D2.2 - BBTs Assessment Tool – v1

Deliverable 2.2 1 MTU June 2024 BBTs Assessment Tool – v1 DELIVERABLE D2.2 Deliverable 2.2 2 Document information Document ID D2.2 Title BBTs assessment tool – v1 Work Package WP2 –Bio-Based Technologies and regional dynamics Due Date 30/06/2024 Delivery Date 28/06/2024 Dissemination Level PU-fully open Partner Responsible MTU Main Authors Carmen Girón Domínguez - MTU Contributors Husain Sadeqi - MTU Peer reviewers Reviewer 1 Thomas McCarthy – Teagasc Reviewer 2 Patrizia Borsotto – CREA Reviewer 3 Roberto Cagliero – CREA Coordinator Carmen Girón Domínguez – MTU Document history Version Date Main Modifications Author(s) 0.1 13/06/2024 Creation of the first version MTU 0.2 21/06/2024 Teagasc revision Teagasc 0.3 24/06/2024 CREA revision CREA 1.0 28/06/2024 Final version ready for submission MTU 2.0 11/09/2024 Copyright added MTU © 2024 by BBioNets consortium is licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 . Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 7 2 Context of the BBTs Assessment tool in the project ................................. 8 2.1 Composition of the BBTs Assessment tool ............................................................... 9 2.1.1 ‘Reference’ Scenarios .................................................................................................. 9 2.1.2 RR-Specific Scenarios ................................................................................................ 14 2.1.3 Validation of the RR-Specific Scenarios (weightage) ................................................ 14 3 Methodology ......................................................................................... 15 3.1 Conceptual design ................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Components of the tool .......................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 Excel sheets ............................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Data Model (Power Pivot) ........................................................................................ 26 4 Usage scenarios and functionalities of the tool ...................................... 31 4.1 Interpretation of results .......................................................................................... 32 5 ‘Reference’ scenario information ........................................................... 33 5.1 Czech Republic ........................................................................................................ 34 5.1.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ..................................................... 34 5.1.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ........................................................... 52 5.1.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ......................................................................... 64 5.2 Greece ..................................................................................................................... 70 5.2.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ..................................................... 70 5.2.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ........................................................... 79 5.2.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ......................................................................... 84 5.3 Ireland ..................................................................................................................... 86 5.3.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ..................................................... 86 5.3.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ........................................................... 93 5.3.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ....................................................................... 102 5.4 Italy ........................................................................................................................ 105 5.4.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ................................................... 105 5.4.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ......................................................... 112 5.4.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ....................................................................... 117 5.5 Poland .................................................................................................................... 119 5.5.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ................................................... 119 5.5.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ......................................................... 125 5.5.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ....................................................................... 134 5.6 Spain ...................................................................................................................... 137 5.6.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. ................................................... 137 5.6.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. ......................................................... 148 4 5.6.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet ....................................................................... 154 6 Conclusions and future works .............................................................. 159 References .................................................................................................. 160 Appendix I Guidelines for Reference Scenarios ........................................... 161 List of Figures Figure 1. Relation of tasks and BBTs Assessment tool outputs per Represented Region. ...................... 8 Figure 2. ‘Reference’ Scenario representation. ....................................................................................... 9 Figure 3. RR-Specific Scenario representation. ..................................................................................... 14 Figure 4. Validation phase represented. ............................................................................................... 14 Figure 5. Concept design of the BBTs Assessment tool ........................................................................ 16 Figure 6. BBTs Assessment tool concept regarding project tasks ......................................................... 16 Figure 7. Screenshot of Excel’s Name Manager with detail of the Names created in the Inventory sheet. ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Figure 8. Screenshot of the Workshop Answers sheet. ........................................................................ 21 Figure 9. Screenshot of the Translate Table sheet ................................................................................ 23 Figure 10. Screenshot of BBTs Assessment tool Power Pivot window. ................................................ 28 Figure 11. Clarification of the Power Pivot snowflake diagram ............................................................ 30 Figure 12. Representation of the layer of information for the BBTs Assessment tool for each region 31 Figure 13. Cost-Effectiveness 2-D plot interpretation guide. Adapted from [2]. .................................. 32 List of Tables Table 1: Relation of resources for the creation of the ‘Reference’ Scenarios generated with the BBTs Assessment tool. ................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 2: Purpose of Excel sheets. .......................................................................................................... 17 Table 3. Table names in the Workshop ................................................................................................. 19 Table 4. Association of information in “TranslateTables” sheet ........................................................... 21 Table 5: Weight tables and its relationship with other information. .................................................... 24 Table 6: Types of variables and fields analysed .................................................................................... 25 5 Table of Abbreviations Abbreviation Description AB Advisory Board BBT Bio-Based Technology D Deliverable FAN Forest and Agriculture Networks HLRD High-Level study of Regional Dynamics OG Operational Groups RPFA Regional Partners for Forestry and Agriculture RR Represented Region T Task WP Work Package 6 Executive Summary This document, titled "BBTs Assessment Tool - v1," outlines the initial version of the Bio-Based Technologies (BBTs) Assessment Tool, detailing its features and the 'Reference' Scenarios for each Represented Region (RR). It describes the tool's integration with project tasks such as the BBioNets knowledge inventory, regional dynamics studies, and workshops for identifying and validating regional needs and BBTs. The primary objective of the tool is to prioritize the most suitable BBTs for each RR based on userprovided data, enhancing accuracy with more detailed input. The methodology section elucidates the tool's operation, interrelationships of information, and accuracy improvement. A data model created with Power Pivot is explained, showcasing its design and functionality. The report covers various applications of the tool, results interpretation through a 2-D costeffectiveness plot and presents 'Reference' Scenarios from each region. An annex provides guidelines for partners on using the tool to develop 'Reference' Scenarios. 7 1 Introduction This document is the D2.2 "BBTs Assessment Tool - v1". It provides an overview of the functionalities of the first version of the Bio-Based Technologies (BBTs) Assessment Tool and the 'reference' scenario for each Represented Region (RR). The BBTs Assessment tool is presented in the context of the project, how it interacts with other tasks such as the BBioNets knowledge inventory, the high-level study on regional dynamics (T2.3), the workshops held during T1.2 to identify regional needs and challenges, and the future workshops to be held during T1.3 for the validation and prioritisation of bio-based technologies (BBTs). The main objective of the tool is to generate a proposed prioritisation of the most appropriate BBT for each RR using the mapped BBTs. The tool is designed so that the more information the user provides, the more accurate the results will be. In other words, the more accurate the suggested prioritisation of BBTs for each RR. This report comprises six chapters along with references and is organised as follows: Chapter 1: Introduction which describes issues concerning deliverable scope, objectives, how it is the function in the project, and it briefly presents the structure of deliverable. Chapter 2: The context of the BBTs Assessment tool which describes how the BBTs Assessment tool fits within the project and a deeply description of terms related to the tool. Chapter 3: Methodology: this section has been written to explain how it works, how the information relates to each other and why it becomes more accurate as more information is added. A data model has been developed using Power Pivot within the tool and it is explained how it is designed, how the different tables are built, how they relate to each other and a visual representation of how it works. Chapter 4: Uses of the BBTs Assessment tool: the “Reference” Scenario is explained, as well as how to interpret the results in a 2-D plot of cost-effectiveness variables. Chapter 5: 'Reference' Scenarios information: 'Reference' Scenarios each region is collected and presented in this deliverable, indicating the basis of the BBTs Assessment tool for each region. Chapter 6: Conclusion: The last section summarises conclusions on BBTs Assessment tool and on next steps. The deliverable also includes, as an annex, the guidelines written for partners on how to use the BBTs Assessment tool to create a 'Reference' Scenario. 