Indian Journal of Advanced Mathematics (IJAM) ISSN: 2582-8932 (Online), Volume-5, Issue-2, October 2025 36 Retrieval Number:100.1/ijam.B121505021025 DOI: 10.54105/ijam.B1215.05021025 Journal Website: www.ijam.latticescipub.com Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) Β© Copyright: All rights reserved. A Comparative Study on the Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Magnetic Fields on Double Diffusive Convection with Soret Effect in Couple-Stressed Nanofluids Suman Sindhwani Abstract: This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of double diffusive convection in a Soret-induced couple-stressed nanofluid layer under the influence of uniform vertical and horizontal magnetic fields. The linear stability analysis is based on the standard mode technique. The Galerkin method has been applied to find the critical Rayleigh number and the corresponding wave number in terms of various parameters. The effects of the Soret parameter, magnetic field, Lewis number, modified diffusivity ratio, Concentration Rayleigh-Darcy number, and Solutal Rayleigh number on the system's stability have been investigated. It has been observed that Stationary convection remains unaffected by the relaxation parameter, and the critical wave number is a function of both the couple stress parameter and the magnetic field; however, stationary convection is stabilised by the couple stress. In double diffusive convection under a magnetic field, the Darcy number also comes into play and has been observed to provide a stabilising effect on stationary convection. In comparison to ordinary fluids, convection sets up earlier in nanofluids. A comparative graphical analysis has been conducted to depict the effects of couple stress and Soret parameter on the stability of a nanofluid in the presence of both vertical and horizontal magnetic fields. It has been observed that the magnetic field still has a stabilising effect in both cases. However, in the case of a vertical magnetic field, the critical value of the stationary Rayleigh number is obtained at a significantly larger wave number compared to that in the case of a horizontal magnetic field, with all parameters remaining the same. The literature survey indicates that no study has investigated the comparison of the effect of vertical and horizontal magnetic fields on double diffusive convection in a couple stress nanofluid layer with a Soret factor. The present study examines the comparative analysis of the effect of vertical and horizontal magnetic fields on Soret-induced double diffusive convection in a couple-stress nanofluid horizontal layer. Keywords: Magnetic Field, Rayleigh Number, Couple-Stressed Nanofluid, Soret Factor I. INTRODUCTION Creating a cutting-edge cooling system to cool crystal silicon mirrors used in high-intensity X-ray sources is one of the earliest applications of nanofluid research. Manuscript received on 05 September 2025 | First Revised Manuscript received on 12 September 2025 | Second Revised Manuscript received on 30 September 2025 | Manuscript Accepted on 15 October 2025 | Manuscript published on 30 October 2025. *Correspondence Author(s) Suman Sindhwani*, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Hindu Girls College, Sonipat (Haryana), India. Email ID:
[email protected] Β© The Authors. Published by Lattice Science Publication (LSP). This is an open-access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Because metallic nanoparticles enhance the effective thermal conductivity of coolants and microchannels increase the effective heat transfer area, this technique may offer more effective cooling through the use of microchannels filled with nanofluids. In MHD power generators, electronic device cooling systems and metal casting, the impact of a magnetic field on the movement of electrically conducting fluids through a vertical plate is crucial. To enhance the heat transfer performance of such devices, the working medium is a nanofluid with enhanced thermal conductivity. A magnetic field can be used to control the flow and