Holistic efficacy of ayurvedic treatment modalities for spinal disorders: An observational study
Abstract
This research investigates the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments for spinal disorders using a holistic, non-invasive approach. Conducted on 49 patients, the study incorporates five integrated modalities: external therapies, internal therapies, diet management, lifestyle modifications, and stress management. The results demonstrate significant symptom resolution rates, with up to 32.65% of patients achieving 90% improvement and 12.24% attaining complete relief. The findings underscore the value of Ayurveda in addressing spinal health through personalized, energy-focused care.
Full text
Corresponding author: D.M. Ravichand Copyright © 2025 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0. Holistic efficacy of ayurvedic treatment modalities for spinal disorders: An observational study R Kranthi Vardhan 1, G Suman Madhuri 1 and D.M. Ravichand 2, * 1 Vardhan Ayurveda Hospital, 2nd Floor, 8-2-629/11/A, RMK Plaza, Road No: 12, Opposite Virinchi Hospital, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad – 500034, India. 2 Department of Pharmacology, Arundathi Institute of Medical Sciences, Beside MLRIT, Dundigal, Gandi Maisamma, Medical - Malkajgiri Dist. Telangana, India. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 Publication history: Received on 11 December 2024; revised on 27 January 2025; accepted on 30 January 2025 Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.21.1.0065 Abstract This research investigates the effectiveness of Ayurvedic treatments for spinal disorders using a holistic, non-invasive approach. Conducted on 49 patients, the study incorporates five integrated modalities: external therapies, internal therapies, diet management, lifestyle modifications, and stress management. The results demonstrate significant symptom resolution rates, with up to 32.65% of patients achieving 90% improvement and 12.24% attaining complete relief. The findings underscore the value of Ayurveda in addressing spinal health through personalized, energy-focused care. Keywords: Observational Study; Ayurvedic Treatment; Meru Chikitsa Spinal Disorders; Stress Management 1. Introduction Spinal disorders, encompassing conditions such as back pain, neck pain, and sciatica, represent a growing public health challenge. Conventional treatments often involve invasive procedures, raising concerns about complications and longterm outcomes [1]. Ayurveda, a 5,000-year-old traditional Indian medicine system, offers a holistic alternative that emphasizes the alignment of body, mind, and spirit. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Ayurvedic treatments, specifically focusing on the novel Meru Chikitsa therapy, for spinal disorders. According to Ayurveda, Meru Chikitsa is based on the belief that the spine is not just a part of the body but also a pathway for life energy or prana [2]. The spine is considered to be the source of various energy channels (Nadis) and energy centres (Chakras) that regulate the body’s physical, mental, and emotional functions. The health of the spine is therefore related to the general health and well-being of an individual [3,4]. Any misalignment, disturbances, or blockages in the spine are thought to cause several health issues, like physical pain, decreased mobility, and emotional imbalances [5]. By focusing on spinal alignment, Meru Chikitsa aims to correct these imbalances and help the energy to flow freely throughout the body to promote holistic healing [6]. According to Ayurveda, Meru Chikitsa is founded on the principle that the spine is not merely a structural component of the body but also a vital pathway for life energy, or prana [7]. The spine is believed to house various energy channels (Nadis) and energy centers (Chakras), which play a crucial role in regulating the physical, mental, and emotional functions of the body [8,9].
