/2023-03-08-ny-invasiv-art-upptackt-i-vattern.html [accessed 08.03.2023] Blackman RC, Constable D, Hahn C, Sheard AM, Durkota J, Hänfling B, Handley LL (2017) Detection of a new non-native freshwater species by DNA metabarcoding of environmental samples—First record of Gammarus fossarum in the UK. Aquatic Invasions 12(2): 177–189. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.2.06 Bojko J, Ovcharenko M (2019) Pathogens and other symbionts of the Amphipoda: Taxonomic diversity and pathological significance. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 136: 3–36. https://doi. org/10.3354/dao03321 Bojko J, Dunn AM, Stebbing PD, Ross SH, Kerr RC, Stentiford GD (2015) Cucumispora ornata n. sp. (Fungi: Microsporidia) infecting invasive ‘demon shrimp’ (Dikerogammarus haemobaphes) in the United Kingdom. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 128: 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jip.2015.04.005 Bojko J, Stentiford GD, Stebbing PD, Hassall C, Deacon A, Cargill B, Pile B, Dunn AM (2019) Pathogens of Dikerogammarus haemobaphes regulate host activity and survival, but also threaten native amphipod populations in the UK. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 136: 63–78. https://doi. org/10.3354/dao03195
265 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Bojko J, Burgess AL, Baker AG, Orr CH (2021) Invasive Non-Native Crustacean Symbionts: Diversity and Impact. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 186: 107482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jip.2020.107482 Bojko J, Reinke AW, Stentiford GD, Williams B, Rogers MS, Bass D (2022) Microsporidia: A new taxonomic, evolutionary, and ecological synthesis. Trends in Parasitology 38: 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.05.007 Bommerlund J, Baars J-R, Schrøder-Nielsen A, Brys R, Mauvisseau C, de Boer HJ, Mauvisseau Q (2023) eDNA-based detection as an early warning tool for detecting established and emerging invasive amphipods. Management of Biological Invasions : International Journal of Applied Research on Biological Invasions 14: 321–333. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2023.14.2.09 Brauer CJ, Sandoval-Castillo J, Gates K, Hammer MP, Unmack PJ, Bernatchez L, Beheregaray LB (2023) Natural hybridisation reduces vulnerability to climate change. Nature Climate Change 13: 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01585-1 Briski E, Ghabooli S, Bailey SA, MacIsaac HJ (2012) Invasion risk posed by macroinvertebrates transported in ships’ ballast tanks. Biological Invasions 14: 1843–1850. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10530-012-0194-0 Burgess A, Bojko J (2022) Microsporidia are coming: Cucumispora ornata and Dictyocoela berillonum invade Northern Britain. BioInvasions Records 11: 401–408. https://doi.org/10.3391/ bir.2022.11.2.13 Cairns A, Yan N (2009) A review of the influence of low ambient calcium concentrations on freshwater daphniids, gammarids, and crayfish. Environmental Reviews 17: 67–79. https://doi. org/10.1139/a09-005 Carpio AJ, De Miguel R, Oteros J, Hillström L, Tortosa FS (2019) Angling as a source of non-native freshwater fish: A European review. Biological Invasions 21: 3233–3248. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10530-019-02042-5 Constable D, Birkby NJ (2016) The impact of the invasive amphipod Dikerogammarus haemobaphes on leaf litter processing in UK rivers. Aquatic Ecology 50: 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10452-016-9574-3 Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Šidagytė-Copilas E (2022) A substantial range expansion of alien Ponto-Caspian amphipods along the eastern Baltic Sea coast. Oceanologia 64: 227–232. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.oceano.2021.09.005 Copilaș-Ciocianu D, Sidorov D (2022) Taxonomic, ecological and morphological diversity of Ponto-Caspian gammaroidean amphipods: A review. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 22: 285– 315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00536-6 Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Rewicz T, Sands AF, Palatov D, Marin I, Arbačiauskas K, Hebert PD, Grabowski M, Audzijonyte A (2022) A DNA barcode reference library for endemic Ponto-Caspian amphipods. Scientific Reports 12: 11332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15442-w Copilaș-Ciocianu D, Sidorov D, Šidagytė-Copilas E (2023a) Global distribution and diversity of alien Ponto-Caspian amphipods. Biological Invasions 25: 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10530-022-02908-1 Copilaş-Ciocianu D, Šidagytė-Copilas E, Son MO, Morhun H, Macher JN, Arbačiauskas K (2023b) Genetic diversity of Ponto-Caspian amphipods throughout the invaded Baltic and native NW Black Sea donor ranges: Does introduction mode matter? Hydrobiologia 850: 3061–3076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-023-05230-6 Crall AW, Jordan R, Holfelder K, Newman GJ, Graham J, Waller DM (2013) The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England) 22: 745–764. https://doi. org/10.1177/0963662511434894
