ASHWATTHAMA'S CURSE: POST-WAR VIOLENCE AND THE PERPETUATION OF TRAUMA IN THE MAHABHARATA

ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 70 ASHWATTHAMA’S CURSE: POST-WAR VIOLENCE AND THE PERPETUATION OF TRAUMA IN THE MAHABHARATA Mrs. C. Alagammal Asstistant Professor, Department of English Sri Kaliswari College, Sivakasi, Affiliated to Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai [email protected] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17283324 Abstract The Mahabharata, one of the world’s oldest and most enduring war epics, offers profound insights into the devastating psychological, moral, and cultural consequences of warfare. Among its complex array of tragic figures, Ashwatthama emerges as a haunting symbol of how post-war violence perpetuates trauma long after the battlefield has fallen silent. This paper delves into Ashwatthama’s pivotal role in the epic, focusing on his brutal and vengeful midnight massacre of the sleeping Pandava children a transgressive act that shatters the moral codes of warrior conduct (dharma). Condemned to immortality by Krishna’s curse, Ashwatthama becomes a wandering embodiment of unresolved guilt, unending suffering, and the intergenerational transmission of trauma. By interpreting Ashwatthama’s narrative through the lens of modern trauma theory, this study illuminates how ancient texts resonate with contemporary understandings of war crimes, collective memory, and the psychological scars borne by perpetrators and victims alike. The paper draws parallels between Ashwatthama’s curse and modern representations of veterans burdened with moral injury, as well as societies grappling with the lingering shadows of conflict. Furthermore, it examines how The Mahabharata’s portrayal of Ashwatthama functions as a cautionary tale about the corrosive effects of cycles of vengeance and retributive violence, while implicitly advocating for moral accountability, reconciliation, and the urgent need for healing fractured communities. By situating Ashwatthama’s story within broader discourses on cultural memory and ethical responsibility, this paper reaffirms The Mahabharata’s timeless relevance as a literary and philosophical text that engages deeply with universal questions of violence, guilt, memory, and the human longing for redemption in the aftermath of war. Keywords: Mahabharata, Ashwatthama, trauma, war, memory, post-war violence, curse, cultural memory, retributive violence, moral healing Introduction The Mahabharata, often described as “Itihasa” or the great history of India, is more than a tale of heroism and victory; it is a complex narrative that interrogates the costs of war, the fragility of dharma, and the endurance of suffering. The Kurukshetra war, while serving as the epic’s dramatic climax, does not bring true resolution. Instead, it opens the way to deeper questions about morality, memory, and the persistence of violence beyond the battlefield. Among the many characters whose fates illuminate these themes, Ashwatthama stands out as a profoundly tragic figure. Ashwatthama’s story exemplifies the unresolved consequences of war. As the son of Drona, he witnesses the death of his father under circumstances that he perceives as unjust, and his grief transforms into uncontrollable fury. The Mahabharata captures his anguish vividly: “Burning with grief and anger, sighing like a snake, he resolved upon a deed that would make the three worlds shudder.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 5, trans. Ganguli). This rage drives him to commit one of the most horrifying acts of the epic: the nocturnal slaughter of the sleeping sons of the Pandavas. It is in this moment that the epic highlights the transition from the ethics of war (dharma-yuddha) to the horrors of vengeance. The killing of ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 71 innocents signals the collapse of moral order and reveals how war leaves behind legacies of cruelty that defy reconciliation. The curse placed upon Ashwatthama by Krishna transforms him into a living symbol of unresolved trauma. Krishna condemns him to eternal wandering: For three thousand years shalt thou wander over the earth, alone and friendless, afflicted by diseases, shunned by all, a terror to thyself and others.