D3.1 Preliminary report on the skill assessment and comparison of state‐of-the-art methods for forecasts and projections of extremes
Abstract
This document focuses mainly on the skill assessment of state‐of‐the‐art predictions of hydro‐meteorologicalvariables relevant for the I‐CISK LLs, and consequently sets the benchmark for quantifying the added valuefrom other scientific methods explored within I‐CISK. The skill assessment is very important for the CSproduced during the project; the usefulness of these CS and trustfulness of their users highly depends on thereliability of the predictions on which these CS are based.
Full text
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 DeliverableD3.1 Preliminaryreportontheskillassessmentandcomparisonof state‐of‐the‐artmethodsforforecastsandprojectionsof extremes September2023
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 InnovatingClimateservicesthroughIntegratingScientificandlocalKnowledge DeliverableTitle:DL3.1Preliminaryreportontheskillassessmentandcomparisonofstate‐of‐ the‐artmethodsforforecastsandprojectionsofextremes Author(s):LluísPesquer(CREAF),IliasPechlivanidis(SMHI),YihengDu(SMHI),Rebecca Emerton(ECMWF),PaoloMazzoli(GECOsistema),GyörgyiBela(IDEAS),Ilyas Masih(IHE),SumiranRastogi(IHE),MarcvandenHomberg(RC510),Micha Werner(IHE). DateOctober2022 Suggestedcitation:PesquerL.,PechlivanidisI.,DuY.,etal.(2022)Preliminaryreportontheskill assessmentandcomparisonofstate‐of‐the‐artmethodsforforecastsand projections Availability:☒PU:Thisreportispublic[Pleaseselect] ☐CO:Confidential,onlyformembersoftheconsortium(includingthe CommissionServices) DocumentRevisions: AuthorRevisionDate LluísPesquer,IliasPechlivanidisFirstdraftJune2022 LluísPesquer,IliasPechlivanidis,YihengDuetal.SeconddraftSeptember2022 MichaWerner,IlyasMasihReviewOctober2022 LluísPesquer,IliasPechlivanidis FinalversionOctober2022 LluísPesquer,YihengDu,PaoloMazzoli,Györgyi Bela VersionafterPOrevisionSeptember2023
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 1 ExecutiveSummary ClimateServices(CS)haveacrucialroleinempoweringcitizens,stakeholdersanddecision‐makersintaking climate‐smartdecisionsthatareresilienttoclimatechangeandcompatiblewithachievingclimateneutrality. Theresultssupportedbyascientificevidencebasecontributetowardsasustainableeconomy,lifestyle, environmentalprotectionandresourceuse.CSaimtotransformclimate‐relateddataandinformationinto customisedproducts,amongothersprojections,forecasts,information,trends,economicanalysisetc.,in ordertofurthersupportadaptation,mitigationanddisasterriskmanagement.Toachievethisadvanced scientificknowledge,monitoringandmodellingofclimatechangeandtheimpactsofclimateextremesare needed.AkeybarrierthatimpedesthecurrentgenerationofCSachievingthefullopportunityoftheirvalue‐ propositionrelatestothefailuretoincorporatethesocialandbehaviouralfactorsandthelocalknowledge andcustomsoftheirusers.Additionalchallengesarein:(i)theunderstandingofthemulti‐temporalandmulti‐ scalardimensionofclimate‐relatedimpactsandactions;(ii)thetranslationofCS‐provideddataintoactionable information;(iii)theconsiderationofreinforcingorbalancingfeedbackloopsassociatedtousers’decisions basedonCS;(iv)thelackoftransdisciplinaryapproachesacrossthefullCSvaluechain;and(v)needtodeliver tailor‐madeandrobustservicesatthescalerelevanttousers. TheI‐CISKprojectaimstoseizetheseuntakenopportunitiesbydevelopingnext‐generationCSthatfollowa socialandbehaviourallyinformedapproachforco‐producingCSthatmeettheclimateinformationneedsof citizens,decisionmakersandstakeholdersatthespatialandtemporalscalerelevanttothem.Intheseven geographicallydiverselivinglabs(LL),eachwithdifferentrelevantsectors,I‐CISKshowcasesitshuman‐centred co‐design,co‐creation,co‐implementation,andco‐evaluationapproachacrosskeysectorsvulnerableto climatechangeinEuropeandbeyond. Thisdocumentfocusesmainlyontheskillassessmentofstate‐of‐the‐artpredictionsofhydro‐meteorological variablesrelevantfortheI‐CISKLLs,andconsequentlysetsthebenchmarkforquantifyingtheaddedvalue fromotherscientificmethodsexploredwithinI‐CISK.TheskillassessmentisveryimportantfortheCS producedduringtheproject;theusefulnessoftheseCSandtrustfulnessoftheirusershighlydependsonthe reliabilityofthepredictionsonwhichtheseCSarebased. Thedocumentpresentsaninitialsetofdifferentmethodsbeingusedtogeneratehydro‐meteorological forecasts,predictionsandprojections,andfurtherlistsdifferentmethodologiesusedtoassesstheskilland robustnessofpredictions.Drivenbyinherentlimitationsinmodel‐basedseasonalmeteorologicalpredictions, biasesintherawseasonalprecipitationandtemperaturepredictionsoverEuropearehighlighted,andthe significantreductionofthesebiasesachievedafterpost‐processing(bias‐adjustment).Moreover,the documentpresentsananalysisofseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictionskillincludingstreamflow extremes(floodsanddroughts)atthescaleoftheLLsintheproject.Finally,abriefreviewofthestate‐of‐the‐ artoftheintegrationoflocalandscientificknowledgeisprovided.Thisreviewisdevelopedfromtherich literatureinthefield,andexplorestheintegrationofknowledgesfromtheperspectiveoftheirintegrationin climateservices.Differentdimensionsoflocalknowledgethatarerelevantinthiscontextareexplored,anda typologyforlevelsofintegrationisintroduced. Keywords ClimateServices;Userneeds;Seasonalpredictions;Biasadjustment;Extremeevents;Localdata;Local knowledge
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 2 AboutI‐CISK I‐CISK’sambitionistoinnovatehowclimateinformationisused,interpretedandactedonthroughanext‐ generationofClimateServicesthatfollowahumancentred,socialandbehaviourallyinformedapproach; integratingtheknowledge,needsandperceptionsofcitizens,decisionmakersandstakeholderswithclimate informationatspatialandtemporalscalerelevanttothem. ClimateServices(CS)arecrucialtoempoweringcitizens,stakeholdersanddecision‐makersintakingclimate‐ smartdecisionsthatareinformedbyasolidscientificevidencebase,thatcontributetowardsasustainable Europeaneconomy,lifestyle,environmentalprotectionandresourceuse,andthatareresilienttoclimate changeandcompatiblewithachievingclimateneutrality.Europeanandinternationalcollaborativeresearch efforts,includingCopernicusandGEOSShaveestablishedasolidscientificfoundationforaneffectiveCSvalue chain,includingadvancedscientificknowledge,monitoringandmodellingofclimatechangeandtheimpacts ofclimateextremes.However,severalbarrierschallengethecurrentgenerationofCSinachievingthefull opportunityoftheirvalue‐proposition.Thesechallengesincludethefailuretoincorporatethesocialand behaviouralfactorsandthelocalknowledgeandcustomsofclimateservicesusers.Additionally,the effectivenessofclimateservicesischallengedby;thestillpoorlydevelopedunderstandingofthemulti‐ temporalandmulti‐scalardimensionofclimate‐relatedimpactsandactions;thetranslationofCS‐provided dataintoactionableinformation;considerationofreinforcingorbalancingfeedbackloopsassociatedtousers’ decisions;andthelackoftrans‐disciplinaryapproachesacrossthefullCSvaluechain. I‐CISKaimstoseizetheseuntakenopportunitiesthroughahuman‐centredframeworkforco‐productionof nextgenerationCSthatspansthefullCSvaluechaintakingthedownstreampartofthevaluechainasastarting point.TheI‐CISKframeworkrealisesthefullpotentialofinformationprovidedthroughCSbyempowering actorstotaketheimpactsofextremeclimaticeventsandclimatechangeintoaccountintheirdecisions. Disclaimer Useofanyknowledge,informationordatacontainedinthisdocumentshallbeattheuser'ssolerisk.Neither theI‐CISKconsortiumnoranyofitsmembers,theirofficers,employeesoragentsshallbeliableorresponsible, innegligenceorotherwise,foranyloss,damageorexpensewhateversustainedbyanypersonasaresultof theuse,inanymannerorform,ofanyknowledge,informationordatacontainedinthisdocument,ordueto anyinaccuracy,omissionorerrorthereincontained. TheEuropeanCommissionshallnotinanywaybeliableorresponsiblefortheuseofanysuchknowledge, informationordata,oroftheconsequencesthereof. ThisdocumentdoesnotrepresenttheopinionoftheEuropeanUnion,andtheEuropeanUnionisnot responsibleforanyusethatmightbemadeofit.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 3 TableofContents 1Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1 1.1Purposeofthisdocument....................................................................................................................1 1.2Structureofthisdocument..................................................................................................................2 2State‐of‐the‐artmethodsandsystemsforforecasts,predictionsandprojections....................................3 2.1Descriptionofthefuturetimescales...................................................................................................3 2.2Exploringmedium‐rangeweatherforecasting....................................................................................4 2.3Exploringsub‐seasonalforecasting......................................................................................................5 2.4Exploringseasonalpredictions.............................................................................................................6 2.5Exploringdecadalpredictions..............................................................................................................7 2.6Exploringcentennialprojections..........................................................................................................8 3State‐of‐the‐artinintegratinglocalknowledgeandlocaldata..................................................................9 3.1Introduction.........................................................................................................................................9 3.2Whatconstituteslocalknowledgeanddata........................................................................................9 3.3Typesoflocalknowledgeandlocaldata...........................................................................................11 3.4Typologyofintegrationoflocalandscientificknowledgeinclimateservices..................................13 3.5Challengesanddirectionslocalandscientificknowledgeinclimateservices..................................15 4Advancinglarge‐scaleclimateservicesthroughintegrationoflocaldata................................................17 4.1IntroductiontoClimateServices........................................................................................................17 4.2DescriptionofEuropeanandglobalClimateServices.......................................................................17 4.2.1TheCopernicusservices................................................................................................................17 4.2.2GlobalEarthObservationSystemofSystems...............................................................................19 4.2.3TheWMOservices........................................................................................................................20 4.3Benchmarkingpredictions.................................................................................................................21 4.3.1Evaluationofpredictions..............................................................................................................21 4.3.2Benchmarksandreferencesystems.............................................................................................21 4.4UserrequirementsfromtheI‐CISKLLs..............................................................................................22 5Impactofpost‐processingonseasonalclimatepredictionerror..............................................................24 5.1Experimentalobjectives.....................................................................................................................24 5.2Dataavailability..................................................................................................................................24 5.3Post‐processingmethodology............................................................................................................24 5.4Assessingtheimpactofpost‐processingonpredictiveerror............................................................25 6Assessmentoffit‐for‐purposemethodologiesatselectedLivingLabs.....................................................28 6.1Experimentalobjectives.....................................................................................................................28
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 4 6.2Assessingtheseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictionskill..........................................................29 6.2.1Hydrologicalmodelling.................................................................................................................29 6.2.2Evaluationframework...................................................................................................................29 6.2.3Assessmentofseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictability......................................................30 6.2.4Assessmentofseasonalpredictabilityofstreamflowextremes..................................................32 6.3DroughtmodelsintheAndalucía(Spain)LivingLab..........................................................................34 6.3.1Backgroundandmethodology......................................................................................................34 6.3.2Precipitation..................................................................................................................................35 6.3.3Temperature.................................................................................................................................37 6.3.4Droughtindices.............................................................................................................................37 6.4UpperSecchiaRiver(Italy)LivingLab................................................................................................38 6.4.1Methodology.................................................................................................................................39 6.4.2Results...........................................................................................................................................40 6.5BudapestLivingLab............................................................................................................................42 6.5.1Background...................................................................................................................................42 6.5.2CalculationofhighresolutionLSTforurbanheatislandmapping...............................................43 6.5.3SatelliteLST...................................................................................................................................44 6.5.4Low‐altitudethermalinfraredremote(TIR)sensingdata(UASs)................................................44 6.5.5CNNnetworkforproducinghighresolutionLST..........................................................................44 6.5.6CitizenMeasurement:UrbanHeatIslandandThermalComfortAssessment.............................45 7Conclusionsandfuturework.....................................................................................................................47 7.1Conclusions........................................................................................................................................47 7.2MovingforwardwiththeLivingLabs.................................................................................................48 References.........................................................................................................................................................49
