Digitalisierung für Agrarökologie? Indikatoren zur Messung des Beitrags digitaler Technologien zur Agrarökologie
Abstract
This resource contains the poster presented at the GIL Conference 2024, accompanying the paper titled "Assessing the contribution of digital technologies to agroecological principles in the European context". The poster summarizes the key objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the research.
Full text
Indikatoren für Agrarökologie Wie kann der Beitrag digitaler Technologien zu agrarökologischen Prinzipien gemessen werden? Basierend auf den 10 Elementen der Agrarökologie von der FAO haben wir ein Indikatorensystem entwickelt, welches es ermöglicht, einen solchen Beitrag zu bestimmen Digitalisierung für Agrarökologie? Indikatoren zur Messung des Beitrags digitaler Technologien zur Agrarökologie Alma Moroder, Karl Reimand, Jochen Kantelhardt, Andreas Meyer-Aurich, Sonoko BellingrathKimura Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) | Eberswalder Straße 84 | 15374 Müncheberg Kontakt: Alma Moroder, [email protected] Datum: 27.02.2024 Landschaftsprozesse Datenanalyse & Simulation Landnutzung & Governance Agrarlandschaftssysteme Experimentelle Infrastruktur 10 Elemente für Agrarökologie, FAO 2018 (1) Feldroboter Naio Dino im Einsatz - patchCROP ZALF (2) Feldroboter vom Hersteller Zauberzeug, Projektpartner im Projekt zUCKERrübe (3) Infound Dokutool NatApp Diversity Co-Creation & Sharing of Knowledge Synergies Efficiency Recycling Resilience Human & Social Values Culture & Food Traditions Responsible Governance Circular & Solidarity Economy Habitat and landscape diversity Crop and tree diversity on the farm Diversity of activities, products and services Wildlife diversity Accessibility of farming activities Livestock and farm animal diversity Access to data collected by technology Connections between farmers and other stakeholders, including advisory services, scientists, etc. Participation of farmers (or other end-users) in product development Connections among farmers for sharing of knowledge Importance of local farmer knowledge in using the technology Knowledge creation from diverse sources Compatibility with other digital and non-digital technologies Compatibility with polyculture fields or non-crop plants Habitat and landscape connectivity Crop -livestock integration Integration of bodies of water into crop and animal farming Integration of trees into crop and animal systems Farm profitability Pesticide use Fertiliser use Energy use Land use efficiency Use of other agricultural inputs (e.g., seed, animal feed) Reusability and reparability of technology Water saving or recycling Recycling of crop residues, manure or other biomass Reduction or recycling of non-organic waste Complete and closed nutrient cycles Source of seeds and animals Protection against extreme weather events Protection of farmers against income fluctuations Protection against pest and disease attacks Reliance on on-farm labour Resilience to changes in policies or regulations Effect on greenhouse gas emissions Affordability of technology and potential repair costs Working conditions and wages Young people's empowerment and involvement in agriculture Farmers' ownership of the technology and the data collected Food security Animal welfare Women’s involvement and autonomy in agriculture Potential for surveillance and non-consensual data extraction Compatibility with local varieties and breeds Preservation of farmers' skills and knowledge Preservation of local farmer identity and traditional values Integration of local culture into technology Nutritional diversity and cultural appropriateness of diets Infrastructure readiness Sufficient risk assessment related to the use of technology Farmers' involvement in determining the use of technology Policies that support digitalisation and innovation Supporting of policymaking and regulation by data provision Transparency of the product Farmers' awareness of rights related to the technology Connecting producers and consumers Consumer benefits and fair prices Importance of local markets Value chain length Autonomy from external farm input suppliers Shareability of technology with other farmers Vorläufige Ergebnisse ▪Entwicklung von 62 Indikatoren für Agrarökologie ▪Entwicklung basierend auf einer Literaturrecherche und 17 semistrukturierten Interviews mit Agrarökologieund Digitalisierungsexpert:innen ▪Bewertung des Beitrags digitaler Technologien zur Agrarökologie durch Indikatoren möglich ▪Ganzheitliche Bewertung komplexer landwirtschaftlicher Systeme in Europa durch Indikatoren möglich ▪Technologien niemals inhärent "agrarökologisch" sondern abhängig von Einsatz durch Nutzer:innen 62 Indikatoren für Agrarökologie