8 2 Context of the BBTs Assessment tool in the project The BBTs Assessment tool is an Excel file designed to consolidate data from various BBioNets resources and analyse it through its Power Pivot engine. This process enables the matching of the needs and resources of the Represented Regions (RR) collected in T1.2 with the available Bio-Based Technologies (BBT) mapped in T2.1, with the generation of a suggested prioritisation of the most suitable BBTs for said region. The tool considers both quantitative (investment costs, operational costs, processing capacity, etc.) and qualitative (added value, process complexity, etc.) variables to analyse cost/benefit for each BBTs. The tool has been designed in such a way that the more information the user provides, the more accurate the results will be. In other words, the more accurate suggested prioritisation of BBTs would be obtained for each RR. As illustrated in Figure 1, the BBTs Assessment tool will commence by incorporating data from tasks T1.2 and T2.1, namely the outputs of the Forestry and agricultural Network (FAN) workshop and the inventory of BBTs. This information, once introduced into the Excel tool, will facilitate the generation of a preliminary list with the suitability of the BBTs found until date, considering the current resources and needs of a single region, or 'Reference' Scenario. A total of six copies of the BBTs Assessment tool will be created, along with six distinct Represented Region-Specific Scenarios (RR-Specific Scenarios). These will contain information that will assist partners in identifying the BBTs that are most needed in each RR. Figure 1. Relation of tasks and BBTs Assessment tool outputs per Represented Region. Once the ‘Reference’ Scenario has been generated for each RR, the process of producing the Represented Region-Specific Scenarios will commence. To achieve this, the High-level study of regional dynamics (HLRD; T2.3) and the BBTs Assessment tool (T2.2) will be employed in a process of information sharing. Nevertheless, the RR-specific scenarios would not be finalised until they have undergone two levels of validation. Firstly, the FANs of each RR would validate them (T1.3). Secondly, the BBioNets Advisory Board would also give a validation. This validation will introduce a weighting factor in the Excel tool, which will enable the recalibration of the previous outputs. This will result in the generation of a final prioritisation list of BBTs, comprising at least five BBTs suitable for each RR. Subsequently, these outputs will be collated by T2.4 in a roadmap for the implementation of the prioritised BBTs in each Represented Region. 9 The following section defines the ‘Reference’ Scenario, the RR-Specific Scenario and the validation. 2.1 Composition of the BBTs Assessment tool The following section provide the logic of the tool by breaking it down into its three main parts, namely: ‘Reference’ Scenarios, RR-Specific Scenarios and 2.1.3 Validation of the RR-Specific Scenarios. 2.1.1 ‘Reference’ Scenarios The ‘Reference’ Scenarios is the first output of collection of information, and it is introduced in the BBTs Assessment tool in T2.2. This information is both the Inventory Knowledge collection, from T2.1 and the FAN Workshops outputs generated in T1.2 (Figure 2). Figure 2. ‘Reference’ Scenario representation. Prior conducting the FAN Workshops (T1.2) in each RR and the gathering information for the Inventory knowledge collection started (T2.1), the leaders of both tasks (Teagasc and CREA) met with MTU to align ideas and collect information that are also necessary for the implementation of the BBTs Assessment. In the Table 1 it is represented, row by row, the relation of the fields from the Inventory knowledge collection, the questions from the FAN Workshops outputs and the BBTs Assessment tool’s table. The name of each table and the information it stores is indicated. In Section 5 there is collected the ‘Reference’ Scenario information per each RR in form of screenshots of the BBTs Assessment tool. 16 Figure 5. Concept design of the BBTs Assessment tool Figure 6. BBTs Assessment tool concept regarding project tasks 17 3.2 Components of the tool As previously stated, the tool utilises the Power Pivot engine to analyse the information. Microsoft defines Power Pivot as an Excel add-in that enables users to perform sophisticated data analysis and create complex data models. In both Excel and Power Pivot, users can create Data Models, which are collections of tables with interrelated data0F 1 . In this context, Power Pivot enables users to link information stored in Excel tables to generate automated, pre-defined analyses, pivot tables and charts, namely automatic output tables and charts. The following subsections will first clarify the type of tables contained in each Excel sheet, thus helping the BBioNets partner to understand and locate the relevant information from different resources. On the other hand, the Data Model created with Power Pivot is explained, giving details of how the tables interact with each other. Finally, for the purpose of this deliverable, it was created a methodology for navigating through these Excel sheets to create a ‘Reference’ Scenario, for partners to follow while using the BBTs Assessment tool during T2.2. These instructions are explained in Appendix I Guidelines for Reference Scenarios. 3.2.1 Excel sheets The Excel file contains nine (9) Excel sheets so far: an Introduction sheet, a copy of the Inventory Knowledge Collection sheet, the Workshop Results sheet, the Association of Results sheet, the Weighting sheet, the Data Model sheet, the Alignment sheet, the Chart sheet and the Lists sheet. The Table 2 clarifies the purpose of each Excel sheet and whether it is intended to be used during T2.2 or T2.4. Table 2: Purpose of Excel sheets. Excel Sheet name Purpose Used during T2.2? Used during T2.4? Introduction Introduce the user to the BBTs Assessment tool Yes Yes Inventory copy This Excel sheet is designed to hold the most up-todate information available from the Inventory Knowledge Collection (T2.1) and allow the tool to use it for analysis. Yes Yes Workshop Answers This Excel sheet holds the answers from the Resources and Needs workshop from 1 Represented Region Yes Yes* TranslateTables This Excel sheet will start to link the workshop outputs with the inventory of BBTs. It has 4 subsections, as this mapping or translation of outputs will be done in 4 different ways. Yes Yes* 1 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/power-pivot-powerful-data-analysis-and-data-modeling-in-excela9c2c6e2-cc49-4976-a7d740896795d045#:~:text=Power%20Pivot%20is%20an%20Excel,rapidly%2C%20and%20share%20insights%20easi ly. 18 Weight This Excel sheet will contain the information from the validation workshops with the FANs (T1.3) and the Advisory Board. The aim is to recalibrate this preliminary version through weighting and prioritisation to produce the final proposed prioritisation of the most appropriate BBT for each Represented Region. Only 1 table will be used Yes* Data Model This Excel sheet contains the final tables that will feed into the Power Pivot model, with all the information automatically added from the other Excel sheets. Yes Yes* Alignment This Excel sheet is the result of the Power Pivot model after comparing information from the related tables and weights. It contains a pivot table with the results of the calculations. Only preliminary info, not definite. Yes Chart This Excel sheet represents the prioritised list of BBTs for the RR. Only preliminary info, not definite. Yes Lists This is an admin Excel sheet that holds static information used in all other Excel sheets and Power Pivot. Yes Yes *This will be updated if needed for T2.4. In the following subsections it will be explained the specific information that the PowerPivot Data Model uses from the Excel sheets. 3.2.1.1 “Inventory copy” sheet The “Inventory copy” sheet is not a real table that Excel reads, it is just a copy of the Inventory Knowledge Collection (T2.1). For Power Pivot to use this information, areas of information in this sheet have been defined as 'names' to use the Inventory information by Inventory fields. In other words, the most relevant inventory fields (cell ranges) have been assigned a name to address their information for the calculation. The inventory fields selected for the tool has been: • Reference Sector • Processing Capacity • Outcomes • Needs and problem statements • Key word • Investment • Intended user • Description of the BBT • BBT codes. 19 The screenshot below (Figure 7) shows the names created from the Inventory sheet and the cell ranges to which each name is assigned. Figure 7. Screenshot of Excel’s Name Manager with detail of the Names created in the Inventory sheet. 3.2.1.2 “Workshop Answers” sheet As explained, this sheet holds the answers from the FAN workshops (T1.2), hence the tables are aligned with the questions asked in the workshops, to hold said answers. This sheet does hold real tables readable by Power Pivot (made by selecting an array of cells and then pressing with Ctrl + T). In Table 3 it is clarified the name of said tables and to which questions they relate to, and in Figure 8 it can be appreciated a screenshot of this sheet in the model. Table 3. Table names in the Workshop Table names in the “Workshop Answers” sheet BBioNets FAN workshop (T1.2) questions Q1_t Q1. What are the primary or secondary resources available in your representative region? Q2_t Q2. What processing equipment is currently being used in your representative region? Q3_t Q3. What secondary products/by-products are currently being generated in your representative region? Q4_t Q4. What is your representative region’s processing needs regarding primary and secondary resources? (identified needs should be ranked from high to low) Q5.1_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? Values provided by the FAN members: Range of farm size of the stakeholders which FAN members interact with (ha): e.g. 10 – 400 ha Q5.2_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? Values provided by the FAN members: Range of forest size of the stakeholders which FAN members interact with (ha): 20 Q5.3_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? National statistics data: Average farm size (ha): Q5.4_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? National statistics data: Average forest size (ha): Q5.5_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? National statistics data: Region total farmed area (ha): Q5.6_t Q5. What is the size/total area of the farm or forest in your representative region? National statistics data: Region total forest area (ha): Q6.1_t Q6. How much would the farmers/foresters in your representative region be willing to invest in the short-term time (2 years) to implement a technology or practice that would help them process their current resources into bioproducts/by-products? Range € Q6.2_t Q6. How much would the farmers/foresters in your representative region be willing to invest in the long-term time (5 years) to implement a technology or practice that would help them process their current resources into bioproducts/by-products? Range € Q7_t Q7. What return on investment period (number of years) is acceptable for investment in a bio-based technology? Please provide an average value of FAN and a range of values (years). Q8.1_t Q8. What key stakeholders are you currently interacting/collaborating with? Q8.2_t Q8. Nature of collaboration: e.g. advisory Q8.3_t Q8. Type of collaboration: open or closed to new members or partners. Q9_t Q9. Where do you go for information in your region? Q10_t Q10. What are the most significant environmental impacts in the region worrying your sector (forest/agriculture)? Q11_t Q11. What ideas do you have for involving women, the unemployed, and the youth in this area? Q12_t Q12 Thinking about the current resources and needs identified, what improvements could be implemented to make the process more circular? Q13_t Q13, Do you know of a more circular approach/technology that will help your RR work in a more circular way? 21 Figure 8. Screenshot of the Workshop Answers sheet. 3.2.1.3 “TranslateTables” sheet The association of the workshop outputs with the Inventory of BBTs will be done in 4 different ways, depending on the type of information. Partners will need to manually add additional information in this sheet. To make it visually readable, this sheet has been divided in 4 colour-coordinated sections: 1) Association of outputs by drop-down cells (Section 1, green). The user will need to interact with the tables in this section. 2) Association of outputs by adding extra information from a quick desk research study (Section 2, yellow). The user will need to interact with the tables in this section. 3) Association of outputs by typing key words to (Section 3, blue). The user will need to interact with the tables in this section. 