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 5 ListofFigures Figure1Timescalesrangesandtherelevanceofinitialvaluesandforcing.....................................................................4 Figure2TheseasonaloutlookavailableintheEFASserviceprovidedbyCEMS.............................................................18 Figure3TheGlobalDroughtMonitortoolofGDIS.........................................................................................................20 Figure4Biasesinrawandbias‐adjustedprecipitationpredictionsforthewinterandsummermonthsandforlead month0.ThepredictionsarebasedontheECMWFSEAS5predictionsystem.................................................................26 Figure5Biasesinrawandbias‐adjustedprecipitationandtemperaturepredictionsforthewinterandsummermonths andforleadmonth0.ThepredictionsarebasedontheCMCC‐SPS3.5predictionsystem...............................................27 Figure6LocationsoftheI‐CISKLivingLabs.....................................................................................................................28 Figure7Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofCRPSS)fordifferenthydro‐meteorologicalvariablesdownscaledtothe scaleoftheLivingLabs.ThehydrologicalmodelsaredrivenbytheECMWFSEAS5predictions......................................31 Figure8Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofCRPSS)fordifferenthydro‐meteorologicalvariablesdownscaledtothe scaleoftheLivingLabs.ThehydrologicalmodelsaredrivenbytheCMCC‐SPS3.5predictions........................................32 Figure9Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofBSS)forstreamflowhigh(BSS90)andlow(BSS10)extremesdownscaled tothescaleoftheLivingLabs.............................................................................................................................................33 Figure10Ontheright,gaugeprecipitationstations(whitepointlocations)usedforthelocalmodelsintheAndalucia LivingLab(yellowboundaries),ontheleft,mapsituationofthisregion(bluepolygon)..................................................34 Figure11Flowchartforthegenerationofthefinerspatialvariabilitypatternmethod...................................................35 Figure12TheyellowlineofsyntheticNDVIshowsamorecoherentresponseofvegetationtotheannualprecipitation pattern(lineblue)thantheoriginalNDVI(ingreen).Thismodified(synthetic)productisneededinmeteorologicalstations locatedinurbanareas........................................................................................................................................................36 Figure13SPIatcoarse(0.25deg.)spatialresolutionbyEDO(upperfigure).Onbottom,SPIatfinerresolution(250m)by I‐CISK(lowerfigure)............................................................................................................................................................38 Figure14LocationofthestudyareainRER‐Italy,southofthePoRiver,intheupperprovincesofReggioEmiliaand Modena(administrativeboundariesanddotsrepresentingriverstagemonitoringstationsfromRegionalEnv.Agency networks)andtheweirattheuppercatchmentclosureofSecchiaRiver.........................................................................38 Figure15Exampleoflocaldatacollectedwiththehelpoftheusers:dischargestation(upperleft)andmeteorological stations(upperright)..........................................................................................................................................................39 Figure16Exampleofcollectedforecastandstatusmaps(multibandraster)fromlefttoright,CopernicusCDSdailyriver dischargeforecast@10kmspatialresolution,localARPAEdailyprecipitationmaps@5kmresolutionandforecasted COSMO2precipitationmaps@2kmresolution(alsoprovidedbyARPAE),withoverlayofrivercatchmentupstreamof theCastellaranoweirandtherivernetwork......................................................................................................................40 Figure17SketchofapossibleserviceGUI.A:Inputfeatures(e.g.rainfallandtemperature,groundstationsoraveraged, recordeddischarge,meteorologicalforecast);B:dischargeforecastforleadtimesofinterest;C:Timeseriesofvariables ofinterest;D:Lumpederrormetricsfortheselectedperiod;E:Configurationoptions;F:errorgraphsandgraphic indicatorsofforecastperformances(seealsonextfigure)................................................................................................41 Figure18Exampleofperformancesgraphs(ontheleftcorrelationamongobservedversuspredictedresiduals,onthe righterrorfrequencydistribution).....................................................................................................................................41 Figure19MapoftheElizabethdistrict..............................................................................................................................42 Figure20Schematicoftherelativehorizontalscalesandverticallayerstypicalofurbanareas:(a)Meso‐scaledome,(b) Meso‐scaleplume,(c)Local‐scale,and(d)Micro‐scale......................................................................................................43 Figure21CNNnetworkforhighresolutionLST.................................................................................................................45 Figure22Impressionoflocalresidenttakingameasurementwithadevicethatwasdevelopedtounderstandurbanheat islandsandheatwaves.Citizenscancontributetowell‐suitedadaptationmethodsandbetterpolicymeasures.The projectwillempowerresidentstomeasuretheirownthermalexposureandunderstandthethermalconditionsintheir livingenvironment.Coloursintheimageindicateheat,withreddercoloursindicatinghighersurfacetemperature.....45 Figure23ThermalimageofcityblocksrecordedinBudapeston7/1/22(leftimage).CitiZcansensorboxuserinterface (citizcan.com)(rightimage)................................................................................................................................................46
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 6 ListofTables Table1Dimensionsoflocalknowledgerelevanttoperceptionofclimaterelevantinformation.................................12 Table2Typologyofapproachestointegratinglocalandscientificknowledgeanddatainclimateservices................14 Table3Examplesoflocalknowledgeintegrationapproachesthathavebeendiscussedinliterature.........................14 Table4Propertiesoftheseasonalclimatepredictionsystems.....................................................................................24 Table5Comparedcontributionsofvegetationindicesintheregressionmodellingofprecipitation.‘out’meansthat theproductisrejectedbythemodelbecauseitscontributionisnotsignificant.Greencolouristhebestoneforamonth, lightbrownmeansthatthereisnotaclearresult,tiedresults..........................................................................................37 Table6Collectedlocaldataattheendoffirststageofanalysis....................................................................................41
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Purposeofthisdocument IntheDescriptionofWorkoftheI‐CISKproject,itisstatedthateffortswillbetargetedtowardsinnovation andenhancementofexistingclimateservices(CS)anddownstreamimpact‐basedproducts,andconsequently onthesupportofdecisionsandpoliciesinmultiplesectorsaccountingfortheirlocaltrade‐offs.InWork Package(WP)3,oneoftheaimsistoaddressthelocalneedsandsectoralgapsofexistingCSandtherefore variousstate‐of‐the‐artmethodswillbeusedtogetherwithtools/methodstointegratelocalstate‐of‐the‐art observationsandlocalknowledge.Bothcontinental/globalandlocal‐scaleprocess‐basedimpactmodels,e.g. forthewaterandagriculturesectors,willbeusedtoassesssub‐seasonal,seasonalandcentennialchanges andimpactsattheLivingLab(LL)scale.Therefore,acontinuousdialoguewithvariousWPs,e.g.WP1,WP2, WP3andWP4,hasbeenestablishedtoensureacontinuousexchangeandfeedbackofinformationrequired totranslatedatasetsintotailoredinformationandindicatorsforlocaluse. TheobjectivesofWP3areto: Toadvancelocalimpactpredictionsandprojectionsofclimatechangeandfutureextremesthrough developingmodellingchainsthatefficientlyintegrateexistingCSwhilealsocombininglocaldataand knowledgeforlocaltailoring. Toexploredifferentscientificstate‐of‐the‐artmethodstobridgedataandservicesthatarecurrently separatedontemporalandspatialscales(fromforecaststoprojections)andincreasethetrustinlocal predictions. Toevaluatetheusefulnessoftheintegratedimpactpredictionsandassessmentsforlocaloperations anddecision‐makingfrombothascientificandauserperspective. Tounlockthebenefitsoftransformationofdatatoinformationforandwithintheclimate‐sensitiveLL regionsandsectorsbyimprovingtheconfidenceinformationofindicatorswhileenhancingtheir usability. Todevelopuser‐drivenvisualisationtoolsthatassurerobustandseamlesstransferofproduced informationfromCS,andcommunicatepredictions,explicitlyincludinguncertainty,forguided decision‐making. Toproviderecommendationsforproductadaptations,extensionsandCSimprovements,anddeliver fitforpurposetools,methodsandproductsforuser‐tailoredreal‐timeoperationalservices Toachievepartoftheobjectiveslistedabove,thisdocumentpresentsthecurrentlyongoingworkandreports onthepreliminaryprogressinWP3,whileitaddressesaseriesofspecificobjectivesthatinclude: Definingthedifferentfuturetimehorizonsandexemplifyingstate‐of‐the‐artmethodsusedto generatehydro‐meteorologicalforecasts,predictionsandprojections. Listingthetraditionalmethodologiesusedtoassesstheskillandrobustnessofpredictions,including commonbenchmarkmethods. QuantifyingthebiasesinseasonalmeteorologicalpredictionsovertheEuropeandomainand exploringthespatialbiasesafterpost‐processing(bias‐adjustment). Benchmarkingtheseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictiveskill,includingextremes,overthespatial scaleofthelivinglabs. Reviewingdifferentapproachestotheintegrationoflocaldataandknowledgeatthescaleoftheliving labtoaddressthelocaluserneeds.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 8 DecadalClimatePredictionSystem(DePreSys):Itisthedecadalpredictionsystemdevelopedandrun bytheMetOffice,HadleyCentre(UK).Theinitialisationisachievedbyrelaxingtofull‐depthanalyses ofoceantemperatureandsalinity,atmosphereanalysesofwinds,temperatureandsurfacepressure. Thisinitialisationimprovestheforecastskillofglobally‐averagedsurfacetemperatureinpasttest cases. 2.6 Exploringcentennialprojections Climateprojectionsaredependentonscenariosoffutureanthropogenicandnaturalforcing.Themain challengeofmid/longtermclimatepredictionscomparedtoweatherforecastsisthatthepredictionofsocio‐ economicdevelopmentisevenmoredifficultthanthepredictionoftheevolutionofthephysicalsystem. TheCoupledModelIntercomparisonProject(CMIP)isthemostrelevantworldwideprojectfortheclimate projectionsmodelling,notexclusivelytomid/longtermones,butmainly,italsocoversothertimescales(i.e. decadal).Since1995,CMIPhascoordinatedclimatemodelexperimentsinvolvingmultipleinternational modellingteams,currentlytheCMIP6istheactivephase. ThecurrentCMIPjoins21researchinstitutionsthateachdeveloptheirownmodels.Aselectionofthemare: CESM(byNationalCenterforAtmosphericResearch,USA):Itisafully‐coupled,globalclimatemodel thatprovidescomputersimulationsonatmosphere(CAM),landCLM,ocean(POP,MOM6),ice(CSIM) oftheEarth'spast,present,andfutureclimatestates.(Danabasogluetal.2020). EC‐Earth(byEurope‐wideconsortium,includingSMHI):ItintegratessomeEuropeanmodelsfrom differentinstitutions,includingECMWFmodels:IFSistheIntegratedForecastSystem,NEMOforthe ocean,LIMforsea‐ice,TM5fortheatmosphericchemistryandtransportandLPJ‐Guessforvegetation. IPSL‐CM(byInstitutPierre‐SimonLaplace,France):ItcomprisesoftheLMDzmodelforthe atmosphere,INCAandREPROBUSforatmosphericcomposition,NEMOfortheocean,oceandynamics (NEMO‐OCE),sea‐ice(NEMO‐LIM)andoceanbiogeochemistry(NEMO‐PISCES),andtheORCHIDEE modelforterrestrialsurfaces. HadGEM2:(byMetOffice,UK):TheHadGEM2familyincludesacoupledatmosphere‐ocean configuration,withorwithoutaverticalextensionintheatmospheretoincludeawell‐resolved stratosphere,andanEarth‐Systemconfigurationwhichincludesdynamicvegetation,oceanbiology andatmosphericchemistry. Mk3L(byCSIRO,Australia):Itisacoupledgeneralcirculationmodelthatincorporatesaspectral atmosphericgeneralcirculationmodel,az‐coordinateoceangeneralcirculationmodel,adynamic‐ thermodynamicseaicemodelandalandsurfaceschemewithstaticvegetation. MPI‐ESM(byMaxPlanckInstituteforMeteorology,Germany):Itcouplestheatmosphere(ECHAM6), ocean(MPIOM,JSBACH)andlandsurface(JSBACH)throughtheexchangeofenergy,momentum, waterandcarbondioxide.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 9 3 State‐of‐the‐artinintegratinglocalknowledgeandlocaldata 3.1 Introduction Climateserviceshaveawell‐recognisedpotentialofempoweringdecisionmakersintakingclimatesmart decisions(GoddardandGoddard,2017);includingstakeholdersfromawiderangeofsectors,publicagencies andpolicybodies,andcitizens.Thispotentialis,however,inmanycasesnotfullyrealised,andtheuptakeof climateservicesmaybehamperedbyanumberofbarriers;includingthelackofunderstandingofuser’sneeds, layperceptions,localknowledge,andcapacitylevels(JacobsandStreet,2020),differencesbetweenthe spatialandtemporalscalesatwhichinformationisprovidedandthescalesrelevanttousers(Howardetal., 2020),difficultyofaccess,aswellaslackofsustainabilityofclimateservices(Vincentetal.,2020).Research shows,however,thattheusersclimateservicesmayserve,oftenhavewelldevelopedknowledgeofthe climatesystemsaroundthembasedontheirobservationandexperience(Tadesseetal.,2015;Plotzetal., 2017;Orloveetal.,2010),andthatrecognisingandintegratingtheseknowledgesthroughco‐creationof climateservicescanhelpclosetheusabilitygap(Plotzetal.,2017;Vincentetal.,2018;Cashetal.,2003), despitechallengestotheseknowledgesasaresultofdemographic,climaticandenvironmentalchanges(Plotz etal.,2017). Inthissectionweprovideabriefreviewofthecurrentstateoftheartintheintegrationoflocalknowledgein climateservices.Wedonotaimtoprovideafullreviewofthemultipledimensionsoflocalknowledge,rather theaimistoreviewofthecurrentstateoftheartfromtheperspectiveofhowlocalandscientificknowledge areintegratedinclimateservices.Theprocessofhowlocalknowledgeisincludedinestablishingclimate servicesinaco‐creationprocessdependsontheorganisationsinvolved(Cashetal.,2003),butthisprocessis beyondthescopeofthissection.Amorecompleteanalysisoftheintegrationoflocalknowledgeinthecontext oftheco‐creationframework,includingtheco‐identificationoflocalknowledgewillbedevelopedinWP2 (Task2.2)andrelateddeliverables. Wefirstbrieflyexplorewhatweconsideraslocalknowledge,bothwithinthescopeofthisreviewbutalsoto establishareferenceforofthedimensionsoflocalknowledgewithinthecontextofintegrationoflocaland scientificknowledgeintheI‐CISKproject.Wethenreviewhowlocalknowledgeisusedinclimateservices,and introduceabasictypologyofhowlocalknowledgeandscientificknowledgeareconsideredand/orintegrated withinclimateservices.Finally,weprovideareflectiononthechallengesanddirectionsoflocalandscientific knowledgeintegrationinclimateservices,andabriefoutlookonhowthesechallengeswillbeaddressedin theI‐CISKproject. 3.2 Whatconstituteslocalknowledgeanddata Todefinelocalknowledgeisitselfachallenge.Whatconstituteslocalknowledgeandwhotheownerofthat knowledgeis,andinparticulartheaspectsoflocalknowledgethatarerelevantwithinthecontextofaclimate service,ishighlydependentonthe(local)contextofthedecisionprocesstheclimateserviceintendstoserve, aswellasthestakeholdersanddecisionmakersthatareinvolved.TheUnitedNationsFoodandAgricultural Organisation(FAO)offersabroaddefinitionoflocalknowledge;describingitas“acollectionoffactsrelated totheentiresystemofconcepts,beliefs,andperceptionsthatpeopleholdabouttheworldaroundthem.This includesthewaypeopleobserveandmeasuretheirsurroundings,solveproblems,andvalidatenew information.Itincludestheprocesseswherebyknowledgeisgenerated,stored,appliedandtransmittedto others”(BuildingonGender,Agrobiodiversityandlocalknowledge).Withinthisframeworkitisimportantto notethatlocalknowledgeisnotonlyheldbytribalorindigenouscommunities,butalsobyothercommunities, includingthoseinruralandurbanenvironments,settledandnomadiccommunities,originalinhabitantsand migrants(ibid).
