scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Shadow Mass, Nature of Electrons and Molecular Bonding in the Quantum Tachyonic Gravity Framework

Angeli, Nazareno

Abstract

This paper formalizes the concept of shadow mass within Quantum Tachyonic Gravity (QTG), defining it as the tachyonic counterpart to baryonic matter - a projected mass existing beyond the C-boundary, and its simplest observable expression - the electron. Extention: this reinterpretation is then used to reframe molecular bonding as deterministic and field-based. TL; DR: The electron is not somewhere inside a probability cloud; the electron is the probability cloud.

Full text

Shadow Mass and Electron Dynamics in the QTG Framework Abstract This paper formalizes the concept of shadow mass within Quantum Tachyonic Gravity (QTG), defining it as the tachyonic counterpart to baryonic matter — a projected mass existing beyond the C-boundary. Shadow mass embodies the field’s counter-balancing effort to stabilize asymmetries, and it forms the foundation of electromagnetism, inertia, and quantum coherence within the QTG model. The paper further explores the electron as a stable shadow-mass vortex and describes how baryonic and shadow mass jointly shape observable phenomena. 1. Definition of Shadow Mass Shadow mass is the tachyonic component of total field mass-energy. It represents the rebalancing counterpart to baryonic asymmetry, existing beyond the light-speed boundary (C). Formally: mₛ = f(ΔΦ_field, v > C), where mₛ is not observable directly but inferred through its field interactions. Key properties: - Exists as pure potential (non-manifested) energy within the tachyonic field. - Acts as the 'mirror inertia' of baryonic matter. - Its local gradients determine gravitational and electromagnetic responses. - Cannot cross the C-boundary directly; effects are observed as rebalancing oscillations (radiation, EM emissions, decoherence). 2. Reciprocity of Mass Projection Baryonic and shadow mass are two aspects of a single oscillatory system. Energy balance is preserved through: m_b v_b² = mₛ vₛ², where v_b < C and vₛ > C. This reciprocal projection guarantees that inertia and gravitational attraction remain symmetrical across both domains. 3. Boundary Potential (Φ_C) The light-speed limit is reframed as a dynamic potential barrier, not a constant of nature. Each baryonic mass induces a localized curvature in Φ_C, determining the local effective speed of light (c_eff). Regions of high field compression (black holes, neutron stars) experience distortions of this boundary, permitting partial energy tunneling from the shadow domain — perceived as gravitational lensing or time dilation. 4. Charge Polarity and Gradient Orientation Electric charge originates from the orientation of rebalancing gradients across Φ_C: - Inward flux (shadow → baryonic) corresponds to negative charge. - Outward flux (baryonic → shadow) corresponds to positive charge. Charge is therefore a vectorial field property, not an intrinsic particle attribute. Field distortions that favor persistent directional rebalancing stabilize as electrons, protons, and ions. 5. Decoherence as Cross-Boundary Leakage Thermal radiation and entropy are secondary effects of oscillatory energy losing coherence and leaking through Φ_C. Photons are not particles but wavefronts of this rebalancing process, marking points where tachyonic and baryonic fields momentarily synchronize before diverging again. 6. The Electron as a Shadow-Mass Vortex The electron is a stabilized vortex of shadow mass, anchored close to Φ_C by its charge polarity and field resonance. Its apparent rest mass emerges from: m_e = E_vortex / c² = f(Φ_C, ω_t) / c², where ω_t is the tachyonic oscillation frequency that defines orbital quantization. This reinterprets atomic structure as the harmonic superposition of baryonic cores and their shadow-mass vortices. 7. Implications 1. Unified origin of forces — gravity, electromagnetism, and inertia are different harmonics of baryonic-shadow mass coupling. 2. Reinterpretation of constants — C, ħ, and G are emergent averages of the inertial basin, not fixed absolutes. 3. Quantum coherence — occurs when baryonic and shadow oscillations resonate perfectly across Φ_C. 4. Matter-energy equivalence — redefined as a projection law, not conversion.