temperature fields after an electrically conducting nanofluid has been poured into the area between the plates. When a magnetic field is applied, a Lorentz force is created, which interacts with buoyancy. Yadav investigated the effect of magnetic fields on the onset of nanofluid convection, assuming that the boundaries were imposed by temperature. In unsteady nanofluid flow, the magnetic field effect was studied by Sheikholeslami et.al. [4]. An analytical investigation was conducted for various governing parameters. A macroscopic filtration model for natural convection in a Darcy-Maxwell nanofluid-saturated porous layer with no nanoparticle flux at the boundary was studied by Jaimala et al. [1]. Shankar et al. [3] investigated the effect of magnetic fields in couple stress fluids. They discovered that a magnetic field slows down the onset of instability, but as the couple stress parameter increases, the opposite behaviour is observed. In the thermo-solutal convection issue for a couple of stresses, Kumar [2] found that both the magnetic field and the couple stress had both stabilising and destabilising effects. Sithole et. al. [6] investigated the issue of thermal radiation and heat generation in a pair stress nanofluid in the presence of a magnetic field. The author studied the linear stability graphical analysis for this case [5] in the presence of a vertical magnetic field. The present study examines the comparison of vertical and horizontal magnetic fields on Soret-induced double diffusive convection in a couple-stress nanofluid horizontal layer. II. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION An infinite isotropic couple-stressed nanofluid porous layer of width a ' between two horizontal planes, with temperatures at the l,ower and upper boundaries are ππβand ππβ(ππβ being greater than ππβ) has been considered. A uniform horizontal magnetic field
A Comparative Study on the Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Magnetic Fields on Double Diffusive Convection with Soret Effect in Couple-Stressed Nanofluids 37 Retrieval Number:100.1/ijam.B121505021025 DOI: 10.54105/ijam.B1215.05021025 Journal Website: www.ijam.latticescipub.com Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) Β© Copyright: All rights reserved. πβ=(π0 β,0,0) acts on the system. The governing equations are as follows: π»β.ππ β=0 β¦ (1) 1 πΎ(πβπππ»β2)ππ β=(1+πβπ ππ‘β)[{βπ»βπβ+ (πβππ+(1βπβ){π(1βπ½π‘(πββππβ)βπ½π(πββ ππ β)})π]+ππ 4π(π»βΓπβ)Γπβ] β¦ (2) (ππ)πππβ ππ‘β+(ππ)πΉππ β.π»βπβ= πππ»β2πβ+ β(ππ)π[π΅ππ»βπβ.π»βπβ +(π΅π‘ ππβ)π»βπβ.π»βπβ] β¦ (3) ππβ ππ‘β+1 βππ β.π»βπβ=πππ»β2πβ+πππ‘π»β2πβ β¦ (4) ππβ ππ‘β+1 βππ β.π»βπβ=π΅ππ»β2πβ+π΅π‘ ππ βπ»β2πβ β¦ (5) (π ππ‘β+1 β(ππ β.π»β))πβ=(πβ.π»β)1 βππ β+ππ»β2πβ β¦ (6) whereπ»ββ
πβ=0 , π = 1 4ππππβ² and ππ β=(π’1π β,π’2π β,π’3π β)along with boundary conditions ππ β=0,πβ=ππβ,πβ=ππβ,π΅πππβ ππ§β+π΅π‘ ππβππβ ππ§β=0 at π§β =0 β¦ (7) ππ β=0,πβ=ππβ,πβ=ππ β,π΅πππβ ππ§β+π΅π‘ ππβππβ ππ§β=0 at π§β =π β¦ (8) Introducing non-dimensional parameters in taking * 0 οΉ as a reference scale for volumetric fraction of nanoparticles, πΌπ(= ππ (ππ)πΉ) as the thermal diffusivity of the porous medium and π(=(ππ)π (ππ)πΉ) as the heat capacity ratio parameter, (π,π,π)=(π₯β,π¦β,π§β) π, π‘ = π‘βπΌπ ππ2, (π’1π,π’2π,π’3π)= (π’1π β,π’2π β,π’3π β)π πΌπ,π = πβπΎ ππΌπ, π=πββπ0 β π0 β,π= πββππ β ππββππ β, π = πββππ β ππββππ β,π= πβπΌπ π2,(ππ,ππ,ππ)=(ππ β,ππ β,ππ β) π0 β. Non-dimensional form of equations is given by π».π =0 β¦ (9) (πββπ»2π)=(1 +π ππ ππ‘)[(βπ»πβπ
ππξΈπ§βπ
πππξΈπ§ +π
πππξΈπ§+π
π πΏπππξΈπ§) +π1 π1π ππ·π(π»Γπ)Γπ] β¦ (10) ππ ππ‘ +(π.π»)π =π»2π+ππ πΏππ»π.π»π +ππππ πΏπ π»π.π»π β¦ (11) 1 πππ ππ‘ +1 βπ.π»π =1 πΏππ»2π+πππ‘π»2π β¦ (12) 1 πππ ππ‘ +1 β(π.π»)π= 1 πΏππ»2π+ππ πΏππ»2π β¦ (13) 1 πππ ππ‘ +1 β(π.π»)π = 1 β(π.π»)π+ P1 π1π π»2π β¦ (14) Here π
π(=πππ½πΎπ(ππββππ’ β) ππΌπ), π
π(=(ππβπ)π0 βππΎπ ππΌπ), π
π(= πππ0 β+π(1βπ0 β)ππΎπ ππΌπ) ,π