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 10 Hermansetal.(2022)pointoutthatwhatdiscriminatesbetweenscientificandlocalknowledgeisthatwhile scientificknowledgeisdevelopedthroughaformalandagreedmethodology,localknowledgereflectsthe accumulatedknowledgeofthepeopleoftheenvironmentalcontextinwhichtheyliveandtowhichtheyare closelyrelated.Thislocalknowledgemaythenbeintrinsicallyusedinmakingpredictionsrelatedtohow environmentalconditions,includingtheweather,maydevelop,ortheconsequenceschangingandextreme theseenvironmentconditions(suchasdroughts,heatwaves,etc.)mayhave.Inthecontextofdisasterrisk reduction(DRR)andearlywarningsystems(EWS),therolelocalknowledgehasisdescribedastheexperience oflocalsurroundings,identificationandmonitoringofindicators,todetect,copeoradapttodisastersaswell ascommunicatedisasterrisk(Dekens,2007).Hadlosetal.(2022)characteriselocalandindigenousknowledge extractedfromfield‐basedstudieswithinDRRandEWStosixoverarchingforms;namely,earlywarning systems,riskknowledgeandperception,structuralmeasures,livelihood‐basedadaptation,socialcohesion andbeliefs.Muchoftheliteratureonlocalknowledgeconsiderstheknowledgeofthosecloselyrelatedtothe environment,suchasforexamplefarmerslivinginruralenvironments.Thereisnotmuchliteratureonhow localknowledgecanbeunderstoodinurbanareas.Inurbanareas,thereisamuchlargermobilityofpeople aswellaschangeintheenvironment(forexampleduetorapidurbanisation),whichwillinfluencehowpeople canbuildup(local)knowledgeoftherisksduetonaturalhazardssurroundingthem.Also,Hermansetal. (2022)foundthatmoststudiesintheirliteraturereviewonlocalknowledgeforearlywarningsystemsare geographicallyconcentratedintheGlobalSouth Scientificknowledgeincontrastisknowledgethatisestablishedthroughaformalandagreedmethodology, suchaslocalmeteorologicalorhydrologicalobservationsandindicatorsderivedfromthoseobservationsis thenreferredtoaslocaldata.Arguably,thisdistinctionbetweenscientificandlocalknowledgesbeingbased onhowformaltheprocessofknowledgegenerationis,issomewhatgrey.Someresearchersconsiderlocal indicatorsestablishedthroughtheuseofformallylocallycollectedobservationaldataaslocalknowledge (Reyes‐Garcíaetal.,2016),whilecitizenscienceisaprocessthatgeneratesandconsolidatesbothscientific andlocalknowledge(Wehnetal.,2021;Tengöetal.,2021). Localknowledgeisreferredtoinliteratureusingvariousnames,eithertohelpdistinguishwhotheownerof theknowledgeisand/ortoclarifytowhattheknowledgemaypertain.Theseincludeindigenousknowledge (Iloka,2016),traditionalknowledgeandlocaltraditionalknowledge(Plotzetal.,2017;Chisadzaetal.,2015) ortraditionalecologicalknowledge(Berkesetal.,2000)amongothers.Plotzetal.(2017)aswellasother authorsunderlinethatmostliteratureonlocalknowledgerelatedtoclimateservicesconsiderstraditionaland orindigenousknowledgediscussedwithinthecontextofdevelopmentresearch,whereformaldatasuchas fromhydro‐meteorologicalobservationsarescarce.However,werecognisethatlocalknowledgethatis relevantinthediversecontextsanddifferentsectorsintheLivingLabsoftheI‐CISKprojectmaybeknowledge thathasdevelopedovermanygenerations,orthathasevolvedinashortertime‐span,andthatbelongsboth toindigenousandnon‐indigenouspeople(ibid). Withintheclimateservicesthatareco‐createdintheI‐CISKlivinglabs,wealsoconsidertheroleoflocaldata collectedthroughaformaldatacollectionprocess.Thismayincludedatasuchaslocalmeteorologicaland/or hydrologicalobservationscollectedbyformalinstitutionswithinthegeographicalcontextofeachlivinglab, suchasthenationalhydrometeorologicalservices(NHMS),orotherpublicand/orprivatebodies.Also,local datacanbecollectedthroughmoreinformalprocesses,suchascitizenscienceorvolunteeredgeographic information.Thescientificknowledgetheselocaldataprovidemaybeusedtocomplementtheknowledge thatisobtainedfromlargerscaledatasetssuchasobtainedfromglobaland/orregionalclimatepredictions andprojections. Anotherwaytolookatlocaldatainrelationtolocalknowledgeisasfollows.Inordertobetterunderstand whatmakesuplocalknowledge,wecanpositionlocalknowledgeinthecommonlyusedDataInformation KnowledgeWisdom(DIKW)pyramid.Mulderetal.(2016)flippedthisconventionalview,wheredataarethe
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 11 rawbuildingblocksofknowledge,arguinginsteadthatdataisgeneratedfromdifferentsourcesofknowledge. Wecandissectlocalknowledgeintoinformationanddataforeachcategoryordimensionoflocalknowledge. Forexample,localknowledgeontheecological(orfloraandfauna)dimensioncanbenarroweddownto informationaboutanimalbehaviour(aspecificfishspeciesasasignofupcomingfloods)(ŠakiTrogrlicetal., 2019).Insomecases,thisusuallyqualitativetypeofinformationcanbeconvertedintoapreferably quantifiableindicator,suchasquantifyingtheincreaseinnumberoffishes.Weemphasisethatbythisprocess of“datafying”thelocalknowledge,onenolongercapturesallthecontextualknowledgeandlivedexperience, andisreducingortransforminglocalknowledgetoscientificknowledgeandtodifferentsmallbuildingblocks. 3.3 Typesoflocalknowledgeandlocaldata Acknowledgementofthevaluethatlocalknowledgecanbringinimprovingthedesignanddeliveryofclimate serviceshasledtocredibleeffortstowardstappingitspotential,withagrowingbodyofliteraturethat capturesthevariousdimensionsoflocalknowledgeinthecontextofclimateservices.Tableprovidesan overviewofsomeofthesedimensionsacrossvariousstudies.Mostoftheapproacheswithinclimateservices literaturetendtofocusoncapturinglocalknowledgethroughindicatorswithinthemeteorologicalcategory (Bucherieetal.,2022;Streefkerketal.,2022).Thiscanbeattributedtoevidenceoftraditional,local knowledge‐basedforecastingmethodsaddingsignificantvalueinenhancingthespatialandtemporal resolutionofscientificforecasts(Masinde,2015)aswellasbeingusefulincommunicatingweatherandclimate informationtolocalcommunities(Tadesseetal.,2015).Literaturemakeslimitedattemptsatplacingaspecific timeframefortheoccurrenceoflocalknowledgeindicators.ŠakiTrogrlicetal.(2019),basedonresearchin Malawi,foundthatassigningatimeframeforaspecificindicatorisachallengingtask,asahighdegreeof disparityisobserved,evenwithinthesamevillage.Nevertheless,itispossibletolinktheobservationson differentlocalknowledgedimensionstoforexamplethedifferentphasesindisasterriskmanagement.For example,localknowledgeonearlywarningversuslocalknowledgeforearlyactionorresponseafterfloods havehappenedcanbemapped(ibid).Thereseemstobelessliteratureonlocalknowledgeinrelationto climatechangeadaptation,asitismorecomplicatedtocapturehowlocalknowledgechangesoverlonger timeperiodsandbecause,duetoclimatechange,possiblyalsosomeoftheextremeweathereventswillbe outsidethelivedexperience(Kelmanetal.,2012).Similarly,alsounderstandinghow“local”localknowledge is,isnotstraightforward.Theseambiguitiesanddifferencesinspatialandtemporalcoverageandresolution betweenlocalandscientificknowledgedirectlyinfluencehowtheintegrationbetweenlocalandscientific knowledgeanddatacantakeplace. Beyondclimateservices,scholarshipondisasterriskreductionandadaptationhasfocussedonother,broader dimensionsoflocalknowledge,including;riskperception,earlyactionstrategies,livelihooddiversification, roleofinstitutionsandsocialcapital,andbeliefsystemsofcommunities(ŠakiTrogrlicetal.,2019;Hadloset al.,2022).Thereisthereforeanopportunityforclimateservicestolearnfrombroaderliteratureandlookat localknowledgemoreholisticallyasawaytobetterunderstanduserneedsembeddedwithintheirlocal contexts.Thisalsomeansthatnearlyallphasesintheco‐creationframeworkofI‐CISKcanleveragelocal knowledgeandlocaldata.Forexample,intheco‐exploreclimateinformationneedsanddesiresphase,abetter understandingoflocalknowledgecanhelpinidentifyinggapsinexistingclimateservices.Intheco‐identify adaptationandDRRplanstosupportphase,thelocalknowledgeonexistinglivelihood‐basedadaptation strategiescanbeidentified.Intheco‐developclimatedataandknowledgephase,thelocalknowledgecanbe actuallyintegrated(whichisthefocusofthissection).Similarly,Tanetal.(2022)showedhowcitizenscience cancontributethroughknowledgetoallpartsofthewarningvaluechain.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 12 Table1Dimensionsoflocalknowledgerelevanttoperceptionofclimaterelevantinformation Dimensionsoflocal knowledge DescriptionReference(Examples) Meteorological conditions Anomaliesinambienttemperatureand/orwind directionandspeedpriortowetseasonrelatedto drought (Streefkerketal.,2022) Meteorological conditions Windspeed,temperatureandcloudformationsover LakeMalawiasprecursorstoflashfloodevents (Bucherieetal.,2022) FloraandFaunaDensityofleavesandfruitsandfloweringlevelsasan indicationofdroughtconditions (Chisadzaetal.,2015) FloraandFaunaChangestothebiophysicalsystemasanindicationof achangingclimateatthelocallevel (Reyes‐Garcíaetal., 2016) Climatechange perception Experiencedclimateknowledgetoimproveservice deliveryofclimateservices (Cliffordetal.,2020) LocalspatialknowledgeLocalknowledgeofspatialandtemporalpatternsof floods,droughtsandrainfall (Paulietal.,2021) RiskperceptionChangesintemperature,inter‐seasonalchangesin rainfallandrecurrenceofextremeevents (Singhetal.,2022) LocalimpactsAwarenessandjudgementoflocalimpactsofheavy rainfallfordisasterpreparedness (Sudmeier‐rieuxetal., 2012) Livelihood‐based adaptationStrategies Cropselection(ChenandCheng,2020) Changingplantingschedules(ŠakiTrogrlicetal., 2019) Improvingirrigationandwatermanagementsystems(LiragandEstrella, 2017) Asdiscussedinsection1.3,wedistinguishlocalknowledgeandlocaldata.Whileinsomecaseslocaldatacan beseenasdirectlylinkedtolocalknowledge,inthiscontextwerefertolocaldataasdatathatislocally collectedthrougha(scientifically)formalprocess.Insomecases,moreinformalprocessesmayalsoresultin usefullocaldata.TherecentCitizenScienceGuidanceNotebytheWMO(2021)summarisestheinfluenceof citizens(assensors,interpreters,engagersandcollaborators)andscientists(instructing,collaborating,orco‐ creating)ondifferenttypesofcitizenscienceprojects.Whenthereisnoinfluenceatallfromthescientists involved,wecouldarguethatthisrepresentsthelocaldatathatispartoflocalknowledge.Thisisalsoinline withLeachandFairhead(2002),whoconsiderthatcitizenscienceimpliesacertainengagementwith,and usuallyamoredominantdiscursiverolefor,thescienceofexpertinstitutionsthanisthecasewithlocal knowledge.Understandingandcharacterisinglocalknowledge(andassociatedlocaldata)isusuallythrough qualitativetechniques,suchasfocusgroupdiscussionsandkeyinformantinterviews.Citizenscienceprojects typicallyusemorequantitativeandformalisedtechniques,thougharenotlimitedtothese(Hicksetal.,2019; CitizenscienceDRR,2022).
