0032_grommisch

Measure Scale Variable name Momentary ER How have you managed your emotions since last survey (#SLS)? Please rate how much you’ve used each strategy to increase, decrease or maintain your level of positive or negative emotions, regardless of whether it worked. Situation Selection #SLS, I chose which situation to put myself in. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) SITSEL Situation Modification #SLS, I actively changed something in the situation. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) SITMOD Distraction #SLS, I did something to distract myself (physically or mentally). 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) DIST Reappraisal #SLS, I changed the way I was thinking about the situation. #SLS, I took a step back and looked at things from a different perspective. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) REAP Acceptance #SLS, I accepted my emotions as valid and important. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) ACPT Rumination #SLS, I thought over and over again about my emotions. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) RUM Social Sharing #SLS, I talked with someone about my emotions. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) SOCSHR Ignoring #SLS, I ignored my emotions. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) IGNR Suppression SLS, I was careful not to express my emotions to others. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) SUPR Well-being Life Satisfaction Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree); 5 items SWLS_agg Depression Anxiety Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity 0 (did not apply to me at all) to 3 (applied to me very much or DASS_D_agg DASS_A_agg Stress and normative data in a large non‐clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(2), 227-239. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657 most of the time); 21 items DASS_S_agg Pleasant Affect Unpleasant Affect Momentary pleasant and unpleasant affect scores were computed by averaging the pleasant affect items (happy [HAP], relaxed [RLX], confident [CONF]) and the unpleasant affect items (sad [SAD], stressed [STR], angry [ANG]), respectively and aggregate them across all measurement occasions to obtain mean scores. 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much) PosA_agg NegA_agg Demographic/ID variables Age in years Age_yrs Gender 1 = male, 2 = female, 5 = other Gender Person ID SEMA_ID Measurement occasion RowNr Day of ESM period DayNr