266 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Cristescu ME, Hebert PD (2005) The “Crustacean Seas” an evolutionary perspective on the Ponto-Caspian peracarids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 505–517. https:// doi.org/10.1139/f04-210 Cristescu MEA, Hebert PDN, Onciu TM (2003) Phylogeography of Ponto-Caspian crustaceans: A benthic–planktonic comparison. Molecular Ecology 12: 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1365-294X.2003.01801.x Csabai Z, Borza P, Rewicz T, Pernecker B, Berta BJ, Móra A (2020) Mass appearance of the Ponto-Caspian invader Pontogammarus robustoides in the River Tisza catchment: Bypass in the southern invasion corridor? Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 9: 7. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2020003 Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B, Flouri T (2020) ModelTest-NG: A New and Scalable Tool for the Selection of DNA and Protein Evolutionary Models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz189 Dick JTA, Alexander ME, MacNeil C (2013) Natural born killers: An invasive amphipod is predatory throughout its life-history. Biological Invasions 15: 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530012-0287-9 Dobrzycka-Krahel A, Graca B (2014) Laboratory study of the effect of salinity and ionic composition of water on the mortality and osmoregulation of the gammarid amphipod Dikerogammarus haemobaphes (Eichwald, 1841): Implications for understanding its invasive distribution pattern. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 47: 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236 244.2014.932141 Dobrzycka-Krahel A, Majkowski W, Melzer M (2016) Length-weight relationships of Ponto-Caspian gammarids that have overcome the salinity barrier of the southern Baltic Sea coastal waters. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology 49: 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236 244.2016.1244948 Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A-H, Soto D, Stiassny ML (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 81: 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950 Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 Emde S, Rueckert S, Palm HW, Klimpel S (2012) Invasive Ponto-Caspian amphipods and fish increase the distribution range of the acanthocephalan Pomphorhynchus tereticollis in the river Rhine. PLoS ONE 7: e53218. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053218 Etxabe AG, Short S, Flood T, Johns T, Ford AT (2015) Pronounced and prevalent intersexuality does not impede the ‘Demon Shrimp’invasion. PeerJ 3: e757. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.757 European Environmental Agency (2018) European waters, Assessment of status and pressures 2018State of Water Report 7/2018: 1–90. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-water Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x Facon B, Jarne P, Pointier JP, David P (2005) Hybridisation and invasiveness in the freshwater snail Melanoides tuberculata: Hybrid vigour is more important than increase in genetic variance. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 524–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00887.x Gasiunas I (1972) Obogoschenie kormovoj bazy ryb vodoemov Litvy akklimatizirovannymi rakoobraznymi Kaspijskogo kompleksa.(Enrichment of fodder basis of water bodies of Lithuania by acclimatised crustaceans-like organisms from the Caspian Sea complex. Voprosy razvedenija ryb I rakoobraznykh v vodoemakh Litvy (On the breeding of fish and crustacean-like organisms in the water bodies of Lithuania), 57–68. [In Russian]
267 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Gatehouse HS, Malone LA (1998) The Ribosomal RNA Gene Region ofNosema apis(Microspora): DNA Sequence for Small and Large Subunit rRNA Genes and Evidence of a Large Tandem Repeat Unit Size. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 71: 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1006/ jipa.1997.4737 Gherardi F (2007) Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Vol. 2, Springer Science & Business Media, 734 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8 Grabner DS, Weigand AM, Leese F, Winking C, Hering D, Tollrian R, Sures B (2015) Invaders, natives and their enemies: Distribution patterns of amphipods and their microsporidian parasites in the Ruhr Metropolis, Germany. Parasites & Vectors 8: 419. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071015-1036-6 Grabowski M, Jażdżewski K, Konopacka A (2007) Alien crustacea in Polish waters–Amphipoda. Aquatic Invasions 2: 25–38. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2007.2.1.3 Hadwen WL, Boon PI, Arthington AH (2012) Aquatic ecosystems in inland Australia: Tourism and recreational significance, ecological impacts and imperatives for management. Marine and Freshwater Research 63: 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF11198 Hall CM, Härkönen T (2006) Lake tourism: An integrated approach to lacustrine tourism systems. Vol. 32, Channel view publications, 235 pp. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781845410421 Harrison PA, Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Berry PM, Bugter R, De Bello F, Feld CK, Grandin U, Harrington R, Haslett JR (2010) Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2791–2821. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10531-010-9789-x Haubrock PJ, Soto I, Ahmed DA, Ansari AR, Tarkan AS, Kurtul I, Macêdo RL, Lázaro-Lobo A, Toutain M, Parker B, Błońska D, Guareschi S, Cano-Barbacil C, Dominguez Almela V, Andreou D, Moyano J, Akalın S, Kaya C, Bayçelebi E, Yoğurtçuoğlu B, Briski E, Aksu S, Emiroğlu Ö, Mammola S, De Santis V, Kourantidou M, Pincheira-Donoso D, Britton JR, Kouba A, Dolan EJ, Kirichenko NI, García-Berthou E, Renault D, Fernandez RD, Yapıcı S, Giannetto D, Nuñez MA, Hudgins EJ, Pergl J, Milardi M, Musolin DL, Cuthbert RN (2024) Biological invasions are a population-level rather than a species-level phenomenon. Global Change Biology 30: e17312. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17312 Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 270: 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 Henriksen A, Brit Lisa S, Jaakko M, Wilander A, Ron H, Curtis C, Jensen JP, Erik F, Tatyana M (1998) Northern European Lake Survey, 1995: Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Russian Kola, Russian Karelia, Scotland and Wales. Ambio 27: 80–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314692 Hogg JC, Ironside JE, Sharpe RG, Hatcher MJ, Smith JE, Dunn AM (2002) Infection of Gammarus duebeni populations by two vertically transmitted microsporidia; parasite detection and discrimination by PCR–RFLP. Parasitology 125: 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182002001774 Hou Z, Sket B, Fišer C, Li S (2011) Eocene habitat shift from saline to freshwater promoted Tethyan amphipod diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 14533–14538. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104636108 Hou Z, Sket B, Li S (2014) Phylogenetic analyses of Gammaridae crustacean reveal different diversification patterns among sister lineages in the Tethyan region. Cladistics 30: 352–365. https:// doi.org/10.1111/cla.12055 Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 17: 754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 Hupało K, Riss HW, Grabowski M, Thiel J, Bącela-Spychalska K, Meyer EI (2018) Climate change as a possible driver of invasion and differential in HSP70 expression in two genetically distinct
274 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Supplementary material 3 Microsporidia overview, host species, literaturę reference, sequence length, GenBank accession numbers Authors: Tomasz Rewicz, Andrea Desiderato, Jennie Barthel Svedén, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska, Tomasz Mamos, Ulf Bjelke Data type: xlsx Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.153292.suppl3 Supplementary material 4 Localities of recorded invasive Ponto-Caspian Crustacea in Sweden Authors: Tomasz Rewicz, Andrea Desiderato, Jennie Barthel Svedén, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska, Tomasz Mamos, Ulf Bjelke Data type: xlsx Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.153292.suppl4 Supplementary material 5 Conventional F-Statistics from haplotype frequencies of the different genes (COI, ATP8, and ND5) Authors: Andrea Desiderato Data type: xlsx Explanation note: The Fst values are calculated between regions and between populations. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.153292.suppl5
275 NeoBiota 101: 243–275 (2025), DOI: 10.3897/neobiota.101.153292 Tomasz Rewicz et al.: Ponto-Caspian Amphipods in Sweden Supplementary material 6 Median-joining networks showing the relationships between Dikerogammarus villosus haplotypes Authors: Tomasz Rewicz, Andrea Desiderato, Jennie Barthel Svedén, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska, Tomasz Mamos, Ulf Bjelke Data type: jpg Explanation note: Based on A: concatenated ND5, ATP8 and COI markers and B: COI only. Colours indicate D. villosus individuals representing different areas of origin. Each bar corresponds to a substitution, with the small black dot in A denoting undetected or extinct intermediate haplotype state. The sizes of the circles are proportionate to the frequencies of haplotypes in the dataset, as illustrated by the open circles with accompanying numbers. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.153292.suppl6 Supplementary material 7 Known distribution of the invasive Ponto-Caspian Crustacea in Sweden Authors: Tomasz Rewicz, Andrea Desiderato, Jennie Barthel Svedén, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska, Tomasz Mamos, Ulf Bjelke Data type: png Explanation note: Data valid for October 2024. Bjelke (2024), modified. Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited. Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.101.153292.suppl7