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 13 InthecontextoftheI‐CISKproject,citizenscanrefertothoseincommunities,suchasinruralareasinLesotho, butalsotohotelownersinGreeceorolivefarmersinSpain.GivenI‐CISK’sco‐creationframework,thecitizens andscientistsintheLivingLabswilloperatemostlyinthecollaborationandco‐creatingsideofthespectrum forthetobecollectedlocaldata.Ofcourse,LivingLabactorsmayalsoalreadyhavelocaldata.Hereonecan thinkofe.g.commercialfarmsthathaverainfallrecordsoveralongperiodoftime(Landmanetal.,2020),but alsocommunitiesthathavelocalknowledgeonhydro‐meteorologicalindicators. 3.4 Typologyofintegrationoflocalandscientificknowledgeinclimateservices Theadvancinginterestinusingco‐creationprocessesfordeliveringusableclimateinformationhas consequentlyalsoledtogrowinginterestinexploringlocalknowledgeandwaystointegrateitwithscientific knowledgeinclimateservices.Severalauthorsarguetherelevanceoflocalknowledgeinthecontextof environmentaldecision‐making,disasterriskmanagementortoenhance(seasonal)climateforecasts(Jiriet al.,2016;Plotzetal.,2017;Streefkerketal.,2022).Theintegrationoflocalknowledgewithinclimateservices alsopresentstheopportunitytobettertailortheinformationtomatchtheend‐userneeds(Knivetonetal., 2014)andtoimprovecommunicationtolocalcommunities(Tadesseetal.,2015). Dryballetal.(2009)discuss,inthecontextofenvironmentalmanagement,processesofsociallearningamong actors.Theyexplainthatparticipationandinteractionamongdifferentactorscanrangefromcoercion(the willofonegroupisimposedontheother),informing,consulting,enticing,co‐creationtoco‐acting(active participation).Thisspectrumofinteractionbetweencommunitiesandexternalactorscanbeused,tosome extent,todescribethespectrumofhowtheholdersofLKandSKrelatetooneanother,reflectingpower relationsbetweentheactors.Wewillshortlygiveanexampleofthetwoextremes.Coercioncanbetheresult whenholdersofSKconsiderSKthemostvaluableknowledgesystemandwheretheyfocuson“extracting” thosepartsofLKthatcanbevalidatedscientificallyandusedtoforexamplelocalisescientificforecasts.Co‐ actingreflectsaprocessinwhichbothLKandSKco‐exist,eachhavetheirrespectivevalueandmutual learningsoccurbasedoncollaborationandnegotiation. Studieshavedefinedknowledgeintegrationinseveralways.Berggrenetal.(2011)definesitasacombination ofspecialisedknowledgetoreachanendresult,whileithasalsobeeninterpretedastheprocessof transformingindividualknowledgetoacollectiveone(OkhuysenandEisenhardt2002).Plotzetal.(2017) lookedatmethodsofintegratinglocalknowledge,comingupwiththetypologythatincludes:consensus buildingapproachesandscienceintegrationapproaches.Theformerisdescribedasaprocesswhereinthe finalproduct(inthiscaseaforecast)isanagreedoutcomeofnegotiationbetweenthelocalandthescientific knowledgeholders.Thenegotiationprocessmayfollowaverystructuredapproachoralessformalone, dependingonthecontext.Thisapproachalsoreliesonthelastmileactorsandlocalsocialnetworkstobuild acommonunderstanding(ibid).Thescienceintegrationprocess,ontheotherhand,employslocalknowledge forvalidation.Forexample,localindicatorsofweatherpatternswhichareextractedthroughsurveyswith stakeholdersareprocessedtovalidateindicatorsestablishedusingexistingscientificdatasets(ibid).Other approachesofintegrationincludeestablishingknowledgetimelinesandparticipatorydownscalingprocesses thataimtodrawonthesimilaritiesbetweenknowledgetypes,andexploringthelimitsofcurrentinformation (Knivetonetal.,2014).Wenotethatmostoftheapproachesforintegratinglocalandscientificknowledgeare whenproducingtheclimateservice,sopriortotheservicebecomingoperational,orwhenevaluatingclimate services,(Hironsetal.,2021)statethatevaluationshouldbeongoingandcombinemeteorologicalverification withdecision‐makersfeedback.However,integrationalsotakesplacewhenaclimateserviceisdelivered.For example,whenclimateserviceuserstriangulatethemselvesbetweentheirlocalknowledgeandthe knowledgeprovidedintheclimateservice.InTablewedevelopanextendedtypologyofintegration.This providesanoverviewofthewiderangeoflevelsofintegrationofLKandSKwithinclimateservicesasfound inrelevantliterature.Table3providesselectedexamplesofintegrationfromliterature,showingthatinmany oftheseseveralofthelevelsofintegrationmaybeconsidered.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 14 Table2Typologyofapproachestointegratinglocalandscientificknowledgeanddatainclimateservices LevelofintegrationDescriptionReference Science‐dominatedInthisapproach,theinformationprovidedthrough theclimateservicederivedfromscientificknowledge isconsideredthemostvaluable(describedas coercion).Thislevelofintegrationisoftenfoundin globalforecastingsystemsthataredevelopedusing globalscientificdatasetsandmodels. (Dryballetal.,2009) ConsensusIntheconsensusapproach,scientificknowledge(e.g. seasonalforecastsobtainedfromaclimatemodel) andlocalknowledge(e.g.seasonalforecastbasedon traditionalknowledgeofmeteorologicalsigns)are consideredequallybyscientificexpertsandtraditional knowledgeholders.Thetwoknowledgesare combinedtodevelopaconsensusforecast. (Plotzetal.,2017) ValidationLocalknowledgeisusedtoevaluateinformation providedbytheclimateservice,orscientific knowledgeisusedtoevaluatetheaccuracyoflocal knowledge‐basedforecasts.Referredtoasscience integrationinPlotzetal. (Landmanetal.,2020; Gillesetal.,2022) TriangulationScientificknowledgeprovidedthroughtheclimate serviceistriangulatedbyuserswiththeirlocal knowledgeoftheirenvironment.Thiscouldinclude comparisonof(seasonal)forecaststheclimateservice provideswithenvironmentalcuesobservedbythe user. (Shahetal.,2012) (Gwenzietal2016) InformingLocalknowledgeisusedtoinformhowscientific knowledgecanbeinterpreted.Examplesinclude where(Meteorological)indicatorsbasedonlocal knowledgeareusedtoinformhowscientificdatasets andmodelsareinterpreted. (Bucherieetal.,2022; Streefkerketal.,2022) ConditioningandBias Correction Notes:herelocalknowledgeandinparticularlocal dataisusedtoconditionmodeluncertaintiesand correctbiases.Thisisthroughformalmathematical approachessuchasquantilemappingorbayesian approaches. Table3Examplesoflocalknowledgeintegrationapproachesthathavebeendiscussedinliterature TypeofintegrationDescriptionReference Modelinput(Forecast thresholdmodel); Informingand validation Meteorologicalindicatorsbasedonlocalknowledge onpredictingdryconditionsduringrainyseason (Streefkerketal.,2022) Validation(Statistical integration) Usingwind‐relatedindicatorsforforecastingrainand optimiselocalandmodernforecasts (Gbangouetal.2021)
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 15 Participatory geographicinformation system(PGIS)or participatorymapping Understandingvulnerabilityandlocaladaptation actionsusingspatiallyexplicitmappingoflocal knowledge (Cruz‐Belloetal.,2018) Crowdsourcinglocal datatovalidatemodels orCommunity‐based observationnetworks Usecrowd‐sourcedfloodobservationsto quantitativelyassessmodelperformanceoffor examplefloodforecastingmodels (Dasguptaetal.,2022) (LeCozetal.,2016) (Alessaetal.,2016) Systemlevelintegration acrosstheearly warningvaluechain Participatoryapproachtoconnecttop‐downscientific knowledge‐basedsystemswithbottom‐up community‐basedsystemsandlocalknowledge. (Tarchianietal.,2020) Usesitespecificrecords toimproveforecastskill ofglobalorregional models Usesiterecordedfarmrainfallrecordsforthe developmentofskillfulforecastsystemsspecifictothe farm (Landmanetal.,2020) Participatory downscaling Theuseofknowledgetimelinesandparticipatory downscalingtovalidatemeteorologicalforecastsand buildtrustintheseforecastsamongfarmersinSenegal andKenya (Knivetonetal.,2014) 3.5 Challengesanddirectionslocalandscientificknowledgeinclimateservices Examplesfromrecentliteraturereviewedintheprecedingsectionsclearlyestablishtheneedforexploring localknowledgeanditsvalueinproducingclimateinformationthatismoresalienttouserneeds.However, localknowledgestillremainsunderutilisedwithindesign,deliveryandcommunicationofclimateservices, predominantlybecausethereisstillalackofaunifiedunderstandingofwhatconstituteslocalknowledge (Hadlosetal.,2022).Currently,withinclimateservicesliterature,localknowledgerelatedtometeorological indicatorsismorefrequentlydiscussedthanotherdimensions(Streefkerketal.,2022).Researchhas, however,revealedthatlocalknowledgeanditsusecanhavewidersocio‐economic,politicaland environmentaldimensions(ŠakiTrogrlicetal.,2019).Furthermore,clearerlinksneedtobedrawnbetween climateservicesandthelocalknowledgeembeddedwithinthelivelihoodpractices,copingandadaptation strategies,andsocialnetworkoflocalcommunities,sothattheinformationoradviceprovidedismoresuited toenduserneeds.Theongoingdiscussionaroundlocalknowledgealsodoesnotfullyconsiderknowledge heldatdifferentlevelsofgovernance(fromlivelihoodstolocalgovernmentbodiestohigherlevelsof government)aswellasalongtheclimateservicesvaluechainitself.Calveletal.(2020)studythisinthecontext ofdroughtwarning,exploringlocalknowledgerelatedwithcommunicationstructures(dissemination channels)anddecision‐making.Thereisalsoaneedtobetterunderstandtheroleoflocalknowledgewithin urbanenvironmentsandcommercialsectors(fore.g.,tourism).Currentrepresentationisskewedtowards agriculture,waterandnaturalresourcemanagement.Aliteraturereviewonclimateservicesforadaptation (Boonetal.,2022)foundthatthemajorityofinterventionseitherdidnotidentifyaclearsectoralfocusor mostlydiscussedtheaforementionedcategories.Thediversecontextsofthelivinglabsthathavebeen establishedintheI‐CISKproject,andtherangesectorsanddiversityoflocalknowledgeholdersineachofthe LivingLabprovidetheopportunitytoreducethisskew.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 16 Additionally,itisalsoimportanttolookatlocalknowledgeintermsofits‘relational’aspecti.e.,‘who’isbeing includedorexcludedintheproblemunderstandingprocess(Bouwen,2001).ŠakiTrogrlicetal.(2019)discuss theintergenerationalandgendereddifferencesinlocalknowledgeoflocalcommunitiesandtheneedtohave amoreholisticandrepresentativeviewoflocalknowledge.Thisconcernisaddressedwithintheco‐creation frameworkoftheICISKproject,andwillneedtobecarefullydocumentedwithinthecontextofeachofthe sevenLivingLabs. Whilethesearesomeofthegapsthathavebeenidentifiedwhenitcomestolocalknowledge,thereisaclear needtounpacktheseinamoresystematicmanner.Morespecifically,itisimportanttounderstandthevarious dimensionsoflocalknowledge.Thiscanshedfurtherlightonthequestionofwhatconstituteslocal knowledge,andcanhelptostartbuildingacommonunderstanding.Thiswillalsoserveasasteppingstone towardsidentifyingvariousentrypointsandpathwaysthroughwhichlocalknowledgecanhelpbuildamore salientandhuman‐centredclimateservices. Inthissection,specificpathwaysareidentifiedastohowlocalknowledgecanbeintegratedwithscientific knowledge.Beforebeingabletointegratelocalandscientificknowledge,onehastocharacteriseand understandlocalknowledge.Theoverviewofthedimensionsoflocalknowledge,aswellasthetypologyof levelsofinformation,illustratesthattheintegrationoflocalknowledgeandscientificknowledgeextendswell beyondthecombiningofquantitativedata,suchasinforexamplebiascorrectionofforecastsusinglocaldata. Breakinglocalknowledgedownintolocal(quantitative)data,hastheriskoflosingthemorecontextual qualitativeinformation,thoughthatmaybenecessaryforsomeintegrationapproaches.However,withinthe co‐creationprocessofdevelopingclimateservices,suchasinthelivinglabsinI‐CISK,theseadditional dimensionsoflocalknowledgeandtypesofintegrationshouldbeexplicitlyconsidered.