scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

Internal Rotation of Gravity Mode Pulsators in the Pleiades

Fritzewski, Dario

Abstract

The Pleiades are one of the closest and best-studied open clusters. However, the asteroseismic analysis of its intermediate members remains incomplete, particularly regarding gravity (g-) mode pulsators. We use the observations obtained by TESS over five sectors to identify A- and F-type g-mode pulsators among the cluster members. Based on TESS full-frame images, we discovered a rich population of g-mode pulsators along the entire upper main sequence. We derived near-core rotation rates for all stars with detected g-modes. Combined with literature rotation periods of low-mass stars, we now have a comprehensive picture of stellar rotation among the Pleiades main sequence stars. To understand this picture, we compare the observed rotation rate distribution of the Pleiades with that of the NGC 2516. This open cluster is a near-twin of the Pleiades in terms of richness and age. Both clusters are ~150 Myr old, as indicated by the rotation period distributions of their respective low-mass members. However, the new rotation rates on the upper main sequence reveal a stark difference between the Pleiades and NGC 2516, with the A-type Pleiades members rotating on average one-third slower than their counterparts in NGC 2516. We provide possible explanations for this difference and discuss how detailed asteroseismic modelling of the Pleiades g-mode pulsators with period-spacing patterns can help to understand the differences between these two nearly coeval open clusters. Our results help to deepen our understanding of the initial rotation distributions of intermediate mass stars.

Full text

Internal Rotation of Gravity Mode Pulsators in the Pleiades Dario Fritzewski TASC 9/KASC 16 Klosterneuburg – 7July 2025 KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/Tad Denton/Adam Block 2 Why open cluster asteroseismology? •Calibration of asteroseismically-informed stellar models •Homogeneous populations with different masses •Empirical relations from open clusters ordered by age Challenges •Membership •Crowded fields leading to contamination •Especially challenging for TESS (21”/px) APOD / Rogelio Bernal Andreo 3 Breger (1972) 𝑀0 𝑉 (𝑏−𝑦)0 50+ years in history of Pulsators in the Pleiades 3 Bedding et al. (2023) Breger (1972) 𝑀0 𝑉 (𝑏−𝑦)0 50+ years in history of Pulsators in the Pleiades 3 Bedding et al. (2023) Mostly δ Sct stars known Two candidate ɣ Dor (Martín & Rodríguez, 2000) Breger (1972) 𝑀0 𝑉 (𝑏−𝑦)0 50+ years in history of Pulsators in the Pleiades HD 23375 - A pure g-mode pulsator 4 3 sectors 2 sectors ~2 yr gap Photometry from TESS FFI Custom aperture to reduce contamination Detrending to remove long-term trends HD 23375 - A pure g-mode pulsator 4 3 sectors 2 sectors ~2 yr gap Photometry from TESS FFI Custom aperture to reduce contamination Detrending to remove long-term trends HD 23375 - A pure g-mode pulsator 4 3 sectors 2 sectors ~2 yr gap Photometry from TESS FFI Custom aperture to reduce contamination Detrending to remove long-term trends HD 23375 - A pure g-mode pulsator 4 3 sectors 2 sectors ~2 yr gap Photometry from TESS FFI Custom aperture to reduce contamination Detrending to remove long-term trends Period spacing patterns are rare 6 Typical patterns in TESS data are short. 3/25 stars with patterns in the Pleiades Even clear ɣ Dor stars do not show patterns Low amplitude peaks missing amplitude [ppt] ΔP [s] 7 Near-core rotation from dominant frequencies near-core rotation freq. [d-1] dominant mode frequency [d-1] Aerts et al. (2025) 7 Assumption: prograde dipole mode •Most common dominant modes •Many stars with observed dipole and quadrupole modes 󲰛 secure identification Near-core rotation from dominant frequencies near-core rotation freq. [d-1] dominant mode frequency [d-1] Aerts et al. (2025) Near-core rotation rates in Pleiades members 8 Near-core rotation rates in Pleiades members 8 Near-core rotation rates in Pleiades members 8 Including data from Rebull et al. (2016a,b) Near-core rotation rates in Pleiades members 8 Including data from Rebull et al. (2016a,b) Near-core rotation in the Pleiades vs. NGC 2516 Including data from Irwin et al. (2007), Rebull et al. (2016), Fritzewski et al. (2020), Healy & McCullough (2020), Bouma et al. (2021), Li et al. (2024) 9 Near-core rotation in the Pleiades vs. NGC 2516 Including data from Irwin et al. (2007), Rebull et al. (2016), Fritzewski et al. (2020), Healy & McCullough (2020), Bouma et al. (2021), Li et al. (2024) 9 Near-core rotation in the Pleiades vs. NGC 2516 ~3 d-1 (0.5 v/vcrit) ~2 d-1 (0.3 v/vcrit) Including data from Irwin et al. (2007), Rebull et al. (2016), Fritzewski et al. (2020), Healy & McCullough (2020), Bouma et al. (2021), Li et al. (2024) 9 Additional Material 13 53% of δ Sct stars are hybrid pulsators p-mode dominated both g-mode dominated With more observations: Even lower amplitude g-modes might be visible 󲰛 Are most δ Sct hybrids? Pleiades and NGC 2516: Two coeval open clusters 14 Fritzewski et al. (2020) See also Jeffries et al. (1998) Identical cool stars rotation period distributions and lithium depletion 󲰛 common age Bouma et al. (2021) NGC 2516