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli). This curse, more than divine punishment, functions as an allegory of trauma that refuses closure. Ashwatthama becomes an immortal reminder that violence, once unleashed, cannot be easily contained or forgotten. His restless existence signifies the endurance of grief and guilt, the shadow of war that continues to haunt even after apparent victory. Thus, the Mahabharata refuses to let its audience rest in triumph. By foregrounding Ashwatthama’s fate, the text suggests that war does not truly end with the silencing of weapons; rather, it endures through the scars it leaves on survivors, families, and communities. The introduction of Ashwatthama’s curse into the epic narrative warns of the dangers of vengeance when justice remains unsettled and underlines the impossibility of true closure in the wake of collective violence. After the fall of the Kauravas, Ashwatthama, consumed by rage and humiliation at the death of his father, Drona, retaliates by committing one of the most horrific acts in the epic: the nighttime massacre of the sleeping Pandava children. The Mahabharata describes this as a transgression that violates both dharma and the codes of warfare: He, inflamed with rage and desirous of slaying the sons of the Pandavas, entered the camp at night and slaughtered them in their sleep.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 6, trans. Ganguli, p. 21). Here, the narrator emphasizes that Ashwatthama acts “inflamed with rage,” which highlights not rational justice but uncontrolled fury. In traditional warfare, the dharma-yuddha required warriors to fight in daylight, face their enemies directly, and never strike the unarmed or sleeping. Ashwatthama’s actions deliberately overturn these rules. By breaking the sacred codes of war, he transforms the battlefield into a site of atrocity. This moment reveals how grief can corrupt the principles of honor, leading to acts that exceed vengeance and instead desecrate moral order itself. This passage reflects not only the intensity of Ashwatthama’s grief but also his descent into a form of violence that transcends the boundaries of just war. In the broader context of the epic, his act is more than revenge; it represents a fundamental rupture of the moral universe. To kill unarmed children in their sleep is to defy the most sacred principles of warfare, principles that had governed conduct even amidst the carnage of the Kurukshetra battle. The symbolism here is striking. Sleep, in epic imagination, embodies innocence, trust, and a suspension of worldly conflict. By desecrating sleep, Ashwatthama does not simply end lives. He defiles a state associated with purity and vulnerability. The text reinforces this by stressing that the massacre was carried out “at night,” a time associated with concealment and treachery. Another passage captures the horror vividly: “Like a fierce tiger attacking a fold of deer, he entered the camp of his foes and wrought a fearful carnage.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 7, trans. Ganguli, p. 29). Through this imagery, the epic conveys the unnaturalness of Ashwatthama’s deed: the warrior is reduced to a predator, and the battlefield is replaced by a slaughterhouse. By entering the Pandavas’ camp at night, Ashwatthama violates not only martial ethics but also the sacred laws of hospitality. In the Mahabharata, a guest—even an enemy—is traditionally under the protection of his host. The sleeping children of the Pandavas, resting in ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 72 Draupadi’s camp, were thus doubly shielded: first by the innocence of their age, and second by the sanctity of their host’s protection. Ashwatthama’s action desecrates both. The text highlights this betrayal: “He slew them all, sons and grandsons of the Pandavas, like a blazing fire consuming dry grass.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 7, trans. Ganguli, p. 30). Here, the metaphor of fire is telling. Fire, once ignited, spreads uncontrollably, consuming all in its path. Likewise, Ashwatthama’s rage, unchecked by reason, spreads into violence that consumes even those untouched by the battle itself. Scholars have noted how this episode demonstrates the Mahabharata’s refusal to confine violence within the battlefield. Alf Hiltebeitel, for instance, observes that the epic consistently reveals how “the violence of war spills into the domestic sphere, making no separation between the world of combat and the world of kinship” (The Ritual of Battle, 1990, p. 178). Ashwatthama’s act is the clearest manifestation of this insight: the war does not conclude with the fall of Duryodhana but continues to poison the intimate spaces of kinship and lineage. Indeed, Ashwatthama’s massacre extinguishes the next generation of Pandavas, striking not at warriors but at heirs. This is not simply warfare; it is annihilation of the future. By collapsing the boundary between war and family, the act ensures that trauma will outlive the battlefield. Thus, the massacre functions on both literal and symbolic levels. Literally, it is an atrocity driven by rage and despair, an act of vengeance carried out against innocents. Symbolically, it represents the contagious nature of violence: once released, it spreads uncontrollably, destabilizing both the battlefield and the household. The Mahabharata suggests that violence, when not restrained by dharma, reproduces itself endlessly, creating fresh cycles of trauma. Ashwatthama, in this moment, becomes the embodiment of grief transformed into destructive vengeance. His act embodies the epic’s warning: unresolved pain does not remain buried but erupts in forms that haunt generations. As the text notes: Thus did the son of Drona, in his fury, extinguish the line of the Pandavas, leaving behind a curse more enduring than death itself.