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 17 4 Advancinglarge‐scaleclimateservicesthroughintegrationoflocaldata 4.1 IntroductiontoClimateServices TheEuropeanCommission’sRoadmapforClimateServices(2015),setthedefinitionofclimateserviceswhich accountsforthosecovering"thetransformationofclimate‐relateddatatogetherwithotherrelevant informationintocustomisedproductssuchasprojections,forecasts,information,trends,economicanalysis, assessments(includingtechnologyassessment),counsellingonbestpracticesdevelopmentandevaluationof solutionsandanyotherservicesinrelationtoclimatethatmaybeusefulforthesocietyatlarge.Assuch,these servicesincludedata,informationandknowledgethatsupportadaptation,mitigationanddisasterrisk management(DRM)."Consequently,aclimateserviceneedstoprovidescience‐basedanduser‐specific informationrelatingtopast,presentandpotentialfutureclimate,assistingsocietyinadaptingtoclimate variabilityandchange. Typically,nationalserviceshavethemandatetoprovideforecastsandwarnings,andmanynationalandlocal organisationsproducetheirownforecastsandclimateservices.Inadditiontothese,arangeofglobaland continentalscaleforecastingsystemsandclimateservicesexisttosupporttheneedsatthelarge‐scale (continentalandglobalscale)andalsoaddressinter‐dependenciesbetweenregionsandevenoccasionally countries.Whilelocalservicesbenefitfromlocalknowledgeandexperience,andoftenbytheexistenceof high‐resolutionmodelsoverthesmalldomains,large‐scaleservicescanprovidecomplementaryinformation tosupportlocalCSandexistingcapabilities.Amongothers,large‐scaleservicesprovidedataandinformation attransboundarydomains,whilethesecanbefoundatlongleadtimesandeveninaprobabilisticapproach. Moreover,theycanprovideinformationwherenootherlocalpredictionsystemsareavailable(withouta massivescale‐upofresourcesforservicecustomization)andfororganisationsworkingatinternationalscales (suchashumanitarianorganisations)(Emertonetal.,2016). Specifically,fortheseasonaltimescale(whichisthetimescalethatthisreportismainlyfocusingon),anumber ofresearchandoperationalcentresprovidepredictionsofmeteorologicalvariablesattheglobalscaleandat atimerangefrom1to12monthsahead.Themostcommonpredictionsystemsare:ECMWFSEAS5,CMCC‐ SPS,MeteoFranceSystem7,GloSEA5fromtheUKMetOffice,NCEPCFSv2etc.AsmentionedinSection2, thesepredictionsystemsrelyoncoupledatmosphere‐ocean‐landGCMs;however,theirconfiguration(i.e. spatialresolution,ensemblemembers,initializationetc.)differsbetweenthemandhencetheforecastingskill variesasafunctionofvariableofinterest,geographicaldomain,leadtime,andaggregationperiod. Consequently,multi‐modelapproachesareexpectedtobebeneficialtounderstandbettertheuncertainty stemmingfromdifferencesinthemodelconfiguration. 4.2 DescriptionofEuropeanandglobalClimateServices Internationalorganisationshavebeencoordinatingeffortstoco‐createclimateservicesforlarge‐scale applications.Below,wesummarisetheseefforts,sincetheycanactasbenchmarkclimateservicestowhichI‐ CISKhuman‐centredCS,whichfocusonamorelocalscale,willaddvalue. 4.2.1 TheCopernicusservices CopernicusistheEuropeanUnion’sEarthObservationProgramme(www.copernicus.eu)andprovidesarange ofservicescoveringtheatmosphere,oceans,land,climatechange,securityandemergencyservices.Manyof theservicesareglobal,whileotherscoveronlytheEuropeandomain. TheCopernicusAtmosphereMonitoringService(CAMS)providesdataandinformationonatmospheric composition,forsectorssuchashealth,environmentalmonitoring,renewableenergy,meteorologyand
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 24 5 Impactofpost‐processingonseasonalclimatepredictionerror 5.1 Experimentalobjectives Seasonalclimatepredictionslackthenecessarydownscalingandtailoring,andhenceeffortisstillongoingto improveservicepredictabilityandusability.Asmentionedinsection2,thepredictabilityofS2Spredictionsis subjecttomultiplesourcesoferroranduncertainty,whicharepresentinthevariouscomponentsofthe productionchaingoingfromclimatemodels(theirparameterization,initialization,bias‐adjustment,etc.)to theservicethatprovidesimpactindicators(impactmodelsetup,structureandparameterization).Inaddition, predictabilityischaracterisedbystrongspatialvariationandcommonlyatemporaldegradationofitsskillin longertimescales(seeFig.1). Here,theobjectiveistoexplorethebiasesthatarepresentintheseasonalclimatepredictions,andalsoapply apost‐processingmethod(alsoknownasbias‐adjustmentmethod)inordertoreducethesebiasesandresults towardsaclimatepredictionproductthatcanbeappliedforimpact(i.e.hydrology)assessmentatthelocal scale.Inaddition,hereweaimtoexploreandbetterunderstandthebiasesinspacefromdifferentseasonal predictionsystems. 5.2 Dataavailability Weassessedtheprecipitationandtemperaturepredictionswhicharedrivenbytwoclimateprediction systems;theECMWFSEAS5(Johnsonetal.,2019)andtheCMCCGlobalSeasonalEnsemblePredictionSystem version3.5(CMCC‐SPS3.5;Gualdietal.,2020).Bothsystemsgeneratetime‐seriesof6(CMCC‐SPS3.5)to7 (ECMWFSEAS5)monthsaheadwithamonthlyinitialization.Theparallelinvestigationofthetwosystems allowsdetectionofspatial‐temporalcomplementaritiesinthepredictions.Wenotethatinordertoquantify theimpactofclimatevariabilityonhydrologyatthelocalscale,bothseasonalpredictionsystemshavetobe downscaledandbias‐adjusted.Onlythencanthesepredictionsdrivethehydrologicalimpactmodel (Hundechaetal.,2016)toprovidelocalinformationofthehydrologicalconditions;seeresultsinSection5. ParticularlyforCMCC‐SPS3.5,theaccesstothepredictionswasduetoaninternalSMHI‐CMCCcollaboration. MoreinformationaboutthesystemsusedcanbefoundinTable1. Table4Propertiesoftheseasonalclimatepredictionsystems NameSourceHandledbyPost processing Ensemble members TimeframeResolution ECMWFSEAS5C3S‐CDS ECMWF‐CDSDBSmethod25 (hindcasts) 1993‐2015 (hindcasts) 0.33° CMCC‐SPS3.5CMCCSMHIDBSmethod40 (hindcasts) 1993‐20160.5° 5.3 Post‐processingmethodology Toadjustthereforecastdataforbiasesanddrifting,amodifiedversionoftheDistributionBasedScaling(DBS) methodwasconsideredandused(Yangetal.,2010).TheDBSforecastingmethodwasoriginallydevelopedto adjustclimateprojectionbiasesandhasbeenadaptedhereforseasonalpredictions.Inessence,theDBS methodimplementsaparametricquantile‐quantilemappinginwhichthetemperatureisconditionedon precipitationoccurrence.Here,notallmeteorologicalvariableswerebias‐adjustedbutinsteadonly precipitationandtemperatureusinganavailablereferencedatasetthatcoverstheentireEuropeandomain. Notethathereprecipitationandtemperaturewerebias‐adjustedseparatelyandnotfollowingamethodthat explicitlyconsiderstheinterdependencebetweenthetwovariables.However,giventhattheDBSbias‐
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 25 adjustmentisconductedforbothvariablestowardsobservations,itisexpectedthattheseparateadjustment stillrespectsthevariableinterdependencewhichispresentintheactualreferencedataset(HydroGFD). TheHydroGFDversion2.0(Bergetal.,2018)datasetwasusedasareferenceofbiasadjustmentforboth ECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5meteorologicalforecasts(dailytemperatureanddailyprecipitation)forthe periodof1993‐2015.TheproductconsistsoftheERA5reanalysisproductcorrectedbyGPCCforprecipitation andtheCRUproductfortemperature,andhencethemonthlymeanwaterbalanceisconstrainedto observations.Theproductisavailableata0.5oresolutionandhencetheseasonalpredictionshadtobe convertedtothisresolutionpriortotheirbias‐adjustment.Usingthisreanalysisproduct,weovercomethe technicalchallengeofdailydatatypicallynotbeingavailableonalargescale(national,continental,global). 5.4 Assessingtheimpactofpost‐processingonpredictiveerror Herewepresentboththebiasesintherawandpost‐processedseasonalpredictionsfromthetwosystems (ECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5),takingwintermonths(DJF)andsummermonths(JJA)asexamples.As expected,thebiasesintherawdatadonotfollowthesamepatternintermsofmagnitudeandspatial variability,whileaftertheDBS‐basedbias‐adjustment(BA),theyaresignificantlyreducedbothfor precipitationandtemperature.TheseasonalprecipitationpredictionsinFigures4(ECMWFSEAS5)and5 (CMCC‐SPS3.5)bothdisplaylargepositiveandnegativebiases,especiallyinregionswithcomplextopography andcoastalareas(e.g.,Spain,Franceandsouth‐easternEurope).Ingeneral,innorthernEurope,ECMWF SEAS5tendstooverpredictprecipitationinthewinter(rainandsnowfallseason)andunderestimate precipitationinthesummer.WhileinsouthernEurope,ECMWFSEAS5showsaclearoverestimationinthe summerprecipitation.InmostpartsofEurope,temperatureisunderpredictedbyECMWFSEAS5onaverage 1and2°Cinallmonthsandallleadmonths,exceptFebruary.CMCC‐SPS3.5showsasimilarbiaspatternin termsofspatialvariabilityonlywithslightlylargeramplitudes. WhiletheDBSmethodishighlyeffective,somebiasesstillremaininmeteorologicalpredictions(especiallyin precipitation,sincethebiasesfortemperaturearecloseto0),whichoriginatefromanassumptionofa theoreticaldistributionofdailydata.Henceitisimportanttonotethatinaproductionchain,suchremaining biaseswillbefurtherpropagated,potentiallyaffectingthequalityofhydrologicalpredictions.Nevertheless, theresultshereindicatethatstate‐of‐the‐artseasonalpredictionsystemsarestillsubjecttobiasesfor Europeanimpactassessments.Althoughthesesystemscanbeusedtoextractseasonalinformationof predictedanomalies,theirusabilityforactuallocalimpactassessmentsisquestionable,andhenceapost‐ processingisnecessary.Thepost‐processingappliedhereshowsthatthebiascorrecteddatasethasfewer remainingbiasesandcanbeconsideredasaninputtoimpactmodelsforlocalassessments.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 26 Figure4Biasesinrawandbias‐adjustedprecipitationpredictionsforthewinterandsummermonthsandforleadmonth 0.ThepredictionsarebasedontheECMWFSEAS5predictionsystem.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 27 Figure5Biasesinrawandbias‐adjustedprecipitationandtemperaturepredictionsforthewinterandsummermonths andforleadmonth0.ThepredictionsarebasedontheCMCC‐SPS3.5predictionsystem.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 28 6 Assessmentoffit‐for‐purposemethodologiesatselectedLivingLabs 6.1 Experimentalobjectives ThemainobjectiveoftheI‐CISKprojectistodevelopnext‐generationCSthatfollowasocialandbehaviourally informedapproachforco‐producingCSthatmeettheclimateinformationneedsofcitizens,decisionmakers andstakeholdersatthespatialandtemporalscalerelevanttothem.I‐CISKshowcasesitshuman‐centredco‐ design,co‐creation,co‐implementation,andco‐evaluationapproachacrosskeysectorsvulnerabletoclimate changeinEuropeandbeyond.Thisisdoneinsevengeographicallyandsectorallydiverselivinglabs(seeFigure 6).Inthissection,wepresent: theperformanceofseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictionsconditionedtothescaleofeachLLs, includingthegeneralaccuracyandpredictabilityofextremes.Theseresultsarealsoconsideredas benchmarksduringthecontinuousscientificeffortsoftailoringthestate‐of‐the‐artclimateservices totheneedsoflocalusers. localexamplesinthreeLLslocatedinthreedifferentclimaticregionsandhencesubjecttodifferent vulnerabilities.Theseare:theAndalucia(Spain)subjecttodroughts,theUpperSecchiaRiver(Italy) subjecttowateravailability,andtheBucharest(Hungary)focusingonurbanheat. Figure6LocationsoftheI‐CISKLivingLabs.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 29 Finally,wenotethattheexamplespresentedinthissectionareatapreliminarystageandtheywillbe completed/complementedinDeliverable3.2“Skillassessmentandcomparisonofstate‐of‐the‐artmethods forforecastsandprojectionsofextremes”. 