Sonoluminescence as Dimensional Collapse: Erasure of Sub-Landauer Coherent Dynamics

Sonoluminescence as Dimensional Collapse: Erasure of Sub-Landauer Coherent Dynamics Ian Todd Sydney Medical School University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia [email protected] October 15, 2025 Abstract Sonoluminescence—the emission of light from acoustically driven bubble collapse—has resisted definitive mechanistic explanation despite decades of research. We propose that sonoluminescence exemplifies dimensional collapse: the sudden reduction of highdimensional coherent dynamics to low-dimensional outputs with thermodynamic dissipation. During bubble oscillation, the interface maintains coherent phase relationships among millions of water molecules. These relationships coordinate collective motion at sub-Landauer energies per interaction, creating high effective dimensionality Deff in the bubble’s phase space. Collapse forces dimensional reduction from extended bubble surface (Deff ∼106) to point-like configuration (D′∼1), with light emission representing the thermodynamic cost of this geometric projection. We derive an information-erasure bound Elight ≥kBTeff∆Sεwhere ∆Sε= ln Nε(Deff)−ln Nε(D′) is the resolution-dependent metric-entropy drop during collapse and Teff is the elec1 tron temperature of the transient plasma core. The bound predicts light emission of ∼5×10−13 J per flash, consistent with observed values of 10−14–10−12 J depending on gas species and drive conditions. Noble gas effects (Xe enhancing emission over Ar) can be understood as changes in interfacial modal participation rather than merely ionization thresholds. The framework explains the persistent temporal inaccessibility via exponential path degeneracy and yields concrete, falsifiable scaling predictions with gas species, interfacial coherence, and collapse rate. We outline measurements (modal participation ratio, polarization, second-order coherence) that distinguish dimensionalcollapse emission from purely thermal scenarios. Keywords: Sonoluminescence, Dimensional Collapse, Sub-Landauer Dynamics, Coherence, Thermodynamics, Bubble Dynamics 1 Introduction 1.1 The Sonoluminescence Puzzle When acoustic waves drive microscopic gas bubbles in liquid to undergo violent oscillations, they can emit brief flashes of light—a phenomenon known as sonoluminescence [1, 2]. Despite extensive experimental and theoretical investigation, the mechanism converting acoustic energy to light remains controversial [3, 4]. Key experimental observations constrain theories: •Light emission occurs in picosecond bursts during bubble collapse. Pulse widths of ∼60–250 ps have been reported via time-correlated single-photon counting [5]. •Emission spectra suggest effective temperatures of 104–105K [6, 7] •Bubble radius collapses from ∼50 µm to <1µm before emission •Radiant output is a small fraction (∼10−6) of input acoustic energy yet indicates very high local Teff at collapse 2 •Internal collapse dynamics remain temporally unresolved despite ultrafast spectroscopy Proposed mechanisms include thermal bremsstrahlung [8], collision-induced emission [9], and quantum vacuum radiation [10]. Yet no consensus exists, and the phenomenon retains surprising features that resist simple explanation. 1.2 An Alternative Framework: Dimensional Collapse Recent work on biological computation [?, 17] proposes that systems maintaining highdimensional coherence at sub-Landauer energies exhibit distinctive thermodynamics. When such systems undergo dimensional reduction—projecting from high effective dimensionality Deff to low-dimensional outputs—they must dissipate energy according to an informationerasure bound. We propose that sonoluminescence is precisely such a dimensional collapse event: coherent phase relationships at the bubble interface undergo sudden geometric reduction, with light emission representing the thermodynamic cost. The erasure bound. Define the metric entropy at resolution εas Sε≡ln Nε, where Nε(D) is the covering number (minimum number of ε-balls needed to cover a D-dimensional manifold). Erasing interfacial correlations reduces Sεby ∆Sε= ln Nε(Deff)−ln Nε(D′). Any logically irreversible projection from a high-dimensional correlated state to a lowerdimensional macrostate at effective temperature Teff must dissipate at least: Ecollapse ≥kBTeff∆Sε(1) following Landauer-Bennett principles [11, 12]. This bound is coarse-grained: it applies to the projection between distinguishable states at resolution ε, not to microscopic trajectories. Proof sketch. Consider the bubble interface as maintaining correlations among N surface regions. These correlations define a high-dimensional manifold Minitial with effective dimension Deff. At measurement resolution ε, this manifold can be covered by Nε(Deff)∼ 3 (L/ε)Deff distinguishable microstates, where