4) Association of outputs automatically (Section “Automatic Tables”). The user has not to interact with the tables in this section. These tables are designed to process information from both workshop answers sheet, the weight sheet, and the other sections in this Translated Tables sheet. In Table 4 it is clarified the association of information, and in Figure 9 it can be appreciated a screenshot of this sheet in the model. Table 4. Association of information in “TranslateTables” sheet Section and colour Type of information Table names Associations Source of information 1 Source of information 2 Section 1 – Green Dropdown cells T1.1_t Q1 Answers Reference sector T1.2_t Q1 Answers Key Word T1.3_t Q1 Answers Categories T1.4_t Q1 Answers Feedstock 22 T1.5_t Q1 Answers Value chains T8.1_t Q8.1 Answers: key stakeholders Type of partners T8.2_t Nature of collaboration Type of partners T8.3_t Type of collaboration Type of partners T10.1_t Q10 Answers C Sink T10.2_t Q10 Answers Envi Sustainability T11_t Q11 Answers Socio Sustainability Section 2 - Yellow Adding extra information (yield of biomasses) T5.3_t Q5.3 Answers. National statistics data, Average farm size (ha): Processing Capacity T5.4_t Q5.4 Answers. National statistics data, Average Forest size (ha): Processing Capacity Section 3 - Blue Narrative synthesis fields T2.1_t Q2 Answers Description BBT T2.2_t Q2 Answers Intended user / conditions of access T3_t Q3 Answers Outcomes and final product Section 4 - Brown Automatic tables T5.1_t Q5.1 Answers Transformation of answers into numbers T5.2_t Q5.2 Answers Transformation of answers into numbers T5.5_t Q5.5 Answers. Region total farmed area (ha): T5.3_t T5.6_t Q5.6 Answers. Region total forest area (ha): T5.4_t T6.1_t Q6.1 Answers: Willingness of investment in the short-term time (2 years) W6.1_t T6.2_t Q6.2 Answers: Willingness of investment in the long-term time (5 years) W6.2_t T7_t Q7 Answers: Return on investment period (number of years) W7_t T2.1_a T2.1_t Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T2.1_t 23 T2.2_a T2.2_t Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T2.2_t T3_a T3_t Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T3_t T5.3_a T5.3_t Processing capacity T5.4_a T5.4_t Processing capacity T6.1_a T6.1_t Investment costs T6.2_a T6.2_t Investment costs T7_a T7_t Return of Investment Figure 9. Screenshot of the Translate Table sheet 3.2.1.4 “Weight” sheet This Excel sheet is only partially used for the ‘Reference’ Scenario, as it is intended to hold primarily information from T1.3 in the final versions for T2.4 analysis. The table named W4_t is the only one used for the ‘Reference’ Scenario creation, as it is only in this sheet where the answers from Question 4 from the FAN workshops (T1.2) are used. This sheet is used to give a weight to the different answers from the tables in “TranslateTables” sheet. At this stage, only weight of +1 or -1 is contemplated. A weightage of +1 on each BBT is to be added if the BBT problem statement meets one of the workshops needs. Otherwise, a weightage of -1 should be added on the BBT row. After T1.3, these weightages will include more variability, as per FAN needs and AB feedback. Below, in Table 5 it is shown the names of the tables that hold the weights and how these relates to other information sheet. 24 Table 5: Weight tables and its relationship with other information. Information weighted from other sheets Weight Table name Table names Source of information 1 Source of information 2 W1.1_t T1.1_t Q1 Answers (Workshop Answers) Reference sector (TranslateTables) W1.2_t T1.2_t Q1 Answers (Workshop Answers) Key Word (TranslateTables) W1.3_t T1.3_t Q1 Answers (Workshop Answers) Categories (TranslateTables) W1.4_t T1.4_t Q1 Answers (Workshop Answers) Feedstock (TranslateTables) W1.5_t T1.5_t Q1 Answers (Workshop Answers) Value chains (TranslateTables) W2.1_t T2.1_a T2.1_t (TranslateTables) Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T2.1_t W2.2_t T2.2_a T2.2_t (TranslateTables) Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T2.2_t W3_t T3_a T3_t (TranslateTables) Prioritisation of BBT Codes with regards to the info in T3_t W4_t n/a Q4 Answers (Workshop Answers) BBT needs/problem statement (Inventory_copy) W5.3_t T5.3_a T5.3_t (TranslateTables) Processing capacity (Inventory_copy) W5.4_t T5.4_a T5.4_t (TranslateTables) Processing capacity (Inventory_copy) W6.1_t T6.1_a T6.1_t (TranslateTables) Investment costs (Inventory_copy) W6.2_t T6.2_a T6.2_t (TranslateTables) Investment costs (Inventory_copy) W7_t T7_a T7_t (TranslateTables) Return of Investment (Inventory_copy) W10.1_t T10.1_t Q10 Answers (Workshop Answers) C Sink (Lists) W10.2_t T10.2_t Q10 Answers (Workshop Answers) Envi Sustainability (Lists) W11_t T11_t Q11 Answers (Workshop Answers) Socio Sustainability (Lists) 25 3.2.1.5 “Data Model” sheet The “Data Model” sheet holds real tables, readable by Power Pivot. These tables are automatically filled from the other Excel sheets. The sheet is presented in 3 sections, depending on the source of the information: 1) Section 1 – Tables with information from the “Inventory” sheet. This also includes the information on the table in the “Lists” sheet for the Category field (read section 3.2.1.8). In this section the following tables were created: a. Inventory1 b. TCat1 c. TCat2 d. TCat3 e. TCat4 2) Section 2 – Hold all tables from the “TranslatedTables” sheet. 3) Section 3 – Hold all tables from the “Weight” sheet. 3.2.1.6 “Alignment new” sheet The “Alignment new” sheet is the result of Power Pivot model after comparing information from the related tables and the weightages. This sheet holds a Pivot Table, i.e., a ‘summary’ table that gathers desired fields from related tables. These relations have been built in the Power Pivot Data Model (see section 3.2.2) with the objective to be able to hold in 1 table all weights and relate them to specific BBTs. This will lead to a different weightage assigned to each BBT and hence, to a prioritisation of them. Both effectiveness and cost related variables are included in this “Alignment new” sheet, to generate a 2-D chart that will help prioritize the BBTs using both types of variables. See Table 6 to understand the relationship between the type of variables and the Inventory field analysed. Table 6: Types of variables and fields analysed Type of variable Fields analysed Effectiveness Reference sector Key Word Feedstock Value chains Categories Intended user / conditions of access Outcomes and final product Processing Capacity 32 In a final stage, MTU will work with IUNG to evaluate the creation of an online interactive version of the BBTs Assessment tool, where all 6 tools will be integrated into the BBioNets platform, and anyone could consult the information of the tools freely and free of charge. 4.1 Interpretation of results In addition, the tool provides the results in a 2-D plot graph, where BBTs are prioritised against both variables, with the cost variable on the Y axis and the effectiveness variable on the X axis. This means that BBTs that fall in the area to the top of the horizontal axis are cost increasing and the area to the right of the vertical axis is more effective or beneficial to the needs of the region. If a BBT falls in the lower right quadrant, the BBT would be more economical and more effective, but if it falls in the upper left quadrant, it would be less effective and less economical. The Figure 13 provides a visual guide to the interpretation of the 2-D plot. Figure 13. Cost-Effectiveness 2-D plot interpretation guide. Adapted from [2]. This visual representation of the proposed prioritisation of BBTs will help users to quickly and clearly identify which BBTs would be more interesting for their region, depending on their needs. 33 5 ‘Reference’ scenario information This section records the ‘Reference’ scenario information for each RR, using information from the FAN workshops (T1.2) and the Inventory of Knowledge collection (T2.1). This information has been revised by each Regional Partners for Forestry and Agriculture (RPFA) following the guidelines written on how to use the BBTs Assessment tool to create a 'Reference' scenario (See Appendix I Guidelines for 'Reference' Scenarios). The ‘Reference’ Scenario information for each RR is presented as follows: • Information for the Workshop “Answers” sheet. • Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. • Information for the “Weight” sheet. 34 5.1 Czech Republic 5.1.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. FAN Region: Jihomoravský 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 48 49 50 51 52 5.1.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. FAN Region: Jihomoravský 53 54 55 56 57 64 5.1.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet FAN Region: Jihomoravský 65 66 67 FAN Region: Vysočina 68 69 70 5.2 Greece 5.2.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. 71 72 73 80 T1.4_t T1.5_t Q1 Answers Feedstock Q1 Answers Value chains Chestnut skin Biomass residues Chestnut skin Greenhouse Vegetable Plant biomass Biomass Greenhouse Vegetable Plant biomass Olive and olive oil-production biomass and prunings Biomass Olive and olive oil-production biomass and prunings Sheep wool Biomass Sheep wool Prunings and grass from fruit trees Biomass Prunings and grass from fruit trees Stone-fruit residue Biomass residues Stone-fruit residue 81 T8.1_t T8.2_t T8.3_t T10.1_t Q8.1 Answers: key stakeholders Nature of collaboration Type of collaboration Type of partners Q10 Answers C Sink MACC General Closed Water management 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). KAEM Living Lab Innovation-co-creation Open Soil health 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). EKETA Research Open Researcher Rising temperatures / temperatures remaining high during winter 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). ROBOCOOP-EU EU project Open Desertification/soil erosion 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). BioCycle Hummus Hub Advisory Open Advisor In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of carbon sequestration as low, medium, or high potential of carbon emissions. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. 82 T10.2_t T11_t Q10 Answers Envi Sustainability Q11 Answers Socio Sustainability Water management 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Give incentives for young people to stay in rural areas 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Soil health 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Allow more women to take active roles in agriculture 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Rising temperatures / temperatures remaining high during winter 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Desertification/soil erosion 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of environmental benefits as low, medium, or high potential of environmental impacts. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. 83 T5.3_t T5.4_t Q5.3 Answers. National statistics data, Average farm size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per farm Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per farm per day Source of information Q5.4 Answers. National statistics data, Average forest size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per forest Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per forest per day Source of information 542,312.40 Chestnut skin - 90,949.10 Chestnut skin - 187,778.30 Greenhouse Vegetable Plant biomass - 6,893.80 Greenhouse Vegetable Plant biomass - 334,672.10 Olive and olive oil-production biomass and prunings - 134,710.70 Olive and olive oil-production biomass and prunings - 84,700.00 Sheep wool - 181,889.30 Sheep wool - - Prunings and grass from fruit trees - - Prunings and grass from fruit trees - - Stone-fruit residue - - Stone-fruit residue - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. SECTION 2 - ADDING EXTRA INFORMATION TO TRANSLATE VALUES FROM WORKSHOP AWNSERS Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. T2.1_t T2.2_t T3_t Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Description BBT" Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Intended user / conditions of access" Q3 Answers Key word to find in "Outcomes and final product" Municipal units of household biomass processes compost Municipal units of household biomass processes Electricity Composting Units for plant residues compost Composting Units for plant residues Heating Aerobic and anaerobic processing equipment processing Aerobic and anaerobic processing equipment Bio-gas Bio-stimulants that support the composting process bio-stimulants Bio-stimulants that support the composting process Bio-fertilizers Sensors for detecting the status of the composting material (temperature, CO2 levels, maturity) sensors Sensors for detecting the status of the composting material (temperature, CO2 levels, maturity) Bio-cyclic Humus-soil Bio-cyclic straws SECTION 3 - TRANSLATION OF VALUES FROM NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS FIELDS IN THE BBIONETS INVENTORY 84 5.2.