6.2 Assessingtheseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictionskill 6.2.1 Hydrologicalmodelling TheHydrologicalPredictionsfortheEnvironment(HYPE)isasemi‐distributedprocess‐basedmodelcapable ofsimulatingthehydrologicalprocessesfromasinglebasintoglobalscale.Themodelhasconceptualroutines formostofthemajorlandsurfaceandsubsurfaceprocesses.Thesnowaccumulationandmeltprocessesare modelledusingthedegree‐daymethodwithlandusedependentparameters.HYPEsimulatesthewaterflow pathsinsoil,whichisdividedintothreelayerswithafluctuatinggroundwatertable.Afractionofrainfallor snowmeltinfiltratesintothetopsoil,whichislimitedbyasoiltypedependentmaximumrate.Ifthesoil moistureintheuppersoillayerexceedsathresholdformacroporeflow,partoftheremainingwaterforms macroporeflow.Potentialevaporation(PET)isestimatedusingthemodifiedJensen‐Haisemodel(Oudinet al.,2005),whilstPETisachievedonlyifeithertheactualsoilmoistureexceedsalargeportionofthesoilfield capacityorthesubbasinisdefinedasawaterbody.Forsoilmoisturebelowthislimitinnon‐waterbodyareas, theactualevaporation,computedusingthecropcoefficientmethodinAllenetal.(1998),decreaseslinearly tozeroatthewiltingpoint.Runofffromthesoilzoneiscomputedwhenthesoilmoistureexceedsfield capacityanditpercolatesfromuppertolowersoillayerswhenthesoilmoistureintheupperlayersexceeds fieldcapacity.Thegroundwaterlevelisestimatedbasedonthelevelinthesoilzonewheretheporespaceis filled. Here,weusetwosetupsoftheHYPEmodel;oneatthecontinentalscalecoveringtheentirepanEuropean region(Hundechaetal.,2016),andanotherattheworld‐widescalecoveringtheentireglobe(Arheimeretal., 2021).TheEuropeanmodelhasaspatialresolutionofabout35400sub‐basins,i.e.inaverage215km2andis referredtoasE‐HYPEv3.0.Theglobalmodelhasaspatialresolutionofmorethan130,000sub‐basins,i.e.in averageabout1000km2,andisreferredtoasWWH.Bothmodelsrunatadailytimestep.InI‐CISK,theLiving LabsthatlieintheEuropeandomainwereinvestigatedwiththeE‐HYPEmodel,whilethoseoutsidethe Europeandomain(GeorgiaandLesotho)wereinvestigatedwiththeWWHmodel. 6.2.2 Evaluationframework TheskillsofseasonalpredictionswereassessedbyContinuousRankProbabilityScore(CRPS;Hersbach,2000) andBrierScore(BS;Brier,1950)onbothhigh(90thpercentile)andlow(10thpercentile)streamflowextremes. Theskillsofthesetwoscores(CRPSSandBSSrespectively)wereachievedbyusingsimulatedclimatologyasa benchmark.TheskillsofseasonalpredictionsonfiveE‐HYPEoutputvariableswereconductedandanalysed asafunctionofleadweeksandforeachseason.Thehydro‐meteorologicalvariablesconsideredhereare: streamflow(COUT),temperature(CTMP),precipitation(CPRC),soilmoisture(SRFF)andevapotranspiration (EVAP).Moreover,theseasonalpredictionskillsonstreamflowextremesfromboththeE‐HYPEandWWH hydrologicalmodelswerefurtheranalysedusingtheBSS10(lowextreme;10thpercentileasathreshold)and BSS90(highextreme;90thpercentileasathreshold)metricsfordifferentleadweekswithinthelowandhigh streamflowperiods(definedbytheclimatologicalterciles;lowstreamflowperiodduring<33rdpercentile,and highstreamflowperiodduring>66thpercentile).Tofurtherextracttheinformationatthelocalscale,wefocus oneachLivingLabandgeneratetheskillscoresaccordingly. FortheLivingLabsinthepan‐Europeanregion(theNetherlands,Hungary,Italy,SpainandGreece),theE‐HYPE modelwithmeteorologicalforcingfrombothECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5re‐forecastswereanalysed. FortheLivingLabsinGeorgiaandLesotho,theWWHmodelforcedwiththeECMWFSEAS5meteorologicalre‐ forecastswasused.Inallcasestheseasonalre‐forecastswerebias‐adjustedpriortobeintroducedinthe hydrologicalmodels.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 30 6.2.3 Assessmentofseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictability Herewepresenttheresultsofpredictiveskillforanumberofhydro‐meteorologicalvariablesatthelivinglab scale.TheskillsofseasonalpredictionsforcedbyECMWFSEAS5wereaggregatedforeachseasonandassessed asafunctionofleadweek(seeFigure7).Ingeneral,theskilldeteriorateswithincreasingleadtime,butthe deteriorationratediffersdependingonthevariable,seasonandLivingLab.IntheSpanishLL(ES),the predictionsshowedhighpositiveskillforstreamflowespeciallyinthespringandsummermonths(MAMand JJA).Theskillstartedfromover0.8rightaftermodelinitializationandremainedabove0.5foraratherlong leadtime;20weeksinMAMand10weeksinJJA.Itisalsoworthynoticingthatinthewintermonths(DJF), thestreamflowpredictionsactuallyremainedskilfulfortheentiretimehorizon,withaCRPSSbeingover0.2 atthefurthestleadweek.Thepredictionsfortheothervariablesalsoshowedpositiveskillcomparedtothe simulatedclimatology(benchmark),onlywithlowerskillandfasterdeteriorationspeedcomparedto streamflow.SimilarpatternswerealsorevealedfortheskillintheGreekLL(GR).IntheLLsinHungary(HU), Italy(IT)andtheNetherlands(NL),thepredictionsforthefivehydro‐climaticvariableshadsimilarskilland deteriorationspeed.Ingeneral,higherskillwasachievedinthefirst4leadweeksinthesethreeLLs,ranging from0.3to0.8dependingontheseasonandvariable.IntheLLinGeorgia(GE)andLesotho(LS),the predictionsderivedfromtheWWHhydrologicalmodelforcedwiththeECMWFSEAS5seasonalpredictions wasassessedatamonthlyscale.Overall,higherskillwasfoundforthehydrologicalvariables,including streamflow,soilmoistureandevapotranspiration,whiletheskillforprecipitationandtemperaturesometimes reachednegativevalues,indicatingnoskillcomparedtoclimatology.Thiswasalsoobservedfortemperature intheLLsinGeorgiaandLesotho.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 31 Figure7Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofCRPSS)fordifferenthydro‐meteorologicalvariablesdownscaledtothescale oftheLivingLabs.ThehydrologicalmodelsaredrivenbytheECMWFSEAS5predictions Theskillsofseasonalhydro‐meteorologicalpredictionsforcedwithCMCC‐SPS3.5werealsoaggregatedand assessedsimilarlytothoseforECMWFSEAS5(seeFigure8).Ingeneral,theskillhassimilarpatternsastheone forECMWFSEAS5,withadeteriorationpatternwithincreasedleadweeks.Nevertheless,onlysmall differencesbetweentheECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5systemswereobservedbycomparingFigures5and
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 32 6.Forexample,inthewintermonths(DJF)intheHungaryLL,theskillofallthehydro‐meteorologicalvariables fromCMCC‐SPS3.5wereslightlylowerthantheoneforECMWFSEAS5,especiallyforprecipitation(CPRC), temperature(CTMP)andevapotranspiration(EVAP).MeanwhileintheLLinItaly,theskillfromCMCC‐SPS3.5 showedaslowerdeteriorationspeedduringthefirst2leadweek(s)thanthatfromECMWFSEAS5.Those resultshighlightthepossibilityofimprovingtheseasonalpredictionskillfordifferentleadweeksbyoptimising (overevenaveraging/combining)thepredictionsystemsforeachLL. Figure8Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofCRPSS)fordifferenthydro‐meteorologicalvariablesdownscaledtothescale oftheLivingLabs.ThehydrologicalmodelsaredrivenbytheCMCC‐SPS3.5predictions. 6.2.4 Assessmentofseasonalpredictabilityofstreamflowextremes Thescientificliteraturehasrecognisedthatbothdroughtsandfloodshaveincreasedinfrequencyand magnitudeoverEurope,posingimmediatesocio‐economicthreats,whichcreatesaneedforhigh‐quality hydrologicalpredictionsonextremes.Thepredictionbeyondthemedium‐rangescaleaidsstrategicplanning forenergyproduction,agriculture,andotheractivitiesthatusuallyhappenonaseasonalscale.Hence, assessingthequalityofseasonalpredictionofstreamflowextremesisfundamentaltoI‐CISKsinceitalsosets thebenchmarkforthefuturework.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 33 Here,weassessthepredictionsintermsoftheirskillforthehydrologicalextremesandateachLL.TheBrier SkillScore(BSS;Brier,1950)wascalculatedforeachsub‐basinineachLL,foreachtargetweekandleadtime forbothlow(BSS10)andhigh(BSS90)streamflowextremes.Targetweeksaredefinedaslow‐streamflow/ high‐streamflowweeksforeachsub‐basinbasedonthetercilesderivedfromsimulatedclimatology.TheBSS forthetargetweeksisthenpooledandanalysedfordifferentleadweeks.Resultsofseasonalpredictionsfor streamflowextremesareshowninFigure9.Theskilloflow/highstreamflowextremesforthedifferentLLsis overallhigh(greaterthan0.6)forthemedium‐rangefuturehorizons(i.e.1–2weeksahead)forbothECMWF SEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5.However,asexpectedtheskilldeterioratesastheleadweeks’increase.Afaster deteriorationrateisobservedforthehighstreamflowextremescomparedwiththerateforthelow streamflowextremes.ThisisespeciallyobviousintheLLinSpain(ES)andGreece(GR),wherethepredictions oflowstreamflowextremesremainskilful(BSS>0)untilthefurthesttimehorizon.Basedonthisinvestigation, furtherinterpretationscanbemadebylinkingtheskillofstreamflowextremestothehydrologicalregimes (seealsoPechlivanidisetal.,2020).Forexample,intheLLsinItalyandtheNetherlands,whichareconsidered asriversystemswithsmallmemory(streamflowbeinghighlyresponsivetoprecipitation),afaster deteriorationofpredictionskilltakesplaceforbothhighandlowstreamflowextremes.However,intheLLsin SpainandGreece,wheretheareasarewithhighlyvariablestreamflowregimesandresponseissometimes drivenbysnowmeltingbesidesprecipitation,thepredictionshaveahigherandlongerskillforthelowthan thehighstreamflowextremes. Figure9Seasonalpredictionskill(intermsofBSS)forstreamflowhigh(BSS90)andlow(BSS10)extremesdownscaledto thescaleoftheLivingLabs.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 40 Figure16Exampleofcollectedforecastandstatusmaps(multibandraster)fromlefttoright,CopernicusCDS dailyriverdischargeforecast@10kmspatialresolution,localARPAEdailyprecipitationmaps@5kmresolutionand forecastedCOSMO2precipitationmaps@2kmresolution(alsoprovidedbyARPAE),withoverlayofrivercatchment upstreamoftheCastellaranoweirandtherivernetwork. Bymeansofdevotedtoolstobedevelopedthismultibandrastershallbeaveragedoverthecatchmentarea toextractasingle“inputsignal”foreachvariable,storedinasimpledatabase(e.g..csvformat)togetherwith otherinputs(e.g.groundstationmeteorologicaldata)andtargetoutputvariables(e.g.timeseriesofrecorded discharge).Thisoperationincludesgapfillingtoaddmissingvaluesinthedatabase.Fortheenvisaged workflowdealingwithdifferentspatialresolutionisnotabigissueasthelumpedinformationoverthe catchmentisthevariabletoseek.ThisdatabaseshallbepassedtoselectedMLalgorithmstobetunedto retrievedesiredforecast,andresultsshallbestoredinthesamedatabaseasbefore. 6.4.2 Results Thefirstpartoftheworkflowhasresultedwithidentificationoflocalandupstreamknowledgeandsketchof theworkflowforthefollowingactivities.Despitebeingearlyatthedevelopmentstage,wehaveidentified targetachievementsandindicatorsofperformance,basingonuserexpectationsandpreviousexperiences frompastH2020projectsandliteraturepublications(Essenfelderetal.,2020;DeGregorioetal.,2018)tobe refinedalongthedevelopmentoftheCS. Concerningforecastskillspracticalapplicationsofdischargeforecastmainlyreliesonestablishederrormetrics indicatorsbothofforecastaccuracy(sucha%RootMeanSquareError,withexpectedtargetaround30to 50%intherangesofdischargeofmajorinterestforpracticalapplications)andpredictivepower(NashSutcliffe IndexandcorrelationcoefficientofthepredictedVsrecordedtimeserieswellabove0.5).Skillsshallbe evaluatedseparatingthedatasetin(past)valuesusedfortuningforecastalgorithms,andmostrecently(10to 20%)justforderivingerrormetrics. Furtherreflectionshavebeendonealsoonwaystodisplaytheproducedknowledge,withanearlymock‐up ofthepossibleGUIanditsmainfunctions(Figures17and18).