π (=ππ½ππππΎ(ππββππ’ β) πππ)They are thermal, concentration, basic density, and solutal Rayleigh-Darcy numbers, respectively. β(= πππ ππ2)is a couple of stress parameters,π1(= π ππΌπ)and π1π(= π ππ) are Prandtl numbers, π(=πππ0 β2π2 4πππ ) is the Magnetic Chandrasekhar number,π·π(= πΎ π2) is the Darcy number, πππ‘(= πππ‘(ππββππ’ β) πΌπ(ππββππ’ β))is Soret parameter, ππ(=π΅π‘(ππββππ β) π΅πππ βπ0 β)and ππ(=(ππ)πβπ0 β (ππ)πΉ) The modified diffusivity ratio and modified particle density increment, respectively. πΏπ(=πΌπ π΅π) and πΏπ =πΌπ ππAre Lewis numbers for the nanofluid and the salt, respectively? A. Basic State and Perturbed State The time-independent basic state of the nanofluid is described as π =0,π =πππ (π),π = πππ (π),π =πππ (π),π = πππ (π) ,π =πξΈπ β¦ (15) where the suffix βbsβ refers to the basic flow. Following Chandrasekhar [3], the basic volume fraction and temperature of nanoparticles are given as πππ =1βπ , πππ =π0+ πππ, and πππ =1βπ . In the basic state, we superimpose perturbations in the form. π =πβ², π=πππ +πβ², π =πππ + πβ² , π =πππ +πβ², π =πξΈπ+πβ² Linearised perturbation equations of Couple Stress nanofluid are obtained as (1 ππ ππ‘ βπ1 π1π π»2)[(π»2ββπ»4)π’3π β²β (1+π ππ ππ‘)(π
ππ»π» 2πβ²βπ
ππ»π» 2πβ²+π
π πΏππ»π» 2πβ²)] =(1+π ππ ππ‘)π π1 π1π π·π βπ»2π2π’3π β² ππ2 β¦ (16) ππβ² ππ‘ βπ’3π β²=π»2πβ²βππππ πΏπ ππβ² ππ βππ πΏπ ππβ² ππ β¦ (17)
Indian Journal of Advanced Mathematics (IJAM) ISSN: 2582-8932 (Online), Volume-5, Issue-2, October 2025 38 Retrieval Number:100.1/ijam.B121505021025 DOI: 10.54105/ijam.B1215.05021025 Journal Website: www.ijam.latticescipub.com Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) Β© Copyright: All rights reserved. 1 πππβ² ππ‘ βπ’3π β² β=1 πΏππ»2πβ²+πππ‘π»2πβ² β¦ (18) 1 πππβ² ππ‘ +1 βπππ’3π β²=1 πΏππ»2πβ²+ππ πΏππ»2πβ² β¦ (19) with the boundary conditions π’3π β²=0,πβ²=0,πβ²=0,ππβ² ππ +ππππβ² ππ =0 at π =0 and π =1 β¦ (20) B. Linear Stability Analysis Following the linear stability theory by Chandrasekhar [3], the perturbations are taken in the form (πβ²,πβ²,π’3π β²,πβ²) =[π·(π),π©(π),πΊ(π),πΉ(π)]ππ π‘+ππΏπ+πππ β¦ (21) where L and M are dimensionless wave numbers in X and Y Directions respectively. Application of the Galerkin-type weighted residuals method with first approximation (N=1) gives πΊ =π΄1sinππ , π© =π΅1sinππ, π· =βπππΆ1sinππ , πΉ =π·1sinππ and leads to the following Rayleigh number π
π=π βπΌ2 [ π
π πΌ2(ππ +π)(ππ΄πΏ2+π )(ππΏ2+π πΏπ)(πΏ2+π ){πΏ2(βπππ‘β1)βπ } βπ
ππππΌ2(ππ +π)(πΏ2π+π πΏπ)(π΄πΏ2π+π ){πΏ2(β+πΏπ)+π πΏπ} +β(πΏ2π+π πΏπ)(πΏ2π+π πΏπ)(πΏ2+π ){π΄ππΏ4+π΅π2πΏ2(π+ππΏ)+π πΏ2+π βπΏ4+π΄βππΏ6} (ππΏ2+π πΏπ)(ππΏ2+π πΏπ)(ππ +π)(π΄πΏ2π+π ) ] β¦ (22) where πΏ2= π2+πΌ2.πΌ = (πΏ2+π2)1 2 β Equation (22), on taking s=0, results in the following Rayleigh number π
π π π‘ =πΏ4 πΌ2β(1+πΏπ β)π
πππ+ππ·ππΏ2πΏ2 βπΌ2βπ
π β(1ββπππ‘) +βπΏ6 πΌ2 β¦ (23) To obtain the critical value of the Rayleigh number ππ
π π π‘ ππΌ =0 And the following critical wave number equation is obtained. 2β(πΌ2)3+(3π2β+1)(πΌ2)2β(π4+βπ6+ππ·ππΏ2 βπ2) =0 β¦ (24) Equations (23) and (24), which give the stationary Rayleigh number and critical wave equation, are similar to the following equations were obtained by the author [5] in the case of a vertical magnetic field. π
π π π‘ =πΏ4 πΌ2β(1+πΏπ β)π
πππ+ππ·ππ2πΏ2 βπΌ2βπ
π β(1ββπππ‘) +βπΏ6 πΌ2 β¦ (25) 2β(πΌ2)3+(3π2β+1)(πΌ2)2β(π4+βπ6+ππ·π βπ4) =0 β¦ (26) III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The stationary convection curves for the Rayleigh number a R versus the wave number ()L ο‘ = are in Fig 1(a)-(f), where = 5,ππ= 4, π·π = 0.2, πΏπ = 10, π
π = 4, β = 0.4, π = 800, π
π =5, πππ‘=0.1. A B
A Comparative Study on the Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Magnetic Fields on Double Diffusive Convection with Soret Effect in Couple-Stressed Nanofluids 39 Retrieval Number:100.1/ijam.B121505021025 DOI: 10.54105/ijam.B1215.05021025 Journal Website: www.ijam.latticescipub.com Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) Β© Copyright: All rights reserved. C D E F g h [Fig.1: Linear Stationary Convection with Wave Number in the Presence of a Horizontal Magnetic Field for Different Values of (a) β (b) Da (c) ο₯ (d) Le (e) n R (f)Q (g) s R (h) ct N ]