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet W4_t ID Q4. What are your representative region’s processing needs regarding primary and secondary resources? (identified needs should be ranked from high to low) BBT CODES BBT NEEDS/PROBLEM STATEMENT Weight 1 Need for collaboration with other sectors in order to avoid contamination of residue bio-mass with micro-plastics, petrol residue and other foreign matter IE10-Biorefinery Glas/GLAS To improve the sustainability, value and resource efficiency of Ireland’s livestock sector through farmer diversification into the bioeconomy and to assess the potential role of grass biorefinery in supporting sustainable and resilient communities in rural Ireland. -1 2 A system (i.e. public funding body, leasing model etc) for wide availability of processing technology and know-how to farmers IT11-FABER/FABER Forest biomass and its management to address climate change and GHG emissions. -1 3 Piloting/demonstration/experimental schemes and educational purposes FI12-ForestChip4Farm/FC4FH Preventing climate change, increasing bioenergy in rural areas, decreasing CO2 emissions from farms and the food chain, promoting a sustainable food chain, and developing new innovations and products. -1 4 Education on specific treatment protocols for the quality of the bio-mass streams that is intended for cyclic use. DE13-Lignocellulosic Biorefinery/LIGNO To valorize the lignocellulosic residues (meadow grass) from farms in a sustainable way. -1 5 Wool processing technology for use in agriculture EL14-BIO2CHP/B2CHP bypasses technical limitations & allows the use of residual biomass for small-scale & on-site energy production -1 6 0 IT15-Scarabeo/HMP2C There is a need for sustainable and efficient methods in the hemp supply chain to increase quality, valorize and reduce energy consumption. 1 7 0 HU16-REFERTIL/3RZRO Recycling and valorization of un-exploited farm and animal by-products -1 8 0 IT17-Mountain Carbon/MNTNC to help improve the management of the organic matter (OM) from dairy cattle manure in the mountain areas -1 9 0 EE18-Hay Biosyngas/HAYBG a cost-effective and efficient way to produce bio-coal from late harvested hay pellets to benefit small and medium-sized entrepreneurs -1 10 0 FI19-Wood2Biogas/Wd2BG to produce and use the gasification gas to boost methane formation in the biogas process, and simultaneously produce biochar, and the use of woody materials in biogas energy production without increasing the amount of digestate from the biogas process -1 11 0 IT20-Clean-ER/CLINR The accumulation of low economic value woody/shrub biomass in mountain areas poses a significant threat as it increases the risk of forest fires, obstructs mobility through wooded areas, and hinders the growth of undergrowth products like mushrooms and berries. -1 FR21-SeCoPPA /ALFLF challenges in efficiently drying alfalfa for animal feed, and a need to utilize manure and shredded wood from hedgerows -1 IE22-BBFB/CHAR The unutilised biomass is left to decay which returns carbon dioxide to the atmosphere while also control of vegetation, by herbicides or mechanically, is essential on commonage land which is an annual expense on farmers. -1 IE23-SBDP/BGAS The intensification of Irish agriculture, particularly in dairying, has raised concerns about its environmental impact as it is a significant contributor to carbon emissions and deteriorating water quality. There is a need for specific tools to further reduce this impact. -1 DE24-GrassBiowert/BWERT Displacement of fossil based products with bio-based alternatives, while offering rural diversification opportunities. -1 BE25-Grassification/GRSFY Valorization of roadside grass clippings and improving its digestion with other feedstock, as monodigestion of grass can be technically challenging due to its fibrous nature. -1 FR26-Pyrogreen/PYROG A bio-based technology that supports valorizing, recycling and recovering of resources by providing a versatile and easy to implement solution that is suitable for local deployment -1 DE27-GO-GRASS/GOGRS The grass from protected wetland areas in the polder meadows is heterogeneous, in parts strongly lignified (rigid) and its nutritional value is too low to be used as animal feed or feedstock for biogas production. The harvested grass is therefore mostly used as bedding material for livestock. -1 NL28-GO-GRASS/GOGRS Low quality natural and roadside grass are used for low added value applications such as compost which also includes costs associated with disposal. Meanwhile, to produce paper conventioanally trees need to be grown over years and then cut down. -1 DK29-GO-GRASS/GOGRS The conversion of annual crops such as maize, rapeseed and cereals into grassland can significantly reduce nitrate leaching under EU water framework directive. The grass needs to be valorized then. -1 PT30-Spawnfoam/SPAWN changing the paradigm of production and consumption of fossil-based composites and materials, such as plastics, by providing an innovative and competitive alternative of organic and biodegradable origin -1 DE31-MixBioPells/PLTIZ Since nowadays wood is getting more scarce caused by the growing demand in material and the energetic use, alternative solid biofuels, like low quality wood, straw or olive press cake, are experiencing growing interest for energetic use. 1 DE32-MixBioPells/PLTHP in Europe small-scale combustion units (20 to 200 kW) are used almost only with high quality wood fuels, and nowadays wood is getting more scarce caused by the growing demand in material and the energetic use, alternative solid biofuels, like low quality wood, straw or olive press cake, are experiencing growing interest for energetic use. 1 DE33-BIOlution/BIOLT Agricultural waste such as tomato and wheat wastes are not used, which has an environmental impact and a management cost for the producer. -1 FR34-GRANUL'HAIE/WdPLT To enhance the value of local raw materials to meet the increasing demand from consumers who are interested in buying local products and also to help producers make better use of their resources. -1 ES35-Bioferti+/BFTZ+ Waste recovery of cattle manure and other organic waste, to increase the biological and physical-chemical quality of agricultural soils, to improve the management of livestock manure and in the agricultural sector to use organic fertilisers instead of mineral fertilisers -1 NL36-ManurePellet/MnPLT a higher percentage of organic matter, a better soil structure and more binding of nutrients in the soil, a problem is formulated for a manure processing initiative -1 IT37-BIOECO_FLIES/W2BSF to valorize agrifood biomass beyond the typical low added value applicaitons such as fertilizer or biomass for digesters -1 DK38-Macrofuels/CWEED There is an undisputed and urgent need to decarbonise the European transport sector and seaweed can be a sustainable bio-based feedstock for liquid transportation fuels. -1 IT39-Res4Carbon/RES4C to define the best practices to guarantee maximum technical, economic and environmental efficiency in the processing, handling and transport logistics process of residues -1 FR40-SIVABA/WdPwr The need to better articulate the various links in the wood energy sector in order to increase its visibility vis-à-vis potential consumers and better distribute the added value throughout the value chain and to valorize wood. -1 BE41-BierbeekCHIP/Wd2CN to valorise the woody material coming from the municipal hollow roads and the wood edges after shredding on the local fields of Bierbeek -1 LT42-cogeneration residue/Res2F a need to develop a production technology for a new type of fertilizer using wood ashes and digestate -1 IT43-CAREGA/4COAL a gradual abandonment of the forests and a progressive decrease in commercial relations between forest owners, forestry companies and user companies -1 IT44-COBRAF/COBRA develop an articulated system of biorefineries that allows maximum exploitation of the biomass of oil crops (hemp, safflower, flax and camelina) -1 IT45-Stabilized Litter/StbMn the impact of stabilized litter obtained from the solid/liquid separation of slurry subjected to a process of sanitation and stabilization in dairy farms taking account of the relevant cost of the purchase and stocking of other litter material such as straw, wood chips or sawdust -1 IT46-BIOACTAM/BIOAA to develop and validate a new generation of products, based on the partial pyrolysis of ligno-cellulosic biomass deriving from forestry, agri-forestry and agronomic activities -1 PT47-GOEfluentes /GoEFt increase the efficiency of water and nutrient utilization, reduce the environmental impact of farming and add value to agricultural waste -1 ES48-INCREdible/RESIN addressing challenges faced by resin as a non-wood forest product -1 LV49-WoodResidueLV/W2IHF developing innovative technological solutions to reclamation of wood processing by-products, further processing and adding value to forest resources -1 IT50-RBR-EAS/BCH4R using different residual biomass with energy purposes (biofuel production), agricultural (production of fertilizer) and food (dietary supplement) as well as for the reduction of emissions of methane produced in the stable -1 Workshop answers regarding processing needs (as visual reference only) Inventory answers to BBTs needs/problems statement Manually add weight to BBTs after reading the workshop anwsers 85 AT-Closing cycles/NTREC Farms need a reasonably closed nutrient cycle to recover energy and resources -1 PL-BIOGAL/BIOGL Livestock sector has several challenges because of the management of the resources and wastes produced. Manure is one of the biggest problems of the sector due to the associated risk of ground wáter pollution, among others. Manure has potential as raw material due to its content in organic matter and nitrogenous compound. -1 ES-LIFE Smart Fertirrigation/FRTGN pig meat production generates large amounts of manure leading to important environmental problems and many anaerobic digestion plants have been established to convert the pig slurries into biogas and digestate. While biogas can be transformed into renewable energy, the digestate has untapped potential -1 BE-DIGESMART /DIGST Biogas production is efficient at reducing agricultural emission by converting the biomass into electricity and thermal energy (cogeneration), or biomethane, but it also produces a digestate with a high concentration of nutrients (N, P, K) and a volume of around 90-95% of what was fed into the digester. This means that large agricultural areas are required for the application of the digestate (because of nitrate regulations), which often results in long transport routes. -1 NL-VORTEX/VORTX Manure stripping innovation for efficiency and cost -1 NL-Manure Evaporation/EVAPR Different manure processing techniques are already available and the thick fraction can be well tolerated. However, the reduction of the thin fraction is not yet optimal -1 DE-Manure Efficiency/MNURE to develop a procedure for liquid slurry processing for agricultural enterprises, with which slurry and manure can be used to produce transport-worthy, nutritionally optimized fertilizers -1 SE-Manure Refining/MNRRF to produce concentrated, transport-efficient fertilizers from biogas plant that produces large amounts of digested manure, as well as redistribution of plant nutrients form animal-dense areas to areas with mainly crop cultivation that lack such nutrients -1 BE-HIATUS/WATER Almost every year, farmers face water shortages due to drought. Therefore, they are looking for alternatives for this valuable water, such as purifying biological effluent from manure via ultra-filtration and membrane filtration into discharge water -1 ES-GO IMECO/PgSLR slurry management and treatment system for ensuring the product generated in pig farms is more competitive and has a lower environmental impact -1 FI-LEX4BIO/BBFRT reducing dependency on mineral and fossil-based fertilizers