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 41 Figure17SketchofapossibleserviceGUI.A:Inputfeatures(e.g.rainfallandtemperature,groundstationsor averaged,recordeddischarge,meteorologicalforecast);B:dischargeforecastforleadtimesofinterest;C:Timeseriesof variablesofinterest;D:Lumpederrormetricsfortheselectedperiod;E:Configurationoptions;F:errorgraphsand graphicindicatorsofforecastperformances(seealsonextfigure). Figure18Exampleofperformancesgraphs(ontheleftcorrelationamongobservedversuspredictedresiduals, ontherighterrorfrequencydistribution). Thetablebelow(Table6)identifiesthelocaldatacontributionattheendofthefirststageoftheanalysis. Table6Collectedlocaldataattheendoffirststageofanalysis. TypeofdataFormatLocationTime start Time end TimestepSourceResolution Riverdischargecsvstation 2021dailyARPAE Precipitationgribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Maxtemperaturegribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Mintemperaturegribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Evapotranspirationgribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Relativehumiditygribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Windspeedgribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Solarradiationgribcatchment2001 hourly/dailyARPAE5km Soilmapshpcatchment20012001 JRC1:10001 km
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 42 Landuseclassmapshpcatchment20172017 RER1:10000 Digitalelevationmodelgeotifcatchment20152015 RER5m ShorttermforecastP/T COSMO gribcatchment2001 72hoursRER5km 6.5 BudapestLivingLab ThemaingoaloftheBudapestexperimentistoshowanotherpotentialCSinwhichthespatialresolutionof existingCSisfarfromtheuserdemands.ThisLLinanurbanenvironmentisacomplexsystemwherethelocal dataisabsolutelyneeded.Inthiscase,thecitizencontributionisveryrelevantandalsotheremotesensing productscanimprovetheskillassessmentofI‐CISKpredictions. 6.5.1 Background IntheLivingLablocatedinErzsébetváros(Elizabethdistrict),weinitiatedaparticipatoryresearchprocessto beabletounderstandtheurbanheatislandphenomenonmorefullyinthedistrictandtocapturethe perceptionsofcitizensontheheatstresstheyhavetoendureduringheatwaves.Forthis,we'veencouraged allcitizenstoparticipateintheresearchprocess. Figure19MapoftheElizabethdistrict. UrbanresidentsoftheElizabethdistrictmaybeexposedtohigherheatloadsduringheatwavesthanthe populationofperi‐urbandistrictsingeneral,duetotheurbanheatisland(UHI)phenomenon,whichcauses highertemperaturesoverthisinner‐cityareathanoverthesurroundingruralareas.Thisproblemwillbe exacerbatedinthefuturebyglobalclimatechangeandurbanpopulationgrowth. Heatdomescanrelocateandaffectnearbylocationswithinaweekortwo.Becauseoftheweakbreezesand increasedhumiditytypicallycausedbythestationaryweatherpatternofheatdomes,theseeffectscanbe extremelyharmfultopeople.Theinabilityofthehumanbodytocoolitselfheatimpactsdomeevenharsher andmoredamaging.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 43 Inthecity,UHIcanbeinterpretedatthreelevels:meso,localandmicro.Thepresentstudyisprimarily concernedwithunderstandingtheclimaticprocessesatthelocalandmicroscales,andwithidentifyinghot andcoldspotsandheattraps.Tofacilitatetheadoptionofmitigationplansandtoquantifytheimpactsof urbanheatislands,itmaybeimportanttoprojectcurrentandfuturelandsurfacetemperatures(LST)and identifydistributionpatterns. Figure20Schematicoftherelativehorizontalscalesandverticallayerstypicalofurbanareas:(a)Meso‐scale dome,(b)Meso‐scaleplume,(c)Local‐scale,and(d)Micro‐scale. Theresultsofourstudyareexpectedtohaveimplicationsforheatandclimatechangeplanningstrategiesfor theElizabethDistrict.Innovativeinterventionstomitigateurbanheatcouldbedevelopedthatarefully adaptiveandcollaborative.Mitigationstrategieswillneedtobeconsideredinlightofthesefindings. 6.5.2 CalculationofhighresolutionLSTforurbanheatislandmapping TheLandSurfaceTemperatureistheskintemperatureofground.Fromaclimateperspective,theaccurate understandingofLSThelpstoevaluatelandsurface–atmosphereexchangeprocessesandsurfaceenergy budgetsinmodels.Moreover,whencombinedwithotherpropertiessuchasalbedo,vegetationandsoil moisture,LSTprovidesavaluablemetricofthesurfacestate.LSTisdefinedbyGCOSasanessentialclimate variable(ECV). Thecalculationoflandsurfacetemperatures(LST)fromsatelliteimagesisessentialformanyfine‐scale applications(Zhouetal.2019).Itisalsousedinawidevarietyofapplicationssuchasmonitoringofglobal climatechange,studiesofdifferentkindsofsurfaces.However,theaccuracyofthecalculationisoftenlimited bydifferentenvironmentalandgeographicalconditions.WeperformacomputationalformofLSTsusingdata frommultiplesources.Weuseanumberofsourcestoobtainourdata,includinggroundmeasurements,UAV remotesensingandsatellitereadings.However,highresolutionLSThasbeenachallengingsubjectfor researchersforquitesometimebecauseseveralsources(missingpixelsetc.)cancauseuncertaintiesinthe calculation.Landsurfacetemperatureisakeyvariablewhenquantifyingtheimpactsofurbanheatislands.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 44 6.5.3 SatelliteLST LSTderivedfromsatellitethermalinfraredbands.Satellite‐basedsensorsareunabletorecordSTwithbotha highspatialandtemporalresolution.TheLSTdataisaffectedbytheincomingsolarradiation,whichaffects thesurfacetemperature.Thetemperaturecanalsochangeoverthecourseofadaybecauseofthewindand duetoaninversioneffect.Furthermore,theLSTvariationisgreatlyaffectedbylandcoverandtemperature inversion,twoofwhichcanaffecttheLSTdatagreatly. 6.5.4 Low‐altitudethermalinfraredremote(TIR)sensingdata(UASs) LSTmeasurementsfromsmallUASwillbeutilizedincombinationwiththermalimagingtechnologyand parallelimageprocessingalgorithmstoimproveandexpandonexistingmethodsforurbanheatislandstudies. SmallUnmannedAerialSystems(UASs)andtheminiaturizationofthermalcameratechnologyhaveenabled higherresolutionairbornethermalmapping.Morebroadly,theconceptalsoexploredthepotentialfor recalibratingdesignstrategiestopreventurbanheatislandeffecttomaximizeimpact. 6.5.5 CNNnetworkforproducinghighresolutionLST WewilldevelopaCNN(convolutionalneuralnetwork)thatwillprocessthesatelliteandUASbaselineimagery, whichwillproduceahighresolutionLSTmapofthedistrict.IfthisCNNnetworkislargeenough,itcandetect differentstructures,andtheAIdecideswhattheabsorptionmaybebasedonimagesegmentsratherthan pixels. ThisCNNnetworkcanberunasasoftwaremoduleandthuscanbeusedlater,eveninotherneighbourhoods, andwillbeabletopredicttheLSTofagivenneighbourhoodwithahighenoughdegreeofconfidence. Pre‐processingphase:productionofthebasicsatelliteandUASLSTimages(upgradingofsatellite images,productionofLSTimagesfromthermalcameradroneimages)fortrainingandvalidation. Trainingphase:(seeFigure20):usedronemeasurementLSTimages,satellitephotosandLSTimages toteachCNN.Dronemeasurementsareonlyavailableforafewdays;however,satelliteimagecapture isfrequent. Processingphase:Usingnewlyacquiredsatelliteimage,highresolutionLSTcanbedetermined.Street measurementscanbeusedtocheckthevalidity.Furthermore,usingimagefusiontechniques,map visualizationscanbeproducedaccordingtotheneedsofthelocalpopulation.Imagefusionisa complexprocessinvolvingimageswithdifferentresolutionsanddifferentradiometricfeatures. However,therearedifferentalgorithmsthatcanbeusedtofusetheseimagesintoasingleproduct. Machinelearningmethodsrepresentapromisingsolutionforimagefusion. Re‐trainingphase:ifnewUASdataareavailable,systemre‐trainingiscapabletogeneratecorrected highresolutionLST Duringthestreetsurvey(seenextsection),measurementsaretakenofheatradiatingindifferentdirections. Wemeasureatselectedlocationshowmuchoftheheatradiatedindifferentdirectionsisthesameasthe heatradiatedupwards(thermalradiationanisotropy).
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 45 Figure21CNNnetworkforhighresolutionLST. 6.5.6 CitizenMeasurement:UrbanHeatIslandandThermalComfortAssessment Wearelaunchingacitizen‐sensingcampaignthatwillmeasureseveralcomponentsofurbanheatwavesand urbanheatislands(airtemperature,humidity,dust,andthermalheatpictures)inthedistrict. Figure22Impressionoflocalresidenttakingameasurementwithadevicethatwasdevelopedtounderstand urbanheatislandsandheatwaves.Citizenscancontributetowell‐suitedadaptationmethodsandbetterpolicymeasures. Theprojectwillempowerresidentstomeasuretheirownthermalexposureandunderstandthethermalconditionsin theirlivingenvironment.Coloursintheimageindicateheat,withreddercoloursindicatinghighersurfacetemperature. Specifically,wearelookingathowheatisdistributedoncitystreetsthroughoutthewholeofElizabethDistrict. Ourmethodologyistoconductvisualfieldsurveysusingathermalimagingcamera(FLIR).Wecarryoutaseries ofstreet‐scalesurveyswithvolunteersintheElizabethdistrict.Theyareusingthermalimagingcamerasto takestreet‐leveltemperaturemeasurements.Theyarecomparingthethermalcharacteristicsofdifferent physicalelementsinthecitystreetsandtryingtofindouthowheatisgeneratedinthecity.Thistypeof researchisusefulforunderstandingthethermalenvironmentinthedistrict,whichaffectsthehealthandwell‐ beingofcitydwellers. Thermalimagingisatechniquethatallowsresidentsto"see"howhot(orcold)thingsarebymeasuringthe infraredradiationemittedbyobjects,differentphysicalelementsofurbanstreets(pavements,walls,grids, manholecovers,etc.).Theresultingdatacanrevealdetailsthatarenotvisibletothenakedeye.Thermal mappingcanhelpdesignersidentifyareasthatneedsidewalks,shadingorshadetrees.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 46 Figure23ThermalimageofcityblocksrecordedinBudapeston7/1/22(leftimage).CitiZcansensorboxuser interface(citizcan.com)(rightimage).