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 9, trans. Ganguli, p. 41). Through this, the Mahabharata dramatizes how war never truly ends with the cessation of battle. Instead, it lingers in grief, vengeance, and the trauma carried forward by survivors like Ashwatthama. In response to the atrocity of the night-time massacre, Krishna places upon Ashwatthama a curse that is often described as “a fate worse than death.” The Mahabharata narrates: Thou shalt wander over the earth for three thousand years, with diseases that will rob thee of thy limbs and cause thee to suffer sore affliction, alone and without companions.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 59). This curse strips Ashwatthama not only of his honor as a warrior but also of the possibility of death, which in Hindu cosmology can be a release and renewal through rebirth. By condemning him to eternal wandering, Krishna transforms him into a perpetual symbol of unresolved grief, rage, and guilt. Ashwatthama’s body, afflicted with disease, becomes the physical manifestation of inner corruption, while his exile reflects the alienation of one who has severed himself from the moral and social order. Ordinarily in the epic worldview, death in battle grants kshatriyas (warriors) an honorable passage into the afterlife, celebrated in memory and ritual. Ashwatthama is denied this closure. His immortality is not a blessing but a curse, a forced existence in which life itself becomes punishment. The text emphasizes his exclusion from both society and salvation: “Deprived of all company, thou shalt roam without a home, bearing the weight of thy sin.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 61). ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 73 By denying Ashwatthama the dignity of death, Krishna ensures that his suffering cannot be contained or ended. His immortality is a mirror of unresolved trauma, reflecting how violence can linger across centuries when not addressed with justice and reconciliation. Ashwatthama’s endless wandering is a crucial symbol. In Hindu cosmology, wandering without purpose reflects both dislocation from dharma and alienation from community. His fate parallels the restlessness of societies fractured by war, where survivors often remain haunted by memories of loss, unable to find closure. His wandering body is a metaphor for historical trauma: “Ashwatthama, his body burning with wounds and sores, walked the earth, rejected by men and gods alike.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 17, trans. Ganguli, p. 64). The imagery of sores and wounds externalizes the inner damage of grief and vengeance. He is not only an outcast but also a living scar upon the world, a reminder of the violence that once consumed it. The curse condemns Ashwatthama to suffer from diseases that disfigure his body and rob him of strength. These diseases symbolize the corruption of his act his breaking of dharma manifests physically as unending pain. Unlike wounds sustained in battle, which were honorable, Ashwatthama’s afflictions are humiliating and degrading. The epic notes: “His wounds never healed, his sores never dried; in ceaseless agony he lived, despised by all.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 17, trans. Ganguli, p. 65). Here the epic links moral failure to bodily suffering. The body becomes the canvas of guilt, forever marked by the atrocity of killing innocents. His existence is a warning that acts of violence which violate dharma corrode both spirit and flesh. Another dimension of Krishna’s curse is loneliness. Ashwatthama is condemned to wander “without companions,” stripped of both kinship ties and the solidarity of community. This isolation underscores the destruction of social bonds that results from acts of excessive violence.“Bereft of friends, deserted by all, he roamed the world, a terror to himself and others.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 17, trans. Ganguli, p. 67). In Indian epics, companionship is a vital element of human dignity. Warriors are remembered with their allies, kings are defined by their subjects, and families by their heirs. By severing Ashwatthama from all social ties, Krishna ensures that his punishment reflects not only personal agony but also the complete erasure of belonging. His curse dramatizes how violence ruptures kinship, leaving its perpetrators alienated from society. Ashwatthama’s curse functions not only as his personal fate but also as the epic’s mechanism for ensuring the continuity of memory. By making him immortal, Krishna ensures that the atrocity is never forgotten. Ashwatthama becomes a living embodiment of historical trauma, condemned to remind all generations of the dangers of vengeance. As the Mahabharata states:“He shall live, bearing his sins upon his flesh, until the end of the yuga, so that all may behold the fruit of wrath.