by optimizing the use of bio-based fertilizers (BBFs) -1 IT-ProBEST/BARK In the production of forest wood fuels, the presence of bark and twigs must be limited. these can be chipped and delivered, essentially at cost price, to thermoelectric plants: an unprofitable and limited solution in the future. -1 IT-ProBEST/ASHES In the production of forest wood fuels, the incombustible elements (ash) must be limited. these can be delivered, essentially at cost price, to thermoelectric plants: an unprofitable and limited solution in the future. -1 IT-FiLeProPri/WSC Face the problem of the socio-economic marginality of wood production in private property. -1 IT-ROSAEXTREM/NRH Encourage the restructuring of farms with structural problems considerable -1 IT-M.ER.LI.n/MERL Analyze needs of partner companies to identify implementation opportunities innovative solutions that are energetically sustainable and economically convenient. -1 IT-INNOVABIOZOO/INZOO The project consists of a series of actions divided into the following areas work: preparatory phase, coordination and animation, adoption of proposed innovations, monitoring, dissemination to other farmers and to scientific community of the RRN and PEI agri circuits. -1 ES-AgriCarbón/AC In Andalusia, agricultural activities play an important role in the socio-economic development which generates contamination in superficial, underground water, soil, and solid wastes. In this context, it becomes relevant the promotion of initiatives to reuse agricultural residues. -1 ES-AGUACAVALUE/BYPRO Promotes possible alternatives for the valorisation of avocado by-products by studying the characterisation of their nutritional profile, content of bioactive compounds, antioxidant potential and digestibility, obtaining products with high nutritional value and high digestibility, -1 ES-AGUACAVALUE/AVOCA Spain concentrates the 93% of the avocado production in Europe. Malaga and Granada (Andalusian provinces) have the 88% of the total production. In Spain, 2 thousand tons of avocado bone and skin are discarded annually. These by products have become an issue to the processing industries due to its negative environmental impact. -1 ES-CHERRY4FOOD/CHERR There is a need for the processing industries of tomato products (gazpacho and salmorejo) to utilise the by-products generated in the process. -1 ES-TOMATOGROUP/TOMAT There is a need for valorisation of the tomato chopping which currently is a residue with no value. -1 ES-BIOSUERO/WHEY In Andalusia, it is produced a large quantity of milk whey every year. From 10 L of milk, it is obtained 1 kg of cheese and 9 L of whey. These will benefit the cheese diaries to valorise what today is a by-product/residue, and to reuse most of the water that can be re-incorporated in the process. -1 ES-Biochar/BIOCH The project is mainly focused on the Western Coast of Huelva (Ayamonte, Isla Cristina, Lepe, Cartaya, Gibraleón, Punta Umbría and Aljaraque) since this is the region where the citrus production of the province is concentrated. At present, citrus pruning is a waste with no valorization. 1 ES-BIORUMIOLI/FEED Need to increase the profitability of livestock farms and create an alternative for the olive oil industry by achieving a more efficient use of energy applied to the management of by-products and the reduction of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from biomass burning. 1 ES-OleoValoriza/OLIVE The olive-mill waterwaste constitute one of the most important environmental problems in olvie cooperatives, since they are characterized by a high DBO and conting organic pollutant compoments, in addition to being generated in very high quantities. 1 ES-OleoValoriza/OLIV2 The reuse and recovery of olive by-products are essential to reduce environmental pollution and contribute to increasing the efficiency of the agricultural and industrial sectors involved and reduce their production costs. 1 CZ-TJ02000130/ Among the difficult tasks are the application of fugate (a by-product of biogas production) and the dependence on peat (a non-renewable natural resource). -1 CZ-QK1920328/ The progressive large-scale decay of spruce stands affecting many areas in the Czech Republic can hardly be prevented and we have no choice but to focus on the new forest generation. -1 CZ-QK1920214/ The issue of protecting water resources while maintaining the competitiveness of agricultural production in their vicinity is quite complex. -1 CZ-TH03030319/ Efficient use of processed field by-products. -1 CZ-QK1710379/ Use of sewage sludge as a valuable waste raw material in agriculture. -1 CZ-TH02030681/ The establishment of field crops (maize) is currently carried out in the form of monoculture. This causes surface runoff of rainwater and the risk of erosion events, low utilisation of rainwater in agriculture and low potential generation of subsurface water reserves. -1 CZ-TH02030925/ Increasing the composting rate, especially when processing bulky materials (urban green waste, sludge), which are increasingly produced by society. -1 CZ-SS06020282/ Conventional mechanical recycling of biopolymers is currently not a technologically feasible process, as their products often end up in the mixed plastic waste chain, where they contaminate fossil plastics and make subsequent recycling impossible. Biodegradation itself requires demanding technological and economic conditions. -1 CZ-TK04010166/ There is a need to update biomass potential in the light of changing factors affecting land use and biomass yields, including updating biomass potential from forest land to reflect the impacts of calamities in the last decade. -1 CZ-FW06010358/ Reduction of the consumption of liquid substances (including liquid fertilisers) per unit area, in particular better use of these substances in case of lack of rainfall on the basis of targeted application to plants and to the top layer of the soil profile. -1 EL11-HIPO-ENERGY/NUTRI - management of Hippophae leaves, which are cultivated only for the harvesting of the fruit - existing studies highlight the nutritional value of the leaves -1 EL12-ΑΕΙΦΟΡΙΚΑ ΚΗΠΕΥΤΙΚΑ/OREG control of downy mildew (caused by soil fungi with negative effects in the production) in the context of the circular economy and the adoption of good agricultural practices -1 EL13-OLIHERB/OLIVE management of the significant quantities of olive leaves produced as by-products during cultivation (pruning), harvesting of olives and olive oil production (milling stage) 1 EL14-BioAnimalChar/PIG cost and quality of pig feed 1 EL15-COMPOST-INNO/COMPO - lack of sufficient amounts of organic waste in the cultivation sites - distance of the sources of organic matter from the places of processing and final use -1 EL16-Compo - Laventer/COLAV increase of the production and the quality of lavender oil -1 EL17-AGROSCHOOLBUS.BIO/RESOL Sustainable management of the residues (branches and leaves), pruning of the olive tree (and other productive trees). 1 EL18-SoilCircle/ Due to the negative effects on crop growth and the environment from the use of synthetic fertilisers, it is recommended to apply soil amendment (compost) to the soil. -1 EL19-ΥΓΕΙΑΡΤΟΣ/YOGO Exploitation of both goat milk and espresso coffee residues -1 EL20-Innovative Rice Residue Management Practices/RICE Handling plant residues remaining in the rice fields after harvesting. Their burning was banned because of the reduction in organic matter and beneficial organisms. After producers complied, problems arose due to delayed assimilation of residues and the emergence of diseases. -1 EL21-ΕΛΑΙΩΝΑΣ/OLFER Management of waste and wastewater generated during the olive farming and olive oil production processes 1 PL91-OrzechDębu/ACORN Changing trends in consumer attitudes and food preferences towards reducing the consumption of meat and animal products. The vegan products available on the market is constantly expanded and modified, taking into account the growing demand for this type of products. Introducing unconventional raw materials and ready-made products creates the opportunity to diversify vegan diet. 1 PL93-GRIST/GRIST Organic grain production and processing of brewery residues into meal, using an innovative dehydration method -1 pl94-Owoce 4.0/Owoce 4.0 Development of technology dedicated to currant plantations -1 86 5.3 Ireland 5.3.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. 87 88 89 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 5.3.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet 103 104 105 5.4 Italy 5.4.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. 112 5.4.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. 113 114 115 T10.1_t T10.2_t T11_t Q10 Answers C Sink Q10 Answers Envi Sustainability Q11 Answers Socio Sustainability Wastewater 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Wastewater 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. The older the entrepreneur, the more likely they are to make investments 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Accumulation of phytosanitary products 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Accumulation of phytosanitary products 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Young people are more interested in closing the supply chain and engaging in multifunctional farm activities 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Accumulation of water-insoluble organic components 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Accumulation of water-insoluble organic components 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. No differences observed between men and women 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Even when using circular techniques, it's important for the byproduct to be local; otherwise, there's an impact from transportation 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Even when using circular techniques, it's important for the byproduct to be local; otherwise, there's an impact from transportation 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Higher salaries to allow a larger and more normal family life 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Accumulation of chemical substances in aquifers and external storage tanks (drugs, PFAS, Triazine, glyphosate) 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Accumulation of chemical substances in aquifers and external storage tanks (drugs, PFAS, Triazine, glyphosate) 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Workplace closer to your home (smart-working essential) 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Use of sewage sludge or related residues in agricultural fields 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Use of sewage sludge or related residues in agricultural fields 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Non-toxic working place 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Hydrogeological instability due to abandonment of mountain territories 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Hydrogeological instability due to abandonment of mountain territories 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Personal growth at work 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Promote the multifunctionality of the forest and the multidisciplinary to manage the forest in a sustainable way and develop ecosystem services 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of carbon sequestration as low, medium, or high potential of carbon emissions. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of environmental benefits as low, medium, or high potential of environmental impacts. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. 