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 752 The health of the spine is intrinsically linked to an individual's overall well-being. Misalignments, disturbances, or blockages in the spine are thought to result in a range of health issues, including physical pain, reduced mobility, and emotional imbalances. Meru Chikitsa seeks to address these issues by restoring proper spinal alignment, thereby facilitating the free flow of energy throughout the body. This approach promotes holistic healing and supports the integration of physical, mental, and emotional health [10]. Meru Chikitsa is founded on the following key principles • Spinal Alignment: The primary objective of Meru Chikitsa is to correct spinal misalignments. It employs gentle and natural techniques to restore proper alignment of the spine. • Energy Flow: In Meru Chikitsa, the spine is regarded as the central conduit of life energy, or prana. Ensuring proper spinal alignment facilitates the free flow of prana, thereby promoting physical, mental, and emotional well-being. • Holistic Healing: This therapy adopts a comprehensive approach by addressing not only physical health but also the mental and emotional aspects of an individual’s well-being. • Non-Invasive Technique: Meru Chikitsa utilizes non-invasive methods, including gentle manipulations, stretches, and pressure techniques, avoiding the need for medications or surgical procedures. As a result, it is considered a safe and effective therapy for individuals across all age groups. • Personalized Therapy: Recognizing that each individual’s spine and energy system are unique, Meru Chikitsa involves a thorough evaluation of the patient’s posture, spinal alignment, and energy flow. Based on this assessment, an Ayurvedic practitioner devises a customized treatment plan tailored to the individual’s specific needs. 2. Methodology 2.1 Study Design This observational study was conducted at Vardhan Ayurveda Hospital (VAH) on a cohort of 49 patients diagnosed with varying spinal disorders. 2.2 Inclusion Criteria • Adults aged 20-77 years. • Diagnosed with conditions such as back pain, neck pain, sciatica, and spinal misalignment. 2.3 Treatment Plan The treatment plan consisted of the following modalities: • External Therapies: Meru Chikitsa (Ancient Ayurveda Spine & Neuro Therapy) and Marma Chikitsa (Vital Point Therapy) are specialized Ayurvedic treatments designed to restore spinal and neuro health through targeted techniques. Based on disease severity, therapy durations vary between 18, 28, or 45 days. Key procedures include Abhyanga (body massage), Shiro Abhyanga (head massage), Swedam (steam therapy), and advanced treatments like Pizhichil (medicated oil bath), Patra Potali Pinda Swedam (leaf bundle massage), and Shali Shastika Pinda Swedam (herbal rice poultice therapy). • Additional therapies such as Nasyam (nasal insufflation), Karna Poorana (ear drop therapy), Greeva Vasti (oil therapy for the cervical region), and Kati Vasti (oil therapy for the lumbar region) address specific pain and mobility issues. Vasti Karma (medicated enema) is also employed to balance doshas and detoxify the system. These therapies work synergistically to enhance spinal alignment, alleviate pain, and improve overall neuromuscular function. • Internal Therapies: Ayurvedic treatments focused on balancing Vata dosha, the primary factor behind pain and inflammation. Internal therapies included a range of targeted formulations such as Ayursages SpineX Gold, Neuro Gold, Muscle Mend, and Joint Flex tablets, along with Gut Reset and Pain Ease Tablets. Complementary therapies used herbal oils like Dhanwantaram Thailam, Sahacharadi Thailam, and Murivenna Thailam for massage, Greeva Vasti, and Kati Vasti. Additional treatments included Anu Thaila nasal drops, Karna Purana ear drops, Ashwagandha Lehyam, and Chyawanprash Lehyam, offering a comprehensive approach to strengthen the spine, reduce pain, and promote overall well-being. • Diet Management: Personalized diets emphasizing Vata-pacifying foods. Patient is asked to avoid Vata Increasing foods and avoid Vata pacifying foods. The following is the diet chart which is given to all of my patients –