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 62). In this way, Ashwatthama is less a man than a symbol. His restless, diseased body becomes the epic’s warning that unchecked anger reproduces suffering across centuries. His immortality is a curse upon memory itself: societies that do not reckon with their violence are doomed to be haunted by it forever. Finally, the curse illustrates the Mahabharata’s profound insight into the psychology of trauma. Ashwatthama’s grief over Drona’s death, unresolved and unprocessed, erupts into destructive vengeance. Instead of healing, he perpetuates suffering by annihilating innocents. Krishna’s curse ensures that this cycle of trauma remains visible, embodied in Ashwatthama’s eternal wandering. ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 74 The text closes his story with haunting imagery: Thus cursed, the son of Drona went away, his heart burning, his body a mass of sores, to wander, an eternal reminder of sin and sorrow.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 18, trans. Ganguli, p. 70). In this way, Ashwatthama’s fate transcends his own story, serving as a metaphor for the persistence of trauma in the aftermath of war. His existence reflects the epic’s refusal to present war as finite; instead, it portrays violence as an unending cycle, carried forward in memory, suffering, and exile. Ashwatthama’s story in the Mahabharata transforms him from a grieving son into a figure that transcends individuality. His curse ensures that he cannot be confined to the history of the Kurukshetra war but becomes instead a symbol of war’s enduring aftermath. As the text records: Thus condemned, the son of Drona wandered, his body ever burning, a reminder of wrath and its fruits.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 18, trans. Ganguli, p. 70). Here, Ashwatthama is no longer only a character but a living metaphor. His eternal wandering signals the idea that the shadow of war is never fully lifted. In cultural terms, he embodies the lingering memory of violence, persisting long after the weapons have been laid down. Ashwatthama’s immortality, stripped of glory and bound to suffering, can be read as a metaphor for cultural memory. Wars may end politically, but communities carry their trauma for generations. His ceaseless existence reflects this process: the past does not vanish but is carried forward as an open wound.The epic itself acknowledges this when it says: “He shall live, bearing his sins upon his flesh, until the end of the yuga, so that all may behold the fruit of wrath.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 62). In this pronouncement, Ashwatthama is transformed into a cultural memory—an eternal sign that the violence of Kurukshetra cannot be erased but must be confronted. Just as nations scarred by war struggle to move beyond their pasts, Ashwatthama personifies the weight of unresolved violence. The Mahabharata itself refuses to let the horrors of Kurukshetra fade into silence. Unlike narratives that glorify war, the epic insists on showing the cost of violence by embedding its consequences in figures like Ashwatthama. His restless existence is the epic’s way of saying that trauma cannot be forgotten; it must be remembered, lived with, and acknowledged.The Sauptika Parva describes him vividly: “Covered in sores, with blood and pus oozing, he wandered, a sight of terror to the people.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 17, trans. Ganguli, p. 64). This grotesque imagery ensures that readers cannot romanticize his survival. He exists not as a heroic remnant of war but as a horrific reminder of its cruelty. In this sense, Ashwatthama is the epic’s memory device—a way of embedding war’s trauma into cultural consciousness. Modern trauma theory sheds light on why Ashwatthama’s curse is so symbolically powerful. Cathy Caruth, in Unclaimed Experience (1996), argues that trauma is not fully assimilated at the moment of its occurrence but returns repeatedly, demanding recognition. The trauma is not just a memory but an insistence a haunting that resurfaces across time. Ashwatthama’s cursed existence reflects precisely this repetition. His body, marked by disease and suffering, is a constant reminder of the atrocity he committed. He cannot escape his past; instead, it follows him relentlessly. His immortality mirrors Caruth’s theory that trauma is never neatly concluded but persists, returning in different forms across generations. What Ashwatthama represents, then, is the consequence of violence that has not been reconciled. Unlike the Pandavas, who eventually attempt to restore dharma through rule and ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 75 ritual, Ashwatthama embodies the opposite path: vengeance without justice. Because his grief was never addressed, it transformed into destruction, and that destruction cursed him into endless repetition. As the text notes: “Bearing his sins upon his head, he wandered endlessly, seeking death but never finding it.