116 T5.3_t T5.4_t Q5.3 Answers. National statistics data, Average farm size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per farm Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per farm per day Source of information Q5.4 Answers. National statistics data, Average forest size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per forest Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per forest per day Source of information 16.00 Wastewater - 6.20 Wastewater - - Chestnut coppicing - - Chestnut coppicing - - Forest resource - - Forest resource - - Woody pruning residues - - Woody pruning residues - - Herbaceous pruning residues - - Herbaceous pruning residues - - Olive mill effluents - - Olive mill effluents - - Depleted substrates - - Depleted substrates - - Agro-food waste - - Agro-food waste - - Olive pomace - - Olive pomace - - Uncultivated land - - Uncultivated land - Grape marc - Grape marc - Manure - Manure - Whey - Whey - Male claves (They are sent for slaughter in the Netherlands when a valorization chain could be created locally). - Male claves (They are sent for slaughter in the Netherlands when a valorization chain could be created locally). - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. SECTION 2 - ADDING EXTRA INFORMATION TO TRANSLATE VALUES FROM WORKSHOP AWNSERS Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. T2.1_t T2.2_t T3_t Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Description BBT" Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Intended user / conditions of access" Q3 Answers Key word to find in "Outcomes and final product" Plant for compost from green pruning residues compost Plant for compost from green pruning residues pruning Biogas gas Biochar pyrolysis Biochar biochar Compost compost Biogas production from converting farm by-products with farm-scale anaerobic digesters anaerobic digestion Biogas production from converting farm by-products with farm-scale anaerobic digesters biogas Energy energy Vermicompost vermicompost Vermicompost vermicompost Biomasses biomass Nutraceutical compounds extraction plants extraction Nutraceutical compounds extraction plants extraction Wood processing residues wood Distillation apparatus, e.g., Clevenger distillation Distillation apparatus, e.g., Clevenger distillation Frozen insect larvae insect Microalgae production plants microalgae Microalgae production plants algae Digested substrate - frass fertilizer fertiliser Local wood processing facilities, e.g., sawmills, debarker wood Local wood processing facilities, e.g., sawmills, debarker sawmill Hazelnut shells for secondary metabolite combustion combustion Compost and biogas from olive-mill waste olive Compost and biogas from olive-mill waste biogas Wood waste for construction materials construction Plants for processing whey into feed or infant milk powder whey Plants for processing whey into feed or infant milk powder milk Biofertilizers and biostimulants from animal compounds - fish fertiliser Cosmetics from processing grapes residues grape Cosmetics from processing grapes residues cosmetic Mushroom production on aromatic plant residues mushroom SECTION 3 - TRANSLATION OF VALUES FROM NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS FIELDS IN THE BBIONETS INVENTORY 117 5.4.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet W4_t ID Q4. What are your representative region’s processing needs regarding primary and secondary resources? (identified needs should be ranked from high to low) BBT CODES BBT NEEDS/PROBLEM STATEMENT Weight 1 Transformation chains of plant residues into second raw materials - e.g. Biostimulants, phytosanitary products IE10-Biorefinery Glas/GLAS To improve the sustainability, value and resource efficiency of Ireland’s livestock sector through farmer diversification into the bioeconomy and to assess the potential role of grass biorefinery in supporting sustainable and resilient communities in rural Ireland. 1 2 Innovation IT11-FABER/FABER Forest biomass and its management to address climate change and GHG emissions. 1 3 Resources for investments FI12-ForestChip4Farm/FC4FH Preventing climate change, increasing bioenergy in rural areas, decreasing CO2 emissions from farms and the food chain, promoting a sustainable food chain, and developing new innovations and products. 1 4 Territorial and/or supply chain projects DE13-Lignocellulosic Biorefinery/LIGNO To valorize the lignocellulosic residues (meadow grass) from farms in a sustainable way. 1 5Dissemination visibility– e.g. advertising EL14-BIO2CHP/B2CHP bypasses technical limitations & allows the use of residual biomass for small-scale & on-site energy production 1 6 Transformation plants IT15-Scarabeo/HMP2C There is a need for sustainable and efficient methods in the hemp supply chain to increase quality, valorize and reduce energy consumption. 1 7 Recovery chain of depleted substrates from floriculture HU16-REFERTIL/3RZRO Recycling and valorization of un-exploited farm and animal by-products -1 8 Material and assortment storage yards IT17-Mountain Carbon/MNTNC to help improve the management of the organic matter (OM) from dairy cattle manure in the mountain areas -1 9 Forestry and woodworking mobile equipment – e.g. mobile sawmill, woodchippers, etc. EE18-Hay Biosyngas/HAYBG a cost-effective and efficient way to produce bio-coal from late harvested hay pellets to benefit small and medium-sized entrepreneurs -1 10 Drying equipment FI19-Wood2Biogas/Wd2BG to produce and use the gasification gas to boost methane formation in the biogas process, and simultaneously produce biochar, and the use of woody materials in biogas energy production without increasing the amount of digestate from the biogas process 1 11 Production of thermoplastic starch for the manufacturing of biodegradable or compostable materials - e.g. Bags for floriculture, pots and containers for fruit growing, clips, etc. IT20-Clean-ER/CLINR The accumulation of low economic value woody/shrub biomass in mountain areas poses a significant threat as it increases the risk of forest fires, obstructs mobility through wooded areas, and hinders the growth of undergrowth products like mushrooms and berries. 1 FR21-SeCoPPA /ALFLF challenges in efficiently drying alfalfa for animal feed, and a need to utilize manure and shredded wood from hedgerows 1 IE22-BBFB/CHAR The unutilised biomass is left to decay which returns carbon dioxide to the atmosphere while also control of vegetation, by herbicides or mechanically, is essential on commonage land which is an annual expense on farmers. -1 IE23-SBDP/BGAS The intensification of Irish agriculture, particularly in dairying, has raised concerns about its environmental impact as it is a significant contributor to carbon emissions and deteriorating water quality. There is a need for specific tools to further reduce this impact. -1 DE24-GrassBiowert/BWERT Displacement of fossil based products with bio-based alternatives, while offering rural diversification opportunities. 1 BE25-Grassification/GRSFY Valorization of roadside grass clippings and improving its digestion with other feedstock, as monodigestion of grass can be technically challenging due to its fibrous nature. -1 FR26-Pyrogreen/PYROG A bio-based technology that supports valorizing, recycling and recovering of resources by providing a versatile and easy to implement solution that is suitable for local deployment -1 DE27-GO-GRASS/GOGRS The grass from protected wetland areas in the polder meadows is heterogeneous, in parts strongly lignified (rigid) and its nutritional value is too low to be used as animal feed or feedstock for biogas production. The harvested grass is therefore mostly used as bedding material for livestock. 1 NL28-GO-GRASS/GOGRS Low quality natural and roadside grass are used for low added value applications such as compost which also includes costs associated with disposal. Meanwhile, to produce paper conventioanally trees need to be grown over years and then cut down. 1 DK29-GO-GRASS/GOGRS The conversion of annual crops such as maize, rapeseed and cereals into grassland can significantly reduce nitrate leaching under EU water framework directive. The grass needs to be valorized then. -1 PT30-Spawnfoam/SPAWN changing the paradigm of production and consumption of fossil-based composites and materials, such as plastics, by providing an innovative and competitive alternative of organic and biodegradable origin 1 DE31-MixBioPells/PLTIZ Since nowadays wood is getting more scarce caused by the growing demand in material and the energetic use, alternative solid biofuels, like low quality wood, straw or olive press cake, are experiencing growing interest for energetic use. 1 DE32-MixBioPells/PLTHP in Europe small-scale combustion units (20 to 200 kW) are used almost only with high quality wood fuels, and nowadays wood is getting more scarce caused by the growing demand in material and the energetic use, alternative solid biofuels, like low quality wood, straw or olive press cake, are experiencing growing interest for energetic use. 1 DE33-BIOlution/BIOLT Agricultural waste such as tomato and wheat wastes are not used, which has an environmental impact and a management cost for the producer. 1 FR34-GRANUL'HAIE/WdPLT To enhance the value of local raw materials to meet the increasing demand from consumers who are interested in buying local products and also to help producers make better use of their resources. -1 ES35-Bioferti+/BFTZ+ Waste recovery of cattle manure and other organic waste, to increase the biological and physical-chemical quality of agricultural soils, to improve the management of livestock manure and in the agricultural sector to use organic fertilisers instead of mineral fertilisers 1 NL36-ManurePellet/MnPLT a higher percentage of organic matter, a better soil structure and more binding of nutrients in the soil, a problem is formulated for a manure processing initiative 1 IT37-BIOECO_FLIES/W2BSF to valorize agrifood biomass beyond the typical low added value applicaitons such as fertilizer or biomass for digesters 1 DK38-Macrofuels/CWEED There is an undisputed and urgent need to decarbonise the European transport sector and seaweed can be a sustainable bio-based feedstock for liquid transportation fuels. -1 IT39-Res4Carbon/RES4C to define the best practices to guarantee maximum technical, economic and environmental efficiency in the processing, handling and transport logistics process of residues 1 FR40-SIVABA/WdPwr The need to better articulate the various links in the wood energy sector in order to increase its visibility vis-à-vis potential consumers and better distribute the added value throughout the value chain and to valorize wood. 1 BE41-BierbeekCHIP/Wd2CN to valorise the woody material coming from the municipal hollow roads and the wood edges after shredding on the local fields of Bierbeek 1 LT42-cogeneration residue/Res2F a need to develop a production technology for a new type of fertilizer using wood ashes and digestate 1 Workshop answers regarding processing needs (as visual reference only) Inventory answers to BBTs needs/problems statement Manually add weight to BBTs after reading the workshop anwsers 118 LT42-cogeneration residue/Res2F a need to develop a production technology for a new type of fertilizer using wood ashes and digestate 1 IT43-CAREGA/4COAL a gradual abandonment of the forests and a progressive decrease in commercial relations between forest owners, forestry companies and user companies 1 IT44-COBRAF/COBRA develop an articulated system of biorefineries that allows maximum exploitation of the biomass of oil crops (hemp, safflower, flax and camelina) -1 IT45-Stabilized Litter/StbMn the impact of stabilized litter obtained from the solid/liquid separation of slurry subjected to a process of sanitation and stabilization in dairy farms taking account of the relevant cost of the purchase and stocking of other litter material such as straw, wood chips or sawdust -1 IT46-BIOACTAM/BIOAA to develop and validate a new generation of products, based on the partial pyrolysis of ligno-cellulosic biomass deriving from forestry, agri-forestry and agronomic activities 1 PT47-GOEfluentes /GoEFt increase the efficiency of water and nutrient utilization, reduce the environmental impact of farming and add value to agricultural waste -1 ES48-INCREdible/RESIN addressing challenges faced by resin as a non-wood forest product 1 LV49-WoodResidueLV/W2IHF developing innovative technological solutions to reclamation of wood processing by-products, further processing and adding value to forest resources 1 IT50-RBR-EAS/BCH4R using different residual biomass with energy purposes (biofuel production), agricultural (production of fertilizer) and food (dietary supplement) as well as for the reduction of emissions of methane produced in the stable 1 AT-Closing cycles/NTREC Farms need a reasonably closed nutrient cycle to recover energy and resources 1 PL-BIOGAL/BIOGL Livestock sector has several challenges because of the management of the resources and wastes produced. Manure is one of the biggest problems of the sector due to the associated risk of ground wáter pollution, among others. Manure has potential as raw material due to its content in organic matter and nitrogenous compound. 