scieee AI-readable full text Open interactive document viewer

The privatization of Open Access

Federic Holderlin

Abstract

Know this: an average public university loses 25% of its scientific output and retains 75% of the ownership (if we can equate open access with a kind of retention). And of that 75% which is open, 93% is through a paid open access model. Therefore, out of 100 articles, the university loses 25 and keeps 75; however, for those 75 articles to remain its own, it has had to pay for 68 of them (because 93% of open access operates through a commercial open access model). This means that open access has been privatized. And that transformative agreements have been the model that has achieved this, shifting the fee from reading to publishing. It is simply a scam. Where we think there is 75% open, we actually have 25% donated and around 70% recovered through a kind of ransom payment. This means that only about 5% of a public university’s output truly belongs to it without having to pay more than what it invested in the production process.

Full text

Federic Holderlin, 2025 You are controlled (ORCID). You cannot do anything, nor publish anything even mildly critical. You put your profile in public. No one is chasing you. It is a panopticon: technology watches everything. It has indeed managed to do what other goddesses attempted clumsily. We have sold our soul. Research is about to become completely automated. ChatGPT writes the articles. The AI that implements Dimensions reads the articles. It is possible to research without reading or writing. Deleuze is right when he says that writing has died (JSON-LD). Capitalist science is profoundly illiterate. No one remembers anymore, but at some point knowledge was published in letters. What romantic times! I have decided to spend a DOI from Zenodo to deposit a self-referential critique of the current research system. My apologies for the audacity.