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 753 • Lifestyle & Exercise Management: Structured regimens, including yoga (Bhujangasana, Halasana) and brisk walking. • Change of Posture is advised. Patient is asked not to sit and sleep on the floor. He / she is advised to be mobile always and not sedentary. The following exercises are taught according to the requirement of the patient – • Swimming • Yoga – Bhujangasan, Halasan, Shalabhasan, Vrukshasan, Balasan • Isometric Exercises • Brisk Walk & • House hold Chores etc 2.3.1 Stress Management: Techniques such as Pranayama and mindfulness meditation. Stress also plays a vital role in causing back pain and neck pain – hence we advise the following modalities for stress relief: • Pranayama (Breathing Exercises) like Anulom Vilom Pranayama • Meditation & • Mindfulness Symptom severity, resolution rates, and patient-reported improvements were analyzed using demographic and clinical data. Avoid Advised Curd Butter Milk (1:4) Besan Leafy Vegetables Tamarind Salads Masalas Seasonal Fruits Banana Mutton Chops Fish/Marine Food Kheema/Paya Chinese Food Soups/Juices Aloo,Brinja,Gongura Do all your work with caution Irregular Sitting (postures) Weight Lifting Sex during the treatment period No exercise 3. Results 3.1 Demographics and Baseline Characteristics The study cohort consisted of 49 patients diagnosed with varying spinal disorders. A detailed summary of demographic and baseline characteristics are as follows: Gender Distribution: Females accounted for 51.02% (n=25), while males constituted 48.98% (n=24). Age: The mean age of the participants was 49.59 ± 13.28 years, with a median age of 50 years. The age range was 20 to 77 years, with the interquartile range (IQR) between 42 and 57 years (Table 1). 3.2 Symptom Profile The most commonly reported symptoms were back pain and sciatica, each affecting 28.57% of the cohort (n=14). Less common symptom combinations included back pain with burning micturition (2.04%, n=1) and neck pain with spinal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 754 problems (2.04%, n=1). Patients often reported severe symptom intensity. An analysis of symptoms is presented in Table 2, with a graphical representation in Figure 1. Table 1 Summary of Demographic and Baseline Characteristics Parameter Statistics Treatment Group (N=49) Gender n 49 Male n (%) 24 (48.98%) Female n (%) 25 (51.02%) Age n 49 Mean ± Sd 49.59 ± 13.28 Median 50 Quantile 42.00;57.00 Range 20.00 - 77.00 Table 2 Overview of symptoms Symptoms Severity n % Back Pain Severe 14 28.57% Back Pain + Erectile Dysfunction + Premature Ejaculation Severe 1 2.04% Back Pain + Neck Pain Severe 1 2.04% Neck Pain Severe 7 14.29% Neck pain + Sciatica Severe 2 4.08% Neck Pain + Spine Problem Severe 1 2.04% Sciatica Severe 14 28.57% Sciatica + Spine Problem Severe 2 4.08% Spine Problem Severe 7 14.29% Grand Total (n) 49 100.00% Figure 1 Distribution of the symptom Treatment Outcomes: The treatment outcomes of Meru Chikitsa demonstrated significant efficacy in managing spinal disorders, with 100% of patients completing the 45-day treatment (Table 3). Symptom resolution rates were notably high, with 64.29% of sciatica patients achieving 90% improvement and complete (100%) resolution observed in rare
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 755 conditions like neck pain combined with spinal problems (Table 4). Gender-specific outcomes revealed slightly higher resolution rates among females (36% achieving 90% improvement) compared to males (29.17%). Complete (100%) resolution was achieved in rare conditions, such as neck pain associated with spinal disorders. Patients with isolated back pain demonstrated varying levels of improvement, with 42.86% achieving an 80% resolution rate (Table 4 and Figure 2). Personalized therapies, including external and internal Ayurvedic treatments, dietary adjustments, and stress management, contributed to holistic healing without adverse effects. Female patients showed slightly higher resolution rates compared to males, underscoring the potential of Meru Chikitsa as a safe, non-invasive approach for spinal health. Table 3 Overview of the treatment details Treatment Duration n % 18 Days - - 28 Days - - 45 Days 49 100.00% Treatment Plan n % External Therapies 49 100.00% Internal Therapies 49 100.00% Diet Management 49 100.00% Lifestyle & Exercise Management 49 100.00% Stress Management 49 100.00% Table 4 Summary of Problem Resolution Rates by Gender % Problem Cured Female (N=25) Male (N=24) Overall n % n % n % 70.00% 1 4.00% 3 12.50% 4 8.16% 80.00% 6 24.00% 9 37.50% 15 30.61% 85.00% 1 4.00% 1 4.17% 2 4.08% 90.00% 9 36.00% 7 29.17% 16 32.65% 95.00% 4 16.00% 2 8.33% 6 12.24% 100.00% 4 16.00% 2 8.33% 6 12.24% Grand Total 25 100.00% 24 100.00% 49 100.00%