1 ES-LIFE Smart Fertirrigation/FRTGN pig meat production generates large amounts of manure leading to important environmental problems and many anaerobic digestion plants have been established to convert the pig slurries into biogas and digestate. While biogas can be transformed into renewable energy, the digestate has untapped potential -1 BE-DIGESMART /DIGST Biogas production is efficient at reducing agricultural emission by converting the biomass into electricity and thermal energy (cogeneration), or biomethane, but it also produces a digestate with a high concentration of nutrients (N, P, K) and a volume of around 90-95% of what was fed into the digester. This means that large agricultural areas are required for the application of the digestate (because of nitrate regulations), which often results in long transport routes. -1 NL-VORTEX/VORTX Manure stripping innovation for efficiency and cost -1 NL-Manure Evaporation/EVAPR Different manure processing techniques are already available and the thick fraction can be well tolerated. However, the reduction of the thin fraction is not yet optimal -1 DE-Manure Efficiency/MNURE to develop a procedure for liquid slurry processing for agricultural enterprises, with which slurry and manure can be used to produce transport-worthy, nutritionally optimized fertilizers 1 SE-Manure Refining/MNRRF to produce concentrated, transport-efficient fertilizers from biogas plant that produces large amounts of digested manure, as well as redistribution of plant nutrients form animal-dense areas to areas with mainly crop cultivation that lack such nutrients 1 BE-HIATUS/WATER Almost every year, farmers face water shortages due to drought. Therefore, they are looking for alternatives for this valuable water, such as purifying biological effluent from manure via ultra-filtration and membrane filtration into discharge water -1 ES-GO IMECO/PgSLR slurry management and treatment system for ensuring the product generated in pig farms is more competitive and has a lower environmental impact -1 FI-LEX4BIO/BBFRT reducing dependency on mineral and fossil-based fertilizers by optimizing the use of bio-based fertilizers (BBFs) 1 IT-ProBEST/BARK In the production of forest wood fuels, the presence of bark and twigs must be limited. these can be chipped and delivered, essentially at cost price, to thermoelectric plants: an unprofitable and limited solution in the future. 1 IT-ProBEST/ASHES In the production of forest wood fuels, the incombustible elements (ash) must be limited. these can be delivered, essentially at cost price, to thermoelectric plants: an unprofitable and limited solution in the future. 1 IT-FiLeProPri/WSC Face the problem of the socio-economic marginality of wood production in private property. 1 IT-ROSAEXTREM/NRH Encourage the restructuring of farms with structural problems considerable -1 IT-M.ER.LI.n/MERL Analyze needs of partner companies to identify implementation opportunities innovative solutions that are energetically sustainable and economically convenient. -1 IT-INNOVABIOZOO/INZOO The project consists of a series of actions divided into the following areas work: preparatory phase, coordination and animation, adoption of proposed innovations, monitoring, dissemination to other farmers and to scientific community of the RRN and PEI agri circuits. -1 ES-AgriCarbón/AC In Andalusia, agricultural activities play an important role in the socio-economic development which generates contamination in superficial, underground water, soil, and solid wastes. In this context, it becomes relevant the promotion of initiatives to reuse agricultural residues. 1 ES-AGUACAVALUE/BYPRO Promotes possible alternatives for the valorisation of avocado by-products by studying the characterisation of their nutritional profile, content of bioactive compounds, antioxidant potential and digestibility, obtaining products with high nutritional value and high digestibility, -1 ES-AGUACAVALUE/AVOCA Spain concentrates the 93% of the avocado production in Europe. Malaga and Granada (Andalusian provinces) have the 88% of the total production. In Spain, 2 thousand tons of avocado bone and skin are discarded annually. These by products have become an issue to the processing industries due to its negative environmental impact. -1 ES-CHERRY4FOOD/CHERR There is a need for the processing industries of tomato products (gazpacho and salmorejo) to utilise the by-products generated in the process. 1 ES-TOMATOGROUP/TOMAT There is a need for valorisation of the tomato chopping which currently is a residue with no value. 1 ES-BIOSUERO/WHEY In Andalusia, it is produced a large quantity of milk whey every year. From 10 L of milk, it is obtained 1 kg of cheese and 9 L of whey. These will benefit the cheese diaries to valorise what today is a by-product/residue, and to reuse most of the water that can be re-incorporated in the process. -1 ES-Biochar/BIOCH The project is mainly focused on the Western Coast of Huelva (Ayamonte, Isla Cristina, Lepe, Cartaya, Gibraleón, Punta Umbría and Aljaraque) since this is the region where the citrus production of the province is concentrated. At present, citrus pruning is a waste with no valorization. -1 ES-BIORUMIOLI/FEED Need to increase the profitability of livestock farms and create an alternative for the olive oil industry by achieving a more efficient use of energy applied to the management of by-products and the reduction of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from biomass burning. -1 ES-OleoValoriza/OLIVE The olive-mill waterwaste constitute one of the most important environmental problems in olvie cooperatives, since they are characterized by a high DBO and conting organic pollutant compoments, in addition to being generated in very high quantities. 1 ES-OleoValoriza/OLIV2 The reuse and recovery of olive by-products are essential to reduce environmental pollution and contribute to increasing the efficiency of the agricultural and industrial sectors involved and reduce their production costs. 1 CZ-TJ02000130/ Among the difficult tasks are the application of fugate (a by-product of biogas production) and the dependence on peat (a non-renewable natural resource). -1 CZ-QK1920328/ The progressive large-scale decay of spruce stands affecting many areas in the Czech Republic can hardly be prevented and we have no choice but to focus on the new forest generation. -1 CZ-QK1920214/ The issue of protecting water resources while maintaining the competitiveness of agricultural production in their vicinity is quite complex. -1 CZ-TH03030319/ Efficient use of processed field by-products. -1 CZ-QK1710379/ Use of sewage sludge as a valuable waste raw material in agriculture. -1 CZ-TH02030681/ The establishment of field crops (maize) is currently carried out in the form of monoculture. This causes surface runoff of rainwater and the risk of erosion events, low utilisation of rainwater in agriculture and low potential generation of subsurface water reserves. -1 CZ-TH02030925/ Increasing the composting rate, especially when processing bulky materials (urban green waste, sludge), which are increasingly produced by society. -1 CZ-SS06020282/ Conventional mechanical recycling of biopolymers is currently not a technologically feasible process, as their products often end up in the mixed plastic waste chain, where they contaminate fossil plastics and make subsequent recycling impossible. Biodegradation itself requires demanding technological and economic conditions. -1 CZ-TK04010166/ There is a need to update biomass potential in the light of changing factors affecting land use and biomass yields, including updating biomass potential from forest land to reflect the impacts of calamities in the last decade. 1 CZ-FW06010358/ Reduction of the consumption of liquid substances (including liquid fertilisers) per unit area, in particular better use of these substances in case of lack of rainfall on the basis of targeted application to plants and to the top layer of the soil profile. -1 EL11-HIPO-ENERGY/NUTRI - management of Hippophae leaves, which are cultivated only for the harvesting of the fruit - existing studies highlight the nutritional value of the leaves -1 EL12-ΑΕΙΦΟΡΙΚΑ ΚΗΠΕΥΤΙΚΑ/OREG control of downy mildew (caused by soil fungi with negative effects in the production) in the context of the circular economy and the adoption of good agricultural practices -1 EL13-OLIHERB/OLIVE management of the significant quantities of olive leaves produced as by-products during cultivation (pruning), harvesting of olives and olive oil production (milling stage) 1 EL14-BioAnimalChar/PIG cost and quality of pig feed -1 EL15-COMPOST-INNO/COMPO - lack of sufficient amounts of organic waste in the cultivation sites - distance of the sources of organic matter from the places of processing and final use -1 EL16-Compo - Laventer/COLAV increase of the production and the quality of lavender oil -1 EL17-AGROSCHOOLBUS.BIO/RESOL Sustainable management of the residues (branches and leaves), pruning of the olive tree (and other productive trees). 1 EL18-SoilCircle/ Due to the negative effects on crop growth and the environment from the use of synthetic fertilisers, it is recommended to apply soil amendment (compost) to the soil. 1 EL19-ΥΓΕΙΑΡΤΟΣ/YOGO Exploitation of both goat milk and espresso coffee residues -1 EL20-Innovative Rice Residue Management Practices/RICE Handling plant residues remaining in the rice fields after harvesting. Their burning was banned because of the reduction in organic matter and beneficial organisms. After producers complied, problems arose due to delayed assimilation of residues and the emergence of diseases. 1 EL21-ΕΛΑΙΩΝΑΣ/OLFER Management of waste and wastewater generated during the olive farming and olive oil production processes 1 PL91-OrzechDębu/ACORN Changing trends in consumer attitudes and food preferences towards reducing the consumption of meat and animal products. The vegan products available on the market is constantly expanded and modified, taking into account the growing demand for this type of products. Introducing unconventional raw materials and ready-made products creates the opportunity to diversify vegan diet. -1 PL93-GRIST/GRIST Organic grain production and processing of brewery residues into meal, using an innovative dehydration method -1 pl94-Owoce 4.0/Owoce 4.0 Development of technology dedicated to currant plantations -1 0 0 119 5.5 Poland 5.5.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. 120 121 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 5.5.3 Information for the “Weight” sheet 135 136 137 5.6 Spain 5.6.1 Information for the “Workshop Answers” sheet. FAN Country: Spain FAN Region: Andalusia Q1_t Q2_t ID Q1. What are the primary or secondary resources available in your representative region? ID Q2. What processing equipment is currently being used in your representative region? 1 Forest pruning residues 1 Chopped 2 Slurry 2 Crushed 3 Wood 3 Separation 4 Olive stone 4 Drying 5 Olive pruning residues 5 Storage 6 Greenhouses plant debris 6 Fermentation 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 13 14 144 Q8.2_t Q8.3_t ID Q8. Nature of collaboration: e.g. advisory ID Q8. Type of collaboration: open or closed to new members or partners. 1 Applied research projects. 1 Open 2 Joint or pilot research projects for the application of innovative technologies. 2 Open 3 Collaboration in R&D programs providing raw materials in search for innovative solutions for the valorisation, or production of biofuels, bioplastics. 3 Open 4 Pilot projects, promotion actions, support for seeking opportunities, access to markets for bioproducts. 4 Open 5 Technical support for fund raising 5 Open 6 Collaboration for the promotion of forestry technologies. 6 Open 7 Direct contact with owners 7 Open 8 8 Open 9 9 Open 10 10 Open 11 11 Open 145 Q9_t Q10_t ID Q9. Where do you go for information in your region? ID Q10. What are the most significant environmental impacts in the region worrying your sector (forest/agriculture)? 1 Scientific and technical publications: JRC. 1 Land degradation and deforestation. 2 Platforms (https://observatoriobiomasa.es/, https://bioplat.org/, Red INtercamBIOM (https://intercambiom.org/practicas-innovadoras/), APPA RenovablesBiomasa (https://www.appa.es/appabiomasa/). 2 Lack of forest cleanup. 3 Public administration portals + Reports (MITECO, CAPADR, AAE (Andalusian Energy Agency). 3 CO2 emissions – climate change. 4 Technological and Agricultural Research Centers such as IFAPA, ceiA3. 