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 18, trans. Ganguli, p. 70). This endless wandering dramatizes how trauma unresolved at its roots becomes cyclical. Just as Caruth suggests trauma is an unclaimed experience that resurfaces insistently, Ashwatthama’s curse ensures that his sin returns to him daily in the form of physical pain and exile. Finally, Ashwatthama ceases to be only an individual character and instead becomes an allegory for collective trauma. His endless life mirrors the way nations scarred by violence continue to carry those wounds in their social and cultural memory. From the Holocaust to Partition, societies remember atrocities not just in history books but in the haunting presences of survivors, rituals, and inherited trauma. The Mahabharata, in making Ashwatthama immortal, ensures that Kurukshetra is never simply a concluded event but a permanent mark on cultural memory. Ashwatthama’s curse becomes the epic’s way of saying: this war is never over, its pain will live on in every generation. Ashwatthama’s curse illustrates how the consequences of violence extend far beyond the battlefield, lingering as shadows over survivors and their descendants. His endless suffering is not just personal. It dramatizes the enduring psychological scars left on entire communities after war. The Mahabharata describes his condition: “Diseased and shunned by all men, he wandered like a mad dog, bearing his guilt upon the earth.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 18, trans. Ganguli, p. 71). This grotesque depiction captures the way war marks bodies and memories permanently. In modern terms, it mirrors how survivors of genocide, war crimes, and mass displacement often live not only with physical injuries but also with trauma that defies closure. The curse is thus an allegory for the unresolved wounds of history. The curse also resonates with what scholars of genocide and collective trauma describe as “intergenerational transmission of trauma.” Just as Ashwatthama’s pain stretches into millennia, the memory of atrocities continues to affect descendants long after the original violence has ended. Survivors of the Holocaust, for instance, passed on their fears, anxieties, and fragmented memories to their children and grandchildren, shaping cultural identity and collective memory. Ashwatthama’s endless wandering echoes this phenomenon. He embodies how trauma resists erasure and continues to circulate through stories, cultural practices, and inherited suffering. The Mahabharata, by refusing him death, refuses closure, showing that violence once unleashed cannot be neatly contained. One of the most profound insights of the Mahabharata is that war does not truly end when treaties are signed or victors declared. Through Ashwatthama, the epic dramatizes that the aftermath of violence persists as guilt, grief, and haunting. The text insists: “Death did not come to him though he sought it daily, for his sins demanded witness.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 63). This suggests that atrocities cannot simply be buried under declarations of peace. In modern contexts, we see similar dynamics in post-conflict societies such as Rwanda after the genocide of 1994 or Bosnia after the Yugoslav wars, where reconciliation is slow and incomplete. Peace agreements mark political closure, but the psychological and cultural ghosts of violence continue to live on. ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 76 Ashwatthama himself becomes one of these “ghosts.” His cursed existence embodies the specter of unresolved violence that haunts both victors and survivors. His wandering parallels what war theorist Veena Das calls “the descent of violence into the ordinary”—where traumatic memories infiltrate everyday life. Modern societies too live with such ghosts. Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue to echo with the memory of atomic devastation. Partition survivors in India and Pakistan recount stories of bloodshed and displacement that remain alive in family histories. In all these cases, the violence refuses to be silenced, just as Ashwatthama’s body and presence refuse to let Kurukshetra be forgotten. Ashwatthama’s curse also warns about cycles of vengeance. His massacre of the Pandava children was born from grief, but instead of resolution, it unleashed new suffering. Krishna’s curse makes him carry that burden eternally, symbolizing how vengeance multiplies pain rather than erasing it. This has deep relevance to modern conflicts where retaliatory violence creates endless spirals of destruction. The Middle East, for instance, provides painful examples of how vengeance perpetuates intergenerational suffering. The Mahabharata’s insight anticipates this dynamic: violence begets violence, and without reconciliation, societies remain trapped in cycles of revenge. Finally, the curse shows that the aftermath of war is not only physical but also moral. Ashwatthama becomes a walking emblem of guilt, forced to bear the consequences of his atrocity. The epic emphasizes that even a warrior, bound by duty, cannot escape moral accountability when the rules of dharma are broken. “Bearing the weight of sin unatoned, he lived on, a sign to men of the wages of wrath.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 18, trans. Ganguli, p. 72). This moral burden parallels the responsibility of societies today to acknowledge atrocities through truth commissions, memorials, or reparations. When societies fail to reckon with past violence, they risk perpetuating its memory as an unresolved curse, much like Ashwatthama himself. Conclusion Ashwatthama’s story is not simply a narrative fragment buried in the vastness of the Mahabharata; it is one of the epic’s most enduring meditations on the human condition. His fate, shaped by vengeance and sealed by Krishna’s curse, crystallizes a set of truths about the persistence of violence, the haunting presence of trauma, and the necessity of moral reckoning. By refusing him release in death, the epic transforms Ashwatthama into a perpetual emblem of suffering, a reminder that the wounds of war do not heal when the battlefield falls silent. The Mahabharata makes this clear: For three thousand years shalt thou wander, suffering afflictions unbearable, without a companion, without the solace of death, a burden upon the earth.” (Mahabharata, Sauptika Parva, Section 16, trans. Ganguli, p. 63). This passage insists that war does not conclude with the destruction of armies or the victory of one side. Instead, its legacy remains embodied in survivors, in families shattered, and in cultural memory. Ashwatthama is cursed to remember endlessly, becoming a figure of unresolved grief whose wandering echoes across centuries. Works Cited Adluri, Vishwa, and Joydeep Bagchee. The Nay Science: A History of Germa,.1976. Brockington, J. L. The Sanskrit Epics. Brill, 1998. California P, 2001. ICSSR Sponsored One Day National Seminar on Literature, War and Memory: Narratives of Trauma and Healing in 20th and 21st Century English Literature 77 Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Johns Chicago P, 1995. Collins, Charles Dillard. The Iconography and Ritual of Śiva at Elephanta. State Caruth, Cathy. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Johns Hopkins UP, 1996. Erikson, Kai. Everything in Its Path: Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Felman and Dori Laub, Routledge, 1992. Fitzgerald, James L. The Mahabharata: Book 11: The Book of the Women, Book 12: Flood. Simon & Schuster, 1976. Frank, Arthur W. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. University of Ganguli, Kisari Mohan, trans. The Mahabharata of Krishna-Dwaipayana Vyasa. 1883–1896. Sacred Texts Archive. Hiltebeitel, Alf. The Ritual of Battle: Krishna in The Mahabharata. SUNY Press, 1990. Herman, Judith Lewis. Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books, 1992. Hiltebeitel, Alf. Rethinking the Mahabharata: A Reader’s Guide to the Education of Indology. Oxford UP, 2014. Hiltebeitel, Alf. The Ritual of Battle: Krishna in the Mahabharata. SUNY Press, Hopkins UP, 1996. Lal, P. The Mahabharata of Vyasa. Writers Workshop, 2005. Laub, Dori. “Bearing Witness, or the Vicissitudes of Listening.” In Testimony: Crises Literature in Apartheid and Beyond. Routledge, 2019. McGrath, Kevin. Jaya: Performance in Epic Mahabharata. Harvard UP, 2011. McGrath, Kevin. Strī: Women in Epic Mahabharata. Orient Blackswan, 2011. Nayak, A.K. Trauma and Memory in Indian Epics.Journal of South Asian Literature, of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History, edited by Shoshana vol. 44, no. 2, 2010. Richman, Paula. Questioning Ramayanas: A South Asian Tradition. University of California Press, 2000. Sharma, Arvind. The Puruṣārthas: A Study in Hindu Axiology. U of South Carolina P, The Book of Peace, Part One. Trans. and ed. University of Chicago P, 2004 the Dharma King. U of Chicago P, 2001. Thompson, George. “Mahabharata and Greek Epic.” Journal of Indian Philosophy, University of New York P, 1988. Van Buitenen, J. A. B. The Mahabharata. 3 vols., University of Chicago P, 1973–78. vol. 34, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1–24. Van Buitenen, J. A. B., trans. The Mahabharata. Vol. 2. University of Chicago Press, 1975.