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 756 Figure 2 Problem Resolution Rates Table 5 Problem Resolution Rates Categorized by Symptoms Symptoms 70.00% 80.00% 85.00% 90.00% 95.00% 100.00 % Overall n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Back Pain - 6 (42.86%) 1 (7.14%) 3 (21.43%) 2 (14.29%) 2 (14.29%) 14 (100%) Back Pain + Erectile Dysfunction + Premature Ejaculation - - - - 1 (100%) - 1 (100%) Back Pain + Neck Pain - - - - 1 (100%) - 1 (100%) Neck Pain 1 (14.29%) 3 (42.86%) - - 1 (14.29%) 2 (28.57%) 7 (100%) Neck pain + Sciatica - - 1 (50.00%) 1 (50.00%) - - 2 (100%) Neck Pain + Spine Problem - - - - - 1 (100%) 1 (100%) Sciatica 1 (7.14%) 3 (21.43%) - 9 (64.29%) - 1 (7.14%) 14 (100%) Sciatica + Spine Problem 1 (50.00%) - - 1 (50.00%) - - 2 (100%) Spine Problem 1 (14.29%) 3 (42.86%) - 2 (28.57%) 1 (14.29%) - 7 (100%) Grand Total 4 (8.16%) 15 (30.61%) 2 (4.08%) 16 (32.65%) 6 (12.24%) 6 (12.24%) 49 (100%) 4. Discussion This study highlights the efficacy of Ayurveda’s integrated approach in treating spinal disorders. The incorporation of Meru Chikitsa emphasizes spinal alignment as a key determinant of overall health. Personalized therapies addressing physical, emotional, and dietary needs contribute to Ayurveda’s holistic framework [11].
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 757 This observational study showcases the effectiveness of Meru Chikitsa as a holistic and non-invasive therapeutic approach for managing spinal disorders. The comprehensive treatment plan, integrating external therapies, internal medications, dietary and lifestyle modifications, and stress management, demonstrated significant benefits in alleviating symptoms and improving overall well-being. Similar findings were reported in studies emphasizing Ayurvedic therapies for musculoskeletal disorders [12, 13]. The significant reduction in pain and improved mobility observed in patients underscores the effectiveness of therapies like Abhyanga, Greeva Vasti, and Pizhichil in restoring spinal alignment and facilitating the free flow of prana. Previous studies on Greeva Vasti and Pizhichil have highlighted their efficacy in reducing pain and improving spinal flexibility in patients with cervical spondylosis and low back pain [14, 15]. Internal therapies, specifically Ayurvedic formulations targeting Vata dosha, played a vital role in addressing the underlying pathology of pain and inflammation, as previously demonstrated in research on Vata-related disorders [16]. Dietary modifications tailored to pacify Vata dosha and structured exercise regimens, including yoga postures such as Bhujangasana and Halasana, contributed to sustained improvements in spinal health. Studies have shown that yoga can enhance spinal mobility, reduce pain, and improve quality of life in patients with back and neck pain [17]. Additionally, stress management techniques like pranayama and mindfulness meditation helped address the psychosomatic aspects of pain, further enhancing therapeutic outcomes [18]. The absence of adverse effects highlights the safety and applicability of this treatment approach across a wide age range. These results align with other findings that confirm the safety of non-invasive Ayurvedic therapies [19]. However, given the observational nature of the study, controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes are recommended to further validate these findings and establish standardized protocols for Meru Chikitsa. In conclusion, Meru Chikitsa provides a safe, effective, and holistic approach to managing spinal disorders, promoting not only physical but also emotional and mental well-being. It holds promise as an integrative therapy in the field of Ayurvedic medicine for patients seeking non-invasive alternatives to conventional treatments. Similar conclusions have been drawn in studies advocating Ayurvedic approaches for managing chronic musculoskeletal conditions [20]. In summary, the comprehensive data highlights the effectiveness of Meru Chikitsa in managing spinal disorders. Significant symptom improvement was observed across all treatment categories, with particularly strong outcomes for sciatica and isolated back pain. Female patients demonstrated slightly better resolution rates compared to males. The results underscore the potential of this integrative Ayurvedic approach as a safe, holistic treatment modality for spinal health. 