Indian Journal of Advanced Mathematics (IJAM) ISSN: 2582-8932 (Online), Volume-5, Issue-2, October 2025 40 Retrieval Number:100.1/ijam.B121505021025 DOI: 10.54105/ijam.B1215.05021025 Journal Website: www.ijam.latticescipub.com Published By: Lattice Science Publication (LSP) Β© Copyright: All rights reserved. IV. CONCLUSION In this analysis, the following results have been obtained: βͺ Stationary convection remains unaffected by the relaxation parameter. βͺ Critical wave number is a function of the couple stress parameter as well as the magnetic field. βͺ Stationary convection gets stabilised by the couple stress. βͺ As compared to ordinary fluids, convection sets up earlier in nanofluid. βͺ Magnetic field stabilises the nanofluid layer. βͺ Porosity has a stabilising as well as a destabilising effect on convection. βͺ Soret parameter promotes the stability of the flow. βͺ Behaviour of solutal Rayleigh number is destabilising, thus resulting in early convection. Furthermore, a comparison has been made to observe the stability under both vertical and horizontal magnetic fields. It is interesting to observe that the magnetic field still has a stabilising effect in both cases. However, in the case of a vertical magnetic field, the critical value of the stationary Rayleigh number is obtained at a significantly larger wave number compared to the case of a horizontal magnetic field, with all parameters remaining the same. DECLARATION STATEMENT I must verify the accuracy of the following information as the article's author. βͺ Conflicts of Interest/ Competing Interests: Based on my understanding, this article has no conflicts of interest. βͺ Funding Support: This article has not been funded by any organizations or agencies. This independence ensures that the research is conducted with objectivity and without any external influence. βͺ Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate: The content of this article does not necessitate ethical approval or consent to participate with supporting documentation. βͺ Data Access Statement and Material Availability: The adequate resources of this article are publicly accessible. βͺ Authorβs Contributions: The authorship of this article is contributed solely. REFERENCES 1. Jaimala, Singh, R., Tyagi, V. K. (2017): A macroscopic filtration model for natural convection in a Darcy Maxwell nanofluid saturated porous layer with no nanoparticle flux at the boundary, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 111, pp. 451-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.04.003 2. Kumar, K; Singh, V; Sharma, S(2016): Effects of Horizontal Magnetic Field and Rotation on Thermal Instability of a couple-stress fluid through a porous medium: a Brinkman Model, Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1799-1806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jafm.68.235.24554 3. Shankar, B., Kumar, J., Shivkumara (2018): Stability of natural convection in a vertical non-newtonian fluid layer with an imposed magnetic field, Meccanica vol.53, 773-786, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0770-6 4. Sheikholeslami, M; Ganji, D.D; Rashidi, M.M.(2016): Magnetic Field effect on Unsteady nanofluid flow and heat transfer using Buongiorno model, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 416, pp.164173, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.026 5. Sindhwani, S. (2025): Magneto Soret induced convection in couple stress nanofluid, GANITA, vol.75(1), 43-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35629/0743-11085056 6. Sithole, H; Mondal, H; Goqo, S; Sibanda, P; Motsa, S (2018): Numerical simulation of couple stress nanofluid flow in magneto-porous medium with thermal radiation and a chemical reaction, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 339, 820-836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.07.042. Disclaimer/Publisherβs Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of the Lattice Science Publication (LSP)/ journal and/ or the editor(s). The Lattice Science Publication (LSP)/ journal and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.