Lis the system size. Collapse projects the system to a nearly uniform final state with dimension D′≪Deff, coverable by Nε(D′)∼ (L/ε)D′states. The projection erases information about which specific initial microstate the system occupied, reducing the number of accessible states by a factor Nε(Deff)/Nε(D′). By the generalized Landauer principle, erasing ln(Nε(Deff)/Nε(D′)) bits of information at temperature Teff requires dissipating at least kBTeff ln(Nε(Deff)/Nε(D′)) of energy. A detailed coarse-graining argument is provided in Appendix A. 1.3 Key Distinctions from Existing Theories Our framework differs from standard approaches: •Not primarily thermal: While collapse generates high temperatures, emission reflects dimensional geometry rather than just blackbody radiation •Coherence-based: The bubble wall maintains phase-coherent collective motion; collapse erases this coherence •Information-theoretic: Light energy scales with dimensional reduction, not merely energy concentration •Explains temporal inaccessibility: Path degeneracy at finite resolution prevents reconstruction of collapse dynamics 1.4 Contributions This work makes four main contributions: (i) We derive a coarse-grained erasure bound Elight ≥kBTeff∆Sεrelating light emission to resolution-dependent metric entropy change. (ii) We map the effective dimensionality Deff to measurable interfacial mode content via a modal participation ratio defined on spherical harmonic decomposition. (iii) We show the bound scales correctly with gas species, liquid properties, and acoustic drive parameters, 4 consistent with observed phenomenology. (iv) We propose four falsifiable experimental tests that distinguish dimensional collapse from purely thermal mechanisms. 2 Bubble Wall Coherence and Sub-Landauer Dynamics 2.1 Phase Relationships at the Interface Consider a spherical bubble of radius R(t) oscillating in response to acoustic drive. The interface involves N∼(R/ℓ)2correlated regions of characteristic size ℓ(molecular scale). These regions must coordinate their motion to maintain spherical symmetry during oscillation. The key question: What energies coordinate this collective motion? Individual molecular kinetic energies are thermal (∼kBT≈4×10−21 J at 300 K). But the phase relationships between regions—the relative timings ensuring coherent radial motion—may involve much weaker coupling. For acoustic wavelength λ≫R, the bubble responds quasi-statically. Pressure gradients across the bubble are small, meaning coordination between surface regions requires only weak signals to maintain synchrony. If these coordination energies Ecoord < kBTln 2 ≈2.9×10−21 J, they fall into the sub-Landauer regime where timing information becomes thermodynamically inaccessible [18]. The sub-Landauer threshold kBTln 2 represents the minimum energy dissipation for erasing one bit of information; below this, operations become logically reversible and timing becomes expensive to determine. In biological systems, coordination at sub-Landauer energies enables high-dimensional coherent computation while remaining temporally inaccessible to external observers—a principle we apply here to bubble interface dynamics. 5 2.2 Effective Dimensionality via Modal Participation To make Deff operationally measurable, we decompose interfacial motion into spherical harmonics Yℓm(θ, ϕ). The radial displacement can be written: δR(θ, ϕ, t) = X ℓ,m aℓm(t)Yℓm(θ, ϕ) (2) Each mode (ℓ, m) carries energy Eℓm =1 2ρR3ω2 ℓ|aℓm|2, where ωℓis the mode frequency and ρ≈103kg/m3is the liquid density (water). We define the modal participation ratio: Deff =Pℓ,m Eℓm2 Pℓ,m E2 ℓm (3) This quantity can be estimated from time-resolved Mie scattering or Schlieren imaging, which resolve the high-ℓtail of the surface-mode spectrum. Operationally, Eℓm can be estimated from time-resolved Mie scattering by fitting the angular spectrum to Yℓm content frame-by-frame; Deff then reports the active mode count independent of overall amplitude. For a bubble at maximum radius Rmax ∼50 µm with correlation length ℓ∼1 nm, the maximum mode number is ℓmax ∼Rmax/ℓ ∼5×104, giving: Nmodes ∼ℓ2 max ∼2.5×109(4) However, not all modes participate equally. Spherical symmetry constraints, hydrodynamic coupling, and preferential acoustic excitation of low-ℓmodes reduce the effective participation. With a participation factor κ∼103–104, we estimate: Deff ∼Nmodes κ∼105–106(5) During oscillation, the bubble explores a high-dimensional manifold of possible phase relationships among surface modes. These relationships encode the coherent collective motion. 