scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Exploring PTFE-free solutions as sustainable wear-resistant eco-polymers

Robbe Vergieu; Ádám Kalácska; Patrick De Baets

Abstract

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a widely utilised polymer in tribological applications (e.g., seals, sliding bearings, and gears), prized for its exceptionally low friction, self-lubricating properties, and high chemical and thermal stability. However, as a per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS), its use is a major source of environmental pollution from industrial and consumer products. Certain PFAS compounds are also associated with carcinogenic and toxic effects, which necessitate a critical and urgent search for sustainable and safer alternatives. Still, the challenge lies in identifying materials that can replicate PTFE's unique combination of favourable properties, since no direct substitute polymer material currently exists. This research project, known as SWEEP (Exploring PTFE-free solutions as sustainable wear-resistant eco-polymers), directly addresses this issue by comprehensively investigating the tribological performance of a series of potential PTFE-free substitute materials, including high-performance thermoplastics and specifically engineered composites. The study employs a multi-faceted experimental approach, combining both lab-scale and component-level testing, to analyse the friction, wear, thermal response, and surface degradation of these alternative materials under a broad range of pressure-velocity (P × V) conditions. The investigation includes a detailed analysis of wear mechanisms, changes in surface topography, and the characteristics of wear particle generation and transfer film formation. As a result, this research provides crucial and fundamental insights into the tribological behaviour and characterisation of these PTFE-free alternatives, while establishing a robust framework for material ranking and evaluation. The eventual findings will be invaluable for the effective selection of polymer sliding elements and tribotechnical components, supporting the development of sustainable, high-performance solutions for various industrial sectors. The project represents a significant step towards reducing the reliance on PFAS-based materials, thereby contributing to both environmental protection and human health.

Full text

Robbe Vergieu 1, Ádám Kalácska 1, Patrick De Baets 1 1Soete Laboratory, Department of Electromechanical, Systems and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 46, B-9052, Zwijnaarde, Belgium Contact [email protected] Soete Laboratory - Ghent University Robbe Vergieu www.ugent.be/ea/emsme/en/research/soete/tribology SWEEP PROJECT: EXPLORING PTFE-FREE SOLUTIONS AS SUSTAINABLE WEAR-RESISTANT ECO-POLYMERS Fig. 2 - Effects of PFAS on human health [2] Fig. 1 - PFAS lifecycle [1] PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) –Low friction characteristics and superior sliding properties –Excellent chemical and thermal resistance –Weak load-bearing capacity and low wear resistance (need for fillers and reinforcements) –Applied in low-weight sliding elements and tribotechnical components (bearings, seals, gears, …) Problem context Work packages Project structure Fig. 3 - Domestic and industrial applications of PTFE [3] References: [1] - PFAS: binnenkort een netelige kwestie? - TAUW, (2020), [2] - Effects of PFAS on human health - European Environment Agency, (2024), [3] - Performance properties and applications of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) —a review - E. Dhanumalayan & Girish M. Joshi, (2018) PFAS (perand polyfluoroalkyl substances) –High durability and slow degradation –Environmental pollution through industrial and consumer products –Certain PFAS compounds: Carcinogenic and toxic –Health and environmental concerns →Need for alternatives Project objectives SWEEP (Exploring PTFE-free solutions as sustainable wear-resistant eco-polymers): Novel fundamental insights into the tribological characterisation of PTFE-free alternatives over a broad P × V range (0.1 –10 MPa∙m/s) →Aiming to bring relevant insights for varied application domains 3 main objectives –Testing protocol development –Analysing and comparing sustainable polymer alternatives –Understanding surface degradation and transfer film formation Potential impact of sustainable polymer materials –Environmental impact reduction: Replacing hazardous substances & Reducing pollution and protecting ecosystems –Economic benefits: Enhancing market competitiveness for sustainable companies & Aligns with consumer preferences and regulatory trends 5 consecutive work packages (each with its own deliverables) Work package 1: Literature and material review –Target application: Sliding contact bearing, bushing, and seal materials –Polymer and countersurface material selection –Classification of wear-influencing parameters –Evaluation and selection of test methods –Determination of testing configurations and testing conditions Work package 2: Processing and pre-test investigations –Design of Experiments (P × V range) + Test matrix/methodology determination (based on target application) –Property characterisation (physical, mechanical, thermal, …) –Preparation of tribospecimens (polymer/countersurface) and test setups Work package 3: Wear testing at coupon and component level –Coupon testing: Pin-on-disc and pin-on-plate (controlled atmosphere) –Component testing: Method and parameters based on target application –Measurement of friction force, deformation/wear, and temperature Work package 4: Post-mortem analysis –Polymer/countersurface investigation –Transfer film and chemical element analysis –Surface damage analysis (3D surface topography and microscopy) Work package 5: Sensitivity analysis and fundamental understanding –Material evaluation/comparison and performance ranking –Coupling of tribological behaviour to mechanical properties & Tribological modelling –Sensitivity analysis with dominant wear influencing parameters (P, V, roughness, …) Presented: FEARS 2025, October 13, 2025, Ghent WP1 Literature and material research WP5 Tribological understanding and final report WP4 Post-mortem investigation WP3 Wear testing (3 different test systems) WP2 Pre-test investigations and methodology development Fig. 5 –3D surface topography of worn specimens and SEM of embedding wear debris Pin-on-plate test setup Pin-on-disc test setup Component test setup Fig. 4 –Coupon-level and component-level test setups Tbl. 1 –Polymer material selection & Testing conditions