4.1 Strengths and Limitations • Comprehensive treatment plan addressing both physical and psychological dimensions. • High adherence rates with no reported complications. • Lack of a control group limits comparative analysis. • Small sample size restricts generalizability. 5. Conclusion The study demonstrates the potential of Ayurvedic modalities, particularly Meru Chikitsa, in alleviating spinal disorders through non-invasive, personalized care. Further research with larger cohorts and controlled designs is warranted to establish broader applicability. In conclusion, Meru Chikitsa provides a safe, effective, and holistic approach to managing spinal disorders, promoting not only physical but also emotional and mental well-being. It holds promise as an integrative theray in the field of Ayurvedic medicine for patients seeking non-invasive alternatives to conventional treatments. Compliance with ethical standards Acknowledgements We extend our heartfelt gratitude to all the participants of this study for their valuable time and cooperation. We sincerely acknowledge the support of the healthcare professionals, Ayurvedic practitioners, and research staff whose expertise and dedication contributed significantly to this study.
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2025, 21(01), 751-758 758 Disclosure of conflict of interest No conflict of interest to be disclosed. Statement of ethical approval Disclosure of conflict of interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests. Statement of informed consent Yes the Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. References [1] Qaseem A., et al., “Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 2017. [2] Lad, Vasant. Ayurveda: The Science of Self-Healing. Lotus Press, 2002. [3] Sharma, P. V. Charaka Samhita: Text with English Translation. Chaukhambha Orientalia, 1994. [4] Murthy, K. R. Srikanta. Sushruta Samhita. Chaukhambha Publications, 2001. [5] Sharma H., Clark C., “Ayurveda and the Mind-Body Connection,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 1998. [6] Mishra L. C., Scientific Basis for Ayurvedic Therapies, CRC Press, 2003. [7] Tiwari P., “Role of Spine Alignment in Ayurveda,” Journal of Ayurveda Research, 2015. [8] Iyengar B.K.S., Light on Yoga, HarperCollins, 1979. [9] Streeter C.C., et al., “Effects of Yoga on the Autonomic Nervous System and Stress Reduction,” Medical Hypotheses, 2012. [10] Raghuram N., et al., “Yoga and Ayurveda: An Integrative Approach to Pain Management,” Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2016. [11] Tiwari P., Bhati K., et al. “Role of Ayurveda in the Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Review,” Ayurveda Research and Practice Journal, 2018. [12] Kulkarni D.D., “Ayurvedic Therapies in the Treatment of Spinal Conditions,” Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 2019. [13] Raghuram N., et al., “Effectiveness of Yoga and Ayurveda in Treating Low Back Pain: A Controlled Study,” Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2016. [14] Chaudhari S.D., “The Role of Greeva Vasti in the Management of Cervical Spondylosis,” International Journal of Ayurveda Research, 2017. [15] Gupta A., “Pizhichil as an Ayurvedic Treatment for Lumbar Pain,” Ayurveda and Musculoskeletal Research Journal, 2020. [16] Mishra R., “Vata Dosha: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches,” Indian Journal of Ayurveda Medicine, 2015. [17] Streeter C.C., et al., “Yoga as a Therapeutic Intervention for Chronic Pain,” The Journal of Pain, 2012. [18] Sharma R., “Pranayama and Stress Management in Pain Disorders,” International Journal of Yoga and Ayurveda Research, 2014. [19] Singh G., “Safety Profile of Ayurvedic Therapies in Geriatric Patients,” Journal of Ayurveda Medicine, 2019. [20] Pandit S., et al., “Holistic Ayurveda Therapies in Chronic Conditions,” Ayurvedic Clinical Practice Review, 2018.