6 2.3 Resolution-Dependent Path Degeneracy At finite temporal resolution ∆t, the number of distinguishable configurations scales with the system’s time-bandwidth product. For a band-limited process over coherence time τc (approximately the acoustic period, ∼10−5s) with temporal resolution ∆t∼10−12 s, the time-bandwidth gives τc/∆t∼107temporal degrees of freedom. Coupling this to the modal dimensionality with correlation factor κ(same as in Eq. 5): Ω(∆t)∼exp Deff κln τc ∆t(6) For Deff ∼106,κ∼103(though values up to 104remain plausible), and ln(τc/∆t)≈16.1, this gives: Ω∼exp[103×16] ∼107000 (7) Even with κ= 104, we obtain Ω ∼10700, still representing astronomical path degeneracy. The bubble’s collapse pathway is buried in exponentially degenerate micro-trajectories—explaining why the mechanism resists temporal decomposition despite sophisticated diagnostics. 3 Dimensional Collapse and Light Emission 3.1 Geometric Reduction During collapse, the bubble reduces from radius Rmax ∼50 µmtoRmin ∼0.5µm (estimates vary; some suggest even smaller). This represents dimensional reduction in two senses: Spatial reduction: Surface area collapses from 4πR2 max to 4πR2 min, a factor of (Rmax/Rmin)2∼ 104. Phase-space reduction: The high-dimensional manifold of coherent phase relationships collapses to a low-dimensional final state. Post-collapse, the bubble no longer maintains the coherent coordination—it has undergone dimensional projection from Deff ∼106to D′∼1 7 (nearly uniform density). 3.2 Connection to Rayleigh-Plesset Dynamics The Rayleigh-Plesset equation describes the radial dynamics: R¨ R+3 2˙ R2=1 ρ"pg(R)−p∞−pacoustic(t)−2σ R−4µ˙ R R#(8) where σ≈0.072 N/m is the surface tension and µ≈10−3Pa·s is the dynamic viscosity of water. The instantaneous kinetic energy of the surrounding liquid for spherically symmetric radial flow is T= 2πρR3˙ R2. This continuum description captures the radial mode but projects out the high-ℓsurface dynamics. Standard RP treatments assume spherical symmetry (ℓ= 0 mode only), effectively setting Deff = 1 by construction. Extended RP frameworks sometimes include low-ℓshape oscillations [1], but typically neglect high-ℓinterfacial modes. Our dimensional collapse framework extends this by treating the full modal space, recognizing that high-ℓ surface modes (shape oscillations, interfacial waves) carry significant phase-space volume during expansion. The final stage of collapse exhibits self-similar compressive focusing with Guderley-like scaling, where the interface undergoes rapid geometric contraction. Our framework interprets this geometric compression as the erasure of correlations across the collapsing surface, with the dimensional reduction bound quantifying the minimum dissipation. 3.3 Thermodynamic Bound on Light Emission The effective temperature Teff in Eq. (1) is the electron temperature of the transient plasma core formed near Rmin. Measurements via spectral fitting indicate Teff ∼104–105K [4], corresponding to kBTeff ∼10−19–10−18 J. This represents the temperature of the degree of freedom (plasma electrons) that couples most directly to the radiation field during collapse. For manifolds with power-law covering scaling, Nε∼(L/ε)D, the entropy change be8 comes: ∆Sε= (Deff −D′) ln(L/ε) (9) where L∼Rmax and ε∼Rmin sets the coarse-graining scale. This gives ln(L/ε)∼ ln(100) ≈4.6. The dimensional collapse bound predicts: Elight ≥kBTeff(Deff −D′) ln(L/ε) (10) With Deff −D′∼106, ln(L/ε)∼5, and Teff ∼104K (kBTeff ∼10−19 J), this predicts: Elight ≳10−19 ×106×5∼5×10−13 J (11) Observed photon yields are typically ∼105–107photons per flash depending on gas and drive [6], at few-eV energies, corresponding to ∼10−14–10−12 J. Our bound lies comfortably within this range, as expected for a lower limit that neglects finite-time effects and additional dissipation channels. 3.4 Energy Budget and Luminous Efficiency An energy budget sanity check confirms consistency. Using the Rayleigh kinetic energy balance T= 2πρR3˙ R2with Rmax ∼50 µm, |˙ R|∼100 m/s, and ρ≈103kg/m3, the acoustic energy input per cycle is Eacoustic ∼10−6–10−5J (velocities near collapse can reach ∼1000 m/s, but most energy input occurs during slower expansion phases). At minimum radius Rmin ∼0.5µm, the compressional potential energy is Ecompress ∼pmaxVmin ∼5×10−10 J for peak pressures pmax ∼1 GPa (consistent with measurements in [4]) and Vmin ≈5×10−19 m3. This places ηlum =Elight/Eacoustic at O(10−6) for representative parameters, with ample room above the radiative output (10−14–10−12 J), consistent with the broader literature on SBSL energetics [1]. 9 6.2 Other Coherent-to-Incoherent Transitions Similar dimensional collapse phenomena may occur in: •Turbulent breakup: Coherent vortex structures collapsing to fine-scale turbulence •Domain wall motion: Magnetic or ferroelectric domains undergoing sudden reorientation. Recent experiments on ferroelectric switching in BaTiO3show ultrafast polarization collapse on picosecond timescales that might exhibit similar dimensional signatures, with the collapse of correlated dipole orientations potentially dissipating energy according to dimensional reduction bounds. •Phase transitions: First-order transitions involving nucleation and growth •Nanoparticle formation: Collapse of supersaturated vapor to solid In each case, high-dimensional coordination suddenly projects to low-dimensional final states, potentially with measurable dimensional collapse signatures. 