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 47 7 Conclusionsandfuturework 7.1 Conclusions Inrecentyears,climateserviceshave(increasingly)receivedattentionbythescientific,developmentand decision‐makingcommunities,sincethedataandinformationprovidedcansupportadaptation,mitigation anddisasterriskmanagement.The(co‐)generatedproductsofsuchservicescoverdifferenttimehorizons fromhistoricaltopresentandtofuture,includingobservations,forecasts,predictionsandprojections.Despite recenteffortsforco‐creatingclimateservices,climateservicesdevelopmentprocedureshavenotputusersat thecentre,whichhaslimitedthepotentialforintegratinglocaldataandknowledgethataddvaluetolocal decision‐makingandactions.TheI‐CISKprojectisputtingeffortontheco‐creationofhuman‐centredclimate services,andthescientificworkconductedintheprojectaimstoexplorefit‐for‐purposemethodologies, tailoredtoaddresslocalneeds.Thisdocumentissettingthescenetotheavailablestate‐of‐the‐artClimate ServicesandpresentsthoseCSthataddresstheneedsofthewater‐andclimate‐relatedsectors.Thissummary ofthestate‐of‐the‐artClimateServicesfortheEuropeanandglobaldomainsiskeyfortheI‐CISKprojectthat aimstoaddvaluetotheproductsoftheseservicesfrombothascientificanduserperspective. Theanalysispresentedinthisreportbenchmarkstheseasonalpredictiveskillforeachofthesevenlivinglabs andexplorestheirlocaldataavailability.Wenotethatthisreportisapreliminary,withmorecompleteresults andinsightsplannedtobepresentedinDeliverable3.2.Thescientificworkpresentedinthisreportis conductedattwospatialscales:theEuropean‐widescaleandthelocalscaleofthelivinglabs.TheEuropean analysisisaimingtoacknowledgethebiasesintherawpredictionsfromtwodifferentseasonalclimatemodels (ECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5)andtofurtherhighlighttheneedforpost‐processing(bias‐adjustment)in ordertoreducethebiasesandgenerateaproductthatcanbeusedforlocalimpactassessments. Weconcludethatthesebiasesarenotsimilarintermsofmagnitudewhileasexpectedthespatialvariability ofbiasesdiffersdependingontheseasonalclimatemodelused.However,evenwhenabias‐adjustmentpost‐ processingmethodisapplied,remainingbiasesstillexist,withtheirmagnitudedependingonthevariableof interest.Inparticular,weconcludethatremainingbiasesaremoreapparentforprecipitationthanfor temperature,whereremainingbiasesalmostreachzero. Despitetheremainingbiasesinthemeteorologicalforcing,analysisofseasonalhydro‐meteorological predictabilityatthelivinglabscaleshowsskillforthefirstleadtimes(upto2monthsahead).Asexpected, differentvariablesshowdifferentlevelofskill,i.e.precipitationislessskilfulthansoilmoistureorstreamflow, andthisconclusionholdsforpredictionswithbothseasonalclimatemodels.Moreover,dependingonthe hydro‐climaticpropertiesofthelivinglab,thehydro‐meteorologicalvariablesshoweddifferentprediction skill.Additionaltothepredictiveskillacrossthefulldistributionofflows,theanalysisalsofocusesonthehigh andlowstreamflowextremes.Resultsshowthatingenerallowstreamflowextremes(droughts)havehigher predictabilitythanhighstreamflowextremes(floods).Thisconclusioniswelllinkedtopreviousfindings indicatingthattherivermemoryisakeyfactorcontrollingtheseasonalhydrologicalpredictability. ThreecasestudiesaredevelopedfromaselectionofrepresentativeclimatevulnerabilitiesinthreeI‐CISKLL. Theselectedvulnerabilities:drought,wateravailabilityandheaturbanislandsareidentifiedasthemain demandsofthestakeholdersintheseLL,butthevariables,timescales,spatialresolutionandotherproperties aregoingtofittotheuserdemandsintheI‐CISKnextstages.Thethreepresentedstudiesshowtherelevant roleoflocaldataandknowledgeforunderstandingthelocalspatialpatternsofthevariabilityofthevariables involved(monthlyprecipitation,landsurfacetemperature,riverdischarge,etc…).Theknowledgeofthese
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 48 patternsisgoingtobeusedfortheimprovementthecorrespondingforecasts,predictionsandprojectionsin thenextstepsoftheLLmodellingstudiesandthenext‐generationofCS. 7.2 MovingforwardwiththeLivingLabs Priortodefiningthestepsforfuturework,wecommunicatesomeoftheconceptualpillarsthataredriving thescientificsteps. ThecurrentlyongoingI‐CISKresearchisconductedinclosecollaborationwiththeLLstakeholders withintheco‐creationprocess. WestronglyarguethatI‐CISKclimateservicesneedtheintegrationoflocaldataandknowledgeto improvingtheboththerelevanceandthequalityoftheforecasts,predictionsandprojectionsatthe requestedtimehorizons(futureperiodsandaggregationwindows)andspatialresolution. Theco‐createdI‐CISKclimateservicesareexpectedtocommunicateaccuratelyandeffectivelythe uncertainty(e.g.throughmapsand/orgraphs)inthelocalimpactindicatorsinordertobetterinform thedecision‐makers. Theplannedfutureworkwillbedevelopedintwomaindirections: ToextendthepresentedpreliminarymethodsandmodelstoallI‐CISKLivingLabs:Inthispreliminary report,weshowresultsfromtwoseasonalpredictionsystemsatthepan‐Europeandomainandthree localstudiesspecificallyaddressedtotheircorrespondingLL:Andalucía(Spain),UpperSecchiaRiver (Italy)andBudapest(Hungary).Deliverable3.2willincludeexamplesforthesevenlivinglabs,andalso someexamplesofamergedanalysisbetweensomeofthem,forinstancethosefromthesamesector andclimatevulnerability(seeFigure4). Tofitthemodelstothelivinglabrequirementsinordertoachievethemaximumusabilityinthe involvedsectors.InthecurrentstageoftheI‐CISKproject,wecollectedlivinglabuserneedsbasedon existingknowledge.Theongoingco‐designactivitiesineachofthelivinglabswillallowustorefinein moredetailtheserequirementsandtocontinueremainingmodellingeffortsatthelocalconditions forgeneratingI‐CISKuser‐tailoredclimateservices. Finally,methodologicallywewillcontinuetheeffortstonarrowthescalingandpredictabilitygap.Todoso, wewilltestvarioustechniquestoincreaseaccuracyandreliabilityatlocalconditionsanddecreasebiasand uncertaintyinclimateprojections.Thiswillbedoneby: Post‐processing(includingdownscalingandbias‐adjustment)ensemblemeteorologicalpredictionsto theresolutionofimpactmodellingusinglocaldata. Implementingdynamicsub‐samplingmethodsbasedonteleconnectionindicesinordertoimprove theseasonalhydrologicalpredictability. Assessingthebenefitofamulti‐modelensembleapproachandaveragingmethods,particularlyatthe seasonaltimehorizons,giventhespatiotemporalcomplementaritythatwasobservedbetween ECMWFSEAS5andCMCC‐SPS3.5.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 49 References Alessa,L.,Kliskey,A.,Gamble,J.,Fidel,M.,Beaujean,G.,andGosz,J.:TheroleofIndigenousscienceand localknowledgeinintegratedobservingsystems :movingtowardadaptivecapacityindicesandearly warningsystems,Sustain.Sci.,91–102,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625‐015‐0295‐7,2016. Arheimer,B.,Pimentel,R.,Isberg,K.,Crochemore,L.,Andersson,J.C.M.,Hasan,A.,Pineda,L.(2020)Global catchmentmodellingusingWorld‐WideHYPE(WWH),opendata,andstepwiseparameterestimation, Hydrol.EarthSyst.Sci.,24,535–559,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess‐24‐535‐2020 BazileR.,BoucherM.A.,PerreaultL.,LeconteR.:VerificationofECMWFSystem4forseasonalhydrological forecastinginanorthernclimate.HydrologyandEarthSystemSciences,21(11),5747–5762. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess‐21‐5747‐2017,2017 BerggrenC.,BengtssonL.,BergekA.,HobdayM.,Söderlund,J.(Eds.),KnowledgeIntegrationandInnovation: CriticalChallengesFacingTechnology‐BasedFirms,OxfordUniversityPress,Oxford(2011),pp.3‐28 Berkes,F.,Colding,J.,andFolke,C.:REDISCOVERYOFTRADITIONALECOLOGICALKNOWLEDGEASADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT,Ecol.Appl.,10,1251–1262,https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/1051‐ 0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2,2000. BergP.,DonnellyC.,GustafssonD.:Near‐real‐timeadjustedreanalysisforcingdataforhydrology.Hydrology andEarthSystemSciences(22),989‐1000.https://doi.org/10.5194/hess‐22‐989‐2018,2018. Boon,E.,Judith,S.,Biesbroek,R.,Goosen,H.,andLudwig,F.:Successfulclimateservicesforadaptation : Whatweknow,don’tknowandneedtoknow,Clim.Serv.,27,100314, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100314,2022. Bouwen,R.:Developingrelationalpracticesforknowledgeintensiveorganizationalcontexts,CareerDev. Int.,6,361–369,https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006057,2001. Bucherie,A.,Werner,M.,VanDenHomberg,M.,andTembo,S.:Flashfloodwarningsincontext:Combining localknowledgeandlarge‐scalehydro‐meteorologicalpatterns,Nat.HazardsEarthSyst.Sci.,22,461–480, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess‐22‐461‐2022,2022. BoerG.J.,SmithD.M.,CassouC.,Doblas‐ReyesF.,DanabasogluG.,KirtmanB.,KushnirY.,KimotoM.,Meehl G.A.,MsadekR.,MuellerW.A.,TaylorK.E.,ZwiersF.,RixenM.,Ruprich‐RobertY.,EadeR.(2016)The DecadalClimatePredictionProject(DCPP)contributiontoCMIP6,Geosci.ModelDev.,9,3751–3777 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd‐9‐3751‐2016,2016 Calvel,A.,Werner,M.,Homberg,M.VanDen,Flamini,A.C.,Streefkerk,I.,Mittal,N.,Whitfield,S.,Vanya,C. L.,Rosa,E.,andArcher,M.:CommunicationStructuresandDecisionMakingCuesandCriteriatoSupport EffectiveDroughtWarninginCentralMalawi,2,https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.578327,2020. Cash,D.W.,Clark,W.C.,Alcock,F.,Dickson,N.M.,Eckley,N.,Guston,D.H.,Jäger,J.,andMitchell,R.B.: Knowledgesystemsforsustainabledevelopment,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.,100,8086–8091, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100,2003. Chen,T.andCheng,H.:InternationalJournalofDisasterRiskReductionApplyingtraditionalknowledgeto resilienceincoastalruralvillages,Int.J.DisasterRiskReduct.,47,101564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101564,2020.
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 56
D3.1‐Methodsforforecastsandprojections 1 Appendix1Glossary AcronymDefinition ACAnomalyCorrelation ANNArtificialNeuralNetwork BABias‐Adjustment CIIClimateImpactIndicator CRPSContinuousRankedProbabilityScore CSClimateService CMIPCoupledModelIntercomparisonProject C3SCopernicusClimateChangeService DCPPDecadalClimatePredictionProject DRMDisasterRiskManagement DSTDecisionSupportTool DLDeepLearning ECVEssentialClimateVariable EDOEuropeanDroughtObservatory EFIExtremeForecastIndex ENSOElNiñoSouthernOscillation ESPEnsembleStreamflowPrediction GCMGlobalCirculationModel GEOSSGlobalEarthObservationSystemofSystems IQRInterquantileRange LLLivingLab LSTLandSurfaceTemperature MAEMeanAbsoluteError MJOMaddenJulianOscillation MLMachineLearning NDVINormalisedDifferenceVegetationIndex NDWINormalisedDifferenceWaterIndex NWPNumericalWeatherPrediction PETPotentialEvapotranspiration RPSRankedProbabilityScore RMSRootMeanSquare SCFSeasonalClimateForecast SEASSeasonalEnsemblePredictionSystem SPEI SPI S2S UHI WMO StandardisedPrecipitationEvapotranspirationIndex StandardisedPrecipitationIndex Sub‐seasonaltoSeasonal UrbanHeatIsland WorldMeteorologicalOrganization WPWorkPackage WWHWorld‐WideHYPE
ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020researchand innovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293 Colophon : ThisreporthasbeenpreparedbytheH2020ResearchProject“InnovatingClimateservicesthroughIntegrating ScientificandlocalKnowledge(I‐CISK)”.ThisresearchprojectisapartoftheEuropeanUnion’sHorizon2020 FrameworkProgrammecall,“Buildingalow‐carbon,climateresilientfuture:Researchandinnovationin supportoftheEuropeanGreenDeal(H2020‐LC‐GD‐2020)”,andhasbeendevelopedinresponsetothecall topic“Developingend‐userproductsandservicesforallstakeholdersandcitizenssupporting climateadaptationandmitigation(LC‐GD‐9‐2‐2020)”.ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropean Union’sHorizon2020researchandinnovationprogrammeundergrantagreementNo101037293. Thisfour‐yearprojectstartedNovember1st2021andiscoordinatedbyIHEDelftInstituteforWaterEducation. Foradditionalinformation,pleasecontact:MichaWerner(m.werner@un‐ihe.org)orvisittheprojectwebsite atwww.icisk.eu