4 The burning of pruning waste, both agricultural and gardening, and the destruction of fruit in warehouses. 5 Agricultural and forestry organizations and associations: Spanish Association of Biomass Energy Valorization (AVEBIOM), CLANER (Renewable Energy Association of Andalusia), AgroBioHeat. 5 Loss of biodiversity. 6 Research Institutions and Universities (UCO, US, ceiA3, CIEMAT (Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas). 6 Water and soil contamination (use of fertilizers and pesticides). 7 Collaboration networks / projects (BIC, ROBIN, SCALE-UP, BIOTRANSFORM, BIOREFINERY MAP). 7 Consumption of water resources. 8 Contacts with experts and technology suppliers through attendance at events in this field. 8 Rapid depletion of natural resources. 9 Consultants and industry professionals. 9 Increase risk of fires if forestry biomass is not managed. 10 Internet. 10 11 Competitor companies. 12 Sectorial bibliography 13 146 Q11_t Q12_t ID Q11. What ideas do you have for involving women, the unemployed, and the youth in this area? ID Thinking about the current resources and needs identified, what improvements could be implemented to make the process more circular? 1 Create a strategy that makes examples visible, promotes cooperation and improves entry conditions in the sector. 1 Promote new business models to manage biomass resources on-site to make profitable and cost effective the biomass management. 2 Offer courses related to forestry training, especially practical ones. 2 Raffia separation equipment to make greenhouses vegetables biomass usable. 3 Educational campaigns from an early age in schools. 3 Increase information to the producer about the available technologies and processes, and communicate opportunities offered by the bioeconomy. Increase social awareness for sustainability. Encourage funding for scaling up pilot technologies that is not yet available at market level 4 Skills development programs for university students. 4 5 Specific training sessions aimed at specific segments of the population. 5 6 Outreach campaigns and initiatives to promote interest in issues related to biomass valorisation. 6 7 Support with public/private funding for the creation of startups, spinoffs, business incubators, etc. 7 8 Establish online platforms and digital tools so that this sector of the population can get involved. 8 9 Labour internships in agricultural exploitations and agri-food industries. 9 10 Investing in reuse plants to generate new job positions. 10 11 147 Q13_t ID Do you know of a more circular approach/technology that will help your RR work in a more circular way? 1 Generate circular bioeconomy microclimates with biomass management plants in forestry areas to incentivise employment and biomass valorisation. 2 Technology to reduce the size and density of the biomass transport in forest sector. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 148 5.6.2 Information for the “TranslateTables” sheet. T1.1_t T1.2_t T1.3_t Q1 Answers Reference sector Q1 Answers Key Word Q1 Answers Categories Forest pruning residues A2.1Silviculture and other forestry activities Forest pruning residues Forestry Forest pruning residues Crop residues and perennial plants F1 Slurry A1.4Animal production Slurry Animal husbandry Slurry Waste or recycled material FC Wood A2.1Silviculture and other forestry activities Wood Forestry Wood Crop residues and perennial plants F1 Olive stone A1.6Support activities to agriculture and post-harvest crop activities Olive stone Circular economy, incl. waste, by-products and residues Olive stone Waste or recycled material FC Olive pruning residues A1.2Growing of perennial crops Olive pruning residues Outdoor horticulture and woody crops (incl. viticulture,olives, fruit, ornamentals) Olive pruning residues Crop residues and perennial plants F1 Greenhouses plant debris A1.1Growing of non-perennial crops Greenhouses plant debris Greenhouse crops Greenhouses plant debris Crop residues and perennial plants F1 SECTION 1 - TRANSLATION OF VALUES FROM DROPDOWN FIELDS IN THE BBIONETS INVENTORY 149 T1.4_t T1.5_t Q1 Answers Feedstock Q1 Answers Value chains Forest pruning residues Biomass residues Forest pruning residues 3 - High potential - Significant arisings of feedstocks available currently. Slurry Wastes Slurry 2 - Medium potential - Significant availability of feedstocks available by 2035. Wood Biomass Wood 3 - High potential - Significant arisings of feedstocks available currently. Olive stone Wastes Olive stone 1Low potential - Low to medium arisings of feedstock available between 2023-2035 Olive pruning residues Biomass residues Olive pruning residues 2 - Medium potential - Significant availability of feedstocks available by 2035. Greenhouses plant debris Biomass Greenhouses plant debris 2 - Medium potential - Significant availability of feedstocks available by 2035. 150 T8.1_t T8.2_t T8.3_t Q8.1 Answers: key stakeholders Nature of collaboration Type of collaboration Type of partners Agricultural research centers. Applied research projects. Open Researcher Universities Joint or pilot research projects for the application of innovative technologies. Open Researcher Biotech companies Collaboration in R&D programs providing raw materials in search for innovative solutions for the valorisation, or production of biofuels, bioplastics. Open Other Agricultural and forestry organizations, cooperatives, and associations Pilot projects, promotion actions, support for seeking opportunities, access to markets for bioproducts. Open Advisor Rural development groups Technical support for fund raising Open Other Technological centres Collaboration for the promotion of forestry technologies. Open Researcher Pasture and forestry exploitations. Direct contact with owners Open Forester Cooperatives Open Advisor Olive oil companies Open Processor or retailer Agricultural associations Open Farmer CSIC Open Researcher 151 T10.1_t T10.2_t Q10 Answers C Sink Q10 Answers Envi Sustainability Land degradation and deforestation. 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). Land degradation and deforestation. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Lack of forest cleanup. 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Lack of forest cleanup. 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. CO2 emissions – climate change. 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). CO2 emissions – climate change. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. The burning of pruning waste, both agricultural and gardening, and the destruction of fruit in warehouses. 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). The burning of pruning waste, both agricultural and gardening, and the destruction of fruit in warehouses. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Loss of biodiversity. 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Loss of biodiversity. 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Water and soil contamination (use of fertilizers and pesticides). 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Water and soil contamination (use of fertilizers and pesticides). 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. Consumption of water resources. 3 - High potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock and product level). Consumption of water resources. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Rapid depletion of natural resources. 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Rapid depletion of natural resources. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant environmental benefits. Increase risk of fires if forestry biomass is not managed. 2 - Medium potential - strong potential for carbon sequestration at the feedstock or product level only. Increase risk of fires if forestry biomass is not managed. 2 - Medium potential - Expected to bring 2 or 1 environmental benefits. In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of carbon sequestration as low, medium, or high potential of carbon emissions. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. In these cells, we are interpreting the drop-down options are low, medium, or high potential of environmental benefits as low, medium, or high potential of environmental impacts. The wording of the drop-down cells does not reflect this because of how the tool works. 152 T11_t Q11 Answers Socio Sustainability Create a strategy that makes examples visible, promotes cooperation and improves entry conditions in the sector. 3 - High potential - Expected to bring at least 3 significant social benefits. Offer courses related to forestry training, especially practical ones. 1 - Low potential - doesn't bring any social benefits. Educational campaigns from an early age in schools. 1 - Low potential - doesn't bring any social benefits. Skills development programs for university students. 1 - Low potential - doesn't bring any social benefits. Specific training sessions aimed at specific segments of the population. 1 - Low potential - doesn't bring any social benefits. Outreach campaigns and initiatives to promote interest in issues related to biomass valorisation. 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Support with public/private funding for the creation of startups, spinoffs, business incubators, etc. 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Establish online platforms and digital tools so that this sector of the population can get involved. 1 - Low potential - doesn't bring any social benefits. Labour internships in agricultural exploitations and agri-food industries. 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. Investing in reuse plants to generate new job positions. 2 - Medium potential -Expected to bring 2 or 1 social benefits. 153 T5.3_t T5.4_t Q5.3 Answers. National statistics data, Average farm size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per farm Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per farm per day Source of information Q5.4 Answers. National statistics data, Average forest size (ha): Biomasses identified from Q1 Avg. yearly yield of biomasses per forest Estimated Avg. tonnes of biomass per forest per day Source of information 17.70 Forest pruning residues 0 - Forest pruning residues - - Slurry 5,540,282 8,575.62 Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural. Junta de Andalucía, “Carcterización del Sector Agreario y Pesquero de Andalucía 2023 - Slurry - - Wood - - Wood - - Olive stone 408,074 631.64 Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural. Junta de Andalucía, “Carcterización del Sector Agreario y Pesquero de Andalucía 2023 - Olive stone - - Olive pruning residues 2,615,650 4,048.68 Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural. Junta de Andalucía, “Carcterización del Sector Agreario y Pesquero de Andalucía 2023 - Olive pruning residues - - Greenhouses plant debris 1,434,883 2,221.01 Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca, Agua y Desarrollo Rural. Junta de Andalucía, “Carcterización del Sector Agreario y Pesquero de Andalucía 2023 - Greenhouses plant debris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. SECTION 2 - ADDING EXTRA INFORMATION TO TRANSLATE VALUES FROM WORKSHOP AWNSERS Check if the field "Processing capacity", colum AO, in the Inventory_copy sheet is in T/Day. If that is not the case, please convert the answer in the field to T/Day. T2.1_t T2.2_t T3_t Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Description BBT" Q2 Answers Key word to find in "Intended user / conditions of access" Q3 Answers Key word to find in "Outcomes and final product" Chopped Chipping;pellet;fertilizer;chips Chopped industrial;forester;farmer;SME;processing;industries;producer Fuel energy; power; combustible Crushed Dryer;pelletizing;fertilizer;chips Crushed industrial;forester;farmer;SME;processing;industries;producer Compost fertilizer; nutritional Separation Maceration;fibers;pyrolysis;separator;evaporation;olivepulp Separation industrial;forester;farmer;SME;processing;industries;producer Biogas energy; power; combustible; biogas Drying Dryer;heat;molding;packaging;temperature Drying industrial;forester;SME;processing;industries Pellets combustible; energy; heat Storage Residues;grain Storage forester;SME;farmer;landowner;producer Fermentation Fertilizer;anaerobic;compost;biofertilizer;composting;descomposition Fermentation SME;biogas;industrial SECTION 3 - TRANSLATION OF VALUES FROM NARRATIVE SYNTHESIS FIELDS IN THE BBIONETS INVENTORY