6.3 Fundamental Questions The dimensional collapse interpretation raises deeper questions: What determines collapse channel? Why does electromagnetic collapse produce light while other systems dissipate thermally? Does channel selection depend on which degrees of freedom maintain coherence? Role of quantum coherence? Our framework is classical—coherence is phase relationships, not superposition. But quantum effects may enhance certain types of coordination. Is there a quantum-classical transition in collapse dynamics? Information preservation? The dimensional collapse bound relates to information entropy. Does light carry information about the high-dimensional initial state, or is this information irrecoverably lost? 16 7 Discussion 7.1 Relationship to Existing Mechanisms The dimensional collapse interpretation doesn’t exclude other mechanisms but reframes them: Thermal bremsstrahlung: High temperatures are consequence of dimensional collapse (energy concentration), not cause of emission. The Teff in our bound reflects this. Our framework predicts that emission should scale with Deff even when peak temperatures remain similar—a key distinction. Collision-induced emission: Collisions represent local collapse events; our framework describes global dimensional reduction driving these local processes. Plasma formation [4]: The transient plasma at Rmin is consistent with our model—it provides the high Teff for the erasure bound. However, plasma models alone don’t explain why emission scales with interface properties (gas species, dissolved impurities) in ways that affect Deff. For example, noble gas effects (Xe enhancing emission over Ar) can be understood as changes in interfacial mode damping and participation, directly affecting Deff, rather than merely changing ionization thresholds. Quantum vacuum radiation [10]: While intriguing, this mechanism predicts energy scales (∼ℏc/Rmin) of order 10−16 J for Rmin ∼0.5µm, roughly 104times smaller than observed emission. Moreover, vacuum radiation doesn’t naturally explain the dependence on liquid properties, gas composition, or acoustic drive characteristics—all of which affect interfacial coherence and thus Deff in our framework. Experimentally, vacuum radiation would predict specific polarization signatures and photon correlations that have not been observed; the sub-Poissonian statistics reported in [?] are more consistent with coherent charge collapse than vacuum fluctuations. Rather than competing theories, thermal, plasma, and collision mechanisms may be aspects of dimensional collapse operating at different scales, with the common thread being 17 erasure of high-dimensional interfacial coherence. 7.2 Limitations and Open Questions Coarse-graining dependence: The Landauer principle applies to logically irreversible operations under a chosen coarse-graining. Our ”erasure” is the projection from correlated field states to a lower-dimensional macrostate at resolution ε. We have chosen L∼Rmax and ε∼Rmin as natural scales set by the collapse geometry; ln(L/ε) is thus a control knob that readers can audit. Different choices of εyield different bounds. For example, choosing ε∼10Rmin (coarser resolution) reduces ln(L/ε) by ln(10) ≈2.3, yielding a factorof-10 smaller bound—still within the observed emission range. Choosing finer resolution ε∼0.1Rmin increases the bound proportionally. Our choice represents the natural geometric scale of the collapsed state. Quantitative refinement: Our estimates use order-of-magnitude parameters. Detailed modeling requires: •Better estimates of Deff from molecular dynamics and surface-mode spectroscopy •Resolution-dependent covering numbers from high-resolution simulation •Mode-specific effective temperatures during collapse Direct coherence measurement: Detecting sub-Landauer phase relationships at bubble interface remains challenging. Techniques might include: •Scattering measurements sensitive to coherent surface modes •Spectroscopy of collective excitations •Comparison with deliberately decoherence-disrupted systems Theoretical development: Connecting hydrodynamic equations (Rayleigh-Plesset) to high-dimensional phase space dynamics requires developing bridge formalism between continuum and discrete coordination descriptions. 18 7.3 Perspectives and Speculative Extensions The following ideas extend the framework beyond current experimental support and should be viewed as speculative directions for future research: Control strategies: If emission reflects dimensional collapse, could we enhance it by engineering interface coherence? Surfactants, nanostructures, or acoustic pulse shaping might increase Deff or optimize collapse geometry. Inverse sonoluminescence: Could we drive dimensional expansion (low to high D) by absorbing light? A toy model might involve photon-driven excitation of surface modes, pumping the bubble interface into higher-ℓstates. The energy required would be ∼kBTeff∆Sε∼ 10−13 J per event, roughly matching observed emission energies. This would require maintaining far-from-equilibrium coherence through resonant optical excitation at frequencies matching interfacial eigenfrequencies (∼THz range). Such a mechanism might be relevant for optical energy storage or photon-to-acoustic conversion, though experimental demonstration remains challenging. Biological relevance: Do biological systems exploit similar acoustic-driven dimensional collapse? Ultrasound-triggered drug release, sonoporation (membrane permeabilization by acoustic cavitation), and acoustic neurostimulation might involve bubble-like collapse events with dimensional characteristics. For example, sonoporation creates transient membrane pores through cavitation-induced collapse; if membrane lipids maintain coherent phase relationships during acoustic oscillation, their sudden collapse could explain the efficacy threshold and pulse-width dependence observed in sonoporation protocols. However, biological applications would require careful investigation of specific mechanisms and energy scales. 8 Conclusion We propose that sonoluminescence exemplifies dimensional collapse: the sudden geometric reduction of high-dimensional coherent dynamics to low-dimensional outputs with thermo19 dynamic dissipation. The framework predicts: 1. Light emission energy scales with dimensional reduction: Elight ≥kBTeff(Deff−D′) ln(L/ε) 2. Collapse pathway involves exponentially degenerate micro-trajectories, explaining why mechanism resists temporal decomposition 3. Coherence at bubble interface maintains sub-Landauer phase relationships quantified by modal participation ratio 4. Emission reflects erasure of this coherence through geometric projection This interpretation: •Explains temporal inaccessibility of collapse dynamics as fundamental consequence of path degeneracy •Connects sonoluminescence to broader framework of coherent-to-incoherent transitions •Provides testable predictions distinguishing dimensional collapse from purely thermal mechanisms •Validates dimensional collapse principles in non-biological, experimentally accessible system Sonoluminescence remains mysterious not because we lack sufficient time resolution, but because the phenomenon operates through path-degenerate dimensional collapse—a computational mode fundamentally resistant to temporal decomposition at finite resolution. Understanding this requires shifting from sequential mechanistic explanations to geometric descriptions of coherence erasure in high-dimensional phase space. The bubble, briefly maintaining coherent phase relationships among millions of surface modes, undergoes sudden dimensional collapse—converting geometric complexity to light. This is not merely energy concentration but information erasure, with photons carrying away 20 the entropy of dimensional reduction. If confirmed, sonoluminescence provides a paradigmatic example of dimensional collapse physics—a window into how physical systems compute through high-dimensional coherence and collapse to discrete observable outputs. Acknowledgments The author thanks reviewers for constructive feedback. Declarations Funding: None. Competing interests: None. Generative AI use: Claude (Anthropic) was used for literature review and manuscript editing. All theoretical development and conclusions are the author’s original work. References [1] Brenner, M.P., Hilgenfeldt, S., Lohse, D. (2002). Single-bubble sonoluminescence. Rev. Mod. Phys., 74(2), 425–484. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.425 [2] Putterman, S.J., Weninger, K.R. (2000). Sonoluminescence: How bubbles turn sound into light. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32, 445–476. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.32.1.445 [3] Barber, B.P., Putterman, S.J. (1991). Observation of synchronous picosecond sonoluminescence. Nature, 352, 318–320. DOI: 10.1038/352318a0 [4] Flannigan, D.J., Suslick, K.S. (2005). Plasma formation and temperature measurement during single-bubble cavitation. Nature, 434, 52–55. DOI: 10.1038/nature03361 [5] Gompf, B., et al. (1997). Resolving sonoluminescence pulse width with timecorrelated single photon counting. Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 1405–1408. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1405 21 [6] Hiller, R., Barber, B.P., Putterman, S.J. (1992). Spectrum of synchronous picosecond sonoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69, 1182–1184. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1182 [7] Hiller, R., et al. (1998). Spectra of sonoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 1090–1093. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1090 [8] Moss, W.C., et al. (1997). Computed optical emissions from a sonoluminescing bubble. Phys. Rev. E, 56, 6166–6172. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.6166 [9] Moran, M.J., Sweider, D. (1998). Measurements of sonoluminescence temporal pulse shape. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 4987–4990. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4987 [10] Schwinger, J. (1993). Casimir light: The source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90(6), 2105–2106. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2105 [11] Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM J. Res. Dev., 5(3), 183–191. DOI: 10.1147/rd.53.0183 [12] Bennett, C.H. (1982). The thermodynamics of computation—a review. Int. J. Theor. Phys., 21(12), 905–940. DOI: 10.1007/BF02084158 [13] Sivak, D.A., Crooks, G.E. (2012). Thermodynamic Metrics and Optimal Paths. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 190602. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.190602 [14] Deffner, S., Lutz, E. (2010). Generalized Clausius inequality for nonequilibrium quantum processes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 170402. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.170402 [15] Garcia-Fernandez, C., et al. (2022). Observation of Nonclassical Photon Statistics in Single-Bubble Sonoluminescence. arXiv:2203.11337 [16] Todd, I. (2025). Intelligence as High-Dimensional Coherence: Energy Landscapes, Phase Space, and the Physical Basis of Computation. Manuscript in preparation. 22 [17] Todd, I. (2025). Maxwell’s Demon in a High-Dimensional Universe: Path Degeneracy, System Boundaries, and the Measurement Illusion. Manuscript under review at BioSystems. [18] Todd, I. (2025). The Limits of Falsifiability: Dimensionality, Measurement Thresholds, and the Sub-Landauer Domain in Biological Systems. BioSystems (in press). A Coarse-Graining and the Erasure Bound Consider a toy model of dimensional collapse. The bubble interface supports Ncoupled oscillators on a sphere. Each oscillator ihas phase ϕi∈[0,2π). The high-dimensional initial state is a correlated configuration where phases satisfy constraints (e.g., Piϕi= 0 modulo 2π, maintaining spherical symmetry). At measurement resolution ∆ϕ=ε, each oscillator can be in one of n= 2π/ε distinguishable phase bins. Without correlations, the full phase space contains nNconfigurations. With constraints reducing effective dimensionality to Deff ≪N, the accessible volume scales as Vinitial ∼nDeff . Collapse projects the system to a final state where all oscillators have similar phases (uniform density), covering a volume Vfinal ∼nD′with D′∼1. The number of initial microstates compatible with the final macrostate is Vinitial/Vfinal = nDeff−D′= (2π/ε)Deff −D′≈(L/ε)Deff−D′, where L∼2πis the system size. Erasing the information about which specific initial microstate the system occupied requires dissipating: Eerase =kBTeff ln Nε(Deff) Nε(D′)=kBTeff(Deff −D′) ln(L/ε) (13) This is the resolution-dependent Landauer bound for dimensional collapse. 23 B Sub-Landauer Dynamics: Key Concepts This section summarizes key concepts from [18] to make the paper self-contained. The Landauer limit: Erasing one bit of information requires dissipating at least kBTln 2 ≈2.9×10−21 J at room temperature (300 K). This sets a fundamental thermodynamic cost for irreversible computation. Sub-Landauer regime: Operations involving energy exchanges E < kBTln 2 fall into a regime where: •Timing information becomes expensive to determine—reconstructing when events occurred requires dissipating more energy than the events themselves carry •Operations become effectively reversible, with causal ordering thermodynamically inaccessible •Systems can maintain high-dimensional coherent states through weak coupling without leaving erasure traces Criteria for sub-Landauer coordination [18]: 1. Energy criterion: Coordination signals carry Ecoord < kBTln 2 2. Coherence criterion: Phase relationships are maintained across spatially separated regions 3. Causal potency: Despite low energy, coordination affects macroscopic system behavior 4. Measurement destruction: Determining timing requires dissipating energy ≫Ecoord, disrupting the coordination In sonoluminescence, the weak signals coordinating surface regions during quasi-static bubble oscillation (λ≫R, small pressure gradients) may satisfy these criteria, enabling 24 high-dimensional coherent dynamics that resist temporal decomposition while still producing observable macroscopic effects (light emission) through dimensional collapse. 25